Harmful Trademarks

Nadiya Farah

doi:10.5771/9783845294568

Summary

Between 2013-2017, around 115 EU trademark applications were rejected on morality and public order grounds. In the GCC (six Arab and Islamic countries), anecdotal evidence suggests some refusals have bemused foreign applicants and highlighted cultural blindspots. In this context, this work examines how three Arab Gulf states that have Islamic law as the main source of legislation and large expatriate communities, apply moral bars to trademark registration. It draws comparison with Western jurisdictions. Three main questions are explored: 1) To what extent do immoral or borderline trademarks/goods proceed to registration in conservative Islamic countries that apply trademark law in conformity with Shari’a law? 2) What reasoning is guiding decisions? 3) Can a concept of ‘harm’ improve our understanding of the power of trademarks and thus the moral thresholds that countries set?

The author is an innovation and IP commercialisation professional. She acquired a passion for trademark law while completing a Master of Laws in ‘Intellectual Property and Competition Law’ in Munich, Germany. She is now pursuing a career in trademark law in the UK.

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2019
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-5283-6
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-9456-8
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies
Volume: 36
Language: English
Pages: 103
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 10 Download chapter (PDF)
Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. Background
2. 2. Scope and geographical focus
3. 3. Legal focus
4. 4. Methodology
5. 5. Chapter outline
Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. A. A concept of harm
  2. 1. 1. Are trademarks property?
    2. 2. Are trademarks tools of expression?
  3. C. The uncertainty of legal certainty
2. Conclusion
Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. A. Development of trademark law
  2. 1. 1. a) Paris Convention
      2. b) National laws
    2. 2. Trademark functions
    3. 3. Registering trademarks
  3. 1. 1. Legal origins
    2. 2. Understanding ‘morality’ and ‘public order’
    3. 3. Tackling the terminology
2. Conclusion
Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. A. Legal system, Shari’a law
  2. B. GCC IP Treaty Memberships
  3. C. Harmonisation
  4. 1. 1. Boycott (“prohibition to deal’) clause
    2. 2. Banned items: products and services that cannot be trademarked
  5. E. Prospects for registrability in the GCC
2. Conclusion
Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. 1. 1. Concern that the public would be offended by the mark
    2. 2. Direct application of the law
    3. 3. A deeper concern about the power of a mark to erode the morals of society
    4. 4. The government should not provide official sanction to offensive marks
    5. 5. The government should not expend its time or financial resources to support marks that are contrary to the values of society
  2. B. The problem of deceptively innocuous marks: trademarks accepted in error
2. Conclusion
Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. 1. 1. Inciting trademarks
    2. 2. Offensive, Debasing or Erosionary trademarks
    3. 3. Divisive trademarks
  2. B. Case examples – marks refused on morality or public order grounds in the GCC
2. Conclusion
ConclusionPages 93 - 94 Download chapter (PDF)
Appendix 1 – Survey of GCC law firmsPages 95 - 96 Download chapter (PDF)
List of Works CitedPages 97 - 103 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (63 entries)

Abdel-khalik J, ‘Disparaging Trademarks: Who Matters’ (2015) 20(2) Michigan Journal of Race and Law 288 Open Google Scholar
Alemanno A and Bonadio E, ‘Do you Mind my Smoking? Plain Packaging of Cigarettes under the TRIPS Agreement' (2011) J.Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 450, 462 Open Google Scholar
Baird S, ‘Moral Intervention in the Trademark Arena: Banning the Registration of Scandalous and Immoral Trademarks’ (1993) 83(5) Trademark Reporter 661 Open Google Scholar
Bonadio E, ‘Brands, Morality and Public Policy: Some Reflections on the Ban on Registration of Controversial Trademarks’ (2015) 19 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 43 Open Google Scholar
Bonadio E, ‘Bans and Restrictions on the Use of Trade Marks and Consumers’ Health’ (2014) 4 Intellectual Property Quarterly 326 Open Google Scholar
Bone RG,‘Hunting Goodwill: A History of the Concept of Goodwill in Trademark Law’ (2006) 86 Boston University Law Review 547 Open Google Scholar
Brown Jr. RS, ‘Advertising and the Public Interest: Legal Protection of Trade Symbols’ (1948) 57 Yale Law Journal 1165 Open Google Scholar
Carpenter M and Murphy K, ‘Calling Bullshit on the Lanham Act: The 2 (a) Bar for Immoral, Scandalous, and Disparaging Marks’(2010) 49 U. Louisville L. Rev. 465 Open Google Scholar
Cohen FS, ‘Dialogue on Private Property’ (1954), IX Rutgers Law Review 357 Open Google Scholar
Dar HA and Presley JR, ‘The Gulf Co-Operation Council: A Slow Path to Integration? ’ (2001) 24(9) The World Economy 1161 Open Google Scholar
Duff R and Marshall S, ‘‘Abstract Endangerment’, Two Harm Principles, and Two Routes to Criminalisation’ (2015) 3(2) Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Open Google Scholar
Ehteshami A, ‘GCC Foreign policy: From the Iran-Iraq War to the Arab Awakening’ in LSE Middle East Centre Collected Papers 1 (April 2015) Open Google Scholar
Fershtman C, Gneezy U, and Hoffman M, ‘Taboos and Identity: Considering the Unthinkable’ (2011) 3 American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 139 Open Google Scholar
Fletcher A and Kera D, ‘The forty-Fourth Year of Administration of the Trademark Act of 1946’ (1991) 81 TMR 601 Open Google Scholar
Gerhardt DM, ‘Trademarks as Entrepreneurial Change Agents for Legal Reform’ (2017) 95(5) North Carolina Law Review, 1519 Open Google Scholar
Gibbons LJ, ‘Semiotics of the Scandalous and the Immoral and the Disparaging: Section 2(A) Trademark Law after Lawrence v. Texas.’ (2005) 9(2) Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Open Google Scholar
Gilson Lalonde A & Gilson J, ‘Trademarks laid bare: Marks that may be scandalous or immoral’ (2011) Trademark Reporter 1476 Open Google Scholar
Goble GW, ‘Where and What a Trade-Mark Protects’ (1927) 22 U. ILL. L. REV. 379, 388 Open Google Scholar
Habachy S, ‘Protection of Trademarks and Patent Rights in the Middle East History, Geography and Economics’ (1962) 6 Patent, Trademark and Copyright Journal of Research and Education Open Google Scholar
Khoury AH, ‘Ancient and Islamic Sources of Intellectual Property Protection in the Middle East: A Focus on Trademarks’ (2003) 43(2) IDEA – The Journal of Law and Technology 151 Open Google Scholar
Marks T and Betancourt JC, ‘Rethinking public policy and alternative dispute resolution: negotiability, mediability and arbitrability’ (2012) 78(1) Arbitration 19 Open Google Scholar
McKenna MP, ‘Testing Modern Trademark Law’s Theory of Harm’ (2009) 95 Iowa Law Review 63 Open Google Scholar
Oswald L, ‘Challenging the Registration of Scandalous and Disparaging Marks under the Lanham Act: Who has Standing to Sue?’ (2004) 41 American Bus. L. J. 251 Open Google Scholar
Palmer B, 'Saudi Arabia’s Trademark Law' (1986) 1(3) Arab Law Quarterly 323 Open Google Scholar
Pollack M, ‘Your Image Is My Image: When Advertising Dedicates Trademarks to the Public Domain-with an example from the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984’ (1993) 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 1391 Open Google Scholar
Ramsey LP, ‘A Free Speech Right To Trademark Protection?’ (2016) 106(1) Trademark Reporter 797 Open Google Scholar
Scassa T, ‘Antisocial Trademarks’ (2013) 103(5) Trademark Reporter 1172 Open Google Scholar
Schechter F, ‘The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection’ (1927) 40 Harvard Law Review 813 Open Google Scholar
Shaoping G and Lin Z, ‘Human Dignity as a Right’ (2009) 4(3) Frontiers of Philosophy in China 370 Open Google Scholar
Snow N, ‘Free Speech & Disparaging Trademarks’ (2016) 57 Boston College Law Review 1675 Open Google Scholar
Spence M, ‘The Mark as Expression/The Mark as Property’ (2005) 58 Current Legal Problems 491 Open Google Scholar
Stolte KM, 'How Early Did Anglo-American Trademark Law Begin ? An Answer to Schechter’s Conundrum' (1997) 8 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 505 Open Google Scholar
Swann, Sr. JB, ‘The Trademark Reporter as Catalyst’ (2011) 101(1) Trade Mark Reporter 81 Open Google Scholar
Wasserman DI, ‘Trading Sex, Marking Bodies: Pornographic Trademarks and the Lanham Act’ (2010) 23 National Black Law Journal Open Google Scholar
Allan TRS, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (OUP 2001) Open Google Scholar
Allan TRS, The Sovereignty of Law, Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (OUP 2013) Open Google Scholar
Ballantyne WM, Essays and Addresses on Arab Laws (Curzon Press 2000) Open Google Scholar
Batey M, Brand Meaning (Routledge 2008) Open Google Scholar
Bently L, ‘The Making of Modern Trade Marks Law: The Construction of the Legal Concept of Trade Mark (1860-80)’ in Bently L, Davis J, and Ginsburg C (eds), Trade Marks and Brands.. An Interdisciplinary Critique (CUP 2010) Open Google Scholar
Bently L, ‘From Communication to Thing: Historical Aspects of the Conceptualisation of Trade Marks as Property‘ in Dinwoodie GB and Janis MD (eds), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2008) Open Google Scholar
Bently L, and Davis J, and Ginsburg JC (eds), Trade Marks and Brands. An Interdisciplinary Critique (CUP 2010) Open Google Scholar
Bodenhausen GHC, Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (as revised at Stockholm in 1967) Open Google Scholar
Davison MD, Horak I, and The Hon. Justice Gummow WMC, Shanahan’s Australian Law of Trade Marks and Passing Off (5th edn, Thomson Reuters 2012) Open Google Scholar
de Carvalho NP, The TRIPS Regime of Trademarks and Designs (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International 2011) Open Google Scholar
Galligan DJ, Discretionary powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Clarendon Press 1986) Open Google Scholar
Gibbons LJ, ‘Trademarking the Immoral and the Scandalous: Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act’ in Peter K. Yu (ed), Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age (Volume 3, Ch 4, Praeger Publishers 2007) Open Google Scholar
Hansen PW, Intellectual Property Law and Practice of the United Arab Emirates (OUP 2009) Open Google Scholar
Landolt PL, Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2008) Open Google Scholar
Lloyd D, Public Policy: A Comparative Study in English and French Law (London: Athlone Press, 1953) Open Google Scholar
Mill JS, On Liberty (J. W. Parker and Son 1859) Open Google Scholar
Phillips J, Trade Mark Law; A Practical Anatomy (OUP 2003) Open Google Scholar
Price D, The Development of Intellectual Property Regimes in the Arabian Gulf States. Infidels at the Gates (Routledge 2012) Open Google Scholar
Ramadan T, Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation (OUP 2009) Open Google Scholar
Schechter FI, ‘The Genesis of the Modern Law Relating to Trade-Marks’ in Dinwoodie GB and Janis MD (eds), Trade mark and Unfair Competition Law: Themes and Theories (Critical Concepts in Intellectual Property Series) (Volume I, Edward Elgar Publishing 2014, and as reviewed by Hyland G, Columbia Legal Studies (2011)) Open Google Scholar
Turner JH, Revolt from the Middle. Emotional Stratification and Change in Post-Industrial Societies (Routledge 2017) Open Google Scholar
CIA, World Factbook, www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sa.html Open Google Scholar
Edward Smith (2009), Absolute Grounds paper submitted by United Kingdom for SCT Assistant Principal Hearing, available at: www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sct/en/comments/pdf/sct21/ref_uk.pdf Open Google Scholar
EUIPO, ‘Guidelines for examination Trade mark, Part B Examination – Absolute Grounds of Refusal’ (24 May 2016). Open Google Scholar
Gulf Labour Markets and Migration, available at: http://gulfmigration.eu/glmm-database/demographic-and-economic-module/?search=1&cmct=Saudi+Arabia Open Google Scholar
Johnson, ‘Swearing: The Last Taboos’ (Blog: Prospero, 21 January 2015), available at: https://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2015/01/johnson-swearing. Open Google Scholar
WTR Yearbook 2017 - Trade mark procedures and strategies: France (World Trade mark Review, available at: www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/France) Open Google Scholar
WTR Yearbook 2017 - Trade mark procedures and strategies: Germany (World Trade mark Review, available at: www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/Germany). Open Google Scholar
WTR Yearbook 2017 - Trade mark procedures and strategies: Italy (World Trade mark Review, available at: www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/Italy) Open Google Scholar