Cover of book: Politicians' Expressions of Anger and Leadership Evaluations
Book Titles Open Access Full access

Politicians' Expressions of Anger and Leadership Evaluations

Empirical Evidence from Germany
Authors:
Publisher:
 20.05.2020

Summary

This book explores the impact of politicians’ expressions of anger on viewers. Electoral candidates may alter their emotional behaviour strategically during election campaigns as a means of gaining voters’ support. Hence, this study investigates empirically how expressions of anger affect leadership evaluations. An experiment was conducted to establish the impact of politicians’ expressions of emotions on viewers. This study focuses on politicians as a social group, as well as three politicians in particular: Chancellor Angela Merkel; Gregor Gysi, the former parliamentary leader of the Left; and Sigmar Gabriel, the former party leader of the Social Democrats. These three case studies are well-suited to testing the effects of expressions of emotion by political leaders with varying positions in the political system.

Lena Masch is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Political Science at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2020
Publication date
20.05.2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6563-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0680-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Volume
34
Language
English
Pages
A49
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 18 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 1.1 The Relevance of Studying Politicians’ Emotion Expressions Download chapter (PDF)
    2. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 1.2.1 The Structure of Emotions Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 1.2.2 Emotion Expressions of Anger and Indignation Download chapter (PDF)
    3. 1.3 Outline of the Book Download chapter (PDF)
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 2.1 Candidate Evaluations Based on Appearances Download chapter (PDF)
    2. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 2.2.1 The Social Function of Emotions Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 2.2.2 Affective Responses Download chapter (PDF)
      3. 2.2.3 Cognitive Responses Download chapter (PDF)
      4. 2.2.4 Social-Contextual Factors Download chapter (PDF)
    3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 2.3.1 Anger and Affective Responses Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 2.3.2 Anger and Cognitive Responses Download chapter (PDF)
      3. 2.3.3 Anger and Social-Contextual Factors Download chapter (PDF)
      4. 2.3.4 Review: Theoretical Expectations and Hypotheses Regarding the Impact of Anger Expressions Download chapter (PDF)
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 3.1 The Visual Media Content Analysis of German News and Talk Shows Download chapter (PDF)
    2. 3.2 Politicians’ Emotional Expressions on German Television Download chapter (PDF)
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 4.1 Determining an Appropriate Research Method Download chapter (PDF)
    2. 4.2 The Experimental Method Download chapter (PDF)
    3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 4.3.1 Pre-Test: The Structure of Politicians’ Emotion Expressions Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 4.3.2 The Procedure Download chapter (PDF)
      3. 4.3.3 The Material Download chapter (PDF)
      4. 4.3.4 The Sample Download chapter (PDF)
      5. 4.3.5 Potential Threats to the Internal Validity of the Study Download chapter (PDF)
    4. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 4.4.1 Measurements of the Dependent Variable: The Structure of Leadership Evaluations Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 4.4.2 Measurements of Covariates and Moderating Variables Download chapter (PDF)
    5. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. 4.5.1.1 Perceptions of Emotional Expressions Download chapter (PDF)
        2. 4.5.1.2 Affective Responses Based on Emotional Expressions Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 4.5.2 The Facial Expressions of Anger Download chapter (PDF)
      3. 4.5.3 Political Issues and Anger Expressions Download chapter (PDF)
  6. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. Evaluations in Sub-Experiment Type 1 (Politicians in General) Download chapter (PDF)
        2. Evaluations in Sub-Experiment Type 2 (Merkel and Gysi) Download chapter (PDF)
        3. Evaluations in Sub-Experiment Type 3 (Gabriel and Merkel) Download chapter (PDF)
      2. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. Download chapter (PDF)
          1. Treatment: Sub-Experiment Type 1 (Politicians in General) Download chapter (PDF)
          2. Treatment: Sub-Experiment Type 2 (Gysi and Merkel) Download chapter (PDF)
          3. Treatment: Sub-Experiment Type 3 (Gabriel and Merkel) Download chapter (PDF)
        2. 5.1.2.2 The Evaluation of Trustworthiness Download chapter (PDF)
      3. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. 5.1.3.1 Problem-Solving Skills Download chapter (PDF)
        2. 5.1.3.2 Leadership Skills Download chapter (PDF)
      4. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. 5.1.4.1 Evaluations of Emotionality Download chapter (PDF)
        2. 5.1.4.2 Evaluations of Politeness Download chapter (PDF)
        3. 5.1.4.3 The Evaluation of Agitation Download chapter (PDF)
        4. 5.1.4.4 The Evaluation of Aggressiveness Download chapter (PDF)
        5. 5.1.4.5 The Evaluation of Arrogance Download chapter (PDF)
        6. Download chapter (PDF)
          1. 5.1.4.6.1 The Evaluation of Decisiveness Download chapter (PDF)
          2. 5.1.4.6.2 The Evaluation of Resilience Download chapter (PDF)
        7. 5.1.4.7 The Evaluation of External Efficacy Download chapter (PDF)
      5. 5.1.5 Summary of the Main Effects Download chapter (PDF)
    2. 5.2 Overview of Potential Moderating Factors Download chapter (PDF)
    3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 5.3.1 The Longevity of the Treatment Effects Download chapter (PDF)
      2. 5.3.2 Spillover Effects on Political Parties Download chapter (PDF)
      3. 5.3.3 The Response Time Download chapter (PDF)
      4. 5.3.4 Summary of the Broader Implications Download chapter (PDF)
  7. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 6.1 Summary of Empirical Findings Download chapter (PDF)
    2. 6.2 Concluding Remarks and Implications for Future Research Download chapter (PDF)
  8. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. References Download chapter (PDF)
    2. Datasets & Questionnaires Download chapter (PDF)
    3. Software & Software Packages Download chapter (PDF)
  9. Appendix A1 - A49 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (493)

  1. Bibliography Open Google Scholar
  2. References Open Google Scholar
  3. Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490): 493–505. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746. Open Google Scholar
  4. Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens (2015). Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method. American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 495–510. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12116. Open Google Scholar
  5. Abelson, Robert P., Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D. & Fiske, Susan T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(4): 619–630. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.619. Open Google Scholar
  6. Akçali, Emel & Korkut, Umut (2012). Geographical Metanarratives in East-Central Europe: Neo-Turanism in Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53(5): 596–614. doi: 10.2747/1539-7216.53.5.596. Open Google Scholar
  7. Allison, Paul D. (1999). Multiple Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Open Google Scholar
  8. Aristotle (1934). Nicomachean Ethics1162a, and V. I. I. I. Book: Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 19, translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  9. Armstrong, J. Scott & Graefe, Andreas (2011). Predicting elections from biographical information about candidates: A test of the index method. Journal of Business Research 64(7): 699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.005. Open Google Scholar
  10. Arzheimer, Kai (2017). Another Dog that didn’t Bark? Less Dealignment and more Partisanship in the 2013 Bundestag Election. German Politics 26(1): 49–64. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1266481. Open Google Scholar
  11. Ashworth, Scott & Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan (2008). Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage. The Journal of Politics 70(4): 1006–1025. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608081024. Open Google Scholar
  12. Bailenson, Jeremy N., Iyengar, Shanto, Yee, Nick & Collins, Nathan A. (2008). Facial Similarity between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5): 935–961. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn064. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bakker, Bert N. & de Vreese, Claes H. (2016). Personality and European Union attitudes: Relationships across European Union attitude dimensions. European Union Politics 17(1): 25–45. doi: 10.1177/1465116515595885. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bakker, Bert N., Klemmensen, Robert, Nørgaard, Asbjørn S. & Schumacher, Gijs (2016b). Stay Loyal or Exit the Party? How Openness to Experience and Extroversion Explain Vote Switching. Political Psychology 37(3): 419–429. doi: 10.1111/pops.12257. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bakker, Bert N., Rooduijn, Matthijs & Schumacher, Gijs (2016a). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 55(2): 302–320. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12121. Open Google Scholar
  16. Bakker, Iris, van der Voordt, Theo, Vink, Peter & de Boon, Jan (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology 33(3): 405–421. doi: 10.1007/s12144-014-9219-4. Open Google Scholar
  17. Ballew, Charles C. & Todorov, Alexander (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(46): 17948–17953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705435104. Open Google Scholar
  18. Banks, Antoine J. (2014). The public’s anger: White racial attitudes and opinions toward health care reform. Political Behavior 36(3): 493–514. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9251-3. Open Google Scholar
  19. Banks, Antoine J. & Valentino, Nicholas A. (2012). Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 286–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00561.x. Open Google Scholar
  20. Barrett, Lisa F. (2016). The Varieties of Anger. The New York Times. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/opinion/sunday/the-varieties-of-anger.html (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar
  21. Barrett, Lisa F. (2017). How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  22. Barrett, Lisa F., Mesquita, Batja & Gendron, Maria (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(5): 286–290. doi: 10.1177/0963721411422522. Open Google Scholar
  23. Bartels, Larry M. (1986). Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test. American Journal of Political Science 30(4): 709–728. doi: 10.2307/2111269. Open Google Scholar
  24. Bassel, Leah (2017). The Politics of Listening: Possibilities and Challenges for Democratic Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  25. Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin & Vohs, Kathleen D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323. Open Google Scholar
  26. Beck, Ulrich & Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  27. Behi, Ruhi & Nolan, Mike (1996). Causality and control: threats to internal validity. British Journal of Nursing 5(6): 374–377. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.6.374. Open Google Scholar
  28. Beierlein, Constanze, Kemper, Christoph J., Kovaleva, Anastassiya & Rammstedt, Beatrice (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen: Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS). ZIS–GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim. Open Google Scholar
  29. Bell, Vaughan & O’Driscoll, Ciarán (2018). The network structure of paranoia in the general population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 53(7): 737–744. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1487-0. Open Google Scholar
  30. Benjamin, Daniel J. & Shapiro, Jesse M. (2009). Thin-Slice Forecasts of Gubernatorial Elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91(33): 523–536. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.3.523. Open Google Scholar
  31. Benoit, William (2016). Functional Theory: Negative Campaigning in Political Television Spots. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 35–46. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar
  32. Berger, Jonah (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science 22(7): 891–893. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413294. Open Google Scholar
  33. Berggren, Niclas, Jordahl, Henrik & Poutvaara, Panu (2010). The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics 94(1/2): 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002. Open Google Scholar
  34. Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A. & Lenz, Gabriel S. (2012). Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057. Open Google Scholar
  35. Bieber, Ina E. & Bytzek, Evelyn (2012). Online-Umfragen: eine geeignete Erhebungsmethode für die Wahlforschung? ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Befragungsmodi am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2009. Methoden, Daten, Analysen 6(2): 185–211. Open Google Scholar
  36. Bittner, Amanda (2011). Platform or personality? The role of party leaders in elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  37. Blumenberg, Johannes N. & Blumenberg, Manuela S. (2017). The Kretschmann Effect: Personalisation and the March 2016 Länder Elections. German Politics 18(2): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2017.1342814. Open Google Scholar
  38. Blumenstiel, Jan E. & Gavras, Konstantin L. (2015). Ursachen und Konsequenzen ambivalenter Einstellungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 50: 418–443. doi: 10.5771/9783845254418-418. Open Google Scholar
  39. Bodenhausen, Galen V., Sheppard, Lori A. & Kramer, Geoffrey P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology 24(1): 45–62. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240104. Open Google Scholar
  40. Bohannon, John (2016). Mechanical Turk upends social sciences. Science 352(6291): 1263–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6291.1263. Open Google Scholar
  41. Bomann, Mieke H. & Jones, Quentin (2003). Information Overload. In David Levinson & Karen Christensen (eds.), Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, pp. 660–663. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  42. Brader, Ted (2005). Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 388–405. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x. Open Google Scholar
  43. Brader, Ted (2006). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  44. Brader, Ted (2011). The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited. Political Psychology 32(2): 337–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00803.x. Open Google Scholar
  45. Brader, Ted & Marcus, George E. (2013). Emotion and Political Psychology. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  46. Bradley, Brendan P., Mogg, Karin, Falla, Sara J. & Hamilton, Lucy R. (1998). Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration. Cognition and Emotion 12(6): 737–753. doi: 10.1080/026999398379411. Open Google Scholar
  47. Brettschneider, Frank & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2002). The nonpersonalization of voting behavior in Germany. In Anthony King (ed.), Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections, pp. 127–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  48. Brooks, Deborah J. (2011). Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians. The Journal of Politics 73(2): 597–615. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000053. Open Google Scholar
  49. Brouard, Sylvain & Kerrouche, Éric (2013). L’effet candidat lors des élections parlementaires. Revue française de science politique 63(6): 1113–1136. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.636.1113. Open Google Scholar
  50. Bryman, Alan (2012). Social Research Methods. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  51. Bucy, Erik P. (2000). Emotional and Evaluative Consequences of Inappropriate Leader Displays. Communication Research 27(2): 194–226. Open Google Scholar
  52. Bucy, Erik P. (2011). Nonverbal communication, emotion, and political evaluation. In Katrin Döveling, Christian von Scheve & Elly A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media, pp. 195–220. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  53. Bucy, Erik P. (2016). The look of losing, then and now: Nixon, Obama, and nonverbal indicators of opportunity lost. American Behavioral Scientist 60(14), 1772–1798. doi: 10.1177/0002764216678279. Open Google Scholar
  54. Bucy, Erik P. & Bradley, Samuel D. (2004). Presidential Expressions and Viewer Emotion: Counterempathic Responses to Televised Leader Displays. Social Science Information 43(1): 59–94. doi: 10.1177/05390184040689. Open Google Scholar
  55. Bucy, Erik P. & Grabe, Maria E. (2008). “Happy warriors” revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news. Politics and the Life Sciences 27(1): 78–98. doi: 10.2990/27_1_78. Open Google Scholar
  56. Bucy, Erik P. & Newhagen, John E. (1999). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Processing televised presidential reactions to the news. Journal of Communication 49(4): 59–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02817.x. Open Google Scholar
  57. Bühler, Karl (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  58. Buhrmester, Michael, Kwang, Tracy & Gosling, Samuel D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Open Google Scholar
  59. Burns, Justine (2006). Racial stereotypes, stigma and trust in post-apartheid South Africa. Economic Modelling 23(5): 805–821. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2005.10.008. Open Google Scholar
  60. Campbell, Angus (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. Public Opinion Quarterly 24(3): 397–418. doi: 10.1086/266960. Open Google Scholar
  61. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. & Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  62. Campbell, Donald T. & Stanley, Julian C. (1971). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. In Nathaniel L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, pp. 171–246. Chicago, IL: McNally. Open Google Scholar
  63. Capelos, Tereza & Demertzis, Nicolas (2018). Political action and resentful affectivity in critical times. Humanity & Society 42(4): 410–433. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802517. Open Google Scholar
  64. Caprara, Gian V. & Vecchione, Michelle (2013). Personality Approaches to Political Behavior. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 23–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  65. Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D. & Potter, Jeff (2008). The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind. Political Psychology 29(6): 807–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x. Open Google Scholar
  66. Carpenter, Dick M., Webster, Marjory J. & Bowman, Chad K. (2019). White House Wit: How Presidents Use Humor as a Leadership Tool. Presidential Studies Quarterly 49(1): 23–55. doi: 10.1111/psq.12492. Open Google Scholar
  67. Carver, Charles S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion 4(1): 3–22. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3. Open Google Scholar
  68. Carver, Charles S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion 30(2): 105–110. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7. Open Google Scholar
  69. Carver, Charles S. & Harmon-Jones, Eddie (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin 135(2): 183–204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965. Open Google Scholar
  70. Carver, Charles S., Sutton, Steven K. & Scheier, Michael F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(6): 741–751. doi: 10.1177/0146167200268008. Open Google Scholar
  71. Chong, Dennis (2013). Degrees of Rationality in Politics. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 96–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  72. Clarke, Harold D., Elliott, Euel & Stewart, Marianne C. (2017). Heuristics, Heterogeneity and Green Choices Voting on California’s Proposition 23. Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 755–774. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.39. Open Google Scholar
  73. Clough, Patricia T. & Halley, Jean (eds.) (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  74. Cohen, Jacob (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar
  75. Corbetta, Piergiorgio & Vignati, Rinaldo (2014). Direct Democracy and Scapegoats: The Five Star Movement and Europe. The International Spectator 49(1): 53–64. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2014.875822. Open Google Scholar
  76. Crivelli, Carlos & Fridlund, Alan J. (2018). Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences: 1–12. [Online First]. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006. Open Google Scholar
  77. Cuddy, Amy J. C., Fiske, Susan T. & Glick, Peter (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 61–149. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0. Open Google Scholar
  78. Curtin, Richard, Presser, Stanley & Singer, Eleanor (2005). Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(1): 87–98. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi002. Open Google Scholar
  79. Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Dalege, Jonas, Borsboom, Denny, van Harreveld, Frenk, van den Berg, Helma, Conner, Mark & van der Maas, Han L.J. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. Psychological Review 123(1): 2–22. doi: 10.1037/a0039802. Open Google Scholar
  81. Dalege, Jonas, Borsboom, Denny, van Harreveld, Frenk, Waldorp, Lourens J. & van der Maas, Han L.J. (2017). Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions. Scientific Reports 7(4909): 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05048-y. Open Google Scholar
  82. Dalton, Russell J. (1984). Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. The Journal of Politics 46(1): 264–284. doi: 10.2307/2130444. Open Google Scholar
  83. Dalton, Russell J. (2002). The Decline of Party Identification. In Russell J. Dalton & Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies, pp. 19–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  84. Dalton, Russell J. (2006). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 4th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
  85. Dalton, Russell J. (2014). Interpreting Partisan Dealignment in Germany. German Politics 23(1/2): 134–144. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2013.853040. Open Google Scholar
  86. Dalton, Russell J. & Bürklin, Wilhelm (2003). Wähler als Wandervögel: Dealignment and the German Voter. German Politics and Society 21(1): 57–75. doi: 10.3167/104503003782353592. Open Google Scholar
  87. Darwin, Charles (1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  88. Davino, Cristina, Furno, Marilena & Vistocco, Domenico (2013). Quantile regression: Theory and applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  89. De Landtsheer, De Vries, Philippe & Vertessen, Dieter (2008). Political Impression Management: How Metaphors, Sound Bites, Appearance Effectiveness, and Personality Traits Can Win Elections. Journal of Political Marketing 7(3/4): 217–238. doi: 10.1080/15377850802005083. Open Google Scholar
  90. de Melo, Celso M., Gratch, Jonathan, Carnevale, Peter & Read, Stephen (2012). Reverse appraisal: The importance of appraisals for the effect of emotion displays on people’s decision making in a social dilemma. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 34(34): 270–275. Open Google Scholar
  91. Debus, Marc (2017). An ‘Angela Merkel Effect’? The Impact of Gender on CDU/CSU Voting Intention between 1998 and 2013. German Politics 26(1): 35–48. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1182501. Open Google Scholar
  92. Decker, Frank (2016). The “Alternative for Germany”: Factors Behind its Emergence and Profile of a New Right-wing Populist Party. German Politics and Society 34(2): 1–16. doi: 10.3167/gps.2016.340201. Open Google Scholar
  93. Dickson, Eric S. (2011). Economics versus Psychology Experiments: Stylization, Incentives, and Deception. In James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski & Arthur Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 58–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Dobson, Andrew (2014). Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  95. Druckman, James N. & Kam, Cindy D. (2011). Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base”. In James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski & Arthur Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 41–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  96. Druckman, James N. (2003). The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited. The Journal of Politics 65(2): 559–571. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015. Open Google Scholar
  97. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. & Lupia, Arthur (eds.) (2011). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  98. Du, Shichuan, Tao, Yong & Martinez, Aleix M. (2014). Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(15): 1454–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322355111. Open Google Scholar
  99. Dumitrescu, Delia (2010). Know Me, Love Me, Fear Me: The Anatomy of Candidate Poster Designs in the 2007 French Legislative Elections. Political Communication 27(1): 20–43. doi: 10.1080/10584600903297117. Open Google Scholar
  100. Dumitrescu, Delia (2016). Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005-2015. American Behavioral Scientist 60(14): 1656-1675. doi: 10.1177/0002764216678280. Open Google Scholar
  101. Dumitrescu, Delia, Gidengil, Elisabeth & Stolle, Dietlind (2015). Candidate Confidence and Electoral Appeal: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Nonverbal Confidence on Voter Evaluations. Political Science Research and Methods 3(1): 43–52. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.16. Open Google Scholar
  102. Durst, Uwe (2001). Why Germans don’t feel “anger”. In Jean Harkins & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 115–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  103. Eagly, Alice H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C. (2001). The Leadership Styles of Women and Men. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 781–797. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241. Open Google Scholar
  104. Ekman, Paul (1992). An Argument for Basic Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 6(3/4): 169–200. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411068. Open Google Scholar
  105. Ekman, Paul & Cordaro, Daniel (2011). What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic. Emotion Review 3(4): 364–370. doi: 10.1177/1754073911410740. Open Google Scholar
  106. Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17(2): 124–129. doi: 10.1037/h0030377. Open Google Scholar
  107. Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar
  108. Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V., Ellsworth, Phoebe, Goldstein, Arnold P. & Krasner, Leonard (1972). Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings. Burlington: Elsevier Science. Open Google Scholar
  109. Elfenbein, Hillary A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion. Organizational Psychology Review 4(4): 326–362. doi: 10.1177/2041386614542889. Open Google Scholar
  110. Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (2013). Appraisal Theory: Old and New Questions. Emotion Review 5(2): 125–131. doi: 10.1177/1754073912463617. Open Google Scholar
  111. Epskamp, Sacha, Borsboom, Denny & Fried, Eiko I. (2018). Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper. Behavior Research Methods 50(1): 195–212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1. Open Google Scholar
  112. Falter, Jürgen W. (1977). Einmal mehr: Läßt sich das Konzept der Parteiidentifikation auf deutsche Verhältnisse übertragen? Theoretische, methodologische und empirische Probleme einer Validierung des Konstrukts „Parteiidentifikation“ für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 18(2/3): 476–500. Open Google Scholar
  113. Ferreira Da Silva, Frederico & Costa, Patrício (2019). Do we need warm leaders? Exploratory study of the role of voter evaluations of leaders’ traits on turnout in seven European countries. European Journal of Political Research 58(1): 117–140. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12273. Open Google Scholar
  114. Field, Andy (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  115. Finn, Christopher & Glaser, Jack (2010). Voter affect and the 2008 US presidential election: Hope and race mattered. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 10(1): 262–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01206.x. Open Google Scholar
  116. Fiorina, Morris P. (1976). The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects. The Journal of Politics 38(2): 390–413. doi: 10.2307/2129541. Open Google Scholar
  117. Fischbacher, Urs (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2): 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4. Open Google Scholar
  118. Fischer, Agneta H. & Manstead, Antony S. R. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones & Lisa F. Barrett (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, pp. 456–468. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  119. Fischer, Agneta H. & Roseman, Ira J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(1): 103–115. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103. Open Google Scholar
  120. Fischer, Agneta H. & Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2010). Where Have all the People Gone? A Plea for Including Social Interaction in Emotion Research. Emotion Review 2(3): 208–211. doi: 10.1177/1754073910361980. Open Google Scholar
  121. Fischer, Agneta H., Halperin, Eran, Canetti, Daphna & Jasini, Alba (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4): 309–320. doi: 10.1177/1754073917751229. Open Google Scholar
  122. Fischer, Agneta H., Pauw, Lisanne S. & Manstead, Antony S. (2019). Emotion Recognition as a Social Act: In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 7–24. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  123. Fiske, Susan T. & Taylor, Shelley E. (2017). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  124. Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter & Xu, Jun (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878. Open Google Scholar
  125. Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C. & Glick, Peter (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2): 77–83. Open Google Scholar
  126. Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363. Open Google Scholar
  127. Forgas, Joseph P. & Bower, Gordon H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1): 53–60. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.53. Open Google Scholar
  128. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2015b). Internet-Strukturdaten: Repräsentative Umfrage - Jahreskumulation. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Archiv__weitere_Umfragen/Internet-Strukturdaten/web_II_14.pdf (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar
  129. Frank, Cornelia, Schoen, Harald & Faas, Thorsten (2015). Zur Einführung: Politische Psychologie als interdisziplinäre Forschungsperspektive. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. PVS Sonderheft 50: 10–43. doi: 10.5771/9783845254418-10. Open Google Scholar
  130. Frey, Siegfried (1999). Die Macht des Bildes: Der Einfluss der nonverbalen Kommunikation auf Kultur und Politik. Bern: H. Huber. Open Google Scholar
  131. Fridkin, Kim L. & Kenney, Patrick J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 307–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x. Open Google Scholar
  132. Fried, Eiko (2016, October 19): R tutorial: how to identify communities of items in networks [Blog Post]. Available online at: http://psych-networks.com/r-tutorial-identify-communities-items-networks/ (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar
  133. Frijda, Nico H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion 1(2): 115–143. doi: 10.1080/02699938708408043. Open Google Scholar
  134. Funk, Carolyn L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior 18(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1007/BF01498658. Open Google Scholar
  135. Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. The Journal of Politics 61(3): 700–720. doi: 10.2307/2647824. Open Google Scholar
  136. Gabriel, Oscar W. & Masch, Lena (2017). Displays of emotion and citizen support for Merkel and Gysi: How emotional contagion affects evaluations of leadership. Politics and the Life Sciences 36(2): 80–103. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.15. Open Google Scholar
  137. Gabriel, Oscar W., Keil, Silke I. & Thaidigsmann, S. Isabell (2009). Kandidatenorientierungen und Wahlentscheid bei der Bundestagswahl 2005. In Oscar W. Gabriel, Bernhard Weßels & Jürgen W. Falter (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005, pp. 267–303. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  138. Gadarian, Shana K. & Van der Vort, Eric (2018). The gag reflex: Disgust rhetoric and gay rights in American politics. Political Behavior 40(2): 521–543. Open Google Scholar
  139. Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H. & Quirk, Paul J. (2007). The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined. Political Analysis 15(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpl008. Open Google Scholar
  140. Garrido, Luis E., Abad, Francisco J. & Ponsoda, Vicente (2011). Performance of Velicer’s Minimum Average Partial Factor Retention Method With Categorical Variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement 71(3): 551–570. doi: 10.1177/0013164410389489. Open Google Scholar
  141. Garzia, Diego (2013a). Changing Parties, Changing Partisans: The Personalization of Partisan Attachments in Western Europe. Political Psychology 34(1): 67–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00918.x. Open Google Scholar
  142. Garzia, Diego (2013b). The Rise of Party Leader Identification in Western Europe. Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 533–544. doi: 10.1177/1065912912463122. Open Google Scholar
  143. Garzia, Diego (2014). Personalization of politics and electoral change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  144. Garzia, Diego (2017). Voter Evaluation of Candidates and Party Leaders. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, pp. 633–653. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  145. Gerber, Alan S. & Green, Donald P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94(3): 653–663. doi: 10.2307/2585837. Open Google Scholar
  146. Gerber, Alan S. & Green, Donald P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: Norton. Open Google Scholar
  147. Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P. & Shaw, Daron R. (2011). How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 105(1): 135–150. doi: 10.1017/S000305541000047X. Open Google Scholar
  148. Glaser, Jack & Salovey, Peter (1998). Affect in electoral politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(3): 156–172. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_1. Open Google Scholar
  149. Glass, David P. (1985). Evaluating presidential candidates: Who focuses on their personal attributes? Public Opinion Quarterly 49(4): 517–534. doi: 10.1086/268948. Open Google Scholar
  150. Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor. Open Google Scholar
  151. Goodwin, Matthew, Hix, Simon & Pickup, Mark (2020). For and against Brexit: A survey experiment of the impact of campaign effects on public attitudes toward EU membership. British Journal of Political Science: 481–495. doi: 10.1017/S0007123417000667. Open Google Scholar
  152. Gooty, Janaki, Connelly, Shane, Griffith, Jennifer A. & Gupta, Alka (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly 21(6): 979–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005. Open Google Scholar
  153. Gosnell, Harold F. (1926). An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. The American Political Science Review 20(4): 896-874. doi: 10.2307/1945435. Open Google Scholar
  154. Grabe, Maria E. & Bucy, Erik P. (2009). Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  155. Gratch, Jonathan & de Melo, Celso M. (2019). Inferring Intentions from Emotion Expressions in Social Decision Making. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 141–160. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  156. Gratch, Jonathan & Marsella, Stacy (2014). Introduction: Toward an Information Processing Revolution in Social Emotions. In Jonathan Gratch & Stacy Marsella (eds.), Social Emotions in Nature and Artifact, pp. 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  157. Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley & Schickler, Eric (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  158. Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie & Schwartz, Jordan L.K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464. Open Google Scholar
  159. Greszki, Robert, Meyer, Marco & Schoen, Harald (2015). Exploring the Effects of Removing “Too Fast” Responses and Respondents from Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 79(2): 471–503. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu058. Open Google Scholar
  160. Haider-Markel, Donald P. & Joslyn, Mark R. (2008). Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 291–310. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn015. Open Google Scholar
  161. Haidt, Jonathan (2003). The Moral Emotions. In Richard J. Davidson, Klaus R. Scherer & H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 852–870. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  162. Hainmueller, Jens & Hiscox, Michael J. (2010). Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. American Political Science Review 104(1): 61–84. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990372. Open Google Scholar
  163. Hamelin, Nicolas, El Moujahid, Othmane, & Thaichon, Park (2017). Emotion and advertising effectiveness: A novel facial expression analysis approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 36: 103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.001. Open Google Scholar
  164. Hand, David J. (1994). Deconstructing Statistical Questions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 157(3): 317–356. doi: 10.2307/2983526. Open Google Scholar
  165. Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2010). What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition and Emotion 24(1): 128–140. doi: 10.1080/02699930802613828. Open Google Scholar
  166. Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2012). The social signal value of emotions. Cognition and Emotion 26(3): 385–389. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.665029. Open Google Scholar
  167. Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2019). The Reverse Engineering of Emotions–Observers of Others’ Emotions as Naïve Personality Psychologists. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 103–118. Cham: SpringerSpringer, Cham. Open Google Scholar
  168. Hareli, Shlomo & Rafaeli, Anat (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 35–59. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.007. Open Google Scholar
  169. Hareli, Shlomo, Elkabetz, Simon & Hess, Ursula (2019). The Use of Emotions to Infer Norms and Standards. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 199–208. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  170. Hareli, Shlomo, Shomrat, Noga & Hess, Ursula (2009). Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion 9(3): 378–384. doi: 10.1037/a0015958. Open Google Scholar
  171. Harell, Allison, Soroka, Stuart & Iyengar, Shanto (2017). Locus of Control and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology 38(2): 245–260. doi: 10.1111/pops.12338. Open Google Scholar
  172. Harkins, Jean & Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.) (2001). Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  173. Hart, William, Ottati, Victor C. & Krumdick, Nathaniel D. (2011). Physical Attractiveness and Candidate Evaluation: A Model of Correction. Political Psychology 32(2): 181–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00812.x. Open Google Scholar
  174. Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In Margaret S. Clark (ed.), Emotion and social behavior, pp. 151–177. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  175. Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2(3): 96–100. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953. Open Google Scholar
  176. Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  177. Hayes, Danny (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908–923. doi: 10.2307/3647705. Open Google Scholar
  178. Hayes, Danny (2009). Has television personalized voting behavior? Political Behavior 31(2): 231–260. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9070-0. Open Google Scholar
  179. Heider, Fritz (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  180. Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J. & Norenzayan, Ara (2010). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–-3): 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Open Google Scholar
  181. Hess, Ursula (2014). Anger Is a Positive Emotion. In W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The positive side of negative emotions, pp. 55–75. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  182. Hibbing, John R., Smith, Kevin B. & Alford, John R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  183. Hill, Edward, Han, David, Dumouchel, Pierre, Dehak, Najim, Quatieri, Thomas, Moehs, Charles, Oscar-Berman, Marlene, Giordano, John, Simpatico, Thomas & Blum, Kenneth (2013). Long term Suboxone™ emotional reactivity as measured by automatic detection in speech. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069043. Open Google Scholar
  184. Hochschild, Arlie R. (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. 3rd edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  185. Hoggett, Paul & Thompson, Simon (2012). Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies. London: Continuum International Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  186. Holland, Paul W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945–960. doi: 10.2307/2289064. Open Google Scholar
  187. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–135. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279. Open Google Scholar
  188. Horiuchi, Yusaku & Mayerson, Asher (2015). The Opportunity Cost of Conflict: Statistically Comparing Israel and Synthetic Israel. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 609–618. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.47. Open Google Scholar
  189. Horn, John L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrica 30(2): 179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447. Open Google Scholar
  190. Huber, Sascha (2014). What comes first, character traits or political assessments? An experimental study. In Marina C. Lobo & John Curtice (eds.), Personality Politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections, pp. 38–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  191. Huddy, Leonie & Terkildsen, Nayda (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 119–147. doi: 10.2307/2111526. Open Google Scholar
  192. Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley & Cassese, Erin (2007). On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus. Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, 202–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  193. Huddy, Leonie., Mason, Lilliana & Aarøe, Lene (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review 109(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000604. Open Google Scholar
  194. Imbens, Guido W. & Rubin, Donald B. (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  195. Isbell, Linda M., Ottati, Victor C. & Burns, Kathleen C. (2006). Affect and Politics: Effect on Judgment, Processing, and Information Seeking. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 57–86. New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
  196. Jack, Rachael E., Garrod, Oliver G.B. & Schyns, Philippe G. (2014). Dynamic Facial Expressions of Emotion Transmit an Evolving Hierarchy of Signals over Time. Current Biology 24(1): 187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.064. Open Google Scholar
  197. Jäckle, Sebastian & Metz, Thomas (2016). Brille, Blazer oder Bart? Das Aussehen als Determinante des Wahlerfolgs von Bundestags- Direktkandidaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57(2): 217–246. doi: 10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-217. Open Google Scholar
  198. Jäckle, Sebastian & Metz, Thomas (2017). Beauty Contest Revisited: The Effects of Perceived Attractiveness, Competence, and Likability on the Electoral Success of German MPs. Politics & Policy 45(4): 495–534. doi: 10.1111/polp.12209. Open Google Scholar
  199. Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing Statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, pp. 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  200. Johns, Robert & Shephard, Mark (2011). Facing the Voters: The Potential Impact of Ballot Paper Photographs in British Elections. Political Studies 59(3): 636–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00874.x. Open Google Scholar
  201. Johnston, Christopher D., Lavine, Howard & Woodson, Benjamin (2015). Emotion and Political Judgment: Expectancy Violation and Affective Intelligence. Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 474–492. doi: 10.1177/1065912915593644. Open Google Scholar
  202. Jost, John T. (2017). Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology. Political Psychology 38(2): 167–208. doi: 10.1111/pops.12407. Open Google Scholar
  203. Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W. & Sulloway, Frank J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339. Open Google Scholar
  204. Kaase, Max (1994). Is there personalization in politics? Candidates and voting behavior in Germany. International Political Science Review 15(3): 211–230. doi: 10.1177/019251219401500301. Open Google Scholar
  205. Kahneman, Daniel (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. The American Psychologist 58(9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697. Open Google Scholar
  206. Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Open Google Scholar
  207. Kalmoe, Nathan P. (2019). Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors. Political Science Research and Methods 7(3): 411–429. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2017.36. Open Google Scholar
  208. Kapp, Julie M., Peters, Colleen & Oliver, Debra Parker (2013). Research recruitment using Facebook advertising: big potential, big challenges. Journal of Cancer Education 28(1): 134–137. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0443-z. Open Google Scholar
  209. Karvonen, Lauri (2010). The personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar
  210. Kaufman, Bruce E. (1999). Emotional arousal as a source of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 38(2): 135–144. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00002-5. Open Google Scholar
  211. Kelley, Harold H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28(2): 107–128. doi: 10.1037/h0034225. Open Google Scholar
  212. Kelly, Janice R. (2004). Mood and Emotion in Groups. In Marylinn B. Brewer & Miles Hewstone (eds.), Emotion and Motivation, pp. 95–112. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Open Google Scholar
  213. Keuschnigg, Marc & Wolbring, Tobias (eds.) (2015). Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  214. Kinder, Donald R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In Richard R. Lau & David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, pp. 233–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  215. Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P. & Fiske, Susan T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior 2(4): 315–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00990172. Open Google Scholar
  216. King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. & Verba, Sidney (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  217. Klein, Markus & Rosar, Ulrich (2016). Problem-Peer und die (Über-)Mutter der Nation: Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. In Harald Schoen & Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 91–109. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  218. Klofstad, Casey A. (2016). Candidate Voice Pitch Influences Election Outcomes. Political Psychology 37(5): 725–738. doi: 10.1111/pops.12280. Open Google Scholar
  219. Knutson, Brian (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20(3): 165–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02281954. Open Google Scholar
  220. Koenker, Roger & d’Orey, Vasco (1987). Algorithm AS 229: Computing Regression Quantiles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36(3): 383–393. doi: 10.2307/2347802. Open Google Scholar
  221. Koenker, Roger (2005). Quantile Regression. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  222. Koppensteiner, Markus & Grammer, Karl (2010). Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality 44(3): 374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.002. Open Google Scholar
  223. Koppensteiner, Markus (2013). Motion cues that make an impression: Predicting perceived personality by minimal motion information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6): 1137–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.002. Open Google Scholar
  224. Kouloumpis, Efthymios, Wilson, Theresa & Moore, Johanna D. (2011). Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 538–541. AAAI Press. Open Google Scholar
  225. Kraus, Sidney (1996). Winners of the First 1960 Televised Presidential Debate Between Kennedy and Nixon. Journal of Communication 46(4): 78–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01507.x. Open Google Scholar
  226. Krohne, Heinz W., Egloff, Boris, Kohlmann, Carl-Walter & Tausch, Anja (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule"(PANAS). Diagnostica 42(2): 139–156. doi: 10.1037/t49650-000. Open Google Scholar
  227. Krosnick, Jon A. & Alwin, Duane F. (1987). An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 51(2): 201–219. doi: 10.1086/269029. Open Google Scholar
  228. Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander, Vitriol, Joseph & Farhart, Christina (2018). Implicit Candidate-Trait Associations in Political Campaigns. Political Psychology 39(1): 177–195. doi: 10.1111/pops.12398. Open Google Scholar
  229. Kuklinski, James H., Cobb, Michael D. & Gilens, Martin (1997). Racial Attitudes and the “New South”. The Journal of Politics 59(2): 323–349. doi: 10.2307/2998167. Open Google Scholar
  230. Ladd, Jonathan M. & Lenz, Gabriel S. (2011). Does Anxiety Improve Voters’ Decision Making? Political Psychology 32(2): 347–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00805.x. Open Google Scholar
  231. Lalancette, Mireille, & Raynauld, Vincent (2019). The power of political image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist 63(7): 888-924. doi: 10.1177/0002764217744838. Open Google Scholar
  232. Lau, Richard R. & Redlawsk, David P. (2001). Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971. doi: 10.2307/2669334. Open Google Scholar
  233. Lau, Richard R. & Redlawsk, David P. (2016). The Effects of Advertising Tone on Information Processing and Vote Choice. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 247–264. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar
  234. Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee & Rovner, Ivy B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta‐analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176–1209. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x. Open Google Scholar
  235. Laustsen, Lasse & Bor, Alexander (2017). The relative weight of character traits in political candidate evaluations: Warmth is more important than competence, leadership and integrity. Electoral Studies 49: 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.08.001. Open Google Scholar
  236. Laustsen, Lasse & Petersen, Michael B. (2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology 38(6): 1083–1101. doi: 10.1111/pops.12403. Open Google Scholar
  237. Lavine, Howard & Gschwend, Thomas (2007). Issues, party and character: The moderating role of ideological thinking on candidate evaluation. British Journal of Political Science 37(1): 139–163. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000075. Open Google Scholar
  238. Lavine, Howard, Lodge, Milton, Polichak, James & Taber, Charles (2002). Explicating the Black Box Through Experimentation: Studies of Authoritarianism and Threat. Political Analysis 10(4): 343–360. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.343. Open Google Scholar
  239. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard & Gaudet, Hazel (1969). The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  240. Lazarus, Richard S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist 39(2): 124–129. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124. Open Google Scholar
  241. Lenz, Gabriel S. & Lawson, Chappell (2011). Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance. American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 574–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x. Open Google Scholar
  242. Levitt, Steven D. & List, John A. (2007). What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 153–174. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.153. Open Google Scholar
  243. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (2006). Does Economics Still Matter? Econometrics and the Vote. The Journal of Politics 68(1): 208–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00381.x. Open Google Scholar
  244. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut & Weisberg, Herbert F. (2008). The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  245. Liesen, Laurette T. & Walsh, Mary B. (2012). The competing meanings of “biopolitics” in political science. Biological and postmodern approaches to politics. Politics and the Life Sciences 31(1-2): 2–15. doi: 10.2990/31_1-2_2. Open Google Scholar
  246. Lobo, Marina C. & Curtice, John (eds.) (2014). Personality Politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  247. Lodge, Milton & Taber, Charles S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  248. Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R. & Brau, Shawn (1995). The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review 89(2): 309–326. doi: 10.2307/2082427. Open Google Scholar
  249. Lord, Frederic M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin 68(5): 304–305. doi: 10.1037/h0025105. Open Google Scholar
  250. Lupia, Arthur (2002). New Ideas in Experimental Political Science. Political Analysis 10(4): 319–324. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.319. Open Google Scholar
  251. Machatzke, Jörg (1997). Die Potsdamer Elitestudie: Positionsauswahl und Ausschöpfung. In Wilhelm P. Bürklin & Hilke Rebenstorf (eds.), Eliten in Deutschland: Rekrutierung und Integration, pp. 35–68. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  252. MacKuen, Michael, Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & Keele, Luke (2007). The Third Way: The Theory of Affective Intelligence and American Democracy. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp. 124–151. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  253. Manders, Erika (2012). Coining images of power: Patterns in the representation of Roman emperors on imperial coinage, A.D. 193–284. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar
  254. Marcus, George E. (2000). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science 3(1): 221-250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221. Open Google Scholar
  255. Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer & Keele, Luke (2006). The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 31–46. New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
  256. Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & MacKuen, Michael (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  257. Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & MacKuen, Michael B. (2017). Measuring Emotional Response: Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measurement. Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 733–754. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.65. Open Google Scholar
  258. Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas A., Vasilopoulos, Pavlos & Foucault, Martial (2019). Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties. Political Psychology 40: 109–139. doi: 10.1111/pops.12571. Open Google Scholar
  259. Marsh, Abigail A., Ambady, Nalini & Kleck, Robert E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5(1): 119–124. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119. Open Google Scholar
  260. Masch, Lena & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2020). How Emotional Displays of Political Leaders Shape Citizen Attitudes: The Case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. German Politics 29(2): 158–179. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2019.1657096. Open Google Scholar
  261. Mason, Lilliana (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  262. Mason, Lilliana & Wronski, Julie (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology 39: 257–277. doi: 10.1111/pops.12485. Open Google Scholar
  263. Masters, Roger D. (1991). Conclusion: Primate Politics and Political Theory. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 221–250. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar
  264. Masters, Roger D. (1994). Differences in Responses of Blacks and Whites to American Leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences 13(2): 183–194. doi: 10.1017/S0730938400018360. Open Google Scholar
  265. Masters, Roger D. & Sullivan, Denis G. (1989a). Nonverbal Displays and Political Leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior 11(2): 123–156. doi: 10.1007/BF00992491. Open Google Scholar
  266. Masters, Roger D. & Sullivan, Denis G. (1989b). Facial displays and political leadership in France. Behavioural Processes 19(1-3): 1–30. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(89)90028-4. Open Google Scholar
  267. Masters, Roger D., Frey, Siegfried & Bente, Gary (1991). Dominance & Attention: Images of Leaders in German, French, & American TV News. Polity 23(3): 373–394. doi: 10.2307/3235132. Open Google Scholar
  268. Masters, Roger D., Sullivan, Denis G., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J. & Englis, Basil G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Systems 9(4): 319–343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1750(86)90190-9. Open Google Scholar
  269. Mattes, Kyle & Redlawsk, David P. (2015). The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  270. Mattes, Kyle, Roseman, Ira J., Redlawsk, David P. & Katz, Steven (2017). Contempt and Anger in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. In Jennifer C. Lucas, Christopher J. Galdieri & Tauna S. Sisco (eds.), Conventional wisdom, parties, and broken barriers in the 2016 election, pp. 101–107. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  271. Mattes, Kyle, Spezio, Michael, Kim, Hackjin, Todorov, Alexander, Adolphs, Ralph & Alvarez, R. Michael (2010). Predicting Election Outcomes from Positive and Negative Trait Assessments of Candidate Images. Political Psychology 31(1): 41–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00745.x. Open Google Scholar
  272. Mayer, Sabrina J. (2016). Die Parteiidentifikation: Eine Konstruktvalidierung neuer Maße auf Basis des Ansatzes sozialer Identität. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  273. McDermott, Monika L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895–918. doi: 10.2307/449110. Open Google Scholar
  274. McDermott, Monika L., Schwartz, Douglas & Vallejo, Sebastian (2015). Talking the talk but not walking the walk: Public reactions to hypocrisy in political scandal. American Politics Research 43(6): 952–974. doi: 10.1177/1532673X15577830. Open Google Scholar
  275. McDermott, Rose (2002). Experimental Methodology in Political Science. Political Analysis 10(4): 325–342. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.325. Open Google Scholar
  276. McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T., Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D. & Englis, Basil G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader’s expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(6): 1513–1529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1513. Open Google Scholar
  277. McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T. & Bush, Lauren K. (1991). The Effect of Attitudes on Emotional Reactions to Expressive Display of Political Leaders. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 15(1): 19–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00997765. Open Google Scholar
  278. McIntosh, Daniel N., Druckman, Daniel & Zajonc, Robert B. (1994). Socially induced affect. In Daniel Druckman & Robert A. Bjork (eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance, pp. 251–276. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Open Google Scholar
  279. Mehrabian, Albert (1980). Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory: Implications for personality, social, environmental, and developmental studies. Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain. Open Google Scholar
  280. Mehrabian, Albert & Russell, James A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  281. Meyrowitz, Joshua (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of the Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  282. Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P. & Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. American Political Science Review 80(2): 521–540. doi: 10.2307/1958272. Open Google Scholar
  283. Miron-Spektor, Ella & Rafaeli, Anat (2009). The effects of anger in the workplace: When, where, and why observing anger enhances or hinders performance. In Joseph J. Martocchio & Hui Liao (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources: Management (Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 28), pp. 153–178. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Open Google Scholar
  284. Mitchell, Dona-Gene (2014). Here today, gone tomorrow? Assessing how timing and repetition of scandal information affects candidate evaluations. Political Psychology 35(5): 679–701. doi: 10.1111/pops.12095. Open Google Scholar
  285. Mölders, Christina & van Quaquebeke, Niels (2017). Some like it hot: How voters’ attitude towards disrespect in politics affects their judgments of candidates. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 5(1): 58–81. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v5i1.633. Open Google Scholar
  286. Mölders, Christina, van Quaquebeke, Niels & Paladino, Maria P. (2017). Consequences of Politicians’ Disrespectful Communication Depend on Social Judgment Dimensions and Voters’ Moral Identity. Political Psychology 38(1): 119–135. doi: 10.1111/pops.12311. Open Google Scholar
  287. Moody, Eric J., McIntosh, Daniel N., Mann, Laura J. & Weisser, Kimberly R. (2007). More than mere mimicry? The influence of emotion on rapid facial reactions to faces. Emotion 7(2): 447–457. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.447. Open Google Scholar
  288. Morgan, Rick L. & Heise, David (1988). Structure of Emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly 51(1): 19–31. doi: 10.2307/2786981. Open Google Scholar
  289. Morton, Rebecca B. & Williams, Kenneth C. (2010). Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  290. Mudde, Cas & Kaltwasser, Cristobal R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  291. Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N. & Freese, Jeremy (2015). The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–138. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.19. Open Google Scholar
  292. Murray, Gregg R. (2014). Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences 33(1): 33–53. doi: 10.2990/33_1_33. Open Google Scholar
  293. Mutz, Diana C. (2007). Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition. American Political Science Review 101(4): 621–635. doi: 10.1017/S000305540707044X. Open Google Scholar
  294. Mutz, Diana C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  295. Mutz, Diana C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  296. Mutz, Diana C. & Reeves, Byron (2005). The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review 99(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051452. Open Google Scholar
  297. Nai, Alessandro & Maier, Jürgen (2018). Perceived personality and campaign style of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Personality and Individual Differences 121: 80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.020. Open Google Scholar
  298. Nai, Alessandro & Walter, Annemarie S. (eds.) (2016). New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar
  299. Ohr, Dieter & Oscarsson, Henrik (2011). Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice. In Kees Aarts, André Blais & Hermann Schmitt (eds.), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, pp. 187–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  300. Ohr, Dieter & Quandt, Markus (2012). Parteiidentifikation in Deutschland: Eine empirische Fundierung des Konzepts auf Basis der Theorie Sozialer Identität. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. PVS Sonderheft 45: 182–207. doi: 10.5771/9783845262178_186. Open Google Scholar
  301. Ohr, Dieter, Klein, Markus & Rosar, Ulrich (2013). Bewertungen der Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen & Oscar W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009, pp. 206–230. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  302. Ottati, Victor C., Terkildsen, Nayda & Hubbard, Clark (1997). Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(11): 1144–1156. doi: 10.1177/01461672972311003. Open Google Scholar
  303. Pancer, S. Mark, Brown, Steven D. & Barr, Cathy W. (1999). Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross‐National Comparison. Political Psychology 20(2): 345–368. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00148. Open Google Scholar
  304. Parkinson, Brian, Fischer, Agneta H. & Manstead, Antony S.R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar
  305. Parrott, W.Gerrod (2004). The Nature of Emotion. In Marilynn B. Brewer & Miles Hewstone (eds.), Emotion and Motivation, pp. 5–20. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Open Google Scholar
  306. Parrott, W. Gerrod (2014). Feeling, function, and the place of negative emotions in a happy life. In W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The Positive Side of Negative Emotions, pp. 273–-296. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  307. Parrott, W. Gerrod (2019). Emotions as Signals of Moral Character. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 161-177. Cham: Springer Open Google Scholar
  308. Parzen, Michael I., Wei, Lee-Jen & Ying, Zhiliang (1994). A resampling method based on pivotal estimating functions. Biometrika 81(2): 341–350. doi: 10.2307/2336964. Open Google Scholar
  309. Patil, Vivek H., Singh, Surendra N., Mishra, Sanjay & Donavan, D. Todd (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion. Journal of Business Research 61(2): 162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008. Open Google Scholar
  310. Petersen, Michael B. (2010). Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality. The Journal of Politics 72(2): 357–365. doi: 10.1017/S002238160999079X. Open Google Scholar
  311. Peterson, Johnathan C., Jacobs, Carly, Hibbing, John, & Smith, Kevin (2018). In your face: Emotional expressivity as a predictor of ideology. Politics and the Life Sciences 37(1): 53–67. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.13. Open Google Scholar
  312. Peterson, Steven A. & Maiden, Robert (1993). Personality and Politics among Older Americans: A Rural Case Study. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 36(2): 157–169. doi: 10.2190/F01D-XTXD-5TXL-V4KQ. Open Google Scholar
  313. Peterson, Steven A. & Somit, Albert (eds.) (2017). Handbook of Biology and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  314. Pietraszewski, David (2016). Priming race: Does the mind inhibit categorization by race at encoding or recall? Social Psychological and Personality Science 7(1): 85–91. doi: 10.1177/1948550615602934. Open Google Scholar
  315. Plutchik, Robert (2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientists 89(4): 344–350. Open Google Scholar
  316. Poguntke, Thomas (2005). A Presidentializing Party State? The Federal Republic of Germany. In Thomas Poguntke & Paul Webb (eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, pp. 63–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  317. Popkin, Samuel L. (1995). Information shortcuts and the reasoning voter. In Bernand Grofman (ed.), Information, participation, and choice: an economic theory of democracy in perspective, pp. 17–35. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  318. Rahn, Wendy M. (1993). The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–496. doi: 10.2307/2111381. Open Google Scholar
  319. Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene & Sullivan, John L. (1990). A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal. In John A. Ferejohn & James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes, pp. 136–159. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  320. Ramiro, Luis & Gomez, Raul (2017). Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left. Political Studies 65(1): 108–126. doi: 10.1177/0032321716647400. Open Google Scholar
  321. Rammstedt, Beatrice, Kemper, Christoph J., Klein, Mira C., Beierlein, Constanze & Kovaleva, Anastassiya (2013). Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der fünf Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit: Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Methoden, Daten, Analysen 7(2): 233–249. doi: 10.12758/mda.2013.0. Open Google Scholar
  322. Ramo, Danielle E. & Prochaska, Judith J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14(1): e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1878. Open Google Scholar
  323. Redlawsk, David P. & Lau, Richard R. (2013). Behavioral Decision-Making. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 130–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  324. Redlawsk, David P. & Pierce, Douglas (2017). Emotions and Voting. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, pp. 406–432. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  325. Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andrew J. & Lau, Richard R. (2007). Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information Processing and Learning in a Campaign. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp. 152–179. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  326. Redlawsk, David P., Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle & Katz, Steven (2016). Losers, Liars, and Low-Energy Individuals: Examining Contempt and Anger as Factors in Candidate Evaluation. Paper presented at the 112th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, September 1-4. Open Google Scholar
  327. Redlawsk, David P., Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle & Katz, Steven (2018). Donald Trump, contempt, and the 2016 GOP Iowa Caucuses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28(2): 173–189. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2018.1441848. Open Google Scholar
  328. Reinemann, Carsten, Maurer, Marcus, Zerback, Thomas & Jandura, Olaf (2013). Die Spätentscheider: Medieneinflüsse auf kurzfristige Wahlentscheidungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  329. Renner, Anna-Maria (2019). Should Female Politicians Avoid Appearing Emotional? – Gender-Specific Effects of Politicians’ Emotions on the Attribution of Competence and Warmth. Politische Psychologie 7(1): 112–132. Open Google Scholar
  330. Renner, Anna-Maria & Masch, Lena (2019). Emotional woman – rational man? Gender stereotypical emotional expressivity of German politicians in news broadcasts. Communications 44(1): 81–103. doi: 10.1515/commun-2017-0048. Open Google Scholar
  331. Rico, Guillem, Guinjoan, Marc & Anduiza, Eva (2017). The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 444–461. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12261. Open Google Scholar
  332. Ridout, Travis N. & Searles, Kathleen (2011). It’s My Campaign I’ll Cry If I Want To: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals. Political Psychology 32(3): 439–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00819.x. Open Google Scholar
  333. Rosar, Ulrich, Klein, Markus & Beckers, Tilo (2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research 47(1): 64-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00720.x. Open Google Scholar
  334. Roseman, Ira J. (2001). A Model of Appraisal in the Emotion System: Integrating Theory, Research, and Applications. In Klaus R. Scherer, Angela Schorr & Tom Johnstone (eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, pp. 68–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  335. Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle, Redlawsk, David P. & Katz, Steven (2019). Reprehensible, Laughable: The Role of Contempt in Negative Campaigning. American Politics Research: 1-34 [Online First]. doi: 10.1177/1532673X19857968. Open Google Scholar
  336. Rosenfeld, Bryn, Imai, Kosuke & Shapiro, Jacob N. (2016). An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 783–802. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12205. Open Google Scholar
  337. Roßmann, Joss (2017). Satisficing in Befragungen: Theorie, Messung und Erklärung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  338. Roth, Dieter & Wüst, Andreas M. (2007). Emanzipiert und ungeliebt: Nicht-, Wechsel- und Protestwähler in Deutschland. In Werner J. Patzelt, Martin Sebaldt & Uwe Kranenpohl (eds.), Res publica semper reformanda. Wissenschaft und politische Bildung im Dienste des Gemeinwohls: Wissenschaft und politische Bildung im Dienste des Gemeinwohls. Festschrift für Heinrich Oberreuter zum 65. Geburtstag, pp. 390–412. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  339. Rubin, Allen & Babbie, Earl R. (2008). Research Methods for Social Work. 6th edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Open Google Scholar
  340. Runge, Thomas E., Frey, Dieter, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Helmreich, Robert L. & Spence, Janet T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits: A comparison between students in the United States and West Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 12(2): 142–162. doi: 10.1177/0022022181122002. Open Google Scholar
  341. Russell, James A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6): 1161–1178. doi: 10.1037/h0077714. Open Google Scholar
  342. Russell, James A. & Barrett, Lisa F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(5): 805–819. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.805. Open Google Scholar
  343. Ryan, Timothy J. (2012). What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments. The Journal of Politics 74(4): 1138–1152. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000540. Open Google Scholar
  344. Saad, Lydia (2012). Obama Ahead in 10-Point Favorability Measure, 62% to 55%: Trends suggest this is not a perfect predictor of victory in the election. Available online at: http://news.gallup.com/poll/158465/obama-ahead-point-favorability-measure.aspx (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar
  345. Sakaluk, John K. & Short, Stephen D. (2017). A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources. The Journal of Sex Research 54(1): 1–9. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538. Open Google Scholar
  346. Salmela, Mikko, & von Scheve, Christian (2018). Emotional dynamics of right-and left-wing political populism. Humanity & Society 42(4): 434–-454. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802521. Open Google Scholar
  347. Scherer, Klaus R. (1997). Profiles of Emotion-antecedent Appraisal: Testing Theoretical Predictions across Cultures. Cognition and Emotion 11(2): 113–150. doi: 10.1080/026999397379962. Open Google Scholar
  348. Scherer, Klaus R. (2003). Introduction: Cognitive Components of Emotion. In Richard J. Davidson, Klaus R. Scherer & H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 563–571. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  349. Scherer, Klaus R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information 44(4): 695–729. doi: 10.1177/0539018405058216. Open Google Scholar
  350. Schmidt-Atzert, Lothar (2008). Klassifikation von Emotionen. In Wilhelm Janke, Martin Schmidt-Daffy & Günter Debus (eds.), Experimentelle Emotionspsychologie: Methodische Ansätze - Probleme - Ergebnisse, pp. 179–193. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  351. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Weßels, Bernhard & Wolf, Christof (2014). Fazit und Ausblick: Langweile und Extreme, Fragmentierung und Konzentration. In Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Hans Rattinger, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Bernhard Weßels & Christof Wolf (eds.), Zwischen Fragmentierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 355–364. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  352. Schoen, Harald (2010). Die Wirtschaftskrise, Angst und politische Urteilsbildung: Eine Analyse zum Affective-Intelligence-Modell am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2009. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 39(2): 205–222. Open Google Scholar
  353. Schoen, Harald & Schumann, Siegfried (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology 28(4): 471–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00582.x. Open Google Scholar
  354. Schoen, Harald & Steinbrecher, Markus (2013). Beyond total effects: Exploring the interplay of personality and attitudes in affecting turnout in the 2009 German federal election. Political Psychology 34(6): 939–940. doi: 10.1111/pops.12168. Open Google Scholar
  355. Schoen, Harald & Weßels, Bernhard (2016). Die Bundestagswahl 2013 – eine Zäsur im Wahlverhalten und Parteiensystem? In Harald Schoen & Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 3–20. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  356. Schreiber, Darren, Fonzo, Greg, Simmons, Alan N., Dawes, Christopher T., Flagan, Taru, Fowler, James H. & Paulus, Martin P. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PloS one 8(2): e52970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052970. Open Google Scholar
  357. Schubert, Glendon & Masters, Roger D. (eds.) (1991). Primate Politics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar
  358. Schubert, James N. (1991). Human Vocalizations in Agonistic Political Encounters. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 207–220. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar
  359. Schumann, Siegfried (2014). Persönlichkeit und Wahlverhalten. In Jürgen W. Falter & Harald Schoen (eds.), Handbuch Wahlforschung, pp. 591–624. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  360. Searles, Kathleen & Mattes, Kyle (2015). It’s a Mad, Mad World: Using Emotion Inductions in a Survey. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 172–182. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.5. Open Google Scholar
  361. Seneca (1928). Moral Essays, Volume I: De Providentia. De Constantia. De Ira. De Clementia. Translated by John W. Basore. Loeb Classical Library 214. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  362. Settle, Jaime E., Dawes, Christopher T., Loewen, Peter John & Panagopoulos, Costas (2017). Negative Affectivity, Political Contention, and Turnout: A Genopolitics Field Experiment. Political Psychology 38(6): 1065–1082. doi: 10.1111/pops.12379. Open Google Scholar
  363. Shah, Dhavan V., Hanna, Alex, Bucy, Erik P., Wells, Chris & Quevedo, Vidal (2015). The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age: Linking Biobehavioral and Computational Approaches via the Second Screen. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659(1): 225–245. doi: 10.1177/0002716215569220. Open Google Scholar
  364. Shannon, Claude E. & Weaver, Warren (1998). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  365. Shaver, Phillip, Schwartz, Judith, Kirson, Donald & O'Connor, Cary (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(6): 1061–1086. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061. Open Google Scholar
  366. Shrout, Patrick E. & Rodgers, Joseph L. (2018). Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis. Annual Review of Psychology 69: 487–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845. Open Google Scholar
  367. Siegert, Ingo, Böck, Ronald, Vlasenko, Bogdan, Philippou-Hübner, David & Wendemuth, Andreas (2011). Appropriate emotional labelling of non-acted speech using basic emotions, geneva emotion wheel and self assessment manikins. Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2011 IEEE International Conference: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICME.2011.6011929. Open Google Scholar
  368. Sinaceur, Marwan, Van Kleef, Gerben A., Neale, Margaret A., Adam, Hajo & Haag, Christophe (2011). Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation? The Journal of Applied Psychology 96(5): 1018–1032. doi: 10.1037/a0023896. Open Google Scholar
  369. Small, Deborah A. & Lerner, Jennifer S. (2008). Emotional Policy: Personal Sadness and Anger Shape Judgments about a Welfare Case. Political Psychology 29(2): 149–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00621.x. Open Google Scholar
  370. Smith, Craig A. & Lazarus, Richard S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion 7(3-4): 233–269. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409189. Open Google Scholar
  371. Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas, Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R. & Hibbing, John R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PloS one 6(10): e25552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025552. Open Google Scholar
  372. Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E. & Brady, Henry E. (1986). Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics. British Journal of Political Science 16(04): 405–430. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400004506. Open Google Scholar
  373. Sparks, Holloway (2015). Mama Grizzlies and Guardians of the Republic: The Democratic and Intersectional Politics of Anger in the Tea Party Movement. New Political Science 37(1): 25–47. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2014.945252. Open Google Scholar
  374. Spector, Paul E. (1981). Research designs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  375. Spezio, Michael L., Rangel, Antonio, Alvarez, Ramon M., O’Doherty, John P., Mattes, Kyle, Todorov, Alexander, Kim, Hackjin & Adolphs, Ralph (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 3(4): 344–352. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn040. Open Google Scholar
  376. Statistisches Bundesamt (2015). Bildungsstand: Bevölkerung nach Bildungsabschluss in Deutschland. Available online at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/BildungForschungKultur/Bildungsstand/Tabellen/Bildungsabschluss.html (last accessed: 18 February 2018). Open Google Scholar
  377. Stavrakakis, Yannis & Katsambekis, Giorgos (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2): 119–142. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266. Open Google Scholar
  378. Steenbergen, Marco R. & Ellis, Christopher (2006). Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits, and Negative Candidate Effect. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 109–133. New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
  379. Stewart, Patrick A. (2011). The influence of self- and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election. Social Science Information 50(2): 201–222. doi: 10.1177/0539018410396616. Open Google Scholar
  380. Stewart, Patrick A. & Ford Dowe, Pearl K. (2013). Interpreting President Barack Obama’s Facial Displays of Emotion: Revisiting the Dartmouth Group. Political Psychology 34(3): 369–385. doi: 10.1111/pops.12004. Open Google Scholar
  381. Stewart, Patrick A., Bucy, Erik P. & Mehu, Marc (2015). Strengthening bonds and connecting with followers. Politics and the Life Sciences 34(1): 73–92. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.5. Open Google Scholar
  382. Stewart, Patrick A., Salter, Frank K. & Mehu, Marc (2009b). Taking leaders at face value: Ethology and the analysis of televised leader displays. Politics and the Life Sciences 28(1): 48–74. doi: 10.2990/28_1_48. Open Google Scholar
  383. Stewart, Patrick A., Waller, Bridget M. & Schubert, James N. (2009a). Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion 33(2): 125–135. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9129-1. Open Google Scholar
  384. Stier, Sebastian, Bleier, Arnim, Lietz, Haiko & Strohmaier, Markus (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication 35(1): 50-74. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/58u4c. Open Google Scholar
  385. Stroud, Laura R., Glaser, Jack & Salovey, Peter (2005). The Effects of Partisanship and Candidate Emotionality on Voter Preference. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 25(1): 25–44. doi: 10.2190/22PC-5PK7-5KU0-DNCQ. Open Google Scholar
  386. Sullivan, Denis G. (1996). Emotional Responses to the Nonverbal Behavior of French and American Political Leaders. Political Behavior 18(3): 311–325. doi: 10.1007/BF01498604. Open Google Scholar
  387. Sullivan, Denis G. & Masters, Roger D. (1988). “Happy Warriors”: Leaders’ Facial Display, Viewers Emotions, and Political Support. American Journal of Political Science 32(2): 345–368. doi: 10.2307/2111127. Open Google Scholar
  388. Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J., Englis, Basil G. & Plate, Elise F. (1991). Facial Displays and Political Leadership: Some Experimental Findings. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 188–206. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar
  389. Sullivan, John L., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene & Rahn, Wendy M. (1990). Candidate Appraisal and Human Nature: Man and Superman in the 1984 Election. Political Psychology 11(3): 459–484. doi: 10.2307/3791660. Open Google Scholar
  390. Tavris, Carol (1989). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  391. Tenscher, Jens (2013). Ein Hauch von Wahlkampf. In Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen & Oscar W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009, pp. 63–78. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  392. Tiedens, Larissa Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1): 86–94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.86. Open Google Scholar
  393. Tigue, Cara C., Borak, Diana J., O’Connor, Jillian J.M., Schandl, Charles & Feinberg, David R. (2012). Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(3): 210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.004. Open Google Scholar
  394. Tilley, James, Neundorf, Anja & Hobolt, Sara B. (2018). When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice. The Journal of Politics 80(2): 555–569. doi: 10.1086/694549. Open Google Scholar
  395. Todorov, Alexander, Mandisodza, Anesu N., Goren, Amir & Hall, Crystal C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308(5728): 1623–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.1110589. Open Google Scholar
  396. Todorov, Alexander, Olivola, Christopher Y., Dotsch, Ron & Mende-Siedlecki, Peter (2015). Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 519–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831. Open Google Scholar
  397. Trivers, Robert L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 46(1): 35–57. doi: 10.1086/406755. Open Google Scholar
  398. Turner, Nigel E. (1998). The Effect of Common Variance and Structure Pattern on Random Data Eigenvalues: Implications for the Accuracy of Parallel Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58(4): 541–568. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058004001. Open Google Scholar
  399. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131. Open Google Scholar
  400. Ulbig, Stacy G. & Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior 21(3): 265–282. doi: 10.1023/A:1022087617514. Open Google Scholar
  401. Valentino, Nicholas A. & Neuner, Fabian G. (2017). Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws. Political Psychology 38(2): 331–350. doi: 10.1111/pops.12332. Open Google Scholar
  402. Valentino, Nicholas A., Banks, Antoine J., Hutchings, Vincent L. & Davis, Anne K. (2009). Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction between Anxiety and Information Utility. Political Psychology 30(4): 591–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x. Open Google Scholar
  403. Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha & Hutchings, Vincent L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics 73(1): 156–170. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939. Open Google Scholar
  404. Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J. & Davis, Anne K. (2008). Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet. Political Psychology 29(2): 247–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x. Open Google Scholar
  405. Van Borkulo, Claudia D., Borsboom, Denny, Epskamp, Sacha, Blanken, Tessa F., Boschloo, Lynn, Schoevers, Robert A. & Waldorp, Lourens J. (2014). A New Method for Constructing Networks from Binary Data. Scientific Reports 4(5918): 1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep05918. Open Google Scholar
  406. Van Borkulo, Claudia D., Boschloo, Lynn, Kossakowski, Jolanda J., Tio, Pia, Schoevers, Robert A., Borsboom, D. & Waldorp, Lourens J. (2017). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Working Paper. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29455.38569. Open Google Scholar
  407. Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2009). How Emotions Regulate Social Life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) Model. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(3): 184–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x. Open Google Scholar
  408. Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2010). The Emerging View of Emotion as Social Information. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(5): 331–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00262.x. Open Google Scholar
  409. Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2016). The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  410. Van Troost, Dunya, Klandermans, Bert & Van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien (2018). Friends in High Places: Anger and Frustration among Protesters When Their Political Allies Fail Them. Humanity & Society 42(4): 455–479. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802537. Open Google Scholar
  411. Van Zomeren, Martijn, Postmes, Tom & Spears, Russell (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 134(4): 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504. Open Google Scholar
  412. Van Zomeren, Martijn, Spears, Russell, Fischer, Agneta H. & Leach, Colin W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(5): 649–664. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649. Open Google Scholar
  413. Van’t Riet, Jonathan, Schaap, Gabi, Kleemans, Mariska, Veling, Harm & Lecheler, Sophie (2019). On different sides: Investigating the persuasive effects of anger expression in political news messages. Political Psychology 40(4): 837–857. doi: 10.1111/pops.12554. Open Google Scholar
  414. Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas & Foucault, Martial (2019). Anger Mediates the Effects of Fear on Support for the Far Right—A Rejoinder. Political Psychology 40(4): 713–717. doi: 10.1111/pops.12598. Open Google Scholar
  415. Vasilopoulou, Sofia & Wagner, Markus (2017). Fear, anger and enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of emotional reactions on public preferences towards European integration. European Union Politics 18(3): 382–405. doi: 10.1177/1465116517698048. Open Google Scholar
  416. Veneti, Anastasia, Jackson, Daniel & Lilleker, Darren G. (eds.) (2019). Visual Political Communication. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  417. Vetter, Angelika & Brettschneider, Frank (1998).“Idealmaße”“ für Kanzlerkandidaten. ZUMA Nachrichten 22(43): 90–115. Open Google Scholar
  418. Vetter, Angelika & Gabriel, Oscar W. (1998). Candidate Evaluations and Party Choice in Germany, 1972-94: Do Candidates Matter? In Christopher J. Anderson & Carsten Zelle (eds.), Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide, pp. 71–98. Westport, CT: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  419. Vorländer, Hans, Herold, Maik & Schäller, Steven (2018). PEGIDA as Part of Right-Wing Populism in Germany and Europe. In Hans Vorländer, Maik Herold & Steven Schäller (eds.), PEGIDA and New Right-Wing Populism in Germany: New Perspectives in German Political Studies, pp. 195–203. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  420. Wagner, Markus (2014). Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis. Political Behavior 36(3): 683–703. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9241-5. Open Google Scholar
  421. Wallander, Lisa (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research 38(3): 505–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004. Open Google Scholar
  422. Walter, Annemarie S. & Nai, Alessandro (2016). Explaining the Use of Attack Behaviour in the Electoral Battlefield: A Literature Overview. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 97–114. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar
  423. Warne, Russell T. & Larsen, Ross (2014). Evaluating a proposed modification of the Guttman rule for determining the number of factors in an exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 50(1): 104–123. Open Google Scholar
  424. Watson, David, Clark, Lee A. & Tellegen, Auke (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6): 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063. Open Google Scholar
  425. Wattenberg, Martin P. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  426. Webster, Steven W. (2018). Anger and declining trust in government in the American electorate. Political Behavior 40(4): 933–964. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9431-7. Open Google Scholar
  427. Weiner, Bernard (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research 42(2): 203–2015. doi: 10.3102/00346543042002203. Open Google Scholar
  428. Weiner, Bernard (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92(4): 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548. Open Google Scholar
  429. Weiner, Bernard (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  430. West, Emily A. (2017). Descriptive Representation and Political Efficacy: Evidence from Obama and Clinton. The Journal of Politics 79(1): 351–355. doi: 10.1086/688888. Open Google Scholar
  431. Wierzbicka, Anna & Harkins, Jean (2001). Introduction. In Jean Harkins & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 1–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  432. Winter, David G. (2013). Personality Profiles of Political Elites. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & James S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 423–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  433. Wood, Adrienne, Rychlowska, Magdalena, Korb, Sebastian & Niedenthal, Paula (2016). Fashioning the Face: Sensorimotor Simulation Contributes to Facial Expression Recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(3): 227–240. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.010. Open Google Scholar
  434. Wright, Daniel B. (2006). Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 76(3): 663–675. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52210. Open Google Scholar
  435. Yoon, Kwang-Il (2015). Political Culture and Attribution of Responsibility. Journal of International and Area Studies 22(2): 39–65. Open Google Scholar
  436. Zajonc, Robert B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(2, Pt. 2): 1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848. Open Google Scholar
  437. Zajonc, Robert B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist 39(2): 117–123. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117. Open Google Scholar
  438. Zaller, John R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  439. Zimmermann, Hubert (2014). A Grand Coalition for the Euro: The Second Merkel Cabinet, the Euro Crisis and the Elections of 2013. German Politics 23(4): 322–336. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2014.953069. Open Google Scholar
  440. Zwick, William R. & Velicer, Wayne F. (1982). Factors Influencing Four Rules for Determining the Number of Components to Retain. Multivariate Behavioral Research 17(2): 253–269. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5. Open Google Scholar
  441. Datasets & Questionnaires Open Google Scholar
  442. American National Election Studies (2010). Time Series Cumulative Data File. The American National Election Studies. Available online at: www.electionstudies.org (last accessed: 02 February 2018). Open Google Scholar
  443. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2001a). Politbarometer East 2000 (Cumulated Data Set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3426 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3426. Open Google Scholar
  444. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2001b). Politbarometer West 2000 (Cumulated Data Set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3425 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3425. Open Google Scholar
  445. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2002a). Politbarometer Eastern Germany 2001 (Accumulated Dataset). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3555 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3555. Open Google Scholar
  446. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2002b). Politbarometer Western Germany 2001 (Accumulated Dataset). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3554 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3554. Open Google Scholar
  447. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2015a). Politbarometer 01/2000 – 06/2015. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Langzeitentwicklung_Themen_im_Ueberblick/Politik_II/8_Sympathiewerte_2.xlsx (last accessed: 12 June 2015). Open Google Scholar
  448. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2017): Politbarometer-Pressemitteilungen 2002-2017. Archiv. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Archiv/ (last accessed: 02 February 2018). Open Google Scholar
  449. GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (2015). ALLBUS/GGSS 2014 (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/German General Social Survey 2014). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5240 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12288. Open Google Scholar
  450. Maier, Jürgen & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2015). Codebuch II zur Medieninhaltsanalyse im Projekt „Die Bedeutung emotionaler Botschaften für die politische Urteilsbildung“: Ebene Einstellung. Universität Koblenz-Landau. Open Google Scholar
  451. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2011). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T1 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5334 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.10757. Open Google Scholar
  452. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2014). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T18 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5351 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12033. Open Google Scholar
  453. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2015a). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T11 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5344 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12224. Open Google Scholar
  454. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2015b). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T15 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5348 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12228. Open Google Scholar
  455. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Henckel, Simon, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2015c). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T25 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5725 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12280. Open Google Scholar
  456. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Schäfer, Anne & Schmidt, Sebastian (2015d). Campaign Media Content Analysis: TV (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5705 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12173. Open Google Scholar
  457. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Wagner, Aiko, Giebler, Heiko, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2017). Vor- und Nachwahl-Querschnitt (Kumulation) (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5702 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12810. Open Google Scholar
  458. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Henckel, Simon, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2016a). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T29 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5729 Data file Version 1.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12522. Open Google Scholar
  459. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof & Henckel, Simon (2016b). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T33 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5733 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12675. Open Google Scholar
  460. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Wolf, Christof, Dietz, Melanie, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2017). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T37 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6817 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12917. Open Google Scholar
  461. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Bieber, Ina, Stövsand, Lars-Christopher, Dietz, Melanie & Scherer, Philipp (2018): Pre-election Cross Section (GLES 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6800 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.12990. Open Google Scholar
  462. Software & Software Packages Open Google Scholar
  463. Arnold, Jeffrey B., Daroczi, Gergely, Werth, Bo & Weitzner, Brian (2017). Package ‘ggthemes’: Extra Themes, Scales and Geoms for ‘ggplot2’. R-package version 3.4.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggthemes/ggthemes.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  464. Auguie, Baptiste & Antonov, Anton (2017). Package ‘gridExtra’: Miscellaneous Functions for ‘Grid’ Graphics. R-package version 2.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/gridExtra.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  465. Barnier, Julien (2017). Package ‘questionr’: Functions to Make Surveys Processing Easier. R-package version 0.6.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/questionr/questionr.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  466. Bernaards, Paul & Jennrich, Robert (2015). Package ‘GPArotation’: GPA Factor Rotation. R-package version 2014.11-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GPArotation/GPArotation.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  467. Champely, Stephane, Ekstrom, Claus, Dalgaard, Peter, Gill, Jeffrey, Weibelzahl, Stephan, Anandkumar, Aditya, Ford, Clay, Volcic, Robert & Rosario, Helios De (2017). Package ‘pwr’: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. R-package version 1.2-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  468. Csardi, Gabor (2017). Package ‘igraph’: Network Analysis and Visualization. R-package version 1.1.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/igraph.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar
  469. Dragulescu, Adrian A. (2015). Package ‘xlsx’: Read, write, format Excel 2007 and Excel 97/2000/XP/2003 files. R-package version 0.5.7. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xlsx/xlsx.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  470. Epskamp, Sacha, Costantini, Giulio, Haslbeck, Jonas, Cramer, Angelique O.J, Waldorp, Lourens J., Schmittmann, Verena D. & Borsboom, Denny (2017). Package ‘qgraph’: Graph Plotting Methods, Psychometric Data Visualization and Graphical Model Estimation. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qgraph/qgraph.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar
  471. Feinerer, Ingo, Hornik, Kurt & Artifex Software Inc (2017). Package ‘tm’: Text Mining Package. R-package version 0.7-3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/tm.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  472. Fellows, Ian (2013). Package ‘wordcloud’: Word Clouds. R-package version 2.5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/wordcloud.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  473. Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, Adler, Daniel, Bates, Douglas, Baud-Bovy, Gabriel, Ellison, Steve, Firth, David, Friendly, Michael, Gorjanc, Gregor, Graves, Spencer, Heiberger, Richard, Laboissiere, Rafael, Monette, Georges, Murdoch, Duncan, Nilsson, Henric, Olge, Derek, Ripley, Brian, Venables, William, Winsemius, David, Zeileis, Achim & R-Core Team (2017a). Package ‘car’: Companion to Applied Regression. R-package version 2.1-5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/car.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  474. Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, Friendly, Michael, Hong, Jangman, Andersen, Robert, Firth, David, Taylor, Steve & R-Core Team (2017b). Package ‘effects’: Effects Displays for Linear, Generalized Linear and Other Models. R-package version 4.0-0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effects/effects.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  475. Harrell, Frank E. (2017). Package ‘Hmisc’: Harrell Miscellaneous. R-package version 4.0-3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/Hmisc.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  476. Hlavac, Marek (2015). Package ‘stargazer’: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R-package version 5.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stargazer/stargazer.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  477. Koenker, Roger, Portnoy, Stephen, Tian Ng, Pin, Zeileis, Achim, Grosjean, Philip & Ripley, Brian (2017). Package ‘quantreg’: Quantile Regression. R-package version 5.33. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quantreg/quantreg.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  478. Krivitsky, Pavel N. & Bender-deMoll, Skye (2017). Package ‘statnet.common’: Common R Scripts and Utilities Used by the Statnet Project Software. R-package version 4.0.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/statnet.common/statnet.common.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2018). Open Google Scholar
  479. Massicotte, Philippe & Edelbuettel, Dirk (2017). Package ‘gtrendsR’: Perform and Display Google Trends Queries. R-package version 1.4.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gtrendsR/gtrendsR.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  480. Oksanen, Jari, Blanchet, F. Guillaume, Friendly, Michael, Kindt, Roeland, Legendre, Pierre, McGlinn, Dan, Minchin, Peter R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, Gavin L., Solymos, Peter, Stevens, M.Henry H., Szoecs, Eduard & Wagner, Helene (2017). Package ‘vegan’: Community Ecology Package. R-package version 2.4-5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf (last accessed: 23 January 2018). Open Google Scholar
  481. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core 3.4.1. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/ (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar
  482. Revelle, William (2017). Package ‘psych’: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. R-package version 1.7.8. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  483. Temple Lang, Duncan & CRAN Team (2017). Package ‘XML’: Tools for Parsing and Generating XML Within R and S-Plus. R-package version 3.89-1.9. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/XML/XML.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  484. van Borkulo, Claudia (2016). Package ‘NetworkComparisonTest’: Statistical Comparison of Two Networks Based on Three Invariance Measures. R-package version 2.0.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NetworkComparisonTest/NetworkComparisonTest.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  485. van Borkulo, Claudia, Epskamp, Sacha & Robitzsch, Alexander (2016). Package ‘IsingFit’: Fitting Ising Models Using the ELasso Method. R-package version 0.3.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/IsingFit/IsingFit.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar
  486. Wei, Taiyun (2016). Package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. R-package version 0.77. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/corrplot.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  487. Wickham, Hadley (2017). Package ‘reshape2’: Flexibly Reshape Data: A Reboot of the Reshape Package. R-package version 1.4.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reshape2/reshape2.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar
  488. Wickham, Hadley, Chang, Winston & RStudio (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. R-package version 2.2.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  489. Wickham, Hadley & RStudio (2017a). Package ‘httr’: Tools for Working with URLs and HTTP. R-packages version 1.3.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/httr/httr.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  490. Wickham, Hadley & RStudio (2017b). Package ‘stringr’: Simple consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. R-package version 1.2.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stringr/stringr.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  491. Wickham, Hadley, Miller, Evan & RStudio (2017a). Package ‘haven’: Import and Export ‘SPSS’, ‘STATA’ and ‘SAS’ Files. R-package version 1.1.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/haven/haven.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  492. Wickham, Hadley, Francois, Romain, Henry, Lionel, Müller, Kirill & RStudio (2017b). Package ‘dplyr’: A grammar of Data Manipulation. R-package version 0.7.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/dplyr.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar
  493. Wickham, Hadley, Chang, Winston, RStudio & R-Core Team (2017c). Package ‘devtools’: Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier. R-package version 1.13.4. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/devtools/devtools.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Psychology General", "Political Sociology", "Party Research & Electoral Research"
Cover of book: Health Psychology
Edited Book No access
Philipp Stang, Maren Weiss, Martin G. Köllner
Health Psychology
Cover of book: Verhängnisvolle Antizipationen
Book Titles No access
Carina Schatten
Verhängnisvolle Antizipationen
Cover of book: Jahrbuch Extremismus & Demokratie (E & D)
Edited Book No access
Uwe Backes, Alexander Gallus, Eckhard Jesse, Tom Thieme
Jahrbuch Extremismus & Demokratie (E & D)
Cover of book: Facetten der Teilhabe an Musikkultur
Book Titles No access
Hsin-Rui Lin
Facetten der Teilhabe an Musikkultur
Cover of book: Secular Humanism in Sweden
Book Titles No access
Susanne Kind
Secular Humanism in Sweden

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex