Cover of book: Politicians' Expressions of Anger and Leadership Evaluations
Monograph Open Access Full access

Politicians' Expressions of Anger and Leadership Evaluations

Empirical Evidence from Germany
Authors:
Publisher:
 2020

Summary

This book explores the impact of politicians’ expressions of anger on viewers. Electoral candidates may alter their emotional behaviour strategically during election campaigns as a means of gaining voters’ support. Hence, this study investigates empirically how expressions of anger affect leadership evaluations. An experiment was conducted to establish the impact of politicians’ expressions of emotions on viewers. This study focuses on politicians as a social group, as well as three politicians in particular: Chancellor Angela Merkel; Gregor Gysi, the former parliamentary leader of the Left; and Sigmar Gabriel, the former party leader of the Social Democrats. These three case studies are well-suited to testing the effects of expressions of emotion by political leaders with varying positions in the political system.

Lena Masch is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Political Science at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2020
Copyright Year
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6563-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0680-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Volume
34
Language
English
Pages
A49
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 18 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 1.1 The Relevance of Studying Politicians’ Emotion Expressions
      1. 1.2.1 The Structure of Emotions
      2. 1.2.2 Emotion Expressions of Anger and Indignation
    3. 1.3 Outline of the Book
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 2.1 Candidate Evaluations Based on Appearances
      1. 2.2.1 The Social Function of Emotions
      2. 2.2.2 Affective Responses
      3. 2.2.3 Cognitive Responses
      4. 2.2.4 Social-Contextual Factors
      1. 2.3.1 Anger and Affective Responses
      2. 2.3.2 Anger and Cognitive Responses
      3. 2.3.3 Anger and Social-Contextual Factors
      4. 2.3.4 Review: Theoretical Expectations and Hypotheses Regarding the Impact of Anger Expressions
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 3.1 The Visual Media Content Analysis of German News and Talk Shows
    2. 3.2 Politicians’ Emotional Expressions on German Television
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 4.1 Determining an Appropriate Research Method
    2. 4.2 The Experimental Method
      1. 4.3.1 Pre-Test: The Structure of Politicians’ Emotion Expressions
      2. 4.3.2 The Procedure
      3. 4.3.3 The Material
      4. 4.3.4 The Sample
      5. 4.3.5 Potential Threats to the Internal Validity of the Study
      1. 4.4.1 Measurements of the Dependent Variable: The Structure of Leadership Evaluations
      2. 4.4.2 Measurements of Covariates and Moderating Variables
        1. 4.5.1.1 Perceptions of Emotional Expressions
        2. 4.5.1.2 Affective Responses Based on Emotional Expressions
      2. 4.5.2 The Facial Expressions of Anger
      3. 4.5.3 Political Issues and Anger Expressions
  6. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. Evaluations in Sub-Experiment Type 1 (Politicians in General)
        2. Evaluations in Sub-Experiment Type 2 (Merkel and Gysi)
        3. Evaluations in Sub-Experiment Type 3 (Gabriel and Merkel)
          1. Treatment: Sub-Experiment Type 1 (Politicians in General)
          2. Treatment: Sub-Experiment Type 2 (Gysi and Merkel)
          3. Treatment: Sub-Experiment Type 3 (Gabriel and Merkel)
        2. 5.1.2.2 The Evaluation of Trustworthiness
        1. 5.1.3.1 Problem-Solving Skills
        2. 5.1.3.2 Leadership Skills
        1. 5.1.4.1 Evaluations of Emotionality
        2. 5.1.4.2 Evaluations of Politeness
        3. 5.1.4.3 The Evaluation of Agitation
        4. 5.1.4.4 The Evaluation of Aggressiveness
        5. 5.1.4.5 The Evaluation of Arrogance
          1. 5.1.4.6.1 The Evaluation of Decisiveness
          2. 5.1.4.6.2 The Evaluation of Resilience
        7. 5.1.4.7 The Evaluation of External Efficacy
      5. 5.1.5 Summary of the Main Effects
    2. 5.2 Overview of Potential Moderating Factors
      1. 5.3.1 The Longevity of the Treatment Effects
      2. 5.3.2 Spillover Effects on Political Parties
      3. 5.3.3 The Response Time
      4. 5.3.4 Summary of the Broader Implications
  7. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 6.1 Summary of Empirical Findings
    2. 6.2 Concluding Remarks and Implications for Future Research
  8. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. References
    2. Datasets & Questionnaires
    3. Software & Software Packages
  9. Appendix A1 - A49 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (493)

  1. Massicotte, Philippe & Edelbuettel, Dirk (2017). Package ‘gtrendsR’: Perform and Display Google Trends Queries. R-package version 1.4.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gtrendsR/gtrendsR.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  2. Wickham, Hadley, Chang, Winston, RStudio & R-Core Team (2017c). Package ‘devtools’: Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier. R-package version 1.13.4. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/devtools/devtools.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  3. Wickham, Hadley, Francois, Romain, Henry, Lionel, Müller, Kirill & RStudio (2017b). Package ‘dplyr’: A grammar of Data Manipulation. R-package version 0.7.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/dplyr.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  4. Wickham, Hadley, Miller, Evan & RStudio (2017a). Package ‘haven’: Import and Export ‘SPSS’, ‘STATA’ and ‘SAS’ Files. R-package version 1.1.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/haven/haven.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  5. Wickham, Hadley & RStudio (2017b). Package ‘stringr’: Simple consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. R-package version 1.2.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stringr/stringr.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  6. Wickham, Hadley & RStudio (2017a). Package ‘httr’: Tools for Working with URLs and HTTP. R-packages version 1.3.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/httr/httr.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  7. Wickham, Hadley, Chang, Winston & RStudio (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. R-package version 2.2.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  8. Wickham, Hadley (2017). Package ‘reshape2’: Flexibly Reshape Data: A Reboot of the Reshape Package. R-package version 1.4.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reshape2/reshape2.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  9. Wei, Taiyun (2016). Package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. R-package version 0.77. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/corrplot.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  10. van Borkulo, Claudia, Epskamp, Sacha & Robitzsch, Alexander (2016). Package ‘IsingFit’: Fitting Ising Models Using the ELasso Method. R-package version 0.3.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/IsingFit/IsingFit.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  11. van Borkulo, Claudia (2016). Package ‘NetworkComparisonTest’: Statistical Comparison of Two Networks Based on Three Invariance Measures. R-package version 2.0.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NetworkComparisonTest/NetworkComparisonTest.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  12. Temple Lang, Duncan & CRAN Team (2017). Package ‘XML’: Tools for Parsing and Generating XML Within R and S-Plus. R-package version 3.89-1.9. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/XML/XML.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  13. Revelle, William (2017). Package ‘psych’: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. R-package version 1.7.8. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  14. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core 3.4.1. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/ (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  15. Oksanen, Jari, Blanchet, F. Guillaume, Friendly, Michael, Kindt, Roeland, Legendre, Pierre, McGlinn, Dan, Minchin, Peter R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, Gavin L., Solymos, Peter, Stevens, M.Henry H., Szoecs, Eduard & Wagner, Helene (2017). Package ‘vegan’: Community Ecology Package. R-package version 2.4-5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf (last accessed: 23 January 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  16. Auguie, Baptiste & Antonov, Anton (2017). Package ‘gridExtra’: Miscellaneous Functions for ‘Grid’ Graphics. R-package version 2.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/gridExtra.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  17. Krivitsky, Pavel N. & Bender-deMoll, Skye (2017). Package ‘statnet.common’: Common R Scripts and Utilities Used by the Statnet Project Software. R-package version 4.0.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/statnet.common/statnet.common.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  18. Koenker, Roger, Portnoy, Stephen, Tian Ng, Pin, Zeileis, Achim, Grosjean, Philip & Ripley, Brian (2017). Package ‘quantreg’: Quantile Regression. R-package version 5.33. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quantreg/quantreg.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  19. Hlavac, Marek (2015). Package ‘stargazer’: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R-package version 5.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stargazer/stargazer.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  20. Harrell, Frank E. (2017). Package ‘Hmisc’: Harrell Miscellaneous. R-package version 4.0-3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/Hmisc.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  21. Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, Friendly, Michael, Hong, Jangman, Andersen, Robert, Firth, David, Taylor, Steve & R-Core Team (2017b). Package ‘effects’: Effects Displays for Linear, Generalized Linear and Other Models. R-package version 4.0-0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effects/effects.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  22. Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, Adler, Daniel, Bates, Douglas, Baud-Bovy, Gabriel, Ellison, Steve, Firth, David, Friendly, Michael, Gorjanc, Gregor, Graves, Spencer, Heiberger, Richard, Laboissiere, Rafael, Monette, Georges, Murdoch, Duncan, Nilsson, Henric, Olge, Derek, Ripley, Brian, Venables, William, Winsemius, David, Zeileis, Achim & R-Core Team (2017a). Package ‘car’: Companion to Applied Regression. R-package version 2.1-5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/car.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  23. Fellows, Ian (2013). Package ‘wordcloud’: Word Clouds. R-package version 2.5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/wordcloud.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  24. Feinerer, Ingo, Hornik, Kurt & Artifex Software Inc (2017). Package ‘tm’: Text Mining Package. R-package version 0.7-3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/tm.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  25. Epskamp, Sacha, Costantini, Giulio, Haslbeck, Jonas, Cramer, Angelique O.J, Waldorp, Lourens J., Schmittmann, Verena D. & Borsboom, Denny (2017). Package ‘qgraph’: Graph Plotting Methods, Psychometric Data Visualization and Graphical Model Estimation. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qgraph/qgraph.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  26. Dragulescu, Adrian A. (2015). Package ‘xlsx’: Read, write, format Excel 2007 and Excel 97/2000/XP/2003 files. R-package version 0.5.7. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xlsx/xlsx.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  27. Csardi, Gabor (2017). Package ‘igraph’: Network Analysis and Visualization. R-package version 1.1.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/igraph.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  28. Champely, Stephane, Ekstrom, Claus, Dalgaard, Peter, Gill, Jeffrey, Weibelzahl, Stephan, Anandkumar, Aditya, Ford, Clay, Volcic, Robert & Rosario, Helios De (2017). Package ‘pwr’: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. R-package version 1.2-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  29. Bernaards, Paul & Jennrich, Robert (2015). Package ‘GPArotation’: GPA Factor Rotation. R-package version 2014.11-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GPArotation/GPArotation.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  30. Barnier, Julien (2017). Package ‘questionr’: Functions to Make Surveys Processing Easier. R-package version 0.6.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/questionr/questionr.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  31. Bibliography Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  32. References Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  33. Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490): 493–505. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  34. Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens (2015). Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method. American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 495–510. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12116. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  35. Abelson, Robert P., Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D. & Fiske, Susan T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(4): 619–630. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.619. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  36. Akçali, Emel & Korkut, Umut (2012). Geographical Metanarratives in East-Central Europe: Neo-Turanism in Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53(5): 596–614. doi: 10.2747/1539-7216.53.5.596. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  37. Allison, Paul D. (1999). Multiple Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  38. Aristotle (1934). Nicomachean Ethics1162a, and V. I. I. I. Book: Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 19, translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  39. Armstrong, J. Scott & Graefe, Andreas (2011). Predicting elections from biographical information about candidates: A test of the index method. Journal of Business Research 64(7): 699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.005. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  40. Arzheimer, Kai (2017). Another Dog that didn’t Bark? Less Dealignment and more Partisanship in the 2013 Bundestag Election. German Politics 26(1): 49–64. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1266481. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  41. Ashworth, Scott & Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan (2008). Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage. The Journal of Politics 70(4): 1006–1025. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608081024. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  42. Bailenson, Jeremy N., Iyengar, Shanto, Yee, Nick & Collins, Nathan A. (2008). Facial Similarity between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5): 935–961. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn064. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  43. Bakker, Bert N. & de Vreese, Claes H. (2016). Personality and European Union attitudes: Relationships across European Union attitude dimensions. European Union Politics 17(1): 25–45. doi: 10.1177/1465116515595885. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  44. Bakker, Bert N., Klemmensen, Robert, Nørgaard, Asbjørn S. & Schumacher, Gijs (2016b). Stay Loyal or Exit the Party? How Openness to Experience and Extroversion Explain Vote Switching. Political Psychology 37(3): 419–429. doi: 10.1111/pops.12257. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  45. Bakker, Bert N., Rooduijn, Matthijs & Schumacher, Gijs (2016a). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 55(2): 302–320. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12121. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  46. Bakker, Iris, van der Voordt, Theo, Vink, Peter & de Boon, Jan (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology 33(3): 405–421. doi: 10.1007/s12144-014-9219-4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  47. Ballew, Charles C. & Todorov, Alexander (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(46): 17948–17953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705435104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  48. Banks, Antoine J. (2014). The public’s anger: White racial attitudes and opinions toward health care reform. Political Behavior 36(3): 493–514. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9251-3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  49. Banks, Antoine J. & Valentino, Nicholas A. (2012). Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 286–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00561.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  50. Barrett, Lisa F. (2016). The Varieties of Anger. The New York Times. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/opinion/sunday/the-varieties-of-anger.html (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  51. Barrett, Lisa F. (2017). How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  52. Barrett, Lisa F., Mesquita, Batja & Gendron, Maria (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(5): 286–290. doi: 10.1177/0963721411422522. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  53. Bartels, Larry M. (1986). Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test. American Journal of Political Science 30(4): 709–728. doi: 10.2307/2111269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  54. Bassel, Leah (2017). The Politics of Listening: Possibilities and Challenges for Democratic Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  55. Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin & Vohs, Kathleen D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  56. Beck, Ulrich & Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  57. Behi, Ruhi & Nolan, Mike (1996). Causality and control: threats to internal validity. British Journal of Nursing 5(6): 374–377. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.6.374. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  58. Beierlein, Constanze, Kemper, Christoph J., Kovaleva, Anastassiya & Rammstedt, Beatrice (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen: Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS). ZIS–GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  59. Bell, Vaughan & O’Driscoll, Ciarán (2018). The network structure of paranoia in the general population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 53(7): 737–744. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1487-0. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  60. Benjamin, Daniel J. & Shapiro, Jesse M. (2009). Thin-Slice Forecasts of Gubernatorial Elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91(33): 523–536. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.3.523. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  61. Benoit, William (2016). Functional Theory: Negative Campaigning in Political Television Spots. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 35–46. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  62. Berger, Jonah (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science 22(7): 891–893. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413294. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  63. Berggren, Niclas, Jordahl, Henrik & Poutvaara, Panu (2010). The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics 94(1/2): 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  64. Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A. & Lenz, Gabriel S. (2012). Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  65. Bieber, Ina E. & Bytzek, Evelyn (2012). Online-Umfragen: eine geeignete Erhebungsmethode für die Wahlforschung? ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Befragungsmodi am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2009. Methoden, Daten, Analysen 6(2): 185–211. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  66. Bittner, Amanda (2011). Platform or personality? The role of party leaders in elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  67. Blumenberg, Johannes N. & Blumenberg, Manuela S. (2017). The Kretschmann Effect: Personalisation and the March 2016 Länder Elections. German Politics 18(2): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2017.1342814. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  68. Blumenstiel, Jan E. & Gavras, Konstantin L. (2015). Ursachen und Konsequenzen ambivalenter Einstellungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 50: 418–443. doi: 10.5771/9783845254418-418. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  69. Bodenhausen, Galen V., Sheppard, Lori A. & Kramer, Geoffrey P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology 24(1): 45–62. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  70. Bohannon, John (2016). Mechanical Turk upends social sciences. Science 352(6291): 1263–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6291.1263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  71. Bomann, Mieke H. & Jones, Quentin (2003). Information Overload. In David Levinson & Karen Christensen (eds.), Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, pp. 660–663. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  72. Brader, Ted (2005). Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 388–405. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  73. Brader, Ted (2006). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  74. Brader, Ted (2011). The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited. Political Psychology 32(2): 337–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00803.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  75. Brader, Ted & Marcus, George E. (2013). Emotion and Political Psychology. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  76. Bradley, Brendan P., Mogg, Karin, Falla, Sara J. & Hamilton, Lucy R. (1998). Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration. Cognition and Emotion 12(6): 737–753. doi: 10.1080/026999398379411. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  77. Brettschneider, Frank & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2002). The nonpersonalization of voting behavior in Germany. In Anthony King (ed.), Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections, pp. 127–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  78. Brooks, Deborah J. (2011). Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians. The Journal of Politics 73(2): 597–615. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000053. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  79. Brouard, Sylvain & Kerrouche, Éric (2013). L’effet candidat lors des élections parlementaires. Revue française de science politique 63(6): 1113–1136. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.636.1113. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  80. Bryman, Alan (2012). Social Research Methods. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  81. Bucy, Erik P. (2000). Emotional and Evaluative Consequences of Inappropriate Leader Displays. Communication Research 27(2): 194–226. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  82. Bucy, Erik P. (2011). Nonverbal communication, emotion, and political evaluation. In Katrin Döveling, Christian von Scheve & Elly A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media, pp. 195–220. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  83. Bucy, Erik P. (2016). The look of losing, then and now: Nixon, Obama, and nonverbal indicators of opportunity lost. American Behavioral Scientist 60(14), 1772–1798. doi: 10.1177/0002764216678279. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  84. Bucy, Erik P. & Bradley, Samuel D. (2004). Presidential Expressions and Viewer Emotion: Counterempathic Responses to Televised Leader Displays. Social Science Information 43(1): 59–94. doi: 10.1177/05390184040689. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  85. Bucy, Erik P. & Grabe, Maria E. (2008). “Happy warriors” revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news. Politics and the Life Sciences 27(1): 78–98. doi: 10.2990/27_1_78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  86. Bucy, Erik P. & Newhagen, John E. (1999). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Processing televised presidential reactions to the news. Journal of Communication 49(4): 59–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02817.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  87. Bühler, Karl (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  88. Buhrmester, Michael, Kwang, Tracy & Gosling, Samuel D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  89. Burns, Justine (2006). Racial stereotypes, stigma and trust in post-apartheid South Africa. Economic Modelling 23(5): 805–821. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2005.10.008. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  90. Campbell, Angus (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. Public Opinion Quarterly 24(3): 397–418. doi: 10.1086/266960. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  91. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. & Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  92. Campbell, Donald T. & Stanley, Julian C. (1971). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. In Nathaniel L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, pp. 171–246. Chicago, IL: McNally. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  93. Capelos, Tereza & Demertzis, Nicolas (2018). Political action and resentful affectivity in critical times. Humanity & Society 42(4): 410–433. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802517. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  94. Caprara, Gian V. & Vecchione, Michelle (2013). Personality Approaches to Political Behavior. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 23–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  95. Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D. & Potter, Jeff (2008). The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind. Political Psychology 29(6): 807–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  96. Carpenter, Dick M., Webster, Marjory J. & Bowman, Chad K. (2019). White House Wit: How Presidents Use Humor as a Leadership Tool. Presidential Studies Quarterly 49(1): 23–55. doi: 10.1111/psq.12492. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  97. Carver, Charles S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion 4(1): 3–22. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  98. Carver, Charles S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion 30(2): 105–110. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  99. Carver, Charles S. & Harmon-Jones, Eddie (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin 135(2): 183–204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  100. Carver, Charles S., Sutton, Steven K. & Scheier, Michael F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(6): 741–751. doi: 10.1177/0146167200268008. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  101. Chong, Dennis (2013). Degrees of Rationality in Politics. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 96–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  102. Clarke, Harold D., Elliott, Euel & Stewart, Marianne C. (2017). Heuristics, Heterogeneity and Green Choices Voting on California’s Proposition 23. Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 755–774. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.39. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  103. Clough, Patricia T. & Halley, Jean (eds.) (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  104. Cohen, Jacob (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  105. Corbetta, Piergiorgio & Vignati, Rinaldo (2014). Direct Democracy and Scapegoats: The Five Star Movement and Europe. The International Spectator 49(1): 53–64. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2014.875822. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  106. Crivelli, Carlos & Fridlund, Alan J. (2018). Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences: 1–12. [Online First]. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  107. Cuddy, Amy J. C., Fiske, Susan T. & Glick, Peter (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 61–149. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  108. Curtin, Richard, Presser, Stanley & Singer, Eleanor (2005). Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(1): 87–98. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  109. Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  110. Dalege, Jonas, Borsboom, Denny, van Harreveld, Frenk, van den Berg, Helma, Conner, Mark & van der Maas, Han L.J. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. Psychological Review 123(1): 2–22. doi: 10.1037/a0039802. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  111. Dalege, Jonas, Borsboom, Denny, van Harreveld, Frenk, Waldorp, Lourens J. & van der Maas, Han L.J. (2017). Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions. Scientific Reports 7(4909): 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05048-y. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  112. Dalton, Russell J. (1984). Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. The Journal of Politics 46(1): 264–284. doi: 10.2307/2130444. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  113. Dalton, Russell J. (2002). The Decline of Party Identification. In Russell J. Dalton & Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies, pp. 19–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  114. Dalton, Russell J. (2006). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 4th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  115. Dalton, Russell J. (2014). Interpreting Partisan Dealignment in Germany. German Politics 23(1/2): 134–144. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2013.853040. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  116. Dalton, Russell J. & Bürklin, Wilhelm (2003). Wähler als Wandervögel: Dealignment and the German Voter. German Politics and Society 21(1): 57–75. doi: 10.3167/104503003782353592. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  117. Darwin, Charles (1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  118. Davino, Cristina, Furno, Marilena & Vistocco, Domenico (2013). Quantile regression: Theory and applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  119. De Landtsheer, De Vries, Philippe & Vertessen, Dieter (2008). Political Impression Management: How Metaphors, Sound Bites, Appearance Effectiveness, and Personality Traits Can Win Elections. Journal of Political Marketing 7(3/4): 217–238. doi: 10.1080/15377850802005083. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  120. de Melo, Celso M., Gratch, Jonathan, Carnevale, Peter & Read, Stephen (2012). Reverse appraisal: The importance of appraisals for the effect of emotion displays on people’s decision making in a social dilemma. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 34(34): 270–275. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  121. Debus, Marc (2017). An ‘Angela Merkel Effect’? The Impact of Gender on CDU/CSU Voting Intention between 1998 and 2013. German Politics 26(1): 35–48. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1182501. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  122. Decker, Frank (2016). The “Alternative for Germany”: Factors Behind its Emergence and Profile of a New Right-wing Populist Party. German Politics and Society 34(2): 1–16. doi: 10.3167/gps.2016.340201. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  123. Dickson, Eric S. (2011). Economics versus Psychology Experiments: Stylization, Incentives, and Deception. In James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski & Arthur Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 58–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  124. Dobson, Andrew (2014). Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  125. Druckman, James N. & Kam, Cindy D. (2011). Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base”. In James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski & Arthur Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 41–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  126. Druckman, James N. (2003). The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited. The Journal of Politics 65(2): 559–571. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  127. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. & Lupia, Arthur (eds.) (2011). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  128. Du, Shichuan, Tao, Yong & Martinez, Aleix M. (2014). Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(15): 1454–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322355111. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  129. Dumitrescu, Delia (2010). Know Me, Love Me, Fear Me: The Anatomy of Candidate Poster Designs in the 2007 French Legislative Elections. Political Communication 27(1): 20–43. doi: 10.1080/10584600903297117. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  130. Dumitrescu, Delia (2016). Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005-2015. American Behavioral Scientist 60(14): 1656-1675. doi: 10.1177/0002764216678280. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  131. Dumitrescu, Delia, Gidengil, Elisabeth & Stolle, Dietlind (2015). Candidate Confidence and Electoral Appeal: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Nonverbal Confidence on Voter Evaluations. Political Science Research and Methods 3(1): 43–52. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  132. Durst, Uwe (2001). Why Germans don’t feel “anger”. In Jean Harkins & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 115–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  133. Eagly, Alice H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C. (2001). The Leadership Styles of Women and Men. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 781–797. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  134. Ekman, Paul (1992). An Argument for Basic Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 6(3/4): 169–200. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411068. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  135. Ekman, Paul & Cordaro, Daniel (2011). What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic. Emotion Review 3(4): 364–370. doi: 10.1177/1754073911410740. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  136. Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17(2): 124–129. doi: 10.1037/h0030377. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  137. Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  138. Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V., Ellsworth, Phoebe, Goldstein, Arnold P. & Krasner, Leonard (1972). Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings. Burlington: Elsevier Science. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  139. Elfenbein, Hillary A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion. Organizational Psychology Review 4(4): 326–362. doi: 10.1177/2041386614542889. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  140. Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (2013). Appraisal Theory: Old and New Questions. Emotion Review 5(2): 125–131. doi: 10.1177/1754073912463617. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  141. Epskamp, Sacha, Borsboom, Denny & Fried, Eiko I. (2018). Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper. Behavior Research Methods 50(1): 195–212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  142. Falter, Jürgen W. (1977). Einmal mehr: Läßt sich das Konzept der Parteiidentifikation auf deutsche Verhältnisse übertragen? Theoretische, methodologische und empirische Probleme einer Validierung des Konstrukts „Parteiidentifikation“ für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 18(2/3): 476–500. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  143. Ferreira Da Silva, Frederico & Costa, Patrício (2019). Do we need warm leaders? Exploratory study of the role of voter evaluations of leaders’ traits on turnout in seven European countries. European Journal of Political Research 58(1): 117–140. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  144. Field, Andy (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  145. Finn, Christopher & Glaser, Jack (2010). Voter affect and the 2008 US presidential election: Hope and race mattered. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 10(1): 262–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01206.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  146. Fiorina, Morris P. (1976). The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects. The Journal of Politics 38(2): 390–413. doi: 10.2307/2129541. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  147. Fischbacher, Urs (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2): 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  148. Fischer, Agneta H. & Manstead, Antony S. R. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones & Lisa F. Barrett (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, pp. 456–468. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  149. Fischer, Agneta H. & Roseman, Ira J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(1): 103–115. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  150. Fischer, Agneta H. & Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2010). Where Have all the People Gone? A Plea for Including Social Interaction in Emotion Research. Emotion Review 2(3): 208–211. doi: 10.1177/1754073910361980. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  151. Fischer, Agneta H., Halperin, Eran, Canetti, Daphna & Jasini, Alba (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4): 309–320. doi: 10.1177/1754073917751229. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  152. Fischer, Agneta H., Pauw, Lisanne S. & Manstead, Antony S. (2019). Emotion Recognition as a Social Act: In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 7–24. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  153. Fiske, Susan T. & Taylor, Shelley E. (2017). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  154. Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter & Xu, Jun (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  155. Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C. & Glick, Peter (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2): 77–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  156. Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  157. Forgas, Joseph P. & Bower, Gordon H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1): 53–60. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.53. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  158. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2015b). Internet-Strukturdaten: Repräsentative Umfrage - Jahreskumulation. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Archiv__weitere_Umfragen/Internet-Strukturdaten/web_II_14.pdf (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  159. Frank, Cornelia, Schoen, Harald & Faas, Thorsten (2015). Zur Einführung: Politische Psychologie als interdisziplinäre Forschungsperspektive. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. PVS Sonderheft 50: 10–43. doi: 10.5771/9783845254418-10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  160. Frey, Siegfried (1999). Die Macht des Bildes: Der Einfluss der nonverbalen Kommunikation auf Kultur und Politik. Bern: H. Huber. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  161. Fridkin, Kim L. & Kenney, Patrick J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 307–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  162. Fried, Eiko (2016, October 19): R tutorial: how to identify communities of items in networks [Blog Post]. Available online at: http://psych-networks.com/r-tutorial-identify-communities-items-networks/ (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  163. Frijda, Nico H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion 1(2): 115–143. doi: 10.1080/02699938708408043. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  164. Funk, Carolyn L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior 18(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1007/BF01498658. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  165. Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. The Journal of Politics 61(3): 700–720. doi: 10.2307/2647824. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  166. Gabriel, Oscar W. & Masch, Lena (2017). Displays of emotion and citizen support for Merkel and Gysi: How emotional contagion affects evaluations of leadership. Politics and the Life Sciences 36(2): 80–103. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  167. Gabriel, Oscar W., Keil, Silke I. & Thaidigsmann, S. Isabell (2009). Kandidatenorientierungen und Wahlentscheid bei der Bundestagswahl 2005. In Oscar W. Gabriel, Bernhard Weßels & Jürgen W. Falter (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005, pp. 267–303. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  168. Gadarian, Shana K. & Van der Vort, Eric (2018). The gag reflex: Disgust rhetoric and gay rights in American politics. Political Behavior 40(2): 521–543. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  169. Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H. & Quirk, Paul J. (2007). The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined. Political Analysis 15(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpl008. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  170. Garrido, Luis E., Abad, Francisco J. & Ponsoda, Vicente (2011). Performance of Velicer’s Minimum Average Partial Factor Retention Method With Categorical Variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement 71(3): 551–570. doi: 10.1177/0013164410389489. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  171. Garzia, Diego (2013a). Changing Parties, Changing Partisans: The Personalization of Partisan Attachments in Western Europe. Political Psychology 34(1): 67–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00918.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  172. Garzia, Diego (2013b). The Rise of Party Leader Identification in Western Europe. Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 533–544. doi: 10.1177/1065912912463122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  173. Garzia, Diego (2014). Personalization of politics and electoral change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  174. Garzia, Diego (2017). Voter Evaluation of Candidates and Party Leaders. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, pp. 633–653. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  175. Gerber, Alan S. & Green, Donald P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94(3): 653–663. doi: 10.2307/2585837. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  176. Gerber, Alan S. & Green, Donald P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: Norton. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  177. Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P. & Shaw, Daron R. (2011). How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 105(1): 135–150. doi: 10.1017/S000305541000047X. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  178. Glaser, Jack & Salovey, Peter (1998). Affect in electoral politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(3): 156–172. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  179. Glass, David P. (1985). Evaluating presidential candidates: Who focuses on their personal attributes? Public Opinion Quarterly 49(4): 517–534. doi: 10.1086/268948. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  180. Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  181. Goodwin, Matthew, Hix, Simon & Pickup, Mark (2020). For and against Brexit: A survey experiment of the impact of campaign effects on public attitudes toward EU membership. British Journal of Political Science: 481–495. doi: 10.1017/S0007123417000667. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  182. Gooty, Janaki, Connelly, Shane, Griffith, Jennifer A. & Gupta, Alka (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly 21(6): 979–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  183. Gosnell, Harold F. (1926). An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. The American Political Science Review 20(4): 896-874. doi: 10.2307/1945435. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  184. Grabe, Maria E. & Bucy, Erik P. (2009). Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  185. Gratch, Jonathan & de Melo, Celso M. (2019). Inferring Intentions from Emotion Expressions in Social Decision Making. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 141–160. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  186. Gratch, Jonathan & Marsella, Stacy (2014). Introduction: Toward an Information Processing Revolution in Social Emotions. In Jonathan Gratch & Stacy Marsella (eds.), Social Emotions in Nature and Artifact, pp. 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  187. Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley & Schickler, Eric (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  188. Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie & Schwartz, Jordan L.K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  189. Greszki, Robert, Meyer, Marco & Schoen, Harald (2015). Exploring the Effects of Removing “Too Fast” Responses and Respondents from Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 79(2): 471–503. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu058. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  190. Haider-Markel, Donald P. & Joslyn, Mark R. (2008). Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 291–310. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  191. Haidt, Jonathan (2003). The Moral Emotions. In Richard J. Davidson, Klaus R. Scherer & H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 852–870. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  192. Hainmueller, Jens & Hiscox, Michael J. (2010). Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. American Political Science Review 104(1): 61–84. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990372. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  193. Hamelin, Nicolas, El Moujahid, Othmane, & Thaichon, Park (2017). Emotion and advertising effectiveness: A novel facial expression analysis approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 36: 103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.001. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  194. Hand, David J. (1994). Deconstructing Statistical Questions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 157(3): 317–356. doi: 10.2307/2983526. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  195. Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2010). What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition and Emotion 24(1): 128–140. doi: 10.1080/02699930802613828. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  196. Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2012). The social signal value of emotions. Cognition and Emotion 26(3): 385–389. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.665029. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  197. Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2019). The Reverse Engineering of Emotions–Observers of Others’ Emotions as Naïve Personality Psychologists. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 103–118. Cham: SpringerSpringer, Cham. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  198. Hareli, Shlomo & Rafaeli, Anat (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 35–59. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.007. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  199. Hareli, Shlomo, Elkabetz, Simon & Hess, Ursula (2019). The Use of Emotions to Infer Norms and Standards. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 199–208. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  200. Hareli, Shlomo, Shomrat, Noga & Hess, Ursula (2009). Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion 9(3): 378–384. doi: 10.1037/a0015958. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  201. Harell, Allison, Soroka, Stuart & Iyengar, Shanto (2017). Locus of Control and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology 38(2): 245–260. doi: 10.1111/pops.12338. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  202. Harkins, Jean & Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.) (2001). Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  203. Hart, William, Ottati, Victor C. & Krumdick, Nathaniel D. (2011). Physical Attractiveness and Candidate Evaluation: A Model of Correction. Political Psychology 32(2): 181–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00812.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  204. Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In Margaret S. Clark (ed.), Emotion and social behavior, pp. 151–177. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  205. Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2(3): 96–100. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  206. Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  207. Hayes, Danny (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908–923. doi: 10.2307/3647705. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  208. Hayes, Danny (2009). Has television personalized voting behavior? Political Behavior 31(2): 231–260. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9070-0. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  209. Heider, Fritz (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  210. Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J. & Norenzayan, Ara (2010). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–-3): 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  211. Hess, Ursula (2014). Anger Is a Positive Emotion. In W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The positive side of negative emotions, pp. 55–75. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  212. Hibbing, John R., Smith, Kevin B. & Alford, John R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  213. Hill, Edward, Han, David, Dumouchel, Pierre, Dehak, Najim, Quatieri, Thomas, Moehs, Charles, Oscar-Berman, Marlene, Giordano, John, Simpatico, Thomas & Blum, Kenneth (2013). Long term Suboxone™ emotional reactivity as measured by automatic detection in speech. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069043. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  214. Hochschild, Arlie R. (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. 3rd edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  215. Hoggett, Paul & Thompson, Simon (2012). Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies. London: Continuum International Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  216. Holland, Paul W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945–960. doi: 10.2307/2289064. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  217. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–135. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  218. Horiuchi, Yusaku & Mayerson, Asher (2015). The Opportunity Cost of Conflict: Statistically Comparing Israel and Synthetic Israel. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 609–618. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  219. Horn, John L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrica 30(2): 179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  220. Huber, Sascha (2014). What comes first, character traits or political assessments? An experimental study. In Marina C. Lobo & John Curtice (eds.), Personality Politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections, pp. 38–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  221. Huddy, Leonie & Terkildsen, Nayda (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 119–147. doi: 10.2307/2111526. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  222. Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley & Cassese, Erin (2007). On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus. Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, 202–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  223. Huddy, Leonie., Mason, Lilliana & Aarøe, Lene (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review 109(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000604. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  224. Imbens, Guido W. & Rubin, Donald B. (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  225. Isbell, Linda M., Ottati, Victor C. & Burns, Kathleen C. (2006). Affect and Politics: Effect on Judgment, Processing, and Information Seeking. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 57–86. New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  226. Jack, Rachael E., Garrod, Oliver G.B. & Schyns, Philippe G. (2014). Dynamic Facial Expressions of Emotion Transmit an Evolving Hierarchy of Signals over Time. Current Biology 24(1): 187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.064. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  227. Jäckle, Sebastian & Metz, Thomas (2016). Brille, Blazer oder Bart? Das Aussehen als Determinante des Wahlerfolgs von Bundestags- Direktkandidaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57(2): 217–246. doi: 10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-217. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  228. Jäckle, Sebastian & Metz, Thomas (2017). Beauty Contest Revisited: The Effects of Perceived Attractiveness, Competence, and Likability on the Electoral Success of German MPs. Politics & Policy 45(4): 495–534. doi: 10.1111/polp.12209. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  229. Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing Statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, pp. 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  230. Johns, Robert & Shephard, Mark (2011). Facing the Voters: The Potential Impact of Ballot Paper Photographs in British Elections. Political Studies 59(3): 636–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00874.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  231. Johnston, Christopher D., Lavine, Howard & Woodson, Benjamin (2015). Emotion and Political Judgment: Expectancy Violation and Affective Intelligence. Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 474–492. doi: 10.1177/1065912915593644. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  232. Jost, John T. (2017). Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology. Political Psychology 38(2): 167–208. doi: 10.1111/pops.12407. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  233. Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W. & Sulloway, Frank J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  234. Kaase, Max (1994). Is there personalization in politics? Candidates and voting behavior in Germany. International Political Science Review 15(3): 211–230. doi: 10.1177/019251219401500301. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  235. Kahneman, Daniel (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. The American Psychologist 58(9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  236. Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  237. Kalmoe, Nathan P. (2019). Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors. Political Science Research and Methods 7(3): 411–429. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2017.36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  238. Kapp, Julie M., Peters, Colleen & Oliver, Debra Parker (2013). Research recruitment using Facebook advertising: big potential, big challenges. Journal of Cancer Education 28(1): 134–137. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0443-z. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  239. Karvonen, Lauri (2010). The personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  240. Kaufman, Bruce E. (1999). Emotional arousal as a source of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 38(2): 135–144. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00002-5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  241. Kelley, Harold H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28(2): 107–128. doi: 10.1037/h0034225. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  242. Kelly, Janice R. (2004). Mood and Emotion in Groups. In Marylinn B. Brewer & Miles Hewstone (eds.), Emotion and Motivation, pp. 95–112. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  243. Keuschnigg, Marc & Wolbring, Tobias (eds.) (2015). Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  244. Kinder, Donald R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In Richard R. Lau & David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, pp. 233–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  245. Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P. & Fiske, Susan T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior 2(4): 315–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00990172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  246. King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. & Verba, Sidney (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  247. Klein, Markus & Rosar, Ulrich (2016). Problem-Peer und die (Über-)Mutter der Nation: Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. In Harald Schoen & Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 91–109. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  248. Klofstad, Casey A. (2016). Candidate Voice Pitch Influences Election Outcomes. Political Psychology 37(5): 725–738. doi: 10.1111/pops.12280. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  249. Knutson, Brian (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20(3): 165–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02281954. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  250. Koenker, Roger & d’Orey, Vasco (1987). Algorithm AS 229: Computing Regression Quantiles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36(3): 383–393. doi: 10.2307/2347802. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  251. Koenker, Roger (2005). Quantile Regression. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  252. Koppensteiner, Markus & Grammer, Karl (2010). Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality 44(3): 374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  253. Koppensteiner, Markus (2013). Motion cues that make an impression: Predicting perceived personality by minimal motion information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6): 1137–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  254. Kouloumpis, Efthymios, Wilson, Theresa & Moore, Johanna D. (2011). Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 538–541. AAAI Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  255. Kraus, Sidney (1996). Winners of the First 1960 Televised Presidential Debate Between Kennedy and Nixon. Journal of Communication 46(4): 78–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01507.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  256. Krohne, Heinz W., Egloff, Boris, Kohlmann, Carl-Walter & Tausch, Anja (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule"(PANAS). Diagnostica 42(2): 139–156. doi: 10.1037/t49650-000. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  257. Krosnick, Jon A. & Alwin, Duane F. (1987). An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 51(2): 201–219. doi: 10.1086/269029. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  258. Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander, Vitriol, Joseph & Farhart, Christina (2018). Implicit Candidate-Trait Associations in Political Campaigns. Political Psychology 39(1): 177–195. doi: 10.1111/pops.12398. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  259. Kuklinski, James H., Cobb, Michael D. & Gilens, Martin (1997). Racial Attitudes and the “New South”. The Journal of Politics 59(2): 323–349. doi: 10.2307/2998167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  260. Ladd, Jonathan M. & Lenz, Gabriel S. (2011). Does Anxiety Improve Voters’ Decision Making? Political Psychology 32(2): 347–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00805.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  261. Lalancette, Mireille, & Raynauld, Vincent (2019). The power of political image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist 63(7): 888-924. doi: 10.1177/0002764217744838. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  262. Lau, Richard R. & Redlawsk, David P. (2001). Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971. doi: 10.2307/2669334. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  263. Lau, Richard R. & Redlawsk, David P. (2016). The Effects of Advertising Tone on Information Processing and Vote Choice. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 247–264. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  264. Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee & Rovner, Ivy B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta‐analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176–1209. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  265. Laustsen, Lasse & Bor, Alexander (2017). The relative weight of character traits in political candidate evaluations: Warmth is more important than competence, leadership and integrity. Electoral Studies 49: 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.08.001. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  266. Laustsen, Lasse & Petersen, Michael B. (2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology 38(6): 1083–1101. doi: 10.1111/pops.12403. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  267. Lavine, Howard & Gschwend, Thomas (2007). Issues, party and character: The moderating role of ideological thinking on candidate evaluation. British Journal of Political Science 37(1): 139–163. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000075. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  268. Lavine, Howard, Lodge, Milton, Polichak, James & Taber, Charles (2002). Explicating the Black Box Through Experimentation: Studies of Authoritarianism and Threat. Political Analysis 10(4): 343–360. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.343. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  269. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard & Gaudet, Hazel (1969). The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  270. Lazarus, Richard S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist 39(2): 124–129. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  271. Lenz, Gabriel S. & Lawson, Chappell (2011). Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance. American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 574–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  272. Levitt, Steven D. & List, John A. (2007). What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 153–174. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  273. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (2006). Does Economics Still Matter? Econometrics and the Vote. The Journal of Politics 68(1): 208–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00381.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  274. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut & Weisberg, Herbert F. (2008). The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  275. Liesen, Laurette T. & Walsh, Mary B. (2012). The competing meanings of “biopolitics” in political science. Biological and postmodern approaches to politics. Politics and the Life Sciences 31(1-2): 2–15. doi: 10.2990/31_1-2_2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  276. Lobo, Marina C. & Curtice, John (eds.) (2014). Personality Politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  277. Lodge, Milton & Taber, Charles S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  278. Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R. & Brau, Shawn (1995). The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review 89(2): 309–326. doi: 10.2307/2082427. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  279. Lord, Frederic M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin 68(5): 304–305. doi: 10.1037/h0025105. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  280. Lupia, Arthur (2002). New Ideas in Experimental Political Science. Political Analysis 10(4): 319–324. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.319. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  281. Machatzke, Jörg (1997). Die Potsdamer Elitestudie: Positionsauswahl und Ausschöpfung. In Wilhelm P. Bürklin & Hilke Rebenstorf (eds.), Eliten in Deutschland: Rekrutierung und Integration, pp. 35–68. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  282. MacKuen, Michael, Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & Keele, Luke (2007). The Third Way: The Theory of Affective Intelligence and American Democracy. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp. 124–151. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  283. Manders, Erika (2012). Coining images of power: Patterns in the representation of Roman emperors on imperial coinage, A.D. 193–284. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  284. Marcus, George E. (2000). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science 3(1): 221-250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  285. Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer & Keele, Luke (2006). The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 31–46. New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  286. Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & MacKuen, Michael (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  287. Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & MacKuen, Michael B. (2017). Measuring Emotional Response: Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measurement. Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 733–754. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  288. Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas A., Vasilopoulos, Pavlos & Foucault, Martial (2019). Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties. Political Psychology 40: 109–139. doi: 10.1111/pops.12571. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  289. Marsh, Abigail A., Ambady, Nalini & Kleck, Robert E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5(1): 119–124. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  290. Masch, Lena & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2020). How Emotional Displays of Political Leaders Shape Citizen Attitudes: The Case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. German Politics 29(2): 158–179. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2019.1657096. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  291. Mason, Lilliana (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  292. Mason, Lilliana & Wronski, Julie (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology 39: 257–277. doi: 10.1111/pops.12485. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  293. Masters, Roger D. (1991). Conclusion: Primate Politics and Political Theory. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 221–250. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  294. Masters, Roger D. (1994). Differences in Responses of Blacks and Whites to American Leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences 13(2): 183–194. doi: 10.1017/S0730938400018360. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  295. Masters, Roger D. & Sullivan, Denis G. (1989a). Nonverbal Displays and Political Leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior 11(2): 123–156. doi: 10.1007/BF00992491. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  296. Masters, Roger D. & Sullivan, Denis G. (1989b). Facial displays and political leadership in France. Behavioural Processes 19(1-3): 1–30. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(89)90028-4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  297. Masters, Roger D., Frey, Siegfried & Bente, Gary (1991). Dominance & Attention: Images of Leaders in German, French, & American TV News. Polity 23(3): 373–394. doi: 10.2307/3235132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  298. Masters, Roger D., Sullivan, Denis G., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J. & Englis, Basil G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Systems 9(4): 319–343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1750(86)90190-9. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  299. Mattes, Kyle & Redlawsk, David P. (2015). The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  300. Mattes, Kyle, Roseman, Ira J., Redlawsk, David P. & Katz, Steven (2017). Contempt and Anger in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. In Jennifer C. Lucas, Christopher J. Galdieri & Tauna S. Sisco (eds.), Conventional wisdom, parties, and broken barriers in the 2016 election, pp. 101–107. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  301. Mattes, Kyle, Spezio, Michael, Kim, Hackjin, Todorov, Alexander, Adolphs, Ralph & Alvarez, R. Michael (2010). Predicting Election Outcomes from Positive and Negative Trait Assessments of Candidate Images. Political Psychology 31(1): 41–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00745.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  302. Mayer, Sabrina J. (2016). Die Parteiidentifikation: Eine Konstruktvalidierung neuer Maße auf Basis des Ansatzes sozialer Identität. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  303. McDermott, Monika L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895–918. doi: 10.2307/449110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  304. McDermott, Monika L., Schwartz, Douglas & Vallejo, Sebastian (2015). Talking the talk but not walking the walk: Public reactions to hypocrisy in political scandal. American Politics Research 43(6): 952–974. doi: 10.1177/1532673X15577830. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  305. McDermott, Rose (2002). Experimental Methodology in Political Science. Political Analysis 10(4): 325–342. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.325. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  306. McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T., Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D. & Englis, Basil G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader’s expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(6): 1513–1529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1513. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  307. McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T. & Bush, Lauren K. (1991). The Effect of Attitudes on Emotional Reactions to Expressive Display of Political Leaders. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 15(1): 19–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00997765. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  308. McIntosh, Daniel N., Druckman, Daniel & Zajonc, Robert B. (1994). Socially induced affect. In Daniel Druckman & Robert A. Bjork (eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance, pp. 251–276. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  309. Mehrabian, Albert (1980). Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory: Implications for personality, social, environmental, and developmental studies. Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  310. Mehrabian, Albert & Russell, James A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  311. Meyrowitz, Joshua (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of the Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  312. Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P. & Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. American Political Science Review 80(2): 521–540. doi: 10.2307/1958272. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  313. Miron-Spektor, Ella & Rafaeli, Anat (2009). The effects of anger in the workplace: When, where, and why observing anger enhances or hinders performance. In Joseph J. Martocchio & Hui Liao (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources: Management (Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 28), pp. 153–178. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  314. Mitchell, Dona-Gene (2014). Here today, gone tomorrow? Assessing how timing and repetition of scandal information affects candidate evaluations. Political Psychology 35(5): 679–701. doi: 10.1111/pops.12095. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  315. Mölders, Christina & van Quaquebeke, Niels (2017). Some like it hot: How voters’ attitude towards disrespect in politics affects their judgments of candidates. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 5(1): 58–81. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v5i1.633. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  316. Mölders, Christina, van Quaquebeke, Niels & Paladino, Maria P. (2017). Consequences of Politicians’ Disrespectful Communication Depend on Social Judgment Dimensions and Voters’ Moral Identity. Political Psychology 38(1): 119–135. doi: 10.1111/pops.12311. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  317. Moody, Eric J., McIntosh, Daniel N., Mann, Laura J. & Weisser, Kimberly R. (2007). More than mere mimicry? The influence of emotion on rapid facial reactions to faces. Emotion 7(2): 447–457. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.447. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  318. Morgan, Rick L. & Heise, David (1988). Structure of Emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly 51(1): 19–31. doi: 10.2307/2786981. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  319. Morton, Rebecca B. & Williams, Kenneth C. (2010). Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  320. Mudde, Cas & Kaltwasser, Cristobal R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  321. Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N. & Freese, Jeremy (2015). The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–138. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  322. Murray, Gregg R. (2014). Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences 33(1): 33–53. doi: 10.2990/33_1_33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  323. Mutz, Diana C. (2007). Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition. American Political Science Review 101(4): 621–635. doi: 10.1017/S000305540707044X. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  324. Mutz, Diana C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  325. Mutz, Diana C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  326. Mutz, Diana C. & Reeves, Byron (2005). The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review 99(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051452. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  327. Nai, Alessandro & Maier, Jürgen (2018). Perceived personality and campaign style of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Personality and Individual Differences 121: 80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.020. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  328. Nai, Alessandro & Walter, Annemarie S. (eds.) (2016). New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  329. Ohr, Dieter & Oscarsson, Henrik (2011). Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice. In Kees Aarts, André Blais & Hermann Schmitt (eds.), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, pp. 187–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  330. Ohr, Dieter & Quandt, Markus (2012). Parteiidentifikation in Deutschland: Eine empirische Fundierung des Konzepts auf Basis der Theorie Sozialer Identität. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. PVS Sonderheft 45: 182–207. doi: 10.5771/9783845262178_186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  331. Ohr, Dieter, Klein, Markus & Rosar, Ulrich (2013). Bewertungen der Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen & Oscar W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009, pp. 206–230. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  332. Ottati, Victor C., Terkildsen, Nayda & Hubbard, Clark (1997). Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(11): 1144–1156. doi: 10.1177/01461672972311003. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  333. Pancer, S. Mark, Brown, Steven D. & Barr, Cathy W. (1999). Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross‐National Comparison. Political Psychology 20(2): 345–368. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00148. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  334. Parkinson, Brian, Fischer, Agneta H. & Manstead, Antony S.R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  335. Parrott, W.Gerrod (2004). The Nature of Emotion. In Marilynn B. Brewer & Miles Hewstone (eds.), Emotion and Motivation, pp. 5–20. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  336. Parrott, W. Gerrod (2014). Feeling, function, and the place of negative emotions in a happy life. In W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The Positive Side of Negative Emotions, pp. 273–-296. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  337. Parrott, W. Gerrod (2019). Emotions as Signals of Moral Character. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 161-177. Cham: Springer Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  338. Parzen, Michael I., Wei, Lee-Jen & Ying, Zhiliang (1994). A resampling method based on pivotal estimating functions. Biometrika 81(2): 341–350. doi: 10.2307/2336964. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  339. Patil, Vivek H., Singh, Surendra N., Mishra, Sanjay & Donavan, D. Todd (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion. Journal of Business Research 61(2): 162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  340. Petersen, Michael B. (2010). Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality. The Journal of Politics 72(2): 357–365. doi: 10.1017/S002238160999079X. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  341. Peterson, Johnathan C., Jacobs, Carly, Hibbing, John, & Smith, Kevin (2018). In your face: Emotional expressivity as a predictor of ideology. Politics and the Life Sciences 37(1): 53–67. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  342. Peterson, Steven A. & Maiden, Robert (1993). Personality and Politics among Older Americans: A Rural Case Study. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 36(2): 157–169. doi: 10.2190/F01D-XTXD-5TXL-V4KQ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  343. Peterson, Steven A. & Somit, Albert (eds.) (2017). Handbook of Biology and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  344. Pietraszewski, David (2016). Priming race: Does the mind inhibit categorization by race at encoding or recall? Social Psychological and Personality Science 7(1): 85–91. doi: 10.1177/1948550615602934. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  345. Plutchik, Robert (2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientists 89(4): 344–350. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  346. Poguntke, Thomas (2005). A Presidentializing Party State? The Federal Republic of Germany. In Thomas Poguntke & Paul Webb (eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, pp. 63–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  347. Popkin, Samuel L. (1995). Information shortcuts and the reasoning voter. In Bernand Grofman (ed.), Information, participation, and choice: an economic theory of democracy in perspective, pp. 17–35. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  348. Rahn, Wendy M. (1993). The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–496. doi: 10.2307/2111381. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  349. Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene & Sullivan, John L. (1990). A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal. In John A. Ferejohn & James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes, pp. 136–159. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  350. Ramiro, Luis & Gomez, Raul (2017). Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left. Political Studies 65(1): 108–126. doi: 10.1177/0032321716647400. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  351. Rammstedt, Beatrice, Kemper, Christoph J., Klein, Mira C., Beierlein, Constanze & Kovaleva, Anastassiya (2013). Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der fünf Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit: Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Methoden, Daten, Analysen 7(2): 233–249. doi: 10.12758/mda.2013.0. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  352. Ramo, Danielle E. & Prochaska, Judith J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14(1): e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1878. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  353. Redlawsk, David P. & Lau, Richard R. (2013). Behavioral Decision-Making. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 130–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  354. Redlawsk, David P. & Pierce, Douglas (2017). Emotions and Voting. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, pp. 406–432. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  355. Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andrew J. & Lau, Richard R. (2007). Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information Processing and Learning in a Campaign. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp. 152–179. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  356. Redlawsk, David P., Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle & Katz, Steven (2016). Losers, Liars, and Low-Energy Individuals: Examining Contempt and Anger as Factors in Candidate Evaluation. Paper presented at the 112th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, September 1-4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  357. Redlawsk, David P., Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle & Katz, Steven (2018). Donald Trump, contempt, and the 2016 GOP Iowa Caucuses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28(2): 173–189. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2018.1441848. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  358. Reinemann, Carsten, Maurer, Marcus, Zerback, Thomas & Jandura, Olaf (2013). Die Spätentscheider: Medieneinflüsse auf kurzfristige Wahlentscheidungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  359. Renner, Anna-Maria (2019). Should Female Politicians Avoid Appearing Emotional? – Gender-Specific Effects of Politicians’ Emotions on the Attribution of Competence and Warmth. Politische Psychologie 7(1): 112–132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  360. Renner, Anna-Maria & Masch, Lena (2019). Emotional woman – rational man? Gender stereotypical emotional expressivity of German politicians in news broadcasts. Communications 44(1): 81–103. doi: 10.1515/commun-2017-0048. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  361. Rico, Guillem, Guinjoan, Marc & Anduiza, Eva (2017). The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 444–461. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12261. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  362. Ridout, Travis N. & Searles, Kathleen (2011). It’s My Campaign I’ll Cry If I Want To: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals. Political Psychology 32(3): 439–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00819.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  363. Rosar, Ulrich, Klein, Markus & Beckers, Tilo (2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research 47(1): 64-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00720.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  364. Roseman, Ira J. (2001). A Model of Appraisal in the Emotion System: Integrating Theory, Research, and Applications. In Klaus R. Scherer, Angela Schorr & Tom Johnstone (eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, pp. 68–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  365. Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle, Redlawsk, David P. & Katz, Steven (2019). Reprehensible, Laughable: The Role of Contempt in Negative Campaigning. American Politics Research: 1-34 [Online First]. doi: 10.1177/1532673X19857968. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  366. Rosenfeld, Bryn, Imai, Kosuke & Shapiro, Jacob N. (2016). An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 783–802. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  367. Roßmann, Joss (2017). Satisficing in Befragungen: Theorie, Messung und Erklärung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  368. Roth, Dieter & Wüst, Andreas M. (2007). Emanzipiert und ungeliebt: Nicht-, Wechsel- und Protestwähler in Deutschland. In Werner J. Patzelt, Martin Sebaldt & Uwe Kranenpohl (eds.), Res publica semper reformanda. Wissenschaft und politische Bildung im Dienste des Gemeinwohls: Wissenschaft und politische Bildung im Dienste des Gemeinwohls. Festschrift für Heinrich Oberreuter zum 65. Geburtstag, pp. 390–412. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  369. Rubin, Allen & Babbie, Earl R. (2008). Research Methods for Social Work. 6th edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  370. Runge, Thomas E., Frey, Dieter, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Helmreich, Robert L. & Spence, Janet T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits: A comparison between students in the United States and West Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 12(2): 142–162. doi: 10.1177/0022022181122002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  371. Russell, James A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6): 1161–1178. doi: 10.1037/h0077714. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  372. Russell, James A. & Barrett, Lisa F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(5): 805–819. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.805. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  373. Ryan, Timothy J. (2012). What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments. The Journal of Politics 74(4): 1138–1152. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000540. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  374. Saad, Lydia (2012). Obama Ahead in 10-Point Favorability Measure, 62% to 55%: Trends suggest this is not a perfect predictor of victory in the election. Available online at: http://news.gallup.com/poll/158465/obama-ahead-point-favorability-measure.aspx (last accessed: 20 July 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  375. Sakaluk, John K. & Short, Stephen D. (2017). A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources. The Journal of Sex Research 54(1): 1–9. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  376. Salmela, Mikko, & von Scheve, Christian (2018). Emotional dynamics of right-and left-wing political populism. Humanity & Society 42(4): 434–-454. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802521. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  377. Scherer, Klaus R. (1997). Profiles of Emotion-antecedent Appraisal: Testing Theoretical Predictions across Cultures. Cognition and Emotion 11(2): 113–150. doi: 10.1080/026999397379962. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  378. Scherer, Klaus R. (2003). Introduction: Cognitive Components of Emotion. In Richard J. Davidson, Klaus R. Scherer & H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 563–571. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  379. Scherer, Klaus R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information 44(4): 695–729. doi: 10.1177/0539018405058216. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  380. Schmidt-Atzert, Lothar (2008). Klassifikation von Emotionen. In Wilhelm Janke, Martin Schmidt-Daffy & Günter Debus (eds.), Experimentelle Emotionspsychologie: Methodische Ansätze - Probleme - Ergebnisse, pp. 179–193. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  381. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Weßels, Bernhard & Wolf, Christof (2014). Fazit und Ausblick: Langweile und Extreme, Fragmentierung und Konzentration. In Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Hans Rattinger, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Bernhard Weßels & Christof Wolf (eds.), Zwischen Fragmentierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 355–364. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  382. Schoen, Harald (2010). Die Wirtschaftskrise, Angst und politische Urteilsbildung: Eine Analyse zum Affective-Intelligence-Modell am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2009. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 39(2): 205–222. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  383. Schoen, Harald & Schumann, Siegfried (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology 28(4): 471–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00582.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  384. Schoen, Harald & Steinbrecher, Markus (2013). Beyond total effects: Exploring the interplay of personality and attitudes in affecting turnout in the 2009 German federal election. Political Psychology 34(6): 939–940. doi: 10.1111/pops.12168. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  385. Schoen, Harald & Weßels, Bernhard (2016). Die Bundestagswahl 2013 – eine Zäsur im Wahlverhalten und Parteiensystem? In Harald Schoen & Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 3–20. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  386. Schreiber, Darren, Fonzo, Greg, Simmons, Alan N., Dawes, Christopher T., Flagan, Taru, Fowler, James H. & Paulus, Martin P. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PloS one 8(2): e52970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052970. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  387. Schubert, Glendon & Masters, Roger D. (eds.) (1991). Primate Politics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  388. Schubert, James N. (1991). Human Vocalizations in Agonistic Political Encounters. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 207–220. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  389. Schumann, Siegfried (2014). Persönlichkeit und Wahlverhalten. In Jürgen W. Falter & Harald Schoen (eds.), Handbuch Wahlforschung, pp. 591–624. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  390. Searles, Kathleen & Mattes, Kyle (2015). It’s a Mad, Mad World: Using Emotion Inductions in a Survey. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 172–182. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  391. Seneca (1928). Moral Essays, Volume I: De Providentia. De Constantia. De Ira. De Clementia. Translated by John W. Basore. Loeb Classical Library 214. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  392. Settle, Jaime E., Dawes, Christopher T., Loewen, Peter John & Panagopoulos, Costas (2017). Negative Affectivity, Political Contention, and Turnout: A Genopolitics Field Experiment. Political Psychology 38(6): 1065–1082. doi: 10.1111/pops.12379. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  393. Shah, Dhavan V., Hanna, Alex, Bucy, Erik P., Wells, Chris & Quevedo, Vidal (2015). The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age: Linking Biobehavioral and Computational Approaches via the Second Screen. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659(1): 225–245. doi: 10.1177/0002716215569220. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  394. Shannon, Claude E. & Weaver, Warren (1998). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  395. Shaver, Phillip, Schwartz, Judith, Kirson, Donald & O'Connor, Cary (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(6): 1061–1086. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  396. Shrout, Patrick E. & Rodgers, Joseph L. (2018). Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis. Annual Review of Psychology 69: 487–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  397. Siegert, Ingo, Böck, Ronald, Vlasenko, Bogdan, Philippou-Hübner, David & Wendemuth, Andreas (2011). Appropriate emotional labelling of non-acted speech using basic emotions, geneva emotion wheel and self assessment manikins. Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2011 IEEE International Conference: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICME.2011.6011929. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  398. Sinaceur, Marwan, Van Kleef, Gerben A., Neale, Margaret A., Adam, Hajo & Haag, Christophe (2011). Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation? The Journal of Applied Psychology 96(5): 1018–1032. doi: 10.1037/a0023896. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  399. Small, Deborah A. & Lerner, Jennifer S. (2008). Emotional Policy: Personal Sadness and Anger Shape Judgments about a Welfare Case. Political Psychology 29(2): 149–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00621.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  400. Smith, Craig A. & Lazarus, Richard S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion 7(3-4): 233–269. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409189. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  401. Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas, Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R. & Hibbing, John R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PloS one 6(10): e25552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025552. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  402. Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E. & Brady, Henry E. (1986). Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics. British Journal of Political Science 16(04): 405–430. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400004506. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  403. Sparks, Holloway (2015). Mama Grizzlies and Guardians of the Republic: The Democratic and Intersectional Politics of Anger in the Tea Party Movement. New Political Science 37(1): 25–47. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2014.945252. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  404. Spector, Paul E. (1981). Research designs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  405. Spezio, Michael L., Rangel, Antonio, Alvarez, Ramon M., O’Doherty, John P., Mattes, Kyle, Todorov, Alexander, Kim, Hackjin & Adolphs, Ralph (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 3(4): 344–352. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn040. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  406. Statistisches Bundesamt (2015). Bildungsstand: Bevölkerung nach Bildungsabschluss in Deutschland. Available online at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/BildungForschungKultur/Bildungsstand/Tabellen/Bildungsabschluss.html (last accessed: 18 February 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  407. Stavrakakis, Yannis & Katsambekis, Giorgos (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2): 119–142. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  408. Steenbergen, Marco R. & Ellis, Christopher (2006). Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits, and Negative Candidate Effect. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 109–133. New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  409. Stewart, Patrick A. (2011). The influence of self- and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election. Social Science Information 50(2): 201–222. doi: 10.1177/0539018410396616. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  410. Stewart, Patrick A. & Ford Dowe, Pearl K. (2013). Interpreting President Barack Obama’s Facial Displays of Emotion: Revisiting the Dartmouth Group. Political Psychology 34(3): 369–385. doi: 10.1111/pops.12004. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  411. Stewart, Patrick A., Bucy, Erik P. & Mehu, Marc (2015). Strengthening bonds and connecting with followers. Politics and the Life Sciences 34(1): 73–92. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  412. Stewart, Patrick A., Salter, Frank K. & Mehu, Marc (2009b). Taking leaders at face value: Ethology and the analysis of televised leader displays. Politics and the Life Sciences 28(1): 48–74. doi: 10.2990/28_1_48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  413. Stewart, Patrick A., Waller, Bridget M. & Schubert, James N. (2009a). Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion 33(2): 125–135. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9129-1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  414. Stier, Sebastian, Bleier, Arnim, Lietz, Haiko & Strohmaier, Markus (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication 35(1): 50-74. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/58u4c. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  415. Stroud, Laura R., Glaser, Jack & Salovey, Peter (2005). The Effects of Partisanship and Candidate Emotionality on Voter Preference. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 25(1): 25–44. doi: 10.2190/22PC-5PK7-5KU0-DNCQ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  416. Sullivan, Denis G. (1996). Emotional Responses to the Nonverbal Behavior of French and American Political Leaders. Political Behavior 18(3): 311–325. doi: 10.1007/BF01498604. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  417. Sullivan, Denis G. & Masters, Roger D. (1988). “Happy Warriors”: Leaders’ Facial Display, Viewers Emotions, and Political Support. American Journal of Political Science 32(2): 345–368. doi: 10.2307/2111127. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  418. Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J., Englis, Basil G. & Plate, Elise F. (1991). Facial Displays and Political Leadership: Some Experimental Findings. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 188–206. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  419. Sullivan, John L., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene & Rahn, Wendy M. (1990). Candidate Appraisal and Human Nature: Man and Superman in the 1984 Election. Political Psychology 11(3): 459–484. doi: 10.2307/3791660. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  420. Tavris, Carol (1989). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  421. Tenscher, Jens (2013). Ein Hauch von Wahlkampf. In Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen & Oscar W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009, pp. 63–78. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  422. Tiedens, Larissa Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1): 86–94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.86. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  423. Tigue, Cara C., Borak, Diana J., O’Connor, Jillian J.M., Schandl, Charles & Feinberg, David R. (2012). Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(3): 210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.004. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  424. Tilley, James, Neundorf, Anja & Hobolt, Sara B. (2018). When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice. The Journal of Politics 80(2): 555–569. doi: 10.1086/694549. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  425. Todorov, Alexander, Mandisodza, Anesu N., Goren, Amir & Hall, Crystal C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308(5728): 1623–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.1110589. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  426. Todorov, Alexander, Olivola, Christopher Y., Dotsch, Ron & Mende-Siedlecki, Peter (2015). Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 519–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  427. Trivers, Robert L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 46(1): 35–57. doi: 10.1086/406755. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  428. Turner, Nigel E. (1998). The Effect of Common Variance and Structure Pattern on Random Data Eigenvalues: Implications for the Accuracy of Parallel Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58(4): 541–568. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058004001. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  429. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  430. Ulbig, Stacy G. & Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior 21(3): 265–282. doi: 10.1023/A:1022087617514. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  431. Valentino, Nicholas A. & Neuner, Fabian G. (2017). Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws. Political Psychology 38(2): 331–350. doi: 10.1111/pops.12332. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  432. Valentino, Nicholas A., Banks, Antoine J., Hutchings, Vincent L. & Davis, Anne K. (2009). Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction between Anxiety and Information Utility. Political Psychology 30(4): 591–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  433. Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha & Hutchings, Vincent L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics 73(1): 156–170. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  434. Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J. & Davis, Anne K. (2008). Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet. Political Psychology 29(2): 247–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  435. Van Borkulo, Claudia D., Borsboom, Denny, Epskamp, Sacha, Blanken, Tessa F., Boschloo, Lynn, Schoevers, Robert A. & Waldorp, Lourens J. (2014). A New Method for Constructing Networks from Binary Data. Scientific Reports 4(5918): 1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep05918. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  436. Van Borkulo, Claudia D., Boschloo, Lynn, Kossakowski, Jolanda J., Tio, Pia, Schoevers, Robert A., Borsboom, D. & Waldorp, Lourens J. (2017). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Working Paper. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29455.38569. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  437. Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2009). How Emotions Regulate Social Life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) Model. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(3): 184–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  438. Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2010). The Emerging View of Emotion as Social Information. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(5): 331–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00262.x. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  439. Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2016). The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  440. Van Troost, Dunya, Klandermans, Bert & Van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien (2018). Friends in High Places: Anger and Frustration among Protesters When Their Political Allies Fail Them. Humanity & Society 42(4): 455–479. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802537. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  441. Van Zomeren, Martijn, Postmes, Tom & Spears, Russell (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 134(4): 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  442. Van Zomeren, Martijn, Spears, Russell, Fischer, Agneta H. & Leach, Colin W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(5): 649–664. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  443. Van’t Riet, Jonathan, Schaap, Gabi, Kleemans, Mariska, Veling, Harm & Lecheler, Sophie (2019). On different sides: Investigating the persuasive effects of anger expression in political news messages. Political Psychology 40(4): 837–857. doi: 10.1111/pops.12554. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  444. Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas & Foucault, Martial (2019). Anger Mediates the Effects of Fear on Support for the Far Right—A Rejoinder. Political Psychology 40(4): 713–717. doi: 10.1111/pops.12598. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  445. Vasilopoulou, Sofia & Wagner, Markus (2017). Fear, anger and enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of emotional reactions on public preferences towards European integration. European Union Politics 18(3): 382–405. doi: 10.1177/1465116517698048. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  446. Veneti, Anastasia, Jackson, Daniel & Lilleker, Darren G. (eds.) (2019). Visual Political Communication. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  447. Vetter, Angelika & Brettschneider, Frank (1998).“Idealmaße”“ für Kanzlerkandidaten. ZUMA Nachrichten 22(43): 90–115. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  448. Vetter, Angelika & Gabriel, Oscar W. (1998). Candidate Evaluations and Party Choice in Germany, 1972-94: Do Candidates Matter? In Christopher J. Anderson & Carsten Zelle (eds.), Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide, pp. 71–98. Westport, CT: Praeger. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  449. Vorländer, Hans, Herold, Maik & Schäller, Steven (2018). PEGIDA as Part of Right-Wing Populism in Germany and Europe. In Hans Vorländer, Maik Herold & Steven Schäller (eds.), PEGIDA and New Right-Wing Populism in Germany: New Perspectives in German Political Studies, pp. 195–203. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  450. Wagner, Markus (2014). Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis. Political Behavior 36(3): 683–703. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9241-5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  451. Wallander, Lisa (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research 38(3): 505–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  452. Walter, Annemarie S. & Nai, Alessandro (2016). Explaining the Use of Attack Behaviour in the Electoral Battlefield: A Literature Overview. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 97–114. Colchester: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  453. Warne, Russell T. & Larsen, Ross (2014). Evaluating a proposed modification of the Guttman rule for determining the number of factors in an exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 50(1): 104–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  454. Watson, David, Clark, Lee A. & Tellegen, Auke (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6): 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  455. Wattenberg, Martin P. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  456. Webster, Steven W. (2018). Anger and declining trust in government in the American electorate. Political Behavior 40(4): 933–964. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9431-7. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  457. Weiner, Bernard (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research 42(2): 203–2015. doi: 10.3102/00346543042002203. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  458. Weiner, Bernard (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92(4): 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  459. Weiner, Bernard (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  460. West, Emily A. (2017). Descriptive Representation and Political Efficacy: Evidence from Obama and Clinton. The Journal of Politics 79(1): 351–355. doi: 10.1086/688888. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  461. Wierzbicka, Anna & Harkins, Jean (2001). Introduction. In Jean Harkins & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 1–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  462. Winter, David G. (2013). Personality Profiles of Political Elites. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & James S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 423–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  463. Wood, Adrienne, Rychlowska, Magdalena, Korb, Sebastian & Niedenthal, Paula (2016). Fashioning the Face: Sensorimotor Simulation Contributes to Facial Expression Recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(3): 227–240. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  464. Wright, Daniel B. (2006). Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 76(3): 663–675. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  465. Yoon, Kwang-Il (2015). Political Culture and Attribution of Responsibility. Journal of International and Area Studies 22(2): 39–65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  466. Zajonc, Robert B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(2, Pt. 2): 1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  467. Zajonc, Robert B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist 39(2): 117–123. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  468. Zaller, John R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  469. Zimmermann, Hubert (2014). A Grand Coalition for the Euro: The Second Merkel Cabinet, the Euro Crisis and the Elections of 2013. German Politics 23(4): 322–336. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2014.953069. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  470. Zwick, William R. & Velicer, Wayne F. (1982). Factors Influencing Four Rules for Determining the Number of Components to Retain. Multivariate Behavioral Research 17(2): 253–269. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  471. Datasets & Questionnaires Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  472. American National Election Studies (2010). Time Series Cumulative Data File. The American National Election Studies. Available online at: www.electionstudies.org (last accessed: 02 February 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  473. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2001a). Politbarometer East 2000 (Cumulated Data Set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3426 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3426. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  474. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2001b). Politbarometer West 2000 (Cumulated Data Set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3425 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3425. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  475. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2002a). Politbarometer Eastern Germany 2001 (Accumulated Dataset). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3555 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3555. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  476. Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2002b). Politbarometer Western Germany 2001 (Accumulated Dataset). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3554 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3554. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  477. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2015a). Politbarometer 01/2000 – 06/2015. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Langzeitentwicklung_Themen_im_Ueberblick/Politik_II/8_Sympathiewerte_2.xlsx (last accessed: 12 June 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  478. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2017): Politbarometer-Pressemitteilungen 2002-2017. Archiv. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Archiv/ (last accessed: 02 February 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  479. GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (2015). ALLBUS/GGSS 2014 (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/German General Social Survey 2014). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5240 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  480. Maier, Jürgen & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2015). Codebuch II zur Medieninhaltsanalyse im Projekt „Die Bedeutung emotionaler Botschaften für die politische Urteilsbildung“: Ebene Einstellung. Universität Koblenz-Landau. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  481. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2011). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T1 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5334 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.10757. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  482. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2014). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T18 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5351 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12033. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  483. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2015a). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T11 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5344 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  484. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2015b). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T15 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5348 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  485. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Henckel, Simon, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2015c). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T25 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5725 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12280. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  486. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Schäfer, Anne & Schmidt, Sebastian (2015d). Campaign Media Content Analysis: TV (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5705 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  487. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Wagner, Aiko, Giebler, Heiko, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2017). Vor- und Nachwahl-Querschnitt (Kumulation) (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5702 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12810. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  488. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Henckel, Simon, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2016a). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T29 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5729 Data file Version 1.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12522. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  489. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof & Henckel, Simon (2016b). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T33 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5733 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12675. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  490. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Wolf, Christof, Dietz, Melanie, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2017). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T37 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6817 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12917. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  491. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Bieber, Ina, Stövsand, Lars-Christopher, Dietz, Melanie & Scherer, Philipp (2018): Pre-election Cross Section (GLES 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6800 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.12990. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  492. Software & Software Packages Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803
  493. Arnold, Jeffrey B., Daroczi, Gergely, Werth, Bo & Weitzner, Brian (2017). Package ‘ggthemes’: Extra Themes, Scales and Geoms for ‘ggplot2’. R-package version 3.4.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggthemes/ggthemes.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748906803

Similar publications

from the series "Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung"
Cover of book: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Edited Book Full access
Thorsten Faas, Sascha Huber, Mona Krewel, Sigrid Roßteutscher
Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Cover of book: Modernisierung deutscher Wahlkämpfe?
Monograph No access
Mona Krewel
Modernisierung deutscher Wahlkämpfe?
Cover of book: Election Campaigns and Voter Decision-Making in a Multi-Party System
Monograph No access
Harald Schoen, Hans Rattinger, Maria Preißinger, Konstantin Gavras, Markus Steinbrecher
Election Campaigns and Voter Decision-Making in a Multi-Party System
Cover of book: Wie sich Wähler beim Entscheiden unterscheiden
Monograph No access
Jan Eric Blumenstiel
Wie sich Wähler beim Entscheiden unterscheiden
Cover of book: Old Friends in Troubled Waters
Monograph No access
Hans Rattinger, Harald Schoen, Fabian Endres, Jana Pötzschke, Sebastian Jungkunz, Matthias Mader
Old Friends in Troubled Waters

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex