Cover des Buchs: Wahlkampffinanzierung und Demokratie in den USA
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Wahlkampffinanzierung und Demokratie in den USA

Autor:innen:
Reihe:
Neue Amerika-Studien, Band 5
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

US-Wahlkämpfe verschlingen seit jeher enorme Summen an Spendengeldern. Doch als das höchste Gericht der USA im Jahr 2010 entschied, dass Spendenverbote für Unternehmen, Interessengruppen sowie Einzelpersonen verfassungswidrig seien, markierte dies nichts weniger als eine Zäsur im Politikfeld der Wahlkampffinanzierung.

Aber welche Auswirkungen haben unbegrenzte Wahlkampfspenden: Lassen sich Wahlen, wie oft behauptet, kaufen und gewinnt demnach stets derjenige Kandidat mit dem meisten Geld? Welche Auswirkungen haben milliardenschwere Wahlkämpfe auf Vertrauen und Partizipation der Bürger, gleichwohl aber auch auf das generelle Funktionieren des politischen Systems?

Diesen und weiteren Fragen wird im vorliegenden Band insbesondere mit Hilfe quantitativ-empirischer Methoden nachgegangen. Es zeigt sich, dass Geld eine wahlvoraussetzende, nicht aber zwangsläufig wahlentscheidende Rolle zukommt. Indes unterminieren Spendengelder jedoch auch andernorts die Funktionsfähigkeit der US-Demokratie.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2020
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6141-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0264-5
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Neue Amerika-Studien
Band
5
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
744
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 24
    1. 1.1 The Golden Age Kein Zugriff
      1. Der Wahlkampf von 1896 Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 A New Gilded Age? Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 Forschungsgegenstand, Fragestellung(en) und Ziel der Untersuchung Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 Methodisches Vorgehen und Datengrundlage Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 Aufbau der Untersuchung Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Forschungsrelevanz Kein Zugriff
    5. 2.5 Forschungsstand Kein Zugriff
    6. 2.6 Grundpositionen der Untersuchung Kein Zugriff
    1. 3.1 Zugänge zur vexata quaestio Wahlkampffinanzierung Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.2.1 Phase der bruchstückhaften Regulierung (1896-1971) Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2.2 Phase umfassender Regulierung (1971-2010) Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.2.3 Phase weitestgehender Deregulierung (2010 - ?) Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Administrative Kosten Kein Zugriff
    2. 4.2 Strategische Kosten Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3 Medial-werbende Kosten Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1.1 Generelle Kostenentwicklungen von US-Wahlkämpfen Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.1.2 Kostenentwicklung auf Präsidentschaftsebene Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.1.3 Kostenentwicklung auf Kongressebene Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.2.1 Wege der monetären Beeinflussung von Wahlen Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.2.1 Inkommensurabilitätsproblem Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.2.2 Simultanitätsproblem Kein Zugriff
        3. 5.2.2.3 Amtsinhabervorteil Kein Zugriff
        4. 5.2.2.4 Medienbezogene Messprobleme: Backlash-, Decay- & Shakedown-Effekt Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.3.1 Elektorales Erklärungsmodell (VCM) Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.3.2 Grenzwerteffekte von Wahlkampfspenden: Threshold Effect Kein Zugriff
          1. Vorwahlen 2012 Kein Zugriff
          2. Vorwahlen 2016 Kein Zugriff
          1. Hauptwahl 2012 Kein Zugriff
          2. Hauptwahl 2016 Kein Zugriff
          3. Wahlkampfausgaben und Wahlerfolg in historischer Perspektive (1960-2016) Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.3.2.1 Forschungsergebnisse vor Citizens United Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.3.2.2 Forschungsergebnisse nach Citizens United Kein Zugriff
        3. 5.3.2.3 Self-Funding Candidates Kein Zugriff
        1. Outside Spending Kein Zugriff
        2. Wahlerfolg = f (Wahlkampfspenden) Kein Zugriff
        1. Fallauswahl Kein Zugriff
        1. Finaler Datensatz Kein Zugriff
        1. Zwischenfazit: Wahlerfolg = f (Wahlkampfspenden + UV1 + UV2 + UV3 + … UVn) Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1.1 Gerrymandering: When you draw the lines, you make the rules Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.1.2 Polarisierung Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.2.1 Permanent Campaigning Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.2.2 Die informelle Macht von Wahlkampfspenden: Preemptive Obedience Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.3.1 The Disappearing Small Donor? Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.3.2 Sinkende Wahlbeteiligung Kein Zugriff
    4. 6.4. Responsive Folgen: The Translation of Economic Power into Political Power Kein Zugriff
    5. 6.5 Konfidenzebene: Unzufriedenheit und Vertrauensverlust Kein Zugriff
    6. 6.6 Normative Ebene Kein Zugriff
  8. 7. Epilog: The Second Gilded Age – Government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich, again Kein Zugriff 632 - 644
    1. Anhang 1: The Multi Stage Explanatory Model Kein Zugriff
    2. Anhang 2(1): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Obama) Kein Zugriff
    3. Anhang 2(2): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Romney) Kein Zugriff
    4. Anhang 3(1): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Clinton) Kein Zugriff
    5. Anhang 3(2): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Trump) Kein Zugriff
    6. Anhang 4: Entwicklung der Wahlkampfkosten von Präsidentschaftswahlkampagnen Kein Zugriff
    7. Anhang 5: Codebuch des SLE-Datensatzes (inkl. Anzahl der Beobachtungen) Kein Zugriff
    8. Anhang 6(1): Outside Spending nach Kontroll- und Experimentalgruppe (Senat) (angegeben als Median und arithmetisches Mittel) Kein Zugriff
    9. Anhang 6(2): Outside Spending nach Kontroll- und Experimentalgruppe (HoR) (angegeben als Median und arithmetisches Mittel) Kein Zugriff
    10. Anhang 7: Entwicklung des Supporting Outside Spending in State Senate Races Kein Zugriff
    11. Anhang 8(1): Entwicklung des Supporting Outside Spending nach Partei (Senat) Kein Zugriff
    12. Anhang 8(2): Entwicklung des Supporting Outside Spending nach Partei (HoR) Kein Zugriff
    13. Anhang 9(1): Entwicklung des Opposing Outside Spending nach Partei (Senat) Kein Zugriff
    14. Anhang 9(2): Entwicklung des Opposing Outside Spending nach Partei (HoR) Kein Zugriff
    15. Anhang 10: Häufigkeit von Third Party Candidates Kein Zugriff
    16. Anhang 11: Wiederwahlquoten auf State Legislature Ebene Kein Zugriff
    17. Anhang 12: R²-Wert-Differenzen basierend auf Tabelle 20 Kein Zugriff
    18. Anhang 13(1): Entwicklung der Wahlbeteiligung bei Präsidentschaftswahlkämpfen Kein Zugriff
    19. Anhang 13(2): Entwicklung der Wahlbeteiligung bei Midterm Elections Kein Zugriff
    20. Anhang 14: Transkription der CREDO-Anschreiben (Kalla/Broockman-Studie) Kein Zugriff
    21. Anhang 14(2): CREDO-Anschreiben (Constituent Condition) Kein Zugriff
  10. Literaturverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 677 - 744

Literaturverzeichnis (898)

  1. LOS ANGELES TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD (2016): With campaign costs about to skyrocket, Donald Trump suddenly loses his aversion to fundraising, in: Los Angeles Times vom 05.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ol-trump-fundraising-flip-flop-20160505-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  2. LOWERY, Wesley (2014): 91% of the time the better-financed candidates wins. Don't act surprised, in: The Washington Post vom 04.03.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/04/04/think-money-doesnt-matter-in-elections-this-chart-says-youre-wrong/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  3. LUBENOW, Gerald C. (Hg.) (2011): A User's Guide to Campaign Finance Reform, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  4. LUO, Michael (2008): Obama hauls in record $750 million for campaign, in: The New York Times vom 05.12.2008, online verfügbar unter <11.06.2017>, zuletzt geprüft am http://www.nytimes.com/05.12.2008/politics/05donate.html. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  5. LUO, Michael (2012): A Secret Donor Revealed, in: The New York Times vom 07.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/a-secret-donor-revealed/>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.11.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  6. MACGILLIS, Alec (2012): Coal Miner's Donor, in: The New Republic vom 04.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/108140/coal-miners-donor-mitt-romney-benefactor>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  7. MACKEY, John (2009): The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare. Eight things we can do to improve health care without adding to the deficit, in: The Wall Street Journal vom 11.08.2009, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  8. MAGARIAN, Gregory P. (2017): Managed Speech. The Roberts Court's First Amendment, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  9. MAGLEBY, David B. (Hg.) (2014): Financing the 2012 Election, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  10. MAGLEBY, David B./ NELSON, Candice J. (1990): The Money Chase. Congressional Campaign Finance Reform, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  11. MAGUIRE, Robert (2013): OpenSecrets.org's New Dark Money Data Measures Groups' Politicization, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/09/opensecretsorgs-new-dark-money-data-measures-groups-politicization/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  12. MAGUIRE, Robert (2015): Five Realities Five Years After: The Post-Citizens United Landscape, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/01/five-realities-five-years-after-the-post-citizens-united-landscape/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  13. MAGUIRE, Robert (2015): Final Tally: 2014's Midterm Was Most Expensive, With Fewer Donors, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/02/final-tally-2014s-midterm-was-most-expensive-with-fewer-donors/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  14. MAGUIRE, Robert (2016): $1.4 billion and counting in spending by super PACs, dark money groups, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/1-4-billion-and-counting-in-spending-by-super-pacs-dark-money-groups/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  15. MAHONEY, James/ GOERTZ, Gary (2006): A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research, in: Political Analysis, Jg. 14, H. 3, S. 227–249. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  16. MAISEL, Louis Sandy (1982): From Obscurity to Oblivion. Running in the Congressional Primary, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  17. MALBIN, Michael J. (Hg.) (1984): Money and politics in the United States: Financing elections in the 1980s, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  18. MALBIN, Michael J. (2013): Small Donors: Incentives, Economies of Scale, and Effects, in: The Forum, Jg. 11, H. 3, S. 385–411. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  19. MALBIN, Michael J. (2017): Three Policy Paths after Citizens United: A Critical Review Essay, in: Tulsa Law Review, Jg. 52, H. 3, S. 537–552. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  20. MALBIN, Michael J./ BRUSOE, Peter W./ JOE, Wesley Y./ PIMLOTT, Jamie P./ WILCOX, Clyde (2007): The CFI Small Donor Project. An Overview of the Project and a Preliminary Report on State Legislative Candidates' Perspectives on Donors and Volunteers, The Campaign Finance Institute. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  21. MANDERSCHEID, Katharina (2012): Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenanalyse mit R. Eine Einführung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  22. MANN, Thomas E. (2003): Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 1, H. 1, S. 69–83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  23. MANN, Thomas E. (2009): The Rashomon World Of Money And Politics, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 112–114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  24. MANN, Thomas E. (2011): Campaign Finance in the Wake of Citizens United, in: The John Marshall Law Review, Jg. 44, H. 4, S. 583–594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  25. MANN, Thomas E. (2016): We Must Address Gerrymandering. Political districts no longer represent the people - and lead to more paralyzing partisanship, in: TIME Magazine vom 13.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/4527291/2016-election-gerrymandering/?xid=emailshare>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  26. MANN, Thomas E./ CORRADO, Anthony (2014): Party Polarization and Campaign Finance, Center for Effective Public Management (Brookings Institution), Washington, D.C., Governance Studies, online verfügbar unter <http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2014/07/polarization-and-campaign-finance/mann-and-corrad_party-polarization-and-campaign-finance.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  27. MANN, Thomas E./ CORRADO, Anthony (2014): Don't expect campaign finance reform to reduce polarization, in: The Washington Post vom 23.07.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/07/23/dont-expect-campaign-finance-reform-to-reduce-polarization/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  28. MANN, Thomas E./ ORNSTEIN, Norman (2012): It's Even Worse Than It Looks. How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism, Philadelphia: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  29. MARK, David (2012): A constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United?, in: Politico vom 19.06.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/arena/archive/a-constitutional-amendment-to-reverse-citizens-united.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  30. MARTIN, Jonathan/ BURNS, Alexander (2016): Key G.O.P. Donors Still Deeply Resist Donald Trump’s Candidacy, in: The New York Times vom 21.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-fundraising.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  31. MARTINDALE, Nathan R. (2010): Citizens Divided: Balancing the First Amendment Right to Free Speech and the Role of Private Corporations in our Nation's Elections, in: North Dakota Law Review, Jg. 86, H. 3, S. 619–640. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  32. MATTHEWS, Dylan (2013): The global upper class makes 32 times as much as the global lower class, in: The Washington Post vom 26.09.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/26/wonkabroad/?utm_term=.40583125e392>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  33. MATYS, Thomas (2010): Corporations in den USA. Kämpfe um Etablierung zwischen königlicher Charter und Industrialisierung, in: Endreß, Martin/ Matys, Thomas (Hg.): Die Ökonomie der Organisation - die Organisation der Ökonomie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 121–152. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  34. MATYS, Thomas (2011): Legal Persons - "Kämpfe" um die organisationale Form, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  35. MAYER, Jane (2011): State for Sale. A conservative multimillionaire has taken control in North Carolina, one of 2012’s top battlegrounds, in: The New Yorker vom 2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/state-for-sale>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  36. MAYER, Jane (2016): Dark Money. The Hidden Story of the Billioinaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, New York, NY, u.a.: Doubleday. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  37. MAYER, Jane/ GROSS, Terry (2011): The Multimillionaire Helping Republicans Win N.C., in: NPR vom 06.10.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://www.npr.org/2011/10/06/141078608/the-multimillionaire-helping-republicans-win-n-c>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  38. MAYER, William G./ BUSCH, Andrew E. (2004): The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  39. MAYERSOHN, Andrew (2015): Donor demographics: old white guys edition, part III, Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/donor-demographics-old-white-guys-edition-part-iii/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  40. MAYERSOHN, Andrew (2017): Those prized small donors? They may not be as small as you think, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/04/small-donors-may-not-be-smol-as-you-think/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  41. MAYERSOHN, Andrew/ GELERNT, Anya (2015): Donor demographics: old white guys edition, part I, Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/donor-demographics-old-white-guys-edition-part-i/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  42. MAYHEW, David R. (2008): Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Presidential Elections. The Historical Record, in: Political Science Quarterly, Jg. 123, H. 2, S. 201–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  43. MAZUR, Allan (2007): Global Social Problems, Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  44. MCELWEE, Sean (2015): Democracy is only for rich white guys: A definitive explanation for America’s most shocking inequalities. A wealth of research data now demonstrates what should be obvious: The law only advances certain people’s interests, in: Salon vom 07.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.salon.com/2015/07/11/democracy_is_only_for_rich_white_guys_a_definitive_explanation_for_americas_most_shocking_inequalities/>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  45. MCELWEE, Sean/ RHODES, Jesse H./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2016): How big is the gap between the donor class and ordinary Americans? Bigger than you think, in: The Washington Post vom 15.12.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/15/how-big-is-the-gap-between-the-donor-class-and-ordinary-americans-bigger-than-you-think/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  46. MCELWEE, Sean/ SCHAFFNER, Brian F./ RHODES, Jesse H. (2016): Whose Voice, Whose Choice? The Distorting Influence of the Political Donor Class in Our Big-Money Elections, Dēmos, online verfügbar unter <http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/Whose%20Voice%20Whose%20Choice_2.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  47. MCGINNIS, John O. (2016): Liberals are dangerously wrong about Citizens United: Money is speech, in: Los Angeles Times vom 20.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mcginnis-money-speech-liberals-20160522-snap-htmlstory.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  48. MCLEAN, Scott L. (2015): Purple Battlegrounds: Presidential Campaign Strategies and Swing State Voters, in: Hunter Hecht, Stacey/ Schultz, David (Hg.): Presidential Swing States. Why Only Ten Matter, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, S. 1–28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  49. MCNEILL, Brian: The Supreme Court’s Shift Away from Protecting Voters to Promoting Free Expression, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 38–39, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  50. MEDVIC, Stephen K. (2014): Campaigns and Elections. Players and Processes, 2. Aufl., New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  51. MENDRALA, Mallory E. (2012): Citizens Divided by Citizens United: How the Recent Supreme Court Decision Affects Small Business in Politics, in: Ohio State Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, Jg. 7, H. 1, S. 253–282. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  52. MERKEL, Wolfgang (Hg.) (2015): Demokratie und Krise. Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  53. MEYERSON, Harold (2015): Americans see a government of, by and for the rich, in: The Washington Post vom 18.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/americans-see-a-government-of-by-and-for-the-rich/2015/11/18/8c8e001a-8e19-11e5-acff-673ae92ddd2b_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.12.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  54. MILLER, Arthur H. (1974): Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 68, H. 3, S. 951–972. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  55. MILLER, Warren E. (1980): Disinterest, Disaffection, and Participation in Presidential Politics, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 2, H. 1, S. 7–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  56. MILYO, Jeffrey (1998): The Electoral Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: A Natural Experiment Approach, Department of Economics, Tufts University, Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University, 9806, online verfügbar unter <http://ase.tufts.edu/economics/papers/9806.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  57. MITCHELL, Alison (1998): Bill to Overhaul Campaign Finance Survives in House, in: The New York Times vom 01.08.1998, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/01/us/bill-to-overhaul-campaign-finance-survives-in-house.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  58. MOEN, Matthew C./ COPELAND, Gary W. (1999): The contemporary Congress. A bicameral approach, Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  59. MONCRIEF, Gary F./ NIEMI, Richard G./ POWELL, Lynda W. (2004): Time, Term Limits, and Turnover. Trends in Membership Stability in U.S. State Legislatures, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 29, H. 3, S. 357–381. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  60. MONDAK, Jeffrey J./ HALPERIN, Karen D. (2008): A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour, in: British Journal of Political Science, Jg. 38, H. 2, S. 335–362. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  61. MOOSMÜLLER, Gertrud (2008): Methoden der empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, München u.a.: Pearson Studium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  62. MORGAN, Howard Wayne (2003): William McKinley and His America, Kent, OH: The Kent State University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  63. MORRISSEY, Joseph F. (2013): A Contractarian Critique of Citizens United, in: Journal of Constitutional Law, Jg. 15, H. 3, S. 765–830. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  64. MULLER, Derek (2016): The Case for More Money in Politics, The Library of Law and Liberty, online verfügbar unter <http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/the-case-for-more-money-in-politics/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  65. MÜLLER, Marion G. (2002): Wahlkampf à l'américain, in: Dörner, Andreas/ Vogt, Ludgera (Hg.): Wahl-Kämpfe. Betrachtungen über ein demokratisches Ritual, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, S. 187–210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  66. MÜNCH, Sybille (2016): Interpretative Policy-Analyse, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  67. MUTCH, Robert E. (1988): Campaigns, Congress, and Courts. The Making of Federal Campaign Finance Law, New York: Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  68. MUTCH, Robert E. (2011): Three Centuries of Campaign Finance Law, in: Lubenow, Gerald C. (Hg.): A User's Guide to Campaign Finance Reform, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., S. 1–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  69. MUTCH, Robert E. (2014): Buying the Vote. A History of Campaign Finance Reform, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  70. MUTCH, Robert E. (2016): Campaign Finance. What Everyone Needs to Know, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  71. NAGLER, Jörg (2009): Abraham Lincoln: Amerikas großer Präsident. Eine Biographie, München: C. H. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  72. NASSMACHER, Karl-Heinz (1993): Comparing Party and Campaign Finance in Western Democracies, in: Gunlicks, Arthur B. (Hg.): Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe, Boulder/ San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press, S. 233–267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  73. NASSMACHER, Karl-Heinz (2009): The Funding of Party Competition. Political Finance in 25 Democracies, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  74. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2008): Limits on Contributions to Political Parties, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/limits-on-contributions-to-political-parties.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  75. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2011): Citizens United and the States. State Laws Affected by Citizens United, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/citizens-united-and-the-states.aspx#laws>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 21.07.2016, zuletzt geprüft am 10.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  76. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2012): 2012 State and Legislative Partisan Composition, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/documents/statevote/legiscontrol_2012.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  77. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2014): Partisan composition of State Legislatures 2002-2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/documents/statevote/legiscontrol_2002_2014.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  78. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MONEY IN STATE POLITICS (2017): Mission & History, online verfügbar unter <https://www.followthemoney.org/about-us/mission-and-history/>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  79. NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO (2017): Survey of Economically Successful Americans, online verfügbar unter <http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/survey-of-economically-successful-americans.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  80. NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO (2012): Take the Money and Run for Office (Transkript), This American Life Show, online verfügbar unter <https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/461/transcript>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  81. NELSON, Michael (Hg.) (2015): Guide to the Presidency, 2. Aufl., London/ New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  82. NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD (2010): The Court's Blow to Democracy, in: The New York Times vom 21.01.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/opinion/22fri1.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  83. NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD (2012): A Landslide Loss for Big Money, in: The New York Times vom 10.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/opinion/sunday/a-landslide-loss-for-big-money.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  84. NEWKIRK II, Vann R. (2017): The Supreme Court Finds North Carolina's Racial Gerrymandering Unconstitutional. The justices end a six-year fight over 2011 congressional maps that diluted black voting strength in the state., in: The Atlantic vom 22.05.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/north-carolina-gerrymandering/527592/>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  85. NEWPORT, Frank/ HARTER, Jim (2016): Presidential Candidates as Leaders: The Public's View, GALLUP, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/191204/presidential-candidates-leaders-public-view.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  86. NICHOLS, John/ MCCHESNEY, Robert W. (2013): Dollarocracy. How the Money-and-Media Election Complex is Destroying America, New York: Nation Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  87. NICHOLS, Philip (2013): A closer look at campaign finance, TEDx Penn 2013, TEDx Talks, online verfügbar unter <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E3WxOJzpv4>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  88. NOAH, Timothy (2012): Crankocracy in America. Who really benefitted vom from Citizens United?, in: The New Republic vom 29.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/102114/crankocracy-friess-simmons-oligarchs-election-america>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  89. NOLAND, Jack (2016): In first post-McCutcheon presidential election, more big donors, giving more, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/in-first-post-mccutcheon-presidential-election-more-big-donors-giving-more/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  90. NORRIS, Pippa (2013): The new research agenda studying electoral integrity, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 32, H. 3, S. 563–575. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  91. NORRIS, Pippa (2014): Why Electoral Integrity Matters, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  92. NORRIS, Pippa (2016): U.S. elections ranked worst among Western democracies. Here’s why. Americans are often proud of the democratic process here. Maybe they shouldn't be., in: The Washington Post vom 29.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/03/29/u-s-elections-ranked-worst-among-western-democracies-heres-why/?utm_term=.0893e22abaa0>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  93. NORRIS, Pippa (2016): Why American elections are flawed (and how to fix them), Hg. v. Electoral Integrity Project, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844793>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  94. NORRIS, Pippa (2017): It’s even worse than the news about North Carolina: American elections rank last among all Western democracies, London School of Economics US Centre Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/01/08/its-even-worse-than-the-news-about-north-carolina-american-elections-rank-last-among-all-western-democracies/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  95. NORRIS, Pippa/ ABEL VAN ES, Andres (Hg.) (2016): Checkbook Elections. Political Finance in Comparative Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  96. NORRIS, Pippa/ FRANK, Richard W./ MARTÍNEZ I COMA, Ferran (2013): Expert Perceptions of Electoral Integrity: A New Dataset, Hg. v. Electoral Integrity Project, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2300990>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  97. NORRIS, Pippa/ GRÖMPING, Max (2017): Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections, 2016-2017, Hg. v. Electoral Integrity Project, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2965729>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  98. NOZICK, Robert (1974): Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  99. NUGENT, Walter (2010): Progressivism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  100. NYE JR., Joseph S. (2009): The Question Of Relevance, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 252–254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  101. O'CALLAGHAN, Tiffany (2009): Whole Foods C.E.O. infuriates liberal customers by condemning universal health care, in: TIME Magazine vom 14.08.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://healthland.time.com/2009/08/14/whole-foods-c-e-o-infuriates-liberal-customers-by-condemning-universal-health-care/print/>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  102. O'CONNOR, Alice (2010): Beyond the "American Dream". Democracy and Economic Citizenship in the Second Gilded Age, History Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, online verfügbar unter <http://www.tobinproject.org/sites/tobinproject.org/files/assets/O%27Connor_Beyond%20the%20American%20Dream.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  103. O'DONNELL, Norah (2016): Are members of Congress becoming telemarketers? Stop fundraising, start working, says Fla. Rep. David Jolly, who is seeking to ban federal-elected officials from dialing for dollars, in: CBS News vom 24.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-are-members-of-congress-becoming-telemarketers/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  104. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION STATISTICS (2016): 2015 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  105. OLDOPP, Birgit (2001): Auf dem Weg ins Parlament. Auswahl und Wahlkampffinanzierung der Kandidaten in Deutschland, Kanada und den USA, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  106. ORNSTEIN, Norman J. (2011): Citizens United: Corrupting Campaign Clarity, American Enterprise Institute, online verfügbar unter <https://www.aei.org/publication/citizens-united-corrupting-campaign-clarity/>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  107. ORNSTEIN, Norman J. (2012): Effect of Citizens United Felt Two Years Later, in: Roll Call vom 17.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_80/effect_citizens_united_felt_two_years_later-211556-1.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.11.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  108. ORNSTEIN, Norman J. (2014): Courting Corruption: The Auctioning of the Judicial System. Don't believe the Citizens United pollyannas. Watching money flooding into elections for judges' seat shows how dangerous unregulated campaigns can be., in: The Atlantic vom 15.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/courting-corruption-the-auctioning-of-the-judicial-system/381524/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  109. ORNSTEIN, Norman J./ PROKOP, Andrew (2016): The political scientist who saw Trump's rise coming. Norm Ornstein on why the Republican Party was ripe for a takeover, what the media missed, and whether Trump could win the presidency, in: Vox vom 06.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/2016/5/6/11598838/donald-trump-predictions-norm-ornstein>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  110. OVERACKER, Louise (1932): Money in Elections, New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  111. OVERBY, Peter (2007): Explainer: What Is a Bundler, in: National Public Radio vom 14.09.2007, online verfügbar unter <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14434721>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  112. OVERTON, Spencer (2004): The Donor Class: Campaign Finance, Democracy, and Participation, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 153, H. 1, S. 73–118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  113. OVERTON, Spencer (2012): The Participation Interest, in: The Georgetown Law Journal, Jg. 100, H. 4, S. 1259–1310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  114. OXLEY, Douglas R. et al. (2008): Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits, in: Science, Jg. 321, H. 5896, S. 1667–1670. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  115. PAGE, Benjamin I. (2009): Exploring Political Inequality, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 101–103. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  116. PAGE, Benjamin I. (2009): Perspectives on Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 7, H. 1, S. 148–151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  117. PAGE, Benjamin I./ BARTELS, Larry M./ Seawright, Jason (2013): Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 11, H. 1, S. 51–73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  118. PAINTER, Richard W. (2016): Taxation Only With Representation. The Conservative Conscience and Campaign Finance Reform, Auburn, AL: Take Back Our Republic. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  119. PALMER, Anna (2012): Corporations don’t pony up for super PACs, in: Politico vom 08.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73804_Page2.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  120. PARKER, Ashley (2015): ‘Koch Primary’ Tests Hopefuls In the G.O.P., in: The New York Times vom 20.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/21/us/koch-seminar-is-early-proving-ground-for-gop-hopefuls.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  121. PARKINSON, Robin (2011): Independent Spending in North Carolina, 2006-2010, National Institute on Money in State Politics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.followthemoney.org/research/institute-reports/independent-spending-in-north-carolina-2006-2010/>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  122. PATTERSON, Samuel C./ RIPLEY, Randall B./ QUINLAN, Stephen V. (1992): Citizens' Orientations toward Legislatures. Congress and the State Legislature, in: The Western Political Quarterly, Jg. 45, H. 2, S. 315–338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  123. PEARSON, Karl (2007): The Grammar of Science, New York: Cosimo Classics. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  124. PENNIMAN, Nick/ POTTER, Wendell (2016): Citizens United is only 15% of the political cash problem, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-penniman-potter-political-campaign-finance-reform-20160308-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  125. PEREZ, Andrew (2016): GOP 2016: Emails Show Carly Fiorina Super PAC Helps Out At Campaign Events, Despite Coordination Rules, in: International Business Times vom 15.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/gop-2016-emails-show-carly-fiorina-super-pac-helps-out-campaign-events-despite>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  126. PERSILY, Nathaniel (2010): The Floodgates Were Already Open. What will the Supreme Court's campaign finance ruling really change?, in: Slate vom 25.01.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/01/the_floodgates_were_already_open.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  127. PERSILY, Nathaniel (2014): Bringing Big Money Out of the Shadows, in: The New York Times vom 02.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/opinion/bringing-big-money-out-of-the-shadows.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  128. PERSILY, Nathaniel (Hg.) (2015): Solutions to Political Polarization in America, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  129. PERSILY, Nathaniel/ LAMMIE, Kelli (2004): Perceptions of Corruption and Campaign Finance: When Public Opinion Determines Constitutional Law, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 153, H. 1, S. 119–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  130. PETERS, Jeremy W. (2012): Going Negative: In Florida, a Sea of Attack Ads, in: The New York Times vom 01.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9400E6D9123BF932A35751C0A9649D8B63>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  131. PETERSDORFF, Winand von (2016): Wie kaufe ich mir einen Präsidenten? Der amerikanische Wahlkampf verschlingt viel Geld. Trotzdem bekommen die Reichen nicht alles, was sie wollen, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 03.01.2016, <http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wahlkampf-finanzierung-in-den-usa-wie-kaufe-ich-mir-einen-praesidenten-13994060.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  132. PEVNICK, Ryan (2016): An Egalitarian Approach to Campaign Finance Reform, in: The New Rambler. An Online Review of Books vom 01.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://newramblerreview.com/component/content/article?id=149%3Aan-egalitarian-approach-to-campaign-finance-reform#.V09s4BPsS0k.twitter>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  133. PIKETTY, Thomas (2014): Das Kapital im 21. Jahrhundert, München: C. H. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  134. PILDES, Richard (2014): How to fix our polarized politics? Strengthen political parties, in: The Washington Post vom 06.02.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/02/06/how-to-fix-our-polarized-politics-strengthen-political-parties/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  135. PILKINGTON, Ed (2012): Rahm Emanuel: Citizens United is one of worst supreme court decisions ever, in: The Guardian vom 22.06.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/22/rahm-emanuel-citizens-united-attack>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  136. PILKINGTON, Ed/ MICHEL, Amanda (2012): Obama, Facebook and the power of friendship: the 2012 data election. A unified computer database that gathers and refines information on millions of potential voters is at the forefront of campaign technology – and could be the key to an Obama win, in: The Guardian vom 17.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  137. PLUMER, Brad (2016): Why more than 80 million Americans won’t vote on Election Day, in: Vox vom 08.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/7/13536198/election-day-americans-vote>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  138. POLITICO STAFF (2012): Barack Obama DNC speech, in: Politico vom 06.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/barack-obama-dnc-speech-text-080890>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  139. POLLOCK, James K. (1926): Party Campaign Funds, New York: Knopf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  140. POLLOCK III, Philip H. (1983): The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy. A Research Note, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 36, H. 3, S. 400–409. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  141. POLSBY, Nelson W./ WILDAVSKY, Aaron/ SCHIER, Steven E./ HOPKINS, David A. (2012): Presidential Elections. Strategies and Structures of American Politics, 13. Aufl., New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  142. PORTER, Glenn (1996): Industrialization and the Rise of Big Business, in: Calhoun, Charles W. (Hg.): The Gilded Age. Essays on the Origins of Modern America, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Books, S. 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  143. POST, Robert C. (Hg.) (2014): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  144. POST, Robert C. (2014): First Lecture: A Short History of Representation and Discursive Democracy, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 3–43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  145. POST, Robert C. (2014): Representative Democracy, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 155–165. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  146. POST, Robert C. (2014): Second Lecture: Campaign Finance Reform and the First Amendment, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 44–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  147. POTTER, Trevor (2012): The Political Reality of Citizens United, PBS Frontline, online verfügbar unter <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/big-sky-big-money/trevor-potter-the-political-reality-of-citizens-united/>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.08.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  148. POTTER, Trevor (2015): Legal Rubble: Money and Politics in the Age of Citizens United, Harvard Election Law Series, Harvard Law School, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA vom 09.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/news/publications-speeches/legal-rubble-money-and-politics-age-citizens-united>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.11.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  149. POTTER, Trevor (2016): “A Republic - If You Can Keep It!”. An Agenda for Our Democracy, The Campaign Legal Center, The Chautauqua Institution, Chautauqua, NY vom 04.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/news/appearances-publications-speeches/republic-if-you-can-keep-it-agenda-our-democracy>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  150. POTTER, Trevor/ JOWERS, Kirk L. (2005): Speech Governed by Federal Election Laws, in: Corrado, Anthony/ Mann, Thomas E./ Ortiz, Daniel R./ Potter, Trevor (Hg.): The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, S. 205–231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  151. POTTER, Wendell/ PENNIMAN, Nick (2016): Nation on the Take. How Big Money Corrupts Our Democracy and What We Can Do About It, New York, NY, u.a.: Bloomsbury Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  152. RAVEL, Ann M. (2017): Dysfunction and Deadlock at the Federal Election Commission, in: The New York Times vom 20.02.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/opinion/dysfunction-and-deadlock-at-the-federal-election-commission.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  153. RAWLS, John (1975): Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  154. RAWLS, John (2002): The Law of the Peoples, 4. Aufl., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  155. RAWLS, John (2003): Politischer Liberalismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  156. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2012): President Obama Job Approval, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 20.01.2017, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  157. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2014): Alaska Senate - Sullivan vs. Begich, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2014/senate/ak/alaska_senate_sullivan_vs_begich-3658.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 04.11.2014, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  158. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2016): Clinton: Favorable/Unfavorable, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/clinton_favorableunfavorable-1131.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 07.11.2016, zuletzt geprüft am 18.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  159. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2016): Trump: Favorable/Unfavorable, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_favorableunfavorable-5493.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 17.07.2017, zuletzt geprüft am 18.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  160. REES, Jonathan (2015): Industrialization and the Transformation of American Life. A Brief Introduction, New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  161. REHFUS, Wulff D. (Hg.) (2003): Handwörterbuch Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  162. REICH, Robert (2015): Look Who’s Buying American Democracy, in: The Huffington Post vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/look-whos-buying-american-democracy_b_8744598.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  163. REICH, Robert (2016): Want to reverse sky‐high inequality? Bernie Sanders is the pragmatic choice, in: The Guardian vom 27.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/27/want-to-reverse-sky-high-inequality-bernie-sanders-is-the-pragmatic-choice>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  164. REPUBLICAN PARTY (2016): Republican Platform 2016, Cleveland, OH. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  165. RESTON, Maeve (2015): 'Koch primary' heads to California, in: CNN News vom 01.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/31/politics/koch-brothers-presidential-2016/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  166. REUTTER, Werner (Hg.) (2017): Landesverfassungsgerichte. Entwicklung - Aufbau - Funktionen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  167. RIIS, Jacob A. (1997): How the Other Half Lives. Studies Among the Tenements of New York, New York, NY: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  168. RIPKEN, Susanna Kim (2011): Corporate First Amendment Rights After Citizens United: An Analysis of the Popular Movement to End the Constitutional Personhood of Corporations, in: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, Jg. 14, H. 1, S. 209–259. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  169. ROBILLAR, Kevin (2012): Who are Romney's '47 Percent'?, in: Politico vom 18.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/who-are-romneys-47-percent-081326>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  170. ROCK THE VOTE (2010): Rock the Vote 2010 Young Voter Poll, online verfügbar unter <https://www.rockthevote.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/research/2010/2010-rock-the-vote-nationwide-baseline.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  171. ROGERS, Steven (2017): Accountability in American Legislatures, ohne Ort. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  172. RÖMMELE, Andrea (1995): Unternehmensspenden in der Parteien- und Wahlkampffinanzierung. Die USA, Kanada, die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Großbritannien im internationalen Vergleich, Baden-Baden: Nomos (Nomos Universitätsschriften Politik, 55). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  173. ROSENBERG, Lisa (1996): A Bag of Tricks. Loopholes in the Campaign Finance System, Washington, DC: Center for Responsive Politics Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  174. ROSENSTONE, Steven J./ HANSEN, John Mark (1993): Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America, New York, NY: Longman. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  175. ROSIAK, Luke (2013): Self-financing candidates can’t buy love; wealthy challengers rarely win the elections, in: The Washington Times vom 30.05.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/30/wealthy-candidates-find-they-cant-buy-loveself-fin/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  176. ROTH, Dieter (1998): Empirische Wahlforschung. Ursprung, Theorien, Instrumente und Methoden, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  177. ROVE, Karl (2010): The GOP Targets State Legislatures, in: Wall Street Journal vom 04.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703862704575099670689398044>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  178. ROVE, Karl (2015): The Triumph of William McKinley. Why the Election of 1896 Still Matters, New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  179. RUBIN, Jennifer (2014): Sen. Mark Begich’s ad draws scorn, is pulled off the air, in: The Washington Post vom 03.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/09/03/sen-mark-begichs-ad-draws-scorn-is-pulled-off-the-air/?utm_term=.1aec8663be09>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  180. RUSSONELLO, Giovanni (2016): Voters Fear Their Ballot Won't Count, Poll Shows, in: The New York Times vom 25.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/us/politics/voter-fraud-poll.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  181. RUTENBERG, Jim (2014): How Billionaire Oligarchs Are Becoming Their Own Political Parties, in: The New York Times vom 17.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/magazine/how-billionaire-oligarchs-are-becoming-their-own-political-parties.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  182. SAAD, Lydia (2011): Perry Leads but Romney Gaining in GOP Favorability, GALLUP, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/poll/149423/perry-leads-romney-gaining-gop-favorability.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  183. SACKS, Mike (2012): Citizens United Backlash Picks Up Official Support From Occupy Wall Street, New York Chapter, in: The Huffington Post vom 06.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/citizens-united-constitutional-amendment-occupy-wall-street_n_1189373.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  184. SAEZ, Emmanuel/ ZUCMAN, Gabriel (2016): Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data, in: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Jg. 131, H. 2, S. 519–578. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  185. SAMPLES, John (2006): The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform, Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  186. SARLIN, Benjy (2014): Mark Begich pulls brutal attack ad after backlash, in: MSNBC News vom 02.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/mark-begich-pulls-brutal-attack-ad-after-backlash>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  187. SCHAFFNER, Brian F./ STREB, Matthew J. (2002): The Partisan Heuristic in Low-Information Elections, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 66, H. 4, S. 559–581. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  188. SCHERER, Michael/ REBALA, Pratheek, Wilson, Chris (2014): The Incredible Rise in Campaign Spending, in: TIME Magazine vom 23.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/3534117/the-incredible-rise-in-campaign-spending/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  189. SCHICKLER, Eric (2009): The Impact Of Unequal Political Participation on Policy Outcomes, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 106–107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  190. SCHLOZMAN, Kay L. (Hg.) (1987): Elections in America, Winchester, MA: Allan and Unwin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  191. SCHLOZMAN, Kay L./ VERBA, Sidney/ BRADY, Henry E. (2012): The Unheavenly Chorus. Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  192. SCHLUP, Leonard/ RYAN, James G. (Hg.) (2003): Historical Dictionary of the Gilded Age, New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  193. SCHMITT, Mark (2012): The rise of the zombie candidate. Super PACs have made it possible for no-shot hopefuls like Gingrich, Perry and Santorum to run indefinitely, in: Salon vom 11.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/the_rise_of_the_zombie_candidate/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  194. SCHMÜCKING, Daniel (2015): Negative Campaigning. Die Wirkung und Entwicklung negativer politischer Werbung in der Bundesrepublik, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  195. SCHOEN, Douglas E. (2012): American Casino. The Rigged Game That's Killing Democracy, New York: Velocity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  196. SCHOUTEN, Fredreka (2015): 2016 GOP hopefuls gear up for 'Koch' primary, in: USA Today vom 29.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/07/29/charles-koch-donors-meeting-california/30803357/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  197. SCHOUTEN, Fredreka (2015): Presidential super PACs push campaign limits, in: USA Today vom 22.09.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/09/22/presidential-super-pacs-push-campaign-boundaries-carly-fiorina-jeb-bush-hillary-clinton/72612984/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  198. SCHOUTEN, Fredreka (2017): Mingling business and White House, Trump holds $10 million fundraiser at Trump hotel, in: USA Today vom 28.06.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/06/28/trump-holds-fundraiser-his-hotel-mingling-business-and-presidency/435549001/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  199. SCHULTZ, David (2016): The Case for a Democratic Theory of American Election Law, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 259–268. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  200. SCHULZ, Thomas (2011): The Second Gilded Age. Has America Become an Oligarchy?, in: Spiegel Online International vom 28.10.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/the-second-gilded-age-has-america-become-an-oligarchy-a-793896.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  201. SCHWARZER, Gudrun (2001): Forschungsanträge verfassen. Ein praktischer Ratgeber für Sozialwissenschaftler/-innen, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, Jg. 8, H. 1, S. 141–156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  202. SEABROOK, Nicholas R. (2010): Money and State Legislative Elections. The Conditional Impact of Political Context, in: American Politics Research, Jg. 38, H. 3, S. 399–424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  203. SEABROOK, Nicholas R. (2017): Drawing the Lines. Constraints on Partisan Gerrymandering in U.S. Politics, Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  204. SEITZ-WALD, Alex (2012): Everyone hates Citizens United. A new poll shows the vast majority of Americans think there’s too much money in politics, in: Salon vom 25.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/people_really_hate_citizens_united/>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  205. SEITZ-WALD, Alex (2015): 'Citizens United' fallout 'more dangerous' than expected, in: MSNBC News vom 21.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/citizens-united-campaign-finance-fallout-different-more-dangerous-expected>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  206. SELKIRK, Kaethe (2011): The Effect of Independent Expenditures on Congressional Elections Following Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010), online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1767268>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  207. SEVASTOPULO, Demetri (2016): Money buing little power in US campaign, in: Financial Times vom 11.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.ft.com/content/c7a84e04-d0e4-11e5-92a1-c5e23ef99c77>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  208. SHAFER, Jack (2015): Three Cheers for Citizens United, in: Politico vom 25.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/citizens-united-2016-121739>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  209. SHAPIRO, Ilya (2015): 'Citizens United' misunderstood, in: USA Today vom 20.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/20/citizens-united-misunderstood-five-years-free-speech-anniversary-critics-column/22076597/>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  210. SHAW, Daron R. (1999): The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-1996, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 93, H. 2, S. 345–361. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  211. SHAW, Jonathan (2012): A Radical Fix for the Republic. Lawrence Lessig thinks American democracy requires a constitutional overhaul to counter the “economy of influence.”, in: Harvard Magazine vom July-August 2012, S. 21–23, online verfügbar unter <http://harvardmag.com/pdf/2012/07-pdfs/0712-21.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  212. SHERMAN, Paul (2012): 'Citizens United' didn't kill our democracy, in: USA Today vom, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/11/11/column-citizens-united-didnt-kill-democracy-after-all/1698277/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  213. SHUMAKER, Walter A./ LONGSDORF, George F. (1901): The Cyclopedic Dictionary of Law, St. Paul, MN: Keefe-Davidson Law Book Co. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  214. SIDES, John/ SHAW, Daron/ GROSSMANN, Matt/ LIPSITZ, Keena (2015): Campaigns and Elections, New York: W. W. Norton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  215. SIDES, John/ VAVRECK, Lynn (2013): The Gamble. Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  216. SILVER, Nate (2012): Supreme Court May Be Most Conservative in Modern History, The New York Times, FiveThirtyEight Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/supreme-court-may-be-most-conservative-in-modern-history/?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  217. SILVER, Nate (2016): How Much Did Comey Hurt Clinton’s Chances? And is it too late for his second letter to help her?, in: FiveThirtyEight vom 06.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-much-did-comey-hurt-clintons-chances/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  218. SILVERLEIB, Alan (2010): Gloves come off after Obama rips Supreme Court ruling, in: CNN News vom 28.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <Gloves come off after Obama rips Supreme Court ruling>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  219. SIMON, Herbert A. (1954): Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 18, H. 3, S. 245–253. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  220. SINCLAIR, Upton (1985): The Jungle, New York, NY: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  221. SINDERBRAND, Rebecca (2012): Analysis: Obama won with a better ground game, in: CNN News vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/07/politics/analysis-why-obama-won>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  222. SINK, Justin (2012): Jimmy Carter: Citizens United ruling 'the most stupid decision that the Supreme Court ever made', in: The Hill vom 29.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/219083-carter-citizens-uniter-ruling-the-most-stupid-decision-the-supreme-court-ever-made>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  223. SIRAKOV, David (2016): Politik in der Krise? Polarisierungsdynamiken im politischen Prozess, in: Lammert, Christian/ Siewert, Markus/ Vormann, Boris (Hg.): Handbuch Politik USA, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 617–636. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  224. SLACK, Donovan (2012): RIP positive ads in 2012, in: Politico vom 04.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/rip-positive-ads-in-2012-083262>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  225. SMITH, Bradley A. (2001): Unfree Speech. The Folly of Campaign Finance Reform, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  226. SMITH, Bradley A. (2010): The Myth of Campaign Finance Reform, in: National Affairs, Jg. 2, H. Winter Issue, S. 75–91. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  227. SMITH, Bradley A. (2010): First Amendment Upheld. An end to giving political speech less protection than pornography, in: Wall Street Journal vom 22.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704509704575019112172931620>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  228. SMITH, Craig R. (Hg.) (2011): A First Amendment Profile of the Supreme Court, Plymouth: John Cabot University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  229. SMITH, Melissa M. (2010): The Future of Campaign Finance Laws, in: Smith, Melissa M./ Williams, Glenda C./ Powell, Larry/ Copeland, Gary A. (Hg.): Campaign Finance Reform. The Political Shell Game, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, S. 123–136. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  230. SMITH, Melissa M./ WILLIAMS, Glenda C./ POWELL, Larry/ COPELAND, Gary A. (Hg.) (2010): Campaign Finance Reform. The Political Shell Game, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  231. SMITH, Steven S./ ROBERTS, Jason M./ VANDER WIELEN, Ryan J. (2007): The American Congress, 5. Aufl., New York, u.a.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  232. SMITH, Terry (2016): Justice Kennedy's Democratic Dystopia, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 281–286. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  233. SONGER, Donald R. (1984): Government Closest to the People. Constituent Knowledge in State & National Politics, in: Polity, Jg. 17, H. 2, S. 387–395. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  234. SORAUF, Frank J. (1988): Money in American Elections, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  235. SORAUF, Frank J. (1992): Inside Campaign Finance. Myths and Realities, New Haven/ London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  236. SORAUF, Frank J. (2003): Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities, in: Dahl, Robert A./ Shapiro, Ian/ Cheibub, José Antonio (Hg.): The Democracy Sourcebook, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, S. 408–418. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  237. SOROS, Jonathan (2015): Big money can't buy elections - influence is something else, Reuters Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/02/09/soros-there-is-no-idyllic-pre-citizens-united-era-to-return-to/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.05.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  238. SPARKS, Corey R. (2014): Foreigners United: Foreign Influence in American Elections After Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, in: Cleveland State Law Review, Jg. 62, H. 2, S. 245–278. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  239. SPENCER, Douglas M./ WOOD, Abby K. (2014): Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis of Independent Political Spending, in: Indiana Law Journal, Jg. 89, H. 3, S. 315–372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  240. SPURLOCK, Chris/ BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2012): New Hampshire Primary Spending Per Vote, in: The Huffington Post vom 12.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/12/new-hampshire-primary-spending_n_1202561.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  241. SQUIRE, Peverill (1989): Challengers in U. S. Senate Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 14, H. 4, S. 531–547. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  242. SQUIRE, Peverill (1995): Candidates, Money, and Voters. Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 48, H. 4, S. 891–917. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  243. STAMM, Stephanie (2015): How Do Presidential Candidates Spend $1 Billion?, in: National Journal vom 17.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/65877/how-do-presidential-candidates-spend-1-billion>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  244. STEEN, Jennifer/ PROKOP, Andrew (2016): Really rich people aren't actually that good at buying their way into political office, in: Vox vom 05.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/2015/12/3/9837596/self-funding-candidates>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  245. STEEN, Jennifer A. (2006): Self-financed candidates in congressional elections, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  246. STEINHAUSER, Paul (2011): Same man, different strategy, for Romney's second White House bid, in: CNN News vom 02.06.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/02/romney.announcement/index.html#>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  247. STEPAN, Alfred/ LINZ, Juan J. (2011): Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 9, H. 4, S. 841–856. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  248. STEVENS, John Paul (2014): Six Amendments. How and why we should change the Constitution, New York: Little Brown and Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  249. STEWART III, Charles/ REYNOLDS, Mark (1990): Television Markets and U. S. Senate Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 15, H. 4, S. 495–523. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  250. STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2014): Der Preis der Ungleichheit. Wie die Spaltung der Gesellschaft unsere Zukunft bedroht, München: Pantheon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  251. STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2015): Reich und Arm. Die wachsende Ungleichheit in unserer Gesellschaft, München: Siedler. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  252. STOCKMAN, Farah (2013): Two rulings that benefited a powerful few, in: The Boston Globe vom 26.02.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/columns/2013/02/26/dred-scott-citizens-united-two-rulings-that-benefited-powerful-few/0LVClAlvVi1MG7TTra77UN/story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  253. STOHR, Greg (2015): Bloomberg Poll: Americans Want Supreme Court to Turn Off Political Spending Spigot. Americans are divided on the justices' decisions on gay marriage, health care, and abortion. But not on campaign finance, in: Bloomberg News vom 28.09.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-28/bloomberg-poll-americans-want-supreme-court-to-turn-off-political-spending-spigot>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  254. STOKES, Donald E./ MILLER, Warren E. (1966): Party government and the salience of Congress, in: Campbell, Angus/ Converse, Philip E./ Miller, Warren E./ Stokes, Donald E. (Hg.): Elections and the political order, New York: Wiley, S. 194–211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  255. STOREY, Tim (2010): Legislature Landslide. GOP makes historic state legislative gains in 2010, Hg. v. Sabato’s Crystal Ball Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/txs2010120901/>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  256. STRATMANN, Thomas (2005): Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature, in: Public Choice, Jg. 49, H. 1 (124), S. 135–156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  257. STRAUSE, Renata E. B./ TOKAJI, Daniel P. (2014): Between Access and Influence, Building a Record for the Next Court, in: Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jg. 9, H. 1, S. 179–221. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  258. STRAUSS, Daniel (2015): Donald Trump's new pitch: I'm so rich I can't be bought, in: Politico vom 28.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/donald-trumps-so-rich-i-cant-be-bought-120743>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  259. STREB, Matthew J. (2016): Rethinking American Electoral Democracy, 4. Aufl., New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  260. SULLIVAN, Andy (2013): Insight: In Washington, lawmakers' routines shaped by fundraising, in: Reuters News vom 12.06.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-fundraising-insight/insight-in-washington-lawmakers-routines-shaped-by-fundraising-idUSBRE95B05520130612>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  261. SULLIVAN, Kathleen M. (1998): Against Campaign Finance Reform, in: Utah Law Review, Jg. 50, H. 2, S. 311–325. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  262. SULLIVAN, Sean (2014): The end of moderates, and what it means, in: The Washington Post vom 09.01.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/01/09/the-end-of-moderates-and-what-it-means/>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  263. SULLIVAN, Sean (2014): Why Mark Begich’s attack ad did plenty of damage — to Begich, in: The Washington Post vom 03.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/09/03/why-mark-begichs-attack-ad-did-plenty-of-damage-to-begich/?utm_term=.0e81ed5ec0ef>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  264. SULTAN, Niv (2017): Self-funded candidates lose big (except when they don't), Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/self-funded-candidates/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  265. SUMMERS, Mark Wahlgren (2004): Party Games. Getting, Keeping and Using Power in Gilded Age Politics, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  266. SUMNER, Andy/ COBHAM, Alex (2013): On inequality, let’s do the Palma (because the Gini is so last century), Oxfam Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/on-inequality-lets-do-the-palma-because-the-gini-is-so-last-century/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  267. TAMARI, Jonathan (2015): In Menendez case, Citizens United also on trial, in: The Philadelphia Inquirer vom 06.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20151006_In_Menendez_case__Citizens_United_also_on_trial.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  268. TANFANI, Joseph (2016): Some Republican candidates spend big on ads, with little to show for it, in: Los Angeles Times vom 25.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-campaign-advertising-20160125-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  269. TANFANI, Joseph/ MEHTA, Seema (2015): Super PACs stretch the rules that prohibit coordination with presidential campaigns, in: Los Angeles Times vom 07.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  270. TEACHOUT, Zephyr (2014): Corruption in America. From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  271. TEACHOUT, Zephyr (2014): Neoliberal Political Law, in: Law and Contemporary Problems, Jg. 77, H. 4, S. 215–237. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  272. TEIXEIRA, Ruy A. (1992): The Disappearing American Voter, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  273. TEMPLE-WEST, Patrick (2014): Sullivan leading Begich in Alaska, in: Politico vom 05.11.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/alaska-2014-election-results-mark-begich-dan-sullivan-112573>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  274. THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER (2012): The Campaign Legal Center Guide to the Current Rules For Federal Elections. What Has Changed in the 2012 Election Cycle, online verfügbar unter <http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/document/campaign-legal-center-guide-current-rules-federal-elections-what-has-changed-2012-election>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  275. THE COOK POLITICAL REPORT (2012): Partisan Voting Index, online verfügbar unter <https://cookpolitical.com/pvi-0>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  276. THE ECONOMIST (2016): Politics by numbers. Voters in America, and increasingly elsewhere too, are being ever more precisely targeted, in: The Economist vom 26.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21695190-voters-america-and-increasingly-elsewhere-too-are-being-ever-more-precisely>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  277. THE HUFFINGTON POST (2014): 2014 Alaska Senate: Sullivan vs. Begich, online verfügbar unter <http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2014-alaska-senate-sullivan-vs-begich>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 04.11.2014, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  278. THE NATION EDITORIAL BOARD (2012): Electoral Dysfunction, 2012, in: The Nation vom 23.01.2012, S. 3–4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  279. THE NEW YORK TIMES (1988): A 30-Second Ad on Crime, in: The New York Times vom 03.11.1988, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/03/us/a-30-second-ad-on-crime.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  280. THE NEW YORK TIMES (2016): Who Is Running for President? Donald J. Trump officially accepted the Republican party's nomination on July 22. Hillary Clinton was officially nominated on July 26 at the Democratic Convention., in: The New York Times vom 26.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/2016-presidential-candidates.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  281. THE NEW YORK TIMES/ CBS NEWS (2015): American's Views on Money in Politics. Most Americans say that money has too much influence on politicians and that campaign finance changes are needed, in: The New York Times vom 02.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/02/us/politics/money-in-politics-poll.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  282. THE NYT EDITORIAL BOARD (2010): The Escalating Price of Politics, in: The New York Times vom 07.03.2010, online verfügbar unter <www.nytimes.com/2010/03/08/opinion/08mona4.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  283. THE NYT EDITORIAL BOARD (2015): The Soaring Price of Political Access, in: The New York Times vom 26.09.2015, SR 10, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/27/opinion/sunday/the-soaring-price-of-political-access.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  284. THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS (2012): With Voters Focused on Economy, Obama Lead Narrows. Social Issues Rank as Lowest Priorities, The Pew Research Center For The People & The Press, Washington, DC, online verfügbar unter <http://www.people-press.org/2012/04/17/with-voters-focused-on-economy-obama-lead-narrows/>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  285. THE REDISTRICTING MAJORITY PROJECT (2013): 2012 REDMAP Summary Report, online verfügbar unter <http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  286. THE WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL BOARD (2016): This would be a nice first step on campaign finance reform, in: The Washington Post vom 10.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-would-be-a-nice-first-step-on-campaign-finance-reform/2016/06/10/745de05a-2e69-11e6-b5db-e9bc84a2c8e4_story.html?utm_term=.dc0c9d7d7ff8>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  287. THEE-BRENAN, Megan (2014): Polls Show Broad Support for Campaign Spending Caps, in: The New York Times vom 02.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/us/politics/polls-show-broad-support-for-campaign-spending-caps.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  288. THERIAULT, Sean M. (2008): Party polarization in Congress, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  289. THOMAS, Scott J. (1989): Do Incumbent Campaign Expenditures Matter?, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 51, H. 4, S. 965–976. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  290. TIME MAGAZINE: Transcript: Read the Full Text of the Primetime Republican Debate, in: TIME Magazine vom, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/3988276/republican-debate-primetime-transcript-full-text/>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  291. TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de (1959): Democracy in America, 4. Aufl., London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  292. TOKAJI, Daniel P. (2011): The Obliteration of Equality in American Campaign Finance Law: A Trans-Border Comparison, in: Journal of Parliamentary & Political Law, Jg. 5, H. 5, S. 381–398. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  293. TOKAJI, Daniel P./ STRAUSE, Renata E. B. (2014): The New Soft Money. Outside Spending in Congressional Elections, Columbus, Ohio. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  294. TOKAJI, Daniel P./ STRAUSE, Renata E. B. (2016): How Sausage Is Made: A Research Agenda For Campaign Finance and Lobbying, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 223–232. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  295. TORRES-SPELLISCY, Ciara (2013): Got Corruption? Nixon's Milk Money. Campaign contributions may not be as brazenly illegal as the dairy industry's were to Nixon, but that should still not dissuade SCOTUS' McCutcheon decision, Brennan Center for Justice, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/got-corruption-nixon%E2%80%99s-milk-money>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  296. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (2014): Corruption Perceptions Index 2014: In Detail, online verfügbar unter <https://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/in_detail>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  297. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL USA (2010): TI-USA Statement to U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, online verfügbar unter <https://www.transparency.org/news/pressrelease/20100126_ti_usa_statement_to_u.s._supreme_courts_ruling_in_citizens_united_>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  298. TREANOR, William M. (2006): The Jurisprudence of Justice Stevens, in: Fordham Law Review, Jg. 74, H. 4, S. 1557–1559. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  299. TRIBE, Laurence/ MATZ, Joshua (2010): Uncertain Justice. The Roberts Court and the Constitution, New York: Henry Holt and Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  300. TROY, Gil (1997): Money and Politics. The Oldest Connection, in: The Wilson Quarterly, Jg. 21, H. 3, S. 14–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  301. TUCKER, Anne (2011): Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis of Free Speech and Corporate Personhood in Citizens United, in: Case Western Reserve Law Review, Jg. 61, H. 2, S. 495–548. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  302. TUCKER, Harvey J./ WEBER, Ronald E. (1987): State Legislative Election Outcomes: Contextual Effects and Legislative Performance Effects, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 12, H. 4, S. 537–553. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  303. TUMULTY, Karen (2012): Election 2012: Republicans united on goal - beat Obama - divided on how to get there, in: The Washington Post vom 11.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/election-2012-republicans-united-on-goal--beat-obama--divided-on-how-to-get-there/2012/02/08/gIQAfCN66Q_story.html?utm_term=.9ee7d2c48f99>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  304. TWAIN, Mark/ DUDLEY WARNER, Charles (2001): The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today, New York, NY: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  305. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU (2002): Census 2000 Special Reports: Demographic Trends in the 20th Century, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  306. U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (2017): About the U.S. Chamber, online verfügbar unter <https://www.uschamber.com/about-us/about-the-us-chamber>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  307. U.S. GOVERNMENT (2012): Senate Hearing: Taking Back Our Democracy: Responding to Citizens United and the Rise of Super PACs. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, United States Senate, Serial No. J–112–89, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg86915/html/CHRG-112shrg86915.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  308. UNGER, Craig (2012): Boss Rove. Inside Karl Rove's Secret Kingdom of Power, New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  309. UNITED STATES CONGRESS (2006): Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. BCRA § 201, 2 U.S.C. § 434(f)(3). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  310. UNITED STATES SENATE (1974): The Final Report of the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, Hg. v. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, S. Res. 60, February 7, 1973 (A resolution to establish a select committee of the Senate to investigate and study illegal or improper cam-paign activities in the Presidential Election of 1972). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  311. URBINATI, Nadia (2014): Free Speech as the Citizen's Right, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 125–140. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  312. UROFSKY, Melvin I. (2005): Money and Free Speech. Campaign Finance Reform and the Courts, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  313. VALELLY, Richard M. (2013): American Politics. A Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  314. VANDEWALKER, Ian (2015): Election Spending 2014: Outside Spending in Senate Races Since Citizens United, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Outside%20Spending%20Since%20Citizens%20United.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  315. VANDEWALKER, Ian/ WEINER, Daniel I. (2015): Stronger Parties, Stronger Democracy: Rethinking Reform, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Stronger_Parties_Stronger_Democracy.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  316. VAVRECK, Lynn (2014): A Campaign Dollar’s Power Is More Valuable to a Challenger, in: The New York Times vom 07.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/upshot/a-campaign-dollars-power-is-more-valuable-to-a-challenger.html?abt=0002&abg=0>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  317. VAVRECK, Lynn (2014): A Campaign Dollar's Power Is More Valuable to a Challenger, in: The New York Times vom 07.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/upshot/a-campaign-dollars-power-is-more-valuable-to-a-challenger.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  318. VAVRECK, Lynn (2015): The Long Decline of Trust in Government, and Why That Can Be Patriotic, in: The New York Times vom 03.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/upshot/the-long-decline-of-trust-in-government-and-why-that-can-be-patriotic.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  319. VAVRECK, Lynn (2016): Yes, Political Ads Are Still Important, Even for Donald Trump, in: The New York Times vom 20.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/upshot/yes-political-ads-are-still-important-even-for-donald-trump.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  320. VERBA, Sidney/ NIE, Norman H. (1972): Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  321. VERBA, Sidney/ NIE, Norman H./ Kim, Jae-On (1978): Participation and Political Equality. A Seven-Nation Comparison, Chicago u.a.: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  322. VERBA, Sidney/ SCHLOZMAN, Kay L./ Brady, Henry E. (1995): Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  323. VICTOR, Jennifer N. (2016): Campaign Fund Raising Is an Arms Race With Limited Impact, in: The New York Times vom 25.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/02/25/does-money-really-matter-in-politics/campaign-fund-raising-is-an-arms-race-with-limited-impact>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  324. VITAL STATISTICS ON CONGRESS (2014): Legislative Productivity in Congress and Workload, Brookings Institution, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Vital-Statistics-Chapter-6-Legislative-Productivity-in-Congress-and-Workload_UPDATE.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  325. VITAL STATISTICS ON CONGRESS (2016): Campaign finance in Congressional elections, Brookings Institution, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brookings.edu/multi-chapter-report/vital-statistics-on-congress/>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  326. VOGEL, Kenneth P.: Karl Rove and the Modern Money Machine, in: Politico Magazine vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/karl-rove-and-the-modern-money-machine-108019>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  327. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2012): 3 billionaires who'll drag out the race, in: Politico vom 12.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/01/meet-the-3-billionaires-wholl-drag-out-the-race-071358>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  328. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2012): The billion-dollar bust?, in: Politico vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/the-billion-dollar-bust-083534>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  329. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2014): Big Money. 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp - on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, New York: PublicAffairs. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  330. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2014): Big Money Breaks Out. Top 100 donors give almost as much as 4.75 million small donors combined., in: Politico vom 29.12.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/top-political-donors-113833.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.12.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  331. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2015): Koch brothers summon Bush, Cruz, Walker, Rubio to SoCal confab, in: Politico vom 27.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/koch-brothers-wealthy-donors-gop-2016-freedom-partners-seminar-california-120663>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  332. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2015): A Koch love fest in California. For some donors and operatives, the focus on overt electoral politics was slightly tawdry, in: Politico vom 03.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/koch-love-fest-in-california-120928>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  333. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2015): How the Koch network rivals the GOP. The billionaires and their allies have built a private political machine without precedent, in: Politico vom 30.12.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/koch-brothers-network-gop-david-charles-217124>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.01.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  334. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2016): How Bernie built a fundraising juggernaut. Sanders’ small-donor operation looks spontaneous, but it grew out of careful planning and innovation, in: Politico vom 10.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-fundraising-219112>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  335. VOGEL, Kenneth P./ ARNSDORF, Isaac (2016): Trump's campaign dwarfed by Clinton's. New FEC reports show that the likely Democratic nominee will start with a huge infrastructure advantage., in: Politico vom 21.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trumps-campaign-dwarfed-by-clintons-223438>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  336. VOGEL, Kenneth P./ PARTI, Tarini (2015): Small donor myth debunked. The heavily touted grassroots fundraising engines were largely spin, a POLITICO analysis shows, in: Politico vom 16.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/small-donor-myth-upended-120275>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  337. VOLOKH, Eugene (1995): Cheap Speech and What It Will Do, in: The Yale Law Journal, Jg. 104, H. 8, S. 1805–1850. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  338. WAGNER, Jochen W. (2005): Deutsche Wahlwerbekampagnen made in USA? Amerikanisierung oder Modernisierung bundesrepublikanischer Wahlkampagnen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  339. WALDEN, Richard (2015): The $2.5 Billion Candidate X 2, in: Huffington Post vom 14.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-walden/the-25-billion-candidate_b_7066146.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  340. WALDMAN, Paul (2015): In 2016, Money Will Matter More Than Ever, Yet Not At All, in: The American Prospect vom 06.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/2016-money-will-matter-more-ever-yet-not-all>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  341. WALKER WILSON, Molly J. (2014): Financing Elections and "Appearance of Corruption": Citizens Attitudes and Behavior in 2012, in: Catholic University Law Review, Jg. 63, H. 4, S. 953–996. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  342. WALLACE, Gregory (2016): Voter turnout at 20-year low in 2016, in: CNN News vom 30.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/popular-vote-turnout-2016/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  343. WALLACk, Grace/ HUDAK, John (2014): How Much Did Your Vote Cost? Spending Per Voter in the 2014 Senate Races, Brookings Institution, Brookings Institution Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2014/11/07/how-much-did-your-vote-cost-spending-per-voter-in-the-2014-senate-races/>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  344. WALSHE, Shushannah (2014): Ad Controvery Roils Alaska Senate Race, in: ABC News vom 02.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/09/ad-controversy-roils-alaska-senate-race/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  345. WANG, Sam (2013): The Great Gerrymander of 2012, in: The Washington Post vom 02.02.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/opinion/sunday/the-great-gerrymander-of-2012.html?pagewanted=all&mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  346. WARREN, Mark E. (2004): What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 48, H. 2, S. 328–343. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  347. WATSON, Robert W. (Hg.) (2008): White House Studies Compendium (5), New York: Nova Science Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  348. WEBER, Max (1972): Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, 5. Aufl., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  349. WEBER, Max (1985): Der Sinn der 'Wertfreiheit' der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften, in: Weber, Max (Hg.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, S. 489–540. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  350. WEBER, Max (1985): Die 'Objektivität' sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnisse, in: Weber, Max (Hg.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, S. 146–214. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  351. WEBER, Max (Hg.) (1985): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  352. WEEKS, Daniel (2008): Does Money Buy Elections? The Impact of Spending on U.S. Congressional Campaigns, Americans for Campaign Reform, Concord, N.H., NUMBER PB08-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  353. WEINER, Daniel I. (2016): Money And Politics In The Age Of Trump, in: The Huffington Post vom 11.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-i-weiner/money-and-politics-in-the_b_12916042.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  354. WEINMANN, Philipp (2016): Wahlen und Direkte Demokratie: Demokratische Teilhabe im Spannungsfeld politischer Machtinteressen, in: Lammert, Christian/ Siewert, Markus/ Vormann, Boris (Hg.): Handbuch Politik USA, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 243–263. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  355. WEINTRAUB, Ellen L./ LEVINE, Jason K. (2009): Campaign Finance and the 2008 Elections - How Small Change(s) Can Really Add Up, in: St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, Jg. 24, H. 2, S. 461–477. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  356. WEISBERG, Herbert F. (2002): Partisanship and Incumbency in Presidential Elections, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 24, H. 2, S. 339–360. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  357. WEISMAN, Jonathan/ YADRON, Danny (2011): Inside the Obama Money Machine, in: Wall Street Journal vom 19.11.2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204517204577042142257818640>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  358. WELCH, Susan/ GRUHL, John/ RIGDON, Susan M./ Thomas, Sue (2012): Understanding American Government, 13. Aufl., Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  359. WELCH, William P. (1976): The Effectiveness of Expenditures in State Legislative Races, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 4, H. 3, S. 333–356. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  360. WELCH, William P. (1981): Money and votes. A simultaneous equation model, in: Public Choice, Jg. 36, H. 2, S. 209–234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  361. WERTHEIMER, Fred (2014): Legalized Bribery. Four years on, Citizens United is ruining democracy. Here's how to get it back, in: Politico vom 19.01.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/citizens-united-campaign-finance-legalized-bribery-102366>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  362. WERTHEIMER, Fred (2016): Citizens United and Its Disastrous Consequences: The Decision, in: The Huffington Post vom 14.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-wertheimer/citizens-united-and-its-d_b_8979252.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  363. WERTHEIMER, Fred (2016): Citizens United Consequences: Super Rich Empowered, Ordinary Americans Undermined, Democracy Subverted, in: The Huffington Post vom 20.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-wertheimer/citizens-united-consequen_b_9029038.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  364. WESLEYAN MEDIA PROJECT (2016): Clinton Crushes Trump 3:1 in Air War. Clinton also dominates local cable, which Trump has largely ignored, Wesleyan Media Project, online verfügbar unter <http://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases/nov-2016/#table1>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  365. WEßELS, Bernhard (2015): Politische Ungleichheit beim Wählen, in: Merkel, Wolfgang (Hg.): Demokratie und Krise. Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 67–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  366. WEST, Darrell M. (2014): Billionaires. Reflections on the Upper Crust, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  367. WEST, Darrell M. (2015): Can Billionaires Buy Elections?, Brookings Institution, online verfügbar unter <http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2015/01/27-can-billionaires-buy-elections-west>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  368. WEST, Tim (2011): Associate Justice Alito, in: Smith, Craig R. (Hg.): A First Amendment Profile of the Supreme Court, Plymouth: John Cabot University Press, S. 160–170. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  369. WHITE, Richard (2015): Welcome back to the bad old days of American politics - only worse, in: Reuters News vom 21.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/01/21/like-elections-in-the-gilded-age-only-with-more-money/>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  370. WHITEHOUSE, Sheldon (2016): The Supreme Court's Blind Spot: Understanding How Democracies Function, in: National Law Journal vom 08.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202751641079/The-Supreme-Courts-Blind-Spot-Understanding-How-Democracies-Function?slreturn=20160717095905>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  371. WICKEL, Martin (2001): Recht und Reform der Wahlkampffinanzierung in den USA, in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, Jg. 32, H. 3, S. 645–669. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  372. WIEBE, Robert H. (1967): The Search for Order. 1877-1920, New York: Hill and Wang. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  373. WILLIAMS, Glenda C. (2010): Overview of Campaign Finance Law, in: Smith, Melissa M./ Williams, Glenda C./ Powell, Larry/ Copeland, Gary A. (Hg.): Campaign Finance Reform. The Political Shell Game, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, S. 1–11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  374. WILLIS, Derek (2014): Every Election Is the Most Expensive Election. Or Not., in: The New York Times vom 16.12.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/17/upshot/every-election-is-the-most-expensive-election-or-not.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  375. WILNER, Elizabeth (2012): Ad Avalanche: 43,000 Political Spots a Day Until November. We're On Our Way to 3.6 Million Ads This Election Cycle, in: Advertising Age vom, online verfügbar unter <http://adage.com/article/campaign-trail/ad-avalanche-43-000-political-spots-a-day-november/237195/#author_bio_box>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  376. WINTERS, Jeffrey A. (2011): Democracy and Oligarchy. Democracy and oligarchy are not opposites, as is commonly supposed. Forms of the former can even promote the latter., in: The American Interest, Jg., H. November/ December Issue, S. 18–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  377. WINTERS, Jeffrey A. (2011): Oligarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  378. WINTERS, Jeffrey A./ PAGE, Benjamin I. (2009): Oligarchy in the United States?, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 7, H. 4, S. 731–751. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  379. WITKO, Christopher (2014): When Does Money Buy Votes? Campaign Contributions and Policymaking, in: Grossmann, Matt (Hg.): New Directions in Interest Group Politics, New York: Routledge, S. 165–184. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  380. WOLFE, Christopher (1997): Judicial Activism. Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security?, 2. überarbeitete Aufl., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  381. WOOD, Gordon S. (2009): Empire of Liberty. A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  382. WOOLDRIDGE, Jeffrey M. (2015): Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach, 6. Aufl., Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  383. YANOW, Dvora (2003): Interpretive Empirical Political Science: What Makes This Not a Subfield of Qualitative Methods, in: Qualitative Methods, Jg. 1, H. 2, S. 9–13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  384. YOUN, Monica (2011): First Amendment Fault Lines and the Citizens United Decision, in: Harvard Law & Policy Review, Jg. 5, H. 1, S. 135–161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  385. YOUN, Monica (Hg.) (2011): Money, Politics, and the Constitution. Beyond Citizens United, New York: The Century Foundation Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  386. YOUNG, Chris/ O'BRIEN, Reity/ FULLER, Andrea (2013): Justice Obscured: Corporations, pro-business nonprofits foot bill for judicial seminars. George Mason University top host of events, The Center for Public Integrity, online verfügbar unter <https://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/03/28/12368/corporations-pro-business-nonprofits-foot-bill-judicial-seminars>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  387. YOUNGE, Gary (2012): US elections: no matter who you vote for, money always wins, in: The Guardian vom 29.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/jan/29/us-politics-vote-money-wins>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  388. ZERNIKE, Kate (2010): Secretive Republican Donors Are Planning Ahead, in: The New York Times vom 19.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/us/politics/20koch.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  389. ZIMMERMANN, Eric (2010): Poll: 70 percent believe Congress is corrupt, in: The Hill vom 08.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/113541-poll-70-percent-believe-congress-is-corrupt>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  390. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (1988): Explaining Senate Election Outcomes, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 82, H. 2, S. 385–403. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  391. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (1989): Campaign Spending in U.S. Senate Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 14, H. 4, S. 487–507. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  392. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (1991): Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 53, H. 1, S. 34–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  393. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (2010): The Disappearing Center. Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  394. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (2013): What If the Pundits Are Right After All? A Reply on Polarization and Sorting, in: The Atlantic vom 04.03.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/what-if-the-pundits-are-right-after-all-a-reply-on-polarization-and-sorting/273690/>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  395. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I./ ALEXANDER, Brad/ GUNNING, Matthew (2006): Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 68, H. 1, S. 75–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  396. ACKERET, Markus (2014): Proteste in Hongkong. Das andere China meldet sich, in: Neue Zürcher Zeitung vom 26.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nzz.ch/international/asien-und-pazifik/das-andere-china-1.18391043>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  397. ALEXANDER, Brad (2005): Good Money and Bad Money. Do Funding Sources Affect Electoral Outcomes, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 58, H. 2, S. 353–358. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  398. ALEXANDER, Herbert (1972): Money in Politics, Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  399. ALEXANDER, Herbert (1976): Financing Politics. Money, Elections, and Political Reforms, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  400. ALEXANDER, Herbert (1976): Financing the 1972 Election, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  401. ALLISON, Bill (2016): Millions From Maxed-Out Clinton Donors Flowed Through Loophole, in: Bloomberg News vom 26.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-dnc-contributions/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.05.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  402. ALMOND, Gabriel A./ VERBA, Sidney (1963): The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  403. ALTSCHULER, Bruce E. (2008): Learning the Art of Policy Management, in: Watson, Robert W. (Hg.): White House Studies Compendium, New York: Nova Science Publishers (5), S. 163–182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  404. AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (2012): External Political Efficacy Index 1952-2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/toptable/tab5b_4.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  405. ANDERHEIDEN, Michael (2003): Rawls, John, in: Rehfus, Wulff D. (Hg.): Handwörterbuch Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, S. 581. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  406. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen/ FIGUEIREDO, John M. de/ SNYDER JR., James (2003): Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Jg. 17, H. 1, S. 105–130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  407. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen/ GERBER, Alan (1994): The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending. Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 56, H. 4, S. 1106–1118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  408. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen/ IYENGAR, Shanto (1997): Going Negative. How Political Advertisements Shrink & Polarize the Electorate, New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  409. APPLEBOME, Peter (2012): Personal Cost for 2 Senate Bids: $100 Million, in: The New York Times vom 02.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/nyregion/linda-e-mcmahon-has-spent-nearly-100-million-in-senate-races.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  410. ARCENEAUX, Kevin/ BRACE, Paul/ JOHNSON, Martin/ ULBIG, Stacy C. (2004): Does State Political Ideology Change over Time?, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 57, H. 4, S. 529–540. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  411. ARKEDIS, Jim (2014): Time is Money: How to Fix Outrageous Political Spending, in: The Daily Beast vom 11.03.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/03/time-is-money-how-to-fix-outrageous-political-spending.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  412. ARZHEIMER, Kai/ EVANS, Jocelyn/ LEWIS-BECK, Michael (Hg.) (2017): The SAGE Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, 2. Aufl., Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  413. AVALIKTOS, Neal (Hg.) (2004): The Election Process Revisited, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  414. AVENT, Ryan (2011): Government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich. Why is policy so responsive to the preferences of the wealthy?, in: The Economist vom 17.02.2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/02/political_economy>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.12.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  415. BABB, Drew (2014): LBJ’s 1964 attack ad ‘Daisy’ leaves a legacy for modern campaigns, in: The Washington Post vom 05.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/lbjs-1964-attack-ad-daisy-leaves-a-legacy-for-modern-campaigns/2014/09/05/d00e66b0-33b4-11e4-9e92-0899b306bbea_story.html?utm_term=.4672e5975d27>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  416. BADE, Rachel (2016): Freedom Caucus opposes GOP's Obamacare replacement plan. A three-year phaseout 'will meet with major resistance,' said the group's incoming leader, Rep. Mark Meadows, in: Politico vom 05.12.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/obamacare-replacement-freedom-caucus-gop-232215>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  417. BADIE, Bertrand/ BERG-SCHLOSSER Dirk/ MORLINO, Leonardo (Hg.) (2011): International Encyclopedia of Political Science (7), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  418. BAI, Matt (2012): How Much Has Citizens United Changed the Political Game?, in: The New York Times vom 17.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/magazine/how-much-has-citizens-united-changed-the-political-game.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  419. BAKER, Peter (2010): Obama Ratchets Up Tone Against G.O.P., in: The New York Times vom 10.10.2010, A11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  420. BALCERZAK, Ashley (2016): Where the money came from, not how much, mattered in the presidential race, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/where-the-money-came-from-not-how-much-mattered-in-the-presidential-race/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  421. BALCH, George I. (1974): Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept "Sense of Political Efficacy", in: Political Methodology, Jg. 1, H. 2, S. 1–43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  422. BANERJEE, Neela (2012): Romney ad features miners allegedly forced to attend rally, in: Los Angeles Times vom 19.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/19/news/la-pn-romney-ad-miners-rally-20120919>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  423. BARBER, Michael (2015): Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 78, H. 1, S. 296–310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  424. BARBER, Michael/ MCCARTY, Nolan (2015): Causes and Consequences of Polarization, in: Persily, Nathaniel (Hg.): Solutions to Political Polarization in America, New York: Cambridge University Press, S. 19-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  425. BARNES, Robert (2009): 'Hillary: The Movie' to Get Supreme Court Screening, in: The Washington Post vom 15.03.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/14/AR2009031401603.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  426. BARRETT, Mark (2017): Meadows mingles with Koch brothers, billionaire GOP donors, in: USA Today vom 30.06.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2017/06/30/meadows-mingles-koch-brothers-billionaire-gop-donors/440580001/>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  427. BARTELS, Larry M. (1991): Instrumental and "Quasi-Instrumental" Variables, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 35, H. 3, S. 777–800. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  428. BARTELS, Larry M. (2008): Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  429. BAUM, Laura (2012): Obama Dominates Advertising in Key States, Wesleyan Media Project, Political Advertising Analysis Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases/obama-dominates-ads-in-key-states/>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  430. BAUMGARTNER, Frank J./ BERRY, Jeffrey M./ HOJNACKI, Marie/ KIMBALL, David C./ LEECH, Beth L. (2009): Lobbying and Policy Change. Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why, Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  431. BEATTY, Jack (2007): A Sisyphean History of Campaign Finance Reform, in: The Atlantic, July Issue, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/a-sisyphean-history-of-campaign-finance-reform/306066/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  432. BEATTY, Jack (2007): Age of Betrayal. The Triumph of Money in America, 1865-1900, New York, NY: Vintage Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  433. BEATTY, Jack/ Bacon, Katie (2007): The Dark Side of the Gilded Age, in: The Atlantic, June Issue, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/06/the-dark-side-of-the-gilded-age/306012/>, zuletzt geprüft am 04.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  434. BENNETT, James (2012): The New Price of American Politics, in: The Atlantic, October Issue, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/10/the/309086/>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  435. BENSEL, Richard Franklin (2008): Passion and Preferences. William Jennings Bryan and the 1896 Democratic National Convention, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  436. BENSON, Eric/ TARTAR, Andre (2012): The Forever Campaign, in: New York Magazine vom 14.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://nymag.com/news/politics/elections-2012/timeline-2012-10/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  437. BERENS, Charlyne (2013): One House. The Unicameral's Progressive Vision for Nebraska, 2. Aufl., Lincoln, NE/ London: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  438. BERENSON, Tessa (2014): Here Are 5 of The Most Dishonest Political Ads of 2014, in: TIME Magazine vom 06.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/3475006/dishonest-political-campaign-ads-2014/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  439. BERMAN, Ari (2012): The.000063 Percent Election, in: The Nation vom 16.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.thenation.com/article/000063-percent-election/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  440. BERMAN, Ari (2015): Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  441. BERNSTEIN, Carl/ WOODWARD, Bob (1974): All The President's Men, New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  442. BEST, Henning/ WOLF, Christof (Hg.) (2010): Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  443. BEST, Henning/ WOLF, Christof (2010): Lineare Regressionsanalyse, in: Best, Henning/ Wolf, Christof (Hg.): Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 607–638. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  444. BEST, Henning/ WOLF, Christof (2010): Logistische Regression, in: Best, Henning/ Wolf, Christof (Hg.): Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 827–854. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  445. BEVIER, Lillian: Citizens United Vindicates Fundamental First Amendment Principles, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 33–34, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  446. BHATTARAI, Abha (2016): Trump taps wrestling executive to lead Small Business Administration, in: The Washington Post vom 07.12.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-taps-wrestling-executive-to-lead-small-business-administration/2016/12/07/3b53e72c-bcc7-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  447. BIERSACK Bob (2016): Team Blue routing Team Red in presidential fundraising, unlike 2012, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/09/team-blue-routing-team-red-in-presidential-fundraising-unlike-2012/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  448. BLAIS, André/ FORUNIER, Patrick/ NADEAU, Richard/ GIDENGIL, Elisabeth/ NEVITTE, Neil (2003): Issue Importance and Performance Voting, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 25, H. 1, S. 51–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  449. BLAIS, André/ GIDENGIL, Elisabeth/ NADEAU, Richard/ NEVITTE, Neil (2002): Anatomy of a Liberal Victory. Making Sense of the Vote in the 2000 Canadian Election, Peterborough: Broadview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  450. BLAKE, Aaron (2015): The most interesting political stat of the day, in: The Washington Post vom 18.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/02/18/the-most-interesting-political-stat-of-the-day/>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.02.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  451. BLASI, Vincent (1994): Free Speech and the Widening Gyre of Fund-Raising: Why Campaign Spending Limits May Not Violate the First Amendment after All, in: Columbia Law Review, Jg. 94, H. 4, S. 1281–1325. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  452. BLASIO, Bill de (2010): Citizens United and the 2010 Midterm Elections, New York, Office of the Public Advocate for the City of New York, online verfügbar unter <http://archive.advocate.nyc.gov/news/2010-12-10/citizens-united-and-2010-midterm-elections-0>, zuletzt geprüft am 04.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  453. BLAU, Judith/ MONCADA, Alberto (2006): Justice in the United States, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  454. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2012): Newt Gingrich South Carolina Surge Boosted By Super PAC Spending Spree, in: The Huffington Post vom 20.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/20/newt-gingrich-south-carolina-super-pac-spending_n_1219093.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  455. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2015): Maine Voters Hope To Restore Their Revolutionary Election System. Until a few years ago, teachers, waitresses and firefighters could run for office in Maine - and win., in: The Huffington Post vom 04.09.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/maine-campaign-finance-reform_us_55e8bf3be4b093be51bafa2e>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  456. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2015): How Super PACs And Campaigns Are Coordinating In 2016. Efforts to circumvent the coordination ban have grown more aggressive, in: The Huffington Post vom 14.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/super-pac-coordination_56463f85e4b045bf3def0273>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.11.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  457. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2016): On Campaign Finance, Republicans and Democrats Could Not Be Further Apart. The Republican platform calls for more money in politics, in: The Huffington Post vom 19.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/2016-campaign-finance-reform_us_578e67abe4b04ca54ebef3bf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  458. BLUMENTHAL, Sidney (1980): The Permanent Campaign. Inside the World of Elite Political Operatives, New York: Beacon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  459. BOATRIGHT, Robert G. (Hg.) (2015): The Deregulatory Moment. A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  460. BOATRIGHT, Robert G./ MALBIN, Michael J./ GLAVIN, Brendan (2016): Independent Expenditures in Congressional Primaries after Citizens United, in: Interests Group & Advocacy, Jg. 5, H. 2, S. 119–140. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  461. BOBIC, Igor (2014): Mark Begich Pulls Controversial Ad About GOP Challenger Dan Sullivan, in: Huffington Post vom 02.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/02/mark-begich-sullivan-ad_n_5754074.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  462. BONICA, Adam (2011): Small Donors and Polarization, in: Boston Review vom 22.07.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://bostonreview.net/bonica-small-donors-polarization>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.02.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  463. BONICA, Adam (2013): Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 57, H. 2, S. 294–311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  464. BONICA, Adam (2014): Mapping the Ideological Marketplace, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 58, H. 2, S. 367–386. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  465. BONICA, Adam/ MCCARTY, Nolan/ POOLE, Keith T./ ROSENTHAL, Howard (2013): Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Jg. 27, H. 3, S. 103–124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  466. BOWLER, Shaun/ DONOVAN, Todd (2016): Campaign Money, Congress, and Perceptions of Corruption, in: American Politics Research, Jg. 44, H. 2, S. 272–295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  467. BOWMAN, Ann O'M./ KEARNEY, Richard C. (2015): State and local government. The essentials, Sixth edition, Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  468. BOYER, Paul S. (Hg.) (2001): The Oxford Companion to United States History, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  469. BRADY, Henry E./ JOHNSTON, Richard (Hg.) (2006): Capturing Campaign Effects, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  470. BRADY, Henry E./ VERBA, Sidney/ SCHLOZMAN, Kay Lehman (1995): Beyond SES. A Resource Model of Political Participation, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 89, H. 2, S. 271–294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  471. BREAUX, David A./ GIERZYNSKI, Anthony (1991): "It's Money That Matters": Campaign Expenditures and State Legislative Primaries, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 16, H. 3, S. 429–443. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  472. BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE (2012): National Survey: Super PACs, Corruption, and Democracy. Americans’ attitudes about the influence of Super PAC spending on government and the implications for our democracy., online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/national-survey-super-pacs-corruption-and-democracy>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  473. BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE (2016): A Civil Rights Perspective on Money in Politics, New York University School of Law, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/civil-rights-perspective-money-politics>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  474. BRIFFAULT, Richard (2011): Corporations, Corruption, and Complexity: Campaign Finance after Citizens United, in: Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Jg. 20, H. 3, S. 643–671. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  475. BROWN, Adam R. (2013): Does Money Buy Votes? The Case of Self-Financed Gubernatorial Candidates, 1998-2008, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 35, H. 1, S. 21–41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  476. BROWN, Heath (2016): Pay-to-Play Politics. How Money Defines the American Democracy, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  477. BRUDNICK, Ida A. (2016): Congressional Salaries and Allowances. In Brief, Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  478. BRUNNER, Wolfram (2002): Wahlkampf in den USA V: Finanzierung, Organisation, Planung, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Sankt Augustin, Wahlen Arbeitspapiere, 57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  479. BRYRNER, Sarah (2016): Most congressional contests not contests at all, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/08/spoiler-most-congressional-contests-not-contests-at-all/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  480. BUNGE, Mario (2009): Political Philosophy. Fact, Fiction, and Vision, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  481. BURGER, Harald/ BUHOFER, Annelies/ SIALM, Ambros (1982): Handbuch der Phraseologie, Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  482. BURKE, Thomas F. (1997): The Concept of Corruption in Campaign Finance Law, in: Constitutional Commentary, Jg. 14, H. 1, S. 127–149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  483. CABRERA, Felipe/ LUCKERSON, Victor (2012): The Money Spent. What fueled the priciest election in U.S. History, in: TIME Magazine vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/the-numbers-election-2012/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  484. CAIN, Bruce E. (1995): Moralism and Realism in Campaign Finance, in: The University of Chicago Legal Forum, Jg. 11, H. 1, S. 111–140. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  485. CAIN, Bruce E. (2015): Democracy More or Less. America's Political Reform Quandry, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in Electoral Law and Democracy). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  486. CALDEIRA, Gregory A./ PATTERSON, Samuel C. (1982): Bring Home the Votes. Electoral Outcomes in State Legislative Races, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 4, H. 1, S. 33–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  487. CALHOUN, Charles W. (Hg.) (1996): The Gilded Age. Essays on the Origins of Modern America, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  488. CALHOUN, Charles W. (1999): Moving beyond Stereotypes of the Gilded Age, in: Organization of American Historians Magazine of History, Jg. 13, H. 4, S. 3–4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  489. CAMPBELL, Angus/ CONVERSE, Philip E./ MILLER, Warren E./ STOKES, Donald E. (1960): The American Voter, Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  490. CAMPBELL, Angus/ CONVERSE, Philip E./ MILLER, Warren E./ STOKES, Donald E. (Hg.) (1966): Elections and the political order, New York: Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  491. CAMPBELL, Angus/ GURIN, Gerald/ MILLER, Warren E. (1954): The voter decides, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  492. CAMPBELL, James E. (2010): The Midterm Landslide of 2010: A Triple Wave Election, in: The Forum, Jg. 8, H. 4, S. 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  493. CAMPBELL, James E./ ALFORD, John R./ HENRY, Keith (1984): Television Markets and Congressional Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 9, H. 4, S. 665–678. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  494. CARNEY, Eliza Newlin (2016): Political Money: New Best-Selling Book Genre?, in: The American Prospect vom 28.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/political-money-new-best-selling-book-genre>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  495. CARNEY, Eliza Newlin (2016): Does Big Money Still Matter? You Bet It Does. It takes more than a super PAC to win the White House, but big campaign contributions wield growing influence in congressional, state, and local contests, and continue to sway policy-making, in: The American Prospect vom 04.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/does-big-money-still-matter-you-bet-it-does>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.02.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  496. CAYTON, Andrew (2016): Why Ohio? Ohio is a likely bellwether of the outcome of 2016. Its history explains why, in: The American Interest vom 08.09.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/09/08/why-ohio/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  497. CBS CHICAGO (2012): He's The 'Milk Dud' No More: Oberweis Wins State Senate Seat, in: CBS Chicago vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/11/07/hes-the-milk-dud-no-more-oberweis-wins-state-senate-seat/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  498. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2016): 2016 Presidential Race, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  499. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2017): 527 Basics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/527s/basics.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  500. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2008): Money Wins Presidency and 9 of 10 Congressional Races in Priciest U.S. Election Ever, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/11/money-wins-white-house-and/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  501. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2010): 2010 Outside Spending, by Super PAC, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/summ.php?cycle=2010&chrt=V&disp=O&type=S>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  502. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2012): 2012 Presidential Race Expenditures, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/expenditures.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  503. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2014): Donor Demographics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/donordemographics.php?cycle=2014&filter=A>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  504. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2016): Outside Spending, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/index.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  505. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2016): Reelection Rates Over the Years, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/reelect.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  506. CHADDOCK, Gail R. (2012): How super PACs are changing the GOP presidential race, in: The Christian Science Monitor vom 06.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0206/How-super-PACs-are-changing-the-GOP-presidential-race>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  507. CHIANG, Lulu/ HOENEMEYER, Lauren (2017): Public trust in institutions sinks to record low, in: CBS News vom 15.01.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.cbsnews.com/news/davos-world-economic-forum-public-trust-in-institutions-at-record-low-media-government-business/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  508. CHICAGO TRIBUNE EDITORIAL BOARD (2017): Editorial: Gerrymandering heads to the U.S. Supreme Court. Will Madigan map-making survive?, in: Chicago Tribune vom 27.05.2017, online verfügbar unter <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-gerrymander-supreme-court-wisconsin-edit-0528-jm-20170527-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  509. CIALDING, Robert B. (2010): Influence. Science and practice, 5. Aufl., Boston, MA: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  510. CITIZENS UNITED (2017): Who We Are, online verfügbar unter <http://www.citizensunited.org/who-we-are.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  511. CLANCY, Adam (2012): Nasty, Brutish and Long. Newt Gingrich and the Future of Primary Campaigns, in: The American Interest vom 09.04.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.the-american-interest.com/2012/04/09/nasty-brutish-and-long/>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  512. CLAYTON, Cornell W./ SALAMONE, Michael F. (2014): Still Crazy after All These Years. The Polarized Politics of the Roberts Court Continue, in: The Forum, Jg. 12, H. 4, S. 739–762. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  513. CLINE, Seth (2012): Supreme Court Re-Affirms Citizens United, in: U.S. News & World Report vom 25.06.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/06/25/supreme-court-re-affirms-citizens-united>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  514. CLINTON, Joshua D./ LAPINSKI, John S. (2004): “Targeted” Advertising and Voter Turnout. An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 66, H. 1, S. 69–96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  515. COATES IV, John C. (2012): Corporate Politics, Governance, and Value Before and After Citizens United, in: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Jg. 9, H. 4, S. 657–696. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  516. COHEN, Ronnie/ O'BYRNE, Shannon (2013): "Can You Hear Me Now…Good!" Feminism(s), the Public/Private Divide, and Citizens United v. FEC, in: UCLA Women's Law Journal, Jg. 20, H. 1, S. 39–70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  517. COHN, Jonathan (2014): It's Official: One Koch Brother Equals 515,000 Union Members, in: The New Republic vom 11.03.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/116961/comparing-koch-brothers-influence-labor>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.11.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  518. COLEMAN, Kevin J./ CANTOR, Joseph E./ NEALE, Thomas H. (2004): Presidential Elections in the United States: A Primer, in: Avaliktos, Neal (Hg.): The Election Process Revisited, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, S. 191–234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  519. COLLINS, Eliza (2015): 7 things Trump said that would have destroyed other Republicans, in: Politico vom 07.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.eu/article/7-things-trump-said-that-would-have-destroyed-other-republicans/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  520. COLLINS, Eliza (2016): Poll: Clinton, Trump most unfavorable candidates ever, in: USA Today vom 31.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/08/31/poll-clinton-trump-most-unfavorable-candidates-ever/89644296/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  521. COMMON CAUSE (2015): Whose Government? Whose Voice?, Common Cause, Washington, D.C., online verfügbar unter <http://www.commoncause.org/research-reports/whose-government-whose-voice/whose-government-whose-voice.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  522. CONDON, Stephanie (2012): Why is Congress a millionaires club?, in: CBS News vom 27.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-is-congress-a-millionaires-club/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  523. CONFESSORE, Nicholas (2015): Koch Brothers’ Budget of $889 Million for 2016 Is on Par With Both Parties’ Spending, in: The New York Times vom 26.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/politics/kochs-plan-to-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  524. CONFESSORE, Nicholas (2015): G.O.P. Consultant Pleads Guilty in PAC Case, in: The New York Times vom 12.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/13/us/politics/political-consultant-pleads-guilty-in-coordination-case.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  525. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ BIGOOD, Jess (2012): Little to Show for Cash Flood by Big Donors, in: The New York Times vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/little-to-show-for-cash-flood-by-big-donors.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  526. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ COHEN, Sarah/ YOURISH, Karen (2015): Just 158 families have provided nearly half of the early money for efforts to capture the White House, in: The New York Times vom 10.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/11/us/politics/2016-presidential-election-super-pac-donors.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  527. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ LIPTON, Eric (2012): A Big Check, and Gingrich Gets a Big Lift, in: The New York Times vom 09.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/us/politics/sheldon-adelson-a-billionaire-gives-gingrich-a-big-lift.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  528. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ SHOREY, Rachel (2016): Money Flows Down Ballot as Donald Trump Is Abandoned by Big Donors (Even Himself), in: The New York Times vom 27.10.2016, A16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  529. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ THEE-BRENAN, Megan (2015): Poll Shows Americans Favor an Overhaul of Campaign Financing, in: The New York Times vom, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/03/us/politics/poll-shows-americans-favor-overhaul-of-campaign-financing.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  530. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ YOURISH, Karen (2016): $2 Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump, in: The New York Times vom 15.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  531. CORASANITI, Nick: At Many Carly Fiorina Events, Her ‘Super PAC’ Covers the Costs, in: The New York Times vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/21/at-many-carly-fiorina-events-her-super-pac-covers-the-costs/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  532. CORASANITI, Nick (2015): Carly Fiorina’s ‘Super PAC’ Aids Her Campaign, in Plain Sight, in: The New York Times vom 01.10.2015, A21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  533. CORASANITI, Nick (2017): Robert Menendez Personally Lobbied for Visas, Former Aide Testifies, in: The New York Times vom 11.09.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/11/nyregion/robert-menendez-corruption-trial-visas.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  534. CORRADO, Anthony (1992): Creative Campaigning. PACs and the Presidential Selection Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  535. CORRADO, Anthony (2005): An Overview of Campaign Finance Law, in: Herrnson, Paul S./ Campbell, Colton C./ Ezra, Marni/ Medvic, Stephen K. (Hg.): Guide to Political Campaigns in America, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, S. 84–104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  536. CORRADO, Anthony (2005): Money and Politics. A History of Federal Campaign Finance Law, in: Corrado, Anthony/ Mann, Thomas E./ Ortiz, Daniel R./ Potter, Trevor (Hg.): The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, S. 7–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  537. CORRADO, Anthony/ MANN, Thomas E./ ORTIZ, Daniel R./ POTTER, Trevor (Hg.) (2005): The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  538. CORRADO, Anthony/ MANN, Thomas E./ ORTIZ, Daniel R./ POTTER, Trevor/ Sorauf, Frank J. (1997): Campaign Finance Reform. A Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  539. COUCH, Cullen: A Conversation with Bob Bauer and Trevor Potter, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 25–32, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  540. COUCH, Cullen: Citizens United. First Amendment Protection or Pandora's Box?, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 21–23, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  541. COX, Gary W./ KATZ, Jonathan N. (2002): Elbridge Gerry's Salamander. The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  542. COX, Ramsey (2014): Franken: Citizens United is one of the ‘worst’ rulings, in: The Hill vom 09.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/217105-franken-citizens-united-decision-is-worst-ever>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  543. CRAIG, Stephen C. (1979): Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 7, H. 2, S. 225–239. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  544. CRAIG, Stephen C./ HILL, David B. (Hg.) (2011): The Electoral Challenge. Theory Meets Practice, 2. Aufl., Washington, DC: CQ Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  545. CROLY, Herbert D. (1983): Marcus Alonzo Hanna, New York, NY: Chelsea House (American Statesmen Series). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  546. CROSSEN, Cynthia (2004): The Man Who Made Political Campaigns All About the Money, in: The Wall Street Journal vom 24.03.2004, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108008220948763387>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  547. CUMMINGS, Jeanne (2011): Don't adjust your set: Now campaign ads never end, in: Politico vom 18.03.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2011/03/dont-adjust-your-set-now-campaign-ads-never-end-051535>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  548. CURRINDER, Marian L./ GREEN, John C. (2011): Money and Elections, in: Craig, Stephen C./ Hill, David B. (Hg.): The Electoral Challenge. Theory Meets Practice. 2. Aufl., Washington, DC: CQ Press, S. 91–116. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  549. DAHL, Robert A. (1961): Who Governs. Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  550. DAHL, Robert A. (1971): Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition, New Haven/ London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  551. DAHL, Robert A. (2003): How Democratic Is the American Constitution, 2. Aufl., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  552. DAHL, Robert A./ Shapiro, Ian/ Cheibub, José Antonio (Hg.) (2003): The Democracy Sourcebook, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  553. DALEY, David (2016): Ratf**ked. The True Story Behind the Secret Plan to Steal America's Democracy, New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  554. DALEY, David (2016): The House the GOP Built: How Republicans Used Soft Money, Big Data, and High-Tech Mapping to Take Control of Congress and Increase Partisanship, in: New York Magazine vom 24.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/gops-house-seats-are-safe-heres-why.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  555. DALEY, David/ Rosenberg, Paul (2016): This is how the GOP rigged Congress: The secret plan that handcuffed Obama’s presidency, but backfired in Donald Trump, in: Salon vom 13.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.salon.com/2016/06/13/this_is_how_the_gop_rigged_congress_the_secret_plan_that_handcuffed_obamas_presidency_but_backfired_in_donald_trump/>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  556. DAVENPORT, Coral (2016): Billionaire Environmentalist to Spend $25 Million to Turn Out Young Voters, in: The New York Times vom 25.04.2016, A10, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/26/us/politics/thomas-steyer-nextgen-climate-change-voters.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  557. DAVIDSON, Roger H./ OLESZEK, Walter J./ LEE, Frances E./ SCHICKLER, Eric (2014): Congress and its members, 14. Aufl., Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  558. DAWOOD, Yasmin (2015): Campaign Finance and American Democracy, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 18, H. 1, S. 329–349. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  559. DECKER, Frank/ JESSE, Eckhard (2016): Fach ohne Ausstrahlung. Die Stimme der Politikwissenschaft ist in der Öffentlichkeit kaum noch zu vernehmen. Die Debatten bestimmen Juristen oder Ökonomen. Die jüngere Generation schweigt, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 20.04.2016, N4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  560. DELILLO, Don (2016): Zero K, London: Picador. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  561. DELLAVIGNA, Stefano/ KAPLAN, Ethan (2007): The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Jg. 122, H. 4, S. 1187–1234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  562. DELLI CARPINI, Michael. X./ KEETER, Scott/ KENNAMER, J. David (1994): Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Jg. 71, H. 2, S. 443–456. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  563. DEMOCRATIC PARTY (2016): 2016 Democratic Party Platform, Orlando, FL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  564. DESILVER, Drew (2017): U.S. trails most developed countries in voter turnout, Pew Research Center, online verfügbar unter <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/15/u-s-voter-turnout-trails-most-developed-countries/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  565. DINOVELLA, Elizabeth (2011): The Group behind the Republican Takeover, in: The Progressive vom 2011, 26-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  566. DJUPE, Paul A./ Peterson, David A. M. (2002): The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 55, H. 4, S. 845–860. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  567. DOHERTY, Brendan J. (2012): The Rise of the President's Permanent Campaign, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  568. DOHERTY, Brendan J. (2013): A Campaign Without End, in: The New York Times vom 21.01.2013, A21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  569. DONAHUE, Patrick (2010): U.S. Falls in Corruption Ranking as Crisis Hits Confidence, in: Bloomberg News vom 26.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-10-26/corruption-increases-in-u-s-as-financial-crisis-erodes-public-confidence>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  570. DÖRNER, Andreas/ Vogt, Ludgera (Hg.) (2002): Wahl-Kämpfe. Betrachtungen über ein demokratisches Ritual, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  571. DOWLING, Conor M./ MILLER, Michael G. (2014): Super PAC! Money, Elections, and Voters after Citizens United, New York, NY: Routledge (Routledge Research in American Politics and Governance). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  572. DOWLING, Conor M./ MILLER, Michael G. (2014): Super PAC! Money, Elections, and Voters after Citizens United, New York, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  573. DOWLING, Conor M./ WICHOWSKY, Amber (2015): Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 59, H. 1, S. 19–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  574. DOWNS, Anthony (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  575. DOYLE, Richard B. (2011): The Rise and (Relative) Fall of Earmarks. Congress and Reform, 2006-2010, in: Public Budgeting & Finance, Jg. 31, H. 1, S. 1–22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  576. DRASH, Wayne (2012): Presidential politics: Why Ohio is the 'big one', in: CNN News vom 24.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/23/politics/ohio-voters-swing-state/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  577. DREW, Elizabeth (2015): How Money Runs Our Politics, in: New York Review of Books vom 04.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/06/04/how-money-runs-our-politics/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  578. DREW, Elizabeth (2016): American Democracy Betrayed, in: The New York Review of Books vom 18.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/08/18/american-democracy-betrayed/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  579. DRUTMAN, Lee (2014): Why we still need to worry about money in politics, in: The Washington Post vom 15.12.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/12/15/why-we-still-need-to-worry-about-money-in-politics/>, zuletzt geprüft am 04.08.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  580. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): The Business of America is Lobbying. How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  581. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): Despite Citizens United, elections aren’t a good investment for corporations, in: The Washington Post vom 27.03.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/despite-citizens-united-politics-isnt-a-good-investment-for-corporations/2015/03/27/f13e0d20-d26c-11e4-ab77-9646eea6a4c7_story.html?utm_term=.856a6328ac9c>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  582. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): Can unlimited contributions to political parties really reduce polarization, in: The Washington Post vom 23.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/06/23/can-unlimited-contributions-to-political-parties-really-reduce-polarization/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  583. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): Giving the two parties even more money will not solve polarization. And, no empowering small donors is not going to make politics even more polarized, in: Vox vom 20.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/polyarchy/2015/11/20/9763292/parties-polarization-small-donors>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.12.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  584. DRYSCH, Thomas (1998): Parteienfinanzierung. Österreich, Schweiz, Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  585. DUGAN, Andrew (2015): Donald Trump Well-Known, but Not Well-Liked, GALLUP, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/poll/187607/donald-trump-known-not-liked.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  586. DÜMBGEN, Lutz (2015): Einführung in die Statistik, Basel: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  587. DWYRE, Diana (2015): Campaign Finance Deregulation in the United States: What Has Changed and Why Does It Matter?, in: Boatright, Robert G. (Hg.): The Deregulatory Moment. A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, S. 33–70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  588. EDSALL, Thomas B. (2014): Would Stronger Parties Mean Less Polarization?, in: The New York Times vom 21.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/opinion/would-stronger-parties-mean-less-polarization.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  589. EDWARDS-LEVY, Ariel (2015): Most People Think Congress Is Great At Representing Wealthy, But Not The Less Well-Off, in: The Huffington Post vom 15.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/15/congress-wealthy-poll_n_6482050.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  590. EGGEN, Dan (2010): Poll: Large majority opposes Supreme Court's decision on campaign financing, in: The Washington Post vom 17.02.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/17/AR2010021701151.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  591. EGGEN, Dan (2010): Money doesn't buy many wins for self-funded candidates, in: The Washington Post vom 04.11.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/03/AR2010110308584.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  592. ELDRIDGE, Sean (2016): How Dialing for Dollars is Undermining our Democracy - And How to Stop It, Medium Corporation, online verfügbar unter <https://medium.com/@SeanEldridge/how-dialing-for-dollars-is-undermining-our-democracy-and-how-to-stop-it-e9aff589785a#.q26xt07rn>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  593. EMDE, Isabel (2014): Wahlkampffinanzierung durch Unternehmen. Eine verfassungsrechtliche Studie zum US-amerikanischen Recht, Baden-Baden: Nomos (Beiträge zum ausländischen und vergleichenden Recht, 33). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  594. ENDREß, Martin/ MATYS, Thomas (Hg.) (2010): Die Ökonomie der Organisation - die Organisation der Ökonomie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  595. EPSTEIN, Lee/ SEGAL, Jeffrey A./ WESTERLAND, Chad (2008): The Increasing Importance of Ideology in the Nomination and Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices, in: Drake Law Review, Jg. 56, H. 4, S. 609–635. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  596. EPSTEIN, Richard A. (34): Citizens United v. FEC. The constitutional right that big corporations should have but do not want, in: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Jg. 2011, H. 2, S. 639–661. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  597. ERGUN, Damla (2012): Seven in 10 Would Send Super PACs Packing, in: ABC News vom 13.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/seven-in-10-would-send-super-pacs-packing/>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  598. ERIKSON, Robert S./ PALFREY, Thomas R. (1998): Campaign Spending and Incumbency. An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 60, H. 2, S. 355–373. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  599. ERIKSON, Robert S./ WRIGHT, Gerald C./ MCIVER, John P. (1985): Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 47, H. 2, S. 469–489. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  600. ERIKSON, Robert S./ WRIGHT, Gerald C./ MCIVER, John P. (1995): Statehouse democracy. Public opinion and policy in the American states, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  601. ETZIONI, Amitai (1995): Capital Corruption. The New Attack on American Democracy, 2. Aufl., New Brunswick, NJ/ London: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  602. EUCHNER, Charles C./ Maltese, John Anthony (2015): The Electoral Process, in: Nelson, Michael (Hg.): Guide to the Presidency. 2. Aufl., London/ New York: Routledge, S. 185–322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  603. FAHS, Alice/ WAUGH, Joan (Hg.) (2004): The Memory of the Civil War in American Culture, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  604. FAIR, Ray C. (2002): Predicting presidential elections and other things, Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  605. FALCONE, Michael (2009): Voinovich to Retire From Senate in 2010, in: The New York Times vom 12.01.2009, online verfügbar unter <https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/ohio-senator-george-voinovich-to-retire-in-2010/?mcubz=0>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  606. FALTER, Jürgen W./ SCHOEN, Harald (Hg.) (2014): Handbuch Wahlforschung, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  607. FALTER, Jürgen W./ WINKER, Jürgen R. (2014): Wahlgeographie und Politische Ökologie, in: Falter, Jürgen W./ Schoen, Harald (Hg.): Handbuch Wahlforschung. 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 135–168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  608. FARIAS, Cristian (2015): The Menendez Case Proves the Supreme Court Was Naive About Campaign Finance Laws, in: The New Republic vom 02.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121446/menedez-corruption-case-exposes-supreme-court-naivete>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.08.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  609. FARRAR-MYERS, Victoria A./ GULATI, Jeff/ SKINNER, Richard (2013): The Impact of Super PACs on the 2010 and 2012 Congressional Elections, Chicago, IL, online verfügbar unter <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312917>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  610. FARRAR-MYERS, Victoria A./ SKINNER, Richard (2012): Super PACs and the 2012 Elections, in: The Forum, Jg. 10, H. 4, S. 105–118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  611. FARRELL, John A. (2012): Did the Conservative Supreme Court Dash Romney's White House Hopes?, in: The Atlantic vom 02.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/did-the-conservative-supreme-court-dash-romneys-white-house-hopes/253890/>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  612. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (2007): Coordinated Communications and Independent Expenditures, Federal Election Commission, online verfügbar unter <https://transition.fec.gov/pages/brochures/indexp.shtml>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  613. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (2017): Recording receipts, online verfügbar unter <https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/keeping-records/records-receipts/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  614. FEINGOLD, Russ (2012): A Gilded Age on Steroids, in: Boston Review vom 01.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://bostonreview.net/forum/under-influence/gilded-age-steroids-russ-feingold>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  615. FERGUSON, Thomas/ JORGENSEN, Paul/ CHEN, Jie (2013): Party Competition and Industrial Structure in the 2012 Elections: Who’s Really Driving the Taxi to the Dark Side?, Roosevelt Institute, online verfügbar unter <http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/sites/all/files/2013_10_21_Ferguson_Jorgensen_Chen_2012_Elections.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  616. FERGUSON, Thomas/ JORGENSEN, Paul/ CHEN, Jie (2015): How Money Drives US Congressional Elections: More Evidence, Institute for New Economic Thinking Annual Conference, Paris, online verfügbar unter <http://ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/How-Money-Drives-US-Congressional-Elections-More-Evidence.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  617. FILZMAIER, Peter (2012): Geld regiert die Politik? Wahlkampffinanzierung in den USA, in: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Jg. 22, H. 1, S. 105–116. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  618. FILZMAIER, Peter/ PLASSER, Fritz (2001): Wahlkampf um das Weiße Haus. Presidential Elections in den USA, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  619. FILZMAIER, Peter/ PLASSER, Fritz (2002): Campaign Finance in den USA, in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Jg. 31, H. 1, S. 41–59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  620. FILZMAIER, Peter/ PLASSER, Fritz (2005): Politik auf amerikanisch. Wahlen und politischer Wettbewerb in den USA, Wien: MANZ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  621. FIORINA, Morris P. (1981): Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  622. FIORINA, Morris P. (2011): Culture war? The myth of a polarized America, 3. Aufl., Boston, MA: Longman. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  623. FLEMING, James Rodger (1996): Science and Technology in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century, in: Calhoun, Charles W. (Hg.): The Gilded Age. Essays on the Origins of Modern America, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Books, S. 19–37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  624. FLICK, Uwe (2004): Triangulation. Eine Einführung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  625. FLITTER, Emily: Why U.S. billionaires may not be able to buy the 2016 election, in: Reuters News vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-billionaires-idUSKBN0OI07I20150602>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  626. FORAN, Clare (2016): Bernie Sanders’s Big Money. The Democratic presidential candidate’s populist rallying cry has helped him rake in cash, and infused massive amounts of money into the political process, in: The Atlantic vom 01.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/bernie-sanders-fundraising/471648/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  627. FORMISANO, Ronald P. (2016): The Populist Tsunami of the Second Gilded Age, in: The Forum, Jg. 14, H. 3, S. 281–294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  628. FOWLER, Erika F./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2010): Advertising Trends in 2010, in: The Forum, Jg. 8, H. 4, S. 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  629. FOWLER, Erika F./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2012): Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012, in: The Forum, Jg. 10, H. 4, S. 51–61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  630. FRANCIA, Peter L./ GREEN, John C./ HERRNSON, Paul S./ POWELL, Lynda W./ WILCOX, Clyde (2003): The Financiers of Congressional Elections. Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates, New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  631. FRANK, Thomas (2012): It’s a rich man’s world. How billionaire backers pick America’s candidate, in: Harpers Magazine, April Ausgabe, S. 25-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  632. FRANKLIN Fowler, Monika/ FRANZ, Michael M./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2016): Political Advertising in the United States, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  633. FRANZ, Michael M. (2010): The Citizens United Election? Or Same As It Ever Was?, in: The Forum, Jg. 8, H. 4, S. 1–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  634. FRANZ, Michael M./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2010): Political Advertising and Persuasion in the 2004 and 2008 Presidential Elections, in: American Politics Research, Jg. 38, H. 2, S. 303–329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  635. FREDERICKS, Bob (2016): NY Democrats selling national convention access to big donors, in: New York Post vom 07.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://nypost.com/2016/05/07/ny-democrats-selling-national-convention-access-to-big-donors/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  636. FREDERICKS, Bob (2016): Clinton's campaign staff is five times the size of Trump's, in: New York Post vom 07.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://nypost.com/2016/10/07/clintons-campaign-staff-is-five-times-the-size-of-trumps/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  637. FREELAND, Chrystia (2012): Plutocrats. The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich, London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  638. FRENCH, Lauren (2016): Congress setting new bar for doing nothing. It's gotten so small-ball that one congressman introduced a bill to recognize the significance of magic, in: Politico vom 21.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/congress-supreme-court-budget-do-nothing-221057>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  639. FRIESS, Steve (2012): The father of all Web campaigns, in: Politico vom 30.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/how-deans-wh-bid-gave-birth-to-web-campaigning-081834>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  640. FROLIK, Joe (2012): How Ohio made a president: Mark Hanna of Cleveland created modern politics in 1896, in: The Plain Dealer vom 16.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/10/how_ohio_made_a_president_mark.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  641. FULLER, Jaime (2014): 'Ready for Hillary' is spending money like crazy, in: The Washington Post vom 13.06.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/06/13/ready-for-hillary-is-already-spending-a-ton-of-dough-on-2016/?utm_term=.8f55477c15af>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  642. GAFFEY, Laura (2012): United States House Elections Post-Citizens United. The Influence of Unbridled Spending, Illinois Wesleyan University Papers, 45, online verfügbar unter <http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=polisci_honproj>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  643. GALLUP (2016): No Improvement in Congress Approval, at 13%, GALLUP Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/poll/189848/no-improvement-congress-approval.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  644. GAMSON, William A. (1968): Power and Discontent, Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  645. GANGHOF, Steffen (2005): Kausale Perspektiven in der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: X-zentrierte und Y-zentrierte Forschungsdesigns, in: Kropp, Sabine/ Minkenberg, Michael (Hg.): Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 76–95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  646. GANGHOF, Steffen (2016): Forschungsdesigns in der Politikwissenschaft - Kausala Perspektiven versus kontrastive Theorietests, in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Jg. 45, H. 1, S. 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  647. GARRAMONE, Gina M. (1984): Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads. Voter response varies with content theme, but backlash or bommerang may be most common effect of negative political advertising, in: Journalism Quarterly, Jg. 61, H. 1, S. 250–259. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  648. GARRETT, Sam R. (2012): "Super PACs" in Federal Elections: Overview and Issues for Congress, in: Jamison, Derrick D./ Gore, Gina (Hg.): Super PACs (Political Action Committees). The New Force in Federal Elections, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, S. 1–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  649. GAUGHAN, Anthony J. (2016): The Forty-Year War on Money in Politics: Watergate, FECA, and the Future of Campaign Finance Reform, in: Ohio State Law Journal, Jg. 77, H. 4, S. 791–837. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  650. GEER, John G. (2006): In Defense of Negativity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  651. GEER, John G. (2010): Fanning the Flames: The News Media’s Role in the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Discussion Paper Series, D‐55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  652. GELERNT, Anya (2015): Donor demographics: old white guys edition, part II, Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/donor-demographics-old-white-guys-edition-part-ii/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  653. GELLNER, Winand/ HORST, Patrick (Hg.) (2016): Die USA am Ende der Präsidentschaft Barack Obamas, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  654. GELLNER, Winand/ KLEIBER, Martin (2012): Das Regierungssystem der USA. Eine Einführung, 2. vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  655. GELLNER, Winand/ OSWALD, Michael (Hg.) (2017): Die USA nach den Wahlen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  656. GELMAN, Andrew/ KING, Gary (1990): Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 34, H. 4, S. 1142–1164. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  657. GENTILVISO, Chris (2012): Wilbur Ross Mitt Romney Fundraiser Carried $50,000-Per-Plate Cost, in: The Huffington Post vom 21.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/21/wilbur-ross-mitt-romney-fundraiser_n_1998127.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  658. GERBER, Alan (1993): Campaign Spending and Senate Election Outcomes, Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  659. GERBER, Alan (1998): Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 92, H. 2, S. 401–411. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  660. GERBER, Alan/ GREEN, Donald P. (2005): Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? An Update, in: Gerber, Alan S./ Green, Donald P. (Hg.): The Science of Voter Mobilization, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE (The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601), S. 142–154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  661. GERBER, Alan S./ GIMPEL, James G./ GREEN, Donald P./ SHAW, Daron R. (2011): How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 105, H. 1, S. 135–150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  662. GERBER, Alan S./ GREEN, Donald P. (Hg.) (2005): The Science of Voter Mobilization (The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  663. GERKEN, Heather (2014): The Real Problem with Citizens United: Campaign Finance, Dark Money, and Shadow Parties, in: Marquette Law Review, Jg. 97, H. 4, S. 903–923. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  664. GERKEN, Heather K. (2010): Lobbying as the New Campaign Finance, in: Georgia State University Law Review, Jg. 27, H. 4, S. 1147–1160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  665. GERRING, John/ THOMAS, Craig W. (2011): Quantitative Versus Qualitative Methods, in: Badie, Bertrand/ Berg-Schlosser, Dirk/ Morlino, Leonardo (Hg.): International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE (7), S. 2189–2196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  666. GIERZYNSKI, Anthony (2000): Money Rules. Financing Elections in America, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  667. GIERZYNSKI, Anthony/ BREAUX, David (1996): Legislative Elections and the Importance of Money, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 21, H. 3, S. 337–357. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  668. GIERZYNSKI, Anthony/ BREAUX, David A. (1991): Money and Votes in State Legislative Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 16, H. 2, S. 203–217. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  669. GILENS, Martin (2005): Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 69, H. 5, S. 778–796. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  670. GILENS, Martin (2012): Affluence & Influence. Economic Inequality and Political Power in America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  671. GILENS, Martin/ PAGE, Benjamin I. (2014): Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 12, H. 3, S. 564–581. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  672. GILES, Michael W./ PRITCHARD, Anita (1985): Campaign Expenditures and Legislative Elections in Florida, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 10, H. 1, S. 71–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  673. GILLUM, Jack (2012): Super PACs Inluencing Early Primary Elections More Than Retail Campaigning, in: The Huffington Post vom 17.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/17/super-pacs-elections-2012_n_1210097.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.03.2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  674. GILSON, Dave (2012): Sheldon Adelson’s Lousy Election Bets, in: Mother Jones vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/sheldon-adelson-super-pac-lousy-bets/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  675. GINSBURG, Ruth Bader/ ROSEN, Jeffrey (2014): Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is an American Hero. She's staying put - and has some choice words for young feminists. An interview, in: The New Republic vom 29.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/119578/ruth-bader-ginsburg-interview-retirement-feminists-jazzercise>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  676. GLANTZ, Stanton A./ Abramowitz, Alan I./ Burkart, Michael P. (1976): Election Outcomes: Whose Money Matters?, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 38, H. 4, S. 1033–1038. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  677. GLASSMAN, Matthew E. (2007): Congressional Franking Privilege. Background and Current Legislation, Congressional Research Service, Order Code RS22771, veröffentlicht am 11.12.2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  678. GOIDEL, Robert K./ GROSS, Donald A. (1994): A Systems Approach to Campaign Finance in U.S. House Elections, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 22, H. 2, S. 125–153. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  679. GOLD, Matea (2012): Effect of 'super PACs' proved to be less than expected, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/08/nation/la-na-outside-money-20121108>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.08.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  680. GOLD, Matea (2014): Supreme Court ruling gives small number of wealthy donors new ways to drive campaigns, in: The Washington Post vom 03.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-ruling-gives-small-number-of-wealthy-donors-new-ways-to-drive-campaigns/2014/04/02/b1ab041a-ba8a-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  681. GOLD, Matea (2015): Menendez indictment marks first big corruption case involving a super PAC, in: The Washington Post vom 02.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/menendez-indictment-marks-first-big-corruption-case-involving-a-super-pac/2015/04/01/f42f4aee-d8d9-11e4-8103-fa84725dbf9d_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  682. GOLD, Matea (2016): Nearly $100 million in super PAC money couldn’t save Jeb Bush, in: The Washington Post vom 20.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/20/nearly-100-million-in-super-pac-money-couldnt-save-jeb-bush/?utm_term=.fa41d4f57373>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  683. GOLD, Matea (2016): An inside look at how politicians beg for big checks, in: The Washington Post vom 20.09.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/an-inside-look-at-how-politicians-beg-for-big-checks/2016/09/19/c0308e24-7c1b-11e6-bd86-b7bbd53d2b5d_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  684. GOLD, Matea/ HAMBURGER, Tom (2014): Scott Walker case shows growing closeness between politicians and wealthy allies, in: The Washington Post vom 23.06.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/scott-walker-case-shows-growing-closeness-between-politicians-and-wealthy-allies/2014/06/23/e8b9304e-f955-11e3-a606-946fd632f9f1_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  685. GOLD, Matea/ HAMBURGER, Tom (2015): In 2016 campaign, the lament of the not quite rich enough, in: The Washington Post vom 25.03.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-2016-campaign-the-lament-of-the-not-quite-rich-enough/2015/03/24/f0a38b18-cdb4-11e4-8a46-b1dc9be5a8ff_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  686. GOLD, Matea/ HAMBURGER, Tom (2015): How a super PAC plans to coordinate with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, in: The Washington Post vom 12.05.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/?utm_term=.f4a372c8b43a>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  687. GOLD, Matea/ MASON, Melanie (2012): Effect of 'super PACs' proved to be less than expected, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/08/nation/la-na-outside-money-20121108>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  688. GOLD, Matea/ NARAYANSWAMY, Anu (2016): How 'ghost corporations' are funding the 2016 election, in: The Washington Post vom 18.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-ghost-corporations-are-funding-the-2016-election/2016/03/18/2446e526-ed14-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  689. GOLD, Matea/ NARAYANSWAMY, Anu (2016): The new Gilded Age: Close to half of all super-PAC money comes from 50 donors, in: The Washington Post vom 15.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-new-gilded-age-close-to-half-of-all-super-pac-money-comes-from-50-donors/2016/04/15/63dc363c-01b4-11e6-9d36-33d198ea26c5_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  690. GOLD, Matea/ NARAYANSWAMY, Anu (2016): How mega-donors helped raise $1 billion for Hillary Clinton, in: The Washington Post vom 24.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-mega-donors-helped-raise-1-billion-for-hillary-clinton/2016/10/22/a92a0ee2-9603-11e6-bb29-bf2701dbe0a3_story.html?utm_term=.d919a7cebf8b>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.02.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  691. GOLD, Matea/ ZAPOTOSKY, Matt (2015): Va. political operative pleads guilty to coordinating campaign contributions, in: The Washington Post vom 12.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/va-man-pleads-guilty-to-coordinating-campaign-contributions/2015/02/12/e63a92dc-b146-11e4-827f-93f454140e2b_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  692. GOLD, Matea/ ZAPOTOSKY, Matt (2015): Republican operative sentenced to 2 years in landmark election case, in: The Washington Post vom 12.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/feds-want-nearly-4-year-sentence-for-republican-operative-convicted-of-illegal-coordination/2015/06/11/7ecbdc72-0ed0-11e5-9726-49d6fa26a8c6_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  693. GOLDENBERG, Edie N./ TRAUGOTT, Michael W. (1984): Campaigning for Congress, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  694. GOLDMACHER, Shane/ KARNI, Annie/ MCCASKILL, Nolan D. (2016): Trump caught on tape making crude, sexually aggressive comments about women, in: Politico vom 08.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-wapo-229299>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  695. GOLDSTEIN, Ken/ FREEDMAN, Paul (2000): New Evidence for New Arguments. Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 62, H. 4, S. 1087–1108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  696. GOLDSTEIN, Ken/ FREEDMAN, Paul (2002): Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect, in: The Journal of Politics vom 2002, S. 721–740. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  697. GOODMAN, Amy/ WEINTRAUB, Ellen L. (2016): Could Citizens United Help Foreign Billionaires Buy This Election? An FEC Commissioner Speaks Out, Democracy Now, online verfügbar unter <http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/5/could_citizens_united_help_foreign_billionaires>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  698. GOULD, Lewis L. (2001): Gilded Age, in: Boyer, Paul S. (Hg.): The Oxford Companion to United States History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 308–310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  699. GOULD-WARTOFSKY, Michael A. (2015): The Occupiers. The Making of the 99 Percent Movement, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  700. GRAHAM, David A. (2015): GOP Candidates Discover the Problems With Money in Politics. It's not just Democrats who are critical of the current state of campaign finance. Lindsey Graham, Chris Christie, and Ted Cruz have their own complaints., in: The Atlantic vom 20.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/not-all-republicans/390912/>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  701. GREEN, Donald P./ GERBER, Alan S. (2015): Get out the vote. How to increase voter turnout, Third edition, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  702. GREEN, Donald P./ KRASNO, Jonathan S. (1988): Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spendingin House Elections, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 32, H. 4, S. 884–907. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  703. GREEN, Donald P./ KRASNO, Jonathan S. (1990): Rebuttal to Jacobson's "New Evidence for Old Arguments", in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 34, H. 2, S. 363–372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  704. GREEN, Emma (2015): The Local Consequences of Citizens United, in: The Atlantic vom 02.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/the-local-consequences-of-citizens-united/397586/>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  705. GREENBLATT, Alan (2016): How Unregulated Dark Money Is Reshaping State Politics. Several governors are using nonprofits to get themselves elected and promote their agendas once in office - without ever having to disclose where the money came from, in: Governing vom 29.09.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.governing.com/topics/elections/gov-dark-money-campaign-finance-state-politics.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  706. GRIFFITH, Robert (1991): Forging America's postwar order: domestic politics and political economy in the age of Truman, in: Lacey, Michael J. (Hg.): The Truman Presidency, Cambridge, u.a.: Cambridge University Press, S. 57–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  707. GRIM, Ryan/ SIDDIQUI, Sabrina (2013): Call Time For Congress Shows How Fundraising Dominates Bleak Work Life, in: The Huffington Post vom 08.01.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/call-time-congressional-fundraising_n_2427291.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  708. GRIPP, Andrew (2014): Gerrymandering Reduces Competition, Fuels Partisanship in House Elections, Independent Voter Network, online verfügbar unter <https://ivn.us/2014/07/14/gerrymandering-reduces-competition-fuels-partisanship-house-elections/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  709. GROSSMANN, Matt (Hg.) (2014): New Directions in Interest Group Politics, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  710. GSCHWEND, Thomas/ SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank (Hg.) (2007): Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft. Probleme - Strategien - Anwendung, Frankfurt/ New York: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  711. GSCHWEND, Thomas/ SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank (2007): Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft: Ein Dialog zwischen Theorie und Daten, in: Gschwend, Thomas/ Schimmelfennig, Frank (Hg.): Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft. Probleme - Strategien - Anwendung, Frankfurt/ New York: Campus Verlag, S. 13–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  712. GÜLDENZOPF, Ralf (2016): Zwischen "Low Quality" und "High Quality" - Direkter Wählerkontakt in den USA und Deutschland, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, KAS Kampagnen-Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://www.adenauercampus.de/web/guest/zeitmaschine-marktwirtschaft/mehr-zum-thema-soziale-marktwirtschaft/-/asset_publisher/iLDvJSMZY5hd/content/zwischen-%E2%80%9Elow-quality%E2%80%9C-und-%E2%80%9Ehigh-quality%E2%80%9C-direkter-wahlerkontakt-in-den-usa-und-deutschland>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  713. GUNLICKS, Arthur B. (Hg.) (1993): Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe, Boulder/ San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  714. HABERMAN, Clyde (2014): The Cost of Campaigns. Retro Report, The New York Times vom 20.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXGEictCR8k>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.02.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  715. HACKER, Jacob S./ PIERSON, Paul (2011): Winner-Take-All Politics. How Washington Made the Rich Richer And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  716. HÄDER, Michael (2010): Empirische Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung, 2. überarbeitete Auflage, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  717. HAFER, Rik W. (2005): The Federal Reserve System. An Encyclopedia, Westport, CT: Greenwood. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  718. HAGENSTEIN, Edwin C./ GREGG, Sara M./ DONAHUE, Brian (2011): American Georgics. Writing on Farming, Culture and the Land, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  719. HALL, Katy (2013): 11 Members Of Congress Who Are Sick Of Fundraising, in: The Huffington Post vom 02.01.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/01/fundraising-congress-call-time-_n_2576413.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  720. HALPER, Evan (2016): Be nice to Hillary Clinton online — or risk a confrontation with her super PAC, in: Los Angeles Times vom 09.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  721. HALPER, Evan (2016): Once a dark art, opposition research comes out of the shadows for 2016 campaigns, in: Los Angeles Times vom 21.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-opposition-research-presidential-election-20150521-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  722. HAMM, Keith E./ MALBIN, Michael J./ KETTLER, Jaclyn J./ GLAVIN, Brendan (2012): The Impact of Citizens United in the States: Independent Spending in State Elections, 2006-2010, New Orleans, LA, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/state/state-indep-spdg_2006-10_working-paper-as-released-22october2012.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  723. HAMM, Keith E./ MALBIN, Michael J./ KETTLER, Jaclyn J./ GLAVIN, Brendan (2014): Independent Spending in State Elections, 2006–2010: Vertically Networked Political Parties Were the Real Story, Not Business, in: The Forum, Jg. 12, H. 2, S. 305–328. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  724. HAMM, Keith E./ MONCRIEF, Gary F. (2008): Legislative Politics in the States, in: Gray, Virginia/ Hanson, Russell L. (Hg.): Politics in the American States. A Comparative Analysis. 9. Aufl., Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, S. 154–191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  725. HANLEY, Brian (2016): Bernie Sanders Received More Individual Campaign Contributions Than Obama’s Entire 2008 Campaign, in: Huffington Post vom 12.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-hanley/bernie-sanders-has-alread_b_9671406.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  726. HANS, Barbara (2017): Inszenierung von Politik. Zur Funktion von Privatheit, Authentizität, Personalisierung und Vertrauen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  727. HANSEN, John Mark (2009): Elections: Five Rules For Commentators, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 169–171. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  728. HARNDEN, Toby (2012): Obama in drastic u-turn to back big-money super PACs… which he once described as 'a corporate takeover of our democracy', in: Daily Mail vom 07.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2097892/Obama-drastic-u-turn-big-money-super-PACs--decried.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  729. HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (2011): Free Speech For People Nationwide Voter Survey, online verfügbar unter <https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/FSFP-Nationwide-Voter-Survey.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  730. HARTENSTEIN, Meena (2010): Target boycotted for donating $150,000 to MN right-wing Republican Tom Emmer's campaign for governor, in: New York Daily News vom 03.08.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/target-boycotted-donating-150-000-mn-right-wing-republican-tom-emmer-campaign-governor-article-1.200635>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  731. HARVARD LAW REVIEW EDITORS (2014): Citizens United at Work: How the Landmark Decision Legalized Political Coercion in the Workplace, in: Harvard Law Review, Jg. 128, H. 4, S. 669–690. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  732. HASEN, Richard L. (2007): The Newer Incoherence. Competition, Social Science, and Balancing in Campaign Finance Law After Randall v. Sorrell, in: Ohio State Law Journal, Jg. 68, H. 4, S. 849–889. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  733. HASEN, Richard L. (2012): End of the Dialogue? Political Polarization, The Supreme Court, And Congress, in: Southern California Law Review, Jg. 86, H. 1, S. 101–155. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  734. HASEN, Richard L. (2012): Fixing Washington, in: Harvard Law Review, Jg. 126, H. 550, S. 550–585. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  735. HASEN, Richard L. (2013): Is ‘‘Dependence Corruption’’ Distinct from a Political Equality Argument for Campaign Finance Laws? A Reply to Professor Lessig, in: Election Law Journal, Jg. 12, H. 3, S. 305–316. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  736. HASEN, Richard L. (2013): Political Dysfunction and Constitutional Change, in: Drake Law Review, Jg. 61, H. 4, S. 989–1020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  737. HASEN, Richard L. (2014): Super PAC Contributions, Corruption, and the Proxy War over Coordination, in: Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jg. 9, H. 1, S. 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  738. HASEN, Richard L. (2014): Three Wrong Progressive Approaches (and One Right One) to Campaign Finance Reform, in: Harvard Law & Policy Review, Jg. 8, H. 1, S. 21–37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  739. HASEN, Richard L. (2015): Election Law's Path in the Roberts Court's First Decade: A Sharp Right Turn but with Speed Bumps and Surprising Twists, University of California, Irvine School of Law, Irvine, CA, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2015-70, online verfügbar unter <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2639902>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  740. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Plutocrats United. Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  741. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Money can't buy Jeb Bush the White House, but it still skews politics, in: Washington Post vom 14.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/money-cant-buy-jeb-bush-the-white-house-but-it-still-skews-politics/2016/01/14/7c920780-b554-11e5-9388-466021d971de_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  742. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Money and Politics in Polarized Times, Yale University Press Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://blog.yupnet.org/2016/02/02/money-and-politics-in-polarized-times/>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.02.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  743. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Campaign-Finance Law, the State of Nature, and the Nirvana Fallacy, The Library of Law and Liberty, online verfügbar unter <http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/campaign-finance-law-the-state-of-nature-and-the-nirvana-fallacy/#sthash.z2C3iMT7.dpuf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  744. HASEN, Richard L./ COLLINS, Ronald K. L. (2016): FAC 6 (First Amendment Conversations) The Law & Politics of Money: A Q & A with Richard Hasen – Part I, Concurring Opinions, online verfügbar unter <http://concurringopinions.com/archives/2016/03/fac-6-first-amendment-conversations-the-law-politics-of-money-a-q-a-with-richard-hasen-part-i.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  745. HASSON, Riley (2016): A New Political Player. The Role of Super PACs in Congressional Elections, University of Connecticut, online verfügbar unter <http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1478&context=srhonors_theses>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  746. HAYES, Danny/ MCKEE, Seth C. (2009): The Participatory Effects of Redistricting, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 53, H. 4, S. 1006–1023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  747. HEARD, Alexander (1962): The Costs of Democracy. Financing American Political Campaigns, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  748. HEBENSTREIT, Jörg (2016): Wahlkampffinanzierung seit 2008: The Rise of Big Money, in: Gellner, Winand/ Horst, Patrick (Hg.): Die USA am Ende der Präsidentschaft Barack Obamas, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 85–107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  749. HEBENSTREIT, Jörg (2017): Does Money Matter? Wahlkampffinanzierung und die US-Präsidentschaftswahlen 2016, in: Gellner, Winand/ Oswald, Michael (Hg.): Die USA nach den Wahlen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, x-y. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  750. HEIDEKING, Jürgen/ Mauch, Christof (2008): Geschichte der USA, 6. Aufl., Tübingen: UTB. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  751. HEIDENHEIMER, Arnold J. (Hg.) (1970): Comparative Political Finance: The Financing of Party Organizations and Elections Campaigns, Lexington, MA: Heath. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  752. HELLMAN, Deborah/ SCHULTZ, David (2016): Problems in the Existing Jurisprudence, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 207–214. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  753. HENNING, Peter J. (2015): Treating Corporations as People, in: The New York Times vom 26.05.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/business/dealbook/treating-corporations-as-people.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  754. HENNIS, Wilhelm (1964): Richtlinienkompetenz und Regierungstechnik, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  755. HEPP IV, John H. (2003): Colleges and Universities, in: Schlup, Leonard/ Ryan, James G. (Hg.): Historical Dictionary of the Gilded Age, New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe, S. 101. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  756. HERRNSON, Paul S. (2008): Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  757. HERRNSON, Paul S./ CAMPBELL, Colton C./ EZRA, Marni/ MEDVIC, Stephen K. (Hg.) (2005): Guide to Political Campaigns in America, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  758. HERRON, Michael C./ WISEMAN, Alan E. (2008): Gerrymanders and Theories of Law Making: A Study of Legislative Redistricting in Illinois, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 70, H. 1, S. 151–167. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  759. HILDEBRANDT, Achim/ JÄCKLE, Sebastian/ WOLF, Frieder/ HEINDL, Andreas (2015): Methodologie, Methoden, Forschungsdesign. Ein Lehrbuch für fortgeschrittene Studierende der Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  760. HILL, Nathan (2016): The Nix. A novel, London: Picador. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  761. HILL, Seth J./ LO, James/ VAVRECK, Lynn/ ZALLER, John (2013): How QuicklyWe Forget: The Duration of Persuasion Effects From Mass Communication, in: Political Communication, Jg. 30, H. 4, S. 521–547. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  762. HOFSTADTER, Richard (1955): The Age of Reform. From Bryan to F.D.R., New York, NY: Vintage Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  763. HOGAN, Robert E. (1999): Campaign Spending in State Legislative Primary Elections, in: State and Local Government Review, Jg. 31, H. 3, S. 214–220. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  764. HOGAN, Robert E. (2007): The Effect of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections, in: Social Science Quarterly, Jg. 88, H. 5, S. 1092–1105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  765. HOHENSTEIN, Kurt (2007): Coining Corruption. The Making of the American Campaign Finance System, DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  766. HOHMANN, James (2014): Begich finally concedes Alaska race, in: Politico vom 17.11.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/2014-alaska-elections-mark-begich-dan-sullivan-112970>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  767. HOIDN, Sabine (2010): Lernkompetenzen an Hochschulen fördern, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  768. HOLBROOK-PROVOW, Thomas M./ POE, Steven C. (1987): Measuring State Political Ideology, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 15, H. 3, S. 399–416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  769. HÖNNIGE, Christoph (2007): Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition. Die vergleichende Analyse eines Spannungsdreiecks, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  770. HORNER, Christopher C. (2015): In support of Citizens United, against targeting political speech, in: The Hill vom 12.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/232535-in-support-of-citizens-united-against-targeting-political-speech>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  771. HOSIE, Duncan (2014): The Broken Promise of Citizens United, in: The Huffington Post vom 12.02.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/duncan-hosie/the-broken-promises-of-ci_b_6241700.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.09.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  772. HSU, Jordan (2014): More of the Same: The High-Cost Impotence of Citizens United, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, online verfügbar unter <https://polisci.ucsd.edu/undergrad/honors-program/More%20of%20the%20Same.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  773. HUBBARD, Glenn/ KANE, Tim (2013): In Defense of Citizens United. Why Campaign Finance Reform Threatens American Democracy, in: Foreign Affairs, Jg. 126, H. July/August, S. 126–133. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  774. HÜBNER, Emil (2007): Das politische System der USA. Eine Einführung, 6., durchgesehene und aktualisierte Auflage, München: C. H. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  775. HULSE, Carl (2016): Steve Israel of New York, a Top House Democrat, Won't Seek Re-election, in: The New York Times vom 05.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/us/politics/steve-israel-house-democrat-new-york.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.01.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  776. HUNT, Albert R. (2012): In Politics, More Can Mean Less, in: The New York Times vom 09.12.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/us/10iht-letter10.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  777. HUNTER HECHT, Stacey/ SCHULTZ, David (Hg.) (2015): Presidential Swing States. Why Only Ten Matter, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  778. ICPSR (2017): State Legislative Election Returns in the United States Series, online verfügbar unter <https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/52>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  779. INGLEHART, Ronald (2015): The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  780. INGRAHAM, Christopher (2014): America's most gerrymandered congressional districts, in: The Washington Post vom 15.05.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/05/15/americas-most-gerrymandered-congressional-districts/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  781. INGRAHAM, Christopher (2014): How gerrymandered is your Congressional district?, in: The Washington Post vom 15.05.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/gerrymandering/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  782. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (2017): Types of Tax-Exempt Organizations, online verfügbar unter <https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/types-of-tax-exempt-organizations>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  783. ISRAEL, Steve (2016): Confessions of a Congressman, in: The New York Times vom 08.01.2016, A19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  784. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel (2011): On Political Corruption, in: Youn, Monica (Hg.): Money, Politics, and the Constitution. Beyond Citizens United, New York: The Century Foundation Press, S. 119–134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  785. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel (2016): Outsourcing Politics: The Hostile Takeovers of Our Hollowed Out Political Parties, New York University School of Law, New York, NY, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, 16-52, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2888064>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  786. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ KARLAN, Pamela S. (1999): The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform, in: Texas Law Review, Jg. 77, H. 7, S. 1705–1738. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  787. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ PETERMAN, Jeremy (2013): Special Interests After Citizens United: Access, Replacement, and Interest Group Response to Legal Change, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 16, H. 9, S. 185–205. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  788. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ PETERMAN, Jeremy (2013): Special Interests After Citizens United. Access, Replacement, and Interest Group Response to Legal Change, New York University School of Law, NYU Center for Law, Economics and Organization, Law & Economics Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 13-02, online verfügbar unter <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222063>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  789. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ PILDES, Richard H. (1998): Politics As Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process, in: Stanford Law Review, Jg. 50, H. 3, S. 643–717. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  790. IYENGAR, Shanto/ SOOD, Gaurav/ LELKES, Yphtach (2012): Affect Not Ideology, A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 76, H. 3, S. 405–431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  791. JACKSON, Robert A./ CARSEY, Thomas M. (2007): US Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 26, H. 1, S. 180–195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  792. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1976): Practical Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform. An Incumbent Protection Act?, in: Public Policy, Jg. 24, H. 1, S. 1–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  793. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1978): The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 72, H. 2, S. 469–491. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  794. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1980): Money in Congressional Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  795. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1984): Money in the 1980 and 1982 congressional elections, in: Malbin, Michael J. (Hg.): Money and politics in the United States: Financing elections in the 1980s, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, S. 38–69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  796. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1985): Money and Votes Reconsidered. Congressional Elections 1972-1982, in: Public Choice, Jg. 47, H. 1, S. 7–62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  797. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1987): Enough Is Too Much: Money and Competition in House Elections, in: Schlozman, Kay L. (Hg.): Elections in America, Winchester, MA: Allan and Unwin, S. 173–195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  798. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1989): Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 83, H. 3, S. 773. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  799. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1990): The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 34, H. 2, S. 334–362. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  800. JACOBSON, Gary C. (2006): Measuring Campaign Spending Effects in U.S. House Elections, in: Brady, Henry E./ Johnston, Richard (Hg.): Capturing Campaign Effects, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, S. 199–220. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  801. JACOBSON, Gary C. (2011): The Republican Resurgence in 2010, in: Political Science Quarterly, Jg. 127, H. 1, S. 27–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  802. JACOBSON, Gary C. (2015): How Do Campaigns Matter?, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 18, H. 1, S. 31–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  803. JACOBSON, Gary C./ CARSON, Jamie L. (2016): The politics of congressional elections, 9. Aufl., Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  804. JACOBSON, Gary C./ KERNELL, Samuel (1983): Strategy and choice in Congressional elections, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  805. JAMISON, Derrick D./ GORE, Gina (Hg.) (2012): Super PACs (Political Action Committees). The New Force in Federal Elections, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  806. JAN, Tracy (2013): Turning the political map into a partisan weapon. The GOP's national effort to control redistricting has cemented its grip on the House but also intensified gridlock, in: Boston Globe vom 23.06.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2013/06/22/new-district-maps-reaped-rewards-for-gop-congress-but-cost-fewer-moderates-more-gridlock/B6jCugm94tpBvVu77ay0wJ/story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  807. JARRETT, Laura/ JORGENSEN, Sarah (2017): Prosecution rests in Menendez corruption trial, in: CNN News vom 13.10.2017, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/11/politics/prosecution-rests-robert-menendez-trial/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  808. JENCKS, Christopher (2009): Does Rising Economic Inequality Matter?, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 115–117. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  809. JOESTEN, Danielle A./ STONE, Walter J. (2014): Reassessing Proximity Voting. Expertise, Party, and Choice in Congressional Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 76, H. 3, S. 740–753. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  810. JOHNSON, Dennis W. (2001): No Place for Amateurs. How Political Consultants Are Reshaping American Democracy, New York/ London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  811. JOHNSTON, Michael (2016): The Supreme Court’s new definition of corruption is out of step with what Americans think, in: The Washington Post vom 20.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/07/20/defining-corruption-is-inherently-political-why-do-we-think-the-supreme-court-will-solve-it/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  812. JOLLY, David: I see members of Congress shake down Americans every single day, in: The Guardian vom, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/18/members-of-congress-like-me-shake-down-americans-every-single-day>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  813. JONES, Ruth S. (1993): Campaign and Party Finance in the American States, in: Gunlicks, Arthur B. (Hg.): Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe, Boulder/ San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press, S. 41–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  814. JONSSON, Patrik (2010): ‘Fighting’ Obama hits Supreme Court over campaign finance, in: The Christian Science Monitor vom 23.01.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0123/Fighting-Obama-hits-Supreme-Court-over-campaign-finance>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  815. JORGENSEN, Sarah (2017): Who is Salomon Melgen?, in: CNN News vom 05.09.2017, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/05/politics/who-is-salomon-melgen/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  816. JOSEPHSON, Matthew (1962): The Robber Barons. The Great American Capitalists, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  817. KALLA, Joshua L./ BROOCKMAN, David E. (2016): Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 60, H. 3, S. 545–558. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  818. KALTENTHALER, Heike (2000): Das Geheimnis des Wahlerfolgs. Negative Campaigning in den USA, Wien u.a. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  819. KAMPS, Klaus (2007): Politisches Kommunikationsmanagement. Grundlagen und Professionalisierung moderner Politikvermittlung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  820. KANG, Michael S. (2005): The Hydraulics and Politics of Party Regulation, in: Iowa Law Review, Jg. 91, H. 1, S. 131–187. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  821. KANG, Michael S. (2012): The End of Campaign Finance Law, in: Virginia Law Review, Jg. 98, H. 1, S. 1–66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  822. KAPLAN, Andee/ HARE, Eric/ HOFMANN, Heike/ COOK, Dianne (2014): Can You Buy a President? Politics After the Tillman Act, in: CHANCE, Jg. 27, H. 2, S. 20–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  823. KARLAN, Pamela S. (2014): Citizens Deflected: Electoral Integrity and Political Reform, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 141–151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  824. KATZ, Alyssa (2015): The Influence Machine. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Corporate Capture of American Life, New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  825. KAZIN, Michael (2007): Rove fails where his hero succeeded, in: Politico vom 02.07.2007, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2007/07/rove-fails-where-his-hero-succeeded-004754>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  826. KEDING, Ole (2015): Online-Kommunikation von Organisationen. Strategisches Handeln unter komplexen Bedingungen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  827. KELLER, Eric/ KELLY, Nathan J. (2015): Partisan Politics, Financial Deregulation, and the New Gilded Age, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 68, H. 3, S. 428–442. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  828. KELLY, Patrick J. (2004): The Election of 1896 and the Restructuring of Civil War Memory, in: Fahs, Alice/ Waugh, Joan (Hg.): The Memory of the Civil War in American Culture, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, S. 180–212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  829. KENDALL, Doug (2009): Elections for Sale? If the Supreme Court lifts restrictions on corporate campaign contributions, watch out, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.09.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2009/sep/08/opinion/oe-kendall8>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  830. KENNY, Christopher/ MCBURNETT, Michael (1992): A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Campaign Spending on Congressional Vote Choice, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 36, H. 4, S. 923–937. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  831. KEY, V. O. (1955): A Theory of Critical Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 17, H. 1, S. 3–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  832. KEY, V. O. (1966): The Responsible Electorate. Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960, New York: Vintage Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  833. KILGORE, Ed (2015): The “Super-PAC Tax”, in: Washington Monthly vom 06.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://washingtonmonthly.com/2015/07/06/the-super-pac-tax/>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  834. KING, Gary (1991): Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage, in: British Journal of Political Science, Jg. 21, H. 1, S. 119–128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  835. KING, Gary/ KEOHANE, Robert O./ VERBA, Sidney (1994): Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  836. KING, Gary/ LEHMAN SCHLOZMAN, Kay/ NIE, Norman H. (Hg.) (2009): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  837. KINSLEY, Michael (2012): Citizens United was the right decision. We may not like the consequences, but the decision was the correct one, in: Star Tribune vom 11.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.startribune.com/citizens-united-was-the-right-decision/162137165/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  838. KINSLEY, Michael (2016): Did the Supreme Court Make the Right Decision in the Citizens United Case After All?, in: Vanity Fair vom 02.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/04/supreme-court-citizens-united-case-decision>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  839. KITTEL, Bernhard (2009): Eine Disziplin auf der Suche nach Wissenschaftlichkeit: Entwicklung und Stand der Methoden in der deutschen Politikwissenschaft, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Jg. 50, H. 3, S. 577–603. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  840. KLEIN, Ezra (2012): Predict the 2012 election with our interactive tool, in: Washington Post vom 24.04.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/create-your-own-election/2012/04/24/gIQAuaOIeT_blog.html?utm_term=.e3fa47262f6e>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.06.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  841. KLEIN, Ezra (2014): The most terrifying graph on democracy is a flat line, in: Vox vom 14.05.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.vox.com/2014/5/14/5718080/the-most-terrifying-graph-about-democracy-is-a-straight-line>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.10.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  842. KLEIN, Joe (2005): The Perils of the Permanent Campaign, in: TIME Magazine vom 30.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1124332,00.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  843. KLUMPP, Tilman/ MIALON, Hugo/ WILLIAMS, Michael (2012): Money Talks. The Impact of Citizens United on State Elections, University of Alberta Working Paper No. 2012-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  844. KLUMPP, Tilman/ MIALON, Hugo M./ WILLIAMS, Michael (2016): The Business of American Democracy: Citizens United, Independent Spending, and Elections, in: Journal of Law and Economics, Jg. 59, H. 1, S. 1–43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  845. KLUMPP, Tilman/ MIALON, Hugo M./ WILLIAMS, Michael A. (2016): Yes, 'Citizens United'gives Republicans an electoral edge. Here's proof, in: The Washington Post vom 07.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/yes-citizens-united-gives-republicans-an-electoral-edge-heres-proof/2016/04/07/c9fe3fa4-fb5c-11e5-886f-a037dba38301_story.html?utm_term=.e8c92fde4c6c>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  846. KNIGHT, Kathleen/ MARSH, Michael (2002): Varieties of election studies, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 21, H. 1, S. 169–187. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  847. KOLB, Matthias (2014): Demokraten flirten mit dem großen Geld, in: Süddeutsche Zeitung vom 09.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/kongresswahlen-in-usa-demokraten-flirten-mit-dem-grossen-geld-1.2165671>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  848. KOLODNY, Robin (2014): Do We Know the Cost of Campaigns in the US?, online verfügbar unter <https://sites.temple.edu/kolodny/files/2014/12/Kolodny-APSA-2014-Final.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.03.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  849. KOß, Michael (2008): Staatliche Parteienfinanzierung und politischer Wettbewerb. Die Entwicklung der Finanzierungsregimes in Deutschland, Schweden, Großbritannien und Frankreich, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  850. KROLL, Andy (2015): The Chairwoman Who’s At War With Her Own Agency, in: National Journal vom 13.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/84089/chairwoman-whos-war-with-her-own-agency>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.11.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  851. KROMM, Chris (2011): The Art Pope empire: Media outlets, think tanks and election machines, in: Independent Weekly vom 09.03.2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-art-pope-empire-media-outlets-think-tanks-and-election-machines/Content?oid=2140145>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  852. KROMM, Chris/ KOTCH, Alex (2016): Big Money's map mischief in North Carolina, Institute for Southern Studies, online verfügbar unter <https://www.facingsouth.org/2016/02/big-moneys-map-mischief-in-north-carolina>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  853. KROPP, Sabine/ MINKENBERG, Michael (Hg.) (2005): Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  854. KRUMHOLZ, Sheila (2013): Campaign Cash and Corruption: Money in Politics, Post-Citizens United, in: Social Research: An International Quarterly, Jg. 80, H. 4, S. 1119–1134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  855. KUHNER, Timothy K. (2011): Citizens United as Neoliberal Jurisprudence: The Resurgence of Economic Theory, in: Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, Jg. 18, H. 1, S. 395–468. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  856. KUHNER, Timothy K. (2014): Capitalism v. Democracy. Money in Politics and the Free Market Constitution, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  857. KUHNER, Timothy K. (2016): Plutocracy and Partyocracy: Oligarchies Born of Constitutional Interpretation, in: Review of Constitutional Studies / Revue d’études constitutionnelles, Jg. 21, H. 1, S. 115–142. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  858. KURTZLEBEN, Danielle (2016): Is The Electoral College Dragging Down Voter Turnout in Your State?, in: National Public Radio vom 26.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.npr.org/2016/11/26/503170280/charts-is-the-electoral-college-dragging-down-voter-turnout-in-your-state>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  859. LA RAJA, Raymond J. (2011): Small Change. Money, Political Parties, and Campaign Finance Reform, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  860. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2014): The effects of campaign finance spending bans on electoral outcomes: Evidence from the states about the potential impact of Citizens United v. FEC, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 33, H. 1, S. 102–114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  861. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2014): Want to Reduce polarization? Give parties more money, in: The Washington Post vom 21.07.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/07/21/want-to-reduce-polarization-give-parties-more-money/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  862. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2015): Campaign Finance and Political Polarization. When Purists Prevail, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  863. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2015): Unlimited party fundraising and spending gives you less polarized legislatures? Discuss., in: The Washington Post vom 08.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/07/08/unlimited-party-fundraising-and-spending-gives-you-less-polarized-legislatures-discuss/>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.09.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  864. LACEY, Michael J. (Hg.) (1991): The Truman Presidency, Cambridge, u.a.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  865. LAMMERT, Christian/ SIEWERT, Markus/ VORMANN, Boris (Hg.) (2016): Handbuch Politik USA, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  866. LANDFRIED, Christine (1990): Parteifinanzen und politische Macht: Eine vergleichende Studie zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland, zu Italien und den USA, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  867. LANOUE, David J. (1994): Retrospective and Prospective Voting in Presidential-Year Elections, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 47, H. 1, S. 193–205. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  868. LAU, Richard R./ ANDERSEN, David J./ DITONTO, Tessa M./ KLEINBERG, Mona S./ REDLAWSK, David P. (2017): Effect of Media Environment Diversity and Advertising Tone on Information Search, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 39, H. 1, S. 231–255. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  869. LAU, Richard R./ SIGELMAN, Lee/ ROVNER, Ivy Brown (2007): The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 69, H. 4, S. 1176–1209. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  870. LAZARSFELD, Paul F. (1944): The Election is Over, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 8, H. 3, S. 317–330. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  871. LAZARSFELD, Paul F./ BERELSON, Bernard R./ GAUDET, Hazel (1968): The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, 3. Aufl., New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  872. LEE, Chisun/ FERGUSON, Brent (2014): To see how Citizens United is hurting democracy, look at local elections, MSNBC News, online verfügbar unter <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/see-how-citizens-united-hurting-democracy-look-local-elections>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  873. LEIGHLEY, Jan E. (Hg.) (2010): The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  874. LEMBCKE, Oliver (2017): Thüringer Verfassungsgerichtshof, in: Reutter, Werner (Hg.): Landesverfassungsgerichte. Entwicklung - Aufbau - Funktionen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 389–420. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  875. LEMIEUX, Scott (2016): The Five Worst Roberts Court Rulings, in: The American Prospect vom 01.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/five-worst-roberts-court-rulings>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  876. LEPORE, Jill (2012): Money Talks. Who’s Fighting For Campaign-Finance Reform, in: The New Yorker vom 10.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/money-talks-whos-fighting-for-campaign-finance-reform>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  877. LERNER, Adam (2015): Citizens United protests interrupt Supreme Court arguments, in: Politico vom 21.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/citizens-united-supreme-court-arguments-114456>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  878. LESSIG, Lawrence (2011): Republic, Lost. How Money Corrupts Congress - and a Plan to Stop It, New York: Twelve. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  879. LESSIG, Lawrence (2014): Out-Posting Post, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 97–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  880. LESSIG, Lawrence (2015): Corrupt and Unequal, Both, in: Fordham Law Review, Jg. 84, H. 2, S. 445–452. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  881. LESSIG, Lawrence (2015): One Mission: There is one issue we must address first in the 2016 election, online verfügbar unter <https://lessig2016.us/one-mission/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  882. LESSIG, Lawrence/ ISQUITH, Elias (2014): Cronies, corruption and cash: Lawrence Lessing on why we need a super PAC to end all super PACs. Harvard professor tells Salon the strategy, nuts-and-bolts and urgent rationale behind his nascent "Mayday PAC", in: Salon vom 18.06.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.salon.com/2014/06/18/teaching_us_to_hate_each_other_lawrence_lessig_on_his_super_pac_to_end_all_super_pacs/>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  883. LEVI, Margaret/ STOKER, Laura (2000): Political Trust and Trustworthiness, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 3, H. 4, S. 475–507. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  884. LEVITT, Justin (2014): Electoral Integrity: The Confidence Game, in: New York University Law Review, Jg. 89, H. 1, S. 70–86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  885. LEVITT, Justin (2017): Who draws the lines?, All About Redistricting. Professor Justin Levitt's guide to drawing the electoral lines, <http://redistricting.lls.edu/who.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  886. LEVITT, Steven D. (1994): Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House, in: The Journal of Political Economy, Jg. 102, H. 4, S. 777–798. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  887. LEVITT, Steven D./ DUBNER, Stephen J. (2007): Freakonomics. Warum wohnen Drogenhändler bei ihren Müttern? Führt mehr Polizei zu weniger Kriminalität? Sind Swimmingpools gefährlicher als Revolver? Macht gute Erziehung glücklich?, Überraschende Antworten auf alltägliche Lebensfragen, München: Wilhelm Goldmann Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  888. LEWIS, Lindsay Mark/ ARKEDIS, Jim (2014): So You've Won a Seat in Congress - Now What. A simple guide for how new members can find success (Hint: Fundraising, fundraising, and fundraising), in: The Atlantic vom 06.11.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/so-youve-won-election-to-congressnow-what/382421/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.05.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  889. LEWIS-BECK, Michael S./ JACOBY, William G./ NORPOTH, Helmut/ WEISBERG, Herbert F. (2008): The American Voter Revisited. With a foreword by Philip E. Converse, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  890. LEWIS-BECK, Michael S./ PALDAM, Martin (2000): Economic Voting. An Introduction, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 19, H. 1, S. 113–121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  891. LEWISON, Jed (2012): 22 consecutive political ads during half-hour Columbus, Ohio, newscast, Hg. v. Daily Kos Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/1/1153753/-22-consecutive-political-ads-during-half-hour-Columbus-Ohio-newscast>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  892. LICHTBLAU, Eric (2015): Bernie Sanders’s Success in Attracting Small Donors Tests Importance of ‘Super PACs’, in: The New York Times vom 25.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/us/politics/bernie-sanders-success-in-attracting-small-donors-tests-importance-of-super-pacs.html?mcubz=0&_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  893. LICHTMAN, Allan J. (2012): Predicting the next president. The keys to the White House, 2012. Aufl., Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  894. LICHTMAN, Allan J. (2014): Who rules America?, in: The Hill vom 12.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/civil-rights/214857-who-rules-america>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.07.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  895. LIJPHART, Arend (2009): The United States: A Different Democracy, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 1–3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  896. LIOZ, Adam/ SHANTON, Karen (2015): The Money Chase. Moving from Big Money Dominance in the 2014 Midterms to a Small Donor Democracy, unter Mitarbeit von Emma Boorboor, Michael Russo und Dan Smith, Demos; U.S.PIRG, New York, online verfügbar unter <http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/TheMoneyChase-Report_0.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  897. LIPTAK, Adam (2017): Justices Reject 2 Gerrymandered North Carolina Districts, Citing Racial Bias, in: The New York Times vom 22.05.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/supreme-court-north-carolina-congressional-districts.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645
  898. LITHWICK, Dahlia (2009): The Supreme Court Reviews Hillary: The Movie, in: Slate vom 24.03.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/supreme_court_dispatches/2009/03/the_supreme_court_reviews_hillary_the_movie.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902645

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Neue Amerika-Studien"
Cover des Buchs: Weltmacht und Demokratie
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Florian Böller, Steffen Hagemann, Lukas D. Herr, Marcus Müller
Weltmacht und Demokratie
Cover des Buchs: The President as Communicator-in-Chief
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Lukas D. Herr
The President as Communicator-in-Chief
Cover des Buchs: No Blank Check
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Marcus Müller
No Blank Check
Cover des Buchs: Western Conceptions of Democracy and the Transatlantic Divide over Democracy Promotion
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Golareh Khalilpour
Western Conceptions of Democracy and the Transatlantic Divide over Democracy Promotion
Cover des Buchs: Donald Trump und die Politik in den USA
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Florian Böller, Christoph M. Haas, Steffen Hagemann, David Sirakov, Sarah Wagner
Donald Trump und die Politik in den USA

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex