Cover of book: Wahlkampffinanzierung und Demokratie in den USA
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Wahlkampffinanzierung und Demokratie in den USA

Authors:
Series:
Neue Amerika-Studien, Volume 5
Publisher:
 2020

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6141-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0264-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Neue Amerika-Studien
Volume
5
Language
German
Pages
744
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 24
    1. 1.1 The Golden Age No access
      1. Der Wahlkampf von 1896 No access
    3. 1.3 A New Gilded Age? No access
    1. 2.1 Forschungsgegenstand, Fragestellung(en) und Ziel der Untersuchung No access
    2. 2.2 Methodisches Vorgehen und Datengrundlage No access
    3. 2.3 Aufbau der Untersuchung No access
    4. 2.4 Forschungsrelevanz No access
    5. 2.5 Forschungsstand No access
    6. 2.6 Grundpositionen der Untersuchung No access
    1. 3.1 Zugänge zur vexata quaestio Wahlkampffinanzierung No access
      1. 3.2.1 Phase der bruchstückhaften Regulierung (1896-1971) No access
      2. 3.2.2 Phase umfassender Regulierung (1971-2010) No access
      3. 3.2.3 Phase weitestgehender Deregulierung (2010 - ?) No access
    1. 4.1 Administrative Kosten No access
    2. 4.2 Strategische Kosten No access
    3. 4.3 Medial-werbende Kosten No access
      1. 5.1.1 Generelle Kostenentwicklungen von US-Wahlkämpfen No access
      2. 5.1.2 Kostenentwicklung auf Präsidentschaftsebene No access
      3. 5.1.3 Kostenentwicklung auf Kongressebene No access
      1. 5.2.1 Wege der monetären Beeinflussung von Wahlen No access
        1. 5.2.2.1 Inkommensurabilitätsproblem No access
        2. 5.2.2.2 Simultanitätsproblem No access
        3. 5.2.2.3 Amtsinhabervorteil No access
        4. 5.2.2.4 Medienbezogene Messprobleme: Backlash-, Decay- & Shakedown-Effekt No access
        1. 5.2.3.1 Elektorales Erklärungsmodell (VCM) No access
        2. 5.2.3.2 Grenzwerteffekte von Wahlkampfspenden: Threshold Effect No access
          1. Vorwahlen 2012 No access
          2. Vorwahlen 2016 No access
          1. Hauptwahl 2012 No access
          2. Hauptwahl 2016 No access
          3. Wahlkampfausgaben und Wahlerfolg in historischer Perspektive (1960-2016) No access
        1. 5.3.2.1 Forschungsergebnisse vor Citizens United No access
        2. 5.3.2.2 Forschungsergebnisse nach Citizens United No access
        3. 5.3.2.3 Self-Funding Candidates No access
        1. Outside Spending No access
        2. Wahlerfolg = f (Wahlkampfspenden) No access
        1. Fallauswahl No access
        1. Finaler Datensatz No access
        1. Zwischenfazit: Wahlerfolg = f (Wahlkampfspenden + UV1 + UV2 + UV3 + … UVn) No access
      1. 6.1.1 Gerrymandering: When you draw the lines, you make the rules No access
      2. 6.1.2 Polarisierung No access
      1. 6.2.1 Permanent Campaigning No access
      2. 6.2.2 Die informelle Macht von Wahlkampfspenden: Preemptive Obedience No access
      1. 6.3.1 The Disappearing Small Donor? No access
      2. 6.3.2 Sinkende Wahlbeteiligung No access
    4. 6.4. Responsive Folgen: The Translation of Economic Power into Political Power No access
    5. 6.5 Konfidenzebene: Unzufriedenheit und Vertrauensverlust No access
    6. 6.6 Normative Ebene No access
  8. 7. Epilog: The Second Gilded Age – Government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich, again No access 632 - 644
    1. Anhang 1: The Multi Stage Explanatory Model No access
    2. Anhang 2(1): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Obama) No access
    3. Anhang 2(2): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Romney) No access
    4. Anhang 3(1): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Clinton) No access
    5. Anhang 3(2): Korrelationsmatrizen Wahlkampfausgaben & RCP-A (Trump) No access
    6. Anhang 4: Entwicklung der Wahlkampfkosten von Präsidentschaftswahlkampagnen No access
    7. Anhang 5: Codebuch des SLE-Datensatzes (inkl. Anzahl der Beobachtungen) No access
    8. Anhang 6(1): Outside Spending nach Kontroll- und Experimentalgruppe (Senat) (angegeben als Median und arithmetisches Mittel) No access
    9. Anhang 6(2): Outside Spending nach Kontroll- und Experimentalgruppe (HoR) (angegeben als Median und arithmetisches Mittel) No access
    10. Anhang 7: Entwicklung des Supporting Outside Spending in State Senate Races No access
    11. Anhang 8(1): Entwicklung des Supporting Outside Spending nach Partei (Senat) No access
    12. Anhang 8(2): Entwicklung des Supporting Outside Spending nach Partei (HoR) No access
    13. Anhang 9(1): Entwicklung des Opposing Outside Spending nach Partei (Senat) No access
    14. Anhang 9(2): Entwicklung des Opposing Outside Spending nach Partei (HoR) No access
    15. Anhang 10: Häufigkeit von Third Party Candidates No access
    16. Anhang 11: Wiederwahlquoten auf State Legislature Ebene No access
    17. Anhang 12: R²-Wert-Differenzen basierend auf Tabelle 20 No access
    18. Anhang 13(1): Entwicklung der Wahlbeteiligung bei Präsidentschaftswahlkämpfen No access
    19. Anhang 13(2): Entwicklung der Wahlbeteiligung bei Midterm Elections No access
    20. Anhang 14: Transkription der CREDO-Anschreiben (Kalla/Broockman-Studie) No access
    21. Anhang 14(2): CREDO-Anschreiben (Constituent Condition) No access
  10. Literaturverzeichnis No access 677 - 744

Bibliography (898)

  1. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (1988): Explaining Senate Election Outcomes, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 82, H. 2, S. 385–403. Open Google Scholar
  2. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (1989): Campaign Spending in U.S. Senate Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 14, H. 4, S. 487–507. Open Google Scholar
  3. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (1991): Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 53, H. 1, S. 34–56. Open Google Scholar
  4. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (2010): The Disappearing Center. Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  5. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I. (2013): What If the Pundits Are Right After All? A Reply on Polarization and Sorting, in: The Atlantic vom 04.03.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/what-if-the-pundits-are-right-after-all-a-reply-on-polarization-and-sorting/273690/>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  6. ABRAMOWITZ, Alan I./ ALEXANDER, Brad/ GUNNING, Matthew (2006): Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 68, H. 1, S. 75–88. Open Google Scholar
  7. ACKERET, Markus (2014): Proteste in Hongkong. Das andere China meldet sich, in: Neue Zürcher Zeitung vom 26.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nzz.ch/international/asien-und-pazifik/das-andere-china-1.18391043>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  8. ALEXANDER, Brad (2005): Good Money and Bad Money. Do Funding Sources Affect Electoral Outcomes, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 58, H. 2, S. 353–358. Open Google Scholar
  9. ALEXANDER, Herbert (1972): Money in Politics, Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. ALEXANDER, Herbert (1976): Financing Politics. Money, Elections, and Political Reforms, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Open Google Scholar
  11. ALEXANDER, Herbert (1976): Financing the 1972 Election, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  12. ALLISON, Bill (2016): Millions From Maxed-Out Clinton Donors Flowed Through Loophole, in: Bloomberg News vom 26.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-dnc-contributions/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.05.2016. Open Google Scholar
  13. ALMOND, Gabriel A./ VERBA, Sidney (1963): The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  14. ALTSCHULER, Bruce E. (2008): Learning the Art of Policy Management, in: Watson, Robert W. (Hg.): White House Studies Compendium, New York: Nova Science Publishers (5), S. 163–182. Open Google Scholar
  15. AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (2012): External Political Efficacy Index 1952-2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/toptable/tab5b_4.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  16. ANDERHEIDEN, Michael (2003): Rawls, John, in: Rehfus, Wulff D. (Hg.): Handwörterbuch Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, S. 581. Open Google Scholar
  17. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen/ FIGUEIREDO, John M. de/ SNYDER JR., James (2003): Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Jg. 17, H. 1, S. 105–130. Open Google Scholar
  18. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen/ GERBER, Alan (1994): The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending. Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 56, H. 4, S. 1106–1118. Open Google Scholar
  19. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen/ IYENGAR, Shanto (1997): Going Negative. How Political Advertisements Shrink & Polarize the Electorate, New York: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  20. APPLEBOME, Peter (2012): Personal Cost for 2 Senate Bids: $100 Million, in: The New York Times vom 02.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/nyregion/linda-e-mcmahon-has-spent-nearly-100-million-in-senate-races.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  21. ARCENEAUX, Kevin/ BRACE, Paul/ JOHNSON, Martin/ ULBIG, Stacy C. (2004): Does State Political Ideology Change over Time?, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 57, H. 4, S. 529–540. Open Google Scholar
  22. ARKEDIS, Jim (2014): Time is Money: How to Fix Outrageous Political Spending, in: The Daily Beast vom 11.03.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/03/time-is-money-how-to-fix-outrageous-political-spending.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  23. ARZHEIMER, Kai/ EVANS, Jocelyn/ LEWIS-BECK, Michael (Hg.) (2017): The SAGE Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, 2. Aufl., Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  24. AVALIKTOS, Neal (Hg.) (2004): The Election Process Revisited, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  25. AVENT, Ryan (2011): Government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich. Why is policy so responsive to the preferences of the wealthy?, in: The Economist vom 17.02.2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/02/political_economy>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.12.2017. Open Google Scholar
  26. BABB, Drew (2014): LBJ’s 1964 attack ad ‘Daisy’ leaves a legacy for modern campaigns, in: The Washington Post vom 05.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/lbjs-1964-attack-ad-daisy-leaves-a-legacy-for-modern-campaigns/2014/09/05/d00e66b0-33b4-11e4-9e92-0899b306bbea_story.html?utm_term=.4672e5975d27>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  27. BADE, Rachel (2016): Freedom Caucus opposes GOP's Obamacare replacement plan. A three-year phaseout 'will meet with major resistance,' said the group's incoming leader, Rep. Mark Meadows, in: Politico vom 05.12.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/obamacare-replacement-freedom-caucus-gop-232215>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  28. BADIE, Bertrand/ BERG-SCHLOSSER Dirk/ MORLINO, Leonardo (Hg.) (2011): International Encyclopedia of Political Science (7), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  29. BAI, Matt (2012): How Much Has Citizens United Changed the Political Game?, in: The New York Times vom 17.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/magazine/how-much-has-citizens-united-changed-the-political-game.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  30. BAKER, Peter (2010): Obama Ratchets Up Tone Against G.O.P., in: The New York Times vom 10.10.2010, A11. Open Google Scholar
  31. BALCERZAK, Ashley (2016): Where the money came from, not how much, mattered in the presidential race, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/where-the-money-came-from-not-how-much-mattered-in-the-presidential-race/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  32. BALCH, George I. (1974): Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept "Sense of Political Efficacy", in: Political Methodology, Jg. 1, H. 2, S. 1–43. Open Google Scholar
  33. BANERJEE, Neela (2012): Romney ad features miners allegedly forced to attend rally, in: Los Angeles Times vom 19.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/19/news/la-pn-romney-ad-miners-rally-20120919>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  34. BARBER, Michael (2015): Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 78, H. 1, S. 296–310. Open Google Scholar
  35. BARBER, Michael/ MCCARTY, Nolan (2015): Causes and Consequences of Polarization, in: Persily, Nathaniel (Hg.): Solutions to Political Polarization in America, New York: Cambridge University Press, S. 19-58. Open Google Scholar
  36. BARNES, Robert (2009): 'Hillary: The Movie' to Get Supreme Court Screening, in: The Washington Post vom 15.03.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/14/AR2009031401603.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  37. BARRETT, Mark (2017): Meadows mingles with Koch brothers, billionaire GOP donors, in: USA Today vom 30.06.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2017/06/30/meadows-mingles-koch-brothers-billionaire-gop-donors/440580001/>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  38. BARTELS, Larry M. (1991): Instrumental and "Quasi-Instrumental" Variables, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 35, H. 3, S. 777–800. Open Google Scholar
  39. BARTELS, Larry M. (2008): Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  40. BAUM, Laura (2012): Obama Dominates Advertising in Key States, Wesleyan Media Project, Political Advertising Analysis Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases/obama-dominates-ads-in-key-states/>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  41. BAUMGARTNER, Frank J./ BERRY, Jeffrey M./ HOJNACKI, Marie/ KIMBALL, David C./ LEECH, Beth L. (2009): Lobbying and Policy Change. Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why, Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  42. BEATTY, Jack (2007): A Sisyphean History of Campaign Finance Reform, in: The Atlantic, July Issue, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/a-sisyphean-history-of-campaign-finance-reform/306066/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Open Google Scholar
  43. BEATTY, Jack (2007): Age of Betrayal. The Triumph of Money in America, 1865-1900, New York, NY: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar
  44. BEATTY, Jack/ Bacon, Katie (2007): The Dark Side of the Gilded Age, in: The Atlantic, June Issue, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/06/the-dark-side-of-the-gilded-age/306012/>, zuletzt geprüft am 04.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  45. BENNETT, James (2012): The New Price of American Politics, in: The Atlantic, October Issue, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/10/the/309086/>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  46. BENSEL, Richard Franklin (2008): Passion and Preferences. William Jennings Bryan and the 1896 Democratic National Convention, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  47. BENSON, Eric/ TARTAR, Andre (2012): The Forever Campaign, in: New York Magazine vom 14.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://nymag.com/news/politics/elections-2012/timeline-2012-10/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  48. BERENS, Charlyne (2013): One House. The Unicameral's Progressive Vision for Nebraska, 2. Aufl., Lincoln, NE/ London: University of Nebraska Press. Open Google Scholar
  49. BERENSON, Tessa (2014): Here Are 5 of The Most Dishonest Political Ads of 2014, in: TIME Magazine vom 06.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/3475006/dishonest-political-campaign-ads-2014/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  50. BERMAN, Ari (2012): The.000063 Percent Election, in: The Nation vom 16.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.thenation.com/article/000063-percent-election/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  51. BERMAN, Ari (2015): Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Open Google Scholar
  52. BERNSTEIN, Carl/ WOODWARD, Bob (1974): All The President's Men, New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  53. BEST, Henning/ WOLF, Christof (Hg.) (2010): Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  54. BEST, Henning/ WOLF, Christof (2010): Lineare Regressionsanalyse, in: Best, Henning/ Wolf, Christof (Hg.): Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 607–638. Open Google Scholar
  55. BEST, Henning/ WOLF, Christof (2010): Logistische Regression, in: Best, Henning/ Wolf, Christof (Hg.): Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 827–854. Open Google Scholar
  56. BEVIER, Lillian: Citizens United Vindicates Fundamental First Amendment Principles, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 33–34, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  57. BHATTARAI, Abha (2016): Trump taps wrestling executive to lead Small Business Administration, in: The Washington Post vom 07.12.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-taps-wrestling-executive-to-lead-small-business-administration/2016/12/07/3b53e72c-bcc7-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  58. BIERSACK Bob (2016): Team Blue routing Team Red in presidential fundraising, unlike 2012, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/09/team-blue-routing-team-red-in-presidential-fundraising-unlike-2012/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  59. BLAIS, André/ FORUNIER, Patrick/ NADEAU, Richard/ GIDENGIL, Elisabeth/ NEVITTE, Neil (2003): Issue Importance and Performance Voting, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 25, H. 1, S. 51–67. Open Google Scholar
  60. BLAIS, André/ GIDENGIL, Elisabeth/ NADEAU, Richard/ NEVITTE, Neil (2002): Anatomy of a Liberal Victory. Making Sense of the Vote in the 2000 Canadian Election, Peterborough: Broadview Press. Open Google Scholar
  61. BLAKE, Aaron (2015): The most interesting political stat of the day, in: The Washington Post vom 18.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/02/18/the-most-interesting-political-stat-of-the-day/>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.02.2015. Open Google Scholar
  62. BLASI, Vincent (1994): Free Speech and the Widening Gyre of Fund-Raising: Why Campaign Spending Limits May Not Violate the First Amendment after All, in: Columbia Law Review, Jg. 94, H. 4, S. 1281–1325. Open Google Scholar
  63. BLASIO, Bill de (2010): Citizens United and the 2010 Midterm Elections, New York, Office of the Public Advocate for the City of New York, online verfügbar unter <http://archive.advocate.nyc.gov/news/2010-12-10/citizens-united-and-2010-midterm-elections-0>, zuletzt geprüft am 04.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  64. BLAU, Judith/ MONCADA, Alberto (2006): Justice in the United States, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  65. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2012): Newt Gingrich South Carolina Surge Boosted By Super PAC Spending Spree, in: The Huffington Post vom 20.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/20/newt-gingrich-south-carolina-super-pac-spending_n_1219093.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  66. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2015): Maine Voters Hope To Restore Their Revolutionary Election System. Until a few years ago, teachers, waitresses and firefighters could run for office in Maine - and win., in: The Huffington Post vom 04.09.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/maine-campaign-finance-reform_us_55e8bf3be4b093be51bafa2e>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  67. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2015): How Super PACs And Campaigns Are Coordinating In 2016. Efforts to circumvent the coordination ban have grown more aggressive, in: The Huffington Post vom 14.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/super-pac-coordination_56463f85e4b045bf3def0273>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.11.2015. Open Google Scholar
  68. BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2016): On Campaign Finance, Republicans and Democrats Could Not Be Further Apart. The Republican platform calls for more money in politics, in: The Huffington Post vom 19.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/2016-campaign-finance-reform_us_578e67abe4b04ca54ebef3bf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  69. BLUMENTHAL, Sidney (1980): The Permanent Campaign. Inside the World of Elite Political Operatives, New York: Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. BOATRIGHT, Robert G. (Hg.) (2015): The Deregulatory Moment. A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  71. BOATRIGHT, Robert G./ MALBIN, Michael J./ GLAVIN, Brendan (2016): Independent Expenditures in Congressional Primaries after Citizens United, in: Interests Group & Advocacy, Jg. 5, H. 2, S. 119–140. Open Google Scholar
  72. BOBIC, Igor (2014): Mark Begich Pulls Controversial Ad About GOP Challenger Dan Sullivan, in: Huffington Post vom 02.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/02/mark-begich-sullivan-ad_n_5754074.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  73. BONICA, Adam (2011): Small Donors and Polarization, in: Boston Review vom 22.07.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://bostonreview.net/bonica-small-donors-polarization>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.02.2016. Open Google Scholar
  74. BONICA, Adam (2013): Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 57, H. 2, S. 294–311. Open Google Scholar
  75. BONICA, Adam (2014): Mapping the Ideological Marketplace, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 58, H. 2, S. 367–386. Open Google Scholar
  76. BONICA, Adam/ MCCARTY, Nolan/ POOLE, Keith T./ ROSENTHAL, Howard (2013): Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Jg. 27, H. 3, S. 103–124. Open Google Scholar
  77. BOWLER, Shaun/ DONOVAN, Todd (2016): Campaign Money, Congress, and Perceptions of Corruption, in: American Politics Research, Jg. 44, H. 2, S. 272–295. Open Google Scholar
  78. BOWMAN, Ann O'M./ KEARNEY, Richard C. (2015): State and local government. The essentials, Sixth edition, Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. Open Google Scholar
  79. BOYER, Paul S. (Hg.) (2001): The Oxford Companion to United States History, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. BRADY, Henry E./ JOHNSTON, Richard (Hg.) (2006): Capturing Campaign Effects, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  81. BRADY, Henry E./ VERBA, Sidney/ SCHLOZMAN, Kay Lehman (1995): Beyond SES. A Resource Model of Political Participation, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 89, H. 2, S. 271–294. Open Google Scholar
  82. BREAUX, David A./ GIERZYNSKI, Anthony (1991): "It's Money That Matters": Campaign Expenditures and State Legislative Primaries, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 16, H. 3, S. 429–443. Open Google Scholar
  83. BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE (2012): National Survey: Super PACs, Corruption, and Democracy. Americans’ attitudes about the influence of Super PAC spending on government and the implications for our democracy., online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/national-survey-super-pacs-corruption-and-democracy>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  84. BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE (2016): A Civil Rights Perspective on Money in Politics, New York University School of Law, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/civil-rights-perspective-money-politics>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  85. BRIFFAULT, Richard (2011): Corporations, Corruption, and Complexity: Campaign Finance after Citizens United, in: Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Jg. 20, H. 3, S. 643–671. Open Google Scholar
  86. BROWN, Adam R. (2013): Does Money Buy Votes? The Case of Self-Financed Gubernatorial Candidates, 1998-2008, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 35, H. 1, S. 21–41. Open Google Scholar
  87. BROWN, Heath (2016): Pay-to-Play Politics. How Money Defines the American Democracy, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  88. BRUDNICK, Ida A. (2016): Congressional Salaries and Allowances. In Brief, Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  89. BRUNNER, Wolfram (2002): Wahlkampf in den USA V: Finanzierung, Organisation, Planung, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Sankt Augustin, Wahlen Arbeitspapiere, 57. Open Google Scholar
  90. BRYRNER, Sarah (2016): Most congressional contests not contests at all, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/08/spoiler-most-congressional-contests-not-contests-at-all/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  91. BUNGE, Mario (2009): Political Philosophy. Fact, Fiction, and Vision, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  92. BURGER, Harald/ BUHOFER, Annelies/ SIALM, Ambros (1982): Handbuch der Phraseologie, Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  93. BURKE, Thomas F. (1997): The Concept of Corruption in Campaign Finance Law, in: Constitutional Commentary, Jg. 14, H. 1, S. 127–149. Open Google Scholar
  94. CABRERA, Felipe/ LUCKERSON, Victor (2012): The Money Spent. What fueled the priciest election in U.S. History, in: TIME Magazine vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/the-numbers-election-2012/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  95. CAIN, Bruce E. (1995): Moralism and Realism in Campaign Finance, in: The University of Chicago Legal Forum, Jg. 11, H. 1, S. 111–140. Open Google Scholar
  96. CAIN, Bruce E. (2015): Democracy More or Less. America's Political Reform Quandry, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in Electoral Law and Democracy). Open Google Scholar
  97. CALDEIRA, Gregory A./ PATTERSON, Samuel C. (1982): Bring Home the Votes. Electoral Outcomes in State Legislative Races, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 4, H. 1, S. 33–67. Open Google Scholar
  98. CALHOUN, Charles W. (Hg.) (1996): The Gilded Age. Essays on the Origins of Modern America, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Books. Open Google Scholar
  99. CALHOUN, Charles W. (1999): Moving beyond Stereotypes of the Gilded Age, in: Organization of American Historians Magazine of History, Jg. 13, H. 4, S. 3–4. Open Google Scholar
  100. CAMPBELL, Angus/ CONVERSE, Philip E./ MILLER, Warren E./ STOKES, Donald E. (1960): The American Voter, Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  101. CAMPBELL, Angus/ CONVERSE, Philip E./ MILLER, Warren E./ STOKES, Donald E. (Hg.) (1966): Elections and the political order, New York: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  102. CAMPBELL, Angus/ GURIN, Gerald/ MILLER, Warren E. (1954): The voter decides, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Open Google Scholar
  103. CAMPBELL, James E. (2010): The Midterm Landslide of 2010: A Triple Wave Election, in: The Forum, Jg. 8, H. 4, S. 1–17. Open Google Scholar
  104. CAMPBELL, James E./ ALFORD, John R./ HENRY, Keith (1984): Television Markets and Congressional Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 9, H. 4, S. 665–678. Open Google Scholar
  105. CARNEY, Eliza Newlin (2016): Political Money: New Best-Selling Book Genre?, in: The American Prospect vom 28.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/political-money-new-best-selling-book-genre>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  106. CARNEY, Eliza Newlin (2016): Does Big Money Still Matter? You Bet It Does. It takes more than a super PAC to win the White House, but big campaign contributions wield growing influence in congressional, state, and local contests, and continue to sway policy-making, in: The American Prospect vom 04.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/does-big-money-still-matter-you-bet-it-does>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.02.2016. Open Google Scholar
  107. CAYTON, Andrew (2016): Why Ohio? Ohio is a likely bellwether of the outcome of 2016. Its history explains why, in: The American Interest vom 08.09.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/09/08/why-ohio/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  108. CBS CHICAGO (2012): He's The 'Milk Dud' No More: Oberweis Wins State Senate Seat, in: CBS Chicago vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/11/07/hes-the-milk-dud-no-more-oberweis-wins-state-senate-seat/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  109. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2016): 2016 Presidential Race, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  110. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2017): 527 Basics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/527s/basics.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  111. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2008): Money Wins Presidency and 9 of 10 Congressional Races in Priciest U.S. Election Ever, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/11/money-wins-white-house-and/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  112. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2010): 2010 Outside Spending, by Super PAC, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/summ.php?cycle=2010&chrt=V&disp=O&type=S>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  113. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2012): 2012 Presidential Race Expenditures, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/expenditures.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  114. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2014): Donor Demographics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/donordemographics.php?cycle=2014&filter=A>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  115. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2016): Outside Spending, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/index.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  116. CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS (2016): Reelection Rates Over the Years, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/reelect.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  117. CHADDOCK, Gail R. (2012): How super PACs are changing the GOP presidential race, in: The Christian Science Monitor vom 06.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0206/How-super-PACs-are-changing-the-GOP-presidential-race>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  118. CHIANG, Lulu/ HOENEMEYER, Lauren (2017): Public trust in institutions sinks to record low, in: CBS News vom 15.01.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.cbsnews.com/news/davos-world-economic-forum-public-trust-in-institutions-at-record-low-media-government-business/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  119. CHICAGO TRIBUNE EDITORIAL BOARD (2017): Editorial: Gerrymandering heads to the U.S. Supreme Court. Will Madigan map-making survive?, in: Chicago Tribune vom 27.05.2017, online verfügbar unter <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-gerrymander-supreme-court-wisconsin-edit-0528-jm-20170527-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  120. CIALDING, Robert B. (2010): Influence. Science and practice, 5. Aufl., Boston, MA: Pearson. Open Google Scholar
  121. CITIZENS UNITED (2017): Who We Are, online verfügbar unter <http://www.citizensunited.org/who-we-are.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  122. CLANCY, Adam (2012): Nasty, Brutish and Long. Newt Gingrich and the Future of Primary Campaigns, in: The American Interest vom 09.04.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.the-american-interest.com/2012/04/09/nasty-brutish-and-long/>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  123. CLAYTON, Cornell W./ SALAMONE, Michael F. (2014): Still Crazy after All These Years. The Polarized Politics of the Roberts Court Continue, in: The Forum, Jg. 12, H. 4, S. 739–762. Open Google Scholar
  124. CLINE, Seth (2012): Supreme Court Re-Affirms Citizens United, in: U.S. News & World Report vom 25.06.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/06/25/supreme-court-re-affirms-citizens-united>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  125. CLINTON, Joshua D./ LAPINSKI, John S. (2004): “Targeted” Advertising and Voter Turnout. An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 66, H. 1, S. 69–96. Open Google Scholar
  126. COATES IV, John C. (2012): Corporate Politics, Governance, and Value Before and After Citizens United, in: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Jg. 9, H. 4, S. 657–696. Open Google Scholar
  127. COHEN, Ronnie/ O'BYRNE, Shannon (2013): "Can You Hear Me Now…Good!" Feminism(s), the Public/Private Divide, and Citizens United v. FEC, in: UCLA Women's Law Journal, Jg. 20, H. 1, S. 39–70. Open Google Scholar
  128. COHN, Jonathan (2014): It's Official: One Koch Brother Equals 515,000 Union Members, in: The New Republic vom 11.03.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/116961/comparing-koch-brothers-influence-labor>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.11.2017. Open Google Scholar
  129. COLEMAN, Kevin J./ CANTOR, Joseph E./ NEALE, Thomas H. (2004): Presidential Elections in the United States: A Primer, in: Avaliktos, Neal (Hg.): The Election Process Revisited, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, S. 191–234. Open Google Scholar
  130. COLLINS, Eliza (2015): 7 things Trump said that would have destroyed other Republicans, in: Politico vom 07.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.eu/article/7-things-trump-said-that-would-have-destroyed-other-republicans/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  131. COLLINS, Eliza (2016): Poll: Clinton, Trump most unfavorable candidates ever, in: USA Today vom 31.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/08/31/poll-clinton-trump-most-unfavorable-candidates-ever/89644296/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  132. COMMON CAUSE (2015): Whose Government? Whose Voice?, Common Cause, Washington, D.C., online verfügbar unter <http://www.commoncause.org/research-reports/whose-government-whose-voice/whose-government-whose-voice.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  133. CONDON, Stephanie (2012): Why is Congress a millionaires club?, in: CBS News vom 27.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-is-congress-a-millionaires-club/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  134. CONFESSORE, Nicholas (2015): Koch Brothers’ Budget of $889 Million for 2016 Is on Par With Both Parties’ Spending, in: The New York Times vom 26.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/politics/kochs-plan-to-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  135. CONFESSORE, Nicholas (2015): G.O.P. Consultant Pleads Guilty in PAC Case, in: The New York Times vom 12.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/13/us/politics/political-consultant-pleads-guilty-in-coordination-case.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  136. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ BIGOOD, Jess (2012): Little to Show for Cash Flood by Big Donors, in: The New York Times vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/little-to-show-for-cash-flood-by-big-donors.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  137. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ COHEN, Sarah/ YOURISH, Karen (2015): Just 158 families have provided nearly half of the early money for efforts to capture the White House, in: The New York Times vom 10.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/11/us/politics/2016-presidential-election-super-pac-donors.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  138. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ LIPTON, Eric (2012): A Big Check, and Gingrich Gets a Big Lift, in: The New York Times vom 09.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/us/politics/sheldon-adelson-a-billionaire-gives-gingrich-a-big-lift.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2012. Open Google Scholar
  139. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ SHOREY, Rachel (2016): Money Flows Down Ballot as Donald Trump Is Abandoned by Big Donors (Even Himself), in: The New York Times vom 27.10.2016, A16. Open Google Scholar
  140. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ THEE-BRENAN, Megan (2015): Poll Shows Americans Favor an Overhaul of Campaign Financing, in: The New York Times vom, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/03/us/politics/poll-shows-americans-favor-overhaul-of-campaign-financing.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  141. CONFESSORE, Nicholas/ YOURISH, Karen (2016): $2 Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump, in: The New York Times vom 15.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  142. CORASANITI, Nick: At Many Carly Fiorina Events, Her ‘Super PAC’ Covers the Costs, in: The New York Times vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/21/at-many-carly-fiorina-events-her-super-pac-covers-the-costs/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  143. CORASANITI, Nick (2015): Carly Fiorina’s ‘Super PAC’ Aids Her Campaign, in Plain Sight, in: The New York Times vom 01.10.2015, A21. Open Google Scholar
  144. CORASANITI, Nick (2017): Robert Menendez Personally Lobbied for Visas, Former Aide Testifies, in: The New York Times vom 11.09.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/11/nyregion/robert-menendez-corruption-trial-visas.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  145. CORRADO, Anthony (1992): Creative Campaigning. PACs and the Presidential Selection Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. CORRADO, Anthony (2005): An Overview of Campaign Finance Law, in: Herrnson, Paul S./ Campbell, Colton C./ Ezra, Marni/ Medvic, Stephen K. (Hg.): Guide to Political Campaigns in America, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, S. 84–104. Open Google Scholar
  147. CORRADO, Anthony (2005): Money and Politics. A History of Federal Campaign Finance Law, in: Corrado, Anthony/ Mann, Thomas E./ Ortiz, Daniel R./ Potter, Trevor (Hg.): The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, S. 7–47. Open Google Scholar
  148. CORRADO, Anthony/ MANN, Thomas E./ ORTIZ, Daniel R./ POTTER, Trevor (Hg.) (2005): The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  149. CORRADO, Anthony/ MANN, Thomas E./ ORTIZ, Daniel R./ POTTER, Trevor/ Sorauf, Frank J. (1997): Campaign Finance Reform. A Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  150. COUCH, Cullen: A Conversation with Bob Bauer and Trevor Potter, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 25–32, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  151. COUCH, Cullen: Citizens United. First Amendment Protection or Pandora's Box?, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 21–23, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  152. COX, Gary W./ KATZ, Jonathan N. (2002): Elbridge Gerry's Salamander. The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  153. COX, Ramsey (2014): Franken: Citizens United is one of the ‘worst’ rulings, in: The Hill vom 09.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/217105-franken-citizens-united-decision-is-worst-ever>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  154. CRAIG, Stephen C. (1979): Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 7, H. 2, S. 225–239. Open Google Scholar
  155. CRAIG, Stephen C./ HILL, David B. (Hg.) (2011): The Electoral Challenge. Theory Meets Practice, 2. Aufl., Washington, DC: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
  156. CROLY, Herbert D. (1983): Marcus Alonzo Hanna, New York, NY: Chelsea House (American Statesmen Series). Open Google Scholar
  157. CROSSEN, Cynthia (2004): The Man Who Made Political Campaigns All About the Money, in: The Wall Street Journal vom 24.03.2004, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108008220948763387>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  158. CUMMINGS, Jeanne (2011): Don't adjust your set: Now campaign ads never end, in: Politico vom 18.03.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2011/03/dont-adjust-your-set-now-campaign-ads-never-end-051535>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  159. CURRINDER, Marian L./ GREEN, John C. (2011): Money and Elections, in: Craig, Stephen C./ Hill, David B. (Hg.): The Electoral Challenge. Theory Meets Practice. 2. Aufl., Washington, DC: CQ Press, S. 91–116. Open Google Scholar
  160. DAHL, Robert A. (1961): Who Governs. Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  161. DAHL, Robert A. (1971): Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition, New Haven/ London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  162. DAHL, Robert A. (2003): How Democratic Is the American Constitution, 2. Aufl., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  163. DAHL, Robert A./ Shapiro, Ian/ Cheibub, José Antonio (Hg.) (2003): The Democracy Sourcebook, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  164. DALEY, David (2016): Ratf**ked. The True Story Behind the Secret Plan to Steal America's Democracy, New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation. Open Google Scholar
  165. DALEY, David (2016): The House the GOP Built: How Republicans Used Soft Money, Big Data, and High-Tech Mapping to Take Control of Congress and Increase Partisanship, in: New York Magazine vom 24.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/gops-house-seats-are-safe-heres-why.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  166. DALEY, David/ Rosenberg, Paul (2016): This is how the GOP rigged Congress: The secret plan that handcuffed Obama’s presidency, but backfired in Donald Trump, in: Salon vom 13.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.salon.com/2016/06/13/this_is_how_the_gop_rigged_congress_the_secret_plan_that_handcuffed_obamas_presidency_but_backfired_in_donald_trump/>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  167. DAVENPORT, Coral (2016): Billionaire Environmentalist to Spend $25 Million to Turn Out Young Voters, in: The New York Times vom 25.04.2016, A10, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/26/us/politics/thomas-steyer-nextgen-climate-change-voters.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  168. DAVIDSON, Roger H./ OLESZEK, Walter J./ LEE, Frances E./ SCHICKLER, Eric (2014): Congress and its members, 14. Aufl., Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
  169. DAWOOD, Yasmin (2015): Campaign Finance and American Democracy, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 18, H. 1, S. 329–349. Open Google Scholar
  170. DECKER, Frank/ JESSE, Eckhard (2016): Fach ohne Ausstrahlung. Die Stimme der Politikwissenschaft ist in der Öffentlichkeit kaum noch zu vernehmen. Die Debatten bestimmen Juristen oder Ökonomen. Die jüngere Generation schweigt, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 20.04.2016, N4. Open Google Scholar
  171. DELILLO, Don (2016): Zero K, London: Picador. Open Google Scholar
  172. DELLAVIGNA, Stefano/ KAPLAN, Ethan (2007): The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Jg. 122, H. 4, S. 1187–1234. Open Google Scholar
  173. DELLI CARPINI, Michael. X./ KEETER, Scott/ KENNAMER, J. David (1994): Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Jg. 71, H. 2, S. 443–456. Open Google Scholar
  174. DEMOCRATIC PARTY (2016): 2016 Democratic Party Platform, Orlando, FL. Open Google Scholar
  175. DESILVER, Drew (2017): U.S. trails most developed countries in voter turnout, Pew Research Center, online verfügbar unter <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/15/u-s-voter-turnout-trails-most-developed-countries/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  176. DINOVELLA, Elizabeth (2011): The Group behind the Republican Takeover, in: The Progressive vom 2011, 26-29. Open Google Scholar
  177. DJUPE, Paul A./ Peterson, David A. M. (2002): The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 55, H. 4, S. 845–860. Open Google Scholar
  178. DOHERTY, Brendan J. (2012): The Rise of the President's Permanent Campaign, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Open Google Scholar
  179. DOHERTY, Brendan J. (2013): A Campaign Without End, in: The New York Times vom 21.01.2013, A21. Open Google Scholar
  180. DONAHUE, Patrick (2010): U.S. Falls in Corruption Ranking as Crisis Hits Confidence, in: Bloomberg News vom 26.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-10-26/corruption-increases-in-u-s-as-financial-crisis-erodes-public-confidence>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  181. DÖRNER, Andreas/ Vogt, Ludgera (Hg.) (2002): Wahl-Kämpfe. Betrachtungen über ein demokratisches Ritual, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  182. DOWLING, Conor M./ MILLER, Michael G. (2014): Super PAC! Money, Elections, and Voters after Citizens United, New York, NY: Routledge (Routledge Research in American Politics and Governance). Open Google Scholar
  183. DOWLING, Conor M./ MILLER, Michael G. (2014): Super PAC! Money, Elections, and Voters after Citizens United, New York, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  184. DOWLING, Conor M./ WICHOWSKY, Amber (2015): Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 59, H. 1, S. 19–36. Open Google Scholar
  185. DOWNS, Anthony (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper. Open Google Scholar
  186. DOYLE, Richard B. (2011): The Rise and (Relative) Fall of Earmarks. Congress and Reform, 2006-2010, in: Public Budgeting & Finance, Jg. 31, H. 1, S. 1–22. Open Google Scholar
  187. DRASH, Wayne (2012): Presidential politics: Why Ohio is the 'big one', in: CNN News vom 24.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/23/politics/ohio-voters-swing-state/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  188. DREW, Elizabeth (2015): How Money Runs Our Politics, in: New York Review of Books vom 04.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/06/04/how-money-runs-our-politics/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  189. DREW, Elizabeth (2016): American Democracy Betrayed, in: The New York Review of Books vom 18.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/08/18/american-democracy-betrayed/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  190. DRUTMAN, Lee (2014): Why we still need to worry about money in politics, in: The Washington Post vom 15.12.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/12/15/why-we-still-need-to-worry-about-money-in-politics/>, zuletzt geprüft am 04.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  191. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): The Business of America is Lobbying. How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  192. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): Despite Citizens United, elections aren’t a good investment for corporations, in: The Washington Post vom 27.03.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/despite-citizens-united-politics-isnt-a-good-investment-for-corporations/2015/03/27/f13e0d20-d26c-11e4-ab77-9646eea6a4c7_story.html?utm_term=.856a6328ac9c>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  193. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): Can unlimited contributions to political parties really reduce polarization, in: The Washington Post vom 23.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/06/23/can-unlimited-contributions-to-political-parties-really-reduce-polarization/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  194. DRUTMAN, Lee (2015): Giving the two parties even more money will not solve polarization. And, no empowering small donors is not going to make politics even more polarized, in: Vox vom 20.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/polyarchy/2015/11/20/9763292/parties-polarization-small-donors>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.12.2015. Open Google Scholar
  195. DRYSCH, Thomas (1998): Parteienfinanzierung. Österreich, Schweiz, Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  196. DUGAN, Andrew (2015): Donald Trump Well-Known, but Not Well-Liked, GALLUP, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/poll/187607/donald-trump-known-not-liked.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  197. DÜMBGEN, Lutz (2015): Einführung in die Statistik, Basel: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  198. DWYRE, Diana (2015): Campaign Finance Deregulation in the United States: What Has Changed and Why Does It Matter?, in: Boatright, Robert G. (Hg.): The Deregulatory Moment. A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, S. 33–70. Open Google Scholar
  199. EDSALL, Thomas B. (2014): Would Stronger Parties Mean Less Polarization?, in: The New York Times vom 21.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/opinion/would-stronger-parties-mean-less-polarization.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  200. EDWARDS-LEVY, Ariel (2015): Most People Think Congress Is Great At Representing Wealthy, But Not The Less Well-Off, in: The Huffington Post vom 15.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/15/congress-wealthy-poll_n_6482050.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  201. EGGEN, Dan (2010): Poll: Large majority opposes Supreme Court's decision on campaign financing, in: The Washington Post vom 17.02.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/17/AR2010021701151.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  202. EGGEN, Dan (2010): Money doesn't buy many wins for self-funded candidates, in: The Washington Post vom 04.11.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/03/AR2010110308584.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  203. ELDRIDGE, Sean (2016): How Dialing for Dollars is Undermining our Democracy - And How to Stop It, Medium Corporation, online verfügbar unter <https://medium.com/@SeanEldridge/how-dialing-for-dollars-is-undermining-our-democracy-and-how-to-stop-it-e9aff589785a#.q26xt07rn>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  204. EMDE, Isabel (2014): Wahlkampffinanzierung durch Unternehmen. Eine verfassungsrechtliche Studie zum US-amerikanischen Recht, Baden-Baden: Nomos (Beiträge zum ausländischen und vergleichenden Recht, 33). Open Google Scholar
  205. ENDREß, Martin/ MATYS, Thomas (Hg.) (2010): Die Ökonomie der Organisation - die Organisation der Ökonomie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  206. EPSTEIN, Lee/ SEGAL, Jeffrey A./ WESTERLAND, Chad (2008): The Increasing Importance of Ideology in the Nomination and Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices, in: Drake Law Review, Jg. 56, H. 4, S. 609–635. Open Google Scholar
  207. EPSTEIN, Richard A. (34): Citizens United v. FEC. The constitutional right that big corporations should have but do not want, in: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Jg. 2011, H. 2, S. 639–661. Open Google Scholar
  208. ERGUN, Damla (2012): Seven in 10 Would Send Super PACs Packing, in: ABC News vom 13.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/seven-in-10-would-send-super-pacs-packing/>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  209. ERIKSON, Robert S./ PALFREY, Thomas R. (1998): Campaign Spending and Incumbency. An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 60, H. 2, S. 355–373. Open Google Scholar
  210. ERIKSON, Robert S./ WRIGHT, Gerald C./ MCIVER, John P. (1985): Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 47, H. 2, S. 469–489. Open Google Scholar
  211. ERIKSON, Robert S./ WRIGHT, Gerald C./ MCIVER, John P. (1995): Statehouse democracy. Public opinion and policy in the American states, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  212. ETZIONI, Amitai (1995): Capital Corruption. The New Attack on American Democracy, 2. Aufl., New Brunswick, NJ/ London: Transaction Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  213. EUCHNER, Charles C./ Maltese, John Anthony (2015): The Electoral Process, in: Nelson, Michael (Hg.): Guide to the Presidency. 2. Aufl., London/ New York: Routledge, S. 185–322. Open Google Scholar
  214. FAHS, Alice/ WAUGH, Joan (Hg.) (2004): The Memory of the Civil War in American Culture, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. Open Google Scholar
  215. FAIR, Ray C. (2002): Predicting presidential elections and other things, Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books. Open Google Scholar
  216. FALCONE, Michael (2009): Voinovich to Retire From Senate in 2010, in: The New York Times vom 12.01.2009, online verfügbar unter <https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/ohio-senator-george-voinovich-to-retire-in-2010/?mcubz=0>. Open Google Scholar
  217. FALTER, Jürgen W./ SCHOEN, Harald (Hg.) (2014): Handbuch Wahlforschung, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  218. FALTER, Jürgen W./ WINKER, Jürgen R. (2014): Wahlgeographie und Politische Ökologie, in: Falter, Jürgen W./ Schoen, Harald (Hg.): Handbuch Wahlforschung. 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 135–168. Open Google Scholar
  219. FARIAS, Cristian (2015): The Menendez Case Proves the Supreme Court Was Naive About Campaign Finance Laws, in: The New Republic vom 02.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121446/menedez-corruption-case-exposes-supreme-court-naivete>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  220. FARRAR-MYERS, Victoria A./ GULATI, Jeff/ SKINNER, Richard (2013): The Impact of Super PACs on the 2010 and 2012 Congressional Elections, Chicago, IL, online verfügbar unter <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312917>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  221. FARRAR-MYERS, Victoria A./ SKINNER, Richard (2012): Super PACs and the 2012 Elections, in: The Forum, Jg. 10, H. 4, S. 105–118. Open Google Scholar
  222. FARRELL, John A. (2012): Did the Conservative Supreme Court Dash Romney's White House Hopes?, in: The Atlantic vom 02.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/did-the-conservative-supreme-court-dash-romneys-white-house-hopes/253890/>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  223. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (2007): Coordinated Communications and Independent Expenditures, Federal Election Commission, online verfügbar unter <https://transition.fec.gov/pages/brochures/indexp.shtml>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  224. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (2017): Recording receipts, online verfügbar unter <https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/keeping-records/records-receipts/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  225. FEINGOLD, Russ (2012): A Gilded Age on Steroids, in: Boston Review vom 01.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://bostonreview.net/forum/under-influence/gilded-age-steroids-russ-feingold>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  226. FERGUSON, Thomas/ JORGENSEN, Paul/ CHEN, Jie (2013): Party Competition and Industrial Structure in the 2012 Elections: Who’s Really Driving the Taxi to the Dark Side?, Roosevelt Institute, online verfügbar unter <http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/sites/all/files/2013_10_21_Ferguson_Jorgensen_Chen_2012_Elections.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  227. FERGUSON, Thomas/ JORGENSEN, Paul/ CHEN, Jie (2015): How Money Drives US Congressional Elections: More Evidence, Institute for New Economic Thinking Annual Conference, Paris, online verfügbar unter <http://ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/How-Money-Drives-US-Congressional-Elections-More-Evidence.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  228. FILZMAIER, Peter (2012): Geld regiert die Politik? Wahlkampffinanzierung in den USA, in: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Jg. 22, H. 1, S. 105–116. Open Google Scholar
  229. FILZMAIER, Peter/ PLASSER, Fritz (2001): Wahlkampf um das Weiße Haus. Presidential Elections in den USA, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  230. FILZMAIER, Peter/ PLASSER, Fritz (2002): Campaign Finance in den USA, in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Jg. 31, H. 1, S. 41–59. Open Google Scholar
  231. FILZMAIER, Peter/ PLASSER, Fritz (2005): Politik auf amerikanisch. Wahlen und politischer Wettbewerb in den USA, Wien: MANZ. Open Google Scholar
  232. FIORINA, Morris P. (1981): Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  233. FIORINA, Morris P. (2011): Culture war? The myth of a polarized America, 3. Aufl., Boston, MA: Longman. Open Google Scholar
  234. FLEMING, James Rodger (1996): Science and Technology in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century, in: Calhoun, Charles W. (Hg.): The Gilded Age. Essays on the Origins of Modern America, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Books, S. 19–37. Open Google Scholar
  235. FLICK, Uwe (2004): Triangulation. Eine Einführung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  236. FLITTER, Emily: Why U.S. billionaires may not be able to buy the 2016 election, in: Reuters News vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-billionaires-idUSKBN0OI07I20150602>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  237. FORAN, Clare (2016): Bernie Sanders’s Big Money. The Democratic presidential candidate’s populist rallying cry has helped him rake in cash, and infused massive amounts of money into the political process, in: The Atlantic vom 01.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/bernie-sanders-fundraising/471648/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  238. FORMISANO, Ronald P. (2016): The Populist Tsunami of the Second Gilded Age, in: The Forum, Jg. 14, H. 3, S. 281–294. Open Google Scholar
  239. FOWLER, Erika F./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2010): Advertising Trends in 2010, in: The Forum, Jg. 8, H. 4, S. 1–16. Open Google Scholar
  240. FOWLER, Erika F./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2012): Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012, in: The Forum, Jg. 10, H. 4, S. 51–61. Open Google Scholar
  241. FRANCIA, Peter L./ GREEN, John C./ HERRNSON, Paul S./ POWELL, Lynda W./ WILCOX, Clyde (2003): The Financiers of Congressional Elections. Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates, New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  242. FRANK, Thomas (2012): It’s a rich man’s world. How billionaire backers pick America’s candidate, in: Harpers Magazine, April Ausgabe, S. 25-27. Open Google Scholar
  243. FRANKLIN Fowler, Monika/ FRANZ, Michael M./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2016): Political Advertising in the United States, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  244. FRANZ, Michael M. (2010): The Citizens United Election? Or Same As It Ever Was?, in: The Forum, Jg. 8, H. 4, S. 1–24. Open Google Scholar
  245. FRANZ, Michael M./ RIDOUT, Travis N. (2010): Political Advertising and Persuasion in the 2004 and 2008 Presidential Elections, in: American Politics Research, Jg. 38, H. 2, S. 303–329. Open Google Scholar
  246. FREDERICKS, Bob (2016): NY Democrats selling national convention access to big donors, in: New York Post vom 07.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://nypost.com/2016/05/07/ny-democrats-selling-national-convention-access-to-big-donors/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  247. FREDERICKS, Bob (2016): Clinton's campaign staff is five times the size of Trump's, in: New York Post vom 07.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://nypost.com/2016/10/07/clintons-campaign-staff-is-five-times-the-size-of-trumps/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  248. FREELAND, Chrystia (2012): Plutocrats. The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich, London: Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  249. FRENCH, Lauren (2016): Congress setting new bar for doing nothing. It's gotten so small-ball that one congressman introduced a bill to recognize the significance of magic, in: Politico vom 21.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/congress-supreme-court-budget-do-nothing-221057>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  250. FRIESS, Steve (2012): The father of all Web campaigns, in: Politico vom 30.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/how-deans-wh-bid-gave-birth-to-web-campaigning-081834>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  251. FROLIK, Joe (2012): How Ohio made a president: Mark Hanna of Cleveland created modern politics in 1896, in: The Plain Dealer vom 16.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/10/how_ohio_made_a_president_mark.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  252. FULLER, Jaime (2014): 'Ready for Hillary' is spending money like crazy, in: The Washington Post vom 13.06.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/06/13/ready-for-hillary-is-already-spending-a-ton-of-dough-on-2016/?utm_term=.8f55477c15af>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  253. GAFFEY, Laura (2012): United States House Elections Post-Citizens United. The Influence of Unbridled Spending, Illinois Wesleyan University Papers, 45, online verfügbar unter <http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=polisci_honproj>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  254. GALLUP (2016): No Improvement in Congress Approval, at 13%, GALLUP Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/poll/189848/no-improvement-congress-approval.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  255. GAMSON, William A. (1968): Power and Discontent, Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. Open Google Scholar
  256. GANGHOF, Steffen (2005): Kausale Perspektiven in der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: X-zentrierte und Y-zentrierte Forschungsdesigns, in: Kropp, Sabine/ Minkenberg, Michael (Hg.): Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 76–95. Open Google Scholar
  257. GANGHOF, Steffen (2016): Forschungsdesigns in der Politikwissenschaft - Kausala Perspektiven versus kontrastive Theorietests, in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Jg. 45, H. 1, S. 1–12. Open Google Scholar
  258. GARRAMONE, Gina M. (1984): Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads. Voter response varies with content theme, but backlash or bommerang may be most common effect of negative political advertising, in: Journalism Quarterly, Jg. 61, H. 1, S. 250–259. Open Google Scholar
  259. GARRETT, Sam R. (2012): "Super PACs" in Federal Elections: Overview and Issues for Congress, in: Jamison, Derrick D./ Gore, Gina (Hg.): Super PACs (Political Action Committees). The New Force in Federal Elections, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, S. 1–36. Open Google Scholar
  260. GAUGHAN, Anthony J. (2016): The Forty-Year War on Money in Politics: Watergate, FECA, and the Future of Campaign Finance Reform, in: Ohio State Law Journal, Jg. 77, H. 4, S. 791–837. Open Google Scholar
  261. GEER, John G. (2006): In Defense of Negativity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  262. GEER, John G. (2010): Fanning the Flames: The News Media’s Role in the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Discussion Paper Series, D‐55. Open Google Scholar
  263. GELERNT, Anya (2015): Donor demographics: old white guys edition, part II, Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/donor-demographics-old-white-guys-edition-part-ii/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  264. GELLNER, Winand/ HORST, Patrick (Hg.) (2016): Die USA am Ende der Präsidentschaft Barack Obamas, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  265. GELLNER, Winand/ KLEIBER, Martin (2012): Das Regierungssystem der USA. Eine Einführung, 2. vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  266. GELLNER, Winand/ OSWALD, Michael (Hg.) (2017): Die USA nach den Wahlen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  267. GELMAN, Andrew/ KING, Gary (1990): Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 34, H. 4, S. 1142–1164. Open Google Scholar
  268. GENTILVISO, Chris (2012): Wilbur Ross Mitt Romney Fundraiser Carried $50,000-Per-Plate Cost, in: The Huffington Post vom 21.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/21/wilbur-ross-mitt-romney-fundraiser_n_1998127.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  269. GERBER, Alan (1993): Campaign Spending and Senate Election Outcomes, Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA. Open Google Scholar
  270. GERBER, Alan (1998): Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 92, H. 2, S. 401–411. Open Google Scholar
  271. GERBER, Alan/ GREEN, Donald P. (2005): Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? An Update, in: Gerber, Alan S./ Green, Donald P. (Hg.): The Science of Voter Mobilization, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE (The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601), S. 142–154. Open Google Scholar
  272. GERBER, Alan S./ GIMPEL, James G./ GREEN, Donald P./ SHAW, Daron R. (2011): How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 105, H. 1, S. 135–150. Open Google Scholar
  273. GERBER, Alan S./ GREEN, Donald P. (Hg.) (2005): The Science of Voter Mobilization (The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  274. GERKEN, Heather (2014): The Real Problem with Citizens United: Campaign Finance, Dark Money, and Shadow Parties, in: Marquette Law Review, Jg. 97, H. 4, S. 903–923. Open Google Scholar
  275. GERKEN, Heather K. (2010): Lobbying as the New Campaign Finance, in: Georgia State University Law Review, Jg. 27, H. 4, S. 1147–1160. Open Google Scholar
  276. GERRING, John/ THOMAS, Craig W. (2011): Quantitative Versus Qualitative Methods, in: Badie, Bertrand/ Berg-Schlosser, Dirk/ Morlino, Leonardo (Hg.): International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE (7), S. 2189–2196. Open Google Scholar
  277. GIERZYNSKI, Anthony (2000): Money Rules. Financing Elections in America, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  278. GIERZYNSKI, Anthony/ BREAUX, David (1996): Legislative Elections and the Importance of Money, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 21, H. 3, S. 337–357. Open Google Scholar
  279. GIERZYNSKI, Anthony/ BREAUX, David A. (1991): Money and Votes in State Legislative Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 16, H. 2, S. 203–217. Open Google Scholar
  280. GILENS, Martin (2005): Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 69, H. 5, S. 778–796. Open Google Scholar
  281. GILENS, Martin (2012): Affluence & Influence. Economic Inequality and Political Power in America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  282. GILENS, Martin/ PAGE, Benjamin I. (2014): Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 12, H. 3, S. 564–581. Open Google Scholar
  283. GILES, Michael W./ PRITCHARD, Anita (1985): Campaign Expenditures and Legislative Elections in Florida, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 10, H. 1, S. 71–88. Open Google Scholar
  284. GILLUM, Jack (2012): Super PACs Inluencing Early Primary Elections More Than Retail Campaigning, in: The Huffington Post vom 17.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/17/super-pacs-elections-2012_n_1210097.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.03.2013. Open Google Scholar
  285. GILSON, Dave (2012): Sheldon Adelson’s Lousy Election Bets, in: Mother Jones vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/sheldon-adelson-super-pac-lousy-bets/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  286. GINSBURG, Ruth Bader/ ROSEN, Jeffrey (2014): Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is an American Hero. She's staying put - and has some choice words for young feminists. An interview, in: The New Republic vom 29.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/119578/ruth-bader-ginsburg-interview-retirement-feminists-jazzercise>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  287. GLANTZ, Stanton A./ Abramowitz, Alan I./ Burkart, Michael P. (1976): Election Outcomes: Whose Money Matters?, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 38, H. 4, S. 1033–1038. Open Google Scholar
  288. GLASSMAN, Matthew E. (2007): Congressional Franking Privilege. Background and Current Legislation, Congressional Research Service, Order Code RS22771, veröffentlicht am 11.12.2007. Open Google Scholar
  289. GOIDEL, Robert K./ GROSS, Donald A. (1994): A Systems Approach to Campaign Finance in U.S. House Elections, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 22, H. 2, S. 125–153. Open Google Scholar
  290. GOLD, Matea (2012): Effect of 'super PACs' proved to be less than expected, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/08/nation/la-na-outside-money-20121108>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  291. GOLD, Matea (2014): Supreme Court ruling gives small number of wealthy donors new ways to drive campaigns, in: The Washington Post vom 03.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-ruling-gives-small-number-of-wealthy-donors-new-ways-to-drive-campaigns/2014/04/02/b1ab041a-ba8a-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  292. GOLD, Matea (2015): Menendez indictment marks first big corruption case involving a super PAC, in: The Washington Post vom 02.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/menendez-indictment-marks-first-big-corruption-case-involving-a-super-pac/2015/04/01/f42f4aee-d8d9-11e4-8103-fa84725dbf9d_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  293. GOLD, Matea (2016): Nearly $100 million in super PAC money couldn’t save Jeb Bush, in: The Washington Post vom 20.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/20/nearly-100-million-in-super-pac-money-couldnt-save-jeb-bush/?utm_term=.fa41d4f57373>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  294. GOLD, Matea (2016): An inside look at how politicians beg for big checks, in: The Washington Post vom 20.09.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/an-inside-look-at-how-politicians-beg-for-big-checks/2016/09/19/c0308e24-7c1b-11e6-bd86-b7bbd53d2b5d_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2016. Open Google Scholar
  295. GOLD, Matea/ HAMBURGER, Tom (2014): Scott Walker case shows growing closeness between politicians and wealthy allies, in: The Washington Post vom 23.06.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/scott-walker-case-shows-growing-closeness-between-politicians-and-wealthy-allies/2014/06/23/e8b9304e-f955-11e3-a606-946fd632f9f1_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  296. GOLD, Matea/ HAMBURGER, Tom (2015): In 2016 campaign, the lament of the not quite rich enough, in: The Washington Post vom 25.03.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-2016-campaign-the-lament-of-the-not-quite-rich-enough/2015/03/24/f0a38b18-cdb4-11e4-8a46-b1dc9be5a8ff_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  297. GOLD, Matea/ HAMBURGER, Tom (2015): How a super PAC plans to coordinate with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, in: The Washington Post vom 12.05.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/?utm_term=.f4a372c8b43a>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  298. GOLD, Matea/ MASON, Melanie (2012): Effect of 'super PACs' proved to be less than expected, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/08/nation/la-na-outside-money-20121108>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  299. GOLD, Matea/ NARAYANSWAMY, Anu (2016): How 'ghost corporations' are funding the 2016 election, in: The Washington Post vom 18.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-ghost-corporations-are-funding-the-2016-election/2016/03/18/2446e526-ed14-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  300. GOLD, Matea/ NARAYANSWAMY, Anu (2016): The new Gilded Age: Close to half of all super-PAC money comes from 50 donors, in: The Washington Post vom 15.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-new-gilded-age-close-to-half-of-all-super-pac-money-comes-from-50-donors/2016/04/15/63dc363c-01b4-11e6-9d36-33d198ea26c5_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  301. GOLD, Matea/ NARAYANSWAMY, Anu (2016): How mega-donors helped raise $1 billion for Hillary Clinton, in: The Washington Post vom 24.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-mega-donors-helped-raise-1-billion-for-hillary-clinton/2016/10/22/a92a0ee2-9603-11e6-bb29-bf2701dbe0a3_story.html?utm_term=.d919a7cebf8b>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  302. GOLD, Matea/ ZAPOTOSKY, Matt (2015): Va. political operative pleads guilty to coordinating campaign contributions, in: The Washington Post vom 12.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/va-man-pleads-guilty-to-coordinating-campaign-contributions/2015/02/12/e63a92dc-b146-11e4-827f-93f454140e2b_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2012. Open Google Scholar
  303. GOLD, Matea/ ZAPOTOSKY, Matt (2015): Republican operative sentenced to 2 years in landmark election case, in: The Washington Post vom 12.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/feds-want-nearly-4-year-sentence-for-republican-operative-convicted-of-illegal-coordination/2015/06/11/7ecbdc72-0ed0-11e5-9726-49d6fa26a8c6_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  304. GOLDENBERG, Edie N./ TRAUGOTT, Michael W. (1984): Campaigning for Congress, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
  305. GOLDMACHER, Shane/ KARNI, Annie/ MCCASKILL, Nolan D. (2016): Trump caught on tape making crude, sexually aggressive comments about women, in: Politico vom 08.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-wapo-229299>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  306. GOLDSTEIN, Ken/ FREEDMAN, Paul (2000): New Evidence for New Arguments. Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 62, H. 4, S. 1087–1108. Open Google Scholar
  307. GOLDSTEIN, Ken/ FREEDMAN, Paul (2002): Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect, in: The Journal of Politics vom 2002, S. 721–740. Open Google Scholar
  308. GOODMAN, Amy/ WEINTRAUB, Ellen L. (2016): Could Citizens United Help Foreign Billionaires Buy This Election? An FEC Commissioner Speaks Out, Democracy Now, online verfügbar unter <http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/5/could_citizens_united_help_foreign_billionaires>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  309. GOULD, Lewis L. (2001): Gilded Age, in: Boyer, Paul S. (Hg.): The Oxford Companion to United States History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 308–310. Open Google Scholar
  310. GOULD-WARTOFSKY, Michael A. (2015): The Occupiers. The Making of the 99 Percent Movement, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  311. GRAHAM, David A. (2015): GOP Candidates Discover the Problems With Money in Politics. It's not just Democrats who are critical of the current state of campaign finance. Lindsey Graham, Chris Christie, and Ted Cruz have their own complaints., in: The Atlantic vom 20.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/not-all-republicans/390912/>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  312. GREEN, Donald P./ GERBER, Alan S. (2015): Get out the vote. How to increase voter turnout, Third edition, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  313. GREEN, Donald P./ KRASNO, Jonathan S. (1988): Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spendingin House Elections, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 32, H. 4, S. 884–907. Open Google Scholar
  314. GREEN, Donald P./ KRASNO, Jonathan S. (1990): Rebuttal to Jacobson's "New Evidence for Old Arguments", in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 34, H. 2, S. 363–372. Open Google Scholar
  315. GREEN, Emma (2015): The Local Consequences of Citizens United, in: The Atlantic vom 02.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/the-local-consequences-of-citizens-united/397586/>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  316. GREENBLATT, Alan (2016): How Unregulated Dark Money Is Reshaping State Politics. Several governors are using nonprofits to get themselves elected and promote their agendas once in office - without ever having to disclose where the money came from, in: Governing vom 29.09.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.governing.com/topics/elections/gov-dark-money-campaign-finance-state-politics.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  317. GRIFFITH, Robert (1991): Forging America's postwar order: domestic politics and political economy in the age of Truman, in: Lacey, Michael J. (Hg.): The Truman Presidency, Cambridge, u.a.: Cambridge University Press, S. 57–88. Open Google Scholar
  318. GRIM, Ryan/ SIDDIQUI, Sabrina (2013): Call Time For Congress Shows How Fundraising Dominates Bleak Work Life, in: The Huffington Post vom 08.01.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/call-time-congressional-fundraising_n_2427291.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  319. GRIPP, Andrew (2014): Gerrymandering Reduces Competition, Fuels Partisanship in House Elections, Independent Voter Network, online verfügbar unter <https://ivn.us/2014/07/14/gerrymandering-reduces-competition-fuels-partisanship-house-elections/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  320. GROSSMANN, Matt (Hg.) (2014): New Directions in Interest Group Politics, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  321. GSCHWEND, Thomas/ SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank (Hg.) (2007): Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft. Probleme - Strategien - Anwendung, Frankfurt/ New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  322. GSCHWEND, Thomas/ SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank (2007): Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft: Ein Dialog zwischen Theorie und Daten, in: Gschwend, Thomas/ Schimmelfennig, Frank (Hg.): Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft. Probleme - Strategien - Anwendung, Frankfurt/ New York: Campus Verlag, S. 13–38. Open Google Scholar
  323. GÜLDENZOPF, Ralf (2016): Zwischen "Low Quality" und "High Quality" - Direkter Wählerkontakt in den USA und Deutschland, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, KAS Kampagnen-Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://www.adenauercampus.de/web/guest/zeitmaschine-marktwirtschaft/mehr-zum-thema-soziale-marktwirtschaft/-/asset_publisher/iLDvJSMZY5hd/content/zwischen-%E2%80%9Elow-quality%E2%80%9C-und-%E2%80%9Ehigh-quality%E2%80%9C-direkter-wahlerkontakt-in-den-usa-und-deutschland>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  324. GUNLICKS, Arthur B. (Hg.) (1993): Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe, Boulder/ San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  325. HABERMAN, Clyde (2014): The Cost of Campaigns. Retro Report, The New York Times vom 20.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXGEictCR8k>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.02.2014. Open Google Scholar
  326. HACKER, Jacob S./ PIERSON, Paul (2011): Winner-Take-All Politics. How Washington Made the Rich Richer And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  327. HÄDER, Michael (2010): Empirische Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung, 2. überarbeitete Auflage, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  328. HAFER, Rik W. (2005): The Federal Reserve System. An Encyclopedia, Westport, CT: Greenwood. Open Google Scholar
  329. HAGENSTEIN, Edwin C./ GREGG, Sara M./ DONAHUE, Brian (2011): American Georgics. Writing on Farming, Culture and the Land, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  330. HALL, Katy (2013): 11 Members Of Congress Who Are Sick Of Fundraising, in: The Huffington Post vom 02.01.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/01/fundraising-congress-call-time-_n_2576413.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  331. HALPER, Evan (2016): Be nice to Hillary Clinton online — or risk a confrontation with her super PAC, in: Los Angeles Times vom 09.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2016. Open Google Scholar
  332. HALPER, Evan (2016): Once a dark art, opposition research comes out of the shadows for 2016 campaigns, in: Los Angeles Times vom 21.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-opposition-research-presidential-election-20150521-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  333. HAMM, Keith E./ MALBIN, Michael J./ KETTLER, Jaclyn J./ GLAVIN, Brendan (2012): The Impact of Citizens United in the States: Independent Spending in State Elections, 2006-2010, New Orleans, LA, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/state/state-indep-spdg_2006-10_working-paper-as-released-22october2012.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  334. HAMM, Keith E./ MALBIN, Michael J./ KETTLER, Jaclyn J./ GLAVIN, Brendan (2014): Independent Spending in State Elections, 2006–2010: Vertically Networked Political Parties Were the Real Story, Not Business, in: The Forum, Jg. 12, H. 2, S. 305–328. Open Google Scholar
  335. HAMM, Keith E./ MONCRIEF, Gary F. (2008): Legislative Politics in the States, in: Gray, Virginia/ Hanson, Russell L. (Hg.): Politics in the American States. A Comparative Analysis. 9. Aufl., Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, S. 154–191. Open Google Scholar
  336. HANLEY, Brian (2016): Bernie Sanders Received More Individual Campaign Contributions Than Obama’s Entire 2008 Campaign, in: Huffington Post vom 12.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-hanley/bernie-sanders-has-alread_b_9671406.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  337. HANS, Barbara (2017): Inszenierung von Politik. Zur Funktion von Privatheit, Authentizität, Personalisierung und Vertrauen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  338. HANSEN, John Mark (2009): Elections: Five Rules For Commentators, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 169–171. Open Google Scholar
  339. HARNDEN, Toby (2012): Obama in drastic u-turn to back big-money super PACs… which he once described as 'a corporate takeover of our democracy', in: Daily Mail vom 07.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2097892/Obama-drastic-u-turn-big-money-super-PACs--decried.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  340. HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (2011): Free Speech For People Nationwide Voter Survey, online verfügbar unter <https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/FSFP-Nationwide-Voter-Survey.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  341. HARTENSTEIN, Meena (2010): Target boycotted for donating $150,000 to MN right-wing Republican Tom Emmer's campaign for governor, in: New York Daily News vom 03.08.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/target-boycotted-donating-150-000-mn-right-wing-republican-tom-emmer-campaign-governor-article-1.200635>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  342. HARVARD LAW REVIEW EDITORS (2014): Citizens United at Work: How the Landmark Decision Legalized Political Coercion in the Workplace, in: Harvard Law Review, Jg. 128, H. 4, S. 669–690. Open Google Scholar
  343. HASEN, Richard L. (2007): The Newer Incoherence. Competition, Social Science, and Balancing in Campaign Finance Law After Randall v. Sorrell, in: Ohio State Law Journal, Jg. 68, H. 4, S. 849–889. Open Google Scholar
  344. HASEN, Richard L. (2012): End of the Dialogue? Political Polarization, The Supreme Court, And Congress, in: Southern California Law Review, Jg. 86, H. 1, S. 101–155. Open Google Scholar
  345. HASEN, Richard L. (2012): Fixing Washington, in: Harvard Law Review, Jg. 126, H. 550, S. 550–585. Open Google Scholar
  346. HASEN, Richard L. (2013): Is ‘‘Dependence Corruption’’ Distinct from a Political Equality Argument for Campaign Finance Laws? A Reply to Professor Lessig, in: Election Law Journal, Jg. 12, H. 3, S. 305–316. Open Google Scholar
  347. HASEN, Richard L. (2013): Political Dysfunction and Constitutional Change, in: Drake Law Review, Jg. 61, H. 4, S. 989–1020. Open Google Scholar
  348. HASEN, Richard L. (2014): Super PAC Contributions, Corruption, and the Proxy War over Coordination, in: Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jg. 9, H. 1, S. 1–21. Open Google Scholar
  349. HASEN, Richard L. (2014): Three Wrong Progressive Approaches (and One Right One) to Campaign Finance Reform, in: Harvard Law & Policy Review, Jg. 8, H. 1, S. 21–37. Open Google Scholar
  350. HASEN, Richard L. (2015): Election Law's Path in the Roberts Court's First Decade: A Sharp Right Turn but with Speed Bumps and Surprising Twists, University of California, Irvine School of Law, Irvine, CA, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2015-70, online verfügbar unter <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2639902>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  351. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Plutocrats United. Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  352. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Money can't buy Jeb Bush the White House, but it still skews politics, in: Washington Post vom 14.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/money-cant-buy-jeb-bush-the-white-house-but-it-still-skews-politics/2016/01/14/7c920780-b554-11e5-9388-466021d971de_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  353. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Money and Politics in Polarized Times, Yale University Press Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://blog.yupnet.org/2016/02/02/money-and-politics-in-polarized-times/>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.02.2016. Open Google Scholar
  354. HASEN, Richard L. (2016): Campaign-Finance Law, the State of Nature, and the Nirvana Fallacy, The Library of Law and Liberty, online verfügbar unter <http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/campaign-finance-law-the-state-of-nature-and-the-nirvana-fallacy/#sthash.z2C3iMT7.dpuf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  355. HASEN, Richard L./ COLLINS, Ronald K. L. (2016): FAC 6 (First Amendment Conversations) The Law & Politics of Money: A Q & A with Richard Hasen – Part I, Concurring Opinions, online verfügbar unter <http://concurringopinions.com/archives/2016/03/fac-6-first-amendment-conversations-the-law-politics-of-money-a-q-a-with-richard-hasen-part-i.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  356. HASSON, Riley (2016): A New Political Player. The Role of Super PACs in Congressional Elections, University of Connecticut, online verfügbar unter <http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1478&context=srhonors_theses>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  357. HAYES, Danny/ MCKEE, Seth C. (2009): The Participatory Effects of Redistricting, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 53, H. 4, S. 1006–1023. Open Google Scholar
  358. HEARD, Alexander (1962): The Costs of Democracy. Financing American Political Campaigns, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. Open Google Scholar
  359. HEBENSTREIT, Jörg (2016): Wahlkampffinanzierung seit 2008: The Rise of Big Money, in: Gellner, Winand/ Horst, Patrick (Hg.): Die USA am Ende der Präsidentschaft Barack Obamas, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 85–107. Open Google Scholar
  360. HEBENSTREIT, Jörg (2017): Does Money Matter? Wahlkampffinanzierung und die US-Präsidentschaftswahlen 2016, in: Gellner, Winand/ Oswald, Michael (Hg.): Die USA nach den Wahlen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, x-y. Open Google Scholar
  361. HEIDEKING, Jürgen/ Mauch, Christof (2008): Geschichte der USA, 6. Aufl., Tübingen: UTB. Open Google Scholar
  362. HEIDENHEIMER, Arnold J. (Hg.) (1970): Comparative Political Finance: The Financing of Party Organizations and Elections Campaigns, Lexington, MA: Heath. Open Google Scholar
  363. HELLMAN, Deborah/ SCHULTZ, David (2016): Problems in the Existing Jurisprudence, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 207–214. Open Google Scholar
  364. HENNING, Peter J. (2015): Treating Corporations as People, in: The New York Times vom 26.05.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/business/dealbook/treating-corporations-as-people.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  365. HENNIS, Wilhelm (1964): Richtlinienkompetenz und Regierungstechnik, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar
  366. HEPP IV, John H. (2003): Colleges and Universities, in: Schlup, Leonard/ Ryan, James G. (Hg.): Historical Dictionary of the Gilded Age, New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe, S. 101. Open Google Scholar
  367. HERRNSON, Paul S. (2008): Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Open Google Scholar
  368. HERRNSON, Paul S./ CAMPBELL, Colton C./ EZRA, Marni/ MEDVIC, Stephen K. (Hg.) (2005): Guide to Political Campaigns in America, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Open Google Scholar
  369. HERRON, Michael C./ WISEMAN, Alan E. (2008): Gerrymanders and Theories of Law Making: A Study of Legislative Redistricting in Illinois, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 70, H. 1, S. 151–167. Open Google Scholar
  370. HILDEBRANDT, Achim/ JÄCKLE, Sebastian/ WOLF, Frieder/ HEINDL, Andreas (2015): Methodologie, Methoden, Forschungsdesign. Ein Lehrbuch für fortgeschrittene Studierende der Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Open Google Scholar
  371. HILL, Nathan (2016): The Nix. A novel, London: Picador. Open Google Scholar
  372. HILL, Seth J./ LO, James/ VAVRECK, Lynn/ ZALLER, John (2013): How QuicklyWe Forget: The Duration of Persuasion Effects From Mass Communication, in: Political Communication, Jg. 30, H. 4, S. 521–547. Open Google Scholar
  373. HOFSTADTER, Richard (1955): The Age of Reform. From Bryan to F.D.R., New York, NY: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar
  374. HOGAN, Robert E. (1999): Campaign Spending in State Legislative Primary Elections, in: State and Local Government Review, Jg. 31, H. 3, S. 214–220. Open Google Scholar
  375. HOGAN, Robert E. (2007): The Effect of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections, in: Social Science Quarterly, Jg. 88, H. 5, S. 1092–1105. Open Google Scholar
  376. HOHENSTEIN, Kurt (2007): Coining Corruption. The Making of the American Campaign Finance System, DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar
  377. HOHMANN, James (2014): Begich finally concedes Alaska race, in: Politico vom 17.11.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/2014-alaska-elections-mark-begich-dan-sullivan-112970>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  378. HOIDN, Sabine (2010): Lernkompetenzen an Hochschulen fördern, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  379. HOLBROOK-PROVOW, Thomas M./ POE, Steven C. (1987): Measuring State Political Ideology, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 15, H. 3, S. 399–416. Open Google Scholar
  380. HÖNNIGE, Christoph (2007): Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition. Die vergleichende Analyse eines Spannungsdreiecks, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  381. HORNER, Christopher C. (2015): In support of Citizens United, against targeting political speech, in: The Hill vom 12.02.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/232535-in-support-of-citizens-united-against-targeting-political-speech>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  382. HOSIE, Duncan (2014): The Broken Promise of Citizens United, in: The Huffington Post vom 12.02.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/duncan-hosie/the-broken-promises-of-ci_b_6241700.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.09.2016. Open Google Scholar
  383. HSU, Jordan (2014): More of the Same: The High-Cost Impotence of Citizens United, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, online verfügbar unter <https://polisci.ucsd.edu/undergrad/honors-program/More%20of%20the%20Same.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  384. HUBBARD, Glenn/ KANE, Tim (2013): In Defense of Citizens United. Why Campaign Finance Reform Threatens American Democracy, in: Foreign Affairs, Jg. 126, H. July/August, S. 126–133. Open Google Scholar
  385. HÜBNER, Emil (2007): Das politische System der USA. Eine Einführung, 6., durchgesehene und aktualisierte Auflage, München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  386. HULSE, Carl (2016): Steve Israel of New York, a Top House Democrat, Won't Seek Re-election, in: The New York Times vom 05.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/us/politics/steve-israel-house-democrat-new-york.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  387. HUNT, Albert R. (2012): In Politics, More Can Mean Less, in: The New York Times vom 09.12.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/us/10iht-letter10.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  388. HUNTER HECHT, Stacey/ SCHULTZ, David (Hg.) (2015): Presidential Swing States. Why Only Ten Matter, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  389. ICPSR (2017): State Legislative Election Returns in the United States Series, online verfügbar unter <https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/52>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  390. INGLEHART, Ronald (2015): The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  391. INGRAHAM, Christopher (2014): America's most gerrymandered congressional districts, in: The Washington Post vom 15.05.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/05/15/americas-most-gerrymandered-congressional-districts/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  392. INGRAHAM, Christopher (2014): How gerrymandered is your Congressional district?, in: The Washington Post vom 15.05.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/gerrymandering/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  393. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (2017): Types of Tax-Exempt Organizations, online verfügbar unter <https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/types-of-tax-exempt-organizations>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  394. ISRAEL, Steve (2016): Confessions of a Congressman, in: The New York Times vom 08.01.2016, A19. Open Google Scholar
  395. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel (2011): On Political Corruption, in: Youn, Monica (Hg.): Money, Politics, and the Constitution. Beyond Citizens United, New York: The Century Foundation Press, S. 119–134. Open Google Scholar
  396. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel (2016): Outsourcing Politics: The Hostile Takeovers of Our Hollowed Out Political Parties, New York University School of Law, New York, NY, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, 16-52, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2888064>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Open Google Scholar
  397. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ KARLAN, Pamela S. (1999): The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform, in: Texas Law Review, Jg. 77, H. 7, S. 1705–1738. Open Google Scholar
  398. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ PETERMAN, Jeremy (2013): Special Interests After Citizens United: Access, Replacement, and Interest Group Response to Legal Change, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 16, H. 9, S. 185–205. Open Google Scholar
  399. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ PETERMAN, Jeremy (2013): Special Interests After Citizens United. Access, Replacement, and Interest Group Response to Legal Change, New York University School of Law, NYU Center for Law, Economics and Organization, Law & Economics Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 13-02, online verfügbar unter <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222063>. Open Google Scholar
  400. ISSACHAROFF, Samuel/ PILDES, Richard H. (1998): Politics As Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process, in: Stanford Law Review, Jg. 50, H. 3, S. 643–717. Open Google Scholar
  401. IYENGAR, Shanto/ SOOD, Gaurav/ LELKES, Yphtach (2012): Affect Not Ideology, A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 76, H. 3, S. 405–431. Open Google Scholar
  402. JACKSON, Robert A./ CARSEY, Thomas M. (2007): US Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 26, H. 1, S. 180–195. Open Google Scholar
  403. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1976): Practical Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform. An Incumbent Protection Act?, in: Public Policy, Jg. 24, H. 1, S. 1–32. Open Google Scholar
  404. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1978): The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections, in: American Political Science Review, Jg. 72, H. 2, S. 469–491. Open Google Scholar
  405. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1980): Money in Congressional Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  406. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1984): Money in the 1980 and 1982 congressional elections, in: Malbin, Michael J. (Hg.): Money and politics in the United States: Financing elections in the 1980s, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, S. 38–69. Open Google Scholar
  407. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1985): Money and Votes Reconsidered. Congressional Elections 1972-1982, in: Public Choice, Jg. 47, H. 1, S. 7–62. Open Google Scholar
  408. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1987): Enough Is Too Much: Money and Competition in House Elections, in: Schlozman, Kay L. (Hg.): Elections in America, Winchester, MA: Allan and Unwin, S. 173–195. Open Google Scholar
  409. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1989): Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 83, H. 3, S. 773. Open Google Scholar
  410. JACOBSON, Gary C. (1990): The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 34, H. 2, S. 334–362. Open Google Scholar
  411. JACOBSON, Gary C. (2006): Measuring Campaign Spending Effects in U.S. House Elections, in: Brady, Henry E./ Johnston, Richard (Hg.): Capturing Campaign Effects, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, S. 199–220. Open Google Scholar
  412. JACOBSON, Gary C. (2011): The Republican Resurgence in 2010, in: Political Science Quarterly, Jg. 127, H. 1, S. 27–52. Open Google Scholar
  413. JACOBSON, Gary C. (2015): How Do Campaigns Matter?, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 18, H. 1, S. 31–47. Open Google Scholar
  414. JACOBSON, Gary C./ CARSON, Jamie L. (2016): The politics of congressional elections, 9. Aufl., Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  415. JACOBSON, Gary C./ KERNELL, Samuel (1983): Strategy and choice in Congressional elections, New Haven, CT. Open Google Scholar
  416. JAMISON, Derrick D./ GORE, Gina (Hg.) (2012): Super PACs (Political Action Committees). The New Force in Federal Elections, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  417. JAN, Tracy (2013): Turning the political map into a partisan weapon. The GOP's national effort to control redistricting has cemented its grip on the House but also intensified gridlock, in: Boston Globe vom 23.06.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2013/06/22/new-district-maps-reaped-rewards-for-gop-congress-but-cost-fewer-moderates-more-gridlock/B6jCugm94tpBvVu77ay0wJ/story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  418. JARRETT, Laura/ JORGENSEN, Sarah (2017): Prosecution rests in Menendez corruption trial, in: CNN News vom 13.10.2017, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/11/politics/prosecution-rests-robert-menendez-trial/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  419. JENCKS, Christopher (2009): Does Rising Economic Inequality Matter?, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 115–117. Open Google Scholar
  420. JOESTEN, Danielle A./ STONE, Walter J. (2014): Reassessing Proximity Voting. Expertise, Party, and Choice in Congressional Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 76, H. 3, S. 740–753. Open Google Scholar
  421. JOHNSON, Dennis W. (2001): No Place for Amateurs. How Political Consultants Are Reshaping American Democracy, New York/ London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  422. JOHNSTON, Michael (2016): The Supreme Court’s new definition of corruption is out of step with what Americans think, in: The Washington Post vom 20.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/07/20/defining-corruption-is-inherently-political-why-do-we-think-the-supreme-court-will-solve-it/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  423. JOLLY, David: I see members of Congress shake down Americans every single day, in: The Guardian vom, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/18/members-of-congress-like-me-shake-down-americans-every-single-day>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  424. JONES, Ruth S. (1993): Campaign and Party Finance in the American States, in: Gunlicks, Arthur B. (Hg.): Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe, Boulder/ San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press, S. 41–67. Open Google Scholar
  425. JONSSON, Patrik (2010): ‘Fighting’ Obama hits Supreme Court over campaign finance, in: The Christian Science Monitor vom 23.01.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0123/Fighting-Obama-hits-Supreme-Court-over-campaign-finance>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  426. JORGENSEN, Sarah (2017): Who is Salomon Melgen?, in: CNN News vom 05.09.2017, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/05/politics/who-is-salomon-melgen/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  427. JOSEPHSON, Matthew (1962): The Robber Barons. The Great American Capitalists, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace. Open Google Scholar
  428. KALLA, Joshua L./ BROOCKMAN, David E. (2016): Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 60, H. 3, S. 545–558. Open Google Scholar
  429. KALTENTHALER, Heike (2000): Das Geheimnis des Wahlerfolgs. Negative Campaigning in den USA, Wien u.a. Open Google Scholar
  430. KAMPS, Klaus (2007): Politisches Kommunikationsmanagement. Grundlagen und Professionalisierung moderner Politikvermittlung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  431. KANG, Michael S. (2005): The Hydraulics and Politics of Party Regulation, in: Iowa Law Review, Jg. 91, H. 1, S. 131–187. Open Google Scholar
  432. KANG, Michael S. (2012): The End of Campaign Finance Law, in: Virginia Law Review, Jg. 98, H. 1, S. 1–66. Open Google Scholar
  433. KAPLAN, Andee/ HARE, Eric/ HOFMANN, Heike/ COOK, Dianne (2014): Can You Buy a President? Politics After the Tillman Act, in: CHANCE, Jg. 27, H. 2, S. 20–30. Open Google Scholar
  434. KARLAN, Pamela S. (2014): Citizens Deflected: Electoral Integrity and Political Reform, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 141–151. Open Google Scholar
  435. KATZ, Alyssa (2015): The Influence Machine. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Corporate Capture of American Life, New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau. Open Google Scholar
  436. KAZIN, Michael (2007): Rove fails where his hero succeeded, in: Politico vom 02.07.2007, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2007/07/rove-fails-where-his-hero-succeeded-004754>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  437. KEDING, Ole (2015): Online-Kommunikation von Organisationen. Strategisches Handeln unter komplexen Bedingungen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  438. KELLER, Eric/ KELLY, Nathan J. (2015): Partisan Politics, Financial Deregulation, and the New Gilded Age, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 68, H. 3, S. 428–442. Open Google Scholar
  439. KELLY, Patrick J. (2004): The Election of 1896 and the Restructuring of Civil War Memory, in: Fahs, Alice/ Waugh, Joan (Hg.): The Memory of the Civil War in American Culture, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, S. 180–212. Open Google Scholar
  440. KENDALL, Doug (2009): Elections for Sale? If the Supreme Court lifts restrictions on corporate campaign contributions, watch out, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.09.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://articles.latimes.com/2009/sep/08/opinion/oe-kendall8>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  441. KENNY, Christopher/ MCBURNETT, Michael (1992): A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Campaign Spending on Congressional Vote Choice, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 36, H. 4, S. 923–937. Open Google Scholar
  442. KEY, V. O. (1955): A Theory of Critical Elections, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 17, H. 1, S. 3–18. Open Google Scholar
  443. KEY, V. O. (1966): The Responsible Electorate. Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960, New York: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar
  444. KILGORE, Ed (2015): The “Super-PAC Tax”, in: Washington Monthly vom 06.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://washingtonmonthly.com/2015/07/06/the-super-pac-tax/>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  445. KING, Gary (1991): Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage, in: British Journal of Political Science, Jg. 21, H. 1, S. 119–128. Open Google Scholar
  446. KING, Gary/ KEOHANE, Robert O./ VERBA, Sidney (1994): Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  447. KING, Gary/ LEHMAN SCHLOZMAN, Kay/ NIE, Norman H. (Hg.) (2009): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  448. KINSLEY, Michael (2012): Citizens United was the right decision. We may not like the consequences, but the decision was the correct one, in: Star Tribune vom 11.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.startribune.com/citizens-united-was-the-right-decision/162137165/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  449. KINSLEY, Michael (2016): Did the Supreme Court Make the Right Decision in the Citizens United Case After All?, in: Vanity Fair vom 02.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/04/supreme-court-citizens-united-case-decision>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  450. KITTEL, Bernhard (2009): Eine Disziplin auf der Suche nach Wissenschaftlichkeit: Entwicklung und Stand der Methoden in der deutschen Politikwissenschaft, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Jg. 50, H. 3, S. 577–603. Open Google Scholar
  451. KLEIN, Ezra (2012): Predict the 2012 election with our interactive tool, in: Washington Post vom 24.04.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/create-your-own-election/2012/04/24/gIQAuaOIeT_blog.html?utm_term=.e3fa47262f6e>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  452. KLEIN, Ezra (2014): The most terrifying graph on democracy is a flat line, in: Vox vom 14.05.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.vox.com/2014/5/14/5718080/the-most-terrifying-graph-about-democracy-is-a-straight-line>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  453. KLEIN, Joe (2005): The Perils of the Permanent Campaign, in: TIME Magazine vom 30.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1124332,00.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  454. KLUMPP, Tilman/ MIALON, Hugo/ WILLIAMS, Michael (2012): Money Talks. The Impact of Citizens United on State Elections, University of Alberta Working Paper No. 2012-18. Open Google Scholar
  455. KLUMPP, Tilman/ MIALON, Hugo M./ WILLIAMS, Michael (2016): The Business of American Democracy: Citizens United, Independent Spending, and Elections, in: Journal of Law and Economics, Jg. 59, H. 1, S. 1–43. Open Google Scholar
  456. KLUMPP, Tilman/ MIALON, Hugo M./ WILLIAMS, Michael A. (2016): Yes, 'Citizens United'gives Republicans an electoral edge. Here's proof, in: The Washington Post vom 07.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/yes-citizens-united-gives-republicans-an-electoral-edge-heres-proof/2016/04/07/c9fe3fa4-fb5c-11e5-886f-a037dba38301_story.html?utm_term=.e8c92fde4c6c>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  457. KNIGHT, Kathleen/ MARSH, Michael (2002): Varieties of election studies, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 21, H. 1, S. 169–187. Open Google Scholar
  458. KOLB, Matthias (2014): Demokraten flirten mit dem großen Geld, in: Süddeutsche Zeitung vom 09.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/kongresswahlen-in-usa-demokraten-flirten-mit-dem-grossen-geld-1.2165671>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  459. KOLODNY, Robin (2014): Do We Know the Cost of Campaigns in the US?, online verfügbar unter <https://sites.temple.edu/kolodny/files/2014/12/Kolodny-APSA-2014-Final.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  460. KOß, Michael (2008): Staatliche Parteienfinanzierung und politischer Wettbewerb. Die Entwicklung der Finanzierungsregimes in Deutschland, Schweden, Großbritannien und Frankreich, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  461. KROLL, Andy (2015): The Chairwoman Who’s At War With Her Own Agency, in: National Journal vom 13.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/84089/chairwoman-whos-war-with-her-own-agency>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.11.2015. Open Google Scholar
  462. KROMM, Chris (2011): The Art Pope empire: Media outlets, think tanks and election machines, in: Independent Weekly vom 09.03.2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-art-pope-empire-media-outlets-think-tanks-and-election-machines/Content?oid=2140145>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  463. KROMM, Chris/ KOTCH, Alex (2016): Big Money's map mischief in North Carolina, Institute for Southern Studies, online verfügbar unter <https://www.facingsouth.org/2016/02/big-moneys-map-mischief-in-north-carolina>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  464. KROPP, Sabine/ MINKENBERG, Michael (Hg.) (2005): Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  465. KRUMHOLZ, Sheila (2013): Campaign Cash and Corruption: Money in Politics, Post-Citizens United, in: Social Research: An International Quarterly, Jg. 80, H. 4, S. 1119–1134. Open Google Scholar
  466. KUHNER, Timothy K. (2011): Citizens United as Neoliberal Jurisprudence: The Resurgence of Economic Theory, in: Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, Jg. 18, H. 1, S. 395–468. Open Google Scholar
  467. KUHNER, Timothy K. (2014): Capitalism v. Democracy. Money in Politics and the Free Market Constitution, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  468. KUHNER, Timothy K. (2016): Plutocracy and Partyocracy: Oligarchies Born of Constitutional Interpretation, in: Review of Constitutional Studies / Revue d’études constitutionnelles, Jg. 21, H. 1, S. 115–142. Open Google Scholar
  469. KURTZLEBEN, Danielle (2016): Is The Electoral College Dragging Down Voter Turnout in Your State?, in: National Public Radio vom 26.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.npr.org/2016/11/26/503170280/charts-is-the-electoral-college-dragging-down-voter-turnout-in-your-state>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  470. LA RAJA, Raymond J. (2011): Small Change. Money, Political Parties, and Campaign Finance Reform, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  471. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2014): The effects of campaign finance spending bans on electoral outcomes: Evidence from the states about the potential impact of Citizens United v. FEC, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 33, H. 1, S. 102–114. Open Google Scholar
  472. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2014): Want to Reduce polarization? Give parties more money, in: The Washington Post vom 21.07.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/07/21/want-to-reduce-polarization-give-parties-more-money/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  473. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2015): Campaign Finance and Political Polarization. When Purists Prevail, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  474. LA RAJA, Raymond J./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2015): Unlimited party fundraising and spending gives you less polarized legislatures? Discuss., in: The Washington Post vom 08.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/07/08/unlimited-party-fundraising-and-spending-gives-you-less-polarized-legislatures-discuss/>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  475. LACEY, Michael J. (Hg.) (1991): The Truman Presidency, Cambridge, u.a.: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  476. LAMMERT, Christian/ SIEWERT, Markus/ VORMANN, Boris (Hg.) (2016): Handbuch Politik USA, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  477. LANDFRIED, Christine (1990): Parteifinanzen und politische Macht: Eine vergleichende Studie zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland, zu Italien und den USA, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  478. LANOUE, David J. (1994): Retrospective and Prospective Voting in Presidential-Year Elections, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 47, H. 1, S. 193–205. Open Google Scholar
  479. LAU, Richard R./ ANDERSEN, David J./ DITONTO, Tessa M./ KLEINBERG, Mona S./ REDLAWSK, David P. (2017): Effect of Media Environment Diversity and Advertising Tone on Information Search, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 39, H. 1, S. 231–255. Open Google Scholar
  480. LAU, Richard R./ SIGELMAN, Lee/ ROVNER, Ivy Brown (2007): The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 69, H. 4, S. 1176–1209. Open Google Scholar
  481. LAZARSFELD, Paul F. (1944): The Election is Over, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 8, H. 3, S. 317–330. Open Google Scholar
  482. LAZARSFELD, Paul F./ BERELSON, Bernard R./ GAUDET, Hazel (1968): The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, 3. Aufl., New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  483. LEE, Chisun/ FERGUSON, Brent (2014): To see how Citizens United is hurting democracy, look at local elections, MSNBC News, online verfügbar unter <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/see-how-citizens-united-hurting-democracy-look-local-elections>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  484. LEIGHLEY, Jan E. (Hg.) (2010): The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  485. LEMBCKE, Oliver (2017): Thüringer Verfassungsgerichtshof, in: Reutter, Werner (Hg.): Landesverfassungsgerichte. Entwicklung - Aufbau - Funktionen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 389–420. Open Google Scholar
  486. LEMIEUX, Scott (2016): The Five Worst Roberts Court Rulings, in: The American Prospect vom 01.08.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/five-worst-roberts-court-rulings>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  487. LEPORE, Jill (2012): Money Talks. Who’s Fighting For Campaign-Finance Reform, in: The New Yorker vom 10.07.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/money-talks-whos-fighting-for-campaign-finance-reform>. Open Google Scholar
  488. LERNER, Adam (2015): Citizens United protests interrupt Supreme Court arguments, in: Politico vom 21.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/citizens-united-supreme-court-arguments-114456>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  489. LESSIG, Lawrence (2011): Republic, Lost. How Money Corrupts Congress - and a Plan to Stop It, New York: Twelve. Open Google Scholar
  490. LESSIG, Lawrence (2014): Out-Posting Post, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 97–105. Open Google Scholar
  491. LESSIG, Lawrence (2015): Corrupt and Unequal, Both, in: Fordham Law Review, Jg. 84, H. 2, S. 445–452. Open Google Scholar
  492. LESSIG, Lawrence (2015): One Mission: There is one issue we must address first in the 2016 election, online verfügbar unter <https://lessig2016.us/one-mission/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  493. LESSIG, Lawrence/ ISQUITH, Elias (2014): Cronies, corruption and cash: Lawrence Lessing on why we need a super PAC to end all super PACs. Harvard professor tells Salon the strategy, nuts-and-bolts and urgent rationale behind his nascent "Mayday PAC", in: Salon vom 18.06.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.salon.com/2014/06/18/teaching_us_to_hate_each_other_lawrence_lessig_on_his_super_pac_to_end_all_super_pacs/>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  494. LEVI, Margaret/ STOKER, Laura (2000): Political Trust and Trustworthiness, in: Annual Review of Political Science, Jg. 3, H. 4, S. 475–507. Open Google Scholar
  495. LEVITT, Justin (2014): Electoral Integrity: The Confidence Game, in: New York University Law Review, Jg. 89, H. 1, S. 70–86. Open Google Scholar
  496. LEVITT, Justin (2017): Who draws the lines?, All About Redistricting. Professor Justin Levitt's guide to drawing the electoral lines, <http://redistricting.lls.edu/who.php>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  497. LEVITT, Steven D. (1994): Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House, in: The Journal of Political Economy, Jg. 102, H. 4, S. 777–798. Open Google Scholar
  498. LEVITT, Steven D./ DUBNER, Stephen J. (2007): Freakonomics. Warum wohnen Drogenhändler bei ihren Müttern? Führt mehr Polizei zu weniger Kriminalität? Sind Swimmingpools gefährlicher als Revolver? Macht gute Erziehung glücklich?, Überraschende Antworten auf alltägliche Lebensfragen, München: Wilhelm Goldmann Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  499. LEWIS, Lindsay Mark/ ARKEDIS, Jim (2014): So You've Won a Seat in Congress - Now What. A simple guide for how new members can find success (Hint: Fundraising, fundraising, and fundraising), in: The Atlantic vom 06.11.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/so-youve-won-election-to-congressnow-what/382421/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  500. LEWIS-BECK, Michael S./ JACOBY, William G./ NORPOTH, Helmut/ WEISBERG, Herbert F. (2008): The American Voter Revisited. With a foreword by Philip E. Converse, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  501. LEWIS-BECK, Michael S./ PALDAM, Martin (2000): Economic Voting. An Introduction, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 19, H. 1, S. 113–121. Open Google Scholar
  502. LEWISON, Jed (2012): 22 consecutive political ads during half-hour Columbus, Ohio, newscast, Hg. v. Daily Kos Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/1/1153753/-22-consecutive-political-ads-during-half-hour-Columbus-Ohio-newscast>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  503. LICHTBLAU, Eric (2015): Bernie Sanders’s Success in Attracting Small Donors Tests Importance of ‘Super PACs’, in: The New York Times vom 25.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/us/politics/bernie-sanders-success-in-attracting-small-donors-tests-importance-of-super-pacs.html?mcubz=0&_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  504. LICHTMAN, Allan J. (2012): Predicting the next president. The keys to the White House, 2012. Aufl., Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  505. LICHTMAN, Allan J. (2014): Who rules America?, in: The Hill vom 12.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/civil-rights/214857-who-rules-america>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  506. LIJPHART, Arend (2009): The United States: A Different Democracy, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 1–3. Open Google Scholar
  507. LIOZ, Adam/ SHANTON, Karen (2015): The Money Chase. Moving from Big Money Dominance in the 2014 Midterms to a Small Donor Democracy, unter Mitarbeit von Emma Boorboor, Michael Russo und Dan Smith, Demos; U.S.PIRG, New York, online verfügbar unter <http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/TheMoneyChase-Report_0.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  508. LIPTAK, Adam (2017): Justices Reject 2 Gerrymandered North Carolina Districts, Citing Racial Bias, in: The New York Times vom 22.05.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/supreme-court-north-carolina-congressional-districts.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  509. LITHWICK, Dahlia (2009): The Supreme Court Reviews Hillary: The Movie, in: Slate vom 24.03.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/supreme_court_dispatches/2009/03/the_supreme_court_reviews_hillary_the_movie.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  510. LOS ANGELES TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD (2016): With campaign costs about to skyrocket, Donald Trump suddenly loses his aversion to fundraising, in: Los Angeles Times vom 05.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ol-trump-fundraising-flip-flop-20160505-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  511. LOWERY, Wesley (2014): 91% of the time the better-financed candidates wins. Don't act surprised, in: The Washington Post vom 04.03.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/04/04/think-money-doesnt-matter-in-elections-this-chart-says-youre-wrong/>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  512. LUBENOW, Gerald C. (Hg.) (2011): A User's Guide to Campaign Finance Reform, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  513. LUO, Michael (2008): Obama hauls in record $750 million for campaign, in: The New York Times vom 05.12.2008, online verfügbar unter <11.06.2017>, zuletzt geprüft am http://www.nytimes.com/05.12.2008/politics/05donate.html. Open Google Scholar
  514. LUO, Michael (2012): A Secret Donor Revealed, in: The New York Times vom 07.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/a-secret-donor-revealed/>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.11.2017. Open Google Scholar
  515. MACGILLIS, Alec (2012): Coal Miner's Donor, in: The New Republic vom 04.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/108140/coal-miners-donor-mitt-romney-benefactor>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  516. MACKEY, John (2009): The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare. Eight things we can do to improve health care without adding to the deficit, in: The Wall Street Journal vom 11.08.2009, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  517. MAGARIAN, Gregory P. (2017): Managed Speech. The Roberts Court's First Amendment, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  518. MAGLEBY, David B. (Hg.) (2014): Financing the 2012 Election, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  519. MAGLEBY, David B./ NELSON, Candice J. (1990): The Money Chase. Congressional Campaign Finance Reform, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  520. MAGUIRE, Robert (2013): OpenSecrets.org's New Dark Money Data Measures Groups' Politicization, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/09/opensecretsorgs-new-dark-money-data-measures-groups-politicization/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  521. MAGUIRE, Robert (2015): Five Realities Five Years After: The Post-Citizens United Landscape, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/01/five-realities-five-years-after-the-post-citizens-united-landscape/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  522. MAGUIRE, Robert (2015): Final Tally: 2014's Midterm Was Most Expensive, With Fewer Donors, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/02/final-tally-2014s-midterm-was-most-expensive-with-fewer-donors/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  523. MAGUIRE, Robert (2016): $1.4 billion and counting in spending by super PACs, dark money groups, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/1-4-billion-and-counting-in-spending-by-super-pacs-dark-money-groups/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  524. MAHONEY, James/ GOERTZ, Gary (2006): A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research, in: Political Analysis, Jg. 14, H. 3, S. 227–249. Open Google Scholar
  525. MAISEL, Louis Sandy (1982): From Obscurity to Oblivion. Running in the Congressional Primary, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. Open Google Scholar
  526. MALBIN, Michael J. (Hg.) (1984): Money and politics in the United States: Financing elections in the 1980s, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Open Google Scholar
  527. MALBIN, Michael J. (2013): Small Donors: Incentives, Economies of Scale, and Effects, in: The Forum, Jg. 11, H. 3, S. 385–411. Open Google Scholar
  528. MALBIN, Michael J. (2017): Three Policy Paths after Citizens United: A Critical Review Essay, in: Tulsa Law Review, Jg. 52, H. 3, S. 537–552. Open Google Scholar
  529. MALBIN, Michael J./ BRUSOE, Peter W./ JOE, Wesley Y./ PIMLOTT, Jamie P./ WILCOX, Clyde (2007): The CFI Small Donor Project. An Overview of the Project and a Preliminary Report on State Legislative Candidates' Perspectives on Donors and Volunteers, The Campaign Finance Institute. Open Google Scholar
  530. MANDERSCHEID, Katharina (2012): Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenanalyse mit R. Eine Einführung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  531. MANN, Thomas E. (2003): Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 1, H. 1, S. 69–83. Open Google Scholar
  532. MANN, Thomas E. (2009): The Rashomon World Of Money And Politics, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 112–114. Open Google Scholar
  533. MANN, Thomas E. (2011): Campaign Finance in the Wake of Citizens United, in: The John Marshall Law Review, Jg. 44, H. 4, S. 583–594. Open Google Scholar
  534. MANN, Thomas E. (2016): We Must Address Gerrymandering. Political districts no longer represent the people - and lead to more paralyzing partisanship, in: TIME Magazine vom 13.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/4527291/2016-election-gerrymandering/?xid=emailshare>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  535. MANN, Thomas E./ CORRADO, Anthony (2014): Party Polarization and Campaign Finance, Center for Effective Public Management (Brookings Institution), Washington, D.C., Governance Studies, online verfügbar unter <http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2014/07/polarization-and-campaign-finance/mann-and-corrad_party-polarization-and-campaign-finance.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  536. MANN, Thomas E./ CORRADO, Anthony (2014): Don't expect campaign finance reform to reduce polarization, in: The Washington Post vom 23.07.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/07/23/dont-expect-campaign-finance-reform-to-reduce-polarization/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  537. MANN, Thomas E./ ORNSTEIN, Norman (2012): It's Even Worse Than It Looks. How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism, Philadelphia: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  538. MARK, David (2012): A constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United?, in: Politico vom 19.06.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/arena/archive/a-constitutional-amendment-to-reverse-citizens-united.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  539. MARTIN, Jonathan/ BURNS, Alexander (2016): Key G.O.P. Donors Still Deeply Resist Donald Trump’s Candidacy, in: The New York Times vom 21.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-fundraising.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  540. MARTINDALE, Nathan R. (2010): Citizens Divided: Balancing the First Amendment Right to Free Speech and the Role of Private Corporations in our Nation's Elections, in: North Dakota Law Review, Jg. 86, H. 3, S. 619–640. Open Google Scholar
  541. MATTHEWS, Dylan (2013): The global upper class makes 32 times as much as the global lower class, in: The Washington Post vom 26.09.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/26/wonkabroad/?utm_term=.40583125e392>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  542. MATYS, Thomas (2010): Corporations in den USA. Kämpfe um Etablierung zwischen königlicher Charter und Industrialisierung, in: Endreß, Martin/ Matys, Thomas (Hg.): Die Ökonomie der Organisation - die Organisation der Ökonomie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 121–152. Open Google Scholar
  543. MATYS, Thomas (2011): Legal Persons - "Kämpfe" um die organisationale Form, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  544. MAYER, Jane (2011): State for Sale. A conservative multimillionaire has taken control in North Carolina, one of 2012’s top battlegrounds, in: The New Yorker vom 2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/state-for-sale>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  545. MAYER, Jane (2016): Dark Money. The Hidden Story of the Billioinaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, New York, NY, u.a.: Doubleday. Open Google Scholar
  546. MAYER, Jane/ GROSS, Terry (2011): The Multimillionaire Helping Republicans Win N.C., in: NPR vom 06.10.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://www.npr.org/2011/10/06/141078608/the-multimillionaire-helping-republicans-win-n-c>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  547. MAYER, William G./ BUSCH, Andrew E. (2004): The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  548. MAYERSOHN, Andrew (2015): Donor demographics: old white guys edition, part III, Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/donor-demographics-old-white-guys-edition-part-iii/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  549. MAYERSOHN, Andrew (2017): Those prized small donors? They may not be as small as you think, Center for Responsive Politics, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/04/small-donors-may-not-be-smol-as-you-think/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  550. MAYERSOHN, Andrew/ GELERNT, Anya (2015): Donor demographics: old white guys edition, part I, Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/06/donor-demographics-old-white-guys-edition-part-i/>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  551. MAYHEW, David R. (2008): Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Presidential Elections. The Historical Record, in: Political Science Quarterly, Jg. 123, H. 2, S. 201–228. Open Google Scholar
  552. MAZUR, Allan (2007): Global Social Problems, Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  553. MCELWEE, Sean (2015): Democracy is only for rich white guys: A definitive explanation for America’s most shocking inequalities. A wealth of research data now demonstrates what should be obvious: The law only advances certain people’s interests, in: Salon vom 07.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.salon.com/2015/07/11/democracy_is_only_for_rich_white_guys_a_definitive_explanation_for_americas_most_shocking_inequalities/>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  554. MCELWEE, Sean/ RHODES, Jesse H./ SCHAFFNER, Brian F. (2016): How big is the gap between the donor class and ordinary Americans? Bigger than you think, in: The Washington Post vom 15.12.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/15/how-big-is-the-gap-between-the-donor-class-and-ordinary-americans-bigger-than-you-think/>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  555. MCELWEE, Sean/ SCHAFFNER, Brian F./ RHODES, Jesse H. (2016): Whose Voice, Whose Choice? The Distorting Influence of the Political Donor Class in Our Big-Money Elections, Dēmos, online verfügbar unter <http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/Whose%20Voice%20Whose%20Choice_2.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  556. MCGINNIS, John O. (2016): Liberals are dangerously wrong about Citizens United: Money is speech, in: Los Angeles Times vom 20.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mcginnis-money-speech-liberals-20160522-snap-htmlstory.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  557. MCLEAN, Scott L. (2015): Purple Battlegrounds: Presidential Campaign Strategies and Swing State Voters, in: Hunter Hecht, Stacey/ Schultz, David (Hg.): Presidential Swing States. Why Only Ten Matter, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, S. 1–28. Open Google Scholar
  558. MCNEILL, Brian: The Supreme Court’s Shift Away from Protecting Voters to Promoting Free Expression, in: UVA Lawyer vom, S. 38–39, online verfügbar unter <http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/alumni/uvalawyer/spr12/citizens.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  559. MEDVIC, Stephen K. (2014): Campaigns and Elections. Players and Processes, 2. Aufl., New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  560. MENDRALA, Mallory E. (2012): Citizens Divided by Citizens United: How the Recent Supreme Court Decision Affects Small Business in Politics, in: Ohio State Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, Jg. 7, H. 1, S. 253–282. Open Google Scholar
  561. MERKEL, Wolfgang (Hg.) (2015): Demokratie und Krise. Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  562. MEYERSON, Harold (2015): Americans see a government of, by and for the rich, in: The Washington Post vom 18.11.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/americans-see-a-government-of-by-and-for-the-rich/2015/11/18/8c8e001a-8e19-11e5-acff-673ae92ddd2b_story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.12.2017. Open Google Scholar
  563. MILLER, Arthur H. (1974): Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 68, H. 3, S. 951–972. Open Google Scholar
  564. MILLER, Warren E. (1980): Disinterest, Disaffection, and Participation in Presidential Politics, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 2, H. 1, S. 7–32. Open Google Scholar
  565. MILYO, Jeffrey (1998): The Electoral Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: A Natural Experiment Approach, Department of Economics, Tufts University, Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University, 9806, online verfügbar unter <http://ase.tufts.edu/economics/papers/9806.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  566. MITCHELL, Alison (1998): Bill to Overhaul Campaign Finance Survives in House, in: The New York Times vom 01.08.1998, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/01/us/bill-to-overhaul-campaign-finance-survives-in-house.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  567. MOEN, Matthew C./ COPELAND, Gary W. (1999): The contemporary Congress. A bicameral approach, Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth. Open Google Scholar
  568. MONCRIEF, Gary F./ NIEMI, Richard G./ POWELL, Lynda W. (2004): Time, Term Limits, and Turnover. Trends in Membership Stability in U.S. State Legislatures, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 29, H. 3, S. 357–381. Open Google Scholar
  569. MONDAK, Jeffrey J./ HALPERIN, Karen D. (2008): A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour, in: British Journal of Political Science, Jg. 38, H. 2, S. 335–362. Open Google Scholar
  570. MOOSMÜLLER, Gertrud (2008): Methoden der empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, München u.a.: Pearson Studium. Open Google Scholar
  571. MORGAN, Howard Wayne (2003): William McKinley and His America, Kent, OH: The Kent State University Press. Open Google Scholar
  572. MORRISSEY, Joseph F. (2013): A Contractarian Critique of Citizens United, in: Journal of Constitutional Law, Jg. 15, H. 3, S. 765–830. Open Google Scholar
  573. MULLER, Derek (2016): The Case for More Money in Politics, The Library of Law and Liberty, online verfügbar unter <http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/the-case-for-more-money-in-politics/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  574. MÜLLER, Marion G. (2002): Wahlkampf à l'américain, in: Dörner, Andreas/ Vogt, Ludgera (Hg.): Wahl-Kämpfe. Betrachtungen über ein demokratisches Ritual, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, S. 187–210. Open Google Scholar
  575. MÜNCH, Sybille (2016): Interpretative Policy-Analyse, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  576. MUTCH, Robert E. (1988): Campaigns, Congress, and Courts. The Making of Federal Campaign Finance Law, New York: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  577. MUTCH, Robert E. (2011): Three Centuries of Campaign Finance Law, in: Lubenow, Gerald C. (Hg.): A User's Guide to Campaign Finance Reform, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., S. 1–24. Open Google Scholar
  578. MUTCH, Robert E. (2014): Buying the Vote. A History of Campaign Finance Reform, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  579. MUTCH, Robert E. (2016): Campaign Finance. What Everyone Needs to Know, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  580. NAGLER, Jörg (2009): Abraham Lincoln: Amerikas großer Präsident. Eine Biographie, München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  581. NASSMACHER, Karl-Heinz (1993): Comparing Party and Campaign Finance in Western Democracies, in: Gunlicks, Arthur B. (Hg.): Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe, Boulder/ San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press, S. 233–267. Open Google Scholar
  582. NASSMACHER, Karl-Heinz (2009): The Funding of Party Competition. Political Finance in 25 Democracies, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  583. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2008): Limits on Contributions to Political Parties, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/limits-on-contributions-to-political-parties.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  584. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2011): Citizens United and the States. State Laws Affected by Citizens United, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/citizens-united-and-the-states.aspx#laws>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 21.07.2016, zuletzt geprüft am 10.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  585. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2012): 2012 State and Legislative Partisan Composition, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/documents/statevote/legiscontrol_2012.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  586. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (2014): Partisan composition of State Legislatures 2002-2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ncsl.org/documents/statevote/legiscontrol_2002_2014.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  587. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MONEY IN STATE POLITICS (2017): Mission & History, online verfügbar unter <https://www.followthemoney.org/about-us/mission-and-history/>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  588. NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO (2017): Survey of Economically Successful Americans, online verfügbar unter <http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/survey-of-economically-successful-americans.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  589. NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO (2012): Take the Money and Run for Office (Transkript), This American Life Show, online verfügbar unter <https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/461/transcript>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  590. NELSON, Michael (Hg.) (2015): Guide to the Presidency, 2. Aufl., London/ New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  591. NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD (2010): The Court's Blow to Democracy, in: The New York Times vom 21.01.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/opinion/22fri1.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2010. Open Google Scholar
  592. NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD (2012): A Landslide Loss for Big Money, in: The New York Times vom 10.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/opinion/sunday/a-landslide-loss-for-big-money.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  593. NEWKIRK II, Vann R. (2017): The Supreme Court Finds North Carolina's Racial Gerrymandering Unconstitutional. The justices end a six-year fight over 2011 congressional maps that diluted black voting strength in the state., in: The Atlantic vom 22.05.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/north-carolina-gerrymandering/527592/>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  594. NEWPORT, Frank/ HARTER, Jim (2016): Presidential Candidates as Leaders: The Public's View, GALLUP, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/191204/presidential-candidates-leaders-public-view.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2016. Open Google Scholar
  595. NICHOLS, John/ MCCHESNEY, Robert W. (2013): Dollarocracy. How the Money-and-Media Election Complex is Destroying America, New York: Nation Books. Open Google Scholar
  596. NICHOLS, Philip (2013): A closer look at campaign finance, TEDx Penn 2013, TEDx Talks, online verfügbar unter <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E3WxOJzpv4>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  597. NOAH, Timothy (2012): Crankocracy in America. Who really benefitted vom from Citizens United?, in: The New Republic vom 29.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://newrepublic.com/article/102114/crankocracy-friess-simmons-oligarchs-election-america>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  598. NOLAND, Jack (2016): In first post-McCutcheon presidential election, more big donors, giving more, Open Secrets Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/in-first-post-mccutcheon-presidential-election-more-big-donors-giving-more/>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  599. NORRIS, Pippa (2013): The new research agenda studying electoral integrity, in: Electoral Studies, Jg. 32, H. 3, S. 563–575. Open Google Scholar
  600. NORRIS, Pippa (2014): Why Electoral Integrity Matters, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  601. NORRIS, Pippa (2016): U.S. elections ranked worst among Western democracies. Here’s why. Americans are often proud of the democratic process here. Maybe they shouldn't be., in: The Washington Post vom 29.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/03/29/u-s-elections-ranked-worst-among-western-democracies-heres-why/?utm_term=.0893e22abaa0>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  602. NORRIS, Pippa (2016): Why American elections are flawed (and how to fix them), Hg. v. Electoral Integrity Project, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844793>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  603. NORRIS, Pippa (2017): It’s even worse than the news about North Carolina: American elections rank last among all Western democracies, London School of Economics US Centre Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/01/08/its-even-worse-than-the-news-about-north-carolina-american-elections-rank-last-among-all-western-democracies/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Open Google Scholar
  604. NORRIS, Pippa/ ABEL VAN ES, Andres (Hg.) (2016): Checkbook Elections. Political Finance in Comparative Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  605. NORRIS, Pippa/ FRANK, Richard W./ MARTÍNEZ I COMA, Ferran (2013): Expert Perceptions of Electoral Integrity: A New Dataset, Hg. v. Electoral Integrity Project, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2300990>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  606. NORRIS, Pippa/ GRÖMPING, Max (2017): Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections, 2016-2017, Hg. v. Electoral Integrity Project, online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2965729>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  607. NOZICK, Robert (1974): Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York, NY: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  608. NUGENT, Walter (2010): Progressivism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  609. NYE JR., Joseph S. (2009): The Question Of Relevance, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 252–254. Open Google Scholar
  610. O'CALLAGHAN, Tiffany (2009): Whole Foods C.E.O. infuriates liberal customers by condemning universal health care, in: TIME Magazine vom 14.08.2009, online verfügbar unter <http://healthland.time.com/2009/08/14/whole-foods-c-e-o-infuriates-liberal-customers-by-condemning-universal-health-care/print/>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  611. O'CONNOR, Alice (2010): Beyond the "American Dream". Democracy and Economic Citizenship in the Second Gilded Age, History Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, online verfügbar unter <http://www.tobinproject.org/sites/tobinproject.org/files/assets/O%27Connor_Beyond%20the%20American%20Dream.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  612. O'DONNELL, Norah (2016): Are members of Congress becoming telemarketers? Stop fundraising, start working, says Fla. Rep. David Jolly, who is seeking to ban federal-elected officials from dialing for dollars, in: CBS News vom 24.04.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-are-members-of-congress-becoming-telemarketers/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  613. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION STATISTICS (2016): 2015 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Open Google Scholar
  614. OLDOPP, Birgit (2001): Auf dem Weg ins Parlament. Auswahl und Wahlkampffinanzierung der Kandidaten in Deutschland, Kanada und den USA, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  615. ORNSTEIN, Norman J. (2011): Citizens United: Corrupting Campaign Clarity, American Enterprise Institute, online verfügbar unter <https://www.aei.org/publication/citizens-united-corrupting-campaign-clarity/>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  616. ORNSTEIN, Norman J. (2012): Effect of Citizens United Felt Two Years Later, in: Roll Call vom 17.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_80/effect_citizens_united_felt_two_years_later-211556-1.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.11.2017. Open Google Scholar
  617. ORNSTEIN, Norman J. (2014): Courting Corruption: The Auctioning of the Judicial System. Don't believe the Citizens United pollyannas. Watching money flooding into elections for judges' seat shows how dangerous unregulated campaigns can be., in: The Atlantic vom 15.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/courting-corruption-the-auctioning-of-the-judicial-system/381524/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  618. ORNSTEIN, Norman J./ PROKOP, Andrew (2016): The political scientist who saw Trump's rise coming. Norm Ornstein on why the Republican Party was ripe for a takeover, what the media missed, and whether Trump could win the presidency, in: Vox vom 06.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/2016/5/6/11598838/donald-trump-predictions-norm-ornstein>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  619. OVERACKER, Louise (1932): Money in Elections, New York: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  620. OVERBY, Peter (2007): Explainer: What Is a Bundler, in: National Public Radio vom 14.09.2007, online verfügbar unter <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14434721>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  621. OVERTON, Spencer (2004): The Donor Class: Campaign Finance, Democracy, and Participation, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 153, H. 1, S. 73–118. Open Google Scholar
  622. OVERTON, Spencer (2012): The Participation Interest, in: The Georgetown Law Journal, Jg. 100, H. 4, S. 1259–1310. Open Google Scholar
  623. OXLEY, Douglas R. et al. (2008): Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits, in: Science, Jg. 321, H. 5896, S. 1667–1670. Open Google Scholar
  624. PAGE, Benjamin I. (2009): Exploring Political Inequality, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 101–103. Open Google Scholar
  625. PAGE, Benjamin I. (2009): Perspectives on Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 7, H. 1, S. 148–151. Open Google Scholar
  626. PAGE, Benjamin I./ BARTELS, Larry M./ Seawright, Jason (2013): Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 11, H. 1, S. 51–73. Open Google Scholar
  627. PAINTER, Richard W. (2016): Taxation Only With Representation. The Conservative Conscience and Campaign Finance Reform, Auburn, AL: Take Back Our Republic. Open Google Scholar
  628. PALMER, Anna (2012): Corporations don’t pony up for super PACs, in: Politico vom 08.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73804_Page2.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  629. PARKER, Ashley (2015): ‘Koch Primary’ Tests Hopefuls In the G.O.P., in: The New York Times vom 20.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/21/us/koch-seminar-is-early-proving-ground-for-gop-hopefuls.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  630. PARKINSON, Robin (2011): Independent Spending in North Carolina, 2006-2010, National Institute on Money in State Politics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.followthemoney.org/research/institute-reports/independent-spending-in-north-carolina-2006-2010/>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  631. PATTERSON, Samuel C./ RIPLEY, Randall B./ QUINLAN, Stephen V. (1992): Citizens' Orientations toward Legislatures. Congress and the State Legislature, in: The Western Political Quarterly, Jg. 45, H. 2, S. 315–338. Open Google Scholar
  632. PEARSON, Karl (2007): The Grammar of Science, New York: Cosimo Classics. Open Google Scholar
  633. PENNIMAN, Nick/ POTTER, Wendell (2016): Citizens United is only 15% of the political cash problem, in: Los Angeles Times vom 08.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-penniman-potter-political-campaign-finance-reform-20160308-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  634. PEREZ, Andrew (2016): GOP 2016: Emails Show Carly Fiorina Super PAC Helps Out At Campaign Events, Despite Coordination Rules, in: International Business Times vom 15.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/gop-2016-emails-show-carly-fiorina-super-pac-helps-out-campaign-events-despite>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  635. PERSILY, Nathaniel (2010): The Floodgates Were Already Open. What will the Supreme Court's campaign finance ruling really change?, in: Slate vom 25.01.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/01/the_floodgates_were_already_open.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  636. PERSILY, Nathaniel (2014): Bringing Big Money Out of the Shadows, in: The New York Times vom 02.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/opinion/bringing-big-money-out-of-the-shadows.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  637. PERSILY, Nathaniel (Hg.) (2015): Solutions to Political Polarization in America, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  638. PERSILY, Nathaniel/ LAMMIE, Kelli (2004): Perceptions of Corruption and Campaign Finance: When Public Opinion Determines Constitutional Law, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 153, H. 1, S. 119–180. Open Google Scholar
  639. PETERS, Jeremy W. (2012): Going Negative: In Florida, a Sea of Attack Ads, in: The New York Times vom 01.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9400E6D9123BF932A35751C0A9649D8B63>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2012. Open Google Scholar
  640. PETERSDORFF, Winand von (2016): Wie kaufe ich mir einen Präsidenten? Der amerikanische Wahlkampf verschlingt viel Geld. Trotzdem bekommen die Reichen nicht alles, was sie wollen, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 03.01.2016, <http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wahlkampf-finanzierung-in-den-usa-wie-kaufe-ich-mir-einen-praesidenten-13994060.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  641. PEVNICK, Ryan (2016): An Egalitarian Approach to Campaign Finance Reform, in: The New Rambler. An Online Review of Books vom 01.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://newramblerreview.com/component/content/article?id=149%3Aan-egalitarian-approach-to-campaign-finance-reform#.V09s4BPsS0k.twitter>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  642. PIKETTY, Thomas (2014): Das Kapital im 21. Jahrhundert, München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  643. PILDES, Richard (2014): How to fix our polarized politics? Strengthen political parties, in: The Washington Post vom 06.02.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/02/06/how-to-fix-our-polarized-politics-strengthen-political-parties/>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  644. PILKINGTON, Ed (2012): Rahm Emanuel: Citizens United is one of worst supreme court decisions ever, in: The Guardian vom 22.06.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/22/rahm-emanuel-citizens-united-attack>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  645. PILKINGTON, Ed/ MICHEL, Amanda (2012): Obama, Facebook and the power of friendship: the 2012 data election. A unified computer database that gathers and refines information on millions of potential voters is at the forefront of campaign technology – and could be the key to an Obama win, in: The Guardian vom 17.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  646. PLUMER, Brad (2016): Why more than 80 million Americans won’t vote on Election Day, in: Vox vom 08.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/7/13536198/election-day-americans-vote>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  647. POLITICO STAFF (2012): Barack Obama DNC speech, in: Politico vom 06.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/barack-obama-dnc-speech-text-080890>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2012. Open Google Scholar
  648. POLLOCK, James K. (1926): Party Campaign Funds, New York: Knopf. Open Google Scholar
  649. POLLOCK III, Philip H. (1983): The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy. A Research Note, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 36, H. 3, S. 400–409. Open Google Scholar
  650. POLSBY, Nelson W./ WILDAVSKY, Aaron/ SCHIER, Steven E./ HOPKINS, David A. (2012): Presidential Elections. Strategies and Structures of American Politics, 13. Aufl., New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  651. PORTER, Glenn (1996): Industrialization and the Rise of Big Business, in: Calhoun, Charles W. (Hg.): The Gilded Age. Essays on the Origins of Modern America, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Books, S. 1–18. Open Google Scholar
  652. POST, Robert C. (Hg.) (2014): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  653. POST, Robert C. (2014): First Lecture: A Short History of Representation and Discursive Democracy, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 3–43. Open Google Scholar
  654. POST, Robert C. (2014): Representative Democracy, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 155–165. Open Google Scholar
  655. POST, Robert C. (2014): Second Lecture: Campaign Finance Reform and the First Amendment, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 44–94. Open Google Scholar
  656. POTTER, Trevor (2012): The Political Reality of Citizens United, PBS Frontline, online verfügbar unter <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/big-sky-big-money/trevor-potter-the-political-reality-of-citizens-united/>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  657. POTTER, Trevor (2015): Legal Rubble: Money and Politics in the Age of Citizens United, Harvard Election Law Series, Harvard Law School, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA vom 09.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/news/publications-speeches/legal-rubble-money-and-politics-age-citizens-united>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.11.2015. Open Google Scholar
  658. POTTER, Trevor (2016): “A Republic - If You Can Keep It!”. An Agenda for Our Democracy, The Campaign Legal Center, The Chautauqua Institution, Chautauqua, NY vom 04.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/news/appearances-publications-speeches/republic-if-you-can-keep-it-agenda-our-democracy>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  659. POTTER, Trevor/ JOWERS, Kirk L. (2005): Speech Governed by Federal Election Laws, in: Corrado, Anthony/ Mann, Thomas E./ Ortiz, Daniel R./ Potter, Trevor (Hg.): The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, S. 205–231. Open Google Scholar
  660. POTTER, Wendell/ PENNIMAN, Nick (2016): Nation on the Take. How Big Money Corrupts Our Democracy and What We Can Do About It, New York, NY, u.a.: Bloomsbury Press. Open Google Scholar
  661. RAVEL, Ann M. (2017): Dysfunction and Deadlock at the Federal Election Commission, in: The New York Times vom 20.02.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/opinion/dysfunction-and-deadlock-at-the-federal-election-commission.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  662. RAWLS, John (1975): Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  663. RAWLS, John (2002): The Law of the Peoples, 4. Aufl., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  664. RAWLS, John (2003): Politischer Liberalismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  665. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2012): President Obama Job Approval, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 20.01.2017, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  666. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2014): Alaska Senate - Sullivan vs. Begich, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2014/senate/ak/alaska_senate_sullivan_vs_begich-3658.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 04.11.2014, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  667. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2016): Clinton: Favorable/Unfavorable, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/clinton_favorableunfavorable-1131.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 07.11.2016, zuletzt geprüft am 18.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  668. REAL CLEAR POLITICS (2016): Trump: Favorable/Unfavorable, online verfügbar unter <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_favorableunfavorable-5493.html>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 17.07.2017, zuletzt geprüft am 18.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  669. REES, Jonathan (2015): Industrialization and the Transformation of American Life. A Brief Introduction, New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  670. REHFUS, Wulff D. (Hg.) (2003): Handwörterbuch Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar
  671. REICH, Robert (2015): Look Who’s Buying American Democracy, in: The Huffington Post vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/look-whos-buying-american-democracy_b_8744598.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  672. REICH, Robert (2016): Want to reverse sky‐high inequality? Bernie Sanders is the pragmatic choice, in: The Guardian vom 27.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/27/want-to-reverse-sky-high-inequality-bernie-sanders-is-the-pragmatic-choice>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  673. REPUBLICAN PARTY (2016): Republican Platform 2016, Cleveland, OH. Open Google Scholar
  674. RESTON, Maeve (2015): 'Koch primary' heads to California, in: CNN News vom 01.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/31/politics/koch-brothers-presidential-2016/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  675. REUTTER, Werner (Hg.) (2017): Landesverfassungsgerichte. Entwicklung - Aufbau - Funktionen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  676. RIIS, Jacob A. (1997): How the Other Half Lives. Studies Among the Tenements of New York, New York, NY: Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  677. RIPKEN, Susanna Kim (2011): Corporate First Amendment Rights After Citizens United: An Analysis of the Popular Movement to End the Constitutional Personhood of Corporations, in: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, Jg. 14, H. 1, S. 209–259. Open Google Scholar
  678. ROBILLAR, Kevin (2012): Who are Romney's '47 Percent'?, in: Politico vom 18.09.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/who-are-romneys-47-percent-081326>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  679. ROCK THE VOTE (2010): Rock the Vote 2010 Young Voter Poll, online verfügbar unter <https://www.rockthevote.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/research/2010/2010-rock-the-vote-nationwide-baseline.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  680. ROGERS, Steven (2017): Accountability in American Legislatures, ohne Ort. Open Google Scholar
  681. RÖMMELE, Andrea (1995): Unternehmensspenden in der Parteien- und Wahlkampffinanzierung. Die USA, Kanada, die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Großbritannien im internationalen Vergleich, Baden-Baden: Nomos (Nomos Universitätsschriften Politik, 55). Open Google Scholar
  682. ROSENBERG, Lisa (1996): A Bag of Tricks. Loopholes in the Campaign Finance System, Washington, DC: Center for Responsive Politics Press. Open Google Scholar
  683. ROSENSTONE, Steven J./ HANSEN, John Mark (1993): Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America, New York, NY: Longman. Open Google Scholar
  684. ROSIAK, Luke (2013): Self-financing candidates can’t buy love; wealthy challengers rarely win the elections, in: The Washington Times vom 30.05.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/30/wealthy-candidates-find-they-cant-buy-loveself-fin/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  685. ROTH, Dieter (1998): Empirische Wahlforschung. Ursprung, Theorien, Instrumente und Methoden, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  686. ROVE, Karl (2010): The GOP Targets State Legislatures, in: Wall Street Journal vom 04.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703862704575099670689398044>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  687. ROVE, Karl (2015): The Triumph of William McKinley. Why the Election of 1896 Still Matters, New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  688. RUBIN, Jennifer (2014): Sen. Mark Begich’s ad draws scorn, is pulled off the air, in: The Washington Post vom 03.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/09/03/sen-mark-begichs-ad-draws-scorn-is-pulled-off-the-air/?utm_term=.1aec8663be09>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  689. RUSSONELLO, Giovanni (2016): Voters Fear Their Ballot Won't Count, Poll Shows, in: The New York Times vom 25.10.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/us/politics/voter-fraud-poll.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  690. RUTENBERG, Jim (2014): How Billionaire Oligarchs Are Becoming Their Own Political Parties, in: The New York Times vom 17.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/magazine/how-billionaire-oligarchs-are-becoming-their-own-political-parties.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  691. SAAD, Lydia (2011): Perry Leads but Romney Gaining in GOP Favorability, GALLUP, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gallup.com/poll/149423/perry-leads-romney-gaining-gop-favorability.aspx>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  692. SACKS, Mike (2012): Citizens United Backlash Picks Up Official Support From Occupy Wall Street, New York Chapter, in: The Huffington Post vom 06.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/citizens-united-constitutional-amendment-occupy-wall-street_n_1189373.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  693. SAEZ, Emmanuel/ ZUCMAN, Gabriel (2016): Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data, in: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Jg. 131, H. 2, S. 519–578. Open Google Scholar
  694. SAMPLES, John (2006): The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform, Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  695. SARLIN, Benjy (2014): Mark Begich pulls brutal attack ad after backlash, in: MSNBC News vom 02.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/mark-begich-pulls-brutal-attack-ad-after-backlash>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  696. SCHAFFNER, Brian F./ STREB, Matthew J. (2002): The Partisan Heuristic in Low-Information Elections, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 66, H. 4, S. 559–581. Open Google Scholar
  697. SCHERER, Michael/ REBALA, Pratheek, Wilson, Chris (2014): The Incredible Rise in Campaign Spending, in: TIME Magazine vom 23.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/3534117/the-incredible-rise-in-campaign-spending/>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  698. SCHICKLER, Eric (2009): The Impact Of Unequal Political Participation on Policy Outcomes, in: King, Gary/ Lehman Schlozman, Kay/ Nie, Norman H. (Hg.): The Future of Political Science. 100 Perspectives, New York, London: Routledge, S. 106–107. Open Google Scholar
  699. SCHLOZMAN, Kay L. (Hg.) (1987): Elections in America, Winchester, MA: Allan and Unwin. Open Google Scholar
  700. SCHLOZMAN, Kay L./ VERBA, Sidney/ BRADY, Henry E. (2012): The Unheavenly Chorus. Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  701. SCHLUP, Leonard/ RYAN, James G. (Hg.) (2003): Historical Dictionary of the Gilded Age, New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Open Google Scholar
  702. SCHMITT, Mark (2012): The rise of the zombie candidate. Super PACs have made it possible for no-shot hopefuls like Gingrich, Perry and Santorum to run indefinitely, in: Salon vom 11.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/the_rise_of_the_zombie_candidate/>. Open Google Scholar
  703. SCHMÜCKING, Daniel (2015): Negative Campaigning. Die Wirkung und Entwicklung negativer politischer Werbung in der Bundesrepublik, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  704. SCHOEN, Douglas E. (2012): American Casino. The Rigged Game That's Killing Democracy, New York: Velocity Press. Open Google Scholar
  705. SCHOUTEN, Fredreka (2015): 2016 GOP hopefuls gear up for 'Koch' primary, in: USA Today vom 29.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/07/29/charles-koch-donors-meeting-california/30803357/>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2017. Open Google Scholar
  706. SCHOUTEN, Fredreka (2015): Presidential super PACs push campaign limits, in: USA Today vom 22.09.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/09/22/presidential-super-pacs-push-campaign-boundaries-carly-fiorina-jeb-bush-hillary-clinton/72612984/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  707. SCHOUTEN, Fredreka (2017): Mingling business and White House, Trump holds $10 million fundraiser at Trump hotel, in: USA Today vom 28.06.2017, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/06/28/trump-holds-fundraiser-his-hotel-mingling-business-and-presidency/435549001/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  708. SCHULTZ, David (2016): The Case for a Democratic Theory of American Election Law, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 259–268. Open Google Scholar
  709. SCHULZ, Thomas (2011): The Second Gilded Age. Has America Become an Oligarchy?, in: Spiegel Online International vom 28.10.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/the-second-gilded-age-has-america-become-an-oligarchy-a-793896.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  710. SCHWARZER, Gudrun (2001): Forschungsanträge verfassen. Ein praktischer Ratgeber für Sozialwissenschaftler/-innen, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, Jg. 8, H. 1, S. 141–156. Open Google Scholar
  711. SEABROOK, Nicholas R. (2010): Money and State Legislative Elections. The Conditional Impact of Political Context, in: American Politics Research, Jg. 38, H. 3, S. 399–424. Open Google Scholar
  712. SEABROOK, Nicholas R. (2017): Drawing the Lines. Constraints on Partisan Gerrymandering in U.S. Politics, Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  713. SEITZ-WALD, Alex (2012): Everyone hates Citizens United. A new poll shows the vast majority of Americans think there’s too much money in politics, in: Salon vom 25.10.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/people_really_hate_citizens_united/>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  714. SEITZ-WALD, Alex (2015): 'Citizens United' fallout 'more dangerous' than expected, in: MSNBC News vom 21.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/citizens-united-campaign-finance-fallout-different-more-dangerous-expected>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  715. SELKIRK, Kaethe (2011): The Effect of Independent Expenditures on Congressional Elections Following Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010), online verfügbar unter <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1767268>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  716. SEVASTOPULO, Demetri (2016): Money buing little power in US campaign, in: Financial Times vom 11.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.ft.com/content/c7a84e04-d0e4-11e5-92a1-c5e23ef99c77>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.02.2017. Open Google Scholar
  717. SHAFER, Jack (2015): Three Cheers for Citizens United, in: Politico vom 25.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/citizens-united-2016-121739>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  718. SHAPIRO, Ilya (2015): 'Citizens United' misunderstood, in: USA Today vom 20.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/20/citizens-united-misunderstood-five-years-free-speech-anniversary-critics-column/22076597/>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  719. SHAW, Daron R. (1999): The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-1996, in: The American Political Science Review, Jg. 93, H. 2, S. 345–361. Open Google Scholar
  720. SHAW, Jonathan (2012): A Radical Fix for the Republic. Lawrence Lessig thinks American democracy requires a constitutional overhaul to counter the “economy of influence.”, in: Harvard Magazine vom July-August 2012, S. 21–23, online verfügbar unter <http://harvardmag.com/pdf/2012/07-pdfs/0712-21.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 01.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  721. SHERMAN, Paul (2012): 'Citizens United' didn't kill our democracy, in: USA Today vom, online verfügbar unter <https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/11/11/column-citizens-united-didnt-kill-democracy-after-all/1698277/>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  722. SHUMAKER, Walter A./ LONGSDORF, George F. (1901): The Cyclopedic Dictionary of Law, St. Paul, MN: Keefe-Davidson Law Book Co. Open Google Scholar
  723. SIDES, John/ SHAW, Daron/ GROSSMANN, Matt/ LIPSITZ, Keena (2015): Campaigns and Elections, New York: W. W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
  724. SIDES, John/ VAVRECK, Lynn (2013): The Gamble. Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  725. SILVER, Nate (2012): Supreme Court May Be Most Conservative in Modern History, The New York Times, FiveThirtyEight Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/supreme-court-may-be-most-conservative-in-modern-history/?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  726. SILVER, Nate (2016): How Much Did Comey Hurt Clinton’s Chances? And is it too late for his second letter to help her?, in: FiveThirtyEight vom 06.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-much-did-comey-hurt-clintons-chances/>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  727. SILVERLEIB, Alan (2010): Gloves come off after Obama rips Supreme Court ruling, in: CNN News vom 28.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <Gloves come off after Obama rips Supreme Court ruling>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  728. SIMON, Herbert A. (1954): Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions, in: Public Opinion Quarterly, Jg. 18, H. 3, S. 245–253. Open Google Scholar
  729. SINCLAIR, Upton (1985): The Jungle, New York, NY: Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  730. SINDERBRAND, Rebecca (2012): Analysis: Obama won with a better ground game, in: CNN News vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/07/politics/analysis-why-obama-won>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  731. SINK, Justin (2012): Jimmy Carter: Citizens United ruling 'the most stupid decision that the Supreme Court ever made', in: The Hill vom 29.03.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/219083-carter-citizens-uniter-ruling-the-most-stupid-decision-the-supreme-court-ever-made>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  732. SIRAKOV, David (2016): Politik in der Krise? Polarisierungsdynamiken im politischen Prozess, in: Lammert, Christian/ Siewert, Markus/ Vormann, Boris (Hg.): Handbuch Politik USA, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 617–636. Open Google Scholar
  733. SLACK, Donovan (2012): RIP positive ads in 2012, in: Politico vom 04.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/rip-positive-ads-in-2012-083262>, zuletzt geprüft am 11.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  734. SMITH, Bradley A. (2001): Unfree Speech. The Folly of Campaign Finance Reform, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  735. SMITH, Bradley A. (2010): The Myth of Campaign Finance Reform, in: National Affairs, Jg. 2, H. Winter Issue, S. 75–91. Open Google Scholar
  736. SMITH, Bradley A. (2010): First Amendment Upheld. An end to giving political speech less protection than pornography, in: Wall Street Journal vom 22.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704509704575019112172931620>, zuletzt geprüft am 20.05.2010. Open Google Scholar
  737. SMITH, Craig R. (Hg.) (2011): A First Amendment Profile of the Supreme Court, Plymouth: John Cabot University Press. Open Google Scholar
  738. SMITH, Melissa M. (2010): The Future of Campaign Finance Laws, in: Smith, Melissa M./ Williams, Glenda C./ Powell, Larry/ Copeland, Gary A. (Hg.): Campaign Finance Reform. The Political Shell Game, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, S. 123–136. Open Google Scholar
  739. SMITH, Melissa M./ WILLIAMS, Glenda C./ POWELL, Larry/ COPELAND, Gary A. (Hg.) (2010): Campaign Finance Reform. The Political Shell Game, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  740. SMITH, Steven S./ ROBERTS, Jason M./ VANDER WIELEN, Ryan J. (2007): The American Congress, 5. Aufl., New York, u.a.: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  741. SMITH, Terry (2016): Justice Kennedy's Democratic Dystopia, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 281–286. Open Google Scholar
  742. SONGER, Donald R. (1984): Government Closest to the People. Constituent Knowledge in State & National Politics, in: Polity, Jg. 17, H. 2, S. 387–395. Open Google Scholar
  743. SORAUF, Frank J. (1988): Money in American Elections, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co. Open Google Scholar
  744. SORAUF, Frank J. (1992): Inside Campaign Finance. Myths and Realities, New Haven/ London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  745. SORAUF, Frank J. (2003): Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities, in: Dahl, Robert A./ Shapiro, Ian/ Cheibub, José Antonio (Hg.): The Democracy Sourcebook, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, S. 408–418. Open Google Scholar
  746. SOROS, Jonathan (2015): Big money can't buy elections - influence is something else, Reuters Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/02/09/soros-there-is-no-idyllic-pre-citizens-united-era-to-return-to/>, zuletzt geprüft am 16.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  747. SPARKS, Corey R. (2014): Foreigners United: Foreign Influence in American Elections After Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, in: Cleveland State Law Review, Jg. 62, H. 2, S. 245–278. Open Google Scholar
  748. SPENCER, Douglas M./ WOOD, Abby K. (2014): Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis of Independent Political Spending, in: Indiana Law Journal, Jg. 89, H. 3, S. 315–372. Open Google Scholar
  749. SPURLOCK, Chris/ BLUMENTHAL, Paul (2012): New Hampshire Primary Spending Per Vote, in: The Huffington Post vom 12.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/12/new-hampshire-primary-spending_n_1202561.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  750. SQUIRE, Peverill (1989): Challengers in U. S. Senate Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 14, H. 4, S. 531–547. Open Google Scholar
  751. SQUIRE, Peverill (1995): Candidates, Money, and Voters. Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research, in: Political Research Quarterly, Jg. 48, H. 4, S. 891–917. Open Google Scholar
  752. STAMM, Stephanie (2015): How Do Presidential Candidates Spend $1 Billion?, in: National Journal vom 17.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/65877/how-do-presidential-candidates-spend-1-billion>, zuletzt geprüft am 02.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  753. STEEN, Jennifer/ PROKOP, Andrew (2016): Really rich people aren't actually that good at buying their way into political office, in: Vox vom 05.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.vox.com/2015/12/3/9837596/self-funding-candidates>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  754. STEEN, Jennifer A. (2006): Self-financed candidates in congressional elections, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  755. STEINHAUSER, Paul (2011): Same man, different strategy, for Romney's second White House bid, in: CNN News vom 02.06.2011, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/02/romney.announcement/index.html#>, zuletzt geprüft am 09.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  756. STEPAN, Alfred/ LINZ, Juan J. (2011): Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 9, H. 4, S. 841–856. Open Google Scholar
  757. STEVENS, John Paul (2014): Six Amendments. How and why we should change the Constitution, New York: Little Brown and Company. Open Google Scholar
  758. STEWART III, Charles/ REYNOLDS, Mark (1990): Television Markets and U. S. Senate Elections, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 15, H. 4, S. 495–523. Open Google Scholar
  759. STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2014): Der Preis der Ungleichheit. Wie die Spaltung der Gesellschaft unsere Zukunft bedroht, München: Pantheon. Open Google Scholar
  760. STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2015): Reich und Arm. Die wachsende Ungleichheit in unserer Gesellschaft, München: Siedler. Open Google Scholar
  761. STOCKMAN, Farah (2013): Two rulings that benefited a powerful few, in: The Boston Globe vom 26.02.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/columns/2013/02/26/dred-scott-citizens-united-two-rulings-that-benefited-powerful-few/0LVClAlvVi1MG7TTra77UN/story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  762. STOHR, Greg (2015): Bloomberg Poll: Americans Want Supreme Court to Turn Off Political Spending Spigot. Americans are divided on the justices' decisions on gay marriage, health care, and abortion. But not on campaign finance, in: Bloomberg News vom 28.09.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-28/bloomberg-poll-americans-want-supreme-court-to-turn-off-political-spending-spigot>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  763. STOKES, Donald E./ MILLER, Warren E. (1966): Party government and the salience of Congress, in: Campbell, Angus/ Converse, Philip E./ Miller, Warren E./ Stokes, Donald E. (Hg.): Elections and the political order, New York: Wiley, S. 194–211. Open Google Scholar
  764. STOREY, Tim (2010): Legislature Landslide. GOP makes historic state legislative gains in 2010, Hg. v. Sabato’s Crystal Ball Blog, online verfügbar unter <http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/txs2010120901/>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  765. STRATMANN, Thomas (2005): Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature, in: Public Choice, Jg. 49, H. 1 (124), S. 135–156. Open Google Scholar
  766. STRAUSE, Renata E. B./ TOKAJI, Daniel P. (2014): Between Access and Influence, Building a Record for the Next Court, in: Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jg. 9, H. 1, S. 179–221. Open Google Scholar
  767. STRAUSS, Daniel (2015): Donald Trump's new pitch: I'm so rich I can't be bought, in: Politico vom 28.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/donald-trumps-so-rich-i-cant-be-bought-120743>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  768. STREB, Matthew J. (2016): Rethinking American Electoral Democracy, 4. Aufl., New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  769. SULLIVAN, Andy (2013): Insight: In Washington, lawmakers' routines shaped by fundraising, in: Reuters News vom 12.06.2013, online verfügbar unter <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-fundraising-insight/insight-in-washington-lawmakers-routines-shaped-by-fundraising-idUSBRE95B05520130612>, zuletzt geprüft am 19.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  770. SULLIVAN, Kathleen M. (1998): Against Campaign Finance Reform, in: Utah Law Review, Jg. 50, H. 2, S. 311–325. Open Google Scholar
  771. SULLIVAN, Sean (2014): The end of moderates, and what it means, in: The Washington Post vom 09.01.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/01/09/the-end-of-moderates-and-what-it-means/>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  772. SULLIVAN, Sean (2014): Why Mark Begich’s attack ad did plenty of damage — to Begich, in: The Washington Post vom 03.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/09/03/why-mark-begichs-attack-ad-did-plenty-of-damage-to-begich/?utm_term=.0e81ed5ec0ef>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  773. SULTAN, Niv (2017): Self-funded candidates lose big (except when they don't), Center for Responsive Politics, online verfügbar unter <https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/self-funded-candidates/>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  774. SUMMERS, Mark Wahlgren (2004): Party Games. Getting, Keeping and Using Power in Gilded Age Politics, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. Open Google Scholar
  775. SUMNER, Andy/ COBHAM, Alex (2013): On inequality, let’s do the Palma (because the Gini is so last century), Oxfam Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/on-inequality-lets-do-the-palma-because-the-gini-is-so-last-century/>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  776. TAMARI, Jonathan (2015): In Menendez case, Citizens United also on trial, in: The Philadelphia Inquirer vom 06.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20151006_In_Menendez_case__Citizens_United_also_on_trial.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  777. TANFANI, Joseph (2016): Some Republican candidates spend big on ads, with little to show for it, in: Los Angeles Times vom 25.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-campaign-advertising-20160125-story.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  778. TANFANI, Joseph/ MEHTA, Seema (2015): Super PACs stretch the rules that prohibit coordination with presidential campaigns, in: Los Angeles Times vom 07.10.2015, online verfügbar unter <www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  779. TEACHOUT, Zephyr (2014): Corruption in America. From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  780. TEACHOUT, Zephyr (2014): Neoliberal Political Law, in: Law and Contemporary Problems, Jg. 77, H. 4, S. 215–237. Open Google Scholar
  781. TEIXEIRA, Ruy A. (1992): The Disappearing American Voter, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Open Google Scholar
  782. TEMPLE-WEST, Patrick (2014): Sullivan leading Begich in Alaska, in: Politico vom 05.11.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/alaska-2014-election-results-mark-begich-dan-sullivan-112573>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  783. THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER (2012): The Campaign Legal Center Guide to the Current Rules For Federal Elections. What Has Changed in the 2012 Election Cycle, online verfügbar unter <http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/document/campaign-legal-center-guide-current-rules-federal-elections-what-has-changed-2012-election>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  784. THE COOK POLITICAL REPORT (2012): Partisan Voting Index, online verfügbar unter <https://cookpolitical.com/pvi-0>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  785. THE ECONOMIST (2016): Politics by numbers. Voters in America, and increasingly elsewhere too, are being ever more precisely targeted, in: The Economist vom 26.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21695190-voters-america-and-increasingly-elsewhere-too-are-being-ever-more-precisely>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2016. Open Google Scholar
  786. THE HUFFINGTON POST (2014): 2014 Alaska Senate: Sullivan vs. Begich, online verfügbar unter <http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2014-alaska-senate-sullivan-vs-begich>, zuletzt aktualisiert am 04.11.2014, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  787. THE NATION EDITORIAL BOARD (2012): Electoral Dysfunction, 2012, in: The Nation vom 23.01.2012, S. 3–4. Open Google Scholar
  788. THE NEW YORK TIMES (1988): A 30-Second Ad on Crime, in: The New York Times vom 03.11.1988, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/03/us/a-30-second-ad-on-crime.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  789. THE NEW YORK TIMES (2016): Who Is Running for President? Donald J. Trump officially accepted the Republican party's nomination on July 22. Hillary Clinton was officially nominated on July 26 at the Democratic Convention., in: The New York Times vom 26.07.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/2016-presidential-candidates.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  790. THE NEW YORK TIMES/ CBS NEWS (2015): American's Views on Money in Politics. Most Americans say that money has too much influence on politicians and that campaign finance changes are needed, in: The New York Times vom 02.06.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/02/us/politics/money-in-politics-poll.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  791. THE NYT EDITORIAL BOARD (2010): The Escalating Price of Politics, in: The New York Times vom 07.03.2010, online verfügbar unter <www.nytimes.com/2010/03/08/opinion/08mona4.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 07.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  792. THE NYT EDITORIAL BOARD (2015): The Soaring Price of Political Access, in: The New York Times vom 26.09.2015, SR 10, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/27/opinion/sunday/the-soaring-price-of-political-access.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 22.10.2015. Open Google Scholar
  793. THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS (2012): With Voters Focused on Economy, Obama Lead Narrows. Social Issues Rank as Lowest Priorities, The Pew Research Center For The People & The Press, Washington, DC, online verfügbar unter <http://www.people-press.org/2012/04/17/with-voters-focused-on-economy-obama-lead-narrows/>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  794. THE REDISTRICTING MAJORITY PROJECT (2013): 2012 REDMAP Summary Report, online verfügbar unter <http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  795. THE WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL BOARD (2016): This would be a nice first step on campaign finance reform, in: The Washington Post vom 10.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-would-be-a-nice-first-step-on-campaign-finance-reform/2016/06/10/745de05a-2e69-11e6-b5db-e9bc84a2c8e4_story.html?utm_term=.dc0c9d7d7ff8>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  796. THEE-BRENAN, Megan (2014): Polls Show Broad Support for Campaign Spending Caps, in: The New York Times vom 02.04.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/us/politics/polls-show-broad-support-for-campaign-spending-caps.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  797. THERIAULT, Sean M. (2008): Party polarization in Congress, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  798. THOMAS, Scott J. (1989): Do Incumbent Campaign Expenditures Matter?, in: The Journal of Politics, Jg. 51, H. 4, S. 965–976. Open Google Scholar
  799. TIME MAGAZINE: Transcript: Read the Full Text of the Primetime Republican Debate, in: TIME Magazine vom, online verfügbar unter <http://time.com/3988276/republican-debate-primetime-transcript-full-text/>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  800. TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de (1959): Democracy in America, 4. Aufl., London: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  801. TOKAJI, Daniel P. (2011): The Obliteration of Equality in American Campaign Finance Law: A Trans-Border Comparison, in: Journal of Parliamentary & Political Law, Jg. 5, H. 5, S. 381–398. Open Google Scholar
  802. TOKAJI, Daniel P./ STRAUSE, Renata E. B. (2014): The New Soft Money. Outside Spending in Congressional Elections, Columbus, Ohio. Open Google Scholar
  803. TOKAJI, Daniel P./ STRAUSE, Renata E. B. (2016): How Sausage Is Made: A Research Agenda For Campaign Finance and Lobbying, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Jg. 164, H. 2, S. 223–232. Open Google Scholar
  804. TORRES-SPELLISCY, Ciara (2013): Got Corruption? Nixon's Milk Money. Campaign contributions may not be as brazenly illegal as the dairy industry's were to Nixon, but that should still not dissuade SCOTUS' McCutcheon decision, Brennan Center for Justice, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/got-corruption-nixon%E2%80%99s-milk-money>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  805. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (2014): Corruption Perceptions Index 2014: In Detail, online verfügbar unter <https://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/in_detail>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  806. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL USA (2010): TI-USA Statement to U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, online verfügbar unter <https://www.transparency.org/news/pressrelease/20100126_ti_usa_statement_to_u.s._supreme_courts_ruling_in_citizens_united_>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  807. TREANOR, William M. (2006): The Jurisprudence of Justice Stevens, in: Fordham Law Review, Jg. 74, H. 4, S. 1557–1559. Open Google Scholar
  808. TRIBE, Laurence/ MATZ, Joshua (2010): Uncertain Justice. The Roberts Court and the Constitution, New York: Henry Holt and Company. Open Google Scholar
  809. TROY, Gil (1997): Money and Politics. The Oldest Connection, in: The Wilson Quarterly, Jg. 21, H. 3, S. 14–32. Open Google Scholar
  810. TUCKER, Anne (2011): Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis of Free Speech and Corporate Personhood in Citizens United, in: Case Western Reserve Law Review, Jg. 61, H. 2, S. 495–548. Open Google Scholar
  811. TUCKER, Harvey J./ WEBER, Ronald E. (1987): State Legislative Election Outcomes: Contextual Effects and Legislative Performance Effects, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Jg. 12, H. 4, S. 537–553. Open Google Scholar
  812. TUMULTY, Karen (2012): Election 2012: Republicans united on goal - beat Obama - divided on how to get there, in: The Washington Post vom 11.02.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/election-2012-republicans-united-on-goal--beat-obama--divided-on-how-to-get-there/2012/02/08/gIQAfCN66Q_story.html?utm_term=.9ee7d2c48f99>, zuletzt geprüft am 12.07.2012. Open Google Scholar
  813. TWAIN, Mark/ DUDLEY WARNER, Charles (2001): The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today, New York, NY: Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  814. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU (2002): Census 2000 Special Reports: Demographic Trends in the 20th Century, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar
  815. U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (2017): About the U.S. Chamber, online verfügbar unter <https://www.uschamber.com/about-us/about-the-us-chamber>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.10.2017. Open Google Scholar
  816. U.S. GOVERNMENT (2012): Senate Hearing: Taking Back Our Democracy: Responding to Citizens United and the Rise of Super PACs. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, United States Senate, Serial No. J–112–89, online verfügbar unter <http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg86915/html/CHRG-112shrg86915.htm>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  817. UNGER, Craig (2012): Boss Rove. Inside Karl Rove's Secret Kingdom of Power, New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  818. UNITED STATES CONGRESS (2006): Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. BCRA § 201, 2 U.S.C. § 434(f)(3). Open Google Scholar
  819. UNITED STATES SENATE (1974): The Final Report of the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, Hg. v. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, S. Res. 60, February 7, 1973 (A resolution to establish a select committee of the Senate to investigate and study illegal or improper cam-paign activities in the Presidential Election of 1972). Open Google Scholar
  820. URBINATI, Nadia (2014): Free Speech as the Citizen's Right, in: Post, Robert C. (Hg.): Citizens Divided. Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), S. 125–140. Open Google Scholar
  821. UROFSKY, Melvin I. (2005): Money and Free Speech. Campaign Finance Reform and the Courts, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Open Google Scholar
  822. VALELLY, Richard M. (2013): American Politics. A Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  823. VANDEWALKER, Ian (2015): Election Spending 2014: Outside Spending in Senate Races Since Citizens United, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Outside%20Spending%20Since%20Citizens%20United.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  824. VANDEWALKER, Ian/ WEINER, Daniel I. (2015): Stronger Parties, Stronger Democracy: Rethinking Reform, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Stronger_Parties_Stronger_Democracy.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  825. VAVRECK, Lynn (2014): A Campaign Dollar’s Power Is More Valuable to a Challenger, in: The New York Times vom 07.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/upshot/a-campaign-dollars-power-is-more-valuable-to-a-challenger.html?abt=0002&abg=0>. Open Google Scholar
  826. VAVRECK, Lynn (2014): A Campaign Dollar's Power Is More Valuable to a Challenger, in: The New York Times vom 07.10.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/upshot/a-campaign-dollars-power-is-more-valuable-to-a-challenger.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  827. VAVRECK, Lynn (2015): The Long Decline of Trust in Government, and Why That Can Be Patriotic, in: The New York Times vom 03.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/upshot/the-long-decline-of-trust-in-government-and-why-that-can-be-patriotic.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  828. VAVRECK, Lynn (2016): Yes, Political Ads Are Still Important, Even for Donald Trump, in: The New York Times vom 20.06.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/upshot/yes-political-ads-are-still-important-even-for-donald-trump.html?_r=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  829. VERBA, Sidney/ NIE, Norman H. (1972): Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, New York: Harper and Row. Open Google Scholar
  830. VERBA, Sidney/ NIE, Norman H./ Kim, Jae-On (1978): Participation and Political Equality. A Seven-Nation Comparison, Chicago u.a.: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  831. VERBA, Sidney/ SCHLOZMAN, Kay L./ Brady, Henry E. (1995): Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA/ London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  832. VICTOR, Jennifer N. (2016): Campaign Fund Raising Is an Arms Race With Limited Impact, in: The New York Times vom 25.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/02/25/does-money-really-matter-in-politics/campaign-fund-raising-is-an-arms-race-with-limited-impact>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  833. VITAL STATISTICS ON CONGRESS (2014): Legislative Productivity in Congress and Workload, Brookings Institution, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Vital-Statistics-Chapter-6-Legislative-Productivity-in-Congress-and-Workload_UPDATE.pdf>, zuletzt geprüft am 18.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  834. VITAL STATISTICS ON CONGRESS (2016): Campaign finance in Congressional elections, Brookings Institution, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brookings.edu/multi-chapter-report/vital-statistics-on-congress/>, zuletzt geprüft am 03.08.2017. Open Google Scholar
  835. VOGEL, Kenneth P.: Karl Rove and the Modern Money Machine, in: Politico Magazine vom, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/karl-rove-and-the-modern-money-machine-108019>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  836. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2012): 3 billionaires who'll drag out the race, in: Politico vom 12.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/01/meet-the-3-billionaires-wholl-drag-out-the-race-071358>, zuletzt geprüft am 10.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  837. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2012): The billion-dollar bust?, in: Politico vom 07.11.2012, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/the-billion-dollar-bust-083534>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  838. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2014): Big Money. 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp - on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, New York: PublicAffairs. Open Google Scholar
  839. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2014): Big Money Breaks Out. Top 100 donors give almost as much as 4.75 million small donors combined., in: Politico vom 29.12.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/top-political-donors-113833.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 30.12.2014. Open Google Scholar
  840. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2015): Koch brothers summon Bush, Cruz, Walker, Rubio to SoCal confab, in: Politico vom 27.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/koch-brothers-wealthy-donors-gop-2016-freedom-partners-seminar-california-120663>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  841. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2015): A Koch love fest in California. For some donors and operatives, the focus on overt electoral politics was slightly tawdry, in: Politico vom 03.08.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/koch-love-fest-in-california-120928>, zuletzt geprüft am 15.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  842. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2015): How the Koch network rivals the GOP. The billionaires and their allies have built a private political machine without precedent, in: Politico vom 30.12.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/koch-brothers-network-gop-david-charles-217124>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  843. VOGEL, Kenneth P. (2016): How Bernie built a fundraising juggernaut. Sanders’ small-donor operation looks spontaneous, but it grew out of careful planning and innovation, in: Politico vom 10.02.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-fundraising-219112>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  844. VOGEL, Kenneth P./ ARNSDORF, Isaac (2016): Trump's campaign dwarfed by Clinton's. New FEC reports show that the likely Democratic nominee will start with a huge infrastructure advantage., in: Politico vom 21.05.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trumps-campaign-dwarfed-by-clintons-223438>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  845. VOGEL, Kenneth P./ PARTI, Tarini (2015): Small donor myth debunked. The heavily touted grassroots fundraising engines were largely spin, a POLITICO analysis shows, in: Politico vom 16.07.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/small-donor-myth-upended-120275>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  846. VOLOKH, Eugene (1995): Cheap Speech and What It Will Do, in: The Yale Law Journal, Jg. 104, H. 8, S. 1805–1850. Open Google Scholar
  847. WAGNER, Jochen W. (2005): Deutsche Wahlwerbekampagnen made in USA? Amerikanisierung oder Modernisierung bundesrepublikanischer Wahlkampagnen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  848. WALDEN, Richard (2015): The $2.5 Billion Candidate X 2, in: Huffington Post vom 14.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-walden/the-25-billion-candidate_b_7066146.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  849. WALDMAN, Paul (2015): In 2016, Money Will Matter More Than Ever, Yet Not At All, in: The American Prospect vom 06.04.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://prospect.org/article/2016-money-will-matter-more-ever-yet-not-all>, zuletzt geprüft am 24.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  850. WALKER WILSON, Molly J. (2014): Financing Elections and "Appearance of Corruption": Citizens Attitudes and Behavior in 2012, in: Catholic University Law Review, Jg. 63, H. 4, S. 953–996. Open Google Scholar
  851. WALLACE, Gregory (2016): Voter turnout at 20-year low in 2016, in: CNN News vom 30.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/popular-vote-turnout-2016/index.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 28.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  852. WALLACk, Grace/ HUDAK, John (2014): How Much Did Your Vote Cost? Spending Per Voter in the 2014 Senate Races, Brookings Institution, Brookings Institution Blog, online verfügbar unter <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2014/11/07/how-much-did-your-vote-cost-spending-per-voter-in-the-2014-senate-races/>, zuletzt geprüft am 26.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  853. WALSHE, Shushannah (2014): Ad Controvery Roils Alaska Senate Race, in: ABC News vom 02.09.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/09/ad-controversy-roils-alaska-senate-race/>, zuletzt geprüft am 25.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  854. WANG, Sam (2013): The Great Gerrymander of 2012, in: The Washington Post vom 02.02.2013, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/opinion/sunday/the-great-gerrymander-of-2012.html?pagewanted=all&mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  855. WARREN, Mark E. (2004): What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy, in: American Journal of Political Science, Jg. 48, H. 2, S. 328–343. Open Google Scholar
  856. WATSON, Robert W. (Hg.) (2008): White House Studies Compendium (5), New York: Nova Science Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  857. WEBER, Max (1972): Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, 5. Aufl., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar
  858. WEBER, Max (1985): Der Sinn der 'Wertfreiheit' der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften, in: Weber, Max (Hg.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, S. 489–540. Open Google Scholar
  859. WEBER, Max (1985): Die 'Objektivität' sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnisse, in: Weber, Max (Hg.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, S. 146–214. Open Google Scholar
  860. WEBER, Max (Hg.) (1985): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar
  861. WEEKS, Daniel (2008): Does Money Buy Elections? The Impact of Spending on U.S. Congressional Campaigns, Americans for Campaign Reform, Concord, N.H., NUMBER PB08-1. Open Google Scholar
  862. WEINER, Daniel I. (2016): Money And Politics In The Age Of Trump, in: The Huffington Post vom 11.11.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-i-weiner/money-and-politics-in-the_b_12916042.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.12.2016. Open Google Scholar
  863. WEINMANN, Philipp (2016): Wahlen und Direkte Demokratie: Demokratische Teilhabe im Spannungsfeld politischer Machtinteressen, in: Lammert, Christian/ Siewert, Markus/ Vormann, Boris (Hg.): Handbuch Politik USA, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 243–263. Open Google Scholar
  864. WEINTRAUB, Ellen L./ LEVINE, Jason K. (2009): Campaign Finance and the 2008 Elections - How Small Change(s) Can Really Add Up, in: St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, Jg. 24, H. 2, S. 461–477. Open Google Scholar
  865. WEISBERG, Herbert F. (2002): Partisanship and Incumbency in Presidential Elections, in: Political Behavior, Jg. 24, H. 2, S. 339–360. Open Google Scholar
  866. WEISMAN, Jonathan/ YADRON, Danny (2011): Inside the Obama Money Machine, in: Wall Street Journal vom 19.11.2011, online verfügbar unter <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204517204577042142257818640>, zuletzt geprüft am 29.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  867. WELCH, Susan/ GRUHL, John/ RIGDON, Susan M./ Thomas, Sue (2012): Understanding American Government, 13. Aufl., Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Open Google Scholar
  868. WELCH, William P. (1976): The Effectiveness of Expenditures in State Legislative Races, in: American Politics Quarterly, Jg. 4, H. 3, S. 333–356. Open Google Scholar
  869. WELCH, William P. (1981): Money and votes. A simultaneous equation model, in: Public Choice, Jg. 36, H. 2, S. 209–234. Open Google Scholar
  870. WERTHEIMER, Fred (2014): Legalized Bribery. Four years on, Citizens United is ruining democracy. Here's how to get it back, in: Politico vom 19.01.2014, online verfügbar unter <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/citizens-united-campaign-finance-legalized-bribery-102366>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  871. WERTHEIMER, Fred (2016): Citizens United and Its Disastrous Consequences: The Decision, in: The Huffington Post vom 14.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-wertheimer/citizens-united-and-its-d_b_8979252.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  872. WERTHEIMER, Fred (2016): Citizens United Consequences: Super Rich Empowered, Ordinary Americans Undermined, Democracy Subverted, in: The Huffington Post vom 20.01.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-wertheimer/citizens-united-consequen_b_9029038.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 21.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  873. WESLEYAN MEDIA PROJECT (2016): Clinton Crushes Trump 3:1 in Air War. Clinton also dominates local cable, which Trump has largely ignored, Wesleyan Media Project, online verfügbar unter <http://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases/nov-2016/#table1>, zuletzt geprüft am 31.05.2017. Open Google Scholar
  874. WEßELS, Bernhard (2015): Politische Ungleichheit beim Wählen, in: Merkel, Wolfgang (Hg.): Demokratie und Krise. Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 67–94. Open Google Scholar
  875. WEST, Darrell M. (2014): Billionaires. Reflections on the Upper Crust, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  876. WEST, Darrell M. (2015): Can Billionaires Buy Elections?, Brookings Institution, online verfügbar unter <http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2015/01/27-can-billionaires-buy-elections-west>, zuletzt geprüft am 27.01.2016. Open Google Scholar
  877. WEST, Tim (2011): Associate Justice Alito, in: Smith, Craig R. (Hg.): A First Amendment Profile of the Supreme Court, Plymouth: John Cabot University Press, S. 160–170. Open Google Scholar
  878. WHITE, Richard (2015): Welcome back to the bad old days of American politics - only worse, in: Reuters News vom 21.01.2015, online verfügbar unter <http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/01/21/like-elections-in-the-gilded-age-only-with-more-money/>, zuletzt geprüft am 13.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  879. WHITEHOUSE, Sheldon (2016): The Supreme Court's Blind Spot: Understanding How Democracies Function, in: National Law Journal vom 08.03.2016, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202751641079/The-Supreme-Courts-Blind-Spot-Understanding-How-Democracies-Function?slreturn=20160717095905>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.08.2016. Open Google Scholar
  880. WICKEL, Martin (2001): Recht und Reform der Wahlkampffinanzierung in den USA, in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, Jg. 32, H. 3, S. 645–669. Open Google Scholar
  881. WIEBE, Robert H. (1967): The Search for Order. 1877-1920, New York: Hill and Wang. Open Google Scholar
  882. WILLIAMS, Glenda C. (2010): Overview of Campaign Finance Law, in: Smith, Melissa M./ Williams, Glenda C./ Powell, Larry/ Copeland, Gary A. (Hg.): Campaign Finance Reform. The Political Shell Game, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, S. 1–11. Open Google Scholar
  883. WILLIS, Derek (2014): Every Election Is the Most Expensive Election. Or Not., in: The New York Times vom 16.12.2014, online verfügbar unter <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/17/upshot/every-election-is-the-most-expensive-election-or-not.html>, zuletzt geprüft am 08.03.2017. Open Google Scholar
  884. WILNER, Elizabeth (2012): Ad Avalanche: 43,000 Political Spots a Day Until November. We're On Our Way to 3.6 Million Ads This Election Cycle, in: Advertising Age vom, online verfügbar unter <http://adage.com/article/campaign-trail/ad-avalanche-43-000-political-spots-a-day-november/237195/#author_bio_box>, zuletzt geprüft am 05.07.2017. Open Google Scholar
  885. WINTERS, Jeffrey A. (2011): Democracy and Oligarchy. Democracy and oligarchy are not opposites, as is commonly supposed. Forms of the former can even promote the latter., in: The American Interest, Jg., H. November/ December Issue, S. 18–27. Open Google Scholar
  886. WINTERS, Jeffrey A. (2011): Oligarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  887. WINTERS, Jeffrey A./ PAGE, Benjamin I. (2009): Oligarchy in the United States?, in: Perspectives on Politics, Jg. 7, H. 4, S. 731–751. Open Google Scholar
  888. WITKO, Christopher (2014): When Does Money Buy Votes? Campaign Contributions and Policymaking, in: Grossmann, Matt (Hg.): New Directions in Interest Group Politics, New York: Routledge, S. 165–184. Open Google Scholar
  889. WOLFE, Christopher (1997): Judicial Activism. Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security?, 2. überarbeitete Aufl., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  890. WOOD, Gordon S. (2009): Empire of Liberty. A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  891. WOOLDRIDGE, Jeffrey M. (2015): Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach, 6. Aufl., Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Open Google Scholar
  892. YANOW, Dvora (2003): Interpretive Empirical Political Science: What Makes This Not a Subfield of Qualitative Methods, in: Qualitative Methods, Jg. 1, H. 2, S. 9–13. Open Google Scholar
  893. YOUN, Monica (2011): First Amendment Fault Lines and the Citizens United Decision, in: Harvard Law & Policy Review, Jg. 5, H. 1, S. 135–161. Open Google Scholar
  894. YOUN, Monica (Hg.) (2011): Money, Politics, and the Constitution. Beyond Citizens United, New York: The Century Foundation Press. Open Google Scholar
  895. YOUNG, Chris/ O'BRIEN, Reity/ FULLER, Andrea (2013): Justice Obscured: Corporations, pro-business nonprofits foot bill for judicial seminars. George Mason University top host of events, The Center for Public Integrity, online verfügbar unter <https://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/03/28/12368/corporations-pro-business-nonprofits-foot-bill-judicial-seminars>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.04.2017. Open Google Scholar
  896. YOUNGE, Gary (2012): US elections: no matter who you vote for, money always wins, in: The Guardian vom 29.01.2012, online verfügbar unter <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/jan/29/us-politics-vote-money-wins>, zuletzt geprüft am 17.06.2017. Open Google Scholar
  897. ZERNIKE, Kate (2010): Secretive Republican Donors Are Planning Ahead, in: The New York Times vom 19.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/us/politics/20koch.html?mcubz=0>, zuletzt geprüft am 06.09.2017. Open Google Scholar
  898. ZIMMERMANN, Eric (2010): Poll: 70 percent believe Congress is corrupt, in: The Hill vom 08.10.2010, online verfügbar unter <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/113541-poll-70-percent-believe-congress-is-corrupt>, zuletzt geprüft am 14.10.2017. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Extremism & Democracy", "Government & Governance & Administration", "Comparative Political Research & Country Studies"
Cover of book: The Function of Political Authority
Book Titles Full access
Carola Hesch
The Function of Political Authority
Cover of book: Die politische Rechte in Lateinamerika
Edited Book Full access
Nadja Ahmad, Hans-Jürgen Burchardt, Kristina Dietz, Hannes Warnecke-Berger, Jonas Wolff
Die politische Rechte in Lateinamerika
Cover of book: Weltmacht und Demokratie
Edited Book No access
Florian Böller, Steffen Hagemann, Lukas D. Herr, Marcus Müller
Weltmacht und Demokratie
Cover of book: The President as Communicator-in-Chief
Book Titles No access
Lukas D. Herr
The President as Communicator-in-Chief
Cover of book: No Blank Check
Book Titles No access
Marcus Müller
No Blank Check

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex