Cover des Buchs: Migration, Citizenship, and Democracy
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Migration, Citizenship, and Democracy

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2021

Zusammenfassung

Ökonomische und vorübergehende Migration stellen liberal-demokratische Gesellschaften vor die Herausforderung, traditionelle Ideale von Gesellschaft und demokratischer Inklusion zu überdenken. Christine Chwaszcza entwickelt einen moralischen Standpunkt für die ethische Bewertung von Fragen zu Immigration, sozialer und demokratischer Inklusion, der demokratietheoretische Überlegungen und Forderungen post-nationaler Gerechtigkeit in einer transnationalen Perspektive integriert. Das Buch wendet sich an Forscher und fortgeschrittene Studierenden der Politischen Philosophie, der Rechtsphilosophie und der Sozialwissenschaften.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2021
Copyrightjahr
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8367-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2759-4
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studien zur Theorie und Empirie der Demokratie
Band
3
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
224
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
    1. The Topic of the Book Kein Zugriff
    2. Overview Kein Zugriff
    3. A Preemptory Remark Kein Zugriff
    4. Acknowledgments Kein Zugriff
    1. 1.1. Citizenship: The General Idea of a Rule-based Account Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.2.1. The Concept of a Social Practice Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2.2. “Rules” and Normativity in Human Agency Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.2.3. Two Problems of Rule-following Kein Zugriff
      4. 1.2.4. The Normative Justification of Social Institutions Kein Zugriff
      5. 1.2.5. A Few Caveats Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3. Voluntary Migration as a Transnational Phenomenon Kein Zugriff
    4. 1.4. The Normative Framework: Philosophical Liberalism Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1.1. Birthright Citizenship as State Citizenship Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2. State Citizenship and the Universal Right to Citizenship Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) Consent-based Accounts of Political Association Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) Voluntary-exchange-based Accounts of Political Association Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) Justice-based Accounts of Political Association Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.1.4. The Procedural Element in a Rule-based Account of Citizenship Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1. The Theoretical Relevance of Political Agency Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2.2. The Normative Relevance of Political Agency Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.2.3. Non-ideal Theory: Why Consequences are Not All that Matters Kein Zugriff
    1. 3.1. Is There an Individual (Human) Right to Free Movement Across Borders? Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.2. Beyond Claim Rights: Freedom of Migration as a Requirement of Transnational Justice Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3. The Competitive Nature of Current Migration Dynamics Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.4.1. Methodological Individualism in Contractarian Theories of Global Justice Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.4.2. Ethical Individualism and the Holistic Nature of Social Institutions Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.4.3. The Idea of Government by Authorization: A Non-voluntaristic Interpretation Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4.4. A First Interim Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.5.1. Goodin’s Argument against Moral Particularism Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.5.2. Political Philosophy without Politics? – A Criticism of Goodin Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.5.3. Political Agency as a sui generis Source of Sociopolitical Justice: A Defense Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.5.4. A Second Interim Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.6.1. Societies as Spaces of Political Agency Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.6.2. Societies as Bearers of a Right to Collective Self-determination Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.6.3. Societies as Addressees of Collective Responsibility Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.6.4. A Third Interim Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    7. 3.7. Summing up: Transnational Justice and Normative Assessments of Rules of Inclusion and Exclusion Kein Zugriff
    8. 3.8. Beyond the Model of the Nation State: Internationalism or Transnationalism? Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1.1. A Brief Outline of Miller’s Argument for Liberal Nationalism Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.1.2. National Integration and the Development of the Model of the Social State Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.1.3. A Counter-thesis: Democratic Legitimacy vs. Liberal Nationalism Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.2.1. Blake on Citizenship and Coercion Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2.2. Beyond Coercion: Political Sovereignty Bottom-up rather than Top-down Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1. Democratic Legitimacy and the “All Affected Persons” Principle Kein Zugriff
    2. 5.2. Democracy as a Mechanism of Pure Procedural Justice: An Outline Kein Zugriff
    3. 5.3. The Moral Point of Democracy Kein Zugriff
    4. 5.4. Democratic Legitimacy as a Social Practice Kein Zugriff
    5. 5.5. The Idea of Transnational Democracy in Light of the Practical Pre-conditions of Democratic Legitimacy Kein Zugriff
    6. 5.6. The Limits of Metaethical Proceduralism: A Criticism of Discourse Ethics Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1.1. Practical Reasons Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.1.2. Moral Reasons Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.1.3. Impartiality and the Construction of a Moral Point of View Kein Zugriff
      4. 6.1.4. Normative Reasoning Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.2.1. Equal Respect: Why the Least Well Off Should Not Always Have Priority Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.2.2. The Moral Status of Voluntary Migrants: A Justice-based Criticism of Miller Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.2.3. The Deficiency of Arguments from Emergency Kein Zugriff
    3. 6.3. Three Standards for the Settlement of Conflicts of Morally Substantive Claims and Justified Interests Kein Zugriff
    4. 6.4. Fairness of Access: A Preliminary Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. 7.1. The Case Against Discrimination Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) Three Caveats Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) What is at Stake? The Moral Weight of Freedom of Religion in Arguments for Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The Moral Difference between Citizens and Non-citizen Residents Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.2.2. Discrimination on the Basis of Political Beliefs Kein Zugriff
    3. 7.3. Discrimination from the Perspective of Different Groups of Potential Migrants Kein Zugriff
    4. 7.4. Citizenship Tests Kein Zugriff
    5. 7.5. A Short Remark on Group-discrimination on the Basis of Special Historical Relations Kein Zugriff
    1. 8.1. Do Immigrants Have a Duty to Naturalize? Kein Zugriff
    2. 8.2. Walzer on Social Integration, Community, and Citizenship Kein Zugriff
    3. 8.3. Rubio-Marín on Immigration and Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
    4. 8.4. Partial and Multiple-layered Citizenship: Bauböck’s Stakeholder Argument for Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.5.1. Dual or Multiple Citizenship Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.5.2. Illegal Immigration and the Normative Weight of de facto Social Integration Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.1.1. The Family as a Social Institution Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.1.2. The Protection of the Family in International Human Rights Documents Kein Zugriff
      3. 9.1.3. Transnational Social Pluralism and Transnational Legal Pluralism Kein Zugriff
    2. 9.2. Who is Authorized to Define the Institution of the Family? Kein Zugriff
    3. 9.3. Polygamy in Practice Kein Zugriff
    4. 9.4. Polygamy in Normative Debates concerning Immigration and Women’s Rights Kein Zugriff
    5. 9.5. Immigration and Transnational Legal Pluralism: Some Principled Objections Kein Zugriff
    6. 9.6. A Brief Remark concerning the Normative Weight of Personal Preferences Kein Zugriff
    7. 9.7. Beyond Access: Liberal Limits of Transnational Legal Pluralism with Respect to Foreign Residents Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.8.1. Access Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.8.2. Naturalization and Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
    9. 9.9. A (Very) Preliminary Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. 10.1. “Multiculturalism”: Conceptual Sense and Nonsense Kein Zugriff
    2. 10.2. Culturalism as a Normative Social Ideal Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.3.1. A Criticism of Cultural Identity Concepts Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.3.2. The Difference between Culturalism and a Practice Account Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.3.3. The Methodological Background of Early Culturalism Debates Kein Zugriff
      4. 10.3.4. The Practice Account as a Methodological Alternative to Culturalism Kein Zugriff
    4. 10.4. A Reassessment of the Value of Cultural Belonging Kein Zugriff
    5. 10.5. Pluriculturalism: A Liberal-democratic Proposal Kein Zugriff
    6. 10.6. A Final Thought Kein Zugriff
  13. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 212 - 222
  14. Name Index Kein Zugriff 223 - 224

Literaturverzeichnis (210)

  1. Abrams, Kerry (2005): “Polygamy, Prostitution, and the Federalization of Immigration Law”, Columbia Law Review 105/3 (2005) 641–716. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  2. Angelos, James (2015): The Full Catastrophe. Travels among the New Greek Ruins, New York: Broadway Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  3. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1957/2000): Intention, Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press 2000. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  4. –– (1985): “Review: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language”, Ethics 95/2 (1985) 342–352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  5. Austin, J.L. (1979a): “Performative Utterances”, in: id: Philosophical Papers, ed. by J.O. Urmson/G.J. Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31979, 232–252. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  6. –– (1979b): “A Plea for Excuses”, in: id: Philosophical Papers, ed. by J.O. Urmson/G.J. Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31979, 175–204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  7. –– (1979c): “Other Minds”, in: id: Philosophical Papers, ed. by J.O. Urmson/G.J. Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31979, 76–116. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  8. Baier, Kurt (1965): The Moral Point of View. A Rational Basis of Ethics, 2nd. abr. ed., New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  9. –– (1978): “The Social Source of Reasons”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 51/6 (1978) 707–733. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  10. Barry, Brian (1995): Justice as Impartiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  11. –– (2001): Culture and Equality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  12. Bauböck, Rainer (2003): “Towards a Political Theory of Migrant Transnationalism”, International Migration Review 37/3 (2003) 700–723. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  13. –– (2017): “Political Membership and Democratic Boundaries”, in: Shachar et.al. (2017), 60–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  14. –– (2018): “Democratic Inclusion: A Pluralist Theory of Citizenship”, in: Democratic Inclusion. Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 3–102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  15. Beitz, Charles (1979): “Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics”, International Organization 33/3 (1979) 405–434. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  16. –– (1979/99): Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton, 2nd. ed., NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  17. –– (2009a): “The Moral Standing of States Revisited”, Ethics and International Affairs 23/4 (2009) 325–347. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  18. –– (2009b): The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  19. Bellah, Robert N./Richard Madson/William M. Sulivan/Ann Swindler/Steven M. Tipton (1985): Habits of the Heart, Berkeley et.al.: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  20. Benhabib, Seyla (2001): Transformations of Citizenship. Dilemmas of the Nation State, Assen: Koniklijke Van Gorcum BV. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  21. Biccheri, Cristina (2017): Norms in the Wild, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  22. Blake, Michael (2001): “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 30/3 (2001) 257–296. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  23. –– (2017): “Jurisdiction and Exclusion: A Response to Sarah Song”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 69–78. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  24. Boeri, Tito/Herbert Brückner/Frédéric Docquier/Hillel Rapoport (2012): Brain Drain and Brain Gain. The Global Competition to Attract High-skilled Migrants (A Report for the Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  25. Bourdieu, Pierre (1998): Practical Reason, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  26. Boghossian, Paul (2006): Fear of Knowledge. Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  27. Bosniak, Linda (2008): The Citizen and the Alien. Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  28. Brock, Gillian (2016): “Justice for Irregular Migrants, Refugees and Temporary Workers: Some Issues for Carens”, Journal of Applied Philosophy 33/4 (2016) 435–442. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  29. ––/Michael Blake (2015): Debating Brain Drain. May Governments Restrict Emigration?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  30. Carens, Joseph H. (1987): “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders”, Review of Politics 49/2 (1987) 251–273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  31. –– (2005): “The Integration of Immigrants”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 2/1 (2005) 29–46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  32. –– (2015): The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  33. Carling, Jørgen (2008): “The Human Dynamics of Migrant Transnationalism”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 31/8 (2008) 1452–1477. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  34. Charsley, Katharine/Anika Liversage (2013): “Transforming Polygamy: Migration, Transnationalism, and Multiple Marriages among Muslim Minorities”, Global Networks 13/1 (2013) 60–78. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  35. Christiano, Thomas (1996): The Rule of the Many. Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  36. –– (2008a): “Immigration, Political Community, and Cosmopolitanism”, San Diego Law Review 45 (2008) 933–961. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  37. –– (2008b): The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  38. –– (2017): “Democracy, Migration, and International Institutions”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 239–276. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  39. Chwaszcza, Christine (2008): “The Theory and Practice of Multicultural Theorizing”, Ethnicities 8/2 (2008) 261–265. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  40. –– (2009): “The Unity of the People, and Immigration in Liberal Theory”, Citizenship Studies 13/5 (2009) 451–474. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  41. –– (2010): “The Concept of Rights in Contemporary Human Rights Discourse”, Ratio Juris 33/3 (2019) 333–364. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  42. –– (2011a): Moral Responsibility and Global Justice. A Human Rights Approach, 2nd rev. ed., Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  43. –– (2011b): “Kollektive Autonomie. Volkssouveränität und individuelle Rechte in der liberalen Demokratie”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59/6 (2011) 917–935. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  44. –– (2012): “The Practical Conditions of Sovereignty of the People: The Status of Citizens in Multilevel Political Organizations”, in: Territories of Citizenship ed. by Ludvig Beckman/Eva Erman, Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan 2012, 81–99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  45. –– (2017): Social Agency and Practical Reasons. A Practice Account, New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  46. –– (2021): “Democracy as a Social Practice”, metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 8/1 (2021) 25–50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  47. Coleman, James S. (1990): The Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  48. Cox, Adam B. (2017): “Three Mistakes in Open Borders Debates”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 51–68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  49. Daniels, Norman (1980): “On Some Methods of Ethics and Linguistics”, Philosophical Studies 37/1 (1980) 21–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  50. Dauvergne, Catherine (2016): The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  51. Descartes, René (1647): “Meditations on First Philosophy”, in: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. II, transl. by John Cottingham/Robert Stoothoff/Dugald Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984, 1–65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  52. De Schutter, Helder/Lea Ypi (2015): “The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants”, British Journal of Political Science 45/2 (2015) 235–251. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  53. Donders, Yvonne (2013): “Cultural Pluralism in International Human Rights Law. The Role of Reservations”, in: The Cultural Dimension of Human Rights, ed. by Ana Vrdoljak, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205–239. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  54. Dryzek, John S. (2006): Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  55. Dworkin, Ronald (1977): Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  56. –– (1987): Law’s Empire, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  57. Eichenberger, Sarah L. (2012): “When Better is for Worse: Immigration Law’s Gendered Impact on Foreign Polygamous Marriage”, Duke Law Journal 61 (2012) 1067–1110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  58. Elster, Jon (1985): “Sour Grapes”, in: id.: Sour Grapes. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  59. Eriksen, Jens-Martin/Frederik Stjernfelt (2012): The Democratic Contradictions of Multiculturalism, New York: Telos Press Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  60. Estlund, David M. (2008): Democratic Authority, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  61. Feinberg, Joel (1970): “The Nature and Value of Rights”, Journal of Value Inquiry 4/4 (1970) 243–257. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  62. Ferracioli, Luara (2016): “Family Migration Schemes and Liberal Neutrality. A Dilemma”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 13/5 (2016) 553–575. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  63. Goldberg, Bruce (1971): “The Linguistic Expression of Feeling”, American Philosophical Quarterly 8/1 (1971) 86–92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  64. Goodin, Robert E. (1988): “What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?”, Ethics 98/4 (1988) 663–686. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  65. –– (2003): Reflective Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  66. ––/Kai Spiekermann (2018): An Epistemic Theory of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  67. Griffin, James (2008): On Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  68. Grimmel, Andreas/Gunther Hellmann (2019): “Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science”, International Political Sociology 13/2 (2019) 198–214. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  69. Guiraudon, Virginie (2014): “Economic Crisis and Institutional Resilience: The Political Economy of Migrant Incorporation”, West European Politics 37/6 (2014) 1297–1313. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  70. Gutman, Amy (ed.) (1994): Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  71. Habermas, Jürgen (1983): “Diskursethik: Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm”, in: id.: Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag 1983, 53–126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  72. –– (1987): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 4th ed., Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  73. –– (1991): “Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik”, in: id.: Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag 1991, 119–226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  74. –– (1995): “Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason. Remarks on John Rawls’s ‘Political Liberalism’”, Journal of Philosophy 92/3 (1995) 109–131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  75. Hafner, Gerhard (2004): “Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law”, Michigan Journal of International Law 25/4 (2004) 849–863. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  76. Hanfling, Oswald (1989): Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy, Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press 1989. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  77. –– (2000): Philosophy and Ordinary Language, London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  78. Hardin, Russel (2005): “Migration and Community”, Journal of Social Philosophy 36/2 (2005) 273–287. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  79. Hargreaves-Heap, Shaun/Yanis Varoufakis (1995): Game Theory. A Critical Text, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  80. Harrison, Rodney (2013): Heritage. Critical Approaches, London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  81. Hart, H.L.A. (1955): “Are There Any Natural Rights?”, Philosophical Review 64 (1955) 175–191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  82. –– (1961/1997): The Concept of Law. Rev. 2nd ed., ed. by Penelope Bulloch/Joseph Raz, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  83. Held, David (2006): Models of Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  84. ––/Daniele Archibugi (1995): Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  85. Hobbes, Thomas (1651): Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill, ed. by Richard Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  86. Huemer, Michael (2010): “Is There a Right to Immigrate?”, Social Theory and Practice 36/3 (2010) 429–461. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  87. Hume, David (1739/1740): A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge/P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed., 1978. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  88. –– (1777): “Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals”, in: id.: Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. by L.A. Selby-Bigge, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  89. Joppke, Christian (1999): Immigration and the Nation-state. The United States, Germany, and Great Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  90. –– (2005): “Exclusion in the Liberal State. The Case of Immigration and Citizenship Policy”, European Journal of Social Theory 8/1 (2005) 43–61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  91. –– (2010): Citizenship and Immigration, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  92. –– (2011): Citizenship and Integration, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  93. –– (2014): “Europe and Islam: Alarmists, Victimists, and Integration by Law”, West European Politics 36/6 (2014) 1314–1335. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  94. –– (2015): The Secular State under Siege. Religion and Politics in Europe and America, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  95. –– (2017): Is Multiculturalism Dead?, Cambridge et.al.: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  96. Kant, Immanuel (1793): “On the common saying: That may be correct in theory, but it is of no use in practice”, in: id.: Practical Philosophy, transl. & ed. by Mary J. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999, 273–310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  97. Koller, Peter (2017): “Die Geltung sozialer Normen”, in: Souveränität, Transstaatlichkeit und Weltverfassung ed. by Jochen Bung/Armin Engländer, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 109–132. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  98. Kolodny, Niko (2014): “Rule Over None”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 42/4 (2014) 287–336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  99. Koopmans, Ruud (2015): “Does Assimilation Work? Sociocultural Determinants of Labour Market Participation of European Muslims”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42/2 (2015) 197–216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  100. –– (2016): “Statistical and Perceived Diversity and Their Impacts on Neighborhood Social Cohesion in Germany, France and the Netherlands”, Social Indicators Research 125/3 (2016) 853–883. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  101. –– (2017): Assimilation oder Multikulturalismus. Bedingungen gelungener Integration, Berlin: Lit Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  102. ––/Ines Michalowski (2017): “Why Do States Extend Rights to Immigrants? Institutional Settings and Historical Legacies Across 44 Countries Worldwide”, Comparative Political Studies 50/1 (2017) 41–74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  103. Koskenniemi, Martti (Study Group of the International Law Commission) (2006): Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, United Nations, General Assembly A/CN.4/L682, International Law Commission, 15th session at Geneva 2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  104. ––/Päivi Leino (2002): “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties”, Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (2002) 553–579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  105. Kratochwil, Friedrich (2018): Praxis. On Acting and Knowing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  106. Krisch, Nico (2010): Beyond Constitutionalism. The Pluralistic Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  107. –– (2011): “Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space”, Ratio Juris 24/4 (2011) 386–412. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  108. Kymlicka, Will (1989): Liberalism, Community and Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  109. –– (1995): Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  110. –– (2015): “The Essentialist Criticism of Multiculturalism: Theories, Policies, Ethos”, in: in: Uberoi Varun/Tariq Modood (eds.): Multiculturalism Rethought, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2015) 209–249. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  111. Lagerspetz, Eerik (2010): “Wisdom and Numbers”, Social Science Information 49/1 (2010) 29–59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  112. Langfield, Michele/William Logan/Máiréad Nic Craith (eds.) (2010): Cultural Diversity, Heritage and Human Rights. Intersections in Theory and Practice, London/ New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  113. Langford, Peter/Ian Bryan (2012): “Hans Kelsen’s Theory of Legal Monism. A Critical Engagement with the Emerging Legal Order of the 1920s”, Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international, 14/1 (2012) 51–86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  114. ––/–– (2019): “From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima”, in: Peter Langford/Ian Bryan/J. McGarry (eds.): Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 161–187. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  115. La Torre, Massimo (2005): “Global Citizenship? Political Rights under Imperial Conditions”, Ratio Juris 18/2 (2005) 236–257. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  116. –– (2012): “Citoyennité”, in: Traitè international de droit constitutionelle, vol. III, ed. by Michel Troper/Dominique Chagnollaud/Dalloz-Sirey 2012, 358–387. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  117. Lindahl, Hans (2018): Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  118. Lines, Greggary E. (2016): “Polymigration: Immigration Implications and Possibilities Post Brown v. Buhman”, Arizona Law Review 58/2 (2016) 477–510. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  119. List, Christian/Robert E. Goodin (2001): “Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem”, Political Philosophy 9/3 (2001) 277–306. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  120. Locke, John (1689): An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  121. –– (1690): Second Treatise on Government, ed. by C.B. Macpherson, Indianapolis: Hackett 1980. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  122. Luban, David (1980): “The Romance of the Nation-State”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9/4 (1980) 392–397. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  123. MacKay, Douglas (2016): “Are Skill-selective Immigration Policies Just?”, Social Theory and Practice 42/1 (2016) 123–154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  124. March, Andrew F. (2011): “Is There a Right to Polygamy? Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public Justification”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2011) 246–272. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  125. Marshall, T.H. (1950/1992): Citizenship and Social Class, ed. by Tom Bottomore, London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  126. Mason, Andrew (2014): “Citizenship Tests: Can They Be a Just Compromise?”, Journal of Social Philosophy 45/2 (2014) 137–161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  127. McIntyre, Alasdair (1995): “Is Patriotism a Virtue?”, in: Ronald Beiner (ed.): Theorizing Citizenship, Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 209–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  128. Meer, Nasar/Tariq Modood (2012): “How Does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism?”, Journal of Intercultural Studies 33/2 (2012) 175–196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  129. Miller, David (1995): On Nationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  130. –– (2007): National Responsibility and Global Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  131. –– (2008): “Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship”, The Journal of Political Philosophy 16/4 (2008) 371–390. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  132. –– (2016): Strangers in Our Midst. The Political Philosophy of Migration, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  133. Modood, Tariq (2013): Multiculturalism, Cambridge et. al.: Polity Press, 2nd edition. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  134. –– (2014): “Multiculturalism, Interculturalism and the Majority” (Kohlberg Memorial Lecture), Journal of Moral Education 43/3 (2014) 302–315. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  135. –– (2015a): Post-immigration ‘Difference’ and Integration, London: British Academy Policy Centre 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  136. –– (2015b): “Rethinking Multiculturalism, Interculturalisms and the Majority”, in: Uberoi Varun/Tariq Modood (eds.): Multiculturalism Rethought, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2015) 348–368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  137. Nasström, Sofia (2007): “The Legitimacy of the People”, Political Theory 35/5 (2007) 624–665. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  138. Offe, Claus (2011): “From Migration in Geographic Space to Migration in Biographic Time: Views from Europe”, The Journal of Political Philosophy 19/3 (2011) 333–373. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  139. Owen, David (2011): “National Membership and the Democratic State: Modes of Membership and Voting Rights”, Critical Review of Social and International Philosophy 14/5 (2011) 641–663. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  140. –– (2018): “Populus, demos, and Self-rule”, in: Democratic Inclusion. Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 183–203. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  141. Özdem, Caglar/Maurice Schiff (2006) (eds.): International Migration, Remittances & the Brain Drain, Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; Houndsmill et.al.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  142. Parekh, Bikhu (2006): Rethinking Multiculturalism, London: Red Globe Press, 2nd ed. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  143. –– (2009): “The Logic of Identity”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8/3 (2009) 267–284. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  144. Plato: Republic, ed. by G.M.A. Grube, Indianapolis: Hackett 1992. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  145. Pogge, Thomas W. (1989): Realizing Rawls, Cornell: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  146. –– (2002): World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge et.al.: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  147. Quine, Willard Van Orman (1973): The Roots of Reference (Paul Carus Lectures), La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  148. Rawls, John (1955): “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review 64/1 (1955) 3–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  149. –– (1958): “Justice as Fairness”, Philosophical Review 67/2 (1958) 164–194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  150. –– (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  151. –– (1980): “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures”, Journal of Philosophy 77/9 (1980) 515–572. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  152. –– (1993a): Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  153. –– (1993b): “The Law of Peoples”, in: On Human Rights. Oxford Amnesty Lectures on Human Rights 1993, New York: Basic Books, 41–83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  154. –– (1999): The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, Mass. et.al.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  155. –– (2001): Justice as Fairness. A Restatement, ed. by Erin Kelly, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  156. Reiner, Hans (1948): “Die ‘Goldene’ Regel”, Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 3/1 (1948) 74–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  157. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762): “On the Social Contract”, in: Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Basic Political Writings ed. by Peter Gay, transl. by Donald A. Cress, Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett 1987, 141–227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  158. Rubio-Marín, Ruth (2000): Immigration as a Democratic Challenge. Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  159. –– (2014): Human Rights and Immigration, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  160. Sandel, Michael J. (1982): Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  161. Schatzki, Theodore E./Karin Knorr Cetina/Eike von Savigny (eds.) (2001): The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  162. Schmitt, Carl (1932/2015): Der Begriff des Politischen, 9th corr. ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  163. Searle, John R. (1995): The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  164. –– (2001): Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  165. –– (2010): Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  166. Sen, Amartya (2006): Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny, London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  167. –– (2009): “The Fog of Identity”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8/3 (2009) 285–288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  168. Shachar, Ayelet (1998): “Group Identity and Women’s Rights in Family Law: The Perils of Multicultural Accommodation”, Journal of Political Philosophy 6/3 (1998) 285–305. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  169. –– (2009): The Birthright Lottery. Citizenship and Global Inequality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  170. –– (2017): “Citizenship for Sale?”, in: Shachar et.al (2017) 789–816. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  171. ––/Ian Hirschl (2014): “On Citizenship, States, and Markets”, Journal of Political Philosophy 22/2 (2014) 231–257. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  172. ––/Rainer Bauböck/Irene Bloemraad/Marten Vink (eds.) (2017): The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  173. Sigman, Shayna (2006): “Everything Lawyers Know about Polygamy is Wrong”, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 16/1 (2006) 102–185. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  174. Smearman, Claire A. (2009): “Second Wives’ Club: Mapping the Impact of Polygamy in U.S. Immigration Law”, Berkeley Journal of International Law 27/2 (2009) 382–447. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  175. Smith, Michael (1987): “The Humean Theory of Motivation”, Mind 96 (1987) 36–61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  176. Smith, Rogers M. (2017): “Citizenship and Membership Duties Towards Quasi-citizens”, in: Shachar et.al. (2017) 817–837. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  177. Somek, Alexander (1998): “National Solidarity, Global Impartiality, and the Performance of Philosophical Theory: The Example of Migration Policy”, Ratio Juris 11/2 (1998) 103–125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  178. Sona, Federica (2005): “Polygamy in Britain”, osservatorio delle libertà ed istituzioni religiosi, www.olir.it/areetematiche/104/documents/Sona_Polygamy_in_Britain.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  179. Song, Sarah (2017): “Why Does the State Have the Right to Control Immigration”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 3–50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  180. Soysal, Yasemin Nohoglu (1994): The Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  181. Spiro, Peter J. (2017): “Multiple Citizenship”, in: Shachar et.al. (2017) 621–643. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  182. –– (2018): “Stakeholder Theory Won’t Save Citizenship”, in: Democratic Inclusion. Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 204–224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  183. Steiner, Hillel (1992): “Libertarianism and the Transnational Migration of People”, in: Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money ed. by Brian Barry/Robert E. Goodin, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press 1992, 87–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  184. Stone Sweet, Alec (2000): Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  185. Taylor, Charles (1985): Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  186. –– (1989): Sources of the Self. The Making of Modern Identity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  187. Tesón, Fernando R. (2008): “Brain Drain”, San Diego Law Review 45 (2008) 899–932. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  188. Tomuschat, Christian (1999): “International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century. General Course on Public International Law”, in: 281 Recueil des Cours 10/25 (1999), 9–438. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  189. Triandafyllidou, Anna/Tariq Modood/Nasar Meer (eds.) (2012): European Multiculturalisms. Cultural, Religious and Ethnic Challenges, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  190. Vertovec, Steven (2007): “Super-diversity and Its Implications”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 30/6 (2007) 1024–1054. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  191. Viehoff, Daniel (2017): “The Truth in Political Instrumentalism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CXVII/3 (2017) 273–295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  192. Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (ed.) (2013): The Cultural Dimension of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  193. Waldron, Jeremy (1999): Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  194. Wallace, James D. (2009): Norms and Practices, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  195. Walzer, Michael (1977): Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  196. –– (1994): Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  197. –– (1980): “The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9/3 (1980) 209–229. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  198. –– (1983): Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism & Equality, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  199. Wellman, Christopher/Phillip Cole (2011): Debating the Ethics of Migration: Is There a Right to Exclude?, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  200. White, Douglas R. (1988): “Rethinking Polygyny. Co-Wives, Codes, and Cultural Systems”, Current Anthropology 19/4 (1988) 529–572. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  201. White Ryan (2009): “Two Sides of Polygamy”, Journal of Law & Family Studies 447 (2009) 447–454. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  202. Wilder, Colin F. (2012): “Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: Four Motives of Legal Change from Early Modern Europe”, History and Theory 51 (2012) 18–41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  203. Will, Frederick L. (1997): Pragmatism and Realism, London et.al.: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  204. Williams, Bernard (1981): “Internal and External Reasons”, in: id.: Moral Luck. Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–113. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  205. Winch, Peter (1958): The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  206. Wimmer, Andreas (2013): Ethnic Boundary Making. Institutions, Power, Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  207. ––/Nina Glick Schiller (2003): “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology”, The International Migration Review 37/3 (2003) 576–610. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  208. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958): “Philosophical Investigations”, trans. by G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2nd ed. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  209. Wylie, Laurence (1964): Village in the Vaucluse. An Account of Life in a French Village, New York: Harper & Row, 2nd edition. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594
  210. Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008): Polygamy. A Cross-cultural Analysis, London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927594

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Studien zur Theorie und Empirie der Demokratie"
Cover des Buchs: Der Naturbegriff der Neuen Rechten in Deutschland und den USA
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Viola Merten
Der Naturbegriff der Neuen Rechten in Deutschland und den USA
Cover des Buchs: Mehr Partizipation – weniger Legitimation?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Juliane Scholz
Mehr Partizipation – weniger Legitimation?
Cover des Buchs: Das Prinzip der Republik
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Martin Stellmacher
Das Prinzip der Republik
Cover des Buchs: Nation und Repräsentation
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Michel Dormal
Nation und Repräsentation

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex