Migration, Citizenship, and Democracy

Prof. Dr. Christine Chwaszcza

doi:10.5771/9783748927594

Zusammenfassung

Ökonomische und vorübergehende Migration stellen liberal-demokratische Gesellschaften vor die Herausforderung, traditionelle Ideale von Gesellschaft und demokratischer Inklusion zu überdenken. Christine Chwaszcza entwickelt einen moralischen Standpunkt für die ethische Bewertung von Fragen zu Immigration, sozialer und demokratischer Inklusion, der demokratietheoretische Überlegungen und Forderungen post-nationaler Gerechtigkeit in einer transnationalen Perspektive integriert. Das Buch wendet sich an Forscher und fortgeschrittene Studierenden der Politischen Philosophie, der Rechtsphilosophie und der Sozialwissenschaften.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr: 2021
Erscheinungsdatum: 01.09.2021
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-8367-0
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-2759-4
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Studien zur Theorie und Empirie der Demokratie
Band: 3
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 224
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 10
1. The Topic of the Book Kein Zugriff
2. Overview Kein Zugriff
3. A Preemptory Remark Kein Zugriff
4. Acknowledgments Kein Zugriff
1. 1.1. Citizenship: The General Idea of a Rule-based Account Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1.2.1. The Concept of a Social Practice Kein Zugriff
  2. 1.2.2. “Rules” and Normativity in Human Agency Kein Zugriff
  3. 1.2.3. Two Problems of Rule-following Kein Zugriff
  4. 1.2.4. The Normative Justification of Social Institutions Kein Zugriff
  5. 1.2.5. A Few Caveats Kein Zugriff
3. 1.3. Voluntary Migration as a Transnational Phenomenon Kein Zugriff
4. 1.4. The Normative Framework: Philosophical Liberalism Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 2.1.1. Birthright Citizenship as State Citizenship Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.1.2. State Citizenship and the Universal Right to Citizenship Kein Zugriff
  3. 1. (1) Consent-based Accounts of Political Association Kein Zugriff
    2. (2) Voluntary-exchange-based Accounts of Political Association Kein Zugriff
    3. (3) Justice-based Accounts of Political Association Kein Zugriff
  4. 2.1.4. The Procedural Element in a Rule-based Account of Citizenship Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 2.2.1. The Theoretical Relevance of Political Agency Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.2.2. The Normative Relevance of Political Agency Kein Zugriff
  3. 2.2.3. Non-ideal Theory: Why Consequences are Not All that Matters Kein Zugriff
1. 3.1. Is There an Individual (Human) Right to Free Movement Across Borders? Kein Zugriff
2. 3.2. Beyond Claim Rights: Freedom of Migration as a Requirement of Transnational Justice Kein Zugriff
3. 3.3. The Competitive Nature of Current Migration Dynamics Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 3.4.1. Methodological Individualism in Contractarian Theories of Global Justice Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.4.2. Ethical Individualism and the Holistic Nature of Social Institutions Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.4.3. The Idea of Government by Authorization: A Non-voluntaristic Interpretation Kein Zugriff
  4. 3.4.4. A First Interim Conclusion Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 3.5.1. Goodin’s Argument against Moral Particularism Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.5.2. Political Philosophy without Politics? – A Criticism of Goodin Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.5.3. Political Agency as a sui generis Source of Sociopolitical Justice: A Defense Kein Zugriff
  4. 3.5.4. A Second Interim Conclusion Kein Zugriff
6. 1. 3.6.1. Societies as Spaces of Political Agency Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.6.2. Societies as Bearers of a Right to Collective Self-determination Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.6.3. Societies as Addressees of Collective Responsibility Kein Zugriff
  4. 3.6.4. A Third Interim Conclusion Kein Zugriff
7. 3.7. Summing up: Transnational Justice and Normative Assessments of Rules of Inclusion and Exclusion Kein Zugriff
8. 3.8. Beyond the Model of the Nation State: Internationalism or Transnationalism? Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 4.1.1. A Brief Outline of Miller’s Argument for Liberal Nationalism Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.1.2. National Integration and the Development of the Model of the Social State Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.1.3. A Counter-thesis: Democratic Legitimacy vs. Liberal Nationalism Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 4.2.1. Blake on Citizenship and Coercion Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.2.2. Beyond Coercion: Political Sovereignty Bottom-up rather than Top-down Kein Zugriff
1. 5.1. Democratic Legitimacy and the “All Affected Persons” Principle Kein Zugriff
2. 5.2. Democracy as a Mechanism of Pure Procedural Justice: An Outline Kein Zugriff
3. 5.3. The Moral Point of Democracy Kein Zugriff
4. 5.4. Democratic Legitimacy as a Social Practice Kein Zugriff
5. 5.5. The Idea of Transnational Democracy in Light of the Practical Pre-conditions of Democratic Legitimacy Kein Zugriff
6. 5.6. The Limits of Metaethical Proceduralism: A Criticism of Discourse Ethics Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 6.1.1. Practical Reasons Kein Zugriff
  2. 6.1.2. Moral Reasons Kein Zugriff
  3. 6.1.3. Impartiality and the Construction of a Moral Point of View Kein Zugriff
  4. 6.1.4. Normative Reasoning Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 6.2.1. Equal Respect: Why the Least Well Off Should Not Always Have Priority Kein Zugriff
  2. 6.2.2. The Moral Status of Voluntary Migrants: A Justice-based Criticism of Miller Kein Zugriff
  3. 6.2.3. The Deficiency of Arguments from Emergency Kein Zugriff
3. 6.3. Three Standards for the Settlement of Conflicts of Morally Substantive Claims and Justified Interests Kein Zugriff
4. 6.4. Fairness of Access: A Preliminary Conclusion Kein Zugriff
1. 7.1. The Case Against Discrimination Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. (1) Three Caveats Kein Zugriff
    2. (2) What is at Stake? The Moral Weight of Freedom of Religion in Arguments for Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
    3. (3) The Moral Difference between Citizens and Non-citizen Residents Kein Zugriff
  2. 7.2.2. Discrimination on the Basis of Political Beliefs Kein Zugriff
3. 7.3. Discrimination from the Perspective of Different Groups of Potential Migrants Kein Zugriff
4. 7.4. Citizenship Tests Kein Zugriff
5. 7.5. A Short Remark on Group-discrimination on the Basis of Special Historical Relations Kein Zugriff
1. 8.1. Do Immigrants Have a Duty to Naturalize? Kein Zugriff
2. 8.2. Walzer on Social Integration, Community, and Citizenship Kein Zugriff
3. 8.3. Rubio-Marín on Immigration and Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
4. 8.4. Partial and Multiple-layered Citizenship: Bauböck’s Stakeholder Argument for Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 8.5.1. Dual or Multiple Citizenship Kein Zugriff
  2. 8.5.2. Illegal Immigration and the Normative Weight of de facto Social Integration Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 9.1.1. The Family as a Social Institution Kein Zugriff
  2. 9.1.2. The Protection of the Family in International Human Rights Documents Kein Zugriff
  3. 9.1.3. Transnational Social Pluralism and Transnational Legal Pluralism Kein Zugriff
2. 9.2. Who is Authorized to Define the Institution of the Family? Kein Zugriff
3. 9.3. Polygamy in Practice Kein Zugriff
4. 9.4. Polygamy in Normative Debates concerning Immigration and Women’s Rights Kein Zugriff
5. 9.5. Immigration and Transnational Legal Pluralism: Some Principled Objections Kein Zugriff
6. 9.6. A Brief Remark concerning the Normative Weight of Personal Preferences Kein Zugriff
7. 9.7. Beyond Access: Liberal Limits of Transnational Legal Pluralism with Respect to Foreign Residents Kein Zugriff
8. 1. 9.8.1. Access Kein Zugriff
  2. 9.8.2. Naturalization and Democratic Inclusion Kein Zugriff
9. 9.9. A (Very) Preliminary Conclusion Kein Zugriff
1. 10.1. “Multiculturalism”: Conceptual Sense and Nonsense Kein Zugriff
2. 10.2. Culturalism as a Normative Social Ideal Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 10.3.1. A Criticism of Cultural Identity Concepts Kein Zugriff
  2. 10.3.2. The Difference between Culturalism and a Practice Account Kein Zugriff
  3. 10.3.3. The Methodological Background of Early Culturalism Debates Kein Zugriff
  4. 10.3.4. The Practice Account as a Methodological Alternative to Culturalism Kein Zugriff
4. 10.4. A Reassessment of the Value of Cultural Belonging Kein Zugriff
5. 10.5. Pluriculturalism: A Liberal-democratic Proposal Kein Zugriff
6. 10.6. A Final Thought Kein Zugriff
Bibliography Kein Zugriff Seiten 212 - 222
Name Index Kein Zugriff Seiten 223 - 224

Literaturverzeichnis (210 Einträge)

Abrams, Kerry (2005): “Polygamy, Prostitution, and the Federalization of Immigration Law”, Columbia Law Review 105/3 (2005) 641–716. Google Scholar öffnen
Angelos, James (2015): The Full Catastrophe. Travels among the New Greek Ruins, New York: Broadway Books. Google Scholar öffnen
Anscombe, G.E.M. (1957/2000): Intention, Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1985): “Review: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language”, Ethics 95/2 (1985) 342–352. Google Scholar öffnen
Austin, J.L. (1979a): “Performative Utterances”, in: id: Philosophical Papers, ed. by J.O. Urmson/G.J. Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31979, 232–252. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1979b): “A Plea for Excuses”, in: id: Philosophical Papers, ed. by J.O. Urmson/G.J. Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31979, 175–204. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1979c): “Other Minds”, in: id: Philosophical Papers, ed. by J.O. Urmson/G.J. Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31979, 76–116. Google Scholar öffnen
Baier, Kurt (1965): The Moral Point of View. A Rational Basis of Ethics, 2nd. abr. ed., New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1978): “The Social Source of Reasons”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 51/6 (1978) 707–733. Google Scholar öffnen
Barry, Brian (1995): Justice as Impartiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2001): Culture and Equality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bauböck, Rainer (2003): “Towards a Political Theory of Migrant Transnationalism”, International Migration Review 37/3 (2003) 700–723. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): “Political Membership and Democratic Boundaries”, in: Shachar et.al. (2017), 60–82. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2018): “Democratic Inclusion: A Pluralist Theory of Citizenship”, in: Democratic Inclusion. Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 3–102. Google Scholar öffnen
Beitz, Charles (1979): “Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics”, International Organization 33/3 (1979) 405–434. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1979/99): Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton, 2nd. ed., NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2009a): “The Moral Standing of States Revisited”, Ethics and International Affairs 23/4 (2009) 325–347. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2009b): The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bellah, Robert N./Richard Madson/William M. Sulivan/Ann Swindler/Steven M. Tipton (1985): Habits of the Heart, Berkeley et.al.: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Benhabib, Seyla (2001): Transformations of Citizenship. Dilemmas of the Nation State, Assen: Koniklijke Van Gorcum BV. Google Scholar öffnen
Biccheri, Cristina (2017): Norms in the Wild, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Blake, Michael (2001): “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 30/3 (2001) 257–296. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): “Jurisdiction and Exclusion: A Response to Sarah Song”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 69–78. Google Scholar öffnen
Boeri, Tito/Herbert Brückner/Frédéric Docquier/Hillel Rapoport (2012): Brain Drain and Brain Gain. The Global Competition to Attract High-skilled Migrants (A Report for the Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998): Practical Reason, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Boghossian, Paul (2006): Fear of Knowledge. Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bosniak, Linda (2008): The Citizen and the Alien. Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Brock, Gillian (2016): “Justice for Irregular Migrants, Refugees and Temporary Workers: Some Issues for Carens”, Journal of Applied Philosophy 33/4 (2016) 435–442. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Michael Blake (2015): Debating Brain Drain. May Governments Restrict Emigration?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Carens, Joseph H. (1987): “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders”, Review of Politics 49/2 (1987) 251–273. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2005): “The Integration of Immigrants”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 2/1 (2005) 29–46. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2015): The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Carling, Jørgen (2008): “The Human Dynamics of Migrant Transnationalism”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 31/8 (2008) 1452–1477. Google Scholar öffnen
Charsley, Katharine/Anika Liversage (2013): “Transforming Polygamy: Migration, Transnationalism, and Multiple Marriages among Muslim Minorities”, Global Networks 13/1 (2013) 60–78. Google Scholar öffnen
Christiano, Thomas (1996): The Rule of the Many. Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2008a): “Immigration, Political Community, and Cosmopolitanism”, San Diego Law Review 45 (2008) 933–961. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2008b): The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): “Democracy, Migration, and International Institutions”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 239–276. Google Scholar öffnen
Chwaszcza, Christine (2008): “The Theory and Practice of Multicultural Theorizing”, Ethnicities 8/2 (2008) 261–265. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2009): “The Unity of the People, and Immigration in Liberal Theory”, Citizenship Studies 13/5 (2009) 451–474. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2010): “The Concept of Rights in Contemporary Human Rights Discourse”, Ratio Juris 33/3 (2019) 333–364. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2011a): Moral Responsibility and Global Justice. A Human Rights Approach, 2nd rev. ed., Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2011b): “Kollektive Autonomie. Volkssouveränität und individuelle Rechte in der liberalen Demokratie”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59/6 (2011) 917–935. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2012): “The Practical Conditions of Sovereignty of the People: The Status of Citizens in Multilevel Political Organizations”, in: Territories of Citizenship ed. by Ludvig Beckman/Eva Erman, Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan 2012, 81–99. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): Social Agency and Practical Reasons. A Practice Account, New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2021): “Democracy as a Social Practice”, metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 8/1 (2021) 25–50. Google Scholar öffnen
Coleman, James S. (1990): The Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Cox, Adam B. (2017): “Three Mistakes in Open Borders Debates”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 51–68. Google Scholar öffnen
Daniels, Norman (1980): “On Some Methods of Ethics and Linguistics”, Philosophical Studies 37/1 (1980) 21–36. Google Scholar öffnen
Dauvergne, Catherine (2016): The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Descartes, René (1647): “Meditations on First Philosophy”, in: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. II, transl. by John Cottingham/Robert Stoothoff/Dugald Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984, 1–65. Google Scholar öffnen
De Schutter, Helder/Lea Ypi (2015): “The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants”, British Journal of Political Science 45/2 (2015) 235–251. Google Scholar öffnen
Donders, Yvonne (2013): “Cultural Pluralism in International Human Rights Law. The Role of Reservations”, in: The Cultural Dimension of Human Rights, ed. by Ana Vrdoljak, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205–239. Google Scholar öffnen
Dryzek, John S. (2006): Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Dworkin, Ronald (1977): Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1987): Law’s Empire, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Eichenberger, Sarah L. (2012): “When Better is for Worse: Immigration Law’s Gendered Impact on Foreign Polygamous Marriage”, Duke Law Journal 61 (2012) 1067–1110. Google Scholar öffnen
Elster, Jon (1985): “Sour Grapes”, in: id.: Sour Grapes. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Eriksen, Jens-Martin/Frederik Stjernfelt (2012): The Democratic Contradictions of Multiculturalism, New York: Telos Press Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Estlund, David M. (2008): Democratic Authority, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Feinberg, Joel (1970): “The Nature and Value of Rights”, Journal of Value Inquiry 4/4 (1970) 243–257. Google Scholar öffnen
Ferracioli, Luara (2016): “Family Migration Schemes and Liberal Neutrality. A Dilemma”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 13/5 (2016) 553–575. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldberg, Bruce (1971): “The Linguistic Expression of Feeling”, American Philosophical Quarterly 8/1 (1971) 86–92. Google Scholar öffnen
Goodin, Robert E. (1988): “What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?”, Ethics 98/4 (1988) 663–686. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2003): Reflective Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Kai Spiekermann (2018): An Epistemic Theory of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Griffin, James (2008): On Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Grimmel, Andreas/Gunther Hellmann (2019): “Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science”, International Political Sociology 13/2 (2019) 198–214. Google Scholar öffnen
Guiraudon, Virginie (2014): “Economic Crisis and Institutional Resilience: The Political Economy of Migrant Incorporation”, West European Politics 37/6 (2014) 1297–1313. Google Scholar öffnen
Gutman, Amy (ed.) (1994): Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, Jürgen (1983): “Diskursethik: Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm”, in: id.: Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag 1983, 53–126. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1987): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 4th ed., Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1991): “Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik”, in: id.: Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag 1991, 119–226. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1995): “Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason. Remarks on John Rawls’s ‘Political Liberalism’”, Journal of Philosophy 92/3 (1995) 109–131. Google Scholar öffnen
Hafner, Gerhard (2004): “Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law”, Michigan Journal of International Law 25/4 (2004) 849–863. Google Scholar öffnen
Hanfling, Oswald (1989): Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy, Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press 1989. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2000): Philosophy and Ordinary Language, London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Hardin, Russel (2005): “Migration and Community”, Journal of Social Philosophy 36/2 (2005) 273–287. Google Scholar öffnen
Hargreaves-Heap, Shaun/Yanis Varoufakis (1995): Game Theory. A Critical Text, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Harrison, Rodney (2013): Heritage. Critical Approaches, London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Hart, H.L.A. (1955): “Are There Any Natural Rights?”, Philosophical Review 64 (1955) 175–191. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1961/1997): The Concept of Law. Rev. 2nd ed., ed. by Penelope Bulloch/Joseph Raz, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Held, David (2006): Models of Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Daniele Archibugi (1995): Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Hobbes, Thomas (1651): Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill, ed. by Richard Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991. Google Scholar öffnen
Huemer, Michael (2010): “Is There a Right to Immigrate?”, Social Theory and Practice 36/3 (2010) 429–461. Google Scholar öffnen
Hume, David (1739/1740): A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge/P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed., 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1777): “Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals”, in: id.: Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. by L.A. Selby-Bigge, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Joppke, Christian (1999): Immigration and the Nation-state. The United States, Germany, and Great Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2005): “Exclusion in the Liberal State. The Case of Immigration and Citizenship Policy”, European Journal of Social Theory 8/1 (2005) 43–61. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2010): Citizenship and Immigration, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2011): Citizenship and Integration, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2014): “Europe and Islam: Alarmists, Victimists, and Integration by Law”, West European Politics 36/6 (2014) 1314–1335. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2015): The Secular State under Siege. Religion and Politics in Europe and America, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): Is Multiculturalism Dead?, Cambridge et.al.: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Kant, Immanuel (1793): “On the common saying: That may be correct in theory, but it is of no use in practice”, in: id.: Practical Philosophy, transl. & ed. by Mary J. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999, 273–310. Google Scholar öffnen
Koller, Peter (2017): “Die Geltung sozialer Normen”, in: Souveränität, Transstaatlichkeit und Weltverfassung ed. by Jochen Bung/Armin Engländer, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 109–132. Google Scholar öffnen
Kolodny, Niko (2014): “Rule Over None”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 42/4 (2014) 287–336. Google Scholar öffnen
Koopmans, Ruud (2015): “Does Assimilation Work? Sociocultural Determinants of Labour Market Participation of European Muslims”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42/2 (2015) 197–216. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2016): “Statistical and Perceived Diversity and Their Impacts on Neighborhood Social Cohesion in Germany, France and the Netherlands”, Social Indicators Research 125/3 (2016) 853–883. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): Assimilation oder Multikulturalismus. Bedingungen gelungener Integration, Berlin: Lit Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Ines Michalowski (2017): “Why Do States Extend Rights to Immigrants? Institutional Settings and Historical Legacies Across 44 Countries Worldwide”, Comparative Political Studies 50/1 (2017) 41–74. Google Scholar öffnen
Koskenniemi, Martti (Study Group of the International Law Commission) (2006): Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, United Nations, General Assembly A/CN.4/L682, International Law Commission, 15th session at Geneva 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Päivi Leino (2002): “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties”, Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (2002) 553–579. Google Scholar öffnen
Kratochwil, Friedrich (2018): Praxis. On Acting and Knowing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Krisch, Nico (2010): Beyond Constitutionalism. The Pluralistic Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2011): “Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space”, Ratio Juris 24/4 (2011) 386–412. Google Scholar öffnen
Kymlicka, Will (1989): Liberalism, Community and Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1995): Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2015): “The Essentialist Criticism of Multiculturalism: Theories, Policies, Ethos”, in: in: Uberoi Varun/Tariq Modood (eds.): Multiculturalism Rethought, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2015) 209–249. Google Scholar öffnen
Lagerspetz, Eerik (2010): “Wisdom and Numbers”, Social Science Information 49/1 (2010) 29–59. Google Scholar öffnen
Langfield, Michele/William Logan/Máiréad Nic Craith (eds.) (2010): Cultural Diversity, Heritage and Human Rights. Intersections in Theory and Practice, London/ New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Langford, Peter/Ian Bryan (2012): “Hans Kelsen’s Theory of Legal Monism. A Critical Engagement with the Emerging Legal Order of the 1920s”, Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international, 14/1 (2012) 51–86. Google Scholar öffnen
––/–– (2019): “From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima”, in: Peter Langford/Ian Bryan/J. McGarry (eds.): Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 161–187. Google Scholar öffnen
La Torre, Massimo (2005): “Global Citizenship? Political Rights under Imperial Conditions”, Ratio Juris 18/2 (2005) 236–257. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2012): “Citoyennité”, in: Traitè international de droit constitutionelle, vol. III, ed. by Michel Troper/Dominique Chagnollaud/Dalloz-Sirey 2012, 358–387. Google Scholar öffnen
Lindahl, Hans (2018): Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Lines, Greggary E. (2016): “Polymigration: Immigration Implications and Possibilities Post Brown v. Buhman”, Arizona Law Review 58/2 (2016) 477–510. Google Scholar öffnen
List, Christian/Robert E. Goodin (2001): “Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem”, Political Philosophy 9/3 (2001) 277–306. Google Scholar öffnen
Locke, John (1689): An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1690): Second Treatise on Government, ed. by C.B. Macpherson, Indianapolis: Hackett 1980. Google Scholar öffnen
Luban, David (1980): “The Romance of the Nation-State”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9/4 (1980) 392–397. Google Scholar öffnen
MacKay, Douglas (2016): “Are Skill-selective Immigration Policies Just?”, Social Theory and Practice 42/1 (2016) 123–154. Google Scholar öffnen
March, Andrew F. (2011): “Is There a Right to Polygamy? Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public Justification”, Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2011) 246–272. Google Scholar öffnen
Marshall, T.H. (1950/1992): Citizenship and Social Class, ed. by Tom Bottomore, London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Mason, Andrew (2014): “Citizenship Tests: Can They Be a Just Compromise?”, Journal of Social Philosophy 45/2 (2014) 137–161. Google Scholar öffnen
McIntyre, Alasdair (1995): “Is Patriotism a Virtue?”, in: Ronald Beiner (ed.): Theorizing Citizenship, Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 209–228. Google Scholar öffnen
Meer, Nasar/Tariq Modood (2012): “How Does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism?”, Journal of Intercultural Studies 33/2 (2012) 175–196. Google Scholar öffnen
Miller, David (1995): On Nationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2007): National Responsibility and Global Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2008): “Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship”, The Journal of Political Philosophy 16/4 (2008) 371–390. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2016): Strangers in Our Midst. The Political Philosophy of Migration, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Modood, Tariq (2013): Multiculturalism, Cambridge et. al.: Polity Press, 2nd edition. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2014): “Multiculturalism, Interculturalism and the Majority” (Kohlberg Memorial Lecture), Journal of Moral Education 43/3 (2014) 302–315. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2015a): Post-immigration ‘Difference’ and Integration, London: British Academy Policy Centre 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2015b): “Rethinking Multiculturalism, Interculturalisms and the Majority”, in: Uberoi Varun/Tariq Modood (eds.): Multiculturalism Rethought, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2015) 348–368. Google Scholar öffnen
Nasström, Sofia (2007): “The Legitimacy of the People”, Political Theory 35/5 (2007) 624–665. Google Scholar öffnen
Offe, Claus (2011): “From Migration in Geographic Space to Migration in Biographic Time: Views from Europe”, The Journal of Political Philosophy 19/3 (2011) 333–373. Google Scholar öffnen
Owen, David (2011): “National Membership and the Democratic State: Modes of Membership and Voting Rights”, Critical Review of Social and International Philosophy 14/5 (2011) 641–663. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2018): “Populus, demos, and Self-rule”, in: Democratic Inclusion. Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 183–203. Google Scholar öffnen
Özdem, Caglar/Maurice Schiff (2006) (eds.): International Migration, Remittances & the Brain Drain, Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; Houndsmill et.al.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Parekh, Bikhu (2006): Rethinking Multiculturalism, London: Red Globe Press, 2nd ed. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2009): “The Logic of Identity”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8/3 (2009) 267–284. Google Scholar öffnen
Plato: Republic, ed. by G.M.A. Grube, Indianapolis: Hackett 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
Pogge, Thomas W. (1989): Realizing Rawls, Cornell: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2002): World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge et.al.: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1973): The Roots of Reference (Paul Carus Lectures), La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publ. Google Scholar öffnen
Rawls, John (1955): “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review 64/1 (1955) 3–32. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1958): “Justice as Fairness”, Philosophical Review 67/2 (1958) 164–194. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1980): “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures”, Journal of Philosophy 77/9 (1980) 515–572. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1993a): Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1993b): “The Law of Peoples”, in: On Human Rights. Oxford Amnesty Lectures on Human Rights 1993, New York: Basic Books, 41–83. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1999): The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, Mass. et.al.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2001): Justice as Fairness. A Restatement, ed. by Erin Kelly, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Reiner, Hans (1948): “Die ‘Goldene’ Regel”, Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 3/1 (1948) 74–105. Google Scholar öffnen
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762): “On the Social Contract”, in: Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Basic Political Writings ed. by Peter Gay, transl. by Donald A. Cress, Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett 1987, 141–227. Google Scholar öffnen
Rubio-Marín, Ruth (2000): Immigration as a Democratic Challenge. Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2014): Human Rights and Immigration, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Sandel, Michael J. (1982): Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Schatzki, Theodore E./Karin Knorr Cetina/Eike von Savigny (eds.) (2001): The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmitt, Carl (1932/2015): Der Begriff des Politischen, 9th corr. ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt. Google Scholar öffnen
Searle, John R. (1995): The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2001): Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2010): Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Sen, Amartya (2006): Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny, London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2009): “The Fog of Identity”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8/3 (2009) 285–288. Google Scholar öffnen
Shachar, Ayelet (1998): “Group Identity and Women’s Rights in Family Law: The Perils of Multicultural Accommodation”, Journal of Political Philosophy 6/3 (1998) 285–305. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2009): The Birthright Lottery. Citizenship and Global Inequality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2017): “Citizenship for Sale?”, in: Shachar et.al (2017) 789–816. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Ian Hirschl (2014): “On Citizenship, States, and Markets”, Journal of Political Philosophy 22/2 (2014) 231–257. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Rainer Bauböck/Irene Bloemraad/Marten Vink (eds.) (2017): The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Sigman, Shayna (2006): “Everything Lawyers Know about Polygamy is Wrong”, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 16/1 (2006) 102–185. Google Scholar öffnen
Smearman, Claire A. (2009): “Second Wives’ Club: Mapping the Impact of Polygamy in U.S. Immigration Law”, Berkeley Journal of International Law 27/2 (2009) 382–447. Google Scholar öffnen
Smith, Michael (1987): “The Humean Theory of Motivation”, Mind 96 (1987) 36–61. Google Scholar öffnen
Smith, Rogers M. (2017): “Citizenship and Membership Duties Towards Quasi-citizens”, in: Shachar et.al. (2017) 817–837. Google Scholar öffnen
Somek, Alexander (1998): “National Solidarity, Global Impartiality, and the Performance of Philosophical Theory: The Example of Migration Policy”, Ratio Juris 11/2 (1998) 103–125. Google Scholar öffnen
Sona, Federica (2005): “Polygamy in Britain”, osservatorio delle libertà ed istituzioni religiosi, www.olir.it/areetematiche/104/documents/Sona_Polygamy_in_Britain.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Song, Sarah (2017): “Why Does the State Have the Right to Control Immigration”, in: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration (Nomos LVII) ed. by Jack Knight, New York: New York University Press 2017, 3–50. Google Scholar öffnen
Soysal, Yasemin Nohoglu (1994): The Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Spiro, Peter J. (2017): “Multiple Citizenship”, in: Shachar et.al. (2017) 621–643. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (2018): “Stakeholder Theory Won’t Save Citizenship”, in: Democratic Inclusion. Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 204–224. Google Scholar öffnen
Steiner, Hillel (1992): “Libertarianism and the Transnational Migration of People”, in: Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money ed. by Brian Barry/Robert E. Goodin, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press 1992, 87–94. Google Scholar öffnen
Stone Sweet, Alec (2000): Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Taylor, Charles (1985): Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1989): Sources of the Self. The Making of Modern Identity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Tesón, Fernando R. (2008): “Brain Drain”, San Diego Law Review 45 (2008) 899–932. Google Scholar öffnen
Tomuschat, Christian (1999): “International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century. General Course on Public International Law”, in: 281 Recueil des Cours 10/25 (1999), 9–438. Google Scholar öffnen
Triandafyllidou, Anna/Tariq Modood/Nasar Meer (eds.) (2012): European Multiculturalisms. Cultural, Religious and Ethnic Challenges, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Vertovec, Steven (2007): “Super-diversity and Its Implications”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 30/6 (2007) 1024–1054. Google Scholar öffnen
Viehoff, Daniel (2017): “The Truth in Political Instrumentalism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CXVII/3 (2017) 273–295. Google Scholar öffnen
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (ed.) (2013): The Cultural Dimension of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Waldron, Jeremy (1999): Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Wallace, James D. (2009): Norms and Practices, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Walzer, Michael (1977): Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1994): Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1980): “The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9/3 (1980) 209–229. Google Scholar öffnen
–– (1983): Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism & Equality, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen
Wellman, Christopher/Phillip Cole (2011): Debating the Ethics of Migration: Is There a Right to Exclude?, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
White, Douglas R. (1988): “Rethinking Polygyny. Co-Wives, Codes, and Cultural Systems”, Current Anthropology 19/4 (1988) 529–572. Google Scholar öffnen
White Ryan (2009): “Two Sides of Polygamy”, Journal of Law & Family Studies 447 (2009) 447–454. Google Scholar öffnen
Wilder, Colin F. (2012): “Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: Four Motives of Legal Change from Early Modern Europe”, History and Theory 51 (2012) 18–41. Google Scholar öffnen
Will, Frederick L. (1997): Pragmatism and Realism, London et.al.: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen
Williams, Bernard (1981): “Internal and External Reasons”, in: id.: Moral Luck. Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–113. Google Scholar öffnen
Winch, Peter (1958): The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar öffnen
Wimmer, Andreas (2013): Ethnic Boundary Making. Institutions, Power, Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
––/Nina Glick Schiller (2003): “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology”, The International Migration Review 37/3 (2003) 576–610. Google Scholar öffnen
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958): “Philosophical Investigations”, trans. by G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2nd ed. Google Scholar öffnen
Wylie, Laurence (1964): Village in the Vaucluse. An Account of Life in a French Village, New York: Harper & Row, 2nd edition. Google Scholar öffnen
Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008): Polygamy. A Cross-cultural Analysis, London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen