Cover des Buchs: The right to good administration at the crossroads of the various sources of fundamental rights in the EU integrated administrative system
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The right to good administration at the crossroads of the various sources of fundamental rights in the EU integrated administrative system

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2015

Zusammenfassung

„Gute Verwaltung“ ist ein zentraler Grundsatz der EU. Die Arbeit analysiert Chancen und Probleme dieses Grundsatzes, stellt sein hohes Potenzial, aber auch seine Probleme umfassend dar und zeigt anhand vieler Beispiele und unterschiedlicher Rechtsquellen die Möglichkeiten einer Fortentwicklung auf.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2015
Copyrightjahr
2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2638-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6798-2
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies
Band
7
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
574
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 30
    1. 1. Aims of the present study Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Approach of the thesis. Methods and sources Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Existing literature on the principle of good administration. Delimitation and input of the present contribution Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Outline of the thesis Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Hierarchical approach Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Pluralistic approach Kein Zugriff
      2. B. An alternative approach: the “lexical order of review” Kein Zugriff
      3. C. Conclusions on the problematic aspects stemming from the confluence of GPL and CFR rights Kein Zugriff
      1. A. Development of the right to good administration into a GPL and a CFR right respectively Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. “Judicialisation” of the Administration Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Good administration as a counterweight to the discretionary powers of the administration: administrative efficiency versus individual’s procedural protection Kein Zugriff
            1. 1) The protection of the right to good administration in the context of “composite” proceedings where a Member State is implementing an EU act with input from one or more EU administrative authorities... Kein Zugriff
            2. 2) The protection of the right to good administration in the context of “composite” proceedings where a final decision is taken by an EU administrative authority on the basis of input from Member Stat... Kein Zugriff
            3. (3) The protection of the right to good administration in the context of EU law implementation by the Commission with the input of the various “composite” Comitology committees Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Good administration at the confluence of its “subjective” and “objective” facets Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Good administration: “principle” or “right” for the purposes of Articles 51(1) and 52(5) CFR? Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Good administration: addressed to “every person” or merely to “EU Citizens”? Kein Zugriff
          4. d. Good administration: a tool for protecting interested third parties in administrative proceedings? Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of good administration as a GPL and as a Charter’s right Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union to which the right to good administration is addressed Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The absence of the EU Member States from the institutional scope of application of Article 41 CFR and the more extensive protection provided under the GPL status of the notion Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the right to good administration as a GPL and as a CFR right Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Roots and development of the right to be heard in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The right to be heard as part of the defence rights and as a sub-element of the right to good administration respectively: interrelation between these two “umbrella” notions Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The “initiated against” condition for the purposes of the right to be heard as a Charter’s right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) The right to be heard of an interested third party in administrative proceedings: criteria Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) What does the “adversely affected” requirement mean in practice? The example of the measures by which OLAF transmits information to the national authorities Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the right to be heard as a Charter’s right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. The institutional scope of protection of the right to be heard as a Charter’s right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The right to be heard as part of the right to good administration in the EU composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right to be heard and good administration Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) Roots and development of the right of access to the file in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
              1. (i) The right of access to the file and the the rights of the defence Kein Zugriff
              2. (ii) The right of access to the file and good administration Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) Roots and development of the right of access to documents in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) The status of the right of access to documents Kein Zugriff
              1. (i) The (polemic) articulation between the right of access to documents and the right of access to the file Kein Zugriff
              2. (ii) The articulation between the right of access to documents and the right of access to the file at the confluence of their (respective secondary legislations’) sources Kein Zugriff
              3. (iii) The right to good administration as a means to ensure the articulation between conflicting legislations – case study of Regulation 1049/2001 v Regulation 45/2001 Kein Zugriff
            4. (4) The right of access to documents and the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. The personal scope of protection of the right of access to the file and the right of access to documents: personal scope in the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the right of access to the file and the right of access to documents: material scope in the CFR v material scope stemming from the GPL status Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The protection of the right to of access to the file and the right of access to documents by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The protection of the right of access to the file and the right of access to documents by the EU Member States Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The right of access to the file and the right of access to documents in the EU composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right of access to the file / the right of access to documents and good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Roots and development of the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and the rights of the defence Kein Zugriff
        3. . The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and the right to effective judicial review: the “statement of reasons” requirement at the confluence of the administrative and ... Kein Zugriff
        4. 4. The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. The personal scope of protection of the administration’s obligation to give reasons for its decisions under the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the administration’s obligation to give reasons for its decisions under the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Institutional scope of protection of the administration’s obligation to give reasons for its decisions under the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions as part of the right to good administration in composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Roots and development of the right to languages in the EU legal order in its various “objective” facets Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Roots and development of the right to languages as a “subjective” right of individuals in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Language rights and the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Language rights of EU minorities Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Language rights of EU officials Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the right to languages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection as a sub-component of the right to good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. The institutional scope of protection of the right to languages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection as a sub-element of the right to good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. The protection of individuals’ language rights at the crossroads of two or more EU Member States Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The protection of language rights in the context of EU law implementation by the institutions of the Union following the advice of the various Comitology Committees Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right to languages and good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The status of the right to damages Kein Zugriff
          2. b. “Fault” requirement v “general principles common to the laws of the Member States” as a pre-condition to confer a remedy for infringement of the principles of good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Breach of the principle of good administration conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) Breach of the “reasonable time” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) Breach of the “impartiality” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            3. (3) Breach of the “confidentiality” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            4. (4) Breach of the “right to be heard” conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            5. (5) Breach of the “statement of reasons” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. The “contractual” liability of the Union for breach of the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Liability of the Union for the acts of its civil servants in the performance of their duties Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Liability of the Union for damage caused to its own civil servants – as a consequence of the violation of their right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Material scope of protection of the right to damages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection under the Charter Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Institutional scope of protection of the right to damages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection under the Charter Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The right to damages as part of the right to good administration in the EU composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right to damages and good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Principle of care: definition, scope of application and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Principle of diligence: definition, scope of application and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Principle of solicitude: definition, scope of application and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Status of the “individuals’ right to have their affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time”/ principles of “care”/“diligence”/“solicitude” Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Origins and development of the “impartiality” requirement in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The respect of the “impartiality” requirement in the context of administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Status of the “impartiality” requirement and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Fairness: origins and development in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Status of the “fairness” principle and its interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) “Reasonable time” determined by the circumstances of the case: the criteria serving to establish the reasonableness of a time-frame Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) Some examples of “reasonable time” in EU administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
          2. . Should a “global assessment” of the time-frames of the various administrative and judicial proceedings supplement the “piecemeal” way of assessing the reasonableness of the respective procedures’ le... Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Status of the “reasonable time” requirement and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The “individuals’ right to have their affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time” / the “principle of care” in composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the principle of care and good administration Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Personal scope of protection of good administration as a CFR right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      2. b. Material scope of protection of good administration as a CFR right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      3. c. Institutional scope of protection of good administration as a CFR right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Sub-principles of the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
      2. b. Implications stemming from the juxtaposition of the various sub-principles of the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The rights of the defence and good administration Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right to be heard as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The protection of the right to be heard in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The right to good administration as a means to ensure the articulation between the right of access to the file and the general right of access to documents Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right of access to the file documents Sas a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The protection of the right of access to the file documents in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. 1) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 C... Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The protection of the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right to languages as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The protection of the right to languages in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The protection of the right to good administration in contractual matters Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right to damages as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The protection of the right to damages in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
          1. (i) Principle of care Kein Zugriff
          2. (ii) Principle of diligence Kein Zugriff
          3. (iii) Principle of solicitude Kein Zugriff
          1. (i) The “impartiality” and “fairness” requirements as sub-components of good administration Kein Zugriff
          2. ii) The “reasonable time” requirement as sub-component of good administration: need for a “global” assessment of the respective time-frames of the various administrative and judicial steps to a proced... Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Final conclusions Kein Zugriff 510 - 511
    1. Legal writings Kein Zugriff
    2. Conferences, Congress and Studies Kein Zugriff
    3. Table of Case-law (in case number order) Kein Zugriff
    4. Opinions of the Advocates General of the CJEU Kein Zugriff
    5. Case-law of the General Court of the EU Kein Zugriff
    6. Case-law of the Civil Service Tribunal of the EU Kein Zugriff
    7. Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights Kein Zugriff
    8. National case-law: Kein Zugriff
    9. Table of International Legal Acts Kein Zugriff
    10. European Resolutions and Recommendations Kein Zugriff
    11. Table of Legal Acts of the EU Kein Zugriff
    12. Regulations Kein Zugriff
    13. Directives Kein Zugriff
    14. Decisions Kein Zugriff
    15. Resolutions, Declarations, Communications, Preliminary Workings and Reports of the EU Kein Zugriff
    16. Codes of Conduct, Rules and Guidelines of the EU Kein Zugriff
  7. Index Kein Zugriff 567 - 574

Literaturverzeichnis (1321)

  1. Case T-97/07 Imelios v Commission [2008] ECR II-54 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  2. Case T-111/07 Agrofert Holding v Commission [2010] ECR II-128 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  3. Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp v Commission [2011] ECR II-5129 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  4. Joined Cases T-166/07 and T-285/07 Italy v Commission [2010] ECR II-193 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  5. Case T-205/07 Italy v Commission [2011] ECR II-15 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  6. Case T-235/07 Bavaria v Commission [2011] ECR II-3229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  7. Case T-240/07 Heineken v Commission [2011] ECR II-3355 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  8. Case T-256/07 People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council [2008] ECR II-3019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  9. Case T-263/07 Estonia v Commission [2009] ECR II-3463 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  10. Case T-300/07 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2010] ECR II-4521 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  11. Case T-326/07 Cheminova and Others v Commission [2009] ECR II-2685 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  12. Case T-340/07 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2010] ECR II-16 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  13. Case T-475/07 Dow AgroSciences v Commission (GC, 9 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  14. Case T-62/08 ThyssenKrupp v Commission [2010] ECR II-3229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  15. Case T-83/08 Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha and Others v Commission (GC, 2 February 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  16. Case T-117/08 Italy v EESC [2011] ECR II-1463 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  17. Case T-121/08 PC-Ware Information Technologies v Commission [2010] ECR II-1541 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  18. Case T-135/08 Schniga v CPVO [2010] ECR II-5089 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  19. Case T-192/08 Kazchrome and Others v Council (GC, 25 October 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  20. Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08 Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais v Commission [2011] ECR II-1999 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  21. Case T-284/08 People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council [2008] ECR II-3487 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  22. Case T-380/08 Netherlands v Commission (GC, 13 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  23. Case T-387/08 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2010] ECR II-178 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  24. Joined Cases T-394/08, T-408/08, T-453/08 and T-454/08 Regione autonomadella Sardegna and Others v Commission [2011] ECR II-6255 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  25. Case T-424/08 Nexus Europe (Ireland) v Commission [2010] ECR II-96 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  26. Case T-428/08 STEF v Commission (GC, 12 April 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  27. Case T-461/08 Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIB [2011] ECR II-6367 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  28. Case T-481/08 Alisei v Commission [2010] ECR II-117 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  29. Case T-584/08 Cantiere navale De Poli v Commission [2011] ECR II-63 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  30. Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission [2011] ECR II-95 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  31. Case T-9/09 P Marcuccio v Commission (GC, 24 November 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  32. Case T-85/09 Kadi v Commission [2010] ECR II-5177 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  33. Case T-143/09 P Commission v Petrilli (GC, 16 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  34. Case T-218/09 Italy v Commission (GC, 12 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  35. Cases T-219/09 and T-326/09 Albertini and Others v EP [2010] ECR II-5935 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  36. Case T-246/09 Insula v Commission (GC, 13 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  37. Case T-261/09 P Commission v Violetti and Others (GC, 20 May 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  38. Case T-286/09 Intel Corp. v Commission (GC, 12 June 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  39. Case T-436/09 Dufour v ECB (GC, 26 October 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  40. Joined Cases T-458/09 and T-171/10 Slovak Telekom v Commission (GC, 22 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  41. Joined Cases T-29/10 and T-33/10 Netherlands and ING Groep v Commission (GC, 2 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  42. Case T-71/10 Xeda International and Others v Commission (GC, 19 January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  43. Case T-317/10 P L v Parliament (GC, 11 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  44. Case T-390/10 P Füller-Tomlinson v EP (GC, 6 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  45. Joined Cases T-439/10 and T-440/10 Fulmen (GC, 21 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  46. Case T-523/10 Interkobo v OHMI (GC, 27 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  47. Case T-107/11 P ETF v Schuerings (GC, 4 December 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  48. Case T-108/11 P ETF v Michel (GC, 4 December 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  49. Case T-116/11 EMA v Commission (GC, 11 December 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  50. Case T-119/11 Gbagbo v Council of the EU (GC, 25 April 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  51. Joined Cases T-229/11 and T-276/11 Lord Inglewood and Others v EP (GC, 13 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  52. Joined Cases T-346/11 and T-347/11 Gollnisch v EP (GC, 17 January 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  53. Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council (GC, 13 Septembre 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  54. Joined Cases T-174/12 and T-80/13 Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank v Council of the EU (GC, 4 February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  55. Case T-368/12 P Commission v Macchia (GC, 21 May 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  56. Case-law of the Civil Service Tribunal of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  57. Joined Cases F-5/05 and F-7/05 Violetti and Others v Commission [2009] ECR Staff CasesI-A-1-83; II-A-1-473 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  58. Case F-23/05 Giraudy v Commission [2007] ECR I-A-1-121 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  59. Case F-36/05 Schulze v Commission (CST, 30 September 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  60. Case F-40/05 Andreasen v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-337; FP-II-A-1-1859 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  61. Case F-44/05 RENV Strack v Commission (CST, 23 October 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  62. Joined Cases F-51/05 and F-18/06 Duyster v Commission (CST, 13 December 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  63. Case F-87/05 Ott and Others v Commission [2006] ECR FP-I-A-1-73; FP-II-A-1-263 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  64. Case F-95/05 N v Commission [2007] ECR Staff Cases I-A-423; II-A-1-2395 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  65. Case F-107/05 Toth v Commission (CST, 30 September 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  66. Joined Cases F-124/05 and F-96/06 A and G v Commission (CST, 13 January 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  67. Case F-125/05 Tsarnavas v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-43; FP-II-A-1-231 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  68. Case F-1/06 Fernández Ortiz v Commission [2007] Staff Cases I-A-1-53; II-A-1-293 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  69. Case F-28/06 Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-431; FP-A-1-2443 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  70. Case F-99/06 López Teruel v OHMI [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-147; FP-II-A-1-797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  71. Case F-133/06 Marcuccio v Commission (CST, 4 November 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  72. Case F-147/06 Dragoman v Commission [2008] ECR Staff Cases I-A-1-265; II-A-1-1411 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  73. Case F-5/07 Nijs v Court of Auditors [2008] ECR FP-I-A-1-207; FP-II-A-1-1145 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  74. Case F-7/07 Angioi v Commission (CST, 29 June 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  75. Case F-9/07 Angé Serrano v Parliament (CST, 29 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  76. Case F-25/07 Bleser v CJEU (CJEU, 14 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  77. Case F-45/07 Wolfgang Mandt v EP (CST, 1 July 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  78. Case F-51/07 Bui Van v Commission (CST, 11 September 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  79. Case F-63/07 Patsarika v Cedefop [2009] ECR I-A-1-39; II-A-1-159 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  80. Joined Cases F-116/07, F-13/08 and F-31/08 Tomas v Parliament (CST, 7 July 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  81. Case F-122/07 Marcuccio v Commission [2009] Staff Cases I-A-1-385; II-A-1-2057 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  82. Case F-30/08 Nanopoulos v Commission (CST 11 May 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  83. Case F-33/08 V v Commission [2009] ECR Staff Cases I-A-1-403; II-A-1-2159 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  84. Case F-80/08 Wenig v Commission [2009] ECR Staff Cases I-A-1-479; II-A-1-2609 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  85. Case F-87/08 Schuerings v ETF (CST, 9 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  86. Case F-88/08 Vandeuren v ETF (CST, 9 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  87. Case F-96/08 Cerafogli v European Central Bank (CST, 28 October 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  88. Case F-53/09 J v Commission (CST, 11 May 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  89. Case F-59/09 De Nicola v European Invest Bank (CST, 8 March 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  90. Case F-63/09 Donati v ECB (CST, 13 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  91. Case F-77/09 Nijs v Court of Auditors (CST, 13 January 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  92. Case F-79/09 AE v Commission (CST, 14 September 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  93. Case F-82/09 Nolin v Commission (CST, 1 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  94. Joined Cases F-88/09 and F-48/10 Z v Court of Justice of the European Union (CST, 5 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  95. Case F-9/10 AC v Council (CST, 28 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  96. Case F-12/10 Kerstens v Commission (CST, 8 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  97. Case F-36/10 Rapone v Commission (CST, 28 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  98. Case F-41/10 Bermeja Garde v European Economic and Social Committee (CST, 25 September 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  99. Case F-42/10 Skareby v Commission (CST, 16 May 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  100. Case F-43/10 Cerafogli v European Central Bank (CST, 12 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  101. Case F-49/10 De Nicola v EIB (CST, 28 June 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  102. Case F-54/10 Verheyden v Commission (CST, 4 February 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  103. Case F-85/10 AI v Court of Justice (CST, 11 July 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  104. Case F-91/10 AK v Commission (CST, 13 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  105. Case F-104/10 de Pretis Cagnodo and Others v Commission (CST, 16 May 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  106. Case F-112/10 Trentea v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (CST, 11 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  107. Case F-2/11 BW v Commission (CST, 13 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  108. Case F-31/11 BI v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CST, 7 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  109. Case F-46/11 Tzirani v Commission (CST, 11 July 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  110. Case F-63/11 Macchia v Commission (CST 13 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  111. Case F-94/11 Brune v Commission (CST, 21 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  112. Case F-97/11 Vienne v European Parliament (CST, 11 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  113. Case F-13/12 BR v Commission (CST 19 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  114. Case F-39/12 BQ v Court of Auditors of the EU (CST, 23 October 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  115. Case F-103/12 Doyle v Europol (CST, 5 November 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  116. Case F-111/12 Nardone v Commission (CST, 2 October 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  117. Case F-8/13 CP v EP (CST, 26 March 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  118. Case F-5/14 R CX v Commission (CST, 13 February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  119. Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  120. Neumeister v Austria App no 1936/63 (ECtHR, 7 May 1974) – Individual dissenting opinion of Judge Zekia Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  121. Wemhoff v Germany App no 2122/64 (ECtHR, 27 June 1968) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  122. König v Germany App no 6232/73 (ECtHR, 28 Juin 1978) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  123. Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium App no 6878/75; 7238/75 (ECtHR, 23 June 1981) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  124. Albert and Le Compte v Belgium App no 7299/75; 7496/76 (ECtHR, 10 February 1983) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  125. Eckle v Germany App no 8130/78 (ECtHR, 21 June 1983) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  126. Piersack v Belgium App no 8692/79 (ECtHR, 26 October 1984) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  127. Kamasinski v Austria App no 9783/82 (ECtHR, 19 December 1989) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  128. Brozicek v Italy App no 10964/84 (ECtHR, 19 December 1989) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  129. Imbrioscia v Switzerland App no 13972/88 (ECtHR, 24 November 1993) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  130. Schuler Zgraggen v Switzerland App no 14518/89 (ECtHR, 24 June 1993) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  131. Hornsby v Greece App no 18357/91 (ECtHR, 19 March 1997) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  132. Ruiz Torija v Spain App no 18390/91 (ECtHR, 9 December 1994) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  133. Garyfallou Aebe v Greece App no 18996/91 (ECtHR, 24 September 1997) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  134. Bryan v UK App no 19178/91 (ECtHR, 22 November 1995) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  135. Acquaviva v France App no 19248/91 (ECtHR, 21 November 1995) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  136. Georgiadis v Grece App no 21522/93 (ECtHR, 29 Mai 1997) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  137. Pélissier and Sassi v France App no 25444/94 (ECtHR, 25 March 1999) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  138. Cyprus v Turkey App no 25781/94 (ECtHR, 10 May 2001) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  139. Selmouni v France App no 25803/94 (ECtHR, 28 July 1999) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  140. Kingsley v UK App no 35605/97 (ECtHR, 28 May 2002) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  141. Ekin Association v France App no 39288/98 (ECtHR, 17 July 2001) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  142. Loiseau v France App no 46809/99 (ECtHR, 18 November 2003) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  143. Sejdovic v Italy App no 56581/00 (ECtHR, 1 March 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  144. Sakkopoulos v Grece App no 61828/00 (ECtHR, 15 January 2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  145. Pizzati v Italy App no 62361/00 (ECtHR, 29 March 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  146. Jussila v Finland App no 73053/01 (ECtHR, 23 November 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  147. Alija v Grece App no 73717/01 (ECtHR, 7 April 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  148. Kakamoukas and Others v Greece App no 38311/02 (ECtHR, 15 February 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  149. Gorou v Greece App no 12686/03 (ECtHR, 20 March 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  150. Matky v Czech Republic App no 19101/03 (ECtHR, 10 July 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  151. Dubus v France App no 5242/04 (ECtHR, 11 Juin 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  152. Tillack v Belgium App no 20477/05 (ECtHR, 27 November 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  153. Golder v UK App no 4451/10 (ECtHR, 21 February 1975) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  154. National case-law: Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  155. France Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  156. CE 4 March 1949, Trèbes Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  157. CE 29 April 1949, Bourdeaux Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  158. CE 7 July 1965 Fédération nationale des transports routiers, Lebon Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  159. CE 9 November 1966, Commune de Clohars-Carnoët (conclusions of President Braibant) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  160. CE 5 May 1995 Burruchaga Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  161. CE 3 December 1999 Didier Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  162. CE 26 May 2008 Société Norelec Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  163. Romania Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  164. Decisions n° 2668 of 20 May 2010 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  165. Decision n° 118 of 21 January 2011 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  166. UK Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  167. R v Chancellor of the University of Cambridge (Dr Bentley's Case) [1723] Str 557 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  168. Doody v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1994] 1 AC 531 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  169. R. v Higher Education Funding Council ex parte Institute of Dental Surgery [1994] 1 All ER 651 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  170. R. (on the application of Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and other cases [2001] HRLR 2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  171. Table of International Legal Acts Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  172. International Treaties and Conventions Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  173. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [1950] 213 UNTS 222 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  174. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [1976] General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  175. The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Access to Information, public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, signed in Aarhus (Århus), Denmark [2001] Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  176. Council of Europe Convention on Access to official documents [2009] Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  177. European Resolutions and Recommendations Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  178. Council of Europe Resolution (77) 31 of 28 September 1977 on the Protection of the Individual in Relation to the Acts of Administrative Authorities Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  179. Council of Europe Recommendation R(97)7 on Local Public Services an the Rights of their Users (1 April 1997) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  180. Council of Europe Recommendation R(80)2 concerning the exercise of discretionary powers by administrative authorities (11 March 1980) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  181. Council of Europe Recommendation R(2000)10 on codes of conduct for public officials (11 May 2000) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  182. Council of Europe Interim Resolution Res DH (2000)135 of 25 October 2000 on excessive length of judicial proceedings in Italy Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  183. Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec (2007)7, which added – in Appendix – a Code of good administration (20 June 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  184. Table of Legal Acts of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  185. Treaties and Conventions of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  186. Treaty instituting the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty [1951] 261 UNTS 140 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  187. Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC Treaty/Treaty of Rome) [1957] 294 UNTS 17 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  188. Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom Treaty/EAEC Treaty) [1957] 294 UNTS 259/OJ 2010 C 84/1 (Consolidated Version) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  189. Treaty establishing the European Community (EEC/EC) (Codified Version) [1992] OJ C 224/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  190. Treaty on the European Union 1992 (Maastricht Treaty) [1992] OJ C 191/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  191. Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts (Treaty of Amsterdam) [1997] OJ C 340/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  192. Treaty establishing the European Community [1997] OJ C 340 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  193. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2000] OJ C 364/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  194. Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe [2004] OJ C 310/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  195. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2007] OJ C 303/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  196. Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2008] OJ C 115/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  197. Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) (TEU) [2010] OJ C 83/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  198. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version) (TFEU) [2010] OJ C 83/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  199. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2010] OJ C 83/389 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  200. Regulations Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  201. EEC Council Regulation 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community [1958] OJ 17/385 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  202. Council Regulation 3 concerning social security for migrant workers [1958] OJ 30/561 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  203. EEC Council Regulation 17: First Regulation Implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty [1962] OJ 13/204 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  204. Council Regulation 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community [1968] OJ L 257/2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  205. Council Regulation (EEC) 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community [1971] OJ L 149/2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  206. Council Regulation (EEC) 355/77 of 15 February 1977 on common measures to improve the conditions under which agricultural products are processed and marketed [1977] OJ L 51/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  207. Commission Regulation (EEC) 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific or cultural materials [1979] OJ L 318/32 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  208. Council Regulation (EEC) 3017/79 of 20 December 1979 on protection against dumped and subsidized imports from countries non members of the European Economic Community [1979] OJ L 339/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  209. Council Regulation (EEC) 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [1989] OJ L 395/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  210. Council Regulation (EEC) 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin [1990] OJ L 224/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  211. Council Regulation (EEC) 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [1992] OJ L 302/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  212. Commission Regulation (EEC) 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [1993] OJ L 253/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  213. Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark [1994] OJ L 11/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  214. Council Regulation (EC) 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1996] OJ L 56/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  215. Council Regulation (EC) 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the Application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [1999] OJ L 083/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  216. European Parliament and Council Regulation 1073/1999 of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) [1999] OJ L 136/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  217. Commission Regulation 823/2000 of 19 April 2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies [2000] OJ L 100/24 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  218. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 45/2001 of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [2001] OJ L 8/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  219. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents [2001] OJ L 145/43 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  220. Council Regulation 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2003] OJ L 1/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  221. Regulation (EC) 1641/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2003 amending Council Regulation (EEC) 1210/90 on the establishment of the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network [2003] OJ L 245/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  222. Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) [2004] OJ L 24/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  223. Commission Regulation (EC) 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty [2004] OJ L 123, pp. 18-24 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  224. Commission Notice on the handling of complainants by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty [2004] OJ C 101/65 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  225. Commission Regulation 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [2004] OJ L 140/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  226. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1367/2006 of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies [2006] OJ L 264/13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  227. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1331/2008 of 16 December 2008 establishing a common authorization procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings [2008] OJ L 354/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  228. Council Regulation (EC) 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Community [2009] OJ L 188/93 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  229. Council Regulation (EU) 1260/2012 of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements [2012] OJ L 361/89 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  230. Directives Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  231. Council Directive 64/221/EEC of 25 February 1964 on the co-ordination of special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health [1964] OJ 56/850 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  232. Council Directive 71/118/EEC of 15 February 1971 on health problems affecting trade in fresh poultrymeat [1971] OJ L 55/23 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  233. Council Directive 92/116/EEC of 17 December 1992 amending and updating Directive 71/118/EEC on health problems affecting trade in fresh poultrymeat [1993] OJ L 62/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  234. European Parliament and Council Directive 2003/4/EC of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC [2003] OJ L 41/26 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  235. Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification [2003] OJ L 251/12 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  236. EP and Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member states (amending Regulation (EEC) N° 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC) [2004] OJ L 158/77 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  237. Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status [2005] OJ L 326/13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  238. European Parliament and Council Directive 2007/46/EC of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles [2007] OJ L 263/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  239. European Parliament and Council Directive 2010/64/EU of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings [2010] OJ L 280/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  240. European Parliament and Council Directive 2012/29/EU of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA [2012] OJ L 315/57 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  241. Decisions Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  242. Council Decision 93/731/EC on public access to Council documents [1993] OJ L 340/43 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  243. Council Decision 93/662/EC of 6 December 1993 adopting the Council’s Rules of Procedure [1993] OJ L 304/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  244. Council Decision 93/731/EC on public access to Council documents [1993] OJ L 340/43 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  245. Commission Decision 94/90/ECSC, EC, Euratom on public access to Commission documents [1994] OJ L 46/58 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  246. Commission Decision 2496/96/ECSC of 18 December 1996 establishing Community rules for State aid to the steel industry [1996] OJ L 338 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  247. Decision of the Committee of the Regions of 17 September 1997 concerning public access to documents of the Committee of the Regions [1997] OJ L 351/70 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  248. Economic and Social Committee Decision on public access to ESC documents [1997] OJ L 339/18 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  249. European Parliament Decision 97/632/EC, ECSC, Euratom on public access to European Parliament documents [1997] OJ L 263/27 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  250. Commission’s Decision 2000/117/EC of 26 October 1999 concerning a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty Case IV/33.884 – Nederlandse Federative Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied and Technische Unie (FEG and TU) (notified under document number C(1999) 3439)) [2000] OJ L 39/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  251. Commission Decision 2000/627/EC of 16 May 2000 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (IV/34.018 – Far East Trade Tariff Charges and Surcharges Agreement (FETTCSA)) (notified under number C(2000) 1170) [2000] OJ L 268 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  252. Council Decision 2001/840/EC of 29 November 2001 amending the Council’s Rules of Procedure [2001] OJ L 313/40 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  253. Commission Decision 2001/937/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 5 December 2001 amending its rules of procedure (C (2001)3714) [2001] OJ L 345/94 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  254. Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [2002] OJ L 190/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  255. Decision of the European Central Bank 2004/258/EC of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents (ECB/2004/3), [2004] OJ L 80/42 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  256. Discussion Document of the Court of Justice of the European Union on Certain Aspects of the Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (5 May 2010), available on ˂www.curia.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  257. Commission Decision 2011/276/EU of 26 May 2010 concerning state aid in the form of a tax settlement agreement implemented by Belgium in favour of Umicore SA [2011] OJ L 122/76 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  258. Resolutions, Declarations, Communications, Preliminary Workings and Reports of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  259. European Commission (DG for employment, industrial relations and social affairs) Report of the expert group on fundamental rights ‘Affirming fundamental rights in the European Union. Time to act’ (1999) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  260. European Commission Communication COM/2000/1 final of 2 February 2002 on the precautionary principle Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  261. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (2000/C 177 E/10) COM(2000) 30 final 2000/0032(COD) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  262. European Parliament Report A5-0318/2000 of 27 October 2000 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents (COM(2000)30 – C5-0057/2000 – 2000/0032(COD)) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  263. European Commission Communication COM (2000) 559 final of 13 September 2000 on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  264. Joined Declaration relating to Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents [2001] OJ L 173/5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  265. The Commission’s Report COM(2004) 45 final of 30 January 2004 on the implementation of the principles in EC Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  266. The Commission’s Proposal of 30 April 2008 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, Brussels, COM(2008) 229 final, 2008/0090 (COD) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  267. Opinion of the EDPS of 30 June 2008 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, available on ˂www.edps.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  268. European Parliament Resolution of 14 January 2009 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (implementation of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001) (2007/2154(INI)), available on ˂ www.europarl.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  269. Joint Communication from the Presidents of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, delivered on 24 January 2011, further to the meeting between the two courts in January 2011, available on ˂www.curia.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  270. European Parliament Resolution of 14 September 2011 on public access to documents (Rule 104(7)) for the years 2009-2010 (2010/2294(INI)), para 36, available on ˂www.europarl.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  271. Answer given by Mr Barroso on behalf of the Commission to the parliamentary question raised by Ms Anneli Jäätteenmäki (17 January 2012) – E-011125/2011, available on ˂ec.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  272. European Parliament, ‘Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union: European Added Value Assessment’ (2012) available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu ˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  273. European Parliament Resolution of 15 January 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on a Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union (2012/2024(INI)), available on ˂www.europarl.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  274. Codes of Conduct, Rules and Guidelines of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  275. 93/730/EC: Code of conduct concerning public access to Council and Commission documents [1993] OJ 340/41 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  276. Rules on public access to documents adopted by the Bank [European Investment Bank]’s Management Committee [1997] OJ C 24/13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  277. Code of Good Administrative Behaviour for Staff of the European Commission and their Relations with the Public [2000] OJ L 267/20 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  278. Guide to the obligations of officials and other servants of the European parliament (Code of conduct) [2000] OJ C 97/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  279. European Ombudsman, ‘European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’ (Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2005), pp. 1-20 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  280. Case C-157/90 Infortec v Commission [1992] ECR I-3525 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  281. Case C-181/90 Consorgan v Commission [1992] ECR I-3557 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  282. Case C-189/90 Cipeke v Commission [1992] ECR I-3573 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  283. Case C-200/90 Denkavit and Others v Skatteministeriet [1992] ECR I-2217 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  284. Case C-255/90 P Burban [1992] ECR I-2253 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  285. Case C-269/90 Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte [1991] ECR I-5469 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  286. Case C-282/90 Vreugdenhil v Commission [1992] ECR I-1937 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  287. Case C-97/91 Borelli v Commission [1992] ECR I-6313 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  288. Case C-198/91 Cook v Commission [1993] ECR I-2487 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  289. Case C-220/91 P Commission v Stahlwerke Peine-Salzgitter [1993] ECR I-2393 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  290. Case C-225/91 Matra v Commission [1993] ECR I-3203 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  291. Case C-326/91 P de Compte v Parliament [1994] ECR I-2091 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  292. Case C-19/92 Kraus v Land Baden-Württemberg [1993] ECR I-1663 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  293. Case C-36/92 P SEP v Commission [1994] ECR I-1911 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  294. Case C-51/92 P Hercules Chemicals v Commission [1999] ECR I-4235 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  295. Case C-60/92 Otto v Postbank NV [1993] ECR I-5683 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  296. Case 75/92 Hua Fa Industrial [1994] ECR I-3141 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  297. Case C-91/92 Faccini Dori v Recreb [1994] ECR I-3325 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  298. Case C-135/92 Fiskano v Commission [1994] ECR I-2885 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  299. Case C-360/92 P The Publishers Association v Commission [1995] ECR I-23 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  300. Joined Cases C-46/93 and C-48/93 Brasserie du pêcheur v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen / Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame and Others [1996] ECR-1029 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  301. Case C-143/93 Gebroeders van Es Douane Agenten BV v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen [1996] ECR I-431 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  302. Case C-310/93 P BPB Industries and British Gypsum v Commission [1995] ECR I-865 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  303. Case C-5/94 Hedley Lomas [1996] ECR I-2553 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  304. Case C-58/94 Kingdom of the Netherlands v Council [1996] ECR I-2169 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  305. Case C-122/94 Commission v Council [1996] ECR I-881 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  306. Case C-150/94 United Kingdom v Council [1998] ECR I-7235 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  307. Joined Cases C-178/94, C-179/94, C-188/94, C-189/94 and C-190/94 Dillenkofer [1996] ECR I-4845 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  308. Case C-192/94 El Corte Inglés v Blázquez Rivero [1996] ECR I-1281 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  309. Case C-274/94 Criminal proceedings v Bickel and Franz [1998] ECR I-7637 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  310. Case C-32/95 P Commission v Lisrestal [1996] ECR I-5373 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  311. Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia [1997] ECR I-3395 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  312. Case C-185/95 P Baustahlgewebe v Commission [1998] ECR I-8417 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  313. Case C-261/95 Palmisani [1997] ECR I-4025 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  314. Case C-263/95 Germany v Commission [1998] ECR I-441 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  315. Case C-282/95 P Guérin automobiles v Commission [1997] ECR I-1503 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  316. Case C-296/95 The Queen v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, ex parte EMU Tabac and Others [1998] ECR I-1605 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  317. Case C-367/95 P Commission v Sytraval [1998] ECR I-1719 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  318. C 209/96 United Kingdom v Commission [1998] ECR I 5655 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  319. Case C-274/96 Criminal proceedings v Bickel and Others [1998] ECR I-7637 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  320. Case C-39/97 Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. [1998] ECR I-5507 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  321. Case C-104/97 P Atlanta and Others v Council and Commission [1999] ECR I-6983 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  322. Case C 245/97 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I 11261 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  323. Case C 252/97 P N v Commission [1998] ECR I 4871 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  324. Case C-263/97 The Queen v Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce, ex parte First City Trading Ltd and Others [1998] ECR I-5537 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  325. Case C-266/97 P VBA v VGB and Others [2000] ECR I-2135 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  326. Case C-302/97 Konle [1999] ECR I-3099 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  327. Case C-334/97 Commission v Commune di Montorio al Vomano [1999] ECR I-3387 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  328. Case C-349/97 Kingdom of Spain v Commission [2003] ECR I-3851 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  329. Case C-424/97 Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein [2000] ECR I-5123 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  330. Case C-48/98 Söhl & Söhlke [1999] ECR I-7877 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  331. Case C-151/98 P Pharos v Commission [1999] ECR I-8157 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  332. Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  333. Case C-168/98 Luxembourg v European Parliament and Council [2000] ECR I-9131 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  334. Joined Cases C-174/98 P and C-189/98 P van der Wal v Commission [2000] ECR I-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  335. Case C-237/98 Dorch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Council and Commission [2000] ECR I-4549 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  336. Case C-352/98 P Bergaderm and Others v Commission [2000] ECR I-5291 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  337. Case C-449/98 P IECC v Commission [2001] ECR I-3875 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  338. Case C-462/98 P Mediocurso [2000] ECR I-7183 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  339. Case C-17/99 France v Commission [2001] ECR I-2481 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  340. Joined Cases C-80/99, C-81/99 and C-82/99 Flemmer and Others v Council and Commission [2001] ECR I-7211 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  341. Case C-194/99 P Thyssen Stahl v Commission [2003] ECR I-10821 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  342. Case C-195/99 P Hoesch v Commission [2003] ECR I-10937 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  343. Joined Cases C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P à C-252/99 P et C-254/99 P Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission [2002] ECR I-8375 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  344. Case C-248/99 P Monsanto [2002] ECR I-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  345. Case C-269/99 Carl Kühne and others [2001] ECR I-9517 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  346. Case C-270/99 P Z v EP [2001] ECR I-9197 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  347. Case C-274/99 P Connolly v Commission [2001] ECR I-1611 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  348. Case C-310/99 Italy v Commission [2002] ECR I-2289 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  349. Case C-315/99 P Ismeri Europa v Court of Auditors [2001] ECR I-5281 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  350. Case C-353/99 P Council v Hautala [2001] ECR I-9565 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  351. Case C-453/99 Courage [2001] ECR I-6297 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  352. Case C 516/99 Schmid [2002] ECR I 4573 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  353. Case C-517/99 RTL Belgium [2010] ECR I-14093 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  354. Joined Cases C-57/00 P and C-61/00 P Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission [2003] ECR I-9975 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  355. Joined Cases C-74/00 P and C-75/00 P Falck and Others v Commission [2002] ECR I-7869 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  356. Case C-76/00 P Petrotub and Others v Council [2003] ECR I-79 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  357. Case C-112/00 Schmidberger [2003] ECR I-5659 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  358. Joined Cases C-204/00 P, C 205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P and C-219/00 P Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission [2004] ECR I-123 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  359. Case C-312/00 P Commission v Camar and Tico [2002] ECR I-11355 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  360. C-338/00 P Volkswagen v Commission [2003] ECR I-9189 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  361. Case C-378/00 Commission v EP and Council [2003] ECR I-937 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  362. Case C-395/00 Distillerie Fratelli Cipriani [2002] ECR I-11877 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  363. Case C 469/00 Ravil [2003] ECR I 5053 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  364. Case C-472/00 P Commisson v Fresh Marine [2003] ECR I-7541 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  365. Case C-501/00 Spain v Commission [2004] ECR I-6717 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  366. Case C-76/01 P Eurocoton and Others v Council [2003] ECR I-10091 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  367. Case C-87/01 P Commission v CCRE [2003] ECR I-7617 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  368. Case C 108/01 Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma and Others [2003] ECR I 5121 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  369. Case C-189/01 Jippes and Others v Minister van Landbouw [2001] ECR I-5689 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  370. Case C-224/01 Köbler [2003] ECR I-10239 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  371. Case C-304/01 Spain v Commission [2004] ECR I-7655 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  372. Case C-361/01 P Kik v OHMI [2003] ECR I-8283 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  373. Case C-36/02 Omega [2004] ECR I-9609 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  374. Case C-141/02 P Commission v T-Mobile Austria GmbH [2005] ECR I-1283 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  375. Case C-170/02 P Schlüsselverlag J.S. Moser and Others v Commission [2003] ECR I-9889 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  376. Case C-234/02 P European Ombudsman v Lamberts [2004] ECR I-2803 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  377. Joined Cases C-387/02, C-391/02 and C-403/02 Criminal proceedings against Berlusconi and Others [2005] ECR I-3565 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  378. Case C-105/03 Pupino [2005], ECR I-5285 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  379. Case C-160/03 Spain v Eurojust [2005] ECR I-2077 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  380. Case C-198/03 P Commission v CEVA Santé Animale [2005] ECR I-6357 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  381. Joined Cases C-346/03 and C-529/03 Atzeni and Others v Regione autonoma della Sardegna [2006] ECR I-1875 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  382. Case C-443/03 Götz Leffler v Berlin Chemie [2005] ECR I-9611 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  383. Case C-540/03 Parliament v Council [2006] ECR I-5769 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  384. Case C-105/04 P Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v Commission [2006] ECR I-8725 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  385. Case C-113/04 P Technische Unie v Commission [2006] ECR I-8831 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  386. Joined Cases C-154/04 and C-155/04 Alliance for Natural Health [20050] ECR I-6451 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  387. Case C-167/04 P JCB Service v Commission [2006] ECR I-8935 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  388. Case C-248/04 Koninklijke Coöperative Cosun UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit [2006] ECR I-10211 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  389. Case C-260/04 Commission v Italy [2007] ECR I-7083 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  390. Case C-310/04 Spain v Council [2006] ECR I-7285 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  391. Case C-506/04 Wilson v Ordre des avocats du bureau de Luxembourg [2006] ECR I-8613 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  392. Case C-521/04 P(R) Tillack v Commission [2005] ECR I-3103 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  393. Case C-28/05 G. J. Dokter [2006] ECR I-5431 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  394. Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Kingdom of Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I-4723 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  395. Case C-51/05 P Commission v Dolianova and Others [2008] ECR I-5341 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  396. Case C-64/05 P Sweden v Commission [2007] ECR I-11389 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  397. Case C-243/05 P Agraz and Others v Commission [2006] ECR I-10833 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  398. Case C-266/05 P Sison v Council [2007] ECR I-1233 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  399. Case C-331/05 P Internationaler Hilfsonds v Commisson [2007] ECR I-5475 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  400. Case C-341/05 Laval [2007] ECR I-11767 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  401. Case C 344/05 P Commission v De Bry [2006] ECR I 10915 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  402. Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P Kadi v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6351 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  403. Case C-428/05 Laub v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [2007] ECR I-5069 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  404. Case C-432/05 Unibet [2007] ECR I-2271 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  405. Case C-438/05 Viking [2007] ECR I-10779 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  406. Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6513 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  407. Case C-271/06 Netto Supermarkt GmbH & Co. OHG v Finanzamt Malchin [2008] ECR I-771 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  408. Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  409. Case C 308/06 Intertanko and Others v Secretary of State for Transport [2008] ECR I 4057 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  410. Joined Cases C-341/06 P and C-342/06 P Chronopost SA and La Poste v UFEX and Others [2008] ECR I-4777 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  411. Joined Cases C-399/06 P and C-403/06 P Hassan v Council and Commission [2009] ECR I-11393 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  412. Case C-409/06 Winner Wetten (CJEU, 8 Septembre 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  413. Case C-445/06 Danske Slagterier [2009] ECR I-2119 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  414. Case C-450/06 Varec v Etat belge [2008] ECR I-581, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  415. Case C-521/06 P Athinaïki Techniki v Commission [2008] ECR I-582 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  416. Case C-47/07 P Masdar (UK) v Commission [2008] ECR I-9761 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  417. Case C-139/07 P Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau [2010] ECR I-5885 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  418. Case C-290/07 P Commission v Scott [2010] ECR I-7763 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  419. Case C-308/07 P Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso v Parliament [2009] ECR I-1059 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  420. Case C-349/07 Sopropé [2008] ECR I-10369 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  421. Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt v Commission [2009] ECR I-6155 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  422. Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon [2009] ECR I-10923 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  423. Case C-440/07 P Commission v Schneider Electric [2009] ECR I-6413 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  424. Case C-441/07 P Commission v Alrosa [2010] ECR I-5949 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  425. Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden v API and Commission [2010] ECR I-8533 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  426. Case C-555/07 Kücükdeveci [2010] ECR I-365 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  427. Case C-28/08 P Commission v Bavarian Lager [2010] ECR I-6055 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  428. Case C-101/08 Audiolux [2009] ECR I-9823 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  429. Case C-127/08 Metock [2008] ECR I-6241 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  430. Case C-140/08 Rakvere Lihakombinaat [2009] ECR I-10533 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  431. Case C-141/08 P Foshan v Council [2009] ECRI-9147 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  432. Case C-203/08 Sporting Exchange v Minister van Justitie [2010] ECR I-4695 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  433. Case C-214/08 P Guigard v Commission [2009] ECR I-91 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  434. Case C-233/08 Kyrian v Celni úřad Tábor [2010] ECR I-177 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  435. Case C-476/08 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2009] ECR I-207 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  436. Case C-526/08 Commission v Luxembourg [2010] ECR I-6151 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  437. Case C-27/09 P French Republic v People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (CJEU, 21 December 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  438. Case C-39/09 P SPM v Council and Commission [2010] ECR I-38 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  439. Case C-83/09 Commission v Kronoply and Kronotex [2011] ECR I-4441 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  440. Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Markus Schecke [2010] ECR I-11063 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  441. Case C-221/09 AJD Tuna [2011] ECR I-1655 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  442. Case C-279/09 DEB (CJEU, 22 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  443. Case C-362/09 P AthinaïkiTechniki v Commission (CJEU, 16 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  444. Joined Cases C-372/09 and C-373/09 Peñarroja Fa [2011] ECR I-1785 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  445. Case C-377/09 Hanssens-Ensch [2010] ECR I-7751 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  446. Case C-410/09 Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa [2011] ECR I-3853 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  447. Case C-457/09 Chartry (CJEU, 1 March 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  448. Joined Cases C-471/09 P to C-473/09 P Diputación Foralde de Vizcaya and Others v Commission [2011] ECR I-111 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  449. Joined Cases C-474/09 P to C-476/09 P Diputación Foralde de Vizcaya and Others v Commission [2011] ECR I-113 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  450. Case C-505/09 P Commission v Estonia (CJEU, 29 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  451. Case C-517/09 RTL Belgium [2010] ECR I-14093 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  452. Case C-51/10 P Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHMI [2011] ECR I-1541 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  453. Case C-109/10 P Solvay v Commission [2011] ECR I-10329 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  454. Case C-149/10 Chatzi [2010] ECR I-8489 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  455. Case C-282/10 Dominguez (CJEU, 24 January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  456. Case C-310/10 Agafiţei and Others [2011] ECR I-2505 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  457. Case C-338/10 GLS (CJEU 22 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  458. Case C-339/10 Estov (CJEU, 12 November 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  459. Case C-400/10 PPU McB (CJEU, 5 October 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  460. Case C-404/10 P Commission v Odile Jacob (CJEU, 28 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  461. Case C-433/10 P Mauerhofer v Commission [2011] ECR 48 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  462. Case C-477/10 P Commission v Agrofert Holding (CJEU, 28 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  463. Case C482/10 Cicala [2011] ECR I-14139 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  464. Case C-500/10 Belvedere Costruzioni (CJEU, 29 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  465. Case C-534/10 Brookfield New Zeeland and Others v CPVO and Others (CJEU, 19 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  466. Case C-566/10 P Italy v Commission (CJEU, 27 November 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  467. Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P Commission and Others v Kadi (CJEU, 18 July 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  468. Case C-617/10 Âklagaren v Ākerberg Fransson (CJEU, 7 May 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  469. Case C-1/11 Interseroh (CJEU, 29 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  470. Case C-103/11 P Commission v Systran (CJEU, 18 April 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  471. Case C-146/11 AS Pimix v Maksu (CJEU, 12 July 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  472. Case C-175/11 HID and BA v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Others (CJEU, 30 January 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  473. Case C-235/11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (CJEU, 29 November 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  474. Case C-399/11 Melloni (CJEU, 26 February 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  475. Case C-411/11 Altner v Commission (CJEU, 15 December 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  476. Case C-418/11 Texdata Software GmbH (CJEU, 26 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  477. Case C-277/11 MM (CJEU, 26 April 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  478. Case C-399/11 Melloni (CJEU, 26 February 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  479. Case C-411/11 Altner v Commission (CJEU, 15 December 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  480. Case C-418/11 Texdata Software GmbH (CJEU, 26 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  481. Case C-131/12 Google Spain and Google Inc. v AEPD and Costeja González (CJEU, 13 May 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  482. Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 YS and M & S (CJEU, 17 July 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  483. Case C-276/12 Sabou (CJEU, 22 October 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  484. Case C-348/12 Council of the EU v Manufacturing Support &Procurement Kala Naft Co. (CJEU, 28 November 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  485. Case C-365/12 P Commission v EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg (CJEU, 27 February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  486. Case C-383/12 PPU M.G. and N.R. (CJEU, 10 Septemer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  487. Case C-531/12 P SEMEA v Commission (CJEU, 19 June 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  488. Case C-604/12 H.N. (CJEU, 8 May 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  489. Case C-166/13 Mukarubega (CJEU, 5 November 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  490. Case C-249/13 Boudjlida (CJEU, 11 December 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  491. Case C-383/13 PPU M.G. and Others (CJEU, 10 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  492. Opinions of the Advocates General of the CJEU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  493. Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig v Commission [1966] ECR 299, Opinion of AG Roemer Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  494. Case 41/69 ACF Chemiefarma v Commission [1970] ECR 661, Opinion of AG Gand Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  495. Case 48/69 ICI v Commission [1972] ECR 619, Opinion of AG Mayras Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  496. Joined Cases 11/70, 25/70, 26/70 and 30/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft and Others [1970] ECR 1125, Joined Opinion of AG Dutheillet de Lamothe Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  497. Case 5/71 Zuckerfabrik Schoeppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975, Opinion of AG Roemer Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  498. Joined Cases 63 to 69/72 Werhahn Hansamühle and Others v Council [1973] ECR 1229, Opinion of AG Roemer Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  499. Case 17/74 Transocean Marine Paint v Commission [1974] ECR 1063, Opinion of AG Warner Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  500. Case 85/76 Hoffmann-La Roche [1979] ECR 461, Opinion of AG Reischl Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  501. Case 55/77 Maris [1977] ECR 2327, Opinion of AG Capotorti Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  502. Joined Cases 83 and 94/76, 4, 15 and 40/77 HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209, Opinion of AG Capotorti Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  503. Case 113/77 NTN Toyo Bearing and Others v Council [1979] ECR 1212, Opinion of AG Warner Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  504. Case 17/78 Deshormes v Commission [1979] ECR 189, Opinion of AG Reischl Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  505. Joined Cases 33/79 and 75/79 Kuhner v Commission [1980] ECR 1677, Opinion of AG Mayras Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  506. Case 64/82 Tradax v Commission [1984] ECR 1359, Opinion of AG Slynn Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  507. Case 185/83 University of Groningen v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen [1984] ECR 3623, Opinion of AG VerLoren van Themaat Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  508. Case 46/85 Manchester Steel Limited v Commission [1986] ECR 2351, Opinion of the AG Mischo Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  509. Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097, Opinion of AG Mancini Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  510. Case C-49/88 Al-Jubail Fertilizer v Council [1991] ECR I-3187, Opinion of AG Darmon Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  511. Joined Cases T-1/89 to 4/89 and T-6/89 to 15/89 Rhône-Poulenc and Others v Commission [1991] ECR II-867, Joined Opinion of AG Vesterdorf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  512. Case C-16/90 Nölle v Hauptzollamt Bremen-Freihafen [1991] ECR I-5163, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  513. Joined Cases C-48/90 and C-66/90 Netherlands and Others v Commission [1992] ECR I-565, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  514. Case C-242/90 P Commission v Albanni and Others [1993] ECR I-3839, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  515. Case C-269/90 Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte [1991] ECR I-5469, Opinion of AG Jacobs Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  516. Case C-310/93 P BPB Industries and British Gypsum v Commission [1995] ECR I-865, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  517. Case C-32/95 P Commission v Lisrestal [1996] ECR I-5373, Opinion of AG La Pergola Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  518. Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia [1997] ECR I-3395, Opinion of AG Fenelly Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  519. Case C-185/95 P Baustahlgewebe v Commission [1998] ECR I-8417, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  520. Case C-367/95 P Commission v Sytraval [1998] ECR I-1719, Opinion of AG Lenz Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  521. Case C-361/96 Société générale des grandes sources d’eaux minerals françaises v Bundesamt für Finanzen [1998] ECR I-3495, Opinion of AG Cosmas Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  522. Joined Cases C-174/98 P and C-189/98 P van der Wal v Commission [2000] ECR I-1, Opinion of AG Cosmas Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  523. Case C-213/99 de Andrade v Director da Alfândega de Leixões [2000] ECR I-11083, Opinion of AG Fennelly Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  524. Case C-244/99 P DSM NV and Others v Commission [2002] ECR I-8375, Opinion of AG Mischo Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  525. Case C-270/99 P Z v EP [2001] ECR I-9197, Opinion of AG Jacobs Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  526. Case C-274/99 P Connolly v Commission [2001] ECR I-1611, Opinion of AG Colomer Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  527. Case C-353/99 P Council v Hautala [2001] ECR I-9565, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  528. Case C-41/00 P Interporc v Commission [2003] ECR I-2125, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  529. Case C-87/01 P Commission v CCRE [2003] ECR I-7617, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  530. Case C-111/02 P EP v Reynolds [2004] ECR I-5474, Opinion of AG Geelhoed Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  531. Case C-141/02 P Commission v T-Mobile Austria GmbH [2005] ECR I-1283, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  532. Joined Cases C-361/02 and C-362/02 Tsapalos and Diamantakis [2004] ECR I-6405, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  533. Case C-160/03 Spain v Eurojust [2005] ECR I-2077, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  534. Case C-181/03 P Nardone v Commission [2005] ECR I-199, Opinion of AG Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  535. Joined Cases C-154/04 and C-155/04 Alliance for Natural Health [20050] ECR I-6451, Opinion of AG Geelhoud Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  536. Case C-248/04 Koninklijke Coöperative Cosun UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit [2006] ECR I-10211, Opinion of AG Stix-Hackl Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  537. Case C-310/04 Spain v Council [2006] ECR I-7285, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  538. Case C-408/04 P Commission v Salzgitter [2008] ECR I-2767, Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  539. Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Kingdom of Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I-4723, Opinion of AG Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  540. Case C-64/05 P Sweden v Commission [2007] ECR I-11389, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  541. Joined Cases C-75/05 P and C-80/05 P Glunz and OSB Deurchland v Kronofrance [2008] ECR I-6619, Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  542. Case C-243/05 P Agraz and Others v Commission [2006] ECR I-10833, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  543. Case C-321/05 Kofoed [2007] ECR I-5795, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  544. Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P Kadi v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6351, Opinion of AG Pojares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  545. Joined Cases C-147/06 and C-148/06 SECAP and Others v Comune di Torino [2008] ECR I-3565, Opinion of AG Colomer Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  546. Case C-161/06 Skoma-Lux [2007] ECR I-10841, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  547. Case C-409/06 Winner Wetten (CJEU, 8 Septembre 2010), Opinion of the AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  548. Case C-521/06 P Athinaïki Techniki v Commission [2008] ECR I-5829, Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  549. Case C-139/07 P Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau [2010] ECR I-5885, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  550. Case C-204/07 P C.A.S. SpA v Commission [2008] ECR I-6135, Opinion AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  551. Case C-290/07 P Commission v Scott [2010] ECR I-7763, Opinion of AG Mengozzi Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  552. Case C-308/07 P Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso v Parliament [2009] ECR I-1059, Opinion of AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  553. Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon [2009] ECR I-10923, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  554. Case C-441/07 P Commission v Alrosa [2010] ECR I-5949, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  555. Case C-28/08 P Commission v Bavarian Lager [2010] ECR I-6055, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  556. Case C-73/08 Bressol and Others v Gouvernement de la Communauté française [2010] ECR I-2735, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  557. Case C392/08 Commission v Spain [2010] ECR I2537, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  558. Case C-83/09 Commission v Kronoply and Kronotex [2011] ECR I-4441, Opinion of AG Jääskinen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  559. Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Markus Schecke [2010] ECR I-11063, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  560. Case C-221/09 AJD Tuna [2011] ECR I-1655, Opinion of AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  561. Case C-336/09 P Poland v Commission (CJEU, 26 June 2012), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  562. Case C-69/10 Samba Diouf [2011] ECR 7151, Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  563. Case C-108/10 Scattolon [2011] ECR I-7491, Opinion AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  564. Case C-109/10 P Solvay v Commission [2011] ECR I-10329, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  565. Case C-282/10 Dominguez (CJEU, 24 January 2012), Opinion of AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  566. Case C-338/10 GLS (CJEU 22 March 2012), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  567. Case C617/10 Âklagaren v Ākerberg Fransson (CJEU, 7 May 2013), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  568. Case C-619/10 Trade Agency (CJEU, 6 September 2012), Opinion ofAG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  569. Joined Cases C-628/10 P and C-14/11 P Alliance One International and Others v Commission and Commission v Alliance One International and Others (CJEU, 19 July 2012), Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  570. Case C-83/11 Rahman (CJEU, 5 Septembre 2012), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  571. Case C-103/11 P Commission v Systran (CJEU, 18 April 2013), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  572. Case C-175/11 HID and BA v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Others (CJEU, 30 January 2013), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  573. Case C-277/11 MM (CJEU, 26 April 2012), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  574. Case C-40/12 P Gascone Sack Deutschland v Commission (CJEU, 26 November 2013), Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  575. Case C-58/12 P Groupe Gascogne v Commission (CJEU, 26 November 2013), Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  576. Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 YS and M & S (CJEU, 17 July 2014), Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  577. Case C-176/12 Association de médiation sociale (CJEU, 15 January 2014), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  578. Case C-276/12 Sabou (CJEU, 22 October 2013), Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  579. Case C-363/12 Z (CJEU, 18 March 2014), Opinion of AG Wahl Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  580. Case C-531/12 P SEMEA v Commission (CJEU, 19 June 2014), Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  581. Case C-604/12 H.N. (CJEU, 8 May 2014), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  582. Case C-166/13 Mukarubega (CJEU, 5 November 2014), Opinion of AG Wathelet Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  583. Case C-249/13 Boudjlida (CJEU, 11 December 2014), Opinion of AG Wathelet Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  584. Case C-383/13 PPU M.G. and Others (CJEU, 10 September 2013), Opinion of AG Wathelet Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  585. Case-law of the General Court of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  586. Case T-1/89 Rhône-Poulenc v Commission [1991] ECR II-967 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  587. Case T-7/89 Hercules v Commission [1991] ECR II-1711 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  588. Case T-26/89 de Compte v Parliament [1991] ECR II-781 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  589. Joined Cases T-34/89 and T-67/89 Costacurta v Commission [1990] ECR II-93 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  590. Case T-61/89 Dansk Pelsdyravlerforening v Commission [1992] ECR II-1931 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  591. Case T-120/89 Stahlwerke Peine-Salzgitter v Commission [1991] ECR II-279 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  592. Case T-133/89 Burban v EP [1990] ECR II-245 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  593. Case T-135/89 Pfloeschner v Commission [1990] ECR II-153 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  594. Case T-143/89 Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission [1995] ECRII-917 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  595. Case T-146/89 Pfloeschner v Commission [1991] ECR II-1293 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  596. Case T-147/89 Société métallurgique de Normandie v Commission [1995] ECR II-1057 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  597. Case T-148/89 Tréfilunion SA v Commission [1995] ECR II-1063 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  598. Case T-151/89 Société des Treillis et Panneaux Soudés v Commission [1995] ECR II-1191 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  599. Case T-24/90 Automec v Commission [1992] ECR II-2223 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  600. Case T 44/90 La Cinq v Commission [1992] ECR II 1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  601. Case T-46/90 Devillez and Others v European Parliament [1993] ECR II-699 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  602. Case T-14/91 Weyrich v Commission [1991] ECR II-235 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  603. Case T-26/91 Kupka-Floridi v Economic and Social Committee [1992] ECR II-1615 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  604. Case T-30/91 Solvay v Commission [1995] ECR II-1775 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  605. Case T-36/91 ICI v Commission [1995] ECR II-1847 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  606. Case T-44/91 Smets v Commission [1994] ECR Staff Cases I-A-97; II-319 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  607. Case T-83/91 Tetra Pak International v Commission [1994] ECR II-755 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  608. Case T-5/92 Tallarico v EP [1993] ECR II-477 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  609. Case T-7/92 Asia Motor France and Others v Commission [1993] ECR II-669 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  610. Joined Cases T-10/92, T-11/92, T-12/92 and T-15/92 Cimenteries and Others v Commission [1992] ECR II-2667 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  611. Case T-46/92 Scottish Football Association v Commission [1994] ECR II-1039 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  612. Case T-65/92 Arauxo-Dumay v Commission [1993] ECR II-597 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  613. Case T-74/92 Ladbroke Racing Deutschland v Commission [1995] ECR II-115 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  614. Case T-77/92 Parker Pen v Commission [1995] ECR II-1213 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  615. Case T-96/92 Comité central d’entreprise de la société générale des grandes sources and Others v Commission [1995] ECR II-1213 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  616. Joint Cases T-98/92 and T-99/92 Di Marzio and Lebedef v Commission [1994] ECR II-541 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  617. Case T-100/92 La Pietra v Commission [1994] ECR FP-I-A-83; FP-II-275 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  618. Case T-107/92 White v Commission [1994] ECR FP-I-A-41; FP-II-143 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  619. Case T-17/93 Matra Hachette v Commission [1994] ECR II-595 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  620. Case T-450/93 Lisrestal v Commission [1994] ECR II-1177 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  621. Case T-459/93 Siemens v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  622. Joined Cases T-481/93 and T-484/93 Vereniging van Exporteurs in Levende Varkens and Others v Commission [1995] ECR II-2941 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  623. Case T-489/93 Unifruit Hellas v Commission [1994] ECR II-1201 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  624. Case T-514/93 Cobrecaf SA and Others v Commission [1995] ECR II-621 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  625. Case T-521/93 Atlanta and Others v Council and Commission [1996] ECR II-1707 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  626. Case T-549/93 D v Commission [1995] ECR FP-I-A-13; FP-II-43 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  627. Case T-572/93 Odigitria v Council and Commission [1995] ECR II-2025 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  628. Case T-12/94 Daffix v Commission [1997] ECR FP-I-A-453; FP-II-1197 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  629. Case T-95/94 Sytraval v Commission [1995] ECR II-2651 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  630. Case T-156/94 Siderúrgica Aristrain Madrid SL v Commission [1999] ECR II-645 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  631. Case T-157/94 Ensidesa v Commission [1999] ECR II-707 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  632. Case T-164/94 Ferchimex SA v Council [1995] ECR-2681 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  633. Case T-167/94 Nölle v Council and Commission [1995] ECR II-2589 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  634. Case T-260/94 Air Inter v Commission [1997] ECR II-997 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  635. Case T-277/94 AITEC v Commission [1996] ECR II-351 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  636. Case T-290/94 Kaysersberg v Commission [1997] ECR II-213 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  637. Case T-294/94 Dimitriadis v Court of Auditors [1996] ECR Staff Cases –I-A-51; II-151 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  638. Case T-295/94 Buchmann v Commission [1998] ECR II-813 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  639. Joined Cases T-305/94 to T-307/94, T-313/94 to T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94 and T-335/94 Limburgse Maatschappij and Others v Commission [1999] ECR II-931 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  640. Case T-308/94 Cascades SA v Commission [1998] ECR II-925 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  641. Case T-330/94 Salt Union Ltd v Commission [1996] ECR II-1475 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  642. Case T-338/94 Finnboard v Commission [1998] ECR II-1617 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  643. Case T-346/94 France-aviation v Commission [1995] ECR II-2841 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  644. Case T-348/94 Enso Española v Commission [1998] ECR II-1875 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  645. Joined Cases T-371/94 and T-394/94 British Airways and Others v Commission [1998] ECR II-2405 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  646. Case T-390/94 Schröder and Others v Commission [1997] ECR II-501 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  647. Joined Cases T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95 and T-104/95 Cimenteries and Others v Commission [2000] ECR II-491 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  648. Case T-73/95 Oliveira v Commission [1997] ECR II-381 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  649. Case T-81/95 Interhotel v Commission [1997] ECR II-1265 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  650. Case T-96/95 Rozand-Lambiotte v Commission [1997] FP-I-A-35; FP-II-97 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  651. Case T-105/95 WWF UK v Commission [1997] ECR II-313 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  652. Case T-121/95 EFMA v Council [1997] ECR II-2391 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  653. Case T-166/95 Karagiozopoulou v Commission [1997] ECR Staff Cases I-A-397; II-1065 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  654. Case T-174/95 Svenska Journalistförbundet v Council [1998] ECR II-2289 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  655. Case T-183/95 Carraro v Commission [1998] ECR FP-I-A-123; FP-II-329 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  656. Case T-184/95 Dorch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Council and Commission [1998] ECR II-667 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  657. Joined Cases T-198/95, T-171/96, T-230/97, T-174/98 and T-225/99 Comafrica and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v Commission [2001] ECR II-1975 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  658. Case T 203/95 R Connolly v Commission [1995] ECR II 2919 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  659. Joined Cases T-213/95 and T-18/96 SCK and FCK v Commission [1997] ECR II-1739 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  660. Case C-219/95 P Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission [1997] ECR I-4411 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  661. Joined Cases T-231/95 and T-18/96 SCK and FNK v Commission [1997] ECR II-1739 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  662. Case T-42/96 Eyckeler v Commission [1998] ECR II-401 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  663. Case T-50/96 Primex Produkte v Commission [1998] ECR II-3773 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  664. Case T-65/96 Kish Glass v Commission [2000] ECR II-1885 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  665. Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98 Camar and Tico v Commission and Council [2000] ECR II-2193 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  666. Case T-80/96 Fernandes Leite Mateus v Council [1997] ECR I-A-87; II-259 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  667. Case T-82/96 ARAP v Commission [1999] ECR II-1889 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  668. Case T-95/96 Gestevisión Telecinco v Commission [1998] ECR II-3407 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  669. Case T-105/96 Pharos v Commission [1998] ECR II-285 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  670. Case T-111/96 ITT Promedia v Commission [1998] ECR II-2937 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  671. Case T-124/96 Interporc v Commission [1998] ECR II-231 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  672. Joined Cases T-125/96 and T-152/96 Boehringer v Council and Commission [1999] ECR II-342 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  673. Joined Cases T-132/96 and T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission [1999] ECR II-3663 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  674. Case T-5/97 Industries des poudres sphériques v Commission [2000] ECR II-3755 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  675. Case T-203/96 Embassy Limousines & Services v Parliament [1998] ECR II-4239 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  676. Case T-19/97 Richter v Commission [1997] ECR FP-I-A-379; FP-II-1019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  677. Case T-46/97 SIC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2125 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  678. Case T-126/97 Sonasa v Commission [1999] ECR II-2793 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  679. Joined Cases T-186/97, T-187/97, T-190/97 to T-192/97, T-210/97, T-211/97, T-216/97, T-217/97, T-218/97, T-279/97, T-280/97, T-293/97 and T-147/99 Kaufring and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-1337 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  680. Case T-188/97 Rothmans International v Commission [1999] ECR II-2463 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  681. Joined Cases T-194/97 and T-83/98 Branco v Commission [2000] ECR II-69 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  682. Case T-203/97 Forvass v Commission [1999] ECR FP-I-A-129; FP-II-705 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  683. Case T-228/97 Irish Sugar v Commission [1999] ECR II-2969 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  684. Case T-231/97 NEC and Brown v Commission [1999] ECR II-2403 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  685. Case T-241/97 Stork Amsterdam v Commission [2000] ECR II-309 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  686. Case T-257/97 Herold v Commission [1999] ECR FP-I-A-49; FP-II-251 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  687. Case T-259/97 Teixeira Neves v CJEU [2000] ECR FP-I-A-169; FP-II-773 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  688. Case T-290/97 MehibasDordtselaan v Commission [2000] ECR II-15 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  689. Case T-309/97 Bavarian Lager v Commission [1999] ECR II-3217 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  690. Case T-14/98 Hautala v Council of the EU [1999] ECR II-2489 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  691. Joined Cases T-24/98 and T-241/99 E v Commission [2001] ECR FP-I-A-149; FP-II-681 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  692. Case T-43/98 Emesa Sugar [2001] ECR II-3519 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  693. T-62/98 Volkswagen v Commission [2000] ECR II-2707 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  694. Case T-166/98 Dolianova and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-3991 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  695. Case T-178/98 Fresh Marine v Commission [2000] ECR II-3331 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  696. Case T-179/98 Cuenda Guijarro and Others v Council [2000] ECR FP-A-A-1; FP-II-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  697. Joined Cases T-191/98, T-212/98 to T 214/98 Atlantic Container Line and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II 3275 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  698. Case T-197/98 Rudolph v Commission [2000] ECR Staff Cases I-A-55; II-241 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  699. Case T-9/99 HFB and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-1487 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  700. Case T-13/99 Pfizer Animal Health SA v Council [2002] ECR II-3305 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  701. Case T-31/99 ABB Asea Brown Boveri v Commission [2002] ECR II-1881 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  702. Case T-54/99 max.mobil v Commission [2002] ECR II-313 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  703. Case T-57/99 Nardone v Commission [2008] ECR FP-I-A-2-83; FP-II-A-2-505 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  704. Case T-70/99 Alpharma Inc. v Council [2002] ECR II-3495 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  705. Joined Cases T-83/99, T-84/99 and T-85/99 Ripa di Meana v European Parliament [2000] ECR II-3493 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  706. Case T-114/99 CSR PAMPRYL v Commission [1999] ECR II-3331 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  707. Case T-118/99 Bonati Brighina v Commission [2001] ECR I-A-25; II-97 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  708. Case T-120/99 Kik v OHMI [2001] ECR II-2235 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  709. Joined Cases T-141/99, T-142/99, T-150/99 and T-151/99 Vela and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-4547 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  710. Case T-171/99 Corus UK v Commission [2001] ECR II-2967 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  711. Case T-182/99 Caravelis v Parliament [2001] ECR II-1313; FP-I-A-113; FP-II-523 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  712. Case T-191/99 Petrie and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-3677 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  713. Case T-196/99 Area Cova and Others v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II-3597 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  714. Case T-199/99 SgaravattiMediterranea v Commission[2002] ECR II-3731 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  715. Case T-204/99 Mattila v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II-2265 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  716. Case T-206/99 Métropole Télévision v Commission [2001] ECR II-2707 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  717. Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II-435 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  718. Joined Cases T-3/00 and T-337/04 Pitsiorlas v Council [2007] ECR II-4779 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  719. Joined Cases T-5/00 and T-6/00 Technische Unie v Commission [2003] ECR II-5761 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  720. Case T 23/00 A v Commission [2000] ECR FP-I A 263 and FP-II 1211 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  721. Joined Cases T-74/00; T-76/00; T-83/00, T-84/00, T-85/00, T-132/00, T-137/00 and T-141/00 Artegodan and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-4945 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  722. Case T-102/00 Vlaams Fonds voor de Sociale Integratie van Personen met een Handicap v Commission [2003] ECR II-2433 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  723. Joined Cases T-112/00 and T-122/00 Iberotam SA and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-97 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  724. Case T-189/00 R Invest Import und Export and Others v Commission [2000] ECR II-2993 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  725. Case T-190/00 Regione Siciliana v Commission [2003] ECR II-5015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  726. Case T-209/00 Lamberts v European Ombudsman [2002] ECR II-2203 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  727. Case T-211/00 Kuijer v Council of the EU [2002] ECR II-485 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  728. Case T-213/00 CMA CGM and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II-913 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  729. Case T-224/00 Midland Ingredients v Commission [2003] ECR II-2597 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  730. Case T-232/00 Chef Revival USA v OHMI [2002] ECR II-2749 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  731. Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T/277/00 Hotel Cipriani and Others v Commission [2008] ECR II-3269 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  732. Case T-307/00 C v Commission [2003] ECR Staff Cases I-A-33; II-221 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  733. Joined Cases T-344/00 and T-345/00 CEVA Santé Animale and Others v Commssion [2003] ECR II-229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  734. Case T-366/00 Scott v Commission [2007] ECR II-797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  735. Case T-7/01 Pyres v Commission [2003] ECR II-239 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  736. Joined Cases T-30/01 to T-32/01, T-86/02 to T-88/02 Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission [2009] ECR II-2919 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  737. Case T-40/01 Scan Office Design v Commission [2002] ECR II-5043 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  738. Joined Cases T-44/01, T-119/01 and T-126/01 Vieira SA and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II-1209 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  739. Case T-67/01 JCB Service v Commission [2004] II-49 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  740. Case T-77/01 Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-81 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  741. Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission [2004] ECR II-127 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  742. Joined Cases T 120/01 and T 300/01 De Nicola v BEI [2004] ECR SC I A 365 and II 1671 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  743. Case T-176/01 Ferriere Nord v Commission [2004] ECR II-3931 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  744. Joined Cases T-188/01, T-189/01 and T-190/01 Tsarnavas v Commission [2003] ECR Staff Cases I-A-95; II-495 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  745. Case T-198/01 R Technische Glaswerke Illmenau v Commission [2002] ECR II-2153 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  746. Case T-203/01 Manufacture française des pneumatiques Michelin v Commission [2003] ECR II-4071 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  747. Case T-210/01 General Electric Company v Commission [2005] ECR II-5575 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  748. Joined Cases T-213/01 and T-214/01 Österreichische Postsparkasse and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-1601 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  749. Joined Cases T-215/01, T-220/01 and T-221/01 Calberson v Commission [2004] ECR II-587 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  750. Joined Cases T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01 to T-246/01, T-251/01 and T/252/01 Tokai Carbon and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-1181 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  751. Case T-271/01 López Cejudo v Commission [2002] ECR FP-I-A-221; FP-II-1109 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  752. Case T-306/01 Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2005] ECR II-3533 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  753. T-307/01 François v Commission [2004] ECR FP-II-1669; FP-I-A-183; II-823 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  754. Case T-310/01 Schneider Electric v Commission [2002] ECR II-4071 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  755. Case T 322/01 Roquette Frères v Commission [2006] ECR II 3137 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  756. Case T-15/02 BASF V Commission [2006] ECR II-497 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  757. Joined Cases T-22/02 and T-23/02 Sumitomo Chemical Co. and Others v Commission [2005] ECR II-4065 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  758. Case T-29/02 GEF v Commisssion [2005] ECR II-835 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  759. Case T-34/02 Le Levant and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-267 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  760. Joined Cases T-44/02 OP, T-54/02 OP, T-56/02 OP, T-60/02 OP and T-61/02 OP Dresdner Bank and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-3567 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  761. Case T-76/02 Messina v Commission [2003] ECR II-3203 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  762. Case T-77/02 Schneider Electric v Commission [2002] ECR II-4201 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  763. Case T-107/02 GE Betz v OHMI [2004] ECR II-1845 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  764. Case T-168/02 IFAW v Commission [2004] ECR 4135 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  765. Case T-198/02 N v Commission [2004] ECR FP-I-A-115; FP-II-507 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  766. Case T-211/02 Tideland Signal v Commission [2002] ECR II-3781 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  767. Case T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du people d’Iran v Council [2006] ECR II-4665 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  768. Case T-235/02 Strongline A/S v OHMI [2003] ECR II-4903 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  769. Case T-236/02 Marcuccio v Commission [2005] ECR FP- I-A-365 and FP-II-1621 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  770. Case T-237/02 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau v Commission [2006] ECR II-5131 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  771. Case T-242/02 Sunrider v OHMI [2005] ECR II-2793 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  772. Case T-256/02 I v CJEC [2004] ECR Staff Cases I-A-289; II-1307 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  773. Case T-266/02 Deutsche Post v Commission [2008] ECR II-1233 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  774. Case T-317/02 FICF and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-4325 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  775. Case T-378/02 R Ilmenau v Commission [2003] ECR II-2921 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  776. Case T-389/02 Sandini v CJEC [2004] ECR Staff Cases I-A-295; II-1339 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  777. Case T-2/03 Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Commission (also known as Club Lombard) [2005] ECR II-1121 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  778. Case T-11/03 Afari v ECB [2004] ECR II-267 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  779. Case T-30/03 RENV. 3F v Commission (GC, 27 Septembre 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  780. Case T-47/03 Sison v Council [2007] ECR II-73 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  781. Case T-84/03 Turco v Council [2004] ECR II-4061 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  782. Case T-132/03 Casini v Commission [2005] ECR FP-I-A-253; FP-II-1169 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  783. Case T-160/03 AFCon Management Consultants and Others v Commission [2005] ECR II-981 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  784. Case T-187/03 Scippacercola v Commission [2005] ECR II-1029 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  785. Case T-198/03 Bank Austrai Creditanstalt v Commission (also known as Club Lombard) [2006] ECR II-1429 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  786. Case T 203/03 Rasmussen v Commission [2005] ECR Staff Cases I-A 279 and II 1287 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  787. Case T-204/03 Haladjian Frères SA v Commission [2006] ECR II-3779 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  788. Case T-212/03 MyTravel Group v Commission [2008] ECR II-1967 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  789. Case T-245/03 R FNSEA and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-271 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  790. Case T-259/03 Nikolaou v Commission [2007] ECR II-99 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  791. Case T-285/03 Agraz and Others v Commission [2008] ECR II-285 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  792. Case T-309/03 Camós Grau v Commission [2006] ECR II-1173; FP-I-A-2-89; FP-II-A-2-89 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  793. Case T-349/03 Corsica Ferries France v Commission [2005] ECR II-2197 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  794. Case T-351/03 Schneider Electric v Commission [2007] ECR II-2237 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  795. Case T-367/03 Tarim and Others v Council and Commission [2006] ECR II-873 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  796. Case T-369/03 Arizona Chemical and Others v Commission [2005] ECR II-5839 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  797. Joined Cases T-391/03 and T-70/04 Franchet and Byk v Commission [2006] ECR II-2023 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  798. Case T-394/03 Angeletti v Commission [2006] ECR Staff Cases I-A-2-95; II-A-2-441 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  799. Case T-410/03 Hoechst v Commission [2008] ECR II-881 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  800. Case T-442/03 SIC v Commission [2008] ECR II-1161 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  801. Case T-5/04 Scano v Commission [2005] ECR FP-I-A-205; FP-II-931 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  802. Case T-95/04 Lavagnoli v Commission [2006] ECR I-A-2-121; II-A-2-569 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  803. Case T-166/04 C v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-2-9; FP-II-A-2-49 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  804. Case T-181/04 Heinen v Commission [2005] ECR I-A-221; II-1013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  805. Case T-192/04 Flex Equipos de Descanso v OHMI [2007] ECR II-2411 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  806. Case T-193/04 Tillack v Commission [2006] ECR II-3995 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  807. Case T-193/04 R Tillack v Commission [2004] ECR II-3575 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  808. Case T-194/04 Bavarian Lager v Commission [2007] ECR II-4523 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  809. Case T-219/04 Spain v Commission [2007] ECR II-1323 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  810. Case T-226/04 Italy v Commission [2006] ECR II-29 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  811. Case T-271/04 Citymo v Commission [2007] ECR II-1375 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  812. Case T-274/04 Rounis v Commission [2005] ECR FP-I-A-407; FP-II-1849 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  813. Case T-294/04 Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commisson [2005] ECR I-2719 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  814. Case T-364/04 Greece v Commission [2008] ECR II-51 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  815. Case T-374/04 Germany v Commission [2007] ECR II-4431 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  816. Case T-465/04 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2008] ECR II-154 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  817. Case T-494/04 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2006] ECR FP-I-A-2-259; FP-II-A-2-1345 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  818. Case T-42/05 Williams v Commission [2008] ECR II-156 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  819. Case T-48/05 Franchet and Byk v Commission [2008] ECR II-1585 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  820. Case T-59/05 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2008] ECR II-157 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  821. Case T-60/05 UFEX and Others v Commission [2007] ECR II-3397 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  822. Case T-135/05 Crampoli v Commission [2006] ECR II-A-2-1527 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  823. Case T-141/05 RENV Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission (GC, 21 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  824. Case T-151/05 NVV and Others v Commission [2009] ECR II-1219 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  825. Case T-185/05 Italy v Commission [2008] ECR II-3207 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  826. Case T-237/05 Odile Jacobs v Commission [2010] ECR II-2245 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  827. Case T-301/05 Guigard v Commission [2008] ECR I-31 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  828. Case T-407/05 SAEME v OHMI [2007] ECR II-4385 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  829. Case T-36/06 Bundesverbanddeutscher Banken v Commission [2010] ECR II-537 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  830. Joined Cases T-50/06, T-56/06, T-60/06, T-62/06 and T-69/06 Ireland and Others v Commission [2007] ECR II-172 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  831. T-63/06 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commissioö [2010] ECR II-177 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  832. Case T-170/06 Alrosa v Commission [2007] ECR II-2601 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  833. Case T-179/06 Commission v Onderzoek en Advies [2009] ECR II-64 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  834. Case T-190/06 Total SA and Others v Commission (GC, 14 July 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  835. Case T-217/06 Arkema France and Others v Commission [2011] ECR II-2593 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  836. Case T-343/06 Shell Petroleum and Others v Commission (GC, 27 September 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  837. Case T-369/06 Holland Malt v Commission [2009] ECR II-3313 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  838. Case T-19/07 Systran v Commission [2010] ECR II-6083 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  839. Case T-24/07 ThyssenKrupp Stainless v Commission [2009] ECR II-2309 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  840. Legal writings Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  841. Addink G-H, Good Governance: Concept and Context (Oxford University Press 2014), pp. 1-177 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  842. Antunes P and Miguel L, ‘La Motivation des Décisions et Droit Communautaire de la Concurrence’ (Symposium ‘Rights of Defence and Rights of the European Commisssion in EC Competition law’, January 1994), pp 273-294 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  843. Aristote, Ethique à Nicomaque (Paris, Librairie Générale Française, Coll. Le livre de poche, Classiques de philosophie 1992), pp. 1-447 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  844. Arzoz X, ‘Language Rights as Legal Norms’ (2009) 15 European Public Law, pp. 541-574 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  845. – ‘Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union’ in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  846. Autin J-L, ‘La Motivation des Actes Administratifs Unilatéraux, Entre Tradition Nationale et Evolution des Droits Européens’ (2011) 137-138 Revue Française d’Administration Publique, pp. 85-99 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  847. Azizi J, ‘Judicial Review of EC State Aid Procedure – Current Problems in the Community Courts’ Case-law and their Impact on Possible Reform’ (2007) European State Aid Law Quarterly (Proceedings of the 5th experts’ forum held in Brussels on 21 and 22 May 2007), pp. 21-24 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  848. – Oral hearing during the Congress Marking 20 Years of ERA “The Citizen at the heart of EU law” (Trier, 19 October 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  849. Azoulai L, ‘Les Garanties Procédurales en Droit Communautaire: Recherches sur la Procédure et le Bon Gouvernement’ (Law Thesis, IUE Florence 2000), pp. 1-636 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  850. – ‘The Judge and the Community’s Administrative Governance’, in Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market: Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (vol. 11/2, Oxford University Press 2002), pp. 109-137 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  851. – ‘Le Principe de Bonne Administration’ in Jean-Bernard Auby and Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère (eds), Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 493-518 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  852. Azoulai L and Clement-Wilz L, ‘La Bonne Administration’ in Bruylant (ed), Traité de Droit Administartif Européen (2nd edition, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2014), pp. 671-697 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  853. Bailleux A and van Drooghenbroeck S, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux: Invocabilité, Interprétation, Application et Relations avec la Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’, in Innovations du Traité de Lisbonne: Incidences pour le Praticien (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2011), pp. 249-323 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  854. Balan E, The Right to a Good Administration and its Impact on Public Administration’s Procedures (Bucuresti, Comunicare.ro 2010), pp. 1-184 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  855. Barav A, ‘Opacité et Transparence ou le Droit d’Empêcher: la Jurisprudence en Matière d’Accès aux Documents Provenant des Etats Membres Détenus par les Institutions Communautaires’, Chemins d’Europe: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 29-62 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  856. Bartosch A, ‘Procedural Rights Denied For Too Long: Is Legal Conservativism Finally Heading for its "Götterdämmerung"?’ (2011) 10 European State Aid Law Quarterly, Issue 4, pp. 579-580 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  857. Bebr G, ‘The Non-Contractual Liability of the European Coal and Steel Community’ in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp. 71-88 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  858. Bélorgey J-M, Gervasoni S and Lambert C, ‘Chroniques: Actualités du Droit Communautaire’ (2005) 20 L’Actualité Juridique: Droit Administartif, pp. 1108-1117 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  859. Bengoetxea J, ‘Multilingual and Multicultural Legal Reasoning: the European Court of Justice’, in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 97-121 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  860. Benoît-Rohmer F, ‘L’Union Européenne et les Droits Fondamentaux depuis l’Entrée en Vigueur du Traité de Lisbonne’ (2011) 1 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, pp. 145-172 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  861. Berramdane A, ‘Considérations sur les Perspectives de Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne’ (2009) 3 Revue du Droit de l’Union Européenne, 441-459 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  862. Billard J-N, ‘L’Exigence de Transgression d’une Norme Protectrice des Particuliers – Principe Enigmatique du Droit de la Responsabilité Extra-Contractuelle des Communautés Européennes’, in Les Mutations Contemporaines du Droit Public. Mélanges en l’Honneur de Benoît Jeanneau (Paris, Dalloz 2002), pp. 625-649 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  863. Bonichot J-C, ‘Des Rayons et des Ombres: les Paradoxes de l’Article 6 du Traité sur l’Union Européenne’, in La Conscience des Droits: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Dalloz 2011), pp. 49-65 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  864. Bonnor P, ‘The Right to Good Administration’ (2006) 182 Deutsche Hochschule fur Verwaltungswissenschaften, pp. 71-93 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  865. Boulanger J, ‘Principes Généraux du Droit et Droit Positif’ in R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias (eds) Le Droit Privé Français au Milieu du XXe Siècle (Paris, Tome I, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 1950), pp. 51-74 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  866. Burgorgue-Larsen L, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux Expliquée au Citoyen’ (2000) 4 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 398-409 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  867. – ‘Le Destin Judiciaire Strasbourgeois de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne : Vices et Vertus du Cosmopolitisme Normatif’ in Chemin de l'Europe : Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 145-175 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  868. Bousta R, Essai sur la Notion de Bonne administration en Droit Public (Law Thesis – University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne – 2009, Paris, le Harmattan 2010), pp. 1-566 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  869. – ‘Who Said There is a "Right to Good Administration"?: A Critical Analysis of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2013) 19 European Public Law, pp. 481-488 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  870. Bradley A, ‘Administrative Justice: A Developing Human Right?’ (1995) 3 European Public Law, pp. 347-369 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  871. Bradley K, ‘La Transparence de l’Union Européenne: une Evidence ou un Trompe l’Oeil?’ (1999) 3-4 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 283-362 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  872. Braibant G, ‘Droits vis-à-vis de l'Administration’ (1991) II Human Rights and the European Community: Methods of Protection, pp. 427-454 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  873. Braun P, ‘Obligation to State Reasons for the Rejection of A Tender: Evropaïki Dynamiki – Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v Commission (T-465/04)’ (2009) 1 Public Procurement Law Review, pp. NA1-NA5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  874. – ‘Requirement to State Reasons for Procurement Decisions: A Note on the Recent Cases of the General Court’ (2011) 2 Public Procurement Law Review, pp. NA 19-NA 23 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  875. Brisard S, ‘Le Droit d’Accès du Public aux Documents Non Publiés des Institutions Communautaires’ (2007) 505 Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union Européenne, pp. 127-134 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  876. Broyelle C, ‘L’Imputation de la Responsabilité dans les Situations d’Exécution Nationale du Droit Communautaire’, in Jean-Bernard Auby and Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochere (eds), Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 811-822 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  877. Brunessen B, Le Juge de l’Union Européenne, Juge Administratif, (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2012), pp. 1-1157 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  878. de Búrca G, ‘The Drafting of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2001) 26 European Law Review, pp.126-138 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  879. Cabral P, ‘Transparency Left in the Shadows: Article 4(5) of Regulation 1049/2001 on Access to Documents Grants the Member States a Power of Veto’ (January 2006) European Current Law, January 2006, pp. xvii-xxii Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  880. della Cananea G, “The European Union’s Mixed Administrative Proceedings” (2004), 68 Law and Contemporary Problems, pp. 197-218 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  881. Caudal-Sizaret S, Les Principes en Droit (Paris, Economica 2008), pp. 1-384 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  882. Chevalier E, Bonne Administration et Union Européenne (Law Thesis – University Limoges – 2010, – Administrative Law Collection 16, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2014), pp. 1-536 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  883. Chiavario M, ‘Langues, Modèles Procéduraux et Effectivité des Droits Fondamentaux’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 221-229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  884. Chiti M, ‘Are There Universal Principles of Good Governance?’ (1995) 1 European Public Law, pp. 241-258 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  885. – ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights for the European Union: a Charter Functional in Nature?’ (2002) 14 European Review of Public Law, pp. 29-55 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  886. Christophe-Tchakaloff M-F, ‘Le Principe d’Egalité’ (Juin 1996) Actualité Juiridique. Droit Administartif, pp. 168-177 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  887. de Condorcet Mis, ‘Réflexions d’un Citoyen Non Gradué sur un Procès Très Connu’, XI Œuvres Complètes (1804) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  888. Constantinesco L, ‘Les Problèmes Résultant de la Responsabilité Extracontractuelle Concomitante de la Communauté et d’un Etat Membre’ (Luxembourg, Office des Publications Officielles des Communautés européennes 1980), pp. 15-22 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  889. Coppel J and O’Neill A, ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ (1992) 29 Common Market Law Review, pp. 669-692 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  890. Costas C, ‘Jurisprudenta Europeana: CJUE, Marea Camera din 25 Octombrie 2011, Cauza C-109/10 P, Solvay SA/Comisia Europeana’ (2011) 10 Revista Romana de Drept Administratif, pp. 125-138 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  891. Coudray L, ‘La Transparence et l’Accès aux Documents’ (2007) Droit Administratif Européen, pp. 519-535 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  892. Coutrelis N and Giacobbo V, ‘La Pratique de l’Accès au Dossier en Droit Communautaire de la Concurrence: Entre Droits de la Défense et Confidentialité’ (2006) 2 Concurrences: Revue des Droits de la Concurrence, pp. 66-78 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  893. Covolo V, ‘Et la Judiciarisation de l’Espace Pénal de l’Union fut…Mais où se Cache le Juge Pénal Européen?’ (2011) 1 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp.103-154 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  894. Craig P, ‘Democracy and Rule-Making within the EC: an Empirical and Normative Assessment’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal, pp. 105-130 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  895. – ‘Once more unto the Breach: the Community, the State and Damages Liability’ (1998) English Public Law and the Common Law of Europe, pp. 141-173 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  896. – European Administrative law (The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol. XVI/1, Oxford, Oxford University Press 2006), pp. 1-888 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  897. – ‘EU Administrative Law. The Acquis’, (2011) 2 Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Communitario Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  898. – EU Administrative Law (Oxford, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press 2012), pp. 1-864 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  899. – ‘Article 41’ in (Steve Peers, Tamara Hervey, Jeff Kenner and Angela Ward eds) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2014), pp. 1069-1098. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  900. Crespo Gonzáles J, ‘The Rights, Duties and Responsibilities of Public Officials’ (European Conference organized by the Council of Europe in collaboration with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombudsman of Poland, Warsaw, 4-5 December 2003), pp. 91-104 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  901. Crofts L, ‘Comment: EU Courts’ Francophone Rule Merits Reform Focus’, MLex Journal (January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  902. de la Croix-Davio T, ‘La Motivation Formelle des Actes Administratifs, Un Pas Vers la Transparence de l’Administration’ (1992) 17 Droit de la Consommation, pp. 30-40 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  903. da Cunha Rodrigues J-N, ‘De l’Abondance de Droits en Temps de Crise’ in Luc Weitzel (dir), L’Europe des Droits Fondamentaux : Mélanges en Hommage à Alberts Weitzel (Editions A. Palone 2013), pp. 29-57 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  904. Curtin D, ‘Constitutionalism in the European Community: The Right to Fair Procedures in Administrative Law’, in Human Rights and Constitutional Law; Essays in Honour of Brian Walsh (The Round Hall Press 1992), pp. 293-316 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  905. Curtin D, Hofmann H and Mendes J, ‘Constitutionalising EU Executive Rule-Making Procedures: A Research Agenda’ (2013) 19(1) European Law Journal, pp. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  906. Curtin D and Meijers H, ‘Access to European Union Information: An Element of Citizenship and a Neglected Constitutional Right’, in Nanette A. Nenwahl and Allan Rosas(eds) The European Union and Human Rights (The Hague/Boston/London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1995) pp.77-104 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  907. von Danwitz T, ‘General Report’ (Seminar of the Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, The Hague 24 November 2011), available on ˂www.juradmin.eu/fr/colloquiums/colloq_fr_23.html˃, pp. 1-23 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  908. von Danwitz T and Paraschas K, ‘A Fresh Start for the Charter: Fundamental Questions on the Application of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 35 Fordham International Law Journal, pp. 1400-1429 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  909. Delvolvé P, ‘The Right to Good Administration’ (European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃), pp. 283-301 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  910. Diamandouros N, ‘The Relationship between the Principle of Good Administration and Legal Obligations’, (2007) Liber Amicorum in Honour of Bo Vesterdorf, pp. 315-341 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  911. – ‘Openness and Access to Documents’ (2008) 7 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 654-658 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  912. – ‘La Contribution du Médiateur Européen à une Bonne Administration au Plan Européen’, in Vers un Modèle Européen de la Fonction Publique? (Neuvième Journée d’Etudes du Pôle Européen Jean Monnet, Bruylant 2011), pp. 271-279 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  913. – ‘The European Ombudsman and Good Administration post-Lisbon’ in D. Ashiagbor, N. Countouris and I. Lianos (eds) The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon (Cambridge University Press 2012), pp. 210-226 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  914. Driessen B, ‘The Council of the European Union and Access to Documents’ (2005) 30 European Law Review, pp. 675-696 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  915. Dubos O, ‘Le Paradigme du « Multi-Level Governance » est-il Soluble dans le Droit?’, (2012) 556 Revue de l’Union Européenne, pp. 144-149 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  916. Dubouis L, ‘Les Principes Généraux, un Instrument Périmé de Protection des Droits Fondamentaux?’ in Les Mutations Contemporaines du Droit Public: Mélanges en l'Honneur de Benoît Jeanneau (Paris, Dalloz 2002), pp. 77-90 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  917. Due O, ‘Le Respect des Droits de la Défense dans le Droit Administratif Communautaire’ (1987) 23 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 383-396 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  918. Duparc Portier P and Masson A, ‘La Question des Langues en Europe: Entre Paradoxes et Divergences Juridiques’ [2007] 72 Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 1051-1085 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  919. Dupont-Lassale J, Le Principe de Bonne Administration en Droit de l’Union Européenne (Law Thesis – University Paris II- Panthéon Assas – 2008, Bruylant 2013), pp. 1-677 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  920. – ‘Innaplicabilité Discutable du Principe de Bonne Administration aux Relations Contractuelles’ (2009) 8-9 Revue Europe, at pp. 13-14 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  921. Dutheil de la Rochère J, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l'Union Européenne: Quelle Signification pour le Citoyen Européen?’, in Problèmes d'Interprétation à la Mémoire de Constantinos N. Kakouris (Bruylant 2004), pp. 103-121 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  922. – ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Not Binding but Influential: the Example of Good Administration’ in Arnull, Eeckhout and Tridimas (eds), Continuity and Change in EU law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs (Oxford University Press 2008), pp. 157-171 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  923. – Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère, ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU: Community of Values with Opt-out?’ (2008) 7 European Constitutional Law Network-Series, pp. 119-129 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  924. – ‘Droits Fondamentaux: Quelle Place dans l'Architecture de l'Union’ in Chemins d’Europe: Mélanges en l'Honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 265-278 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  925. Eckes C, ‘Case T-228/02, Organisation des Modjahedines du people d’Iran v Council and UK (OMPI), Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 December 2006’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1117-1129 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  926. Eckes C and Mendes J, ‘The Right to be Heard in Composite Administrative Procedures: Lost in Between Protection?’(2011) 36 European Law Review, pp. 651-670 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  927. Edel F, ‘La Convention du Conseil de l’Europe sur l’Accès aux Documents Publics: Premier Traité Consacrant un Droit General d’Accès aux Documents Administratifs’ (2011) 137-138 Revue Française d’Administration Publique, pp. 59-78 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  928. Eissen M-A, ‘La Durée des Procédures Civiles et Pénales dans la Jurisprudence de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’ (1995) 416 Bulletin d’Information de la Cour de Cassation, pp. 3-33 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  929. Eveillard G, ‘Les Formes et Procédures en Droit Public: l'Application de l'Article 6 de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme à la Procédure Administrative Non Contentieuse’ (2010) 10 L'actualité Juridique: Droit Administratif, pp. 531-539 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  930. Fallon M, ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux Liés à la Citoyenneté de l'Union Européenne, sous les Regards Croisés du Traité C.E. et de la Charte’ in Jean-Yves Carlier and Olivier de Schutter (eds), La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne: son Apport à la Protection des Droits de l'Homme en Europe. Hommage à Silvio Marcus Helmons (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2002), pp. 149-178 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  931. Fau-Nougaret M, ‘La «Bonne Gouvernance» dans les Relations Juridiques Internationales’, (2001) 446 Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union européenne, pp. 171-174 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  932. Favret J-M, ‘Les Influences Réciproques du Droit Communautaire et du Droit National dans le Contentieux de la Responsabilité Publique Extracontractuelle’ (Paris, Pedone 2000), pp. 1-427 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  933. Fines F, Étude de la Responsabilité Extracontractuelle de la Communauté Économique Européenne (Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 1990), pp 1-489 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  934. Flaesch-Mougin C, ‘Typologie des Principes de l’Union Européenne’, in Apogée (ed) Le Droit de l’Union Européenne en Principes. Liber Amicorum en l’Honneur de Jean Raux (Publications du Centre d’Excellence Jean Monnet de Rennes 2006), pp. 99-152 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  935. Flanagan A, ‘EU Freedom of Information: Determining Where the Interests Lies’ (2007) 13 European Public Law, pp. 595-632 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  936. Fortsakis T, ‘Les Principes Gouvernant une Bonne Administration’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃), pp. 35-45 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  937. – ‘Principles Governing Good Administration’ (2005) 11 European Public law, pp. 207-217 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  938. Gadbin D, ‘Les Principes de "Bonne Gouvernance Européenne"’, in Mélanges en Hommage à Guy Isaac : 50 Ans de Droit Communautaire, (Toulouse, PUSS 2004), pp. 589-614 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  939. Galetta D-U, ‘Inhalt und Bedeutung des Europäischen Rechts auf eine Gute Verwaltung’ (2007) 42 Europarecht, pp. 57-81 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  940. – Procedural Autonomy of the Member States: Paradise Lost? A Study of the “Functionalized Procedural Competence” of EU Member States (Berlin, Springer Heidelberg 2010), pp. 1-145 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  941. – ‘Le Champ d’Application de l’Article 41 de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne sur le Droit à une Bonne Administration: À Propos des Arrêts Cicala et M.’ (2013) 1 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, pp. 77-85 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  942. Gaudissart M-A, ‘Le Régime et la Pratique Linguistiques de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes’, in P.I.E. Peter Lang s.a. (ed), Langues et Construction Européenne (Bruxelles 2010) pp. 137-160 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  943. Genevois B, ‘La Motivation et le Style des Décisions Juridictionnelles’, in Bruylant (ed) Pédagocie Judiciaire et Application des Droits Communautaire et Européen (Collection Droit de l’Union Européenne – Colloques 2012), pp.109-123 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  944. Gerkrath J, ‘Les Principes Généraux du Droit ont-ils encore un Avenir en tant qu’Instruments de Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne?’ (2006) 1 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 31-43 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  945. Gervasoni S, ‘Le Tribunal de la Fonction Publique de l'Union Européenne: Cinq Ans de Jurisprudence’ (2011) 5-6 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 731-790 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  946. van Gerven W, ‘Remedies for Infringements of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) 10 European Public Law, pp. 261-284 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  947. Górzyńska T, ‘The Right to Information as a Criterion of Good Administration’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃, pp. 47-53 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  948. Grzeszick B, ‘Case C-440/07 P, Schneider Electric SA v. Commission, Judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2009 [2009] ECR I-6413’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, pp.907-923 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  949. Grin F, ‘Principles of Policy Evaluation and their Application to Multilingualism in the European Union’ in Xabier Arzoz (ed), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (John Benjamins Publishing Company 2008), pp. 73-83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  950. Groussot X, General Principles of Community Law (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing 2006), pp.1-476 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  951. Harden I, ‘The Revision of Regulation 1049/2001 on Public Access to Documents’ (2009) 15 European Public Law, pp. 239-256 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  952. Harding C, ‘The Legal Accountability of Community Institutions: A Study of Illegality and Non-Contractual Liability Under European Community Law’ (1994) 52 Maastricht Journal of European and International Law, pp. 52-72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  953. Harlow C and Rawlings R, ‘Promoting Accountability in Multilevel Governance: A Network Approach’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal, pp. 542-562 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  954. Hautamäki V-P, ‘Legal Sources of Good administration in Finland’ (2006) 69 Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, pp. 57-71 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  955. Heliskoski J and Leino P, ‘Darkness at the Break of Noon: The Case-law on Regulation N° 1049/2001 on Access to Documents’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, pp. 735–781 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  956. Heukels T, ‘The Contractual Liability of the European Community Revisited’ in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds) The Action for Damages in Community Law (The Hague,London, Boston, Kluwer Law International 1997), pp. 89-108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  957. Heukels T and McDonnell A, ‘Limitation of the Action for Damages Against the Community: Considerations and New Developments’, in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Instituut 1997), pp. 217-241 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  958. Hofmann H, ‘Good Administration in EU Law – A Fundamental Right?’ (2007) 13 Bulletin des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 44-52 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  959. – ‘Composite Decision Making Procedures in EU Administrative Law’, in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 136-167 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  960. – Herwig C. H. Hofmann, ‘Inquisitorial Procedures and General Principles of Law: the Duty of Care in the Case-law of the European Court of Justice’ in Laverne Jacobs (ed), The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives (Ashgate 2013), pp. 153-166 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  961. Hofmann H and Türk A, ‘Policy Implementation’ in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) EU Administrative Governance (London, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  962. Hofmann H, Rowe G and Türk A, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011), pp.1-965 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  963. Hofmann H and Mihaescu B, ‘The Relation between the Charter’s Fundamental Rights and the Unwritten General Principles of Law: Good Administration as the Test-Case’ (2013) 9/1 European Constitutional Law Review, pp. 73-101 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  964. Hofmann H and Tidghi M, ‘Rights and Remedies in Implementation of EU Policies by Multi-Jurisdictional Networks’ (2014) 20 European Public Law, pp. 147-163 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  965. Ibánez A, ‘Liability between Administrations: Who Is Responsible For What? (Some Obscure Points in the Case of the European Community)’ (2000) 12 Revue Européenne de Droit Public, pp. 955-974 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  966. Idot L, ‘La Transparence dans les Procédures Administratives: l’Exemple du Droit de la Concurrence’ in La Transparence dans l’Union Européenne: Mythe ou Principe Juridique? (Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit de Jurisprudence 1999), pp. 121-146 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  967. – ‘Les Droits de la Défense’ in Réalité et Perspectives du Droit Communautaire des Droits Fondamentaux (Bruylant 2000), pp. 213-251 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  968. – ‘L’Accès au Dossier de la Commission dans la Procedure de Mise en Ouvre des Articles 81 et 82 TCE. Questions en Suspens’, in A. Pedone (ed) Le droit à la mesure de l’homme. Mélanges en l’honneur de Philippe Léger (Paris, Pedone 2006), pp. 199-216 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  969. – ‘La Coopération entre la Commission Européenne et les Juridictions Nationales en Droit de la Concurrence’ (2009-2010) 1 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 59-72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  970. – ‘Le Règlement n° 1049/2001 Doit-il s’Appliquer aux « Procédures Concurrence »? À Propos des Affaires Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau, Odile Jacobs et Agrofelt’ (October 2010) Europe, pp. 5-11 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  971. Inghelram J, Legal and Institutional Aspects of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): an Analysis with a Look Forward to a European Public Prosecutor’s Office, in Groningen (ed) Europa Law Publishing (2011), pp. 1-308 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  972. Jacobs F, ‘Human Rights in the European Union: the Role of the Court of Justice’ (2001) 26 European Law Review, pp. 331-341 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  973. Jacqué J-P, ‘Le Traité de Lisbonne. Une Vue Cavalière’ (2008) 3 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, pp. 439-483 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  974. – ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux dans le Traité de Lisbonne’ (2010) 80 L'Observateur de Bruxelles, pp. 17-20 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  975. – ‘L’Importance d’un Droit Administrative Européen Vue de l’Union Européenne’, in Jean-Bernard Auby (dir) L’Etat Actuel et les Perspectives du Droit Administratif Européen. Analyses de Droit Comparé (Bruylant 2010), pp. 33-44 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  976. – ‘Le Droit à une Bonne Administration dans la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (2011) 137-138 Revue Française d’Administration Publique, pp. 79-83 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  977. – ‘La Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne Après Lisbonne’ (2012) 26 L’Europe des Libertés, Revue d’Actualité Juridique, pp. 2-12 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  978. Jäderblom H, ‘From Fragmentation to Increased Coherence: A User-Friendly EU Administrative Law’, (Note from March 2011 requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs – available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies˃) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  979. Joliet R, Le Droit Institutionnel des Communautés Européennes. Le contentieux (Faculté de droit, d’Economie et de Sciences Sociales de Liège 1981), pp. 1-302 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  980. Jowell J, ‘The Universality of Administrative Justice’ in Matthias Ruffert (ed), The Transformation of Administrative Law in Europe (European Legal Studies, vol. 4, München, Sellier. European Law Publishers 2007), pp. 55-66 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  981. – ‘Administrative Justice and Standards of Substantive Judicial Review’ in Anthony Arnull, Piet EEckhout and Takis Tridimas (eds), Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacob (United States, Oxford University Press 2008), pp. 172-186 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  982. Juaristi P, Reagan T and Tonkin H, ‘Language Diversity in the European Union: an Overview’, in Xabier Arzoz (ed), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (John Benjamins Publishing Company 2008), pp. 47-72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  983. de Kater J, ‘Technische Universität München v. Hauptzollamt München-Mitte, 21 November 1991 (C-269/90)’ (1992) EC Tax Review, pp. 52-56 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  984. Katsorchi P, ‘L’Engagement de la Responsabilité Non Contractuelle del’Union en Matière de Concurrence’ (2011) 545 Revue de l’Union Européenne, pp. 122-128 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  985. Kutscher H, ‘Méthodes d’Interprétation Vues par le Juge à la Cour’ (Luxembourg, Rencontre Judiciaire et Universitaire 27-28 Septembre 1976), pp. I.1-I-53 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  986. Kańska K, ‘Towards Administrative Human Rights in the EU. Impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal, pp. 296-326 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  987. Kauff-Gazin F, ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux dans le Traité de Lisbonne: un Bilan Contrasté’ (2008) 7 Europe, 18e année, pp. 37-42 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  988. – Commentary in (2010) 7 JurisClasseur Europe, Fasc 233, at p. 22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  989. Kjaer A and Adamo S, ‘Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy: Introduction and Overview’ in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 3-15 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  990. Kontra M, Phillipson R, Skutnabb-Kangas T and Várady T, Language: a Right and a Resource. Approaching Linguistic Human Rights (Budapest, Central European University Press 1999), pp. 1-346 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  991. Koprić I, Musa A and Novak G, ‘Good Administration as a Ticket to the European Administrative Space’ (2011) 61 Zbornik Pravnogfakulteta U Zagreb, pp. 1515-1560 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  992. Kranenborg H, ‘Access to Documents and Data Protection in the European Union: on the Public Nature of Personal Data’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1079-1114 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  993. Laffranque L, Préface to XXV FIDE Congress ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions’ (Tallinn 2012), at p. XIX Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  994. Lagrange M, ‘The Non-Contractual Liability of the Community, in the ECSC and in the EEC’ (1996) 3 Common Market Law Review, pp. 10-36 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  995. Ladenburger C, ‘Report from the European Union Institutions’ (XXV FIDE Congress: ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions’, Tallinn 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  996. Lasinski-Sulecki K and Morawski W, ‘Late Publication of EC Law in Languages of New Member States and its Effects: Obligations on Individuals Following the Court's Judgment in Skoma-Lux’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, pp. 705-725 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  997. de Leeuw M, ‘The European Ombudsman's Role as a Developer of Norms of Good Administration’ (2011) 17 European Public Law, pp. 349-368 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  998. Lefas A, ‘Essai de Comparaison entre le Concept de « Natural Justice » en Droit Administratif Anglo-Saxon et les « Principes Généraux du Droit » ainsi que les « Règles de Procédure » Correspondants en Droit Administratif Français’ (July-December 1978) Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, pp. 745-775 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  999. Leino P, ‘Just a Little Sunshine in the Rain: the 2010 Case-law of the European Court of Justice on Access to Documents’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1215-1252 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1000. – ‘Enforcing Citizens’ Right to Good Administration: Time for Action’ (2012) European Added Value Assessment Research Paper 4/2012, available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/eav_lawofadminprocedure_/EAV_LawofAdminprocedure_EN.pdf˃ accessed 13 May 2014, pp. I-1 – I-46 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1001. Léger P, ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux en Droit Communautaire’ (2002) 10 Bulletin des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 1-25 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1002. Lemasurier J, ‘Vers une Démocratie Administrative: Du Refus d'Informer au Droit d'Etre Informé’ (1980) Revue du Droit Public, pp. 1239-1269 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1003. Lenaerts K, ‘Interlocking Legal Orders in the European Union and Comparative Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 873-906 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1004. – ‘In the Union We Trust: Trust-Enhancing Principles of Community Law’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review, pp. 317-343 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1005. – ‘La Solidarité ou le Chapitre IV de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (2010) 82 Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 217-236 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1006. – ‘EU Federalism in 3-D’, in Elke Cloots, Geert De Baere and Stefan Sottiaux (eds), Federalism in the European Union (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2012), pp. 13-44 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1007. – ‘Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review, pp. 375-403 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1008. – ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Scope of Application and Methods of Interpretation’ in Bruylant (ed), De Rome à Lisbonne: les Juridictions de l’Union Européenne à la Croisée des Chemins. Mélanges en l'Honneur de Paolo Mengozzi (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2013), pp. 107-143 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1009. Lenaerts K and Vanhamme J, ‘Procedural Rights of Private Parties in the Community Administrative Process’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review, pp. 531-569 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1010. Lenaerts K and Arts D, ‘The Action for Damages’ in Robert Bray (ed), Procedural Law of the European Union (London, Sweet & Maxwell 1999), pp. 245-275 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1011. Lenaerts K and de Smijter E, ‘A “Bill of Rights” for the European Union’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review, pp. 273-300 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1012. Lenaerts K and Gutiérrez-Fons J, ‘The Constitutional Allocations of Powers and General Principles of EU law’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1629-1669 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1013. Lenaerts K and Gutiérrez-Fons J, ‘The Place of the Charter in the EU Constitutional Edifice’ in (Steve Peers, Tamara Hervey, Jeff Kenner and Angela Ward eds) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2014), pp. 1559-1593 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1014. Levade A, ‘Préambule’ in Traité Etablissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (Partie II, La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union : Commentaire Article par Article, Tome 2, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2005), pp. 1-32 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1015. Lewis A, ‘Joint and Several Liability of the European Communities and National Authorities’ in Lord Lloyd of Hampstead, Roger W. Rideout and Jacqueline Dyson (eds), Current Legal Problems (London, Stevens & Sons 1980), pp. 99-119 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1016. Liisberg J, ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? Article 53 of the Charter: a Fountain of Law or Just an Inkblot? (2001) 4 Jean Monnet Working Paper 4/01, pp. 1-60 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1017. Lilovska D, ‘The Right to Good Administration in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1018. Lottini M, ‘From ‘Administrative Cooperation’ in the Application of European Union Law to ‘Administrative Cooperation’ in the Protection of European Rights and Liberties’, (2012) 18 EuropeanL, pp. 127-147 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1019. Magnette P, La Citoyenneté Européenne, Droits, Politiques, Institutions in l'Université de Bruxelles (ed) (Bruxelles, Etudes Européennes 1999) pp. 1-245 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1020. Mankou M, ‘Du Principe de Bonne Administration au Droit à la Bonne Administration: Contribution à une Problématique de la Bonne Administration en Droit Communautaire’ (2002) 2 Cahiers de l'IREDE, pp. 7-46 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1021. Mariatte F, ‘Commentary on the T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du people d’Iran v Council case’ (February 2007) European Review, pp. 11-13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1022. – ‘Développements Récents sur les Questions de Recevabilité des Recours dans le Contentieux des Aides d’Etat’ in Stéphanie Mahieu (dir), Contentieux de l’Union Européenne – Questions Choisies (Larcier 2014), pp. 259-289 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1023. Marty N, ‘La Notion de Bonne Administration: À la Confluence des Droits Européens et du Droit Administratif Français’ (Law thesis, University of Montpellier 2007), pp. 1-691 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1024. Mauro C, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Futur Parquet Européen’ in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne : Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant 2013), pp. 1197-217, at p. 199 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1025. van der Meersch J, ‘L’Ordre Juridique des Communautés Européennes et le Droit International’ (1975) 5 Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de Droit International, pp. 1-433 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1026. Meiöhard H, Gritta C and Eckhard P, ‘Rights Vis-à-Vis the Administration at the Community Level’ (1991) II Human Rights and the European Community: Methods of Protection, pp. 455-494 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1027. Mendes J, ‘Good Administration in EU Law and the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’ (2009) 9 EUI Working Papers Law, pp. 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1028. – ‘Participation and Participation Rights in EU Law and Governance’, in Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law. Towards an Integrated Administration (Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 257-287 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1029. – ‘Participation and the Rule of Law after Lisbon: A Legal View on Article 11 TEU’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1849–1878 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1030. – Participation in EU Rule-Making: A Bights-Based Approach (Oxford University Press 2011), pp. 1-502 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1031. Mengozzi P, ‘Les Caractéristiques Spécifiques de l’Union Européenne dans la Perspective de son Adhésion à la CEDH’ (2010) 1 Il Diritto dell’ Unione Europea, pp. 231-245 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1032. Michel V, ‘Salubrité du Berlaymont et Unification des Régimes de Responsabilité’ (2009) Revue Europe, pp. 17-18 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1033. Michelet K, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l'Union Européenne et la Procédure Administrative Non Contentieuse’, (2002) 14 L’Actulité Juridique: Droit Français, pp. 949-955 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1034. Mihaescu B, ‘Liability of the European Union for Acts of Its Institutions’ (2011) 4 Revista Romana de Drept European, pp. 97-114 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1035. – ‘Tableau Comparatif des Droits Fondamentaux tels qu’ils sont Reconnus dans la CEDH et dans l’Ordre Juridique de l’Union Européenne’ (2012) 6 Revista Romana de Drept European, pp. 113-150 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1036. Millett L, ‘The Right to Good Administration in European law’ (2002) Public Law, pp. 309-322 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1037. Mitard E, ‘L'Impartialité Administrative’ (1999) Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif, pp. 478-495 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1038. Molinier J, ‘Le Contrôle Juridictionnel et Ses Limites : À Propos du Pouvoir Discrétionnaire des Institutions Communautaires’, in Joël Rideau (dir), De la Communauté de Droit à l’Union de Droit: Continuités et Avatars Européens (Paris, L.G.D.J. 2000) pp.77-98 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1039. Monjean-Decaudin S, ‘Linguistique Juridique et Procès Pénal dans l’Union Européenne’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit pénal, langue et Union européenne : Réflexions autour du procès pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 71-89 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1040. Muguet-Poullennec G, ‘Transparence et Aides d’État: Comment Mettre en Ouvre le Droit Général d’Accès aux Documents?’ (April/June 2007) 11 Revue Lamy de la Concurrence, pp. 62-65 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1041. – ‘Droit Processuel de la Concurrence: Protection de la Vie Privée, Données Nominatives et Transparence’ (April/Juin 2008) 15 Revue Lamy de la Concurrence, pp. 78-80 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1042. Mykolaitis D, ‘The Other Way Around: Liability of Community Institutions for Losses Incurred Owing to Misapplications of EC Competition Law (Schneider III)’ (2008) 14 International Law & Regulation, pp. 52-60 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1043. Nadal J-L, ‘L’Impartialité du Magistrat’ (2012) 25 Annonces de la Seine, pp. 7-11 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1044. Nehl H-P, Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing 1999), pp. 1-214 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1045. – Good Administration as Procedural Right and/or General Principle?’ in H.C.H Hofmann and A. H. Türk (eds), Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 322-351 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1046. – ‘Legal Protection in the Field of EU Funds’ (2011) 4 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 629-652 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1047. Neill P, ‘Administrative Justice/Some Necessary Reforms’ (1998) Report of the Committee of the JUSTICE-All Souls Review of Administrative Law in the United Kingdom, pp.7-85 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1048. Neuhold C, ‘‘Glass Half Empty or Glass Half-Full?’: Accountability Issues in Comitology and the Role of the European Parliament after the 2006 Reform of Comitology’, in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration (USA, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 65-89 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1049. Niemivuo M, Good Administration and the Council of Europe (2008) 14 European Public Law, pp. 545-563 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1050. Nieto-Garrido E, ‘Possible Developments of Article 298 TFEU: Towards an Open, Efficient and Independent European Administration’ (2012) 18 European Public Law, pp. 373–398 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1051. Nowak C, ‘The Commission’s Constitutional Duty to State Reasons in the Area of EC State Aid Law: Note on Judgment in Joined Cases T-50/06, T-56/06, T-60/06, T-62/06 and T-69/06, Ireland et al. v. Commission’ (2008) 7 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 718-725 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1052. O’Brien F, ‘Nemo Iudex in Causa Sua: Aspects of the No-Bias Rule of Constitutional Justice in Courts and Administrative Bodies’ (2011) 2(2) Irish Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 26-53 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1053. Oliver P, ‘Joint Liability of the Community and the Member States’, in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Instituut 1997), pp. 285-309 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1054. O’Higgins K, ‘Overview of the Jurisprudence in State Aid Cases: Substance and Procedure – An Update’ (2011) 4 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 601-610 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1055. Oosting M, ‘The Role of a Modern Administration in a State Governed by the Rule of Law’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1056. Papadopoulou R, Principes Généraux du Droit et Droit Communautaire: Origines et Concrétisation (Bruxelles, Bruylant 1996), pp. 1-319 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1057. Perju V, ‘Reason and Authority in the European Court of Justice’ (2009) 49 Virginia Journal of International Law, pp. 307-377 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1058. Pekka A, Public Liability in EU Law: Brasserie, Bergaderm and Beyond (Exford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2011), pp. 1-219 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1059. Pescatore P, ‘Le Recours, dans la Jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes, à des Normes Déduites de la Comparaison des Droits des Etats Membres’ (1980) 2 Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, pp. 337-359 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1060. Petit-Leclair S, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Pratique d’Eurojust’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant 2013), pp. 175-178 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1061. Pliakos A, Les Droits de la Défense et le Droit Communautaire de la Concurrence (Bruxelles, Bruylant 1987), pp. 1-440 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1062. Prechal S, ‘Competence Creep and General Principles of Law’ (2010) 3 Review of European Administrative Law, pp. 5-22 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1063. – Conference on ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU: Future Challenges’ (University of Luxembourg, 22 October 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1064. Prechal S and de Leeuw M, ‘Dimensions of Transparency: the Building Blocks for a New Legal Principle?’ (2007) I Review of European Administrative Law, pp. 51-61 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1065. – ‘Transparency: a General Principle of EU Law?’ (2008) 62 European Monographs, pp. 201-242 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1066. Quiriny B, ‘Actualité du Principe Général d'Impartialité Administrative’ (2006) 2 Revue du Droit Public, pp. 375-400 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1067. Rabinovici I, ‘The Right to be Heard in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2012) 18 European Public Law, pp. 149-173 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1068. Rawls J, 'Justice as Fairness' (1958) 67 Philosophical Review, pp. 164-194 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1069. Rebut D, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Mandat d’Arrêt Européen’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 167-173 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1070. Reichel J, ‘Between Supremacy and Autonomy – Applying the Principle of Good Administration in the Member States’ (2008) 62 European Monographs, pp. 243-271 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1071. Reichling C, ‘Terminologie Juridique Multilingue Comparée’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp.129-163 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1072. Renders D and Gors B, ‘Origine et Contours des Principes Généraux de Bonne Administration en Droit Belge’ (2012) 4 Revue Française de Droit Administratif, pp. 763-772 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1073. Rideau J, ‘Droits de la Défense et Garanties Procédurales’ (1997) 265 Recueil des Cours. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, pp. 111-133 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1074. – ‘Justice et Langues dans l’Union Européenne’ in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 21-70 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1075. Ritleng D, ‘De l’Irresponsabilité Extracontractuelle de la Communauté’ in A. Pedone (eds) L’Union Européenne: Union de Droit, Union des Droits. Mélanges en l’Honneur de Philippe Manin (Paris, A. Pedone 2010, pp. 921-932 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1076. – ‘Les Contrats de l’Administration de l’Union Européenne’ in Jean-Bernard Auby et Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère (eds) Traité de Droit Administartif Européen (Bruylant 2014), pp. 219-238 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1077. Rossi L-S, ‘Les Rapports entre la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux et le Traité de Lisbonne’ in Chemins d’Europe: Mélanges en l'Honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 609-623 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1078. Ruffert M, ‘Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: a Comparative View’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review, pp. 307-336 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1079. Ruiz Fabri H, ‘Principes Généraux du Droit Communautaire et Droit Comparé’ (2007) 45 Revue Française de Théorie, de Philosophie et de Culture Juridique, pp. 127-161 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1080. Runavot M-C, ‘La « Bonne Administration »: Consolidation d’un Droit sous Influence Européenne’ (2010) 2 Revue Française de Droit Administratif, pp. 395-403 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1081. Sacerdoti G, ‘The European Charter of Fundamental Rights: From a Nation-State Europe to a Citizens’ Europe’ (2002) 8 Columbia Journal of European Law, pp. 37-52 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1082. Sauron J-L, ‘La Coopération entre les Administrations Communautaires et Nationales', in J. Auvret-Finck (dir) L'Union Européenne: Carrefour de Coopération (Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 2002), pp. 233-243 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1083. Sautel O, ‘Sur la Déchéance en Droit Privé – Contribution à la Théorie de la Permanence de la Cause’ (1999) 43 Le Dalloz, pp. 487-496 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1084. Sauvé J-M, ‘Un Juge Indépendant et Impartial’ in Dalloz (eds), La Conscience des Droits : Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Paul Costa, (Paris, Dalloz 2011), pp. 539-562 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1085. Sauvé J-M and Polge N, ‘Les Principes Généraux du Droit en Droit Interne et en Droit Communautaire. Leçons Croisées pour un Avenir Commun?’ (J-C Masclet, H. Ruiz Fabri, C. Boutayeb and S. Rodrigues dir), L’Union Européenne. Union de Droit, Union des Droits: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Philippe Manin (Paris, A. Pedone eds 2010), pp. 727-750 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1086. Schaller F, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Droit à la Traduction et à l’Interprétation’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 231-239 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1087. Schmidt-Assmann E, ‘Le Modèle de l' « Administration Composée » et le Rôle du Droit Administratif Européen’ (2006) 6 Revue Française de Droit Administratif, pp. 1246-1255 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1088. Schockweiler F, ‘La Motivation des Décisions Individuelles en Droit Communautaire et en Droit National’ (1989) 1-2 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 3-40 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1089. Schrameck O, ‘Le Principe d’Impartialité en Droit Public Français et la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’ in Dalloz (ed), La Conscience des Droits: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Paris, Dalloz 2011), pp. 563-569 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1090. Schwarze J, European Administrative Law (London, Sweet and Maxwell 1992), pp. 1-1547 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1091. – ‘Judicial Review of European Administrative Procedure’ (Spring 2004) Public Law, pp. 146-166 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1092. – Droit Administratif Européen (Office des Publication Officielles des Communautés Européennes Luxembourg, Bruylant 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1093. Shapiro M, ‘The Giving Reasons Requirement’ (1993) vol. 1992 The University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 179-220 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1094. Shuibhne N, ‘EC Law and Minority Language Policy: Some Recent Developments’ in Xavier Arzoz (ed), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (John Benjamins Publishing Company 2008), pp. 123-143 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1095. de la Sierra S, 'Les Sources des Principes du Droit Administratif Européen', in Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 339-356 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1096. Simon D, ‘Y a-t-il des Principes Généraux du Droit Communautaire?’ (1991) 13 Revue Française de Théorie Juridique, pp. 73-86 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1097. – ‘Les Droits du Citoyen de l’Union’ (2000) 12 Revue Universelle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 22-27 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1098. – Le Système Juridique Communautaire (Presses Universiatires de France 2001), pp. 1-779 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1099. – ‘Une Théorie de l’Intensité du Contrôle Juridictionnel Est-Elle Possible? – Brefs Propos sur une Tentative Avortée du Tribunal de Première Instance (TPI 30 Janvier 2002 Max.Mobil Telekommunikation Service GmbH, T-54/99) (2002) 4 Europe Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1100. – ‘Article II-101 – Droit à une Bonne Administration’, in Traité Etablissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (Partie II, La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union : Commentaire Article par Article, Tome 2, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2005), pp. 525-537 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1101. – ‘Le Principe de « Bonne Administration » ou la « Bonne Gouvernance » Concrète’ in Apogée (eds), Le Droit de l'Union Européenne en Principes: Liber Amicorum en l'Honneur de Jean Raux (Rennes 2006), pp.155-176 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1102. – ‘Les Principes en Droit Communautaire’ in S. Caudal (dir) Les Principes en Droit (Paris, Economica 2008), pp. 287-304 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1103. – ‘Transparence: Accès à des Données Nominatives et Respect de la Confidentialité et de la Vie Privée’ (January 2008) Europe, pp.12-13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1104. – ‘Ordre Juridique de l’Union européenne. Droits fondamentaux. Transparence et Vie Privée’, (2011) 1 Europe, p. 12 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1105. Simon D and Rigaux A, ‘La Responsabilité des États Membres en Cas de Violation du Droit Communautaire Revisitée, ou Comment le Problème Technique de l’Odeur Sexuelle des Porcs Mâles Non Castrés Conduit la Cour à Trancher des Questions Fondamentales’ (2009) 5 Europe, pp. 5-8 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1106. Skouris V, ‘Intégration de la Charte/Adhésion à la CEDH’’ (Working Group II 2002) – available on <http://european-convention.eu.int/docs/wd2/3063.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1107. – ‘50 Ans de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme Vus Par les Autres Cours Internationales’ (2009) 14 Bulletin des Droits de l'Homme, pp. 1-9 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1108. Skutnabb-Kangas T and Phillipson R, ‘Linguistic Human Rights, Past and Present’ in Tove Skutnabb-Kangas and Robert Phillipson (eds), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (Berlin, Walter de Gruyter 1994) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1109. Söderman J, Public Hearing on the draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Preliminary remarks’ (Brussels, Belgium, February 2000), available on ˂http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/activities/speech.faces/en/355/html.bookmark˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1110. – ‘Transparency as a Fundamental Principle of the European Union’, (2002) 7/01 Forum Constitutionis Europae, pp. 1-18 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1111. – ‘Good Administration: a Fundamental Right’ (2004) Justice and Home Affairs in the EU, pp. 113-119 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1112. Solé J-P, ‘Good Administration and European Public Law: The Fight for Quality in the Field of Administrative Decisions’ (2002) 14 Revue Européenne de Droit Public, pp. 1503-1544 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1113. – ‘EU Law, Global Law and the Right to Good Administration’, in Springer (ed), Global Administrative Law and EU Administrative Law: Relationships, Legal Issues and Comparison (2011), pp. 133-145 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1114. Smits C, ‘Entre Diplomatie et Croisade. Des Influences Réciproques Entre le Régime de la Responsabilité Extra-Contractuelle de la Communauté et le Régime de la Responsabilité Extra-Contractuelle des Etats Membres’, in Georges Vandersanden and Aline de Walsche (dir) Mélanges en Hommage à Jean-Victor Louis (Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles 2003), pp. 409-442 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1115. Spiezia F, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Pratiques d’Eurojust dans le Cadre du Mandat d’Arrêt Européen’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant 2013), pp. 179-196 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1116. Sudre F, ‘Le Renforcement des Droits de l’Homme au sein de l’Union Européenne’ in Joël Rideau (dir), De la Communauté de Droit à l’Union de Droit: Continuités et Avatars Européens (L.G.D.J. 2000), pp. 207-230 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1117. Sweeney J, ‘Alconbury and the Right to a Fairly Fair Hearing’ (2002) 8 European Public Law, pp. 35-44 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1118. Tavernier P, ‘L’insertion de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne dans le Système Européen de Protection des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés Fondamentales’ (2011) Droits de l’Homme et Libertés Fondamentales, pp. 1069-1080 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1119. Thomas R, ‘Reason-Giving in English and European Community Administrative Law’ (1997) 3 European Public Law, pp. 213-222 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1120. Tournepiche A, ‘TPICE, 4 octobre 2006, Hans Martin Tillack/Commission’, (2006) 4 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 735-741 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1121. Tridimas T, ‘Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down? (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review 301, pp. 301–332 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1122. – The General Principles of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed. 2006), pp.1-591 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1123. Trondal J, ‘EU Committee Governance and the Multilevel Community Administration’ in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) EU Administrative Governance (London, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2006), pp. 391-416 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1124. Truchot L, ‘La Motivation et le Style des Décisions Juridictionnelles du Tribunal de l’Union Européenne’, in Bruylant (ed) Pédagocie Judiciaire et Application des Droits Communautaire et Européen (Collection Droit de l’Union Européenne – Colloques 2012), pp. 159-172 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1125. Vandersanden G, ‘Conclusions générales’ du Colloque co-organisé par le Centre d’études et de recherches internationales et communautaires (CERIC) de l’Université Paul Cézanne et l’Institut de droit européen des droits de l’homme (IDEDH) de l’Université Montpellier I organised on the 9 and 10 October 2009, in Bruylant (ed) Pédagocie Judiciaire et Application des Droits Communautaire et Européen (Collection Droit de l’Union Européenne – Colloques 2012), pp. 109-123 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1126. Usher J, General Principles of EC Law (European Law Series, University of Edinburgh, Longman 1998), pp. 1-167 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1127. del Vecchio G, ‘Les Bases du Droit Comparé et les Principes Généraux du Droit’ (1960) Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, pp. 493-499 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1128. Vesterdorf B, ‘Transparency: Not Just a Vogue Word’ (1999) Fordham International Law Journal, pp. 902-929 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1129. Vitorino A, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (2001) 1 Revue du Droit de l’Union Européenne, pp. 27-64 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1130. Voinea C and Bischin R, ‘Buna Administrare – Drept Fundamental European si Valoare Administrativa Europeana’ (2009) 6 Revista Romana de Drept Comunitar, pp. 161-168 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1131. Wakefield J, ‘Case T-193/04, Hans-Martin Tillack v. Commission, Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2006, [2006] ECR II-3995’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, pp. 199-221 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1132. – The Right to Good Administration (Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International ed., European Monographs 2007), pp.1-285 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1133. – ‘The Changes in Liability of EU Institutions: Bergaderm, FIAMM and Schneider’ (2012) 12 ERA Forum: Journal of the Academy of European Law, pp. 625-684 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1134. Waline M, ‘Le Principe "Audi Alteram Partem"’ (1957) 1856-1956 Livre Jubilaire du Conseil d’Etat du Luxembourg, pp. 495-506 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1135. Wathelet M, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux: un Bon Pas dans une Course qui Reste Longue’ (2000) 1-2 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 585-593 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1136. Weiler J, ‘A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices’ in (G. Bermann and C. Pistor eds.) Law and Governance in an Enlarged European Union (New York, Oxford and Portland 2004), pp. 39-59 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1137. Weiß W, ‘Human Rights in the EU: Rethinking the Role of the European Convention on Human Rights after Lisbon’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review, pp. 64-95 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1138. Weitzel L, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne, Avancée ou Régression?’ in Luc Weitzel (dir), L’Europe des Droits Fondamentaux: Mélanges en Hommage à Alberts Weitzel (Editions A. Palone 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1139. White S, ‘Rights of the Defence in Administrative Investigations: Access to the File in EC Investigations’ (2009) 2 Review of European Administrative Law, pp. 57-69 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1140. de Witte B, ‘The Protection of Linguistic Diversity of the EU Charter other than Article 22’, in X. Arzoz (ed), Respecting Lingustic Diversity in the European Union (Amsterdam, John Benjamins 2008), pp. 175-190 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1141. – ‘Language Rights: The Interaction between Domestic and European Developments’ in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 167-188 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1142. Yeng-Seng W, ‘Le Médiateur Européen, Artisan du Développement du Droit à une Bonne Administration’ (2004) 58 Revue Universelle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 527-552 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1143. Ziller J, ‘Les Relations entre l’Union Européenne et les Administrations Nationales. Esquisse d’une Problématique’, in d'Y. Meny and P. Muller (dir) Politiques Publiques en Europe (Paris, Le Harmattan 1995), pp. 119-124 - Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1144. – ‘Article II-102 – Droit d’Accès aux Documents’, in in Traité Etablissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (Partie II, La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union: Commentaire Article par Article, Tome 2, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2005), pp. 538-550 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1145. – ‘What’s New in European Administartive Law? Quoi de Neuf en Droit Administratif Européen?’ (2005) 10 EUI Working Papers EUI Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1146. ‘L’Autorité Administrative dans l’Union Européenne’ in de L. Burgorgue-Larsen and L. Azoulia (dir) L'Autorité de l'Union Européenne (Bruxelles, Actes du Colloque de Rouen du 9 avril 2004, Bruylant 2006), pp. 119-153 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1147. – ‘Droit à une Bonne Administration’ (2007) Jurisclasseur Libertés, Fasc. 1040, pp. 1-28 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1148. – Introduction: Les Concepts d’Administration Directe, d’Administration Indirecte et de Co-Administration et les Fondements du Droit Administratif Européen’ in J.-B. Auby et J. Dutheilde la Rochère (dir) Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 235-243 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1149. – ‘Is a Law of Administrative Procedure for the Union Institutions Necessary?’ (2011) 3-4 Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, pp. 699-725 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1150. – ‘Aspects Relating to Added Value for Citizens and Economic Operators’ (2012) European Added Value Assessment Research Paper 4/2012, available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/eav_lawofadminprocedure_/EAV_LawofAdminprocedure_EN.pdf˃ accessed 13 May 2014, pp. II-1 – II-54 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1151. Woehrling J-M, ‘Le Contrôle Juridictionnel de l’Administration en Europe et la Discrimination entre Droit Objectif et Droits Subjectifs’, in L’Etat Actuel et les Perspectives du Droit Administratif Européen: Analyses de Droit Comparé (Bruylant 2010), pp. 297-322 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1152. Conferences, Congress and Studies Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1153. The XVIIth FIDE Congress addressing the topic of “Procedures and Sanctions in Economic Administrative Law” (Berlin 1996) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1154. European Conference ‘The Right to Good Administration’ (Warsaw, December 2003) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1155. Council of Europe’s Working Party of the Project Group on Administrative Law (CJ-DA-GT), Report of the 2nd meeting (Strasbourg 8-10 December 2004), available on ˂www.coe.int˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1156. European Conference ‘Pursuit of Good Administration’ (Vilnius, October 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1157. Swedish Statskontoret, ‘Principles of Good Administration in the Member States of the European Union’ (Stockholm 2005) available on <http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publikationer/2005/200504.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1158. The EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, ‘Commentaire de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (June 2006), available on ˂ http://ec.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1159. European Conference ‘Training of Civil Servants to Achieve Good Administration’ (Warsaw, November 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1160. House of Lords European Union Committee, ‘The workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (London, April 2011), available on : <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldselect/ldeucom/128/128.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1161. The XXVth FIDE Congress on “The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions” (Tallin 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1162. Table of Case-law (in case number order) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1163. Case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1164. Case 1/56 Bourgaux v Assemblée commune [1956] ECR-421 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1165. Joined Cases 7/56, 3/57 to 7/57 Algera [1957] ECR 39 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1166. Case 9/56 Meroni v High Authority [1958] ECR 11 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1167. Joined Cases 1/57 and 14/57 Société des usines à tubes de la Sarre [1957] ECR 105 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1168. Case 23/59 F.E.R.A.M. v High Authority [1959] ECR 501 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1169. Joint Cases 42 and 49/59 SNUPAT v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1961] ECR 53 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1170. Joined Cases 43/59, 45/59 and 48/59 Von Lachmüller and Others v Commission [1960] ECR 933 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1171. Case 44/59 Fiddelaar v Commission [1960] ECR 1077 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1172. Joined Cases 9/60 and 12/60 Belgium v Vloeberghs and High Authority [1962] ECR 171 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1173. Case 24/62 Germany v Commission [1963] ECR 63 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1174. Case 25/62 Plaumann v Commission [1963] ECR 95 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1175. Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Administratie der Belastingen [1963] ECR 3 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1176. Case 32/62 Alvis [1963] ECR 49 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1177. Joined Cases 35/62 and 16/63 Leroy v High Authority [1963] ECR 197 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1178. Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig v Commission [1966] ECR 299 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1179. Case 16/65 Schwarze [1965] ECR 877 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1180. Joined Cases 5, 7 and 13 to 24/66 Kampffmeyer and Others v Commission [1967] ECR 245 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1181. Case 5/67 Beus v Hauptzollamt München [1968] ECR 83 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1182. Case 6/67 Guerra v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (CJEU, 5 July 1967) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1183. Case 35/67 Van Eick v Commission [1968] ECR 329 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1184. Case 14/68 Wilhelm and Others v Bundeskartellamt [1969] ECR-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1185. Case 4/69 Lütticke v Commission [1971] ECR 325 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1186. Case 9/69 Sayag and Others [1969] ECR 329 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1187. Case 13/69 van Eick v Commission [1970] ECR 3 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1188. Case 41/69 ACF Chemiefarma v Commission [1970] ECR 661 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1189. Case 45/69 Boehringer Mannheim GmbH v Commission of the European Communities [1970] ECR 769 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1190. Case 49/69 BASF v Commission [1972] ECR 713 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1191. Case 11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft [1970] ECR 1125 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1192. Case 25/70 Köster [1970] ECR 1161 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1193. Case 46/71 Brandau v Council [1972] ECR 373 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1194. Case 6/72 Continental Can Company v Commission [1973] ECR 215 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1195. Case 7/72 Boehringer Mannheim v Commission [1972] ECR 1281 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1196. Joined Cases 10 and 47/72 di Pillo v Commission [1973] ECR 763 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1197. Case 53/72 Guillot v Commission [1974] ECR 791 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1198. Case 81/72 Commission v Council [1973] ECR 575 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1199. Case 4/73 Nold and Others v Commission [1974] ECR 491 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1200. Case 120/73 Lorenz GmbH v Germany and Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1973] ECR 1471 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1201. Case 169/73 Compagnie Continentale France v Council [1975] ECR 117 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1202. Case 17/74 Transocean Marine Paint v Commission [1974] ECR 1063 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1203. Case 72/74 Union syndicale v Council [1975] ECR 401 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1204. Case 74/74 CNTA v Commission [1976] ECR 797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1205. Case 33/76 Rewe-Zentralfinanz [1976] ECR 1989 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1206. Case 61/76 Geist v Commission [1977] ECR 1419 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1207. Joined Cases 64/76 and 113/76, 167/78 and 239/78, 27/79, 28/79 and 45/79 Dumortier Frères and Others v Council [1979] ECR 3091 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1208. Case 85/76 Hoffmann-La Roche [1979] ECR 461 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1209. Case 101/76 Koniklijke Scholten Honig v Council and Commission [1977] ECR 797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1210. Case 121/76 Moli v Commission [1977] ECR 1971 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1211. Case 30/77 Régina v Bouchereau [1977] ECR 1999 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1212. Case 55/77 Maris [1977] ECR 2327 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1213. Joined Cases 83 and 94/76, 4, 15 and 40/77 HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1214. Case 118/77 ISO v Council [1979] ECR 1277 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1215. Case 119/77 Nippon Seiko v Council [1979] ECR 1303 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1216. Case 125/77 Koninklijke Scholten-Honig NV and Others v Hoofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten [1978] ECR 1991 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1217. Case 143/77 Koninklijke Scholten-Honig v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3583 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1218. Case 14/78 Denkavit and Others v Commission [1978] ECR 2497 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1219. Case 18/78 V v Commission [1979] ECR-2093 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1220. Case 87/78 Welding & Co. v Hauptzollamt Hambourg-Waltershof [1978] ECR 2457 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1221. Case 98/78 Racke [1979] ECR 69 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1222. Case 99/78 Decker v Hauptzollamt Landau [1979] ECR 101 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1223. Joined Cases 209 to 215 and 218/78 van Landewyck and Others v Commission [1980] ECR 3125 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1224. Case 238/78 Ireks-Arkady v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 2955 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1225. Case 250/78 DEKA Getreideprodukte & Co v EEC [1983] ECR 421 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1226. Case 261/78 Interquell Stärke-Chemie v EEC [1982] ECR 3271 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1227. Case 9/79 Wörsdorfer [1979] ECR 2717 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1228. Joined Cases 33/79 and 75/79 Kuhner v Commission [1980] ECR 1677 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1229. Case 44/79 Hauer v Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1979] ECR 3727 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1230. Case 112/80 Dürbeck [1981] ECR 1095 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1231. Case 125/80 Arning v Commission [1981] ECR 2539 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1232. Case 195/80 Michel v EP [1981] ECR 2861 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1233. Joined Cases 212 and 217/80 Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato v Srl Meridionale Industria Salumi and Others [1981] ECR 2735 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1234. Joined Cases 256, 257, 265, 267/80, 5 and 51/81 and 282/82 Wührer and Others v Council and Commission [1984] ECR 3693 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1235. Case 280/80 Bakke-d’Aloya v Council [1981] ECR-2887 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1236. Case 14/81 Alpha Steel v Commission [1982] ECR 749 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1237. Case 44/81 Germany v Commission [1982] ECR 1855 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1238. Case 51/81 De Franceschi v Council and Commission [1982] ECR 117 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1239. Case 106/81 Kind KG v EEC [1982] ECR 2885 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1240. Case 191/81 Plug v Commission [1982] ECR-4229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1241. Case 210/81 Demo-Studio Schmidt v Commission [1983] ECR 3045 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1242. Case 256/81 Pauls Agriculture Limited v Council and Commission [1983] ECR 1707 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1243. Case 283/81 CILFIT v Ministry of Health [1982] ECR 3415 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1244. Case 310/81 EISS v Commission [1984] ECR 1341 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1245. Case 318/81 Commission v CO.DE.MI [1985] ECR 3693 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1246. Case 322/81 Michelin v Commission [1983] ECR 3461 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1247. Joined Cases 43/82 and 63/82 VBVB and VBBB v Commission [1984] ECR 19 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1248. Case 64/82 Tradax v Commission [1984] ECR 1359 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1249. Case 84/82 Germany v Commission [1984] ECR 1451 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1250. Joined Cases 96-102, 104, 105, 108 and 110/82 IAZ and Others v Commission [1983] ECR 3369 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1251. Case 179/82 Lucchini v Commission [1983] ECR 3083 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1252. Joined Cases 205/82 to 215/82 Deutsche Milchkontor and Others [1983] ECR 2633 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1253. Joined Cases 239/82 and 275/82 Allied Corporation and Others v Commission [1984] ECR 1005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1254. Case 264/82 Timex v Council and Commission [1985] ECR 849 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1255. Case 271/82 Auer v Ministère Public [1983] ECR 2727 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1256. Case 281/82 Unifrex v Commission and Council [1984] ECR 1969 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1257. Case 292/82 Merck Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [1983] ECR 3781 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1258. Joined Cases 296 and 318/82 Netherlands and Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek v Commission [1985] ECR 809 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1259. Case 5/83 Criminal proceedings v Rienks [1983] ECR 4233 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1260. Case 37/83 Rewe-Zentral [1984] ECR 1229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1261. Case 53/83 Allied Corporation and Others v Council [1985] ECR 1621 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1262. Case 118/83 CMC v Commission [1985] ECR 2325 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1263. Case 145/83 Adams v Commission [1985] ECR 3539 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1264. Case 228/83 F. v Commission [1985] ECR 275 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1265. Case 289/83 GAARM v Commission [1984] ECR 4295 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1266. Case 294/83 Les Verts [1986] ECR 1339 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1267. Case 42/84 Remia v Commission [1985] ECR 2545 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1268. Case 123/84 Klein v Commission [1985] ECR 1907 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1269. Case 137/84 Criminal proceedings v Mutsch [1985] ECR 2681 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1270. Joined Cases 142/84 and 156/84 BAT and Reynolds v Commission [1987] ECR 4487 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1271. Case 197/84 Steinhauser v City of Biarritz [1985] ECR 1819 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1272. Case 222/84 Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [1986] ECR 1651 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1273. Case 234/84 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR 2263 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1274. Case 299/84 Neumann v BALM [1985] ECR 3663 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1275. Case 40/85 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR 2321 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1276. Case 46/85 Manchester Steel Limited v Commission [1986] ECR 2351 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1277. Case 155/85 Strack v Parliament [1986] ECR 3561 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1278. Case 203/85 Nicolet Instrument v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main-Flughafen [1986] ECR 2049 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1279. Case 223/85 RSV v Commission [1987] ECR 4617 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1280. Case 233/85 Bonino v Commission [1987] ECR 739 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1281. Case 321/85 Schwiering v Court of Auditors [1986] ECR 3199 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1282. Case 324/85 Bouteiller v Commission [1987] ECR 529 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1283. Case 348/85 Denmark v Commission [1987] ECR 5225 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1284. Case 417/85 Maurissen v Court of Auditors [1987] ECR 551 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1285. Case 62/86 AKZO v Commission [1991] ECR I-3444 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1286. Joined Cases 175 and 209/86 M. v Council [1988] ECR 1891 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1287. Joined Cases 176 and 177/86 Houyoux and Guery v Commission [1987] ECR 4333 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1288. Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1289. Case 316/86 Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas vKrücken [1988] ECR 2213 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1290. Case 43/87 Nicolet Instrument v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main-Flughafen [1988] ECR 1557 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1291. Joined Cases 46/87 and 227/88 Hoechst v Commission [1989] ECR 2859 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1292. Case 55/87 Moksel v BALM [1988] ECR 3845 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1293. Case 70/87 Fediol v Commission [1989] ECR 1781, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1294. Case 85/87 Dow Benelux v Commission [1989] ECR 3137 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1295. Case 174/87 Ricoh v Council [1992] ECR I-1335 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1296. Case 213/87 Gemeente Amsterdam and VIA v Commission [1990] ECR I-221 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1297. Case 249/87 Mulfinger and Others v Commission [1989] ECR 4127 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1298. Case 301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1299. Case 308/87 Grifoni v EAEC [1994] ECR I-341 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1300. Case 354/87 Weddel& Co. BV v Commission [1990] ECR I-3847 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1301. Case 374/87 Orkem v Commission [1989] ECR 3283 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1302. Case C-10/88 Italy v Commission [1990] ECR I-1229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1303. Case C-49/88 Al-Jubail Fertilizer v Council [1991] ECR I-3187 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1304. Case C-119/88 AERPO and Others v Commission [1990] ECR I-2189 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1305. Case C-152/88 Sofrimport v Commission [1990] ECR I-2477 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1306. Case C-303/88 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1307. Case C-350/88 Delacre and Others v Commission [1990] ECR I-395 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1308. Joined Cases C-104/89 and C-37/90 Mulder and Others v Council and Commission [1992] ECR I-3061 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1309. Case C-170/89 BEUC v Commission [1991] ECR I-5709 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1310. Case C-174/89 Hoche GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaftliche Marktordnung [1990] ECR I-2681 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1311. Case C-200/89 Funoc v Commission [1990] ECR I-3669 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1312. Case C-213/89 Factortame [1990] ECR I-2433 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1313. Case C 260/89 ERT [1991] ECR I 2925 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1314. Case C-291/89 Interhotel v Commission [1991] ECR I-2257 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1315. Case C-304/89 Oliveira v Commission [1991] ECR I-2283 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1316. Case C-340/89 Vlassopoulou [1991] ECR I-2357 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1317. Case C-370/89 SGEEM and Etroy v EIB [1993] ECR I-2583 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1318. Joined Cases C-6/90 and C-9/90 Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy [1991] ECR I-5357 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1319. Case C-16/90 Nölle v Hauptzollamt Bremen-Freihafen [1991] ECR I-5163 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1320. Joined Cases C-48/90 and C-66/90 Netherlands and Others v Commission [1992] ECR I-565 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982
  1321. Joined Cases C-63/90 and C-67/90 Portugal and Spain v Council [1992] ECR I-5073 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845267982

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies"
Cover des Buchs: Interfaces between National and EU Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Giovanni Chiapponi
Interfaces between National and EU Law
Cover des Buchs: Experimental Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Stefan Braum
Experimental Law
Cover des Buchs: Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Katalin Ligeti, Kei Hannah Brodersen
Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Cover des Buchs: Implications of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts on Contract Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Chantal Bomprezzi
Implications of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts on Contract Law
Cover des Buchs: Data Protection by Design in the E-Health Care Sector
Monographie Vollzugriff
Giorgia Bincoletto
Data Protection by Design in the E-Health Care Sector

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex