Cover des Buchs: The right to good administration at the crossroads of the various sources of fundamental rights in the EU integrated administrative system
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The right to good administration at the crossroads of the various sources of fundamental rights in the EU integrated administrative system

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 30.10.2015

Zusammenfassung

„Gute Verwaltung“ ist ein zentraler Grundsatz der EU. Die Arbeit analysiert Chancen und Probleme dieses Grundsatzes, stellt sein hohes Potenzial, aber auch seine Probleme umfassend dar und zeigt anhand vieler Beispiele und unterschiedlicher Rechtsquellen die Möglichkeiten einer Fortentwicklung auf.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2015
Erscheinungsdatum
30.10.2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2638-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6798-2
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies
Band
7
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
574
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 30
    1. 1. Aims of the present study Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Approach of the thesis. Methods and sources Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Existing literature on the principle of good administration. Delimitation and input of the present contribution Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Outline of the thesis Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Hierarchical approach Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Pluralistic approach Kein Zugriff
      2. B. An alternative approach: the “lexical order of review” Kein Zugriff
      3. C. Conclusions on the problematic aspects stemming from the confluence of GPL and CFR rights Kein Zugriff
      1. A. Development of the right to good administration into a GPL and a CFR right respectively Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. “Judicialisation” of the Administration Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Good administration as a counterweight to the discretionary powers of the administration: administrative efficiency versus individual’s procedural protection Kein Zugriff
            1. 1) The protection of the right to good administration in the context of “composite” proceedings where a Member State is implementing an EU act with input from one or more EU administrative authorities... Kein Zugriff
            2. 2) The protection of the right to good administration in the context of “composite” proceedings where a final decision is taken by an EU administrative authority on the basis of input from Member Stat... Kein Zugriff
            3. (3) The protection of the right to good administration in the context of EU law implementation by the Commission with the input of the various “composite” Comitology committees Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Good administration at the confluence of its “subjective” and “objective” facets Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Good administration: “principle” or “right” for the purposes of Articles 51(1) and 52(5) CFR? Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Good administration: addressed to “every person” or merely to “EU Citizens”? Kein Zugriff
          4. d. Good administration: a tool for protecting interested third parties in administrative proceedings? Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of good administration as a GPL and as a Charter’s right Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union to which the right to good administration is addressed Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The absence of the EU Member States from the institutional scope of application of Article 41 CFR and the more extensive protection provided under the GPL status of the notion Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the right to good administration as a GPL and as a CFR right Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Roots and development of the right to be heard in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The right to be heard as part of the defence rights and as a sub-element of the right to good administration respectively: interrelation between these two “umbrella” notions Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The “initiated against” condition for the purposes of the right to be heard as a Charter’s right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) The right to be heard of an interested third party in administrative proceedings: criteria Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) What does the “adversely affected” requirement mean in practice? The example of the measures by which OLAF transmits information to the national authorities Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the right to be heard as a Charter’s right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. The institutional scope of protection of the right to be heard as a Charter’s right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The right to be heard as part of the right to good administration in the EU composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right to be heard and good administration Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) Roots and development of the right of access to the file in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
              1. (i) The right of access to the file and the the rights of the defence Kein Zugriff
              2. (ii) The right of access to the file and good administration Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) Roots and development of the right of access to documents in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) The status of the right of access to documents Kein Zugriff
              1. (i) The (polemic) articulation between the right of access to documents and the right of access to the file Kein Zugriff
              2. (ii) The articulation between the right of access to documents and the right of access to the file at the confluence of their (respective secondary legislations’) sources Kein Zugriff
              3. (iii) The right to good administration as a means to ensure the articulation between conflicting legislations – case study of Regulation 1049/2001 v Regulation 45/2001 Kein Zugriff
            4. (4) The right of access to documents and the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. The personal scope of protection of the right of access to the file and the right of access to documents: personal scope in the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the right of access to the file and the right of access to documents: material scope in the CFR v material scope stemming from the GPL status Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The protection of the right to of access to the file and the right of access to documents by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The protection of the right of access to the file and the right of access to documents by the EU Member States Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The right of access to the file and the right of access to documents in the EU composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right of access to the file / the right of access to documents and good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Roots and development of the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and the rights of the defence Kein Zugriff
        3. . The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and the right to effective judicial review: the “statement of reasons” requirement at the confluence of the administrative and ... Kein Zugriff
        4. 4. The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. The personal scope of protection of the administration’s obligation to give reasons for its decisions under the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the administration’s obligation to give reasons for its decisions under the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Institutional scope of protection of the administration’s obligation to give reasons for its decisions under the CFR v its protection as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions as part of the right to good administration in composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions and good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Roots and development of the right to languages in the EU legal order in its various “objective” facets Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Roots and development of the right to languages as a “subjective” right of individuals in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Language rights and the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Language rights of EU minorities Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Language rights of EU officials Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The material scope of protection of the right to languages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection as a sub-component of the right to good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. The institutional scope of protection of the right to languages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection as a sub-element of the right to good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. The protection of individuals’ language rights at the crossroads of two or more EU Member States Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. The protection of language rights in the context of EU law implementation by the institutions of the Union following the advice of the various Comitology Committees Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right to languages and good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The status of the right to damages Kein Zugriff
          2. b. “Fault” requirement v “general principles common to the laws of the Member States” as a pre-condition to confer a remedy for infringement of the principles of good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Breach of the principle of good administration conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) Breach of the “reasonable time” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) Breach of the “impartiality” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            3. (3) Breach of the “confidentiality” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            4. (4) Breach of the “right to be heard” conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
            5. (5) Breach of the “statement of reasons” requirement conferring a right to reparation upon individuals Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. The “contractual” liability of the Union for breach of the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Liability of the Union for the acts of its civil servants in the performance of their duties Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Liability of the Union for damage caused to its own civil servants – as a consequence of the violation of their right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Material scope of protection of the right to damages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection under the Charter Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Institutional scope of protection of the right to damages in the EU Courts’ case-law v its protection under the Charter Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The right to damages as part of the right to good administration in the EU composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the right to damages and good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Principle of care: definition, scope of application and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Principle of diligence: definition, scope of application and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Principle of solicitude: definition, scope of application and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Status of the “individuals’ right to have their affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time”/ principles of “care”/“diligence”/“solicitude” Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Origins and development of the “impartiality” requirement in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The respect of the “impartiality” requirement in the context of administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Status of the “impartiality” requirement and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Fairness: origins and development in the EU legal order Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Status of the “fairness” principle and its interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
            1. (1) “Reasonable time” determined by the circumstances of the case: the criteria serving to establish the reasonableness of a time-frame Kein Zugriff
            2. (2) Some examples of “reasonable time” in EU administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
          2. . Should a “global assessment” of the time-frames of the various administrative and judicial proceedings supplement the “piecemeal” way of assessing the reasonableness of the respective procedures’ le... Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Status of the “reasonable time” requirement and interrelation with the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
      3. C. The “individuals’ right to have their affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time” / the “principle of care” in composite administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
      4. D. Conclusions on the interrelation between the principle of care and good administration Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Personal scope of protection of good administration as a CFR right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      2. b. Material scope of protection of good administration as a CFR right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      3. c. Institutional scope of protection of good administration as a CFR right and as a GPL Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Sub-principles of the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
      2. b. Implications stemming from the juxtaposition of the various sub-principles of the right to good administration Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The rights of the defence and good administration Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right to be heard as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The protection of the right to be heard in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The right to good administration as a means to ensure the articulation between the right of access to the file and the general right of access to documents Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right of access to the file documents Sas a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The protection of the right of access to the file documents in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. 1) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 C... Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The protection of the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right to languages as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The protection of the right to languages in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
        1. (1) The protection of the right to good administration in contractual matters Kein Zugriff
        2. (2) The “personal”, “material” and “institutional” scope of the right to damages as a GPL and as a sub-component of good administration in Article 41 CFR Kein Zugriff
        3. (3) The protection of the right to damages in “composite” administrative proceedings Kein Zugriff
          1. (i) Principle of care Kein Zugriff
          2. (ii) Principle of diligence Kein Zugriff
          3. (iii) Principle of solicitude Kein Zugriff
          1. (i) The “impartiality” and “fairness” requirements as sub-components of good administration Kein Zugriff
          2. ii) The “reasonable time” requirement as sub-component of good administration: need for a “global” assessment of the respective time-frames of the various administrative and judicial steps to a proced... Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Final conclusions Kein Zugriff 510 - 511
    1. Legal writings Kein Zugriff
    2. Conferences, Congress and Studies Kein Zugriff
    3. Table of Case-law (in case number order) Kein Zugriff
    4. Opinions of the Advocates General of the CJEU Kein Zugriff
    5. Case-law of the General Court of the EU Kein Zugriff
    6. Case-law of the Civil Service Tribunal of the EU Kein Zugriff
    7. Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights Kein Zugriff
    8. National case-law: Kein Zugriff
    9. Table of International Legal Acts Kein Zugriff
    10. European Resolutions and Recommendations Kein Zugriff
    11. Table of Legal Acts of the EU Kein Zugriff
    12. Regulations Kein Zugriff
    13. Directives Kein Zugriff
    14. Decisions Kein Zugriff
    15. Resolutions, Declarations, Communications, Preliminary Workings and Reports of the EU Kein Zugriff
    16. Codes of Conduct, Rules and Guidelines of the EU Kein Zugriff
  7. Index Kein Zugriff 567 - 574

Literaturverzeichnis (1321)

  1. Legal writings Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Addink G-H, Good Governance: Concept and Context (Oxford University Press 2014), pp. 1-177 Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Antunes P and Miguel L, ‘La Motivation des Décisions et Droit Communautaire de la Concurrence’ (Symposium ‘Rights of Defence and Rights of the European Commisssion in EC Competition law’, January 1994), pp 273-294 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Aristote, Ethique à Nicomaque (Paris, Librairie Générale Française, Coll. Le livre de poche, Classiques de philosophie 1992), pp. 1-447 Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Arzoz X, ‘Language Rights as Legal Norms’ (2009) 15 European Public Law, pp. 541-574 Google Scholar öffnen
  6. – ‘Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union’ in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Autin J-L, ‘La Motivation des Actes Administratifs Unilatéraux, Entre Tradition Nationale et Evolution des Droits Européens’ (2011) 137-138 Revue Française d’Administration Publique, pp. 85-99 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/rfap.137.0085
  8. Azizi J, ‘Judicial Review of EC State Aid Procedure – Current Problems in the Community Courts’ Case-law and their Impact on Possible Reform’ (2007) European State Aid Law Quarterly (Proceedings of the 5th experts’ forum held in Brussels on 21 and 22 May 2007), pp. 21-24 Google Scholar öffnen
  9. – Oral hearing during the Congress Marking 20 Years of ERA “The Citizen at the heart of EU law” (Trier, 19 October 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Azoulai L, ‘Les Garanties Procédurales en Droit Communautaire: Recherches sur la Procédure et le Bon Gouvernement’ (Law Thesis, IUE Florence 2000), pp. 1-636 Google Scholar öffnen
  11. – ‘The Judge and the Community’s Administrative Governance’, in Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market: Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (vol. 11/2, Oxford University Press 2002), pp. 109-137 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. – ‘Le Principe de Bonne Administration’ in Jean-Bernard Auby and Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère (eds), Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 493-518 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/rfap.123.0373
  13. Azoulai L and Clement-Wilz L, ‘La Bonne Administration’ in Bruylant (ed), Traité de Droit Administartif Européen (2nd edition, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2014), pp. 671-697 Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Bailleux A and van Drooghenbroeck S, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux: Invocabilité, Interprétation, Application et Relations avec la Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’, in Innovations du Traité de Lisbonne: Incidences pour le Praticien (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2011), pp. 249-323 Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Balan E, The Right to a Good Administration and its Impact on Public Administration’s Procedures (Bucuresti, Comunicare.ro 2010), pp. 1-184 Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Barav A, ‘Opacité et Transparence ou le Droit d’Empêcher: la Jurisprudence en Matière d’Accès aux Documents Provenant des Etats Membres Détenus par les Institutions Communautaires’, Chemins d’Europe: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 29-62 Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bartosch A, ‘Procedural Rights Denied For Too Long: Is Legal Conservativism Finally Heading for its "Götterdämmerung"?’ (2011) 10 European State Aid Law Quarterly, Issue 4, pp. 579-580 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.21552/ESTAL/2011/4/256
  18. Bebr G, ‘The Non-Contractual Liability of the European Coal and Steel Community’ in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp. 71-88 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Bélorgey J-M, Gervasoni S and Lambert C, ‘Chroniques: Actualités du Droit Communautaire’ (2005) 20 L’Actualité Juridique: Droit Administartif, pp. 1108-1117 Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Bengoetxea J, ‘Multilingual and Multicultural Legal Reasoning: the European Court of Justice’, in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 97-121 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Benoît-Rohmer F, ‘L’Union Européenne et les Droits Fondamentaux depuis l’Entrée en Vigueur du Traité de Lisbonne’ (2011) 1 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, pp. 145-172 Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Berramdane A, ‘Considérations sur les Perspectives de Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne’ (2009) 3 Revue du Droit de l’Union Européenne, 441-459 Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Billard J-N, ‘L’Exigence de Transgression d’une Norme Protectrice des Particuliers – Principe Enigmatique du Droit de la Responsabilité Extra-Contractuelle des Communautés Européennes’, in Les Mutations Contemporaines du Droit Public. Mélanges en l’Honneur de Benoît Jeanneau (Paris, Dalloz 2002), pp. 625-649 Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bonichot J-C, ‘Des Rayons et des Ombres: les Paradoxes de l’Article 6 du Traité sur l’Union Européenne’, in La Conscience des Droits: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Dalloz 2011), pp. 49-65 Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Bonnor P, ‘The Right to Good Administration’ (2006) 182 Deutsche Hochschule fur Verwaltungswissenschaften, pp. 71-93 Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Boulanger J, ‘Principes Généraux du Droit et Droit Positif’ in R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias (eds) Le Droit Privé Français au Milieu du XXe Siècle (Paris, Tome I, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 1950), pp. 51-74 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Burgorgue-Larsen L, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux Expliquée au Citoyen’ (2000) 4 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 398-409 Google Scholar öffnen
  28. – ‘Le Destin Judiciaire Strasbourgeois de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne : Vices et Vertus du Cosmopolitisme Normatif’ in Chemin de l'Europe : Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 145-175 Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Bousta R, Essai sur la Notion de Bonne administration en Droit Public (Law Thesis – University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne – 2009, Paris, le Harmattan 2010), pp. 1-566 Google Scholar öffnen
  30. – ‘Who Said There is a "Right to Good Administration"?: A Critical Analysis of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2013) 19 European Public Law, pp. 481-488 Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bradley A, ‘Administrative Justice: A Developing Human Right?’ (1995) 3 European Public Law, pp. 347-369 Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bradley K, ‘La Transparence de l’Union Européenne: une Evidence ou un Trompe l’Oeil?’ (1999) 3-4 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 283-362 Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Braibant G, ‘Droits vis-à-vis de l'Administration’ (1991) II Human Rights and the European Community: Methods of Protection, pp. 427-454 Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Braun P, ‘Obligation to State Reasons for the Rejection of A Tender: Evropaïki Dynamiki – Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v Commission (T-465/04)’ (2009) 1 Public Procurement Law Review, pp. NA1-NA5 Google Scholar öffnen
  35. – ‘Requirement to State Reasons for Procurement Decisions: A Note on the Recent Cases of the General Court’ (2011) 2 Public Procurement Law Review, pp. NA 19-NA 23 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Brisard S, ‘Le Droit d’Accès du Public aux Documents Non Publiés des Institutions Communautaires’ (2007) 505 Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union Européenne, pp. 127-134 Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Broyelle C, ‘L’Imputation de la Responsabilité dans les Situations d’Exécution Nationale du Droit Communautaire’, in Jean-Bernard Auby and Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochere (eds), Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 811-822 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/rfap.123.0373
  38. Brunessen B, Le Juge de l’Union Européenne, Juge Administratif, (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2012), pp. 1-1157 Google Scholar öffnen
  39. de Búrca G, ‘The Drafting of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2001) 26 European Law Review, pp.126-138 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Cabral P, ‘Transparency Left in the Shadows: Article 4(5) of Regulation 1049/2001 on Access to Documents Grants the Member States a Power of Veto’ (January 2006) European Current Law, January 2006, pp. xvii-xxii Google Scholar öffnen
  41. della Cananea G, “The European Union’s Mixed Administrative Proceedings” (2004), 68 Law and Contemporary Problems, pp. 197-218 Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Caudal-Sizaret S, Les Principes en Droit (Paris, Economica 2008), pp. 1-384 Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Chevalier E, Bonne Administration et Union Européenne (Law Thesis – University Limoges – 2010, – Administrative Law Collection 16, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2014), pp. 1-536 Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Chiavario M, ‘Langues, Modèles Procéduraux et Effectivité des Droits Fondamentaux’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 221-229 Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Chiti M, ‘Are There Universal Principles of Good Governance?’ (1995) 1 European Public Law, pp. 241-258 Google Scholar öffnen
  46. – ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights for the European Union: a Charter Functional in Nature?’ (2002) 14 European Review of Public Law, pp. 29-55 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Christophe-Tchakaloff M-F, ‘Le Principe d’Egalité’ (Juin 1996) Actualité Juiridique. Droit Administartif, pp. 168-177 Google Scholar öffnen
  48. de Condorcet Mis, ‘Réflexions d’un Citoyen Non Gradué sur un Procès Très Connu’, XI Œuvres Complètes (1804) Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Constantinesco L, ‘Les Problèmes Résultant de la Responsabilité Extracontractuelle Concomitante de la Communauté et d’un Etat Membre’ (Luxembourg, Office des Publications Officielles des Communautés européennes 1980), pp. 15-22 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Coppel J and O’Neill A, ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ (1992) 29 Common Market Law Review, pp. 669-692 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1992.tb00467.x
  51. Costas C, ‘Jurisprudenta Europeana: CJUE, Marea Camera din 25 Octombrie 2011, Cauza C-109/10 P, Solvay SA/Comisia Europeana’ (2011) 10 Revista Romana de Drept Administratif, pp. 125-138 Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Coudray L, ‘La Transparence et l’Accès aux Documents’ (2007) Droit Administratif Européen, pp. 519-535 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Coutrelis N and Giacobbo V, ‘La Pratique de l’Accès au Dossier en Droit Communautaire de la Concurrence: Entre Droits de la Défense et Confidentialité’ (2006) 2 Concurrences: Revue des Droits de la Concurrence, pp. 66-78 Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Covolo V, ‘Et la Judiciarisation de l’Espace Pénal de l’Union fut…Mais où se Cache le Juge Pénal Européen?’ (2011) 1 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp.103-154 Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Craig P, ‘Democracy and Rule-Making within the EC: an Empirical and Normative Assessment’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal, pp. 105-130 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00023
  56. – ‘Once more unto the Breach: the Community, the State and Damages Liability’ (1998) English Public Law and the Common Law of Europe, pp. 141-173 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. – European Administrative law (The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol. XVI/1, Oxford, Oxford University Press 2006), pp. 1-888 Google Scholar öffnen
  58. – ‘EU Administrative Law. The Acquis’, (2011) 2 Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Communitario Google Scholar öffnen
  59. – EU Administrative Law (Oxford, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press 2012), pp. 1-864 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. – ‘Article 41’ in (Steve Peers, Tamara Hervey, Jeff Kenner and Angela Ward eds) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2014), pp. 1069-1098. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845259055_384
  61. Crespo Gonzáles J, ‘The Rights, Duties and Responsibilities of Public Officials’ (European Conference organized by the Council of Europe in collaboration with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombudsman of Poland, Warsaw, 4-5 December 2003), pp. 91-104 Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Crofts L, ‘Comment: EU Courts’ Francophone Rule Merits Reform Focus’, MLex Journal (January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  63. de la Croix-Davio T, ‘La Motivation Formelle des Actes Administratifs, Un Pas Vers la Transparence de l’Administration’ (1992) 17 Droit de la Consommation, pp. 30-40 Google Scholar öffnen
  64. da Cunha Rodrigues J-N, ‘De l’Abondance de Droits en Temps de Crise’ in Luc Weitzel (dir), L’Europe des Droits Fondamentaux : Mélanges en Hommage à Alberts Weitzel (Editions A. Palone 2013), pp. 29-57 Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Curtin D, ‘Constitutionalism in the European Community: The Right to Fair Procedures in Administrative Law’, in Human Rights and Constitutional Law; Essays in Honour of Brian Walsh (The Round Hall Press 1992), pp. 293-316 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Curtin D, Hofmann H and Mendes J, ‘Constitutionalising EU Executive Rule-Making Procedures: A Research Agenda’ (2013) 19(1) European Law Journal, pp. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12010
  67. Curtin D and Meijers H, ‘Access to European Union Information: An Element of Citizenship and a Neglected Constitutional Right’, in Nanette A. Nenwahl and Allan Rosas(eds) The European Union and Human Rights (The Hague/Boston/London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1995) pp.77-104 Google Scholar öffnen
  68. von Danwitz T, ‘General Report’ (Seminar of the Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, The Hague 24 November 2011), available on ˂www.juradmin.eu/fr/colloquiums/colloq_fr_23.html˃, pp. 1-23 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. von Danwitz T and Paraschas K, ‘A Fresh Start for the Charter: Fundamental Questions on the Application of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 35 Fordham International Law Journal, pp. 1400-1429 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Delvolvé P, ‘The Right to Good Administration’ (European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃), pp. 283-301 Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Diamandouros N, ‘The Relationship between the Principle of Good Administration and Legal Obligations’, (2007) Liber Amicorum in Honour of Bo Vesterdorf, pp. 315-341 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. – ‘Openness and Access to Documents’ (2008) 7 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 654-658 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. – ‘La Contribution du Médiateur Européen à une Bonne Administration au Plan Européen’, in Vers un Modèle Européen de la Fonction Publique? (Neuvième Journée d’Etudes du Pôle Européen Jean Monnet, Bruylant 2011), pp. 271-279 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. – ‘The European Ombudsman and Good Administration post-Lisbon’ in D. Ashiagbor, N. Countouris and I. Lianos (eds) The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon (Cambridge University Press 2012), pp. 210-226 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084338.001
  75. Driessen B, ‘The Council of the European Union and Access to Documents’ (2005) 30 European Law Review, pp. 675-696 Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Dubos O, ‘Le Paradigme du « Multi-Level Governance » est-il Soluble dans le Droit?’, (2012) 556 Revue de l’Union Européenne, pp. 144-149 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Dubouis L, ‘Les Principes Généraux, un Instrument Périmé de Protection des Droits Fondamentaux?’ in Les Mutations Contemporaines du Droit Public: Mélanges en l'Honneur de Benoît Jeanneau (Paris, Dalloz 2002), pp. 77-90 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Due O, ‘Le Respect des Droits de la Défense dans le Droit Administratif Communautaire’ (1987) 23 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 383-396 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Duparc Portier P and Masson A, ‘La Question des Langues en Europe: Entre Paradoxes et Divergences Juridiques’ [2007] 72 Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 1051-1085 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Dupont-Lassale J, Le Principe de Bonne Administration en Droit de l’Union Européenne (Law Thesis – University Paris II- Panthéon Assas – 2008, Bruylant 2013), pp. 1-677 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. – ‘Innaplicabilité Discutable du Principe de Bonne Administration aux Relations Contractuelles’ (2009) 8-9 Revue Europe, at pp. 13-14 Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Dutheil de la Rochère J, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l'Union Européenne: Quelle Signification pour le Citoyen Européen?’, in Problèmes d'Interprétation à la Mémoire de Constantinos N. Kakouris (Bruylant 2004), pp. 103-121 Google Scholar öffnen
  83. – ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Not Binding but Influential: the Example of Good Administration’ in Arnull, Eeckhout and Tridimas (eds), Continuity and Change in EU law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs (Oxford University Press 2008), pp. 157-171 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219032.001.0001
  84. – Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère, ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU: Community of Values with Opt-out?’ (2008) 7 European Constitutional Law Network-Series, pp. 119-129 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845212579-119
  85. – ‘Droits Fondamentaux: Quelle Place dans l'Architecture de l'Union’ in Chemins d’Europe: Mélanges en l'Honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 265-278 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Eckes C, ‘Case T-228/02, Organisation des Modjahedines du people d’Iran v Council and UK (OMPI), Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 December 2006’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1117-1129 Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Eckes C and Mendes J, ‘The Right to be Heard in Composite Administrative Procedures: Lost in Between Protection?’(2011) 36 European Law Review, pp. 651-670 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599769.003.0005
  88. Edel F, ‘La Convention du Conseil de l’Europe sur l’Accès aux Documents Publics: Premier Traité Consacrant un Droit General d’Accès aux Documents Administratifs’ (2011) 137-138 Revue Française d’Administration Publique, pp. 59-78 Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Eissen M-A, ‘La Durée des Procédures Civiles et Pénales dans la Jurisprudence de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’ (1995) 416 Bulletin d’Information de la Cour de Cassation, pp. 3-33 Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Eveillard G, ‘Les Formes et Procédures en Droit Public: l'Application de l'Article 6 de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme à la Procédure Administrative Non Contentieuse’ (2010) 10 L'actualité Juridique: Droit Administratif, pp. 531-539 Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Fallon M, ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux Liés à la Citoyenneté de l'Union Européenne, sous les Regards Croisés du Traité C.E. et de la Charte’ in Jean-Yves Carlier and Olivier de Schutter (eds), La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne: son Apport à la Protection des Droits de l'Homme en Europe. Hommage à Silvio Marcus Helmons (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2002), pp. 149-178 Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Fau-Nougaret M, ‘La «Bonne Gouvernance» dans les Relations Juridiques Internationales’, (2001) 446 Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union européenne, pp. 171-174 Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Favret J-M, ‘Les Influences Réciproques du Droit Communautaire et du Droit National dans le Contentieux de la Responsabilité Publique Extracontractuelle’ (Paris, Pedone 2000), pp. 1-427 Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Fines F, Étude de la Responsabilité Extracontractuelle de la Communauté Économique Européenne (Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 1990), pp 1-489 Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Flaesch-Mougin C, ‘Typologie des Principes de l’Union Européenne’, in Apogée (ed) Le Droit de l’Union Européenne en Principes. Liber Amicorum en l’Honneur de Jean Raux (Publications du Centre d’Excellence Jean Monnet de Rennes 2006), pp. 99-152 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Flanagan A, ‘EU Freedom of Information: Determining Where the Interests Lies’ (2007) 13 European Public Law, pp. 595-632 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Fortsakis T, ‘Les Principes Gouvernant une Bonne Administration’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃), pp. 35-45 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. – ‘Principles Governing Good Administration’ (2005) 11 European Public law, pp. 207-217 Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Gadbin D, ‘Les Principes de "Bonne Gouvernance Européenne"’, in Mélanges en Hommage à Guy Isaac : 50 Ans de Droit Communautaire, (Toulouse, PUSS 2004), pp. 589-614 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Galetta D-U, ‘Inhalt und Bedeutung des Europäischen Rechts auf eine Gute Verwaltung’ (2007) 42 Europarecht, pp. 57-81 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0531-2485-2007-1-57
  101. – Procedural Autonomy of the Member States: Paradise Lost? A Study of the “Functionalized Procedural Competence” of EU Member States (Berlin, Springer Heidelberg 2010), pp. 1-145 Google Scholar öffnen
  102. – ‘Le Champ d’Application de l’Article 41 de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne sur le Droit à une Bonne Administration: À Propos des Arrêts Cicala et M.’ (2013) 1 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, pp. 77-85 Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Gaudissart M-A, ‘Le Régime et la Pratique Linguistiques de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes’, in P.I.E. Peter Lang s.a. (ed), Langues et Construction Européenne (Bruxelles 2010) pp. 137-160 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Genevois B, ‘La Motivation et le Style des Décisions Juridictionnelles’, in Bruylant (ed) Pédagocie Judiciaire et Application des Droits Communautaire et Européen (Collection Droit de l’Union Européenne – Colloques 2012), pp.109-123 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Gerkrath J, ‘Les Principes Généraux du Droit ont-ils encore un Avenir en tant qu’Instruments de Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne?’ (2006) 1 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 31-43 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Gervasoni S, ‘Le Tribunal de la Fonction Publique de l'Union Européenne: Cinq Ans de Jurisprudence’ (2011) 5-6 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 731-790 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. van Gerven W, ‘Remedies for Infringements of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) 10 European Public Law, pp. 261-284 Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Górzyńska T, ‘The Right to Information as a Criterion of Good Administration’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃, pp. 47-53 Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Grzeszick B, ‘Case C-440/07 P, Schneider Electric SA v. Commission, Judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2009 [2009] ECR I-6413’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, pp.907-923 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Grin F, ‘Principles of Policy Evaluation and their Application to Multilingualism in the European Union’ in Xabier Arzoz (ed), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (John Benjamins Publishing Company 2008), pp. 73-83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1075/wlp.2.06gri
  111. Groussot X, General Principles of Community Law (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing 2006), pp.1-476 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Harden I, ‘The Revision of Regulation 1049/2001 on Public Access to Documents’ (2009) 15 European Public Law, pp. 239-256 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1011352405966
  113. Harding C, ‘The Legal Accountability of Community Institutions: A Study of Illegality and Non-Contractual Liability Under European Community Law’ (1994) 52 Maastricht Journal of European and International Law, pp. 52-72 Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Harlow C and Rawlings R, ‘Promoting Accountability in Multilevel Governance: A Network Approach’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal, pp. 542-562 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00383.x
  115. Hautamäki V-P, ‘Legal Sources of Good administration in Finland’ (2006) 69 Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, pp. 57-71 Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Heliskoski J and Leino P, ‘Darkness at the Break of Noon: The Case-law on Regulation N° 1049/2001 on Access to Documents’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, pp. 735–781 Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Heukels T, ‘The Contractual Liability of the European Community Revisited’ in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds) The Action for Damages in Community Law (The Hague,London, Boston, Kluwer Law International 1997), pp. 89-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Heukels T and McDonnell A, ‘Limitation of the Action for Damages Against the Community: Considerations and New Developments’, in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Instituut 1997), pp. 217-241 Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Hofmann H, ‘Good Administration in EU Law – A Fundamental Right?’ (2007) 13 Bulletin des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 44-52 Google Scholar öffnen
  120. – ‘Composite Decision Making Procedures in EU Administrative Law’, in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 136-167 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781848449206.00013
  121. – Herwig C. H. Hofmann, ‘Inquisitorial Procedures and General Principles of Law: the Duty of Care in the Case-law of the European Court of Justice’ in Laverne Jacobs (ed), The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives (Ashgate 2013), pp. 153-166 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Hofmann H and Türk A, ‘Policy Implementation’ in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) EU Administrative Governance (London, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781845429966.00012
  123. Hofmann H, Rowe G and Türk A, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011), pp.1-965 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286485.001.0001
  124. Hofmann H and Mihaescu B, ‘The Relation between the Charter’s Fundamental Rights and the Unwritten General Principles of Law: Good Administration as the Test-Case’ (2013) 9/1 European Constitutional Law Review, pp. 73-101 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S1574019612001046
  125. Hofmann H and Tidghi M, ‘Rights and Remedies in Implementation of EU Policies by Multi-Jurisdictional Networks’ (2014) 20 European Public Law, pp. 147-163 Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Ibánez A, ‘Liability between Administrations: Who Is Responsible For What? (Some Obscure Points in the Case of the European Community)’ (2000) 12 Revue Européenne de Droit Public, pp. 955-974 Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Idot L, ‘La Transparence dans les Procédures Administratives: l’Exemple du Droit de la Concurrence’ in La Transparence dans l’Union Européenne: Mythe ou Principe Juridique? (Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit de Jurisprudence 1999), pp. 121-146 Google Scholar öffnen
  128. – ‘Les Droits de la Défense’ in Réalité et Perspectives du Droit Communautaire des Droits Fondamentaux (Bruylant 2000), pp. 213-251 Google Scholar öffnen
  129. – ‘L’Accès au Dossier de la Commission dans la Procedure de Mise en Ouvre des Articles 81 et 82 TCE. Questions en Suspens’, in A. Pedone (ed) Le droit à la mesure de l’homme. Mélanges en l’honneur de Philippe Léger (Paris, Pedone 2006), pp. 199-216 Google Scholar öffnen
  130. – ‘La Coopération entre la Commission Européenne et les Juridictions Nationales en Droit de la Concurrence’ (2009-2010) 1 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 59-72 Google Scholar öffnen
  131. – ‘Le Règlement n° 1049/2001 Doit-il s’Appliquer aux « Procédures Concurrence »? À Propos des Affaires Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau, Odile Jacobs et Agrofelt’ (October 2010) Europe, pp. 5-11 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Inghelram J, Legal and Institutional Aspects of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): an Analysis with a Look Forward to a European Public Prosecutor’s Office, in Groningen (ed) Europa Law Publishing (2011), pp. 1-308 Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Jacobs F, ‘Human Rights in the European Union: the Role of the Court of Justice’ (2001) 26 European Law Review, pp. 331-341 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Jacqué J-P, ‘Le Traité de Lisbonne. Une Vue Cavalière’ (2008) 3 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, pp. 439-483 Google Scholar öffnen
  135. – ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux dans le Traité de Lisbonne’ (2010) 80 L'Observateur de Bruxelles, pp. 17-20 Google Scholar öffnen
  136. – ‘L’Importance d’un Droit Administrative Européen Vue de l’Union Européenne’, in Jean-Bernard Auby (dir) L’Etat Actuel et les Perspectives du Droit Administratif Européen. Analyses de Droit Comparé (Bruylant 2010), pp. 33-44 Google Scholar öffnen
  137. – ‘Le Droit à une Bonne Administration dans la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (2011) 137-138 Revue Française d’Administration Publique, pp. 79-83 Google Scholar öffnen
  138. – ‘La Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne Après Lisbonne’ (2012) 26 L’Europe des Libertés, Revue d’Actualité Juridique, pp. 2-12 Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Jäderblom H, ‘From Fragmentation to Increased Coherence: A User-Friendly EU Administrative Law’, (Note from March 2011 requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs – available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies˃) Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Joliet R, Le Droit Institutionnel des Communautés Européennes. Le contentieux (Faculté de droit, d’Economie et de Sciences Sociales de Liège 1981), pp. 1-302 Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Jowell J, ‘The Universality of Administrative Justice’ in Matthias Ruffert (ed), The Transformation of Administrative Law in Europe (European Legal Studies, vol. 4, München, Sellier. European Law Publishers 2007), pp. 55-66 Google Scholar öffnen
  142. – ‘Administrative Justice and Standards of Substantive Judicial Review’ in Anthony Arnull, Piet EEckhout and Takis Tridimas (eds), Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacob (United States, Oxford University Press 2008), pp. 172-186 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219032.001.0001
  143. Juaristi P, Reagan T and Tonkin H, ‘Language Diversity in the European Union: an Overview’, in Xabier Arzoz (ed), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (John Benjamins Publishing Company 2008), pp. 47-72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1075/wlp.2.05jua
  144. de Kater J, ‘Technische Universität München v. Hauptzollamt München-Mitte, 21 November 1991 (C-269/90)’ (1992) EC Tax Review, pp. 52-56 Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Katsorchi P, ‘L’Engagement de la Responsabilité Non Contractuelle del’Union en Matière de Concurrence’ (2011) 545 Revue de l’Union Européenne, pp. 122-128 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Kutscher H, ‘Méthodes d’Interprétation Vues par le Juge à la Cour’ (Luxembourg, Rencontre Judiciaire et Universitaire 27-28 Septembre 1976), pp. I.1-I-53 Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Kańska K, ‘Towards Administrative Human Rights in the EU. Impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal, pp. 296-326 Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Kauff-Gazin F, ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux dans le Traité de Lisbonne: un Bilan Contrasté’ (2008) 7 Europe, 18e année, pp. 37-42 Google Scholar öffnen
  149. – Commentary in (2010) 7 JurisClasseur Europe, Fasc 233, at p. 22. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Kjaer A and Adamo S, ‘Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy: Introduction and Overview’ in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 3-15 Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Kontra M, Phillipson R, Skutnabb-Kangas T and Várady T, Language: a Right and a Resource. Approaching Linguistic Human Rights (Budapest, Central European University Press 1999), pp. 1-346 Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Koprić I, Musa A and Novak G, ‘Good Administration as a Ticket to the European Administrative Space’ (2011) 61 Zbornik Pravnogfakulteta U Zagreb, pp. 1515-1560 Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Kranenborg H, ‘Access to Documents and Data Protection in the European Union: on the Public Nature of Personal Data’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1079-1114 Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Laffranque L, Préface to XXV FIDE Congress ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions’ (Tallinn 2012), at p. XIX Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Lagrange M, ‘The Non-Contractual Liability of the Community, in the ECSC and in the EEC’ (1996) 3 Common Market Law Review, pp. 10-36 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Ladenburger C, ‘Report from the European Union Institutions’ (XXV FIDE Congress: ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions’, Tallinn 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Lasinski-Sulecki K and Morawski W, ‘Late Publication of EC Law in Languages of New Member States and its Effects: Obligations on Individuals Following the Court's Judgment in Skoma-Lux’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, pp. 705-725 Google Scholar öffnen
  158. de Leeuw M, ‘The European Ombudsman's Role as a Developer of Norms of Good Administration’ (2011) 17 European Public Law, pp. 349-368 Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Lefas A, ‘Essai de Comparaison entre le Concept de « Natural Justice » en Droit Administratif Anglo-Saxon et les « Principes Généraux du Droit » ainsi que les « Règles de Procédure » Correspondants en Droit Administratif Français’ (July-December 1978) Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, pp. 745-775 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3406/ridc.1978.18678
  160. Leino P, ‘Just a Little Sunshine in the Rain: the 2010 Case-law of the European Court of Justice on Access to Documents’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1215-1252 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. – ‘Enforcing Citizens’ Right to Good Administration: Time for Action’ (2012) European Added Value Assessment Research Paper 4/2012, available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/eav_lawofadminprocedure_/EAV_LawofAdminprocedure_EN.pdf˃ accessed 13 May 2014, pp. I-1 – I-46 Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Léger P, ‘Les Droits Fondamentaux en Droit Communautaire’ (2002) 10 Bulletin des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 1-25 Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Lemasurier J, ‘Vers une Démocratie Administrative: Du Refus d'Informer au Droit d'Etre Informé’ (1980) Revue du Droit Public, pp. 1239-1269 Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Lenaerts K, ‘Interlocking Legal Orders in the European Union and Comparative Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 873-906 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/iclq/52.4.873
  165. – ‘In the Union We Trust: Trust-Enhancing Principles of Community Law’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review, pp. 317-343 Google Scholar öffnen
  166. – ‘La Solidarité ou le Chapitre IV de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (2010) 82 Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 217-236 Google Scholar öffnen
  167. – ‘EU Federalism in 3-D’, in Elke Cloots, Geert De Baere and Stefan Sottiaux (eds), Federalism in the European Union (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2012), pp. 13-44 Google Scholar öffnen
  168. – ‘Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review, pp. 375-403 Google Scholar öffnen
  169. – ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Scope of Application and Methods of Interpretation’ in Bruylant (ed), De Rome à Lisbonne: les Juridictions de l’Union Européenne à la Croisée des Chemins. Mélanges en l'Honneur de Paolo Mengozzi (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2013), pp. 107-143 Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Lenaerts K and Vanhamme J, ‘Procedural Rights of Private Parties in the Community Administrative Process’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review, pp. 531-569 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1018349809247
  171. Lenaerts K and Arts D, ‘The Action for Damages’ in Robert Bray (ed), Procedural Law of the European Union (London, Sweet & Maxwell 1999), pp. 245-275 Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Lenaerts K and de Smijter E, ‘A “Bill of Rights” for the European Union’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review, pp. 273-300 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1010670801584
  173. Lenaerts K and Gutiérrez-Fons J, ‘The Constitutional Allocations of Powers and General Principles of EU law’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1629-1669 Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Lenaerts K and Gutiérrez-Fons J, ‘The Place of the Charter in the EU Constitutional Edifice’ in (Steve Peers, Tamara Hervey, Jeff Kenner and Angela Ward eds) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2014), pp. 1559-1593 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845259055_1600
  175. Levade A, ‘Préambule’ in Traité Etablissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (Partie II, La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union : Commentaire Article par Article, Tome 2, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2005), pp. 1-32 Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Lewis A, ‘Joint and Several Liability of the European Communities and National Authorities’ in Lord Lloyd of Hampstead, Roger W. Rideout and Jacqueline Dyson (eds), Current Legal Problems (London, Stevens & Sons 1980), pp. 99-119 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/clp/33.1.99
  177. Liisberg J, ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? Article 53 of the Charter: a Fountain of Law or Just an Inkblot? (2001) 4 Jean Monnet Working Paper 4/01, pp. 1-60 Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Lilovska D, ‘The Right to Good Administration in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃) Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Lottini M, ‘From ‘Administrative Cooperation’ in the Application of European Union Law to ‘Administrative Cooperation’ in the Protection of European Rights and Liberties’, (2012) 18 EuropeanL, pp. 127-147 Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Magnette P, La Citoyenneté Européenne, Droits, Politiques, Institutions in l'Université de Bruxelles (ed) (Bruxelles, Etudes Européennes 1999) pp. 1-245 Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Mankou M, ‘Du Principe de Bonne Administration au Droit à la Bonne Administration: Contribution à une Problématique de la Bonne Administration en Droit Communautaire’ (2002) 2 Cahiers de l'IREDE, pp. 7-46 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Mariatte F, ‘Commentary on the T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du people d’Iran v Council case’ (February 2007) European Review, pp. 11-13 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. – ‘Développements Récents sur les Questions de Recevabilité des Recours dans le Contentieux des Aides d’Etat’ in Stéphanie Mahieu (dir), Contentieux de l’Union Européenne – Questions Choisies (Larcier 2014), pp. 259-289 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Marty N, ‘La Notion de Bonne Administration: À la Confluence des Droits Européens et du Droit Administratif Français’ (Law thesis, University of Montpellier 2007), pp. 1-691 Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Mauro C, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Futur Parquet Européen’ in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne : Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant 2013), pp. 1197-217, at p. 199 Google Scholar öffnen
  186. van der Meersch J, ‘L’Ordre Juridique des Communautés Européennes et le Droit International’ (1975) 5 Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de Droit International, pp. 1-433 Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Meiöhard H, Gritta C and Eckhard P, ‘Rights Vis-à-Vis the Administration at the Community Level’ (1991) II Human Rights and the European Community: Methods of Protection, pp. 455-494 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Mendes J, ‘Good Administration in EU Law and the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’ (2009) 9 EUI Working Papers Law, pp. 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1554907
  189. – ‘Participation and Participation Rights in EU Law and Governance’, in Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law. Towards an Integrated Administration (Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 257-287 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. – ‘Participation and the Rule of Law after Lisbon: A Legal View on Article 11 TEU’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1849–1878 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. – Participation in EU Rule-Making: A Bights-Based Approach (Oxford University Press 2011), pp. 1-502 Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Mengozzi P, ‘Les Caractéristiques Spécifiques de l’Union Européenne dans la Perspective de son Adhésion à la CEDH’ (2010) 1 Il Diritto dell’ Unione Europea, pp. 231-245 Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Michel V, ‘Salubrité du Berlaymont et Unification des Régimes de Responsabilité’ (2009) Revue Europe, pp. 17-18 Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Michelet K, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l'Union Européenne et la Procédure Administrative Non Contentieuse’, (2002) 14 L’Actulité Juridique: Droit Français, pp. 949-955 Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Mihaescu B, ‘Liability of the European Union for Acts of Its Institutions’ (2011) 4 Revista Romana de Drept European, pp. 97-114 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. – ‘Tableau Comparatif des Droits Fondamentaux tels qu’ils sont Reconnus dans la CEDH et dans l’Ordre Juridique de l’Union Européenne’ (2012) 6 Revista Romana de Drept European, pp. 113-150 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Millett L, ‘The Right to Good Administration in European law’ (2002) Public Law, pp. 309-322 Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Mitard E, ‘L'Impartialité Administrative’ (1999) Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif, pp. 478-495 Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Molinier J, ‘Le Contrôle Juridictionnel et Ses Limites : À Propos du Pouvoir Discrétionnaire des Institutions Communautaires’, in Joël Rideau (dir), De la Communauté de Droit à l’Union de Droit: Continuités et Avatars Européens (Paris, L.G.D.J. 2000) pp.77-98 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Monjean-Decaudin S, ‘Linguistique Juridique et Procès Pénal dans l’Union Européenne’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit pénal, langue et Union européenne : Réflexions autour du procès pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 71-89 Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Muguet-Poullennec G, ‘Transparence et Aides d’État: Comment Mettre en Ouvre le Droit Général d’Accès aux Documents?’ (April/June 2007) 11 Revue Lamy de la Concurrence, pp. 62-65 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. – ‘Droit Processuel de la Concurrence: Protection de la Vie Privée, Données Nominatives et Transparence’ (April/Juin 2008) 15 Revue Lamy de la Concurrence, pp. 78-80 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Mykolaitis D, ‘The Other Way Around: Liability of Community Institutions for Losses Incurred Owing to Misapplications of EC Competition Law (Schneider III)’ (2008) 14 International Law & Regulation, pp. 52-60 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Nadal J-L, ‘L’Impartialité du Magistrat’ (2012) 25 Annonces de la Seine, pp. 7-11 Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Nehl H-P, Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing 1999), pp. 1-214 Google Scholar öffnen
  206. – Good Administration as Procedural Right and/or General Principle?’ in H.C.H Hofmann and A. H. Türk (eds), Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 322-351 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781848449206.00017
  207. – ‘Legal Protection in the Field of EU Funds’ (2011) 4 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 629-652 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Neill P, ‘Administrative Justice/Some Necessary Reforms’ (1998) Report of the Committee of the JUSTICE-All Souls Review of Administrative Law in the United Kingdom, pp.7-85 Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Neuhold C, ‘‘Glass Half Empty or Glass Half-Full?’: Accountability Issues in Comitology and the Role of the European Parliament after the 2006 Reform of Comitology’, in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration (USA, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009), pp. 65-89 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781848449206.00010
  210. Niemivuo M, Good Administration and the Council of Europe (2008) 14 European Public Law, pp. 545-563 Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Nieto-Garrido E, ‘Possible Developments of Article 298 TFEU: Towards an Open, Efficient and Independent European Administration’ (2012) 18 European Public Law, pp. 373–398 Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Nowak C, ‘The Commission’s Constitutional Duty to State Reasons in the Area of EC State Aid Law: Note on Judgment in Joined Cases T-50/06, T-56/06, T-60/06, T-62/06 and T-69/06, Ireland et al. v. Commission’ (2008) 7 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 718-725 Google Scholar öffnen
  213. O’Brien F, ‘Nemo Iudex in Causa Sua: Aspects of the No-Bias Rule of Constitutional Justice in Courts and Administrative Bodies’ (2011) 2(2) Irish Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 26-53 Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Oliver P, ‘Joint Liability of the Community and the Member States’, in Ton Heukels and Alison McDonnell (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Instituut 1997), pp. 285-309 Google Scholar öffnen
  215. O’Higgins K, ‘Overview of the Jurisprudence in State Aid Cases: Substance and Procedure – An Update’ (2011) 4 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 601-610 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.21552/ESTAL/2011/4/254
  216. Oosting M, ‘The Role of a Modern Administration in a State Governed by the Rule of Law’ (The Right to Good Administration. European Conference organised by the Council of Europe in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior and of Public Administration of Poland and the Office of the Ombusman of Poland, Warsaw 4-5 December 2003), available on ˂ http://www.coe.int/˃) Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Papadopoulou R, Principes Généraux du Droit et Droit Communautaire: Origines et Concrétisation (Bruxelles, Bruylant 1996), pp. 1-319 Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Perju V, ‘Reason and Authority in the European Court of Justice’ (2009) 49 Virginia Journal of International Law, pp. 307-377 Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Pekka A, Public Liability in EU Law: Brasserie, Bergaderm and Beyond (Exford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing 2011), pp. 1-219 Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Pescatore P, ‘Le Recours, dans la Jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes, à des Normes Déduites de la Comparaison des Droits des Etats Membres’ (1980) 2 Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, pp. 337-359 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3406/ridc.1980.3839
  221. Petit-Leclair S, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Pratique d’Eurojust’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant 2013), pp. 175-178 Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Pliakos A, Les Droits de la Défense et le Droit Communautaire de la Concurrence (Bruxelles, Bruylant 1987), pp. 1-440 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Prechal S, ‘Competence Creep and General Principles of Law’ (2010) 3 Review of European Administrative Law, pp. 5-22 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7590/REAL_2010_01_02
  224. – Conference on ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU: Future Challenges’ (University of Luxembourg, 22 October 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Prechal S and de Leeuw M, ‘Dimensions of Transparency: the Building Blocks for a New Legal Principle?’ (2007) I Review of European Administrative Law, pp. 51-61 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7590/REAL_2007_00_03
  226. – ‘Transparency: a General Principle of EU Law?’ (2008) 62 European Monographs, pp. 201-242 Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Quiriny B, ‘Actualité du Principe Général d'Impartialité Administrative’ (2006) 2 Revue du Droit Public, pp. 375-400 Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Rabinovici I, ‘The Right to be Heard in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2012) 18 European Public Law, pp. 149-173 Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Rawls J, 'Justice as Fairness' (1958) 67 Philosophical Review, pp. 164-194 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2182612
  230. Rebut D, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Mandat d’Arrêt Européen’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 167-173 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/legi.050.0087
  231. Reichel J, ‘Between Supremacy and Autonomy – Applying the Principle of Good Administration in the Member States’ (2008) 62 European Monographs, pp. 243-271 Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Reichling C, ‘Terminologie Juridique Multilingue Comparée’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp.129-163 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Renders D and Gors B, ‘Origine et Contours des Principes Généraux de Bonne Administration en Droit Belge’ (2012) 4 Revue Française de Droit Administratif, pp. 763-772 Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Rideau J, ‘Droits de la Défense et Garanties Procédurales’ (1997) 265 Recueil des Cours. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, pp. 111-133 Google Scholar öffnen
  235. – ‘Justice et Langues dans l’Union Européenne’ in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 21-70 Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Ritleng D, ‘De l’Irresponsabilité Extracontractuelle de la Communauté’ in A. Pedone (eds) L’Union Européenne: Union de Droit, Union des Droits. Mélanges en l’Honneur de Philippe Manin (Paris, A. Pedone 2010, pp. 921-932 Google Scholar öffnen
  237. – ‘Les Contrats de l’Administration de l’Union Européenne’ in Jean-Bernard Auby et Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère (eds) Traité de Droit Administartif Européen (Bruylant 2014), pp. 219-238 Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Rossi L-S, ‘Les Rapports entre la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux et le Traité de Lisbonne’ in Chemins d’Europe: Mélanges en l'Honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (Dalloz 2010), pp. 609-623 Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Ruffert M, ‘Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: a Comparative View’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review, pp. 307-336 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1018338301685
  240. Ruiz Fabri H, ‘Principes Généraux du Droit Communautaire et Droit Comparé’ (2007) 45 Revue Française de Théorie, de Philosophie et de Culture Juridique, pp. 127-161 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/droit.045.0127
  241. Runavot M-C, ‘La « Bonne Administration »: Consolidation d’un Droit sous Influence Européenne’ (2010) 2 Revue Française de Droit Administratif, pp. 395-403 Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Sacerdoti G, ‘The European Charter of Fundamental Rights: From a Nation-State Europe to a Citizens’ Europe’ (2002) 8 Columbia Journal of European Law, pp. 37-52 Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Sauron J-L, ‘La Coopération entre les Administrations Communautaires et Nationales', in J. Auvret-Finck (dir) L'Union Européenne: Carrefour de Coopération (Paris, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 2002), pp. 233-243 Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Sautel O, ‘Sur la Déchéance en Droit Privé – Contribution à la Théorie de la Permanence de la Cause’ (1999) 43 Le Dalloz, pp. 487-496 Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Sauvé J-M, ‘Un Juge Indépendant et Impartial’ in Dalloz (eds), La Conscience des Droits : Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Paul Costa, (Paris, Dalloz 2011), pp. 539-562 Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Sauvé J-M and Polge N, ‘Les Principes Généraux du Droit en Droit Interne et en Droit Communautaire. Leçons Croisées pour un Avenir Commun?’ (J-C Masclet, H. Ruiz Fabri, C. Boutayeb and S. Rodrigues dir), L’Union Européenne. Union de Droit, Union des Droits: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Philippe Manin (Paris, A. Pedone eds 2010), pp. 727-750 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Schaller F, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Droit à la Traduction et à l’Interprétation’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant, 2013), pp. 231-239 Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Schmidt-Assmann E, ‘Le Modèle de l' « Administration Composée » et le Rôle du Droit Administratif Européen’ (2006) 6 Revue Française de Droit Administratif, pp. 1246-1255 Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Schockweiler F, ‘La Motivation des Décisions Individuelles en Droit Communautaire et en Droit National’ (1989) 1-2 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 3-40 Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Schrameck O, ‘Le Principe d’Impartialité en Droit Public Français et la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’ in Dalloz (ed), La Conscience des Droits: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Paris, Dalloz 2011), pp. 563-569 Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Schwarze J, European Administrative Law (London, Sweet and Maxwell 1992), pp. 1-1547 Google Scholar öffnen
  252. – ‘Judicial Review of European Administrative Procedure’ (Spring 2004) Public Law, pp. 146-166 Google Scholar öffnen
  253. – Droit Administratif Européen (Office des Publication Officielles des Communautés Européennes Luxembourg, Bruylant 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Shapiro M, ‘The Giving Reasons Requirement’ (1993) vol. 1992 The University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 179-220 Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Shuibhne N, ‘EC Law and Minority Language Policy: Some Recent Developments’ in Xavier Arzoz (ed), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (John Benjamins Publishing Company 2008), pp. 123-143 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1075/wlp.2.10shu
  256. de la Sierra S, 'Les Sources des Principes du Droit Administratif Européen', in Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 339-356 Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Simon D, ‘Y a-t-il des Principes Généraux du Droit Communautaire?’ (1991) 13 Revue Française de Théorie Juridique, pp. 73-86 Google Scholar öffnen
  258. – ‘Les Droits du Citoyen de l’Union’ (2000) 12 Revue Universelle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 22-27 Google Scholar öffnen
  259. – Le Système Juridique Communautaire (Presses Universiatires de France 2001), pp. 1-779 Google Scholar öffnen
  260. – ‘Une Théorie de l’Intensité du Contrôle Juridictionnel Est-Elle Possible? – Brefs Propos sur une Tentative Avortée du Tribunal de Première Instance (TPI 30 Janvier 2002 Max.Mobil Telekommunikation Service GmbH, T-54/99) (2002) 4 Europe Google Scholar öffnen
  261. – ‘Article II-101 – Droit à une Bonne Administration’, in Traité Etablissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (Partie II, La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union : Commentaire Article par Article, Tome 2, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2005), pp. 525-537 Google Scholar öffnen
  262. – ‘Le Principe de « Bonne Administration » ou la « Bonne Gouvernance » Concrète’ in Apogée (eds), Le Droit de l'Union Européenne en Principes: Liber Amicorum en l'Honneur de Jean Raux (Rennes 2006), pp.155-176 Google Scholar öffnen
  263. – ‘Les Principes en Droit Communautaire’ in S. Caudal (dir) Les Principes en Droit (Paris, Economica 2008), pp. 287-304 Google Scholar öffnen
  264. – ‘Transparence: Accès à des Données Nominatives et Respect de la Confidentialité et de la Vie Privée’ (January 2008) Europe, pp.12-13 Google Scholar öffnen
  265. – ‘Ordre Juridique de l’Union européenne. Droits fondamentaux. Transparence et Vie Privée’, (2011) 1 Europe, p. 12 Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Simon D and Rigaux A, ‘La Responsabilité des États Membres en Cas de Violation du Droit Communautaire Revisitée, ou Comment le Problème Technique de l’Odeur Sexuelle des Porcs Mâles Non Castrés Conduit la Cour à Trancher des Questions Fondamentales’ (2009) 5 Europe, pp. 5-8 Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Skouris V, ‘Intégration de la Charte/Adhésion à la CEDH’’ (Working Group II 2002) – available on <http://european-convention.eu.int/docs/wd2/3063.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen
  268. – ‘50 Ans de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme Vus Par les Autres Cours Internationales’ (2009) 14 Bulletin des Droits de l'Homme, pp. 1-9 Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Skutnabb-Kangas T and Phillipson R, ‘Linguistic Human Rights, Past and Present’ in Tove Skutnabb-Kangas and Robert Phillipson (eds), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (Berlin, Walter de Gruyter 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Söderman J, Public Hearing on the draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Preliminary remarks’ (Brussels, Belgium, February 2000), available on ˂http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/activities/speech.faces/en/355/html.bookmark˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  271. – ‘Transparency as a Fundamental Principle of the European Union’, (2002) 7/01 Forum Constitutionis Europae, pp. 1-18 Google Scholar öffnen
  272. – ‘Good Administration: a Fundamental Right’ (2004) Justice and Home Affairs in the EU, pp. 113-119 Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Solé J-P, ‘Good Administration and European Public Law: The Fight for Quality in the Field of Administrative Decisions’ (2002) 14 Revue Européenne de Droit Public, pp. 1503-1544 Google Scholar öffnen
  274. – ‘EU Law, Global Law and the Right to Good Administration’, in Springer (ed), Global Administrative Law and EU Administrative Law: Relationships, Legal Issues and Comparison (2011), pp. 133-145 Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Smits C, ‘Entre Diplomatie et Croisade. Des Influences Réciproques Entre le Régime de la Responsabilité Extra-Contractuelle de la Communauté et le Régime de la Responsabilité Extra-Contractuelle des Etats Membres’, in Georges Vandersanden and Aline de Walsche (dir) Mélanges en Hommage à Jean-Victor Louis (Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles 2003), pp. 409-442 Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Spiezia F, ‘Langue, Linguistique et Pratiques d’Eurojust dans le Cadre du Mandat d’Arrêt Européen’, in Groupe De Boeck s.a. (ed), Droit Pénal, Langue et Union Européenne: Réflexions Autour du Procès Pénal (Bruylant 2013), pp. 179-196 Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Sudre F, ‘Le Renforcement des Droits de l’Homme au sein de l’Union Européenne’ in Joël Rideau (dir), De la Communauté de Droit à l’Union de Droit: Continuités et Avatars Européens (L.G.D.J. 2000), pp. 207-230 Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Sweeney J, ‘Alconbury and the Right to a Fairly Fair Hearing’ (2002) 8 European Public Law, pp. 35-44 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1014586407661
  279. Tavernier P, ‘L’insertion de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne dans le Système Européen de Protection des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés Fondamentales’ (2011) Droits de l’Homme et Libertés Fondamentales, pp. 1069-1080 Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Thomas R, ‘Reason-Giving in English and European Community Administrative Law’ (1997) 3 European Public Law, pp. 213-222 Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Tournepiche A, ‘TPICE, 4 octobre 2006, Hans Martin Tillack/Commission’, (2006) 4 Revue des Affaires Européennes, pp. 735-741 Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Tridimas T, ‘Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down? (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review 301, pp. 301–332 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1010645411771
  283. – The General Principles of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed. 2006), pp.1-591 Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Trondal J, ‘EU Committee Governance and the Multilevel Community Administration’ in Herwig C. H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk (eds) EU Administrative Governance (London, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2006), pp. 391-416 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781845429966.00023
  285. Truchot L, ‘La Motivation et le Style des Décisions Juridictionnelles du Tribunal de l’Union Européenne’, in Bruylant (ed) Pédagocie Judiciaire et Application des Droits Communautaire et Européen (Collection Droit de l’Union Européenne – Colloques 2012), pp. 159-172 Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Vandersanden G, ‘Conclusions générales’ du Colloque co-organisé par le Centre d’études et de recherches internationales et communautaires (CERIC) de l’Université Paul Cézanne et l’Institut de droit européen des droits de l’homme (IDEDH) de l’Université Montpellier I organised on the 9 and 10 October 2009, in Bruylant (ed) Pédagocie Judiciaire et Application des Droits Communautaire et Européen (Collection Droit de l’Union Européenne – Colloques 2012), pp. 109-123 Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Usher J, General Principles of EC Law (European Law Series, University of Edinburgh, Longman 1998), pp. 1-167 Google Scholar öffnen
  288. del Vecchio G, ‘Les Bases du Droit Comparé et les Principes Généraux du Droit’ (1960) Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, pp. 493-499 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3406/ridc.1960.11678
  289. Vesterdorf B, ‘Transparency: Not Just a Vogue Word’ (1999) Fordham International Law Journal, pp. 902-929 Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Vitorino A, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (2001) 1 Revue du Droit de l’Union Européenne, pp. 27-64 Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Voinea C and Bischin R, ‘Buna Administrare – Drept Fundamental European si Valoare Administrativa Europeana’ (2009) 6 Revista Romana de Drept Comunitar, pp. 161-168 Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Wakefield J, ‘Case T-193/04, Hans-Martin Tillack v. Commission, Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2006, [2006] ECR II-3995’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, pp. 199-221 Google Scholar öffnen
  293. – The Right to Good Administration (Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International ed., European Monographs 2007), pp.1-285 Google Scholar öffnen
  294. – ‘The Changes in Liability of EU Institutions: Bergaderm, FIAMM and Schneider’ (2012) 12 ERA Forum: Journal of the Academy of European Law, pp. 625-684 Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Waline M, ‘Le Principe "Audi Alteram Partem"’ (1957) 1856-1956 Livre Jubilaire du Conseil d’Etat du Luxembourg, pp. 495-506 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Wathelet M, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux: un Bon Pas dans une Course qui Reste Longue’ (2000) 1-2 Cahiers de Droit Européen, pp. 585-593 Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Weiler J, ‘A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices’ in (G. Bermann and C. Pistor eds.) Law and Governance in an Enlarged European Union (New York, Oxford and Portland 2004), pp. 39-59 Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Weiß W, ‘Human Rights in the EU: Rethinking the Role of the European Convention on Human Rights after Lisbon’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review, pp. 64-95 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S157401961110005X
  299. Weitzel L, ‘La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne, Avancée ou Régression?’ in Luc Weitzel (dir), L’Europe des Droits Fondamentaux: Mélanges en Hommage à Alberts Weitzel (Editions A. Palone 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  300. White S, ‘Rights of the Defence in Administrative Investigations: Access to the File in EC Investigations’ (2009) 2 Review of European Administrative Law, pp. 57-69 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7590/REAL_2009_01_05
  301. de Witte B, ‘The Protection of Linguistic Diversity of the EU Charter other than Article 22’, in X. Arzoz (ed), Respecting Lingustic Diversity in the European Union (Amsterdam, John Benjamins 2008), pp. 175-190 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1075/wlp.2.12wit
  302. – ‘Language Rights: The Interaction between Domestic and European Developments’ in Anne Lise Kjaer and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European democracy (Ashgate 2011), pp. 167-188 Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Yeng-Seng W, ‘Le Médiateur Européen, Artisan du Développement du Droit à une Bonne Administration’ (2004) 58 Revue Universelle des Droits de l’Homme, pp. 527-552 Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Ziller J, ‘Les Relations entre l’Union Européenne et les Administrations Nationales. Esquisse d’une Problématique’, in d'Y. Meny and P. Muller (dir) Politiques Publiques en Europe (Paris, Le Harmattan 1995), pp. 119-124 - Google Scholar öffnen
  305. – ‘Article II-102 – Droit d’Accès aux Documents’, in in Traité Etablissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (Partie II, La Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union: Commentaire Article par Article, Tome 2, Bruxelles, Bruylant 2005), pp. 538-550 Google Scholar öffnen
  306. – ‘What’s New in European Administartive Law? Quoi de Neuf en Droit Administratif Européen?’ (2005) 10 EUI Working Papers EUI Google Scholar öffnen
  307. ‘L’Autorité Administrative dans l’Union Européenne’ in de L. Burgorgue-Larsen and L. Azoulia (dir) L'Autorité de l'Union Européenne (Bruxelles, Actes du Colloque de Rouen du 9 avril 2004, Bruylant 2006), pp. 119-153 Google Scholar öffnen
  308. – ‘Droit à une Bonne Administration’ (2007) Jurisclasseur Libertés, Fasc. 1040, pp. 1-28 Google Scholar öffnen
  309. – Introduction: Les Concepts d’Administration Directe, d’Administration Indirecte et de Co-Administration et les Fondements du Droit Administratif Européen’ in J.-B. Auby et J. Dutheilde la Rochère (dir) Droit Administratif Européen (Bruxelles, Bruylant 2007), pp. 235-243 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/rfap.123.0373
  310. – ‘Is a Law of Administrative Procedure for the Union Institutions Necessary?’ (2011) 3-4 Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, pp. 699-725 Google Scholar öffnen
  311. – ‘Aspects Relating to Added Value for Citizens and Economic Operators’ (2012) European Added Value Assessment Research Paper 4/2012, available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/eav_lawofadminprocedure_/EAV_LawofAdminprocedure_EN.pdf˃ accessed 13 May 2014, pp. II-1 – II-54 Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Woehrling J-M, ‘Le Contrôle Juridictionnel de l’Administration en Europe et la Discrimination entre Droit Objectif et Droits Subjectifs’, in L’Etat Actuel et les Perspectives du Droit Administratif Européen: Analyses de Droit Comparé (Bruylant 2010), pp. 297-322 Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Conferences, Congress and Studies Google Scholar öffnen
  314. The XVIIth FIDE Congress addressing the topic of “Procedures and Sanctions in Economic Administrative Law” (Berlin 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  315. European Conference ‘The Right to Good Administration’ (Warsaw, December 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Council of Europe’s Working Party of the Project Group on Administrative Law (CJ-DA-GT), Report of the 2nd meeting (Strasbourg 8-10 December 2004), available on ˂www.coe.int˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  317. European Conference ‘Pursuit of Good Administration’ (Vilnius, October 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Swedish Statskontoret, ‘Principles of Good Administration in the Member States of the European Union’ (Stockholm 2005) available on <http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publikationer/2005/200504.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen
  319. The EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, ‘Commentaire de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne’ (June 2006), available on ˂ http://ec.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  320. European Conference ‘Training of Civil Servants to Achieve Good Administration’ (Warsaw, November 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  321. House of Lords European Union Committee, ‘The workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (London, April 2011), available on : <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldselect/ldeucom/128/128.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen
  322. The XXVth FIDE Congress on “The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions” (Tallin 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Table of Case-law (in case number order) Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Case 1/56 Bourgaux v Assemblée commune [1956] ECR-421 Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Joined Cases 7/56, 3/57 to 7/57 Algera [1957] ECR 39 Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Case 9/56 Meroni v High Authority [1958] ECR 11 Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Joined Cases 1/57 and 14/57 Société des usines à tubes de la Sarre [1957] ECR 105 Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Case 23/59 F.E.R.A.M. v High Authority [1959] ECR 501 Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Joint Cases 42 and 49/59 SNUPAT v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1961] ECR 53 Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Joined Cases 43/59, 45/59 and 48/59 Von Lachmüller and Others v Commission [1960] ECR 933 Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Case 44/59 Fiddelaar v Commission [1960] ECR 1077 Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Joined Cases 9/60 and 12/60 Belgium v Vloeberghs and High Authority [1962] ECR 171 Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Case 24/62 Germany v Commission [1963] ECR 63 Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Case 25/62 Plaumann v Commission [1963] ECR 95 Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Administratie der Belastingen [1963] ECR 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Case 32/62 Alvis [1963] ECR 49 Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Joined Cases 35/62 and 16/63 Leroy v High Authority [1963] ECR 197 Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig v Commission [1966] ECR 299 Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Case 16/65 Schwarze [1965] ECR 877 Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Joined Cases 5, 7 and 13 to 24/66 Kampffmeyer and Others v Commission [1967] ECR 245 Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Case 5/67 Beus v Hauptzollamt München [1968] ECR 83 Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Case 6/67 Guerra v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (CJEU, 5 July 1967) Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Case 35/67 Van Eick v Commission [1968] ECR 329 Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Case 14/68 Wilhelm and Others v Bundeskartellamt [1969] ECR-1 Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Case 4/69 Lütticke v Commission [1971] ECR 325 Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Case 9/69 Sayag and Others [1969] ECR 329 Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Case 13/69 van Eick v Commission [1970] ECR 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Case 41/69 ACF Chemiefarma v Commission [1970] ECR 661 Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Case 45/69 Boehringer Mannheim GmbH v Commission of the European Communities [1970] ECR 769 Google Scholar öffnen
  351. Case 49/69 BASF v Commission [1972] ECR 713 Google Scholar öffnen
  352. Case 11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft [1970] ECR 1125 Google Scholar öffnen
  353. Case 25/70 Köster [1970] ECR 1161 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(70)90098-4
  354. Case 46/71 Brandau v Council [1972] ECR 373 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1530/acta.0.0690369
  355. Case 6/72 Continental Can Company v Commission [1973] ECR 215 Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Case 7/72 Boehringer Mannheim v Commission [1972] ECR 1281 Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Joined Cases 10 and 47/72 di Pillo v Commission [1973] ECR 763 Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Case 53/72 Guillot v Commission [1974] ECR 791 Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Case 81/72 Commission v Council [1973] ECR 575 Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Case 4/73 Nold and Others v Commission [1974] ECR 491 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2285713
  361. Case 120/73 Lorenz GmbH v Germany and Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1973] ECR 1471 Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Case 169/73 Compagnie Continentale France v Council [1975] ECR 117 Google Scholar öffnen
  363. Case 17/74 Transocean Marine Paint v Commission [1974] ECR 1063 Google Scholar öffnen
  364. Case 72/74 Union syndicale v Council [1975] ECR 401 Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Case 74/74 CNTA v Commission [1976] ECR 797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90324-9
  366. Case 33/76 Rewe-Zentralfinanz [1976] ECR 1989 Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Case 61/76 Geist v Commission [1977] ECR 1419 Google Scholar öffnen
  368. Joined Cases 64/76 and 113/76, 167/78 and 239/78, 27/79, 28/79 and 45/79 Dumortier Frères and Others v Council [1979] ECR 3091 Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Case 85/76 Hoffmann-La Roche [1979] ECR 461 Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Case 101/76 Koniklijke Scholten Honig v Council and Commission [1977] ECR 797 Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Case 121/76 Moli v Commission [1977] ECR 1971 Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Case 30/77 Régina v Bouchereau [1977] ECR 1999 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3989/scimar.1999.63n171
  373. Case 55/77 Maris [1977] ECR 2327 Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Joined Cases 83 and 94/76, 4, 15 and 40/77 HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Case 118/77 ISO v Council [1979] ECR 1277 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/BF01949987
  376. Case 119/77 Nippon Seiko v Council [1979] ECR 1303 Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Case 125/77 Koninklijke Scholten-Honig NV and Others v Hoofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten [1978] ECR 1991 Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Case 143/77 Koninklijke Scholten-Honig v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3583 Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Case 14/78 Denkavit and Others v Commission [1978] ECR 2497 Google Scholar öffnen
  380. Case 18/78 V v Commission [1979] ECR-2093 Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Case 87/78 Welding & Co. v Hauptzollamt Hambourg-Waltershof [1978] ECR 2457 Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Case 98/78 Racke [1979] ECR 69 Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Case 99/78 Decker v Hauptzollamt Landau [1979] ECR 101 Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Joined Cases 209 to 215 and 218/78 van Landewyck and Others v Commission [1980] ECR 3125 Google Scholar öffnen
  385. Case 238/78 Ireks-Arkady v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 2955 Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Case 250/78 DEKA Getreideprodukte & Co v EEC [1983] ECR 421 Google Scholar öffnen
  387. Case 261/78 Interquell Stärke-Chemie v EEC [1982] ECR 3271 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(82)90008-6
  388. Case 9/79 Wörsdorfer [1979] ECR 2717 Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Joined Cases 33/79 and 75/79 Kuhner v Commission [1980] ECR 1677 Google Scholar öffnen
  390. Case 44/79 Hauer v Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1979] ECR 3727 Google Scholar öffnen
  391. Case 112/80 Dürbeck [1981] ECR 1095 Google Scholar öffnen
  392. Case 125/80 Arning v Commission [1981] ECR 2539 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/bbpc.19810851129
  393. Case 195/80 Michel v EP [1981] ECR 2861 Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Joined Cases 212 and 217/80 Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato v Srl Meridionale Industria Salumi and Others [1981] ECR 2735 Google Scholar öffnen
  395. Joined Cases 256, 257, 265, 267/80, 5 and 51/81 and 282/82 Wührer and Others v Council and Commission [1984] ECR 3693 Google Scholar öffnen
  396. Case 280/80 Bakke-d’Aloya v Council [1981] ECR-2887 Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Case 14/81 Alpha Steel v Commission [1982] ECR 749 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/presa.121.0401
  398. Case 44/81 Germany v Commission [1982] ECR 1855 Google Scholar öffnen
  399. Case 51/81 De Franceschi v Council and Commission [1982] ECR 117 Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Case 106/81 Kind KG v EEC [1982] ECR 2885 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(82)90008-6
  401. Case 191/81 Plug v Commission [1982] ECR-4229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3888676
  402. Case 210/81 Demo-Studio Schmidt v Commission [1983] ECR 3045 Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Case 256/81 Pauls Agriculture Limited v Council and Commission [1983] ECR 1707 Google Scholar öffnen
  404. Case 283/81 CILFIT v Ministry of Health [1982] ECR 3415 Google Scholar öffnen
  405. Case 310/81 EISS v Commission [1984] ECR 1341 Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Case 318/81 Commission v CO.DE.MI [1985] ECR 3693 Google Scholar öffnen
  407. Case 322/81 Michelin v Commission [1983] ECR 3461 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1021/ic00154a029
  408. Joined Cases 43/82 and 63/82 VBVB and VBBB v Commission [1984] ECR 19 Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Case 64/82 Tradax v Commission [1984] ECR 1359 Google Scholar öffnen
  410. Case 84/82 Germany v Commission [1984] ECR 1451 Google Scholar öffnen
  411. Joined Cases 96-102, 104, 105, 108 and 110/82 IAZ and Others v Commission [1983] ECR 3369 Google Scholar öffnen
  412. Case 179/82 Lucchini v Commission [1983] ECR 3083 Google Scholar öffnen
  413. Joined Cases 205/82 to 215/82 Deutsche Milchkontor and Others [1983] ECR 2633 Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Joined Cases 239/82 and 275/82 Allied Corporation and Others v Commission [1984] ECR 1005 Google Scholar öffnen
  415. Case 264/82 Timex v Council and Commission [1985] ECR 849 Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Case 271/82 Auer v Ministère Public [1983] ECR 2727 Google Scholar öffnen
  417. Case 281/82 Unifrex v Commission and Council [1984] ECR 1969 Google Scholar öffnen
  418. Case 292/82 Merck Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [1983] ECR 3781 Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Joined Cases 296 and 318/82 Netherlands and Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek v Commission [1985] ECR 809 Google Scholar öffnen
  420. Case 5/83 Criminal proceedings v Rienks [1983] ECR 4233 Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Case 37/83 Rewe-Zentral [1984] ECR 1229 Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Case 53/83 Allied Corporation and Others v Council [1985] ECR 1621 Google Scholar öffnen
  423. Case 118/83 CMC v Commission [1985] ECR 2325 Google Scholar öffnen
  424. Case 145/83 Adams v Commission [1985] ECR 3539 Google Scholar öffnen
  425. Case 228/83 F. v Commission [1985] ECR 275 Google Scholar öffnen
  426. Case 289/83 GAARM v Commission [1984] ECR 4295 Google Scholar öffnen
  427. Case 294/83 Les Verts [1986] ECR 1339 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1381027
  428. Case 42/84 Remia v Commission [1985] ECR 2545 Google Scholar öffnen
  429. Case 123/84 Klein v Commission [1985] ECR 1907 Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Case 137/84 Criminal proceedings v Mutsch [1985] ECR 2681 Google Scholar öffnen
  431. Joined Cases 142/84 and 156/84 BAT and Reynolds v Commission [1987] ECR 4487 Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Case 197/84 Steinhauser v City of Biarritz [1985] ECR 1819 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb00663.x
  433. Case 222/84 Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [1986] ECR 1651 Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Case 234/84 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR 2263 Google Scholar öffnen
  435. Case 299/84 Neumann v BALM [1985] ECR 3663 Google Scholar öffnen
  436. Case 40/85 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR 2321 Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Case 46/85 Manchester Steel Limited v Commission [1986] ECR 2351 Google Scholar öffnen
  438. Case 155/85 Strack v Parliament [1986] ECR 3561 Google Scholar öffnen
  439. Case 203/85 Nicolet Instrument v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main-Flughafen [1986] ECR 2049 Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Case 223/85 RSV v Commission [1987] ECR 4617 Google Scholar öffnen
  441. Case 233/85 Bonino v Commission [1987] ECR 739 Google Scholar öffnen
  442. Case 321/85 Schwiering v Court of Auditors [1986] ECR 3199 Google Scholar öffnen
  443. Case 324/85 Bouteiller v Commission [1987] ECR 529 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1021/j100301a009
  444. Case 348/85 Denmark v Commission [1987] ECR 5225 Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Case 417/85 Maurissen v Court of Auditors [1987] ECR 551 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3109/01050398709042173
  446. Case 62/86 AKZO v Commission [1991] ECR I-3444 Google Scholar öffnen
  447. Joined Cases 175 and 209/86 M. v Council [1988] ECR 1891 Google Scholar öffnen
  448. Joined Cases 176 and 177/86 Houyoux and Guery v Commission [1987] ECR 4333 Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097 Google Scholar öffnen
  450. Case 316/86 Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas vKrücken [1988] ECR 2213 Google Scholar öffnen
  451. Case 43/87 Nicolet Instrument v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main-Flughafen [1988] ECR 1557 Google Scholar öffnen
  452. Joined Cases 46/87 and 227/88 Hoechst v Commission [1989] ECR 2859 Google Scholar öffnen
  453. Case 55/87 Moksel v BALM [1988] ECR 3845 Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Case 70/87 Fediol v Commission [1989] ECR 1781, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen
  455. Case 85/87 Dow Benelux v Commission [1989] ECR 3137 Google Scholar öffnen
  456. Case 174/87 Ricoh v Council [1992] ECR I-1335 Google Scholar öffnen
  457. Case 213/87 Gemeente Amsterdam and VIA v Commission [1990] ECR I-221 Google Scholar öffnen
  458. Case 249/87 Mulfinger and Others v Commission [1989] ECR 4127 Google Scholar öffnen
  459. Case 301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307 Google Scholar öffnen
  460. Case 308/87 Grifoni v EAEC [1994] ECR I-341 Google Scholar öffnen
  461. Case 354/87 Weddel& Co. BV v Commission [1990] ECR I-3847 Google Scholar öffnen
  462. Case 374/87 Orkem v Commission [1989] ECR 3283 Google Scholar öffnen
  463. Case C-10/88 Italy v Commission [1990] ECR I-1229 Google Scholar öffnen
  464. Case C-49/88 Al-Jubail Fertilizer v Council [1991] ECR I-3187 Google Scholar öffnen
  465. Case C-119/88 AERPO and Others v Commission [1990] ECR I-2189 Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Case C-152/88 Sofrimport v Commission [1990] ECR I-2477 Google Scholar öffnen
  467. Case C-303/88 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433 Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Case C-350/88 Delacre and Others v Commission [1990] ECR I-395 Google Scholar öffnen
  469. Joined Cases C-104/89 and C-37/90 Mulder and Others v Council and Commission [1992] ECR I-3061 Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Case C-170/89 BEUC v Commission [1991] ECR I-5709 Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Case C-174/89 Hoche GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaftliche Marktordnung [1990] ECR I-2681 Google Scholar öffnen
  472. Case C-200/89 Funoc v Commission [1990] ECR I-3669 Google Scholar öffnen
  473. Case C-213/89 Factortame [1990] ECR I-2433 Google Scholar öffnen
  474. Case C 260/89 ERT [1991] ECR I 2925 Google Scholar öffnen
  475. Case C-291/89 Interhotel v Commission [1991] ECR I-2257 Google Scholar öffnen
  476. Case C-304/89 Oliveira v Commission [1991] ECR I-2283 Google Scholar öffnen
  477. Case C-340/89 Vlassopoulou [1991] ECR I-2357 Google Scholar öffnen
  478. Case C-370/89 SGEEM and Etroy v EIB [1993] ECR I-2583 Google Scholar öffnen
  479. Joined Cases C-6/90 and C-9/90 Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy [1991] ECR I-5357 Google Scholar öffnen
  480. Case C-16/90 Nölle v Hauptzollamt Bremen-Freihafen [1991] ECR I-5163 Google Scholar öffnen
  481. Joined Cases C-48/90 and C-66/90 Netherlands and Others v Commission [1992] ECR I-565 Google Scholar öffnen
  482. Joined Cases C-63/90 and C-67/90 Portugal and Spain v Council [1992] ECR I-5073 Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Case C-157/90 Infortec v Commission [1992] ECR I-3525 Google Scholar öffnen
  484. Case C-181/90 Consorgan v Commission [1992] ECR I-3557 Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Case C-189/90 Cipeke v Commission [1992] ECR I-3573 Google Scholar öffnen
  486. Case C-200/90 Denkavit and Others v Skatteministeriet [1992] ECR I-2217 Google Scholar öffnen
  487. Case C-255/90 P Burban [1992] ECR I-2253 Google Scholar öffnen
  488. Case C-269/90 Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte [1991] ECR I-5469 Google Scholar öffnen
  489. Case C-282/90 Vreugdenhil v Commission [1992] ECR I-1937 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000644
  490. Case C-97/91 Borelli v Commission [1992] ECR I-6313 Google Scholar öffnen
  491. Case C-198/91 Cook v Commission [1993] ECR I-2487 Google Scholar öffnen
  492. Case C-220/91 P Commission v Stahlwerke Peine-Salzgitter [1993] ECR I-2393 Google Scholar öffnen
  493. Case C-225/91 Matra v Commission [1993] ECR I-3203 Google Scholar öffnen
  494. Case C-326/91 P de Compte v Parliament [1994] ECR I-2091 Google Scholar öffnen
  495. Case C-19/92 Kraus v Land Baden-Württemberg [1993] ECR I-1663 Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Case C-36/92 P SEP v Commission [1994] ECR I-1911 Google Scholar öffnen
  497. Case C-51/92 P Hercules Chemicals v Commission [1999] ECR I-4235 Google Scholar öffnen
  498. Case C-60/92 Otto v Postbank NV [1993] ECR I-5683 Google Scholar öffnen
  499. Case 75/92 Hua Fa Industrial [1994] ECR I-3141 Google Scholar öffnen
  500. Case C-91/92 Faccini Dori v Recreb [1994] ECR I-3325 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(94)90020-5
  501. Case C-135/92 Fiskano v Commission [1994] ECR I-2885 Google Scholar öffnen
  502. Case C-360/92 P The Publishers Association v Commission [1995] ECR I-23 Google Scholar öffnen
  503. Joined Cases C-46/93 and C-48/93 Brasserie du pêcheur v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen / Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame and Others [1996] ECR-1029 Google Scholar öffnen
  504. Case C-143/93 Gebroeders van Es Douane Agenten BV v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen [1996] ECR I-431 Google Scholar öffnen
  505. Case C-310/93 P BPB Industries and British Gypsum v Commission [1995] ECR I-865 Google Scholar öffnen
  506. Case C-5/94 Hedley Lomas [1996] ECR I-2553 Google Scholar öffnen
  507. Case C-58/94 Kingdom of the Netherlands v Council [1996] ECR I-2169 Google Scholar öffnen
  508. Case C-122/94 Commission v Council [1996] ECR I-881 Google Scholar öffnen
  509. Case C-150/94 United Kingdom v Council [1998] ECR I-7235 Google Scholar öffnen
  510. Joined Cases C-178/94, C-179/94, C-188/94, C-189/94 and C-190/94 Dillenkofer [1996] ECR I-4845 Google Scholar öffnen
  511. Case C-192/94 El Corte Inglés v Blázquez Rivero [1996] ECR I-1281 Google Scholar öffnen
  512. Case C-274/94 Criminal proceedings v Bickel and Franz [1998] ECR I-7637 Google Scholar öffnen
  513. Case C-32/95 P Commission v Lisrestal [1996] ECR I-5373 Google Scholar öffnen
  514. Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia [1997] ECR I-3395 Google Scholar öffnen
  515. Case C-185/95 P Baustahlgewebe v Commission [1998] ECR I-8417 Google Scholar öffnen
  516. Case C-261/95 Palmisani [1997] ECR I-4025 Google Scholar öffnen
  517. Case C-263/95 Germany v Commission [1998] ECR I-441 Google Scholar öffnen
  518. Case C-282/95 P Guérin automobiles v Commission [1997] ECR I-1503 Google Scholar öffnen
  519. Case C-296/95 The Queen v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, ex parte EMU Tabac and Others [1998] ECR I-1605 Google Scholar öffnen
  520. Case C-367/95 P Commission v Sytraval [1998] ECR I-1719 Google Scholar öffnen
  521. C 209/96 United Kingdom v Commission [1998] ECR I 5655 Google Scholar öffnen
  522. Case C-274/96 Criminal proceedings v Bickel and Others [1998] ECR I-7637 Google Scholar öffnen
  523. Case C-39/97 Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. [1998] ECR I-5507 Google Scholar öffnen
  524. Case C-104/97 P Atlanta and Others v Council and Commission [1999] ECR I-6983 Google Scholar öffnen
  525. Case C 245/97 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I 11261 Google Scholar öffnen
  526. Case C 252/97 P N v Commission [1998] ECR I 4871 Google Scholar öffnen
  527. Case C-263/97 The Queen v Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce, ex parte First City Trading Ltd and Others [1998] ECR I-5537 Google Scholar öffnen
  528. Case C-266/97 P VBA v VGB and Others [2000] ECR I-2135 Google Scholar öffnen
  529. Case C-302/97 Konle [1999] ECR I-3099 Google Scholar öffnen
  530. Case C-334/97 Commission v Commune di Montorio al Vomano [1999] ECR I-3387 Google Scholar öffnen
  531. Case C-349/97 Kingdom of Spain v Commission [2003] ECR I-3851 Google Scholar öffnen
  532. Case C-424/97 Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein [2000] ECR I-5123 Google Scholar öffnen
  533. Case C-48/98 Söhl & Söhlke [1999] ECR I-7877 Google Scholar öffnen
  534. Case C-151/98 P Pharos v Commission [1999] ECR I-8157 Google Scholar öffnen
  535. Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857 Google Scholar öffnen
  536. Case C-168/98 Luxembourg v European Parliament and Council [2000] ECR I-9131 Google Scholar öffnen
  537. Joined Cases C-174/98 P and C-189/98 P van der Wal v Commission [2000] ECR I-1 Google Scholar öffnen
  538. Case C-237/98 Dorch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Council and Commission [2000] ECR I-4549 Google Scholar öffnen
  539. Case C-352/98 P Bergaderm and Others v Commission [2000] ECR I-5291 Google Scholar öffnen
  540. Case C-449/98 P IECC v Commission [2001] ECR I-3875 Google Scholar öffnen
  541. Case C-462/98 P Mediocurso [2000] ECR I-7183 Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Case C-17/99 France v Commission [2001] ECR I-2481 Google Scholar öffnen
  543. Joined Cases C-80/99, C-81/99 and C-82/99 Flemmer and Others v Council and Commission [2001] ECR I-7211 Google Scholar öffnen
  544. Case C-194/99 P Thyssen Stahl v Commission [2003] ECR I-10821 Google Scholar öffnen
  545. Case C-195/99 P Hoesch v Commission [2003] ECR I-10937 Google Scholar öffnen
  546. Joined Cases C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P à C-252/99 P et C-254/99 P Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission [2002] ECR I-8375 Google Scholar öffnen
  547. Case C-248/99 P Monsanto [2002] ECR I-1 Google Scholar öffnen
  548. Case C-269/99 Carl Kühne and others [2001] ECR I-9517 Google Scholar öffnen
  549. Case C-270/99 P Z v EP [2001] ECR I-9197 Google Scholar öffnen
  550. Case C-274/99 P Connolly v Commission [2001] ECR I-1611 Google Scholar öffnen
  551. Case C-310/99 Italy v Commission [2002] ECR I-2289 Google Scholar öffnen
  552. Case C-315/99 P Ismeri Europa v Court of Auditors [2001] ECR I-5281 Google Scholar öffnen
  553. Case C-353/99 P Council v Hautala [2001] ECR I-9565 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3237002
  554. Case C-453/99 Courage [2001] ECR I-6297 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2606
  555. Case C 516/99 Schmid [2002] ECR I 4573 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12256-3_7
  556. Case C-517/99 RTL Belgium [2010] ECR I-14093 Google Scholar öffnen
  557. Joined Cases C-57/00 P and C-61/00 P Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission [2003] ECR I-9975 Google Scholar öffnen
  558. Joined Cases C-74/00 P and C-75/00 P Falck and Others v Commission [2002] ECR I-7869 Google Scholar öffnen
  559. Case C-76/00 P Petrotub and Others v Council [2003] ECR I-79 Google Scholar öffnen
  560. Case C-112/00 Schmidberger [2003] ECR I-5659 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1677/erc.0.0100375
  561. Joined Cases C-204/00 P, C 205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P and C-219/00 P Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission [2004] ECR I-123 Google Scholar öffnen
  562. Case C-312/00 P Commission v Camar and Tico [2002] ECR I-11355 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1155/S1110865702206010
  563. C-338/00 P Volkswagen v Commission [2003] ECR I-9189 Google Scholar öffnen
  564. Case C-378/00 Commission v EP and Council [2003] ECR I-937 Google Scholar öffnen
  565. Case C-395/00 Distillerie Fratelli Cipriani [2002] ECR I-11877 Google Scholar öffnen
  566. Case C 469/00 Ravil [2003] ECR I 5053 Google Scholar öffnen
  567. Case C-472/00 P Commisson v Fresh Marine [2003] ECR I-7541 Google Scholar öffnen
  568. Case C-501/00 Spain v Commission [2004] ECR I-6717 Google Scholar öffnen
  569. Case C-76/01 P Eurocoton and Others v Council [2003] ECR I-10091 Google Scholar öffnen
  570. Case C-87/01 P Commission v CCRE [2003] ECR I-7617 Google Scholar öffnen
  571. Case C 108/01 Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma and Others [2003] ECR I 5121 Google Scholar öffnen
  572. Case C-189/01 Jippes and Others v Minister van Landbouw [2001] ECR I-5689 Google Scholar öffnen
  573. Case C-224/01 Köbler [2003] ECR I-10239 Google Scholar öffnen
  574. Case C-304/01 Spain v Commission [2004] ECR I-7655 Google Scholar öffnen
  575. Case C-361/01 P Kik v OHMI [2003] ECR I-8283 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1063/1.1565697
  576. Case C-36/02 Omega [2004] ECR I-9609 Google Scholar öffnen
  577. Case C-141/02 P Commission v T-Mobile Austria GmbH [2005] ECR I-1283 Google Scholar öffnen
  578. Case C-170/02 P Schlüsselverlag J.S. Moser and Others v Commission [2003] ECR I-9889 Google Scholar öffnen
  579. Case C-234/02 P European Ombudsman v Lamberts [2004] ECR I-2803 Google Scholar öffnen
  580. Joined Cases C-387/02, C-391/02 and C-403/02 Criminal proceedings against Berlusconi and Others [2005] ECR I-3565 Google Scholar öffnen
  581. Case C-105/03 Pupino [2005], ECR I-5285 Google Scholar öffnen
  582. Case C-160/03 Spain v Eurojust [2005] ECR I-2077 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1108/TCJ-01-2005-B006
  583. Case C-198/03 P Commission v CEVA Santé Animale [2005] ECR I-6357 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-0734-x
  584. Joined Cases C-346/03 and C-529/03 Atzeni and Others v Regione autonoma della Sardegna [2006] ECR I-1875 Google Scholar öffnen
  585. Case C-443/03 Götz Leffler v Berlin Chemie [2005] ECR I-9611 Google Scholar öffnen
  586. Case C-540/03 Parliament v Council [2006] ECR I-5769 Google Scholar öffnen
  587. Case C-105/04 P Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v Commission [2006] ECR I-8725 Google Scholar öffnen
  588. Case C-113/04 P Technische Unie v Commission [2006] ECR I-8831 Google Scholar öffnen
  589. Joined Cases C-154/04 and C-155/04 Alliance for Natural Health [20050] ECR I-6451 Google Scholar öffnen
  590. Case C-167/04 P JCB Service v Commission [2006] ECR I-8935 Google Scholar öffnen
  591. Case C-248/04 Koninklijke Coöperative Cosun UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit [2006] ECR I-10211 Google Scholar öffnen
  592. Case C-260/04 Commission v Italy [2007] ECR I-7083 Google Scholar öffnen
  593. Case C-310/04 Spain v Council [2006] ECR I-7285 Google Scholar öffnen
  594. Case C-506/04 Wilson v Ordre des avocats du bureau de Luxembourg [2006] ECR I-8613 Google Scholar öffnen
  595. Case C-521/04 P(R) Tillack v Commission [2005] ECR I-3103 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/chin.200509037
  596. Case C-28/05 G. J. Dokter [2006] ECR I-5431 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452821-6/50021-6
  597. Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Kingdom of Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I-4723 Google Scholar öffnen
  598. Case C-51/05 P Commission v Dolianova and Others [2008] ECR I-5341 Google Scholar öffnen
  599. Case C-64/05 P Sweden v Commission [2007] ECR I-11389 Google Scholar öffnen
  600. Case C-243/05 P Agraz and Others v Commission [2006] ECR I-10833 Google Scholar öffnen
  601. Case C-266/05 P Sison v Council [2007] ECR I-1233 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9525-y
  602. Case C-331/05 P Internationaler Hilfsonds v Commisson [2007] ECR I-5475 Google Scholar öffnen
  603. Case C-341/05 Laval [2007] ECR I-11767 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47641-2_49
  604. Case C 344/05 P Commission v De Bry [2006] ECR I 10915 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/9780470277553.ch3
  605. Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P Kadi v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6351 Google Scholar öffnen
  606. Case C-428/05 Laub v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [2007] ECR I-5069 Google Scholar öffnen
  607. Case C-432/05 Unibet [2007] ECR I-2271 Google Scholar öffnen
  608. Case C-438/05 Viking [2007] ECR I-10779 Google Scholar öffnen
  609. Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6513 Google Scholar öffnen
  610. Case C-271/06 Netto Supermarkt GmbH & Co. OHG v Finanzamt Malchin [2008] ECR I-771 Google Scholar öffnen
  611. Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 Google Scholar öffnen
  612. Case C 308/06 Intertanko and Others v Secretary of State for Transport [2008] ECR I 4057 Google Scholar öffnen
  613. Joined Cases C-341/06 P and C-342/06 P Chronopost SA and La Poste v UFEX and Others [2008] ECR I-4777 Google Scholar öffnen
  614. Joined Cases C-399/06 P and C-403/06 P Hassan v Council and Commission [2009] ECR I-11393 Google Scholar öffnen
  615. Case C-409/06 Winner Wetten (CJEU, 8 Septembre 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-315
  616. Case C-445/06 Danske Slagterier [2009] ECR I-2119 Google Scholar öffnen
  617. Case C-450/06 Varec v Etat belge [2008] ECR I-581, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  618. Case C-521/06 P Athinaïki Techniki v Commission [2008] ECR I-582 Google Scholar öffnen
  619. Case C-47/07 P Masdar (UK) v Commission [2008] ECR I-9761 Google Scholar öffnen
  620. Case C-139/07 P Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau [2010] ECR I-5885 Google Scholar öffnen
  621. Case C-290/07 P Commission v Scott [2010] ECR I-7763 Google Scholar öffnen
  622. Case C-308/07 P Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso v Parliament [2009] ECR I-1059 Google Scholar öffnen
  623. Case C-349/07 Sopropé [2008] ECR I-10369 Google Scholar öffnen
  624. Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt v Commission [2009] ECR I-6155 Google Scholar öffnen
  625. Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon [2009] ECR I-10923 Google Scholar öffnen
  626. Case C-440/07 P Commission v Schneider Electric [2009] ECR I-6413 Google Scholar öffnen
  627. Case C-441/07 P Commission v Alrosa [2010] ECR I-5949 Google Scholar öffnen
  628. Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden v API and Commission [2010] ECR I-8533 Google Scholar öffnen
  629. Case C-555/07 Kücükdeveci [2010] ECR I-365 Google Scholar öffnen
  630. Case C-28/08 P Commission v Bavarian Lager [2010] ECR I-6055 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1021/ie100032c
  631. Case C-101/08 Audiolux [2009] ECR I-9823 Google Scholar öffnen
  632. Case C-127/08 Metock [2008] ECR I-6241 Google Scholar öffnen
  633. Case C-140/08 Rakvere Lihakombinaat [2009] ECR I-10533 Google Scholar öffnen
  634. Case C-141/08 P Foshan v Council [2009] ECRI-9147 Google Scholar öffnen
  635. Case C-203/08 Sporting Exchange v Minister van Justitie [2010] ECR I-4695 Google Scholar öffnen
  636. Case C-214/08 P Guigard v Commission [2009] ECR I-91 Google Scholar öffnen
  637. Case C-233/08 Kyrian v Celni úřad Tábor [2010] ECR I-177 Google Scholar öffnen
  638. Case C-476/08 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2009] ECR I-207 Google Scholar öffnen
  639. Case C-526/08 Commission v Luxembourg [2010] ECR I-6151 Google Scholar öffnen
  640. Case C-27/09 P French Republic v People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (CJEU, 21 December 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  641. Case C-39/09 P SPM v Council and Commission [2010] ECR I-38 Google Scholar öffnen
  642. Case C-83/09 Commission v Kronoply and Kronotex [2011] ECR I-4441 Google Scholar öffnen
  643. Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Markus Schecke [2010] ECR I-11063 Google Scholar öffnen
  644. Case C-221/09 AJD Tuna [2011] ECR I-1655 Google Scholar öffnen
  645. Case C-279/09 DEB (CJEU, 22 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  646. Case C-362/09 P AthinaïkiTechniki v Commission (CJEU, 16 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  647. Joined Cases C-372/09 and C-373/09 Peñarroja Fa [2011] ECR I-1785 Google Scholar öffnen
  648. Case C-377/09 Hanssens-Ensch [2010] ECR I-7751 Google Scholar öffnen
  649. Case C-410/09 Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa [2011] ECR I-3853 Google Scholar öffnen
  650. Case C-457/09 Chartry (CJEU, 1 March 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  651. Joined Cases C-471/09 P to C-473/09 P Diputación Foralde de Vizcaya and Others v Commission [2011] ECR I-111 Google Scholar öffnen
  652. Joined Cases C-474/09 P to C-476/09 P Diputación Foralde de Vizcaya and Others v Commission [2011] ECR I-113 Google Scholar öffnen
  653. Case C-505/09 P Commission v Estonia (CJEU, 29 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  654. Case C-517/09 RTL Belgium [2010] ECR I-14093 Google Scholar öffnen
  655. Case C-51/10 P Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHMI [2011] ECR I-1541 Google Scholar öffnen
  656. Case C-109/10 P Solvay v Commission [2011] ECR I-10329 Google Scholar öffnen
  657. Case C-149/10 Chatzi [2010] ECR I-8489 Google Scholar öffnen
  658. Case C-282/10 Dominguez (CJEU, 24 January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  659. Case C-310/10 Agafiţei and Others [2011] ECR I-2505 Google Scholar öffnen
  660. Case C-338/10 GLS (CJEU 22 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  661. Case C-339/10 Estov (CJEU, 12 November 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  662. Case C-400/10 PPU McB (CJEU, 5 October 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  663. Case C-404/10 P Commission v Odile Jacob (CJEU, 28 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  664. Case C-433/10 P Mauerhofer v Commission [2011] ECR 48 Google Scholar öffnen
  665. Case C-477/10 P Commission v Agrofert Holding (CJEU, 28 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  666. Case C482/10 Cicala [2011] ECR I-14139 Google Scholar öffnen
  667. Case C-500/10 Belvedere Costruzioni (CJEU, 29 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  668. Case C-534/10 Brookfield New Zeeland and Others v CPVO and Others (CJEU, 19 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  669. Case C-566/10 P Italy v Commission (CJEU, 27 November 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  670. Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P Commission and Others v Kadi (CJEU, 18 July 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  671. Case C-617/10 Âklagaren v Ākerberg Fransson (CJEU, 7 May 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  672. Case C-1/11 Interseroh (CJEU, 29 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  673. Case C-103/11 P Commission v Systran (CJEU, 18 April 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  674. Case C-146/11 AS Pimix v Maksu (CJEU, 12 July 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  675. Case C-175/11 HID and BA v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Others (CJEU, 30 January 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  676. Case C-235/11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (CJEU, 29 November 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  677. Case C-399/11 Melloni (CJEU, 26 February 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  678. Case C-411/11 Altner v Commission (CJEU, 15 December 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  679. Case C-418/11 Texdata Software GmbH (CJEU, 26 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  680. Case C-277/11 MM (CJEU, 26 April 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  681. Case C-399/11 Melloni (CJEU, 26 February 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  682. Case C-411/11 Altner v Commission (CJEU, 15 December 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  683. Case C-418/11 Texdata Software GmbH (CJEU, 26 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  684. Case C-131/12 Google Spain and Google Inc. v AEPD and Costeja González (CJEU, 13 May 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  685. Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 YS and M & S (CJEU, 17 July 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  686. Case C-276/12 Sabou (CJEU, 22 October 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  687. Case C-348/12 Council of the EU v Manufacturing Support &Procurement Kala Naft Co. (CJEU, 28 November 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  688. Case C-365/12 P Commission v EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg (CJEU, 27 February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  689. Case C-383/12 PPU M.G. and N.R. (CJEU, 10 Septemer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  690. Case C-531/12 P SEMEA v Commission (CJEU, 19 June 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  691. Case C-604/12 H.N. (CJEU, 8 May 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  692. Case C-166/13 Mukarubega (CJEU, 5 November 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  693. Case C-249/13 Boudjlida (CJEU, 11 December 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  694. Case C-383/13 PPU M.G. and Others (CJEU, 10 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  695. Opinions of the Advocates General of the CJEU Google Scholar öffnen
  696. Joined Cases 56 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig v Commission [1966] ECR 299, Opinion of AG Roemer Google Scholar öffnen
  697. Case 41/69 ACF Chemiefarma v Commission [1970] ECR 661, Opinion of AG Gand Google Scholar öffnen
  698. Case 48/69 ICI v Commission [1972] ECR 619, Opinion of AG Mayras Google Scholar öffnen
  699. Joined Cases 11/70, 25/70, 26/70 and 30/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft and Others [1970] ECR 1125, Joined Opinion of AG Dutheillet de Lamothe Google Scholar öffnen
  700. Case 5/71 Zuckerfabrik Schoeppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975, Opinion of AG Roemer Google Scholar öffnen
  701. Joined Cases 63 to 69/72 Werhahn Hansamühle and Others v Council [1973] ECR 1229, Opinion of AG Roemer Google Scholar öffnen
  702. Case 17/74 Transocean Marine Paint v Commission [1974] ECR 1063, Opinion of AG Warner Google Scholar öffnen
  703. Case 85/76 Hoffmann-La Roche [1979] ECR 461, Opinion of AG Reischl Google Scholar öffnen
  704. Case 55/77 Maris [1977] ECR 2327, Opinion of AG Capotorti Google Scholar öffnen
  705. Joined Cases 83 and 94/76, 4, 15 and 40/77 HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209, Opinion of AG Capotorti Google Scholar öffnen
  706. Case 113/77 NTN Toyo Bearing and Others v Council [1979] ECR 1212, Opinion of AG Warner Google Scholar öffnen
  707. Case 17/78 Deshormes v Commission [1979] ECR 189, Opinion of AG Reischl Google Scholar öffnen
  708. Joined Cases 33/79 and 75/79 Kuhner v Commission [1980] ECR 1677, Opinion of AG Mayras Google Scholar öffnen
  709. Case 64/82 Tradax v Commission [1984] ECR 1359, Opinion of AG Slynn Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/33.2.409
  710. Case 185/83 University of Groningen v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen [1984] ECR 3623, Opinion of AG VerLoren van Themaat Google Scholar öffnen
  711. Case 46/85 Manchester Steel Limited v Commission [1986] ECR 2351, Opinion of the AG Mischo Google Scholar öffnen
  712. Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097, Opinion of AG Mancini Google Scholar öffnen
  713. Case C-49/88 Al-Jubail Fertilizer v Council [1991] ECR I-3187, Opinion of AG Darmon Google Scholar öffnen
  714. Joined Cases T-1/89 to 4/89 and T-6/89 to 15/89 Rhône-Poulenc and Others v Commission [1991] ECR II-867, Joined Opinion of AG Vesterdorf Google Scholar öffnen
  715. Case C-16/90 Nölle v Hauptzollamt Bremen-Freihafen [1991] ECR I-5163, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen
  716. Joined Cases C-48/90 and C-66/90 Netherlands and Others v Commission [1992] ECR I-565, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen
  717. Case C-242/90 P Commission v Albanni and Others [1993] ECR I-3839, Opinion of AG Van Gerven Google Scholar öffnen
  718. Case C-269/90 Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte [1991] ECR I-5469, Opinion of AG Jacobs Google Scholar öffnen
  719. Case C-310/93 P BPB Industries and British Gypsum v Commission [1995] ECR I-865, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen
  720. Case C-32/95 P Commission v Lisrestal [1996] ECR I-5373, Opinion of AG La Pergola Google Scholar öffnen
  721. Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia [1997] ECR I-3395, Opinion of AG Fenelly Google Scholar öffnen
  722. Case C-185/95 P Baustahlgewebe v Commission [1998] ECR I-8417, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen
  723. Case C-367/95 P Commission v Sytraval [1998] ECR I-1719, Opinion of AG Lenz Google Scholar öffnen
  724. Case C-361/96 Société générale des grandes sources d’eaux minerals françaises v Bundesamt für Finanzen [1998] ECR I-3495, Opinion of AG Cosmas Google Scholar öffnen
  725. Joined Cases C-174/98 P and C-189/98 P van der Wal v Commission [2000] ECR I-1, Opinion of AG Cosmas Google Scholar öffnen
  726. Case C-213/99 de Andrade v Director da Alfândega de Leixões [2000] ECR I-11083, Opinion of AG Fennelly Google Scholar öffnen
  727. Case C-244/99 P DSM NV and Others v Commission [2002] ECR I-8375, Opinion of AG Mischo Google Scholar öffnen
  728. Case C-270/99 P Z v EP [2001] ECR I-9197, Opinion of AG Jacobs Google Scholar öffnen
  729. Case C-274/99 P Connolly v Commission [2001] ECR I-1611, Opinion of AG Colomer Google Scholar öffnen
  730. Case C-353/99 P Council v Hautala [2001] ECR I-9565, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen
  731. Case C-41/00 P Interporc v Commission [2003] ECR I-2125, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen
  732. Case C-87/01 P Commission v CCRE [2003] ECR I-7617, Opinion of AG Léger Google Scholar öffnen
  733. Case C-111/02 P EP v Reynolds [2004] ECR I-5474, Opinion of AG Geelhoed Google Scholar öffnen
  734. Case C-141/02 P Commission v T-Mobile Austria GmbH [2005] ECR I-1283, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen
  735. Joined Cases C-361/02 and C-362/02 Tsapalos and Diamantakis [2004] ECR I-6405, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  736. Case C-160/03 Spain v Eurojust [2005] ECR I-2077, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen
  737. Case C-181/03 P Nardone v Commission [2005] ECR I-199, Opinion of AG Maduro Google Scholar öffnen
  738. Joined Cases C-154/04 and C-155/04 Alliance for Natural Health [20050] ECR I-6451, Opinion of AG Geelhoud Google Scholar öffnen
  739. Case C-248/04 Koninklijke Coöperative Cosun UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit [2006] ECR I-10211, Opinion of AG Stix-Hackl Google Scholar öffnen
  740. Case C-310/04 Spain v Council [2006] ECR I-7285, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  741. Case C-408/04 P Commission v Salzgitter [2008] ECR I-2767, Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  742. Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Kingdom of Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I-4723, Opinion of AG Maduro Google Scholar öffnen
  743. Case C-64/05 P Sweden v Commission [2007] ECR I-11389, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501760701428506
  744. Joined Cases C-75/05 P and C-80/05 P Glunz and OSB Deurchland v Kronofrance [2008] ECR I-6619, Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  745. Case C-243/05 P Agraz and Others v Commission [2006] ECR I-10833, Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen
  746. Case C-321/05 Kofoed [2007] ECR I-5795, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  747. Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P Kadi v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6351, Opinion of AG Pojares Maduro Google Scholar öffnen
  748. Joined Cases C-147/06 and C-148/06 SECAP and Others v Comune di Torino [2008] ECR I-3565, Opinion of AG Colomer Google Scholar öffnen
  749. Case C-161/06 Skoma-Lux [2007] ECR I-10841, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  750. Case C-409/06 Winner Wetten (CJEU, 8 Septembre 2010), Opinion of the AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  751. Case C-521/06 P Athinaïki Techniki v Commission [2008] ECR I-5829, Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  752. Case C-139/07 P Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau [2010] ECR I-5885, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  753. Case C-204/07 P C.A.S. SpA v Commission [2008] ECR I-6135, Opinion AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen
  754. Case C-290/07 P Commission v Scott [2010] ECR I-7763, Opinion of AG Mengozzi Google Scholar öffnen
  755. Case C-308/07 P Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso v Parliament [2009] ECR I-1059, Opinion of AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen
  756. Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon [2009] ECR I-10923, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  757. Case C-441/07 P Commission v Alrosa [2010] ECR I-5949, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  758. Case C-28/08 P Commission v Bavarian Lager [2010] ECR I-6055, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  759. Case C-73/08 Bressol and Others v Gouvernement de la Communauté française [2010] ECR I-2735, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  760. Case C392/08 Commission v Spain [2010] ECR I2537, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  761. Case C-83/09 Commission v Kronoply and Kronotex [2011] ECR I-4441, Opinion of AG Jääskinen Google Scholar öffnen
  762. Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Markus Schecke [2010] ECR I-11063, Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  763. Case C-221/09 AJD Tuna [2011] ECR I-1655, Opinion of AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen
  764. Case C-336/09 P Poland v Commission (CJEU, 26 June 2012), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen
  765. Case C-69/10 Samba Diouf [2011] ECR 7151, Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen
  766. Case C-108/10 Scattolon [2011] ECR I-7491, Opinion AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  767. Case C-109/10 P Solvay v Commission [2011] ECR I-10329, Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  768. Case C-282/10 Dominguez (CJEU, 24 January 2012), Opinion of AG Trstenjak Google Scholar öffnen
  769. Case C-338/10 GLS (CJEU 22 March 2012), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  770. Case C617/10 Âklagaren v Ākerberg Fransson (CJEU, 7 May 2013), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen
  771. Case C-619/10 Trade Agency (CJEU, 6 September 2012), Opinion ofAG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  772. Joined Cases C-628/10 P and C-14/11 P Alliance One International and Others v Commission and Commission v Alliance One International and Others (CJEU, 19 July 2012), Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  773. Case C-83/11 Rahman (CJEU, 5 Septembre 2012), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  774. Case C-103/11 P Commission v Systran (CJEU, 18 April 2013), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen
  775. Case C-175/11 HID and BA v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Others (CJEU, 30 January 2013), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  776. Case C-277/11 MM (CJEU, 26 April 2012), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  777. Case C-40/12 P Gascone Sack Deutschland v Commission (CJEU, 26 November 2013), Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  778. Case C-58/12 P Groupe Gascogne v Commission (CJEU, 26 November 2013), Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  779. Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 YS and M & S (CJEU, 17 July 2014), Opinion of AG Sharpston Google Scholar öffnen
  780. Case C-176/12 Association de médiation sociale (CJEU, 15 January 2014), Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón Google Scholar öffnen
  781. Case C-276/12 Sabou (CJEU, 22 October 2013), Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipt017
  782. Case C-363/12 Z (CJEU, 18 March 2014), Opinion of AG Wahl Google Scholar öffnen
  783. Case C-531/12 P SEMEA v Commission (CJEU, 19 June 2014), Opinion of AG Kokott Google Scholar öffnen
  784. Case C-604/12 H.N. (CJEU, 8 May 2014), Opinion of AG Bot Google Scholar öffnen
  785. Case C-166/13 Mukarubega (CJEU, 5 November 2014), Opinion of AG Wathelet Google Scholar öffnen
  786. Case C-249/13 Boudjlida (CJEU, 11 December 2014), Opinion of AG Wathelet Google Scholar öffnen
  787. Case C-383/13 PPU M.G. and Others (CJEU, 10 September 2013), Opinion of AG Wathelet Google Scholar öffnen
  788. Case-law of the General Court of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  789. Case T-1/89 Rhône-Poulenc v Commission [1991] ECR II-967 Google Scholar öffnen
  790. Case T-7/89 Hercules v Commission [1991] ECR II-1711 Google Scholar öffnen
  791. Case T-26/89 de Compte v Parliament [1991] ECR II-781 Google Scholar öffnen
  792. Joined Cases T-34/89 and T-67/89 Costacurta v Commission [1990] ECR II-93 Google Scholar öffnen
  793. Case T-61/89 Dansk Pelsdyravlerforening v Commission [1992] ECR II-1931 Google Scholar öffnen
  794. Case T-120/89 Stahlwerke Peine-Salzgitter v Commission [1991] ECR II-279 Google Scholar öffnen
  795. Case T-133/89 Burban v EP [1990] ECR II-245 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(90)90002-2
  796. Case T-135/89 Pfloeschner v Commission [1990] ECR II-153 Google Scholar öffnen
  797. Case T-143/89 Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission [1995] ECRII-917 Google Scholar öffnen
  798. Case T-146/89 Pfloeschner v Commission [1991] ECR II-1293 Google Scholar öffnen
  799. Case T-147/89 Société métallurgique de Normandie v Commission [1995] ECR II-1057 Google Scholar öffnen
  800. Case T-148/89 Tréfilunion SA v Commission [1995] ECR II-1063 Google Scholar öffnen
  801. Case T-151/89 Société des Treillis et Panneaux Soudés v Commission [1995] ECR II-1191 Google Scholar öffnen
  802. Case T-24/90 Automec v Commission [1992] ECR II-2223 Google Scholar öffnen
  803. Case T 44/90 La Cinq v Commission [1992] ECR II 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  804. Case T-46/90 Devillez and Others v European Parliament [1993] ECR II-699 Google Scholar öffnen
  805. Case T-14/91 Weyrich v Commission [1991] ECR II-235 Google Scholar öffnen
  806. Case T-26/91 Kupka-Floridi v Economic and Social Committee [1992] ECR II-1615 Google Scholar öffnen
  807. Case T-30/91 Solvay v Commission [1995] ECR II-1775 Google Scholar öffnen
  808. Case T-36/91 ICI v Commission [1995] ECR II-1847 Google Scholar öffnen
  809. Case T-44/91 Smets v Commission [1994] ECR Staff Cases I-A-97; II-319 Google Scholar öffnen
  810. Case T-83/91 Tetra Pak International v Commission [1994] ECR II-755 Google Scholar öffnen
  811. Case T-5/92 Tallarico v EP [1993] ECR II-477 Google Scholar öffnen
  812. Case T-7/92 Asia Motor France and Others v Commission [1993] ECR II-669 Google Scholar öffnen
  813. Joined Cases T-10/92, T-11/92, T-12/92 and T-15/92 Cimenteries and Others v Commission [1992] ECR II-2667 Google Scholar öffnen
  814. Case T-46/92 Scottish Football Association v Commission [1994] ECR II-1039 Google Scholar öffnen
  815. Case T-65/92 Arauxo-Dumay v Commission [1993] ECR II-597 Google Scholar öffnen
  816. Case T-74/92 Ladbroke Racing Deutschland v Commission [1995] ECR II-115 Google Scholar öffnen
  817. Case T-77/92 Parker Pen v Commission [1995] ECR II-1213 Google Scholar öffnen
  818. Case T-96/92 Comité central d’entreprise de la société générale des grandes sources and Others v Commission [1995] ECR II-1213 Google Scholar öffnen
  819. Joint Cases T-98/92 and T-99/92 Di Marzio and Lebedef v Commission [1994] ECR II-541 Google Scholar öffnen
  820. Case T-100/92 La Pietra v Commission [1994] ECR FP-I-A-83; FP-II-275 Google Scholar öffnen
  821. Case T-107/92 White v Commission [1994] ECR FP-I-A-41; FP-II-143 Google Scholar öffnen
  822. Case T-17/93 Matra Hachette v Commission [1994] ECR II-595 Google Scholar öffnen
  823. Case T-450/93 Lisrestal v Commission [1994] ECR II-1177 Google Scholar öffnen
  824. Case T-459/93 Siemens v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675 Google Scholar öffnen
  825. Joined Cases T-481/93 and T-484/93 Vereniging van Exporteurs in Levende Varkens and Others v Commission [1995] ECR II-2941 Google Scholar öffnen
  826. Case T-489/93 Unifruit Hellas v Commission [1994] ECR II-1201 Google Scholar öffnen
  827. Case T-514/93 Cobrecaf SA and Others v Commission [1995] ECR II-621 Google Scholar öffnen
  828. Case T-521/93 Atlanta and Others v Council and Commission [1996] ECR II-1707 Google Scholar öffnen
  829. Case T-549/93 D v Commission [1995] ECR FP-I-A-13; FP-II-43 Google Scholar öffnen
  830. Case T-572/93 Odigitria v Council and Commission [1995] ECR II-2025 Google Scholar öffnen
  831. Case T-12/94 Daffix v Commission [1997] ECR FP-I-A-453; FP-II-1197 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/07313569708955735
  832. Case T-95/94 Sytraval v Commission [1995] ECR II-2651 Google Scholar öffnen
  833. Case T-156/94 Siderúrgica Aristrain Madrid SL v Commission [1999] ECR II-645 Google Scholar öffnen
  834. Case T-157/94 Ensidesa v Commission [1999] ECR II-707 Google Scholar öffnen
  835. Case T-164/94 Ferchimex SA v Council [1995] ECR-2681 Google Scholar öffnen
  836. Case T-167/94 Nölle v Council and Commission [1995] ECR II-2589 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(94)01302-0
  837. Case T-260/94 Air Inter v Commission [1997] ECR II-997 Google Scholar öffnen
  838. Case T-277/94 AITEC v Commission [1996] ECR II-351 Google Scholar öffnen
  839. Case T-290/94 Kaysersberg v Commission [1997] ECR II-213 Google Scholar öffnen
  840. Case T-294/94 Dimitriadis v Court of Auditors [1996] ECR Staff Cases –I-A-51; II-151 Google Scholar öffnen
  841. Case T-295/94 Buchmann v Commission [1998] ECR II-813 Google Scholar öffnen
  842. Joined Cases T-305/94 to T-307/94, T-313/94 to T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94 and T-335/94 Limburgse Maatschappij and Others v Commission [1999] ECR II-931 Google Scholar öffnen
  843. Case T-308/94 Cascades SA v Commission [1998] ECR II-925 Google Scholar öffnen
  844. Case T-330/94 Salt Union Ltd v Commission [1996] ECR II-1475 Google Scholar öffnen
  845. Case T-338/94 Finnboard v Commission [1998] ECR II-1617 Google Scholar öffnen
  846. Case T-346/94 France-aviation v Commission [1995] ECR II-2841 Google Scholar öffnen
  847. Case T-348/94 Enso Española v Commission [1998] ECR II-1875 Google Scholar öffnen
  848. Joined Cases T-371/94 and T-394/94 British Airways and Others v Commission [1998] ECR II-2405 Google Scholar öffnen
  849. Case T-390/94 Schröder and Others v Commission [1997] ECR II-501 Google Scholar öffnen
  850. Joined Cases T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95 and T-104/95 Cimenteries and Others v Commission [2000] ECR II-491 Google Scholar öffnen
  851. Case T-73/95 Oliveira v Commission [1997] ECR II-381 Google Scholar öffnen
  852. Case T-81/95 Interhotel v Commission [1997] ECR II-1265 Google Scholar öffnen
  853. Case T-96/95 Rozand-Lambiotte v Commission [1997] FP-I-A-35; FP-II-97 Google Scholar öffnen
  854. Case T-105/95 WWF UK v Commission [1997] ECR II-313 Google Scholar öffnen
  855. Case T-121/95 EFMA v Council [1997] ECR II-2391 Google Scholar öffnen
  856. Case T-166/95 Karagiozopoulou v Commission [1997] ECR Staff Cases I-A-397; II-1065 Google Scholar öffnen
  857. Case T-174/95 Svenska Journalistförbundet v Council [1998] ECR II-2289 Google Scholar öffnen
  858. Case T-183/95 Carraro v Commission [1998] ECR FP-I-A-123; FP-II-329 Google Scholar öffnen
  859. Case T-184/95 Dorch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Council and Commission [1998] ECR II-667 Google Scholar öffnen
  860. Joined Cases T-198/95, T-171/96, T-230/97, T-174/98 and T-225/99 Comafrica and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v Commission [2001] ECR II-1975 Google Scholar öffnen
  861. Case T 203/95 R Connolly v Commission [1995] ECR II 2919 Google Scholar öffnen
  862. Joined Cases T-213/95 and T-18/96 SCK and FCK v Commission [1997] ECR II-1739 Google Scholar öffnen
  863. Case C-219/95 P Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission [1997] ECR I-4411 Google Scholar öffnen
  864. Joined Cases T-231/95 and T-18/96 SCK and FNK v Commission [1997] ECR II-1739 Google Scholar öffnen
  865. Case T-42/96 Eyckeler v Commission [1998] ECR II-401 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1116/1.590152
  866. Case T-50/96 Primex Produkte v Commission [1998] ECR II-3773 Google Scholar öffnen
  867. Case T-65/96 Kish Glass v Commission [2000] ECR II-1885 Google Scholar öffnen
  868. Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98 Camar and Tico v Commission and Council [2000] ECR II-2193 Google Scholar öffnen
  869. Case T-80/96 Fernandes Leite Mateus v Council [1997] ECR I-A-87; II-259 Google Scholar öffnen
  870. Case T-82/96 ARAP v Commission [1999] ECR II-1889 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3056-2_18
  871. Case T-95/96 Gestevisión Telecinco v Commission [1998] ECR II-3407 Google Scholar öffnen
  872. Case T-105/96 Pharos v Commission [1998] ECR II-285 Google Scholar öffnen
  873. Case T-111/96 ITT Promedia v Commission [1998] ECR II-2937 Google Scholar öffnen
  874. Case T-124/96 Interporc v Commission [1998] ECR II-231 Google Scholar öffnen
  875. Joined Cases T-125/96 and T-152/96 Boehringer v Council and Commission [1999] ECR II-342 Google Scholar öffnen
  876. Joined Cases T-132/96 and T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission [1999] ECR II-3663 Google Scholar öffnen
  877. Case T-5/97 Industries des poudres sphériques v Commission [2000] ECR II-3755 Google Scholar öffnen
  878. Case T-203/96 Embassy Limousines & Services v Parliament [1998] ECR II-4239 Google Scholar öffnen
  879. Case T-19/97 Richter v Commission [1997] ECR FP-I-A-379; FP-II-1019 Google Scholar öffnen
  880. Case T-46/97 SIC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2125 Google Scholar öffnen
  881. Case T-126/97 Sonasa v Commission [1999] ECR II-2793 Google Scholar öffnen
  882. Joined Cases T-186/97, T-187/97, T-190/97 to T-192/97, T-210/97, T-211/97, T-216/97, T-217/97, T-218/97, T-279/97, T-280/97, T-293/97 and T-147/99 Kaufring and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-1337 Google Scholar öffnen
  883. Case T-188/97 Rothmans International v Commission [1999] ECR II-2463 Google Scholar öffnen
  884. Joined Cases T-194/97 and T-83/98 Branco v Commission [2000] ECR II-69 Google Scholar öffnen
  885. Case T-203/97 Forvass v Commission [1999] ECR FP-I-A-129; FP-II-705 Google Scholar öffnen
  886. Case T-228/97 Irish Sugar v Commission [1999] ECR II-2969 Google Scholar öffnen
  887. Case T-231/97 NEC and Brown v Commission [1999] ECR II-2403 Google Scholar öffnen
  888. Case T-241/97 Stork Amsterdam v Commission [2000] ECR II-309 Google Scholar öffnen
  889. Case T-257/97 Herold v Commission [1999] ECR FP-I-A-49; FP-II-251 Google Scholar öffnen
  890. Case T-259/97 Teixeira Neves v CJEU [2000] ECR FP-I-A-169; FP-II-773 Google Scholar öffnen
  891. Case T-290/97 MehibasDordtselaan v Commission [2000] ECR II-15 Google Scholar öffnen
  892. Case T-309/97 Bavarian Lager v Commission [1999] ECR II-3217 Google Scholar öffnen
  893. Case T-14/98 Hautala v Council of the EU [1999] ECR II-2489 Google Scholar öffnen
  894. Joined Cases T-24/98 and T-241/99 E v Commission [2001] ECR FP-I-A-149; FP-II-681 Google Scholar öffnen
  895. Case T-43/98 Emesa Sugar [2001] ECR II-3519 Google Scholar öffnen
  896. T-62/98 Volkswagen v Commission [2000] ECR II-2707 Google Scholar öffnen
  897. Case T-166/98 Dolianova and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-3991 Google Scholar öffnen
  898. Case T-178/98 Fresh Marine v Commission [2000] ECR II-3331 Google Scholar öffnen
  899. Case T-179/98 Cuenda Guijarro and Others v Council [2000] ECR FP-A-A-1; FP-II-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-054-3:127
  900. Joined Cases T-191/98, T-212/98 to T 214/98 Atlantic Container Line and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II 3275 Google Scholar öffnen
  901. Case T-197/98 Rudolph v Commission [2000] ECR Staff Cases I-A-55; II-241 Google Scholar öffnen
  902. Case T-9/99 HFB and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-1487 Google Scholar öffnen
  903. Case T-13/99 Pfizer Animal Health SA v Council [2002] ECR II-3305 Google Scholar öffnen
  904. Case T-31/99 ABB Asea Brown Boveri v Commission [2002] ECR II-1881 Google Scholar öffnen
  905. Case T-54/99 max.mobil v Commission [2002] ECR II-313 Google Scholar öffnen
  906. Case T-57/99 Nardone v Commission [2008] ECR FP-I-A-2-83; FP-II-A-2-505 Google Scholar öffnen
  907. Case T-70/99 Alpharma Inc. v Council [2002] ECR II-3495 Google Scholar öffnen
  908. Joined Cases T-83/99, T-84/99 and T-85/99 Ripa di Meana v European Parliament [2000] ECR II-3493 Google Scholar öffnen
  909. Case T-114/99 CSR PAMPRYL v Commission [1999] ECR II-3331 Google Scholar öffnen
  910. Case T-118/99 Bonati Brighina v Commission [2001] ECR I-A-25; II-97 Google Scholar öffnen
  911. Case T-120/99 Kik v OHMI [2001] ECR II-2235 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00667-X
  912. Joined Cases T-141/99, T-142/99, T-150/99 and T-151/99 Vela and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-4547 Google Scholar öffnen
  913. Case T-171/99 Corus UK v Commission [2001] ECR II-2967 Google Scholar öffnen
  914. Case T-182/99 Caravelis v Parliament [2001] ECR II-1313; FP-I-A-113; FP-II-523 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/713666464
  915. Case T-191/99 Petrie and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-3677 Google Scholar öffnen
  916. Case T-196/99 Area Cova and Others v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II-3597 Google Scholar öffnen
  917. Case T-199/99 SgaravattiMediterranea v Commission[2002] ECR II-3731 Google Scholar öffnen
  918. Case T-204/99 Mattila v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II-2265 Google Scholar öffnen
  919. Case T-206/99 Métropole Télévision v Commission [2001] ECR II-2707 Google Scholar öffnen
  920. Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II-435 Google Scholar öffnen
  921. Joined Cases T-3/00 and T-337/04 Pitsiorlas v Council [2007] ECR II-4779 Google Scholar öffnen
  922. Joined Cases T-5/00 and T-6/00 Technische Unie v Commission [2003] ECR II-5761 Google Scholar öffnen
  923. Case T 23/00 A v Commission [2000] ECR FP-I A 263 and FP-II 1211 Google Scholar öffnen
  924. Joined Cases T-74/00; T-76/00; T-83/00, T-84/00, T-85/00, T-132/00, T-137/00 and T-141/00 Artegodan and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-4945 Google Scholar öffnen
  925. Case T-102/00 Vlaams Fonds voor de Sociale Integratie van Personen met een Handicap v Commission [2003] ECR II-2433 Google Scholar öffnen
  926. Joined Cases T-112/00 and T-122/00 Iberotam SA and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-97 Google Scholar öffnen
  927. Case T-189/00 R Invest Import und Export and Others v Commission [2000] ECR II-2993 Google Scholar öffnen
  928. Case T-190/00 Regione Siciliana v Commission [2003] ECR II-5015 Google Scholar öffnen
  929. Case T-209/00 Lamberts v European Ombudsman [2002] ECR II-2203 Google Scholar öffnen
  930. Case T-211/00 Kuijer v Council of the EU [2002] ECR II-485 Google Scholar öffnen
  931. Case T-213/00 CMA CGM and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II-913 Google Scholar öffnen
  932. Case T-224/00 Midland Ingredients v Commission [2003] ECR II-2597 Google Scholar öffnen
  933. Case T-232/00 Chef Revival USA v OHMI [2002] ECR II-2749 Google Scholar öffnen
  934. Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T/277/00 Hotel Cipriani and Others v Commission [2008] ECR II-3269 Google Scholar öffnen
  935. Case T-307/00 C v Commission [2003] ECR Staff Cases I-A-33; II-221 Google Scholar öffnen
  936. Joined Cases T-344/00 and T-345/00 CEVA Santé Animale and Others v Commssion [2003] ECR II-229 Google Scholar öffnen
  937. Case T-366/00 Scott v Commission [2007] ECR II-797 Google Scholar öffnen
  938. Case T-7/01 Pyres v Commission [2003] ECR II-239 Google Scholar öffnen
  939. Joined Cases T-30/01 to T-32/01, T-86/02 to T-88/02 Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission [2009] ECR II-2919 Google Scholar öffnen
  940. Case T-40/01 Scan Office Design v Commission [2002] ECR II-5043 Google Scholar öffnen
  941. Joined Cases T-44/01, T-119/01 and T-126/01 Vieira SA and Others v Commission [2003] ECR II-1209 Google Scholar öffnen
  942. Case T-67/01 JCB Service v Commission [2004] II-49 Google Scholar öffnen
  943. Case T-77/01 Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission [2002] ECR II-81 Google Scholar öffnen
  944. Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission [2004] ECR II-127 Google Scholar öffnen
  945. Joined Cases T 120/01 and T 300/01 De Nicola v BEI [2004] ECR SC I A 365 and II 1671 Google Scholar öffnen
  946. Case T-176/01 Ferriere Nord v Commission [2004] ECR II-3931 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1115/1.1638783
  947. Joined Cases T-188/01, T-189/01 and T-190/01 Tsarnavas v Commission [2003] ECR Staff Cases I-A-95; II-495 Google Scholar öffnen
  948. Case T-198/01 R Technische Glaswerke Illmenau v Commission [2002] ECR II-2153 Google Scholar öffnen
  949. Case T-203/01 Manufacture française des pneumatiques Michelin v Commission [2003] ECR II-4071 Google Scholar öffnen
  950. Case T-210/01 General Electric Company v Commission [2005] ECR II-5575 Google Scholar öffnen
  951. Joined Cases T-213/01 and T-214/01 Österreichische Postsparkasse and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-1601 Google Scholar öffnen
  952. Joined Cases T-215/01, T-220/01 and T-221/01 Calberson v Commission [2004] ECR II-587 Google Scholar öffnen
  953. Joined Cases T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01 to T-246/01, T-251/01 and T/252/01 Tokai Carbon and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-1181 Google Scholar öffnen
  954. Case T-271/01 López Cejudo v Commission [2002] ECR FP-I-A-221; FP-II-1109 Google Scholar öffnen
  955. Case T-306/01 Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2005] ECR II-3533 Google Scholar öffnen
  956. T-307/01 François v Commission [2004] ECR FP-II-1669; FP-I-A-183; II-823 Google Scholar öffnen
  957. Case T-310/01 Schneider Electric v Commission [2002] ECR II-4071 Google Scholar öffnen
  958. Case T 322/01 Roquette Frères v Commission [2006] ECR II 3137 Google Scholar öffnen
  959. Case T-15/02 BASF V Commission [2006] ECR II-497 Google Scholar öffnen
  960. Joined Cases T-22/02 and T-23/02 Sumitomo Chemical Co. and Others v Commission [2005] ECR II-4065 Google Scholar öffnen
  961. Case T-29/02 GEF v Commisssion [2005] ECR II-835 Google Scholar öffnen
  962. Case T-34/02 Le Levant and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-267 Google Scholar öffnen
  963. Joined Cases T-44/02 OP, T-54/02 OP, T-56/02 OP, T-60/02 OP and T-61/02 OP Dresdner Bank and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-3567 Google Scholar öffnen
  964. Case T-76/02 Messina v Commission [2003] ECR II-3203 Google Scholar öffnen
  965. Case T-77/02 Schneider Electric v Commission [2002] ECR II-4201 Google Scholar öffnen
  966. Case T-107/02 GE Betz v OHMI [2004] ECR II-1845 Google Scholar öffnen
  967. Case T-168/02 IFAW v Commission [2004] ECR 4135 Google Scholar öffnen
  968. Case T-198/02 N v Commission [2004] ECR FP-I-A-115; FP-II-507 Google Scholar öffnen
  969. Case T-211/02 Tideland Signal v Commission [2002] ECR II-3781 Google Scholar öffnen
  970. Case T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du people d’Iran v Council [2006] ECR II-4665 Google Scholar öffnen
  971. Case T-235/02 Strongline A/S v OHMI [2003] ECR II-4903 Google Scholar öffnen
  972. Case T-236/02 Marcuccio v Commission [2005] ECR FP- I-A-365 and FP-II-1621 Google Scholar öffnen
  973. Case T-237/02 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau v Commission [2006] ECR II-5131 Google Scholar öffnen
  974. Case T-242/02 Sunrider v OHMI [2005] ECR II-2793 Google Scholar öffnen
  975. Case T-256/02 I v CJEC [2004] ECR Staff Cases I-A-289; II-1307 Google Scholar öffnen
  976. Case T-266/02 Deutsche Post v Commission [2008] ECR II-1233 Google Scholar öffnen
  977. Case T-317/02 FICF and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-4325 Google Scholar öffnen
  978. Case T-378/02 R Ilmenau v Commission [2003] ECR II-2921 Google Scholar öffnen
  979. Case T-389/02 Sandini v CJEC [2004] ECR Staff Cases I-A-295; II-1339 Google Scholar öffnen
  980. Case T-2/03 Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Commission (also known as Club Lombard) [2005] ECR II-1121 Google Scholar öffnen
  981. Case T-11/03 Afari v ECB [2004] ECR II-267 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.1133-a
  982. Case T-30/03 RENV. 3F v Commission (GC, 27 Septembre 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  983. Case T-47/03 Sison v Council [2007] ECR II-73 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2501/S0021849907070250
  984. Case T-84/03 Turco v Council [2004] ECR II-4061 Google Scholar öffnen
  985. Case T-132/03 Casini v Commission [2005] ECR FP-I-A-253; FP-II-1169 Google Scholar öffnen
  986. Case T-160/03 AFCon Management Consultants and Others v Commission [2005] ECR II-981 Google Scholar öffnen
  987. Case T-187/03 Scippacercola v Commission [2005] ECR II-1029 Google Scholar öffnen
  988. Case T-198/03 Bank Austrai Creditanstalt v Commission (also known as Club Lombard) [2006] ECR II-1429 Google Scholar öffnen
  989. Case T 203/03 Rasmussen v Commission [2005] ECR Staff Cases I-A 279 and II 1287 Google Scholar öffnen
  990. Case T-204/03 Haladjian Frères SA v Commission [2006] ECR II-3779 Google Scholar öffnen
  991. Case T-212/03 MyTravel Group v Commission [2008] ECR II-1967 Google Scholar öffnen
  992. Case T-245/03 R FNSEA and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-271 Google Scholar öffnen
  993. Case T-259/03 Nikolaou v Commission [2007] ECR II-99 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1504/IJFSM.2007.011677
  994. Case T-285/03 Agraz and Others v Commission [2008] ECR II-285 Google Scholar öffnen
  995. Case T-309/03 Camós Grau v Commission [2006] ECR II-1173; FP-I-A-2-89; FP-II-A-2-89 Google Scholar öffnen
  996. Case T-349/03 Corsica Ferries France v Commission [2005] ECR II-2197 Google Scholar öffnen
  997. Case T-351/03 Schneider Electric v Commission [2007] ECR II-2237 Google Scholar öffnen
  998. Case T-367/03 Tarim and Others v Council and Commission [2006] ECR II-873 Google Scholar öffnen
  999. Case T-369/03 Arizona Chemical and Others v Commission [2005] ECR II-5839 Google Scholar öffnen
  1000. Joined Cases T-391/03 and T-70/04 Franchet and Byk v Commission [2006] ECR II-2023 Google Scholar öffnen
  1001. Case T-394/03 Angeletti v Commission [2006] ECR Staff Cases I-A-2-95; II-A-2-441 Google Scholar öffnen
  1002. Case T-410/03 Hoechst v Commission [2008] ECR II-881 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.020
  1003. Case T-442/03 SIC v Commission [2008] ECR II-1161 Google Scholar öffnen
  1004. Case T-5/04 Scano v Commission [2005] ECR FP-I-A-205; FP-II-931 Google Scholar öffnen
  1005. Case T-95/04 Lavagnoli v Commission [2006] ECR I-A-2-121; II-A-2-569 Google Scholar öffnen
  1006. Case T-166/04 C v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-2-9; FP-II-A-2-49 Google Scholar öffnen
  1007. Case T-181/04 Heinen v Commission [2005] ECR I-A-221; II-1013 Google Scholar öffnen
  1008. Case T-192/04 Flex Equipos de Descanso v OHMI [2007] ECR II-2411 Google Scholar öffnen
  1009. Case T-193/04 Tillack v Commission [2006] ECR II-3995 Google Scholar öffnen
  1010. Case T-193/04 R Tillack v Commission [2004] ECR II-3575 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-835812
  1011. Case T-194/04 Bavarian Lager v Commission [2007] ECR II-4523 Google Scholar öffnen
  1012. Case T-219/04 Spain v Commission [2007] ECR II-1323 Google Scholar öffnen
  1013. Case T-226/04 Italy v Commission [2006] ECR II-29 Google Scholar öffnen
  1014. Case T-271/04 Citymo v Commission [2007] ECR II-1375 Google Scholar öffnen
  1015. Case T-274/04 Rounis v Commission [2005] ECR FP-I-A-407; FP-II-1849 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.037
  1016. Case T-294/04 Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commisson [2005] ECR I-2719 Google Scholar öffnen
  1017. Case T-364/04 Greece v Commission [2008] ECR II-51 Google Scholar öffnen
  1018. Case T-374/04 Germany v Commission [2007] ECR II-4431 Google Scholar öffnen
  1019. Case T-465/04 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2008] ECR II-154 Google Scholar öffnen
  1020. Case T-494/04 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2006] ECR FP-I-A-2-259; FP-II-A-2-1345 Google Scholar öffnen
  1021. Case T-42/05 Williams v Commission [2008] ECR II-156 Google Scholar öffnen
  1022. Case T-48/05 Franchet and Byk v Commission [2008] ECR II-1585 Google Scholar öffnen
  1023. Case T-59/05 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2008] ECR II-157 Google Scholar öffnen
  1024. Case T-60/05 UFEX and Others v Commission [2007] ECR II-3397 Google Scholar öffnen
  1025. Case T-135/05 Crampoli v Commission [2006] ECR II-A-2-1527 Google Scholar öffnen
  1026. Case T-141/05 RENV Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission (GC, 21 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1027. Case T-151/05 NVV and Others v Commission [2009] ECR II-1219 Google Scholar öffnen
  1028. Case T-185/05 Italy v Commission [2008] ECR II-3207 Google Scholar öffnen
  1029. Case T-237/05 Odile Jacobs v Commission [2010] ECR II-2245 Google Scholar öffnen
  1030. Case T-301/05 Guigard v Commission [2008] ECR I-31 Google Scholar öffnen
  1031. Case T-407/05 SAEME v OHMI [2007] ECR II-4385 Google Scholar öffnen
  1032. Case T-36/06 Bundesverbanddeutscher Banken v Commission [2010] ECR II-537 Google Scholar öffnen
  1033. Joined Cases T-50/06, T-56/06, T-60/06, T-62/06 and T-69/06 Ireland and Others v Commission [2007] ECR II-172 Google Scholar öffnen
  1034. T-63/06 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commissioö [2010] ECR II-177 Google Scholar öffnen
  1035. Case T-170/06 Alrosa v Commission [2007] ECR II-2601 Google Scholar öffnen
  1036. Case T-179/06 Commission v Onderzoek en Advies [2009] ECR II-64 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/BF03087525
  1037. Case T-190/06 Total SA and Others v Commission (GC, 14 July 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1038. Case T-217/06 Arkema France and Others v Commission [2011] ECR II-2593 Google Scholar öffnen
  1039. Case T-343/06 Shell Petroleum and Others v Commission (GC, 27 September 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1040. Case T-369/06 Holland Malt v Commission [2009] ECR II-3313 Google Scholar öffnen
  1041. Case T-19/07 Systran v Commission [2010] ECR II-6083 Google Scholar öffnen
  1042. Case T-24/07 ThyssenKrupp Stainless v Commission [2009] ECR II-2309 Google Scholar öffnen
  1043. Case T-97/07 Imelios v Commission [2008] ECR II-54 Google Scholar öffnen
  1044. Case T-111/07 Agrofert Holding v Commission [2010] ECR II-128 Google Scholar öffnen
  1045. Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp v Commission [2011] ECR II-5129 Google Scholar öffnen
  1046. Joined Cases T-166/07 and T-285/07 Italy v Commission [2010] ECR II-193 Google Scholar öffnen
  1047. Case T-205/07 Italy v Commission [2011] ECR II-15 Google Scholar öffnen
  1048. Case T-235/07 Bavaria v Commission [2011] ECR II-3229 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00247.2010
  1049. Case T-240/07 Heineken v Commission [2011] ECR II-3355 Google Scholar öffnen
  1050. Case T-256/07 People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council [2008] ECR II-3019 Google Scholar öffnen
  1051. Case T-263/07 Estonia v Commission [2009] ECR II-3463 Google Scholar öffnen
  1052. Case T-300/07 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2010] ECR II-4521 Google Scholar öffnen
  1053. Case T-326/07 Cheminova and Others v Commission [2009] ECR II-2685 Google Scholar öffnen
  1054. Case T-340/07 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2010] ECR II-16 Google Scholar öffnen
  1055. Case T-475/07 Dow AgroSciences v Commission (GC, 9 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1056. Case T-62/08 ThyssenKrupp v Commission [2010] ECR II-3229 Google Scholar öffnen
  1057. Case T-83/08 Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha and Others v Commission (GC, 2 February 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1058. Case T-117/08 Italy v EESC [2011] ECR II-1463 Google Scholar öffnen
  1059. Case T-121/08 PC-Ware Information Technologies v Commission [2010] ECR II-1541 Google Scholar öffnen
  1060. Case T-135/08 Schniga v CPVO [2010] ECR II-5089 Google Scholar öffnen
  1061. Case T-192/08 Kazchrome and Others v Council (GC, 25 October 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1062. Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08 Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais v Commission [2011] ECR II-1999 Google Scholar öffnen
  1063. Case T-284/08 People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council [2008] ECR II-3487 Google Scholar öffnen
  1064. Case T-380/08 Netherlands v Commission (GC, 13 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1065. Case T-387/08 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission [2010] ECR II-178 Google Scholar öffnen
  1066. Joined Cases T-394/08, T-408/08, T-453/08 and T-454/08 Regione autonomadella Sardegna and Others v Commission [2011] ECR II-6255 Google Scholar öffnen
  1067. Case T-424/08 Nexus Europe (Ireland) v Commission [2010] ECR II-96 Google Scholar öffnen
  1068. Case T-428/08 STEF v Commission (GC, 12 April 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1069. Case T-461/08 Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIB [2011] ECR II-6367 Google Scholar öffnen
  1070. Case T-481/08 Alisei v Commission [2010] ECR II-117 Google Scholar öffnen
  1071. Case T-584/08 Cantiere navale De Poli v Commission [2011] ECR II-63 Google Scholar öffnen
  1072. Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission [2011] ECR II-95 Google Scholar öffnen
  1073. Case T-9/09 P Marcuccio v Commission (GC, 24 November 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1074. Case T-85/09 Kadi v Commission [2010] ECR II-5177 Google Scholar öffnen
  1075. Case T-143/09 P Commission v Petrilli (GC, 16 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1076. Case T-218/09 Italy v Commission (GC, 12 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1077. Cases T-219/09 and T-326/09 Albertini and Others v EP [2010] ECR II-5935 Google Scholar öffnen
  1078. Case T-246/09 Insula v Commission (GC, 13 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1079. Case T-261/09 P Commission v Violetti and Others (GC, 20 May 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1080. Case T-286/09 Intel Corp. v Commission (GC, 12 June 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  1081. Case T-436/09 Dufour v ECB (GC, 26 October 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1082. Joined Cases T-458/09 and T-171/10 Slovak Telekom v Commission (GC, 22 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1083. Joined Cases T-29/10 and T-33/10 Netherlands and ING Groep v Commission (GC, 2 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1084. Case T-71/10 Xeda International and Others v Commission (GC, 19 January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1085. Case T-317/10 P L v Parliament (GC, 11 September 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1086. Case T-390/10 P Füller-Tomlinson v EP (GC, 6 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1087. Joined Cases T-439/10 and T-440/10 Fulmen (GC, 21 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1088. Case T-523/10 Interkobo v OHMI (GC, 27 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1089. Case T-107/11 P ETF v Schuerings (GC, 4 December 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1090. Case T-108/11 P ETF v Michel (GC, 4 December 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1091. Case T-116/11 EMA v Commission (GC, 11 December 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1092. Case T-119/11 Gbagbo v Council of the EU (GC, 25 April 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1093. Joined Cases T-229/11 and T-276/11 Lord Inglewood and Others v EP (GC, 13 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1094. Joined Cases T-346/11 and T-347/11 Gollnisch v EP (GC, 17 January 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/t18611-000
  1095. Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council (GC, 13 Septembre 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1096. Joined Cases T-174/12 and T-80/13 Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank v Council of the EU (GC, 4 February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  1097. Case T-368/12 P Commission v Macchia (GC, 21 May 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  1098. Case-law of the Civil Service Tribunal of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  1099. Joined Cases F-5/05 and F-7/05 Violetti and Others v Commission [2009] ECR Staff CasesI-A-1-83; II-A-1-473 Google Scholar öffnen
  1100. Case F-23/05 Giraudy v Commission [2007] ECR I-A-1-121 Google Scholar öffnen
  1101. Case F-36/05 Schulze v Commission (CST, 30 September 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1102. Case F-40/05 Andreasen v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-337; FP-II-A-1-1859 Google Scholar öffnen
  1103. Case F-44/05 RENV Strack v Commission (CST, 23 October 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1104. Joined Cases F-51/05 and F-18/06 Duyster v Commission (CST, 13 December 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  1105. Case F-87/05 Ott and Others v Commission [2006] ECR FP-I-A-1-73; FP-II-A-1-263 Google Scholar öffnen
  1106. Case F-95/05 N v Commission [2007] ECR Staff Cases I-A-423; II-A-1-2395 Google Scholar öffnen
  1107. Case F-107/05 Toth v Commission (CST, 30 September 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1108. Joined Cases F-124/05 and F-96/06 A and G v Commission (CST, 13 January 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1109. Case F-125/05 Tsarnavas v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-43; FP-II-A-1-231 Google Scholar öffnen
  1110. Case F-1/06 Fernández Ortiz v Commission [2007] Staff Cases I-A-1-53; II-A-1-293 Google Scholar öffnen
  1111. Case F-28/06 Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-431; FP-A-1-2443 Google Scholar öffnen
  1112. Case F-99/06 López Teruel v OHMI [2007] ECR FP-I-A-1-147; FP-II-A-1-797 Google Scholar öffnen
  1113. Case F-133/06 Marcuccio v Commission (CST, 4 November 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  1114. Case F-147/06 Dragoman v Commission [2008] ECR Staff Cases I-A-1-265; II-A-1-1411 Google Scholar öffnen
  1115. Case F-5/07 Nijs v Court of Auditors [2008] ECR FP-I-A-1-207; FP-II-A-1-1145 Google Scholar öffnen
  1116. Case F-7/07 Angioi v Commission (CST, 29 June 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1117. Case F-9/07 Angé Serrano v Parliament (CST, 29 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1118. Case F-25/07 Bleser v CJEU (CJEU, 14 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1119. Case F-45/07 Wolfgang Mandt v EP (CST, 1 July 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1120. Case F-51/07 Bui Van v Commission (CST, 11 September 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  1121. Case F-63/07 Patsarika v Cedefop [2009] ECR I-A-1-39; II-A-1-159 Google Scholar öffnen
  1122. Joined Cases F-116/07, F-13/08 and F-31/08 Tomas v Parliament (CST, 7 July 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1123. Case F-122/07 Marcuccio v Commission [2009] Staff Cases I-A-1-385; II-A-1-2057 Google Scholar öffnen
  1124. Case F-30/08 Nanopoulos v Commission (CST 11 May 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1125. Case F-33/08 V v Commission [2009] ECR Staff Cases I-A-1-403; II-A-1-2159 Google Scholar öffnen
  1126. Case F-80/08 Wenig v Commission [2009] ECR Staff Cases I-A-1-479; II-A-1-2609 Google Scholar öffnen
  1127. Case F-87/08 Schuerings v ETF (CST, 9 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1128. Case F-88/08 Vandeuren v ETF (CST, 9 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1129. Case F-96/08 Cerafogli v European Central Bank (CST, 28 October 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1130. Case F-53/09 J v Commission (CST, 11 May 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1131. Case F-59/09 De Nicola v European Invest Bank (CST, 8 March 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1132. Case F-63/09 Donati v ECB (CST, 13 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1133. Case F-77/09 Nijs v Court of Auditors (CST, 13 January 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1134. Case F-79/09 AE v Commission (CST, 14 September 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1135. Case F-82/09 Nolin v Commission (CST, 1 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  1136. Joined Cases F-88/09 and F-48/10 Z v Court of Justice of the European Union (CST, 5 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1137. Case F-9/10 AC v Council (CST, 28 September 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1138. Case F-12/10 Kerstens v Commission (CST, 8 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1139. Case F-36/10 Rapone v Commission (CST, 28 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1140. Case F-41/10 Bermeja Garde v European Economic and Social Committee (CST, 25 September 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1141. Case F-42/10 Skareby v Commission (CST, 16 May 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1142. Case F-43/10 Cerafogli v European Central Bank (CST, 12 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1143. Case F-49/10 De Nicola v EIB (CST, 28 June 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1144. Case F-54/10 Verheyden v Commission (CST, 4 February 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  1145. Case F-85/10 AI v Court of Justice (CST, 11 July 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1146. Case F-91/10 AK v Commission (CST, 13 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1147. Case F-104/10 de Pretis Cagnodo and Others v Commission (CST, 16 May 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1148. Case F-112/10 Trentea v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (CST, 11 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1149. Case F-2/11 BW v Commission (CST, 13 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1150. Case F-31/11 BI v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CST, 7 March 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1151. Case F-46/11 Tzirani v Commission (CST, 11 July 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1152. Case F-63/11 Macchia v Commission (CST 13 June 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1153. Case F-94/11 Brune v Commission (CST, 21 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1154. Case F-97/11 Vienne v European Parliament (CST, 11 December 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  1155. Case F-13/12 BR v Commission (CST 19 March 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1156. Case F-39/12 BQ v Court of Auditors of the EU (CST, 23 October 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1157. Case F-103/12 Doyle v Europol (CST, 5 November 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00328-7
  1158. Case F-111/12 Nardone v Commission (CST, 2 October 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  1159. Case F-8/13 CP v EP (CST, 26 March 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  1160. Case F-5/14 R CX v Commission (CST, 13 February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  1161. Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights Google Scholar öffnen
  1162. Neumeister v Austria App no 1936/63 (ECtHR, 7 May 1974) – Individual dissenting opinion of Judge Zekia Google Scholar öffnen
  1163. Wemhoff v Germany App no 2122/64 (ECtHR, 27 June 1968) Google Scholar öffnen
  1164. König v Germany App no 6232/73 (ECtHR, 28 Juin 1978) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/best.197800140
  1165. Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium App no 6878/75; 7238/75 (ECtHR, 23 June 1981) Google Scholar öffnen
  1166. Albert and Le Compte v Belgium App no 7299/75; 7496/76 (ECtHR, 10 February 1983) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(83)90310-7
  1167. Eckle v Germany App no 8130/78 (ECtHR, 21 June 1983) Google Scholar öffnen
  1168. Piersack v Belgium App no 8692/79 (ECtHR, 26 October 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  1169. Kamasinski v Austria App no 9783/82 (ECtHR, 19 December 1989) Google Scholar öffnen
  1170. Brozicek v Italy App no 10964/84 (ECtHR, 19 December 1989) Google Scholar öffnen
  1171. Imbrioscia v Switzerland App no 13972/88 (ECtHR, 24 November 1993) Google Scholar öffnen
  1172. Schuler Zgraggen v Switzerland App no 14518/89 (ECtHR, 24 June 1993) Google Scholar öffnen
  1173. Hornsby v Greece App no 18357/91 (ECtHR, 19 March 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  1174. Ruiz Torija v Spain App no 18390/91 (ECtHR, 9 December 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  1175. Garyfallou Aebe v Greece App no 18996/91 (ECtHR, 24 September 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  1176. Bryan v UK App no 19178/91 (ECtHR, 22 November 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  1177. Acquaviva v France App no 19248/91 (ECtHR, 21 November 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  1178. Georgiadis v Grece App no 21522/93 (ECtHR, 29 Mai 1997) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1300/J120v27n57_12
  1179. Pélissier and Sassi v France App no 25444/94 (ECtHR, 25 March 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  1180. Cyprus v Turkey App no 25781/94 (ECtHR, 10 May 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  1181. Selmouni v France App no 25803/94 (ECtHR, 28 July 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  1182. Kingsley v UK App no 35605/97 (ECtHR, 28 May 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  1183. Ekin Association v France App no 39288/98 (ECtHR, 17 July 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  1184. Loiseau v France App no 46809/99 (ECtHR, 18 November 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  1185. Sejdovic v Italy App no 56581/00 (ECtHR, 1 March 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  1186. Sakkopoulos v Grece App no 61828/00 (ECtHR, 15 January 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  1187. Pizzati v Italy App no 62361/00 (ECtHR, 29 March 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  1188. Jussila v Finland App no 73053/01 (ECtHR, 23 November 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  1189. Alija v Grece App no 73717/01 (ECtHR, 7 April 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  1190. Kakamoukas and Others v Greece App no 38311/02 (ECtHR, 15 February 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  1191. Gorou v Greece App no 12686/03 (ECtHR, 20 March 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  1192. Matky v Czech Republic App no 19101/03 (ECtHR, 10 July 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  1193. Dubus v France App no 5242/04 (ECtHR, 11 Juin 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  1194. Tillack v Belgium App no 20477/05 (ECtHR, 27 November 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  1195. Golder v UK App no 4451/10 (ECtHR, 21 February 1975) Google Scholar öffnen
  1196. National case-law: Google Scholar öffnen
  1197. France Google Scholar öffnen
  1198. CE 4 March 1949, Trèbes Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2928977
  1199. CE 29 April 1949, Bourdeaux Google Scholar öffnen
  1200. CE 7 July 1965 Fédération nationale des transports routiers, Lebon Google Scholar öffnen
  1201. CE 9 November 1966, Commune de Clohars-Carnoët (conclusions of President Braibant) Google Scholar öffnen
  1202. CE 5 May 1995 Burruchaga Google Scholar öffnen
  1203. CE 3 December 1999 Didier Google Scholar öffnen
  1204. CE 26 May 2008 Société Norelec Google Scholar öffnen
  1205. Romania Google Scholar öffnen
  1206. Decisions n° 2668 of 20 May 2010 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice Google Scholar öffnen
  1207. Decision n° 118 of 21 January 2011 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice Google Scholar öffnen
  1208. UK Google Scholar öffnen
  1209. R v Chancellor of the University of Cambridge (Dr Bentley's Case) [1723] Str 557 Google Scholar öffnen
  1210. Doody v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1994] 1 AC 531 Google Scholar öffnen
  1211. R. v Higher Education Funding Council ex parte Institute of Dental Surgery [1994] 1 All ER 651 Google Scholar öffnen
  1212. R. (on the application of Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and other cases [2001] HRLR 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  1213. Table of International Legal Acts Google Scholar öffnen
  1214. International Treaties and Conventions Google Scholar öffnen
  1215. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [1950] 213 UNTS 222 Google Scholar öffnen
  1216. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [1976] General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) Google Scholar öffnen
  1217. The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Access to Information, public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, signed in Aarhus (Århus), Denmark [2001] Google Scholar öffnen
  1218. Council of Europe Convention on Access to official documents [2009] Google Scholar öffnen
  1219. European Resolutions and Recommendations Google Scholar öffnen
  1220. Council of Europe Resolution (77) 31 of 28 September 1977 on the Protection of the Individual in Relation to the Acts of Administrative Authorities Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900025352
  1221. Council of Europe Recommendation R(97)7 on Local Public Services an the Rights of their Users (1 April 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  1222. Council of Europe Recommendation R(80)2 concerning the exercise of discretionary powers by administrative authorities (11 March 1980) Google Scholar öffnen
  1223. Council of Europe Recommendation R(2000)10 on codes of conduct for public officials (11 May 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  1224. Council of Europe Interim Resolution Res DH (2000)135 of 25 October 2000 on excessive length of judicial proceedings in Italy Google Scholar öffnen
  1225. Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec (2007)7, which added – in Appendix – a Code of good administration (20 June 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  1226. Table of Legal Acts of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  1227. Treaties and Conventions of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  1228. Treaty instituting the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty [1951] 261 UNTS 140 Google Scholar öffnen
  1229. Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC Treaty/Treaty of Rome) [1957] 294 UNTS 17 Google Scholar öffnen
  1230. Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom Treaty/EAEC Treaty) [1957] 294 UNTS 259/OJ 2010 C 84/1 (Consolidated Version) Google Scholar öffnen
  1231. Treaty establishing the European Community (EEC/EC) (Codified Version) [1992] OJ C 224/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1232. Treaty on the European Union 1992 (Maastricht Treaty) [1992] OJ C 191/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1233. Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts (Treaty of Amsterdam) [1997] OJ C 340/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1234. Treaty establishing the European Community [1997] OJ C 340 Google Scholar öffnen
  1235. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2000] OJ C 364/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1236. Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe [2004] OJ C 310/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1237. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2007] OJ C 303/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1238. Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2008] OJ C 115/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1239. Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) (TEU) [2010] OJ C 83/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1240. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version) (TFEU) [2010] OJ C 83/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1241. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2010] OJ C 83/389 Google Scholar öffnen
  1242. Regulations Google Scholar öffnen
  1243. EEC Council Regulation 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community [1958] OJ 17/385 Google Scholar öffnen
  1244. Council Regulation 3 concerning social security for migrant workers [1958] OJ 30/561 Google Scholar öffnen
  1245. EEC Council Regulation 17: First Regulation Implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty [1962] OJ 13/204 Google Scholar öffnen
  1246. Council Regulation 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community [1968] OJ L 257/2 Google Scholar öffnen
  1247. Council Regulation (EEC) 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community [1971] OJ L 149/2 Google Scholar öffnen
  1248. Council Regulation (EEC) 355/77 of 15 February 1977 on common measures to improve the conditions under which agricultural products are processed and marketed [1977] OJ L 51/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1249. Commission Regulation (EEC) 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific or cultural materials [1979] OJ L 318/32 Google Scholar öffnen
  1250. Council Regulation (EEC) 3017/79 of 20 December 1979 on protection against dumped and subsidized imports from countries non members of the European Economic Community [1979] OJ L 339/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1251. Council Regulation (EEC) 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [1989] OJ L 395/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1252. Council Regulation (EEC) 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin [1990] OJ L 224/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1253. Council Regulation (EEC) 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [1992] OJ L 302/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1254. Commission Regulation (EEC) 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [1993] OJ L 253/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1255. Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark [1994] OJ L 11/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1256. Council Regulation (EC) 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1996] OJ L 56/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1257. Council Regulation (EC) 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the Application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [1999] OJ L 083/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1258. European Parliament and Council Regulation 1073/1999 of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) [1999] OJ L 136/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1259. Commission Regulation 823/2000 of 19 April 2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies [2000] OJ L 100/24 Google Scholar öffnen
  1260. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 45/2001 of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [2001] OJ L 8/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1261. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents [2001] OJ L 145/43 Google Scholar öffnen
  1262. Council Regulation 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2003] OJ L 1/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1263. Regulation (EC) 1641/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2003 amending Council Regulation (EEC) 1210/90 on the establishment of the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network [2003] OJ L 245/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1264. Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) [2004] OJ L 24/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1265. Commission Regulation (EC) 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty [2004] OJ L 123, pp. 18-24 Google Scholar öffnen
  1266. Commission Notice on the handling of complainants by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty [2004] OJ C 101/65 Google Scholar öffnen
  1267. Commission Regulation 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [2004] OJ L 140/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1268. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1367/2006 of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies [2006] OJ L 264/13 Google Scholar öffnen
  1269. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1331/2008 of 16 December 2008 establishing a common authorization procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings [2008] OJ L 354/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1270. Council Regulation (EC) 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Community [2009] OJ L 188/93 Google Scholar öffnen
  1271. Council Regulation (EU) 1260/2012 of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements [2012] OJ L 361/89 Google Scholar öffnen
  1272. Directives Google Scholar öffnen
  1273. Council Directive 64/221/EEC of 25 February 1964 on the co-ordination of special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health [1964] OJ 56/850 Google Scholar öffnen
  1274. Council Directive 71/118/EEC of 15 February 1971 on health problems affecting trade in fresh poultrymeat [1971] OJ L 55/23 Google Scholar öffnen
  1275. Council Directive 92/116/EEC of 17 December 1992 amending and updating Directive 71/118/EEC on health problems affecting trade in fresh poultrymeat [1993] OJ L 62/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1276. European Parliament and Council Directive 2003/4/EC of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC [2003] OJ L 41/26 Google Scholar öffnen
  1277. Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification [2003] OJ L 251/12 Google Scholar öffnen
  1278. EP and Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member states (amending Regulation (EEC) N° 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC) [2004] OJ L 158/77 Google Scholar öffnen
  1279. Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status [2005] OJ L 326/13 Google Scholar öffnen
  1280. European Parliament and Council Directive 2007/46/EC of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles [2007] OJ L 263/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1281. European Parliament and Council Directive 2010/64/EU of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings [2010] OJ L 280/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1282. European Parliament and Council Directive 2012/29/EU of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA [2012] OJ L 315/57 Google Scholar öffnen
  1283. Decisions Google Scholar öffnen
  1284. Council Decision 93/731/EC on public access to Council documents [1993] OJ L 340/43 Google Scholar öffnen
  1285. Council Decision 93/662/EC of 6 December 1993 adopting the Council’s Rules of Procedure [1993] OJ L 304/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1286. Council Decision 93/731/EC on public access to Council documents [1993] OJ L 340/43 Google Scholar öffnen
  1287. Commission Decision 94/90/ECSC, EC, Euratom on public access to Commission documents [1994] OJ L 46/58 Google Scholar öffnen
  1288. Commission Decision 2496/96/ECSC of 18 December 1996 establishing Community rules for State aid to the steel industry [1996] OJ L 338 Google Scholar öffnen
  1289. Decision of the Committee of the Regions of 17 September 1997 concerning public access to documents of the Committee of the Regions [1997] OJ L 351/70 Google Scholar öffnen
  1290. Economic and Social Committee Decision on public access to ESC documents [1997] OJ L 339/18 Google Scholar öffnen
  1291. European Parliament Decision 97/632/EC, ECSC, Euratom on public access to European Parliament documents [1997] OJ L 263/27 Google Scholar öffnen
  1292. Commission’s Decision 2000/117/EC of 26 October 1999 concerning a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty Case IV/33.884 – Nederlandse Federative Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied and Technische Unie (FEG and TU) (notified under document number C(1999) 3439)) [2000] OJ L 39/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1293. Commission Decision 2000/627/EC of 16 May 2000 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (IV/34.018 – Far East Trade Tariff Charges and Surcharges Agreement (FETTCSA)) (notified under number C(2000) 1170) [2000] OJ L 268 Google Scholar öffnen
  1294. Council Decision 2001/840/EC of 29 November 2001 amending the Council’s Rules of Procedure [2001] OJ L 313/40 Google Scholar öffnen
  1295. Commission Decision 2001/937/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 5 December 2001 amending its rules of procedure (C (2001)3714) [2001] OJ L 345/94 Google Scholar öffnen
  1296. Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [2002] OJ L 190/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1297. Decision of the European Central Bank 2004/258/EC of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents (ECB/2004/3), [2004] OJ L 80/42 Google Scholar öffnen
  1298. Discussion Document of the Court of Justice of the European Union on Certain Aspects of the Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (5 May 2010), available on ˂www.curia.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1299. Commission Decision 2011/276/EU of 26 May 2010 concerning state aid in the form of a tax settlement agreement implemented by Belgium in favour of Umicore SA [2011] OJ L 122/76 Google Scholar öffnen
  1300. Resolutions, Declarations, Communications, Preliminary Workings and Reports of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  1301. European Commission (DG for employment, industrial relations and social affairs) Report of the expert group on fundamental rights ‘Affirming fundamental rights in the European Union. Time to act’ (1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  1302. European Commission Communication COM/2000/1 final of 2 February 2002 on the precautionary principle Google Scholar öffnen
  1303. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (2000/C 177 E/10) COM(2000) 30 final 2000/0032(COD) Google Scholar öffnen
  1304. European Parliament Report A5-0318/2000 of 27 October 2000 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents (COM(2000)30 – C5-0057/2000 – 2000/0032(COD)) Google Scholar öffnen
  1305. European Commission Communication COM (2000) 559 final of 13 September 2000 on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Google Scholar öffnen
  1306. Joined Declaration relating to Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents [2001] OJ L 173/5 Google Scholar öffnen
  1307. The Commission’s Report COM(2004) 45 final of 30 January 2004 on the implementation of the principles in EC Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents Google Scholar öffnen
  1308. The Commission’s Proposal of 30 April 2008 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, Brussels, COM(2008) 229 final, 2008/0090 (COD) Google Scholar öffnen
  1309. Opinion of the EDPS of 30 June 2008 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, available on ˂www.edps.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1310. European Parliament Resolution of 14 January 2009 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (implementation of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001) (2007/2154(INI)), available on ˂ www.europarl.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1311. Joint Communication from the Presidents of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, delivered on 24 January 2011, further to the meeting between the two courts in January 2011, available on ˂www.curia.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1312. European Parliament Resolution of 14 September 2011 on public access to documents (Rule 104(7)) for the years 2009-2010 (2010/2294(INI)), para 36, available on ˂www.europarl.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1313. Answer given by Mr Barroso on behalf of the Commission to the parliamentary question raised by Ms Anneli Jäätteenmäki (17 January 2012) – E-011125/2011, available on ˂ec.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1314. European Parliament, ‘Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union: European Added Value Assessment’ (2012) available on ˂http://www.europarl.europa.eu ˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1315. European Parliament Resolution of 15 January 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on a Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union (2012/2024(INI)), available on ˂www.europarl.europa.eu˃ Google Scholar öffnen
  1316. Codes of Conduct, Rules and Guidelines of the EU Google Scholar öffnen
  1317. 93/730/EC: Code of conduct concerning public access to Council and Commission documents [1993] OJ 340/41 Google Scholar öffnen
  1318. Rules on public access to documents adopted by the Bank [European Investment Bank]’s Management Committee [1997] OJ C 24/13 Google Scholar öffnen
  1319. Code of Good Administrative Behaviour for Staff of the European Commission and their Relations with the Public [2000] OJ L 267/20 Google Scholar öffnen
  1320. Guide to the obligations of officials and other servants of the European parliament (Code of conduct) [2000] OJ C 97/1 Google Scholar öffnen
  1321. European Ombudsman, ‘European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’ (Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2005), pp. 1-20 Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex