, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Arms Export Controls under Siege of Globalisation

Defeated Nation States or Voluntary Surrender?
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

Während die Verteidigungsindustrie zunehmend transnational ausgerichtet ist, findet Rüstungsexportkontrolle nach wie vor auf nationaler Ebene statt. Am Beispiel des deutschen Exportkontrollregimes analysiert diese Arbeit, ob sich aus der gegenwärtigen Situation Kontrollrisiken ergeben, die deutsche sicherheitspolitische Grundsätze untergraben könnten. Auf der Grundlage dreier Fallstudien wird festgestellt: Der transnationale Rüstungshandel wirft eine Reihe von Kontrollproblemen auf. Aufgrund politischer Intensionen und institutioneller Limitationen werden die Möglichkeiten staatlicher Einflussnahme nicht voll ausgeschöpft. Ausgehend von den empirischen Erkenntnissen werden neue wissenschaftstheoretische Folgerungen entwickelt.


Publikation durchsuchen


Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4563-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7618-7
Verlag
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
102
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten I - X
  2. 1.0 Introduction Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 3
    1. 2.1 Literature Review Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.0 Theoretical Foundations Kein Zugriff Seiten 7 - 9
      1. 4.1 Liberalisation / Privatisation in Germany Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2 The Cold War Caesura Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3 The Organisation of the EU Defence Industry Today Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.1.1 COCOM and Wassenaar Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.1.2 The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.1 Exclusion of Military Goods from EU Competence Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.2 Split of Dual-Use and Defence Related Goods Kein Zugriff
        3. 5.2.3 The EC Dual Use-Regulation - Legal Provisions and Practical Impact Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.3.1 From a Political Code to a Legal Common Position Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.3.2 Inconsistencies in the Implementation of the Common Position Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.4 COARM and the New Intergovernmentalism Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.0 Conclusions: Economic and Regulatory Developments Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.1 The War Weapons Control Act Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.2 The Foreign Trade and Payments Act (AWG) Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.3 Principles for the Export of War Weapons and Other Military Equipment Kein Zugriff
      4. 7.4 Regulatory Oversight over License Decisions Kein Zugriff
    1. 8.0 Legal Ambiguity Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.1 The Eurofighter Typhoon Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.2 Integrated Parts and Exemptions from End-Use Declarations Kein Zugriff
      3. 9.3 Application and Implementation of Guidelines Kein Zugriff
      4. 9.4 International Framework Agreements Kein Zugriff
      5. 9.5 Evaluation: Armament Cooperation Kein Zugriff
      6. 9.6 Theorising Armament Cooperation Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.1 Small Arms: Market and Perceptions Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.2 Government Stance and Policy Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.3 Restriction on the Delivery of Key Components Kein Zugriff
      4. 10.4 Legal Impediments Kein Zugriff
      5. 10.5 Post-Shipment Controls Kein Zugriff
      6. 10.6 Evaluation: License Production of Small Arms Kein Zugriff
      7. 10.7 Theorising License Production of Small Arms Kein Zugriff
      1. 11.1 The Structure of the Rheinmetall Group Kein Zugriff
      2. 11.2 Rheinmetall Relations with the German Government Kein Zugriff
      3. 11.3 Government Stance and Policy Kein Zugriff
      4. 11.4 Technical Assistance and the Export of Data Kein Zugriff
      5. 11.5 Exerting Political Pressure Kein Zugriff
      6. 11.6 Evaluation: Affiliated Companies and Joint Ventures Abroad Kein Zugriff
      7. 11.7 Theorising Affiliated Companies and Joint Ventures Abroad Kein Zugriff
    2. 12.0 Conclusion and Outlook Kein Zugriff
  4. 13.0 Bibliography Kein Zugriff Seiten 79 - 90
  5. Annex I: Interview Overview Kein Zugriff Seiten 91 - 91
  6. Annex II: Practical example of Dual-Use licensing Kein Zugriff Seiten 92 - 93
  7. Annex III: The EU Common Position Criteria Kein Zugriff Seiten 94 - 94
  8. Annex IV: Glossary Kein Zugriff Seiten 95 - 102

Literaturverzeichnis (139 Einträge)

  1. 13.0 Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Alves, Péricles Gasparini. 1992. “Access to outer space technologies: implications for international security.” Vol. 15. United Nations Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Amnesty International. 2017. “Geneva: As global arms trade surges, states greenlight reckless, harmful deals.” https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/09/geneva-as-global-arms-trade-surges-states greenlight-reckless-harmful-deals/ Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Assemblée Nationale. 2000. Rapport d’information sur le contrôle des exportations d'armement. Présenté par Jean-Claude Sandrier, Christian Martin et Alain Veyret, Députés. No. 2334. Paris, 25 Avril, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Baldwin, Richard, and Philippe Martin.1999. “Two waves of globalisation: superficial similarities,fundamental differences.“ National Bureau of Economic Research, 01 January, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Balsiger, Jörg.2019. Logic of appropriateness. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2019. https://www.britannica.com/topic/logic-of-appropriateness Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, 23 May, 1949. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Bellais, Renaud, and Susan Jackson. 2014. “Defence Firms beyond National Borders: Internationalisation or Multi-Domestic Approach?.” In The evolving boundaries of defence: an assessment of recent shifts in defence activities, 231-249. Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Béraud-Sudreau .2014. “French adaptation strategies for arms export controls since the 1990s.” Paris Paper no. 10. Strategic Research Institute of the French Military Academy (IRSEM). Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Bickel, Markus. 2017. Die Profiteure des Terrors wie Deutschland an Kriegen verdient und arabische Diktaturen stärkt. Westend Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Bickerton, Christopher, Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. 2015. “The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post‐Maastricht Era”. Journal of Common Market Studies,53(4): 703-722. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Bitzinger, Richard. 1994. “The globalization of the arms industry: The next proliferation challenge.” International Security 19, no. 2 170-198. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Bode, Hans- Günter, and Heinz Gläser. 1978. Rüstung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Regensburg: Walhalla & Praetoria. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Bomben für die Welt. 2018. Directed by Philipp Grüll and Karl Hoffman. ARD. Germany. 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Bröker, Anja, and Christian Thiels. 2018. “Eurofighter für Katar - Deutschland macht mit.” Tageschau. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/eurofighter-katar-101.html Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bromley, Mark, and Hugh Griffiths. 2010. “End-user certificates: improving standards to prevent diversion”. SIPRI, no. 2010/3. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bromley, Mark. 2012. “The Review of the EU Common Position on Arms Exports: Prospects for Strengthened Control”. EU Non-Proliferation Consortium. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Bromley, Mark., Neil Cooper, and Paul Holtom. 2012. “The UN Arms Trade Treaty: arms export controls, the human security agenda and the lessons of history”. International Affairs 88(5): 1029-1048. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Brooks, Stephen. 2005. Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the changing of conflict. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Brüggemann, Michael, and Hartmut Wessler. 2012. Transnationale Kommunikation. Eine Einführung. Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Brzoska, Michael, and Hartmut Küchle. “Folgen, Auswirkungen und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten internationaler Abkommen für eine restriktive deutsche Rüstungsexportpolitik.” BICC, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle BAFA. 2017. “Endverbleibs-dokumente - Erläuterungenzur praktischen Verwendung von Endverbleibs-dokumenten”. August 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (BpB) 2012. “Fallstudie Kleinwaffen in Deutschland”. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Coalition Treaty. 2018. “Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa, Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland, Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land. Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD.” 12 March, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Cops, Diederik, Nils Duquet, and Gregory Gourdin. 2017. Towards Europeanised arms export controls.Comparing control systems in EU Member States. Flemish Peace Institute. Artoos. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, Official Journal of the European Union, L335, 08 December 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Davis, Ian. 2002.The Regulation of Arms and Dual-Use Exports; Germany, Sweden and the UK. PhD diss. Oxford. University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. DeVore, Marc. 2013. “Arms production in the global village: Options for adapting to defense-industrial globalization.” Security studies 22, 532-572. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Eavis, Paul. and Shannon A. 1994. “Arms and dual-use export controls: priorities for the European Union.” Saferworld Briefing, London, June 1994. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Elman, Colin. 1996. “Horses for courses: Why nor neorealist theories of foreign policy?”. Security Studies 6: 7-53. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. European Commission. 2015. Final Report: Data and information collection for EU dual use export control policy review. Written by SIPRI and Ecorys. Brussels 06 November, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. European Commission. 2016. Impact Assessment. Report on the EU Export Control Policy Review. Brussels: 28 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. European Commission. 2018. Impact Assessment. Proposal for a Regulation establishing the European Defence Fund. Brussels, 13 June 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. European Council. 2000. “Joint Action concerning the control of technical assistance related to certain military end-uses.” 2000/401/CFSP. Official Journal of the European Communities, L159, 30 June 2000: 216-217. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. European Council. 2008. “Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 08 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment”. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. European Council. 2009. “Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items”. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. European Council. 2018. “Nineteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment.” Official Journal of the European Union. 14 February, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. European Parliament. 2018. “Draft Report on the Council’s annual report in accordance with Operative Provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports.” Committee on Foreign Affairs. 29 June, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. European Parliamentary Research Service Blog. 2015. “EU Rules on Control of Arms Exports.” 14 December, 2015. https://epthinktank.eu/2015/12/14/eu-rules-on-control-of-arms-exports/. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. European Union, Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 13 December, 2007/C 115/01. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. European Union, Treaty Establishing the European Community (Consolidated Version), Rome Treaty. 25 March, 1957. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. European Union, Treaty on the European Union (Consolidated Version), Treaty of Maastricht, 7 February 1992, Official Journal of the European Communities 325/5. 24 December, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Export Manager. 2018. North-America. Frankfurt Business Media. Edition 9. 14, November 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Farnborough Agreement. 2000. “Framework Agreement between The French Republic, The Federal Republic of Germany, The Italian Republic, The Kingdom of Spain, The Kingdom of Sweden and The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Concerning Measures to Facilitate the Restructuring and Operation of the European Defence Industry.” Farnborough Air Show, 27 July, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Federal Government. 2004. Antwort auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Erich G.Fritz u.a. Drucksache 15/2363. Berlin. 15 January, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Federal Government. 2010. “Waffenexporte - Kontrolle des Endverbleibs deutscher Kriegswaffen und Rüstungsgüter.“ Drucksache 17/3861. Deutscher Bundestag, 23 November, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Federal Government. 2010. Antwort auf Kleine Anfrage von Jan Van Aken, Christine Buchholz, Dr. Diether Dehm. “Waffenexporte - Kontrolle des Endverbleibs deutscher Kriegswaffen und Rüstungsgüter.” Drucksache 17/3861. 23 November. 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Federal Government. 2015. “Rüstungsexportentscheidungen des Bundes-sicherheitsrates.” Drucksache 18/4194. Deutscher Bundestag, 04 March, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Federal Government. 2015. Antwort auf die Kleine Anfrage von Jan van Aken, Christine Buchholz, Annette Groth und der Fraktion DIE LINKE.“Fusion von Krauss-Maffei Wegmann und Nexter.” Drucksache 18/5511. 08 July, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Federal Government. 2015. Strategy Paper of the Federal Government on Strengthening the Defence Industry in Germany. Berlin, 21 July, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Federal Government. 2016. Antwort auf die Kleine Anfrage von Jan van Aken. “Genehmigungen für den Rüstungsexport nach Saudi-Arabien im zweiten Halbjahr 2015.” Drucksache18/7274. 15 January, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. 2018.“A restrictive, responsible policy on the export of military equipment.” Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Federal Ministry For Economic Affairs and Energy. 2019. “Principles of the German Federal Government governing the export of small arms and light weapons, corresponding ammunition and production equipment to third countries.” (“Small Arm Principles”) 29 May, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Federal Ministry of Defence. 2016. “White Paper On German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr.” Berlin, 13 July 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Foreign Relations. 2018. [Electronic] US Code of Federal Regulations, title 22. 28 March, 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Foreign Trade and Payments Act of 6 June 2013 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 1482), as last amended by Article 4 of the Act of 20 July 2017 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 2789). Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance of 02 August 2013 (Federal Law Gazette [BGBl.] Part I p. 2865), as last amended by Article 1 of the Ordinance of 19 December, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Friederichs, Hauke. 2014. “Die Sünden der deutschen Rüstungsexporte.” Zeit Online, 2 June, 2014. https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2014-06/ruestung-waffen-export Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Friederichs, Hauke. 2017. “Heckler & Koch: Gewinner des Jahres.“ Zeit Online, 11 December, 2017. https://www.zeit.de/2017/51/heckler-koch-waffen-waffenexporte-umsatz Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Gabelnick, Tamar, and Anna Rich. 2000. “Globalized weaponry.” Social Justice 27.4 (82 (2000): 37-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Gebauer, Matthias. 2015a. “Deutsche Gewehre im Jemen: Bundesregierung gibt Lücke bei Waffenexport-Kontrolle zu.” Spiegel Online, 12 June, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. ——— .2015b. “Kampf gegen den IS: Deutscher Waffen-Nachschub für die Peschmerga.“ Spiegel Online 18 December, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. ———. 2016. “Urteil im Fall Heckler & Koch: Regierung muss über Waffenexport nach Saudi-Arabien entscheiden.“ Spiegel Online, 23 June, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Grässlin, Jürgen. 2013. Schwarzbuch Waffenhandel: Wie Deutschland Am Krieg Verdient. Heyne Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Griffiths, Philip. 2018. “The Wassenaar Arrangement: Transparency and Effectiveness in Regulating Transfers of Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies.” International Seminar on strategic Export Controls. Islamabad 09 May, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Guay, Terrence. 2009. “Globalization and the Transatlantic Defense Industrial Base.” UNISCI Discussion Papers no. 19 (January): 86-109. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. H&K AG. 2018. “Consolidated financial statements as of 31 December 2017 and Group management report.” https://www.heckler-koch.com/de/ir/abschluesse.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Handelsbatt. 2018.“Rheinmetall exportiert weiter Waffen nach Saudi-Arabien.” 12 December, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Hansen, Susanne Therese. 2016. “Taking ambiguity seriously: Explaining the indeterminacy of the European Union conventional arms export control regime”. European Journal of International Relations, 22(1): 192-216. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Harnisch, Sebastian, and Hanns Maull. 2001. Germany as a civilian power? The foreign policy of the Berlin Republic. Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Hauge, Rod, Martin Harrop, and Shaun Breslin. 2016. Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. 10th Edition. MacMillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Herby, Peter. 1999. “Arms availability and the situation of civilians in armed conflict - Summary of an ICRC study for the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent”. Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross 81, no. 835: 669-672. doi:10.1017/S1560775500059861. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Holtom, Paul and Irene Pavesi. 2017. “Trade Update 2017-Out of the Shadows.” Small Arm Survey, 2017.http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/S-Trade-Update/SAS-Trade-Update-2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. How did bombs made in Italy kill a family in Yemen?. 2017. Directed by Malachy Browne and Barbara Marcolini. The New York Times. 29 December, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. James, Andrew. 2002. “Comparing European responses to defence industry globalization.” Defence & security analysis 18, 123-143. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. James, Andrew. 2019. “EU and US revenues in home and international market by Frost and Sullivan 2014.” The Political Economy of the Defence Industry. Sciences Po Paris, 12 March, 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Joint Conference Church and Development GKKE. 2017. Arms Export Report presented by the GKKE Working group on Arms Exports. 18 December, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Joyner, Daniel. 2017. Non-proliferation export controls: origins, challenges, and proposals for strengthening. Ashgate Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Karp, Aaron. 2018. “Estimating global Civilian-held firearms numbers.” Small Arms Survey, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Katzenstein, Peter. 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Kimball, Daryl. 2017. “Fact Sheets & Briefs The Wassenaar Arrangement at a Glance.” Arms Control Association, 11 December, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Knight, Ben. 2017. Deutsche Welle: “UN’S Arms Trade Treaty `too weak to make a difference´.” Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Knöpfle, Claudia. 2017. “Endverbleibskontrolle exportierter Waffen hat begonnen.” Bayrischer Rund- funk, 30 August, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Kollewe, Julia. 2017. “BAE Systems to cut nearly 2,000 UK jobs.” The Guardian, 10 October, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Küchle, Hartmut. 2005. Die Neustrukturierung des deutschen Rüstungsmarktes als industriepolitische Aufgabe. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. [Restructuring the German defence market as an industrial policy task]. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Lagneau, Laurent. 2014. “À nouveau, Berlin bloque l’exportation de matériels militaires francais.” Zone militaire. 14 September, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Lequesne, Christian. 2015. “EU foreign policy through the lens of practice theory: A different approach to the European External Action Service.” Cooperation and conflict 50, no. 3 (2015): 351-367. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Markowski, Stefan, and Robert Wylie. 2007. “The emergence of European defence and defence Industry policies.” Security Challenges 3 (2): 31-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Markusen, Ann, and Sean Costigan, eds. 1999. “Arming the Future: A defense industry for the 21st century”. Council on Foreign Relations Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Markusen, Ann. 1999. "The rise of world weapons". Foreign Policy, no. 114 (spring): 40-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Meijer, Hugo. 2014. “Transatlantic Perspectives on China’s Military Modernization: The Case of Europe’s Arms Embargo against the People’s Republic of China.” Paris Paper no. 12. Strategic Research Institute of the French Military Academy (IRSEM). Google Scholar öffnen
  93. ———.2016. Trading with the Enemy - The Making of US Export Control Policy toward the People's Republic of China. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. ———. 2018. The Handbook of European Defence Policies and Armed Forces. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Moltmann, Bernhard. 2012. “Die Zange, die nicht kneift: der EU-Gemeinsame Standpunkt zu Rüstungsexporten-Chancen und Risiken seiner Überprüfung.” HSFK Report no.3/2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Monreal, Christoph, and Hermann Runte. 2000. “Das aktuelle Exportkontrollrecht - Ein Überblick.” GewArch, 142-148. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. “Arms and autarky in modern European history." Daedalus 23-45. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. ———. 1997. “Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics.” International Organization 51.4 (1997): 513-553. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Nassauer, Otfried, and Christopher Steinmetz. 2005. “Made in Germany” inside - Komponenten – die vergessenen Rüstungsexporte. Studie in Kooperation von Oxfam Deutschland und dem Berliner Informationszentrum für Transatlantische Sicherherheit. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Nassauer, Otfried .2016. “Hemmungslos und unersättlich - Rheinmetall und die Munitionsexporte.“Berliner Informationszentrum für Transatlantische Sicherheit, 2016. https://www.bits.de/public/unv_a/orginal-041116.htm#fn1 Google Scholar öffnen
  101. ———. 2018. “Munitionsgeschäfte in deutscher Verantwortung EXPLOSIV, TÖDLICH und PROFITABEL.” Evangelische Landeskirche in Baden und Berliner Informationszentrum für Transatlantische Sicherheit, 2018. http://www.bits.de/public/pdf/rr18-01.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Nye, Joseph S. 1988. „Neorealism and Neoliberalism.“ World Politics 40: 235-251. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. 2003. Best practice guide on export control of small arms and light weapons. Vienna: OSCE Secretariat. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. 2012. “Document on Small Arms and Light Weapons.” 308th Plenary Meeting of the OSCE Forum for Security Cooperation on 24 November, 2000. https://www.osce.org/fsc/20783. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Pauly, Marcel, and Vanessa Steinmetz. 2018. “Rüstungsexporte: Deutschlands Geschäft mit dem Krieg“. Spiegel Online, 02 January 2018. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/ruestungs exporte-so-steht-es-um-die-branche-in-deutschland-a-1189627.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Pearlstein, Steven. 2011. “Dani Rodrik's `The Globalization Paradox´.” Washington Post, 13 March, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Platte, Hendrik, and Dirk Leuffen. 2016. “German arms exports: between normative aspirations and political reality.” German politics 25.4 (2016): 561-580. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Political Principles of the Federal Government for the Export of Weapons of War and Other Military Equipment, Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, no. 38 (5 May 1982). Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Project Consult/Syndex. 2004. Die Zukunft der europäischen Verteidigungsindustrie - Diskussionsgrundlage für die EMB-Konferenz in Brüssel, 10 and 11 December, 2003. Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Prössl, Christoph. 2018. “Waffenexporte: Bislang erst drei Kontrollen vor Ort” Tagesschau, 15 September, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Puetter, Uwe. 2012. “Europe's deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and Euro pean Council in EU economic governance.” Journal of European Public Policy: 161-178. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Quéau, Yannik. 2013. “Error 404: the European defence project you were looking for does not exist.” The Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security (GRIP). 04 December, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Rheinmetall Group. 2018. Annual Report 2017. https://ir.rheinmetall.com/websites/rheinmetall/English /3031/annual-reports.html Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Rheinmetall Group. 2019. Annual Report 2018. https://ir.rheinmetall.com/websites/rheinmetall/English/ 2010/annual-figures.html Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Rhodes, Chris, David Hough, and Louise Butcher. 2014. “House of Commons Library Privatisation. Research Paper 14/61“. 20 November, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Rodrik, Dani. 2011. “The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy.” W. W. Norton & Company, 21 February, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. RUAG. 2016. Business activities in the UAE. 08 December 2016. https://www.ruag.com/en/news/statement-ruag-regarding-business-activities-uaeruag-present-united-arab-emirates-over-20-years. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Schneider, Greg, and Renae Merle. 2004. “Reagan’s Defense Buildup Bridged Military Eras.” Washington Post 9 (2004): E1. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Schröder, Alwin. 2015.“Deutsche Gewehre im Jemen: Bundesregierung verlangt Aufklärung von Saudi Arabien. ”Spiegel Online, 20 June, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Schwer, Andreas. 2013. “Capital Markets Day 2013 Combat Systems - The largest one of three divisions.” Rheinmetall, 08 November, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Spiegel Magazin. 1972. “Da tümmelt sich die Elite.” DER SPIEGEL, Nr 28/1972. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Sprenger, Sebastian. 2018. “Tank maker takeover: Germany’s Rheinmetall eyes acquisition of rival KMW.” Defense News, 27 November, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. State Department. 2016. “Blue Lantern End-Use Monitoring Program Office of Defense.” Policy Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Bureau of Political-Military Affairs U.S. Department of State, October 30, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Stewart, Ian, and Nicolas Gillard. 2015. “Open Source and Trade Data for Non-Proliferation: Challenges and Opportunities” No. IAEA-CN-220. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2019. SIPRI Arms Transfers Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2019. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Vlachos-Dengler, Katia. 2004. Off Track?. RAND National Defense Research Institute. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. War Weapons Control Act as last amended by Article 3 of the law of 11 October 2002, Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3970 Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Webb, Whitney. 2018. “US Provided `Intelligence and Bomb Used in Massacre of Yemeni Schoolchildren”. Mint Press News. 13 August, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics.” International organization Vol.46 no. 2 (Spring ): 391-425. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Whyte, Philip. 2007.“ Sarkonomics a user’s guide.“ Centre for European Reform. 08 November, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Widman, Miriam. 2014.“ G3 Rifle Used by Militias Worldwide, Made in Germany.” Handelsblatt, April 09, 2014. https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/politics/gun-exports-g3-rifle-used-by-militias-worldwide-made-in-germany/. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Wolf, K. (2015). Putting numbers on capabilities: defence inflation vs. cost escalation. European Union Institute for Security Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Wolf, Martin. 2001. “Will the nation-state survive globalization.” Foreign Affairs, 80, 178. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Yemen and the global arms trade. DW Documentary. Deutsche Welle. 2018. https://www.dw.com/en/yemen-and-the-global-arms-trade/av-46580888. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Zeit Online. 2016. “Heckler und Koch will Waffenexporte erzwingen.” 20 May, 2016. https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2016-05/heckler-und-koch-waffen-exporte-ruestungs industrie. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Zeit Online. 2018. “Rheinmetall: Gabriel soll Waffenhersteller Rheinmetall geholfen haben.” 06 March, 2018. https://www.zeit.de/politik/2018-03/rheinmetall-indien-sigmar-gabriel-korruptionsvorwuerfe. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Zeit Online. 2018.“Rheinmetall- Rüstungsexporte nach Saudi-Arabien laufen indirekt weiter.” 04 December, 2018. https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/2018-12/ruestungskonzern- rheinmetall-saudi-arabien-munitionslieferung-exportstopps-lieferungen Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Friedensforschung & Konfliktforschung", "Internationale Beziehungen"
Cover des Buchs: The Function of Political Authority
Monographie Vollzugriff
Carola Hesch
The Function of Political Authority
Cover des Buchs: Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Gert Krell, Peter Schlotter, Alexandra Homolar, Frank A. Stengel
Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Cover des Buchs: (Neu-)Ordnung
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Uwe Wagschal, Marius Fröhle
(Neu-)Ordnung
Cover des Buchs: Streit um das Kyjiwer Erbe
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Andriy Mykhaleyko
Streit um das Kyjiwer Erbe