, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Loyalität auf industriellen Internet of Things Plattformen
Eine empirische Untersuchung von Plattformökosystemen mittels der Theorie der Netzwerkexternalitäten, der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion und der Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie- Autor:innen:
- Reihe:
- Controlling Praxis
- Verlag:
- 2022
Zusammenfassung
Welche Eigenschaften von IIoT-Plattformen beeinflussen die langfristige Bindung der Akteure an das Plattformökosystem? Basierend auf der Theorie der Netzwerkexternalitäten, der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion und der Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie wird ein theoretisches Untersuchungsmodell entwickelt. Dieses wird mittels Strukturgleichungsmodell empirisch überprüft und die zentralen Werttreiber von IIoT-Plattformen identifiziert. Aus den empirischen Ergebnissen der Untersuchung werden zuletzt Gestaltungsempfehlungen zur Steigerung der Loyalität der Akteure abgeleitet.
Schlagworte
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Copyrightjahr
- 2022
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-8573-5
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-2990-1
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Reihe
- Controlling Praxis
- Sprache
- Deutsch
- Seiten
- 313
- Produkttyp
- Monographie
Inhaltsverzeichnis
KapitelSeiten
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 24
- 1.1 Problemstellung und Forschungsfrage Kein Zugriff
- 1.2 Relevanz der Forschungsfrage Kein Zugriff
- 1.3 Einordnung der Untersuchung in das Controlling Kein Zugriff
- 1.4 Zielsetzung und Struktur der Untersuchung Kein Zugriff
- 2.1 Zielsetzung und Aufbau des Kapitels Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.1 Unterscheidung digitaler und analoger Plattformen Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.2 Stand der Forschung und Literaturreview Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.3 Spezifika und Definition plattformbasierter Ökosysteme Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.4 Gestaltungsmerkmale plattformbasierter Ökosysteme Kein Zugriff
- 2.3.1 IoT – Das Internet der Dinge Kein Zugriff
- 2.3.2 Definition IIoT Plattform Kein Zugriff
- 2.4.1 Geschäftsbeziehungen auf IIoT Plattformen Kein Zugriff
- 2.4.2 Entwicklung des Bezugsrahmens der Untersuchung Kein Zugriff
- 2.5 Fazit der begrifflichen und konzeptionellen Grundlagen Kein Zugriff
- 3.1 Zielsetzung und Aufbau des Kapitels Kein Zugriff
- 3.2 Auswahl relevanter Veröffentlichungen Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.1 Ansatz nach Lou et al. (2000) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.2 Ansatz nach Pae und Hyun (2002) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.3 Ansatz nach Zhu et al. (2006) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.4 Ansatz nach Lai et al. (2007) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.5 Ansatz nach Lin und Bhattacherjee (2008) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.6 Ansatz nach Lin und Lu (2011) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.7 Ansatz nach Lin et al. (2011) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.8 Ansatz nach Chiu et al. (2013) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.9 Ansatz nach Kang und Namkung (2016) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.10 Ansatz nach Hsu und Lin (2016) Kein Zugriff
- 3.3.11 Ansatz nach Zhang et al. (2017) Kein Zugriff
- 3.4 Synopse und Bewertung Kein Zugriff
- 4.1 Zielsetzung und Aufbau des Kapitels Kein Zugriff
- 4.2 Grundlagen der Entwicklung des theoriebasierten Erklärungsmodells Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.1.1 Einordnung und zentrale Aussagen Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.1.2 Interpretation im Kontext von IIoT Plattformen Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.1.3 Implikationen für das Erklärungsmodell Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.2.1 Einordnung und zentrale Aussagen Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.2.2 Interpretation im Kontext von IIoT Plattformen Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.2.3 Implikationen für das Erklärungsmodell Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.3.1 Einordnung und zentrale Aussagen Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.3.2 Interpretation im Kontext von IIoT Plattformen Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.3.3 Implikationen für das Erklärungsmodell Kein Zugriff
- 4.3.4 Alternative Erklärungsansätze Kein Zugriff
- 4.4 Synthese des Erklärungsmodells Kein Zugriff
- 4.5 Kritische Würdigung nach der Datenerhebung publizierter Modelle Kein Zugriff
- 5.1 Zielsetzung und Aufbau des Kapitels Kein Zugriff
- 5.2 Gütekriterien der quantitativen Forschung Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.1.1 Auswahl geeigneter Analyseverfahren Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.1.2 Grundlagen der Strukturgleichungsmodellierung Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.1.3 Auswahl des Verfahrens zur Strukturgleichungsanalyse Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.2.1 Der PLS-SEM Algorithmus Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.2.2.1 Evaluation der Messmodelle Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.2.2.2 Evaluation des Strukturmodells Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.2.2.3 Zusammenfassende Darstellung der Kriterien zur Modellevaluation Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.1 Vorgehen bei der Datenerhebung Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.2 Operationalisierung der Konstrukte Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.3 Konstruktion des Erhebungsinstruments Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.4 Bildung der Stichprobe Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.5 Datenerhebung und Aufbereitung Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.1 Vorgehen bei der Datenanalyse und Evaluation Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.2.1 Eigenschaften der Stichprobe Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.2.2 Deskriptive Datenanalyse Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.3 Prüfen der Anforderungen an die PLS-SEM Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.4 Ergebnisse der Evaluation der Messmodelle Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.5 Ergebnisse der Evaluation des Strukturmodells Kein Zugriff
- 5.5.6 Robustheitstests Kein Zugriff
- 5.6 Ergebnisdiskussion Kein Zugriff
- 6.1 Zielsetzung und Aufbau des Kapitels Kein Zugriff
- 6.2 Ableitung der Gestaltungsempfehlungen des Strukturmodells Kein Zugriff
- 6.3 Qualitative empirische Validierung der Gestaltungsempfehlungen Kein Zugriff
- 6.4 Gestaltungsempfehlungen des Strukturmodells Kein Zugriff
- 6.5 Ergänzende Indikatoren zur Priorisierung der Gestaltungsempfehlungen Kein Zugriff
- 7.1 Abschließende Bewertung der Forschungsfragen Kein Zugriff
- 7.2 Limitationen der Untersuchung Kein Zugriff
- 7.3 Zukünftiger Forschungsbedarf Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 1: Kognitive Pretests zur Entwicklung des Modells und des Erhebungsinstruments Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 2: Englische Arbeitsdefinitionen der Konstrukte im Modell Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 3: Englische Operationalisierung der Konstrukte Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 4: Fragebogen Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 5: Early-Late-Respondents-Test der Homogenität der Varianzen Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 6: Bewertung der Common Method Variance Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 7: Deskriptive Datenanalyse Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 8: Kreuzladungen der Messmodelle Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 9: Interviewleitfaden für die Experteninterviews Kein Zugriff
- Anhang 10: Liste der Experteninterviews zur Validierung der Gestaltungsempfehlungen Kein Zugriff
- 9. Literaturverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 289 - 313
Literaturverzeichnis (393 Einträge)
Es wurden keine Treffer gefunden. Versuchen Sie einen anderen Begriff.
- Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity In Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2, 267–299. Google Scholar öffnen
- Adler, N. J. & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education 8 (1), 72–95. Google Scholar öffnen
- Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review 84 (4), 98–107. Google Scholar öffnen
- Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management 43 (1), 39–58. Google Scholar öffnen
- Adner, R. & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal 31 (3), 306–333. Google Scholar öffnen
- Adner, R. & Levinthal, D. (2001). Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation. Management Science 47 (5), 611–628. Google Scholar öffnen
- Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J. C., Gupta, A. & Kauffman, R. J. (2007). Technology roles and paths of influence in an ecosystem model of technology evolution. Information Technology and Management 8 (2), 185–202. Google Scholar öffnen
- Agarwal, R. & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability. Information Systems Research 13 (2), 168–186. Google Scholar öffnen
- Aguirre-Urreta, M. & Hu, J. (2019). Detecting Common Method Bias: Performance of the Harman’s Single-Factor Test. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 50 (2), 45–70. Google Scholar öffnen
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3), 488–500. Google Scholar öffnen
- Alvesson, M. & Ashcraft, K. L. (2017). Interviews. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Hrsg.), Qualitative organizational research. Core methods and current challenges (S. 239–257). Los Angeles: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ammar, M., Russello, G. & Crispo, B. (2018). Internet of Things: A survey on the security of IoT frameworks. Journal of Information Security and Applications 38, 8–27. Google Scholar öffnen
- Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C. & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing 58 (3), 53–66. Google Scholar öffnen
- Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3), 411–423. Google Scholar öffnen
- Anderson, R. E. & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003). E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework. Psychology and Marketing 20 (2), 123–138. Google Scholar öffnen
- Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics 37 (3), 668–691. Google Scholar öffnen
- Armstrong, M. & Wright, J. (2007). Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts. Economic Theory 32 (2), 353–380. Google Scholar öffnen
- Armstrong, S. J. & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3), 396–402. Google Scholar öffnen
- Arora, S., ter Hofstede, F. & Mahajan, V. (2017). The Implications of Offering Free Versions for the Performance of Paid Mobile Apps. Journal of Marketing 81 (6), 62–78. Google Scholar öffnen
- Arthur, B. W. (1996). Increasing Returns and the New World of Business. Harvard Business Review 74 (4), 100–109. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ashnai, B., Henneberg, S. C., Naudé, P. & Francescucci, A. (2016). Inter-personal and inter-organizational trust in business relationships: An attitude–behavior–outcome model. Industrial Marketing Management 52, 128–139. Google Scholar öffnen
- Asvanund, A., Clay, K., Krishnan, R. & Smith, M. D. (2004). An Empirical Analysis of Network Externalities in Peer-to-Peer Music-Sharing Networks. Information Systems Research 15 (2), 155–174. Google Scholar öffnen
- Atzori, L., Iera, A. & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks 54 (15), 2787–2805. Google Scholar öffnen
- Augustin, C. & Singh, J. (2005). Curvilinear Effects of Consumer Loyalty Determinants in Relational Exchanges. Journal of Marketing Research 42 (1), 96–108. Google Scholar öffnen
- Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. & Weiber, R. (2018). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (15., vollständig überarbeitete Auflage). Berlin: Springer Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
- Backhaus, K., Erichson, B. & Weiber, R. (Hrsg.). (2015). Fortgeschrittene Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (3., überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Berlin: Springer Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1), 74–94. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. & Philips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3), 421–458. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bailey, J. P. & Bakos, Y. (1997). An Exploratory Study of the Emerging Role of Electronic Intermediaries. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1 (3), 7–20. Google Scholar öffnen
- Baiyere, A., Topi, H., Venkatesh, V., Wyatt, J. & Donnellan, B. (2020). Internet of Things (IoT) – A Research Agenda for Information Systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 47 (1), 557–579. Google Scholar öffnen
- Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J. & Tourangeau, R. (2013). Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1 (2), 90–143. Google Scholar öffnen
- Baldwin, C. Y. & Woodward, C. J. (2009). The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View. In A. Gawer (Hrsg.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation (19–42). Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Baligh, H. H. & Richartz, L. E. (1964). An Analysis of Vertical Market Structures. Management Science 10 (4), 667–689. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bangemann, T., Karnouskos, S., Camp, R., Carlsson, O., Riedl, M., McLeod, S., Harrison, R., Colombo, A. W. & Stluka, P. (2014). State of the Art in Industrial Automation. In A. W. Colombo, T. Bangemann, S. Karnouskos, J. Delsing, P. Stluka, R. Harrison et al. (Hrsg.), Industrial Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems (S. 23–47). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Barney, J. B. & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Issue: Competitive Organizational Behavior), 175–190. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F. & Urban, G. L. (2005). Are the Drivers and Role of Online Trust the Same for All Web Sites and Consumers? A Large-Scale Exploratory Empirical Study. Journal of Marketing 69 (4), 133–152. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bauer, H. H., Grether, M. & Leach, M. (2002). Building customer relations over the Internet. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (2), 155–163. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bauwens, J., Ruckebusch, P., Giannoulis, S., Moerman, I. & Poorter, E. de. (2020). Over-the-Air Software Updates in the Internet of Things: An Overview of Key Principles. IEEE Communications Magazine 58 (2), 35–41. Google Scholar öffnen
- Beer, A. & Faulkner, D. (2014). How to use primary and secondary data. In R. Stimson (Hrsg.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Spatially Integrated Social Science (S. 192–209). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Benlian, A., Hilkert, D. & Hess, T. (2015). How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology 30 (3), 209–228. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bergen, M., Dutta, S. & Walker, O. C. (1992). Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories. Journal of Marketing 56 (3), 1–24. Google Scholar öffnen
- TRUMPF GmbH + Co. KG. (2019). Presse-Information. Ditzingen. https://www.trumpf.com/filestorage/TRUMPF_Master/Corporate/Press/Press_releases/2019_20/Corporate/20190702_PR_AXOOM_GFT/20190702-PM-AXOOM-GFT.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly 25 (3), 351–370. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bortz, J. & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (Springer-Lehrbuch, 7., vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boudreau, K. J. (2010). Open Platform Strategies and Innovation. Granting Access vs. Devolving Control. Management Science 56 (10), 1849–1872. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation. Organization Science 23 (5), 1409–1427. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boudreau, K. J., Jeppesen, L. B. & Miric, M. (2019). Competing on Freemium: Digital Competition with Network Effects. SSRN Electronic Journal 10 (accepted manuscript). Google Scholar öffnen
- Boyes, H., Hallaq, B., Cunningham, J. & Watson, T. (2018). The industrial internet of things (IIoT): An analysis framework. Computers in Industry 101, 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen
- Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A. & Tilly, B. (2006). Metcalfe's Law is Wrong. Communications Networks Increase in Value as they add Members-but by how much? IEEE Spectrum (July), 34–39. Google Scholar öffnen
- Brown, J. R., Dev, C. S. & Lee, D.-J. (2000). Managing Marketing Channel Opportunism: The Efficacy of Alternative Governance Mechanisms. Journal of Marketing 64 (2), 51–65. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bruhn, M. (2016). Relationship Marketing. Das Management von Kundenbeziehungen (Vahlens Handbücher). München: Verlag Franz Vahlen. Google Scholar öffnen
- Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. T. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56 (2), 81–105. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P. & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem:. The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly 36 (1), 263–290. Google Scholar öffnen
- Cen, Y. & Li, L. (2020). Effects of network externalities on user loyalty to online B2B platforms: an empirical study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 33 (2), 309–334. Google Scholar öffnen
- Cennamo, C. & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal 34 (11), 1331–1350. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chalmers, A. F. & Bergemann, N. (2007). Wege der Wissenschaft. Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie (6., verbesserte Auflage). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A. & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (2), 178–184. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chin, W. W. (1998a). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 (1), vii–xvi. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chin, W. W. (1998b). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Hrsg.), Modern methods for business research (Introduction to methodology for business and management, S. 295–336). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B. & Wright, R. T. (2012). Assessing Common Method Bias: Problems with the ULMC Technique. MIS Quarterly 36 (3), 1003–1019. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chiou, J.-S. & Droge, C. (2006). Service Quality, Trust, Specific Asset Investment, and Expertise: Direct and Indirect Effects in a Satisfaction-Loyalty Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (4), 613–627. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chiu, C.-M., Cheng, H.-L., Huang, H.-Y. & Chen, C.-F. (2013). Exploring individuals’ subjective well-being and loyalty towards social network sites from the perspective of network externalities: The Facebook case. International Journal of Information Management 33 (3), 539–552. Google Scholar öffnen
- CHO, J. (2006). The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. Journal of Retailing 82 (1), 25–35. Google Scholar öffnen
- Choi, G., Nam, C. & Kim, S. (2019). The impacts of technology platform openness on application developers’ intention to continuously use a platform: From an ecosystem perspective. Telecommunications Policy 43 (2), 140–153. Google Scholar öffnen
- Choi, J. P. (2010). Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing. The Journal of Industrial Economics 58 (3), 607–626. Google Scholar öffnen
- Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management 47 (3), 385–403. Google Scholar öffnen
- Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T. & Mayrhofer, P. (2013). The Effects of Rewarding User Engagement: The Case of Facebook Apps. Information Systems Research 24 (1), 186–200. Google Scholar öffnen
- Coase, R. H. (2013). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics 56 (4), 837–877. Google Scholar öffnen
- Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O. & Parker, G. G. (2018). Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age. Information Systems Research 29 (2), 381–400. Google Scholar öffnen
- Cusumano, M. A. & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MITSloan Management Review 43 (3), 51–58. Google Scholar öffnen
- Cusumano, M. A., Yoffie, D. B. & Gawer, A. (2020). The Future of Platforms. MITSloan Management Review 61 (3), 46–54. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dal Bianco, V., Myllarniemi, V., Komssi, M. & Raatikainen, M. (2014). The Role of Platform Boundary Resources in Software Ecosystems: A Case Study. IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 11–20. Google Scholar öffnen
- Datta, H., Foubert, B. & van Heerde, H. J. (2015). The Challenge of Retaining Customers Acquired with Free Trials. Journal of Marketing Research 52 (2), 217–234. Google Scholar öffnen
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319–340. Google Scholar öffnen
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14), 1111–1132. Google Scholar öffnen
- DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3 (1), 60–95. Google Scholar öffnen
- Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Wei, K. K. & Zhang, J. (2010). Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study of mobile instant messages in China. International Journal of Information Management 30 (4), 289–300. Google Scholar öffnen
- Devaraj, S., Fan, M. & Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of b2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validation e-Commerce metrics. Information Systems Research 13 (3), 316–333. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dewenter, R. & Rösch, J. (2015). Einführung in die neue Ökonomie der Medienmärkte. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen
- Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P. & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (3), 434–449. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dick, A. S. & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (2), 99–113. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dijkstra, T. K. & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. MIS Quarterly 39 (2), 297–316. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ding, Y., Jin, M., Li, S. & Feng, D. (2020). Smart logistics based on the internet of things technology: an overview. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications (1757053), 1–23. Google Scholar öffnen
- Doganoglu, T. & Wright, J. (2006). Multihoming and compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24 (1), 45–67. Google Scholar öffnen
- Döring, N. & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Douglas, S. P. & Craig, S. C. (2007). Collaborative and Iterative Translation: An Alternative Approach to Back Translation. Journal of International Marketing 15 (1), 30–43. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dremel, C., Wulf, J., Herterich, M. M., Waizmann, J.-C. & Brenner, W. (2017). How AUDI AG Established Big Data Analytics in Its Digital Transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive 16 (2), 81–100. Google Scholar öffnen
- DuBois, F. L. & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the International Business Journals. Journal of International Business Studies 31 (4), 689–704. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H. & Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing 51 (2), 11–27. Google Scholar öffnen
- Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. (1986). Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science 1 (1), 54–77. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ehret, M. & Wirtz, J. (2017). Unlocking value from machines: business models and the industrial internet of things. Journal of Marketing Management 33 (1–2), 111–130. Google Scholar öffnen
- Eisenmann, T. R. (2006). Internet companies' growth strategies: determinants of investment intensity and long-term performance. Strategic Management Journal 27 (12), 1183–1204. Google Scholar öffnen
- Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review 84 (10), Reprint 1463, 1–11. Google Scholar öffnen
- Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2009). Opening platforms: how, when and why? In A. Gawer (Hrsg.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation (S. 131–162). Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal 32 (12), 1270–1285. Google Scholar öffnen
- Esposito Vinci, V., Trinchera, L. & Amato, S. (2010). PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang (Hrsg.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, S. 47–82). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Evans, D. S. (2003). Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries. Review of Network Economics 2 (3), 191–209. Google Scholar öffnen
- Evans, D. S. & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers. The new economics of multisided platforms. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Evans, J. H., Feng, M., Hoffman, V. B., Moser, D. V. & Van der Stede, W. A. (2015). Points to Consider When Self-Assessing Your Empirical Accounting Research. Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (3), 1162–1192. Google Scholar öffnen
- Evans, P. C. & Basole, R. C. (2016). Revealing the API ecosystem and enterprise strategy via visual analytics. Communications of the ACM 59 (2), 26–28. Google Scholar öffnen
- Evans, P. C. & Gawer, A. (2016). The Rise of the Platform Enterprise. A Global Survey (The Center for Global Enterprise, Hrsg.). Google Scholar öffnen
- Farooq, M. U., Waseem, M., Mazhar, S., Khairi, A. & Kamal, T. (2015). A Review on Internet of Things (IoT). International Journal of Computer Applications 113 (1), 0975 8887, S. 1–7. Google Scholar öffnen
- Farrell, J. & Klemperer, P. (2007). Chapter 31 Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects. In M. Armstrong & R. H. Porter (Hrsg.), Handbook of Industrial Organization Volume 3 (Handbook of Industrial Organization, Bd. 3, S. 1967–2072). North Holland. Google Scholar öffnen
- Farrell, J. & Saloner, G. (1986). Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements and Predation. American Economic Review 76 (5), 940–955. Google Scholar öffnen
- Farrell, J. & Saloner, G. (1992). Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces. The Journal of Industrial Economics 40 (1), 9–35. Google Scholar öffnen
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39 (2), 175–191. Google Scholar öffnen
- Faulbaum, F., Prüfer, P. & Rexroth, M. (2009). Was ist eine gute Frage? Die systematische Evaluation der Fragenqualität (1. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ferrari, P., Flammini, A., Rinaldi, S., Sisinni, E., Maffei, D. & Malara, M. (2018). Impact of Quality of Service on Cloud Based Industrial IoT Applications with OPC UA. Electronics 7 (7, 109), 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Flavián, C. & Guinalíu, M. (2006). Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy policy. Industrial Management & Data Systems 106 (5), 601–620. Google Scholar öffnen
- Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M. & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management 43 (1), 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen
- Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schuetz, S. W. & Heinzl, A. (2019). Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance. Information Systems Journal 29 (1), 119–144. Google Scholar öffnen
- Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39–50. Google Scholar öffnen
- Fuhr, D. (2016). Leitfaden Security für den Maschinen- und Anlagenbau. Der Weg durch die IEC 62443. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gandal, N. (1994). Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities. The RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1), 160–170. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gao, L. & Bai, X. (2014). An empirical study on continuance intention of mobile social networking services. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 26 (2), 168–189. Google Scholar öffnen
- Garbarino, E. & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing 63 (2), 70–87. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gawer, A. (Hrsg.). (2009). Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms. Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy 43 (7), 1239–1249. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gawer, A. (2020). Digital Platforms’ Boundaries: The Interplay of Firm Scope, Platform Sides, and Digital Interfaces. Long Range Planning (102045, Articel in Press), 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gawer, A. & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (3), 417–433. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gawer, A. & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16 (1), 1–34. Google Scholar öffnen
- Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American statistical Association 70 (350), 320–328. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ghazawneh, A. & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development. The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal 23 (2), 173–192. Google Scholar öffnen
- Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly 19 (2), 213–236. Google Scholar öffnen
- Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J. & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: do they matter? Personality and Individual Differences 35 (6), 1241–1254. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E. A. & Kyriakou, H. (2020). The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value. Academy of Management Review (forthcoming), 1–40. Google Scholar öffnen
- Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B. & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 56 (4), 475–495. Google Scholar öffnen
- Grunwald, G. & Schwill, J. (2017). Beziehungsmarketing. Gestaltung nachhaltiger Geschäftsbeziehungen – Grundlagen und Praxis. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag für Wirtschaft Steuern Recht GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S. & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (7), 1645–1660. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gulati, R., Puranam, P. & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal 33 (6), 571–586. Google Scholar öffnen
- Häder, M. (2019). Empirische Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hagiu, A. (2006). Pricing and commitment by two‐sided platforms. RAND Journal of Economics 37 (3), 720–737. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or Two-Sided Platform? Review of Network Economics 6 (2), 115–133. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided markets. MITSloan Management Review 55 (2), 71–80. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hagiu, A. & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 43, 162–174. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivariate Data Analysis 1 (2), 107–123. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2), 139–152. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (3), 414–433. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Richter, N. F. & Hauff, S. (2017). Partial Least Squares Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. München: Franz Vahlen. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hanelt, A., Nischak, F., Markus, N., Hodapp, D. & Schneider, S. (2020). Building Platform Ecosystems for IoT – Exploring the Impact on Industrial-Age Firms. In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen
- Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M. & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets 30 (1), 87–98. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M. & Krcmar, H. (2019). Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets 29 (3), 503–518. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P. & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes. Journal of Service Research 4 (3), 230–247. Google Scholar öffnen
- Henrich, F. (2011). Verbesserung von Kommunikation in Prinzipal-Agenten-Beziehungen im Callcenter Umfeld : eine empirische Analyse zur Entwicklung eines Kommunikationsmodells und zur Ableitung von Handlungsempfehlungen für die Praxis. Lüneburg: Dissertation im Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Henseler, J. (2010). On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Computational Statistics 25 (1), 107–120. Google Scholar öffnen
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Advertising Research: Basic Concepts and Recent Issues. In S. Okazaki (Hrsg.), Handbook of Research on International Advertising (S. 252–276). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1), 115–135. Google Scholar öffnen
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20, 277–319. Google Scholar öffnen
- Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Wricke, M. & Purucker, C. (2012). Preisfairness als Schlüssel zur Kundenzufriedenheit. In C. Homburg (Hrsg.), Kundenzufriedenheit. Konzepte – Methoden – Erfahrungen (8., überarb. Aufl., S. 299–321). Wiesbaden: Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hill, C. W. (1997). Establishing a standard: Competitive strategy and technological standards in winner-take-all industries. Academy of Management Executive 11 (2), 7–25. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hochstein, B., Rangarajan, D., Mehta, N. & Kocher, D. (2020). An Industry/Academic Perspective on Customer Success Management. Journal of Service Research 23 (1), 3–7. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hoehle, H. & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Mobile Application Usability: Conceptualization and Instrument Development. MIS Quarterly 39 (2), 435–472. Google Scholar öffnen
- Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms: Harcourt, Brace. Google Scholar öffnen
- Homburg, C., Hoyer, W. D. & Koschate, N. (2005). Customers' Reactions to Price Increases: Do Customer Satisfaction and Perceived Motive Fairness Matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33 (1), 36–49. Google Scholar öffnen
- Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Reimann, M. & Schilke, O. (2012). What Drives Key Informant Accuracy? Journal of Marketing Research 49 (4), 594–608. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hong, H., Cao, M. & Wang, G. A. (2017). The Effects of Network Externalities and Herding on User Satisfaction with Mobile Social Apps. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 18 (1), 18–31. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hong, I. B. & Cho, H. (2011). The impact of consumer trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces: Intermediary trust vs. seller trust. International Journal of Information Management 31 (5), 469–479. Google Scholar öffnen
- Horváth, P. (2019). Editorial. Controlling in der Plattformökonomie. Controlling – Zeitschrift für erfolgsorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung 31 (6), 1. Google Scholar öffnen
- Horváth, P., Gleich, R. & Seiter, M. (2020). Controlling (14., komplett überarbeitete Auflage). München: Vahlen. Google Scholar öffnen
- Horváth, P. & Kaufmann, L. (1998). Balanced Scorecard – ein Werkzeug zur Umsetzung von Strategien. Harvard Business Manager 20 (5), 39–50. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hox, J. J. & Boeije, H. R. (2005). Data Collection, Primary vs. Secondary. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement 1 (1), 593–599. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hsieh, P.‐L. (2013). Perceived opportunism (PO) in e‐return service encounters. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 23 (2), 96–110. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hsu, C.-L. & Lin, J. C.-C. (2016). An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 62, 516–527. Google Scholar öffnen
- Huber, T. L., Kude, T. & Dibbern, J. (2017). Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs. Information Systems Research 28 (3), 563–584. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A. & Mäntymäki, M. (2016). The influence of developer multi-homing on competition between software ecosystems. Journal of Systems and Software 111, 119–127. Google Scholar öffnen
- Iansiti, M. & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review 82 (3), 68–78. Google Scholar öffnen
- Iimi, A. (2005). Estimating demand for cellular phone services in Japan. Telecommunications Policy 29 (1), 3–23. Google Scholar öffnen
- Illich-Edlinger, S., Möller, K. & Huth, L. (2021). Zielorientierte Skalierung digitaler Marktplätze. Nutzersteigerung und -steuerung in Plattformgeschäften durch Performance Management. Controlling – Zeitschrift für erfolgsorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung 33 (1), 67–74. Google Scholar öffnen
- IoT Analytics GmbH. (2020). IoT Platform Companies Landscape 2020. https://iot-analytics.com/iot-platform-companies-landscape-2020/. Zugegriffen: 16. Dezember 2020. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C. & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal 39 (8), 2255–2276. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4), 305–360. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jiang, Z. & Sarkar, S. (2009). Speed Matters: The Role of Free Software Offer in Software Diffusion. Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (3), 207–240. Google Scholar öffnen
- John, G. (1984). An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecedents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel. Journal of Marketing Research 21 (3), 278–289. Google Scholar öffnen
- Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A. & Huber, F. (2006). The Evolution of Loyalty Intentions. Journal of Marketing 70 (2), 122–132. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kallus, K. W. (2016). Erstellung von Fragebogen (2., aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage). Wien: facultas. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kang, J.-W. & Namkung, Y. (2016). Restaurant Information Sharing on Social Networking Sites. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 40 (6), 739–763. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kano, N. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14, 39–48. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kapoor, K., Ziaee Bigdeli, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Schroeder, A., Beltagui, A. & Baines, T. (2021). A socio-technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research 128 (Available online), 94–108. Google Scholar öffnen
- Karat, J. (1997). Evolving the scope of user-centered design. Communications of the ACM 40 (7), 33–38. Google Scholar öffnen
- Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. The American Economic Review 75 (3), 424–440. Google Scholar öffnen
- Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1992). Product Introduction with Network Externalities. The Journal of Industrial Economics 40 (1), 55–83. Google Scholar öffnen
- Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2), 93–115. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kauffman, R. J., McAndrews, J. & Wang, Y.-M. (2000). Opening the "Black Box" of Network Externalities in Network Adoption. Information Systems Research 11 (1), 61–82. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kennedy, M. S., Ferrell, L. K. & LeClair, D. T. (2001). Consumers' trust of salesperson and manufacturer: an empirical study. Journal of Business Research 51 (1), 73–86. Google Scholar öffnen
- Khare, A., Stewart, B. & Schatz, R. (Hrsg.). (2017). Phantom Ex Machina. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L. & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships. A Longitudinal Exploration. Information Systems Research 20 (2), 237–257. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kim, G. S., Park, S.‐B. & Oh, J. (2008). An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS). Psychology & Marketing 25 (8), 769–786. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kim, H.-W. & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 567–582. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kim, S. & Kim, S. (2016). A multi-criteria approach toward discovering killer IoT application in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 102, 143–155. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kirsch, L. J. (1997). Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research 8 (3), 215–239. Google Scholar öffnen
- Köksal, G., Batmaz, İ. & Testik, M. C. (2011). A review of data mining applications for quality improvement in manufacturing industry. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (10), 13448–13467. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kornmeier, M. (2007). Wissenschaftstheorie und wissenschaftliches Arbeiten. Eine Einführung für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler (BA KOMPAKT). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Krause, T., Strauß, O., Scheffler, G., Kett, H., Lehmann, K. & Renner, T. (2017). IT-Plattformen für das Internet der Dinge (IoT). Basis intelligenter Produkte und Services. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
- Krebs, D. & Menold, N. (2014). Gütekriterien quantitativer Sozialforschung. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 425–438). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kromrey, H., Roose, J. & Strübing, J. (2016). Empirische Sozialforschung. Modelle und Methoden der standardisierten Datenerhebung und Datenauswertung mit Annotationen aus qualitativ-interpretativer Perspektive (UTB, Bd. 8681, 13., völlig überarbeitete Auflage). Konstanz: UVK; UVK/Lucius. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lai, F., Wang, J., Hsieh, C.‐T. & Chen, J.‐C. (2007). On network externalities, e‐business adoption and information asymmetry. Industrial Management & Data Systems 107 (5), 728–746. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K. & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer Value, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Switching Costs: An Illustration From a Business-to-Business Service Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32 (3), 293–311. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lancastre, A. & Lages, L. F. (2006). The relationship between buyer and a B2B e-marketplace: Cooperation determinants in an electronic market context. Industrial Marketing Management 35 (6), 774–789. Google Scholar öffnen
- Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning. Simulation & Gaming 45 (6), 752–768. Google Scholar öffnen
- Landsman, V. & Stremersch, S. (2011). Multihoming in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Inquiry in the Video Game Console Industry. Journal of Marketing 75 (6), 39–54. Google Scholar öffnen
- Laudon, K. C., Laudon, J. P. & Schoder, D. (2010). Wirtschaftsinformatik. Eine Einführung (IT, 2., aktualisierte Aufl.). München: Pearson Deutschland. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lecerof, A. & Paterno, F. (1998). Automatic support for usability evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24 (10), 863–888. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lee, E., Lee, J. & Lee, J. (2006). Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias. Management Science 52 (12), 1838–1848. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lee, F. (2020). Vom Datenkraken zum Datentreuhänder. Harvard Business Manager (11), 36–39. Google Scholar öffnen
- Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., Wendelin, R. & Westerlund, M. (2020). Industrial internet of things business models in the machine-to-machine context. Industrial Marketing Management 84, 298–311. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lenz, J., Wuest, T. & Westkämper, E. (2018). Holistic approach to machine tool data analytics. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48, 180–191. Google Scholar öffnen
- Li, D., Browne, G. J. & Wetherbe, J. C. (2006). Why Do Internet Users Stick with a Specific Web Site? A Relationship Perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 10 (4), 105–141. Google Scholar öffnen
- Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q. & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management. MIS Quarterly 31 (1), 59–87. Google Scholar öffnen
- Liao, Y.-W., Wang, Y.-S. & Yeh, C.-H. (2014). Exploring the relationship between intentional and behavioral loyalty in the context of e-tailing. Internet Research 24 (5), 668–686. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lin, C.-P. & Bhattacherjee, A. (2008). Elucidating Individual Intention to Use Interactive Information Technologies: The Role of Network Externalities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 13 (1), 85–108. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lin, C.-P., Tsai, Y. H., Wang, Y.-J. & Chiu, C.-K. (2011). Modeling IT relationship quality and its determinants: A potential perspective of network externalities in e-service. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (1), 171–184. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lin, K.-Y. & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites. An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (3), 1152–1161. Google Scholar öffnen
- Linder, J. C., Jarvenpaa, S. & Davenport, T. H. (2003). Toward an Innovation Sourcing Strategy. MITSloan Management Review 44 (4), 43–49. Google Scholar öffnen
- Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A. & Choi, H. S. (2014). Effects of Freemium Strategy in the Mobile App Market: An Empirical Study of Google Play. Journal of Management Information Systems 31 (3), 326–354. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lou, H., Luo, W. & Strong, D. (2000). Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems 9 (2), 91–103. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lu, Y., Papagiannidis, S. & Alamanos, E. (2018). Internet of Things: A systematic review of the business literature from the user and organisational perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136, 285–297. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y. & Boland Jr., R. J. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal 26 (1), 47–75. Google Scholar öffnen
- MacCallum, R. C. & Browne, M. W. (1993). The Use of Causal Indicators in Covariance Structure Models:. Some Practical Issues. Psychological Bulletin 114 (3), 533–541. Google Scholar öffnen
- Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55 (4), 587–634. Google Scholar öffnen
- Makropoulos, P., Nichols, J., Paternò, F. & Pipek, V. (2017). Editorial: End-User Development for the Internet of Things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 24 (2), 1–3. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mankiw, N. G. & Taylor, M. P. (2016). Grundzüge der Volkswirtschaftslehre (6. Auflage 2016,überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschel. Google Scholar öffnen
- Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J. & Aharon, D. (2015). The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value Beyond the Hype. Google Scholar öffnen
- Markey, R. (2020). Geschätzte Kunden: Was sind Ihre Kunden wert? Harvard Business Manager (11), 21–29. Google Scholar öffnen
- Martilla, J. A. & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing 41 (1), 77–79. Google Scholar öffnen
- Martín‐Consuegra, D., Molina, A. & Esteban, Á. (2007). An integrated model of price, satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical analysis in the service sector. Journal of Product & Brand Management 16 (7), 459–468. Google Scholar öffnen
- Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F. & Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight your customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management 5 (2), 6–18. Google Scholar öffnen
- McIntyre, D. P. & Srinivasan, A. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy. Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal 38 (1), 141–160. Google Scholar öffnen
- McIntyre, D. P., Srinivasan, A. & Chintakananda, A. (2020). The persistence of platforms: The role of network, platform, and complementor attributes. Long Range Planning (Forthcoming). Google Scholar öffnen
- McIntyre, D. P. & Subramaniam, M. (2009). Strategy in Network Industries: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management 35 (6), 1494–1517. Google Scholar öffnen
- Menon, K., Kärkkäinen, H. & Wuest, T. (2019). Industrial internet platform provider and end-user perceptions of platform openness impacts. Industry and Innovation 55 (2), 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen
- Miaskiewicz, T. & Kozar, K. A. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies 32 (5), 417–430. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mineraud, J., Mazhelis, O., Su, X. & Tarkoma, S. (2016). A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things platforms. Computer Communications 89, 5–16. Google Scholar öffnen
- Moore, G. C. & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2 (3), 192–222. Google Scholar öffnen
- Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review 71 (3), 75–86. Google Scholar öffnen
- Moosbrugger, H. & Kelava, A. (2012). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (Springer-Lehrbuch, 2., aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58 (3), 20–38. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mouakket, S. & Sun, Y. (2019). Examining factors that influence information disclosure on social network sites from the perspective of network externalities. Industrial Management & Data Systems 119 (4), 774–791. Google Scholar öffnen
- Müller, M. (2005). Informationstransfer im Supply Chain Management (Habilitation an der Universität Oldenburg). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann‐Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 4 (1), 13–20. Google Scholar öffnen
- Najmul Islam, A.K.M., Cenfetelli, R. & Benbasat, I. (2020). Organizational buyers’ assimilation of B2B platforms: Effects of IT-enabled service functionality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 29 (1), 101597, S. 1–28. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nambisan, S. (2013). Information Technology and Product/Service Innovation: A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 14 (Special Issue), 215–226. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nambisan, S., Wright, M. & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy 48 (8), 103773, 1–9. Google Scholar öffnen
- Neumayer, E. & Plümper, T. (2017). Robustness tests for quantitative research (Methodological tools in the social sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nord, J. H., Koohang, A. & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2019). The Internet of Things: Review and theoretical framework. Expert Systems with Applications 133, 97–108. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2. Auflage). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar öffnen
- Oliver, P., Marwell, G. & Teixeira, R. (1985). A Theory of the Crititcal Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action. The American Journal of Sociology 91 (3), 522–556. Google Scholar öffnen
- Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue), 33–44. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A. & Lyytinen, K. (2015). The Impact of Openness on the Market Potential of Multi-Sided Platforms: A Case Study of Mobile Payment Platforms. Journal of Information Technology 30 (3), 260–275. Google Scholar öffnen
- Otto, B. & Jarke, M. (2019). Designing a multi-sided data platform: findings from the International Data Spaces case. Electronic Markets 29 (4), 561–580. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (1), 129–141. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C. & Gawer, A. (2018). Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems. Journal of Management Studies 55 (7), 1203–1241. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pae, J. H. & Hyun, J. S. (2002). The impact of technology advancement strategies on consumers' patronage decisions. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 (5), 375–383. Google Scholar öffnen
- Page, W. (2020). Are We Reaching Peak Streaming Subscriptions? Billboard Magazine (October 17), 35–36. Google Scholar öffnen
- Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D. & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing 70 (4), 136–153. Google Scholar öffnen
- Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K. & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. (2007). Customer Loyalty to Whom? Managing the Benefits and Risks of Salesperson-Owned Loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research 44 (2), 185–199. Google Scholar öffnen
- Panico, C. & Cennamo, C. (2020). User Preferences And Strategic Interactions In Platform Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal (Accepted Articel). Google Scholar öffnen
- Park, C.‐H. & Kim, Y.‐G. (2003). Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 31 (1), 16–29. Google Scholar öffnen
- Parker, G. & van Alstyne, M. (2018). Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control. Management Science 64 (7), 3015–3032. Google Scholar öffnen
- Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M. W. & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution. How networked markets are transforming the economy – and how to make them work for you (First edition). New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen
- Parker, G., Van Alsytne, M. & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform Ecosystems. How Developers Invert the Firm. MIS Quarterly 41 (1), 255–266. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pauli, T., Fielt, E. & Matzner, M. (2021). Digital Industrial Platforms. Business & Information Systems Engineering (Published Online). Google Scholar öffnen
- Pavlou, Liang & Xue. (2007). Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective. MIS Quarterly 31 (1), 105–136. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pavlou, P. A. & Gefen, D. (2004). Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust. Information Systems Research 15 (1), 37–59. Google Scholar öffnen
- Peitz, M. (2006). Marktplätze und indirekte Netzwerkeffekte. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 7 (3), 317–333. Google Scholar öffnen
- Penttinen, E., Halme, M., Lyytinen, K. & Myllynen, N. (2018). What Influences Choice of Business-to-Business Connectivity Platforms? International Journal of Electronic Commerce 22 (4), 479–509. Google Scholar öffnen
- Perren, R. & Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Lateral Exchange Markets: How Social Platforms Operate in a Networked Economy. Journal of Marketing 82 (1), 20–36. Google Scholar öffnen
- Petrik, D. & Herzwurm, G. (2019a). iIoT ecosystem development through boundary resources: a Siemens MindSphere case study. In K. Smolander, P. Grünbacher, S. Hyrynsalmi & S. Jansen (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business: Start-ups, Platforms, and Ecosystems – IWSiB 2019 (S. 1–6). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Petrik, D. & Herzwurm, G. (2019b). Towards an Understanding of iIoT Ecosystem Evolution – MindSphere Case Study. In S. Hyrynsalmi, M. Suoranta & A. Nguyen-Duc (Hrsg.), Software Business. 10th International Conference, ICSOB 2019, Jyväskylä, Finland, November 18–20, 2019, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 1st ed. 2019, S. 46–54). Google Scholar öffnen
- Picot, A. (1991). Ökonomische Theorien der Organisation – Ein Überblick über neuere Ansätze und deren betriebswirtschaftliches Anwendungspotential. In D. Ordelheide, B. Rudolph & E. Büsselmann (Hrsg.), Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Ökonomische Theorie (S. 144–170). Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
- Picot, A. (2015). Organisation. Theorie und Praxis aus ökonomischer Sicht (7. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. Google Scholar öffnen
- Plinke, W. (1997). Grundlagen des Geschäftsbeziehungsmanagements. In M. Kleinaltenkamp & W. Plinke (Hrsg.), Geschäftsbeziehungsmanagement im Technischen Vertrieb. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of applied psychology 88 (5), 879–903. Google Scholar öffnen
- Polites, G. L. & Karahanna, E. (2012). Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance. MIS Quarterly 36 (1), 21–42. Google Scholar öffnen
- Popper, K. (1934). Logik der Forschung. Zur Erkenntnistheorie der modernen Nautwissenschaft (Schriften zur wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung, Bd. 9). Wien: Springer-Verlag Wien. Google Scholar öffnen
- Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition. Harvard Business Review 92 (11), 64–88. Google Scholar öffnen
- Prajogo, D. & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics 135 (1), 514–522. Google Scholar öffnen
- Profanter, S., Tekat, A., Dorofeev, K. & Rickert, M. (2019). OPC UA versus ROS, DDS, and MQTT: Performance Evaluation of Industry 4.0 Protocols. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), 1–8. Google Scholar öffnen
- PwC. (2020). Global Top 100 companies by market capitalisation. May 2020. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/audit-services/publications/assets/global-top-100-companies-2020.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. Januar 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rauyruen, P., Miller, K. E. & Groth, M. (2009). B2B services: linking service loyalty and brand equity. Journal of Services Marketing 23 (3), 175–186. Google Scholar öffnen
- Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M. & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing 26 (4), 332–344. Google Scholar öffnen
- Reinhardt, R. & Gurtner, S. (2015). Differences between early adopters of disruptive and sustaining innovations. Journal of Business Research 68 (1), 137–145. Google Scholar öffnen
- Reuver, M. de, Sørensen, C. & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: a research agenda. Journal of Information Technology 33 (2), 124–135. Google Scholar öffnen
- Riasanow, T., Jäntgen, L., Hermes, S., Böhm, M. & Krcmar, H. (2020). Core, intertwined, and ecosystem-specific clusters in platform ecosystems: analyzing similarities in the digital transformation of the automotive, blockchain, financial, insurance and IIoT industry. Electronic Markets (Published Online), 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen
- Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J. & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A Tale of Three Perspectives. Organizational Research Methods 12 (4), 762–800. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rietveld, J. (2018). Creating and capturing value from freemium business models: A demand-side perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (2), 171–193. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rietveld, J. & Eggers, J. P. (2018). Demand Heterogeneity in Platform Markets: Implications for Complementors. Organization Science 29 (2), 304–322. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N. & Nieborg, D. B. (2020). The Coevolution of Platform Dominance and Governance Strategies: Effects on Complementor Performance Outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries 6 (3, Accepted for Publication), 488–513. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rietveld, J., Schilling, M. A. & Bellavitis, C. (2019). Platform Strategy: Managing Ecosystem Value Through Selective Promotion of Complements. Organization Science 30 (6), 1232–1251. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results. Industrial Management & Data Systems 116 (9), 1865–1886. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. & Becker, J.-M. (2020) SmartPLS 3. [Computer software]: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com./. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rochet, J.-C. & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4), 990–1029. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rochet, J.‐C. & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics 37 (3), 645–667. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rohlfs, J. (1974). A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5 (1), 16–37. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rohlfs, J. H. (2003). Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries (1. paperback ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Roldán, J. L. & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. Steenkamp & M. S. Raisinghani (Hrsg.), Research methodologies, innovations, and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (S. 193–221). Hershey, Pa: IGI Global. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rosen, S. & Tesser, A. (1972). Fear of Negative Evaluation and the Reluctance to Transmit Bad News. Journal of Communication 22, 124–141. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19 (4), 305–335. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rudow, B. (2014). Betriebliche Informationssysteme in der Automobilproduktion. Soziotechnisches System – Nutzerpersönlichkeit – Nutzungserleben – Rollout und Betrieb – Fabriksteuerung – Informationen auf Shopfloor – IT-Nutzen. München: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rufín, R., Medina, C. & Rey, M. (2013). Building trust and commitment to blogs. The Service Industries Journal 33 (9–10), 876–891. Google Scholar öffnen
- Russo, I. & Confente, I. (2017). Customer Loyalty and Supply Chain Management. Business-to-Business Customer Loyalty Analysis (Routledge Studies in Business Organizations and Networks, 1st ed.). Milton: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rysman, M. (2009). The Economics of Two-Sided Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (3), 125–143. Google Scholar öffnen
- Saadatmand, F., Lindgren, R. & Schultze, U. (2019). Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement. Research Policy 48 (8), 103770, 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sanchez-Franco, M. J., Ramos, A. F. V. & Velicia, F. A. M. (2009). The moderating effect of gender on relationship quality and loyalty toward Internet service providers. Information & Management 46 (3), 196–202. Google Scholar öffnen
- Saris, W. E. & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research (Wiley series in survey methodology). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sarstedt, M. & Mooi, E. (2019). A Concise Guide to Market Research. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). The Emergence of Edge Computing. Computer 50 (1), 30–39. Google Scholar öffnen
- Saunders, M. N. K. & Townsend, K. (2016). Reporting and Justifying the Number of Interview Participants in Organization and Workplace Research. British Journal of Management 27 (4), 836–852. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schallehn, M., Schorling, C., Bowen, P. & Straehle, O. (2019). Beyond Proofs of Concept: Scaling the Industrial IoT (Bain & Company, I., Hrsg.). Google Scholar öffnen
- Scharfe, P. & Wiener, M. (2020). A Taxonomy of Smart Machines in the Mechanical Engineering Industry: Toward Structuring the Design Solution Space. ICIS 2020 Proceedings, 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schept, K. (2020). BRANDZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2020. https://www.brandz.com/admin/uploads/files/2020_BrandZ_Global_Top_100_Report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. Januar 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity. The Academy of Management Review 25 (2), 312–334. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schreieck, M., Hein, A., Wiesche, M. & Krcmar, H. (2018). The Challenge of Governing Digital Platform Ecosystems. In C. Linnhoff-Popien, R. Schneider & M. Zaddach (Hrsg.), Digital Marketplaces Unleashed (527–538). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schüler, F. (2020). Loyalty on Industrial Internet of Things Platforms: An Empirical Study Integrating Network Effects, Human-Computer Interaction and Agency Theory to Explore Platform Ecosystems. Proceedings of the EURAM2020 Conference, Dublin, 1–38. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schüler, F., Heering, F. & Haas, J. (2019). Nudging und Gamification zur Steuerungsoptimierung plattformbasierter Geschäftsmodelle. Controlling – Zeitschrift für erfolgsorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung 31 (6), 32–39. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schüler, F. & Petrik, D. (2021). Objectives of platform research: A co-citation and systematic literature review analysis. In M. Seiter, L. Grünert & A. Steur (Hrsg.), Management Digitaler Plattformen (ZfbF-Sonderheft, Bd. 75, 1. Auflage, erscheint am 16.03.2021,). Springer Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schwarz, N., Strack, F. & Mai, H.-P. (1991). Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (1), 3–23. Google Scholar öffnen
- Seetharaman, A., Patwa, N., Saravanan, A. S. & Sharma, A. (2019). Customer expectation from Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT). Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 30 (8), 1161–1178. Google Scholar öffnen
- Seiter, M. & Autenrieth, P. (2019). Steuerung plattformbasierter Geschäftsmodelle – Benötigen wir neue Steuerungsgrößen? Controlling – Zeitschrift für erfolgsorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung 31 (6), 11–17. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shankar, V. & Bayus, B. L. (2003). Network effects and competition: an empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strategic Management Journal 24 (4), 375–384. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shapiro, C. & Hal, V. R. (1999). Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shermata, W. A. (2004). Competing through Innovation in Network Markets: Strategies for Challengers. The Academy of Management Review 29 (3), 359–377. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shin, D. (2014). A socio-technical framework for Internet-of-Things design: A human-centered design for the Internet of Things. Telematics and Informatics 31 (4), 519–531. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shneiderman, B. (1980). Software psychology. Human factors in computer and information systems (Winthrop computer systems series). Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shugan, S. M. (2002a). Editorial: Marketing Science, Models, Monopoly Models, and Why We Need Them. Marketing Science 21 (3), 223–228. Google Scholar öffnen
- Shugan, S. M. (2002b). In Search of Data: An Editorial. Marketing Science 21 (4), 369–377. Google Scholar öffnen
- Simon, H. A. (1962). The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106, 467–482. Google Scholar öffnen
- Slack, N. (1994). The Importance-Performance Matrix as a Determinant of Improvement Priority. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 14 (5), 59–75. Google Scholar öffnen
- Söhnchen, F. (2009). Common Method Variance und Single Source Bias. In S. Albers, D. Klapper, U. Konradt, A. Walter & J. Wolf (Hrsg.), Methodik der empirischen Forschung (S. 137–152). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
- Speckmann, C. (2019). Mit MindSphere die digitale Transformation vorantreiben. Controlling – Zeitschrift für erfolgsorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung 31 (6), 63–65. Google Scholar öffnen
- Spector, P. E. (2006). Method Variance in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods 9 (2), 221–232. Google Scholar öffnen
- Stallkamp, M. & Schotter, A. P. J. (2019). Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms. Global Strategy Journal (Special Issue), 1–23. Google Scholar öffnen
- Stein, P. (2014). Forschungsdesigns für die quantitative Sozialforschung. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen
- Steur, A. J. & Seiter, M. (2020). Properties of feedback mechanisms on digital platforms: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Economics (Published Online). Google Scholar öffnen
- Stier, W. (1996). Empirische Forschungsmethoden (Springer-Lehrbuch). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
- Strader, T. J., Ramaswami, S. N. & Houle, P. A. (2007). Perceived network externalities and communication technology acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (1), 54–65. Google Scholar öffnen
- Suarez, F. F. (2005). Network Effects Revisited: The Role of Strong Ties in Technology Selection. The Academy of Management Journal 48 (4), 710–720. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M. & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48 (1), 159–205. Google Scholar öffnen
- Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K. & Benbasata, I. (2003). Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective. MIS Quarterly 27 (1), 19–49. Google Scholar öffnen
- Thitimajshima, W., Esichaikul, V. & Krairit, D. (2018). A framework to identify factors affecting the performance of third-party B2B e-marketplaces: A seller’s perspective. Electronic Markets 28 (2), 129–147. Google Scholar öffnen
- Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E. & Gann, D. M. (2014). Architectural Leverage. Putting Platforms in Context. Academy of Management Perspectives 28 (2), 198–219. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ting, S.‐C., Chen, C.‐N. & Bartholomew, D. E. (2007). An integrated study of entrepreneurs' opportunism. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 22 (5), 322–335. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform Ecosystems. Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Burlington: Elsevier Science. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tiwana, A. (2015a). Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems. Information Systems Research 26 (2), 266–281. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tiwana, A. (2015b). Platform Desertion by App Developers. Journal of Management Information Systems 32 (4), 40–77. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B. & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research Commentary —Platform Evolution. Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research 21 (4), 675–687. Google Scholar öffnen
- Töpfer, A. (2012). Erfolgreich Forschen. Ein Leitfaden für Bachelor-, Master-Studierende und Doktoranden (Springer-Lehrbuch, 3., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tseng, F.-C. & Teng, C.-I. (2014). Antecedents for user intention to adopt another auction site. Internet Research 24 (2), 205–222. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ulrich, H. (1982). Anwendungsorientierte Wissenschaft. Die Unternehmung 36 (1), 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen
- Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, Platforms, and the New Rules of Strategy. Harvard Business Review 94 (4), 54–62. Google Scholar öffnen
- Van der Stede, W. A., Young, M. S. & Chen, C. X. (2007). Doing Management Accounting Survey Research. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood & M. D. Shields (Hrsg.), Handbook of management accounting research (Volume 1, S. 445–478). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar öffnen
- VDMA & McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Hrsg.). (2020). Kundenzentrierung als Chance für den digitalen Durchbruch. Was sich die Endkundenindustrien vom Maschinenbau bei digitalen Plattformen und Mehrwertdiensten wünschen. Google Scholar öffnen
- Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences 39 (2), 273–315. Google Scholar öffnen
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478. Google Scholar öffnen
- Venkatesh, V. & Ramesh, V. (2006). Web and Wireless Site Usability: Understanding Differences and Modeling Use. MIS Quarterly 30 (1), 181–206. Google Scholar öffnen
- Voigt, S. & Hinz, O. (2016). Making Digital Freemium Business Models a Success: Predicting Customers’ Lifetime Value via Initial Purchase Information. Business & Information Systems Engineering 58 (2), 107–118. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wang, W.-T., Wang, Y.-S. & Liu, E.-R. (2016). The stickiness intention of group-buying websites: The integration of the commitment–trust theory and e-commerce success model. Information & Management 53 (5), 625–642. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wareham, J., Fox, P. B. & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science 25 (4), 1195–1215. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weiber, R. & Mühlhaus, D. (2014). Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS, SmartPLS und SPSS (Springer-Lehrbuch, 2., erw. und korr. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weijters, B., Cabooter, E. & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing 27 (3), 236–247. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weisstein, F. L., Monroe, K. B. & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2013). Effects of price framing on consumers’ perceptions of online dynamic pricing practices. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41 (5), 501–514. Google Scholar öffnen
- West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Research Policy 32 (7), 1259–1285. Google Scholar öffnen
- West, J. & O'mahony, S. (2008). The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities. Industry and Innovation 15 (2), 145–168. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weyl, E. G. (2010). A Price Theory of Multi-Sided Platforms. American Economic Review 100 (4), 1642–1672. Google Scholar öffnen
- Whitten, D. & Wakefield, R. L. (2006). Measuring switching costs in IT outsourcing services. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15 (3), 219–248. Google Scholar öffnen
- Williams, L. J. & O'Boyle, E. H. (2015). Ideal, nonideal, and no-marker variables: The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) marker technique works when it matters. The Journal of applied psychology, 1579–1602. Google Scholar öffnen
- Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. The American Economic Review 63 (2), 316–325. Google Scholar öffnen
- Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, and relational contracting. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wold, H. (1975). Path Models with Latent Variables: The NIPALS Approach. In H. M. Blalock, A. Aganbegian, F. M. Borodkin, R. Boudon & V. Capecci (Hrsg.), Quantitative Sociology. International Perspectives on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling (S. 307–357). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wortmann, F. & Flüchter, K. (2015). Internet of Things. Business & Information Systems Engineering 57 (3), 221–224. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wu, J.-H., Chen, Y.-C. & Lin, L.-M. (2007). Empirical evaluation of the revised end user computing acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (1), 162–174. Google Scholar öffnen
- Xia, L., Monroe, K. B. & Cox, J. L. (2004). The Price Is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions. Journal of Marketing 68 (4), 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen
- Xiong, J., Ma, R., Chen, L., Tian, Y., Li, Q., Liu, X. & Yao, Z. (2020). A Personalized Privacy Protection Framework for Mobile Crowdsensing in IIoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 16 (6), 4231–4241. Google Scholar öffnen
- Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L. & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research 56 (8), 2941–2962. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X. & Tang, J. (2016). Incentive Mechanisms for Crowdsensing: Crowdsourcing With Smartphones. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 24 (3), 1732–1744. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yang, J. & Mai, E. (2010). Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system. Journal of Business Research 63 (9–10), 1050–1057. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yang, S. (2015). Understanding B2B customer loyalty in the mobile telecommunication industry: a look at dedication and constraint. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 30 (2), 117–128. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yang, Z., Diao, Z. & Kang, J. (2020). Customer management in Internet-based platform firms: review and future research directions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 38 (7), 957–973. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yi, Y. & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research 66 (9), 1279–1284. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yoffie, D. B. & Kwak, M. (2006). With Friends Like These. The Art of Managing Complementors. Harvard Business Review 84 (9), 88–98. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K. & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science 23 (5), 1398–1408. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O. & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research Commentary —The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 21 (4), 724–735. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhang, C.-B., Li, Y.-N., Wu, B. & Li, D.-J. (2017). How WeChat can retain users: Roles of network externalities, social interaction ties, and perceived values in building continuance intention. Computers in Human Behavior 69, 284–293. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhang, Y., Deng, R. H., Zheng, D., Li, J., Wu, P. & Cao, J. (2019). Efficient and Robust Certificateless Signature for Data Crowdsensing in Cloud-Assisted Industrial IoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15 (9), 5099–5108. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhang, Y., Li, J. & Tong, T. W. (2020). Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors. Strategic Management Journal (Online Preprint), 1–28. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhao, L. & Lu, Y. (2012). Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention. Decision Support Systems 53 (4), 825–834. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhao, Y., Delft, S. von, Morgan-Thomas, A. & Buck, T. (2020). The evolution of platform business models: Exploring competitive battles in the world of platforms. Long Range Planning 53 (4), 101892, 1–24. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhou, T. (2015). The effect of network externality on mobile social network site continuance. Program 49 (3), 289–304. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhou, T. & Lu, Y. (2011). Examining mobile instant messaging user loyalty from the perspectives of network externalities and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (2), 883–889. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhu, F. & Iansiti, M. (2012). Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management Journal 33 (1), 88–106. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., Gurbaxani, V. & Xu, S. X. (2006). Migration to Open-Standard Interorganizational Systems: Network Effects, Switching Costs, and Path Dependency. MIS Quarterly 30 (Special Issue on Standard Making), 515–539. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhu, X., Song, B., Ni, Y., Ren, Y. & Li, R. (2016). Platforms—From the One-Sided Market to the One-Sided + Two-Sided Market. In X. Zhu, B. Song, Y. Ni, Y. Ren & R. Li (Hrsg.), Business Trends in the Digital Era (S. 43–61). Singapore: Springer Singapore. Google Scholar öffnen





