Cover des Buchs: When do Paper Tigers get Teeth?
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

When do Paper Tigers get Teeth?

Social Standards in U.S. and EU Preferential Trade Agreements
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Die präferentiellen Handelsabkommen der USA und der EU enthalten heutzutage durchgehend Sozialstandards zum Schutz von Arbeitern und der Umwelt. Doch während die USA einen sanktionsbasierten Ansatz verfolgen, vertraut die EU allein auf Dialog- und Kooperationsmechanismen.

Dieses Buch unternimmt den Versuch zu erklären, warum die USA und die EU solch unterschiedliche Ansätze gewählt haben. Die Arbeit vergleicht dazu die Verhandlungen der USA und der EU mit Zentralamerika, Peru und Kolumbien sowie Südkorea. Die empirischen Befunde legen nahe, dass die gesellschaftlichen Präferenzen in den USA und Europa weitgehend deckungsgleich waren. Der unterschiedliche institutionelle Rahmen in den USA und der EU wandelten diese gesellschaftlichen Forderungen jedoch in unterschiedliche Politikergebnisse um. So haben die Charakteristika des politischen Systems der USA die Herausbildung sanktions-basierter Sozialstandards stärker begünstigt als das konsensorientierte System der EU.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4723-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8989-2
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Internationale Politische Ökonomie
Band
17
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
245
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
  2. List of Abbreviations Kein Zugriff 11 - 14
    1. 1.1 The Enforcement Mechanisms of U.S. and EU PTA Social Standards: A Policy Puzzle Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Trade Policy and Politics in the 21th Century Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 The Argument of the Book Kein Zugriff
    4. 1.4 Chapter Overview Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 The Controversy over Social Standards Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1 Labor in the GATT/WTO-System Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2.2 Environment in the GATT/WTO System Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.3.1 Social Standards in U.S. and EU Unilateral Trade Preference Schemes Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.3.2 Social Standards in U.S. Preferential Trade Agreements: The Coercive Approach Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3.3 Social Standards in EU Preferential Trade Agreements: The Cooperative Approach Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Concluding Remarks: Same Ends, Different Means Kein Zugriff
    1. 3.1 Trade Politics and Social Standards: A Literature Review Kein Zugriff
      1. Preferences of Societal Interest Groups Kein Zugriff
      2. Responsiveness of Policy-Makers Kein Zugriff
      3. The Institutional Form of Delegation Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.3.1 Variables and Operationalization Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.3.2 Qualitative Comparative Method Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3.3 Case Selection Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.3.4 Data Collection and Data Analysis Kein Zugriff
    4. 3.4 Structure of the Empirical Chapters Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Institutional Structure of U.S. Trade Politics Kein Zugriff
      1. Business Groups, Labor Unions and Environmental NGOs Kein Zugriff
      2. The U.S. Congress Kein Zugriff
      3. The U.S. President Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.3.1 Pre-negotiation Stage Kein Zugriff
        1. The US – Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) Kein Zugriff
        2. The US-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement (PTPA) and the US-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) Kein Zugriff
        3. The US – Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) Kein Zugriff
    4. 4.4 Concluding Remarks Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1. Institutional Structure of EU Trade Politics Kein Zugriff
      1. Business Groups, Labor Unions and Environmental NGOs Kein Zugriff
      2. The Council and the European Parliament Kein Zugriff
      3. The European Commission (DG Trade) Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.3.1 Pre-negotiation Stage Kein Zugriff
        1. The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement Kein Zugriff
        2. The EU-Peru/Colombia Preferential Trade Agreement Kein Zugriff
        3. The EU-Central America Association Agreement Kein Zugriff
    4. 5.4 Concluding Remarks Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.1 Key Insights and Broader Implications Kein Zugriff
    2. 6.2 Alternative Explanations Kein Zugriff
    3. 6.3 The Functioning of U.S. and EU Social Standards in practice Kein Zugriff
    4. 6.4 Concluding Considerations and Outlook Kein Zugriff
  9. References Kein Zugriff 201 - 245

Literaturverzeichnis (753)

  1. 11.11.11, ALOP, ANC, APRODEV, CNCD, FIDC, FIDH, Friends of the Earth Europe, Grupo Sur, ICCO, IEPALA, and Secours Catholique – Caritas France. 2007. Re: Recommendations on the EU-CAN negotiation directives. Joint Letter EU-CAN Negotiations, February 1. Available at: http://www.aprodev.eu/files/Central_America/200701_cso_letter_eu-ca_negotiation_directives.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  2. 350.org, Center for International Environmental Law, Center for Biological Diversity, Earthjustice, Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, Green America, Greenpeace USA, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Oil Change International, Sierra Club, and SustainUS. 2015. Environmental Provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Letter from 13 U.S. environmental organizations to Congress, October 29. Available at: https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/uploads-wysiwig/TPP%20letter%20FINAL%20%282%29.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Aaronson, Susan, and Jamie M. Zimmerman. 2008. Trade Imbalance. The Struggle to Weigh Human Rights Concerns in Trade Policymaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):401-419. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Abel, Patrick. 2018. Comparative Conclusions on Arbitral Dispute Settlement in Trade-Labour Matters Under US FTAs. In Labour Standards in International Economic Law, edited by H. Gött. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. ACEA, BusinessEurope, CEFIC, CEEV, CEPS, CEPI, DIAGEO, DIGITALEUROPE, EBCY, ESF, ETNO, EURATEX, and Pernod-Ricard. 2012. Approval of the EU-Colombia & Peru Trade Agreement. EU business co-signed letter, October 3. Available at: http://spirits.eu/files/32/eu-business-letter-in-favour-of-eu-colombia-agreement.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Addo, Kofi. 2002. The Correlation between Labor Standards and International Trade. Which Way Forward? Journal of World Trade 36 (2):285-303. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. ———. 2015. Core Labour Standards and International Trade. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. AFL-CIO. 2002. 'Free Trade' Too Costly For Workers at Home and Abroad. Press Release, Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Available at: http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/resources/upload/trade.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  10. ———. 2002. NAFTA's Seven-Year Itch: Promised Benefits Not Delivered to Workers. Press Release, Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nafta_at_seven.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  11. ———. 2007. Statement by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney on U.S. Trade Policy Developments. May 11. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Available at: http://www.aflcio.org/Press-Room/Press-Releases/Statement-by-AFL-CIO-President-John-Sweeney-on-U.S3 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. ———. 2015. Ten Critical Problems with the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. ———. 2015. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Four Countries That Don’t Comply With U.S. Trade Law. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. AFX News. 2007. SKorea will not renegotiate FTA with US - top negotiator. AFX News, April 13. Available at: http://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2007-04/8056877-skorea-will-not-renegotiate-fta-with-us-top-negotiator-020.htm Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Agence France Press. 2008. EU to negotiate trade pact with Colombia, Peru. Agence France Press, November 11. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  16. ———. 2012. Merkel urges swift EU trade progress with Peru, Colombia. Agence France Press, June 12. Available at: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/merkel-urges-eu-trade-progress-031915783.html Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Edward A. Fogarty. 2004. Between regionalism and globalism: European Union interregional trade strategies. In EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism, edited by V. K. Aggarwal and E. A. Fogarty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Akhtar, Shayerah Ilias, and Vivian C. Jones. 2014. Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Negotiations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Alden, Edward. 2003. Workers bar way to free trade in central America. Financial Times, December 4. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/financialtimes_cafta.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  20. ———. 2005. Bush likely to pay high price at home for deal on Central American trading pact. Financial Times, June 27. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/40af84a8-e6a8-11d9-b6bc-00000e2511c8.html#axzz40zoqp870 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Allee, Tod, and Manfred Elsig. 2014. Dispute settlement provisions in PTAs: new data and new concepts. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by A. Dür and M. Elsig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. ALOP, APRODEV, CIFCA, CNCD, FIAN, Friends of the Earth Europe, Grupo Sur, and OIDHACO. 2012. The European Parliament prioritises trade interests over human rights and sustainable development. Press Release, December 11. Available at: http://www.cifcaeu.org/en/the-european-parliament-prioritises-trade-interests-over-human-rights-and-sustainable-development/ Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Alston, Phillip. 2004. ‘Core Labour Standards’ and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law 15 (3):457-521. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Alt, James E., Jeffrey Frieden, Michael J. Giligan, Dani Rodrik, and Ronald Rogowski. 1996. The International Political Economy of International Trade: Enduring Puzzles and an Agenda for Inquiry. Comparative Political Studies 29 (6):689-717. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Alt, James E., and Michael Gilligan. 1994. The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Actions Problems and Domestic Political Institutions. Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (2):165-192. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Andrews, Edmund L. 2005. House Approves Free Trade Pact. New York Times, July 28. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/28/business/worldbusiness/house-approves-free-trade-pact.html?_r=0 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. ———. 2005. Pleas and Promises by G.O.P. As Trade Pact Wins by 2 Votes. New York Times, July 29. Available at: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D01E2DE113FF93AA15754C0A9639C8B63 Google Scholar öffnen
  28. ———. 2005. Senate Approves Free Trade Pact. New York Times, July 1. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/01/politics/senate-approves-central-american-free-trade-pact.html Google Scholar öffnen
  29. ———. 2005. White House Makes Deals for Support of Trade Pact. New York Times, July 25. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/26/politics/white-house-makes-deals-for-support-of-trade-pact.html?_r=0 Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Antkiewicz, Agata, and Bessma Momani. 2009. Pursuing Geopolitical Stability through Interregional Trade: the EU’s Motives for Negotiating with the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of European Integration 31 (2):217-235. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Appelbaum, Binyamin, and Jennifer Steinhauer. 2011. Congress Ends 5-Year Standoff on Trade Deals in Rare Accord. New York Times, October 12. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/business/trade-bills-near-final-chapter.html?pagewanted=all Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Baccini, Leonardo. 2010. Explaining formation and design of EU trade agreements: The role of transparency and flexibility. European Union Politics 11 (2):195-217. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Baccini, Leonardo, Andreas Dür, and Manfred Elsig. 2015. The Politics of Trade Agreement Design: Revisiting the Depth–Flexibility Nexus. International Studies Quarterly 59 (4):765-775. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Bailey, Michael A., Judith Goldstein, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics 49 (3):309-338. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Baldwin, Matthew. 2006. Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade. The World Economy 29 (11):1451-1518. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Baldwin, Richard. 1986. The Political Economy of US Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Baldwin, Richard, and Dany Jaimovich. 2012. Are Free Trade Agreements contagious? Journal of International Economics 88 (1):1-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Baldwin, Robert E. 2003. The Decline of US Labor Unions and the Role of Trade. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Balistreri, Edward J. 1997. The Performance of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model in Predicting Endogenous Policy Forces at the Individual Level. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique 30 (1):1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Banchón, Mirra 2012. Acuerdo UE-Colombia y Perú, a discusión. Deutsche Welle, February 29. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/acuerdo-ue-colombia-y-per%C3%BA-a-discusi%C3%B3n/a-15775764 Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Bang, Guri. 2011. Signed but Not Ratified: Limits to U.S. Participation in International Environmental Agreements. Review of Policy Research 28 (1):65-81. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Bardwell, Kedron 2000. The Puzzling Decline in House Support for Free Trade: Was Fast Track a Referendum on NAFTA? Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (4):591-610. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Barfield, Claude. 2008. The Fast-Track Trade War. The American, May 7. Available at: https://www.aei.org/publication/the-fast-track-trade-war-2/ Google Scholar öffnen
  44. ———. 2009. Politics of Trade in the USA and in the Obama Administration: Implications for Asian Regionalism. Asian Economic Policy Review 4 (2):227–243. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Barnard, Bruce. 1996. EU wants to discuss Wages, Labor Standards. Asia, Britain certain to oppose proposal. Journal of Commerce, July 25. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Barquero S., Marvin. 2008. Nicaragua objeta condiciones de Acuerdo con Unión Europea. La Nación, April 18. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/Nicaragua-condiciones-Acuerdo-Union-Europea_0_971102995.html Google Scholar öffnen
  47. ———. 2008. Temas políticos obstaculizan avance de Acuerdo con UE. La Nación, April 19. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/Temas-politicos-obstaculizan-Acuerdo-UE_0_971302941.html Google Scholar öffnen
  48. ———. 2008. UE anuente a acelerar Acuerdo de Asociación con el Istmo. La Nación, April 17. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/UE-acelerar-Acuerdo-Asociacion-Istmo_0_970902920.html Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Barrett, Scott. 2003. Environment and Statecraft : The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Bartels, Lorand. 2013. Human Rights and Sustainable Development Obligations in EU Free Trade Agreements. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 40 (4):297-313. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Beach, Derek. 2016. It's all about mechanisms - what process-tracing case studies should be tracing. New Political Economy 21 (5):463-472. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Beatty, Andrew. 2007. Trade deals spark battle over services. Politico, April 11. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/trade-deals-spark-battle-over-services/ Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Beaulieu, Eugene. 2002. Factor or Industry Cleavages in Trade Policy? An Empirical Analysis of the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem. Economics & Politics 14 (2):99-131. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. ———. 2002. The Stolper–Samuelson Theorem Faces Congress. Review of International Economics 10 (2):343-360. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Becker, Elisabeth. 2003. A Pact on Central America Trade Zone, Minus One. New York Times, December 18. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/18/business/a-pact-on-central-america-trade-zone-minus-one.html Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Becker, Elizabeth 2003. U.S. Begins Talks for Trade Pact With Central Americans. New York Times, January 9. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/09/business/us-begins-talks-for-trade-pact-with-central-americans.html Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Behrens, Maria, and Holger Janusch. 2012. Great 'Normative Power': The European and American Trade Approaches with Chile and Mexiko. European foreign affairs review 17 (3):367-386. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Bender, Peter. 2002. The European Parliament and the WTO. European foreign affairs review 7 (2):193-208. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Benedick, Richard. 2009. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, edited by D. F. Sprinz and Y. Wolinsky. Ann Arbor: Universtiy of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Berger, Axel, Clara Brandi, and Dominique Bruhn. 2017. Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements: Promises at the Trade and Environment Interface. Discussion Paper: German Development Institut 16/2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Bermúdez Mora, Kattia 2010. Europa no podrá tomar represalias comerciales en temas laborales y ambientales. El Financiero, April 21. Available at: http://wvw.elfinancierocr.com/ef_archivo/2010/abril/25/economia2343251.html Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Bernhard, William, Lawrence J. Broz, and William Roberts Clark. 2003. The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1995. Trade Liberalisation and ‘Fair Trade’ Demands: Addressing the Environmental and Labour Standards Issues. The World Economy 18 (6):745–759. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. ———. 2000. On thinking clearly about the linkage between trade and the environment. Environment and Development Economics 5 (4):483-529. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. ———. 2007. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. ———. 2008. Termites in the Trading System. How Preferential Trade Agreements Undermine Free Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Bilby, Ethan. 2013. Europe trade action against Bangladesh would have big impact. Reuters, May 1. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-bangladesh-trade-idUSBRE9400JQ20130501 Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Blustein, Paul. 2005. U.S., Peru Strike Free-Trade Agreement. The Washington Post, December 8. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/07/AR2005120702791.html Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Bolle, Mary Jane. 2013. Overview of Labor Enforcement Issues in Free Trade Agreements. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Bollyky, Thomas J., and Anu Bradford. 2013. Getting to Yes on Transatlantic Trade. Consistent U.S.-EU Rules Could Remake Global Commerce. Foreign Affairs, July 10. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-07-10/getting-yes-transatlantic-trade Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2005. Green Parties and Politics in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Bomberg, Elizabeth, and David Schlosberg, eds. 2013. Environmentalism in the United States: Changing Conceptions of Activism. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Bossuyt, Fabienne. 2009. The Social Dimension of the New Generation of EU FTAs with Asia and Latin America: Ambitious Continuation for the Sake of Policy Coherence. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):703-722. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Bounds, Andrew. 2006. EU trade deals will not hang on Doha. Financial Times, July 10. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/abca11b4-0faf-11db-ad3d-0000779e2340.html?siteedition=intl#axzz40zoqp870 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Bounds, Andrew, and Anna Fifield. 2007. EU told to exclude N Korea enclave from pact. Financial Times, October 16. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d7bd5ffe-7b80-11dc-8c53-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz3zZOi8qWh Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Bouwen, Pieter. 2004. Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research 43 (3):337-369. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Brack, Duncan. 2004. Trade and the Environment. In Trade Politics, edited by B. Hocking and S. McGuire. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Brainard, Lael, and Hal Shapiro. 2001. Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority. In Brookings Policy Brief. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Briceno Ruiz, José. 2007. Strategic Regionalism and Regional Social Policy in the FTAA Process. Global Social Policy 7 (3):294–315. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Bridges. 2007. EU-Andean Trade Pact Underway. Bridges, October 1. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-andean-trade-pact-underway Google Scholar öffnen
  84. ———. 2008. Little Progress In EU-Central America FTA Talks. Bridges, April 23. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/little-progress-in-eu-central-america-fta-talks Google Scholar öffnen
  85. ———. 2009. EU, South Korea Conclude FTA Talks. Bridges, July 15. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-south-korea-conclude-fta-talks Google Scholar öffnen
  86. ———. 2009. EU, South Korea Sign Free Trade Accord. Bridges, October 21. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-south-korea-sign-free-trade-accord Google Scholar öffnen
  87. ———. 2010. EU Resumes Trade Talks with Mercosur, Concludes Talks with Central America. Bridges, May 19. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-resumes-trade-talks-with-mercosur-concludes-talks-with-central-america Google Scholar öffnen
  88. ———. 2012. EU Trade Ministers Agree to Approve Deal with Colombia, Peru. Bridges, March 21. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-trade-ministers-agree-to-approve-deal-with-colombia-peru Google Scholar öffnen
  89. ———. 2012. EU Trade Ministers Approve Pact with Colombia, Peru. Bridges, June 6. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-trade-ministers-approve-pact-with-colombia-peru Google Scholar öffnen
  90. ———. 2012. EU, Central America Sign Region-to-Region Deal. Bridges, July 4. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-central-america-sign-region-to-region-deal Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Broscheid, Andreas, and David Coen. 2003. Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission. An Informational Model of Forum Politics. European Union Politics 4 (2):165–189. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Brunnée, Jutta. 2004. The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant. European Journal of International Law 15 (4):617-649. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Buck, Tobias. 2004. Latin Americans face EU trade talks disappointment. Financial Times, May 5. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7ed0f4b6-9e32-11d8-81c6-000e2511c801.html#axzz3zmPLJWQf Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Buerkle, Tom 1994. Brittan Rebuffs Clinton Over Labor Standards. New York Times, January 18. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1994/01/18/business/worldbusiness/18iht-gatt_0.html Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Burchell, J. 2014. The Evolution of Green Politics: Development and Change Within European Green Parties. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Burgoon, Brian. 2004. The Rise and Stall of Labor Linkage in Globalization Politics. International Politics 41 (2):196-220. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. ———. 2009. The Distinct Politics of the European Union’s ‘Fair Trade’ Linkage to Labour Standards European foreign affairs review 14 (5):643–661. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Business Round Table. 2001. The Case for U.S. Trade Leadership: the United States is Falling Behind. Press Release, February 9. Washington, D.C.: Business Round Table. Available at: http://www.businessroundtable.org/publications/publication.aspx?qs=2496BF807822B0F19D2 Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Business Week. 2001. Calming the Waters: A Talk with the U.S. Trade Rep. Business Week, July 23. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2001-07-22/q-and-a-calming-the-waters-a-talk-with-the-u-dot-s-dot-trade-rep Google Scholar öffnen
  100. BusinessEurope. 2007. Position on the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA). Position Paper, July 18. Brussels: BusinessEurope. Available at: http://www.bilaterals.org/IMG/pdf/EU-Korea_position_BusinessEurope_180707.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Büthe, Tim, and Helen V. Milner. 2014. Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Diversity in Trade Agreements: Credibility, Commitment, and Economic Flows in the Developing World, 1971–2007. World Politics 66 (1):88-122. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Callan, Eoin. 2007. Democrats to throw out Colombia trade deal. Financial Times, November 22. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/84143836-799d-11db-90a6-0000779e2340.html#axzz3yuKqURup Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Callan, Eoin, and Anastasia Molony. 2007. White House trades on Democrats’ terms. Financial Times, May 13. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/f5b19952-0192-11dc-8b8c-000b5df10621 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Carlos Nino, Luis 2008. EU Drops IPC Prerequisite from Trade Talks with Central America. IHS Global Insight, April 22. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Center for International Environmental Law, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, League of Conservation Voters, Mineral Policy Center, National Environmental Trust, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and U.S. Public Interest Research Group. 2002. U.S. Fast Track Conference Bill neither Reflects America's Environmental Values nor Addresses Fundamental Problems with Investment Rules. Letter to Congress. Available at: http://www.ciel.org/news/u-s-fast-track-conference-bill-neither-reflects-americas-environmental-values-nor-addresses-fundamental-problems-with-investment-rules/ Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Céspedez Vargas, Renzo. 2009. Negociaciones Del Acuerdo De Asociacion Centroamérica-Unión Europea, Retos Y Oportunidades Para Los Sectores Productivos De Los Países Centroamericanos. San José: Fundación Friedrich Ebert. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Chalmers, Adam William. 2013. Trading information for access: informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (1):39–58. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Chan, Anita. 2003. Racing to the bottom: international trade without a social clause. Third World Quaterly 24 (6):1011-1028. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Chan, Sewell. 2010. U.S. Plans Trade Complaint Against Guatemala. New York Times, July 30. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/business/global/31trade.html Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Charnovitz, Steve. 1987. The influence of international labour standards on the world trading regime. A historical overview. International Labour Review 26 (5):565-584. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. ———. 1992. Environmental and Labour Standards in Trade. The World Economy 15 (3):335-356. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. ———. 2005. The Labor Dimension of the Emerging Free Trade Area of the Americas. In Labour Rights as Human Rights, edited by P. Alston. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1995. The New Sovereignty: compliance with international regulatory agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Clark, William Roberts, Erick Duchesne, and Sophie Meunier. 2000. Domestic and International Asymmetries in United States–European Union Trade Negotiations. International Negotiation 5 (1):69-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Coen, David. 2007. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3):333–345. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. COHA. 2010. Obama’s hard stance on Guatemalan labor: A monumental step for labor or mere political manoeuvring? Council on Hemispheric Affairs. Available at: http://www.coha.org/obama%E2%80%99s-hard-stance-on-guatemalan-labor-a-monumental-step-for-labor-rights-or-mere-political-maneuvering Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Collier, David. 2008. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4):823-830. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Collingsworth, Terry, J. William Goold, and Pharis J. Harvey. 1994. Time for a Global New Deal. Foreign Affairs 73 (1):8-13. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Collinson, Sarah. 1999. 'Issue-systems', 'multi-level games' and the analysis of the EUs external commercial and associated policies: a research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (2):206-224. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Condon, Madison. 2015. The Integration of Environmental Law into International Investment Treaties and Trade Agreements: Negotiation Process and the Legalization of Commitments. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 33 (1):102-152. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Cooper, Helene, and Steven Greenhouse. 2011. U.S. and Colombia Near Trade Pact. New York Times, April 6. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/07/business/07trade.html Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Cooper, William H., and Mark E. Manyin. 2006. The Proposed South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUSFTA). In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. ———. 2007. The Proposed South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). In CRS Report for Congress. Washinghton, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Cooper, William H., Mark E. Manyin, Remy Jurenas, and Michaela D. Platzer. 2011. The Proposed U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implications. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackleton. 2011. The European Parliament. 8th ed. London: John Harper Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Correa, Jorge. 2008. Negociación en bloque, CAN y Unión Europea es inviable. Portafolio, April 30. Available at: http://www.portafolio.co/economia/finanzas/negociacion-bloque-can-union-europea-inviable-289698 Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Council of the European Union. 1999. WTO: Preparation of the Third Ministerial Conference - Council Conclusions of 26 October 1999. Luxembourg: Council of the European Union (12121/99). Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Cronin, David. 2008. EU has decided to push ahead with plans to secure a free trade agreement. Inter Press Service, December 8. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  129. ———. 2008. Europe: EU official reverse course, give Colombia trade deal. Inter Press Service, December 11. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Cross, Ciaran. 2017. Focus: Failure by design: Did the US choose to lose the Guatemala labour dispute? International Union Rights 24 (3):23-25. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. da Conceição, Eugénia. 2010. Who Controls Whom? Dynamics of Power Delegation and Agency Losses in EU Trade Politics. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4):1107–1126. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. da Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia. 2011. Negotiating Trade Liberalization at the WTO. Domestic Politics and Bargaining Dynamics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillian. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. ———. 2013. Do Agents “Run Amok”? A Comparison of Agency Slack in the EU and US Trade Policy in the Doha Round. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 15 (1):21-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. ———. 2013. Two-level games and trade cooperation: What do we now know? International Politics 50 (4):579–599. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Dadush, Uri. 2013. Cold Water for Hot Trade Deals. The National Interest, May 13. Available at: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/cold-water-hot-trade-deals-8460?page=show Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Damro, Chad. 2012. Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5):682-699. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Dark, Taylor E. 1999. The Unions and the Democrats. An Enduring Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Davis, Bob. 2004. U.S. to Renew Trade Focus On Latin America. Wall Street Journal, October 11. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB109744579434841472 Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Davis, Christina L. 2012. Why Adjudicate?: Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. De Biévre, Dirk. 2006. The EU regulatory trade agenda and the quest for WTO enforcement. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6):851–866. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. De Biévre, Dirk, and Andreas Dür. 2005. Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy. Comparative Political Studies 38 (10):1271-1296. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. De Biévre, Dirk, and Arlo Poletti. 2015. Judicial Politics in International Trade Relations: Introduction to the Special Issue. World Trade Review 14 (S1):1-11. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, and Sierra Club. 2007. Statement by Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Sierra Club regarding Trade and Environment Deal. Press Release, May 14. Available at: http://vault.sierraclub.org/trade/downloads/peru-statement.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Destler, I.M. 1997. Renewing Fast-Track Legislation, Policy Analyses in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. ———. 2005. American Trade Politics. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. ———. 2007. American Trade Politics in 2007: Building Bipartisan Compromise. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Destler, I.M., and Peter J. Balint. 1999. The New Politics of American Trade: Trade, Labor, and the Environment, Policy Analyses in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Destler, I.M., and John S. Odell. 1987. Anti-Protection: Changing Forces in United States Trade Policies. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Deutsche Welle. 2008. Merkel ofrece ayuda a Colombia para aclarar violaciones de DDHH. Deutsche Welle, May 15. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/merkel-ofrece-ayuda-a-colombia-para-aclarar-violaciones-de-ddhh/a-3344780 Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Dickerson, Marla. 2008. CAFTA labor complaint filed. Los Angeles Times, April 24. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/24/business/fi-labor24 Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Doherty, Brian. 2005. Ideas and Actions in the Green Movement. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Donnan, Shawn, and Demetri Sevastopulo. 2015. US, Japan and 10 countries strike Pacific trade deal. Financial Times, October 5. Available at: https://next.ft.com/content/d4a31d08-6b4c-11e5-8171-ba1968cf791a Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom. 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379-406. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Draper, Peter, Khumalo Nkululeko, and Faith Tigere. 2017. Sustainability Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Can they be Multilateralised? In RTA Exchange. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review 3 (1):53-78. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. ———. 2003. The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion. International Organization 57 (3):643-659. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. ———. 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Dryzek, John S., David Downes, Chrisitan Hunold, David Schlosberg, and Hans-Kristian Hernes, eds. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Duffy, Robert J. 2012. Organized Interests and Environmental Policy. In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy edited by M. E. Kraft and S. Kamieniecki. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Dür, Andreas. 2006. Assessing the EU's role in international trade negotiations. European political science 5 (4):362-376. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. ———. 2007. EU Trade Policy as Protection for Exporters: The Agreements with Mexico and Chile. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):833–855. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. ———. 2008. Bringing Economic Interests Back into the Study of EU Trade Policy-Making. British Journal of Politics and International Relation 10 (1):27-45. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Dür, Andreas, Leonardo Baccini, and Manfred Elsig. 2014. The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. Review of International Organizations 9 (3):353-375. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Dür, Andreas, and Dirk De Biévre. 2007. Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. Journal of Public Policy 27 (1):79-101. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Dür, Andreas, and Manfred Elsig. 2011. Principals, agents, and the European Union´s foreign economic policies. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (3):323-338. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Dür, Andreas, and Hubert Zimmermann. 2007. Introduction: The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):771-787. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Dymond, William A. 2001. Core labour standards and the world trade organization: Labour's love lost. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 8 (3):99-114. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Dymond, William A., and Michael M. Hart. 2000. Post-Modern Trade Policy. Reflections on the Challenges to Multilateral Trade Negotiations After Seattle. Journal of World Trade 34 (3):21-38. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Ebert, Franz Christian. 2016. Labour Provisions in EU Trade Agreements. International Labour Review 155 (3):407-433. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2):24-50. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Eckhardt, Jappe, and Manfred Elsig. 2015. Support for international trade law: The US and the EU compared. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (4):966-986. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. EESC. 2018. Opinion. Trade and sustainable development chapters (TSD) in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTA). Brussels: European Economic and Social Comittee. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Egan, Michelle P. 2005. Creating a Transatlantic Marketplace: Government Policies and Business Strategies. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Eggen, Dan. 2008. Bush Backs New Trade Pact With Colombia. Washington Post, April 8. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/07/AR2008040700789.html Google Scholar öffnen
  176. ———. 2008. Bush Concedes Defeat On Colombia Trade Pact. Washinton Post, April 15. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/14/AR2008041400991.html Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Eilperin, Juliet. 2007. How Trade Breakthrough Almost Broke Down in Congress. Washington Post, November 22. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/21/AR2007112102333.html Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Elliot, Kimberly Ann. 2011. Labor Rights. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development. A Handbook, edited by J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 2000. Preferences for Workers? Worker Rights and the US Generalized System of Preferences. In Working Paper. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Richard B. Freeman. 2003. Can Labor Standards Improve Under Globalization? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Elsig, Manfred. 2010. European Union trade policy after enlargement: larger crowds, shifting priorities and informal decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (6):781–798. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Elsig, Manfred, and Cédric Dupont. 2012. European Union Meets South Korea: Bureaucratic Interests, Exporter Discrimination and the Negotiations of Trade Agreements. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3):492-507. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Elsig, Manfred, and Jappe Eckhardt. 2015. The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning. World Trade Review 14 (S1):13-32. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Emmott, Robin. 2012. EU approves deals to boost trade with Latin America. Reuters, December 11. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/eu-trade-latam-idUSL5E8NB8IO20121211 Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1996. The partisan paradox and the U.S. tariff, 1877 - 1934. International Organization 50 (2):301-324. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. ESF. 2007. ESF Position Paper on EU Free Trade Agreements. Position Paper, February 28. Available at: http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/esf-position-paper-on-eu-free-trade-agreements-final.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  187. ———. 2009. Services Industry Calls for swift conclusion of the EU-Korea FTA. Letter to Commission President José Manuel Barroso, July 6. Available at: http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/esf-korea-letter-to-barroso-july-6-2009.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. ETUC. 2006. On the communication ‘Global Europe: competing in the world. Resolution adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee in their meeting held in Brussels on 7–8 December. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. ———. 2008. Notorious rights violations rewarded in new European Union trade preferences system Press Release, December 12. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/press/notorious-rights-violations-rewarded-new-european-union-trade-preferences-system#.WEWDCnoabJg Google Scholar öffnen
  190. ———. 2009. EU Trade negotiations with Colombia and Peru. Resolution adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee in their meeting held in Brussels held from 1-2 December 2009. Press Release. Available at: http://etuc.org/a/6736 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. ———. 2010. ETUC welcomes EU Parliament decisions on trade and sustainable development Press Release, November 26. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/press/etuc-welcomes-eu-parliament-decisions-trade-and-sustainable-development#.VrtQg0aql_k Google Scholar öffnen
  192. ———. 2010. EU Trade Commissioner and ETUC's General Secretary discuss labour standards and trade policy. Press Release, April 13. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/press/eu-trade-commissioner-and-etucs-general-secretary-discuss-labour-standards-and-trade-policy#.VrtMa0aql_k Google Scholar öffnen
  193. ———. 2013. EP INTA Hearing on Sustainable Development Chapters in Trade Agreements. Speech at the EP's INTA Committee, November 27. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/speeches/ep-inta-hearing-sustainable-development-chapters-trade-agreements#.WEWGa3oabJg Google Scholar öffnen
  194. ETUC, CCT, and CSACC. 2008. Proposed Social Chapter for an Association Agreement by and between Central America and the European Union. April 2008. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  195. ———. 2009. Open Letter from the CSACC-CCT-CES concerning the Central America-EU Association Agreement. Letter, March 5. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/CartaAbierta-EN.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. ETUC/ITUC. 2007. ETUC/ITUC statement of trade union demands relating to key social elements of ‘sustainable development’ chapters in European Union negotiations on free trade agreements (FTAs). ETUC/ITUC, October 7. Available at: https://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/TLE_EN.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. ETUC/ITUC/TUCA. 2010. Appeal to European Union, Latin American and Caribbean Heads of State and of Government. LAC-EU Trade Union Summit 4th & 5th May 2010. Available at: https://www.ituc-csi.org/appeal-to-european-union-latin Google Scholar öffnen
  198. ———. 2012. ETUC letter on the proposed European Union Free Trade Agreement with Colombia and Peru. Letter to MEPs, February 22. Available at: www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/Letter.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Euractive. 2011. Parliament clears EU-South Korea trade pact. Euractive, February 18. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/trade/parliament-clears-eu-south-korea-news-502267 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. ———. 2012. EU lawmakers approve trade deals with Latin America. Euractive, December 11. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/trade/eu-lawmakers-approve-trade-deals-news-516590 Google Scholar öffnen
  201. ———. 2012. EU-Latin America trade deals in troubled water. Euractive, June 28. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/global-europe/eu-latin-america-trade-deals-tro-news-513602 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Eurobarometer. 1996. Standard Eurobarometer Survey: 44.2bis. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Eurochambers. 2007. The European Commission's Questionnaire on FTAs. Position Paper, April 2007. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  204. EuroCommerce. 2001. Jahresbericht 2001. Aktionsplan 2002. Brussels: EuroCommerce. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. ———. 2007. Free Trade Negotiations. Contribution to the DG Trade Stakeholder Consultation. Position Paper, May 31. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  206. European Commission. 1994. Statement by Sir Leon Brittan. Meeting at Ministerial Level Marrakesh (Morocco), April 12. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  207. ———. 2001. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee - Promoting core Labour Standards and Improving Social governance in the context of globalisation, COM(2001) 416 final. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. ———. 2004. The Social Dimension of Globalisation - the EU's policy contribution on extending the benefits to all, COM(2004) 383. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  209. ———. 2004. Trade policy in the Prodi Commission 1999-2004. An assessment. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. ———. 2005. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament: "European values in the globalised world - Contribution of the Commission to the October Meeting of Heads of State and Government", 20 October 2005, COM(2005) 525 final. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. ———. 2007. Commission Staff Working Document: The external dimension of the Single Market review. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. ———. 2007. EU and Central America start negotiations for new Association Agreement. Press Release, June 29. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-07-981_en.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. ———. 2007. EU to start negotiations for Association Agreement with the Andean Community; aid package for the region of EUR 713 million. Press Release, April 20. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/534&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Google Scholar öffnen
  214. ———. 2008. Industrial Relations in Europe 2008. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. ———. 2013. European Union, Trade in goods with Andean community. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. ———. 2013. European Union, Trade in goods with Central America (6). Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. ———. 2015. EU Textual Proposal. Trade And Sustainable Development. Brussels: European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. ———. 2018. Feedback and way forward on improving the implementation and enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. European Parliament. 1994. Resolution on the Introduction of a Social Clause in the Unilateral and Multilateral Trading System, A3-0007/94. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. ———. 1996. Resolution on the World Trade Organization (WTO), A4-0320/96. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. ———. 2007. Debates - Thursday, 13 December 2007: 5. Economic and trade relations with Korea. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. ———. 2007. Debates - Wednesday, 14 March 2007: Negotiation of an EU-Central America Association Agreement - Negotiation of an EU-Andean Community Association Agreement. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. ———. 2007. European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2007 on the trade and economic relations with Korea (2007/2186(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. ———. 2007. European Parliament resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe - external aspects of competitiveness (2006/2292(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. ———. 2007. Negotiation of an EU-Andean Community Association Agreement European Parliament recommendation of 15 March 2007 to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Andean Community and its member countries, of the other part (2006/2221(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. ———. 2007. Negotiation of an EU-Central America Association Agreement. European Parliament recommendation of 15 March 2007 to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the countries of Central America, of the other part (2006/2222(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. ———. 2007. Report on the Trade and Economic Relations with Korea (2007/2186(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. ———. 2010. Debates - Wednesday, 10 February 2010: 19. EU - South Korea free trade agreement. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. ———. 2010. European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. ———. 2010. European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on international trade policy in the context of climate change imperatives (2010/2103(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. ———. 2011. Debates - Monday, 9 May 2011: 20. Free trade agreement with India. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. ———. 2012. Debates - Monday, 10 December 2012: 15. EU-Central America association agreement. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. ———. 2012. Debates - Tuesday, 22 May 2012: EU trade agreement with Colombia and Peru. Brussels: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. ———. 2012. European Parliament resolution of 13 June 2012 on the EU trade agreement with Colombia and Peru (2012/2628(RSP)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. ———. 2016. European Parliament resolution on implementation of the 2010 recommendations of Parliament on social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility (2015/2038(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. European Report. 2006. Trade Strategy: Mandelson preaches ambitious and offensive bilateralism. European Report, October 12. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  237. ———. 2007. Free Trade Agreements: EU less demanding than US in social matters. European Report, October 9. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  238. European United Left/Nordic Green Left. 2012. Colombia/Peru trade deal - “Listen to the unions, Listen to the families of the victims: Vote No!”. Press Release, December 12. Available at: http://www.guengl.eu/news/article/gue-ngl-news/colombia-peru-trade-deal-listen-to-the-unions-listen-to-the-families-of-the Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Evans, Peter B., Harold K. Jacobson, and Robert D. Putnam. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkley: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Evenett, Simon J., and Michael Meier. 2008. An Interim Assessment of the US Trade Policy of ‘Competitive Liberalization’. The World Economy 31 (1):31-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Fabbrini, Sergio. 2007. Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Falke, Andreas. 2005. EU–USA Trade Relations in the Doha Development Round: Market Access versus a Post-modern Trade Policy Agenda. European foreign affairs review 10 (3):339–357. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Falkner, Robert. 2007. The political economy of 'normative power' Europe: EU environmental leadership in international biotechnology regulation. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4):507-526. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Falleti, Tulia G. 2016. Process tracing of extensive and intensive processes. New Political Economy 21 (5):455-462. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Feinberg, Richard E. 2003. The Political Economy of United States’ Free Trade Arrangements. The World Economy 26 (7):1019–1040. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Fifield, Anna. 2006. S Korea 'will not rush' US trade accord. Financial Times, April 18. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8b44eb2c-ce77-11da-a032-0000779e2340.html#axzz3x1berC28 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Filipovic, Christina 2010. Colombia backs rights monitoring in EU trade deal. Colombia Reports, October 11. Available at: http://colombiareports.com/colombia-rights-monitoring-eu-trade-deal/ Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Financial Times. 2005. Partisanship on trade. Financial Times, July 29. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/1d6f38c2-ff5c-11d9-86df-00000e2511c8 Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Fox, David. 1996. EU agrees to steer clear of labor issues/Move seen pleasing Asian partners. Journal of Commerce, October 29. Available at: http://www.joc.com/maritime-news/eu-agrees-steer-clear-labor-issues-move-seen-pleasing-partners-asia_19961029.html Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Francia, Peter L. 2012. The Future of Organized Labor in American Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. French, John D. 2002. From the Suites to the Streets: The Unexpected Re-emergence of the "Labor Question," 1994-1999. Labor History 43 (3):285-304. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. ———. 2006. North American Free Trade Agreement. In Encyclopedia of US Labor and Working Class History, edited by E. Arnesen. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Frennhoff Larsén, Magdalena. 2007. Principal–Agent Analysis with One Agent and Two Principals: European Union Trade Negotiations with South Africa. Politics & Policy 35 (3):440-463. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. ———. 2007. Trade Negotiations between the EU and South Africa: A Three-Level Game. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):857-881. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Frieden, Jeffrey. 1988. Capital Politics: Creditors and the International Political Economy. Journal of Public Policy 8 (3/4):265-286. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. ———. 1991. Debt, Development and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. ———. 1999. Actors and Preferences in International Relations. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Frieden, Jeffrey, and Lisa L. Martin. 2003. International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner. New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Friends of the Earth Europe. 2007. Central Americas poor and environment will be hit by free trade with the EU. Press Release, October 22. Available at: https://www.foeeurope.org/press/2007/Oct22_CP_CA_free_trade.htm Google Scholar öffnen
  260. ———. 2015. TTIP leak exposes EU’s failure to protect the environment. Press Release, October 26. Available at: http://www.foeeurope.org/TTIP-leak-exposes-EU%E2%80%99s-failure-protect-environment-231015 Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Fritz, Thomas. 2010. Die zweite Eroberung. Das EU-Freihandelsabkommen mit Kolumbien und Peru. Berlin and Amsterdam: Forschungs- und Dokumentationszentrum Chile-Lateinamerika/Transnational Institute. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. FT/Harris. 2007. Poll Finds Strong Populist Mood in Europe and to a Lesser Extent in the USA. In Press Release: Harris Interactive. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Gallagher, Kevin P. 2008. Understanding developing country resistance to the Doha Round. Review of International Political Economy 15 (1):62–85. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Gantz, David A. 2011. Labor Rights and Environmental Protection Under NAFTA and Other U.S. Free Trade Agreements. Arizona Legal Studies. Discussion Paper No. 11-13. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. GAO. 2007. International Trade: An Analysis of Free Trade Agreements and Congressional and Private Sector Consultations under Trade Promotion Authority. In Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. ———. 2014. Free Trade Agreements: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative schould continue to improve its Monitoring of Environmental Commitments. In Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. ———. 2014. Free Trade Agreements: U.S. Partners Are Adressing Labor Commitments, but More Monitoring and Enforcement Are Needed. In Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Garcia Bercero, Ignacio. 2006. Dispute Settlement in European Union Free Trade Agreements: Lessons Learned? In Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, edited by L. Bartels and F. Ortino. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Gardner, Andrew. 2012. MEPs approve Latin American trade deals. Politico, December 12. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/meps-approve-latin-american-trade-deals/ Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Garrett, Geoffrey, and George Tsebelis. 1996. An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50 (2):269-299. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. George. 2014. Environment and Regional Trade Agreements. Emerging Trends and Policy Drivers. In OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers: 2014/02. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Goldfarb, Zachary A., and Lori Montgomery. 2011. Obama gets win as Congress passes free-trade agreements. Washinton Post, October 12. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obama-gets-win-as-congress-passes-free-trade-agreements/2011/10/12/gIQAGHeFgL_story.html Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Goldirova, Renata. 2009. Brussels Divided Over Korean Trade Deal. Bloomberg Business Week, July 22. Available at: http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jul2009/gb20090722_028291.htm Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Gomez Arana, Arantza. 2014. The European Union and the Central American Common Market Signs an Association Agreement: Pragmatism versus Values? European foreign affairs review 20 (1):43-63. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. González Garibay, Montserrat. 2011. The trade-labour and trade-environment linkages: together or apart? The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 10 (2):165-184. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. González Garibay, Montserrat, and Johan Adriaensen. 2013. The Illusion of Choice: The European Union and the Trade-Labour Linkage. Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (4):542-559. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Goodman, Peter. 2007. Democrats, White House Clash on Trade. Washington Post, February 15. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/14/AR2007021401752.html Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Gourevitch, Peter A., and James Shinn. 2005. Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Grandi, Pablo Lazo. 2009. Trade Agreements and their Relation to Labour Standards: The Current Situation. In ICTSD Programme on EPAs and Regionalism. Issue Paper no. 3. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Greenhouse, Steven. 2010. U.S. Union Backing Boosts Korea Trade Pact. New York Times, December 10. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/09/business/global/09trade.html?_r=0 Google Scholar öffnen
  285. ———. 2013. Under Pressure, Bangladesh Adopts New Labor Law. New York Times, July 16. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/world/asia/under-pressure-bangladesh-adopts-new-labor-law.html Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Gregson, Julie. 2010. Rights groups slam EU free trade deal with Colombia. Deutsche Welle, March 11. Available at: http://www.dw.com/en/rights-groups-slam-eu-free-trade-deal-with-colombia/a-5339801 Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Greven, Thomas. 2005. Die Verankerung von Arbeitnehmerrechten in bilateralen und regionalen Handels- und Investitionsabkommen. In FES Briefing Paper. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 1994. Protection for Sale. The American Economic Review 84 (4):833-850. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Grynberg, Roman, and Veniana Qalo. 2006. Labour Standards in US and EU Preferential Trading Arrangements. Journal of World Trade 40 (4):619-653. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Guber, Deborah, and Christopher Bosso. 2010. Past the Tipping Point? Public Discourse and the Role of the Environmental Movement in the Post-Bush Era. In Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, edited by N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Hacker, Jacob S. , and Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society 38 (2):152-204. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer - and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2005. Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization 59 (3):593–629. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. ———. 2009. Forced to be good: why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Haggard, Stephan. 1988. The institutional foundations of hegemony: explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934. International Organization 42 (1):91-119. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Haggard, Stephan, and Steven B. Webb. 1994. Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Hall, Peter A. 1998. Heterogeneous preferences and the practice of group representation in U.S. trade policy. In Constituent interests and U.S. trade policies, edited by A. V. Deardorff and R. M. Stern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. ———. 2013. Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing. European political science 12 (1):20-30. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Hamdan, Fouad. 2006. Yes to Global Trade – But Protect our Planet. In Speech at the Conference “EU Trade on Trial” in Brussels, November 23, 2006. Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Hamilton, Daniel S. 2014. America’s Mega-Regional Trade Diplomacy: Comparing TPP and TTIP. The International Spectator 49 (1):81–97. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. ———. 2014. The Geopolitics of TTIP: Repositioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World. Washington, D.C.: Center for Transatlantic Relations. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Harrison, James, Mirela Barbu, Liam Campling, and Franz Christian Ebert. 2018. Labour Standards Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Reflections on the European Commission’s Reform Agenda. World Trade Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Harrison, James, Mirela Barbu, Liam Campling, Ben Richardson, and Adrian Smith. 2018. Governing Labour Standards through Free Trade Agreements: Limits of the European Union's Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters. Journal of Common Market Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Haworth, Nigel, Stephen Hughes, and Rorden Wilkinson. 2005. The international labour standards regime: a case study in global regulation. Environment and Planning 37 (11):1939-1953. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Henisz, Witold J., and Edward D. Mansfield. 2006. Votes and Vetoes: The Political Determinants of Commercial Openness. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1):189-212. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Hepple, Bob. 2008. Enforcement: the law and politics of cooperation and compliance. In Social and Labour Rights in a Global Context. International and Comparative Perspectives, edited by B. Hepple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Heydon, Kenneth, and Stephen Woolcock. 2009. The rise of bilateralism: Comparing American, European and Asian approaches to preferential trade agreements. New York: United Nations University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Hilary, John. 2014. European Trade Unions and Free Trade: Between International Solidarity and Perceived Self-Interest. Globalizations 11 (1):47-57. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Hirsch, Steve. 2007. Labor, greens denounce trade policy. Washington Post, February 14. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/washtimes_laborgreensdenouncetpa_02142007.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Hitt, Greg. 2006. Washington, Seoul Face a Thorny Issue. Wall Street Journal, July 10. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115248923871401893 Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Hix, Simon. 2013. Why the 2014 European Elections Matter: Ten Key Votes in the 2009–2013 European Parliament. SIEPS European Policy Analysis. September 2013: 15epa. Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Hix, Simon, Noury G. Abdul, and Gérard Roland. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Hix, Simon, and Abdul Noury. 2009. After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (2):159-174. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Hocking, Brian. 2004. Changing the terms of trade policy making: from the ‘club’ to the ‘multistakeholder’ model. World Trade Review 3 (1):3-26. Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Hopewell, Kristen. 2015. Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization. Review of International Political Economy 22 (2):311-338. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Horn, Henrik, Petros C. Mavroidis, and André Sapir. 2010. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements. The World Economy 33 (11):1565-1588. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Hornbeck, J. F. 2005. The Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA). In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Hornbeck, J. F., and William H. Cooper. 2013. Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Howse, Robert, and Michael J. Trebilcock. 1996. The fair trade-free trade debate: Trade, labor, and the environment. International Review of Law and Economics 16 (1):61–79. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Hughes, Steve, and Rorden Wilkinson. 1998. International labour standards and world trade: No role for the world trade organization? New Political Economy 3 (3):375-389. Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Hulse, Carl. 2008. House Votes to Put Off Trade Deal Bush Sought. New York Times, April 11. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/11/business/11trade.html?_r=0 Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Human Rights Watch. 2007. The US-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Annex 22-B: A Missed Opportunity on Workers’ Rights in North Korea. Washington, D.C.: Human Rights Watch. Google Scholar öffnen
  324. ———. 2010. EU: Try to Improve Human Rights in North Korea. Press Release, June 14. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2010/06/14/eu-try-improve-human-rights-north-korea Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Ikenberry, G. John, David A. Lake, and Michael Mastanduno. 1988. Introduction: approaches to explaining American foreign economic policy. International Organization 42 (1):1-14. Google Scholar öffnen
  326. ILO. 2017. Handbook on Assessment of Labour Provisions in Trade and Investment Arrangements. Geneva: International Labour Organisation. Google Scholar öffnen
  327. ILO, and IILS. 2013. Social Dimension of Free Trade Agreements. Geneva: International Labour Organization and International Institute for Labour Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Inside US Trade. 2001. Zoellick lays out deliberate approach to Jordan, Vietnam. Inside US Trade, February 2. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  329. ———. 2002. U.S. looks for Fines, Sanctions Mix for Chile, Singapore FTAs. Inside US Trade, October 25. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  330. ———. 2003. Administration faces tough fight for textile Republican votes on CAFTA. Inside US Trade, January 2. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  331. ———. 2003. Baucus proposes new CAFTA environment rules to bolster U.S. position. Inside US Trade, October 17. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  332. ———. 2003. CAFTA negotiators likely to meet on agriculture this month. Inside US Trade, August 8. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  333. ———. 2003. House Democrats criticize U.S. Labor Proposal in CAFTA as Inadequate. Inside US Trade, May 16. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  334. ———. 2003. Major CAFTA issues unresolevd as U.S., others announce conclusion. Inside US Trade, December 19. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  335. ———. 2003. Senators call for improved CAFTA labor, environmental standards. Inside US Trade, November 28. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  336. ———. 2003. U.S. tables CAFTA agriculture, industrial market access proposals. Inside US Trade, May 30. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  337. ———. 2003. Vargo warns CAFTA delay could threaten 2004 congressional vote. Inside US Trade, December 12. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  338. ———. 2004. Ecuador, Peru settle outstanding issues, will be included in FTA talks. Inside US Trade, May 7. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  339. ———. 2004. Peru, Ecuador could be dropped from Andean FTA over Investment. Inside US Trade, October 8. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  340. ———. 2004. U.S. hints at delaying sanctions decision after new promises. Inside US Trade, March 26. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  341. ———. 2004. U.S.-Andean FTA talks begin next week, deadline hinges on fast track. Inside US Trade, May 14. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  342. ———. 2004. U.S., Costa Rica settle insurance, textile issues in FTA talks. Inside US Trade, January 30. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  343. ———. 2004. USTR says no changes to CAFTA text on labor, as AFL-CIO gears up for fight. Inside US Trade, February 27. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  344. ———. 2005. CAFTA countries lay out labor enforcement plan, seek more funding. Inside US Trade, April 8. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  345. ———. 2005. Ecuador presses for better FTA treatment for flowers, canned tuna. Inside US Trade, February 11. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  346. ———. 2005. Levin sees little USTR Willingness to compromise on labor in FTAs. Inside US Trade, November 11. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  347. ———. 2005. No definite date set for conclusion of Andean FTA talks. Inside US Trade, October 28. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  348. ———. 2005. U.S. warns Ecuador of possible Andean FTA exclusion over labor. Inside US Trade, October 7. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  349. ———. 2005. U.S., Andean talks adjourn after achieving most progress with Peru. Inside US Trade, November 25. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  350. ———. 2005. U.S., Andeans agree to intensify FTA work, hope to finish by mid-November. Inside US Trade, September 30. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  351. ———. 2005. Unions say they will punish Democrats for supporting DR-CAFTA deal. Inside US Trade, July 29. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  352. ———. 2005. USTR delays preliminary decisions on Andean Trade Benefits. Inside US Trade, January 21. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  353. ———. 2005. Vargo says major work remains in key areas of the Andean FTA. Inside US Trade, March 25. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  354. ———. 2006. Portman to stick to labor provisions outlined in Fast Track. Inside US Trade, February 10. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  355. ———. 2006. U.S. freezes Ecuador FTA after government cancels occidental contract. Inside US Trade, May 19. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  356. ———. 2006. U.S., Colombia beef unresolved as notification to Congress lags. Inside US Trade, August 4. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  357. ———. 2007. Environmental groups laud new Peru language as first step. Inside US Trade, June 29. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  358. ———. 2007. Levin skeptical of FTA labor side letters in Schwab Meeting. Inside US Trade, January 26. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  359. ———. 2007. Rangel unveils Democratic trade policy principles to administration. Inside US Trade, March 27. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  360. ———. 2007. Rangel, Levin say conceptual agreement not enough for Colombia FTA. Inside US Trade, May 11. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  361. ———. 2007. Schwab says FTA labor talks focused on substance, not form. Inside US Trade, January 19. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  362. ———. 2008. New Peru FTA Decrees Anger Civil Society Over Labor, Environment. Inside US Trade, July 4. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  363. ———. 2015. EU pushes new environmental rules, but without enforceability. Inside US Trade, February 13. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  364. ———. 2016. Malmstrom Non-Committal on Enforcement for TTIP Labor, Environment Provisions. Inside US Trade, July 7. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Irwin, Douglas A. 1994. The Political Economy of Free Trade: Voting in the British General Election of 1906. The Journal of Law and Economics 37 (1):75-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  366. ———. 1996. Industry or class cleavages over trade policy? Evidence from the British General Election of 1923. In The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, edited by J. N. Bhagwati, R. C. Feenstra, G. M. Grossman and D. A. Irwin. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  367. ———. 2015. Free Trade under Fire. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  368. Islam, Shada. 1994. Europe: EC Row Brewing over Trade and Labor Standards Link. Inter Press Service, January 27. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Jacoby, Wade, and Sophie Meunier. 2010. Europe and the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3):299–317. Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Jaffe, Adam B., Steven R. Peterson, Paul R. Portney, and Robert N. Stavins. 1995. Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1):132-163. Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Janusch, Holger. 2015. Labor Standards in U.S. Trade Politics. Journal of World Trade 49 (6):1047-1072. Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Jensen, Nathan M. 2006. Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Jinnah, Sikina, and Julia Kennedy. 2011. A New Era of Trade-Environment Politics: Learning from US Leadership and its Consequences Abroad. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 12 (1):95-109. Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Jinnah, Sikina, and Elisa Morgera. 2013. Environmental Provisions in American and EU Free Trade Agreements: A Preliminary Comparison and Research Agenda. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 22 (3):324-339. Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Johnson, Ailish. 2009. EU-ILO relations. Between regional and global governance. In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU Influences the World, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Jones, Kent. 2010. The Doha Blues: Institutional Crisis and Reform in the WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Jones, Vivian C. 2015. Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Kagan, Robert A. 2003. Adversial Legalism. The American Way of Law. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Kahler, Miles, and David A. Lake. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  380. Kahn-Nisser, Sara. 2016. A Matter of Degree: Europeanization, ILO Treaty Ratification and Labour Standards in Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (3):356-374. Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Karol, David. 2000. Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Much Ado About Nothing? International Organization 54 (04):825-844. Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Karp, Larry. 2011. The Environment and Trade. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3:397–417. Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Katzenstein, P. J. 1977. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1977. Conclusion: domestic structures and strategies of foreign economic policy. International Organization 31 (04):879-920. Google Scholar öffnen
  385. Keech, William R., and Kyoungsan Pak. 1995. Partisanship, Institutions, and Change in American Trade Politics. The Journal of Politics 57 (04):1130-1142. Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Kelemen, Daniel R., and Eric C. Sibbitt. 2004. The Globalization of American Law. International Organization 58 (1):103-136. Google Scholar öffnen
  387. Kelemen, Daniel R., and David Vogel. 2010. Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics. Comparative Political Studies 43 (4):427–456. Google Scholar öffnen
  388. Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2010. Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3):335-349. Google Scholar öffnen
  389. ———. 2011. Eurolegalism. The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  390. Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Tim Knievel. 2015. The United States, the European Union, and international environmental law: The domestic dimensions of green diplomacy. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (4):945-965. Google Scholar öffnen
  391. Kerremans, Bart. 1999. The US Debate on Trade Negotiating Authority between 1994 and 1999. Journal of World Trade 33 (5):49-85. Google Scholar öffnen
  392. Kerremans, Bart, and Myriam Martins Gistelinck. 2009. Interest Aggregation, Political Parties, Labour Standards and Trade: Differences in the US and EU Approaches to the Inclusion of Labour Standards in International Trade Agreements. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):683–701. Google Scholar öffnen
  393. Keune, Maarten. 2009. EU enlargement and social standards. Exporting the European social model? In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the world, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. Ex Ante Due Diligence: Formation of PTAs and Protection of Labor Rights. International Studies Quarterly 56 (4):704-719. Google Scholar öffnen
  395. Kim, Soo Yeon, Edward D. Mansfield, and Helen V. Milner. 2016. Regional Trade Governance. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, edited by T. Börzel and T. Risse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  396. King, Neil Jr. 2004. Kerry Would Seek Tighter Standards Governing CAFTA. The Wallstreet Journal, June 1. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108577638109124157 Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Kirk, Ron. 2010. Tough Trade Enforcement Supports Jobs for American Workers. White House Blog. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/07/30/tough-trade-enforcement-supports-jobs-american-workers Google Scholar öffnen
  398. Kissack, Robert. 2009. Writing a new normative standard? EU member states and ILO conventions. In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization: How the EU Influences the World, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  399. ———. 2011. The Performance of the European Union in the International Labour Organization. Journal of European Integration 33 (6):651-665. Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Klein, Rick. 2005. House Passes Free-Trade Agreement in Tight Vote. The Boston Globe, July 28. Available at: http://archive.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/07/28/house_passes_free_trade_agreement_in_tight_vote/ Google Scholar öffnen
  401. Kohl, Tristan, Steven Brakman, and Harry Garretsen. 2016. Do Trade Agreements Stimulate International Trade Differently? Evidence from 296 Trade Agreements. The World Economy 39 (1):97-131. Google Scholar öffnen
  402. Kotz, David M. 2015. The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Kraft, Michael E., and Sheldon Kamieniecki. 2007. Business and Environmental Policy: Corporate Interests in the American Political System. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  404. Krasner, Stephen D. 1977. US Commercial and Monetary Policy: Unravelling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness. International Organization 31 (4):635-671. Google Scholar öffnen
  405. ———. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Krugman, Paul R. 1993. The Narrow and Broad Arguments for Free Trade. The American Economic Review 83 (2):362-366. Google Scholar öffnen
  407. Krupa, Peter. 2007. E.U. Negotiations Launch, So Does Opposition. Tico Times, October 26. Available at: http://www.ticotimes.net/2007/10/26/e-u-negotiations-launch-so-does-opposition Google Scholar öffnen
  408. Kucik, Jeffrey. 2012. The Domestic Politics of Institutional Design: Producer Preferences over Trade Agreement Rules. Economics and Politics 24 (2):95–118. Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Kull, Steven. 2005. Americans on CAFTA and US Trade Policy: The PIPA/Knowledge Networks Polls. Google Scholar öffnen
  410. La Nación. 2009. Jefe negociador de Costa Rica ve complicada posición de Unión Europea; 'Posición de UE es complicada'. La Nación, March 25. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  411. ———. 2010. Daniel Ortega fustiga Acuerdo con la Unión Europea. La Nación, May 1. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/Daniel-Ortega-Acuerdo-Union-Europea_0_1119688065.html Google Scholar öffnen
  412. Labor Advisory Committee. 2007. The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Report of the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy (LAC). Washington, D.C.: LAC. Google Scholar öffnen
  413. Lacey, Marc. 2001. Bush Seeking to Modify Pact on Trade With Jordan. New York Times, April 11. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/11/world/bush-seeking-to-modify-pact-on-trade-with-jordan.html Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Lake, David A. 1988. The state and American trade strategy in the pre-hegemonic era. International Organization 42 (01):33-58. Google Scholar öffnen
  415. ———. 2009. Open economy politics: A critical review. Review of International Organisation 4 (3):219-244. Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Lamy, Pascal. 1999. The EU's approach to trade and core labour standards in the New WTO Round. Speech to the ICFTU, Seattle, November 29. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  417. Langille, Brian A. 1997. Eight Ways to think about International Labour Standards. Journal of World Trade 31 (4):27-53. Google Scholar öffnen
  418. ———. 2005. Core Labour Rights - The True Story (Reply to Alston). European Journal of International Law 16 (3):409-437. Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Lee, Donna, and Rorden Wilkinson. 2007. The WTO after Hong Kong: Progress in, and Prospects for, the Doha Development Agenda. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  420. Lee, Eddy. 1997. Globalization and Labour Standards: a review of issues. International Labour Review 136 (2):173-189. Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Lee, Thea M. 2006. Testimony on the Proposed U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Submitted by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Google Scholar öffnen
  423. Leeg, Tobias. 2018. Negotiating sustainable trade: explaining the difference in social standards in US and EU preferential trade agreements. Contemporary Politics 24 (4):398-417. Google Scholar öffnen
  424. Leeg, Tobias 2014. Normative Power Europe? The EU in the Negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with India. European foreign affairs review 19 (3):335-355. Google Scholar öffnen
  425. Lerer, Lisa, and Victoria McGrane. 2008. Venezuela scolds Bush over Colombia deal. Politico, September 4. Available at: http://www.politico.com/story/2008/04/venezuela-scolds-bush-over-colombia-deal-009473 Google Scholar öffnen
  426. Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  427. Levin, Sander M. 2002. The FTAA: A Chance to Shape the Rules of International Trade. Economic Perspectives: An Electronic Journal of the US. Department of State 7 (3):37-40. Google Scholar öffnen
  428. Lichtenstein, Nelson. 2010. Ideology and Interest on the Social Policy Home Front. In The Presidency of George W. Bush: A First Historical Assessment, edited by J. E. Zelizer. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  429. Lohmann, Susanne, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1994. Divided government and US trade policy: theory and evidence. International Organization 48 (4):595-632. Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Los Angeles Times. 2005. U.S., Others Agree to Rework CAFTA Rules. Los Angeles Times, July 20. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jul/20/business/fi-cafta20 Google Scholar öffnen
  431. Lundsgaarde, Erik. 2013. The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Lütz, Susanne. 2011. Back to the future? The domestic sources of transatlantic regulation. Review of International Political Economy 18 (4):iii-xxii. Google Scholar öffnen
  433. Madani, Dorsati. 1999. A Review of the Role and Impact of Export Processing Zones. In Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Magee, Stephen P. 1980. Three Simple Test of the Stolper Samuelson Theorem. In Issues in International Economics, edited by P. Oppenheimer. London: Oriel Press London. Google Scholar öffnen
  435. Magee, Stephen P., William A. Brock, and Leslie Young. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  436. Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. 2006. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis 14 (3):227-249. Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Mandelson, Peter. 2005. Open markets, open trade: Europe’s global challenge. Speech at Market Access Symposium, Brussels, September 19. Google Scholar öffnen
  438. ———. 2006. Trade policy and Decent Work. Intervention by Peter Mandelson at the EU Decent Work Conference, Brussels, December 5. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  439. Manger, Mark S. 2009. Investing in Protection. The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements between North and South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Manger, Mark S., and Kenneth C. Shadlen. 2012. Political Trade Dependence and North–South Trade Agreements. International Studies Quarterly 58 (1):79-91. Google Scholar öffnen
  441. Mann, Michael. 1996. Brittan bids to dovetail trade rules with environment laws. Politico, February 21. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/brittan-bids-to-dovetail-trade-rules-with-environment-laws/ Google Scholar öffnen
  442. Manners, Ian. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2):235-258. Google Scholar öffnen
  443. ———. 2009. The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Europe Perspective. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):785-803. Google Scholar öffnen
  444. ———. 2011. The European Union’s normative power. In Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by R. G. Whitman. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Mansfield, Edward D., and Marc L. Busch. 1995. The political economy of nontariff barriers: a cross-national analysis. International Organization 49 (4):723 - 749. Google Scholar öffnen
  446. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2007. Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science 37 (3):403 - 432. Google Scholar öffnen
  447. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Peter B. Rosendorff. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3):477-513. Google Scholar öffnen
  448. Manyin, Mark E. 2007. South Korea-U.S. Economic Relations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Manyin, Mark E., and Dick K. Nanto. 2011. The Kaesong North-South Korean Industrial Complex. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  450. Marx, Axel, Brecht Lein, and Nicolas Brando. 2016. The Protection of Labour Rights in Trade Agreements: The Case of the EU-Colombia Agreement Journal of World Trade 50 (4):587-610. Google Scholar öffnen
  451. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  452. McCormick, J. 1995. The Global Environmental Movement. Bloominton: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated. Google Scholar öffnen
  453. Melo Araujo, Billy A. 2013. Intellectual Property and the EU's Deep Trade Agenda. Journal of International Economic Law 16 (2):439-474. Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Menon, Anand, and Martin A. Schain. 2006. Comparative Federalism: The European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  455. Meunier, Sophie. 2000. What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU–U.S. Trade Negotiations. International Organization 54 (1):103–135. Google Scholar öffnen
  456. ———. 2005. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  457. ———. 2007. Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):905–926. Google Scholar öffnen
  458. Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  459. ———. 1991. Resisting the Protectionist Temptation: Industry and the Making of Trade Policy in France and the United States during the 1970s. In International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, edited by J. Frieden and D. A. Lake. New York: St. Martin's. Google Scholar öffnen
  460. ———. 1999. The Political Economy of International Trade. Annual Review of Political Science 2:91-114. Google Scholar öffnen
  461. ———. 2006. Why multilateralism? Foreign aid and domestic principal-agent problems. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson and M. J. Tierney. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  462. Milner, Helen V., and Benjamin Judkins. 2004. Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left–Right Divide on Trade Policy? International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):95-120. Google Scholar öffnen
  463. Milner, Helen V., and Keiko Kubota. 2005. Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries. International Organization 59 (1):107-143. Google Scholar öffnen
  464. Milner, Helen V., and Edward D. Mansfield. 2012. Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of International Trade Agreements. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  465. Milner, Helen V., and Peter B. Rosendorff. 1997. Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):117-146. Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Milner, Helen V., and Dustin H. Tingley. 2010. The Political Economy of U.S. Foreign Aid: American Legislators and the Domestic Politics of Aid. Economics & Politics 22 (2):200-232. Google Scholar öffnen
  467. Mincetur. 2009. Acuerdo Comercial entre la Unión Europea - Peru y Colombia. Tercera Ronda de Negociaciones, Bruselas, Bélgica del 4 al 8 de Mayo 2009: Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo de Peru. Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Introduction: Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining. In Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics edited by P. B. Evans, H. K. Jacobson and R. D. Putnam. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  469. ———. 1997. Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51 (4):513-553. Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Motaal, Abdel. 2001. Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and WTO Rules. Journal of World Trade 35 (6):1215-1233. Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, and Thomas Poguntke, eds. 2002. Green Parties in National Governments. London: Frank Cass. Google Scholar öffnen
  472. Murillo, Álvaro. 2007. Centroamérica y la UE discrepan hasta en el saludo. El Paìs, October 31. Available at: http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2007/10/31/actualidad/1193785206_850215.html Google Scholar öffnen
  473. ———. 2008. La corte de La Haya, nuevo escollo entre la UE y Centroamérica. El País, March 14. Available at: http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2008/03/14/actualidad/1205449203_850215.html Google Scholar öffnen
  474. ———. 2008. Stagno critica ‘hipocresía’ de UE contra armamento. La Naciòn, April 11. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/nacional/Stagno-critica-hipocresia-UE-armamento_0_969703066.html Google Scholar öffnen
  475. Mutch, Robert E. 2016. Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  476. Narlikar, Amrita. 2004. The ministerial process and power dynamics in the World Trade Organization: understanding failure from Seattle to Cancún. New Political Economy 9 (3):413-428. Google Scholar öffnen
  477. ———. 2010. New powers in the club: the challenges of global trade governance. International Affairs 86 (3):717-728. Google Scholar öffnen
  478. Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz. 2014. The Established Anglophone Democracies. In Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. A Handbook on Political Finance, edited by E. Falguera, S. Jones and M. Ohman. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Google Scholar öffnen
  479. Needham, Vicki. 2013. US, Guatemala resolve labor enforcement concerns. The Hill, April 11. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/293511-us-guatemala-resolve-labor-enforcement-concerns Google Scholar öffnen
  480. ———. 2014. US ramps up pressure on Guatemala over labor rights. The Hill, September 18. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/218225-us-moves-forward-on-labor-case-with-guatemala Google Scholar öffnen
  481. ———. 2014. US trade officials give Guatemala more time to install labor overhaul. The Hill, August 25. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/215913-us-trade-officials-give-guatemala-more-time-to-install-labor-overhaul Google Scholar öffnen
  482. New York Times. 2005. Applauding the Cafta 15. New York Times, July 29. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/29/opinion/applauding-the-cafta-15.html Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Newell, Peter. 2005. The Political Economy of Trade and the Environment. In The Political Economy of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century. Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics, edited by D. Kelly and W. Grant. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. Google Scholar öffnen
  484. Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. 1998. Minimizing agency costs in two-level games: Lessons from the trade authority controversies in the United States and the European Union. In Negotiating on Behalf of Others, edited by R. H. Mnookin and L. E. Susskind. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Nielson, Daniel L. 2003. Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in Middle-Income Presidential Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47 (3):470-491. Google Scholar öffnen
  486. Novitz, Tonia. 2009. In search of a coherent social policy. EU import and export of ILO labour standards? In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the World, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  487. O'Brien, Robert. 2000. Workers and world order: the tentative transformation of the international union movement. Review of International Studies 26 (04):533-555. Google Scholar öffnen
  488. O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. Politics, Process and American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  489. O'Reilly, Robert F. 2005. Veto Points, Veto Players, and International Trade Policy. Comparative Political Studies 38 (6):652-675. Google Scholar öffnen
  490. Oatley, Thomas. 2010. International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. New York: Longman. Google Scholar öffnen
  491. Obach, B. K. 2004. Labor and the Environmental Movement: The Quest for Common Ground. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  492. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Claire Roche Kelly. 2008. EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges. The International Spectator 43 (3):35-50. Google Scholar öffnen
  493. OECD. 1996. Trade, Employment, and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers’ Rights and International Trade. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Google Scholar öffnen
  494. ———. 2007. Environment and Regional Trade Agreements. Paris: OECD Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  495. Olivet, Cecilia, and Paulina Novo. 2011. Time for Europe to put values and human rights above commercial advantage. Policy Brief: Why EU–Colombia/Peru Free Trade Agreements should not be ratified. In Policy Brief. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Olsen, Kelly. 2007. South Korea, EU Launch Free Trade Talks. Washington Post, May 6. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501260.html Google Scholar öffnen
  497. ———. 2007. U.S., South Korea Reach Free Trade Deal. Washington Post, April 2. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/02/AR2007040200273_pf.html Google Scholar öffnen
  498. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  499. Orbie, Jan, and Olufemi Babarinde. 2008. The Social Dimension of Globalization and EU Development Policy: Promoting Core Labour Standards and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of European Integration 30 (3):459-477. Google Scholar öffnen
  500. Orbie, Jan, Martins Gistelinck, and Bart Kerremans. 2009. The social dimension of EU trade policies. In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the world, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  501. Orbie, Jan, Deborah Martens, Myriam Oehri, and Lore Van den Putte. 2016. Promoting sustainable development or legitimising free trade? Civil society mechanisms in EU trade agreements. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 1 (4):526–546. Google Scholar öffnen
  502. Orbie, Jan, and Lisa Tortell. 2009. From the social clause to social dimension of globalization. In The EU and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the world, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  503. ———. 2009. The New GSP Beneficiaries: Ticking the Box or Truly Consistent with ILO Findings. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):663-681. Google Scholar öffnen
  504. Orbie, Jan, Lisa Tortell, Robert Kissack, Sieglinde Gstöhl, Jan Wouters, and Nicolas Hachez. 2009. JESP Symposium: The European Union’s global social role. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (2):99–116. Google Scholar öffnen
  505. Orbie, Jan, Hendrik Vos, and Liesbeth Taverniers. 2005. EU Trade Policy and a Social Clause: A Question of Competences? Politique européenne 17 (3):159-187. Google Scholar öffnen
  506. Page, Benjamin I., and Martin Gilens. 2017. Democracy in America?: What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  507. Palmer, Doug. 2004. Colombia top priority in Andean trade talks - U.S. Reuters, September 29. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/reuters_colombiapriority_09292004.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  508. ———. 2007. Bush trade agenda at risk as Democrats take over. Washington Post, January 4. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/04/AR2007010400863_pf.html Google Scholar öffnen
  509. Pearson, K. 2015. Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives. Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  510. Peruvian Times. 2007. Peru president proposes creation of Environment Ministry. Peruvian Times, December 21. Available at: http://www.peruviantimes.com/21/peru-president-proposes-creation-of-environment-ministry/76/ Google Scholar öffnen
  511. Phillips, Leigh. 2009. Brussels' commitment to Latin American integration questioned. EU observer, September 30. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/28749 Google Scholar öffnen
  512. ———. 2009. Human rights no block to EU-Colombia talks. EU observer, May 4. Available at: https://euobserver.com/foreign/28062 Google Scholar öffnen
  513. Phillips, Nicola. 2007. The Limits of ‘Securitization’: Power, Politics and Process in US Foreign Economic Policy. Government and Opposition 42 (2):158–189. Google Scholar öffnen
  514. Piccio, Daniela R. 2014. Northern, Western and Southern Europe. In Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. A Handbook on Political Finance, edited by E. Falguera, S. Jones and M. Ohman. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Google Scholar öffnen
  515. Pickel, Gert, and Susanne Pickel. 2009. Qualitative Interviews als Verfahren des Ländervergleichs. In Methoden der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: Eine Einführung, edited by S. Pickel, G. Pickel, H.-J. Lauth and D. Jahn. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  516. Pierson, Paul, and Theda Skocpol. 2007. The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  517. Pinto, Pablo M., and Santiago M. Pinto. 2008. The Politics of Investment: Partisanship and the sectoral Allocation of Foreign Direct Investment. Economics and Politics 20 (2):216-254. Google Scholar öffnen
  518. Poletti, Arlo, and Dirk De Biévre. 2013. The political science of European trade policy: A literature review with a research outlook. Comparative European Politics 12 (1):101-119. Google Scholar öffnen
  519. Poletti, Arlo, and Daniela Sicurelli. 2012. The EU as Promoter of Environmental Norms in the Doha Round. West European Politics 35 (4):911-932. Google Scholar öffnen
  520. ———. 2016. The European Union, Preferential Trade Agreements, and the International Regulation of Sustainable Biofuels. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2):249-266. Google Scholar öffnen
  521. Politi, James, Demetri Sevastopulo, and Jude Webber. 2018. Trump hails Canada-US deal to revamp Nafta ‘historic’. Financial Times, October 1st. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/8a43c9f4-c51e-11e8-8670-c5353379f7c2 Google Scholar öffnen
  522. Politi, James, Andrew Ward, and Edward Luce. 2008. Bush sets scene for Colombia trade fight. Financial Times, April 7. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8d439084-04dc-11dd-a2f0-000077b07658.html#axzz3wvKorAXx Google Scholar öffnen
  523. Pollack, Mark , and Gregory Shaffer, eds. 2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen
  524. Porges, Amelia. 2011. Dispute Settlement. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development. A Handbook, edited by J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen
  525. Portela, C. 2009. European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy: When and Why Do They Work? Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  526. Portela, Clara, and Jan Orbie. 2014. Sanctions under the EU Generalised System of Preferences and foreign policy: coherence by accident? Contemporary Politics 20 (1):63-76. Google Scholar öffnen
  527. Portman, Rob. 2005. Remarks of Ambassador Rob Portman, United States Trade Representative. Speech at IDB Donor Conference, Washington, D.C., July 19. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  528. Postnikov, Evgeny. 2014. The design of social standards in EU and US preferential trade agreements. In Handbook of the international political economy of trade, edited by D. A. Deese. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  529. Postnikov, Evgeny, and Ida Bastiaens. 2014. Does dialogue work? The effectivness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreements. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (6):923-940. Google Scholar öffnen
  530. Pruzin, Daniel. 2002. Costa Rican Minister Says Government Open To Labor, Environmental Provisions in CAFTA. Bloomberg International Trade Reporter, October 17. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  531. R. V., Anuradha 2011. Environment. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development. A Handbook, edited by J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen
  532. Ramstad, Evan 2010. After Attack, South's Talks with U.S. Accelerated. Wall Street Journal, December 4. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703989004575653672051698034 Google Scholar öffnen
  533. Ramstad, Evan, and John W. Miller. 2010. South Korea and EU Near Free-Trade Pact. Wall Street Journal, March 25. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123789624042424463 Google Scholar öffnen
  534. Rangel. 2009. Moving Forward: A New, Bipartisan Trade Policy That Reflects American Values. Harvard Journal on Legislation 45 (2):377–419. Google Scholar öffnen
  535. Ravenhill, John. 2010. The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: A political domino effect. Review of International Organisation 17 (2):178-208. Google Scholar öffnen
  536. Reuters. 2004. No plans to change CAFTA labor provisions -US aide. Reuters, May 5. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/reuters_caftalabor_may2004.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  537. ———. 2008. Colombia, Peru Presidents Urge Quick EU Trade Deal. Reuters, September 22. Available at: http://arhiva.dalje.com/en-economy/colombia-peru-presidents-urge-quick-eu-trade-deal/184861 Google Scholar öffnen
  538. Richards, John E. 1999. Toward a Positive Theory of International Institutions: Regulating International Aviation Markets. International Organization 53 (1):1-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  539. Rickard, Stephanie J. 2015. Electoral Systems and Trade. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, edited by L. L. Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  540. Rittberger, Berthold. 2012. Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (s1):18-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  541. Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. Trade and the variety of democratic institutions. International Organization 41 (2):203-223. Google Scholar öffnen
  543. ———. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions. How Trade Affects Domestic Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  544. ———. 1999. Institutions as Constraints on Strategic Choice. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  545. Rosen, Howard. 2004. Free Trade Agreements as Foreign Policy Tools: The US-Israel and US-Jordan FTAs In Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities, edited by J. J. Schott. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  546. Ross, George. 2011. European Center-Lefts and the Mazes of European Integration. In What's Left of the Left. Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times, edited by J. Cronin, G. Ross and J. Shoch. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  547. Rowland, Kara. 2011. Three free-trade agreements linked to aid for workers. Washington Times, June 28. Available at: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/28/iowa-obama-touts-economic-progress/?page=all Google Scholar öffnen
  548. Sachs, Noah. 2006. Planning the Funeral at the Birth: Extended Producer Responsibility in the European Union and the United States. Harvard Environmental Law Review 30 (51):51-98. Google Scholar öffnen
  549. Salazar-Xirinachs, Jose M. , and Jaime Granados. 2004. The US-Central America Free Trade Agreement: Opportunities and Challenges In Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities, edited by J. J. Schott. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  550. Sang-Hun, Choe. 2008. South Korea and U.S. reach deal on beef imports. New York Times, June 22. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/world/asia/22korea.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=32B027F445364CE33467A4668786F12A&gwt=pay Google Scholar öffnen
  551. ———. 2009. Seoul Says European Trade Deal Is Near. New York Times, July 13. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/business/global/14trade.html?_r=0 Google Scholar öffnen
  552. Sanger, David E. 2001. Bush links Trade with Democracy at Quebec Talks. New York Times, April 22. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/22/world/bush-links-trade-with-democracy-at-quebec-talks.html Google Scholar öffnen
  553. Sapir, André. 2007. Europe and the Global Economy. In Fragmented Power: Europe and the Global Economy, edited by A. Sapir. Brussels: Bruegel. Google Scholar öffnen
  554. Sbragia, Alberta. 2010. The EU, the US, and trade policy: competitive interdependence in the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3):368–382. Google Scholar öffnen
  555. Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1935. Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar öffnen
  556. Scherrer, Christof. 1998. Protecting labor in the global economy: A social clause in trade agreements? New Political Science 20 (1):53-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  557. Scherrer, Christof, Thomas Greven, Aaron Leopold, and Elisabeth Molinari. 2009. An Analysis of the relative Effectivness of Social and Environmental Norms in Free Trade Agreements. Brussels: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  558. Schirm, Stefan A. 2010. Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global governance. European Journal of International Relations 16 (2):197–221. Google Scholar öffnen
  559. Schnietz, Karen E. 2000. The Institutional Foundation of U.S. Trade Policy: Revisiting Explanations for the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act. Journal of Policy History 12 (4):417-444. Google Scholar öffnen
  560. Schott, Jeffrey J. 2004. Assessing US FTA Policy. In Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities, edited by J. J. Schott. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  561. ———. 2017. US Trade Policy Options in the Pacific Basin: Bigger Is Better. In Policy Brief. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute of International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  562. Schott, Jeffrey J., Scott C. Bradford, and Thomas Moll. 2006. Negotiating the Korea–United States Free Trade Agreement. In Policy Briefs in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  563. Schott, Jeffrey J., and Cathleen Cimino. 2013. Crafting a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: What Can Be Done. In Policy Briefs in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics Google Scholar öffnen
  564. Sek, Leonore. 2003. Trade Promotion Authority (Fast-Track Authority for Trade Agreements): Background and Developments in the 107th Congress. In Issue Brief for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  565. Seligman, Dan. 2001. Transcript from a Panel Session at the Society of Environmental Journalists’ 10th National Conference. Speech at KING-TV Seattle. Available at: http://www.sierraclub.org/trade/articles/debate.asp Google Scholar öffnen
  566. Semuels, Alana, and Tom Hamburger. 2011. On South Korea trade deal, Obama and chamber are on same side. Los Angeles Times, January 24. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/24/business/la-fi-korea-fta-20110125 Google Scholar öffnen
  567. Shaffer, Greg. 2003. Defending Interests. Public-Private Partnerships in W.T.O. Litigation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  568. Shapiro, Hal. 2006. Fast Track: A Legal, Historical, and Political Analysis International Law and Development. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  569. Shear, Michael D. 2017. Trump Will Withdraw U.S. From Paris Climate Agreement. New York Times, June 1st. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/trump-paris-climate-agreement.html Google Scholar öffnen
  570. Shoch, James. 2000. Contesting Globalization: Organized Labor, NAFTA, and the 1997 and 1998 Fast-Track Fights. Politics & Society 28 (1):119-150. Google Scholar öffnen
  571. ———. 2001. Organized Labor versus Globalization. NAFTA, Fast Track, and PNTR with China. In Rekindling the Movement. Labor's Quest for Relevance in the Twenty-First Century, edited by L. Turner, H. C. Katz and R. W. Hurd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  572. ———. 2001. Trading Blows: Party Competition and U.S. Trade Policy in a Globalizing Era. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  573. Sierra Club. 2011. Sierra Club Letter Opposing Korea Colombia Panama FTAs. Letter to Congress, October 6. Washington, D.C.: Sierra Club. Available at: http://www.citizen.org/documents/sierra-club-letter-opposing-korea-colombia-panama-ftas-october-2011.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  574. ———. 2015. TPP Text Analysis: Environment Chapter Fails to Protect the Environment. Washinton, D.C.: Sierra Club. Google Scholar öffnen
  575. Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth. 2008. Statement on the US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement. Press Release, March 12. Available at: www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/envirocolombiaFTAsign-onhouse.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  576. Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2013. The Power of Economic Ideas: A Constructivist Political Economy of EU Trade Policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (4):597-617. Google Scholar öffnen
  577. ———. 2014. Constructing European Union Trade Policy. A Global Idea of Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. Google Scholar öffnen
  578. ———. 2014. Explaining the resilience of free trade: The Smooth-Hawley myth and the crisis. Review of International Political Economy 21 (3):535-574. Google Scholar öffnen
  579. Singh, J.P. 2008. Negotiation and the Global Information Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  580. Sokou, Katerina, and Howard Schneider. 2013. U.S. suspends Bangladesh's trade privileges due to labor concerns. Washinton Post, June 27. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-to-suspend-trade-privileges-with-bangladesh/2013/06/27/16171f08-df3d-11e2-963a-72d740e88c12_story.html Google Scholar öffnen
  581. Song, Yeongkwan. 2011. KORUS FTA vs. Korea-EU FTA: Why the Differences? In Academic Paper Series Vol. 6 No. 5. Washington, D.C.: Korea Economic Institute. Google Scholar öffnen
  582. Standing, Guy. 2008. The ILO: An Agency for Globalization? Development and Change 39 (3):355-384. Google Scholar öffnen
  583. Stark, Pete. 2001. Don't Make Same Errors On This Trade Agreement. Roll Call, May 7. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  584. Steffenson, Rebecca. 2005. Managing EU-US Relations: Actors, Institutions and the New Transatlantic Agenda. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  585. Stiles, Andrew. 2010. Business dials up trade efforts. The Hill, July 13. Available at: http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/108605-business-dials-up-free-trade-efforts Google Scholar öffnen
  586. Stolper, Wolfgang, and Paul A. Samuelson. 1941. Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies 9 (1): 58–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  587. Stout, David. 2008. Bush to Force Vote on Colombia Trade. New York Times, April 7. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/washington/07cnd-trade.html Google Scholar öffnen
  588. Strauch, Nicolas, and Robertas Pogorelis. 2011. Electoral systems. The link between governance, elected members and voters. Brussels: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen
  589. Suranovic, Steven. 2002. International Labour and Environmental Standards Agreements: Is This Fair Trade? The World Economy 25 (2):231-245. Google Scholar öffnen
  590. ———. 2010. International Trade: Theory and Policy. Nyack: Flat World Knowledge, L.L.C. Google Scholar öffnen
  591. Swann, Christopher. 2005. Sugar lobby deal mooted to save trade pact. Financial Times, April 12. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/caecfb9e-aaf0-11d9-98d7-00000e2511c8.html#axzz3yuKqURup Google Scholar öffnen
  592. Swanson, Ian. 2007. Labor Groups Differ on Peru Free Trade Deal. The Hill, September 18. Available at: http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/3274-labor-groups-differ-on-peru-free-trade-deal Google Scholar öffnen
  593. Teffer, Peter. 2015. EU wants promises on labour, environment in US trade pact. EU observer, November 6. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/131002 Google Scholar öffnen
  594. The Economic Times. 2009. Labour pangs likely to hold up India-EU free-trade agreement. The Economic Times, November 7. Available at: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2009-11-07/news/28434950_1_india-eu-trade-india-and-eu-india-eu-free-trade-agreement Google Scholar öffnen
  595. The Economist. 2007. Trade, timber and tribes. The Economist, October 4. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/9910163 Google Scholar öffnen
  596. ———. 2009. Low expectations exceeded. The Economist, April 30. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/13578834 Google Scholar öffnen
  597. The Hankyoreh. 2007. Gov’t says bracing itself for renegotiation on FTA. The Hankyoreh, May 23. Available at: http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_business/211306.html Google Scholar öffnen
  598. ———. 2007. U.S. may seek FTA renegotiations on labor, environment. The Hankyoreh, May 12. Available at: http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_business/208805.html Google Scholar öffnen
  599. The White House. 2001. Bush Says Labor, Environmental Concerns Should Not Hamper Trade Deals. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary. Google Scholar öffnen
  600. ———. 2001. The President's 2001 International Trade Agenda Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary. Google Scholar öffnen
  601. Tico Times. 2010. EU and Central America begin new rounds of talk for association agreement, this time including Panama. Tico Times, October 7. Available at: http://www.ticotimes.net/2010/03/19/eu-and-central-america-begin-new-round-of-talks-for-association-agreement-this-time-including-panama Google Scholar öffnen
  602. Toner, Robin. 2007. For Democrats, New Challenge in Age-Old Rift. New York Times, May 8. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/08/washington/08trade.html?_r=0&f Google Scholar öffnen
  603. Trampusch, Christine, and Bruno Palier. 2016. Between X and Y: how process tracing contributes to opening the black box of causality. New Political Economy 21 (5):437-454. Google Scholar öffnen
  604. Trottman, Melanie. 2010. Unions Make Vote Push. Wall Street Journal, October 4. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703431604575521940172598182 Google Scholar öffnen
  605. Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25 (3):289-325. Google Scholar öffnen
  606. Tsogas, George. 1999. Labour standards in international trade agreements: an assessment of the arguments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 10 (2):351-375. Google Scholar öffnen
  607. U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2000. U.S. Chamber Hails Free Trade Talks with Chile. Press Release, November 29. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/us-chamber-hails-free-trade-talks-chile Google Scholar öffnen
  608. ———. 2001. U.S. Chamber Pulls Out All Stops For Trade Ad Campaign Starts Final Week Before Congress Votes. Press Release, November 28. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/us-chamber-pulls-out-all-stops-trade-ad-campaign-starts-final-week-congress-votes Google Scholar öffnen
  609. ———. 2003. Statement by U.S. Chamber Vice President for Asia Myron Brilliant before the International Trade Commission on the Impact of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Google Scholar öffnen
  610. ———. 2007. Chamber Welcomes Bipartisan Deal to Move Trade Agenda Forward. Press Statement, May 9. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/chamber-welcomes-bipartisan-deal-move-trade-agenda-forward Google Scholar öffnen
  611. U.S. Department of Labor. 2012. Union members 2011. News Release, January 27. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/union2_01272012.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  612. UNCED. 1992. Agenda 21. The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Google Scholar öffnen
  613. UNICE. 1998. UNICE Comments on International Trade and Labour Standards. Position paper, June 11. Brussels: Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederation of Europe. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03080-E.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  614. ———. 1999. UNICE and the WTO Millennium Round. Executive Summary, September 1999. Brussels: Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03310-E.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  615. ———. 2001. The new WTO round. UNICE Fact Sheets, October 2001. Brussels: Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03850-E.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  616. ———. 2006. UNICE Strategy on a EU Approach to Free Trade Agreements. Position Paper, December 7. Available at: http://www.bilaterals.org/?unice-strategy-on-an-eu-approach&lang=en Google Scholar öffnen
  617. USCIB. 2001. Statement of the United States Council for International Business on Recommendations for a Broad-Based WTO Negotiation. May 10. Washington, D.C.: US Council for International Business. Available at: http://www.jmcti.org/2000round/US/USTR_comment/USCIB.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  618. ———. 2007. Labor and Employment. Position Paper, Washington, D.C.: US Council for International Business. Available at: http://www.uscib.org/index.asp?documentID=825 Google Scholar öffnen
  619. ———. 2007. USCIB Welcomes Bipartisan Trade Policy Accord. Press Release, May 14. Washington, D.C.: US Council for International Business. Available at: http://www.uscib.org/uscib-welcomes-bipartisan-trade-policy-accord-ud-3699/ Google Scholar öffnen
  620. Usi, Eva. 2012. Humala: "queremos industrializar el Perú". Deutsche Welle, June 12. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/humala-queremos-industrializar-el-per%C3%BA/a-16017789 Google Scholar öffnen
  621. Van den Hoven, Adrian. 2004. Assuming Leadership in Multilateral Economic Institutions: The EU's ‘Development Round’ Discourse and Strategy. West European Politics 27 (2):256-283. Google Scholar öffnen
  622. Van den Putte, Lore. 2015. Divided we stand: the European Parliament’s position on social trade in the post-Lisbon era. In Global Governance of Labour Rights. Assessing the Effectiveness of Transnational Public and Private Policy Initiatives, edited by A. Marx, J. Wouters, G. Rayp and L. Beke. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  623. ———. 2015. Involving Civil Society in Social Clauses and the Decent Work Agenda. Global Labour Journal 6 (2):221 - 235. Google Scholar öffnen
  624. Van den Putte, Lore, Ferdi De Ville, and Jan Orbie. 2015. The European Parliament as an actor in international trade: from power to impact. In The European Parliament and its International Relations, edited by S. Stavridis and D. Irrera. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  625. Van den Putte, Lore, and Jan Orbie. 2015. EU Bilateral Trade Agreements and the Surprising Rise of Labour Provisions. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31 (3):263–284. Google Scholar öffnen
  626. Van den Putte, Lore, Jan Orbie, Fabienne Bossuyt, and Ferdi De Ville. 2014. Social norms in EU bilateral trade agreements: A comparative overview. In Linking trade and non-commercial interests: the EU as a global role model?, edited by T. Takács, A. Ott and A. Dimopoulos. The Hague: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations. Google Scholar öffnen
  627. van Haute, Emilie, ed. 2016. Green Parties in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  628. van Schendelen, Rinus. 2005. Machiavelli in Brussels. The Art of Lobbying the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  629. Vieth, Warren. 2005. Friends, Foes Made Over Trade Deal. Los Angeles Times, August 7. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/print/2005/aug/07/nation/na-cafta7 Google Scholar öffnen
  630. Villareal, Angeles M. 2005. Andean-U.S. Free-Trade Agreement Negotiations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  631. ———. 2006. Andean-U.S. Free-Trade Agreement Negotiations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  632. ———. 2008. U.S.-Peru Economic Relations and the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  633. Vinagre, Emili. 2009. Merkel avala a Uribe y ofrece apoyo para pacificación en Colombia. Deutsche Welle, January 31. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/merkel-avala-a-uribe-y-ofrece-apoyo-para-pacificaci%C3%B3n-en-colombia/a-3992973-0 Google Scholar öffnen
  634. Visser, Jelle. 2006. Union membership statistics in 24 countries. Monthly Labor Review January:38-49. Google Scholar öffnen
  635. Vogel, David. 1997. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  636. ———. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  637. Vogel, Toby. 2012. Member states and MEPs to clash over free-trade deal. Politico, March 7. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/member-states-and-meps-to-clash-over-free-trade-deal/ Google Scholar öffnen
  638. Vogler, John, and Hannes R. Stephan. 2007. The European Union in global environmental governance: Leadership in the making? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7 (4):389-413. Google Scholar öffnen
  639. Vogt, Jeffrey S. 2014. Trade and Investment Arrangements and Labor Rights. In Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Impacts: New Expectations and Paradigms, edited by L. Blecher, N. Kaymar Stafford and G. C. Bellamy. New York: ABA Book Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  640. ———. 2015. The Evolution of Labor Rights and Trade—A Transatlantic Comparison and Lessons for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Journal of International Economic Law 18 (4):827–860. Google Scholar öffnen
  641. ———. 2015. A Little Less Conversation: The EU and the (Non) Application of Labour Conditionality in the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31 (3):285–304. Google Scholar öffnen
  642. Wade, Robert Hunter. 2003. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of 'development space'. Review of International Political Economy 10 (4):621-644. Google Scholar öffnen
  643. Waer, Paul. 1996. Social Clauses in International Trade The Debate in the European Union. Journal of World Trade 30 (4):25-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  644. Wall Street Journal. 2010. Obama's Outsourced Trade Policy. Wall Street Journal, September 15. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703376504575490944170692312 Google Scholar öffnen
  645. ———. 2011. Democrats vs. Obama on Trade. Wall Street Journal, March 14. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704296604576196480280412662 Google Scholar öffnen
  646. Wallach, Lori, and Michelle Sforza. 1999. The WTO: Five Years of Reasons to Resist Corporate Globalization. New York: Seven Stories Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  647. Weisman, Steven R. 2007. Bush and Democrats in Accord on Trade Deals. New York Times, May 10. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/business/11trade.html?_r=0&pa Google Scholar öffnen
  648. ———. 2007. Partisan Disagreements Jeopardize New Trade Deals. New York Times, July 8. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/washington/08trade.html Google Scholar öffnen
  649. ———. 2007. Using Chávez as Counterpoint, Bush Pursues Latin Trade Pacts. New York Times, October 24. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/25/business/worldbusiness/25trade.html Google Scholar öffnen
  650. Weissbrodt, David, and Matthew Mason. 2014. Compliance of the United States with International Labor Law. Minnesota Law Review 98 (5):1842-1878. Google Scholar öffnen
  651. Weitzman, Hal. 2005. US and Peru end trade impasse with agreement. Financial Times, December 7. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/02108266-6776-11da-a650-0000779e2340.html#axzz3xgQwp4IV Google Scholar öffnen
  652. Wheeler, David. 2001. Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air Pollution in Developing Countries. Journal of Environment & Development 10 (3):225-245. Google Scholar öffnen
  653. Wilkinson, Rorden. 1999. Labour and trade-related regulation: beyond the trade-labour standards debate? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1 (2):165-191. Google Scholar öffnen
  654. Williams, Brock R., Mark E. Manyin, Remy Jurenas, and Michaela D. Platzer. 2014. The U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implementation. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  655. Williamson, Elizabeth. 2010. U.S. Sets Sweeping New Deal on Trade. Wall Street Journal, December 3. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703350104575652882154932888 Google Scholar öffnen
  656. ———. 2010. U.S. Vows New Push in Korean Trade Pact. Wall Street Journal, June 25. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704846004575333303589295326 Google Scholar öffnen
  657. ———. 2011. Trade Pacts Tied to Worker Aid. Wall Street Journal, May 17. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703421204576327164110599384 Google Scholar öffnen
  658. Williamson, Elizabeth, and Melanie Trottman. 2010. Obama Courts Labor Support for Trade Deal. Wall Street Journal, August 4. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704499604575407790047897522 Google Scholar öffnen
  659. Willis, Andrew. 2009. EU trade talks with Peru continue despite government violence. EU observer, June 17. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/28324 Google Scholar öffnen
  660. ———. 2009. Honduran coup threatens to delay EU trade deal. EU observer, June 29. Available at: https://euobserver.com/foreign/28386 Google Scholar öffnen
  661. ———. 2010. EU completes trade talks with Peru and Colombia. EU observer, March 2. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/29582 Google Scholar öffnen
  662. ———. 2010. Landmark EU-Korea trade deal moves a step closer. EU Observer, June 23. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/30351 Google Scholar öffnen
  663. ———. 2010. Parliament sets out concerns over Colombia trade deal. EU observer, February 2. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/29392 Google Scholar öffnen
  664. ———. 2011. EU signs trade deals with Peru and Colombia. EU observer, April 14. Available at: https://euobserver.com/news/32177 Google Scholar öffnen
  665. Wolf, Martin. 2005. Why Globalization Works. Yale: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  666. Woll, Cornelia. 2009. Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union: Who Captures Whom? In Lobbying in the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues, edited by D. Coen and J. Richardson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  667. ———. 2012. The brash and the soft-spoken: Lobbying styles in a transatlantic comparison. Interest Groups & Advocacy 1 (2):193-214. Google Scholar öffnen
  668. Woll, Cornelia, and Alvaro Artigas. 2007. When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: The impact on business–government relations in international trade politics. Regulation & Governance 1 (2):121-138. Google Scholar öffnen
  669. Woolcock, Stephen. 2005. European Union Trade Policy: Domestic Institutions and Systemic Factors. In The Politics of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century. Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics, edited by D. Kelly and W. Grant. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. Google Scholar öffnen
  670. ———. 2007. European Union policy towards Free Trade Agreements. In ECIPE Working Paper. Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy. Google Scholar öffnen
  671. ———. 2010. The Treaty of Lisbon and the European Union as an actor in international Trade. In ECIPE Working Paper. Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy. Google Scholar öffnen
  672. ———. 2011. European Union Economic Diplomacy. The Role of the EU in External Economic Relations. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar öffnen
  673. ———. 2014. Differentiation within reciprocity: the European Union approach to preferential trade agreements. Contemporary Politics 20 (1):36-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  674. ———. 2014. EU Policy on Preferential Trade Agreements in the 2000s: A Reorientation towards Commercial Aims. European Law Journal 20 (6):718-732. Google Scholar öffnen
  675. WTO. 1994. Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization. Marrakesh: World Trade Organization. Google Scholar öffnen
  676. WWF. 2001. Environment & Trade in the European Union’s Inter-regional Agreements. Position Paper, May 2001. Brussels: World Wildlife Fund European Policy Office. Available at: http://assets.panda.org/downloads/dgtrademikel3.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  677. ———. 2003. A League of Gentlemen. Who really runs EU Trade Decision-Making? Report, November 2003. Brussels. World Wildlife Fund European Policy Office. Available at: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/aleagueofgentlemenfinal.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  678. Yandle, Bruce. 1983. Bootleggers and Baptists: The Education of a Regulatory Economist. Regulation (May/June):12-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  679. Yerkey, Gary G. 2001. EU's Lamy Opposes Addressing Social Issues Such as Workers' Rights in Trade Agreements. Bloomberg International Trade Reporter, April 5. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  680. Yoon, Esook 2003. South Korean Environmental Foreign Policy. Asia-Pacific Review of Economic Studies 13 (2):74-96. Google Scholar öffnen
  681. Young, Alasdair R. 2004. The Incidental Fortress: The Single European Market and World Trade. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (2):393–414. Google Scholar öffnen
  682. Young, Alasdair R., and John Peterson. 2006. The EU and the new trade politics. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6):795-814. Google Scholar öffnen
  683. ———. 2014. Parochial Global Europe. 21st Century Trade Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  684. Zarocostas, John. 1994. US under pressure for attempt to link trade, labor rules. Journal of Commerce, March 28. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  685. Zimmermann, Hubert. 2007. Drachenzähmung. Die EU und die USA in den Verhandlungen um die Integration Chinas in den Welthandel. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  686. ———. 2007. Realist Power Europe? The EU in the Negotiations about China's and Russia's WTO Accession. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):813-832. Google Scholar öffnen
  687. ———. 2008. How the EU Negotiates Trade and Democracy: The Cases of China's Accession to the WTO and the Doha Round. European foreign affairs review 13 (2):255-280. Google Scholar öffnen
  688. Zoellick, Robert B. 2001. American Trade Leadership: What is at Stake. Speech to the Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., September 24. Available at: Google Scholar öffnen
  689. Interviews Google Scholar öffnen
  690. Interview 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  691. U.S. academic, Washington, D.C., March 4th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  692. Interview 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  693. USTR official, Washington, D.C., March 9th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  694. Interview 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  695. AFL-CIO representative, Washington, D.C., March 10th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  696. Interview 4 Google Scholar öffnen
  697. International Brotherhood of Teamsters representative, Washington, D.C., March 12th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  698. Interview 5 Google Scholar öffnen
  699. Friends of the Earth representative, Washington, D.C., March 14th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  700. Interview 6 Google Scholar öffnen
  701. USTR official, Washington, D.C., March 17th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  702. Interview 7 Google Scholar öffnen
  703. U.S. Department of Labor official, Washington, D.C., March 27th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  704. Interview 8 Google Scholar öffnen
  705. Journalist Inside U.S. Trade, Washington, D.C., March 30th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  706. Interview 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  707. USTR official, Washington, D.C., April 2nd 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  708. Interview 10 Google Scholar öffnen
  709. Think Tank representative, Washington, D.C., April 6th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  710. Interview 11 Google Scholar öffnen
  711. Republican congressional aide, Washington, D.C., April 7th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  712. Interview 12 Google Scholar öffnen
  713. Democratic congressional aide, Washington, D.C., April 8th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  714. Interview 13 Google Scholar öffnen
  715. Think Tank representative, Washington, D.C., April 9th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  716. Interview 14 Google Scholar öffnen
  717. Democratic congressional aide, Washington, D.C., April 13th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  718. Interview 15 Google Scholar öffnen
  719. National Association of Manufacturers representative, Washington, D.C., April 14th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  720. Interview 16 Google Scholar öffnen
  721. USTR official, Washington, D.C., April 16th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  722. Interview 17 Google Scholar öffnen
  723. U.S. academic, Washington, D.C., April 20th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  724. Interview 18 Google Scholar öffnen
  725. Alliance for American Manufacturing representative, Washington, D.C., April 22th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  726. Interview 19 Google Scholar öffnen
  727. U.S. Chamber of Commerce representative, Washington, D.C., April 24th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  728. Interview 20 Google Scholar öffnen
  729. BusinessEurope representative, Brussels, November 9th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  730. Interview 21 Google Scholar öffnen
  731. S&D Member of the European Parliament, Brussels, November 10th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  732. Interview 22 Google Scholar öffnen
  733. DG Trade official, Brussels, November 11th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  734. Interview 23 Google Scholar öffnen
  735. EESC representative, Brussels, November 11th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  736. Interview 24 Google Scholar öffnen
  737. ITUC representative, Brussels, November 12th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  738. Interview 25 Google Scholar öffnen
  739. DG Trade and DG Employment officials, Brussels, November 12th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  740. Interview 26 Google Scholar öffnen
  741. DG Trade official, Brussels, November 12th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  742. Interview 27 Google Scholar öffnen
  743. DG Environment official, Brussels, November 13th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  744. Interview 28 Google Scholar öffnen
  745. ETUC representative, Brussels, November 13th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  746. Interview 29 Google Scholar öffnen
  747. DG Trade official, telephone interview, November 24th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  748. Interview 30 Google Scholar öffnen
  749. DG Trade official, telephone interview, December 9th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  750. Interview 31 Google Scholar öffnen
  751. Friends of the Earth Europe representative, telephone interview, December 11th 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  752. Interview 32 Google Scholar öffnen
  753. DG Trade official, telephone interview, February 2nd 2016 Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Volkswirtschaftslehre", "Internationale Organisationen & NGOs", "Wettbewerbspolitik & Ordnungspolitik & Wirtschaftspolitik"
Cover des Buchs: Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Gert Krell, Peter Schlotter, Alexandra Homolar, Frank A. Stengel
Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Cover des Buchs: Kapital als Medium
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Michael Mayer
Kapital als Medium
Cover des Buchs: Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Antonino Alì
Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Cover des Buchs: European Union, How Comes?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hartmut Marhold
European Union, How Comes?
Cover des Buchs: De-Globalisierung
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Stefan A. Schirm, Andreas Busch, Susanne Lütz, Stefanie Walter, Hubert Zimmermann
De-Globalisierung

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex