Cover of book: When do Paper Tigers get Teeth?
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

When do Paper Tigers get Teeth?

Social Standards in U.S. and EU Preferential Trade Agreements
Authors:
Publisher:
 2019

Summary

Die präferentiellen Handelsabkommen der USA und der EU enthalten heutzutage durchgehend Sozialstandards zum Schutz von Arbeitern und der Umwelt. Doch während die USA einen sanktionsbasierten Ansatz verfolgen, vertraut die EU allein auf Dialog- und Kooperationsmechanismen.

Dieses Buch unternimmt den Versuch zu erklären, warum die USA und die EU solch unterschiedliche Ansätze gewählt haben. Die Arbeit vergleicht dazu die Verhandlungen der USA und der EU mit Zentralamerika, Peru und Kolumbien sowie Südkorea. Die empirischen Befunde legen nahe, dass die gesellschaftlichen Präferenzen in den USA und Europa weitgehend deckungsgleich waren. Der unterschiedliche institutionelle Rahmen in den USA und der EU wandelten diese gesellschaftlichen Forderungen jedoch in unterschiedliche Politikergebnisse um. So haben die Charakteristika des politischen Systems der USA die Herausbildung sanktions-basierter Sozialstandards stärker begünstigt als das konsensorientierte System der EU.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4723-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8989-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Internationale Politische Ökonomie
Volume
17
Language
English
Pages
245
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
  2. List of Abbreviations No access 11 - 14
    1. 1.1 The Enforcement Mechanisms of U.S. and EU PTA Social Standards: A Policy Puzzle No access
    2. 1.2 Trade Policy and Politics in the 21th Century No access
    3. 1.3 The Argument of the Book No access
    4. 1.4 Chapter Overview No access
    1. 2.1 The Controversy over Social Standards No access
      1. 2.2.1 Labor in the GATT/WTO-System No access
      2. 2.2.2 Environment in the GATT/WTO System No access
      1. 2.3.1 Social Standards in U.S. and EU Unilateral Trade Preference Schemes No access
      2. 2.3.2 Social Standards in U.S. Preferential Trade Agreements: The Coercive Approach No access
      3. 2.3.3 Social Standards in EU Preferential Trade Agreements: The Cooperative Approach No access
    4. 2.4 Concluding Remarks: Same Ends, Different Means No access
    1. 3.1 Trade Politics and Social Standards: A Literature Review No access
      1. Preferences of Societal Interest Groups No access
      2. Responsiveness of Policy-Makers No access
      3. The Institutional Form of Delegation No access
      1. 3.3.1 Variables and Operationalization No access
      2. 3.3.2 Qualitative Comparative Method No access
      3. 3.3.3 Case Selection No access
      4. 3.3.4 Data Collection and Data Analysis No access
    4. 3.4 Structure of the Empirical Chapters No access
    1. 4.1 Institutional Structure of U.S. Trade Politics No access
      1. Business Groups, Labor Unions and Environmental NGOs No access
      2. The U.S. Congress No access
      3. The U.S. President No access
      1. 4.3.1 Pre-negotiation Stage No access
        1. The US – Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) No access
        2. The US-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement (PTPA) and the US-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) No access
        3. The US – Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) No access
    4. 4.4 Concluding Remarks No access
    1. 5.1. Institutional Structure of EU Trade Politics No access
      1. Business Groups, Labor Unions and Environmental NGOs No access
      2. The Council and the European Parliament No access
      3. The European Commission (DG Trade) No access
      1. 5.3.1 Pre-negotiation Stage No access
        1. The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement No access
        2. The EU-Peru/Colombia Preferential Trade Agreement No access
        3. The EU-Central America Association Agreement No access
    4. 5.4 Concluding Remarks No access
    1. 6.1 Key Insights and Broader Implications No access
    2. 6.2 Alternative Explanations No access
    3. 6.3 The Functioning of U.S. and EU Social Standards in practice No access
    4. 6.4 Concluding Considerations and Outlook No access
  9. References No access 201 - 245

Bibliography (753)

  1. 11.11.11, ALOP, ANC, APRODEV, CNCD, FIDC, FIDH, Friends of the Earth Europe, Grupo Sur, ICCO, IEPALA, and Secours Catholique – Caritas France. 2007. Re: Recommendations on the EU-CAN negotiation directives. Joint Letter EU-CAN Negotiations, February 1. Available at: http://www.aprodev.eu/files/Central_America/200701_cso_letter_eu-ca_negotiation_directives.pdf Open Google Scholar
  2. 350.org, Center for International Environmental Law, Center for Biological Diversity, Earthjustice, Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, Green America, Greenpeace USA, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Oil Change International, Sierra Club, and SustainUS. 2015. Environmental Provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Letter from 13 U.S. environmental organizations to Congress, October 29. Available at: https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/uploads-wysiwig/TPP%20letter%20FINAL%20%282%29.pdf Open Google Scholar
  3. Aaronson, Susan, and Jamie M. Zimmerman. 2008. Trade Imbalance. The Struggle to Weigh Human Rights Concerns in Trade Policymaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  4. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):401-419. Open Google Scholar
  5. Abel, Patrick. 2018. Comparative Conclusions on Arbitral Dispute Settlement in Trade-Labour Matters Under US FTAs. In Labour Standards in International Economic Law, edited by H. Gött. Heidelberg: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  6. ACEA, BusinessEurope, CEFIC, CEEV, CEPS, CEPI, DIAGEO, DIGITALEUROPE, EBCY, ESF, ETNO, EURATEX, and Pernod-Ricard. 2012. Approval of the EU-Colombia & Peru Trade Agreement. EU business co-signed letter, October 3. Available at: http://spirits.eu/files/32/eu-business-letter-in-favour-of-eu-colombia-agreement.pdf Open Google Scholar
  7. Addo, Kofi. 2002. The Correlation between Labor Standards and International Trade. Which Way Forward? Journal of World Trade 36 (2):285-303. Open Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2015. Core Labour Standards and International Trade. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  9. AFL-CIO. 2002. 'Free Trade' Too Costly For Workers at Home and Abroad. Press Release, Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Available at: http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/resources/upload/trade.pdf Open Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2002. NAFTA's Seven-Year Itch: Promised Benefits Not Delivered to Workers. Press Release, Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nafta_at_seven.pdf Open Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2007. Statement by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney on U.S. Trade Policy Developments. May 11. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Available at: http://www.aflcio.org/Press-Room/Press-Releases/Statement-by-AFL-CIO-President-John-Sweeney-on-U.S3 Open Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2015. Ten Critical Problems with the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Open Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2015. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Four Countries That Don’t Comply With U.S. Trade Law. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Open Google Scholar
  14. AFX News. 2007. SKorea will not renegotiate FTA with US - top negotiator. AFX News, April 13. Available at: http://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2007-04/8056877-skorea-will-not-renegotiate-fta-with-us-top-negotiator-020.htm Open Google Scholar
  15. Agence France Press. 2008. EU to negotiate trade pact with Colombia, Peru. Agence France Press, November 11. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2012. Merkel urges swift EU trade progress with Peru, Colombia. Agence France Press, June 12. Available at: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/merkel-urges-eu-trade-progress-031915783.html Open Google Scholar
  17. Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Edward A. Fogarty. 2004. Between regionalism and globalism: European Union interregional trade strategies. In EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism, edited by V. K. Aggarwal and E. A. Fogarty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  18. Akhtar, Shayerah Ilias, and Vivian C. Jones. 2014. Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Negotiations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  19. Alden, Edward. 2003. Workers bar way to free trade in central America. Financial Times, December 4. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/financialtimes_cafta.pdf Open Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2005. Bush likely to pay high price at home for deal on Central American trading pact. Financial Times, June 27. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/40af84a8-e6a8-11d9-b6bc-00000e2511c8.html#axzz40zoqp870 Open Google Scholar
  21. Allee, Tod, and Manfred Elsig. 2014. Dispute settlement provisions in PTAs: new data and new concepts. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by A. Dür and M. Elsig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  22. ALOP, APRODEV, CIFCA, CNCD, FIAN, Friends of the Earth Europe, Grupo Sur, and OIDHACO. 2012. The European Parliament prioritises trade interests over human rights and sustainable development. Press Release, December 11. Available at: http://www.cifcaeu.org/en/the-european-parliament-prioritises-trade-interests-over-human-rights-and-sustainable-development/ Open Google Scholar
  23. Alston, Phillip. 2004. ‘Core Labour Standards’ and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law 15 (3):457-521. Open Google Scholar
  24. Alt, James E., Jeffrey Frieden, Michael J. Giligan, Dani Rodrik, and Ronald Rogowski. 1996. The International Political Economy of International Trade: Enduring Puzzles and an Agenda for Inquiry. Comparative Political Studies 29 (6):689-717. Open Google Scholar
  25. Alt, James E., and Michael Gilligan. 1994. The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Actions Problems and Domestic Political Institutions. Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (2):165-192. Open Google Scholar
  26. Andrews, Edmund L. 2005. House Approves Free Trade Pact. New York Times, July 28. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/28/business/worldbusiness/house-approves-free-trade-pact.html?_r=0 Open Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2005. Pleas and Promises by G.O.P. As Trade Pact Wins by 2 Votes. New York Times, July 29. Available at: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D01E2DE113FF93AA15754C0A9639C8B63 Open Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2005. Senate Approves Free Trade Pact. New York Times, July 1. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/01/politics/senate-approves-central-american-free-trade-pact.html Open Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2005. White House Makes Deals for Support of Trade Pact. New York Times, July 25. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/26/politics/white-house-makes-deals-for-support-of-trade-pact.html?_r=0 Open Google Scholar
  30. Antkiewicz, Agata, and Bessma Momani. 2009. Pursuing Geopolitical Stability through Interregional Trade: the EU’s Motives for Negotiating with the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of European Integration 31 (2):217-235. Open Google Scholar
  31. Appelbaum, Binyamin, and Jennifer Steinhauer. 2011. Congress Ends 5-Year Standoff on Trade Deals in Rare Accord. New York Times, October 12. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/business/trade-bills-near-final-chapter.html?pagewanted=all Open Google Scholar
  32. Baccini, Leonardo. 2010. Explaining formation and design of EU trade agreements: The role of transparency and flexibility. European Union Politics 11 (2):195-217. Open Google Scholar
  33. Baccini, Leonardo, Andreas Dür, and Manfred Elsig. 2015. The Politics of Trade Agreement Design: Revisiting the Depth–Flexibility Nexus. International Studies Quarterly 59 (4):765-775. Open Google Scholar
  34. Bailey, Michael A., Judith Goldstein, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics 49 (3):309-338. Open Google Scholar
  35. Baldwin, Matthew. 2006. Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade. The World Economy 29 (11):1451-1518. Open Google Scholar
  36. Baldwin, Richard. 1986. The Political Economy of US Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  37. Baldwin, Richard, and Dany Jaimovich. 2012. Are Free Trade Agreements contagious? Journal of International Economics 88 (1):1-16. Open Google Scholar
  38. Baldwin, Robert E. 2003. The Decline of US Labor Unions and the Role of Trade. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  39. Balistreri, Edward J. 1997. The Performance of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model in Predicting Endogenous Policy Forces at the Individual Level. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique 30 (1):1-17. Open Google Scholar
  40. Banchón, Mirra 2012. Acuerdo UE-Colombia y Perú, a discusión. Deutsche Welle, February 29. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/acuerdo-ue-colombia-y-per%C3%BA-a-discusi%C3%B3n/a-15775764 Open Google Scholar
  41. Bang, Guri. 2011. Signed but Not Ratified: Limits to U.S. Participation in International Environmental Agreements. Review of Policy Research 28 (1):65-81. Open Google Scholar
  42. Bardwell, Kedron 2000. The Puzzling Decline in House Support for Free Trade: Was Fast Track a Referendum on NAFTA? Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (4):591-610. Open Google Scholar
  43. Barfield, Claude. 2008. The Fast-Track Trade War. The American, May 7. Available at: https://www.aei.org/publication/the-fast-track-trade-war-2/ Open Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2009. Politics of Trade in the USA and in the Obama Administration: Implications for Asian Regionalism. Asian Economic Policy Review 4 (2):227–243. Open Google Scholar
  45. Barnard, Bruce. 1996. EU wants to discuss Wages, Labor Standards. Asia, Britain certain to oppose proposal. Journal of Commerce, July 25. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  46. Barquero S., Marvin. 2008. Nicaragua objeta condiciones de Acuerdo con Unión Europea. La Nación, April 18. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/Nicaragua-condiciones-Acuerdo-Union-Europea_0_971102995.html Open Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2008. Temas políticos obstaculizan avance de Acuerdo con UE. La Nación, April 19. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/Temas-politicos-obstaculizan-Acuerdo-UE_0_971302941.html Open Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2008. UE anuente a acelerar Acuerdo de Asociación con el Istmo. La Nación, April 17. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/UE-acelerar-Acuerdo-Asociacion-Istmo_0_970902920.html Open Google Scholar
  49. Barrett, Scott. 2003. Environment and Statecraft : The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  50. Bartels, Lorand. 2013. Human Rights and Sustainable Development Obligations in EU Free Trade Agreements. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 40 (4):297-313. Open Google Scholar
  51. Beach, Derek. 2016. It's all about mechanisms - what process-tracing case studies should be tracing. New Political Economy 21 (5):463-472. Open Google Scholar
  52. Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  53. Beatty, Andrew. 2007. Trade deals spark battle over services. Politico, April 11. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/trade-deals-spark-battle-over-services/ Open Google Scholar
  54. Beaulieu, Eugene. 2002. Factor or Industry Cleavages in Trade Policy? An Empirical Analysis of the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem. Economics & Politics 14 (2):99-131. Open Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2002. The Stolper–Samuelson Theorem Faces Congress. Review of International Economics 10 (2):343-360. Open Google Scholar
  56. Becker, Elisabeth. 2003. A Pact on Central America Trade Zone, Minus One. New York Times, December 18. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/18/business/a-pact-on-central-america-trade-zone-minus-one.html Open Google Scholar
  57. Becker, Elizabeth 2003. U.S. Begins Talks for Trade Pact With Central Americans. New York Times, January 9. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/09/business/us-begins-talks-for-trade-pact-with-central-americans.html Open Google Scholar
  58. Behrens, Maria, and Holger Janusch. 2012. Great 'Normative Power': The European and American Trade Approaches with Chile and Mexiko. European foreign affairs review 17 (3):367-386. Open Google Scholar
  59. Bender, Peter. 2002. The European Parliament and the WTO. European foreign affairs review 7 (2):193-208. Open Google Scholar
  60. Benedick, Richard. 2009. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  61. Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, edited by D. F. Sprinz and Y. Wolinsky. Ann Arbor: Universtiy of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  62. Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  63. Berger, Axel, Clara Brandi, and Dominique Bruhn. 2017. Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements: Promises at the Trade and Environment Interface. Discussion Paper: German Development Institut 16/2017. Open Google Scholar
  64. Bermúdez Mora, Kattia 2010. Europa no podrá tomar represalias comerciales en temas laborales y ambientales. El Financiero, April 21. Available at: http://wvw.elfinancierocr.com/ef_archivo/2010/abril/25/economia2343251.html Open Google Scholar
  65. Bernhard, William, Lawrence J. Broz, and William Roberts Clark. 2003. The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  66. Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1995. Trade Liberalisation and ‘Fair Trade’ Demands: Addressing the Environmental and Labour Standards Issues. The World Economy 18 (6):745–759. Open Google Scholar
  67. ———. 2000. On thinking clearly about the linkage between trade and the environment. Environment and Development Economics 5 (4):483-529. Open Google Scholar
  68. ———. 2007. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  69. ———. 2008. Termites in the Trading System. How Preferential Trade Agreements Undermine Free Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. Bilby, Ethan. 2013. Europe trade action against Bangladesh would have big impact. Reuters, May 1. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-bangladesh-trade-idUSBRE9400JQ20130501 Open Google Scholar
  71. Blustein, Paul. 2005. U.S., Peru Strike Free-Trade Agreement. The Washington Post, December 8. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/07/AR2005120702791.html Open Google Scholar
  72. Bolle, Mary Jane. 2013. Overview of Labor Enforcement Issues in Free Trade Agreements. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  73. Bollyky, Thomas J., and Anu Bradford. 2013. Getting to Yes on Transatlantic Trade. Consistent U.S.-EU Rules Could Remake Global Commerce. Foreign Affairs, July 10. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-07-10/getting-yes-transatlantic-trade Open Google Scholar
  74. Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2005. Green Parties and Politics in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  75. Bomberg, Elizabeth, and David Schlosberg, eds. 2013. Environmentalism in the United States: Changing Conceptions of Activism. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  76. Bossuyt, Fabienne. 2009. The Social Dimension of the New Generation of EU FTAs with Asia and Latin America: Ambitious Continuation for the Sake of Policy Coherence. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):703-722. Open Google Scholar
  77. Bounds, Andrew. 2006. EU trade deals will not hang on Doha. Financial Times, July 10. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/abca11b4-0faf-11db-ad3d-0000779e2340.html?siteedition=intl#axzz40zoqp870 Open Google Scholar
  78. Bounds, Andrew, and Anna Fifield. 2007. EU told to exclude N Korea enclave from pact. Financial Times, October 16. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d7bd5ffe-7b80-11dc-8c53-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz3zZOi8qWh Open Google Scholar
  79. Bouwen, Pieter. 2004. Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research 43 (3):337-369. Open Google Scholar
  80. Brack, Duncan. 2004. Trade and the Environment. In Trade Politics, edited by B. Hocking and S. McGuire. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  81. Brainard, Lael, and Hal Shapiro. 2001. Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority. In Brookings Policy Brief. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Open Google Scholar
  82. Briceno Ruiz, José. 2007. Strategic Regionalism and Regional Social Policy in the FTAA Process. Global Social Policy 7 (3):294–315. Open Google Scholar
  83. Bridges. 2007. EU-Andean Trade Pact Underway. Bridges, October 1. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-andean-trade-pact-underway Open Google Scholar
  84. ———. 2008. Little Progress In EU-Central America FTA Talks. Bridges, April 23. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/little-progress-in-eu-central-america-fta-talks Open Google Scholar
  85. ———. 2009. EU, South Korea Conclude FTA Talks. Bridges, July 15. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-south-korea-conclude-fta-talks Open Google Scholar
  86. ———. 2009. EU, South Korea Sign Free Trade Accord. Bridges, October 21. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-south-korea-sign-free-trade-accord Open Google Scholar
  87. ———. 2010. EU Resumes Trade Talks with Mercosur, Concludes Talks with Central America. Bridges, May 19. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-resumes-trade-talks-with-mercosur-concludes-talks-with-central-america Open Google Scholar
  88. ———. 2012. EU Trade Ministers Agree to Approve Deal with Colombia, Peru. Bridges, March 21. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-trade-ministers-agree-to-approve-deal-with-colombia-peru Open Google Scholar
  89. ———. 2012. EU Trade Ministers Approve Pact with Colombia, Peru. Bridges, June 6. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-trade-ministers-approve-pact-with-colombia-peru Open Google Scholar
  90. ———. 2012. EU, Central America Sign Region-to-Region Deal. Bridges, July 4. Available at: http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/eu-central-america-sign-region-to-region-deal Open Google Scholar
  91. Broscheid, Andreas, and David Coen. 2003. Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission. An Informational Model of Forum Politics. European Union Politics 4 (2):165–189. Open Google Scholar
  92. Brunnée, Jutta. 2004. The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant. European Journal of International Law 15 (4):617-649. Open Google Scholar
  93. Buck, Tobias. 2004. Latin Americans face EU trade talks disappointment. Financial Times, May 5. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7ed0f4b6-9e32-11d8-81c6-000e2511c801.html#axzz3zmPLJWQf Open Google Scholar
  94. Buerkle, Tom 1994. Brittan Rebuffs Clinton Over Labor Standards. New York Times, January 18. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1994/01/18/business/worldbusiness/18iht-gatt_0.html Open Google Scholar
  95. Burchell, J. 2014. The Evolution of Green Politics: Development and Change Within European Green Parties. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar
  96. Burgoon, Brian. 2004. The Rise and Stall of Labor Linkage in Globalization Politics. International Politics 41 (2):196-220. Open Google Scholar
  97. ———. 2009. The Distinct Politics of the European Union’s ‘Fair Trade’ Linkage to Labour Standards European foreign affairs review 14 (5):643–661. Open Google Scholar
  98. Business Round Table. 2001. The Case for U.S. Trade Leadership: the United States is Falling Behind. Press Release, February 9. Washington, D.C.: Business Round Table. Available at: http://www.businessroundtable.org/publications/publication.aspx?qs=2496BF807822B0F19D2 Open Google Scholar
  99. Business Week. 2001. Calming the Waters: A Talk with the U.S. Trade Rep. Business Week, July 23. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2001-07-22/q-and-a-calming-the-waters-a-talk-with-the-u-dot-s-dot-trade-rep Open Google Scholar
  100. BusinessEurope. 2007. Position on the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA). Position Paper, July 18. Brussels: BusinessEurope. Available at: http://www.bilaterals.org/IMG/pdf/EU-Korea_position_BusinessEurope_180707.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  101. Büthe, Tim, and Helen V. Milner. 2014. Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Diversity in Trade Agreements: Credibility, Commitment, and Economic Flows in the Developing World, 1971–2007. World Politics 66 (1):88-122. Open Google Scholar
  102. Callan, Eoin. 2007. Democrats to throw out Colombia trade deal. Financial Times, November 22. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/84143836-799d-11db-90a6-0000779e2340.html#axzz3yuKqURup Open Google Scholar
  103. Callan, Eoin, and Anastasia Molony. 2007. White House trades on Democrats’ terms. Financial Times, May 13. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/f5b19952-0192-11dc-8b8c-000b5df10621 Open Google Scholar
  104. Carlos Nino, Luis 2008. EU Drops IPC Prerequisite from Trade Talks with Central America. IHS Global Insight, April 22. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  105. Center for International Environmental Law, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, League of Conservation Voters, Mineral Policy Center, National Environmental Trust, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and U.S. Public Interest Research Group. 2002. U.S. Fast Track Conference Bill neither Reflects America's Environmental Values nor Addresses Fundamental Problems with Investment Rules. Letter to Congress. Available at: http://www.ciel.org/news/u-s-fast-track-conference-bill-neither-reflects-americas-environmental-values-nor-addresses-fundamental-problems-with-investment-rules/ Open Google Scholar
  106. Céspedez Vargas, Renzo. 2009. Negociaciones Del Acuerdo De Asociacion Centroamérica-Unión Europea, Retos Y Oportunidades Para Los Sectores Productivos De Los Países Centroamericanos. San José: Fundación Friedrich Ebert. Open Google Scholar
  107. Chalmers, Adam William. 2013. Trading information for access: informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (1):39–58. Open Google Scholar
  108. Chan, Anita. 2003. Racing to the bottom: international trade without a social clause. Third World Quaterly 24 (6):1011-1028. Open Google Scholar
  109. Chan, Sewell. 2010. U.S. Plans Trade Complaint Against Guatemala. New York Times, July 30. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/business/global/31trade.html Open Google Scholar
  110. Charnovitz, Steve. 1987. The influence of international labour standards on the world trading regime. A historical overview. International Labour Review 26 (5):565-584. Open Google Scholar
  111. ———. 1992. Environmental and Labour Standards in Trade. The World Economy 15 (3):335-356. Open Google Scholar
  112. ———. 2005. The Labor Dimension of the Emerging Free Trade Area of the Americas. In Labour Rights as Human Rights, edited by P. Alston. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  113. Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1995. The New Sovereignty: compliance with international regulatory agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  114. Clark, William Roberts, Erick Duchesne, and Sophie Meunier. 2000. Domestic and International Asymmetries in United States–European Union Trade Negotiations. International Negotiation 5 (1):69-95. Open Google Scholar
  115. Coen, David. 2007. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3):333–345. Open Google Scholar
  116. COHA. 2010. Obama’s hard stance on Guatemalan labor: A monumental step for labor or mere political manoeuvring? Council on Hemispheric Affairs. Available at: http://www.coha.org/obama%E2%80%99s-hard-stance-on-guatemalan-labor-a-monumental-step-for-labor-rights-or-mere-political-maneuvering Open Google Scholar
  117. Collier, David. 2008. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4):823-830. Open Google Scholar
  118. Collingsworth, Terry, J. William Goold, and Pharis J. Harvey. 1994. Time for a Global New Deal. Foreign Affairs 73 (1):8-13. Open Google Scholar
  119. Collinson, Sarah. 1999. 'Issue-systems', 'multi-level games' and the analysis of the EUs external commercial and associated policies: a research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (2):206-224. Open Google Scholar
  120. Condon, Madison. 2015. The Integration of Environmental Law into International Investment Treaties and Trade Agreements: Negotiation Process and the Legalization of Commitments. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 33 (1):102-152. Open Google Scholar
  121. Cooper, Helene, and Steven Greenhouse. 2011. U.S. and Colombia Near Trade Pact. New York Times, April 6. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/07/business/07trade.html Open Google Scholar
  122. Cooper, William H., and Mark E. Manyin. 2006. The Proposed South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUSFTA). In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  123. ———. 2007. The Proposed South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). In CRS Report for Congress. Washinghton, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  124. Cooper, William H., Mark E. Manyin, Remy Jurenas, and Michaela D. Platzer. 2011. The Proposed U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implications. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  125. Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackleton. 2011. The European Parliament. 8th ed. London: John Harper Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  126. Correa, Jorge. 2008. Negociación en bloque, CAN y Unión Europea es inviable. Portafolio, April 30. Available at: http://www.portafolio.co/economia/finanzas/negociacion-bloque-can-union-europea-inviable-289698 Open Google Scholar
  127. Council of the European Union. 1999. WTO: Preparation of the Third Ministerial Conference - Council Conclusions of 26 October 1999. Luxembourg: Council of the European Union (12121/99). Open Google Scholar
  128. Cronin, David. 2008. EU has decided to push ahead with plans to secure a free trade agreement. Inter Press Service, December 8. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  129. ———. 2008. Europe: EU official reverse course, give Colombia trade deal. Inter Press Service, December 11. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  130. Cross, Ciaran. 2017. Focus: Failure by design: Did the US choose to lose the Guatemala labour dispute? International Union Rights 24 (3):23-25. Open Google Scholar
  131. da Conceição, Eugénia. 2010. Who Controls Whom? Dynamics of Power Delegation and Agency Losses in EU Trade Politics. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4):1107–1126. Open Google Scholar
  132. da Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia. 2011. Negotiating Trade Liberalization at the WTO. Domestic Politics and Bargaining Dynamics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillian. Open Google Scholar
  133. ———. 2013. Do Agents “Run Amok”? A Comparison of Agency Slack in the EU and US Trade Policy in the Doha Round. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 15 (1):21-36. Open Google Scholar
  134. ———. 2013. Two-level games and trade cooperation: What do we now know? International Politics 50 (4):579–599. Open Google Scholar
  135. Dadush, Uri. 2013. Cold Water for Hot Trade Deals. The National Interest, May 13. Available at: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/cold-water-hot-trade-deals-8460?page=show Open Google Scholar
  136. Damro, Chad. 2012. Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5):682-699. Open Google Scholar
  137. Dark, Taylor E. 1999. The Unions and the Democrats. An Enduring Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  138. Davis, Bob. 2004. U.S. to Renew Trade Focus On Latin America. Wall Street Journal, October 11. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB109744579434841472 Open Google Scholar
  139. Davis, Christina L. 2012. Why Adjudicate?: Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  140. De Biévre, Dirk. 2006. The EU regulatory trade agenda and the quest for WTO enforcement. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6):851–866. Open Google Scholar
  141. De Biévre, Dirk, and Andreas Dür. 2005. Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy. Comparative Political Studies 38 (10):1271-1296. Open Google Scholar
  142. De Biévre, Dirk, and Arlo Poletti. 2015. Judicial Politics in International Trade Relations: Introduction to the Special Issue. World Trade Review 14 (S1):1-11. Open Google Scholar
  143. Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, and Sierra Club. 2007. Statement by Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Sierra Club regarding Trade and Environment Deal. Press Release, May 14. Available at: http://vault.sierraclub.org/trade/downloads/peru-statement.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  144. Destler, I.M. 1997. Renewing Fast-Track Legislation, Policy Analyses in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  145. ———. 2005. American Trade Politics. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  146. ———. 2007. American Trade Politics in 2007: Building Bipartisan Compromise. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  147. Destler, I.M., and Peter J. Balint. 1999. The New Politics of American Trade: Trade, Labor, and the Environment, Policy Analyses in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  148. Destler, I.M., and John S. Odell. 1987. Anti-Protection: Changing Forces in United States Trade Policies. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  149. Deutsche Welle. 2008. Merkel ofrece ayuda a Colombia para aclarar violaciones de DDHH. Deutsche Welle, May 15. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/merkel-ofrece-ayuda-a-colombia-para-aclarar-violaciones-de-ddhh/a-3344780 Open Google Scholar
  150. Dickerson, Marla. 2008. CAFTA labor complaint filed. Los Angeles Times, April 24. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/24/business/fi-labor24 Open Google Scholar
  151. Doherty, Brian. 2005. Ideas and Actions in the Green Movement. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  152. Donnan, Shawn, and Demetri Sevastopulo. 2015. US, Japan and 10 countries strike Pacific trade deal. Financial Times, October 5. Available at: https://next.ft.com/content/d4a31d08-6b4c-11e5-8171-ba1968cf791a Open Google Scholar
  153. Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom. 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379-406. Open Google Scholar
  154. Draper, Peter, Khumalo Nkululeko, and Faith Tigere. 2017. Sustainability Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Can they be Multilateralised? In RTA Exchange. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Open Google Scholar
  155. Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review 3 (1):53-78. Open Google Scholar
  156. ———. 2003. The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion. International Organization 57 (3):643-659. Open Google Scholar
  157. ———. 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  158. Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  159. Dryzek, John S., David Downes, Chrisitan Hunold, David Schlosberg, and Hans-Kristian Hernes, eds. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  160. Duffy, Robert J. 2012. Organized Interests and Environmental Policy. In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy edited by M. E. Kraft and S. Kamieniecki. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  161. Dür, Andreas. 2006. Assessing the EU's role in international trade negotiations. European political science 5 (4):362-376. Open Google Scholar
  162. ———. 2007. EU Trade Policy as Protection for Exporters: The Agreements with Mexico and Chile. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):833–855. Open Google Scholar
  163. ———. 2008. Bringing Economic Interests Back into the Study of EU Trade Policy-Making. British Journal of Politics and International Relation 10 (1):27-45. Open Google Scholar
  164. Dür, Andreas, Leonardo Baccini, and Manfred Elsig. 2014. The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. Review of International Organizations 9 (3):353-375. Open Google Scholar
  165. Dür, Andreas, and Dirk De Biévre. 2007. Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. Journal of Public Policy 27 (1):79-101. Open Google Scholar
  166. Dür, Andreas, and Manfred Elsig. 2011. Principals, agents, and the European Union´s foreign economic policies. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (3):323-338. Open Google Scholar
  167. Dür, Andreas, and Hubert Zimmermann. 2007. Introduction: The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):771-787. Open Google Scholar
  168. Dymond, William A. 2001. Core labour standards and the world trade organization: Labour's love lost. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 8 (3):99-114. Open Google Scholar
  169. Dymond, William A., and Michael M. Hart. 2000. Post-Modern Trade Policy. Reflections on the Challenges to Multilateral Trade Negotiations After Seattle. Journal of World Trade 34 (3):21-38. Open Google Scholar
  170. Ebert, Franz Christian. 2016. Labour Provisions in EU Trade Agreements. International Labour Review 155 (3):407-433. Open Google Scholar
  171. Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2):24-50. Open Google Scholar
  172. Eckhardt, Jappe, and Manfred Elsig. 2015. Support for international trade law: The US and the EU compared. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (4):966-986. Open Google Scholar
  173. EESC. 2018. Opinion. Trade and sustainable development chapters (TSD) in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTA). Brussels: European Economic and Social Comittee. Open Google Scholar
  174. Egan, Michelle P. 2005. Creating a Transatlantic Marketplace: Government Policies and Business Strategies. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  175. Eggen, Dan. 2008. Bush Backs New Trade Pact With Colombia. Washington Post, April 8. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/07/AR2008040700789.html Open Google Scholar
  176. ———. 2008. Bush Concedes Defeat On Colombia Trade Pact. Washinton Post, April 15. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/14/AR2008041400991.html Open Google Scholar
  177. Eilperin, Juliet. 2007. How Trade Breakthrough Almost Broke Down in Congress. Washington Post, November 22. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/21/AR2007112102333.html Open Google Scholar
  178. Elliot, Kimberly Ann. 2011. Labor Rights. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development. A Handbook, edited by J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Open Google Scholar
  179. Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 2000. Preferences for Workers? Worker Rights and the US Generalized System of Preferences. In Working Paper. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  180. Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Richard B. Freeman. 2003. Can Labor Standards Improve Under Globalization? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  181. Elsig, Manfred. 2010. European Union trade policy after enlargement: larger crowds, shifting priorities and informal decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (6):781–798. Open Google Scholar
  182. Elsig, Manfred, and Cédric Dupont. 2012. European Union Meets South Korea: Bureaucratic Interests, Exporter Discrimination and the Negotiations of Trade Agreements. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3):492-507. Open Google Scholar
  183. Elsig, Manfred, and Jappe Eckhardt. 2015. The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning. World Trade Review 14 (S1):13-32. Open Google Scholar
  184. Emmott, Robin. 2012. EU approves deals to boost trade with Latin America. Reuters, December 11. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/eu-trade-latam-idUSL5E8NB8IO20121211 Open Google Scholar
  185. Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1996. The partisan paradox and the U.S. tariff, 1877 - 1934. International Organization 50 (2):301-324. Open Google Scholar
  186. ESF. 2007. ESF Position Paper on EU Free Trade Agreements. Position Paper, February 28. Available at: http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/esf-position-paper-on-eu-free-trade-agreements-final.pdf Open Google Scholar
  187. ———. 2009. Services Industry Calls for swift conclusion of the EU-Korea FTA. Letter to Commission President José Manuel Barroso, July 6. Available at: http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/esf-korea-letter-to-barroso-july-6-2009.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  188. ETUC. 2006. On the communication ‘Global Europe: competing in the world. Resolution adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee in their meeting held in Brussels on 7–8 December. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation. Open Google Scholar
  189. ———. 2008. Notorious rights violations rewarded in new European Union trade preferences system Press Release, December 12. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/press/notorious-rights-violations-rewarded-new-european-union-trade-preferences-system#.WEWDCnoabJg Open Google Scholar
  190. ———. 2009. EU Trade negotiations with Colombia and Peru. Resolution adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee in their meeting held in Brussels held from 1-2 December 2009. Press Release. Available at: http://etuc.org/a/6736 Open Google Scholar
  191. ———. 2010. ETUC welcomes EU Parliament decisions on trade and sustainable development Press Release, November 26. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/press/etuc-welcomes-eu-parliament-decisions-trade-and-sustainable-development#.VrtQg0aql_k Open Google Scholar
  192. ———. 2010. EU Trade Commissioner and ETUC's General Secretary discuss labour standards and trade policy. Press Release, April 13. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/press/eu-trade-commissioner-and-etucs-general-secretary-discuss-labour-standards-and-trade-policy#.VrtMa0aql_k Open Google Scholar
  193. ———. 2013. EP INTA Hearing on Sustainable Development Chapters in Trade Agreements. Speech at the EP's INTA Committee, November 27. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/speeches/ep-inta-hearing-sustainable-development-chapters-trade-agreements#.WEWGa3oabJg Open Google Scholar
  194. ETUC, CCT, and CSACC. 2008. Proposed Social Chapter for an Association Agreement by and between Central America and the European Union. April 2008. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  195. ———. 2009. Open Letter from the CSACC-CCT-CES concerning the Central America-EU Association Agreement. Letter, March 5. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/CartaAbierta-EN.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  196. ETUC/ITUC. 2007. ETUC/ITUC statement of trade union demands relating to key social elements of ‘sustainable development’ chapters in European Union negotiations on free trade agreements (FTAs). ETUC/ITUC, October 7. Available at: https://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/TLE_EN.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  197. ETUC/ITUC/TUCA. 2010. Appeal to European Union, Latin American and Caribbean Heads of State and of Government. LAC-EU Trade Union Summit 4th & 5th May 2010. Available at: https://www.ituc-csi.org/appeal-to-european-union-latin Open Google Scholar
  198. ———. 2012. ETUC letter on the proposed European Union Free Trade Agreement with Colombia and Peru. Letter to MEPs, February 22. Available at: www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/Letter.pdf Open Google Scholar
  199. Euractive. 2011. Parliament clears EU-South Korea trade pact. Euractive, February 18. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/trade/parliament-clears-eu-south-korea-news-502267 Open Google Scholar
  200. ———. 2012. EU lawmakers approve trade deals with Latin America. Euractive, December 11. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/trade/eu-lawmakers-approve-trade-deals-news-516590 Open Google Scholar
  201. ———. 2012. EU-Latin America trade deals in troubled water. Euractive, June 28. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/global-europe/eu-latin-america-trade-deals-tro-news-513602 Open Google Scholar
  202. Eurobarometer. 1996. Standard Eurobarometer Survey: 44.2bis. Open Google Scholar
  203. Eurochambers. 2007. The European Commission's Questionnaire on FTAs. Position Paper, April 2007. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  204. EuroCommerce. 2001. Jahresbericht 2001. Aktionsplan 2002. Brussels: EuroCommerce. Open Google Scholar
  205. ———. 2007. Free Trade Negotiations. Contribution to the DG Trade Stakeholder Consultation. Position Paper, May 31. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  206. European Commission. 1994. Statement by Sir Leon Brittan. Meeting at Ministerial Level Marrakesh (Morocco), April 12. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  207. ———. 2001. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee - Promoting core Labour Standards and Improving Social governance in the context of globalisation, COM(2001) 416 final. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  208. ———. 2004. The Social Dimension of Globalisation - the EU's policy contribution on extending the benefits to all, COM(2004) 383. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  209. ———. 2004. Trade policy in the Prodi Commission 1999-2004. An assessment. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  210. ———. 2005. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament: "European values in the globalised world - Contribution of the Commission to the October Meeting of Heads of State and Government", 20 October 2005, COM(2005) 525 final. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  211. ———. 2007. Commission Staff Working Document: The external dimension of the Single Market review. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  212. ———. 2007. EU and Central America start negotiations for new Association Agreement. Press Release, June 29. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-07-981_en.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  213. ———. 2007. EU to start negotiations for Association Agreement with the Andean Community; aid package for the region of EUR 713 million. Press Release, April 20. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/534&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Open Google Scholar
  214. ———. 2008. Industrial Relations in Europe 2008. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  215. ———. 2013. European Union, Trade in goods with Andean community. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  216. ———. 2013. European Union, Trade in goods with Central America (6). Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  217. ———. 2015. EU Textual Proposal. Trade And Sustainable Development. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  218. ———. 2018. Feedback and way forward on improving the implementation and enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements. Open Google Scholar
  219. European Parliament. 1994. Resolution on the Introduction of a Social Clause in the Unilateral and Multilateral Trading System, A3-0007/94. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  220. ———. 1996. Resolution on the World Trade Organization (WTO), A4-0320/96. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  221. ———. 2007. Debates - Thursday, 13 December 2007: 5. Economic and trade relations with Korea. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  222. ———. 2007. Debates - Wednesday, 14 March 2007: Negotiation of an EU-Central America Association Agreement - Negotiation of an EU-Andean Community Association Agreement. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  223. ———. 2007. European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2007 on the trade and economic relations with Korea (2007/2186(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  224. ———. 2007. European Parliament resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe - external aspects of competitiveness (2006/2292(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  225. ———. 2007. Negotiation of an EU-Andean Community Association Agreement European Parliament recommendation of 15 March 2007 to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Andean Community and its member countries, of the other part (2006/2221(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  226. ———. 2007. Negotiation of an EU-Central America Association Agreement. European Parliament recommendation of 15 March 2007 to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the countries of Central America, of the other part (2006/2222(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  227. ———. 2007. Report on the Trade and Economic Relations with Korea (2007/2186(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  228. ———. 2010. Debates - Wednesday, 10 February 2010: 19. EU - South Korea free trade agreement. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  229. ———. 2010. European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  230. ———. 2010. European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on international trade policy in the context of climate change imperatives (2010/2103(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  231. ———. 2011. Debates - Monday, 9 May 2011: 20. Free trade agreement with India. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  232. ———. 2012. Debates - Monday, 10 December 2012: 15. EU-Central America association agreement. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  233. ———. 2012. Debates - Tuesday, 22 May 2012: EU trade agreement with Colombia and Peru. Brussels: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  234. ———. 2012. European Parliament resolution of 13 June 2012 on the EU trade agreement with Colombia and Peru (2012/2628(RSP)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  235. ———. 2016. European Parliament resolution on implementation of the 2010 recommendations of Parliament on social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility (2015/2038(INI)). Strasbourg: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  236. European Report. 2006. Trade Strategy: Mandelson preaches ambitious and offensive bilateralism. European Report, October 12. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  237. ———. 2007. Free Trade Agreements: EU less demanding than US in social matters. European Report, October 9. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  238. European United Left/Nordic Green Left. 2012. Colombia/Peru trade deal - “Listen to the unions, Listen to the families of the victims: Vote No!”. Press Release, December 12. Available at: http://www.guengl.eu/news/article/gue-ngl-news/colombia-peru-trade-deal-listen-to-the-unions-listen-to-the-families-of-the Open Google Scholar
  239. Evans, Peter B., Harold K. Jacobson, and Robert D. Putnam. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  240. Evenett, Simon J., and Michael Meier. 2008. An Interim Assessment of the US Trade Policy of ‘Competitive Liberalization’. The World Economy 31 (1):31-66. Open Google Scholar
  241. Fabbrini, Sergio. 2007. Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  242. Falke, Andreas. 2005. EU–USA Trade Relations in the Doha Development Round: Market Access versus a Post-modern Trade Policy Agenda. European foreign affairs review 10 (3):339–357. Open Google Scholar
  243. Falkner, Robert. 2007. The political economy of 'normative power' Europe: EU environmental leadership in international biotechnology regulation. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4):507-526. Open Google Scholar
  244. Falleti, Tulia G. 2016. Process tracing of extensive and intensive processes. New Political Economy 21 (5):455-462. Open Google Scholar
  245. Feinberg, Richard E. 2003. The Political Economy of United States’ Free Trade Arrangements. The World Economy 26 (7):1019–1040. Open Google Scholar
  246. Fifield, Anna. 2006. S Korea 'will not rush' US trade accord. Financial Times, April 18. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8b44eb2c-ce77-11da-a032-0000779e2340.html#axzz3x1berC28 Open Google Scholar
  247. Filipovic, Christina 2010. Colombia backs rights monitoring in EU trade deal. Colombia Reports, October 11. Available at: http://colombiareports.com/colombia-rights-monitoring-eu-trade-deal/ Open Google Scholar
  248. Financial Times. 2005. Partisanship on trade. Financial Times, July 29. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/1d6f38c2-ff5c-11d9-86df-00000e2511c8 Open Google Scholar
  249. Fox, David. 1996. EU agrees to steer clear of labor issues/Move seen pleasing Asian partners. Journal of Commerce, October 29. Available at: http://www.joc.com/maritime-news/eu-agrees-steer-clear-labor-issues-move-seen-pleasing-partners-asia_19961029.html Open Google Scholar
  250. Francia, Peter L. 2012. The Future of Organized Labor in American Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  251. French, John D. 2002. From the Suites to the Streets: The Unexpected Re-emergence of the "Labor Question," 1994-1999. Labor History 43 (3):285-304. Open Google Scholar
  252. ———. 2006. North American Free Trade Agreement. In Encyclopedia of US Labor and Working Class History, edited by E. Arnesen. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  253. Frennhoff Larsén, Magdalena. 2007. Principal–Agent Analysis with One Agent and Two Principals: European Union Trade Negotiations with South Africa. Politics & Policy 35 (3):440-463. Open Google Scholar
  254. ———. 2007. Trade Negotiations between the EU and South Africa: A Three-Level Game. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):857-881. Open Google Scholar
  255. Frieden, Jeffrey. 1988. Capital Politics: Creditors and the International Political Economy. Journal of Public Policy 8 (3/4):265-286. Open Google Scholar
  256. ———. 1991. Debt, Development and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  257. ———. 1999. Actors and Preferences in International Relations. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  258. Frieden, Jeffrey, and Lisa L. Martin. 2003. International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner. New York: W.W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
  259. Friends of the Earth Europe. 2007. Central Americas poor and environment will be hit by free trade with the EU. Press Release, October 22. Available at: https://www.foeeurope.org/press/2007/Oct22_CP_CA_free_trade.htm Open Google Scholar
  260. ———. 2015. TTIP leak exposes EU’s failure to protect the environment. Press Release, October 26. Available at: http://www.foeeurope.org/TTIP-leak-exposes-EU%E2%80%99s-failure-protect-environment-231015 Open Google Scholar
  261. Fritz, Thomas. 2010. Die zweite Eroberung. Das EU-Freihandelsabkommen mit Kolumbien und Peru. Berlin and Amsterdam: Forschungs- und Dokumentationszentrum Chile-Lateinamerika/Transnational Institute. Open Google Scholar
  262. FT/Harris. 2007. Poll Finds Strong Populist Mood in Europe and to a Lesser Extent in the USA. In Press Release: Harris Interactive. Open Google Scholar
  263. Gallagher, Kevin P. 2008. Understanding developing country resistance to the Doha Round. Review of International Political Economy 15 (1):62–85. Open Google Scholar
  264. Gantz, David A. 2011. Labor Rights and Environmental Protection Under NAFTA and Other U.S. Free Trade Agreements. Arizona Legal Studies. Discussion Paper No. 11-13. Open Google Scholar
  265. GAO. 2007. International Trade: An Analysis of Free Trade Agreements and Congressional and Private Sector Consultations under Trade Promotion Authority. In Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Open Google Scholar
  266. ———. 2014. Free Trade Agreements: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative schould continue to improve its Monitoring of Environmental Commitments. In Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Open Google Scholar
  267. ———. 2014. Free Trade Agreements: U.S. Partners Are Adressing Labor Commitments, but More Monitoring and Enforcement Are Needed. In Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Open Google Scholar
  268. Garcia Bercero, Ignacio. 2006. Dispute Settlement in European Union Free Trade Agreements: Lessons Learned? In Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, edited by L. Bartels and F. Ortino. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  269. Gardner, Andrew. 2012. MEPs approve Latin American trade deals. Politico, December 12. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/meps-approve-latin-american-trade-deals/ Open Google Scholar
  270. Garrett, Geoffrey, and George Tsebelis. 1996. An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50 (2):269-299. Open Google Scholar
  271. George. 2014. Environment and Regional Trade Agreements. Emerging Trends and Policy Drivers. In OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers: 2014/02. Open Google Scholar
  272. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  273. Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  274. Goldfarb, Zachary A., and Lori Montgomery. 2011. Obama gets win as Congress passes free-trade agreements. Washinton Post, October 12. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obama-gets-win-as-congress-passes-free-trade-agreements/2011/10/12/gIQAGHeFgL_story.html Open Google Scholar
  275. Goldirova, Renata. 2009. Brussels Divided Over Korean Trade Deal. Bloomberg Business Week, July 22. Available at: http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jul2009/gb20090722_028291.htm Open Google Scholar
  276. Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  277. Gomez Arana, Arantza. 2014. The European Union and the Central American Common Market Signs an Association Agreement: Pragmatism versus Values? European foreign affairs review 20 (1):43-63. Open Google Scholar
  278. González Garibay, Montserrat. 2011. The trade-labour and trade-environment linkages: together or apart? The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 10 (2):165-184. Open Google Scholar
  279. González Garibay, Montserrat, and Johan Adriaensen. 2013. The Illusion of Choice: The European Union and the Trade-Labour Linkage. Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (4):542-559. Open Google Scholar
  280. Goodman, Peter. 2007. Democrats, White House Clash on Trade. Washington Post, February 15. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/14/AR2007021401752.html Open Google Scholar
  281. Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  282. Gourevitch, Peter A., and James Shinn. 2005. Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  283. Grandi, Pablo Lazo. 2009. Trade Agreements and their Relation to Labour Standards: The Current Situation. In ICTSD Programme on EPAs and Regionalism. Issue Paper no. 3. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). Open Google Scholar
  284. Greenhouse, Steven. 2010. U.S. Union Backing Boosts Korea Trade Pact. New York Times, December 10. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/09/business/global/09trade.html?_r=0 Open Google Scholar
  285. ———. 2013. Under Pressure, Bangladesh Adopts New Labor Law. New York Times, July 16. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/world/asia/under-pressure-bangladesh-adopts-new-labor-law.html Open Google Scholar
  286. Gregson, Julie. 2010. Rights groups slam EU free trade deal with Colombia. Deutsche Welle, March 11. Available at: http://www.dw.com/en/rights-groups-slam-eu-free-trade-deal-with-colombia/a-5339801 Open Google Scholar
  287. Greven, Thomas. 2005. Die Verankerung von Arbeitnehmerrechten in bilateralen und regionalen Handels- und Investitionsabkommen. In FES Briefing Paper. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Open Google Scholar
  288. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 1994. Protection for Sale. The American Economic Review 84 (4):833-850. Open Google Scholar
  289. Grynberg, Roman, and Veniana Qalo. 2006. Labour Standards in US and EU Preferential Trading Arrangements. Journal of World Trade 40 (4):619-653. Open Google Scholar
  290. Guber, Deborah, and Christopher Bosso. 2010. Past the Tipping Point? Public Discourse and the Role of the Environmental Movement in the Post-Bush Era. In Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, edited by N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Open Google Scholar
  291. Hacker, Jacob S. , and Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society 38 (2):152-204. Open Google Scholar
  292. Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer - and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  293. Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2005. Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization 59 (3):593–629. Open Google Scholar
  294. ———. 2009. Forced to be good: why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  295. Haggard, Stephan. 1988. The institutional foundations of hegemony: explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934. International Organization 42 (1):91-119. Open Google Scholar
  296. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  297. Haggard, Stephan, and Steven B. Webb. 1994. Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  298. Hall, Peter A. 1998. Heterogeneous preferences and the practice of group representation in U.S. trade policy. In Constituent interests and U.S. trade policies, edited by A. V. Deardorff and R. M. Stern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  299. ———. 2013. Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing. European political science 12 (1):20-30. Open Google Scholar
  300. Hamdan, Fouad. 2006. Yes to Global Trade – But Protect our Planet. In Speech at the Conference “EU Trade on Trial” in Brussels, November 23, 2006. Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe. Open Google Scholar
  301. Hamilton, Daniel S. 2014. America’s Mega-Regional Trade Diplomacy: Comparing TPP and TTIP. The International Spectator 49 (1):81–97. Open Google Scholar
  302. ———. 2014. The Geopolitics of TTIP: Repositioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World. Washington, D.C.: Center for Transatlantic Relations. Open Google Scholar
  303. Harrison, James, Mirela Barbu, Liam Campling, and Franz Christian Ebert. 2018. Labour Standards Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Reflections on the European Commission’s Reform Agenda. World Trade Review. Open Google Scholar
  304. Harrison, James, Mirela Barbu, Liam Campling, Ben Richardson, and Adrian Smith. 2018. Governing Labour Standards through Free Trade Agreements: Limits of the European Union's Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters. Journal of Common Market Studies. Open Google Scholar
  305. Haworth, Nigel, Stephen Hughes, and Rorden Wilkinson. 2005. The international labour standards regime: a case study in global regulation. Environment and Planning 37 (11):1939-1953. Open Google Scholar
  306. Henisz, Witold J., and Edward D. Mansfield. 2006. Votes and Vetoes: The Political Determinants of Commercial Openness. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1):189-212. Open Google Scholar
  307. Hepple, Bob. 2008. Enforcement: the law and politics of cooperation and compliance. In Social and Labour Rights in a Global Context. International and Comparative Perspectives, edited by B. Hepple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  308. Heydon, Kenneth, and Stephen Woolcock. 2009. The rise of bilateralism: Comparing American, European and Asian approaches to preferential trade agreements. New York: United Nations University Press. Open Google Scholar
  309. Hilary, John. 2014. European Trade Unions and Free Trade: Between International Solidarity and Perceived Self-Interest. Globalizations 11 (1):47-57. Open Google Scholar
  310. Hirsch, Steve. 2007. Labor, greens denounce trade policy. Washington Post, February 14. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/washtimes_laborgreensdenouncetpa_02142007.pdf Open Google Scholar
  311. Hitt, Greg. 2006. Washington, Seoul Face a Thorny Issue. Wall Street Journal, July 10. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115248923871401893 Open Google Scholar
  312. Hix, Simon. 2013. Why the 2014 European Elections Matter: Ten Key Votes in the 2009–2013 European Parliament. SIEPS European Policy Analysis. September 2013: 15epa. Open Google Scholar
  313. Hix, Simon, Noury G. Abdul, and Gérard Roland. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  314. Hix, Simon, and Abdul Noury. 2009. After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (2):159-174. Open Google Scholar
  315. Hocking, Brian. 2004. Changing the terms of trade policy making: from the ‘club’ to the ‘multistakeholder’ model. World Trade Review 3 (1):3-26. Open Google Scholar
  316. Hopewell, Kristen. 2015. Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization. Review of International Political Economy 22 (2):311-338. Open Google Scholar
  317. Horn, Henrik, Petros C. Mavroidis, and André Sapir. 2010. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements. The World Economy 33 (11):1565-1588. Open Google Scholar
  318. Hornbeck, J. F. 2005. The Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA). In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  319. Hornbeck, J. F., and William H. Cooper. 2013. Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  320. Howse, Robert, and Michael J. Trebilcock. 1996. The fair trade-free trade debate: Trade, labor, and the environment. International Review of Law and Economics 16 (1):61–79. Open Google Scholar
  321. Hughes, Steve, and Rorden Wilkinson. 1998. International labour standards and world trade: No role for the world trade organization? New Political Economy 3 (3):375-389. Open Google Scholar
  322. Hulse, Carl. 2008. House Votes to Put Off Trade Deal Bush Sought. New York Times, April 11. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/11/business/11trade.html?_r=0 Open Google Scholar
  323. Human Rights Watch. 2007. The US-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Annex 22-B: A Missed Opportunity on Workers’ Rights in North Korea. Washington, D.C.: Human Rights Watch. Open Google Scholar
  324. ———. 2010. EU: Try to Improve Human Rights in North Korea. Press Release, June 14. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2010/06/14/eu-try-improve-human-rights-north-korea Open Google Scholar
  325. Ikenberry, G. John, David A. Lake, and Michael Mastanduno. 1988. Introduction: approaches to explaining American foreign economic policy. International Organization 42 (1):1-14. Open Google Scholar
  326. ILO. 2017. Handbook on Assessment of Labour Provisions in Trade and Investment Arrangements. Geneva: International Labour Organisation. Open Google Scholar
  327. ILO, and IILS. 2013. Social Dimension of Free Trade Agreements. Geneva: International Labour Organization and International Institute for Labour Studies. Open Google Scholar
  328. Inside US Trade. 2001. Zoellick lays out deliberate approach to Jordan, Vietnam. Inside US Trade, February 2. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  329. ———. 2002. U.S. looks for Fines, Sanctions Mix for Chile, Singapore FTAs. Inside US Trade, October 25. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  330. ———. 2003. Administration faces tough fight for textile Republican votes on CAFTA. Inside US Trade, January 2. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  331. ———. 2003. Baucus proposes new CAFTA environment rules to bolster U.S. position. Inside US Trade, October 17. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  332. ———. 2003. CAFTA negotiators likely to meet on agriculture this month. Inside US Trade, August 8. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  333. ———. 2003. House Democrats criticize U.S. Labor Proposal in CAFTA as Inadequate. Inside US Trade, May 16. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  334. ———. 2003. Major CAFTA issues unresolevd as U.S., others announce conclusion. Inside US Trade, December 19. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  335. ———. 2003. Senators call for improved CAFTA labor, environmental standards. Inside US Trade, November 28. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  336. ———. 2003. U.S. tables CAFTA agriculture, industrial market access proposals. Inside US Trade, May 30. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  337. ———. 2003. Vargo warns CAFTA delay could threaten 2004 congressional vote. Inside US Trade, December 12. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  338. ———. 2004. Ecuador, Peru settle outstanding issues, will be included in FTA talks. Inside US Trade, May 7. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  339. ———. 2004. Peru, Ecuador could be dropped from Andean FTA over Investment. Inside US Trade, October 8. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  340. ———. 2004. U.S. hints at delaying sanctions decision after new promises. Inside US Trade, March 26. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  341. ———. 2004. U.S.-Andean FTA talks begin next week, deadline hinges on fast track. Inside US Trade, May 14. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  342. ———. 2004. U.S., Costa Rica settle insurance, textile issues in FTA talks. Inside US Trade, January 30. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  343. ———. 2004. USTR says no changes to CAFTA text on labor, as AFL-CIO gears up for fight. Inside US Trade, February 27. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  344. ———. 2005. CAFTA countries lay out labor enforcement plan, seek more funding. Inside US Trade, April 8. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  345. ———. 2005. Ecuador presses for better FTA treatment for flowers, canned tuna. Inside US Trade, February 11. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  346. ———. 2005. Levin sees little USTR Willingness to compromise on labor in FTAs. Inside US Trade, November 11. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  347. ———. 2005. No definite date set for conclusion of Andean FTA talks. Inside US Trade, October 28. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  348. ———. 2005. U.S. warns Ecuador of possible Andean FTA exclusion over labor. Inside US Trade, October 7. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  349. ———. 2005. U.S., Andean talks adjourn after achieving most progress with Peru. Inside US Trade, November 25. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  350. ———. 2005. U.S., Andeans agree to intensify FTA work, hope to finish by mid-November. Inside US Trade, September 30. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  351. ———. 2005. Unions say they will punish Democrats for supporting DR-CAFTA deal. Inside US Trade, July 29. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  352. ———. 2005. USTR delays preliminary decisions on Andean Trade Benefits. Inside US Trade, January 21. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  353. ———. 2005. Vargo says major work remains in key areas of the Andean FTA. Inside US Trade, March 25. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  354. ———. 2006. Portman to stick to labor provisions outlined in Fast Track. Inside US Trade, February 10. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  355. ———. 2006. U.S. freezes Ecuador FTA after government cancels occidental contract. Inside US Trade, May 19. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  356. ———. 2006. U.S., Colombia beef unresolved as notification to Congress lags. Inside US Trade, August 4. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  357. ———. 2007. Environmental groups laud new Peru language as first step. Inside US Trade, June 29. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  358. ———. 2007. Levin skeptical of FTA labor side letters in Schwab Meeting. Inside US Trade, January 26. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  359. ———. 2007. Rangel unveils Democratic trade policy principles to administration. Inside US Trade, March 27. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  360. ———. 2007. Rangel, Levin say conceptual agreement not enough for Colombia FTA. Inside US Trade, May 11. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  361. ———. 2007. Schwab says FTA labor talks focused on substance, not form. Inside US Trade, January 19. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  362. ———. 2008. New Peru FTA Decrees Anger Civil Society Over Labor, Environment. Inside US Trade, July 4. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  363. ———. 2015. EU pushes new environmental rules, but without enforceability. Inside US Trade, February 13. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  364. ———. 2016. Malmstrom Non-Committal on Enforcement for TTIP Labor, Environment Provisions. Inside US Trade, July 7. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  365. Irwin, Douglas A. 1994. The Political Economy of Free Trade: Voting in the British General Election of 1906. The Journal of Law and Economics 37 (1):75-108. Open Google Scholar
  366. ———. 1996. Industry or class cleavages over trade policy? Evidence from the British General Election of 1923. In The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, edited by J. N. Bhagwati, R. C. Feenstra, G. M. Grossman and D. A. Irwin. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  367. ———. 2015. Free Trade under Fire. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  368. Islam, Shada. 1994. Europe: EC Row Brewing over Trade and Labor Standards Link. Inter Press Service, January 27. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  369. Jacoby, Wade, and Sophie Meunier. 2010. Europe and the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3):299–317. Open Google Scholar
  370. Jaffe, Adam B., Steven R. Peterson, Paul R. Portney, and Robert N. Stavins. 1995. Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1):132-163. Open Google Scholar
  371. Janusch, Holger. 2015. Labor Standards in U.S. Trade Politics. Journal of World Trade 49 (6):1047-1072. Open Google Scholar
  372. Jensen, Nathan M. 2006. Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  373. Jinnah, Sikina, and Julia Kennedy. 2011. A New Era of Trade-Environment Politics: Learning from US Leadership and its Consequences Abroad. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 12 (1):95-109. Open Google Scholar
  374. Jinnah, Sikina, and Elisa Morgera. 2013. Environmental Provisions in American and EU Free Trade Agreements: A Preliminary Comparison and Research Agenda. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 22 (3):324-339. Open Google Scholar
  375. Johnson, Ailish. 2009. EU-ILO relations. Between regional and global governance. In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU Influences the World, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  376. Jones, Kent. 2010. The Doha Blues: Institutional Crisis and Reform in the WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  377. Jones, Vivian C. 2015. Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  378. Kagan, Robert A. 2003. Adversial Legalism. The American Way of Law. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  379. Kahler, Miles, and David A. Lake. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  380. Kahn-Nisser, Sara. 2016. A Matter of Degree: Europeanization, ILO Treaty Ratification and Labour Standards in Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (3):356-374. Open Google Scholar
  381. Karol, David. 2000. Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Much Ado About Nothing? International Organization 54 (04):825-844. Open Google Scholar
  382. Karp, Larry. 2011. The Environment and Trade. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3:397–417. Open Google Scholar
  383. Katzenstein, P. J. 1977. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Open Google Scholar
  384. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1977. Conclusion: domestic structures and strategies of foreign economic policy. International Organization 31 (04):879-920. Open Google Scholar
  385. Keech, William R., and Kyoungsan Pak. 1995. Partisanship, Institutions, and Change in American Trade Politics. The Journal of Politics 57 (04):1130-1142. Open Google Scholar
  386. Kelemen, Daniel R., and Eric C. Sibbitt. 2004. The Globalization of American Law. International Organization 58 (1):103-136. Open Google Scholar
  387. Kelemen, Daniel R., and David Vogel. 2010. Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics. Comparative Political Studies 43 (4):427–456. Open Google Scholar
  388. Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2010. Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3):335-349. Open Google Scholar
  389. ———. 2011. Eurolegalism. The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  390. Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Tim Knievel. 2015. The United States, the European Union, and international environmental law: The domestic dimensions of green diplomacy. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (4):945-965. Open Google Scholar
  391. Kerremans, Bart. 1999. The US Debate on Trade Negotiating Authority between 1994 and 1999. Journal of World Trade 33 (5):49-85. Open Google Scholar
  392. Kerremans, Bart, and Myriam Martins Gistelinck. 2009. Interest Aggregation, Political Parties, Labour Standards and Trade: Differences in the US and EU Approaches to the Inclusion of Labour Standards in International Trade Agreements. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):683–701. Open Google Scholar
  393. Keune, Maarten. 2009. EU enlargement and social standards. Exporting the European social model? In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the world, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  394. Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. Ex Ante Due Diligence: Formation of PTAs and Protection of Labor Rights. International Studies Quarterly 56 (4):704-719. Open Google Scholar
  395. Kim, Soo Yeon, Edward D. Mansfield, and Helen V. Milner. 2016. Regional Trade Governance. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, edited by T. Börzel and T. Risse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  396. King, Neil Jr. 2004. Kerry Would Seek Tighter Standards Governing CAFTA. The Wallstreet Journal, June 1. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108577638109124157 Open Google Scholar
  397. Kirk, Ron. 2010. Tough Trade Enforcement Supports Jobs for American Workers. White House Blog. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/07/30/tough-trade-enforcement-supports-jobs-american-workers Open Google Scholar
  398. Kissack, Robert. 2009. Writing a new normative standard? EU member states and ILO conventions. In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization: How the EU Influences the World, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  399. ———. 2011. The Performance of the European Union in the International Labour Organization. Journal of European Integration 33 (6):651-665. Open Google Scholar
  400. Klein, Rick. 2005. House Passes Free-Trade Agreement in Tight Vote. The Boston Globe, July 28. Available at: http://archive.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/07/28/house_passes_free_trade_agreement_in_tight_vote/ Open Google Scholar
  401. Kohl, Tristan, Steven Brakman, and Harry Garretsen. 2016. Do Trade Agreements Stimulate International Trade Differently? Evidence from 296 Trade Agreements. The World Economy 39 (1):97-131. Open Google Scholar
  402. Kotz, David M. 2015. The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  403. Kraft, Michael E., and Sheldon Kamieniecki. 2007. Business and Environmental Policy: Corporate Interests in the American Political System. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  404. Krasner, Stephen D. 1977. US Commercial and Monetary Policy: Unravelling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness. International Organization 31 (4):635-671. Open Google Scholar
  405. ———. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  406. Krugman, Paul R. 1993. The Narrow and Broad Arguments for Free Trade. The American Economic Review 83 (2):362-366. Open Google Scholar
  407. Krupa, Peter. 2007. E.U. Negotiations Launch, So Does Opposition. Tico Times, October 26. Available at: http://www.ticotimes.net/2007/10/26/e-u-negotiations-launch-so-does-opposition Open Google Scholar
  408. Kucik, Jeffrey. 2012. The Domestic Politics of Institutional Design: Producer Preferences over Trade Agreement Rules. Economics and Politics 24 (2):95–118. Open Google Scholar
  409. Kull, Steven. 2005. Americans on CAFTA and US Trade Policy: The PIPA/Knowledge Networks Polls. Open Google Scholar
  410. La Nación. 2009. Jefe negociador de Costa Rica ve complicada posición de Unión Europea; 'Posición de UE es complicada'. La Nación, March 25. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  411. ———. 2010. Daniel Ortega fustiga Acuerdo con la Unión Europea. La Nación, May 1. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/economia/Daniel-Ortega-Acuerdo-Union-Europea_0_1119688065.html Open Google Scholar
  412. Labor Advisory Committee. 2007. The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Report of the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy (LAC). Washington, D.C.: LAC. Open Google Scholar
  413. Lacey, Marc. 2001. Bush Seeking to Modify Pact on Trade With Jordan. New York Times, April 11. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/11/world/bush-seeking-to-modify-pact-on-trade-with-jordan.html Open Google Scholar
  414. Lake, David A. 1988. The state and American trade strategy in the pre-hegemonic era. International Organization 42 (01):33-58. Open Google Scholar
  415. ———. 2009. Open economy politics: A critical review. Review of International Organisation 4 (3):219-244. Open Google Scholar
  416. Lamy, Pascal. 1999. The EU's approach to trade and core labour standards in the New WTO Round. Speech to the ICFTU, Seattle, November 29. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  417. Langille, Brian A. 1997. Eight Ways to think about International Labour Standards. Journal of World Trade 31 (4):27-53. Open Google Scholar
  418. ———. 2005. Core Labour Rights - The True Story (Reply to Alston). European Journal of International Law 16 (3):409-437. Open Google Scholar
  419. Lee, Donna, and Rorden Wilkinson. 2007. The WTO after Hong Kong: Progress in, and Prospects for, the Doha Development Agenda. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  420. Lee, Eddy. 1997. Globalization and Labour Standards: a review of issues. International Labour Review 136 (2):173-189. Open Google Scholar
  421. Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  422. Lee, Thea M. 2006. Testimony on the Proposed U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Submitted by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. Open Google Scholar
  423. Leeg, Tobias. 2018. Negotiating sustainable trade: explaining the difference in social standards in US and EU preferential trade agreements. Contemporary Politics 24 (4):398-417. Open Google Scholar
  424. Leeg, Tobias 2014. Normative Power Europe? The EU in the Negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with India. European foreign affairs review 19 (3):335-355. Open Google Scholar
  425. Lerer, Lisa, and Victoria McGrane. 2008. Venezuela scolds Bush over Colombia deal. Politico, September 4. Available at: http://www.politico.com/story/2008/04/venezuela-scolds-bush-over-colombia-deal-009473 Open Google Scholar
  426. Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  427. Levin, Sander M. 2002. The FTAA: A Chance to Shape the Rules of International Trade. Economic Perspectives: An Electronic Journal of the US. Department of State 7 (3):37-40. Open Google Scholar
  428. Lichtenstein, Nelson. 2010. Ideology and Interest on the Social Policy Home Front. In The Presidency of George W. Bush: A First Historical Assessment, edited by J. E. Zelizer. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  429. Lohmann, Susanne, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1994. Divided government and US trade policy: theory and evidence. International Organization 48 (4):595-632. Open Google Scholar
  430. Los Angeles Times. 2005. U.S., Others Agree to Rework CAFTA Rules. Los Angeles Times, July 20. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jul/20/business/fi-cafta20 Open Google Scholar
  431. Lundsgaarde, Erik. 2013. The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  432. Lütz, Susanne. 2011. Back to the future? The domestic sources of transatlantic regulation. Review of International Political Economy 18 (4):iii-xxii. Open Google Scholar
  433. Madani, Dorsati. 1999. A Review of the Role and Impact of Export Processing Zones. In Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Open Google Scholar
  434. Magee, Stephen P. 1980. Three Simple Test of the Stolper Samuelson Theorem. In Issues in International Economics, edited by P. Oppenheimer. London: Oriel Press London. Open Google Scholar
  435. Magee, Stephen P., William A. Brock, and Leslie Young. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  436. Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. 2006. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis 14 (3):227-249. Open Google Scholar
  437. Mandelson, Peter. 2005. Open markets, open trade: Europe’s global challenge. Speech at Market Access Symposium, Brussels, September 19. Open Google Scholar
  438. ———. 2006. Trade policy and Decent Work. Intervention by Peter Mandelson at the EU Decent Work Conference, Brussels, December 5. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  439. Manger, Mark S. 2009. Investing in Protection. The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements between North and South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  440. Manger, Mark S., and Kenneth C. Shadlen. 2012. Political Trade Dependence and North–South Trade Agreements. International Studies Quarterly 58 (1):79-91. Open Google Scholar
  441. Mann, Michael. 1996. Brittan bids to dovetail trade rules with environment laws. Politico, February 21. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/brittan-bids-to-dovetail-trade-rules-with-environment-laws/ Open Google Scholar
  442. Manners, Ian. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2):235-258. Open Google Scholar
  443. ———. 2009. The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Europe Perspective. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):785-803. Open Google Scholar
  444. ———. 2011. The European Union’s normative power. In Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by R. G. Whitman. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
  445. Mansfield, Edward D., and Marc L. Busch. 1995. The political economy of nontariff barriers: a cross-national analysis. International Organization 49 (4):723 - 749. Open Google Scholar
  446. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2007. Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science 37 (3):403 - 432. Open Google Scholar
  447. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Peter B. Rosendorff. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3):477-513. Open Google Scholar
  448. Manyin, Mark E. 2007. South Korea-U.S. Economic Relations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  449. Manyin, Mark E., and Dick K. Nanto. 2011. The Kaesong North-South Korean Industrial Complex. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  450. Marx, Axel, Brecht Lein, and Nicolas Brando. 2016. The Protection of Labour Rights in Trade Agreements: The Case of the EU-Colombia Agreement Journal of World Trade 50 (4):587-610. Open Google Scholar
  451. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  452. McCormick, J. 1995. The Global Environmental Movement. Bloominton: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated. Open Google Scholar
  453. Melo Araujo, Billy A. 2013. Intellectual Property and the EU's Deep Trade Agenda. Journal of International Economic Law 16 (2):439-474. Open Google Scholar
  454. Menon, Anand, and Martin A. Schain. 2006. Comparative Federalism: The European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  455. Meunier, Sophie. 2000. What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU–U.S. Trade Negotiations. International Organization 54 (1):103–135. Open Google Scholar
  456. ———. 2005. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  457. ———. 2007. Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):905–926. Open Google Scholar
  458. Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  459. ———. 1991. Resisting the Protectionist Temptation: Industry and the Making of Trade Policy in France and the United States during the 1970s. In International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, edited by J. Frieden and D. A. Lake. New York: St. Martin's. Open Google Scholar
  460. ———. 1999. The Political Economy of International Trade. Annual Review of Political Science 2:91-114. Open Google Scholar
  461. ———. 2006. Why multilateralism? Foreign aid and domestic principal-agent problems. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson and M. J. Tierney. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  462. Milner, Helen V., and Benjamin Judkins. 2004. Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left–Right Divide on Trade Policy? International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):95-120. Open Google Scholar
  463. Milner, Helen V., and Keiko Kubota. 2005. Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries. International Organization 59 (1):107-143. Open Google Scholar
  464. Milner, Helen V., and Edward D. Mansfield. 2012. Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of International Trade Agreements. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  465. Milner, Helen V., and Peter B. Rosendorff. 1997. Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):117-146. Open Google Scholar
  466. Milner, Helen V., and Dustin H. Tingley. 2010. The Political Economy of U.S. Foreign Aid: American Legislators and the Domestic Politics of Aid. Economics & Politics 22 (2):200-232. Open Google Scholar
  467. Mincetur. 2009. Acuerdo Comercial entre la Unión Europea - Peru y Colombia. Tercera Ronda de Negociaciones, Bruselas, Bélgica del 4 al 8 de Mayo 2009: Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo de Peru. Open Google Scholar
  468. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Introduction: Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining. In Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics edited by P. B. Evans, H. K. Jacobson and R. D. Putnam. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  469. ———. 1997. Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51 (4):513-553. Open Google Scholar
  470. Motaal, Abdel. 2001. Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and WTO Rules. Journal of World Trade 35 (6):1215-1233. Open Google Scholar
  471. Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, and Thomas Poguntke, eds. 2002. Green Parties in National Governments. London: Frank Cass. Open Google Scholar
  472. Murillo, Álvaro. 2007. Centroamérica y la UE discrepan hasta en el saludo. El Paìs, October 31. Available at: http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2007/10/31/actualidad/1193785206_850215.html Open Google Scholar
  473. ———. 2008. La corte de La Haya, nuevo escollo entre la UE y Centroamérica. El País, March 14. Available at: http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2008/03/14/actualidad/1205449203_850215.html Open Google Scholar
  474. ———. 2008. Stagno critica ‘hipocresía’ de UE contra armamento. La Naciòn, April 11. Available at: http://www.nacion.com/nacional/Stagno-critica-hipocresia-UE-armamento_0_969703066.html Open Google Scholar
  475. Mutch, Robert E. 2016. Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  476. Narlikar, Amrita. 2004. The ministerial process and power dynamics in the World Trade Organization: understanding failure from Seattle to Cancún. New Political Economy 9 (3):413-428. Open Google Scholar
  477. ———. 2010. New powers in the club: the challenges of global trade governance. International Affairs 86 (3):717-728. Open Google Scholar
  478. Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz. 2014. The Established Anglophone Democracies. In Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. A Handbook on Political Finance, edited by E. Falguera, S. Jones and M. Ohman. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Open Google Scholar
  479. Needham, Vicki. 2013. US, Guatemala resolve labor enforcement concerns. The Hill, April 11. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/293511-us-guatemala-resolve-labor-enforcement-concerns Open Google Scholar
  480. ———. 2014. US ramps up pressure on Guatemala over labor rights. The Hill, September 18. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/218225-us-moves-forward-on-labor-case-with-guatemala Open Google Scholar
  481. ———. 2014. US trade officials give Guatemala more time to install labor overhaul. The Hill, August 25. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/215913-us-trade-officials-give-guatemala-more-time-to-install-labor-overhaul Open Google Scholar
  482. New York Times. 2005. Applauding the Cafta 15. New York Times, July 29. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/29/opinion/applauding-the-cafta-15.html Open Google Scholar
  483. Newell, Peter. 2005. The Political Economy of Trade and the Environment. In The Political Economy of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century. Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics, edited by D. Kelly and W. Grant. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. Open Google Scholar
  484. Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. 1998. Minimizing agency costs in two-level games: Lessons from the trade authority controversies in the United States and the European Union. In Negotiating on Behalf of Others, edited by R. H. Mnookin and L. E. Susskind. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  485. Nielson, Daniel L. 2003. Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in Middle-Income Presidential Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47 (3):470-491. Open Google Scholar
  486. Novitz, Tonia. 2009. In search of a coherent social policy. EU import and export of ILO labour standards? In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the World, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  487. O'Brien, Robert. 2000. Workers and world order: the tentative transformation of the international union movement. Review of International Studies 26 (04):533-555. Open Google Scholar
  488. O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. Politics, Process and American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  489. O'Reilly, Robert F. 2005. Veto Points, Veto Players, and International Trade Policy. Comparative Political Studies 38 (6):652-675. Open Google Scholar
  490. Oatley, Thomas. 2010. International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. New York: Longman. Open Google Scholar
  491. Obach, B. K. 2004. Labor and the Environmental Movement: The Quest for Common Ground. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  492. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Claire Roche Kelly. 2008. EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges. The International Spectator 43 (3):35-50. Open Google Scholar
  493. OECD. 1996. Trade, Employment, and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers’ Rights and International Trade. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Open Google Scholar
  494. ———. 2007. Environment and Regional Trade Agreements. Paris: OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  495. Olivet, Cecilia, and Paulina Novo. 2011. Time for Europe to put values and human rights above commercial advantage. Policy Brief: Why EU–Colombia/Peru Free Trade Agreements should not be ratified. In Policy Brief. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Open Google Scholar
  496. Olsen, Kelly. 2007. South Korea, EU Launch Free Trade Talks. Washington Post, May 6. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501260.html Open Google Scholar
  497. ———. 2007. U.S., South Korea Reach Free Trade Deal. Washington Post, April 2. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/02/AR2007040200273_pf.html Open Google Scholar
  498. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  499. Orbie, Jan, and Olufemi Babarinde. 2008. The Social Dimension of Globalization and EU Development Policy: Promoting Core Labour Standards and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of European Integration 30 (3):459-477. Open Google Scholar
  500. Orbie, Jan, Martins Gistelinck, and Bart Kerremans. 2009. The social dimension of EU trade policies. In The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the world, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  501. Orbie, Jan, Deborah Martens, Myriam Oehri, and Lore Van den Putte. 2016. Promoting sustainable development or legitimising free trade? Civil society mechanisms in EU trade agreements. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 1 (4):526–546. Open Google Scholar
  502. Orbie, Jan, and Lisa Tortell. 2009. From the social clause to social dimension of globalization. In The EU and the Social Dimension of Globalization. How the EU influences the world, edited by J. Orbie and L. Tortell. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  503. ———. 2009. The New GSP Beneficiaries: Ticking the Box or Truly Consistent with ILO Findings. European foreign affairs review 14 (5):663-681. Open Google Scholar
  504. Orbie, Jan, Lisa Tortell, Robert Kissack, Sieglinde Gstöhl, Jan Wouters, and Nicolas Hachez. 2009. JESP Symposium: The European Union’s global social role. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (2):99–116. Open Google Scholar
  505. Orbie, Jan, Hendrik Vos, and Liesbeth Taverniers. 2005. EU Trade Policy and a Social Clause: A Question of Competences? Politique européenne 17 (3):159-187. Open Google Scholar
  506. Page, Benjamin I., and Martin Gilens. 2017. Democracy in America?: What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  507. Palmer, Doug. 2004. Colombia top priority in Andean trade talks - U.S. Reuters, September 29. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/reuters_colombiapriority_09292004.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  508. ———. 2007. Bush trade agenda at risk as Democrats take over. Washington Post, January 4. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/04/AR2007010400863_pf.html Open Google Scholar
  509. Pearson, K. 2015. Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives. Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  510. Peruvian Times. 2007. Peru president proposes creation of Environment Ministry. Peruvian Times, December 21. Available at: http://www.peruviantimes.com/21/peru-president-proposes-creation-of-environment-ministry/76/ Open Google Scholar
  511. Phillips, Leigh. 2009. Brussels' commitment to Latin American integration questioned. EU observer, September 30. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/28749 Open Google Scholar
  512. ———. 2009. Human rights no block to EU-Colombia talks. EU observer, May 4. Available at: https://euobserver.com/foreign/28062 Open Google Scholar
  513. Phillips, Nicola. 2007. The Limits of ‘Securitization’: Power, Politics and Process in US Foreign Economic Policy. Government and Opposition 42 (2):158–189. Open Google Scholar
  514. Piccio, Daniela R. 2014. Northern, Western and Southern Europe. In Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. A Handbook on Political Finance, edited by E. Falguera, S. Jones and M. Ohman. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Open Google Scholar
  515. Pickel, Gert, and Susanne Pickel. 2009. Qualitative Interviews als Verfahren des Ländervergleichs. In Methoden der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: Eine Einführung, edited by S. Pickel, G. Pickel, H.-J. Lauth and D. Jahn. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  516. Pierson, Paul, and Theda Skocpol. 2007. The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  517. Pinto, Pablo M., and Santiago M. Pinto. 2008. The Politics of Investment: Partisanship and the sectoral Allocation of Foreign Direct Investment. Economics and Politics 20 (2):216-254. Open Google Scholar
  518. Poletti, Arlo, and Dirk De Biévre. 2013. The political science of European trade policy: A literature review with a research outlook. Comparative European Politics 12 (1):101-119. Open Google Scholar
  519. Poletti, Arlo, and Daniela Sicurelli. 2012. The EU as Promoter of Environmental Norms in the Doha Round. West European Politics 35 (4):911-932. Open Google Scholar
  520. ———. 2016. The European Union, Preferential Trade Agreements, and the International Regulation of Sustainable Biofuels. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2):249-266. Open Google Scholar
  521. Politi, James, Demetri Sevastopulo, and Jude Webber. 2018. Trump hails Canada-US deal to revamp Nafta ‘historic’. Financial Times, October 1st. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/8a43c9f4-c51e-11e8-8670-c5353379f7c2 Open Google Scholar
  522. Politi, James, Andrew Ward, and Edward Luce. 2008. Bush sets scene for Colombia trade fight. Financial Times, April 7. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8d439084-04dc-11dd-a2f0-000077b07658.html#axzz3wvKorAXx Open Google Scholar
  523. Pollack, Mark , and Gregory Shaffer, eds. 2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  524. Porges, Amelia. 2011. Dispute Settlement. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development. A Handbook, edited by J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Open Google Scholar
  525. Portela, C. 2009. European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy: When and Why Do They Work? Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  526. Portela, Clara, and Jan Orbie. 2014. Sanctions under the EU Generalised System of Preferences and foreign policy: coherence by accident? Contemporary Politics 20 (1):63-76. Open Google Scholar
  527. Portman, Rob. 2005. Remarks of Ambassador Rob Portman, United States Trade Representative. Speech at IDB Donor Conference, Washington, D.C., July 19. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  528. Postnikov, Evgeny. 2014. The design of social standards in EU and US preferential trade agreements. In Handbook of the international political economy of trade, edited by D. A. Deese. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  529. Postnikov, Evgeny, and Ida Bastiaens. 2014. Does dialogue work? The effectivness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreements. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (6):923-940. Open Google Scholar
  530. Pruzin, Daniel. 2002. Costa Rican Minister Says Government Open To Labor, Environmental Provisions in CAFTA. Bloomberg International Trade Reporter, October 17. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  531. R. V., Anuradha 2011. Environment. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development. A Handbook, edited by J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Open Google Scholar
  532. Ramstad, Evan 2010. After Attack, South's Talks with U.S. Accelerated. Wall Street Journal, December 4. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703989004575653672051698034 Open Google Scholar
  533. Ramstad, Evan, and John W. Miller. 2010. South Korea and EU Near Free-Trade Pact. Wall Street Journal, March 25. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123789624042424463 Open Google Scholar
  534. Rangel. 2009. Moving Forward: A New, Bipartisan Trade Policy That Reflects American Values. Harvard Journal on Legislation 45 (2):377–419. Open Google Scholar
  535. Ravenhill, John. 2010. The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: A political domino effect. Review of International Organisation 17 (2):178-208. Open Google Scholar
  536. Reuters. 2004. No plans to change CAFTA labor provisions -US aide. Reuters, May 5. Available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/reuters_caftalabor_may2004.pdf Open Google Scholar
  537. ———. 2008. Colombia, Peru Presidents Urge Quick EU Trade Deal. Reuters, September 22. Available at: http://arhiva.dalje.com/en-economy/colombia-peru-presidents-urge-quick-eu-trade-deal/184861 Open Google Scholar
  538. Richards, John E. 1999. Toward a Positive Theory of International Institutions: Regulating International Aviation Markets. International Organization 53 (1):1-37. Open Google Scholar
  539. Rickard, Stephanie J. 2015. Electoral Systems and Trade. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, edited by L. L. Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  540. Rittberger, Berthold. 2012. Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (s1):18-37. Open Google Scholar
  541. Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  542. Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. Trade and the variety of democratic institutions. International Organization 41 (2):203-223. Open Google Scholar
  543. ———. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions. How Trade Affects Domestic Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  544. ———. 1999. Institutions as Constraints on Strategic Choice. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  545. Rosen, Howard. 2004. Free Trade Agreements as Foreign Policy Tools: The US-Israel and US-Jordan FTAs In Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities, edited by J. J. Schott. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  546. Ross, George. 2011. European Center-Lefts and the Mazes of European Integration. In What's Left of the Left. Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times, edited by J. Cronin, G. Ross and J. Shoch. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  547. Rowland, Kara. 2011. Three free-trade agreements linked to aid for workers. Washington Times, June 28. Available at: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/28/iowa-obama-touts-economic-progress/?page=all Open Google Scholar
  548. Sachs, Noah. 2006. Planning the Funeral at the Birth: Extended Producer Responsibility in the European Union and the United States. Harvard Environmental Law Review 30 (51):51-98. Open Google Scholar
  549. Salazar-Xirinachs, Jose M. , and Jaime Granados. 2004. The US-Central America Free Trade Agreement: Opportunities and Challenges In Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities, edited by J. J. Schott. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  550. Sang-Hun, Choe. 2008. South Korea and U.S. reach deal on beef imports. New York Times, June 22. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/world/asia/22korea.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=32B027F445364CE33467A4668786F12A&gwt=pay Open Google Scholar
  551. ———. 2009. Seoul Says European Trade Deal Is Near. New York Times, July 13. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/business/global/14trade.html?_r=0 Open Google Scholar
  552. Sanger, David E. 2001. Bush links Trade with Democracy at Quebec Talks. New York Times, April 22. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/22/world/bush-links-trade-with-democracy-at-quebec-talks.html Open Google Scholar
  553. Sapir, André. 2007. Europe and the Global Economy. In Fragmented Power: Europe and the Global Economy, edited by A. Sapir. Brussels: Bruegel. Open Google Scholar
  554. Sbragia, Alberta. 2010. The EU, the US, and trade policy: competitive interdependence in the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3):368–382. Open Google Scholar
  555. Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1935. Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar
  556. Scherrer, Christof. 1998. Protecting labor in the global economy: A social clause in trade agreements? New Political Science 20 (1):53-68. Open Google Scholar
  557. Scherrer, Christof, Thomas Greven, Aaron Leopold, and Elisabeth Molinari. 2009. An Analysis of the relative Effectivness of Social and Environmental Norms in Free Trade Agreements. Brussels: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  558. Schirm, Stefan A. 2010. Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global governance. European Journal of International Relations 16 (2):197–221. Open Google Scholar
  559. Schnietz, Karen E. 2000. The Institutional Foundation of U.S. Trade Policy: Revisiting Explanations for the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act. Journal of Policy History 12 (4):417-444. Open Google Scholar
  560. Schott, Jeffrey J. 2004. Assessing US FTA Policy. In Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities, edited by J. J. Schott. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  561. ———. 2017. US Trade Policy Options in the Pacific Basin: Bigger Is Better. In Policy Brief. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute of International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  562. Schott, Jeffrey J., Scott C. Bradford, and Thomas Moll. 2006. Negotiating the Korea–United States Free Trade Agreement. In Policy Briefs in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Open Google Scholar
  563. Schott, Jeffrey J., and Cathleen Cimino. 2013. Crafting a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: What Can Be Done. In Policy Briefs in International Economics. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics Open Google Scholar
  564. Sek, Leonore. 2003. Trade Promotion Authority (Fast-Track Authority for Trade Agreements): Background and Developments in the 107th Congress. In Issue Brief for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  565. Seligman, Dan. 2001. Transcript from a Panel Session at the Society of Environmental Journalists’ 10th National Conference. Speech at KING-TV Seattle. Available at: http://www.sierraclub.org/trade/articles/debate.asp Open Google Scholar
  566. Semuels, Alana, and Tom Hamburger. 2011. On South Korea trade deal, Obama and chamber are on same side. Los Angeles Times, January 24. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/24/business/la-fi-korea-fta-20110125 Open Google Scholar
  567. Shaffer, Greg. 2003. Defending Interests. Public-Private Partnerships in W.T.O. Litigation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  568. Shapiro, Hal. 2006. Fast Track: A Legal, Historical, and Political Analysis International Law and Development. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  569. Shear, Michael D. 2017. Trump Will Withdraw U.S. From Paris Climate Agreement. New York Times, June 1st. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/trump-paris-climate-agreement.html Open Google Scholar
  570. Shoch, James. 2000. Contesting Globalization: Organized Labor, NAFTA, and the 1997 and 1998 Fast-Track Fights. Politics & Society 28 (1):119-150. Open Google Scholar
  571. ———. 2001. Organized Labor versus Globalization. NAFTA, Fast Track, and PNTR with China. In Rekindling the Movement. Labor's Quest for Relevance in the Twenty-First Century, edited by L. Turner, H. C. Katz and R. W. Hurd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  572. ———. 2001. Trading Blows: Party Competition and U.S. Trade Policy in a Globalizing Era. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press. Open Google Scholar
  573. Sierra Club. 2011. Sierra Club Letter Opposing Korea Colombia Panama FTAs. Letter to Congress, October 6. Washington, D.C.: Sierra Club. Available at: http://www.citizen.org/documents/sierra-club-letter-opposing-korea-colombia-panama-ftas-october-2011.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  574. ———. 2015. TPP Text Analysis: Environment Chapter Fails to Protect the Environment. Washinton, D.C.: Sierra Club. Open Google Scholar
  575. Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth. 2008. Statement on the US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement. Press Release, March 12. Available at: www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/envirocolombiaFTAsign-onhouse.pdf Open Google Scholar
  576. Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2013. The Power of Economic Ideas: A Constructivist Political Economy of EU Trade Policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (4):597-617. Open Google Scholar
  577. ———. 2014. Constructing European Union Trade Policy. A Global Idea of Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. Open Google Scholar
  578. ———. 2014. Explaining the resilience of free trade: The Smooth-Hawley myth and the crisis. Review of International Political Economy 21 (3):535-574. Open Google Scholar
  579. Singh, J.P. 2008. Negotiation and the Global Information Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  580. Sokou, Katerina, and Howard Schneider. 2013. U.S. suspends Bangladesh's trade privileges due to labor concerns. Washinton Post, June 27. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-to-suspend-trade-privileges-with-bangladesh/2013/06/27/16171f08-df3d-11e2-963a-72d740e88c12_story.html Open Google Scholar
  581. Song, Yeongkwan. 2011. KORUS FTA vs. Korea-EU FTA: Why the Differences? In Academic Paper Series Vol. 6 No. 5. Washington, D.C.: Korea Economic Institute. Open Google Scholar
  582. Standing, Guy. 2008. The ILO: An Agency for Globalization? Development and Change 39 (3):355-384. Open Google Scholar
  583. Stark, Pete. 2001. Don't Make Same Errors On This Trade Agreement. Roll Call, May 7. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  584. Steffenson, Rebecca. 2005. Managing EU-US Relations: Actors, Institutions and the New Transatlantic Agenda. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  585. Stiles, Andrew. 2010. Business dials up trade efforts. The Hill, July 13. Available at: http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/108605-business-dials-up-free-trade-efforts Open Google Scholar
  586. Stolper, Wolfgang, and Paul A. Samuelson. 1941. Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies 9 (1): 58–73. Open Google Scholar
  587. Stout, David. 2008. Bush to Force Vote on Colombia Trade. New York Times, April 7. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/washington/07cnd-trade.html Open Google Scholar
  588. Strauch, Nicolas, and Robertas Pogorelis. 2011. Electoral systems. The link between governance, elected members and voters. Brussels: European Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  589. Suranovic, Steven. 2002. International Labour and Environmental Standards Agreements: Is This Fair Trade? The World Economy 25 (2):231-245. Open Google Scholar
  590. ———. 2010. International Trade: Theory and Policy. Nyack: Flat World Knowledge, L.L.C. Open Google Scholar
  591. Swann, Christopher. 2005. Sugar lobby deal mooted to save trade pact. Financial Times, April 12. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/caecfb9e-aaf0-11d9-98d7-00000e2511c8.html#axzz3yuKqURup Open Google Scholar
  592. Swanson, Ian. 2007. Labor Groups Differ on Peru Free Trade Deal. The Hill, September 18. Available at: http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/3274-labor-groups-differ-on-peru-free-trade-deal Open Google Scholar
  593. Teffer, Peter. 2015. EU wants promises on labour, environment in US trade pact. EU observer, November 6. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/131002 Open Google Scholar
  594. The Economic Times. 2009. Labour pangs likely to hold up India-EU free-trade agreement. The Economic Times, November 7. Available at: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2009-11-07/news/28434950_1_india-eu-trade-india-and-eu-india-eu-free-trade-agreement Open Google Scholar
  595. The Economist. 2007. Trade, timber and tribes. The Economist, October 4. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/9910163 Open Google Scholar
  596. ———. 2009. Low expectations exceeded. The Economist, April 30. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/13578834 Open Google Scholar
  597. The Hankyoreh. 2007. Gov’t says bracing itself for renegotiation on FTA. The Hankyoreh, May 23. Available at: http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_business/211306.html Open Google Scholar
  598. ———. 2007. U.S. may seek FTA renegotiations on labor, environment. The Hankyoreh, May 12. Available at: http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_business/208805.html Open Google Scholar
  599. The White House. 2001. Bush Says Labor, Environmental Concerns Should Not Hamper Trade Deals. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary. Open Google Scholar
  600. ———. 2001. The President's 2001 International Trade Agenda Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary. Open Google Scholar
  601. Tico Times. 2010. EU and Central America begin new rounds of talk for association agreement, this time including Panama. Tico Times, October 7. Available at: http://www.ticotimes.net/2010/03/19/eu-and-central-america-begin-new-round-of-talks-for-association-agreement-this-time-including-panama Open Google Scholar
  602. Toner, Robin. 2007. For Democrats, New Challenge in Age-Old Rift. New York Times, May 8. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/08/washington/08trade.html?_r=0&f Open Google Scholar
  603. Trampusch, Christine, and Bruno Palier. 2016. Between X and Y: how process tracing contributes to opening the black box of causality. New Political Economy 21 (5):437-454. Open Google Scholar
  604. Trottman, Melanie. 2010. Unions Make Vote Push. Wall Street Journal, October 4. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703431604575521940172598182 Open Google Scholar
  605. Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25 (3):289-325. Open Google Scholar
  606. Tsogas, George. 1999. Labour standards in international trade agreements: an assessment of the arguments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 10 (2):351-375. Open Google Scholar
  607. U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2000. U.S. Chamber Hails Free Trade Talks with Chile. Press Release, November 29. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/us-chamber-hails-free-trade-talks-chile Open Google Scholar
  608. ———. 2001. U.S. Chamber Pulls Out All Stops For Trade Ad Campaign Starts Final Week Before Congress Votes. Press Release, November 28. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/us-chamber-pulls-out-all-stops-trade-ad-campaign-starts-final-week-congress-votes Open Google Scholar
  609. ———. 2003. Statement by U.S. Chamber Vice President for Asia Myron Brilliant before the International Trade Commission on the Impact of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Open Google Scholar
  610. ———. 2007. Chamber Welcomes Bipartisan Deal to Move Trade Agenda Forward. Press Statement, May 9. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/chamber-welcomes-bipartisan-deal-move-trade-agenda-forward Open Google Scholar
  611. U.S. Department of Labor. 2012. Union members 2011. News Release, January 27. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/union2_01272012.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  612. UNCED. 1992. Agenda 21. The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Open Google Scholar
  613. UNICE. 1998. UNICE Comments on International Trade and Labour Standards. Position paper, June 11. Brussels: Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederation of Europe. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03080-E.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  614. ———. 1999. UNICE and the WTO Millennium Round. Executive Summary, September 1999. Brussels: Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03310-E.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  615. ———. 2001. The new WTO round. UNICE Fact Sheets, October 2001. Brussels: Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03850-E.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  616. ———. 2006. UNICE Strategy on a EU Approach to Free Trade Agreements. Position Paper, December 7. Available at: http://www.bilaterals.org/?unice-strategy-on-an-eu-approach&lang=en Open Google Scholar
  617. USCIB. 2001. Statement of the United States Council for International Business on Recommendations for a Broad-Based WTO Negotiation. May 10. Washington, D.C.: US Council for International Business. Available at: http://www.jmcti.org/2000round/US/USTR_comment/USCIB.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  618. ———. 2007. Labor and Employment. Position Paper, Washington, D.C.: US Council for International Business. Available at: http://www.uscib.org/index.asp?documentID=825 Open Google Scholar
  619. ———. 2007. USCIB Welcomes Bipartisan Trade Policy Accord. Press Release, May 14. Washington, D.C.: US Council for International Business. Available at: http://www.uscib.org/uscib-welcomes-bipartisan-trade-policy-accord-ud-3699/ Open Google Scholar
  620. Usi, Eva. 2012. Humala: "queremos industrializar el Perú". Deutsche Welle, June 12. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/humala-queremos-industrializar-el-per%C3%BA/a-16017789 Open Google Scholar
  621. Van den Hoven, Adrian. 2004. Assuming Leadership in Multilateral Economic Institutions: The EU's ‘Development Round’ Discourse and Strategy. West European Politics 27 (2):256-283. Open Google Scholar
  622. Van den Putte, Lore. 2015. Divided we stand: the European Parliament’s position on social trade in the post-Lisbon era. In Global Governance of Labour Rights. Assessing the Effectiveness of Transnational Public and Private Policy Initiatives, edited by A. Marx, J. Wouters, G. Rayp and L. Beke. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  623. ———. 2015. Involving Civil Society in Social Clauses and the Decent Work Agenda. Global Labour Journal 6 (2):221 - 235. Open Google Scholar
  624. Van den Putte, Lore, Ferdi De Ville, and Jan Orbie. 2015. The European Parliament as an actor in international trade: from power to impact. In The European Parliament and its International Relations, edited by S. Stavridis and D. Irrera. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  625. Van den Putte, Lore, and Jan Orbie. 2015. EU Bilateral Trade Agreements and the Surprising Rise of Labour Provisions. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31 (3):263–284. Open Google Scholar
  626. Van den Putte, Lore, Jan Orbie, Fabienne Bossuyt, and Ferdi De Ville. 2014. Social norms in EU bilateral trade agreements: A comparative overview. In Linking trade and non-commercial interests: the EU as a global role model?, edited by T. Takács, A. Ott and A. Dimopoulos. The Hague: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations. Open Google Scholar
  627. van Haute, Emilie, ed. 2016. Green Parties in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  628. van Schendelen, Rinus. 2005. Machiavelli in Brussels. The Art of Lobbying the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Open Google Scholar
  629. Vieth, Warren. 2005. Friends, Foes Made Over Trade Deal. Los Angeles Times, August 7. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/print/2005/aug/07/nation/na-cafta7 Open Google Scholar
  630. Villareal, Angeles M. 2005. Andean-U.S. Free-Trade Agreement Negotiations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  631. ———. 2006. Andean-U.S. Free-Trade Agreement Negotiations. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  632. ———. 2008. U.S.-Peru Economic Relations and the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  633. Vinagre, Emili. 2009. Merkel avala a Uribe y ofrece apoyo para pacificación en Colombia. Deutsche Welle, January 31. Available at: http://www.dw.com/es/merkel-avala-a-uribe-y-ofrece-apoyo-para-pacificaci%C3%B3n-en-colombia/a-3992973-0 Open Google Scholar
  634. Visser, Jelle. 2006. Union membership statistics in 24 countries. Monthly Labor Review January:38-49. Open Google Scholar
  635. Vogel, David. 1997. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  636. ———. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  637. Vogel, Toby. 2012. Member states and MEPs to clash over free-trade deal. Politico, March 7. Available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/member-states-and-meps-to-clash-over-free-trade-deal/ Open Google Scholar
  638. Vogler, John, and Hannes R. Stephan. 2007. The European Union in global environmental governance: Leadership in the making? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7 (4):389-413. Open Google Scholar
  639. Vogt, Jeffrey S. 2014. Trade and Investment Arrangements and Labor Rights. In Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Impacts: New Expectations and Paradigms, edited by L. Blecher, N. Kaymar Stafford and G. C. Bellamy. New York: ABA Book Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  640. ———. 2015. The Evolution of Labor Rights and Trade—A Transatlantic Comparison and Lessons for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Journal of International Economic Law 18 (4):827–860. Open Google Scholar
  641. ———. 2015. A Little Less Conversation: The EU and the (Non) Application of Labour Conditionality in the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31 (3):285–304. Open Google Scholar
  642. Wade, Robert Hunter. 2003. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of 'development space'. Review of International Political Economy 10 (4):621-644. Open Google Scholar
  643. Waer, Paul. 1996. Social Clauses in International Trade The Debate in the European Union. Journal of World Trade 30 (4):25-42. Open Google Scholar
  644. Wall Street Journal. 2010. Obama's Outsourced Trade Policy. Wall Street Journal, September 15. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703376504575490944170692312 Open Google Scholar
  645. ———. 2011. Democrats vs. Obama on Trade. Wall Street Journal, March 14. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704296604576196480280412662 Open Google Scholar
  646. Wallach, Lori, and Michelle Sforza. 1999. The WTO: Five Years of Reasons to Resist Corporate Globalization. New York: Seven Stories Press. Open Google Scholar
  647. Weisman, Steven R. 2007. Bush and Democrats in Accord on Trade Deals. New York Times, May 10. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/business/11trade.html?_r=0&pa Open Google Scholar
  648. ———. 2007. Partisan Disagreements Jeopardize New Trade Deals. New York Times, July 8. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/washington/08trade.html Open Google Scholar
  649. ———. 2007. Using Chávez as Counterpoint, Bush Pursues Latin Trade Pacts. New York Times, October 24. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/25/business/worldbusiness/25trade.html Open Google Scholar
  650. Weissbrodt, David, and Matthew Mason. 2014. Compliance of the United States with International Labor Law. Minnesota Law Review 98 (5):1842-1878. Open Google Scholar
  651. Weitzman, Hal. 2005. US and Peru end trade impasse with agreement. Financial Times, December 7. Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/02108266-6776-11da-a650-0000779e2340.html#axzz3xgQwp4IV Open Google Scholar
  652. Wheeler, David. 2001. Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air Pollution in Developing Countries. Journal of Environment & Development 10 (3):225-245. Open Google Scholar
  653. Wilkinson, Rorden. 1999. Labour and trade-related regulation: beyond the trade-labour standards debate? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1 (2):165-191. Open Google Scholar
  654. Williams, Brock R., Mark E. Manyin, Remy Jurenas, and Michaela D. Platzer. 2014. The U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implementation. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  655. Williamson, Elizabeth. 2010. U.S. Sets Sweeping New Deal on Trade. Wall Street Journal, December 3. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703350104575652882154932888 Open Google Scholar
  656. ———. 2010. U.S. Vows New Push in Korean Trade Pact. Wall Street Journal, June 25. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704846004575333303589295326 Open Google Scholar
  657. ———. 2011. Trade Pacts Tied to Worker Aid. Wall Street Journal, May 17. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703421204576327164110599384 Open Google Scholar
  658. Williamson, Elizabeth, and Melanie Trottman. 2010. Obama Courts Labor Support for Trade Deal. Wall Street Journal, August 4. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704499604575407790047897522 Open Google Scholar
  659. Willis, Andrew. 2009. EU trade talks with Peru continue despite government violence. EU observer, June 17. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/28324 Open Google Scholar
  660. ———. 2009. Honduran coup threatens to delay EU trade deal. EU observer, June 29. Available at: https://euobserver.com/foreign/28386 Open Google Scholar
  661. ———. 2010. EU completes trade talks with Peru and Colombia. EU observer, March 2. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/29582 Open Google Scholar
  662. ———. 2010. Landmark EU-Korea trade deal moves a step closer. EU Observer, June 23. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/30351 Open Google Scholar
  663. ———. 2010. Parliament sets out concerns over Colombia trade deal. EU observer, February 2. Available at: https://euobserver.com/economic/29392 Open Google Scholar
  664. ———. 2011. EU signs trade deals with Peru and Colombia. EU observer, April 14. Available at: https://euobserver.com/news/32177 Open Google Scholar
  665. Wolf, Martin. 2005. Why Globalization Works. Yale: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  666. Woll, Cornelia. 2009. Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union: Who Captures Whom? In Lobbying in the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues, edited by D. Coen and J. Richardson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  667. ———. 2012. The brash and the soft-spoken: Lobbying styles in a transatlantic comparison. Interest Groups & Advocacy 1 (2):193-214. Open Google Scholar
  668. Woll, Cornelia, and Alvaro Artigas. 2007. When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: The impact on business–government relations in international trade politics. Regulation & Governance 1 (2):121-138. Open Google Scholar
  669. Woolcock, Stephen. 2005. European Union Trade Policy: Domestic Institutions and Systemic Factors. In The Politics of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century. Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics, edited by D. Kelly and W. Grant. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. Open Google Scholar
  670. ———. 2007. European Union policy towards Free Trade Agreements. In ECIPE Working Paper. Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy. Open Google Scholar
  671. ———. 2010. The Treaty of Lisbon and the European Union as an actor in international Trade. In ECIPE Working Paper. Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy. Open Google Scholar
  672. ———. 2011. European Union Economic Diplomacy. The Role of the EU in External Economic Relations. Farnham: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar
  673. ———. 2014. Differentiation within reciprocity: the European Union approach to preferential trade agreements. Contemporary Politics 20 (1):36-48. Open Google Scholar
  674. ———. 2014. EU Policy on Preferential Trade Agreements in the 2000s: A Reorientation towards Commercial Aims. European Law Journal 20 (6):718-732. Open Google Scholar
  675. WTO. 1994. Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization. Marrakesh: World Trade Organization. Open Google Scholar
  676. WWF. 2001. Environment & Trade in the European Union’s Inter-regional Agreements. Position Paper, May 2001. Brussels: World Wildlife Fund European Policy Office. Available at: http://assets.panda.org/downloads/dgtrademikel3.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  677. ———. 2003. A League of Gentlemen. Who really runs EU Trade Decision-Making? Report, November 2003. Brussels. World Wildlife Fund European Policy Office. Available at: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/aleagueofgentlemenfinal.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  678. Yandle, Bruce. 1983. Bootleggers and Baptists: The Education of a Regulatory Economist. Regulation (May/June):12-16. Open Google Scholar
  679. Yerkey, Gary G. 2001. EU's Lamy Opposes Addressing Social Issues Such as Workers' Rights in Trade Agreements. Bloomberg International Trade Reporter, April 5. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  680. Yoon, Esook 2003. South Korean Environmental Foreign Policy. Asia-Pacific Review of Economic Studies 13 (2):74-96. Open Google Scholar
  681. Young, Alasdair R. 2004. The Incidental Fortress: The Single European Market and World Trade. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (2):393–414. Open Google Scholar
  682. Young, Alasdair R., and John Peterson. 2006. The EU and the new trade politics. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6):795-814. Open Google Scholar
  683. ———. 2014. Parochial Global Europe. 21st Century Trade Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  684. Zarocostas, John. 1994. US under pressure for attempt to link trade, labor rules. Journal of Commerce, March 28. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  685. Zimmermann, Hubert. 2007. Drachenzähmung. Die EU und die USA in den Verhandlungen um die Integration Chinas in den Welthandel. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  686. ———. 2007. Realist Power Europe? The EU in the Negotiations about China's and Russia's WTO Accession. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4):813-832. Open Google Scholar
  687. ———. 2008. How the EU Negotiates Trade and Democracy: The Cases of China's Accession to the WTO and the Doha Round. European foreign affairs review 13 (2):255-280. Open Google Scholar
  688. Zoellick, Robert B. 2001. American Trade Leadership: What is at Stake. Speech to the Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., September 24. Available at: Open Google Scholar
  689. Interviews Open Google Scholar
  690. Interview 1 Open Google Scholar
  691. U.S. academic, Washington, D.C., March 4th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  692. Interview 2 Open Google Scholar
  693. USTR official, Washington, D.C., March 9th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  694. Interview 3 Open Google Scholar
  695. AFL-CIO representative, Washington, D.C., March 10th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  696. Interview 4 Open Google Scholar
  697. International Brotherhood of Teamsters representative, Washington, D.C., March 12th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  698. Interview 5 Open Google Scholar
  699. Friends of the Earth representative, Washington, D.C., March 14th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  700. Interview 6 Open Google Scholar
  701. USTR official, Washington, D.C., March 17th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  702. Interview 7 Open Google Scholar
  703. U.S. Department of Labor official, Washington, D.C., March 27th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  704. Interview 8 Open Google Scholar
  705. Journalist Inside U.S. Trade, Washington, D.C., March 30th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  706. Interview 9 Open Google Scholar
  707. USTR official, Washington, D.C., April 2nd 2015 Open Google Scholar
  708. Interview 10 Open Google Scholar
  709. Think Tank representative, Washington, D.C., April 6th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  710. Interview 11 Open Google Scholar
  711. Republican congressional aide, Washington, D.C., April 7th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  712. Interview 12 Open Google Scholar
  713. Democratic congressional aide, Washington, D.C., April 8th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  714. Interview 13 Open Google Scholar
  715. Think Tank representative, Washington, D.C., April 9th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  716. Interview 14 Open Google Scholar
  717. Democratic congressional aide, Washington, D.C., April 13th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  718. Interview 15 Open Google Scholar
  719. National Association of Manufacturers representative, Washington, D.C., April 14th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  720. Interview 16 Open Google Scholar
  721. USTR official, Washington, D.C., April 16th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  722. Interview 17 Open Google Scholar
  723. U.S. academic, Washington, D.C., April 20th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  724. Interview 18 Open Google Scholar
  725. Alliance for American Manufacturing representative, Washington, D.C., April 22th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  726. Interview 19 Open Google Scholar
  727. U.S. Chamber of Commerce representative, Washington, D.C., April 24th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  728. Interview 20 Open Google Scholar
  729. BusinessEurope representative, Brussels, November 9th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  730. Interview 21 Open Google Scholar
  731. S&D Member of the European Parliament, Brussels, November 10th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  732. Interview 22 Open Google Scholar
  733. DG Trade official, Brussels, November 11th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  734. Interview 23 Open Google Scholar
  735. EESC representative, Brussels, November 11th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  736. Interview 24 Open Google Scholar
  737. ITUC representative, Brussels, November 12th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  738. Interview 25 Open Google Scholar
  739. DG Trade and DG Employment officials, Brussels, November 12th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  740. Interview 26 Open Google Scholar
  741. DG Trade official, Brussels, November 12th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  742. Interview 27 Open Google Scholar
  743. DG Environment official, Brussels, November 13th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  744. Interview 28 Open Google Scholar
  745. ETUC representative, Brussels, November 13th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  746. Interview 29 Open Google Scholar
  747. DG Trade official, telephone interview, November 24th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  748. Interview 30 Open Google Scholar
  749. DG Trade official, telephone interview, December 9th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  750. Interview 31 Open Google Scholar
  751. Friends of the Earth Europe representative, telephone interview, December 11th 2015 Open Google Scholar
  752. Interview 32 Open Google Scholar
  753. DG Trade official, telephone interview, February 2nd 2016 Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Economics", "International Organizations & NGOs", "Competition Policy & Economic Order Policy & Economic Policy"
Cover of book: Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Educational Book No access
Gert Krell, Peter Schlotter, Alexandra Homolar, Frank A. Stengel
Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Cover of book: Kapital als Medium
Book Titles No access
Michael Mayer
Kapital als Medium
Cover of book: Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Edited Book No access
Antonino Alì
Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Cover of book: European Union, How Comes?
Book Titles No access
Hartmut Marhold
European Union, How Comes?
Cover of book: De-Globalisierung
Edited Book No access
Stefan A. Schirm, Andreas Busch, Susanne Lütz, Stefanie Walter, Hubert Zimmermann
De-Globalisierung

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex