Cover des Buchs: 60 Jahre Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

60 Jahre Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen

Steckbriefe von 250 Studien
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2017

Zusammenfassung

Ein Buch, eine Radiosendung, eine TV-Serie, das aktuelle Computerspiel oder der neue Kinoblockbuster – sie alle sind darauf angelegt, Interaktionen und Beziehungen zwischen Medienfiguren und Rezipienten zu evozieren. Seit nunmehr 60 Jahren steht die Untersuchung dieser sogenannten parasozialen Prozesse im Zentrum von zahlreichen Forschungsarbeiten. Dieses Buch beinhaltet Steckbriefe von rund 250 empirischen Studien sowie vorangestellt ein Überblickskapitel, das die ersten Entwicklungen bis hin zum aktuellen Forschungsstand und den neuen Trends in der Erforschung von parasozialen Phänomenen skizziert. Das Buch ermöglicht dem Leser unter anderem, Studien nach individuellen Schwerpunkten zu suchen, und liefert dann im Steckbriefformat erste wichtige Eckdaten hinsichtlich Fragestellung, Methodik und Ergebnisse dieser Studien. Somit soll dieses Buch sowohl den Einstieg für Studierende als auch den Entwurf fortgeschrittener Studien in einem so vielseitigen Forschungsgebiet erleichtern.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3298-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7651-9
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Reihe Rezeptionsforschung
Band
37
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
364
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 6
  2. Einleitung Kein Zugriff 7 - 12
      1. Recherche Kein Zugriff
      2. Auswahl und Ausschluss von Publikationen Kein Zugriff
      3. Systematisierung und Aufbereitung der Studien Kein Zugriff
      1. Untersuchungsgegenstände von damals bis heute Kein Zugriff
      2. Methodische Herangehensweise und Datenerhebung Kein Zugriff
      3. Übergreifende Erkenntnisse und Muster Kein Zugriff
      4. 60 Jahre Forschung – Ein Fazit Kein Zugriff
    1. Der Mustersteckbrief Kein Zugriff 53 - 66
      1. Film & Fernsehen Kein Zugriff
      2. Radio & Musik Kein Zugriff
      3. Printmedien Kein Zugriff
      4. Neue Medien Kein Zugriff
      5. Medienübergreifend Kein Zugriff
      1. Studienreferenzen Kein Zugriff
      2. Weitere zitierte Literatur Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (291)

  1. Adam, A. & Sizemore, B. (2013). Parasocial romance: A social exchange perspective. Interpersona, 7, 12–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.106
  2. Androutsopoulos, J. & Weidenhöffer, J. (2015). Zuschauer-Engagement auf Twitter: Handlungskategorien der rezeptionsbegleitenden Kommunikation am Beispiel von #tatort. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 62, 23–59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2015-0002
  3. Annese, S. (2004). Mediated identity in the parasocial interaction of TV. Identity, 4, 371–388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0404_5
  4. Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M. & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14, 149–154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1026//1617-6383.14.4.149
  5. Ashe, D. D. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2001). Shyness, loneliness, and attitude toward celebrities. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 124–132. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Aubrey, J. S., Behm-Morawitz, E. & Kim, K. (2014). Understanding the effects of MTV's 16 and pregnant on adolescent girls' beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward teen pregnancy. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 1145–1160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.872721
  7. Auter, P. J. (1992). TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 173–181. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364165
  8. Auter, P. J., Arafa, N. & Al-Jaber, K. (2005). Identifying with arabic journalists: How Al Jazeera tapped parasocial interaction in the arab world. Gazette, 67, 189–204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0016549205050131
  9. Auter, P. J., Ashton, E. & Soliman, M. R. (2008). A study of Egyptian and American young adult parasocial relationships with music video personae. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 1, 131–144. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1386/jammr.1.2.131_1
  10. Auter, P. J. & Lane, R. (1999). Locus of control, parasocial interaction and usage of radio or TV ministry programs. Journal of Communication & Religion, 22, 93–120. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Auter, P. J. & Moore, R. L. (1993). Buying from a friend: A content analysis of two teleshopping programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 425–436. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000217
  12. Auter, P. J. & Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17, 79–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388753
  13. Bae, H.-S., Brown, W. J. & Kang, S. (2011). Social influence of a religious hero: The late cardinal Stephen Kim Sou-hwan's effect on cornea donation and volunteerism. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 62–78. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.529489
  14. Bae, H.-S. & Lee, B. (2004). Audience involvement and its antecedents: An analysis of the electronic bulletin board messages about an entertainment-education drama on divorce in Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 14, 6–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/0129298042000195125
  15. Baek, Y. M., Bae, Y. & Jang, H. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users' psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 512–517. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0510
  16. Baeßler, B. (2009). Medienpersonen als parasoziale Beziehungspartner. Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zu personazentrierter Rezeption. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845216300
  17. Bal, E. (2013). An evaluation about television serials in Turkey in the context of parasocial interaction. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 767–773. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n7p767
  18. Banks, J. & Bowman, N. D. (2016a). Avatars are (sometimes) people too: Linguistic indicators of parasocial and social ties in player-avatar relationships. New Media & Society, 18, 1257–1276. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Banks, J. & Bowman, N. D. (2016b). Emotion, anthropomorphism, realism, control: Validation of a merged metric for player-avatar interaction (PAX). Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 215–223. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Bentley, J. M. (2014). Best practices in noncommercial radio fundraising: A practitioner perspective. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19, 250–261. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1505
  21. Boehmer, J. (2016). Does the game really change? How students consume mediated sports in the age of social media. Communication & Sport, 4, 460–483. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/2167479515595500
  22. Bond, B. J. & Calvert, S. L. (2014a). A model and measure of US parents' perceptions of young children's parasocial relationships. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 286–304. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Bond, B. J. & Calvert, S. L. (2014b). Parasocial breakup among young children in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 474–490. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bond, B. J. & Compton, B. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences' endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 717–732. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485
  25. Bond, B. J. & Drogos, K. L. (2014). Sex on the shore: Wishful identification and parasocial relationships as mediators in the relationship between Jersey Shore exposure and emerging adults' sexual attitudes and behaviors. Media Psychology, 17, 102–126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.872039
  26. Bowman, N. D., Schultheiss, D. & Schumann, C. (2012). "I'm attached, and I'm a good guy/gal!": How character attachment influences pro- and anti-social motivations to play massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 1–6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0311
  27. Branch, S. E., Wilson, K. M. & Agnew, C. R. (2013). Committed to Oprah, Homer, or House: Using investment model to understand parasocial relationships. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 96–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/a0030938
  28. Briggs, M. (2007). Meaning, play and experience: Audience activity and the "ontological bias" in children's media research. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 4, 48–63. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Brown, C. M., Shilling, A. A. & Young, S. G. (2015). Acceptance and rejection of pets and parasocial others cause corresponding changes in the self's perceived relational value. Self and identity, 14, 233–251. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.976253
  30. Brown, W. J. & Basil, M. D. (1995). Media celebrities and public health: Responses to "Magic" Johanson's HIV disclosure and its impact on AIDS risk and high-risk behaviors. Health Communication, 7, 345–370. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0704_4
  31. Brown, W. J., Basil, M. D. & Bocarnea, M. C. (2003). The influence of famous athletes on health beliefs and practices: Mark McGwire, child abuse prevention, and androstenedione. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 41–57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10810730305733
  32. Brown, W. J. & De Matviuk, M. A. C. (2010). Sports celebrities and public health: Diego Maradona's influence on drug use prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 358–373. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10810730903460575
  33. Bui, N. H. (2017). Exploring similarity characteristics, identification and parasocial interactions in choice of celebrities. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 6, 21–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000082
  34. Burnett, A. & Beto, R. R. (2000). Reading romance novels: An application of parasocial relationship theory. North Dakota Journal of Speech & Theatre, 13, 28–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Calvert, S. L., Richards, M. N. & Kent, C. C. (2014). Personalized interactive characters for toddlers' learning of seriation from a video presentation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 148–155. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.004
  36. Casper, M. F. & Child, J. T. (2009). Embedded reporting and audience response: Parasocial interaction and perceived realism in embedded reporting from the Iraq war on television news. In P. M. Haridakis, B. S. Hugenberg & S. T. Wearden (Hrsg.), War and the media: Essays on news reporting, propaganda and popular culture (S. 205–221). North Carolina: McFarland. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Centeno, D. G. (2010). Celebrification in Philippine politics: Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorsers' parasociability and the public's voting behavior. Social Science Diliman, 6, 66–85. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Centeno, D. G. (2015). Constructing celebrities as political endorsers: Parasocial acts, cultural power, and cultural capital. Philippine Political Science Journal, 36, 209–232. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2015.1084746
  39. Chen, C.-P. (2016). Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16, 232–254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1469540514521081
  40. Chiu, C. M. & Huang, H. Y. (2015). Examining the antecedents of user gratification and its effects on individuals' social network services usage: The moderating role of habit. European Journal of Information Systems, 24, 411–430. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.9
  41. Chory-Assad, R. M. & Yanen, A. (2005). Hopelessness and loneliness as predictors of older adults' involvement with favorite television performers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 182–201. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_3
  42. Chung, D. & Kim, C. H. (2009). Causal Links of Presence. In J. A. Jacko (Hrsg.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains (S. 279–286). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Chung, K. & Hwang, G. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of Formular One spectators' fanship: The case of inaugural Grand Prix. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management, 6, 38–46. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Claessens, N. & van den Bulck, H. (2015). Parasocial relationships with audiences' favorite celebrities: The role of audience and celebrity characteristics in a representative Flemish sample. Communications, 40, 43–65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0027
  45. Cohen, E. L. (2010). Expectancy violations in relationships with friends and media figures. Communication Research Reports, 27, 97–111. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08824091003737836
  46. Cohen, J. (1997). Parasocial relations and romantic attraction: Gender and dating status differences. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 516–529. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838159709364424
  47. Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 191–202. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5
  48. Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 187–202. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041374
  49. Cole, T. & Leets, L. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 495–511. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0265407599164005
  50. Colliander, J. & Dahlén, M. (2011). Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media - Weighing publicity effeciveness of blogs versus online magazines. Journal of Advertising Research, 51, 313–320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-1-313-320
  51. Colliander, J. & Erlandsson, S. (2015). The blog and the bountiful: Exploring the effects of disguised product placement on blogs that are revealed by a third party. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21, 110–124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2012.730543
  52. Conway, J. C. & Rubin, A. M. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18, 443–463. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365091018004001
  53. Cortese, J. & Rubin, A. M. (2010). Uses and Gratifications of television home shopping. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 18, 89–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15456870903554924
  54. Courbet, D. & Fourquet-Courbet, M. P. (2014). When a celebrity dies… Social identity, uses of social media, and the mourning process among fans: The case of Michael Jackson. Celebrity Studies, 5, 275–290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2013.872361
  55. Cummins, R. G. & Cui, B. (2014). Reconceptualizing address in television programming: The effect of address and affective empathy on viewer experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 64, 723–742. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12076
  56. Curnalia, R. M. (2014). Frugal reality TV during the great recession: A qualitative content analysis of the TLC's extreme couponing. In A. F. Slade, A. J. Narro & B. P. Buchanan (Hrsg.), Reality television: Oddities of culture (S. 101–121). Lanham: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Currás-Pérez, R., Miquel-Romero, M. J., Ruiz-Mafé, C. & Sanz-Blas, S. (2011). The role of parasocial interaction and teleparticipation on teleshopping behaviour. In S. Okazaki (Hrsg.), Advances in Advertising Research (2. Aufl., S. 191–213). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. De Backer, C. J. S., Nelissen, M., Vyncke, P., Braeckman, J. & McAndrew, F. T. (2007). Celebrities: From teachers to friends: A test of two hypotheses on adaptiveness of celebrity gossip. Human Nature, 18, 334–354. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9023-z
  59. DeGroot, J. M. & Leith, A. P. (2015). R.I.P. Kutner: Parasocial grief following the death of a television character. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying. [Online first], Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S. & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003
  61. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S. & Tippin, B. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15, 261–280. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00197.x
  62. Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T. & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42, 21–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
  63. Dibble, J. L. & Rosaen, S. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship. Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 122–132. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000044
  64. Dittmar, M. L. (1994). Relations among depression, gender, and television viewing of college students. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 9, 317–328. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Droog, S. M. de, Buijzen, M. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2012). Use a rabbit or a rhino to sell a carrot? The effect of character-product congruence on children's liking of healthy foods. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 1068–1080. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.650833
  66. Duck, J. M. & Noble, G. (1979). 'Sesame Street' & 'Play School': A comparison and contrast of the two programs suitable for a four year-old target audience. Media Information Australia, 13, 15–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1329878X7901300104
  67. Dunn, S. G. S. & Nisbett, G. S. (2014). Parasocial interactions online: Candidate intimacy in webpages and facebook. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 3, 26–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Eggermont, S. & Vandebosch, H. (2001). Television as a substitute: Loneliness, need intensity, mobility, life-satisfaction and the elderly television viewer. Communicatio;, 27, 10–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/02500160108537902
  69. Eyal, K. & Cohen, J. (2006). When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 502–523. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9
  70. Eyal, K. & Dailey, R. M. (2012). Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 758–781. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.616276
  71. Eyal, K. & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 77–98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5
  72. Eyal, K. & Te'eni-Harari, T. (2013). Explaining the relationship between media exposure and early adolescents' body image perceptions: The role of favorite characters. Journal of Media Psychology, 25, 129–141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000094
  73. Fabian, T. (1993). Fernsehen und Einsamkeit im Alter. Eine empirische Untersuchung zu parasozialer Interaktion. Münster: LIT. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Fogel, J. (2016). Reality television programs are associated with illegal drug use and prescription drug misuse among college students. Substance Use & Misuse, 51, 62–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2015.1082593
  75. Frederick, E., Hamrick, M. E. & Clavio, G. (2014). Bypass and broadcast: Utilizing parasocial interaction to examine @nhl communication on twitter during the 2012-2013 lockout. Journal of Sports Media, 9, 25–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1353/jsm.2014.0009
  76. Frederick, E., Lim, C. H., Clavio, G., Pedersen, P. M. & Burch, L. (2014). Choosing between the one-way or two-way street: An exploration of relationship promotion by professional athletes on Twitter. Communication & Sport, 2, 80–99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/2167479512466387
  77. Frederick, E. L., Lim, C. M., Clavio, G. & Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 481–502. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.5.4.481
  78. Gardner, W. L. & Knowles, M. L. (2008). Love makes you real: Favorite television characters are perceived as "real" in a social facilitation paradigm. Social Cognition, 26, 156–168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.156
  79. Giles, D. C. & Maltby, J. (2004). The role of media figures in adolescent development: Relations between autonomy, attachment, and interest in celebrities. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 813–822. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00154-5
  80. Gleich, U. (1995). Die Beziehung von Fernsehzuschauern zu Medienpersonen - Eine explorative Untersuchung. In R. Arbinger & R. S. Jäger (Hrsg.), Zukunftsperspektiven empirisch-pädagogischer Forschung (S. 363–381). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Gleich, U. (1996). Sind Fernsehpersonen die "Freunde" des Zuschauers? Ein Vergleich zwischen parasozialen und realen sozialen Beziehungen. In P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Fernsehen als "Beziehungskiste": Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen (S. 113–144). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Gleich, U. (1997a). Parasocial interaction with people on the screen. In P. Winterhoff-Spurk & Van der Voort, T. H. A. (Hrsg.), New horizons in media psychology: Research cooperation and projects in Europe (S. 35–55). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Gleich, U. (1997b). Parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen von Fernsehzuschauern mit Personen auf dem Bildschirm: Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zum Konzept des aktiven Rezipienten. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Gleich, U. & Burst, M. (1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen von Fernsehzuschauern mit Personen auf dem Bildschirm. Medienpsychologie, 8, 182–200. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Gola, A. A. H., Richards, M. N., Lauricella, A. R. & Calvert, S. L. (2013). Building meaningful parasocial relationships between toddlers and media characters to teach early mathematical skills. Media Psychology, 16, 390–411. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.783774
  86. Gong, N. Z. & Xu, W. (2014). Reciprocal versus parasocial relationships in online social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4, 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s13278-014-0184-6
  87. Goode, J. & Robinson, J. D. (2013). Linguistic synchrony in parasocial interaction. Communication Studies, 64, 453–466. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.773923
  88. Grant, A. E., Guthrie, K. K. & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1991). Television shopping: A media system dependency perspective. Communication Research, 18, 773–798. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365091018006004
  89. Greenwood, D. N. (2008). Television as escape from self: Psychological predictors of media involvement. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 414–424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.001
  90. Greenwood, D. N. (2009). Idealized TV friends and young women's body concerns. Body Image, 6, 97–104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.12.001
  91. Greenwood, D. N. & Long, C. R. (2009). Psychological Predictors of Media Involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36, 637–654. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338906
  92. Greenwood, D. N. & Long, C. R. (2011). Attachment, belongingness needs, and relationship status predict imagined intimacy with media figures. Communication Research, 38, 278–297. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362687
  93. Greenwood, D. N., Pietromonaco, P. R. & Long, C. R. (2008). Young women's attachment style and interpersonal engagement with female TV stars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 387–407. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0265407507087964
  94. Gries, P., Sanders, M. A., Stroup, D. R. & Cai, H. (2015). Hollywood in China: How American popular culture shapes Chinese views of the "beautiful imperialist" - An experimental analysis. The China Quarterly, 224, 1070–1082. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015000831
  95. Gudelunas, D. (2002). QVC: Television retail & ritual. The Journal of American Culture, 25, 105–118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1542-734X.00017
  96. Gudelunas, D. (2006). Shopping with friends: Audience perspectives on television shopping. Popular Communication, 4, 229–252. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15405710pc0404_2
  97. Hartmann, T., Daschmann, G. & Stuke, D. (2006). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Sportlern. Eine empirische Studie am Beispiel von Formel-1-Fahrern. In H. Schramm, W. Wirth & H. Bilandzic (Hrsg.), Empirische Unterhaltungsforschung: Studien zur Rezeption und Wirkung von medialer Unterhaltung (S. 149–168). München: R. Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Hartmann, T. & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring Viewers' experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61, 1104–1121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
  99. Hartmann, T. & Klimmt, C. (2005). Ursachen und Effekte Parasozialer Interaktionen im Rezeptionsprozess: Eine Fragebogenstudie auf der Basis des PSI-Zwei-Ebenen-Modells. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 17, 88–98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.17.3.88
  100. Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C. & Vorderer, P. (2001). Avatare: Parasoziale Beziehungen zu virtuellen Akteuren. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 49, 350–368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2001-3-350
  101. Hartmann, T., Stuke, D. & Daschmann, G. (2008). Parasocial relationships with drivers affect suspense in racing sport spectators. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 24–34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.1.24
  102. Harwood, J. & Vincze, L. (2015). Ethnolinguistic identification, vitality, and gratifications for television use in a bilingual media environment. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 73–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/josi.12097
  103. Henkel, S. & Walter, B. von. (2009). Markante Persönlichkeiten - Prominente als Marken der Gegenwartsgesellschaft. In H. Willems (Hrsg.), Theatralisierung der Gesellschaft. Band 2: Medientheatralität und Medientheatralisierung (S. 309–327). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Hinnant, A. & Meyers Hendrickson, E. (2014). Negotiating normalcy in celebrity health behavior: A focus group analysis. Journal of Magazine & New Media Research, 15, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Hoffner, C. (1996). Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389–402. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364360
  106. Hoffner, C. A. & Cohen, E. L. (2012). Responses to obsessive compulsive disorder on Monk among series fans: Parasocial relations, presumed media influence, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 650–668. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732136
  107. Hoffner, C. A. & Cohen, E. L. (2015). Portrayal of mental illness on the TV series Monk: Presumed influence and consequences of exposure. Health Communication, 30, 1046–1054. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.917840
  108. Hofstetter, C. R. & Gianos, C. L. (1997). Political talk radio: Actions speak louder than words. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 501–515. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838159709364423
  109. Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 188–211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  110. Houlberg, R. (1984). Local television news audience and the para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 423–429. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838158409386551
  111. Hu, M. (2016). The Influence of a scandal on parasocial relationship, parasocial interaction, and parasocial breakup. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 217–231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000068
  112. Hung, K. (2014). Why celebrity sells: A dual entertainment path model of brand endorsement. Journal of Advertising, 43, 155–166. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.838720
  113. Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Atkin, D. & Neuendorf, K. (2010). Moving from theorizing to application: Predicting audience enjoyment of TV formats. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 156–179. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Jeong, H., Candidate, D. & Park, H. S. (2015). The effect of parasocial interaction on intention to register as organ donors through entertainment-education programs in Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27, 2040–2048. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1010539512472359
  115. Jin, S.-A. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with an avatar in second life: A typology of the self and an empirical test of the mediating role of social presence. Presence, 19, 331–340. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00001
  116. Jin, S.-A. A. (2011). Leveraging avatars in 3D virtual environments (second life) for interactive learning: The moderating role of the behavioral activation system vs. behavioral inhibition system and the mediating role of enjoyment. Interactive Learning Environments, 19, 467–486. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10494820903484692
  117. Jin, S.-A. A. & Park, N. (2009). Parasocial interaction with my avatar: effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 723–727. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0289
  118. Jordan, J. M. & Bahk, C. M. (2001). The cognitive bases and social consequences of communication involvement. Communication Research Reports, 18(11-25). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384778
  119. Junger, L. T. & Witte, E. H. (2008). Media and the contact hypothesis: An experimental study on the impact of parasocial contact. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Hamburger Forschungsbericht zur Sozialpsychologie Nr. 83 (S. 1–29). Hamburg: Arbeitsbereich Sozialpsychologie. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Kassing, J. W. & Sanderson, J. (2009a). "Is this a church? Such a big bunch of believers around here!": Fan expressions of social support on Floydlandis.com. Journal of Communication Studies, 1, 308–330. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Kassing, J. W. & Sanderson, J. (2009b). "You're the kind of guy that we all want for a drinking buddy": Expressions of parasocial interaction on Floydlandis.com. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 182–203. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Kawamura, Y., Ivankova, N. V., Kohler, C. L. & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2009). Utilizing mixed methods to assess parasocial interaction of an entertainment-education program audience. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 88–104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.3.1.88
  123. Khan, M. A. & Manzoor, S. (2013). Television viewing and schoolgirls of Multan: A Uses and Gratifications approach. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 33, 297–310. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Kim, H., Ko, E. & Kim, J. (2015). SNS users' para-social relationships with celebrities: social media effects on purchase intentions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25, 279–294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2015.1043690
  125. Kim, J. & Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107–135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365097024002001
  126. Kistler, M. E. & Lee, M. J. (2010). Does exposure to sexual hip-hop music videos influence the sexual attitudes of college students? Mass Communication and Society, 13, 67–86. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Klastrup, L. (2015). "I didn't know her, but…": Parasocial mourning of mediated deaths on Facebook RIP pages. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 21, 146–164. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2014.983564
  128. Klimmt, C. & Vorderer, P. (2002). "Lara ist mein Medium". Parasoziale Interaktionen mit Lara Croft im Vergleich zur Lieblingsfigur aus Film und Fernsehen. In P. Rössler, S. Kubisch & V. Gehrau (Hrsg.), Empirische Perspektiven der Rezeptionsforschung (S. 177–192). München: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Kline, S. L. (2005). Interactive media systems: Influence strategies in television home shopping. Text & Talk, 25, 201–231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.2.201
  130. Knoll, J., Schramm, H., Schallhorn, C. & Wynistorf, S. (2015). Good guy vs. bad guy - The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 34, 720–743. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Kronewald, E. (2008). Fernsehnutzung von Singles und Liierten: Die Relevanz des Merkmals Beziehungsstand für Fernsehnutzungsmotive und parasoziale Beziehungen. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Lather, J. & Moyer-Gusé, E. (2012). How do we react when our favorite characters are taken away? An examination of a temporary parasocial breakup. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 196–215. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15205431003668603
  133. Lavelle, K. E. (2013). Cullen Jones is my friend!: Increasing diversity in swimming through parasocial relationships on facebook. In B. Brummet & A. Ishak (Hrsg.), Sports and identity: New agendas in communication (S. 44–59). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Lee, B. K., Park, H. S., Choi, M. I. & Kim, C. S. (2010). Promoting organ donation through an entertainment-education TV program in korea: Open your eyes. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 22, 89–97. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Lee, E.-J. (2013). Effectiveness of politicians' soft campaign on twitter versus TV: Cognitive and experiential routes. Journal of Communication, 63, 953–974. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12049
  136. Lee, E.-J. & Jang, J.-w. (2013). Not so imaginary interpersonal contact with public figures on social network sites: How affiliative tendency moderates its effects. Communication Research, 40, 27–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0093650211431579
  137. Lee, E.-J. & Shin, S. Y. (2014). When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians' twitter communication. Communication Research, 41, 1088–1110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466407
  138. Leißner, L., Stehr, P., Rössler, P., Döringer, E., Morsbach, M. & Simon, L. (2014). Parasoziale Meinungsführerschaft. Beeinflussung durch Medienpersonen im Rahmen parasozialer Beziehungen: Theoretische Konzeption und erste empirische Befunde. Publizistik, 59, 247–267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11616-014-0208-2
  139. Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as parasocial interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 177–187. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838157909363919
  140. Lim, C. M. & Kim, Y.-K. (2011). Older consumers' TV HomeShopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 763–780. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/mar.20411
  141. Lin, H.-Y. & Chiang, C.-H. (2013). Analyzing behaviors influencing the adoption of online games from the perspective of virtual contact. Social Behavior and Personality, 41, 113–122. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.1.113
  142. Lin, L. C. S. (2015). Facebook politics: Strategic network campaigning in the 2012 Taiwan presidential election. Media International Australia, 155, 54–65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1515500107
  143. Löbler, H. (2009). My relationship to Scarlett O'Hara - Characterising para-social relationships using the repertory grid technique. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 8, 29–50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1362/147539209X414371
  144. Lueck, J. A. (2015). Friend-zone with benefits: The parasocial advertising of Kim Kardashian. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21, 91–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2012.726235
  145. Luo, J. T., McGoldrick, P., Beatty, S. & Keeling, K. A. (2006). On-screen characters: Their design and influence on consumer trust. Journal of Services Marketing, 20, 112–124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1108/08876040610657048
  146. Lystig Fritchie, L. & Johnson, K. K. (2003). Personal selling approaches used in television shopping. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 7, 249–258. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1108/13612020310484807
  147. Madison, T. P. & Porter, L. V. (2015). The people we meet: Discriminating functions of parasocial interactions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 47–71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0276236615574490
  148. Madison, T. P. & Porter, L. V. (2016). Cognitive and imagery attributes of parasocial relationships. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 359–379. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0276236615599340
  149. Madison, T. P., Porter, L. V. & Greule, A. (2016). Parasocial compensation hypothesis: Predictors of using parasocial relationships to compensate for real-life interaction. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 258–279. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0276236615595232
  150. Maier, J. H. (2005). Bestehen parasoziale Beziehungen zu Politikern?: Eine empirische Exploration mit der Repertory Grid Technik. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 17, 99–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.17.3.99
  151. Maltby, J. & Day, L. (2011). Celebrity worship and incidence of elective cosmetic surgery: Evidence of a link among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 49, 483–489. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.014
  152. Maltby, J., Giles, D. C., Barber, L. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2005). Intense personal celebrity worship and body image: Evidence of a link among female adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 17–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1348/135910704X15257
  153. Maltby, J., Houran, J. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2003). A clinical interpretation of attitudes and behaviors associated with celebrity worship. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 25–29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1097/00005053-200301000-00005
  154. Marmor-Lavie, G. & Weimann, G. (2008). Intimacy appeals in Israeli televised political advertising. Political Communication, 25, 249–268. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10584600802197327
  155. Matthews, P. & Barrett, L. (2005). Small-screen social groups: Soap operas and social networks. Evolution, Mind and Behavior, 3, 75–86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.3.2005.1.5
  156. May, R. A. B. (1999). Tavern culture and television viewing: The influence of local viewing culture on patrons' reception of television programs. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 69–99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023370
  157. McCourt, A. & Fitzpatrick, J. (2001). The role of personal characteristics and romantic characteristics in parasocial relationships: A pilot study. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2, 42–58. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. McCutcheon, L. E. (2002). Are parasocial relationship styles reflected in love styles? Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 82–93. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. McCutcheon, L. E., Ashe, D. D., Houran, J. & Maltby, J. (2003). A cognitive profile of individuals who tend to worship celebrities. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 309–322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600616
  160. Men, L. R. & Tsai, W. H. S. (2013a). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39, 13–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Men, L. R. & Tsai, W. H. S. (2013b). Toward an integrated model of public engagement on corporate social networking sites: Antecedents, the process, and relational outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7, 257–273. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Men, L. R. & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2015). Infusing social media with humanity: Corporate character, public engagement, and relational outcomes. Public Relations Review, 41, 395–403. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.02.005
  163. Moyer-Gusé, E. & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
  164. Nabi, R. L., Stitt, C. R., Halford, J. & Finnerty, K. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the Uses and Gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_5
  165. Noble, G. (1983). Sesame Street and Playschool revisited. Media Information Australia, 28, 26–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1329878X8302800110
  166. Nordlund, J. E. (1978). Media interaction. Communication Research, 5, 150–175. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500202
  167. Ophir, Y. & Weimann, G. (2012). From terrorist to persona: Para-social interaction and the ETA website. Perspectives on Terrorism, 6, 23–35. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Ortiz, R. R. & Brooks, M. E. (2014). Getting what they deserve? Consequences of sexual expression by central characters in five popular television teen dramas in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 40–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.863477
  169. Paechter, M., Schweizer, K. & Weidenmann, B. (2000). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu einer Dozentin im Netz. Medienpsychologie, 12, 242–259. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Papa, M. J. & Singhal, A. (2009). How entertainment-education programmes promote dialogue in support of social change. Journal of Creative Communications, 4, 185–208. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/097325861000400304
  171. Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., Law, S., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E. & Shefner-Rogers, C. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50, 31–55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02862.x
  172. Parashar, S. (2015). Television connectedness: A comparative study of television programs. International Journal of Applied Services Marketing Perspectives, 4, 1737–1746. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Park, J. H. & Lennon, S. J. (2004). Television apparel shopping: Impulse buying and parasocial interaction. Clothing and Textiles Journal, 22, 135–144. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0402200304
  174. Perloff, R. M. & Krevans, J. (1987). Tracking the psychosocial predictors of older individuals' television uses. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 365–372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1987.9712677
  175. Perse, E. M. (1990). Media involvement and local news effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 17–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838159009386723
  176. Perse, E. M. & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16, 59–77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001003
  177. Phua, J. (2014). The influence of Asian American spokesmodels in technology-related advertising: An experiment. Howard Journal of Communications, 25, 399–414. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2014.956600
  178. Phua, J. (2016). The effects of similarity, parasocial identification, and source credibility in obesity public service announcements on diet and exercise self-efficacy. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 699–708. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1359105314536452
  179. Piccirillo, M. S. (1986). On the authenticity of televisual experience: A critical exploration of para-social closure. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3, 337–355. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15295038609366658
  180. Pitout, M. (1998). Reception analysis: A qualitative investigation of the parasocial and social dimensions of soap opera viewing. Communicatio, 24, 65–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/02500169808537891
  181. Powell, L., Hickson, M., Amsbary, J. H., Richmond, V. P. & McCroskey, J. C. (2014). The "Drinking-Buddy" scale and perceptions of assertiveness, responsiveness and authenticity. Political Science & Public Affairs, 2, 1–4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000134
  182. Powell, L., Richmond, V. P. & Cantrell-Williams, G. (2012). The "Drinking-Buddy" Scale as a measure of para-social behavior. Psychological Reports, 110, 1029–1037. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2466/07.17.28.PR0.110.3.1029-1037
  183. Powell, L., Richmond, V. P. & Williams, G. C. (2011). Social networking and political campaigns: Perceptions of candidates as interpersonal constructs. North American Journal of Psychology, 13, 331–342. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Ramasubramanian, S. & Kornfield, S. (2012). Japanese anime heroines as role models for U.S. youth: Wishful identification, parasocial interaction, and intercultural entertainment effects. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5, 189–207. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Richards, M. N. & Calvert, S. L. (2015). Toddlers' judgement of media character source credibility on touchscreens. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1755–1775. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0002764215596551
  186. Roberts, S. & Howard, S. (2005). Watching Teletubbies: Television and its very young audience. In J. Marsh (Hrsg.), Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood (S. 91–107). London: RoutledgeFalmer. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Robinson, J. D. & Agne, R. (2009). Audience replies to character blogs as parasocial relationships. In T. Dumova (Hrsg.), Handbook of Research on Social Interaction Technologies and Collaboration Software: Concepts and Trends (S. 302–312). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Rosaen, S. F. & Dibble, J. L. (2008). Investigating the relationships among child's age, parasocial interactions, and the social realism of favorite television characters. Communication Research Reports, 25, 145–154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08824090802021806
  189. Rosaen, S. F. & Dibble, J. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on parasocial relationships with television characters. Communication Studies, 67, 147–162. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121898
  190. Rosaen, S. F., Sherry, J. L. & Smith, S. L. (2011). Maltreatment and parasocial relationships in US children. Journal of Children and Media, 5, 379–394. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2011.599520
  191. Rosengren, K. E. (1994). Media use under structural change. In K. E. Rosengren (Hrsg.), Media effects and beyond: Culture, socialization, and lifestyles (S. 49–75). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Rosengren, K. E. & Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Hrsg.), Sociology of mass communications (S. 166–194). Hamondsworth: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Rosengren, K. E., Windahl, S., Hakansson, P. & Johnsson-Smaragdi, U. (1976). Adolescents' TV relations: Three scales. Communication Research, 3, 347–366. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300401
  194. Rössler, P., Germanus, E., Gruschwitz, S. & Kalch, A. (2009). Wie werden aus Zuschauern Mitspieler? Zwischen parasozialer und sozialer Interaktion: Resonanz auf Call-In-Shows im Fernsehen. In S. Trepte, U. Hasebrink & H. Schramm (Hrsg.), Strategische Kommunikation und Mediengestaltung - Anwendung und Erkenntnisse der Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung (S. 165–183). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Rössler, P. & Veigel, A. (2005). Was interessiert an Stars und Sternchen? Publizistik, 50, 438–461. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0143-3
  196. Rossmann, C. (2008). Fiktion Wirklichkeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90845-8
  197. Rubin, A. M., Haridakis, P. M. & Eyal, K. (2003). Viewer aggression and attraction to television talk shows. Media Psychology, 5, 331–362. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0504_02
  198. Rubin, A. M. & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–292. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
  199. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M. & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
  200. Rubin, A. M. & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 635–654. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7
  201. Rubin, R. B. & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, 279–292. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
  202. Russell, C. A. & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, Characters, and Products. A Balance Model of Sitcom Product Placement Effects. Journal of Advertising, 35, 7–21.Salamon, E. D. (1985). The radio religion of the Barry Manilow international fan club-UK. Studies in Popular Culture, 8, 86–104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350101
  203. Sanderson, J. (2008). Spreading the world: Emphatic interaction displays on blogmaverick.com. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 156–167. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.4.156
  204. Sanderson, J. (2009). "You are all loved so much": Exploring relational maintenance within the context of parasocial relationships. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 171–182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.4.171
  205. Sanderson, J. & Emmons, B. (2014). Extending and withholding forgiveness to Josh Hamilton: Exploring forgiveness within parasocial interaction. Communication & Sport, 2, 24–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/2167479513482306
  206. Sanderson, J. & Truax, C. (2014). "I hate you man!": Exploring maladaptive parasocial interaction expressions to college athletes via Twitter. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7, 333–351. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Savage, M. E. & Spence, P. R. (2014). Will you listen? An examination of parasocial interaction and credibility in radio. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 21, 3–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2014.891214
  208. Schallhorn, C., Knoll, J. & Schramm, H. (2014). Die Bedeutung der parasozialen Interaktion (PSI) für die Wirkung von Product Placements auf Erwachsene. In H. Schramm & J. Knoll (Hrsg.), Innovation der Persuasion. Die Qualität der Werbe- und Markenkommunikation in neuen Medienwelten (S. 16–33). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B. & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544
  210. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B. & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_02
  211. Schmid, H. & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy: Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. International Communication Gazette, 73, 252–269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1748048510393658
  212. Schramm, H. & Hartmann, T. (2008a). Die Messung von parasozialen Interaktionen als mehrdimensionales Konstrukt. Entwicklung und Validierung von PSI-Prozess-Skalen auf Basis des Zwei-Ebenen-Modells parasozialer Interaktionen. In J. Matthes, W. Wirth, G. Daschmann & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Methoden und Forschungslogik der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie - Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 48–69). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Schramm, H. & Hartmann, T. (2008b). The PSI-Process Scales. A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33, 385–401. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Schramm, H. & Wirth, W. (2010). Testing a universal tool for measuring parasocial interactions across different situations and media. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 26–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000004
  215. Semmler, S. M., Loof, T. & Berke, C. (2015). The influence of audio-only character narration on character and narrative engagement. Communication Research Reports, 32, 63–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.989976
  216. Shedlosky-Shoemaker, R., Costabile, K. A. & Arkin, R. M. (2014). Self-expansion through fictional characters. Self and Identity, 13, 556–578. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.882269
  217. Sherman-Morris, K. (2005). Tornadoes, television and trust: A closer look at the influence of the local weathercaster during severe weather. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 6, 201–210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2006.10.002
  218. Shim, C., Zhang, Y. B. & Harwood, J. (2012). Direct and mediated intercultural contact: Koreans' attitudes toward US Americans. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5, 169–188. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2012.670715
  219. Six, U. & Gleich, U. (2000). Sozio-emotionale und kognitive Reaktionen auf Ereignisszenarien mit TV-Personen. Ein Experiment zur parasozialen Beziehung. In A. Schorr (Hrsg.), Publikums- und Wirkungsforschung (S. 363–383). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Skumanich, S. A. & Kintsfather, D. P. (1998). Individual media dependency relations within television shopping programming: A causal model reviewed and revised. Communication Research, 25, 200–219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/009365098025002004
  221. So, J. & Nabi, R. (2013). Reduction of perceived social distance as an explanation for media's influence on personal risk perceptions: A test of the risk convergence model. Human Communication Research, 39, 317–338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12005
  222. Song, W. & Fox, J. (2016). Playing for love in a romantic video game: Avatar identification, parasocial relationship, and Chinese women's romantic beliefs. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 197–215. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1077972
  223. Sood, S. & Rogers, E. (2000). Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in india. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 386–414. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4403_4
  224. Spinda, J. S., Earnheardt, A. C. & Hugenberg, L. W. (2009). Checkered flags and mediated friendships: Parasocial interaction among NASCAR fans. Journal of Sports Media, 4, 31–55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1353/jsm.0.0041
  225. Spitzberg, B. H. & Cupach, W. R. (2008). Fanning the flames of fandom: Celebrity worship, parasocial interaction, and stalking. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan & J. Hoffmann (Hrsg.), Stalking, threatening and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (S. 287–321). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Spreckels, J. (2012). 'I wanna become a real rock star': Para-social interaction of German adolescent girls with television talent shows. In R. Ayaß & C. Gerhardt (Hrsg.), The appropriation of media in everyday life (S. 161–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Stehr, P. (2014). Der parasoziale Meinungsführer als Akteur der politischen Willensbildung: Quantitative Prüfung eines Modellentwurfs. In D. Friess, J. Jax & A. Michalski (Hrsg.), Sprechen Sie EU? Das kommunikative Versagen einer großen Idee: Beiträge zur 9. Fachtagung des DFPK (S. 219–237). Berlin: Frank & Timme. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Stehr, P., Leißner, L., Schönhardt, F. & Rössler, P. (2014). Parasoziale Meinungsführerschaft als methodische Herausforderung: Entwicklung eines Fragebogeninstruments zur Messung des Einflusses von Medienpersonen auf die politische Meinungs- und Einstellungsbildung. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 62, 395–416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2014-3-395
  229. Stehr, P., Rössler, P., Schönhardt, F. & Leißner, L. (2015). Parasocial opinion leadership: Media personalities' influence within parasocial relations: Theoretical conceptualization and preliminary results. International Journal of Communication, 9, 982–1001. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Stephens, D. L. & Hill, R. P., Bergman, K. (1996). Enhancing the consumer-product relationship: Lessons from the QVC home shopping channel. Journal of Business Research, 37, 193–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00069-0
  231. Stern, B. B., Russell, C. A. & Russell, D. W. (2007). Hidden persuasions in soap operas: Damaged heroines and negative consumer effects. International Journal of Advertising, 26, 9–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2007.11072994
  232. Stever, G. S. (1991). The celebrity appeal questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 68, 859–866. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3.859
  233. Stever, G. S. (2009). Parasocial and social interaction with celebrities: Classification of Media Fans. Journal of Media Psychology, 14, 1–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Stever, G. S. & Lawson, K. (2013). Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 339–354. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Su, H. J., Huang, Y. A., Brodowsky, G. & Kim, H. J. (2011). The impact of product placement on TV-induced tourism: Korean TV dramas and Taiwanese viewers. Tourism Management, 32, 805–814. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.020
  236. Sun, T. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sport teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 194–217. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Sun, T. & Wu, G. (2012). Influence of personality traits on parasocial relationship with sports celebrities: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 136–146. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/cb.1378
  238. Szpitalak, M., Polak, M., Polczyk, R. & Dukała, K. (2015). The influence of social, para-social, and nonsocial misleading post-event sources on memory performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 185–197. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Tanganika, F. (2014). The role of "Musekeweya", an entertainment-education radio soap opera in the promotion of reconciliation in Rwanda. Rwandan Journal of Education, 1, 55–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Thallmair, A. & Rössler, P. (2001). Parasoziale Interaktion bei der Rezeption von Daily Talk shows. Eine Befragung von älteren Talk-Zuschauern. In C. Schneiderbauer (Hrsg.), Daily Talkshows unter der Lupe (S. 179–208). München: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Theran, S. A., Newberg, E. M. & Gleason, T. R. (2010). Adolescent girls' parasocial interactions with media figures. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 171, 270–277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2010.483700
  242. Thorson, K. S. & Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 34–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117
  243. Tian, Q. & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 250–269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
  244. Tian, Y. & Yoo, J. H. (2015). Connecting with the biggest looser: An extended model of parasocial interaction and identification in health-related reality TV shows. Health Communication, 30, 1–7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.836733
  245. Tsao, J. (1996). Compensatory media use: An exploration of two paradigms. Communication Studies, 47, 89–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368466
  246. Tsay, M. & Bodine, B. M. (2012). Exploring parasocial interaction in college students as a multidimensional construct: Do personality, interpersonal need, and television motive predict their relationships with media characters? Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 185–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/a0028120
  247. Tsiotsou, R. H. (2015). The role of social and parasocial relationships on social networking sites loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 401–414. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.064
  248. Tukachinsky, R. (2010). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 73–94. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Tukachinsky, R. (2015). When actors don't walk the talk: Parasocial relationships moderate the effect of actor-character incongruence. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3394–3410. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41, 443–453. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369904
  251. Visscher, A. & Vorderer, P. (1998). Freunde in guten und schlechten Zeiten. Parasoziale Beziehungen von Vielsehern zu Charakteren einer Daily Soap. In H. Wilhelms & M. Jurga (Hrsg.), Inszenierungsgesellschaft (S. 453–469). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Vorderer, P. (1996). Picard, Brinkmann, Derrick und Co. als Freunde der Zuschauer. Eine explorative Studie über parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren. In P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Fernsehen als "Beziehungskiste": Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen (S. 153–171). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Vorderer, P. & Knobloch, S. (1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 8, 201–216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83274-0_14
  254. Wang, Q., Fink, E. L. & Cai, D. A. (2008). Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A Uses and Gratifications approach. Communication Quarterly, 56, 87–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01463370701839057
  255. Wegener, C. (2008). Medien, Aneignung und Identität: "Stars" im Alltag jugendlicher Fans. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Wen, N. & Cui, D. (2014). Effects of celebrity involvement on young people's political and civic engagement. Chinese Journal of Communication, 7, 409–428. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2014.953964
  257. Wenner, L. A. (1983). Political news on television: A reconsideration of audience orientations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 380–395. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374132
  258. Wolfenden, H. (2014). "I know exactly who they are": Radio presenters' conceptions of audience. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 12, 5–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1386/rjao.12.1-2.5_1
  259. Yates, B. L. (2015). It's social, not parasocial: Understanding the impact of the internet on building community among Bruce Springsteen fans. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23, 254–268. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.1090438
  260. Young, A. F., Gabriel, S. & Hollar, J. L. (2013). Batman to the rescue! The protective effects of parasocial relationships with muscular superheroes on men's body image. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 173–177. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.003
  261. Young, A. F., Gabriel, S. & Sechrist, G. B. (2012). The skinny on celebrities: Parasocial relationships moderate the effects of thin media figures on women's body image. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 3, 659–666. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434785
  262. Auter, P. J. (1992). TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 173–181. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364165
  263. Auter, P. J. & Palmgreen, P. (1992, Mai). Development of a new parasocial interaction measure: The Audience-Persona Interaction Scale. Vortrag auf der 42. Jahrestagung der International Communication Association (ICA), 21.-25.05.1992, Miami, USA. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Banks, J. (2013). Human-technology relationality and self-network organization: Players and avatars in World of Warcraft: Unveröffentlichte Doktorarbeit. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Banks, J. (2015). Object, me, symbiote, other: A social typology of player-avatar relationships. First Monday, 20. [Online First] Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i2.5433
  266. Barbara, A. M. & Dion, K. L. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do: Especially for the strongly "preoccupied" lovers. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 5, 315–342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10811440008407850
  267. Bocarnea, M. C. & Brown, W. J. (2007). Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods & J. D. Baker (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (S. 309–312). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 245–264. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  269. Döringer, E., Kleinert, I., Leißner, L., Mattern, M., Morsbach, M., Schönhardt, F., Simon, L. & Stehr, P. (2012, September). Parasoziale Meinungsführerschaft. Theoretische Konzeptualisierung und Entwicklung eines Instruments zur empirischen Prüfung des Einflusses von Medienpersonen auf die politische Meinungsbildung. Vortrag auf der 14. Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe „Methoden“ in der DGPuK, Zürich. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Eyal, K. & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 77–98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5
  271. Fraley, R. F. & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults' close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131–144. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x
  272. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279-305. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
  273. Hartmann, T. (2010). Parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Hartmann, T., Schramm, H. & Klimmt, C. (2004). Personenzentrierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen. Publizistik, 49, 25-47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11616-004-0003-6
  275. Havighurst, R. J. (1952). Developmental tasks and education. New York: David McKay. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Hoerner, J. (1999). Scaling the web: A parasocial interaction scale for world wide web sites. In D. W. Schumann & E. Thorson Hrsg.), Advertising and the World Wide Web (S. 135-147). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Honeycutt, J. M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Honeycutt, J. M. (Hrsg.). (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T. & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Psychology of entertainment (S. 291–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Lewis, M. L., Weber, R. & Bowman, N. D. (2008). "They may be pixels, but they're MY pixels": Developing a metric of character attachment in role-playing video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 515–518. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0137
  282. Maltby, J., Houran, J., Lange, R., Ashe, D. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2002). Thou shalt worship no other gods - Unless they are celebrities: The relationship between celebrity worship and religious orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1157–1172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00059-9
  283. Maltby, J., Houran, J. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2003). A clinical interpretation of attitudes and behaviors associated with celebrity worship. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 25–29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1097/00005053-200301000-00005
  284. McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R. & Houran, J. (2002). Evidence for non-pathological and pathological dimensions of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 67–87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1348/000712602162454
  285. Michener, C. D. (1969). Comparative social behavior of bees. Annual Review of Entomology, 14, 299-342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.14.010169.001503
  286. Rosaen, S. F. & Smith, S. L. (2004, Mai). Abused children and television: Examining parasocial interactions in special populations. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Rubin, A. M. (1994). Parasocial interaction scale. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen & H. E. Sypher (Hrsg.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (S. 273–277). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P. & Sypher, H. E. (Hrsg.). (1994). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M. & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
  290. Russell, C. A., Norman, A. T. & Heckler, S. E. (2004). The consumption of television programming: Development and validation of the connectedness scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 150–161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1086/383431
  291. Vorderer, P. (1998). Unterhaltung durch Fernsehen: Weche Rolle spielen parasoziale Beziehungen zwischen Zuschauern und Fernsehakteuren? In G. Roters, W. Klingler & O. Zöllner (Hrsg.), Fernsehforschung in Deutschland. Themen, Akteure, Methoden (S. 689-707). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Medienpolitik & Medienethik", "Medienwirkungsforschung & Mediennutzungsforschung"
Cover des Buchs: Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Greta Olson, Christian Schmidt, Benno Zabel, Jochen Bung, Franziska Martinsen, Hanna Meißner
Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Cover des Buchs: Israel in deutschen Medien
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover des Buchs: Medienmanagement
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Ingo Knuth, Thomas Kilian
Medienmanagement
Cover des Buchs: Deepfakes und das Persönlichkeitsrecht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Antonia Dicke
Deepfakes und das Persönlichkeitsrecht
Cover des Buchs: Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen
Monographie Teilzugriff
Holger Schramm, Nicole Liebers, Laurenz Biniak, Franca Dettmar
Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex