Cover des Buchs: Non-Contractual Liabilities from Civilian Versions of GNSS
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Non-Contractual Liabilities from Civilian Versions of GNSS

Current Trends, Legal Challenges and Potential
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 29.05.2017

Zusammenfassung

Das Buch untersucht die Frage nach der Haftungspflicht, die von der Bereitstellung von Navigationssignalen ausgeht. Insbesondere wird dabei die Entwicklung des Galileo-Programms zur Satellitennavigation der EU untersucht sowie die Haftungsansprüche, die gerade von fehlerhafter Kommunikation und Information ausgehen. Zudem bietet das Werk Lösungsansätze bei Streitfällen auf Basis der internationalen Schlichtungsmodelle.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2017
Erscheinungsdatum
29.05.2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3760-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8067-7
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies
Band
12
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
370
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 26
      1. I.1 Satellite based services Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Direct damage scenarios Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Indirect damage scenarios Kein Zugriff
      1. II.1 Scope of the research Kein Zugriff
        1. a. The architecture of GNSS Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Liability implications for civilian versions of GNSS: a general overview Kein Zugriff
        3. c. Tiers of errors leading to signal loss and the operator’s perspective Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Research questions Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Case studies Kein Zugriff
        3. c. Forms of civil liability Kein Zugriff
        4. d. Catastrophic cases of damage and causation Kein Zugriff
      1. III.1 Literature review: status quo Kein Zugriff
      2. III.2 Outcomes and innovative aspects Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. Methodology Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Central themes of the chapter Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Satellite based services: definition Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Some examples: navigation, telecommunication, and Earth observation Kein Zugriff
          1. a.1 Definition Kein Zugriff
          2. a.2 Global dimension Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 The Global Positioning System (GPS) Kein Zugriff
          2. b.2 The Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) Kein Zugriff
          3. b.3 The advent of the EU’s Galileo Kein Zugriff
          1. c.1 Transport applications Kein Zugriff
          2. c.2 Scientific applications Kein Zugriff
          3. c.3 Timing applications Kein Zugriff
          4. c.4 Data protection through the use of future GNSS related applications Kein Zugriff
          5. c.5 Leisure related applications Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Central themes of the chapter Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Technological risks Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Industrial risks and governance risks Kein Zugriff
        3. c. Liability risks Kein Zugriff
          1. a.1 Evidence for GNSS malfunctioning Kein Zugriff
          2. a.2 Examples of loss scenarios: loss of life, economic damage, and minor incidents Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Sources of errors Kein Zugriff
        1. a. GNSS specificities in general Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 Organizational issues Kein Zugriff
          2. b.2 The multimodal dimension Kein Zugriff
          3. b.3 The global coverage Kein Zugriff
          4. b.4 GNSS as systems based upon the coordination of different actors Kein Zugriff
          5. b.5 Concluding comments on GNSS specificities Kein Zugriff
          1. c.1 Tiers of liability: an overview Kein Zugriff
              1. c.2 (a) 1 Primary claimants including direct and indirect users: Kein Zugriff
              2. c.2 (a) 2 Third party claimants on the ground Kein Zugriff
              1. c.2 (b) 1 Main signal provider Kein Zugriff
              2. c.2 (b) 2 Satellite component manufacturers Kein Zugriff
              3. c.2 (b) 3 GNSS receiver manufacturers and sellers Kein Zugriff
    3. Concluding chapter on first part: Signal provision in space and signal provider’s liability Kein Zugriff 99 - 102
      1. I. The applicability of current liability law Kein Zugriff
      2. II. Contractual, tort and product liability Kein Zugriff
      3. III. Some comments on the type of liability, case studies reviewed, and possibility of disclaiming liabilities Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Central themes of the chapter Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Jurisdictional immunities and the EU: general remarks Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 Damage scenarios outside EU territory Kein Zugriff
          2. b.2 Damage scenarios within EU territory Kein Zugriff
        3. c. Concluding comments on immunity issues Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Preliminary observations Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Contractual and non-contractual liability of the EU Kein Zugriff
        3. c. Requirements under Article 340 (2) TFEU Kein Zugriff
        4. d. Official acts of EU servants and/or agencies Kein Zugriff
        5. e. Exclusive jurisdiction of the EU courts Kein Zugriff
        6. f. Concluding comments Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Preliminary remarks Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 General remarks: international, regional and also national instruments and the rule of actor sequitur forum rei Kein Zugriff
          2. b.2 Specific remarks: jurisdiction as a matter of national private international law provisions Kein Zugriff
          1. c.1 General remarks Kein Zugriff
          2. c.2 Specific remarks Kein Zugriff
        4. d. Substantive laws: some common elements including damage, wrongful act, fault, causation Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Product liability Kein Zugriff
        2. b. Public international law instruments including space law provisions Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Central themes of the chapter: possibility of a private governance scheme Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Legal regimes under a private governance scheme: international, national and european Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 International space law and non-governmental actors Kein Zugriff
            1. b 2 (a) Preliminary considerations Kein Zugriff
            2. b 2 (b) The Outer Space Treaty Kein Zugriff
            3. b 2 (c) The Liability Convention for Damage Caused by Space Objects Kein Zugriff
            4. b 2 (d) National space law acts Kein Zugriff
            5. b 2 (e) Overall observations on Space Treaties and Galileo signal defects Kein Zugriff
            6. b 2 (f) The 2011 PCA Rules for Arbitration on Outer Space Disputes Kein Zugriff
            7. b 2 (g) UN declarations and legal principles related to space activities Kein Zugriff
          3. b.3 Concluding comments for tort (non-contractual) liability from the perspective of international space law Kein Zugriff
          1. c.1 ITU’s legal framework Kein Zugriff
          2. c.2 International air and maritime law Kein Zugriff
          3. c.3 General international law Kein Zugriff
          4. c.4 Concluding comments from the perspective of international law Kein Zugriff
          1. d.1 Applicability of domestic tort law provisions Kein Zugriff
          2. d.2 Assessment of the solutions provided under domestic-national tort law Kein Zugriff
          3. d.3 Concluding comments from the perspective of domestic law Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Introductory remarks on product liability Kein Zugriff
        2. b. A distinct form of non-contractual liability Kein Zugriff
          1. c.1 The EU perspective Kein Zugriff
          2. c.2 The US perspective Kein Zugriff
          3. c.3 Some observations on the definition of product: a restrictive approach Kein Zugriff
        4. d. Preliminary conclusions Kein Zugriff
        5. e. Food for thought: an alternative approach Kein Zugriff
        6. f. General conclusion on product liability and signal failures Kein Zugriff
    4. Concluding chapter on second part: A future need for a centralized approach Kein Zugriff 229 - 234
      1. I. First case study Kein Zugriff
      2. II. Second case study Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Central themes of the chapter Kein Zugriff
        1. a. Preliminary considerations Kein Zugriff
        2. b. A public governance scheme Kein Zugriff
        3. c. A private governance scheme Kein Zugriff
        4. d. Common problems irrespective of the governance scheme Kein Zugriff
      3. III. A need to apply the precautionary principle Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Central themes of the chapter Kein Zugriff
          1. a.1 The principle of subsidiarity Kein Zugriff
          2. a.2 The principles of conferral and proportionality Kein Zugriff
          3. a.3 EU legal principles and the advent of Galileo Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 Passive or active approach Kein Zugriff
          2. b.2 EU Regulation or Directive Kein Zugriff
          3. b.3 Disclaiming liability or accepting and regulating it Kein Zugriff
        3. c. Concluding remarks Kein Zugriff
          1. a.1 Main elements of the existing de lege ferenda proposals Kein Zugriff
          2. a.2 Objective of this book: an alternative proposal Kein Zugriff
          1. b.1 Damage Kein Zugriff
          2. b.2 Jurisdictional immunity Kein Zugriff
          3. b.3 Operator Kein Zugriff
          4. b.4 The channeling liability system Kein Zugriff
          5. b.5 Strict liability regime Kein Zugriff
          6. b.6 Further issues Kein Zugriff
          7. b.7 Concluding comments: arbitration or traditional court adjudication Kein Zugriff
            1. c.1(a) General remarks Kein Zugriff
            2. c.1(b) Specific remarks Kein Zugriff
            1. c.2(a) Case studies reviewed Kein Zugriff
            2. c.2(b) Responses in current law Kein Zugriff
            3. c.2(c) Responses by the PCA rules Kein Zugriff
            4. c.2(d) Responses by the existing de lege ferenda proposal on the literature Kein Zugriff
            1. c.3(a) An EU Regulation providing for mandatory arbitration through the new PCA rules together with a strict liability regime and liability channeling Kein Zugriff
            2. c.3(b) Reasons affirming the alternative proposal Kein Zugriff
              1. i. Procedural: the need to make the new PCA rules obligatory and importance of an alternative proposal in this book (i.e. binding arbitration from a procedural viewpoint) Kein Zugriff
              2. ii. Substantive: the strict liability rule and liability channeling from a substantive viewpoint should remain Kein Zugriff
            4. c.3(d) Advantages of the alternative proposal compared to the existing de lege ferenda considerations Kein Zugriff
            5. c.3(e) Concluding statements Kein Zugriff
          4. c.4 Further issues: force majeure, interoperability, insurance and extraterritoriality Kein Zugriff
    3. Concluding chapter on third part: Other options available at international level Kein Zugriff 333 - 338
    4. Summary table (De Lege Ferenda) Kein Zugriff 339 - 342
    1. I. The research problem revisited Kein Zugriff
      1. II.1 Substantive viewpoint: strict liability Kein Zugriff
      2. II.2 Procedural viewpoint: binding arbitration Kein Zugriff
    3. III. Open ended questions Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Books Kein Zugriff
    2. b. Articles Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Legislation (international law perspective) Kein Zugriff
      2. b. Legislation (european law perspective) Kein Zugriff
      3. c. Legislation (national law perspective including also national soft law instruments) Kein Zugriff
      4. Kein Zugriff
      5. d. Soft law instruments-international law perspective Kein Zugriff
      1. a. Case law: international law perspective Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (255)

  1. I. Research books and articles Google Scholar öffnen
  2. a. Books Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Achilleas P., Droit de l’ Espace: Telecommunication-Observation-Navigation-Defense-Exploration (in French), Larcier, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Andrade A., The Global Navigation Satellite System, Ashgate Studies in Aviation, Economics and Management, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Awange Joseph L., Environmental Monitoring using GNSS, Springer, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88256-5_8
  6. Barnard C. and Peers S. (Eds.), European Union Law, Oxford University Press, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199686117.003.0001
  7. Barnard C., The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms, second edition, Oxford University Press, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Brownlie I., Principles of Public International Law, New York, Oxford University Press, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Cooter R. and Ulen T., Law and Economics, fifth edition, Pearson International Edition, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Craig P. and De Burca G., EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Diederiks-Verschoor I. H. Ph. and Kopal V., An Introduction to Space Law, third edition, Wolters Kluwer, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Dunk von der F. together with Tronchetti F. (Eds.), Handbook on Space Law, Edward Elgard Publishing, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781781000366.00015
  13. Ewald F., Gollier C., De Sadeleer N (Eds.), Le Statut Juridique du Principe de Precaution (in French), edition PUF, Paris, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Faure M. (Ed.), Tort Law and Economics, Volume 1 Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, second edition, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Faure M. and Hartlief T. (Eds.), Financial Compensation for Victims of Catastrophes: A Comparative Legal Approach, Tort and Insurance Law Volume14, Vienna/New York: Springer 2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/3-211-33775-X_12
  16. Foster N., Blackstone’s EU Treaties and Legislation 2010-2011, twenty first edition, Oxford University Press, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Hobe S., Tedd B.S., Schrogl K.U. (Eds.), Cologne Commentary on Space Law, Volume I, Carl Heymans Verlag, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Hofmann M. (Ed.), Dispute Settlement in the Area of Space Communication, Second Luxembourg Workshop on Space and Satellite Communication Law, Nomos, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845258584
  19. Hofmann M. (Ed.), International Regulations of Space Communications: Current Issues, Larcier, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Kerameus K., Greek Civil Procedural Law (in Greek), Sakkoulas Publications, 1986. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2070023
  21. Koch A. and Koziol H. (Eds.), Unification of Tort Law-Wrongfulness, Unification of Tort Law Series, Kluwer Law International, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Kornilakis P., Law of Non-Contractual Obligations (in Greek), Sakkoulas Publications, Athens-Thessaloniki, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Lyall F. and Larsen P., Space Law: A Treatise, Ashgate, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Lyall F., International Communications: The International Telecommunication Union and Universal Postal, Ashgate, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Shaw M., International Law, fifth edition, Cambridge University Press, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Smith L.J. and Baumman I., Contracting for Space: Contract Practice in the European Space Sector, Ashgate, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Viikari L., Dispute Resolution in the Space Sector: Present Status and Future Prospects, Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Viney G., Le principe de Precaution. Le point de Vue d’un Juriste, Les Petites Affiches (in French), 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. b. Articles Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Alsip D.H., “Report, Implementation of the US Coast Guard’ s Differential GPS Navigation Services”, June 1993. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300011334
  31. Andorno R., “The Precautionary Principle: A New Legal Standard for a Technological Age”, in Journal of International Biotechnology Law, Volume 1, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2004.1.1.11
  32. Aspremont J.D., “A European Law of International Responsibility? The Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations and the European Union”, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-19, University of Amsterdam. SHARES Research Paper 22 (2013), ACIL 2013-04. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bazex M., « L’Affirmation de Compétence Extraterritoriale des Communautés Européennes» in L’ Application Extraterritoriale du Droit Economique, 51-66, 1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Bernestein A., “How Can a Product be Liable”, in 45 Duke Law Journal, 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Birnbaum L.N., “Strict Product Liability and Computer Software”, in 8 Computer Law Journal, 1988. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bollweg H.G., “Initial Consideration Regarding the Feasibility of an International Unidroit Instrument to Cover Liability for Damage Caused by Malfunctions in Global Navigation Satellite Systems”, in Uniform Law Review, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ulr/13.4.917
  37. Carbone S. and Maestri M.E.D., “The Rationale for an International Convention on Third Party Liability for Satellite Navigation Signals”, in Uniform Law Review, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ulr/14.1-2.35
  38. Carpanelli E. and Cohen B., paper entitled: “Interpreting Damage Caused by Space Objects under the 1972 Liability Convention”, published in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, 2013, Eleven International Publishing, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Christol C., “International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects”, in American Journal of International Law, 74, 1980. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2201505
  40. Cole M., “Review of the EU Telecommunications Framework and its Impact on the Frequency Management”, paper published in International Regulations of Space Communications: Current Issues, Mahulena Hofmann (Ed.), Larcier, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Conway G., “Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union”, European Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, May 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
  42. Delaney H. and Zande R.V.D, “A Guide to the EU Directive Concerning Liability for Defective Products (Product Liability Directive)”, in NIST GCR 01-824, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Dunk von der F., “About the New PCA Rules and their Application to Satellite Communication Disputes”, paper published in Dispute Settlement in the Area of Space Communication, Second Luxembourg Workshop on Space and Satellite Communication Law, Mahulena Hofmann (Ed.), Nomos, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845258584-93
  44. Dunk von der F. “Liability for Global Navigation Satellite Services: A Comparative Analysis of GPS and Galileo”, in Journal of Space Law, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Dunk von der F., “Liability versus Responsibility in Space Law: Misconception or Misconstruction?”, in Space and Telecommunications Law program Faculty Publications, 1991, Paper 43. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Dunk von der F., “The European Equation: GNSS=Multimodality+Liability”, in Air and Space Law in the 21st Century, Liber Amicorum for Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Filho J., “Legal Issues of Commercial Space Activities”, United Nations Workshop on Space Law, Ukraine, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Gabriel H.D., “The Global Positioning System: United States Government Liability, -Real and Potential- ”, in Risk Management for GNSS Malfunctioning, Rome, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Grundmann S., “Information, Party Autonomy and Economic Agents in European Contract Law”, in Common Market Law Review 39, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1015249325898
  50. Henaku B.D.K., “The Law on Global Air Navigation by Satellite: An Analysis of Legal Aspects of the ICAO CNS/ATM System”, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Hobe S., “The Impact of New Developments on International Space Law: New Actors, Commercialization, Privatization, Increase in Number of Space Faring Nations”, in Uniform Law Review, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ulr/15.3-4.869
  52. Hobe S., “The Permanent Court of Arbitration Adopts Optional Rules For Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities”, in German Journal of Air and Space Law, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Hoffmeister F., “Litigating against the European Union and Its Member States – Who Responds under the ILC's Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?”, in European Journal of International Law, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq048
  54. Hofmann H., “Agency Design in the European Union”, in Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice (The), 28, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4501
  55. Hofmann M., “Security Aspects of the Galileo Services”, in Proceedings of the 46th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, 2003, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, S.1-8. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), “Global Navigation Satellite Systems: A Manual, International Civil Aviation”, Canada, 2005, retrieved from: http://www.icao.int/Meetings/PBN-Symposium/Documents/9849_cons_en%5B1%5D.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Jakhu R., “Dispute Resolution under the ITU Agreements”, retrieved from: http://swfound.org/media/48115/Jakhu-Dispute%20resolution%20under%20the%20ITU%20agreements.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Jordan A. and O’ Riordan T., “The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Policy and Politics”, in C. Raffensperger and J Tickner (Eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment. Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Washington, Island Press, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Juenger F., Eason-Weinmann Center for Comparative Law Colloquium: “The Internationalization of Law and Legal Practice: Forum Shopping, Domestic and International”, in Tulane Law Review, Volume 64, 1989. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Kayser V., “Commercial Exploitation of Space Developing Domestic Regulation”, in 17-II Annals of Air and Space Law, 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Lanneti D., “Toward a Revised Definition of Product under the Restatement (Third) Torts: Product Liability”, in 35 Torts and Insurance Law Journal, 1999-2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Letsas G., “The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy”, University College London – Faculty of Laws, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2021836
  63. Loukakis A., “Product Liability Ramifications for Erroneous GNSS Signals: Is an Alternative Approach Possible?”, published in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, 2013, Eleven International Publishing, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Magnus U., “Civil Liability for Satellite Based Services”, in Uniform Law Review, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ulr/13.4.935
  65. Masson-Zwaan T., “The Aerospace Plane: An Object at the Cross-Roads between Air and Space Law”, published in Air and Space Law: De Lege Ferenda, Essays In Honour Of Henri A. Wassenbergh, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Pocar F., “An Introduction To The PCA’s Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities”, in Journal of Space Law 38, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Ramses Wessel, “Immunities of the European Union”, International Organizations Law Review, Volume 10, 2013, No.2. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Recuerda, M. A., “Dangerous Interpretations of the Precautionary Principle and the Foundational Values of the European Union Food Law: Risk versus Risk”, in. Journal of Food Law and Policy 4, Volume 1, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Reutiman J., “Defective Information: Should Information Be a Product Subject to Products Liability Claims?”, in Cornel Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 22, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Roma A., Schrogl K.U., Aranzamendi M.S. (Eds.), “Policy Aspects of Third Party Liability in Satellite Navigation: Preparing a Roadmap for Europe”, Report, European Space Policy Institute, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99091-9
  71. Saunders P., “Use and Abuse of the Precautionary Principle”, Institute of Science in Society submission to US Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (ACIEP) Biotech, Working Group, July 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Schubert F.P., “An International Convention On GNSS Liability: When Does Desirable Become Necessary?”, in Annals of Air and Space Law, Volume XXIV, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Shaffer G. and Pollack M., “Hard vs Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance”, in Minnesota Law Review 94, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Smith L.J., “Where’s Paradise or Paradise Lost?” The EU’s Satellite Navigation System Galileo- some comments on inherent risk, Paper, in: Proceedings of the 50th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Smith L.J. & Doldirina C., “Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Cases of Damage from Space in Europe-The advent of the Most Suitable Choice-Rome II”, Paper, in Proceedings of the 51st Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Smith L.J., “The Current Challenges of Liability for Loss of Satellite Based Services”, published in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, 2013, Eleven International Publishing, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Smith L.J., “Contractual Responses to Loss of Satellite Based Services”, paper published in Harmful Interference from a Regulatory Perspective, Mahulena Hofmann (Ed.), Third Luxembourg Workshop in Space and Satellite Communication Law, Nomos, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Tronchetti F., “The PCA Rules for Dispute Settlement in Outer Space: A Significant Step Forward”, in Space Policy 29, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2013.06.007
  79. UNIDROIT, “An Instrument on Third Party Liability for Global Navigational Satellite Systems: A Preliminary Study”, S79, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. UNIDROIT, “Risk Management in GNSS Malfunctioning”, Report, Third Informal Meeting on Third Party Liability Regime for GNSS Malfunctioning, Rome 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Viscusi W.K. and Zeckhauser R.J., “Addressing Catastrophic Risks: Disparate Anatomies Require Tailored Therapies”, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Harvard Kennedy School, John F. Kennedy School of Government, November 2011, RWP11-045. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Wade J., “Product Design Defects and their Actionability”, in 33 Vanderbilt Law Review, 1980. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.2927
  83. Woodard J., “GPS Manufacturer Liability Under A Strict Product’s Liability Paradigm When GPS Fails To Give Accurate Direction To GPS End-Users”, in 34 Dayton Law Review, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Wouters J. and Eeckhoutte D.V., “Giving Effect to Customary International Law Through European Community Law”, in Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Law, Institute for International Law, Working Paper No 25, June 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. II. Legislation (including soft law instruments) Google Scholar öffnen
  86. a. Legislation (international law perspective) Google Scholar öffnen
  87. 1929 The Warsaw Convention, Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules relating to International Carriage by Air, Warsaw, done 12 October 1929, entered into force 13 of February 1933. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. 1944 Convention on International Civil Aviation, Chicago, done 7 December 1944, entered into force 4 April 1947. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. 1945 Charter of the United Nations, San Francisco, USA, done 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945. To be found in the following link: http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=1&. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Statute of the International Court of Justice, San Francisco, USA, done 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945. To be found in the following link: http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/?p1=4&p2=2. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 10 June 1958. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. 1963 The Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, Vienna, 21 May 1963. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. 1967 The Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and other Celestial Bodies, 1967, 610 UNTS 205, 18 UST 2410, TIAS 6347. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. 1968 Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Brussels, 6 October 1968. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, done at Vienna, 23 May 1969 and entered into force 27 January 1980, United Nations Treaty Series, vol.1115. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 29 November 1969. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. 1971 The International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, Brussels, 18 December 1971. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. 1972 European Convention on State Immunity, Basle, 16 May 1972. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, 1972, 961 UNTS 187, 24 UST 2389, TIAS 7762. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. 1975 Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, 1975 1023 UNTS 15, 28 UST 895, TIAS 8480. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. 1980 Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome Convention), Rome, 19 June 1980. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. 1982 Convention Establishing the European Telecommunications Satellite Organization (EUTELSAT), Paris, done 15 July 1982, entered into force 1 September 1985. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. 1983 Convention for the Establishment of a European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT), Geneva, done 24 May 1983, entered into force 19 June 1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. 1987 The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Montreal, 16 September 1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. 1988 Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Lugano, 16 September 1988. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. The International Telecommunication Regulations, signed 9 December 1988, Melbourne, and entered into force 1 July 1990. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. 1989 The United Nations Convention on Civil Liability for Damage Caused during Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road, Rail and Inland Navigation Vessels, Geneva, 10 October, 1989. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. 1992 The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 4 June, 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. The Constitution and Convention of the International Telecommunication Union signed 22 December 1992 (Geneva) and which entered into force 1 July 1994. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. 1996 The International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, London, 3 May, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. 1997 The Kyoto Protocol on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto, 11 December 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. 1999 The Montreal Convention amending the Warsaw Convention, Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, Montreal, 28 May 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. 2001 Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, Text adopted by the International Law Commission at its fifty-third session, in 2001. Retrieved from the following link Google Scholar öffnen
  114. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_6_2001.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. 2003 Radio Regulations of the International Telecommunication Union. The last revision of the Radio Regulations was signed on 4 July 2003 (Geneva), and the majority of the provisions entered into force on 1 January 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. 2004 The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property, New York, 2 December, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. 2011 Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, adopted by the International Law Commission at its sixty-third session, in 2011. Retrieved from the following link http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_11_2011.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. b. Legislation (european law perspective) Google Scholar öffnen
  119. 1. Primary law Google Scholar öffnen
  120. The Treaty of Paris (18 April 1951). Google Scholar öffnen
  121. The Treaties of Rome (Euratom Treaty and the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community) (25 March 1957). Google Scholar öffnen
  122. The Maastricht Treaty on European Union (7 February 1992). Google Scholar öffnen
  123. The amending Treaties: Google Scholar öffnen
  124. The Single European Act (17 and 28 February 1986). Google Scholar öffnen
  125. The Treaty of Amsterdam (2 October 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
  126. The Treaty of Nice (26 February 2001). Google Scholar öffnen
  127. The Treaty of Lisbon (13 December 2007) entered into force on 1 December 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. 2. Secondary law (regulations and directives) Google Scholar öffnen
  129. 1999 Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products as amended by Directive 1999/34/EC of 10 May, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. 2000 Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. 2002 Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 of the European Parliament and Council of 21 May 2002 setting up the Galileo Joint Undertaking. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. 2007 Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. 2008 Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.15388/Litera.2008.3.7832
  134. 2009 Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2009 on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation program (EGNOS and Galileo). Google Scholar öffnen
  135. 2011 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. 2013 Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the implementation and exploitation of European satellite navigation systems and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. c. Legislation (national law perspective including also national soft law instruments) Google Scholar öffnen
  138. 1. United States of America Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Restatement of Torts, Second (1965−79; some sections superseded by Restatement of Torts, Third volumes). Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Uniform Commercial Code, (edition 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Restatement of Torts, Third, Products Liability (1998). Google Scholar öffnen
  142. 2. Europe Google Scholar öffnen
  143. France Google Scholar öffnen
  144. • Environmental Law Acts-Legislation containing: Google Scholar öffnen
  145. - The Rural Code of 1999, especially Art. 200-1. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. • Space Law Acts-Legislation containing: Google Scholar öffnen
  147. - Decree 62-153, Regulations Relating to the CNES. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. - Law No. 61-1382, 20 December 1961 Statute of the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). Google Scholar öffnen
  149. - Decree 89-508 & Decree 90-1102, concerning the Space Committee. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Germany Google Scholar öffnen
  151. • Environmental Law Acts-Legislation containing: Google Scholar öffnen
  152. - Law on protection from contamination of 1974 (Art. 1 and 5, par. I 2). Google Scholar öffnen
  153. - Law on chemical products of 1980 (esp. Art. 10). Google Scholar öffnen
  154. - Law on environmental tolerance of 1990 (esp. Art.1). Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Greece Google Scholar öffnen
  156. • Greek Civil Code, Accessible from the following link: http://www.hadjimichalis.gr/nomothesia_ellinik_astikos.asp. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. • Greek Code of Civil Procedure (Κώδικας Πολιτικής Δικονομίας), Sakkoulas Publications, June 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Netherlands Google Scholar öffnen
  159. • Space Law Acts-Legislation containing: Google Scholar öffnen
  160. - Rules Concerning Space Activities and the Establishment of a Registry of Space Objects (Space Activities Act). Google Scholar öffnen
  161. - Decree of 13 November 2007, containing rules with regard to a registry of information concerning space objects (Space Objects Registry Decree). Google Scholar öffnen
  162. - Order of the Minister of Economic Affairs dated 7 February 2008, no. WJZ 7119929, containing rules governing license applications for the performance of space activities and the registration of space objects. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. - Form for registration of space objects (Annex 1 by article 4 of the "Regeling aanvraag vergunning ruimtevaartactiviteiten en registratie"). Google Scholar öffnen
  164. - Order of the Minister of Economic Affairs dated 16 April 2010, no. WJZ/10020347, containing amendments to rules governing license applications for the performance of space activities and the registration of space objects. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Sweden Google Scholar öffnen
  166. • Space Law Acts-Legislation containing: Google Scholar öffnen
  167. - Act on Space Activities, 1982: 963, 18 November 1982: Space Law-Basic Legal Documents, E.II.1; 36 Zeitschrift fur Luft- und Weltraumrecht, 1987, at 11. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. - Decree on Space Activities, 1982: 1069; Space Law- Basic Legal Documents, E.ii.2; 36; 36 Zeitschrift fur Luft- und Weltraumrecht,1987, at 11. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. d. Soft law instruments-international law perspective Google Scholar öffnen
  170. United Nations Conference on the Environment Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, June 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. United Nations, Commission on International Trade Law Google Scholar öffnen
  173. United Nations Commission International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules adopted in 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.18356/17055cd4-en
  174. Under The Authority of the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs Google Scholar öffnen
  175. The "Declaration of Legal Principles" Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Uses of Outer Space. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. General Assembly resolution 1962 (XVIII) of 13 December 1963. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. The "Broadcasting Principles" Google Scholar öffnen
  179. The Principles Governing the Use by States of Artificial Earth Satellites for International Direct Television Broadcasting. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. General Assembly resolution 37/92 of 10 December 1982. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. The "Remote Sensing Principles" Google Scholar öffnen
  182. The Principles Relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Outer Space. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. General Assembly resolution 41/65 of 3 December 1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. The "Nuclear Power Sources" Principles Google Scholar öffnen
  185. The Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. General Assembly resolution 47/68 of 14 December 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. The "Benefits Declaration" Google Scholar öffnen
  188. The Declaration on International Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for the Benefit and in the Interest of All States, Taking into Particular Account the Needs of Developing Countries. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. General Assembly resolution 51/122 of 13 December 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Under the Authority of the Permanent Court of Arbitration Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Permanent Court of Arbitration, Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities, effective since 6 December 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. III. Case law Google Scholar öffnen
  193. a. Case law: international law perspective Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Arbitration Cases Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Trail Smelter Arbitration Tribunal (United States of America and Canada), 33 American Journal of International Law 182 (1939) and 35 American Journal of International Law 684 (1941) 716. See also Reports of International Arbitral Awards, 16 April 1938 and 11 March 1941, Volume III, United Nations, 1905–82, especially 1963. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. International Court of Justice Cases Google Scholar öffnen
  197. 1995 Google Scholar öffnen
  198. New Zealand v France Case, International Court of Justice, Order of 22 September 1995, ICJ Reports, 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. 1997 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia), International Court of Justice, Judgement of 25 September 1997, ICJ Reports 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Other International Tribunals Google Scholar öffnen
  202. World Trade Organization (WTO)/Appellate Body Google Scholar öffnen
  203. 1998 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. WTO Appellate Body Report, European Community Measures Affecting Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), Complaint by the United States and Canada against the European Union, 13 February 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. b. Case law: european law perspective Google Scholar öffnen
  206. 1957 Case 9/56 Meroni v High Authority [1957] ECR 133. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. 1962 Case 18/60 Worms v High Authority [1962] ECR 195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.1962.3.2.243
  208. 1969 Case 9/69 Sayag v Leduc [1969] ECR 329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7202/500077ar
  209. 1971 Case 5/71 Aktien-Zuckerfabrik Schoppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. 1975 Case 74/74 Comptoir National Technique Agricole (CNTA) SA v Commission [1975] ECR 533. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. 1978 Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, and 40/77 Bayerische HNL Vermehrungsbetriebe GmbH & Co KG v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209,1223-1224. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Cases 44-51/77 Union Malt v Commission [1978] ECR 57. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. 1979 Cases 64, 113/76, 167, 239/78, 27, 28 and 45/79 Dumortier Freres SA v Council [1979] ECR 3091. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. 1983 Case 145/83, Stanley George Adams v Commission of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7139-4
  215. 1994 Case C-146/91 KYDEP v Council and Commission [1994] ECRI-4199. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. 1997 Case C-158/94, Commission v Italy [1997] ECRI-5793. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1097/00004669-199701000-00010
  217. 1998 Case C-180/96, United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, [1998] ECR 2000 I-1651. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Case C-162/96, Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz [1998], ECR I-3655. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2494(99)80010-8
  219. 2000 Case C-6/99, Association Greenpeace France and Others v Ministere de l’ Agriculture et de la Peche and Others, [2000] ECR 2000 I-1651. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Cases T-79/96, 260/97, and 117/98 Camar Srl and Tico Srl v Commission [2000], ECR II-2193. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. 2002 Case T-13/99, Pfizer Animal Health SA v Council, [2002] ECR-II-3305. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Cases T-74, 76, 83-85, 132, 137 and 141/00 Artegodan GmbH v Commission [2002] ECR II-4945. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. 2005 Case T-315/01, Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council and Commission [2005] ECR II-3649. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Case T-306/01, Yusuf and Al Barakaat v Council and Commission [2005] ECR II-3533. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. 2006 Case T-193/04 Tillack v Commission [2006] ECRII-3995. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Case T-304/01 Perez and others v Council [2006] ECRII-4861. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. 2008 Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P. Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities [2008] ECRI-06351. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. c. Case law: national law perspective Google Scholar öffnen
  229. United States of America Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Supreme Court of California Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Escola v Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944). Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Superior Court of New Jersey Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Moon Carrier v Reliance Insurance Col, 153 N.J. Super. 312, 379 A. 2d (1977). Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Court of Appeals of California Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Kaiser Aetna v Deal 86 Cal.App.3d 896 (1978). Google Scholar öffnen
  236. United States Supreme Court Google Scholar öffnen
  237. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp v Woodson, 444 U.S 286 (1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  238. United States Court of Appeals Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Elgin Airport Inn, Inc. v Commonwealth Edison Co., 410. N.E.2d 620, 624 (3rd. App. Ct. 1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  240. United States Court of Appeals Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Aetna Cas & Sur. Co. v Jeppesen & Co., 642 F. 2d. 339, 342 (9th Cir. 1981). Google Scholar öffnen
  242. United States Court of Appeals Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Sallomey v Jeppesen & Co., 707F.2d 671, 676-77 (2nd Cir. 1983). Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Court of Appeals of California Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Pierce v Pacific Gas & Elec. Co., 166 Cal. App. 3d 68, 212 Cal. Rptr. 283 (1985). Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Schriner v Pennsylvania Power &Light Co., 501A.2d 1128, 1133 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1985). Google Scholar öffnen
  248. United States Court of Appeals Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Winter v G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 938F. 2d 1033 (9th Cir. 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Supreme Court of Wisconsin Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v Wisconsin Elec. Power Co., 176 Wis. 2d 740, 792, 501 N.W. 2d 788, 809, (1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Europe Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Italian Constitutional Court Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Italian Constitutional Court 14 July 1986, 184. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Italian Constitutional Court 11 July 2003, 233 in Foro it., 2003, 1, 2201. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex