Cover des Buchs: Flag Follows Trade?
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Flag Follows Trade?

The USA and its Economic and Foreign Policy Interdependencies
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

Die USA sind wirtschaftlich, militärisch und politisch eine Weltmacht. Das Zusammenspiel dieser Komponenten macht die Vereinigten Staaten zum mächtigsten Land der Welt. Handels-, Wirtschafts- und Sicherheitspolitik in der US-Außenpolitik werden in diesem Buch in einem Zusammenhang betrachtet. Es zeigt, wie sich die amerikanische Supermacht auf ihre globale Wirtschaftskraft verlässt, um ihre Macht zu finanzieren und damit ihre Position in der Welt gegenüber dem aufstrebenden China zu behaupten.

Dr. Christian Schlegel ist Politikwissenschaftler, Dozent und Politikredakteur für den öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunk.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4835-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7952-2
Verlag
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
216
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff I - XVI
  2. 1 Introduction Kein Zugriff 1 - 6
    1. 2.1 Britain’s Free Trade Dominance Since the 18th Century Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 America’s Free Trade Dominance Since World War II Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 US Political Institutions and their Trade Instruments Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Conclusion: The Advantages of Economic Strength Kein Zugriff
    1. 3.1 Answers in the Most Popular Political Theories Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.2 Search for the Grand Strategy Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3 Trade in National Security Strategies Kein Zugriff
    4. 3.4 Conclusion: Connection between Trade and Security Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 US Historical Key Points in the Middle East Kein Zugriff
    2. 4.2 The First US Bilateral Trade Treaty With Israel Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3 The Free Trade Agreement With Jordan Kein Zugriff
    4. 4.4 Other Free Trade Agreements in the Middle East Kein Zugriff
    5. 4.5 Conclusion: Middle East Security Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1 US Historical Key Points in Asia Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.2.1 Bush’s and Obama’s Asia Strategy Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2.2 Trump and his Indo-Pacific Strategy Kein Zugriff
    3. 5.3 Sino-American relations: Competition and Dependencies Kein Zugriff
    4. 5.4 South Korea’s dilemma Kein Zugriff
    5. 5.5 Japan as Security Ally and Economic Competitor Kein Zugriff
    6. 5.6 Rising India With its Own Ambitions Kein Zugriff
    7. 5.7 Cooperation With Australia and New Zealand Kein Zugriff
    8. 5.8 Further States of Southeast Asia and Their Anxious Look Toward China Kein Zugriff
    9. 5.9 Conclusion: Maintaining American influence Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.1 US Historical Key Points in the “Western Hemisphere” Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.2.1 The Relationship Between Canada, Mexico, and the US Before NAFTA Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.2.2 North American Security Cooperation Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.2.3 Geopolitical Aspects between the US, Mexico, and Canada Kein Zugriff
      4. 6.2.4 How do Trade and Security Fit Together? Kein Zugriff
      5. 6.2.5 Summary: Security Relevance for USMCA Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.3.1 Historical Connections Between the US and Central America Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.3.2 Bilateral Relations Between the US and the CAFTA-DR Member States Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.3.3 Summary: Central America and the US Kein Zugriff
    4. 6.4 South American Trade Agreements Kein Zugriff
    5. 6.5 Conclusion: Securing the US’s Sphere of Influence Kein Zugriff
    1. 7.1 US-Russia Relations Since the 1990s Kein Zugriff
    2. 7.2 Economic relations between Russia and the US Kein Zugriff
    3. 7.3 Conclusion: Old and New Enemy Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.1.1 The Interplay Between Business and Politics in Transatlantic Relations Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.1.2 US-EU Trade Negotiations Kein Zugriff
    2. 8.2 Economic Aspects of a Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.3.1 European Defense Under Pressure Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.3.2 Energy and Security Policy Kein Zugriff
    4. 8.4 Conclusion: Between Friendship and Competition Kein Zugriff
    1. 9.1 US Historical Key Points in Africa Kein Zugriff
    2. 9.2 Trade Agreement with Morocco Kein Zugriff
    3. 9.3 Trade Agreement with Kenya Kein Zugriff
    4. 9.4 Rivalry With China on the African continent Kein Zugriff
    5. 9.5 Conclusion: The Continent of the Future? Kein Zugriff
    1. 10.1 Middle East: Israel, Jordan, Oman Kein Zugriff
    2. 10.2 Asia-Pacific: South Korea, Australia, and Singapore Kein Zugriff
    3. 10.3 America: Canada, Mexico, and Latin America Kein Zugriff
    4. 10.4 Africa: Morocco Kein Zugriff
    5. 10.5 Conclusion: Defence, Security and Trade Kein Zugriff
  12. 11 The Interdependence of US Trade, Economic, and Security Policies Kein Zugriff 181 - 188
  13. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 189 - 212
  14. Index Kein Zugriff 213 - 216

Literaturverzeichnis (285)

  1. Aggarwal, V. K., 2013. U.S. Free Trade Agreements and Linkages. International Negotiation, Issue 18, pp. 89–110. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Aggarwal, V. K., 2016. Mega-FTAs and the Trade-Security Nexus: The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Analysis from the East-West Center, March, Issue 123, pp. 1–8. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Ahmed, S. & Engel, R., 2020. Making U.S. Foreign Policy Work Better For The Middle Class. [Online] Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/09/23/making-u.s.-foreign-policy-work-better-for-middle-class-pub-82728 [Accessed 15 October 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Ali, M., 2018. Aid for development or foreign policy: objectives behind US foreign aid allocations to Israel. Policy Perspectives, 3(15), pp. 29–46. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Allen-Ebrahimian, B., 2017. Sink Trump’s Other Trade Dreams. [Online] Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/11/14/the-new-tpp-may-sink-trumps-other-trade-dreams [Accessed 20 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Allison, G., 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Allison, G. & Zelikow, P., 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2 ed. New York: Longman. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Ambrose, S. E. & Brinkley, D. G., 2011. Rise to Globalism. American Foreign Policy Since 1938. 11 ed. New York: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Andrew, J., 2003. AUSFTA: Linking War, Free Trade and the Environment. Faculty of Business and Law, University of Wollongong, Australia, January. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Armstrong, S., 2015. The costs of Australia’s ‘free trade’ agreement with. East Asia Forum, 8 February. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Armstrong, S., 2015. The economic impact of the Australia–United States free trade agreement. AJRC Working Paper, January. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Armstrong, S., 2018. More to Australia–Japan security than bilateral defence ties. East Asia Economic Forum, 17 January. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Arunajaeet, K., 2016. Aborting TPP: will US global leadership be crippled. RSIS Commentaries, 23 November, Issue 286. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Ashby, P., 2014. NAFTA-Land Security: The Mérida Initiative, Transnational Threats, and U.S. Security Projection in Mexico. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis. Kent: University of Kent. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Azrieli, A., 1993. Improving arbitration under the U.S.-Israel free trade agreement: A Framework for a Middle-East Free Trade Zone. St. John’s Law Review, Spring, 2(67), pp. 187–263. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bard, M., 2022. U.S.-Israel Free Trade Area Agreement: Background & Overview. [Online] Available at: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/background-and-overview-of-u-s-israel-free-trade-area-agreement [Accessed 10 October 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. BBC.com, 2022. What sanctions are being imposed on Russia over Ukraine invasion? [Online] Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60125659 [Accessed 19 May 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Beal, A. & Gedan, B. N., 2018. Chile, the Trans Pacific Partnership’s unlikely savior. Global Americans, 5 February. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Beattie, A. & Politi, J., 2018. How is Donald Trump’s USMCA trade deal different from Nafta. Financial Times, 1 October. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Belin, J. et al., 2017. Defence industrial links between the EU and the US. [Online] Available at: https://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Ares-20-Report-EU-DTIB-Sept-2017.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  21. [Accessed 20 September 2022]."Belladonna, A., 2019. Central America Between China and the United States. [Online] Available at: https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/central-america-between-china-and-united-states-24236 [Accessed 28 August 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Benning, T., 2018. ‘How is that a bad deal?’: Texans keep up defense of NAFTA, which Trump has called ‘worst trade deal ever’. Dallas News, February. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Biden, J. R., 2021. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/white-house-publishes-interim-national-security-strategic-guidance/ [Accessed 16 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Biegon, R., 2020. US Hegemony and the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Consensus, Crisis, and Common Sense. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Spring, 13(1), pp. 69–101. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Blackwill, R. & Rappleye, T., 2017. Trump’s five mistaken reasons for withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Foreign Policy, 22 June. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Blackwill, R. & Tellis, A., 2015. Revising US grand strategy toward China. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Blecker, R. A., 2014. The Mexican and U.S. Economies after 20 years of NAFTA. International Journal of Political Economy, Summer, Volume 43, pp. 5–26. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Blekinskop, P., 2019. EU plans sharp hike in U.S. energy import as trade lever. Reuters, 2 May. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Booth, J. A., Wade, C. J. & Walker, T. W., 2015. Understanding Central America. Global Forces, Rebellion, and Change. 6 ed. Boulder: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bown, C. P., 2017. Economics and Policy in the Age of Trump. London: CEPR Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bown, C. P., 2018. The 5 surprising things about the new USMCA trade agreement. The Washington Post, 9 October. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Brattberg, E., 2015. Toward a Transatlantic Renaissance? TTIP’s Geopolitical Impact in a Multipolar World. Washington, The German Marshall Fund of the United States. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bravo, R., Leonard, J. & Donnan, S., 2018. EU Trade Talks Become Contentious as President Trump Threatens Tariffs. Time, 21 October. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Bryne, A., 2020. The Monroe Doctrine and United States National Security in the Early Twentieth Century. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland / Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Buchanan, P. G. & Rimland, B., 2020. Defining the Diamond. The Past, Present, and Future of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue. CSIS Briefs, March. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bush, G. H., 1990. National Security Strategy of the United States. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/1990.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Bush, G. H., 1993. National Security Strategy of the United States. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/1993.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Bush, G. W., 2002. National Security Strategy 2002. [Online] Available at: http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2002/ [Accessed 30 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bush, G. W., 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2002.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Bush, G. W., 2005. President Signs CAFTA-DR. [Online] Available at: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050802-2.html [Accessed 15 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Bush, G. W., 2006. The National Security Strategy of the United States. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2006.pdf [Accessed 16 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Cameron, M. A. & Tomlin, B. W., 2000. Negotiating North American Free Trade. International Negotiation, pp. 43–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Cassidy, B., 2018. Cassidy, Colleagues Call for Blocking Construction of Russian Natural Gas Pipeline to Europe. [Online] Available at: https://www.cassidy.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cassidy-colleageus-call-for-blocking-construction-of-russian-natural-gas-pipeline-to-europe [Accessed 13 August 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Chaudhury, D. R., 2021. CAATSA sanctions against India will trigger significant blowback, warns influential US think tank. The Economic Times, 21 November. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Chazan, G. & Peel, M., 2019. US warns against European joint military project. Financial Times, 14 May. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Choi, Y., 2018. A middle power’s trade policy under U.S.-China FTA competition: South Korea’s double hedging FTA diplomacy. Contemporary Politics, 2(24), pp. 233–249. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. CIA World Factbook, 2020a. CIA.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ho.html [Accessed 14 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. CIA World Factbook, 2020b. CIA.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gt.html [Accessed 15 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. CIA World Factbook, 2020c. CIA.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/nu.html [Accessed 15 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. CIA World Factbook, 2020d. CIA.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cs.html [Accessed 15 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. CIA World Factbook, 2020e. CIA.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/dr.html [Accessed 15 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. CIA World Factbook, 2020f. China. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/china/#economy [Accessed 20 July 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. CIA World Factbook, 2020g. CIA.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/geos/ks.html [Accessed 27 December 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. CIA World Factbook, 2022. Russia. [Online] Available at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/russia/#economy [Accessed 25 February 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Ciuriak, D., 2018. America Unbound: The New New World Order in Trade. Centre for International Governance Innovation, 4 June. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Clinton, H., 2011. America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Policy, November, Issue 189, pp. 56–63. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Clinton, H., 2012. U.S. Department of State – Remarks at Techport Australia. [Online] Available at: https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2012/11/200565.htm [Accessed 7 June 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Clinton, W. J., 1994. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/1994.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Clinton, W. J., 1999. A National Security Strategy for a New Century. [Online] Available at: https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/media/pdf/nssr-1299.pdf [Accessed 31 August 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Colantuoni, S., 2019. Chinese Investment in Central America is Growing. [Online] Available at: https://www.thecentralamericangroup.com/chinese-investment-in-central-america/ [Accessed 28 August 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Cole, W., 2021. Australia’s new US-UK security pact risks China trade. Reuters, 16 September. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Consilium.europa.eu, 2019. Trade with the United States: Council authorises negotiations on elimination of tariffs for industrial goods and on conformity assessment. [Online] Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/04/15/trade-with-the-united-states-council-authorises-negotiations-on-elimination-of-tariffs-for-industrial-goods-and-on-conformity-assessment/ [Accessed 2019 May 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Cooke, J., 2009. Obama’s Africa Agenda. Current History, May, 108(718), pp. 195–201. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Cook, M. & Wilkins, T., 2011. Australia-Japan Security Relations. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Cooley, A. & Nexon, D. H., 2020. How Hegemony Ends. The Unraveling of American Power. Foreign Affairs, July/August, pp. 143–156. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Cooper, W. H., 2014. Free Trade Agreements: Impact on U.S. Trade and Implications for U.S. Trade Policy, Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Cornell, P. E., 2009. Energy and the Three Levels of National Security: Differentiating Energy Concerns. Connections, Fall, 4(8), pp. 63–80. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Cox, M., 2018. The economic rise of a superpower: from Washington to Trump. In: US Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–75. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Cox, M. & Stokes, D., 2018b. US Foreign Policy. 3 ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Crawford, J.-A. & Fiorentino, R. V., 2005. The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements. WTO discussion papers. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. De Graaff, N. & Van Apeldoorn, B., 2018. US–China relations and the liberal world order: contending elites, colliding visions? International Affairs 94: 1 (2018) 113–131; doi: 10.1093/ia/iix232, 94(1), pp. 113–131. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Defense.gov, 2015. Framework for the U.S.-India Defense Relationship. [Online] Available at: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2015-Defense-Framework.pdf [Accessed 18 September 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Defense.gov, 2020. U.S., Morocco Chart Defense Cooperation Through 2030. [Online] Available at: https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2369742/us-morocco-chart-defense-cooperation-through-2030/ [Accessed 17 September 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Deltas, G., Desmet, K. & Facchini, G., 2012. Hub-and-spoke free trade areas: theory and evidence from Israel. Canadian Journal of Economics, 45(3), pp. 942 – 977. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Democracyranking.org, 2016. The Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy. [Online] Available at: http://democracyranking.org/wordpress/rank/democracy-ranking-2016/ [Accessed 12 March 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Dgft.gov, 2020. Belize, Ministry Responsible for Investment Trade & Commerce: Central America Market. [Online] Available at: https://www.dgft.gov.bz/central-america-market/ [Accessed 9 September 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Dhue, S., 2018. Trump claims Mexico will pay for his border wall because of the new North American trade deal, but the White House struggles to explain how. CNBC, 19 December. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Dian, M., 2017. The strategic value of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the consequences of abandoning it. International politics, Issue 54, pp. 583–597. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Dominguez, R. & Larivé, M. H. A., 2019. The Resilient Partner Beyond Crises: EU Perceptions in the United States. In: N. Chaban & M. Holland, eds. Shaping the EU Global Strategy. Partners and Perceptions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Dueck, C., 2008. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Ec.europa.eu, 2018. United States. [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/united-states [Accessed 5 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Economictimes.indiatimes.com, 2021. Free Trade Agreement is the next frontier in US-India relationship: USIBC president. [Online] Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/free-trade-agreement-is-the-next-frontier-in-india-us-relationship-usibc-president/articleshow/86636035.cms [Accessed 23 November 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Eisenhower, D. D., 1961. Military-Industrial Complex Speech. [Online] Available at: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/eisenhower001.asp [Accessed 17 October 2002]. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. El-Erian, M. A., 2018. Understanding Today’s Trade Friction. The International Economy, Spring, pp. 40–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Envall, H. D. P., 2016. Japan’s ‘Pivot’ Perspective: Reassurance, Restructuring, and the Rebalance. Security Challenges, 12(3), pp. 5–19. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Europa.eu, 2018. Joint U.S.-EU Statement following President Juncker’s visit to the White House. [Online] Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-18-4687_en.htm [Accessed 2019 July 9]. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Europarl.europa.eu, 1995. The New Transatlantic Agenda. [Online] Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/124321/new_transatlantic_agenda_en.pdf [Accessed 15 May 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Farnsworth, C. H., 1985. Israel and U.S. facing hurdles on trade pact. New York Times, 10 January. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Fas.org, 2019. Guatemala: Political and Socioeconomic Conditions and U.S. Relations. [Online] Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42580.pdf [Accessed 24 September 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Faunce, T., Bai, J. & Nguyen, D., 2010. Impact of the Australia – US Free Trade Agreement on Australian medicines regulation and prices. Journal of Generic Medicines, 1(7). Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Feinberg, R. E., 2003. The Political Economy of United States’ Free Trade Agreements. The World Economy, Volume 7, pp. 1019–1040. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Fergusson, I. F. & Villarreal, M. A., 2017. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Fleming, S., Donnan, S. & Brunsden, J., 2018. Trump threatens 20 % tariffs on EU car imports. Financial Times, 22 June. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Flores-Macías, G. & Sánchez-Talanquer, M., 2019. The Political Economy of NAFTA/USMCA. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Foot, R. & Walter, A., 2010. China, the United States, and global order. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Ford, J., 2017. The Pivot to Asia Was Obama’s Biggest Mistake. The Diplomat, 21 January. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Frenkel, O., 1990. Constraints and Compromises: Trade Policy in a Democracy: The Case of the U.S.-Israel Free Trade Area. New York: Routledge Library Editions: International Trade Policy. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Frost, E. N., 2009. What is Economic Power? Joint Force Quarterly, April, Issue 53, pp. 9–11. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Fuchs, M. H., 2016. Obama’s Asia Pivot has been a historic success. The New Republic, 31 August. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Fukuyama, F., 1992. The end of history and the Last Man. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Funabashi, Y., 2018. In America’s absence, Japan takes the lead on Asian free trade. The Washington Post. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Gantz, D. A., 2008. "The “Bipartisan Trade Deal,” Trade Promotion Authority and the Future of U.S. Free Trade Agreements. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 1(28), pp. 115–154. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Gantz, D. E., 2016. Introduction to U.S. Free Trade Agreements. British Journal of American Legal Studies, Issue 5. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Gerstenzang, J., 2001. Bush links free trade to world progress. Los Angeles Times, 8 May. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Globalsecurity.org, 2018. Peru – Relations with the United States. [Online] Available at: globalsecurity.org/military/world/peru/forrel-us.htm [Accessed 1 August 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Goldberg, M., Hirsch, S. & Sassoon, D. M., 1988. An analysis of the American-Israeli Free Trade Agreement. The World Economy, 11(2), p. 281–300. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Green, M. J. & Goodman, M. P., 2016. After TPP: the Geopolitics of Asia and the Pacific. The Washington Quarterly, Winter, 38(4). Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Greenspan, A. & Wooldridge, A., 2018. Capitalism in America. A History. New York City: Penguin Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Griffith, M. K., Steinberg, R. & Zysman, J., 2015. Great Power Politics in a Global Economy: Origins and Consequences of the TPP and TTIP, Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Grifftiths, M., 2007. International Relations Theory for the 21st century. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Habib, J. & Howard, M., 2019. The Political Economy of Donald J. Trump. In: Reading Donald Trump. A Parallax View of the Campaign and Early Presidency. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 103–125. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Hacker, J. S. & Pierson, P., 2016. American Amnesia. How the war on government let us to forget what made America prosper. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Ha, J., 2017. Impact of Trump Administration’s Proposed Policies on the United States and China. In: US-China Cooperation in a Changing Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics, pp. 34–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Hastedt, G., 2000. American Foreign Policy. Past, Present, Future. 4 ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Hastedt, G., 2020. American Foreign Policy. Past, Present, and Future. 12 ed. Maryland: Rowman&Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Hdsl.org, 1998. Homeland Security Digital Library. [Online] Available at: https://www.hdsl.org/?abstract&did=478280 [Accessed 11 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. He, K., 2008. Institutional balancing and international relations theory: Economic interdependence and balance of power strategies in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), pp. 489–518. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Hendrix, C., 2018. US-Mexico Relations and the Security Stakes of NAFTA Renegotiation. [Online] Available at: http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2017/07/18/us-mexico-relations-and-the-security-stakes-of-nafta-renegotiation/ [Accessed 23 March 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Hicks, R., Millner, H. V. & Tingley, D., 2014. Trade Policy, Economic Interests, and Party Politics in a Developing Country: The Political Economy of CAFTA-DR. International Studies Quarterly, pp. 106–117. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Hirschman, A. O., 1980. National Power and the structure of foreign trade. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Hoadley, S., 2007. U.S. Free Trade Agreements in East Asia: Politics, Economics, and Security Policy in the Bush Administration. Journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, Issue 26, pp. 51–75. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Hobbes, T., 1965. Leviathan. 8 ed. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Holland, K., 2014. The Canada–United States defence relationship – a partnership for the twenty-first century. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 20:3, Volume 3, pp. 241–246. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Holland, S. & Gardner, T., 2019. Trump considering sanctions over Russia’s Nord Stream 2 natgas pipeline. Reuters, 12 June. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Howe, A., 1997. Free Trade and Liberal England, 1846–1946. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Hufbauer, G. & Goodrich, B., 2004. Lessons from NAFTA. In: Free trade agreements: US strategies and priorities. Washington: The Peterson Institute for International Economics, pp. 37–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Human Rights Watch, 2020. hrw.org. [Online] Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/honduras [Accessed 14 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Hurlburt, H., 2018. Security Policy is Economic Policy. Democracy, Spring, Issue 48. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Ikenberry, G. J., 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West. Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs, January/ February. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Ikenberry, G. J., 2011. Liberal Leviathan. The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Ikenberry, G. J., 2017. The Plot Against American Foreign Policy: Can the Liberal Order Survive. Foreign Affairs, May/June, pp. 2–9. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Ikenberry, G. J., 2018. Why The Liberal World Order Will Survive. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), pp. 17–29. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Ikenberry, G. J., 2020. The Next Liberal Order: The Age of Contagion Demands More Internationalism, Not Less. Foreign Affairs, July/August, pp. 133–142. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Ikenson, D., 2016. TPP, R.I.P? Trump’s Promise to Withdraw from the Agreement is a Terrible Mistake. Foreign Affairs, 22 November. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. International Trade Administration, 2021. https://www.trade.gov/ [Online] Available at: https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/israel-market-overview [Accessed 05 May 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Irwin, D. A., 2002. Free Trade Under Fire. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Irwin, D. A., 2020. Trade Policy in American Economic History. Annual Reviews of Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Janusch, H., 2016. Bilaterale Verhandlungen der Vereinigten Staaten über Freihandelsabkommen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Johnson, J. E., 2019. Towards A New Generation in Central American Trade: Proposals for Modernizing CAFTA-DR. Pace International Law Review, Winter, 1(32), pp. 103–136. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Kapoutsis, I. & Volkema, R., 2019. Hard-Core Toughie: Donald Trump’s Negotiation for the United States Presidency. Negotiation Journal, January. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Kay, S., 2006. Global Security in the Twenty-First Century: The Quest for Power and the Search for Peace. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Keohane, J. S. & Nye, R. O., 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Kessler, E., 2022. How Economic Sanctions are Used in U.S. Foreign Policy, Chicago: Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Kessler, G., 2017. The Trump administration’s claim that the U.S. government ‘certified’ 700,000 jobs lost by NAFTA. The Washington Post, 18 August. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Kilroy, R. J., 2007. Cooperation in North America. Homeland Security Affairs, Issue 1, pp. 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Kissinger, H. A., 2012. The Future of U.S.-Chinese Relations – Conflict is a Choice, not a Necessity. Foreign Affairs, March/April, 2(91), pp. 44–55. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Korteweg, R., 2016. The Geopolitical Promise of TTIP. IAI Working Papers, 25 September, Issue 16. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Kramer, M., 2016. Israel and the Post-American Middle East. Foreign Affairs, July / August, pp. 51–56. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Krieckhaus, J., 2018. US Trade Policy, President Trump and the KORUS FTA. Korea Observer, Winter, 49(4), pp. 619–642. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Kupchan, C. A. & Trubowitz, P. L., 2021. The Home Front. Why an Internationalist Foreign Policy Needs a Stronger Domestic Foundation. Foreign Affairs, May/June. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Lampe, M., 2009. Effects of Bilateralism and the MFN Clause on International Trade – Evidence for the Cobden-Chevalier Network, (1860–1875). The Journal of Economic History, December, 4(69), pp. 1012–1040. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Landler, M., 2016. Leaving Asia, Obama predicts U.S. tilt toward region will be lasting. The New York Times, 8 September. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Lee, S.-O., Wainwright, J. & Glassman, J., 2018. Geopolitical economy and the production of territory: The case of US-China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(2), pp. 416–436. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Leffler, M., 1990. National Security. The Journal of American History, 77(1), pp. 143–152. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Leffler, M., 2019. A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War. Lexington, Massachusetts: Plunkett Lake Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Lei, W., 2020. China and the United States in Africa. Competition or Cooperation? China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 6(1), pp. 123–141. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Lind, M., 2012. Land of Promise: an economic history of the United States. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Machiavelli, N., 2014. The Prince. New York: Penguin Classics. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Magnusson, L., 2004. The Tradition of Free Trade. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Marcus, J., 1989. The Politics of Israels security. International Affairs, 65(2), pp. 233–246. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Martin, L. G., 2003. Assessing the impact of U.S.-Israeli relations on the Arab world. Strategic Studies Institute (SSI), July. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Mearsheimer, J. J., 2010. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Winter, pp. 381–396. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Mearsheimer, J. J. & Walt, S., 2006. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Middle East Policy, March, 6(13). Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Melchior, A., 2018. Free Trade Agreements and Globalisation. In the shadow of Brexit and Trump. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Meltzer, J. P., 2016. Deepening the United States-Africa trade and investment. brookings.edu, 28 January. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Meyer, P. J., 2019a. Honduras: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service, 26 July. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Meyer, P. J., 2019b. U.S. Strategy for Engagement in Central America: Policy Issues for Congress. [Online] Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R44812.pdf [Accessed 29 September 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Meyer, T. & Sitaraman, G., 2019. Trade and the Separation of Powers. California Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Mfat.govt.nz, 2018. Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (P4). [Online] Available at: http://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/p4/ [Accessed 9 May 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Mishra, V., 2017. India-US Maritime Cooperation: The Next Decade. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 12(1), pp. 60–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Monroe, J., 1823. Transcript of Monroe Doctrine. [Online] Available at: http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=23&page=transcript [Accessed 15 September 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Moore, G. J., 2017. Avoiding a Thucydides Trap in Sino-AmericanRelations (…and 7 Reasons why that Might be Difficult). Asian Security, Issue 13, pp. 98–115. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Morgenthau, H. J., 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Borsoi Book. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Muchira, N., 2021. Fate of Kenya-U.S. Free Trade Deal Uncertain. The Maritime Executive. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Muetzenich, R., 2017. Will the EU-US relationship ever be the same again? International Politics and Society, December. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Murphy, J. & Sherman, N., 2018. USMCA trade deal: Who gets what from ‘new NAFTA’? BBC News, 1 October. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Nagy, S. R., 2015. The geopolitics of the TPP: Reconfiguring regional architecture in East Asia. World Commerce Review, September. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Narine, S., 2017. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and American Domestic Politics: Why the End of the TPP Signals the Beginning of the End of American Dominance in the Asia Pacific. Paper Prepared for ISA International Conference. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Nato.int, 2018. Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2011–2018). [Online] Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_07/20180709_180710-pr2018-91-en.pdf [Accessed 13 August 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Nato.int, 2019. Defence expenditure. [Online] Available at: https://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2019/PR-2019-034-eng.xlsx [Accessed 10 July 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Naughton, B., Kroeber, A. R., De Jonquières, G. & Webster, G., 2015. What Will the TPP Mean for China? Foreign Policy, 7 October. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Needleman, R., 2013. Free Trade Agreements and Unfree Labor: The Case of Colombia. New Labour Forum, 22(2), pp. 51–58. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Nye, J., 2017. America still holds the aces in its poker game with China. [Online] Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/80961dbc-bfc5-11e7-823b-ed31693349d3 [Accessed 12 March 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Obama, B., 2010. National Security Strategy. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2010.pdf [Accessed 16 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Obama, B., 2013. obamawhitehouse.archives.gov. [Online] Available at: https://obamawhithouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament [Accessed 18 June 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Obama, B., 2013. The White House President Barack Obama. [Online] Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/03/21/remarks-president-barack-obama-people-israel [Accessed 4 October 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Obama, B., 2015. National Security Strategy. [Online] Available at: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2015.pdf [Accessed 16 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Obama, B., 2016. President Obama: The TPP would let America, not China, lead the way on global trade. [Online] Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-obama-the-tpp-would-let%20America-lead-the-way-on-global-trade/2016/05/02/680540e4-0fd0-11e6-93ae-50921721165d_story.html?utm_term=.7727d678bb0d [Accessed 2 February 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. OEC, 2020. The Observatory of Economic Complexity. [Online] Available at: https://oec.world/ Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Okpotor, F. I., 2016. The Political Economy of US Security Assistance to Africa: A Research Agenda. African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, Spring, 6(1), pp. 105–122. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Panetta, A., 2018. Here’s how the TPP deal could affect NAFTA negotiations. The Canadian Press, 23 January. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Parmar, I., Miller, L. B. & Ledwidge, M., 2009. New Directions in US Foreign Policy. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Pastor, R. A., 2004. North America’s Second Decade. Foreign Affairs, Jan.-Feb., pp. 124–135. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Patnaik, S. & Kunhardt, J., 2022. Biden could reduce inflation, mitigate a recession, and strengthen democracy with a new EU-US trade agreement, Washington: Brookings. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Patrick, S. M., 2017. Trump and World Order. The return of Self-Help. Foreign Affairs, March/April, Volume 96, pp. 52–57. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Pence, M. R., 2018. Remarks by Vice President Pence At Conference On Prosperity And Security In Central America. [Online] Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-pence-conference-prosperity-security-central-america/ [Accessed 18 September 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Petraeus, D. H., Zoellick, R. B. & O’Neil, S. K., 2014. North America – Time for a new focus, New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Piccone, T., 2016. The Geopolitics of China’s Rise in Latin America. Geoeconomics and Global Issues Paper, Issue 2, pp. 1–24. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Pollins, B. M., 1989. Does Trade Still Follow the Flag? The American Political Science Review, June, 2(83), pp. 465 – 480. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Raza, W. et al., 2014. ASSESS_TTIP: Assessing the claimed benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Policy Note, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), Issue 10. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Reagan, R., 1985. Ronald Reagan Presidential Library & Museum. [Online] Available at: https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/statement-signing-united-states-israel-free-trade-area-implementation-act-1985 [Accessed 30 September 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Reagan, R., 1987. National Security Strategy of the United States. [Online] Available at: https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nss/nss1987.pdf?ver=FUZbPLy3ZDfa4UTDpMkNzw%3d%3d [Accessed 12 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Reagan, R., 2009. The Reagan Diaries. New York: Harper Collins. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Reich, M., 1972. Does the U.S. Economy Require Military Spending? The American Economic Review, 1 March, Volume 62, pp. 296–303. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Reinsch, W., Caporal, J. & Murray, L., 2019. CSIS – Center for Strategic and International Studies: At Last, An RCEP Deal. [Online] Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/last-rcep-deal [Accessed 3 August 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Representative, O. o. t. U. S. T., 2021. https://ustr.gov/ [Online] Available at: https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/middle-eastnorth-africa/jordan [Accessed 10 October 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Restrepo, D., Werz, M. & Martinez, J., 2017. Preserving and Strengthening the U.S.-Mexican Relationship, Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Reverson, D. S. & Gvosdev, N. K. C. J. A., 2018. The Oxford Handbook of U.S. National Security. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Reynolds, I. & Tweed, D., 2018. TPP Is a Big Deal, With or Without the U.S. Bloomberg, 12 April. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Ripsman, N. M., Zielinski, R. C. & Schilde, K. E., 2018. The Political Economy of Security. In: The Oxford Handbook of U.S. National Security. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–264. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Rivera, F. M., 2018. World Finance – the voice of the market. [Online] Available at: https://www.worldfinance.com/strategy/government-policy/financial-history-cafta-dr [Accessed 17 August 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Rodrik, D., 2018. What Do Trade Agreements Really Do? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018 Spring, 32(2), pp. 73–90. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Rose, G., 2015. What Obama Gets Right. Keep Calm and Carry the Liberal Order On. Foreign Affairs, September/October, pp. 2–12. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Rosenberg, M. B. & Solis, L. G., 2007. The United States and Central America. Geopolitical Realities And Regional Fragility. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Rosen, H., 2004. Free trade agreements as foreign policy tools: The US-Israel and US-Jordan FTAs. Free Trade Agreements: US strategies and priorities. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Saunders, P. C., 2013. The Rebalance to Asia: U.S.-China Relations and Regional Security. Strategic Forum, August. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Schlegel, C., 2018. The Significance of Security Policy in the Israel-United States Free Trade Agreement. Zeitschrift für Außen-und Sicherheitspolitik, 11(13). Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Schmidt, B. C., 2016. Foreign Policy. Theories, Actors, Cases. In: S. Smith, A. Hadfield & T. Dunne, eds. 3 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Seelke, C. R., 2014. Dominican Republic: Background on U.S. Relations. CRS Report for Congress, 21 March. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Seelke, C. R. & Finklea, K. M., 2010. U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: the Mérida Initiative and beyond. Congressional Research Service, 29 July, pp. 1–35. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Sipri.org, 2018a. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. [Online] Available at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Sipri.org, 2018b. China. [Online] Available at: https://www.sipri.org/research/armaments-and-disarmament/nuclear-weapons/word-nuclear-forces/china Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Skonieczny, A., 2018. Trading with the enemy: narrative, identity and US trade politics. Review of International Political Economy. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Smith, S. & Hadfield, A., 2016. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 3 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Snyder, J., 2004. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy, Nov/Dec, pp. 52–62. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Sobhani, R. S., 2019. A boost to global energy security. The Washington Times, 24 June. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Sohn, Y., 2019. South Korea under the United States-China rivalry: dynamics of the economic-security nexus in trade policymaking. The Pacific Review, 6(32), pp. 1019–1040. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Sokolsky, R. & Rumer, E., 2020. U.S.-Russian-Relations in 2030. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Solís, M., 2017. Trump withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Brookings, 24 March. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Sondland, G., 2019. Reliance on Russian gas has big risks on Europe. Financial Times, 12 March. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Staff, T., 2017. Bernie Sanders calls for rethink on US aid to Israel, Iran policy. The Times of Israel, 23 September. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. State.gov, 2019a. About the U.S. Department of State. [Online] Available at: https://www.state.gov/about/ Google Scholar öffnen
  233. State.gov, 2019b. U.S. Arms Sales and Defense Trade. [Online] Available at: https://www.state.gov/u-s-arms-sales-and-defense-trade/ [Accessed 7 January 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. State.gov, 2021. U.S. Relations With Russia. [Online] Available at: https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-russia/ [Accessed 9 September 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Stokes, D., 2018. Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order. International Affairs, Volume 94, pp. 133–150. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Stokes, D. & Whitman, R. G., 2013. Transatlantic triage? European and UK ‘grand strategy’ after the rebalance to Asia. International Affairs, September, 89(5). Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Strandell, H. & Wolf, P., 2018. The EU in the world — 2018 edition. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Sushentsov, A. A. & Wohlforth, W. C., 2020. The tragedy of US–Russian relations: NATO centrality and the revisionists’ spiral. International Politics, Issue 57, p. 427–450. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Swanson, A., 2018. Trump Weighs Rejoining Accord With Pacific Rim in About-Face. The New York Times, 13 April.p. A1. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Swanson, A., 2020. U.S. to Sign Limited Trade Deal With Brazil. The New York Times, 19 October. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Swanson, A., 2021. European Steel Plan Shows Biden’s Bid to Merge Climate and Trade Policy. The New York Times, 3 November. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Taft-Morales, M., 2016. Nicaragua: In Brief. CRS Report, 14 September. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Tankersley, J., 2019. Trump loves the new NAFTA. Congress doesn’t. The New York Times, 6 February. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Taylor, J. B., 2002. The Economic Component of Foreign Policy. Remarks to the Hoover Institution Board Of Overseers, Washington: U.S. Department of the Treasury. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Tellis, A., 2014. The geopolitics of the TTIP and the TPP. Adelphi Series, 54(450), pp. 93–120. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Thompson, J., 2014. Making North America: Trade, Security, and Integration. London: University of Toronto Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Tolchin, M., 1985. U.S. signs trade pact with Israel. The New York Times. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Torrey, Z., 2018. TPP 2.0: The Deal Without the US. What’s new about the CPTPP and what do changes mean? The Diplomat, 03 February. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Trade.ec.europa.eu, 2018. Factsheet on Trade in goods and customs duties in TTIP. [Online] Available at: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/152998.htm [Accessed 4 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Trump, D. J., 2017a. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. [Online] Available at: http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2017/ [Accessed 11 June 2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Trump, D. J., 2017b. whitehouse.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-regarding-withdrawal-united-states-trans-pacific-partnership-negotiations-agreement/ [Accessed 7 June 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Trump, D. J., 2017c. whithouse.gov. [Online] Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-apec-ceo-summit-da-nang-vietnam/ [Accessed 18 June 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Ustr.gov, 2018. Office of the United States Trade Representative. [Online] Available at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreeements/free-trade-agreements [Accessed 18 June 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Ustr.gov, 2022. Israel Free Trade Agreement. [Online] Available at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/israel-fta [Accessed 10 October 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Valdivia, A. G., 2019. Green Light For The EU Defence Fund: More European Cooperation In A Context Of Global Instabilities. Forbes, 25 April. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Vaughan, A., 2019. Nord Stream 2 Russian gas pipeline likely to go ahead after EU deal. The Guardian, 25 February. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Von der Burchard, H., 2019a. EU-US trade talks move forward, but problems remain. Politico, 11 April. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Von der Burchard, H., 2019b. Trump to EU: Include agriculture in US trade talks or face tariffs. Politico, 16 April. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Von Soest, C., 2021. The End of Apathy: The New Africa Policy under Joe Biden. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA). Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Walt, S. M., 1985. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, Spring, 9(4), pp. 3–43. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Walt, S. M., 2016. Obama Was Not a Realist President. Foreign Affairs, 7 April. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Walt, S. M., 2018a. US grand strategy after the Cold War: Can realism explain it? Should realism guide it? International Relations, 32(1), pp. 3–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Walt, S. M., 2018b. Voice: Has Trump Become a Realist? [Online] Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/04/17/has-trump-become-a-realist/ [Accessed 30 July 2020]. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Waltz, K. N., 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Weatherall, K., 2016. Intellectual property in the TPP: not the new TRIPs. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 17(257), pp. 331–362. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Whitehouse.gov, 2022. FACT SHEET: United States, G7 and EU Impose Severe and Immediate Costs on Russia. [Online] Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/04/06/fact-sheet-united-states-g7-and-eu-impose-severe-and-immediate-costs-on-russia/ [Accessed 19 May 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Williams, W. A., 2009. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. 50th anniversary ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Wilson, C. & Valenzuela, P., 2014. Mexico’s Southern Border Strategy: Programa Frontera Sur. [Online] Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Mexico_Southern_Border_Strategy.pdf [Accessed 14 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Wilson, J. D., 2015. Mega-Regional Trade in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of contemporary Asia, 45(2), pp. 345–353. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Wilson, W., 1918. Fourteen Points Speech. [Online] Available at: https://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/democrac/51.htm [Accessed 11 February 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Wong, A. N., 2018. U.S. Department of State. [Online] Available at: https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/04/280134.htm [Accessed 30 May 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Wood, D., 2017. Working with Mexico, not against it, would bolster security. thehill.com, 7 March. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Wood, E. A., Pomeranz, W. E., Merry, E. W. & Trudolyubov, M., 2016. Roots of Russia’s War in Ukraine. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Worldbank.org, 2018a. World Integrated Trade Solution. [Online] Available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/USA/Year/2016/TradeFlow/Export/Partner/by-country [Accessed 19 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Worldbank.org, 2018b. World Integrated Trade Solution. [Online] Available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/CHN/Year/2016/TradeFlow/Export/Partner/by-country [Accessed 19 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Worldbank.org, 2018c. World Integrated Trade Solution. [Online] Available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/USA/Year/2016/TradeFlow/Export/Partner/by-country [Accessed 19 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Worldbank.org, 2018d. World Integrated Trade Solution. [Online] Available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/JPN/Year/2016/TradeFlow/Export/Partner/by-country [Accessed 19 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Worldbank.org, 2018e. GDP (current US$). [Online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Worldbank.org, 2022. World Bank Open Data. [Online] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/ [Accessed 04 April 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Worrell, J., 2017. U.S. Trade with Russia. Overall Trends. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/technology-evaluation/ote-data-portal/country-analysis/2277-2017-statistical-analysis-of-u-s-trade-with-russia-pdf [Accessed 25 February 2022]. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Ye, M., 2015. China and Competing Cooperation in Asia-Pacific: TPP, RCEP, and the New Silk Road. Asian Security, Issue 11: 3, pp. 206–224. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Yin, J. Z. & Hamilton, M. H., 2018. The Conundrum of US-China Trade Relations Through Game Theory Modeling. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(8). Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Yong, W., 2013. The Politics of the TPP are plain: Target China. Global Asia, Spring, 8(1), pp. 54–56. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Yuhas, A., 2016. Congress will abandon Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, White House concedes. The Guardian, 13 November. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Zolotukhina, E., 2011. New START: The Contentious Road to Ratification. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(1), pp. 69–76. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Internationale Beziehungen", "Politik allgemein"
Cover des Buchs: Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Gert Krell, Peter Schlotter, Alexandra Homolar, Frank A. Stengel
Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Cover des Buchs: (Neu-)Ordnung
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Uwe Wagschal, Marius Fröhle
(Neu-)Ordnung
Cover des Buchs: Arenen des Diskurses
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Thomas Schölderle, Laura Martena
Arenen des Diskurses
Cover des Buchs: European Union, How Comes?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hartmut Marhold
European Union, How Comes?
Cover des Buchs: Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Sara Arezes
Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex