Culture, Practice &amp; Europeanization

doi:10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2

Über die Zeitschrift

Culture, Practice and Europeanization (CPE) ist ein peer reviewtes open access Journal für die Veröffentlichung forschungsbasierter Artikel, die sich mit den vielfältigen sozialen Prozessen, Interaktionen und Policies im Zusammenhang mit der Europäisierung und internationalen Begegnungen in Europa befassen. Für die Veröffentlichung kommen Beiträge aus verschiedenen Disziplinen in Betracht, diese können empirischer, theoretischer und konzeptioneller Natur sein.CPE veröffentlicht in erster Linie Originalartikel in voller Länge, berücksichtigt aber auch Rezensionen, Konferenzbeiträge und Nachrichten aus der Wissenschaft.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

ISSN-Print: 2566-7742
ISSN-Online: 2566-7742
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache: Englisch
Produkttyp: Ausgabe

Artikel

Literaturverzeichnis (269 Einträge)

Amiraux, V. & Guiraudon, V. (2010). Discrimination in comparative perspective: Policies and practices. American Behavioral Scientist 53 (12), 1691–1714. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Béland, D. (2019). How Ideas and Institutions Shape the Politics of Public Policy, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Béland, D., Campbell, A. L. & Weaver, K. R. (2022). Policy Feedback: How Policies Shape Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Bell, M. (2002). Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Brunovskis A. & Skilbrei, M. L. (2018). Individual or structural inequality? Access and barriers in welfare services for women who sell sex. Social Inclusion. 6(3), 310–318. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Castel, R. (2002). From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers: Transformation of the Social Question. New York & London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Chappe, V.-A. (2019). L’Egalité au travil: Justice et mobilisations contre les discriminations. Paris: Presses des Mindes. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Chevalier, J. (2003). Lutte contre les discriminations et Etat-providence. In D. Borillo (Ed.), Lutter contre les discriminations (38–54). Paris: La Découverte. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
de Witte, B. (2010). From a ‘common principle of equality’ to ‘European anti-discrimination law’. American Behavioral Scientist. 53(12), 1715–1730. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Défenseur des droits (2022). Actes – De la mobilisation collective à la reconnaissance des discriminations systémiques en droit. Retrieved from: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/fr/actes-de-rencontre/2022/03/actes-de-la-mobilisation-collective-a-la-reconnaissance-des (last accessed: 2022, October 15). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Deming, D. & Dynarski, S. (2008). The lengthening of childhood (NBER Working Paper No. 14214). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Dubois, V. (2021). Contrôler les assistés. Genèses et usages d’un mot d’ordre. Paris: Raison d’agir. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1998). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Facci, A., Parolari, P. & Riva, N. (2019). Values in the Charters of Fundamental Rights – A Legal-Philosophical Analysis with a Focus on Migrants’ Rights. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Geddes, A. (2004). Britain, France, and EU anti-discrimination policy: The emergence of an EU policy paradigm. West European Politics 27(2), 334–353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Guiraudon, V. (2009). Equality in the making: Implementing European non-discrimination law. Citizenship Studies 13(5), 527–549. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Hall, Peter (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Heidenreich, M. (2022). Territorial and Spatial Inequalities in Europe: Challenges of European Integration. Cham: Springer Nature. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Jackson, A. (2007). New approaches to drug therapy: A journal article. Psychology Today and Tomorrow, 27(1), 54–59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Kilpatrick, C. (2018). The displacement of Social Europe: A productive lens of inquiry. European Constitutional Law Review 14(1), 62–74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 2(3), 159–173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Lombardo, E. & Rolandsen Augustín, L. (2012). Framing gender intersection in the European Union: What implications for quality of intersectionality in policies? Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 19(4), 482–512. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Martin Rein, M. & Schön, D. (1996). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (145–166), Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Marx-Ferree, M. (2011). Varieties of Feminism – German Gender Politics in Global Perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Mau, S., Lux, T. & Gützlau, F. (2020). Die drei Arenen der neuen Ungleichheitskonflikte. Eine sozialstrukturelle Positionsbestimmung der Einstellungen zu Umverteilung, Migration und sexueller Diversität. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 30, 317–346. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Mehta, J. (2011.) The varied roles of ideas in politics: From “whether” to “how”. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Sciences Research (23–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Mercat-Bruns, M. (2016). Discrimination at Work: Comparing European, French, and American Law. California: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Prechal, S. (2004). Equality of treatment, non-discrimination and social policy: Achievements in three themes. Common Market Law Review, 41(2), 533–551. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Shaw, J. (2005). Mainstreaming equality and diversity in European Union law and policy. Current Legal Problems 58(1), 255–312. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Somek, A. (2011). Engineering Equality: An Essay on European Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford: Oxford Academic (online edition). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693375.001.0001 (last accessed: 2024, October 29). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (Eds.) (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Treib, O. (2006). Les conflits politiques en Allemagne autour de la transposition de la directive européenne contre le racisme. Critique internationale 4(33), 27–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
van Oorschot, W. (1991). Non-take-up of social security benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy Nr. 1(1), 15–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Verloo, M. (2006) Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3), 211–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Warin, P. (Ed.) (2017). Le non-recours aux politiques sociales. Grenoble: Grenoble Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Zaccaroni, G. (2021). Equality and Non-Discrimination in the EU – The Foundations of the EU Legal Order. Northampton: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-99
Aurich, P. (2011). Activating the unemployed — Directions and divisions in Europe. European Journal of Social Security, 13(3), 294–316. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Auth, D. & Peukert, A. (2022). Gender equality in care: policy goals and outcomes during the merkel era. German Politics, 31(1), 177–196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Avlijaš, S., Hassel A. & Palier B. (2021). Growth strategies and welfare reforms in Europe. In A. Hassel & B. Palier (Eds.), Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies: How Have Growth Regimes Evolved? (372–436), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Bambra, C. (2004). The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender-blind? Social Policy and Society, 3, 201–212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Betzelt, S. & Bothfeld, S. (2011). Incoherent Strategies – Fragemented Outcomes: Raising Women’s Employment Rate in Germany. German Policy Studies, 7(1), 73–106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Bonoli, G. (2007). New social risks and the politics of post-industrial social policies. In K. Armingeon & G. Bonoli (Eds.). The politics of post-industrial welfare states (21–44). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Branco, R., Miró, J. & Natili, M. (2024). Back from the Cold? Progressive Politics and Social Policy Paradigms in Southern Europe after the Great Recession. Politics & Society, 52(4), 630–661. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. (2024). Familienportal. Retrieved from: https://familienportal.de/familienportal (last accessed: 2024, November 8). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Ciccia, R. & Bleijenbergh, I. (2014). After the male breadwinner model? childcare services and the division of labor in European countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 21(1), 50–79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Clasen, J. & Clegg, D. (2007). Levels and levers of conditionality: measuring change within welfare states. In J. Clasen and NA. Siegel (Eds), Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis (166–197). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(1), 1–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Daly, M. & Ferragina, E. (2018). Family policy in high-income countries: Five decades of development. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 255–270. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Daly, M. & Scheiwe, K. (2010). Individualisation and personal obligations – social policy, family policy, and law reform in Germany and the UK. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24(2), 177–197. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Dingeldey, I. (2016). Changes in labour market policies, the gender model and social inequality: Institutional dualization revisited. In M. Wulfgramm M. et al. (Eds.), Welfare State Transformations and Inequality in OECD Countries, Transformations of the State (219 – 243). London: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Dobrotić, I. & Blum, S. (2020). Inclusiveness of parental-leave benefits in twenty-one European countries: Measuring social and gender inequalities in leave eligibility. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(3), 588–614. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Eggers, T., Grages, C. & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2019). Self-responsibility of the “active social citizen”: Different types of the policy concept of “active social citizenship” in different types of welfare states. American Behavioural Scientist, 63(1), 43–64. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Eggers, T., Grages, C. & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2021). Politiken zur familialen Care-Arbeit und Gleichstellung der Geschlechter: eine theoretische Diskussion. In S. Scherger et al. (Eds), Geschlechterungleichheiten in Arbeit, Wohlfahrtsstaat und Familie (165–189). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Eggers, T., Grages, C. & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2023). How culture influences the strengthening of market principles in conservative welfare states: The case of long-term care policy. International Journal of Social Welfare, 33, 413–426. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Esping-Andersen, G. (2003). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Estévez-Abe, M. & Naldini, M. (2016). Politics of defamilialization: A comparison of Italy, Japan, Korea and Spain. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(4), 327–343. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Evers, A. & Guillemard, AM. (Eds). (2013). Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Eydal, B., Gíslason, I., Rostgaard, T., Brandth, B., Duvander A.-Z. & Lammi-Taskula, J. (2015). Trends in parental leave in the Nordic countries: has the forward march of gender equality halted? Community, Work & Family, 18(2), 167–181. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Ferragina, E. (2022). Welfare state change as a double movement: Four decades of retrenchment and expansion in compensatory and employment‐oriented policies across 21 high‐income countries. Social Policy & Administration, 56(5), 705–725. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Fraser, N. (1994). After the family wage. Gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory, 22(4), 591–618. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Frericks, P., Höppner, J. & Och, R. (2018). The difficulty of measuring institutions: A methodological approach to the comparative analysis of institutions. Social Indicators Research, 137(3), 847–865. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Frericks, P. & Höppner, J. (2019). Self-responsibility readdressed: Shifts in financial responsibility for social security between the public realm, the individual, and the family in Europe. American Behavioural Scientist, 63(1), 65–84. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Garritzmann, J.L., Häusermann, S. & Palier, B. (2023). Social investments in the knowledge economy: The politics of inclusive, stratified, and targeted reforms across the globe. Social Policy & Administration, 57(1), 87–101. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Goijaerts, J. (2022). Ambiguous policy paradigms in the Dutch welfare state: A gender-blind mix of social investment and conservative care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 29 (4), 1403–1424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Hassel. A. & Palier, B. (Eds) (2021). Growth and Welfare in Advanced Economies. How Have Growth Regimes Evolved? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Hemerijck, A. (2018). Social investment as a policy paradigm. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 810–827. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Heuer, J-O., Lux, T., Mau, S., Zimmermann, K. (2020). Legitimizing Inequality. Comparative Sociology, 19(4–5), 542–584. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Ibáñez, Z., León, M., Soler, L., Alvarino, M. (2021). Fostering work-life balance for precarious workers: culture and social protection systems in comparative perspective (Euroship Working Paper No.5). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
International Network on Leave Policies and Research [LP&R] (2020) Annual reviews. Retrieved from: https://www.leavenetwork.org/annual-review-reports/archive-reviews (last accessed: 2023, January 13). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
International Network on Leave Policies and Research [LP&R] (2021) Annual reviews. Retrieved from: https://www.leavenetwork.org/annual-review-reports/archive-reviews (last accessed: 2023, January 13). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Jenson, J. (2008). Writing Women Out, Folding Gender In: The European Union “Modernises” Social Policy. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(2), 131–153. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Jenson, J. (2013). Changing perspectives on social citizenship: a cross-time comparison. In A. Evers & A.M., Guillemard (Eds.), Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape (57–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Jenson, J. & Saint-Martin, D. (2003). New Routes to Social Cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment State. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1), 77–79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Johansson, H. & Hvinden, B. (2008). Nordic activation reforms in a European context: a distinct universalistic model? In B. Hvinden & H. Johansson (Eds), Citizenship in Nordic welfare states: Dynamics of choice, duties and participation in a changing Europe (53–66). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Knijn, T. & Kremer, M. (1997). Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Toward inclusive citizenship. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 4(3), 328–361. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Social Politics, International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 7(2), 127–191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Leitner, S. (2017). De-Familisierung im Adult Worker Model: Wo bleibt die Sorgearbeit? In Widersprüche e.V. (Eds.), „In and against the State!“ – aktuelle staatstheoretische Perspektiven für eine Politik des Sozialen (55–68). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Letablier M-T., Eydoux, A. & Betzelt, S. (2011). Social Citizenship and Activation in Europe: A gendered Perspective. In S. Betzelt & S. Bothfeld (Eds), Activation and Labour Market Reforms in Europe: Challenges to Social Citizenship (79–100). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
León, M. (2009). Gender Equality and the European Employment Strategy: The Work/Family Belance Debate. Social Policy and Society, 8(2), 197–209. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
León, M., Palomera, D., Ibáñez, G., Martínez-Virto, L. & Gabaldón-Estevan, D. (2022). Entre la equidad y la conciliación: similitudes y disparidades en el diseño institucional del primer ciclo de educación infantil en España. Revista de Sociologia, 107(3), e3084. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
León, M. & Pavolini, E. (2014). ‘Social investment’ or back to ‘familism’: The impact of the economic crisis on family and care policies in Italy and Spain. South European Society and Politics, 19(3), 353–369. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Lessenich, S. (2010). Constructing the socialized self: Mobilization and control in the “active society”. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges (304–320). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Lessenich, S. (2012). Das Anerkennungsdefizitsyndrom des Wohlfahrtsstaats. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37(1), 99–115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Lewis, J. (2001). The Decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 8(2), 152–169. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Lewis, J. & West, A. (2017). Early childhood education and care in England under austerity: Continuity or change in political ideas, policy goals, availability, affordability and quality in a childcare market? Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 331–348. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Lister, R. (1994). “She Has Other Duties”: Women, Citizenship and Social Security. in S. Baldwin & J. Falkingham (Eds.), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Marshall, TH. (1992). Bürgerrecht und soziale Klassen: Zur Soziologie des Wohlfahrsstaates. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Mau, S. (2003). The moral economy of welfare states: Britain and Germany compared. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
McLaughlin, E. & Glendinning, C. (1994). Paying for Care in Europe: Is There a Feminist Approach? 52–69 in L. Hantrais & S. Mangen (Eds.), Family Policy and the Welfare of Women, Cross-National Research Papers. Leicestershire: European Research Centre. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
MISSOC. (2020). Comparative Tables on Social Protection. Retrieved from: https://www.missoc.org/missoc-database/comparative-tables (last accessed: 2023, January 13). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Offe, C. (1970). Leistungsprinzip und industrielle Arbeit. Mechanismen der Statusverteilung in Arbeitsorganisationen der industriellen Leistungsgesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlags-Anstalt. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Orloff, A.S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship. The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Palier, B., Palme, J. & Morel, N. (Eds). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Parolin, Z. & van Lancker, W. (2021). What a social investment ‘litmus test’ must address: A response to Plavgo and Hemerijck. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 297–308. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Pavolini, E. & Van Lacker, W. (2018). The Matthew effect in childcare use: A matter of policies or preferences? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 878–893. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Pérez, B. & Laparra, M. (2011). Chances and pitfalls of flexible labour markets: The case of the Spanish strategy of labour market flexibility. In S. Betzelt & S. Bothfeld (Eds), Activation and Labour Market Reforms in Europe: Challenges to Social Citizenship (147–172). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Peukert, A., Beblo, M., Lüth, L., Zimmermann, K. (2022). Erwerbs- und Familienarbeit im Homeoffice? Innerfamiliale Arbeitsteilung in der Corona-Krise auf dem Prüfstand. Sozialer Fortschritt, 71(1), 29–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Sachweh, P. (2016). Social justice and the welfare state: Institutions, outcomes, and attitudes in comparative perspective. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (293–313). New York, NY: Springer New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Sachweh, P. (2012). The moral economy of inequality: popular views on income differentiation, poverty and wealth. Socio-Economic Review, 10(3), 419–445. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Sachweh, P. & Münnich, S. (2017). Kapitalismus als Lebensform? Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and social‐democratic welfare states. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes (75–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Saraceno, C. (2015). A Critical Look to the Social Investment Approach from a Gender Perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(2), 257–269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Saraceno, C. & Keck, W. (2011). Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities. Demographic Research, 25, 371–406. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Spanish Government. (2022). Información general sobre la Educación Infantil. Retrieved from: https://educagob.educacionyfp.gob.es/ensenanzas/infantil/informacion-general/organizacion.html (last accessed: 2023, January 05). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Soler-Buades, L. (2024). No welfare without workfare? Revisiting varieties of minimum income schemes in Europe (2008–2022). Social Policy & Administration, online first: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13077. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Taylor-Gooby, P., Hvinden, B., Mau, S., Leruth, B., Schoyen, M. & Gyory, A. (2019) Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study. Acta Sociologica, 62(2), 119–134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
UK Government. (2022). Benefits. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/browse/benefits (last accessed 18 July 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Van Lancker, W. & Ghysels, J. (2016). Explaining patterns of inequality in childcare service use across 31 developed economies: A welfare state perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 57(5), 310–337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Weber, M. (Ed) (1922). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Ylöstalo, H. (2022). Feminism at the crossroads of Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism: Restructuring women’s labor in the context of family leave reform in Finland. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 29 (4), 1336–1359. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Zagel, H. & Lohmann, H. (2020). Conceptual approaches in comparative family policy. In R. Nieuwenhuis & W. van Lancker (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy (119–140). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-107
Banting, K. & Koning, E. (2017). Just Visiting? The Weakening of Social Protection in a Mobile World. In A. Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Multicultural Governance in a Mobile World. Edinburgh Universi-ty Press, 108–136. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Battaglio, R. P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N. & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral Public Administration ad fontes : A Synthesis of Research on Bounded Rationality, Cognitive Biases, and Nudging in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304–320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Baumberg Geiger, B. (2016). The stigma of claiming benefits : A quantitative study. Journal of So-cial Policy, 45(2), 181–199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Bonvin, J.-M., Tabin, J.-P., Perriard, A., Rosenstein, E. & Lovey, M. (2023). Social Policies, Vulnerabil-ity and the Life Course: A Complex Nexus. In: Spini, D., Widmer, E. (eds) Withstanding Vulnerability throughout Adult Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 123–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Boost, D., Raeymaeckers, P., Hermans, K. & Elloukmani, S. (2020). Overcoming non-take-up of rights : A realist evaluation of Integrated Rights-Practices. Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 831–852. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021a). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing re-flexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021b). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) the-matic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Brodkin, E. Z. & Majmundar, M. (2010). Administrative Exclusion : Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 827–848. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Careja, R. & Harris, E. (2022). Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research : Findings and challeng-es. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(2), 212–224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Currie, J. (2004). The Take Up of Social Benefits. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 1103. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Daigneault, P.-M., Jacob, S. & Tereraho, M. (2012). Understanding and Improving the Take-up of Public Programs : Lessons Learned from the Canadian and International Experience in Human Ser-vices. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 39–50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Dubois, H. & Ludwinek, A. (Eds.). (2015). Access to social benefits : Reducing non-take-up. Publica-tions Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Farrell, M., Smith, J., Reardon, L. & Obara, E. (2016). Framing the Mesage : Using Behavioral Eco-nomics to Engage TANF Recipients (p. 43) [OPRE Report]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Finkelstein, A. & Notowidigdo, M. J. (2019). Take-Up and Targeting : Experimental Evidence from SNAP*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1505–1556. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Ford, R. (2015). Who Should We Help? An Experimental Test of Discrimination in the British Wel-fare State. Political Studies, 64(3), 630–650. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Hanratty, M. J. (2006). Has the Food Stamp program become more accessible? Impacts of recent changes in reporting requirements and asset eligibility limits. Journal of Policy Analysis and Man-agement, 25(3), 603–621. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Hupe, P. L., Hill, M. & Buffat, A. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Policy Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Kerr, S. A. (1982). Deciding about Supplementary Pensions : A Provisional Model. Journal of Social Policy, 11(04), 505. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Kim, J. & Joo, M. (2020). The Effects of Direct Certification in the U.S. National School Lunch Pro-gram on Program Participation. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 11(3), 393–413. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Knotz, C. M., Gandenberger, M. K., Fossati, F. & Bonoli, G. (2022). A Recast Framework for Welfare Deservingness Perceptions. Social Indicators Research, 159(3), 927–943. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Kootstra, A. (2016). Deserving and Undeserving Welfare Claimants in Britain and the Netherlands : Examining the Role of Ethnicity and Migration Status Using a Vignette Experiment. European Socio-logical Review, 32(3), 325–338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Laenen, T., Rossetti, F. & van Oorschot, W. (2019). Why deservingness theory needs qualitative re-search : Comparing focus group discussions on social welfare in three welfare regimes. Internatio-nal Journal of Comparative Sociology, 60(3), 190–216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Leresche, F. (2019). La critique portée par le non-recours aux droits sociaux : Propositions pour dé-velopper une approche subalterne. SociologieS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th Anniversary Edition : Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Lucas, B., Bonvin, J.-M. & Hümbelin, O. (2021). The Non-Take-Up of Health and Social Benefits : What Implications for Social Citizenship? Swiss Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 161–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Mazé, A. & Rode, A. (2019). Adapter l’aide et l’action sociales des collectivités territoriales. In P. Warin (Ed.), Agir contre le non-recours aux droits sociaux : Scènes et enjeux politiques. Presses Uni-versitaires de Grenoble. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Moffitt, R. (1983). An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma. The American Economic Review, 73(5), 1023–1035. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
ODENORE. (2012). L’envers de la « fraude sociale »: Le scandale du non-recours aux prestations sociales. Paris: La Découverte. Retrieved from: https://www.editionsladecouverte.fr/l_envers_de_la__fraude_sociale_-9782707173706 (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Revillard, A. (2018). Saisir les conséquences d‘une politique à partir de ses ressortissants. La récep-tion de l’action publique. Revue francaise de science politique, 68(3), 469–491. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Schwabish, J. A. (2012). Downloading benefits: The impact of online food stamp applications on participation. In Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Fall Research Conference. Baltimore (2012, November 10). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Thomann, E. & Rapp, C. (2018). Who Deserves Solidarity? Unequal Treatment of Immigrants in Swiss Welfare Policy Delivery. Policy Studies Journal, 46(3), 531–552. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Van Gestel, R., Goedemé, T., Janssens, J., Lefevere, E. & Lemkens, R. (2023). Improving Take-Up by Reaching Out to Potential Beneficiaries. Insights from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in Belgium. Journal of Social Policy, 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Van Mechelen, N. & Van der Heyden, M. (2017). La lutte contre le non-take-up : Un inventaire des mesures de politiques et réflexion à la lumière de la littérature scientifique et des expériences de politique au Royaume-Uni et en Suède (TAKE Policy brief 1/2017). Herman Deleeck Centre for So-cial Policy – University of Antwerp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
van Oorschot, W. (1991). Non-Take-Up of Social Security Benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 1(1), 15–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
van Oorschot, W. (1998). Failing selectivity: On the extent and causes of non-take-up of social se-curity benefits. In Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative Perspective. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
van Oorschot, W. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the condi-tionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28(1), 33–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
van Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B. & Reeskens, T. (2017). The social legitimacy of target-ed welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness. Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
van Oorschot, W. & Uunk, W. (2007). Welfare Spending and the Public’s Concern for Immigrants: Multilevel Evidence for Eighteen European Countries. Comparative Politics, 40(1), 63–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Warin, P. (2016). Le non-recours aux politiques sociales. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Gre-noble. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-134
Assouline, M., Sharon, G. & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2022). Discrimination of Minority Wel-fare Claimants in the Real World: The Effect of Implicit Prejudice. Journal of Public Ad-ministration Research and Theory, 32(1), 75–96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Astier, I. (2000). Présentation du dossier “Les magistratures sociales”. Droit et Société, (44–45), 85–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Baudot, P. (2016). Le handicap comme catégorie administrative Instrumentation de l’action publique et délimitation d’une population. Revue française des affaires sociales, (4), 63–87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Bell, E. & Smith, K. (2022). Working Within a System of Administrative Burden: How Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Role Perceptions Shape Access to the Promise of Higher Educa-tion. Administration & Society, 54(2), 167–211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Bouckaert, N. & Schokkaert E. (2011). Une première évaluation du non-recours au revenu d’intégration. Revue belge de sécurité sociale, 53(4), 609–634. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Bourgois, L. (2020). Limiter l’accès aux services de droit commun pour mieux insérer? Le « non-recours par interdiction temporaire » dans les politiques locales des bidonvilles. Revue française des affaires sociales, La documentation française, 245–266. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Chevallier, C. & Perona, M. (2022). Homo sapiens dans la cité. Comment adapter l’action publique à la psychologie humaine, Paris: Odile Jacob. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Daigneault, P.-M. (2023). Evaluation of the non-take up of public services and social be-nefits. In F. Varone, S. Jacob & P. Bundi (Eds.), Handbook of public policy evaluation (408–424). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Damon, J. (2012). La question SDF: Critique d’une action publique. Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
De Schutter, O. (2022). Non-take-up of rights in the context of social protection. Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. United Nations. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Döring, M. & Jilke, S. (2023). Cream-skimming at the frontline: The role of administrative literacy. Public Administration, 101(4), 1569–1586. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
DREES (2023), Le handicap en chiffres – Édition 2023. Retrieved from: https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/publications-communique-de-presse/panoramas-de-la-drees/le-handicap-en-chiffres-edition-2023 (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Dubois, H. & Ludwinek, A. (2015). Access to social benefits: Reducing non-take-up. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Dussuet, A., Ledoux, C. & Sonnet, C. (2022). Gouverner le pouvoir discrétionnaire des street-level bureaucrats. Le cas de la mise en œuvre de l’APA, Revue française des af-faires sociales, 67–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Halling, A. & Bækgaard, M. (2023). Administrative burden in citizen-state interactions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Herd, P. & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means, Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Hernanz, V., Malherbet, F. & Pellizzari., M. (2004). Take-Up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries: A Review of the Evidence, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 17, OECD Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Hupe, P. & Buffat, A. (2014). A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Janssens, J. & Van Mechelen, N. (2017). Who is to blame? An overview of the factors con-tributing to the non-takeup of social rights. CSB Working Paper. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Jilke S., Van Dooren W. & Rys S. (2018). Discrimination and Administrative Burden in Public Service Markets: Does a Public–Private Difference Exist?, Journal of Public Admi-nistration Research and Theory, 28(3), 423–439. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Kerr, S. (1982). Deciding about Supplementary Pensions, Journal of Social Policy, 11, 505517. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Ko, W. & Moffitt, R. (2022). Take-up of Social Benefits. National Bureau of Economic Re-search Working paper 30148. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Koning, P. & Heinrich, C.J. (2013). Cream-skimming, parking and other intended and un-intended effects of high-powered, performance-based contracts, Journal of Policy Analy-sis and Management, 32(3), 461–483. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Korpela, T. (2020). Register-based study on benefit receipt before and after centralising the administration of social assistance in Finland. Expert workshop non-take-up and coverage of social benefits, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Laumet, D. (2013) Le droit à l’épreuve du lien? Pour une compréhension de la non-mobilisation du droit au logement opposable par les acteurs des dispositifs de l’urgence sociale grenobloise. Grenoble: Master degree Institute of political science. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Leduc, S. (2008). Le non-recours et les logiques discriminatoires dans laccès aux soins: Le rôle des agents de l‘Assurance maladie en question, Vie sociale, 1 (1), 69–93. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Leresche F. (2019). La critique portée par le non-recours aux droits sociaux : propositions pour développer une approche subalterne, SociologieS [in ligne], Premiers textes. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lévy, J. (2016). Les « grands exclus » aux prises avec l‘institution: entre normativité de l'insertion et réconciliation institutionnelle. AISLF Congress. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lima, L. (2013). L’expertise sur autrui comme nouveau mode de régulation de la protec-tion sociale. Principes et dispositifs. Working paper. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lima, L., Trombert, C. (2013), L’assistance-chômage des jeunes sous condition d’accompagnement. De quelques mécanismes du non-recours par éviction. Lien social et Politiques, (70), 29–43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New-York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lucas B., Ludwig C., Chappuis J., Maggi J. & Crettaz E. (2019). Le non-recours aux presta-tions sociales à Genève. Quelles adaptations de la protection sociale aux attentes des familles en situation de précarité? Rapport de recherche. Genève: Haute école de travail social. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lucas, B., Bonvin, J.-M. & Hümbelin, O. (2021). The non-take-up of health and social be-nefits: What implications for social citizenship? Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 47(2), 161–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Lucas, B. & Warin, P. (2022). Le non-recours aux prestations: éléments d’une analyse critique des politiques sociales, In Giraud O., Perrier G., Politiques sociales: l’état des savoirs. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Mallet, M. 2021. Caseworker Prejudice: Exploring Secondary Non-Take-Up from Below Among Latino Immigrants in Madrid, London, and New York City, Swiss Journal of Socio-logy, 47 (2), 201–220. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Marc, C., Portela, M., Hannafi, C., Le Gall, R., Rode, A. & Laguérodie, S. (2022), Non-take-up of minimum social benefits: quantification in Europe. Paris: DREES REPORTS no. 94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Masood A. & Nisar A. M. (2021). Administrative Capital and Citizens’ Responses to Admi-nistrative Burden, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 56–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Moynihan, D., Herd, P.,& Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychologi-cal, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Noël, L. (2017). Aperçus du non-recours aux droits sociaux et de la sous-protection so-ciale en Région bruxelloise. Observatoire de la santé et du social de Bruxelles-Capitale. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Perrier, G. (2013). Mettre l’usager au cœur du dispositive? Regards croisés sur quatre maisons départementales des personnes handicapées. Terrains & travaux, 23(2), 93–112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Rode, A. (2009). L’émergence du non-recours aux soins des populations précaires: entre droit aux soins et devoirs de soins. Lien social et Politiques, (61), 149–158. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Rode, A., El Fahli, R. & Revil, H. (2021). Observer la précarité énergétique: Retour sur une démarche de ‘baromètre précarité énergétique’ croisant santé et non-recours. Odenore working paper, 32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Rode, A. (2024). Access to social rights under tension: The growing role of third-party actors in dealing with the administrative burden and its implications. International jour-nal of social welfare, 33(4), 819–831. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Saikkonen, P. & Ylikännö, M. (2020). Is There Room for Targeting within Universalism? Finnish Social Assistance Recipients as Social Citizens. Social Inclusion, 8(1), 145–154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Tabin, J.-P. & Leresche, F. (2019). Une critique furtive de l’État social: Une perspective théorique pour comprendre le non-recours raisonné aux prestations sociales, Emulations – Revue de sciences sociales, 999. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Tervola, J., Jokela, M. & Ollonqvist, J. (2021). Smaller net or just fewer to catch? Disen-tangling the causes for the varying sizes of minimum income schemes. International Journal of social welfare. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12553 (last acces-sed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Tiggelaar, M. & George, B. (2023). No two-party game: how third-sector organisations alter administrative burden and improve social equity. Public Management Review. Ret-rieved from: https://www-tandfonline-com.uni-flensburg.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2023.2215233 (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E. & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Van Oorschot, W. (1991). Non-take-up of Social Security Benefits in Europe, Journal of European Social Policy, 1, 15–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Vial, B. (2016). Ne pas se sentir concerné par ses droits. Une analyse du non-recours dans les parcours sociaux juvéniles. Agora débats/jeunesses, 3(74), 77–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Vial, B. (2018). Le non-recours des jeunes adultes à l’aide publique. Paris: INJEP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Vial, B. (2020). L’expérience du non-recours dans les parcours d’insertion des jeunes peu ou pas diplômés. Thèse de science politique. Université Grenoble Alpes. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Vial, B. (2022). Agir contre le non-recours des jeunes en rupture de logement. Apports et limites d’un dispositif de lutte contre le non-recours. Paris: INJEP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Warin, P. (2014). L’action sur le non-recours devant des résistances du travail social. Re-vue française des affaires sociales, 64–77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Warin, P. (2016). Le non-recours. Définitions et typologie. Odenore working paper, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Warin, P. (2018). What non-demand demands. On the non-take-up of social welfare. Books & ideas. Retrieved from: https://laviedesidees.fr/What-Non-Demand-Demands (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Warin, P. (2020). Petite introduction à la question du non-recours aux droits sociaux. Pa-ris: ESF Editeur. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Warin, P., Chauveaud, C., Rode, A. (2018). Le non-recours par non-orientation. Un cas concernant le handicap psychique. Odenore working paper, 24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Warin, P., Chauveaud, C. & Rode, A. (2018). La compensation du handicap psychique face au risque de non-recours. Grenoble: research report for the Caisse Nationale de Solidari-té pour l’Autonomie. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Weill, P.-E. (2015). L’exercice collectif du pouvoir discrétionnaire. Les commissions Droit au logement opposable (DALO), Politix, 4(112), 223–244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-153
Amiraux, V. & Guiraudon, V. (2010). Discrimination in comparative perspective: policies and practices. American Behavioral Scientist, SAGE Publications (UK and US), 2010, 53(10), 1691–1714. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Baumberg, B. (2016). The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study. Journal of Social Policy, 45(2), 181–199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Bennett, F. (2024). Take-up of social security benefits: past, present-and future? Journal of Poverty and Soical Justice. 32(1), 2–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Beltran, G. (2017). Explications et modes de justification du renoncement aux soins dans une population ruralo-agricole. Rôles et ajustements d’un modèle de masculinité traditionnelle. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologique 48(1), 87–107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Bettrich, B. (2022). Les causes de la pauvreté féminine dans une Suisse riche. Caritas. Almanach Social: 43–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Bertozzi, F., Bonoli G. & Gay-des-Combes, B. (2008). La réforme de l’Etat social en Suisse: vieillissement, emploi, conflit travail-famille. Lausanne : Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, coll. Le savoir suisse. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Bozec, G. & Réguer-Petit, M. (2015). Les femmes plus vulnérables, mais résistantes. Dans Braconnier, C. et Mayer, N. (dir.). Les inaudibles Sociologie politique des précaires. Paris, Presses de Sciences Po: 235–272. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Reseach in Psychology. 3, 77–101. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Brodkin, E. Z. & Majmundar, M. (2010). Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20: 827–848. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Bütschi, D. & Cattacin, S. (1993). The Third Sector in Switzerland: The Transformation of the Subsidiarity Principle. West European Politics 16(3), 362 -379. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Cantonal Statistical Office (2019). Information statistique. Bilan et état de la population en 2018. Genève, Statisique Genève. Office cantonal de la statisique. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Geneva statistics (2024): Retrieved from: https://statistique.ge.ch/actualites/welcome.asp?actu=4771&Actudomaine=15_03&mm1=08/01&aaaa1=2022&mm2=11/8&aaaa2=2024 (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Crettaz, E. (2018). La pauvreté laborieuse en Suisse: étendue et mécanismes. Social Change in Switzerland, N° 15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Currie, J. (2006). The Take-up of Social Benefits in Poverty, The Distribution of Income, and Public Policy, edited by A. Auerbach, D. Card, and J. Quigley, New York: Russell Sage: 80–148. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc (2023). Evaluation of the Non-Take-Up of Public Services and Social Benefits, In F. Varone, S. Jacob,& P. Bundi (Eds.), Handbook of public policy evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 408–424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
De Schutter, O. (2022). Non-take-up of rights in the context of social protection, A/HRC/50/38, United Nations General Assembly, 19 April. Retrieved from: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G22/322/17/PDF/G2232217.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Dubet, F. (2016). Sociologie de l’expérience. Paris, Editions du Seuil, Points. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Eurofound (2015). Access to social benefits: reducing non-take-up. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Federal Statistical Office (2024)Pauvreté. Retrieved from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/situation-economique-sociale-population/bien-etre-pauvrete/pauvrete-privations/pauvrete.html (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Federal Statistical Office (2017). Les familles en Suisse. Rapport statistique 2017. Neuchâtel. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Fraser, N. & Gordon L. (1994). A Genealogy of Dependency. Tracing a key world of US Welfare State. Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 19 (2), 309–336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Fredrich, B. (2022). Les causes de la pauvreté féminine dans une Suisse riche. in Almanach Social. (In)égalités: la pauvreté féminine. Caritas Suisse, Lucerne, 43–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Giraud, O. & B. Lucas (2014). Overcoming Privacy Preserving Federalism: A multiscalar approach to the Swiss and German shifts in Gender Regime, Fédéralisme Régionalisme [En ligne], Volume 14: 2014, Étudier les systèmes fédéraux à travers le prisme du genre. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Goodman, A, Fleming, K, Markwick, M; Morrison, T; Lagimodiere L, Kerr, T. & Western Aboriginal Harm Reduction Society (2017). They treated me like crap and I know it was because I was Native: The healthcare experiences of Aboriginal Peoples living in Vancouver’s inner city. Soc Sci Med. 2017 April; 178: 87–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Hernanz, V., F. Malherbet et M. Pellizzari (2004), Take-Up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries: A Review of the Evidence, Documents de travail de l’OCDE sur les questions sociales, l’emploi et les migrations, n° 17, Éditions OCDE, Paris. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Hernes, H. M. (1987). Welfare State and Women Power. Esssyas in State feminism. Oslo, Norwegian University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Hümbelin, O, Richard, T., Schuwey, C., Luchsinger, L. & Fluder, R. (2021). Nichtbezug von bedarfsabhängigen Sozialleistungen im Kanton Basel-Stadt – Ausmass und Beweggründe Bern: Bericht im Auftrag des Amtes für Sozialbeiträge des Kantons Basel-Stadt. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Hümbelin, O. (2019). Non-Take-Up of Social Assistance: Regional Differences and the Role of Social Norms, 45(1), 7–33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Lucas, B., Bonvin, J.-M. & Hümbelin, O. (2021). The non-take-up of health and social benefits: What implications for social citizenship? Revue Suisse de Sociologie Vol 47(2), 161–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Lucas, B. (2020). La pauvreté caché. Les raisons du non-recours à l’assistance sociale. Almanach Social 2020. Quand l’assistance sociale changera. Lucerne, Ed. Caritas: 113–128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Lucas, B. (2020b). Non Recours. In Bonvin, J.-M., Knöpfel, C., Hugentobler, V. et U. Tecklenburg (Eds.). Dictionnaire de politique sociale suisse. Seismo: 342–344. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Lucas, B. & Ludwig, C. (2019). Non-recours aux aides sociales et santé perçue REISO, Revue d’information sociale. Published online November 19, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.reiso.org/articles/themes/precarite/5199-non-recours-aux-aides-sociales-et-sante-percue. In German: Lucas, B. & Ludwig, C. (2019). Macht der Verzicht auf Sozialleistungen krank? Impuls. 3, BFH, Bern: 4–7 (last accessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Lucas, B., Ludwig, C., Chapuis, J., Maggi J. & Crettaz, E. (2019). Non-take-up of social benefits in Geneva. What adaptations of social protection to the expectations of families in precarious situations? Geneva, Haute école de travail social, HES–SO. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Mallet, M. & Garcia, E. (2021). Caseworker Prejudice: Exploring Secondary Non-Take-Up from Below among Latino Immigrants in Madrid, London and New York City, Swiss Journal of Sociology, 47(2) 201–220, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Mazet, Pierre (2014). Analysis of the non take-up of benefits: a public policy assessment tool 1. Pauvreté et ineffectivité des droits. Service de lutte contre la pauvreté, la précarité et l’exclusion sociale. Bruxelles, Belgium. halshs-01816099 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Molinier, P. (2000). Virilité défensive, masculinité créatrice. Travail, Genre et Société. (3) 25–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Moffitt, R. (1983). An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma. The American Economic Review, 73(5), 1023–1035. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Nadai, E., Gonon, A., Hübscher, R. & John, A. (2021). Dynamiken von Beschäftigungsfähigkeit – Erwerbsverläufe von gering qualifizierten Arbeitskräften. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 67(3), 183–210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Neuenschwander, P., Hümbelin, O., Kalbermatter, M. & Ruder, R. (2012). Der schwere Gang zum Sozialdienst. Zürich, Switzerland: Seismo. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Simmel, G. (2009). Le pauvre. Alia. Petite collection. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Spicker, P. (2011). Stigma and Social Welfare. London: Croom Helm; New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Van Mechelen, N. & Janssens, J. (2017). Who is to Blame? An Overview of the Factors Contributing to the Non-Take-Up of Social Rights. Working Paper Nr. 1708. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp. Published on 15.1.2021. Retrieved from: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/hdlwpaper/1708.htm (last acceessed: 2024, November 11). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Warin, P. (2006), L’Accès aux droits sociaux, Grenoble, Presses universitaires de Grenoble. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Warin, P. (2016). Le Non-Recours aux Politiques Sociales, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Warin, P. & B. Lucas (2020). Non-take-up. A critical Analysis Category. Working Paper n° 26, Grenoble, ODENORE, Observatoire des non-recours aux droits et services. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353192748_NON-TAKE-UP_A_CRITICAL_ANALYSIS_CATEGORY (last accessed: 2024, November 11) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-176
Cour des Comptes, Who we are and what we do. Retrieved from: https://www.ccomptes.fr/en/nous-decouvrir/cour-des-comptes (last accessed: 2024, October, 24). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202
Défenseur des droits (2021a). Travellers: breaking down barriers to rights. Contribution to the National Strategy. Retrieved from: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/ddd_rapport_gens-du-voyage_2021_EN_20211004.pdf (last accessed: 2024, October 24). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202
Défenseur des droits (2021b). For effective protection of the rights of Roma. Retrieved from: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/ddd_rapport_droits-des-personnes-roms_EN_20220110.pdf (last accessed: 2024, October 24). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202
Défenseur des droits (2022). Report. Dematerialisation of public services: three years later, where are we? Retrieved from: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/ddd_rapport_dematerialisation_EN_2022_202205.pdf (last accessed: 2024, October 24). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202
Défenseur des droits (2023). How do we work to defend your rights? Retrieved from: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/defender-rights-311 (last: 2024, October 24). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202
Latraverse, S. (2018). 20 ans de non-discrimination en France: du droit aux pratiques. Cahiers de la LCD (6), 121–137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202
Giraud, O. & Tietze, N. (forthcoming). “Non-take up”, “Access to social rights”, “Anti-discrimination”: Reframing equality in France. Zeitschrift für Politik Sonderband. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2024-2-202