Cover des Buchs: Self-Spreading Biotechnology and International Law
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Self-Spreading Biotechnology and International Law

Prevention, Responsibility, and Liability in a Transboundary Context
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

Wer haftet, wenn sich selbst ausbreitende Gentechnik grenzüberschreitende Schäden verursacht? Mit Gene Drives und ähnlichen Verfahren wird es bald möglich sein, das Erbgut wild lebender Arten, Keime und Nutzpflanzen direkt in der Umwelt zu verändern. Dies könnte helfen, drängende Probleme in der öffentlichen Gesundheit, im Naturschutz und in der Ernährungssicherheit zu lösen. Allerdings bergen diese Verfahren auch das Risiko einer unkontrollierten Ausbreitung über Staatsgrenzen hinweg. Anhand einer grundlegenden Untersuchung der einschlägigen Verträge und des Völkergewohnheitsrechts zu Prävention und Haftung für grenzüberschreitende Schäden wird aufgezeigt, dass das derzeit geltende Völkerrecht dieser Herausforderung noch nicht gewachsen ist.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7377-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1352-8
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
Band
316
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
808
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 44 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
        1. I. Basics of Molecular Biology
          1. 1. Genetic Mutation
          2. 2. Sexual Reproduction
          3. 3. Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance
        3. III. Anthropogenic Genetic Change
        1. I. Functioning of Genome Editing
          1. 1. Zinc Finger Nucleases
          2. 2. Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases
          3. 3. CRISPR-Cas
          1. 1. Agriculture
          2. 2. Basic Research and Medicine
          3. 3. Human Germline Editing
          4. 4. Industrial Biotechnology
          1. 1. Off-Target Effects
          2. 2. Genetic Mosaicism
          3. 3. In Vivo Delivery of CRISPR-Cas Components
          1. 1. Alleged Environmental Risks of Genome Editing in Agriculture
          2. 2. Risks and Ethical Concerns Relating to Human Genome Editing
          1. 1. Over-Replication Mechanisms
          2. 2. Interference Mechanisms
        2. II. Development of Engineered Gene Drives
            1. a) Modification Drives
            2. b) Suppression Drives
            3. c) Current State of Development
          2. 2. Control of Invasive Species
          3. 3. Agriculture
          1. 1. Limitations of Current Gene Drive Techniques
            1. a) Unintended Geographic Spread
            2. b) Intended but Unauthorized Spread
            3. c) Undesired Spread to Non-Target Species
            4. d) Dual Use of Gene Drive Techniques
          3. 3. Potential Ecological Effects of Suppressing a Target Species
          4. 4. Potential Transboundary Effects of Gene Drives
      4. D. Horizontal Environmental Genetic Alteration Agents (HEGAAs)
        1. I. Use of Genetically Modified Viruses in Plant Pest Control
        2. II. Self-Disseminating Vaccines
        3. III. Mass Releases of Sterile Genetically Modified Insects
        4. IV. Use of Wolbachia to Suppress Mosquito-Vectored Infectious Diseases
      6. F. Summary
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. ‘Genetically Modified’ and ‘Living Modified’ Organisms
      2. B. Types of Damage Potentially Caused by LMOs
      3. C. The Distinction Between ‘Responsibility’ and ‘Liability’
      4. D. The ‘Polluter-Pays’ Principle: State or Operator Liability?
      5. E. Standards of Liability: Fault-Based, Objective, Strict, and Absolute Liability
      6. F. Procedural Issues in Enforcing Civil Liability in a Transboundary Context
      7. G. Civil Liability and ‘Administrative Liability’ for Damage to the Environment
      8. H. Summary and Outlook
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
            1. a) Living Organism
            2. b) Genetic Material
            3. c) ‘Novel Combination’ of Genetic Material
              1. aa) ‘Application of in vitro nucleic acid techniques…’
              2. bb) ‘… that overcome natural physiological reproductive or recombination barriers…’
              3. cc) ‘… and that are not techniques used in traditional breeding and selection’
              1. aa) Genome Editing
              2. bb) Engineered Gene Drives
              3. cc) Genetically Modified Viruses
              4. dd) Techniques That Harness Natural Mechanisms of Self-Propagation (Wolbachia)
          2. 2. Restriction to Hazardous LMOs?
          3. 3. Activities Covered by the Protocol
          4. 4. Exemption for Transboundary Movement of LMOs Which Are Pharmaceuticals (Article 5)
          5. 5. Conclusions
            1. a) Scope of the AIA Provisions
            2. b) Procedure of Obtaining an Advance Informed Agreement From the Party of Import
            3. c) Risk Assessment
            4. d) Role of the Precautionary Principle in Decision-Making (Article 10(6))
            5. e) Role of Socio-Economic Considerations in Decision-Making (Article 26)
            6. f) Rules for LMOs Intended for Direct Use as Food or Feed, or for Processing (Article 11)
              1. aa) Genuine and Disguised Changes to the Intended Use
              2. bb) Responsibilities of Exporting Parties
              3. cc) Responsibilities of Importing Parties
            8. h) Conclusions
              1. aa) Obligation to Establish Appropriate Risk Management Measures (para. 1)
              2. bb) Imposition of Preventive Measures Based on Risk Assessment (para. 2)
                1. (1) The Notion of ‘Unintentional Transboundary Movement’
                2. (2) Obligation to Take ‘Appropriate Measures’
                3. (3) Requirement of a Risk Assessment
              4. dd) Appropriate Observation Period for Any LMO (para. 4)
              5. ee) Obligation to Cooperate (para. 5)
            2. b) Notification in Case of Unintentional Transboundary Movements (Article 17)
              1. aa) Prevention of Illegal Transboundary Movements (para. 1)
              2. bb) Obligation to Dispose of the LMO in Case of an Illegal Transboundary Movement (para. 2)
            4. d) Handling, Transport, Packaging, and Identification (Article 18(1))
            5. e) Conclusions
          3. 3. Information-Sharing Through the Biosafety Clearing-House (Article 20)
          4. 4. Application in Relation to Non-Parties (Article 24)
          5. 5. Upward Derogation (Articles 2(4) and 14)
          6. 6. Liability and Redress (Article 27)
        3. III. Conclusions
          1. 1. The European Union’s Legal Framework for GMOs
          2. 2. Scope of the GMO Regime in the European Union
          3. 3. Compatibility of the European GMO Regime With the Cartagena Protocol
        1. I. Jurisdictional Scope (Article 4)
        2. II. Prevention of Transboundary Harm (Article 3)
        3. III. Regulation and Control of Risks Associated With the Use and Release of Living Modified Organisms (Article 8(g))
        4. IV. Provision of Information to Parties Receiving LMOs (Article 19(4))
        5. V. Control of Invasive Alien Species (Article 8(h))
          1. 1. Environmental Impact Assessments (lit. a)
          2. 2. Procedural Obligations (lit. c and d)
        7. VII. Examination of the Issue of Liability and Redress (Article 14(2))
        8. VIII. Are Eradication Programmes Prohibited Under the CBD?
        9. IX. Conclusions
        1. I. Key Provisions of International Trade Law
        2. II. Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Potential Source of Conflict With the Cartagena Protocol
        3. III. Resolving Potential Conflicts Between International Trade Law and the Cartagena Protocol
      4. D. International Plant Protection Convention
      5. E. World Organisation for Animal Health
      6. F. Codex Alimentarius
      7. G. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
      8. H. International Regulations on the Transport of Hazardous Goods
      9. I. International Health Regulations
        1. I. Biological Weapons Convention
        2. II. ENMOD Convention
        3. III. International Humanitarian Law
        4. IV. Conclusions
      11. K. Summary
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. The Legal Foundation of the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm
        1. I. Harm
          1. 1. ‘Extraterritorial’ Transboundary Harm
          2. 2. Harm to Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction
          3. 3. Harm to ‘Global Commons’
        3. III. Harm Caused by ‘Physical Consequences’
        4. IV. The Threshold of ‘Significant’ Harm
        5. V. Risk of Harm
          1. 1. Foreseeability as a Precondition of Prevention
          2. 2. The Precautionary Principle (or Approach)
          3. 3. Precaution and the Burden of Proof
          4. 4. Precaution in the Area of Biosafety
          1. 1. Scholarly Opinions
          2. 2. Transboundary Effects of LMOs and the Notion of ‘Significant Harm’
          3. 3. Anticipation of Risk
        8. VIII. Conclusions
      3. C. Prevention of Transboundary Harm as an Obligation of ‘Due Diligence’
        1. I. Adoption and Enforcement of Effective Domestic Regulation
          1. 1. Legal Status
          2. 2. Triggers of the Obligation
          3. 3. Process and Content of EIAs
          4. 4. Standards for Risk Assessments of LMOs/GMOs
          5. 5. Conclusions
        3. III. Use of the Best Available Technologies
            1. a) Timing
            2. b) Addressees
            3. c) Content
            4. d) Procedure
          2. 2. Exchange of Information
          3. 3. Consultations and Negotiations
          1. 1. Legal Status Under General International Law
          2. 2. Public Participation Under the Cartagena Protocol
            1. a) Status Quo
            2. b) The GMO Amendment
            3. c) The Lucca Guidelines
          1. 1. Notification in Emergency Situations
          2. 2. Obligation to Control and Mitigate Damage
        7. VII. Conclusions
        1. I. Occurrence of Harm as an Indication of a Breach
        2. II. Occurrence of Harm as a Prerequisite of a Breach
        3. III. Relationship Between Procedural and Substantive Obligations of Prevention
      6. F. Summary
    3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. The Development of COP Decision 14/19
        1. I. Functions of COP Decisions
        2. II. COP Decisions as ‘Soft Law’
        3. III. Soft Law Status of Decision 14/19 for Parties to the CBD
        4. IV. Effect on Non-Parties
          1. 1. References to Precaution in Earlier COP Decisions
          2. 2. Early Deployment of Gene Drives as a Precautionary Measure?
          3. 3. Assessment
            1. a) Status of the Obligation Under International Law
              1. aa) Guidance on Risk Assessment and Monitoring of LMOs
              2. bb) Additional Guidance on Risk Assessment of Engineered Gene Drives
            3. c) Assessment
            1. a) Status of the Obligation Under International Law
              1. aa) Phased Pathway to the Deployment of Gene Drives
              2. bb) Self-Limiting Gene Drives
            3. c) Assessment
              1. aa) CBD Mo’otz Kuxtal Voluntary Guidelines
              2. bb) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
              3. cc) Assessment
            2. b) Excursus: Consent of Individuals as a Human Rights Requirement?
          4. 4. Conclusions
          1. 1. No Binding International Rules on LMOs in Contained Use
          2. 2. The WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual
          3. 3. Excursus: Regulation of Gene Drives in Contained Use in the European Union
          4. 4. Containment Standards for Gene Drives Formulated by Researchers
        4. IV. Conclusions
          1. 1. ‘Likely’ Transboundary Movements as ‘Intentional’ Transboundary Movements?
          2. 2. Proposal for a Clarification
        2. II. Transboundary Spreads and the Obligation to Prevent Significant Transboundary Harm
      5. E. Summary and Outlook
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. Negotiating History
          1. 1. LMOs That Are Pharmaceuticals for Humans
          2. 2. Products Derived From LMOs
          1. 1. Biological Diversity
            1. a) Adverse Effects on Conservation
            2. b) Adverse Effects on Sustainable Use
            3. c) Conclusions
          3. 3. Threshold of Damage: ‘Measurable’ and ‘Significant’
          4. 4. Risks to Human Health
          5. 5. Domestic Criteria to Address Damage
          6. 6. Types of Damage Not Addressed by the Supplementary Protocol
          7. 7. Conclusions
          1. 1. Damage Resulting From Authorized Uses Following Intentional Transboundary Movement (Article 3(2))
          2. 2. Damage Resulting From Unintentional Movements (Article 3(3))
          3. 3. Damage Resulting From Illegal Transboundary Movements (Article 3(3))
          4. 4. Damage Resulting From Transboundary Movements From Non-Parties (Article 3(7))
          5. 5. Damage Resulting From LMOs in Transit
          6. 6. Damaged Caused by Domestic Activities With LMOs
          7. 7. Conclusions
        4. IV. Temporal Scope (Article 3(4))
        5. V. Spatial Scope (Article 3(5))
        6. VI. Conclusions
        1. I. Meaning and Scope of ‘Response Measures’
        2. II. Identification of the Liable Operator
        3. III. Establishment of a Causal Link and Standard of Proof (Article 4)
          1. 1. Requirement of the Operator to Take Response Measures (para. 1)
          2. 2. Responsibilities of the Competent Authority (para. 2)
          3. 3. Measures When There Is a Threat of Damage (para. 3)
          4. 4. Response Measures Taken Instead of the Responsible Operator (para. 4)
          5. 5. Recovery of Expenses by the Competent Authority (para. 5)
          6. 6. Reasoning and Legal Review of Decisions (para. 6)
          1. 1. Provision of ‘Rules and Procedures That Address Damage’ (Article 12(1))
          2. 2. Response Measures Already Addressed by Domestic Civil Liability Law (Article 5(7))
          3. 3. Implementation of Response Measures ‘in Accordance With Domestic Law’ (Article 5(8))
        6. VI. Conclusions
          1. 1. Material or Personal Damage
          2. 2. Damage ‘Associated’ With Biodiversity Damage
        2. II. Provision of Adequate Rules and Procedures on Civil Liability (Article 12(2))
        3. III. List of Elements to be Addressed When Developing Civil Liability Law (Article 12(3))
        4. IV. The Meaning of ‘Adequate’ Rules and Procedures
        5. V. Conclusions
        6. VI. Excursus: Draft Guidelines on Civil Liability and Redress
        1. I. Exemptions From Liability, Time and Financial Limits, and Right of Recourse (Articles 6 to 9)
          1. 1. Right of Parties to Provide for Financial Security (para. 1)
          2. 2. Consistency of Financial Security Provisions With Existing International Law (para. 2)
          3. 3. Study on Financial Security Mechanisms (para. 3)
          4. 4. Conclusions
        3. III. Relationship to State Responsibility (Article 11)
        4. IV. Review of Effectiveness (Article 13)
        5. V. Relationship to Rights and Obligations Under International Law (Article 16)
        6. VI. Governance- and Process-Related Provisions (Articles 14 to 21)
        1. I. Transboundary Harm
        2. II. Designation of a Competent Authority
        3. III. Right of Affected Individuals to Request Action
        4. IV. International Coordination of Response Measures
        5. V. Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, and Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments
        1. I. Proposed Scope of Domestic Implementing Legislation
        2. II. Identification of the Liable Operator and Exemptions
        3. III. Determination of Damage
        4. IV. Identification of Suitable Response Measures
        5. V. Civil Liability
        6. VI. Conclusions
      8. H. Summary and Outlook
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. Membership
      2. B. Scope
      3. C. Causation, Identification of the Party Liable and Standard of Liability
      4. D. Defences
      5. E. Response
      6. F. Financial Caps and Time Limits
      7. G. Claims Process, Arbitration and Enforcement
      8. H. Conclusions
    3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. Scope of Application and Use of Terms
        1. I. The Standard of ‘Prompt and Adequate’ Compensation
        2. II. Imposition of Strict Operator Liability
        3. III. Compensation Funding
      3. C. Obligation to Provide for Response Measures
      4. D. Obligation to Provide for International and Domestic Remedies
      5. E. Relationship to the Law of State Responsibility
      6. F. Legal Status: Emerging Customary International Law?
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
        1. I. Conduct Consisting of an Action or Omission
          1. 1. Conduct by State Organs and Persons Exercising Governmental Authority
              1. aa) Instruction
              2. bb) Direction
              3. cc) Control
              1. aa) Regulatory Oversight
              2. bb) Enterprises Owned and Controlled by a State
              3. cc) Research and Development Activities by Public and Governmental Institutions
              4. dd) State-Funded Research and Development Activities
          3. 3. Attribution of Conduct Acknowledged and Adopted by the State as Its Own
          4. 4. Attribution by Lex Specialis Norms
          5. 5. Attribution of Transboundary Harm Through Human Rights Law?
          6. 6. Conclusions
          1. 1. International Obligation of Any Origin or Character
          2. 2. Conduct in Breach of the Obligation
          3. 3. No Requirement of Fault
          1. 1. Consent
          2. 2. Self-Defence
          3. 3. Countermeasures
          4. 4. Force Majeure
          5. 5. Necessity
          6. 6. Reparation in the Event of a Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness
        1. I. Obligations of Cessation and Non-Repetition
          1. 1. Recoverable Injury
            1. a) Proof of Causality for Environmental Damage
            2. b) Harm Within the Ambit of the Rule Breached
            3. c) Concurrent Causes of Damage and ‘Shared Responsibility’
              1. aa) Objective of Restitution
              2. bb) Restitution Not Materially Impossible
              3. cc) Disproportionality of Restitution
              1. aa) Loss of Life and Personal Injury
              2. bb) Property Damage
              3. cc) Loss of Profits or Income
              4. dd) Damage to the Environment
              5. ee) Punitive Damages
              6. ff) Interest
            3. c) Satisfaction
          4. 4. Contribution to the Injury and Failure to Mitigate Damage
        3. III. Right to Take Countermeasures
          1. 1. Invocation of Responsibility by Injured States
            1. a) Right of Non-Injured States to Invoke Responsibility
            2. b) Remedies Available to Non-Injured States
          1. 1. The Law of Diplomatic Protection in Cases of Transboundary Harm
          2. 2. The Requirement to Exhaust Local Remedies in Cases of Transboundary Harm
          1. 1. The Claims Process Envisaged in the ARSIWA
          2. 2. Settlement of Disputes
              1. aa) Role, Functions and Procedures
              2. bb) Recent Practice
              3. cc) Legal Status
            2. b) The Relationship Between Non-Compliance Procedures and State Responsibility
          4. 4. Conclusions
      4. D. Summary and Outlook
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. International Treaties
      2. B. State Practice
      3. C. Human Rights Law
      4. D. International Law Commission
      5. E. Conclusions
    3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
          1. 1. Mitigation Measures
          2. 2. Restoration Measures
          3. 3. Evaluation Measures
          1. 1. Limitation to ‘Reasonable’ Measures
          2. 2. Limitation of Reimbursement to Incremental and Extraordinary Expenses
          3. 3. Limitation of Restoration Costs to the Monetary Value of the Impaired Environment?
        3. III. Compensability of ‘Environmental Solidarity Costs’
          1. 1. The Practice of International Liability Treaties
          2. 2. The Stance of the International Law Commission
          3. 3. Compensability of Environmental Damage in the United Nations Compensation Commission
          4. 4. Compensation of Environmental Damage Before the International Court of Justice (Case of Costa Riva v. Nicaragua)
          5. 5. Conclusions
          1. 1. Compensatory Restoration
            1. a) Valuation Based on Market Prices
            2. b) Non-Market-Based Valuation Techniques
            3. c) Benefit (Or Value) Transfer Method
            4. d) Costs for ‘Hypothetical’ Response Measures
          3. 3. Conclusions
          1. 1. Costa Rica’s ‘Ecosystem Services Approach’
          2. 2. Nicaragua’s ‘Replacement Costs Approach’
          3. 3. Nicaragua’s ‘Corrected Analysis’
          4. 4. The Court’s Judgment: ‘Overall Assessment’ of Environmental Damage
          5. 5. Assessment
      3. C. Summary
    4. Concluding Remarks 665 - 670 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Chapter 1: The Emergence of Self-Spreading Biotechnology
      2. Chapter 2: Concepts and Terms Relevant to Transboundary Harm Caused by Biotechnology
      3. Chapter 3: The Regulation of Biotechnology in International Law
      4. Chapter 4: Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Biotechnology Under Customary International Law
      5. Chapter 5: The International Governance of Engineered Gene Drives
      6. Chapter 6: The Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Redress and Liability
      7. Chapter 7: A Private Liability Scheme: The ‘Biodiversity Compact’
      8. Chapter 8: A Customary Obligation to Ensure Prompt and Adequate Compensation for Transboundary Damage?
      9. Chapter 9: State Responsibility for Transboundary Harm Caused by Biotechnology
      10. Chapter 10: Strict State Liability for Transboundary Harm?
      11. Chapter 11: Compensation for Environmental Damage in International Law
    6. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Kapitel 1: Das Aufkommen von sich selbst ausbreitender Biotechnologie
      2. Kapitel 2: Relevante Konzepte und Begriffe im Kontext grenzüberschreitender Schäden durch Biotechnologie
      3. Kapitel 3: Die völkerrechtliche Regulierung der Biotechnologie
      4. Kapitel 4: Verhütung grenzüberschreitender Schäden durch Biotechnologie im Rahmen des Völkergewohnheitsrechts
      5. Kapitel 5: Die internationale Regulierung synthetischer Gene Drives
      6. Kapitel 6: Das Zusatzprotokoll von Nagoya/Kuala Lumpur über Haftung und Wiedergutmachung
      7. Kapitel 7: Ein privatrechtliches Haftungssystem: Der „Biodiversity Compact“
      8. Kapitel 8: Eine gewohnheitsrechtliche Verpflichtung zur Sicherstellung einer unverzüglichen und angemessenen Entschädigung für grenzüberschreitende Schäden?
      9. Kapitel 9: Staatenverantwortlichkeit für durch Biotechnologie verursachte grenzüberschreitende Schäden
      10. Kapitel 10: Staatliche Gefährdungshaftung für grenzüberschreitende Umweltschäden?
      11. Kapitel 11: Ersatzfähigkeit von Umweltschäden im Völkerrecht
  6. Table of Cases 713 - 720 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  7. Table of Treaties and Instruments 721 - 742 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  8. Bibliography 743 - 808 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (959)

  1. Zetsche, Bernd/Gootenberg, Jonathan S./Abudayyeh, Omar O. et al., Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System, 163 (2015) Cell 759–771 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  2. Zuleeg, Manfred, Vertragskonkurrenz im Völkerrecht: Teil I: Verträge zwischen souverä-nen Staaten, 20 (1977) German YBIL 246 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  3. Zuccaro, Michael V./Xu, Jia/Mitchell, Carl et al., Allele-Specific Chromosome Removal After Cas9 Cleavage in Human Embryos, 183 (2020) Cell 1650–1664.e15 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  4. Zhou, Huanbin/Liu, Bo/Weeks, Donald P./Spalding, Martin H./Yang, Bing, Large Chromoso-mal Deletions and Heritable Small Genetic Changes Induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in Rice, 42 (2014) Nucleic Acids Res. 10903–10914 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  5. Zhou, Hong/Zhou, Michael/Li, Daisy et al., Whole Genome Analysis of CRISPR Cas9 SgRNA Off-Target Homologies via an Efficient Computational Algorithm, 18 (2017) BMC Genomics 826 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  6. Zhong, Guocai/Wang, Haimin/Li, Yujun/Tran, Mai H./Farzan, Michael, Cpf1 Proteins Excise CRISPR RNAs from MRNA Transcripts in Mammalian Cells, 13 (2017) Nature Chemical Biology 839 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  7. Zhang, Zhao/Zhang, Yuelin/Gao, Fei et al., CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Editing System in Hu-man Stem Cells: Current Status and Future Prospects, 9 (2017) Molecular Therapy – Nucleic Acids 230–241 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  8. Zhang, Xiao-Hui/Tee, Louis Y./Wang, Xiao-Gang/Huang, Qun-Shan/Yang, Shi-Hua, Off-Target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Engineering, 4 (2015) Molecular Therapy – Nucleic Acids e264 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  9. Zhang, Sarah, No One Knows Exactly What Would Happen If Mosquitoes Were to Dis-appear, The Atlantic, 24 September 2018, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/09/mosquito-target-malaria/570937/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  10. Young, Tomme Rosanne, National Experiences with Legislative Implementation of the Protocol, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 329–387 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  11. Zeidan, Sayed Mohamed Mohamed, State Responsibility and Liability for Environmental Damage Caused by Nuclear Accidents (Tilburg University, Tilburg 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  12. Zarrilli, Simonetta, International Trade in GMOs and GM Products: National and Multilat-eral Legal Frameworks (United Nations, New York/Geneva 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  13. Zambrano, Diego, A Comity of Errors: The Rise, Fall, and Return of International Comity in Transnational Discovery, 34 (2016) Berkeley Journal of International Law 101–159 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  14. Zahar, Alexander, Methodological Issues in Climate Law, 5 (2015) Climate Law 25–34 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  15. Youssoufian, Hagop/Pyeritz, Reed E., Human Genetics and Disease: Mechanisms and Consequences of Somatic Mosaicism in Humans, 3 (2002) Nature Rev. Genet. 748 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  16. Young, Tomme Rosanne, Recognition of “Environmental Services” in the ICJ’s First Award of Compensa-tion for International Environmental Damage, 48 (2018) Environmental Policy and Law 36–41 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  17. Young, Tomme Rosanne, Use of the Biosafety Clearing-House in Practice, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 137–146 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  18. Larracuente, Amanda M./Presgraves, Daven C., The Selfish Segregation Distorter Gene Complex of Drosophila Melanogaster, 192 (2012) Genetics 33–53 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  19. Latty, Franck, Actions and Omissions, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 355–363 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  20. Lauterpacht, Elihu/Nevill, Penelope, The Different Forms of Reparation: Interest, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsi-bility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 613–655 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  21. Lawrence, Eleanor (ed.), Henderson’s Dictionary of Biology (16th ed., Pearson, Harlow 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  22. Ledford, Heidi, Alternative CRISPR System Could Improve Genome Editing, 526 (2015) Nature News 17 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  23. Ledford, Heidi, CRISPR, the Disruptor, 522 (2015) Nature 20–24 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  24. Ledford, Heidi, The Unsung Heroes of CRISPR, 535 (2016) Nature News 342 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  25. Ledford, Heidi, CRISPR Deployed to Combat Sickle-Cell Anaemia, Nature News, 12 October 2016, available at: https://www.nature.com/news/crispr-deployed-to-combat-sickle-cell-anaemia-1.20782 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  26. Ledford, Heidi, Geneticists Enlist Engineered Virus and CRISPR to Battle Citrus Disease, 545 (2017) Nature News 277 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  27. Ledford, Heidi, CRISPR Gene Therapy Shows Promise Against Blood Diseases, 588 (2020) Nature 383 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  28. Ledford, Heidi, CRISPR Treatment Inserted Directly into the Body for First Time, 579 (2020) Nature 185 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  29. Lee, Maria, EU Regulation of GMOs: Law and Decision Making for a New Technology (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  30. Lefeber, René, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origin of State Liabil-ity (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  31. Lefeber, René, Creative Legal Engineering, 13 (2000) Leiden Journal of International Law 1–9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  32. Lefeber, René, The Legal Significance of the Supplementary Protocol: The Result of a Para-digm Evolution, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 73–91 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  33. Lefeber, René/Nieto Carrasco, Jimena, Negotiating the Supplementary Protocol: The Co-Chairs' Perspective, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversi-ty Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, Lon-don 2014), 52–70 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  34. Lentzos, Filippa, WHO: COVID-19 Didn’t Leak from a Lab. Also WHO: Maybe It Did, Bul-letin of the Atomic Scientists, 11 November 2021, available at: https://thebulletin.org/2021/02/who-covid-19-didnt-leak-from-a-lab-also-who-maybe-it-did/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  35. Lentzos, Filippa/Reeves, R. Guy, Scientists Are Working on Vaccines that Spread Like a Disease. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 18 Sep-tember 2020, available at: https://thebulletin.org/2020/09/scientists-are-working-on-vaccines-that-spread-like-a-disease-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  36. Lentzos, Filippa/Rybicki, Edward P./Engelhard, Margret et al., Eroding Norms over Release of Self-Spreading Viruses, 375 (2022) Science 31–33 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  37. Lenzerini, Federico, Biotechnology, Human Dignity and the Human Genome, in: Frances-co Francioni/Tullio Scovazzi (eds.), Biotechnology and International Law (Hart, Oxford 2006), 285–340 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  38. Leopoldina Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften, The Opportunities and Limits of Genome Editing (Halle (Saale) 2015), available at: https://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2015_3Akad_Stellungnahme_Genome_Editing.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  39. Lewandowsky, Stephan/Jacobs, Peter/Neil, Stuart, Conspiracy Theories Made It Harder for Scientists to Seek the Truth, 326 (2022) Scientific American 72–77 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  40. Lewis, Renee, Bikinians Evacuated ‘For Good of Mankind’ Endure Lengthy Nuclear Fall-out, Al Jazeera America, 28 July 2015, available at: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/7/28/bikini-nuclear-test-survivors-demand-compensation.html (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  41. Lewontin, Richard Charles, The Units of Selection, 1 (1970) Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1–18 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  42. Li, Fang/Scott, Maxwell J., CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of the White and Sex Lethal Loci in the Invasive Pest, Drosophila Suzukii, 469 (2016) Biochemical and Bio-physical Research Communications 911–916 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  43. Li, Ling/He, Zhi-Yao/Wei, Xia-Wei/Gao, Guang-Ping/Wei, Yu-Quan, Challenges in CRISPR/CAS9 Delivery: Potential Roles of Nonviral Vectors, 26 (2015) Human Gene Therapy 452–462 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  44. Liang, Puping/Xu, Yanwen/Zhang, Xiya et al., CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Human Tripronuclear Zygotes, 6 (2015) Protein & Cell 363–372 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  45. Lim, Li Ching/Lim, Li Lin, Gene Drives: Legal and Regulatory Issues (Third World Net-work, Penang (Malaysia) 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  46. Lim, Poh Lian/Kurup, Asok/Gopalakrishna, Gowri et al., Laboratory-Acquired Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, 350 (2004) N. Engl. J. Med. 1740–1745 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  47. Lim Tung, Odile Juliette, Genetically Modified Organisms and Transboundary Damage: A Two-Pronged Compromise for Redress Under the Liability and Redress Protocol to the Cartagena Protocol, 38 (2013) SAYIL 67–91 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  48. Lim Tung, Odile Juliette, Transboundary Movements of Genetically Modified Organisms and the Carta-gena Protocol: Key Issues and Concerns, 17 (2014) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1739 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  49. Lima, Rodigro C. A., Trade and the Supplementary Protocol: How to Achieve Mutual Supportiveness, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 131–149 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  50. Lin, Steven/Staahl, Brett T./Alla, Ravi K./Doudna, Jennifer A., Enhanced Homology-Directed Human Genome Engineering by Controlled Timing of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery, 3 (2014) eLife e04766 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  51. Lindroos, A., Dispelling the Chimera of 'Self-Contained Regimes' International Law and the WTO, 16 (2005) EJIL 857–877 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  52. Lipton, Joshua/LeJeune, Kate, Determining and Quantifying Environmental Damage, in: Joshua Lipton/Ece Özdemiroğlu et al. (eds.), Equivalency Methods for Environmental Liability (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 2018), 57–88 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  53. Liu, Jing, Compensating Ecological Damage: Comparative and Economic Observations (Intersentia, Cambridge 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  54. Lockwood, Jeffrey A., Insects as Weapons of War, Terror, and Torture, 57 (2012) Annu-al Review of Entomology 205–227 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  55. Ludlow, Karinne/Smyth, Stuart J./Falck-Zepeda, José B., Introduction to Socio-Economic Considerations in the Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms, in: Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation (Springer, New York, NY 2014), 3–14 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  56. Lunshof, Jeantine E./Birnbaum, Angela, Adaptive Risk Management of Gene Drive Exper-iments, 22 (2017) Appl. Biosaf. 97–103 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  57. Luo, Ming/Gilbert, Brian/Ayliffe, Michael, Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology for Targeted Mutagenesis, Gene Replacement and Stacking of Genes in Higher Plants, 35 (2016) Plant Cell Reports 1439–1450 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  58. Lusser, Maria/Davies, Howard V., Comparative Regulatory Approaches for Groups of New Plant Breeding Techniques, 30 (2013) New Biotechnology 437–446 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  59. Lusser, Maria/Parisi, Claudia/Plan, Damien/Rodríguez-Cerezo, Emilio, New Plant Breeding Techniques: State-of-the-Art and Prospects for Commercial Development (2011), avail-able at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC63971/jrc63971.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  60. Lyttle, Terence W., Cheaters Sometimes Prosper: Distortion of Mendelian Segregation by Meiotic Drive, 9 (1993) Trends in Genetics 205–210 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  61. Ma, Hong/Marti-Gutierrez, Nuria/Park, Sang-Wook et al., Correction of a Pathogenic Gene Mutation in Human Embryos, 548 (2017) Nature 413 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  62. Ma, Sanyuan/Zhang, Shengling/Wang, Feng et al., Highly Efficient and Specific Genome Editing in Silkworm Using Custom TALENs, 7 (2012) PLOS ONE e45035 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  63. Mačák, Kubo, Decoding Article 8 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Attribution of Cyber Operations by Non-State Actors, 21 (2016) Journal of Conflict and Security Law 405–428 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  64. MacAlister Elliott and Partners Ltd/Economics for the Environment Consultancy Ltd, Study on the Valuation and Restoration of Damage to Natural Resources for the Purpose of Envi-ronmental Liability, Report for the European Commission, Directorate-General Envi-ronment, B4–3040/2000/265781/MAR/B3 (2001), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/liability/pdf/biodiversity_main.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  65. Mackenzie, Ruth, Environmental Damage and Genetically Modified Organisms, in: Mi-chael Bowman/Alan E. Boyle (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Com-parative Law. Problems of Definition and Valuation (Oxford University Press, Ox-ford/New York 2002), 63–84 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  66. Mackenzie, Ruth/Burhenne-Guilmin, Françoise/La Viña, Antonio G.M./Werksman, Jacob D., An Explanatory Guide to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (IUCN, Gland/Cambridge 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  67. Mackenzie, Ruth/Sands, Philippe, Prospects for International Environmental Law, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Bi-osafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 457–466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  68. Mahmoudi, Said, Gut Dam Claims, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Ox-ford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  69. Mali, Prashant/Yang, Luhan/Esvelt, Kevin M. et al., RNA-Guided Human Genome Engi-neering via Cas9, 339 (2013) Science 823–826 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  70. Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine, Biodiversité, biotechnologies, biosécurité: Le droit internation-al désarticulé (2000) Journal du Droit International 947–994 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  71. Malone, Linda A., The Chernobyl Accident: A Case Study in International Law Regulating State Responsibility for Transboundary Nuclear Pollution, 12 (1987) Colum. J. Envt’l. L. 203–241 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  72. Mandal, Pankaj K./Ferreira, Leonardo M. R./Collins, Ryan et al., Efficient Ablation of Genes in Human Hematopoietic Stem and Effector Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9, 15 (2014) Cell Stem Cell 643–652 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  73. Marceau, Gabrielle Zoe, Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relation-ship Between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties, 35 (2001) Journal of World Trade 1081–1131 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  74. Margolis, Emanuel, The Hydrogen Bomb Experiments and International Law, 64 (1955) Yale L.J. 629–647 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  75. Mariani, Meredith T., The Intersection of International Law, Agricultural Biotechnology, and Infectious Disease (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  76. Marquard, Helen, Scope, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 289–298 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  77. Marraffini, Luciano A., CRISPR-Cas Immunity in Prokaryotes, 526 (2015) Nature 55 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  78. Marshall, John M., The Cartagena Protocol and Genetically Modified Mosquitoes, 28 (2010) Nature Biotech. 896–897 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  79. Marshall, John M., Commentary: The Cartagena Protocol in the Context of Recent Releases of Transgenic and Wolbachia-Infected Mosquitoes, 19 (2011) Asia-Pacific Journal of Mo-lecular Biology and Biotechnology 91–100 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  80. Marshall, John M., The Cartagena Protocol and Releases of Transgenic Mosquitoes, in: Brij K. Tyagi (ed.), Training Manual: Biosafety for Human Health and the Environment in the Context of the Potential Use of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes (GMMs) (WHO, Ge-neva 2015), 163–177 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  81. Marshall, John M./Akbari, Omar S., Gene Drive Strategies for Population Replacement, in: Zach N. Adelman (ed.), Genetic Control of Malaria and Dengue (Elsevier 2015), 169–200 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  82. Marshall, John M./Buchman, Anna/Sanchez C, Hector M./Akbari, Omar S., Overcoming Evolved Resistance to Population-Suppressing Homing-Based Gene Drives, 7 (2017) Sci. Rep. 3776 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  83. Marshall, John M./Taylor, Charles E., Malaria Control with Transgenic Mosquitoes, 6 (2009) PLOS Medicine e1000020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  84. Marshall Islands Nuclear Claims Tribunal (11 June 2007), available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20110716110909/http://www.nuclearclaimstribunal.com/ (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  85. Martignago, Damiano/Rico-Medina, Andrés/Blasco-Escámez, David/Fontanet-Manzaneque, Juan B./Caño-Delgado, Ana I., Drought Resistance by Engineering Plant Tissue-Specific Responses, 10 (2019) Frontiers in Plant Science 1676 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  86. Mason, Michael, The Governance of Transnational Environmental Harm: Addressing New Modes of Accountability/Responsibility, 8 (2008) Global Environmental Politics 8–24 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  87. Matz-Lück, Nele, Biological Diversity, International Protection, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Ox-ford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  88. Matz-Lück, Nele, Treaties, Conflict Clauses, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Ox-ford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  89. Mbengue, Makane Moïse, Preamble, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  90. McCaffrey, Stephen C., The Law of International Watercourses (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  91. McConnell, Fiona, The Biodiversity Convention: A Negotiating History, A Personal Ac-count of Negotiating the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity – and After (Kluwer Law International, London 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  92. McConnell, Sean C./Blasimme, Alessandro, Ethics, Values, and Responsibility in Human Genome Editing, 21 (2019) AMA Journal of Ethics E1017–1020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  93. McDermott, Shannon R./Noor, Mohamed A. F., The Role of Meiotic Drive in Hybrid Male Sterility, 365 (2010) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1265–1272 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  94. McDonald, Neil, The Role of Due Diligence in International Law, 68 (2019) ICLQ 1041–1054 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  95. McGarity, Thomas O., International Regulation of Deliberate Release Biotechnologies, in: Francesco Francioni/Tullio Scovazzi (eds.), International Responsibility for Environ-mental Harm (Graham & Trotman, London 1991), 319–361 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  96. McGraw, Désirée M., The CBD – Key Characteristics and Implications for Implementa-tion, 11 (2002) RECIEL 17–28 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  97. McLean, Kirsty Galloway, Bridging the Gap Between Researchers and Policy-Makers: International Collaboration Through the Biosafety Clearing-House, 4 (2005) Environ-mental Biosafety Research 123–126 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  98. McMeniman, Conor J./Lane, Roxanna V./Cass, Bodil N. et al., Stable Introduction of a Life-Shortening Wolbachia Infection into the Mosquito Aedes Aegypti, 323 (2009) Sci-ence 141–144 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  99. McRae, Andrew D./Weijer, Charles/Binik, Ariella et al., Who Is the Research Subject in Cluster Randomized Trials in Health Research?, 12 (2011) Trials 183 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  100. Meagher, Karen M./Allyse, Megan A./Master, Zubin/Sharp, Richard R., Reexamining the Ethics of Human Germline Editing in the Wake of Scandal, 95 (2020) Mayo Clinic Pro-ceedings 330–338 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  101. Mehravar, Maryam/Shirazi, Abolfazl/Nazari, Mahboobeh/Banan, Mehdi, Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing, 445 (2019) Developmental Biology 156–162 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  102. Meier, Benjamin Mason/Habibi, Roojin/Yang, Y. Tony, Travel Restrictions Violate Interna-tional Law, 367 (2020) Science 1436 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  103. Memorandum of Cooperation Between the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity on Coop-eration Between the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Sec-retariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (25 February 2004), available at: https://www.ippc.int/static/media/files/partner_publication/2015/10/26/1287738124_m_of_c_-_cbd_-_fao_2013042321-19en_2013100412-10--67.12_KB.pdf (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  104. Mendel, Gregor, Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden (Experiments on Plant Hybrids), 4 (1866) Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereins zu Brünn 3–47 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  105. Meshel, Tamar, Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources And/or the Environment, MPILux Working Paper 1 (2017), available at: https://www.mpi.lu/fileadmin/mpi/medien/research/MPEiPro/WPS1_2017_Meshel_Optional_Rules_for_Arbitration_of_Disputes_Relating_to_Natural_Resources.pdf (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  106. Michaels, Jan, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  107. Midic, Uros/Hung, Pei-Hsuan/Vincent, Kailey A. et al., Quantitative Assessment of Timing, Efficiency, Specificity and Genetic Mosaicism of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing of Hemoglobin Beta Gene in Rhesus Monkey Embryos, 26 (2017) Human Molecular Genetics 2678–2689 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  108. Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste/Henle, Klaus/Titeux, Nicolas et al., Setting Temporal Baselines for Biodiversity: The Limits of Available Monitoring Data for Capturing the Full Impact of Anthropogenic Pressures, (2017) 7 Sci. Rep. 41591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  109. Milano, Enrico, The Outcomes of the Procedure and Their Legal Effects, in: Tullio Tre-ves/Laura Pineschi et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2009), 407–418 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  110. Milanović, Marko, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles and Policy (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  111. Milanović, Marko/Papić, Tatjana, The Applicability of the ECHR in Contested Territories, 67 (2018) ICLQ 779–800 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  112. Miles, Cameron A., Introductory Note to Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)/Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) (I.C.J.), 55 (2016) ILM 417 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  113. Min, John/Smidler, Andrea L./Najjar, Devora/Esvelt, Kevin M., Harnessing Gene Drive, 5 (2018) Journal of Responsible Innovation S40 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  114. Mitchell, Heidi J./Bartsch, Detlef, Regulation of GM Organisms for Invasive Species Con-trol, 7 (2020) Front. Bioeng. & Biotechnol. 927 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  115. Mojica, Francisco J.M./Díez-Villaseñor, Chc)sar/García-Martínez, Jesús/Soria, Elena, Inter-vening Sequences of Regularly Spaced Prokaryotic Repeats Derive from Foreign Ge-netic Elements, 60 (2005) Journal of Molecular Evolution 174–182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  116. Monnheimer, Maria, Due Diligence Obligations in International Human Rights Law (Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge et al. 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  117. Montgomery, Jacob S./Sadeque, Ahmed/Giacomini, Darci A./Brown, Patrick J./Tranel, Patrick J., Sex-Specific Markers for Waterhemp (Amaranthus Tuberculatus) and Palmer Ama-ranth (Amaranthus Palmeri), 67 (2019) Weed Science 412–418 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  118. Montjoie, Michel, The Concept of Liability in the Absence of an Internationally Wrongful Act, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  119. Moreira, Luciano A./Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Iñaki/Jeffery, Jason A. et al., A Wolbachia Symbiont in Aedes Aegypti Limits Infection with Dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium, 139 (2009) Cell 1268–1278 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  120. Moreira, Luciano A./Saig, Emad/Turley, Andrew P. et al., Human Probing Behavior of Ae-des Aegypti When Infected with a Life-Shortening Strain of Wolbachia, 3 (2009) PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases e568 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  121. Moscou, Matthew J./Bogdanove, Adam J., A Simple Cipher Governs DNA Recognition by TAL Effectors, 326 (2009) Science 1501 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  122. Mout, Rubul/Ray, Moumita/Lee, Yi-Wei/Scaletti, Federica/Rotello, Vincent M., In Vivo Deliv-ery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Therapeutic Gene Editing: Progress and Challenges, 28 (2017) Bioconjugate Chemistry 880–884 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  123. Mukherjee, Siddhartha, The Gene: An Intimate History (Scribner, New York 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  124. Muller, Hermann Joseph, Artificial Transmutation of the Gene, 66 (1927) Science 84–87 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  125. Mullin, Emily, CRISPR 2.0 Is Here, and It’s Way More Precise, MIT Technology Review, 25 October 2017, available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609203/crispr-20-is-here-and-its-way-more-precise/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  126. Munro, R. D./Lammers, Johan G. (eds.), Environmental Protection and Sustainable De-velopment: Legal Principles and Recommendations Adopted by the Experts Group on Environmental Law of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Gra-ham & Trotman, London 1987) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  127. Murase, Shinya, Third Report on the Protection of the Atmosphere, UN Doc. A/CN.4/692 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  128. Murphy, Aisling A./Redwood, Alec J./Jarvis, Michael A., Self-Disseminating Vaccines for Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15 (2016) Expert Review of Vaccines 31–39 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  129. Murphy, Sean D., Biotechnology and International Law, 42 (2001) Harv. Int’l L. J. 47–139 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  130. Murray, James/Bradley, Henry/Craigie, William A. et al., Oxford English Dictionary, Online Edition, available at: http://www.oed.com/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  131. Myhr, Anne Ingeborg/Dalmo, Roy A., DNA Vaccines: Mechanisms and Aspects of Rele-vance for Biosafety, in: Terje Traavik/Li C. Lim (eds.), Biosafety First. Holistic Ap-proaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Or-ganisms (Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim 2009), 253–262 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  132. Naeem, Muhammad/Majeed, Saman/Hoque, Mubasher Zahir/Ahmad, Irshad, Latest Devel-oped Strategies to Minimize the Off-Target Effects in CRISPR-Cas-Mediated Genome Editing, 9 (2020) Cells Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  133. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  134. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects (The National Acad-emies Press, Washington, DC 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  135. Neff, Robyn, The Cartagena Protocol and the WTO: Will the EU Biotech Products Case Leave Room for the Protocol?, 16 (2005) Fordham Environmental Law Review 261–288 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  136. Nejat, Naghmeh/Rookes, James/Mantri, Nitin L./Cahill, David M., Plant-Pathogen Interac-tions: Toward Development of Next-Generation Disease-Resistant Plants, 37 (2017) Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 229–237 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  137. Nelson, Dolliver, Exclusive Economic Zone, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  138. Neuhaus, Carolyn P./Caplan, Arthur L., Ethical Lessons from a Tale of Two Genetically Modified Insects, 35 (2017) Nature Biotech. 713–716 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  139. Nicklisch, Fritz, Rechtsfragen der modernen Bio- und Gentechnologie: Regelungsbe-darf und Regelungsansätze, 44 (1989) Betriebs-Berater 1–10 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  140. Nie, Jing-Bao, In the Shadow of Biological Warfare: Conspiracy Theories on the Origins of COVID-19 and Enhancing Global Governance of Biosafety as a Matter of Urgency, 17 (2020) Bioethical Inquiry 567–574 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  141. Nijar, Gurdial Singh, The Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: An Analysis and Implementation Chal-lenges, 13 (2013) Int. Environ. Agreements 271–290 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  142. Nijar, Gurdial Singh, Civil Liability in the Supplementary Protocol, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 111–124 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  143. Nijar, Gurdial Singh/Dawkins, Kristin/Sorensen, Neil, Developing a Liability and Redress Regime Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: For Damage Resulting from the Transboundary Movements of Genetically Modified Organisms (2005), available at: https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Developing_a_Liability_and_Redress_Regime_unde.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  144. Nijar, Gurdial Singh/Lawson-Stopps, Sarah/Gan, Pei Fern, Liability & Redress Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: A Record of the Negotiations for Developing Interna-tional Rules (CEBLAW, Kuala Lumpur 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  145. Noble, Charleston/Adlam, Ben/Church, George M./Esvelt, Kevin M./Nowak, Martin A., Cur-rent CRISPR Gene Drive Systems Are Likely to Be Highly Invasive in Wild Populations, 7 (2018) eLife e33423 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  146. Noble, Charleston/Min, John/Olejarz, Jason et al., Daisy-Chain Gene Drives for the Altera-tion of Local Populations, 116 (2019) PNAS 8275–8282 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  147. Noble, Charleston/Olejarz, Jason/Esvelt, Kevin M./Church, George M./Nowak, Martin A., Evo-lutionary Dynamics of CRISPR Gene Drives, 3 (2017) Science Advances e1601964 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  148. Nollkaemper, André, Cluster-Litigation in Cases of Transboundary Environmental Harm, in: Michael G. Faure/Ying Song (eds.), China and International Environmental Liability. Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton 2008), 11–37 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  149. Nollkaemper, André, Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in International Adjudication, 4 (2013) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 277–294 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  150. Nollkaemper, André/Jacobs, Dov, Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Concep-tual Framework, 34 (2013) Mich. J. Int’l L. 359–438 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  151. North, Ace R./Burt, Austin/Godfray, H. Charles J., Modelling the Suppression of a Malaria Vector Using a CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drive to Reduce Female Fertility, 18 (2020) BMC Biology 98 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  152. Nuismer, Scott L./Althouse, Benjamin M./May, Ryan et al., Eradicating Infectious Disease Using Weakly Transmissible Vaccines, 283 (2016) Proc. R. Soc. B Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  153. Nuismer, Scott L./Bull, James J., Self-Disseminating Vaccines to Suppress Zoonoses, 4 (2020) Nature Ecology & Evolution 1168–1173 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  154. Oeter, Stefan, Methods and Means of Combat, in: Dieter Fleck (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013), 115–230 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  155. O'Hara, Peter, The Illegal Introduction of Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease Virus in New Zealand, 25 (2006) Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizoot-ics) 119–123 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  156. Ohio State University, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Insect Al-lies: How the Enemies of Corn May Someday Save It (16 October 2017), available at: https://cfaes.osu.edu/news/articles/insect-allies-how-the-enemies-corn-may-someday-save-it (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  157. Okowa, Phoebe N., Procedural Obligations in International Environmental Agreements, 67 (1997) BYIL 275–336 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  158. Okowa, Phoebe N., State Responsibility for Transboundary Air Pollution in International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  159. Okowa, Phoebe N., Responsibility for Environmental Damage, in: Malgosia A. Fitzmaurice/David Ong/Panos Merkouris (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2010), 303–319 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  160. Okowa, Phoebe N., Principle 18, in: Jorge E. Viñuales (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015), 471–492 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  161. Olleson, Simon, Attribution in Investment Treaty Arbitration, 31 (2016) ICSID Re-view 457–483 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  162. O'Neill, Onora, Informed Consent and Public Health, 359 (2004) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1133–1136 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  163. O'Neill, Scott L./Ryan, Peter A./Turley, Andrew P. et al., Scaled Deployment of Wolbachia to Protect the Community from Dengue and Other Aedes Transmitted Arboviruses, 2 (2018) Gates Open Research 36 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  164. Oppenheim, Lassa Francis Lawrence, International Law: A Treatise, Vol. 1: Peace (2nd ed., Longmans, Green & Co., London 1912) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  165. Orgel, L. E./Crick, F. H. C., Selfish DNA: The Ultimate Parasite, 284 (1980) Nature 604 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  166. Ormond, Kelly E./Mortlock, Douglas P./Scholes, Derek T. et al., Human Germline Genome Editing: ASHG Postition Statement, 101 (2017) American Journal of Human Genet-ics 167–176 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  167. Orsini, Amandine, Business as a Regulatory Leader for Risk Governance? The Compact Initiative for Liability and Redress Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 21 (2012) Environmental Research 960–979 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  168. Osaka, Eri, Corporate Liability, Government Liability, and the Fukushima Nuclear Disas-ter, 21 (2012) Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 433–459 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  169. Ostera, Graciela R./Gostin, Lawrence O., Biosafety Concerns Involving Genetically Modi-fied Mosquitoes to Combat Malaria and Dengue in Developing Countries, 305 (2011) Journal of the American Medical Association 930–931 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  170. Outreach Network for Gene Drive Research, Open Letter: Research on Gene Drive Tech-nology Can Benefit Conservation and Public Health (14 November 2018), available at: https://genedrivenetwork.org/open-letter (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  171. Owen, Michael P., Lab Rat’s Web Portal for Laboratory Biorisk Management (04 January 2020), available at: https://www.seanet.com/~owenmp/biosafety/lab-biorisk-mgmt.html (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  172. Owens, Brian, Behind New Zealand’s Wild Plan to Purge All Pests, 541 (2017) Nature News 148 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  173. Oxman, Bernard H., Jurisdiction of States, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  174. Oye, Kenneth A./Esvelt, Kevin/Appleton, Evan et al., Regulating Gene Drives, 345 (2014) Science 626–628 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  175. Pabo, C. O./Peisach, E./Grant, R. A., Design and Selection of Novel Cys2His2 Zinc Fin-ger Proteins, 70 (2001) Annual Review of Biochemistry 313–340 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  176. Paddock, LeRoy C., Funding Contaminated Site Cleanup in the United States, 3 (1994) RECIEL 133–142 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  177. Palchetti, Paolo, De Facto Organs of a State, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  178. Palmisano, Giuseppe, Fault, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Ency-clopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  179. Papantoniou, Angeliki, Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, November 2015, 2017, 112 (2018) AJIL 460–466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  180. Parsons, George R., Travel Cost Models, in: Patricia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 187–223 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  181. PartnerRe, GMO: Not New, but Still an Emerging Liability Risk, PartnerReviews May 2013, available at: https://partnerre.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/GMO_-_Not_New_But_Still_An_Emerging_Liability_Risk.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  182. Pascual, Unai/Muradian, Roldan et al., The Economics of Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity, in: Pushpam Kumar (ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodi-versity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (Routledge, London 2010), 183–256 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  183. Paul, Thomas C., Substitution Costs, in: Patricia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 347–390 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  184. Pauwels, Katia/Podevin, Nancy/Breyer, Didier/Carroll, Dana/Herman, Philippe, Engineering Nucleases for Gene Targeting: Safety and Regulatory Considerations, 31 (2014) New Biotechnology 18–27 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  185. Pavoni, Riccardo, Assessing and Managing Biotechnology Risk Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 10 (2000) Italian YBIL 113–144 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  186. Payne, Cymie R., Legal Liability for Environmental Damage: The United Nations Com-pensation Commission and the 1990–1991 Gulf War, in: Carl Bruch/Carroll Muf-fett/Sandra S. Nichols (eds.), Governance, Natural Resources, and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding (Earthscan, London 2016), 719–760 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  187. Peck, Alison, The New Imperialism: Toward an Advocacy Strategy for GMO Accountabil-ity, 21 (2008) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 37–72 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  188. Pedersen, Ole W., From Abundance to Indeterminacy: The Precautionary Principle and Its Two Camps of Custom, 3 (2014) Transnational Environmental Law 323–339 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  189. Peel, Jacqueline, New State Responsibility Rules and Compliance with Multilateral Envi-ronmental Obligations: Some Case Studies of How the New Rules Might Apply in the International Environmental Context, 10 (2001) RECIEL 82–97 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  190. Peel, Jacqueline, A GMO by Any Other Name … Might Be an SPS Risk!: Implications of Expand-ing the Scope of the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, 17 (2006) EJIL 1009–1031 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  191. Peel, Jacqueline, Unpacking the Elements of a State Responsibility Claim for Transboundary Pol-lution, in: S. Jayakumar/Tommy Koh et al. (eds.), Transboundary Pollution (Edward El-gar, Cheltenham/Northampton 2015), 51–78 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  192. Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Team Receives $7M Award to Enlist Insects as Allies for Food Security (20 November 2017), available at: http://news.psu.edu/story/495037/2017/11/20/research/penn-state-team-receives-7m-award-enlist-insects-allies-food (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  193. Pérez Ortega, Rodrigo, Can Vaccines for Wildlife Prevent Human Pandemics?, Quanta Magazine, 24 August 2020, available at: https://www.quantamagazine.org/can-vaccines-for-wildlife-prevent-human-pandemics-20200824/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  194. Perisse, Iuri Viotti/Fan, Zhiqiang/Singina, Galina N./White, Kenneth L./Polejaeva, Irina A., Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock, 11 (2020) Frontiers in Genetics 614688 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  195. Perron-Welch, Frederic, Socioeconomics, Biosafety, and Sustainable Development, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 147–163 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  196. Petrović, Dražen, Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: The UN Compensation Commission, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of Interna-tional Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 849–859 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  197. Pevec, Davor, The Marshall Islands Nuclear Claims Tribunal: The Claims of the Enewetak People, 35 (2006) Denver J. Int’l. L. & Pol’y 221–239 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  198. Pfeifer, Kevin/Frieß, Johannes L./Giese, Bernd, Insect Allies – Assessment of a Viral Ap-proach to Plant Genome Editing, 18 (2022) Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  199. Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), Introduction, available at: https://www.picscheme.org/en/about (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  200. Pierce, Benjamin A., Genetics: A Conceptual Approach (7th ed., Macmillan Learning, New York 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  201. Pineschi, Laura, Non-Compliance Procedures and the Law of State Responsibility, in: Tullio Treves/Laura Pineschi et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mecha-nisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2009), 483–497 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  202. Pisillo-Mazzeschi, Riccardo, The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States, 35 (1992) German YBIL 9–51 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  203. Pisupati, Balakrishna, Biotechnology, Cartagena Protocol and the WTO Rules, 7 (2005) Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 75–89 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  204. Plakokefalos, Ilias, Liability for Transboundary Harm, in: André Nollkaemper/Ilias Plakokefalos et al. (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017), 1051–1068 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  205. Pollegioni, Paola/North, Ace R./Persampieri, Tania et al., Detecting the Population Dynam-ics of an Autosomal Sex Ratio Distorter Transgene in Malaria Vector Mosquitoes, 57 (2020) The Journal of Applied Ecology 2086–2096 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  206. Poulantzas, Dionyssios M., The Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies and Liability for Space Vehicle Accidents, 31 (1965) Journal of Air Law and Commerce 261 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  207. Pourcel, C./Salvignol, G./Vergnaud, G., CRISPR Elements in Yersinia Pestis Acquire New Repeats by Preferential Uptake of Bacteriophage DNA, and Provide Additional Tools for Evolutionary Studies, 151 (2005) Microbiology 653–663 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  208. Predator Free 2050 Limited, Current Research Projects, available at: https://pf2050.co.nz/current-research-projects/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  209. Prévost, Denise, Opening Pandora’s Box: The Panel’s Findings in the EC-Biotech Prod-ucts Dispute, 34 (2007) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 67–101 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  210. Proelß, Alexander, Article 34, in: Oliver Dörr/Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Con-vention on the Law of Treaties (2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  211. Pugh, Jonathan, Driven to Extinction? The Ethics of Eradicating Mosquitoes with Gene-Drive Technologies, 42 (2016) Journal of Medical Ethics 578–581 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  212. Pythoud, François, Commodities, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 321–328 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  213. Quentin-Baxter, Robert Q., Preliminary Report on International Liability for Injurious Con-sequences Arising Out of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law, YBILC 1980, Vol. II, Pt. 1, p. 247 (1980) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  214. Quiberoni, Andrea/Moineau, Sylvain/Rousseau, Geneviève M./Reinheimer, Jorge/Ackermann, Hans-Wolfgang, Streptococcus Thermophilus Bacteriophages, 20 (2010) International Dairy Journal 657–664 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  215. Raban, Robyn R./Marshall, John M./Akbari, Omar S., Progress Towards Engineering Gene Drives for Population Control, 223 (2020) Journal of Experimental Biology Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  216. Rabitz, Florian, Gene Drives and the International Biodiversity Regime, 28 (2019) RECIEL 339–348 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  217. Rabitz, Florian, The International Governance of Gene Drive Organisms (2021) Environmental Politics 1–20 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  218. Ragazzi, Maurizio, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Clarendon Press, Oxford 2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  219. Ragni, Chiara, Procedures and Mechanisms on Compliance Under the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, in: Tullio Tre-ves/Laura Pineschi et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2009), 101–120 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  220. Rai, Karamjit S./Black, William C., Mosquito Genomes: Structure, Organization, and Evo-lution, 41 (1999) Advances in Genetics 1–33 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  221. Raisz, Anikó, GMO as a Weapon – a.k.a. a New Form of Aggression?, 2 (2014) Hungar-ian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 275–288 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  222. Rani, Reema/Yadav, Prashant/Barbadikar, Kalyani M. et al., CRISPR/Cas9: A Promising Way to Exploit Genetic Variation in Plants, 38 (2016) Biotechnology Letters 1991–2006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  223. Rao, Pemmaraju Sreenivasa, First Report on the Legal Regime for Allocation of Loss in Case of Transboundary Harm Arising Out of Hazardous Activities, UN Doc. A/CN.4/531 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  224. Rao, Pemmaraju Sreenivasa, Second Report on the Legal Regime for the Allocation of Loss in Case of Transboundary Harm Arising Out of Hazardous Activities, UN Doc. A/CN.4/540 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  225. Rao, Pemmaraju Sreenivasa, Third Report on the Legal Regime for the Allocation of Loss in Case of Trans-boundary Harm Arising Out of Hazardous Activities, UN Doc. A/CN.4/566 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  226. Ratliff, Dane P., The PCA Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment, 14 (2001) Leiden J. Int’l L. 887–896 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  227. Read, John E., The Trail Smelter Dispute, 1 (1963) Canadian YBIL 213–229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  228. Redford, Kent H./Brooks, Thomas M./Macfarlane, Nicholas B.W./Adams, Jonathan S., Ge-netic Frontiers for Conservation: An Assessment of Synthetic Biology and Biodiversity Conservation (IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  229. Redgwell, Catherine, Biotechnology, Biodiversity and International Law, 58 (2005) Cur-rent Legal Problems 543–569 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  230. Redick, Thomas P., Handling, Transport, Packaging, and Information, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge 2013), 89–110 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  231. Reeves, R. Guy/Boëte, Christophe/Beck, Felix et al., Gesundheitsbereich: Bekämpfung von Malaria in Afrika durch Einsatz von Gene Drives versus Malariabekämpfung durch andere Herangehensweisen/Maßnahmen: Report for the Office of Technology As-sessment at the German Bundestag; unpublished, on file with author (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  232. Reeves, R. Guy/Bryk, Jarosław/Altrock, Philipp M./Denton, Jai A./Reed, Floyd A., First Steps Towards Underdominant Genetic Transformation of Insect Populations, 9 (2014) PLOS ONE e97557 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  233. Reeves, R. Guy/Denton, Jai A./Santucci, Fiammetta/Bryk, Jarosław/Reed, Floyd A., Scien-tific Standards and the Regulation of Genetically Modified Insects, 6 (2012) PLOS Ne-glected Tropical Diseases e1502 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  234. Reeves, R. Guy/Phillipson, Martin, Mass Releases of Genetically Modified Insects in Ar-ea-Wide Pest Control Programs and Their Impact on Organic Farmers, 9 (2017) Sus-tainability 59 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  235. Reeves, R. Guy/Voeneky, Silja/Caetano-Anollés, Derek/Beck, Felix/Boëte, Christophe, Agri-cultural Research, or a New Bioweapon System?, 362 (2018) Science 35–37 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  236. Regalado, Antonio, Exclusive: Chinese Scientists Are Creating CRISPR Babies, MIT Technology Review, 25 November 2018, available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/11/25/138962/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  237. Rey García, Paula, Directive 2001/18/EC on the Deliberate Release into the Environ-ment of GMOs: An Overview and the Main Provisions for Placing on the Market, 3 (2006) JEEPL 3–12 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  238. Reynolds, Jesse L., Governing New Biotechnologies for Biodiversity Conservation: Gene Drives, International Law, and Emerging Politics, 20 (2020) Global Environmental Politics 28–48 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  239. Reynolds, Jesse L., Engineering Biological Diversity: The International Governance of Synthetic Biology, Gene Drives, and De-Extinction for Conservation, 49 (2021) Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1–6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  240. Ricci, Ezra, Biosafety Regulation: The Cartagena Protocol (2004), available at: http://www.ruig-gian.org/ressources/Brochure3Cartagenaprotoc.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  241. Richardson, Christopher D./Ray, Graham J./DeWitt, Mark A./Curie, Gemma L./Corn, Jacob E., Enhancing Homology-Directed Genome Editing by Catalytically Active and Inactive CRISPR-Cas9 Using Asymmetric Donor DNA, 34 (2016) Nature Biotech. 339–344 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  242. Ricroch, Agnes E./Ammann, Klaus/Kuntz, Marcel, Editing EU Legislation to Fit Plant Ge-nome Editing, 17 (2016) EMBO Reports 1365–1369 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  243. Rincon, Paul, Coronavirus: Is There Any Evidence for Lab Release Theory?, BBC News, 01 May 2020, available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52318539 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  244. Roberts, Andrew/Andrade, Paulo Paes de/Okumu, Fredros O. et al., Results from the Workshop “Problem Formulation for the Use of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes”, 96 (2017) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 530–533 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  245. Rockman, Matthew V./Skrovanek, Sonja S./Kruglyak, Leonid, Selection at Linked Sites Shapes Heritable Phenotypic Variation in C. Elegans, 330 (2010) Science 372–376 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  246. Rommens, Caius M., Intragenic Crop Improvement: Combining the Benefits of Tradition-al Breeding and Genetic Engineering, 55 (2007) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 4281–4288 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  247. Rosenberger, Randall S./Loomis, John B., Benefit Transfer, in: Patricia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 431–462 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  248. Royal Society, Gene Drive Research: Why It Matters (2018), available at: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2018/08-11-18-gene-drive-statement.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  249. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020 (07 October 2020), available at: https://www.kva.se/en/pressrum/pressmeddelanden/nobelpriset-i-kemi-2020 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  250. Rubin, Alfred P., Pollution by Analogy: The Trail Smelter Arbitration, 50 (1971) Oregon Law Review 259–282 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  251. Rudall, Jason, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica V. Nicaragua), 112 (2018) AJIL 288–294 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  252. Rudall, Jason, Compensation for Environmental Damage Under International Law (Routledge, Abingdon/New York 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  253. Rulli, Tina, CRISPR and the Ethics of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes, in: David Boonin (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy (Springer International Pub-lishing, Cham 2018), 509–521 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  254. Runge, Jan-Niklas/Lindholm, Anna K., Carrying a Selfish Genetic Element Predicts In-creased Migration Propensity in Free-Living Wild House Mice, 285 (2018) Proc. R. Soc. B 1333 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  255. Ryan, Owen W./Skerker, Jeffrey M./Maurer, Matthew J. et al., Selection of Chromosomal DNA Libraries Using a Multiplex CRISPR System, 3 (2014) eLife e03703 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  256. Ryngaert, Cedric, State Responsibility and Non-State Actors, in: Math Noortmann/August Reinisch/Cedric Ryngaert (eds.), Non-State Actors in International Law (Hart, Oxford 2015), 163–182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  257. Sachariew, K., State Responsibility for Multilateral Treaty Violations: Identifying the ‘In-jured State’ and Its Legal Status, 35 (1988) NLR 273 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  258. Sachariew, K., The Definition of Thresholds of Tolerance for Transboundary Environmental Injury Under International Law: Development and Present Status, 37 (1990) Nether-lands International Law Review 193–206 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  259. Sachs, Noah, Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law, 55 (2007) UCLA Law Review 837–904 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  260. Sadat-Akhavi, Seyed-Ali, Methods of Resolving Conflicts Between Treaties (Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  261. Safrin, Sabrina, The Relationship with Other Agreements: Much Ado About a Savings Clause, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Proto-col on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Develop-ment? (Earthscan, London 2002), 438–454 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  262. Sami, Abdul/Xue, Zhao/Tazein, Saheera et al., CRISPR-Cas9-Based Genetic Engineering for Crop Improvement Under Drought Stress, 12 (2021) Bioengineered 5814–5829 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  263. Sánchez, Miguel A./Parrott, Wayne A., Characterization of Scientific Studies Usually Cited as Evidence of Adverse Effects of GM Food/Feed, 15 (2017) Plant Biotechnology Journal 1227–1234 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  264. Sand, Peter H., Compensation for Environmental Damage from the 1991 Gulf War, 35 (2005) Environmental Policy and Law 244–249 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  265. Sand, Peter H., Enforcing CITES: The Rise and Fall of Trade Sanctions, 22 (2013) RECIEL 251–263 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  266. Sand, Peter H./Hammitt, James K., Public Health Claims, in: Cymie R. Payne/Peter H. Sand (eds.), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission. Environ-mental Liability (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York 2011), 193–217 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  267. Sander, Gerald G., Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Ox-ford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  268. Sander, Jeffry D./Joung, J. Keith, CRISPR-Cas Systems for Editing, Regulating and Tar-geting Genomes, 32 (2014) Nature Biotech. 347–355 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  269. Sands, Philippe (ed.), Chernobyl: Law and Communication: Transboundary Nuclear Air Pollution – The Legal Materials (Grotius Publications Ltd., Cambridge 1988) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  270. Sands, Philippe/Peel, Jacqueline/Fabra, Adriana/Mackenzie, Ruth, Principles of International Environmental Law (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al. 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  271. Sands, Philippe/Stewart, Richard B., Valuation of Environmental Damage – US and Inter-national Law Approaches, 5 (1995) RECIEL 290–296 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  272. Sapranauskas, Rimantas/Gasiunas, Giedrius/Fremaux, Christophe et al., The Streptococcus Thermophilus CRISPR/Cas System Provides Immunity in Escherichia Coli, 39 (2011) Nucleic Acids Res. 9275–9282 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  273. Saxler, Barbara/Siegfried, Jule/Proelss, Alexander, International Liability for Transboundary Damage Arising from Stratospheric Aerosol Injections, 7 (2015) Law, Innovation and Technology 112–147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  274. Schaefer, Kellie A./Wu, Wen-Hsuan/Colgan, Diana F. et al., Unexpected Mutations After CRISPR-Cas9 Editing in Vivo, 14 (2017) Nature Methods 547–548 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  275. Schlegel, Rolf H. J., Concise Encyclopedia of Crop Improvement: Institutions, Persons, Theories, Methods, and Histories (Haworth Food & Agricultural Press, New York 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  276. Schleidgen, Sebastian/Dederer, Hans-Georg/Sgodda, Susan et al., Human Germline Editing in the Era of CRISPR-Cas: Risk and Uncertainty, Inter-Generational Responsibility, Therapeutic Legitimacy, 21 (2020) BMC Medical Ethics 87 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  277. Schmalenbach, Kirsten, Verantwortlichkeit und Haftung, in: Alexander Proelß (ed.), In-ternationales Umweltrecht (De Gruyter, Berlin 2017), 211–242 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  278. Schmalenbach, Kirsten, Article 26, in: Oliver Dörr/Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  279. Schmitt, Daniela M., Staatenverantwortlichkeit für Schäden an der biologischen Vielfalt (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  280. Schoonejans, Eric, Advance Informed Agreement Procedures, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 299–320 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  281. Schrijver, Nico J., Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru Case (Nauru v Australia), in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  282. Schuster, Felix/Aldag, Patrick/Frenzel, Antje et al., CRISPR/Cas12a Mediated Knock-in of the Polled Celtic Variant to Produce a Polled Genotype in Dairy Cattle, 10 (2020) Sci. Rep. 13570 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  283. Schwartz, Bryan/Berlin, Mark L., After the Fall: An Analysis of Canadian Legal Claims for Damage Caused by Cosmos 954, 27 (1982) McGill Law Journal 676–720 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  284. Schwartz, Priscilla, Principle 16, in: Jorge E. Viñuales (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Envi-ronment and Development: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015), 429–450 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  285. Schwermer, Sylvia, Annex A: Economic Valuation Methods, in: UBA (ed.), Economic Valuation of Environmental Damage. Methodolocical Convention 2.0 for Estimates of Environmental Costs (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  286. Scott, Joanne, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Com-mentary (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  287. Scovazzi, Tullio, Some Remarks on International Responsibility in the Field of Environ-mental Protection, in: Maurizio Ragazzi (ed.), International Responsibility Today. Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Nijhoff, Leiden 2005), 209–222 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  288. Sdunzig, Tobias, Die UN-Konvention über Biodiversität und ihre Zusatzprotokolle: Ver-handlungshistorie, Inhalt, Kritik sowie Analyse der rechtlichen Steuerungsfähigkeit aus völkerrechtlicher und europarechtlicher Sicht (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  289. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Including Its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (3rd ed., Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  290. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Status of Third-Party Liability Treaties and Analysis of Difficulties Facing Their Entry into Force: Note by the Executive Secretary, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/BS/WG-L&R/1/INF/3 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  291. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), An Exploration of Tools and Methodologies for Valuation of Biodiversity and Biodiversity Resources and Functions, CBD Technical Series No. 28 (Montreal 2007), available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-28.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  292. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), The Concept of Imminent Threat of Damage and Its Legal and Technical Impli-cations: Note by the Executive Secretary, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/BS/GF-L&R/3/INF/2 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  293. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Summary Report on the Survey on the Application of and Experience in the Use of Socio-Economic Considerations in Decision-Making on Living Modified Organisms: Note by the Executive Secretary, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/5/INF/10 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  294. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Standards for Shipments of Living Modified Organisms: Outcomes of an Online Forum, CBD Biosafety Technical Series 01 (Montreal 2011), available at: https://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=103868 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  295. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Analysis of the Results of the Testing of the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms”, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/7/INF/3 (2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  296. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), The N–KL Supplementary Protocol: Capacity Building Activities (01 January 2018), available at: https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/supplementary/NKL_workshops.shtml#tab=0 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  297. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Press Release: Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress Comes into Force (05 March 2018), available at: http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/e-doc/?news=116175 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  298. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, Biosafety Clearing-House and Article 17 Na-tional Focal Points (27 May 2022), available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/lists/cpb-bch-a17-fp.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  299. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat), Calendar of SCBD Meetings (25 May 2022), available at: https://www.cbd.int/meetings/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  300. Segers, Seppe/Mertes, Heidi, Does Human Genome Editing Reinforce or Violate Human Dignity?, 34 (2020) Bioethics 33–40 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  301. Segerson, Kathleen, Valuing Environmental Goods and Services: An Economic Perspec-tive, in: Patricia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Non-market Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 1–25 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  302. Selle, Kurt/Barrangou, Rodolphe, CRISPR‐Based Technologies and the Future of Food Science, 80 (2015) Journal of Food Science R2367 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  303. Semenov, B. A., Nuclear Power in the Soviet Union, 25 (1983) IAEA Bulletin 47–59 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  304. Sendut, Jefferi Hamzah, The International Court of Justice and Compensation for Envi-ronmental Harm: A Missed Opportunity?, 1 (2018) De Lege Ferenda 17–29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  305. Serbus, Laura R./Casper-Lindley, Catharina/Landmann, Frederic/Sullivan, William, The Ge-netics and Cell Biology of Wolbachia-Host Interactions, 42 (2008) Annual Review of Genetics 683–707 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  306. Shalem, Ophir/Sanjana, Neville E./Zhang, Feng, High-Throughput Functional Genomics Using CRISPR–Cas9, 16 (2015) Nature Rev. Genet. 299 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  307. Shapiro, James A., Revisiting the Central Dogma in the 21st Century, 1178 (2009) An-nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 6–28 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  308. Shapiro, James A./Sternberg, Richard von, Why Repetitive DNA Is Essential to Genome Function, 80 (2005) Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 227–250 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  309. Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (8th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK et al. 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  310. Shibata, Akiho, A New Dimension in International Environmental Liability Regimes: A Prelude to the Supplementary Protocol, in: International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 17–51 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  311. Shibata, Akiho, Conclusion: Beyond the Supplementary Protocol, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), Inter-national Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supple-mentary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 240–251 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  312. Shibata, Akiho, International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lum-pur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  313. Shine, Clare, Invasive Species in an International Context: IPPC, CBD, European Strate-gy on Invasive Alien Species and Other Legal Instruments, 37 (2007) EPPO Bulle-tin 103–113 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  314. Shmakov, Sergey/Abudayyeh, Omar O./Makarova, Kira S. et al., Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems, 60 (2015) Molecular Cell 385–397 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  315. Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander, The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimen-sion of the Relations of International Responsibility, 13 (2002) EJIL 1127–1145 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  316. Silver, Lee M., The Peculiar Journey of a Selfish Chromosome: Mouse t Haplotypes and Meiotic Drive, 9 (1993) Trends in Genetics 250–254 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  317. Simon, Samson/Otto, Mathias/Engelhard, Margret, Scan the Horizon for Unprecedented Risks, 362 (2018) Science 1007–1008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  318. Simon, Samson/Otto, Mathias/Engelhard, Margret, Synthetic Gene Drive: Between Continuity and Novelty: Crucial Differences Between Gene Drive and Genetically Modified Organisms Require an Adapted Risk Assessment for Their Use (2018) EMBO Reports e45760 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  319. Simoni, Alekos/Hammond, Andrew M./Beaghton, Andrea K. et al., A Male-Biased Sex-Distorter Gene Drive for the Human Malaria Vector Anopheles Gambiae, 38 (2020) Nature Biotech. 1054–1060 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  320. Simoni, Alekos/Siniscalchi, Carla/Chan, Yuk-Sang et al., Development of Synthetic Selfish Elements Based on Modular Nucleases in Drosophila Melanogaster, 42 (2014) Nucleic Acids Res. 7461–7472 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  321. Sirinathsinghji, Eva, Why Genome Edited Organisms Are Not Excluded from the Carta-gena Protocol on Biosafety, TWN Biosafety Briefing (2020), available at: https://biosafety-info.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Biosafety-Briefing-English.pdf (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  322. Skåre, Mari, Liability Annex or Annexes to the Environmental Protocol: A Review of the Process Within the Antarctic Treaty System, in: Davor Vidas (ed.), Implementing the Environmental Protection Regime for the Antarctic (Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht 2000), 163–180 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  323. Smets, Greet/Rüdelsheim, Patrick, Study on Risk Assessment: Application of Annex I of Decision CP 9/13 to Living Modified Organisms Containing Engineered Gene Drives, UN Doc. CBD/CP/RA/AHTEG/2020/1/4, Annex (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  324. Smyth, Stuart J./Kershen, Drew L., Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives, 6 (2006) Global Jurist Advances 1–78 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  325. Solf, Waldemar A., Article 55 AP I, in: Michael Bothe/Karl J. Partsch/Waldemar A. Solf (eds.), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts. Commentary on the Two 1977 Addi-tional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  326. Sprink, Thorben/Eriksson, Dennis/Schiemann, Joachim/Hartung, Frank, Regulatory Hurdles for Genome Editing: Process- vs. Product-Based Approaches in Different Regulatory Contexts, 35 (2016) Plant Cell Reports 1493–1506 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  327. Steel, Daniel, Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Envi-ronmental Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  328. Stein, Rob, In a 1st, Doctors in U.S. Use CRISPR Tool to Treat Patient with Genetic Dis-order, NPR, 29 July 2019, available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/07/29/744826505/sickle-cell-patient-reveals-why-she-is-volunteering-for-landmark-gene-editing-st?t=1617188222805 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  329. Stein, Rob, In a 1st, Scientists Use Revolutionary Gene-Editing Tool to Edit Inside a Patient, NPR, 04 March 2020, available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/04/811461486/in-a-1st-scientists-use-revolutionary-gene-editing-tool-to-edit-inside-a-patient (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  330. Steinbrecher, Ricarda A., Genetic Engineering in Plants and the “New Breeding Tech-niques (NBTs)”: Inherent Risks and the Need to Regulate (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  331. Stephens, Tim, Article 235 UNCLOS, in: Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Con-vention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (C.H.Beck/Hart/Nomos, München et al. 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  332. Stewart, Terence P./Johanson, David S., A Nexus of Trade and the Environment: The Relationship Between the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization, 14 (2003) Colorado Journal of International Environmen-tal Law and Policy 1–52 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  333. Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Controlling the Risks of Genetically Modified Organisms: The Carta-gena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement, 10 (1999) YB Int’l Env. L. 82–119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  334. Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Transboundary Pollution, in: Fred L. Morrison/Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Interna-tional, Regional, and National Environmental Law (Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London 2000), 169–200 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  335. Stoll, Peter-Tobias, World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Pe-ters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Ox-ford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  336. Strauss, Debra M., The Application of TRIPS to GMOs: International Intellectual Property Rights and Biotechnology, 45 (2009) Stan. J. Int’l L. 287–320 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  337. Subrin, Stephen N., Fishing Expeditons Allowed: The Historical Background of the 1938 Federal Discovery Rules, 39 (1998) Boston College Law Review 691–745 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  338. Sugahara, Ryohei/Saeki, Shinjiro/Jouraku, Akiya/Shiotsuki, Takahiro/Tanaka, Seiji, Knock-down of the Corazonin Gene Reveals Its Critical Role in the Control of Gregarious Characteristics in the Desert Locust, 79 (2015) Journal of Insect Physiology 80–87 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  339. Sun, Yongwei/Jiao, Guiai/Liu, Zupei et al., Generation of High-Amylose Rice Through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of Starch Branching Enzymes, 8 (2017) Front. Plant Sci. 298 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  340. Swetlitz, Ike, Researchers to Release First-Ever Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes in Africa, STAT, 05 September 2018, available at: https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/05/release-genetically-engineered-mosquitoes-africa/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  341. Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology, Gene Drives: Ethical Con-siderations on the Use of Gene Drives in the Environment (2019), available at: https://www.ekah.admin.ch/inhalte/ekah-dateien/dokumentation/publikationen/EKAH_Bericht_Gene_Drives_EN_V2.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  342. Switzerland, Département fédéral des affaires étrangères, Etats parties au Protocole addi-tionnel aux Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949 relatif à la protection des victimes des conflits armés internationaux, available at: https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/fr/documents/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/geneve/1977-PROT-1_fr.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  343. SynBioWatch, Common Call for a Global Moratorium on Genetically-Engineered Gene Drives (05 December 2016), available at: http://www.synbiowatch.org/gene-drives/gene-drives-moratorium/?lores (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  344. SynBioWatch, A Call to Protect Food Systems from Genetic Extinction Technology: The Global Food and Agriculture Movement Says No to Release of Gene Drives (16 October 2018), available at: http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/files/etc_ftfsignonletter113018engweb_1.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  345. Synolakis, Costas/Kânoğlu, Utku, The Fukushima Accident Was Preventable, 373 (2015) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 20140379 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  346. Szablowski, David, Operationalizing Free, Prior, and Informed Consent in the Extractive Industry Sector? Examining the Challenges of a Negotiated Model of Justice, 30 (2010) Canadian Journal of Development Studies 111–130 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  347. Takeuchi, Ryo/Choi, Michael/Stoddard, Barry L., Redesign of Extensive Protein–DNA In-terfaces of Meganucleases Using Iterative Cycles of in Vitro Compartmentalization, 111 (2014) PNAS 4061–4066 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  348. Talmon, Stefan, The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities, 58 (2009) ICLQ 493–517 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  349. Tams, Christian J., All’s Well that Ends Well: Comments on the ILCs Articles on State Responsibility, 62 (2002) ZaöRV 759–808 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  350. Tams, Christian J., Waiver, Acquiescence and Extinctive Prescription, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 1035–1049 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  351. Tan, Wenfang/Proudfoot, Chris/Lillico, Simon G./Whitelaw, C. Bruce A., Gene Targeting, Genome Editing: From Dolly to Editors, 25 (2016) Transgenic Research 273–287 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  352. Tang, Lichun/Zeng, Yanting/Du, Hongzi et al., CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Human Zygotes Using Cas9 Protein, 292 (2017) Molecular Genetics and Ge-nomics 525–533 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  353. Tanzi, Attila, Liability for Lawful Acts, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  354. Target Malaria, Male Bias and Female Fertility, available at: https://targetmalaria.org/what-we-do/our-approach/male-bias-and-female-fertility/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  355. Target Malaria, Target Malaria Welcomes the Decision of the National Biosafety Agency of Burkina Faso to Approve a Small-Scale Release of Genetically Modified Sterile Male Mosquitoes (n.d.), available at: https://targetmalaria.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/statement_authorisation_nba_bf-1.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  356. Target Malaria, Who We Are, available at: https://targetmalaria.org/who-we-are/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  357. Target Malaria, Results of the Small-Scale Release of Non Gene Drive Genetically Modified Sterile Male Mosquitoes in Burkina Faso (2021), available at: https://targetmalaria.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Development-pathway_FS_EN_Results-of-the-small-scale-release-of-non-gene-drive-genetically-modified-Burkina-Faso_March21.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  358. Taylor, Laura O., Hedonics, in: Patricia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 235–292 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  359. Tebas, Pablo/Stein, David/Tang, Winson W. et al., Gene Editing of CCR5 in Autologous CD4 t Cells of Persons Infected with HIV, 370 (2014) N. Engl. J. Med. 901–910 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  360. Teem, John L./Ambali, Aggrey/Glover, Barbara et al., Problem Formulation for Gene Drive Mosquitoes Designed to Reduce Malaria Transmission in Africa: Results from Four Regional Consultations 2016–2018, 18 (2019) Malaria Journal 347 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  361. Teetzmann, Constantin, Schutz vor Wissen? Forschung mit doppeltem Verwendungs-zweck zwischen Schutzpflichten und Wissenschaftsfreiheit (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  362. Telesetsky, Anastasia, Introductory Note to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress, 50 (2011) ILM 105–107 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  363. Tewolde Berhan Gebre Egziabher, The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: History, Content and Implementation from a Developing Country Perspective, in: Terje Traavik/Li C. Lim (eds.), Biosafety First. Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engi-neering and Genetically Modified Organisms (Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim 2009), 389–405 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  364. The Compact: A Contractual Mechanism for Response in the Event of Damage to Bio-logical Diversity Caused by the Release of a Living Modified Organism, Second Amended Text (18 September 2012), available at: http://www.biodiversitycompact.org/wp-content/uploads/Compact-Second-Amended-Text-with-translation-reference-January-2014-2.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  365. Then, Christoph/Bauer-Panskus, Andreas, Playing Russian Roulette with Biodiversity: Un-controlled Applications of Gene Editing Threaten Biodiversity, the Rights of Consumers and Farmers, as Well as the Future of Animal and Plant Breeding (Munich 2017), avail-able at: http://www.testbiotech.org/sites/default/files/Russian_Roulette_with_Biodiversity_0.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  366. Third World Network, Comments on the Draft Guidelines on Civil Liability and Redress in the Field of Damage Resulting from Transboundary Movements of Living Modified Or-ganisms, 31 May 2010, in: Third World Network (ed.), Liability and Redress for Damage Resulting from GMOs. The Negotiations Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Penang 2012), 46–51 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  367. Third World Network, Liability and Redress for Damage Resulting from GMOs: The Negotiations Un-der the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Penang 2012), available at: https://www.twn.my/title2/books/pdf/liability_and_redress.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  368. Thizy, Delphine/Coche, Isabelle/Vries, Jantina de, Providing a Policy Framework for Re-sponsible Gene Drive Research: An Analysis of the Existing Governance Landscape and Priority Areas for Further Research, 5 (2020) Wellcome Open Research 173 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  369. Thomas, Elmo/Teshome Kebede, Mahlet, One Legally Binding Provision on Civil Liability: Why It Was so Important from the African Negotiator’s Perspective, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 125–130 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  370. Thomas, Jim, The National Academies’ Gene Drive Study Has Ignored Important and Obvious Issues, The Guardian, 09 June 2016, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/jun/09/the-national-academies-gene-drive-study-has-ignored-important-and-obvious-issues (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  371. Thürer, Daniel, Soft Law, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclo-pedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  372. Thyme, Summer B./Boissel, Sandrine J. S./Arshiya Quadri, S. et al., Reprogramming Hom-ing Endonuclease Specificity Through Computational Design and Directed Evolution, 42 (2014) Nucleic Acids Res. 2564–2576 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  373. Tigerstrom, Barbara J. von/Halabi, Sam F./Wilson, Kumanan R., The International Health Regulations (2005) And the Re-Establishment of International Travel Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic, 27 (2020) Journal of Travel Medicine 1–4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  374. Tladi, Dire, Civil Liability in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol: To Be or Not to Be (Binding)?, 10 (2010) Int. Environ. Agreements 15–27 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  375. Tladi, Dire, Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of the Supplementary Pro-tocol: Re-Interpretation and Re-Imagination, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liabil-ity Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  376. Toczeck Skarlatakis, Christine/Kinderlerer, Julian, The Importance of Public Participation, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 111–130 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  377. Tomuschat, Christian, Article 2(3) UNC, in: Bruno Simma/Daniel-Erasmus Khan et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012), 181–199 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  378. Torres, Juan M./Sánchez, Carmen/Ramı́rez, Miguel A. et al., First Field Trial of a Transmis-sible Recombinant Vaccine Against Myxomatosis and Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease, 19 (2001) Vaccine 4536–4543 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  379. Treves, Tullio, Article 287 UNCLOS, in: Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Con-vention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (C.H.Beck/Hart/Nomos, München et al. 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  380. Treves, Tullio, Environmental Impact Assessment and the Precautionary Approach: Why Are International Courts and Tribunals Reluctant to Consider Them as General Principles of Law?, in: Mads T. Andenæs/Malgosia A. Fitzmaurice et al. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2019), 379–388 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  381. Triepel, Heinrich, Völkerrecht und Landesrecht (Hirschfeld, Leipzig 1899) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  382. Trouwborst, Arie, Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  383. Trouwborst, Arie, Precautionary Rights and Duties of States (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  384. Tsai, Ching‐Sung/Kong, In Iok/Lesmana, Anastashia et al., Rapid and Marker‐Free Refac-toring of Xylose‐fermenting Yeast Strains with Cas9/CRISPR, 112 (2015) Biotechnolo-gy and Bioengineering 2406–2411 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  385. Tsatsakis, Aristidis M./Nawaz, Muhammad Amjad/Kouretas, Demetrios et al., Environmental Impacts of Genetically Modified Plants: A Review, 156 (2017) Environmental Re-search 818–833 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  386. Tsuda, Yoshimi/Caposio, Patrizia/Parkins, Christopher J. et al., A Replicating Cytomegalovi-rus-Based Vaccine Encoding a Single Ebola Virus Nucleoprotein CTL Epitope Confers Protection Against Ebola Virus, 5 (2011) PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases e1275 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  387. Tunc, André (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vol. XI: Torts (Brill Nijhoff, Leiden 1986) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  388. Tvedt, Morten Walløe/Schei, Peter Johan, “Genetic Resources” in the CBD: The Wording, the Past, the Present and the Future, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/9/INF/1, Annex (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  389. Tvedt, Morten Walløe/Young, Tomme R., Beyond Access: Exploring Implementation of the Fair and Equitable Sharing Commitment in the CBD, ABS Series No. 2 (2007), available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/EPLP-067-2.pdf (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  390. Tyagi, Shaily/Kesiraju, Karthik/Saakre, Manjesh et al., Genome Editing for Resistance to Insect Pests: An Emerging Tool for Crop Improvement, 5 (2020) ACS Omega 20674–20683 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  391. UC Davis, Big Win: New Countermeasures to Eliminate Pandemic Risk, available at: https://www.preemptproject.org/s/BIG-WIN-New-Countermeasures.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  392. Unckless, Robert L./Clark, Andrew G./Messer, Philipp W., Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive, 205 (2017) Genetics 827–841 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  393. UNECE, The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide (2nd ed., Geneva 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  394. UNECE, The Aarhus Convention’s GMO Amendment (12 March 2020), available at: http://www.unece.org/env/pp/gmos.html (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  395. UNEP-GEF BCH Project, An Introduction to the Biosafety Clearing House (2011), availa-ble at: http://bch.cbd.int/help/trainingmaterials/En/03)%20Training%20Modules/MO02En.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  396. United Kingdom, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, An Introductory Guide to Valuing Ecosystem Services (2007), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/pdf/valuing_ecosystems.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  397. United Nations Compensation Commission, UNCC at a Glance, available at: https://uncc.ch/uncc-glance (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  398. United Nations Office at Geneva, Lists of States Parties, Signatory States and Non-Signatory States of the Biological Weapons Convention, available at: https://www.un.org/disarmament/biological-weapons/about/membership-and-regional-groups (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  399. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Overview of Declarations and Reservations to the New York Convention, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXII-1&chapter=22&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  400. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Treaty Collection, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-8-a&chapter=27&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  401. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Constitution of the World Health Organization, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=080000028002d899&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  402. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Deci-sion-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-13&chapter=27&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  403. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Treaty Collec-tion, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-8&chapter=27&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  404. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Trans-boundary Context, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-4&chapter=27&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  405. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations Treaty Collection, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-1&chapter=26&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  406. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbi-tral Awards, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXII-1&chapter=22&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  407. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the GMO Amendment to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-13-b&chapter=27&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  408. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, United Nations Treaty Collection, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-8-c&chapter=27&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  409. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280167ca8&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  410. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Materials on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, UN Doc. ST/LEG/SER.B/25 (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  411. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Status of the International Plant Protection Convention (New Revised Text), United Nations Treaty Collection, available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280066b19&clang=_en (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  412. University of Joensuu/Environment Canada/United Nations Environment Programme, Multilat-eral Environmental Agreement Negotiator’s Handbook (2nd ed., Joensuu, Finland 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  413. University of Oxford, Department of Zoology, New Project Led by Oxford University’s Zo-ology Department to Study the Community Ecology of the African Mosquito Vectors of Malaria (15 June 2017), available at: https://www.zoo.ox.ac.uk/article/new-project-led-oxford-universitys-zoology-department-study-community-ecology-african (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  414. Urnov, Fyodor D./Ronald, Pamela C./Carroll, Dana, A Call for Science-Based Review of the European Court's Decision on Gene-Edited Crops, 36 (2018) Nature Biotech. 800–802 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  415. van der Meer, Piet, Definitions, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Envi-ronment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 281–288 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  416. van der Meer, Piet/Angenon, Geert/Bergmans, Hans et al., The Status Under EU Law of Organisms Developed Through Novel Genomic Techniques (2021) European Journal of Risk Regulation 1–20 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  417. van der Vlugt, C./van den Akker, E./Roesink, C. H./Westra, J., Risk Assessment Method for Activities Involving Organisms with a Gene Drive Under Contained Use, RIVM Letter Report 2018–0090 (2018), available at: https://rivm.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10029/622023/2018-0090.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y (last accessed 28 May 2022) eng Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  418. van der Vlugt, Cécile J. B./Brown, David D./Lehmann, Kathleen/Leunda, Amaya/Willemarck, Nicolas, A Framework for the Risk Assessment and Management of Gene Drive Tech-nology in Contained Use, 23 (2018) Appl. Biosaf. 25–31 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  419. van die Wiel, Clemens/Schaart, Jan/Nieks, Rients/Visser, Richard, Traditional Plant Breed-ing Methods (2010), available at: http://edepot.wur.nl/141713 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  420. Vassena, R./Heindryckx, B./Peco, R. et al., Genome Engineering Through CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in the Human Germline and Pluripotent Stem Cells, 22 (2016) Human Re-production Update 411–419 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  421. Vega-Barbosa, Giovanny/Aboagye, Lorraine, Human Rights and the Protection of the Envi-ronment: The Advisory Opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, EJIL: Talk!, 26 February 2018, available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/human-rights-and-the-protection-of-the-environment-the-advisory-opinion-of-the-inter-american-court-of-human-rights/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  422. Vence, Tracy, “Heroes of CRISPR” Disputed, The Scientist, 19 January 2016, available at: https://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/45119/title/-Heroes-of-CRISPR--Disputed/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  423. Ventura, Andrea/Maddalo, Danilo/Manchado, Eusebio et al., In Vivo Engineering of Onco-genic Chromosomal Rearrangements with the CRISPR/Cas9 System, 516 (2014) Na-ture 423–427 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  424. Verheyen, Roda, Climate Change Damage and International Law: Prevention, Duties and State Responsibility (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  425. Vermeer-Künzli, Anna Maria Helena, The Protection of Individuals by Means of Diplomatic Protection: Diplomatic Protection as a Human Rights Instrument (Universiteit Leiden, Leiden 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  426. Vicente, Manuel M./Chaves-Ferreira, Miguel/Jorge, João M. P./Proença, João T./Barreto, Vasco M., The Off-Targets of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Re-peats Gene Editing, 9 (2021) Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 718466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  427. Vihma, Antto, Climate of Consensus: Managing Decision Making in the UN Climate Change Negotiations, 24 (2015) RECIEL 58–68 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  428. Vives-Vallés, Juan Antonio/Collonnier, Cécile, The Judgment of the CJEU of 25 July 2018 on Mutagenesis: Interpretation and Interim Legislative Proposal, 10 (2019) Frontiers in Plant Science 1813 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  429. Vöneky, Silja, Die Fortgeltung des Umweltvölkerrechts in internationalen bewaffneten Konflikten (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  430. Vöneky, Silja, Analogy in International Law, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  431. Vöneky, Silja, The Liability Annex to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, in: Doris König/Peter-Tobias Stoll et al. (eds.), International Law Today: New Challenges and the Need for Reform? (Springer, Berlin et al. 2008), 165–197 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  432. Vöneky, Silja, Recht, Moral und Ethik: Grundlagen und Grenzen demokratischer Legitimation für Ethikgremien (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  433. Vöneky, Silja, International Standard Setting in Biomedicine – Foundations and New Challeng-es, 61 (2019) German YBIL 131–152 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  434. Vöneky, Silja, Limiting the Misuse of the Environment during Peacetime and War – The ENMOD Convention, FIP 5/2020 (2020), available at: https://www.jura.uni-freiburg.de/de/institute/ioeffr2/downloads/online-papers/FIP%202020_05_Voeneky_ENMOD-Convention_final.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  435. Vöneky, Silja/Beck, Felix, Article 145 UNCLOS, in: Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Na-tions Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (C.H.Beck/Hart/Nomos, Mün-chen et al. 2017), 1007–1028 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  436. Vöneky, Silja/Beck, Felix, Umweltschutz und Menschenrechte, in: Alexander Proelß (ed.), Internationales Umweltrecht (2nd ed., De Gruyter, Berlin 2022), 191–286 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  437. Vöneky, Silja/Höfelmeier, Anja, Article 139 UNCLOS, in: Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (C.H.Beck/Hart/Nomos, München et al. 2017), 968–976 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  438. Vordermayer, Markus, The Extraterritorial Application of Multilteral Environmental Agree-ments, 59 (2018) Harv. Int’l L. J. 59–124 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  439. Waibel, Michael, The Diplomatic Channel, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 1085–1097 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  440. Walker, T./Johnson, P. H./Moreira, L. A. et al., The WMel Wolbachia Strain Blocks Dengue and Invades Caged Aedes Aegypti Populations, 476 (2011) Nature 450 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  441. Walton, Beatrice A., Duties Owed: Low-Intensity Cyber Attacks and Liability for Trans-boundary Torts in International Law, 126 (2017) Yale L.J. 1460–1519 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  442. Waltz, Emily, CRISPR-Edited Crops Free to Enter Market, Skip Regulation, 34 (2016) Nature Biotech. 582 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  443. Waltz, Emily, Gene-Edited CRISPR Mushroom Escapes US Regulation, 532 (2016) Nature News 293 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  444. Wang, Ming/Zuris, John A./Meng, Fantao et al., Efficient Delivery of Genome-Editing Pro-teins Using Bioreducible Lipid Nanoparticles, 113 (2016) PNAS 2868–2873 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  445. Warmbrod, Kelsey Lane/Kobokovich, Amanda/West, Rachel et al., Gene Drives: Pursuing Opportunities, Minimizing Risk (2020), available at: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2020/200518-Gene-Drives-Report.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  446. Wasmer, Martin, Roads Forward for European GMO Policy: Uncertainties in Wake of ECJ Judgment Have to Be Mitigated by Regulatory Reform, 7 (2019) Front. Bioeng. & Biotechnol. 367 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  447. Watson, Crystal/Sell, Tara Kirk/Watson, Matthew et al., Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks (2018), available at: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2018/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  448. Webber, Bruce L./Raghu, S./Edwards, Owain R., Opinion: Is CRISPR-Based Gene Drive a Biocontrol Silver Bullet or Global Conservation Threat?, 112 (2015) PNAS 10565–10567 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  449. Wehrli, A., The WHO Certification Scheme on the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products Moving in International Commerce, 31 (1997) Drug Information Journal 899–902 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  450. Weitzdörfer, Julius, Die Haftung für Nuklearschäden nach japanischem Atomrecht – Rechtsprobleme der Reaktorkatastrophe von Fukushima I, 16 (2011) Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht 61–115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  451. Whiteman, Marjorie M., Damages in International Law, Vol. III (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1943) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  452. Whiteman, Marjorie M., Digest of International Law, Vol. 4 (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1965) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  453. Whitworth, Kristin M./Rowland, Raymond R. R./Ewen, Catherine L. et al., Gene-Edited Pigs Are Protected from Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, 34 (2016) Nature Biotech. 20–22 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  454. WHO Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing, Human Genome Editing: As We Explore Options for Global Governance, Caution Must Be Our Watchword (08 November 2019), available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/08-11-2019-human-genome-editing-as-we-explore-options-for-global-governance-caution-must-be-our-watchword (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  455. WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases/Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Guidance Framework for Testing of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes (2nd ed., WHO, Geneva 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  456. Wicker, Thomas/Sabot, François/Hua-Van, Aurélie et al., A Unified Classification System for Eukaryotic Transposable Elements, 8 (2007) Nature Rev. Genet. 973 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  457. Wiener, Jonathan B./Rogers, Michael D., Comparing Precaution in the United States and Europe, 5 (2002) Journal of Risk Research 317–349 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  458. Wiersema, Annecoos, The New International Law-Makers? Conferences of the Parties to Multilateral Environmental Agreements, 31 (2008) Mich. J. Int’l L. 231–287 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  459. Wilcox, Vanessa, Damage Caused by GMOs Under International Environmental Law, in: Bernhard A. Koch (ed.), Damage Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms. Compara-tive Survey of Redress Options for Harm to Persons, Property or the Environment (De Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2010), 754–783 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  460. Wilde, Ralph, The Extraterritorial Application of International Human Rights Law on Civil and Political Rights, in: Scott Sheeran/Nigel Rodley (eds.), Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law (Taylor and Francis, Hoboken 2014), 635–661 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  461. Wilson, Christopher J./Fennell, Tim/Bothmer, Anne et al., Response to “Unexpected Muta-tions After CRISPR-Cas9 Editing in Vivo”, 15 (2018) Nature Methods 236–237 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  462. Windbichler, Nikolai/Menichelli, Miriam/Papathanos, Philippos Aris et al., A Synthetic Hom-ing Endonuclease-Based Gene Drive System in the Human Malaria Mosquito, 473 (2011) Nature 212–215 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  463. Windbichler, Nikolai/Papathanos, Philippos Aris/Crisanti, Andrea, Targeting the X Chromo-some During Spermatogenesis Induces Y Chromosome Transmission Ratio Distortion and Early Dominant Embryo Lethality in Anopheles Gambiae, 4 (2008) PLOS Genet-ics e1000291 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  464. Winter, G./Jans, J. H./Macrory, R./Kramer, L., Weighing up the EC Environmental Liability Directive, 20 (2008) J. Envt’l L. 163–191 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  465. Wittich, Stephan, Compensation, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Ox-ford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  466. Wittich, Stephan, Punitive Damages, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 667 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  467. Wolf, Joachim, Gibt es im Völkerrecht einen einheitlichen Schadensbegriff?, 49 (1989) ZaöRV 403–444 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  468. Wolfrum, Rüdiger/Möldner, Mirka, International Courts and Tribunals, Evidence, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  469. Woo, Je Wook/Kim, Jungeun/Kwon, Soon Il et al., DNA-Free Genome Editing in Plants with Preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins, 33 (2015) Nature Biotech. 1162 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  470. World Mosquito Program, FAQ, available at: https://www.worldmosquitoprogram.org/en/learn/faqs (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  471. World Mosquito Program, Our Wolbachia Method, available at: https://www.worldmosquitoprogram.org/en/work/wolbachia-method (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  472. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Member Countries, available at: https://www.woah.org/en/who-we-are/members/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  473. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Our Missions, available at: https://www.woah.org/en/who-we-are/mission/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  474. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Role of the OIE in Improving Animal Health by Using Biotechnologies: OIE Bulletin 2007–4, available at: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Publications_&_Documentation/docs/pdf/bulletin/Bull_2007-4-ENG.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  475. World Trade Organization (WTO), Members and Observers, available at: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  476. Xanat, Vargas Meza/Jiang, Ke/Barnett, George A./Park, Han Woo, International Trade of GMO-Related Agricultural Products, 52 (2018) Quality & Quantity 565–587 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  477. Xiang, Wen, International Liability and Redress for Genetically Modified Organisms and Challenge for China's Biosafety Regulation, in: Vasilka Sancin/Maša Kovič Dine (eds.), International Environmental Law: Contemporary Concerns and Challenges (GV založba, Ljubljana 2012), 581–600 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  478. Xiao, An/Wang, Zhanxiang/Hu, Yingying et al., Chromosomal Deletions and Inversions Mediated by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas in Zebrafish, 41 (2013) Nucleic Acids Res. e141 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  479. Xiaoyi, Jiang/Jianwei, Zhang, Marine Environment and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Twenty Years' Practices and Prospects, 5 (2017) China Legal Sci-ence 84–110 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  480. Xue, Hanqin, Transboundary Damage in International Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  481. Yamamoto, D. S./Nagumo, H./Yoshida, S., Flying Vaccinator; a Transgenic Mosquito De-livers a Leishmania Vaccine via Blood Feeding, 19 (2010) Insect Molecular Biolo-gy 391–398 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  482. Yao, Franck Adama/Millogo, Abdoul-Azize/Epopa, Patric Stephane et al., Mark-Release-Recapture Experiment in Burkina Faso Demonstrates Reduced Fitness and Dispersal of Genetically-Modified Sterile Malaria Mosquitoes, 13 (2022) Nature Comms. 796 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  483. Yen, Shuo-Ting/Zhang, Min/Deng, Jian Min et al., Somatic Mosaicism and Allele Complexity Induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA Injections in Mouse Zygotes, 393 (2014) Developmen-tal Biology 3–9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  484. Yifru, Worku Damena/Fujii, Mai/Garforth, Kathryn, The Decision-Making Procedures of the Protocol, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 78–88 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  485. Yifru, Worku Damena/Garforth, Kathryn, The Supplementary Protocol: A Treaty Subject to Domestic Law?, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 150–165 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  486. Yifru, Worku Damena/Garforth, Kathryn/Scarone, Paola, Review of Issues, Instruments and Practices Relevant to Liability and Redress for Damage Resulting from Transboundary Movements of Living Modified Organisms, CBD Biosafety Technical Series 03 (Mon-treal 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  487. Yin, Hao/Xue, Wen/Chen, Sidi et al., Genome Editing with Cas9 in Adult Mice Corrects a Disease Mutation and Phenotype, 32 (2014) Nature Biotech. 551 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  488. Abbate, Jeremy/May, Mike/Friedman, Yali, Scientific American Worldview: A Glob-al Biotechnology Perspective (2016), available at: https://static.scientificamerican.com/wv/assets/2016_SciAmWorldView.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  489. Acquaah, George, Conventional Plant Breeding Principles and Techniques, in: Jameel M. Al-Khayri/Mohan Jain/Dennis V. Johnson (eds.), Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies. Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools (Springer, Cham 2015), 115–158 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  490. African Centre for Biodiversity/GeneWatch UK/Third World Network, GM Mosquitoes in Burkina Faso: A Briefing for the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (2018), available at: http://www.genewatch.org/uploads/f03c6d66a9b354535738483c1c3d49e4/GM_mosquito_report_WEB.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  491. Agapito-Tenfen, Sarah Z./Wikmark, Odd-Gunnar, Current Status of Emerging Technolo-gies for Plant Breeding: Biosafety and Knowledge Gaps of Site Directed Nucleases and Oligonucleotide-Directed Mutagenesis, Biosafety Report 02/2015 (2015), available at: http://genok.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/250615_Emerging_technologies_final.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  492. Ago, Roberto, Fourth Report on State Responsibility, YBILC 1972, Vol. II, 126 (1972) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  493. Ahloowalia, B. S./Maluszynski, M./Nichterlein, K., Global Impact of Mutation-Derived Varie-ties, 135 (2004) Euphytica 187–204 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  494. Akbari, Omar S./Bellen, Hugo J./Bier, Ethan et al., Safeguarding Gene Drive Experiments in the Laboratory: Multiple Strategies Are Needed to Ensure Safe Gene Drive Experi-ments, 349 (2015) Science 927–929 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  495. Akbari, Omar S./Chen, Chun-Hong/Marshall, John M. et al., Novel Synthetic Medea Selfish Genetic Elements Drive Population Replacement in Drosophila; a Theoretical Explora-tion of Medea-Dependent Population Suppression, 3 (2014) ACS Synthetic Biolo-gy 915–928 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  496. Akbari, Omar S./Matzen, Kelly D./Marshall, John M. et al., A Synthetic Gene Drive System for Local, Reversible Modification and Suppression of Insect Populations, 23 (2013) Current Biology 671–677 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  497. Albers, Bruce/Johnson, Alexander/Lewis, Julian et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell (6th ed., Garland Science, New York 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  498. Alcalay, Yehonatan/Fuchs, Silke/Galizi, Roberto et al., The Potential for a Released Auto-somal X-Shredder Becoming a Driving-Y Chromosome and Invasively Suppressing Wild Populations of Malaria Mosquitoes, 9 (2021) Front. Bioeng. & Biotechnol. 752253 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  499. Alphey, Luke S./Crisanti, Andrea/Randazzo, Filippo Fil/Akbari, Omar S., Opinion: Standardiz-ing the Definition of Gene Drive, 117 (2020) PNAS 30864–30867 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  500. Altwicker-Hámori, Szilvia/Altwicker, Tilmann/Peters, Anne, Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-Pecuniary Damage Under the European Convention on Human Rights, 76 (2016) ZaöRV 1–51 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  501. Alvarez-Morales, Reynaldo Ariel, A Scientific Perspective on the Supplementary Protocol, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Na-goya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 105–110 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  502. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Local Remedies in International Law (2nd ed., Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge 2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  503. American Law Institute (ALI), Restatement of the Law Third: Foreign Relations of the United States, Volume 2 (American Law Inst. Publ, St. Paul, Minnesota 1987) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  504. Andersen, Kristian G./Rambaut, Andrew/Lipkin, W. Ian/Holmes, Edward C./Garry, Robert F., The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2, 26 (2020) Nature Medicine 450–452 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  505. Andolfo, Giuseppe/Iovieno, Paolo/Frusciante, Luigi/Ercolano, Maria R., Genome-Editing Technologies for Enhancing Plant Disease Resistance, 7 (2016) Front. Plant Sci. 1813 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  506. Angulo, Elena/Bárcena, Juan, Towards a Unique and Transmissible Vaccine Against Myxomatosis and Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease for Rabbit Populations, 34 (2007) Wild-life Research 567 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  507. Angulo, Elena/Cooke, B., First Synthesize New Viruses Then Regulate Their Release? The Case of the Wild Rabbit, 11 (2002) Molecular Ecology 2703–2709 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  508. Angulo, Elena/Gilna, Ben, When Biotech Crosses Borders, 26 (2008) Nature Bio-tech. 277–282 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  509. Antunes, Nuno Sérgio Marques, Acquiescence, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  510. Araki, Motoko/Nojima, Kumie/Ishii, Tetsuya, Caution Required for Handling Genome Edit-ing Technology, 32 (2014) Trends in Biotechnology 234–237 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  511. Arangio-Ruiz, Gaetano, Second Report on State Responsibility, YBILC 1989 Vol. II, Pt. 1, 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  512. Ardlie, K. G., Putting the Brake on Drive: Meiotic Drive of t Haplotypes in Natural Popu-lations of Mice, 14 (1998) Trends in Genetics 189–193 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  513. Ascencio, Alfonso, The Transboundary Movement of Living Modified Organisms: Issues Relating to Liability and Compensation, 6 (1997) RECIEL 293–303 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  514. Baden, Lindsey R./El Sahly, Hana M./Essink, Brandon et al., Efficacy and Safety of the MRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine, 384 (2021) N. Engl. J. Med. 403–416 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  515. Bail, Christoph/Decaestecker, Jean Paul/Jørgensen, Matthias, European Union, in: Chris-toph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 166–185 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  516. Baltimore, David/Berg, Paul/Botchan, Michael et al., Biotechnology. A Prudent Path For-ward for Genomic Engineering and Germline Gene Modification, 348 (2015) Sci-ence 36–38 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  517. Banaszewska, Dorota Marianna, Lex Specialis, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  518. Banda, Maria L., Regime Congruence: Rethinking the Scope of State Responsibility for Transboundary Environmental Harm, 103 (2019) Minnesota Law Review 1879–1690 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  519. Barboza, Julio, The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  520. Barrangou, Rodolphe, CRISPR Craziness: A Response to the EU Court Ruling, 1 (2018) The CRISPR Journal 251–252 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  521. Barrangou, Rodolphe/Doudna, Jennifer A., Applications of CRISPR Technologies in Re-search and Beyond, 34 (2016) Nature Biotech. 933 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  522. Barrangou, Rodolphe/Fremaux, Christophe/Deveau, Hélène et al., CRISPR Provides Ac-quired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes, 315 (2007) Science 1709–1712 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  523. Bartkowski, Bartosz, Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Perspective (Routledge, London/New York 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  524. Bearden, David M., Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-ity Act: A Summary of Superfund Cleanup Authorities and Related Provisions of the Act (2012), available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41039.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  525. Beck, Felix, All About that Risk? A (Re-)Assessment of the CJEU’s Reasoning in the “Genome Editing” Case, 17 (2019) EurUP 246–255 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  526. Beck, Felix, The International Regime on Liability for Damage Arising from the Use of Ge-nome Editing and Gene Drives in Agriculture: Current Shortcomings and Pathways for Future Improvement, in: Christian Dürnberger/Sebastian Pfeilmeier/Stephan Schleiss-ing (eds.), Genome Editing in Agriculture. Between Precaution and Responsibility (No-mos, Baden-Baden 2019), 135–151 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  527. Becker-Weinberg, Vasco, Article 229 UNCLOS, in: Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Na-tions Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (C.H.Beck/Hart/Nomos, Munich et al. 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  528. Bederman, David J./Keskar, Soniya P., Antarctic Environmental Liability: The Stockholm Annex and Beyond, 19 (2005) Emory International Law Review 1383–1405 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  529. Beeman, R. W./Friesen, K. S./Denell, R. E., Maternal-Effect Selfish Genes in Flour Bee-tles, 256 (1992) Science 89–92 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  530. Beisel, Chase L./Gomaa, Ahmed A./Barrangou, Rodolphe, A CRISPR Design for Next-Generation Antimicrobials, 15 (2014) Genome Biology 516 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  531. Bendel, Justine/Harrison, James, Determining the Legal Nature and Content of EIAs in International Environmental Law: What Does the ICJ Decision in the Joined Costa Rica v Nicaragua/Nicaragua v Costa Rica Cases Tell Us?, 42 (2017) QIL 13–21 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  532. Benzing, Markus, Das Beweisrecht vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  533. Bergkamp, Lucas, Liability and Environment: Private and Public Law Aspects of Civil Lia-bility for Environmental Harm in an International Context (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  534. Bergkamp, Lucas, Liability and Redress: Existing Legal Solutions for Traditional Damage, in: CropLife International (ed.), Compilation of Expert Papers Concerning Liability and Re-dress and Living Modified Organisms. A Contribution to the Article 27 Process Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (2004), 21–29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  535. Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie, The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: A Multilateral Approach to Regulate GMOs, in: Edith Brown Weiss/John H. Jackson/Nathalie Bernas-coni-Osterwalder (eds.), Reconciling Environment and Trade (2nd ed., Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden 2008), 645–677 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  536. Beyerlin, Ulrich/Marauhn, Thilo, International Environmental Law (Hart/Beck/Nomos, Ox-ford et al. 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  537. Bianchi, Andrea, Environmental Harm Resulting from the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space: Some Remarks on State Responsibility and Liability, in: Francesco Francioni/Tullio Scovazzi (eds.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm (Graham & Trotman, London 1991), 231–272 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  538. Bibikova, Marina/Golic, Mary/Golic, Kent G./Carroll, Dana, Targeted Chromosomal Cleav-age and Mutagenesis in Drosophila Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases, 161 (2002) Genet-ics 1169–1175 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  539. Bier, Ethan, Gene Drives Gaining Speed, 23 (2022) Nature Rev. Genet. 5–22 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  540. Bikard, David/Euler, Chad W./Jiang, Wenyan et al., Exploiting CRISPR-Cas Nucleases to Produce Sequence-Specific Antimicrobials, 32 (2014) Nature Biotech. 1146–1150 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  541. Bilder, Richard B., The Settlement of Disputes in the Field of the International Law of the Environment, 144 (1975) RdC 140–239 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  542. Birnie, Patricia W./Boyle, Alan E./Redgwell, Catherine, International Law and the Environ-ment (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  543. Boch, Jens/Scholze, Heidi/Schornack, Sebastian et al., Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors, 326 (2009) Science 1509–1512 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  544. Böckenförde, Markus, The Introduction of Alien or New Species into the Marine Envi-ronment: A Challenge for Standard Setting and Enforcement, in: Peter Ehlers/Elisabeth Mann-Borgese/Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Marine Issues. From a Scientific, Political and Legal Perspective (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002), 241–263 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  545. Böckenförde, Markus, Biological Safety, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclo-pedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  546. Böckenförde, Markus, Genetically Modified Organisms, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  547. Bodansky, Daniel, Deconstructing the Precautionary Principle, in: David D. Caron/Harry N. Scheiber (eds.), Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters (Law of the Sea Institute Uni-versity of California, Berkeley et al. 2010), 381–391 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  548. Bodansky, Daniel, Thirty Years Later: Top Ten Developments in International Environmental Law (2020) Yearbook of International Environmental Law 1–19 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  549. Bodansky, Daniel/Crook, John R., Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles: Introduction and Overview, 96 (2002) AJIL 773–791 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  550. Böhringer, Ayse-Martina, Die Kooperationsvereinbarungen der Sekretariate multilateraler Umweltschutzübereinkommen (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  551. Bolotin, Alexander/Quinquis, Benoit/Sorokin, Alexei/Ehrlich, S. Dusko, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindrome Repeats (CRISPRs) Have Spacers of Extrachromosomal Origin, 151 (2005) Microbiology 2551–2561 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  552. Boon, Kristen E., Are Control Tests Fit for the Future? The Slippage Problem in Attribu-tion Doctrines, 15 (2015) Melb. J. Int’l L. 1–48 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  553. Boos-Hersberger, Astrid, Transboundary Water Pollution and State Responsibility: The Sandoz Spill, 4 (1997) Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law 103–131 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  554. Boothby, William H., Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  555. Borchard, Edwin M., Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States, 1 (1929) ZaöRV 223–250 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  556. Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Reflections of Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law, 63 (2014) ICLQ 535–567 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  557. Boyce Thompson Institute, BTI Receives DARPA “Insect Allies” Award to Develop Virus-es and Insects for Maize Improvement (27 July 2017), available at: https://btiscience.org/explore-bti/news/post/bti-receives-darpa-insect-allies-award-to-develop-viruses-and-insects-for-maize-improvement/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  558. Boyle, Alan E., State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequenc-es of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?, 39 (1990) ICLQ 1–26 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  559. Boyle, Alan E., The Role of International Human Rights Law in the Protection of the Environ-ment, in: Alan E. Boyle/Michael Anderson (eds.), Human Rights Approaches to Envi-ronmental Protection (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996), 43–69 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  560. Boyle, Alan E., Reparation for Environmental Damage in International Law: Some Preliminary Problems, in: Michael Bowman/Alan E. Boyle (eds.), Environmental Damage in Interna-tional and Comparative Law. Problems of Definition and Valuation (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York 2002), 17–26 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  561. Boyle, Alan E., Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law, 17 (2005) J. Envt’l L. 3–26 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  562. Boyle, Alan E., Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Re-sponsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 95–104 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  563. Boyle, Alan E./Redgwell, Catherine, Birnie, Boyle, and Redgwell’s International Law and the Environment (4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, NY 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  564. Boyle, Kevin J., Contingent Valuation in Practice, in: Patricia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 83–122 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  565. Brand, Ronald A., Forum Non Conveniens, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  566. Brans, Edward H. P., Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources: Standing, Dam-age and Damage Assessment (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  567. Brans, Edward H. P./Dongelmans, Dorith H., The Supplementary Protocol and the EU Environmental Liability Directive, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Re-gime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 180–200 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  568. Bratspies, Rebecca M., State Responsibility for Human-Induced Environmental Disas-ters, 55 (2012) German YBIL 175–213 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  569. Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (eds.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  570. Brenner, D. M./Baltensperger, D. D. et al., Genetic Resources and Breeding of Amaran-thus, in: Jules Janick (ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews, Volume 19 (Wiley, New York, N.Y 2000), 227–285 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  571. Brent, Kerryn Anne, The Certain Activities Case: What Implications for the No-Harm Rule?, 20 (2017) Asia Pac. JEL 28–56 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  572. Brinegar, Katelyn/K Yetisen, Ali/Choi, Sun et al., The Commercialization of Genome-Editing Technologies, 37 (2017) Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 924–932 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  573. Broberg, Morten, A Critical Appraisal of the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations (2005) In Times of Pandemic: It Is Time for Revision, 11 (2020) European Journal of Risk Regulation 202–209 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  574. Brown, Paul, Insurers Refuse to Cover GM Farmers, The Guardian, 08 October 2003, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2003/oct/08/gm.sciencenews (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  575. Brown Weiss, Edith, Invoking State Responsibility in the Twenty-First Century, 96 (2002) AJIL 798–816 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  576. Brunnée, Jutta, COPing with Consent: Law-Making Under Multilateral Environmental Agreements, 15 (2002) Leiden J. Int’l L. 1–52 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  577. Brunnée, Jutta, Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection, 53 (2004) ICLQ 351–368 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  578. Brunnée, Jutta, Enforcement Mechanisms in International Law and International Environmental Law, in: Ulrich Beyerlin/Peter-Tobias Stoll/Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Ensuring Compli-ance with Multilateral Environmental Agreements. A Dialogue Between Practitioners and Academia (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden 2006), 1–23 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  579. Brunnée, Jutta, International Environmental Law and Community Interests: Procedural Aspects, in: Eyal Benvenisti/Georg Nolte/Keren Yalin-Mor (eds.), Community Interests Across International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018), 151–175 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  580. Buchman, Anna/Marshall, John M./Ostrovski, Dennis/Yang, Ting/Akbari, Omar S., Syntheti-cally Engineered Medea Gene Drive System in the Worldwide Crop Pest Drosophila Suzukii (2018) PNAS 201713139 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  581. Buchthal, Joanna/Evans, Sam Weiss/Lunshof, Jeantine/Telford, Sam R./Esvelt, Kevin M., Mice Against Ticks: An Experimental Community-Guided Effort to Prevent Tick-Borne Disease by Altering the Shared Environment, 374 (2019) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 20180105 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  582. Bull, J. J., Evolutionary Decay and the Prospects for Long-Term Disease Intervention Using Engineered Insect Vectors, 2015 (2015) Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health 152–166 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  583. Bull, James J./Smithson, Mark W./Nuismer, Scott L., Transmissible Viral Vaccines, 26 (2018) Trends in Microbiology 6–15 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  584. Burt, Austin, Site-Specific Selfish Genes as Tools for the Control and Genetic Engineer-ing of Natural Populations, 270 (2003) Proc. R. Soc. B 921–928 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  585. Burt, Austin/Coulibaly, Mamadou/Crisanti, Andrea/Diabate, Abdoulaye/Kayondo, Jonathan K., Gene Drive to Reduce Malaria Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa, 5 (2018) Journal of Responsible Innovation S80 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  586. Burt, Austin/Crisanti, Andrea, Gene Drive: Evolved and Synthetic, 13 (2018) ACS Chemi-cal Biology 343–346 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  587. Burt, Austin/Koufopanou, Vassiliki, Homing Endonuclease Genes: The Rise and Fall and Rise Again of a Selfish Element, 14 (2004) Current Opinion in Genetics & Develop-ment 609–615 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  588. Burt, Austin/Trivers, Robert, Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements (Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  589. Callaway, Ewen, ‘Gene Drive’ Moratorium Shot Down at UN Biodiversity Meeting, Nature News (21 December 2016), available at: http://www.nature.com/news/gene-drive-moratorium-shot-down-at-un-biodiversity-meeting-1.21216 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  590. Callaway, Ewen, UN Treaty Agrees to Limit Gene Drives but Rejects a Moratorium, Nature News, 29 November 2018, available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07600-w (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  591. Callaway, Ewen, The Mosquito Strategy that Could Eliminate Dengue, Nature News, 20 August 2020, available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02492-1 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  592. Callebaut, Sam Odo, New Developments in Modern Biotechnology: A Survey and Analy-sis of the Regulatory Status of Plants Produced Through New Breeding Techniques, Master Thesis (2015), available at: http://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/213/647/RUG01-002213647_2015_0001_AC.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  593. Cammack, Richard/Attwood, Teresa K. et al. (eds.), Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  594. Campbell, Karl J./Beek, Joe/Eason, Charles T. et al., The Next Generation of Rodent Eradications: Innovative Technologies and Tools to Improve Species Specificity and Increase Their Feasibility on Islands, 185 (2015) Biological Conservation 47–58 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  595. Cançado Trindade, Antônio Augusto, Principle 15, in: Jorge E. Viñuales (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015), 403–428 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  596. Carlson, Daniel F./Lancto, Cheryl A./Zang, Bin et al., Production of Hornless Dairy Cattle from Genome-Edited Cell Lines, 34 (2016) Nature Biotech. 479–481 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  597. Carneiro Dutra, Heverton Leandro/Neves Rocha, Marcele/Stehling Dias, Fernando et al., Wolbachia Blocks Currently Circulating Zika Virus Isolates in Brazilian Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes, 19 (2016) Cell Host & Microbe 771–774 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  598. Caron, David D., The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship Between Form and Authority, 96 (2002) AJIL 857–873 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  599. Carrato, J. Thomas/Barkett, John/Goldberg, Phil, The Industry's Compact and Its Implica-tions for the Supplementary Protocol, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Re-gime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 218–239 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  600. Carroll, Dana, Genome Engineering with Zinc-Finger Nucleases, 188 (2011) Genet-ics 773–782 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  601. Cassese, Antonio, The Nicaragua and Tadic Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judg-ment on Genocide in Bosnia, 18 (2007) EJIL 649–668 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  602. Champer, Jackson/Buchman, Anna/Akbari, Omar S., Cheating Evolution: Engineering Gene Drives to Manipulate the Fate of Wild Populations, 17 (2016) Nature Rev. Genet. 146–159 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  603. Champer, Jackson/Reeves, Riona/Oh, Suh Yeon et al., Novel CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive Constructs Reveal Insights into Mechanisms of Resistance Allele Formation and Drive Efficiency in Genetically Diverse Populations, 13 (2017) PLOS Genetics e1006796 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  604. Chang, Yen-Chiang/Zhao, Yue, The Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Incident and Ma-rine Pollution, 64 (2012) Marine Pollution Bulletin 897–901 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  605. Charlesworth, B./Langley, C. H., The Population Genetics of Drosophila Transposable Elements, 23 (1989) Annual Review of Genetics 251–287 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  606. Charney, Jonathan I., Third State Remedies for Environmental Damage to the World’s Common Spaces, in: Francesco Francioni/Tullio Scovazzi (eds.), International Respon-sibility for Environmental Harm (Graham & Trotman, London 1991), 149–177 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  607. Charpentier, Emmanuelle/van der Oost, John/White, Malcolm F., CrRNA Biogenesis, in: Rodolphe Barrangou/John van der Oost (eds.), CRISPR-Cas Systems. RNA-Mediated Adaptive Immunity in Bacteria and Archaea (Springer, Heidelberg/New York 2013), 115–144 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  608. Chaudhary, Kulbhushan/Pratap, Dharmendra/Sharma, Pradeep K., Transcription Activator‐like Effector Nucleases (TALENs): An Efficient Tool for Plant Genome Editing, 16 (2016) Engineering in Life Sciences 330–337 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  609. Chen, Chun-Hong/Huang, Haixia/Ward, Catherine M. et al., A Synthetic Maternal-Effect Selfish Genetic Element Drives Population Replacement in Drosophila, 316 (2007) Sci-ence 597–600 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  610. Cho, Seung Woo/Kim, Sojung/Kim, Yongsub et al., Analysis of Off-Target Effects of CRISPR/Cas-Derived RNA-Guided Endonucleases and Nickases, 24 (2014) Genome Research 132–141 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  611. Chung, John J., The United Nations Compensation Commission and the Balancing of Rights Between Individual Claimants and the Government of Iraq, 10 (2005) UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs 141–178 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  612. Churchill, Robin R., Facilitating (Transnational) Civil Liability Litigation for Environmental Damage by Means of Treaties: Progress, Problems, and Prospects, 12 (2002) YB Int’l Env. L. 3–41 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  613. Churchill, Robin R./Ulfstein, Geir, Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law, 94 (2000) AJIL 623 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  614. Citorik, Robert J./Mimee, Mark/Lu, Timothy K., Sequence-Specific Antimicrobials Using Efficiently Delivered RNA-Guided Nucleases, 32 (2014) Nature Biotech. 1141–1145 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  615. Clark, David P./Pazdernik, Nanette Jean/McGehee, Michelle R., Molecular Biology (3rd ed., Elsevier, London 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  616. Cogan, Jacob Katz, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica V. Nicaragua); Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the San Juan River (Nicaragua V. Costa Rica), 110 (2016) AJIL 320–326 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  617. Cogley, Michael, Could Self-Spreading Vaccines Stop a Coronavirus Pandemic?, The Telegraph, 31 January 2020, available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2020/01/28/could-self-spreading-vaccines-stop-global-coronavirus-pandemic/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  618. Cohen, Alexander F., Cosmos 954 and the International Law of Satellite Accidents, 10 (1984) Yale L.J. 78–91 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  619. Cohen, Jon, Inside the Circle of Trust, 365 (2019) Science 430–437 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  620. Cohen, Jon, Did CRISPR Help – Or Harm – The First-Ever Gene-Edited Babies?, Science News, 01 August 2019, available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/did-crispr-help-or-harm-first-ever-gene-edited-babies (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  621. Cohen, Stanley N./Chang, Annie C. Y./Boyer, Herbert W./Helling, Robert B., Construction of Biologically Functional Bacterial Plasmids in Vitro, 70 (1973) PNAS 3240–3244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  622. Collins, C. M./Bonds, J. A. S./Quinlan, M. M./Mumford, J. D., Effects of the Removal or Reduction in Density of the Malaria Mosquito, Anopheles Gambiae S.L., on Interacting Predators and Competitors in Local Ecosystems, 33 (2019) Medical and Veterinary En-tomology 1–15 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  623. Collins, Francis S., Statement on NIH Funding of Research Using Gene-Editing Tech-nologies in Human Embryos (28 April 2015), available at: https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-nih-funding-research-using-gene-editing-technologies-human-embryos (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  624. Committee on Strategies for Identifying and Addressing Potential Biodefense Vulnerabilities Posed by Synthetic Biology/Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology/Board on Life Sci-ences et al., Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology (Washington (DC) 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  625. Cong, Le/Ran, F. Ann/Cox, David et al., Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems, 339 (2013) Science 819–823 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  626. Connolly, John B./Mumford, John D./Fuchs, Silke et al., Systematic Identification of Plausi-ble Pathways to Potential Harm via Problem Formulation for Investigational Releases of a Population Suppression Gene Drive to Control the Human Malaria Vector Anopheles Gambiae in West Africa, 20 (2021) Malaria Journal 170 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  627. Cook, Kate, Liability: ‘No Liability, No Protocol’, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotech-nology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 371–384 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  628. Cook, Kate, Non-Parties, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Car-tagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 351–360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  629. Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire/Perron-Welch, Frederic et al. (eds.), Legal Aspects of Im-plementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  630. Cory, Jennifer S./Hirst, Mark L./Williams, Trevor et al., Field Trial of a Genetically Improved Baculovirus Insecticide, 370 (1994) Nature 138–140 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  631. Cottier, Thomas/Müller, Jörg Paul, Estoppel, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  632. Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie/Morizot, Baptiste/Boëte, Christophe, Agricultural Pest Control with CRISPR‐based Gene Drive: Time for Public Debate: Should We Use Gene Drive for Pest Control?, 18 (2017) EMBO Reports 878–880 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  633. Cowan, Peter J./Hawthorne, Wayne J./Nottle, Mark B., Xenogeneic Transplantation and Tolerance in the Era of CRISPR-Cas9, 24 (2019) Current Opinion in Organ Transplan-tation 5–11 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  634. Cox, David B. T./Gootenberg, Jonathan S./Abudayyeh, Omar O. et al., RNA Editing with CRISPR-Cas13, 358 (2017) Science 1019–1027 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  635. Craig, G. B./Hickey, W. A./VandeHey, R. C., An Inherited Male-Producing Factor in Aedes Aegypti, 132 (1960) Science 1887–1889 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  636. Craik, Neil, The International Law of Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Sub-stance and Integration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  637. Crawford, James, Second Report on State Responsibility, UN Doc. A/CN. 4/498 (1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  638. Crawford, James, Third Report on State Responsibility, UN Doc. A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  639. Crawford, James, Fourth Report on State Responsibility, UN Doc. A/CN.4/517 and Add.1 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  640. Crawford, James, International Crimes of States, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 405–414 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  641. Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  642. Crawford, James, The International Court of Justice and the Law of State Responsibility, in: Chris-tian J. Tams/James Sloan (eds.), The Development of International Law by the Interna-tional Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013), 71–86 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  643. Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  644. Crawford, James/Olleson, Simon, The Continuing Debate on a UN Convention on State Responsibility, 54 (2005) ICLQ 959–971 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  645. Cripps, Yvonne, A New Frontier for International Law, 29 (1980) ICLQ 1–20 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  646. CropLife International, The Compact, available at: http://www.biodiversitycompact.org/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  647. CropLife International/Global Industry Coalition, Implementation Guide to the Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Proto-col on Biosafety (2013), available at: https://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Implementation-Guide-to-the-Nagoya-Kuala-Lumpur-Supplementary-Protocol-on-Liability-and-Redress-to-the-Cartagena-Protocol-on-Biosafety.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  648. Cullet, Philippe, Liability and Redress for Modern Biotechnology, 15 (2006) YB Int’l Env. L. 165–195 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  649. Cyranoski, David, Russian ‘CRISPR-Baby’ Scientist Has Started Editing Genes in Human Eggs with Goal of Altering Deaf Gene, 574 (2019) Nature 465–466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  650. Cyranoski, David, What CRISPR-Baby Prison Sentences Mean for Research, 577 (2020) Na-ture 154–155 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  651. Czybulka, Detlef, Article 196 UNCLOS, in: Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Con-vention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (C.H.Beck/Hart/Nomos, München et al. 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  652. Daniel, Anne, Civil Liability Regimes as a Complement to Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Sound International Policy or False Comfort?, 12 (2003) RECIEL 225–241 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  653. David, Aaron S./Kaser, Joe M./Morey, Amy C./Roth, Alexander M./Andow, David A., Release of Genetically Engineered Insects: A Framework to Identify Potential Ecological Effects, 3 (2013) Ecology and Evolution 4000–4015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  654. Dawidowicz, Martin, Third-Party Countermeasures: A Progressive Development of Inter-national Law?, 29 (2016) QIL 3–15 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  655. de La Fayette, Louise Angélique, International Liability for Damage to the Environment, in: Malgosia A. Fitzmaurice/David Ong/Panos Merkouris (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2010), 320–360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  656. Dederer, Hans-Georg, The Challenge of Regulating Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union: Trends and Issues, in: Yumiko Nakanishi (ed.), Contemporary Issues in Environmental Law. The EU and Japan (Springer, Tokyo et al. 2016), 139–168 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  657. Dederer, Hans-Georg, Options for the Regulation of Genome Edited Plants – Framing the Issues, in: Christian Dürnberger/Sebastian Pfeilmeier/Stephan Schleissing (eds.), Genome Editing in Agriculture. Between Precaution and Responsibility (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2019), 77–122 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  658. Dederer, Hans-Georg/Hamburger, David (eds.), Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Coun-tries and the EU (Springer International Publishing, Cham 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  659. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Broad Agency Announcement: Insect Al-lies: HR001117S000 (2016), available at: http://web.evolbio.mpg.de/HEGAAs/files/links-to-information-source/hr001117s0002-copy.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  660. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,PREventing EMerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) (17 November 2020), available at: https://www.darpa.mil/program/preventing-emerging-pathogenic-threats (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  661. Deltcheva, Elitza/Chylinski, Krzysztof/Sharma, Cynthia M. et al., CRISPR RNA Maturation by Trans-Encoded Small RNA and Host Factor RNase III, 471 (2011) Nature 602–607 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  662. Deredec, Anne/Burt, Austin/Godfray, H. C. J., The Population Genetics of Using Homing Endonuclease Genes in Vector and Pest Management, 179 (2008) Genetics 2013–2026 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  663. Deredec, Anne/Godfray, H. Charles J./Burt, Austin, Requirements for Effective Malaria Control with Homing Endonuclease Genes, 108 (2011) PNAS E874–80 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  664. Descamps, Hannes/Slabbinck, Robin et al. (eds.), International Documents on Environ-mental Liability (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  665. Desierto, Diane, Evidence but not Empiricism? Environmental Impact Assessments at the International Court of Justice in Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Bor-der Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), EJIL: Talk!, 26 February 2016, available at: http://www.ejiltalk.org/evidence-but-not-empiricism-environmental-impact-assessments-at-the-international-court-of-justice-in-certain-activities-carried-out-by-nicaragua-in-the-border-area-costa-rica-v-nicaragua-and-con/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  666. Deveau, Hélène/Barrangou, Rodolphe/Garneau, Josiane E. et al., Phage Response to CRISPR-Encoded Resistance in Streptococcus Thermophilus, 190 (2008) Journal of Bacteriology 1390–1400 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  667. Dhole, Sumit/Vella, Michael R./Lloyd, Alun L./Gould, Fred, Invasion and Migration of Spa-tially Self‐limiting Gene Drives: A Comparative Analysis, 11 (2018) Evolutionary Applica-tions 794–808 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  668. DiCarlo, James E./Chavez, Alejandro/Dietz, Sven L./Esvelt, Kevin M./Church, George M., Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drives in Yeast, 33 (2015) Nature Biotech. 1250–1255 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  669. Dolezel, Marion/Lüthi, Christoph/Gaugitsch, Helmut, Beyond Limits – The Pitfalls of Global Gene Drives for Environmental Risk Assessment in the European Union, 15 (2020) BioRisk 1–29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  670. Dolzer, Rudolf, Völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit und Haftung für Umweltschäden, in: Umweltschutz im Völkerrecht und Kollisionsrecht (C.F. Müller, Heidelberg 1992), 195–243 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  671. Domingo, José L., Safety Assessment of GM Plants: An Updated Review of the Scien-tific Literature, 95 (2016) Food and Chemical Toxicology 12–18 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  672. Dong, Huirong/Huang, Yong/Wang, Kejian, The Development of Herbicide Resistance Crop Plants Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing, 12 (2021) Genes 912 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  673. Dörr, Oliver, Article 31 VCLT, in: Oliver Dörr/Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Con-vention on the Law of Treaties (2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  674. Dörr, Oliver, Article 32 VCLT, in: Oliver Dörr/Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Conven-tion on the Law of Treaties (2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  675. Douhan, Alena, Liability for Environmental Damage, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  676. Drury, Douglas W./Dapper, Amy L./Siniard, Dylan J./Zentner, Gabriel E./Wade, Michael J., CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drives in Genetically Variable and Nonrandomly Mating Wild Popu-lations, 3 (2017) Science Advances e1601910 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  677. Duall, Elizabeth, Liability and Redress Regime for Genetically Modified Organisms Under the Cartegena Protocol, 36 (2007) Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 173–201 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  678. Dudley, Joseph P./Woodford, Michael H., Bioweapons, Biodiversity, and Ecocide: Potential Effects of Biological Weapons on Biological Diversity, 52 (2002) BioScience 583 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  679. Dugard, John, Diplomatic Protection, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  680. Dunning Hotopp, Julie C., Horizontal Gene Transfer Between Bacteria and Animals, 27 (2011) Trends in Genetics 157–163 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  681. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Due Diligence in the International Law of Liability, in: OECD (ed.), Legal Aspects of Transfrontier Pollution (Paris 1977), 369 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  682. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility, 10 (1999) EJIL 371–385 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  683. Dutch Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM), The Status of Oligonucleotides Within the Context of Site-Directed Mutagenesis: 100701–03 (2010), available at: https://cogem.net/app/uploads/2019/07/100703-01-The-status-of-oligonucleotides-within-the-context-of-site-directed-mutagenesis.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  684. Duvic-Paoli, Leslie-Anne, The Status of the Right to Public Participation in International Environmental Law: An Analysis of the Jurisprudence, 23 (2012) YB Int’l Env. L. 80–105 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  685. Duvic-Paoli, Leslie-Anne, The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law (Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  686. Ebbesson, Jonas, Public Participation in Environmental Matters, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  687. Eckhoff, Philip A./Wenger, Edward A./Godfray, H. Charles J./Burt, Austin, Impact of Mosqui-to Gene Drive on Malaria Elimination in a Computational Model with Explicit Spatial and Temporal Dynamics, 114 (2017) PNAS E255–E264 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  688. Economides, Constantin P., Content of the Obligation: Obligations of Means and Obliga-tions of Result, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of In-ternational Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 373–381 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  689. Eggers, Barbara/Mackenzie, Ruth, The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 3 (2000) J. Int. Econ. L. 525–543 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  690. Ehrenzweig, Albert A., Products Liability in the Conflict of Laws–Toward a Theory of En-terprise Liability Under Foreseeable and Insurable Laws, 69 (1960) Yale L.J. 794–803 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  691. Ellison, Evan E./Nagalakshmi, Ugrappa/Gamo, Maria Elena et al., Multiplexed Heritable Gene Editing Using RNA Viruses and Mobile Single Guide RNAs, 6 (2020) Nature Plants 620–624 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  692. ENCODE Project Consortium, An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Hu-man Genome, 489 (2012) Nature 57 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  693. Endres, A. Bryan, “GMO:” Genetically Modified Organism or Gigantic Monetary Obliga-tion? The Liability Schemes for GMO Damage in the United States and the European Union, 22 (2000) Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Re-view 453–505 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  694. Epiney, Astrid, The Role of NGOs in the Process of Ensuring Compliance with MEAs, in: Ulrich Beyerlin/Peter-Tobias Stoll/Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Ensuring Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Agreements. A Dialogue Between Practitioners and Academia (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden 2006), 319–352 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  695. Eriksson, Dennis, Recovering the Original Intentions of Risk Assessment and Manage-ment of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union, 6 (2018) Front. Bio-eng. & Biotechnol. 845 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  696. Eriksson, Dennis/Custers, René/Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin et al., Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Scope and Definitions, 38 (2020) Trends in Biotechnology 231–234 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  697. Eriksson, Dennis/Kershen, Drew L./Nepomuceno, Alexandre et al., A Comparison of the EU Regulatory Approach to Directed Mutagenesis with that of Other Jurisdictions, Conse-quences for International Trade and Potential Steps Forward, 222 (2019) New Phytolo-gist 1673–1684 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  698. Espinosa, Juan-Francisco Escudero, The Definition of Damage Resulting from Trans-boundary Movements of Living Modified Organisms in Light of the Cartagena Protocol, 47 (2009) Canadian YBIL 319–342 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  699. Esrick, Erica B./Lehmann, Leslie E./Biffi, Alessandra et al., Post-Transcriptional Genetic Silencing of BCL11A to Treat Sickle Cell Disease, 384 (2021) N. Engl. J. Med. 205–215 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  700. Esvelt, Kevin M./Gemmell, Neil J., Conservation Demands Safe Gene Drive, 15 (2017) PLOS Biology e2003850 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  701. Esvelt, Kevin M./Smidler, Andrea L./Catteruccia, Flaminia/Church, George M., Concerning RNA-Guided Gene Drives for the Alteration of Wild Populations, 3 (2014) eLife e03401 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  702. Etty, Thijs F.M., 7. Biotechnology, 22 (2011) YB Int’l Env. L. 318–332 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  703. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, Statement on Gene Editing (2016), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/research_and_innovation/ege/gene_editing_ege_statement.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  704. Falck-Zepeda, José B., Socio-Economic Considerations, Article 26.1 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: What Are the Issues and What Is at Stake?, 12 (2009) AgBioFo-rum 90–107 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  705. Falkner, Robert, Regulating Biotech Trade: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 76 (2000) International Affairs 299–313 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  706. Faure, Michael G., Economic Criteria for Compulsory Insurance, 31 (2006) The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 149–168 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  707. Faure, Michael G./Jiang, Minzhen, Study on Financial Security Mechanisms (Article 10 of the Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress), UN Doc. CBD/CP/MOP/10/INF/1, Annex (2021) (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  708. Faure, Michael G./Wibisana, Andri, Liability in Cases of Damage Resulting from GMOs: An Economic Perspective, in: Bernhard A. Koch/Bjarte Askeland (eds.), Eco-nomic Loss Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms. Liability and Redress for the Adventitious Presence of GMOs in Non-GM Crops (Springer, Vienna/New York 2008), 531–575 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  709. Faure, Michael G./Wibisana, Andri, Liability for Damage Caused by GMOs: An Economic Perspective, 23 (2010) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 1–69 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  710. Fears, Robin, Assessing the Security Implications of Genome Editing Technology: Re-port of an International Workshop, Herrenhausen, Germany, 11–13 October 2017 (Herrenhausen 2018), available at: https://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/sites/default/files/downloads/Summary_Report_Genome_Editing.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  711. Fedder, B., Marine Genetic Resources, Access and Benefit Sharing: Legal and Biologi-cal Perspectives (Routledge, London 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  712. Fellmeth, Aaron X./Horwitz, Maurice, Guide to Latin in International Law (Oxford Universi-ty Press, Oxford 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  713. Fernández, Almudena/Josa, Santiago/Montoliu, Lluis, A History of Genome Editing in Mammals, 28 (2017) Mammalian Genome 237–246 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  714. Field, Barry C./Field, Martha K., Environmental Economics: An Introduction (7th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, New York 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  715. Field, Matt, Experts Know the New Coronavirus Is Not a Bioweapon. They Disagree on Whether It Could Have Leaked from a Research Lab, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 30 March 2020, available at: https://thebulletin.org/2020/03/experts-know-the-new-coronavirus-is-not-a-bioweapon-they-disagree-on-whether-it-could-have-leaked-from-a-research-lab/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  716. Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., Liability for Environmental Damage Caused to the Global Com-mons, 5 (1996) RECIEL 305–311 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  717. Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., Non-Compliance Procedures and the Law of Treaties, in: Tullio Treves/Laura Pineschi et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effective-ness of International Environmental Agreements (T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2009), 453–481 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  718. Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A./Redgwell, C., Environmental Non-Compliance Procedures and International Law, 31 (2000) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 35 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  719. Fogleman, Valerie, Enforcing the Environmental Liability Directive: Duties, Powers and Self-Executing Provisions, 4 (2006) Environmental Liability 127–146 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  720. Fontaubert, A. Charlotte de/Agardy, Tundi S./Downes, David R., Biodiversity in the Seas: Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity in Marine and Coastal Habitats (IUCN/CIEL Center for International Environmental Law/World Wildlife Fund, Gland et al. 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  721. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization, Codex Alimentarius: Members, available at: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/about-codex/members/en/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  722. Förster, Susanne, Internationale Haftungsregeln für schädliche Folgewirkungen gen-technisch veränderter Organismen: Europäische und internationale Entwicklungen und Eckwerte für ein Haftungsregime im internationalen Recht (Springer, Berlin et al. 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  723. Forteau, Mathias, Reparation in the Event of a Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Re-sponsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 887–893 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  724. Foster, Caroline E., The ILC Draft Principles on the Allocation of Loss in the Case of Transboundary Harm Arising Out of Hazardous Activities: Privatizing Risk?, 14 (2005) RECIEL 265–282 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  725. Foster, Caroline E., Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011), available at: http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=691838 (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  726. Foster, Caroline E., Diminished Ambitions? Public International Legal Authority in the Transnational Economic Era, 17 (2014) J. Int. Econ. L. 355–397 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  727. Fraley, Robert T./Rogers, Stephen G./Horsch, Robert B. et al., Expression of Bacterial Genes in Plant Cells, 80 (1983) PNAS 4803–4807 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  728. Francioni, Francesco, Exporting Environmental Hazard Through Multinational Enterpris-es: Can the State of Origin Be Held Responsible?, in: Francesco Francioni/Tullio Sco-vazzi (eds.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm (Graham & Trotman, London 1991), 275–316 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  729. Francioni, Francesco/Scovazzi, Tullio (eds.), International Responsibility for Environmen-tal Harm (Graham & Trotman, London 1991) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  730. Frangoul, Haydar/Altshuler, David/Cappellini, M. Domenica et al., CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Edit-ing for Sickle Cell Disease and Β-Thalassemia, 384 (2021) N. Engl. J. Med. 252–260 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  731. Fransen, Lindsey/La Vina, Antonio/Dayrit, Fabian et al., Integrating Socio-Economic Con-siderations into Biosafety Decisions: The Role of Public Participation (2005), available at: http://pdf.wri.org/fransen_lavina_biosafetywhitepaper.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  732. Fraser, Malcolm J., Insect Transgenesis: Current Applications and Future Prospects, 57 (2012) Annual Review of Entomology 267–289 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  733. Freestone, David, Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area, 105 (2011) AJIL 755–760 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  734. Frey, Joachim, Biological Safety Concepts of Genetically Modified Live Bacterial Vac-cines, 25 (2007) Vaccine 5598–5605 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  735. Friedrich, Jürgen, Environment, Private Standard-Setting, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Pe-ters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Ox-ford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  736. Friedrichs, Steffi/Takasu, Yoko/Kearns, Peter et al., An Overview of Regulatory Approach-es to Genome Editing in Agriculture, 3 (2019) Biotechnology Research and Innova-tion 208–220 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  737. Frouville, Olivier de, Attribution of Conduct to the State: Private Individuals, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 257–280 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  738. Futami, Eriko/Otsuka, Tadashi, A Japanese Approach to the Domestic Implementation of the Supplementary Protocol, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 201–217 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  739. Gaines, Sanford E., International Principles for Transnational Environmental Liability: Can Developments in Municipal Law Help Break the Impasse?, 30 (1989) Harv. Int’l L. J. 311–349 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  740. Gaines, Todd A./Zhang, Wenli/Wang, Dafu et al., Gene Amplification Confers Glyphosate Resistance in Amaranthus Palmeri, 107 (2010) PNAS 1029–1034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  741. Gaj, Thomas/Gersbach, Charles A./Barbas, Carlos F., ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-Based Methods for Genome Engineering, 31 (2013) Trends in Biotechnology 397–405 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  742. Gaja, Giorgio, States Having an Interest in Compliance with the Obligation Breached, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsi-bility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 957–964 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  743. Gaja, Giorgio, The Concept of an Injured State, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 941–947 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  744. Galizi, Roberto/Doyle, Lindsey A./Menichelli, Miriam et al., A Synthetic Sex Ratio Distortion System for the Control of the Human Malaria Mosquito, 5 (2014) Nature Comms. 3977 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  745. Galizi, Roberto/Hammond, Andrew/Kyrou, Kyros et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 Sex-Ratio Distor-tion System for Genetic Control, 6 (2016) Sci. Rep. 31139 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  746. Gantz, Valentino M./Bier, Ethan, The Mutagenic Chain Reaction: A Method for Convert-ing Heterozygous to Homozygous Mutations, 348 (2015) Science 442–444 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  747. Gantz, Valentino M./Jasinskiene, Nijole/Tatarenkova, Olga et al., Highly Efficient Cas9-Mediated Gene Drive for Population Modification of the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles Stephensi, 112 (2015) PNAS E6736–43 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  748. Garforth, Kathryn, Socio-Economic Considerations in Biosafety Decision-Making: An International Sustainable Development Law Perspective, CISDL Working Paper; un-published, on file with author (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  749. Garneau, Josiane E./Dupuis, Marie-Eve/Villion, Manuela et al., The CRISPR/Cas Bacterial Immune System Cleaves Bacteriophage and Plasmid DNA, 468 (2010) Nature 67–71 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  750. Garner, Bryan A. (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed., Thomson Reuters, St. Paul, Minn. 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  751. Garrood, William T./Kranjc, Nace/Petri, Karl et al., Analysis of Off-Target Effects in CRISPR-Based Gene Drives in the Human Malaria Mosquito, 118 (2021) PNAS Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  752. Gasiunas, Giedrius/Barrangou, Rodolphe/Horvath, Philippe/Siksnys, Virginijus, Cas9–crRNA Ribonucleoprotein Complex Mediates Specific DNA Cleavage for Adaptive Immunity in Bacteria, 109 (2012) PNAS E2579–86 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  753. Gassmann, Aaron J./Petzold-Maxwell, Jennifer L./Clifton, Eric H. et al., Field-Evolved Re-sistance by Western Corn Rootworm to Multiple Bacillus Thuringiensis Toxins in Trans-genic Maize, 111 (2014) PNAS 5141–5146 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  754. Gaudelli, Nicole M./Komor, Alexis C./Rees, Holly A. et al., Programmable Base Editing of A•T to G•C in Genomic DNA Without DNA Cleavage, 551 (2017) Nature 464 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  755. Gaugitsch, Helmut, Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety – Where Is the Roadmap for Risk Assessment Taking Us?, 3 (2015) Front. Bioeng. & Biotechnol. 212 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  756. Gaulkin, Thomas/Field, Matt, WHO’s “Exciting Adventure” to Find the Origins of COVID-19 Runs into Trouble, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 30 March 2021, available at: https://thebulletin.org/2021/03/whos-exciting-adventure-to-find-the-origins-of-covid-19-runs-into-trouble/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  757. Gautier, Philippe, Environmental Damage and the United Nations Claims Commission: New Directions for Future International Environmental Cases?, in: Tafsir M. Ndiaye/Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law, and Settlement of Disputes. Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2010), 177–214 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  758. Ge, Xia/d'Avignon, D. André/Ackerman, Joseph J. H./Sammons, R. Douglas, Rapid Vacuolar Sequestration: The Horseweed Glyphosate Resistance Mechanism, 66 (2010) Pest Management Science 345–348 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  759. Geens, Stefan, About Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Their Mutual Border, and Google, Ogle Earth, 07 November 2010, available at: https://ogleearth.com/2010/11/about-costa-rica-nicaragua-their-border-and-google/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  760. George, Dalton R./Kuiken, Todd/Delborne, Jason A., Articulating ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’ (FPIC) For Engineered Gene Drives, 286 (2019) Proc. R. Soc. B 20191484 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  761. German Central Committee on Biological Safety (ZKBS), Position Statement of the ZKBS on the Classification of Genetic Engineering Operations for the Production and Use of Higher Organisms Using Recombinant Gene Drive Systems, Az. 45310.0111 (2016), available at: http://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/06_Gentechnik/ZKBS/01_Allgemeine_Stellungnahmen_deutsch/01_allgemeine_Themen/Bewertung_von_Gene_drive_Systemen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  762. German Ethics Council, Biosecurity – Freedom and Responsibility of Research: Opinion (2014), available at: https://www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/englisch/opinion-biosecurity.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  763. German Ethics Council, Intervening in the Human Germline: Opinion (2019), available at: https://www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/englisch/opinion-intervening-in-the-human-germline-summary.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  764. Gerstein, Daniel M., National Security and Arms Control in the Age of Biotechnology: The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lan-ham et al. 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  765. Giese, Bernd, The Viral Era: New Biotechnologies Give Humans an Unprecedented Control over Nature and Require Appropriate Safeguards, 22 (2021) EMBO Re-ports e53229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  766. Glenn, Jane Matthews, Damage Caused by GMOs Under Canadian Law, in: Bernhard A. Koch (ed.), Damage Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms. Comparative Survey of Redress Options for Harm to Persons, Property or the Environment (De Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2010), 663–714 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  767. Glowka, Lyle/Burhenne-Guilmin, Françoise/Synge, Hugh et al., A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity (IUCN, Gland/Cambridge 1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  768. Godfray, H. Charles J./North, Ace/Burt, Austin, How Driving Endonuclease Genes Can Be Used to Combat Pests and Disease Vectors, 15 (2017) BMC Biology 81 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  769. Goldblat, Jozef, The Biological Weapons Convention: An Overview, 37 (1997) Interna-tional Review of the Red Cross Archive 251–265 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  770. Goldie, L.F.E., Concepts of Strict and Absolute Liability and the Ranking of Liability in Terms of Relative Exposure to Risk, 16 (1985) NYL 175 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  771. Goldson, S. L./Bourdôt, G. W./Brockerhoff, E. G. et al., New Zealand Pest Management: Current and Future Challenges, 45 (2015) Journal of the Royal Society of New Zea-land 31–58 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  772. Gomaa, Ahmed A./Klumpe, Heidi E./Luo, Michelle L. et al., Programmable Removal of Bac-terial Strains by Use of Genome-Targeting CRISPR-Cas Systems, 5 (2014) mBio e00928–13 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  773. Gong, Zheng/Cheng, Ming/Botella, Jose R., Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops, 3 (2021) Frontiers in Genome Editing 817279 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  774. Gostin, Lawrence O./DeBartolo, Mary C./Friedman, Eric A., The International Health Regu-lations 10 Years on: The Governing Framework for Global Health Security, 386 (2015) The Lancet 2222–2226 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  775. Gostin, Lawrence O./Habibi, Roojin/Meier, Benjamin Mason, Has Global Health Law Risen to Meet the COVID-19 Challenge? Revisiting the International Health Regulations to Prepare for Future Threats, 48 (2020) The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 376–381 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  776. Gouritin, Armelle, EU Environmental Law, International Environmental Law, and Human Rights Law: The Case of Environmental Responsibility (Brill Nijhoff, Leiden 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  777. Graff, Laurence, The Precautionary Principle, in: Christoph Bail/Robert Falkner/Helen Marquard (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotech-nology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London 2002), 410–422 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  778. Grohmann, Lutz/Keilwagen, Jens/Duensing, Nina et al., Detection and Identification of Ge-nome Editing in Plants: Challenges and Opportunities, 10 (2019) Frontiers in Plant Sci-ence 236 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  779. Gullison, Ted/Hardner, Jared/Anstee, Stuart/Meyer, Mike, Good Practices for the Collection of Biodiversity Baseline Data (2015), available at: https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/7096/Good_Practices_for_the_Collection_of_Biodiversity_Baseline_Data.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  780. Gupta, Aarti, Framing “Biosafety” in an International Context: The Biosafety Protocol Negotiations, ENRP Discussion Paper E-99–10 (1999), available at: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/Framing%20Biosafety%20in%20an%20International%20Context%20-%20E-99-10.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  781. Gupta, Aarti, Creating a Global Biosafety Regime, 2 (2000) International Journal of Biotech-nology 205–230 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  782. Gupta, Aarti, Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 42 (2000) Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Develop-ment 22–33 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  783. Gupta, Aarti, Transparency to What End? Governing by Disclosure Through the Biosafety Clearing House, 28 (2010) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 128–144 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  784. Gupta, Aarti/Orsini, Amandine, Liability, Redress and the Cartagena Protocol, Chapter III.32, in: Elisa Morgera/Jona Razzaque/Michael G. Faure (eds.), Biodiversity and Na-ture Protection Law, Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law, Volume III (Edward El-gar, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA 2017), 445–454 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  785. Gurwitz, David, Gene Drives Raise Dual-Use Concerns, 345 (2014) Science 1010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  786. Habibi, Roojin/Burci, Gian Luca/Campos, Thana C. de et al., Do Not Violate the Internation-al Health Regulations During the COVID-19 Outbreak, 395 (2020) The Lancet 664–666 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  787. Haeussler, Maximilian/Schönig, Kai/Eckert, Hélène et al., Evaluation of Off-Target and on-Target Scoring Algorithms and Integration into the Guide RNA Selection Tool CRISPOR, 17 (2016) Genome Biology 148 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  788. Hafner, Gerhard/Buffard, Isabelle, Obligations of Prevention and the Precautionary Princi-ple, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 521–534 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  789. Hamburger, David, Comparative Analysis: The Regulation of Plants Derived from Ge-nome Editing in Argentina, Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan and the Unit-ed States, in: Hans-Georg Dederer/David Hamburger (eds.), Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology. A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Countries and the EU (Springer International Publishing, Cham 2019), 313–363 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  790. Hamdan, Norfadilah/Lee, Chia Hau/Wong, Syie Luing et al., Prevention of Enzymatic Browning by Natural Extracts and Genome-Editing: A Review on Recent Progress, 27 (2022) Molecules 1101 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  791. Hammond, Andrew/Galizi, Roberto/Kyrou, Kyros et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drive Sys-tem Targeting Female Reproduction in the Malaria Mosquito Vector Anopheles Gambiae, 34 (2016) Nature Biotech. 78 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  792. Hammond, Andrew/Pollegioni, Paola/Persampieri, Tania et al., Gene-Drive Suppression of Mosquito Populations in Large Cages as a Bridge Between Lab and Field, 12 (2021) Nature Comms. 4589 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  793. Hammond, Andrew M./Kyrou, Kyros/Bruttini, Marco et al., The Creation and Selection of Mutations Resistant to a Gene Drive over Multiple Generations in the Malaria Mosquito, 13 (2017) PLOS Genetics e1007039 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  794. Handl, Günther, An International Legal Perspective on the Conduct of Abnormally Dan-gerous Activities in Frontier Areas: The Case of Nuclear Power Plant Siting, 7 (1978) ELQ 1–50 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  795. Handl, Günther, State Liability for Accidental Transnational Environmental Damage by Private Persons, 74 (1980) AJIL 525–565 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  796. Handl, Günther, The Environment: International Rights and Responsibilities, 74 (1980) ASIL Proceedings 223–247 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  797. Handl, Günther, Liability as an Obligation Established by a Primary Rule of International Law: Some Basic Reflections on the International Law Commission's Work, 16 (1985) NYL 49 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  798. Handl, Günther, International Accountability for Transboundary Environmental Harm Revisited: What Role for State Liability?, 37 (2007) Environmental Policy and Law 117–125 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  799. Handl, Günther, Transboundary Impacts, in: Daniel Bodansky/Jutta Brunnée/Ellen Hey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007), 531–549 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  800. Handl, Günther/Lutz, Robert E., An International Policy Perspective on the Trade of Haz-ardous Materials and Technologies, 30 (1989) Harv. Int’l L. J. 351–374 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  801. Hanley, Nick, The Economic Value of Environmental Damage, in: Michael Bowman/Alan E. Boyle (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law. Problems of Definition and Valuation (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York 2002), 27–39 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  802. Hartke, Victoria Riess, The International Fallout from Chernobyl, 5 (1987) Dickinson Journal of International Law 319–343 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  803. Hartung, Frank/Schiemann, Joachim, Precise Plant Breeding Using New Genome Editing Techniques: Opportunities, Safety and Regulation in the EU, 78 (2014) The Plant Journal 742–752 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  804. Haupt, Kirsten/Mützelburg, Thomas, Global Radiation Monitoring in the Wake of the Fuku-shima Disaster, 16 (2011) CTBTO Spectrum 18–19 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  805. Hay, David (ed.), Words and Phrases: Legally Defined, Volume 1: A-K (4th ed., Lex-isNexis Butterworths, London 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  806. Hayes, Keith R./Hosack, Geoffrey R./Dana, Genya V. et al., Identifying and Detecting Po-tentially Adverse Ecological Outcomes Associated with the Release of Gene-Drive Modified Organisms, 5 (2018) Journal of Responsible Innovation S139-S158 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  807. Hayes, Keith R./Hosack, Geoffrey R./Ickowicz, Adrien et al., Risk Assessment for Control-ling Mosquito Vectors with Engineered Nucleases: Controlled Field Release for Sterile Male Construct: Risk Assessment Final Report (2018), available at: https://targetmalaria.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CSIRO_Target_Malaria_Risk_Assessment_Sterile_Males_plus_Executive_Summary1.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  808. He Jiankui, About Lulu and Nana: Twin Girls Born Healthy After Gene Surgery as Sin-gle-Cell Embryos (31 March 2021), available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th0vnOmFltc (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  809. Heathcote, Sarah, Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: Necessity, in: James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010), 491–501 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  810. Heck, Michelle, Insect Transmission of Plant Pathogens: A Systems Biology Perspective, 3 (2018) mSystems e00168–17 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  811. Hefferon, Kathleen L., Nutritionally Enhanced Food Crops; Progress and Perspectives, 16 (2015) International Journal of Molecular Sciences 3895–3914 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  812. Heffron, Raphael J./Ashley, Stephen F./Nuttall, William J., The Global Nuclear Liability Re-gime Post Fukushima Daiichi, 90 (2016) Progress in Nuclear Energy 1–10 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  813. Heinsch, Robert, Conflict Classification in Ukraine: The Return of the “Proxy War”?, 91 (2015) International Law Studies 323–360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  814. Hellmich, Simon Niklas, What Is Socioeconomics? An Overview of Theories, Methods, and Themes in the Field, 46 (2017) Forum for Social Economics 3–25 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  815. Hemmings, Alan D., Liability Postponed: The Failure to Bring Annex VI of the Madrid Protocol into Force, 8 (2018) The Polar Journal 315–332 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  816. Henckaerts, Jean-Marie/Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  817. Henckels, Caroline, GMOs in the WTO: A Critique of the Panel’s Legal Reasoning in EC-Biotech, 7 (2006) Melb. J. Int’l L. 278–305 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  818. Henderson, Wendy R./Murphy, Elaine C., Pest or Prized Possession? Genetically Modi-fied Biocontrol from an International Perspective, 34 (2007) Wildlife Research 578–585 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  819. Herfst, Sander/Schrauwen, Eefje J. A./Linster, Martin et al., Airborne Transmission of In-fluenza A/H5N1 Virus Between Ferrets, 336 (2012) Science 1534–1541 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  820. Hess, Burkhardt, International Civil Litigation, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  821. Hill, Ryan, Risk Assessment and Risk Management, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Seg-ger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 63–77 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  822. Hillgenberg, Hartmut, A Fresh Look at Soft Law, 10 (1999) European Journal of Interna-tional Law 499–515 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  823. Hindman, Amy/Lefeber, René, 4. International/Civil Liability and Compensation: General Developments, 19 (2008) YB Int’l Env. L. 214–222 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  824. Hindman, Amy/Lefeber, René, International/Civil Liability and Compensation: General Developments, 21 (2010) YB Int’l Env. L. 178–187 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  825. Hiraizumi, Yuichiro./Crow, James F., Heterozygous Effects on Viability, Fertility, Rate of Development, and Longevity of Drosophila Chromosomes that Are Lethal When Homo-zygous, 45 (1960) Genetics 1071–1083 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  826. Hirakawa, Matthew P./Krishnakumar, Raga/Timlin, Jerilyn A./Carney, James P./Butler, Kim-berly S., Gene Editing and CRISPR in the Clinic: Current and Future Perspectives, 40 (2020) Bioscience Reports Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  827. Hochkirch, Axel/Beninde, Joscha/Fischer, Marietta et al., License to Kill?: Disease Eradica-tion Programs May Not Be in Line with the Convention on Biological Diversity, 11 (2018) Conservation Letters e12370 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  828. Hoermann, Astrid/Tapanelli, Sofia/Capriotti, Paolo et al., Converting Endogenous Genes of the Malaria Mosquito into Simple Non-Autonomous Gene Drives for Population Re-placement, 10 (2021) eLife e58791 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  829. Hoffman, Kenneth B., State Responsibility in International Law and Transboundary Pollu-tion Injuries, 25 (1976) ICLQ 509–542 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  830. Hokanson, Karen E., When Policy Meets Practice: The Dilemma for Guidance on Risk Assessment Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 7 (2019) Front. Bioeng. & Biotechnol. 82 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  831. Holmes, Thomas P./Adamowicz, Wiktor L./Carlsson, Fredrik, Choice Experiments, in: Patri-cia A. Champ/Kevin J. Boyle/Thomas C. Brown (eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Springer Nature, Dordrecht 2017), 133–186 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  832. Hoogh, André J.J. de, Articles 4 and 8 of the 2001 ILC Articles on State Responsibility, the Tadić Case and Attribution of Acts of Bosnian Serb Authorities to the Federal Re-public of Yugoslavia, 72 (2002) BYIL 255–292 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  833. Horbach, N.L.J.T., The Confusion About State Responsibility and International Liability, 4 (1991) Leiden J. Int’l L. 47–74 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  834. Horvath, Philippe/Coûté-Monvoisin, Anne-Claire/Boyaval, Patrick/Fremaux, Chris-tophe/Barrangou, Rodolphe, Comparative Analysis of CRISPR Loci in Lactic Acid Bacteria Genomes, 131 (2009) International Journal of Food Microbiology 62–70 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  835. Horvath, Philippe/Gasiunas, Giedrius et al., Applications of the Versatile CRISPR-Cas Sys-tems, in: Rodolphe Barrangou/John van der Oost (eds.), CRISPR-Cas Systems. RNA-Mediated Adaptive Immunity in Bacteria and Archaea (Springer, Heidelberg/New York 2013), 267–286 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  836. Horváthy, Balázs, New Impulses: Aarhus Convention and Genetically Modified Organ-isms, in: Hanna Müllerová (ed.), Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: Implementation of the Aarhus Convention (Institute of State and Law of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague 2013), 29–52 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  837. Howse, Robert/Horn, Henrik, European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, 8 (2009) World Trade Review 49–83 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  838. Hsu, Patrick D./Lander, Eric S./Zhang, Feng, Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering, 157 (2014) Cell 1262–1278 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  839. Huang, He/Zheng, Guosong/Jiang, Weihong/Hu, Haifeng/Lu, Yinhua, One-Step High-Efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Streptomyces, 47 (2015) Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 231–243 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  840. Huang, Sanwen/Weigel, Detlef/Beachy, Roger N./Li, Jiayang, A Proposed Regulatory Framework for Genome-Edited Crops, 48 (2016) Nature Genetics 109–111 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  841. Huguenin, Michael T./Donlan, Michael C. et al., Assessment and Valuation of Damage to the Environment, in: Cymie R. Payne/Peter H. Sand (eds.), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission. Environmental Liability (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York 2011), 67–94 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  842. Husby, Jan, Definitions of GMO/LMO and Modern Biotechnology, in: Terje Traavik/Li C. Lim (eds.), Biosafety First. Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic En-gineering and Genetically Modified Organisms (Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim 2009), 365–373 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  843. Hussain, Amjad/Ding, Xiao/Alariqi, Muna et al., Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agro-nomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing, 10 (2021) Plants 621 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  844. Institut de Droit International, Responsibility and Liability Under International Law for Envi-ronmental Damage: Resolution Adopted on September 4, 1997, 37 ILM 1474 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  845. International Commission of Jurists, The Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Gross Human Rights Violations: A Practitioners’ Guide, Revised Edition (2018), available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Universal-Right-to-a-Remedy-Publications-Reports-Practitioners-Guides-2018-ENG.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  846. International Court of Justice, Declarations Recognizing the Jurisdiction of the Court as Compulsory, available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/en/declarations (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  847. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Report of the Fourth Session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Biosafety: 5–13 February 1998, ENB Vol. 9 No. 85 (1998), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb0985e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  848. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Highlights of BSWG-5 #9: Wednesday, 26 August 1998, ENB Vol. 9 No. 106 (1998), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09106e.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  849. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Report of the Sixth Session of the Open-Ended Ad Hoc Working Group on Bi-osafety and the First Extraordinary Session of the CBD Conference of the Parties: 14–23 February 1999, ENB Vol. 9 No. 117 (1999), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09117e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  850. International Institute for Sustainable Development, First Meeting of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: 11–15 December 2000, ENB Vol. 9 No. 173 (2000), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/archive/download/pdf/enb09173e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  851. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Summary of the Fifth Meeting of the Open-Ended Ad Hoc Working Group on Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: 12–19 March 2008, ENB Vol. 9 No. 345 (2008), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09435e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  852. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Summary of the Fourth Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: 12–16 May 2008, ENB Vol. 9 No. 441 (2008), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09441e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  853. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Summary of the First Meeting of the Group of Friends of the Co-Chairs on Lia-bility and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: 23–27 Febru-ary 2009, ENB Vol. 9 No. 457 (2009), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09457e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  854. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Friends of the Co-Chairs Highlights: Monday, 8 February 2010, ENB Vol. 9 No. 491 (2010), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09491e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  855. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Summary of the Second Meeting of the Group of Friends of the Co-Chairs on Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: 8–12 Feb-ruary 2010, ENB Vol. 9 No. 495 (2010), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09495e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  856. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Summary of the UN Biodioversity Conference: 2–17 December 2016, ENB Vol. 9 No. 678 (2016), available at: https://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09678e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  857. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, Volume 09: Biological Diversity and Plant Genetic Resources (19 December 2017), available at: http://enb.iisd.org/vol09/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  858. International Institute for Sustainable Development, UN Biodiversity Conference Highlights: Sunday, 18 November 2018, ENB Vol. 9 No. 716 (2018), available at: https://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09716e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  859. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Summary of the UN Biodiversity Conference: 13–29 November 2018, ENB Vol. 9 No. 725 (2018), available at: https://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09725e.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  860. International Law Association, International Law on Biotechnology: Draft Final Report and Draft Final Recommendations (2010), available at: https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1168&StorageFileGuid=b1a0a676-2f01-4b8e-92ba-103076a7de6b (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  861. International Law Association, ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law: First Report (2014), available at: https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1429&StorageFileGuid=fd770a95-9118-4a20-ac61-df12356f74d0 (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  862. International Law Association, ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law: Second Report (2016), available at: https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1427&StorageFileGuid=ed229726-4796-47f2-b891-8cafa221685f (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  863. International Monetary Fund, SDR Valuation (27 May 2022), available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/fin/data/rms_sdrv.aspx (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  864. International Plant Protection Convention, Overview on International Standards for Phyto-sanitary Measures (ISPMs) And Their Application to Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) (2016), available at: https://www.ippc.int/static/media/uploads/ippc_ispmsforlmos_2016-02-24.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  865. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Global Status of Com-mercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2019, ISAAA Brief 55 (2019), available at: https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  866. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive Species (2002), available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/Rep-2000-052.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  867. Ishino, Yoshizumi/Shinagawa, Hideo/Makino, Kozo/Amemura, Mitsuko/Nakata, Atsuo, Nucle-otide Sequence of the {i}ap Gene, Responsible for Alkaline Phosphatase Isozyme Conversion in Escherichia Coli, and Identification of the Gene Product, 169 (1987) Journal of Bacteriology 5429–5433 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  868. Island Conservation, The Genetic Biocontrol of Invasive Rodents (GBIRd) Program, available at: http://www.geneticbiocontrol.org/ (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  869. Israel, Brian D./Martin, Jean et al., Legal Obstacles for Contingent Valuation Methods in Environmental Litigation, in: Kenneth Train/Daniel McFadden (eds.), Contingent Valua-tion of Environmental Goods: A Comprehensive Critique (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2017), 292–306 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  870. Ito, Junitsu/Ghosh, Anil/Moreira, Luciano A./Wimmer, Ernst A./Jacobs-Lorena, Marcelo, Transgenic Anopheline Mosquitoes Impaired in Transmission of a Malaria Parasite, 417 (2002) Nature 452 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  871. Jabbar, Abdul/Zulfiqar, Farheen/Mahnoor, Mahnoor et al., Advances and Perspectives in the Application of CRISPR-Cas9 in Livestock, 63 (2021) Molecular Biotechnology 757–767 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  872. Jacinto, Filipe V./Link, Wolfgang/Ferreira, Bibiana I., CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing: From Basic Research to Translational Medicine, 24 (2020) Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 3766–3778 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  873. Jackson, D. A./Symons, R. H./Berg, P., Biochemical Method for Inserting New Genetic Information into DNA of Simian Virus 40: Circular SV40 DNA Molecules Containing Lambda Phage Genes and the Galactose Operon of Escherichia Coli, 69 (1972) PNAS 2904–2909 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  874. Jackson, Lee Ann, Risk Assessment Frameworks in the Multilateral Setting, in: Stuart Smyth/Peter Phillips/David Castle (eds.), Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2014), 203–216 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  875. Jacur Romanin, Francesca, Triggering Non-Compliance Procedures, in: Tullio Tre-ves/Laura Pineschi et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2009), 373–387 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  876. Jaffe, Gregory, Implementing the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol Through National Bi-osafety Regulatory Systems: An Analysis of Key Unresolved Issues, 5 (2005) Journal of Public Affairs 299–311 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  877. Jaffe, Gregory, Crafting National Biosafety Systems, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 48–59 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  878. Jagota, S. P., State Responsibility: Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness, 16 (1985) NYL 249 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  879. James, Stephanie/Collins, Frank H./Welkhoff, Philip A. et al., Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group, 98 (2018) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1–49 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  880. James, Stephanie/Tountas, Karen, Using Gene Drive Technologies to Control Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, 10 (2018) Sustainability 4789 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  881. Janzen, F. J./Phillips, P. C., Exploring the Evolution of Environmental Sex Determination, Especially in Reptiles, 19 (2006) Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1775–1784 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  882. Jenks, C. Wilfried, Liability for Ultra-Hazardous Activities in International Law, 117 (1966) RdC 99–200 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  883. Jennings, Robert/Watts, Arthur, Oppenheim’s International Law (9th ed., Longman, Harlow 1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  884. Jensen, Eric Talbot, The International Law Environmental Warfare: Active and of Passive Damage During Armed Conflict, 38 (2005) Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 145–185 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  885. Jeschke, Jonathan M./Keesing, Felicia/Ostfeld, Richard S., Novel Organisms: Comparing Invasive Species, GMOs, and Emerging Pathogens, 42 (2013) Ambio 541–548 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  886. Jinek, Martin/Chylinski, Krzysztof/Fonfara, Ines et al., A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity, 337 (2012) Science 816–821 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  887. Johnson, Barbara/Casagrande, Rocco, Comparison of International Guidance for Biosafe-ty Regarding Work Conducted at Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) And Gain-of-Function (GOF) Experiments, 21 (2016) Appl. Biosaf. 128–141 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  888. Johnson, Durward/Kraska, James, Some Synthetic Biology May Not Be Covered by the Biological Weapons Convention (18 May 2020), available at: https://www.lawfareblog.com/some-synthetic-biology-may-not-be-covered-biological-weapons-convention (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  889. Johnson, Michael, Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica: The Adoption of An-nex VI to the Antarctic Environment Protocol, 19 (2006) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 33–55 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  890. Jorasch, Petra, Will the EU Stay Out of Step with Science and the Rest of the World on Plant Breeding Innovation?, 39 (2020) Plant Cell Reports 163–167 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  891. Jorgensen, Nina H. B., A Reappraisal of Punitive Damages in International Law, 68 (1998) BYIL 247–266 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  892. Jouanin, Aurelie/Gilissen, Luud J. W. J./Schaart, Jan G. et al., CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing of Gluten in Wheat to Reduce Gluten Content and Exposure–Reviewing Methods to Screen for Coeliac Safety, 7 (2020) Frontiers in Nutrition 51 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  893. Joung, J. Keith/Sander, Jeffry D., TALENs: A Widely Applicable Technology for Targeted Genome Editing, 14 (2013) Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 49–55 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  894. Jung, Christian/Capistrano‐Gossmann, Gina/Braatz, Janina/Sashidhar, Niharika/Melzer, Sieg-bert, Recent Developments in Genome Editing and Applications in Plant Breeding, 137 (2018) Plant Breeding 1–9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  895. Jungcurt, Stefan/Schabus, Nicole, Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 19 (2010) RECIEL 197–206 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  896. Jusoh, Sufian, Harmonisation of Liability Rules in Transboundary Movement of Biotech-nology Crops (Centre for International Trade and Investment, Kuala Lumpur 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  897. Kadner Graziano, Thomas/Erhardt, Matthias, Cross-Broder Damage Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law, in: Bernhard A. Koch (ed.), Dam-age Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms. Comparative Survey of Redress Op-tions for Harm to Persons, Property or the Environment (De Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2010), 784–812 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  898. Kahrmann, Jens/Bömeke, Olivia/Leggewie, Georg, Aged GMO Legislation Meets New Ge-nome Editing Techniques, 15 (2017) EurUP 176–182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  899. Kahrmann, Jens/Leggewie, Georg, CJEU’s Ruling Makes Europe’s GMO Legislation Ripe for Reformation, 16 (2018) EurUP 497–504 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  900. Kaiser, Karen, Treaties, Direct Applicability, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  901. Kanchiswamy, Chidananda Nagamangala/Malnoy, Mickael/Velasco, Riccardo/Kim, Jin-Soo/Viola, Roberto, Non-GMO Genetically Edited Crop Plants, 33 (2015) Trends in Bio-technology 489–491 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  902. Kang, Xiangjin/He, Wenyin/Huang, Yuling et al., Introducing Precise Genetic Modifications into Human 3PN Embryos by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Editing, 33 (2016) Jour-nal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 581–588 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  903. Kaye, David, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, UN Doc. A/75/261 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  904. Kazhdan, Daniel, Precautionary Pulp: Pulp Mills and the Evolving Dispute Between Inter-national Tribunals over the Reach of the Precautionary Principle, 38 (2011) ELQ 527–552 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  905. Keiper, Felicity/Atanassova, Ana, Regulation of Synthetic Biology: Developments Under the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Protocols, 8 (2020) Front. Bioeng. & Bio-technol. 310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  906. Kelle, Alexander, Prohibiting Chemical & Biological Weapons: Multilateral Regimes and Their Evolution (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  907. Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (Rinehart & Company, New York 1952) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  908. Kershen, Drew L., Legal Liability Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology, 44 (2004) Crop Science 456–463 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  909. Kim, Sojung/Kim, Daesik/Cho, Seung Woo/Kim, Jungeun/Kim, Jin-Soo, Highly Efficient RNA-Guided Genome Editing in Human Cells via Delivery of Purified Cas9 Ribonucleo-proteins, 24 (2014) Genome Research 1012–1019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  910. Kim, Y. G./Cha, J./Chandrasegaran, S., Hybrid Restriction Enzymes: Zinc Finger Fusions to Fok I Cleavage Domain, 93 (1996) PNAS 1156–1160 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  911. Kindji, Kévine/Faure, Michael G., Assessing Reparation of Environmental Damage by the ICJ: A Lost Opportunity?, 57 (2019) QIL 5–33 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  912. Kingsbury, Benedict, Indigenous Peoples, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  913. Kingsbury, Noël, Hybrid: The History and Science of Plant Breeding (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  914. Kinzelbach, Katrin, Introduction to the Study of Academic Freedom, in: Researching Ac-ademic Freedom. Guidelines and Sample Case Studies (FAU University Press, Erlan-gen 2020), 1–10 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  915. Kinzelbach, Katrin/Saliba, Ilyas/Spannagel, Janika/Quinn, Robert, Free Universities: Putting the Academic Freedom Index into Action (2020), available at: https://www.gppi.net/media/KinzelbachEtAl_2020_Free_Universities.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  916. Kirgis, Frederic L., Standing to Challenge Human Endeavors that Could Change the Cli-mate, 84 (1990) AJIL 525–530 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  917. Kiss, Alexandre, Present Limits to the Enforcement of State Responsibility for Environ-mental Damage, in: Francesco Francioni/Tullio Scovazzi (eds.), International Responsi-bility for Environmental Harm (Graham & Trotman, London 1991), 3–14 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  918. Kiss, Alexandre/Shelton, Dinah, International Environmental Law (3rd ed., Transnational Publ, Ardsley, NY 2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  919. Kiss, Alexandre/Shelton, Dinah, Guide to International Environmental Law (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  920. Klabbers, Jan, Compliance Procedures, in: Daniel Bodansky/Jutta Brunnée/Ellen Hey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  921. Klabbers, Jan, Treaties, Amendment and Revision, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  922. Klassen, W./Curtis, C. F., History of the Sterile Insect Technique, in: Victor A. Dyck/J. Hendrichs/A. S. Robinson (eds.), Sterile Insect Technique. Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management (Springer, Dordrecht Netherlands 2005), 3–36 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  923. Klein, Eckart, Self-Contained Regime, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  924. Klein, T. A./Windbichler, N./Deredec, A./Burt, A./Benedict, M. Q., Infertility Resulting from Transgenic I-PpoI Male Anopheles Gambiae in Large Cage Trials, 106 (2012) Patho-gens and Global Health 20–31 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  925. Kleinheisterkamp, Jan, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum/Anne Peters (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008 et seq.) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  926. Klug, William S./Cummings, Michael R./Spencer, Charlotte A./Palladino, Michael Ange-lo/Killian, Darrell, Concepts of Genetics (Pearson, Hoboken, New Jersey 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  927. Knudsen, Guy R., International Deployment of Microbial Pest Control Agents: Falling Between the Cracks of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena Bi-osafety Protocol, 30 (2012) Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 625–651 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  928. Koch, Bernhard A., Damage Caused by GMOs: Comparative Analysis, in: Damage Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms. Comparative Survey of Redress Options for Harm to Persons, Property or the Environment (De Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2010), 882–942 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  929. Koch, Bernhard A./Askeland, Bjarte (eds.), Economic Loss Caused by Genetically Modi-fied Organisms: Liability and Redress for the Adventitious Presence of GMOs in Non-GM Crops (Springer, Vienna/New York 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  930. Koester, Veit, The Compliance Mechanism of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: De-velopment, Adoption, Content, and First Years of Life, in: Marie-Claire Cordonier Seg-ger/Frederic Perron-Welch/Christine Frison (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 164–187 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  931. Kofler, Natalie, Gene Drives: Yelling Match Drowns Out Marginalized Voices, 565 (2019) Nature 25 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  932. Kofler, Natalie, Why Were Scientists Silent over Gene-Edited Babies?, 566 (2019) Nature 427 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  933. Kofler, Natalie/Collins, James P./Kuzma, Jennifer et al., Editing Nature: Local Roots of Global Governance, 362 (2018) Science 527–529 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  934. Kohm, Katherine E., Shortcomings of the Cartagena Protocol: Resolving the Liability Loophole at an International Level, 27 (2009) UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 145–180 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  935. Kojima, Kazunobu/Booth, Catherine Makison/Summermatter, Kathrin et al., Risk-Based Re-boot for Global Lab Biosafety, 360 (2018) Science 260–262 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  936. Kolopack, Pamela A./Lavery, James V., Informed Consent in Field Trials of Gene-Drive Mosquitoes, 1 (2017) Gates Open Research 14 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  937. Komen, John, The Emerging International Regulatory Framework for Biotechnology, 3 (2012) GM Crops & Food 78–84 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  938. Komor, Alexis C./Badran, Ahmed H./Liu, David R., CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes, 168 (2017) Cell 20–36 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  939. Koonin, Eugene V./Makarova, Kira S./Zhang, Feng, Diversity, Classification and Evolution of CRISPR-Cas Systems, 37 (2017) Current Opinion in Microbiology 67–78 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  940. Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  941. Krenek, Pavel/Samajova, Olga/Luptovciak, Ivan et al., Transient Plant Transformation Me-diated by Agrobacterium Tumefaciens: Principles, Methods and Applications, 33 (2015) Biotechnology Advances 1024–1042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  942. Kuiken, T./Dana, G./Oye, K./Rejeski, D., Shaping Ecological Risk Research for Synthetic Biology, 4 (2014) Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 191–199 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  943. Kuiken, Todd, DARPA’s Synthetic Biology Initiatives Could Militarize the Environment: Is that Something We’re Comfortable with? (28 March 2018), available at: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2017/05/what_happens_if_darpa_uses_synthetic_biology_to_manipulate_mother_nature.html (last accessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  944. Kulesza, Joanna, Due Diligence in International Law (Brill Nijhoff, Leiden 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  945. Kumar, Manoj/Yadav, Ashok Kumar/Verma, Vinod et al., Bioengineered Probiotics as a New Hope for Health and Diseases: An Overview of Potential and Prospects, 11 (2016) Future Microbiology 585–600 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  946. Kummer Peiry, Katharina, Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste and Chemi-cals, in: André Nollkaemper/Ilias Plakokefalos et al. (eds.), The Practice of Shared Re-sponsibility in International Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017), 936–961 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  947. Kuzma, Jennifer, Procedurally Robust Risk Assessment Framework for Novel Genetical-ly Engineered Organisms and Gene Drives, 15 (2021) Regulation & Governance 1144–1165 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  948. Kyrou, Kyros/Hammond, Andrew M./Galizi, Roberto et al., A CRISPR–Cas9 Gene Drive Targeting Doublesex Causes Complete Population Suppression in Caged Anopheles Gambiae Mosquitoes, 36 (2018) Nature Biotech. 1062 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  949. La Fayette, Louise de, The ILC and International Liability: A Commentary, 6 (1997) RECIEL 322–334 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  950. La Vina, Antonio/Fransen, Lindsey, Integrating Socio-Economic Considerations into Bi-osafety Decisions: The Challenge for Asia (2004), available at: https://www.wri.org/publication/integrating-socio-economic-considerations-biosafety-decisions-0 (last ac-cessed 28 May 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  951. Lago Candeira, Alejandro, Administrative Approach to Liability: Its Origin, Negotiation and Outcome, in: Akiho Shibata (ed.), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage. The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Taylor & Francis, London 2014), 92–104 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  952. Lai, Hung-En/Canavan, Caoimhe/Cameron, Loren et al., Synthetic Biology and the United Nations, 37 (2019) Trends in Biotechnology 1146–1151 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  953. Laible, Götz/Wei, Jingwei/Wagner, Stefan, Improving Livestock for Agriculture: Techno-logical Progress from Random Transgenesis to Precision Genome Editing Heralds a New Era, 10 (2015) Biotechnology Journal 109–120 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  954. Lammers, Johan G., Pollution of International Watercourses: A Search for Substantive Rules and Principles of Law (Nijhoff, Boston 1984) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  955. Lammers, Johan G., International Responsibility and Liability for Damage Caused by Environmental Interferences, 31 (2001) Environmental Policy and Law 42–50 and 94–105 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  956. Lande, Russell, Anthropogenic, Ecological and Genetic Factors in Extinction and Con-servation, 40 (1998) Researches on Population Ecology 259–269 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  957. Lander, Eric S., The Heroes of CRISPR, 164 (2016) Cell 18–28 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  958. Lanphier, Edward/Urnov, Fyodor/Haecker, Sarah Ehlen/Werner, Michael/Smolenski, Joanna, Don’t Edit the Human Germ Line, 519 (2015) Nature News 410 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528
  959. Lareau, Caleb A./Clement, Kendell/Hsu, Jonathan Y. et al., Response to “Unexpected Mu-tations After CRISPR-Cas9 Editing in Vivo”, 15 (2018) Nature Methods 238–239 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748913528

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht"
Cover des Buchs: The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Jannika Jahn, Moritz Vinken, Khaled El Mahmoud
The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change
Cover des Buchs: Partizipation in der Umweltgovernance
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Laura Fischer
Partizipation in der Umweltgovernance
Cover des Buchs: Fusion Energy in Nuclear Weapons Law
Monographie Vollzugriff
Philipp Sauter
Fusion Energy in Nuclear Weapons Law
Cover des Buchs: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover des Buchs: Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Augusto Wiegand Cruz
Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex