Cover of book: Global Governance und Menschenrechte
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Global Governance und Menschenrechte

Konstellationen zwischen Privatheit und Öffentlichkeit
Authors:
Publisher:
 2020

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5715-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9847-4
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Internationale Politische Theorie
Volume
8
Language
German
Pages
338
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
    1. Einleitung No access
    2. I Privatheit, Öffentlichkeit und Global Governance No access
    3. II Global Governance und internationale Menschenrechte No access
    4. III Unternehmerische Verantwortung für Menschenrechte No access
    5. IV Unternehmerische Verantwortung für moderne Sklaverei No access
      1. a) Das Private, das Öffentliche und das Gesellschaftliche No access
      2. b) Geschlechterverhältnisse No access
      3. c) Die Legitimität normativer und politischer Macht No access
      4. d) Offene Normativität No access
        1. 1 Konturen Internationaler Politischer Theorie No access
        2. 2 Privatheit in den Internationalen Beziehungen und der Politischen Theorie No access
        3. 3 Privatheit in der Internationalen Politischen Theorie No access
        4. 4 Verdoppelung und Überkreuzung des Privaten No access
        5. 5 Ausblick No access
    2. Die Privatheit der Privatsphäre No access
      1. Introduction No access
      2. Definitions of Global Governance No access
      3. The Multiplicity of Global Governance No access
      4. The Role of States No access
      5. The Role of Nonstate Actors No access
      6. The Role of International Institutions No access
      7. Analytical and Critical Perspectives on Global Governance No access
      8. Conclusion No access
          1. 1.1 Libertärer Paternalismus No access
          2. 1.2 Global Governance No access
          3. 1.3 Grundlagen der Perspektivenverschränkung No access
          1. 2.1 Das bessere Leben No access
          2. 2.2 Freiheit und Heteronomie No access
          1. 3.1 Die Akteurskonstellation No access
          2. 3.2 Der Startpunkt der Legitimität No access
          1. 4.1 Governing Nudges No access
          2. 4.2 Nudging Governance No access
      2. Fazit No access
          1. 1.1 The Idea of Human Rights No access
          2. 1.2 The Institutionalization of Human Rights No access
          3. 1.3 The Application of Human Rights No access
          1. 2.1 Dynamic Pluralism No access
          2. 2.2 Awareness of Power and Inequalities No access
          3. 2.3 Contextual Universalism No access
          4. 2.4 Open Normativity No access
        3. Conclusion No access
      1. 1 Einleitung No access
      2. 2 Das häusliche Private im Menschenrecht: Frauenmenschenrechte No access
      3. 3 Das globale Private im Menschenrecht: Privatisierung und Global Governance No access
        1. a) Eindeutige Trennung: No access
        2. b) Diffundierende Auflösung: No access
        3. c) Verschiebung der Trennlinie: No access
        1. d) Vermittlung von Privatheit und Öffentlichkeit No access
      1. 1 Einleitung No access
      2. 2 Öffentliches Völkerrecht und nichtstaatliche Akteure No access
      3. 3 Soft Law und transnationales Recht No access
      4. 4 Unternehmerische Verantwortung für Menschenrechte No access
      5. 5 Die Legitimität nichtstaatlicher Akteure No access
        1. 1 Genesis No access
        2. 2 Content No access
        3. 3 Impact No access
      1. 1 Einleitung No access
      2. 2 Das Konzept menschenrechtlicher Verantwortung No access
      3. 3 Corporate Social Responsibility No access
        1. 4.1 Unternehmerische Verantwortung für Menschenrechte No access
        2. 4.2 Staatliche Verantwortung für Menschenrechte No access
          1. 5 Die Ecuador-Initiative No access
        4. 5.1 Die politische Konfrontation zwischen verbindlicher und unverbindlicher Verantwortung No access
          1. 6 Konklusion: Diffusion menschenrechtlicher Verantwortung No access
        6. 6.1 Produktiv komplementäre Verantwortung No access
        7. 6.2 Unternehmen als gesellschaftliche Akteure No access
        8. 6.3 Diffusion statt Dichotomien No access
          1. 1.1 Externe Effekte No access
          2. 1.2 Selbstinteresse No access
          3. 1.3 Gemeinwohl No access
          4. 1.4 Legitimität No access
          1. 2.1 Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung No access
          2. 2.2 Pluralismus im transnationalen Recht No access
          3. 2.3 Komplementäre Verantwortung No access
      2. Ausblick No access
    4. Which Business? Controversies about the Scope of Application of a Future Treaty on Business and Human Rights No access
      1. Einleitung No access
        1. 1) Schuldknechtschaft und Vertragssklaverei: No access
        2. 2) Hausarbeit: No access
        3. 3) Besitzsklaverei und herkunftsbasierte Sklaverei: No access
        4. 4) Rituelle und religiöse Sklaverei: No access
        5. 5) Zwangsarbeit und Menschenhandel: No access
        6. 6) Kinderarbeit: No access
      3. Definitionen moderner Sklaverei No access
        1. a) Die Erweiterung von Sklaverei-Definitionen No access
        2. b) Die Dekonstruktion von Sklaverei-Definitionen No access
      5. Ein offenes Fazit No access
          1. 1.1 Key Documents No access
          2. 1.2 Interim Conclusion: Definitions of Modern Slavery No access
          1. 2.1 Slavery as Homogenous Concept No access
          2. 2.2 Slavery as Absolute Evil No access
          3. 2.3 The Emotionalization of Slavery No access
          4. 2.4 Repressive Policies No access
          5. 2.5 Slavery as Powerlessness No access
          6. 2.6 Interim Conclusion: Slavery as Detached Phenomenon No access
          1. 3.1 The Practical Dimension: Civil Society Strategies No access
          2. 3.2 The Conceptual Dimension: Delineation and Normativity No access
          3. 3.3 The Framework Dimension: Human Rights No access
        4. 4 Conclusion: Modern Slavery as Embedded Concept No access
          1. 1.1 Modern Slavery as Relation No access
          2. 1.2 Modern Slavery as Structure No access
          3. 1.3 Modern Slavery: A Pathway No access
          1. 2.1 The Power of Business No access
          2. 2.2 Internal and External Realms of Business Agency No access
          3. 2.3 Public and Private Business Roles No access
          4. 2.4 Business Responsibility: A Pathway No access
          1. 3.1 Narrow Business Responsibility for Modern Slavery as Relation No access
          2. 3.2 Broad Business Responsibility for Modern Slavery as Structure No access
        4. 4 Strengths and Limits No access
        5. 5 Conclusion No access
  7. Schriftenverzeichnis No access 337 - 338

Bibliography (355)

  1. References Open Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2005). The power of liberal international organizations. In M. N. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in global governance (pp. 161–184). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, M., & Sikkink, K. (2008). From international relations to global society. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 62–83). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. N., & Duvall, R. (Eds.). (2005). Power in global governance. Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 98. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  5. Best, J., & Gheciu, A. (2014). Theorizing the public as practices: Transformations of the public in historical context. In J. Best & A. Gheciu (Eds.), The return of the public in global governance (pp. 15–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  6. Brand, U., Brunnengräber, A., Schrader, L., Stock, C., & Wahl, P. (2000). Global Governance: Alternative zur neoliberalen Globalisierung? (1st ed.). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot. Open Google Scholar
  7. Brühl, T., & Rittberger, V. (2001). From international to global governance: Actors, collective decision-making, and the United Nations in the world of the twenty-first century. In V. Rittberger (Ed.), Global governance and the United Nations system (pp. 1–47). Tokyo, New York: United Nations University Press. Open Google Scholar
  8. Brysk, A. (2005). Human rights and private wrongs: Constructing global civil society. Global horizons. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  9. Çağlar, G., Prügl, E., & Zwingel, S. (Eds.). (2013). Feminist strategies in international governance. Routledge global institutions: Vol. 70. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  10. Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance. (2015). Confronting the crisis of global governance: Report of the Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance. The Hague, Washington, D.C.: The Hague Institute for Global Justice and the Stimson Center. Open Google Scholar
  11. Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (1999). Private authority and international affairs. In A. C. Cutler, V. Haufler, & T. Porter (Eds.), Private authority and international affairs (pp. 3–27). Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  12. Fuchs, D. (2005). Understanding business power in global governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  13. Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in the international system. In R. B. Hall & T. J. Biersteker (Eds.), The emergence of private authority in global governance (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  14. Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913 Open Google Scholar
  15. Keohane, R. O. (2005). Global governance and democratic accountability. In R. Wilkinson (Ed.), The Global Governance Reader (pp. 120–137). London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  16. Mende, J. (2016). Global Governance und libertärer Paternalismus: Akteure, Normativität und Legitimität. Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie, 3(1), 557–596. Open Google Scholar
  17. Näsström, S. (2010). Democracy counts: Problems of equality in transnational democracy. In C. Jönsson & J. Tallberg (Eds.), Democracy beyond the nation state? Transnational actors in global governance: Patterns, explanations, and implications (pp. 197–217). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  18. Peters, A., Koechlin, L., Förster, T., & Zinkernagel, G. F. (Eds.). (2009). Non-state actors as standard setters. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  19. Rittberger, V., & Zangl, B. (2010). International organization: Polity, politics and policies. Basingstoke u.a.: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  20. Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  21. Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 1(1), 13–43. Open Google Scholar
  22. Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. O. (Eds.). (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  23. Ruggie, J. G. (2004). Reconstituting the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047847 Open Google Scholar
  24. Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://lib.myilibrary.com/detail.asp?id=215885 Open Google Scholar
  25. The Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighborhood: The report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  26. Zürn, M. (2013). Globalization and global governance. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (2nd ed., pp. 401–425). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  27. Zürn, M. (2017). The social origins of silent majorities: Paper for the workshop: Beyond representative democracy? Design and legitimacy of non-majoritarian institutions, Berlin, 5–7 October 2017. Open Google Scholar
  28. References Open Google Scholar
  29. Acharya A (2004) How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58(02): 239–275. Open Google Scholar
  30. Adami R (2017) Intersectional dialogue: Analyzing power in reaching a Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 on conflicting grounds. Journal of Human Rights 17(3): 357–366. Open Google Scholar
  31. Ake C (1987) The African context of human rights. Africa Today 34(1/2): 5–12. Open Google Scholar
  32. Al-Hibri AY (1999) Is Western patriarchal feminism good for Third World/minority women? In: Cohen J, Howard M and Nussbaum MC (eds) Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 41–46. Open Google Scholar
  33. American Anthropological Association EB (1947) Statement on human rights. American Anthropologist 49(4/1): 539–543. Open Google Scholar
  34. An-Na’im AA (1999) The cultural mediation of human rights: The Al-Arqam Case in Malaysia. In: Bauer JR and Bell D (eds) The East Asian challenge for human rights: Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–168. Open Google Scholar
  35. An-Na’im AA and Deng FM (eds) (1990) Human rights in Africa: Cross-cultural perspectives. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Open Google Scholar
  36. Asmal K, Chidester D and Lubisi C (2005) Legacy of freedom: The ANC’s human rights tradition. Africans’ claims in South Africa, the Freedom Charter, the Women’s Charter and other human rights landmarks of the African National Congress. Johannesburg: Ball. Open Google Scholar
  37. Barreto J-M (ed) (2013) Human rights from a third world perspective: Critique, history and international law. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Ann Arbor: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  38. Bauer JR and Bell D (eds) (1999) The East Asian challenge for human rights. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  39. Bhabha HK (1994) The location of culture. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  40. Bhambra GK (2009) Rethinking modernity: Postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  41. Bhambra GK (2014) Connected sociologies. London: Bloomsbury. Open Google Scholar
  42. Bhambra GK (2015) On the Haitian revolution and the society of equals. Theory, Culture & Society 32(7–8): 267–274. Open Google Scholar
  43. Bielefeldt H (2000) „Western“ versus „Islamic“ human rights conceptions? A critique of cultural essentialism in the discussion on human rights. Political Theory 28(1): 90–121. Open Google Scholar
  44. Bielefeldt H (2007) Ideengeschichte(n) der Menschenrechte. In: Janz N and Risse T (eds) Menschenrechte: Globale Dimensionen eines universellen Anspruchs. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 177–186. Open Google Scholar
  45. Brotton J (2002) The Renaissance Bazaar: from the Silk Road to Michelangelo. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  46. Buck-Morss S (2000) Hegel and Haiti. Critical Inquiry 6(4): 821–865. Open Google Scholar
  47. Burke E (1790) Reflections on the revolution in France, and on the proceedings in certain societies in London relative to that event. London: J. Dodsley. Open Google Scholar
  48. Carozza PG (2003) From conquest to constitutions: Retrieving a Latin American tradition of the idea of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly 25: 281–313. Open Google Scholar
  49. Chakrabarty D (2008) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  50. Chan J (1999) A Confucian perspective on human rights for contemporary China. In: Bauer JR and Bell D (eds) The East Asian challenge for human rights: Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–239. Open Google Scholar
  51. Chowdhry G (2005) Postcolonial interrogations of child labor: Human rights, carpet trade, and Rugmark in India. In: Chowdhry G and Nair S (eds) Power, postcolonialism and international relations: Reading race, gender and class. London: Routledge, pp. 225–253. Open Google Scholar
  52. Comaroff JL and Comaroff J (1997) Postcolonial politics and discourses of democracy in southern Africa: An anthropological reflection on African political modernities. Journal of Anthropological Research 35(2): 123–146. Open Google Scholar
  53. Conrad S and Randeria S (2002) Geteilte Geschichten: Europa in einer postkolonialen Welt. In: Conrad S and Randeria S (eds) Jenseits des Eurozentrismus: Postkoloniale Perspektiven in den Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus, pp. 9–49. Open Google Scholar
  54. Cousin G (2011) Rethinking the concept of ‘western’. Higher Education Research & Development 30(5): 585–594. Open Google Scholar
  55. Deitelhoff N (2009) The discoursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization 63(1): 33–65. Open Google Scholar
  56. Derrida J (1992) The other heading: Memories, responses, and responsibilities. In: The other heading: Reflections on today’s Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 4–83. Open Google Scholar
  57. Dohrmann JA (2007) Ursprung und Entwicklung der Menschenrechte in Indien. In: Janz N and Risse T (eds) Menschenrechte: Globale Dimensionen eines universellen Anspruchs. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 113–143. Open Google Scholar
  58. Donnelly J (1998) Human rights: A new standard of civilization? International Affairs 74(1): 1–23. Open Google Scholar
  59. Douzinas C (2007) Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish. Open Google Scholar
  60. Glendon MA (2003) The forgotten crucible: The Latin American influence on the universal human rights idea. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 27–40. Open Google Scholar
  61. Gouges Od (2012 [1791]) Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne. Paris: Ed. Mille et une nuits. Open Google Scholar
  62. Hall S (1992) The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In: Hall S and Grieben B (eds) Formations of modernity: Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 185–227. Open Google Scholar
  63. Hall S (2000) Conclusion: The multi-cultural question. In: Hesse B (ed.) Un/settled multiculturalisms: Diasporas, entanglements, transruptions. London: Zed Books, pp. 209–241. Open Google Scholar
  64. Hastrup K (2003) Representing the common good: The limits of legal language. In: Wilson RA and Mitchell JP (eds) Human rights in global perspective: Anthropological studies of rights, claims and entitlements. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 16–32. Open Google Scholar
  65. Hoover J (2013) Rereading the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Plurality and contestation, not consensus. Journal of Human Rights 12(2): 217–241. Open Google Scholar
  66. Hopgood S (2013) The endtimes of human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  67. Hunt LA (2008) Inventing human rights: A history. New York: W.W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
  68. Huntington SP (2002) The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. London: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  69. Ignatieff M and Gutmann A (eds) (2003) Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. Jensen SLB (2016) The making of international human rights: The 1960s, decolonization and the reconstruction of global values. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  71. Joas H (2013) The sacredness of the person: A new genealogy of human rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Open Google Scholar
  72. Kapur R (2006) Human rights in the 21st century: Take a walk on the dark side. Sydney Law Review 28: 665–687. Open Google Scholar
  73. Karan PP (2005) The non-Western world: Environment, development, and human rights. New York: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar
  74. Kennedy D (2012) The international human rights regime: Still part of the problem? In: Dickinson R, Katselli E, Murray C and Pedersen OW (eds) Examining critical perspectives on human rights: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–34. Open Google Scholar
  75. Kingsbury B (1998) Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law 9(4): 599–625. Open Google Scholar
  76. Klotz A and Lynch C (2007) Strategies for research in constructivist international relations. Armonk, London: M.E. Sharpe. Open Google Scholar
  77. Kuhrt A (1983) The Cyrus Cylinder and Achaemenid imperial policy. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 8(25): 83–97. Open Google Scholar
  78. Lauren PG (2011) The evolution of international human rights: Visions seen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  79. Lustick I (1996) History, historiography, and political science: Multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias. American Political Science Review 90(3): 605–618. Open Google Scholar
  80. Mayer A (2017) Redefining rights: OIC attempts to reshape values in the UN human rights system. In: Chase AT (ed.) Routledge handbook on human rights and the Middle East and North Africa: London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Open Google Scholar
  81. Mbaya E-R (1999) Demokratieprinzip und Menschenrechte im afrikanischen Kontext. In: Brunkhorst H, Köhler WR and Lutz-Bachmann M (eds) Recht auf Menschenrechte: Menschenrechte, Demokratie und internationale Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 314–344. Open Google Scholar
  82. Mbembe A (2003) Necropolitics. Public Culture 15(1): 11–40. Open Google Scholar
  83. McDonald M (1991) Should communities have rights? Reflections on liberal individualism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 4(2): 217–237. Open Google Scholar
  84. Mende J (2015a) Privatheit und Global Governance in der Internationalen Politischen Theorie. Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 6(2): 207–222. Open Google Scholar
  85. Mende J (2015b) The imperative of indigeneity: Indigenous human rights and their limits. Human Rights Review 16(3): 221–238. Open Google Scholar
  86. Mende J (2016a) A human right to culture and identity? The ambivalence of group rights. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. Open Google Scholar
  87. Mende J (2016b) Collective identity. In: Tiedemann P (ed.) Right to identity: Stuttgart, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag; Nomos, pp. 129–150. Open Google Scholar
  88. Mende J (2017) Privatisierung oder Diffusion von Verantwortung? Die Entwicklung wirtschaftlicher Verantwortung für Menschenrechte. Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 52: Politik und Verantwortung(hrsg. v. Daase, Christopher; Junk, Julian; Kroll, Stefan; Rauer, Valentin): 409–435. Open Google Scholar
  89. Mende J (2018) Normative and contextual feminism: Lessons from the debate around female genital mutilation/cutting. Gender Forum. An Internet Journal for Gender Studies 17(68): 47–69. Open Google Scholar
  90. Menke C and Pollmann A (2007) Philosophie der Menschenrechte: Zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Open Google Scholar
  91. Morsink J (1999) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, drafting, and intent. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  92. Moyn S (2012) The last utopia: Human rights in history. Cambridge, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Harvard University Press; ProQuest. Open Google Scholar
  93. Mutua M (2008) Human rights: A political and cultural critique. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Nair S (2005) Human rights and postcoloniality: Representing Burma. In: Chowdhry G and Nair S (eds) Power, postcolonialism and international relations: Reading race, gender and class. London: Routledge, pp. 254–283. Open Google Scholar
  95. Näsström S (2010) Democracy counts: Problems of equality in transnational democracy. In: Jönsson C and Tallberg J (eds) Transnational actors in global governance: Patterns, explanations, and implications. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 197–217. Open Google Scholar
  96. Nesiah V (2010) From Berlin to Bonn to Baghdad: A space for infinite justice. In: Charlesworth H and Coicaud J-M (eds) Fault lines of international legitimacy: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 146–172. Open Google Scholar
  97. Nkrumah K (1962) Towards colonial freedom: Africa in the struggle against world imperialism. London: Panaf. Open Google Scholar
  98. Othman N (1999) Grounding human rights arguments in non-western culture: Shari’a and the citizenship rights of women in a modern Islamic state. In: Bauer JR and Bell D (eds) The East Asian challenge for human rights: Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–192. Open Google Scholar
  99. Panikkar R (1982) Is the notion of human rights a Western concept? Diogenes 30(120): 75–102. Open Google Scholar
  100. Peters J and Wolper A (eds) (1995) Women’s rights, human rights: International feminist perspectives. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  101. Pinheiro PS (2014) Interview with Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro: „Besides human rights, I don’t see a solution for serving the victims“. SUR – International Journal On Human Rights 11(20): 91–95. Open Google Scholar
  102. Pollis A and Schwab P (1980) Human rights: A Western construct with limited applicability. In: Pollis A and Schwab P (eds) Human rights: Cultural and ideological perspectives. New York: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  103. Pritchard S (2001) Der völkerrechtliche Minderheitenschutz: Historische und neuere Entwicklungen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
  104. Rajagopal B (2006) Counter-hegemonic international Law: Rethinking human rights and development as a Third World strategy. Third World Quarterly 27(5): 767–783. Open Google Scholar
  105. Reus-Smit C (2001) Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies 27(4): 519–538. Open Google Scholar
  106. Said EW (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books. Open Google Scholar
  107. Scott D (2004) Conscripts of modernity: The tragedy of colonial enlightenment. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  108. Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books. Open Google Scholar
  109. Sen AK (2007) Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: Norton. Open Google Scholar
  110. Sharma A (2004) Hinduism and human rights: A conceptual approach. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  111. Sharma A (2006) Are human rights Western? A contribution to the dialogue of civilizations. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  112. Sikkink K (2017) Evidence for hope: Making human rights work in the 21st century. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  113. Spivak GC (1988) In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  114. Spivak GC (1994) Can the subaltern speak? In: Williams P and Chrisman L (eds) Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 66–111. Open Google Scholar
  115. Spivak GC (2004) Righting wrongs. South Atlantic Quarterly 103(2–3): 523–581. Open Google Scholar
  116. Stapleton J (ed) (1995) Group rights: Perspectives since 1900. Bristol: Thoemmes. Open Google Scholar
  117. Tatsuo I (1999) Liberal democracy and Asian orientalism. In: Bauer JR and Bell D (eds) The East Asian challenge for human rights: Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–59. Open Google Scholar
  118. Waltz S (2002) Reclaiming and rebuilding the history of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Third World Quarterly 23(3): 437–448. Open Google Scholar
  119. Wiredu K (1990) An Akan perspective on human rights. In: An-Na’im AA and Deng FM (eds) Human rights in Africa: Cross-cultural perspectives. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, pp. 243–260. Open Google Scholar
  120. Wollstonecraft M (1792) A vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. London: J. Johnson. Open Google Scholar
  121. Yasuaki O (1999) Toward an intercivilizational approach to human rights. In: Bauer JR and Bell D (eds) The East Asian challenge for human rights: Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–123. Open Google Scholar
  122. Zakaria F and Lee KY (1994) Culture is destiny: A conversation with Lee Kuan Yew. Foreign Affairs 73(2): 109–126. Open Google Scholar
  123. Zhang J (2007) Ist das Menschenrechtsbild in China konfuzianisch oder universal? Fortschritte und Probleme in Theorie und Praxis der Menschenrechte. In: Janz N and Risse T (eds) Menschenrechte: Globale Dimensionen eines universellen Anspruchs. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 101–111. Open Google Scholar
  124. References Open Google Scholar
  125. Agustín LM (2007) Sex at the margins: Migration, labour markets and the rescue industry. London, New York: Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  126. Akurang-Parry KO (2010) Transformations in the feminization of unfree domestic labor: A study of Abaawa or prepubescent female servitude in modern Ghana. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 28–47. Open Google Scholar
  127. Albuquerque C de (2010) Chronicle of an announced birth: The coming into life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – the missing piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 32(1): 144–178. Open Google Scholar
  128. Allain J (ed) (2013) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  129. Aradau C (2008) Rethinking trafficking in women: Politics out of security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  130. Bales K (2005) New slavery: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Open Google Scholar
  131. Bales K (2013) Slavery in its contemporary manifestations. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 281–303. Open Google Scholar
  132. Bales K and Robbins PT (2001) ‘No one shall be held in slavery or servitude’: A critical analysis of international slavery agreements and concepts of slavery. Human Rights Review 2(2): 18–45. Open Google Scholar
  133. Barrientos S, Kothari U and Phillips N (2013) Dynamics of unfree labour in the contemporary global economy. The Journal of Development Studies 49(8): 1037–1041. Open Google Scholar
  134. Beare ME (1999) Illegal migration: Personal tragedies, social problems, or national security threats? In: Williams P (ed.) Illegal immigration and commercial sex: The new slave trade. London, Portland: Frank Cass, pp. 11–41. Open Google Scholar
  135. Bernstein E and Schaffner L (eds) (2004) Regulating sex: Sexual freedom and the politics of intimacy. New York, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  136. Bhukuth A (2005) Child Labour and Debt Bondage: A Case Study of Brick Kiln Workers in Southeast India. Journal of Asian and African Studies 40(4): 287–302. Open Google Scholar
  137. Brace L (2004) The politics of property: Labour, freedom and belonging. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar
  138. Brass T (2013) Debating Capitalist Dynamics and Unfree Labour: A Missing Link? The Journal of Development Studies 50(4): 570–582. Open Google Scholar
  139. Breman J (2010) Neo-bondage: A fieldwork-based account. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 48–62. Open Google Scholar
  140. Brysk A (2011) Sex as slavery? Understanding private wrongs. Human Rights Review 12(3): 259–270. Open Google Scholar
  141. Brysk A (2012) Rethinking trafficking: Human rights and private wrongs. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 73–85. Open Google Scholar
  142. Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) (2012a) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  143. Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2012b) Introduction: Rethinking trafficking. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–10. Open Google Scholar
  144. Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2012) Rethinking trafficking: Contemporary slavery. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 13–24. Open Google Scholar
  145. Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2017) What slaveholders think: How contemporary perpetrators rationalize what they do. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. Chuang JA (2015) Giving as governance? Philanthrocapitalism and modern-day slavery abolitionism. UCLA Law Review 62: 1516–1556. Open Google Scholar
  147. Cockayne J, Grono N and Panaccione K (2016) Slavery and the limits of international criminal justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice 14(2): 253–267. Open Google Scholar
  148. Craig G, Gaus A, Wilkinson M, et al. (2007) Contemporary slavery in the UK: Overwiew and key issues. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  149. Crane A (2013) Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Academy of Management Review 38(1): 49–69. Open Google Scholar
  150. Cullen H (2013) Contemporary international legal norms on slavery. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–321. Open Google Scholar
  151. Datta MN and Bales K (2013) Slavery in Europe: Part 1: Estimating the dark figure. Human Rights Quarterly 35(4): 817–829. Open Google Scholar
  152. Deitelhoff N and Wolf KD (2013) Business and human rights: How corporate norm violators become norm entrepreneurs. In: Risse T, Ropp SC and Sikkink K (eds) The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–238. Open Google Scholar
  153. Ehrenreich B and Hochschild AR (eds) (2004) Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Metropolitan Books/Holt. Open Google Scholar
  154. Eide A, Krause C and Rosas A (eds) (1995) Economic, social and cultural rights: A textbook. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar
  155. Engerman SL (2000) Slavery at different times and places. The American Historical Review 105(2): 480–484. Open Google Scholar
  156. Ercelawn A and Nauman M (2004) Unfree labor in South Asia: Debt bondage at brick kilns in Pakistan. Economic and Political Weekly 39(22): 2235–2242. Open Google Scholar
  157. Festa L (2010) Humanity without feathers. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1(1): 3–27. Open Google Scholar
  158. Gold S, Trautrims A and Trodd Z (2015) Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20(5): 485–494. Open Google Scholar
  159. Goodhart ME (ed) (2016) Human rights: Politics and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  160. Greene SE (2009) Modern Trokosi and the 1807 abolition in Ghana: Connecting past and present. The William and Mary Quarterly 66(4): 959–974. Open Google Scholar
  161. Gupta R (2016) Defining modern slavery out of existence: who benefits? Open Democracy(03. February 2016) (accessed 19 November 2018). Open Google Scholar
  162. Hall S (1992) The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In: Hall S and Grieben B (eds) Formations of modernity: Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 185–227. Open Google Scholar
  163. Hathaway JC (2008) The human rights quagmire of ‘human trafficking’. Virginia Journal of International Law 49(1): 1–59. Open Google Scholar
  164. Haynes DF (2014) The celebritization of human trafficking. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 653(1): 25–45. Open Google Scholar
  165. Hebert L (2012) The sexual politics of U.S. inter/national security. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 86–106. Open Google Scholar
  166. Herzfeld B (2002) Slavery and gender: Women’s double exploitation. Gender and Development 10(1): 50–55. Open Google Scholar
  167. Hickey R (2013) Seeking to understand the definition of slavery. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–241. Open Google Scholar
  168. Kapur R (2004) Erotic justice: Postcolonialism, law, sexuality. London: GlassHouse. Open Google Scholar
  169. Keck ME and Sikkink K (1998) Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  170. Kempadoo K (2012) Introduction: From moral panic to global justice: Changing perspectives on trafficking. In: Kempadoo K, Sanghera J and Pattanaik B (eds) Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: New perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  171. Kempadoo K (2015) The modern-day white (wo)man’s burden: Trends in anti-trafficking and anti-slavery campaigns. Journal of Human Trafficking 1(1): 8–20. Open Google Scholar
  172. Kempadoo K, Sanghera J and Pattanaik B (eds) (2012) Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: New perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  173. Kopytoff I and Miers S (1977) African ‘slavery’ as an institution of marginality. In: Miers S and Kopytoff I (eds) Slavery in Africa: Historical and anthropological perspectives. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 3–83. Open Google Scholar
  174. Krennerich M (2013) Soziale Menschenrechte: Zwischen Recht und Politik. Schwalbach/Ts.: Wochenschau-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  175. Landman T (2018a) Hidden in plain sight: A cross-national analysis of modern slavery prevalence. Rights Lab Working Paper, University of Nottingham. Open Google Scholar
  176. Landman T (2018b) Out of the shadows: Trans-disciplinary research on modern slavery. Peace Human Rights Governance 2(2): 143–162. Open Google Scholar
  177. Lawrance BN (2010) From child labor ‘problem’ to human trafficking ‘crisis’: Child advocacy and anti-trafficking legislation in Ghana. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 63–88. Open Google Scholar
  178. Lindquist J (2013) Beyond anti-anti-trafficking. Dialectical Anthropology 37(2): 319–323. Open Google Scholar
  179. Lively A (2000) Masks: Blackness, race, and the imagination. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  180. Lott TL (1998) Early Enlightenment conceptions of the rights of slaves. In: Lott TL (ed.) Subjugation and bondage: Critical essays on slavery and social philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 99–129. Open Google Scholar
  181. Mende J (2016) A human right to culture and identity? The ambivalence of group rights. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. Open Google Scholar
  182. Mende J and Drubel J (2019) Business Responsibility for Modern Slavery: At the Junction Human Rights Review 21(3):313–335. Open Google Scholar
  183. Miers S (2000) Contemporary forms of slavery. Canadian Journal of African Studies 34(3): 714–747. Open Google Scholar
  184. Miers S (2003) Slavery: A question of definition. Slavery & Abolition 24(2): 1–16. Open Google Scholar
  185. Moravcsik J (1998) Slavery and the ties that do not bind. In: Lott TL (ed.) Subjugation and bondage: Critical essays on slavery and social philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 171–186. Open Google Scholar
  186. O’Connell Davidson J (2006) Will the real sex slave please stand up? Feminist Review(83): 4–22. Open Google Scholar
  187. O’Connell Davidson J (2008) Trafficking, modern slavery and the human security agenda. Human Security Journal 6: 8–15. Open Google Scholar
  188. O’Connell Davidson J (2010) New slavery, old binaries: Human trafficking and the borders of ‘freedom’. Global Networks. A Journal of Transnational Affairs 10(2): 244–261. Open Google Scholar
  189. O’Connell Davidson J (2012) Absolving the state: The trafficking-slavery metaphor. Global Dialogue 14(2): 31–41. Open Google Scholar
  190. O’Connell Davidson J (2014) The making of modern slavery: Whose interests are served by the new abolitionism? British Academy Review 24: 28–31. Open Google Scholar
  191. O’Connell Davidson J (2015) Modern slavery: The margins of freedom. Basingstoke u.a.: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  192. Patterson O (1982) Slavery and social death: A comparative study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  193. Peterson MJ (1992) Whalers, cetologists, environmentalists, and the international management of whaling. International Organization 46(01): 147. Open Google Scholar
  194. Quirk J (2006) The anti-slavery project: Linking the historical and contemporary. Human Rights Quarterly 28(3): 565–598. Open Google Scholar
  195. Quirk J (2007) Trafficked into slavery. Journal of Human Rights 6(2): 181–207. Open Google Scholar
  196. Quirk J (2012) Uncomfortable silences: Contemporary slavery and the ‘lessons’ of history. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 25–43. Open Google Scholar
  197. Quirk J (2013) Defining slavery in all its forms: Historical inquiry as contemporary instruction. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–278. Open Google Scholar
  198. Raymond JG and Hughes D (2001) Sex trafficking of women in the United States: International and domestic trends. Amherst: Coalition Against Trafficking in Women. Open Google Scholar
  199. Research Network on the Legal Parameters of Slavery (2012) Bellagio-Harvard Guidelines on the Legal Parameters of Slavery. Available at: http://www.law.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/FileStore/Filetoupload,651854,en.pdf (accessed 2 April 2017). Open Google Scholar
  200. Ruf UP (1999) Ending slavery: Hierarchy, dependency, and gender in Central Mauritania. Bielefeld: Transcript. Open Google Scholar
  201. Sikkink K (2017) Evidence for hope: Making human rights work in the 21st century. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  202. Skinner EB (2009) The fight to end global slavery. World Policy Journal 26(2): 33–41. Open Google Scholar
  203. Smith HM (2011) Sex trafficking: Trends, challenges, and the limitations of international law. Human Rights Review 12(3): 271–286. Open Google Scholar
  204. Spivak GC, Danius S and Jonsson S (1993) An Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Boundary 2 20(2): 24–50. Open Google Scholar
  205. Steinfeld RJ (2001) Coercion, contract, and free labor in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  206. Sutton A (1994) Slavery in Brazil: A link in the chain of modernisation. The case of Amazonia. London: Anti-Slavery International. Open Google Scholar
  207. Weissbrodt D and Anti-Slavery International (2002) Abolishing slavery and its contemporary forms. New York, Geneva: United Nations Pub. Open Google Scholar
  208. Weitzer R (2007) The Social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society 35(3): 447–475. Open Google Scholar
  209. Weitzer R (2011) Legalizing prostitution: From illicit cice to lawful business. New York: New York University Press. Open Google Scholar
  210. Wong WH (2011) Is trafficking slavery? Anti-Slavery International in the twenty-first century. Human Rights Review 12(3): 315–328. Open Google Scholar
  211. References Open Google Scholar
  212. Abrahamsen R and Williams MC (2014) Publics, practices and power. In: Best J and Gheciu A (eds) The return of the public in global governance: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243–256. Open Google Scholar
  213. Ad Hoc Committee on Slavery (1951) Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Slavery: E/1988. Open Google Scholar
  214. Addo MK (ed) (1999) Human rights standards and the responsibility of transnational corporations. The Hague: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar
  215. Akurang-Parry KO (2010) Transformations in the feminization of unfree domestic labor: A study of Abaawa or prepubescent female servitude in modern Ghana. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 28–47. Open Google Scholar
  216. Allain J (2013) Slavery in international law: Of human exploitation and trafficking. Boston, Mass.: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  217. Allain J and Hickey R (2012) Property and the definition of slavery. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 61(04): 915–938. Open Google Scholar
  218. Bakker F de, Groenewegen P and Den Hond F (2005) A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society 44(3): 283–317. Open Google Scholar
  219. Bales K (2005) New slavery: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Open Google Scholar
  220. Bales K (2016) Blood and earth: Modern slavery, ecocide, and the secret to saving the world. New York: Spiegel & Grau. Open Google Scholar
  221. Barrientos S (2011) ‘Labour chains’: Analysing the role of labour contractors in global production networks. Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute. Open Google Scholar
  222. Barrientos S, Kothari U and Phillips N (2013) Dynamics of unfree labour in the contemporary global economy. Journal of Development Studies 49(8): 1037–1041. Open Google Scholar
  223. Becker W and Ulrich P (2010) Corporate Governance and Controlling: Begriffe und Wechselwirkungen. In: Keuper F and Neumann F (eds) Corporate governance, risk management und compliance: Innovative Konzepte und Strategien. Wiesbaden: Gabler, pp. 5–28. Open Google Scholar
  224. Bobbio N (1997) The great dichotomy: Public/private. In: Democracy and dictatorship: The nature and limits of state power. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 1–21. Open Google Scholar
  225. Bofinger P (2003) Grundzüge der Volkswirtschaftslehre: Eine Einführung in die Wissenschaft von Märkten. München: Pearson Studium. Open Google Scholar
  226. Bowen HR (2013) Social responsibilities of the businessman: Introduction by Jean-Pascal Gond. Foreword by Peter Geoffrey Bowen. University of Iowa Press. Open Google Scholar
  227. Brysk A (2012) Rethinking trafficking: Human rights and private wrongs. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 73–85. Open Google Scholar
  228. Campbell T (2012) Corporate social responsibility: Beyond the business case to human rights. In: Cragg W (ed.) Business and human rights: Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub, pp. 47–73. Open Google Scholar
  229. Carroll AB (2008) A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In: Crane A (ed.) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–46. Open Google Scholar
  230. Chesney T, Evans K, Gold S, et al. (2019) Understanding labour exploitation in the Spanish agricultural sector using an agent based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 214: 696–704. Open Google Scholar
  231. Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2012) Rethinking trafficking: Contemporary slavery. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 13–24. Open Google Scholar
  232. Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2017) What slaveholders think: How contemporary perpetrators rationalize what they do. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  233. Ciliberti F, Groot G de, Haan J de, et al. (2009) Codes to coordinate supply chains: SMEs’ experiences with SA8000. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14(2): 117–127 (accessed 23 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  234. Cragg W (2012) Ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(1): 9–36. Open Google Scholar
  235. Craig G, Gaus A, Wilkinson M, et al. (2007) Contemporary slavery in the UK: Overwiew and key issues. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  236. Crane A (2013) Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Academy of Management Review 38(1): 49–69. Open Google Scholar
  237. Crane A, Lebaron G, Allain J, et al. (2017) Governance gaps in eradicating forced labor: From global to domestic supply chains. Regulation & Governance 35(online first). Open Google Scholar
  238. Crane A, Matten D and Moon J (2008a) Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  239. Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, et al. (2008b) The corporate social responsibility agenda. In: Crane A (ed.) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4–15. Open Google Scholar
  240. Crouch C (2010) CSR and changing mode of governance: Towards corporate noblesse oblige? In: Utting P and Marques JC (eds) Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Towards inclusive development? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  241. Cutler AC, Haufler V and Porter T (1999) Private authority and international affairs. In: Cutler AC, Haufler V and Porter T (eds) Private authority and international affairs: Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 3–27. Open Google Scholar
  242. Deva S (2013) Treating human rights lightly: A critique of the consensus rhetoric and the language employed by the Guiding Principles. In: Deva S and Bilchitz D (eds) Human rights obligations of business: Beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–103. Open Google Scholar
  243. Distelhorst G, Locke RM, Pal T, et al. (2015) Production goes global, compliance stays local: Private regulation in the global electronics industry. Regulation & Governance 9(3): 224–242. Open Google Scholar
  244. Dottridge M (2005) Types of forced labour and slavery-like abuse occuring in Africa today: A Preliminary Classification. Cahiers d'Études Africaines 45(179/180): 689–712. Open Google Scholar
  245. Drubel J (2019) Regulation by visibility: New forms of global social governance. Global Social Policy 19(3): 188–206. Open Google Scholar
  246. Epstein EM (1973) Dimensions of corporate power, part 1. California Management Review 16(2): 9–23. Open Google Scholar
  247. Epstein EM (1974) Dimensions of corporate power, part 2. California Management Review 16(4): 32–47. Open Google Scholar
  248. Fransen L and Lebaron G (2018) Big audit firms as regulatory intermediaries in transnational labor governance. Regulation & Governance(online first). Open Google Scholar
  249. Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  250. Friedman M (2007) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits: The New York Times Magazine. 13. September 1970. Reprint. In: Zimmerli WC, Holzinger M and Richter K (eds) Corporate ethics and corporate governance: Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  251. Fuchs D (2004) The role of business in global governance. In: Schirm SA (ed.) New rules for global markets: Public and private governance in the world economy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133–154. Open Google Scholar
  252. Fuchs D (2005) Understanding business power in global governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  253. Galtung J (1969) Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research 6(3): 167–191. Open Google Scholar
  254. George RT de (2011) Business ethics. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley, licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia. Open Google Scholar
  255. Göbel T (2010) Decent work and transnational governance: Multi-stakeholder Initiatives' impact on labour rights in global supply chains. Germany: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  256. Gold S and Schleper MC (2017) A pathway towards true sustainability: A recognition foundation of sustainable supply chain management. European Management Journal 35(4): 425–429. Open Google Scholar
  257. Gold S, Trautrims A and Trodd Z (2015) Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20(5): 485–494 (accessed 22 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  258. Gond J-P and Moon J (eds) (2012) Corporate social responsibility: Volume 1. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  259. Greene SE (2009) Modern Trokosi and the 1807 abolition in Ghana: Connecting past and present. The William and Mary Quarterly 66(4): 959–974. Open Google Scholar
  260. Haake H and Seuring S (2009) Sustainable procurement of minor items – exploring limits to sustainability. Sustainable Development 17(5): 284–294. Open Google Scholar
  261. Hardtke A (2010) Das CSR-Universum. In: Hardtke A and Kleinfeld A (eds) Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen: Von der Idee der Corporate Social Responsibility zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung. Wiesbaden: Gabler, pp. 13–70. Open Google Scholar
  262. Harvey D (2006) The limits to capital. London, New York: Verso. Open Google Scholar
  263. Hathaway JC (2008) The human rights quagmire of “human trafficking”. Virginia Journal of International Law 49(1): 1–59. Open Google Scholar
  264. Haynes K, Murray A and Dillard J (eds) (2013) Corporate social responsibility: A research handbook. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  265. Helpman E (2011) Understanding global trade. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  266. Herzfeld B (2002) Slavery and gender: Women’s double exploitation. Gender and Development 10(1): 50–55. Open Google Scholar
  267. HRC (2008) Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie. A/HRC/8/5. Geneva: Human Rights Council. Open Google Scholar
  268. ILO (1930) Forced labour: Report I, second discussion. International Labour Conference, 14th Session. Open Google Scholar
  269. ILO (2003) Fundamental rights at work and international labour standards. Geneva: International Labor Office. Open Google Scholar
  270. ILO (2012) ILO global estimate of forced labour: Results and methodology. Geneva: International Labour Office. Open Google Scholar
  271. Joyner BE and Payne D (2002) Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 41(4): 297–311. Open Google Scholar
  272. Kelling NK, Sauer PC, Gold S, et al. (2020) The role of institutional uncertainty for social sustainability of companies and supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics(online first). Open Google Scholar
  273. Kobrin SJ (2009) Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 19(03): 349–374. Open Google Scholar
  274. Kurucz EC, Colbert BA and Wheeler D (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A (ed.) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–112. Open Google Scholar
  275. Lawrance BN (2010) From child labor ‘problem’ to human trafficking ‘crisis’: Child advocacy and anti-trafficking legislation in Ghana. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 63–88. Open Google Scholar
  276. League of Nations (1926) Slavery Convention. Open Google Scholar
  277. Landman T (2018) Hidden in plain sight: A cross-national analysis of modern slavery prevalence. Rights Lab Working Paper, University of Nottingham. Open Google Scholar
  278. Lebaron G and Ayers AJ (2013) The rise of a ‘new slavery’? Understanding African unfree labour through neoliberalism. Third World Quarterly 34(5): 873–892. Open Google Scholar
  279. Lebaron G and Phillips N (2018) States and the political economy of unfree labour. New Political Economy 24(1): 1–21. Open Google Scholar
  280. Lerche J (2007) A global alliance against forced labour? : Unfree labour, neo-liberal globalization and the International Labour Organization. Journal of Agrarian Change 7(4): 425–452. Open Google Scholar
  281. Levy DL and Kaplan R (2008) Corporate social responsibility and theories of global governance: Strategic contestation in global issue arenas. In: Crane A (ed.) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 432–451. Open Google Scholar
  282. Lockett A, Moon J and Visser W (2006) Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies 43(1): 115–136. Open Google Scholar
  283. Lukes S (2005) Power: A radical view. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  284. Lund-Thomsen P and Lindgreen A (2014) Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics 123(1): 11–22. Open Google Scholar
  285. Lusk M and Lucas F (2009) The challenge of human trafficking and contemporary slavery. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare 25(1): 49–57. Open Google Scholar
  286. Massey DB (1995) Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  287. McGrath S (2012) Many chains to break: The multi-dimensional concept of slave labour in Brazil. Antipode 45(4): 1005–1028. Open Google Scholar
  288. Mende J (2016) A human right to culture and identity? The ambivalence of group rights. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. Open Google Scholar
  289. Mende J (2019) The concept of modern slavery: Definition, critique, and the human rights frame. Human Rights Review 20(2): 229–248. Open Google Scholar
  290. Mende J (2020a) The public, the private, and the business-societal: A threefold approach to business responsibility for human rights. In: Brysk A and Stohl M (eds) Research agendas for human rights: Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming. Open Google Scholar
  291. Mende J (2020) Business authority in global governance: Beyond public and private. WZB Berlin Social Science Center Discussion Paper SP IV 2020–103. Open Google Scholar
  292. Mezzadra S and Neilson B (2013) Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Open Google Scholar
  293. Miers S (2000) Contemporary forms of slavery. Canadian Journal of African Studies 34(3): 714–747. Open Google Scholar
  294. Miers S (2003) Slavery: A question of definition. Slavery & Abolition 24(2): 1–16. Open Google Scholar
  295. Moon J (2002) The social responsibility of business and new governance. Government and Opposition 37(03): 385–408. Open Google Scholar
  296. Moravcsik J (1998) Slavery and the ties that do not bind. In: Lott TL (ed.) Subjugation and bondage: Critical essays on slavery and social philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 171–186. Open Google Scholar
  297. Mosley L (2011) Labor rights and multinational production. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  298. Muchlinski P (2001) Human rights and multinationals: Is there a problem? International Affairs 77(1): 31–48. Open Google Scholar
  299. New S (2020) Modern slavery and supply chain transparency. In: Choi T-M (ed.) The Oxford handbook of supply chain management: Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming. Open Google Scholar
  300. New SJ (2015) Modern slavery and the supply chain: The limits of corporate social responsibility? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20(6): 697–707 (accessed 22 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  301. O’Connell Davidson J (2015) Modern slavery: The margins of freedom. Basingstoke u.a.: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  302. Ollus N (2015) Regulating forced labour and combating human trafficking: The relevance of historical definitions in a contemporary perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change 63(5): 221–246. Open Google Scholar
  303. Peterson VS (2003) A critical rewriting of global political economy: Integrating reproductive, productive, and virtual economies. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  304. Preuss L (2009) Ethical sourcing codes of large UK-based corporations: Prevalence, content, limitations. Journal of Business Ethics 88(4): 735–747 (accessed 22 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  305. Quirk J (2012) Uncomfortable silences: Contemporary slavery and the ‘lessons’ of history. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 25–43. Open Google Scholar
  306. Ramasastry A (2015) Corporate social responsibility versus business and human rights: Bridging the gap between responsibility and accountability. Journal of Human Rights 14(2): 237–259. Open Google Scholar
  307. Rasche A (2015) The corporation as a political actor: European and North American perspectives. European Management Journal 33(1): 4–8. Open Google Scholar
  308. Research Network on the Legal Parameters of Slavery (2012) Bellagio-Harvard Guidelines on the Legal Parameters of Slavery. Available at: http://www.law.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/FileStore/Filetoupload,651854,en.pdf (accessed 2 April 2017). Open Google Scholar
  309. Scherer AG and Palazzo G (2008) Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A (ed.) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413–431. Open Google Scholar
  310. Scherer AG and Palazzo G (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies 48(4): 899–931. Open Google Scholar
  311. Scholte JA (2005) Globalization: A critical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  312. Schrempf-Stirling J and Palazzo G (2016) Upstream corporate social responsibility: The evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility. Business & Society 55(4): 491–527 (accessed 22 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  313. Schwarz K and Allain J (2020) Antislavery in domestic legislation: An empirical analysis of national prohibition globally. Open Google Scholar
  314. Standing G (2000) Global labour flexibility: Seeking distributive justice. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Macmillan [u.a.]. Open Google Scholar
  315. Stevenson M and Cole R (2018) Modern slavery in supply chains: A secondary data analysis of detection, remediation and disclosure. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 23(2): 81–99 (accessed 22 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  316. Stiller S and Gold S (2014) Socially sustainable supply chain management practices in the Indian seed sector: A case study. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 15(1): 52–67 (accessed 23 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  317. Storper M and Walker R (1989) The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. Oxford, UK, New York, NY, USA: B. Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  318. Sylwester JG (2014) Fishers of men: The neglected effects on environmental depletion on labor trafficking in the Thai fishing industry. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 23(2). Open Google Scholar
  319. Taylor M (ed) (2008a) Global economy contested: Power and conflict across the international division of labor. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  320. Taylor M (2008b) Power, conflict and the production of the global economy: oo. In: Taylor M (ed.) Global economy contested: Power and conflict across the international division of labor. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 11–31. Open Google Scholar
  321. Taylor N (2014) Theorising capitalist diversity: The uneven and combined development of labour forms. Capital & Class 38(1): 129–141. Open Google Scholar
  322. United Nations (1956) Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery. New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  323. United Nations (1969) Vienna Convention on the law of the treaties. Vienna: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  324. United Nations (2000) United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto. Open Google Scholar
  325. United Nations (2011) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. New York, Geneva: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  326. United Nations Secretary General (1953) Slavery, The Slave Trade, And Other Forms Of Servitude. Report to the UN Economic and Social Council. E/2357. New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  327. United States of America (2000) Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act. Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  328. van der Linden M (2008) The ‘globalization’ of labour and working-class history and its consequences. In: Lucassen J (ed.) Global labour history: A state of the art. Bern, Switzerland, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 13–38. Open Google Scholar
  329. Wettstein F (2009) Multinational corporations and global justice: The human rights obligations of a quasi-governmental institution. Stanford: Stanford Business Books. Open Google Scholar
  330. Wettstein F (2012) Silence as complicity: Elements of a corporate duty to speak out against the violation of human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(1): 37–61. Open Google Scholar
  331. Wood S (2012) The case for leverage-based corporate human rights responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(1): 63–98. Open Google Scholar
  332. Yawar SA and Seuring S (2017) Management of social issues in supply chains: A literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 141(3): 621–643 (accessed 22 July 2018). Open Google Scholar
  333. Young IM (2006) Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy 23(1): 102–130. Open Google Scholar
  334. Schriftenverzeichnis Open Google Scholar
  335. Erstveröffentlichungsnachweise und Quellenangaben der einzelnen Beiträge: Open Google Scholar
  336. I Privatheit, Öffentlichkeit und Global Governance Open Google Scholar
  337. Mende, Janne (2015): Privatheit und Governance in der Internationalen Politischen Theorie, in: Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie (Sonderheft Internationale Politische Theorie, hrsg. v. Nicole Deitelhoff, Christian Volk), Jg. 6, Nr. 2, S. 207–222. DOI: 10.3224/zpth.v6i2.22878 (peer-reviewed) Open Google Scholar
  338. Mende, Janne (2014): Die Privatheit der Privatsphäre, in: Zeitschrift für Kritische Theorie, Jg. 20, Nr. 38/39, S. 230–234 Open Google Scholar
  339. Mende, Janne (2020): Global Governance, in: Scott N. Romaniuk/Manish Thapa/Péter Marton (Hrsg.): The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–319–74336–3_220 Open Google Scholar
  340. Mende, Janne (2016): Global Governance und libertärer Paternalismus: Akteure, Normativität und Legitimität, in: Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie (Themen¬schwerpunkt: Libertärer Paternalismus, hrsg. v. Johannes Drerup, Aaron Voloj Dessauer), Jg. 3, Nr. 1, S. 557–596. DOI: 10.22613/zfpp/3.1.16 (peer-reviewed) Open Google Scholar
  341. II Global Governance und internationale Menschenrechte Open Google Scholar
  342. Mende, Janne (2019): Are Human Rights Western – And Why Does it Matter? A Perspective from International Political Theory, in: Journal of International Political Theory, online first: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1755088219832992. DOI: 10.1177/1755088219832992 (peer-reviewed) Open Google Scholar
  343. Mende, Janne (2016): Öffentlicher Menschenrechtsschutz, privater Menschenrechtsbruch. Alte und neue Antagonismen in Zeiten der Globalisierung und Global Governance, in: Karl-Rudolf Korte (Hrsg.): Politik in unsicheren Zeiten: Kriege, Krisen und neue Antagonismen, Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 278–292 Open Google Scholar
  344. Mende, Janne (2016): Die Bedeutung und Legitimität nichtstaatlicher Akteure im Menschenrecht, in: Kritische Justiz, Vierteljahresschrift für Recht und Politik, Jg. 49, Nr. 4, S. 2–9. DOI: 10.5771/0023–4834–2016–4–431 Open Google Scholar
  345. break-after Open Google Scholar
  346. III Unternehmerische Verantwortung für Menschenrechte Open Google Scholar
  347. Mende, Janne (2018): The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in: Arbeitskreis Menschenrechte im 20. Jahrhundert der Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung (Hrsg.): Quellen zur Geschichte der Menschenrechte, online: https://www.geschichte-menschenrechte.de/business-human-rights/ Open Google Scholar
  348. Mende, Janne (2017): Die Entwicklung unternehmerischer Verantwortung für Menschenrechte: Privatisierung oder Diffusion?, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 52: Politik und Verantwortung. Analysen zum Wandel politischer Entscheidungs- und Rechtfertigungspraktiken, hrsg. v. Christopher Daase, Valentin Rauer, Stefan Kroll, Julian Junk, S. 409–435 (peer-reviewed) Open Google Scholar
  349. Mende, Janne (2017): Unternehmen als gesellschaftliche Akteure: Die unternehmerische Verantwortung für Menschenrechte zwischen privater und öffentlicher Sphäre, in: MenschenRechtsMagazin, Jg. 22, Nr. 1, S. 5–17 Open Google Scholar
  350. Wiederabdruck in: Julia Druschel/Nikolaus Goldbach/Franziska Paulmann/ Carolina Vestena (Hrsg.) (2020): Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf Soziale Menschenrechte, Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 77–98 Open Google Scholar
  351. Mende, Janne (2018): Which Business? Controversies about the Scope of Application of a Future Treaty on Business and Human Rights, Völkerrechtsblog. International Law & International Legal Thought, online: https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/which-business/. DOI: 10.17176/20180730–093114–0 Open Google Scholar
  352. IV Unternehmerische Verantwortung für moderne Sklaverei Open Google Scholar
  353. Mende, Janne (2016): Moderne Sklaverei: Unschärfen eines Begriffs, in: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, Jg. 61, Nr. 9, S. 33–36 (stark erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung in diesem Buch) Open Google Scholar
  354. Mende, Janne (2019): The Concept of Modern Slavery: Definition, Critique, and the Human Rights Frame, in: Human Rights Review, Jg. 20, Nr. 2, S. 229–248. DOI: 10.1007/s12142–018–0538-y (peer-reviewed) Open Google Scholar
  355. Mende, Janne/Drubel, Julia (2020): At the Junction: Two Models of Business Responsibility for Modern Slavery, in: Human Rights Review, Jg. 21, Nr. 3, S. 313-335, online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-020-00596-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12142–020–00596–9 (peer-reviewed) Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Book Titles No access
Yannis Ockernahl
Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex