Cover of book: Dynamics of Public Risk Perception and Media Coverage
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Dynamics of Public Risk Perception and Media Coverage

The Cases of Climate Change, Terrorism and Demographic Change
Authors:
Publisher:
 14.12.2021

Summary

Viele gesellschaftliche Risiken sind nur noch begrenzt persönlich erfahrbar, weshalb Menschen bei der Risikoeinschätzung zunehmend auf die Informationen Dritter angewiesen sind. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die Dynamik der öffentlichen Risikowahrnehmung mit besonderem Fokus auf die Rolle der Medienberichterstattung. Dabei wird ein Vergleich der öffentlichen Meinung zu verschiedenen Risiken, namentlich Klimawandel, Terrorismus und demographischer Wandel über einen Zeitraum von 25 Jahren (1990-2015) vorgenommen. Die Analyse betrachtet die Risikowahrnehmung in den USA und Deutschland und liefert wertvolle Erkenntnisse darüber, wie und warum die Einschätzung von Risiken durch die Öffentlichkeit in diesen Ländern voneinander abweicht.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2021
Publication date
14.12.2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7872-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2272-8
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
English
Pages
239
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. 1.1 Research Interest No access
    2. 1.2 Conceptual Design No access
    3. 1.3 Structure of the Thesis No access
    4. 1.4 Main Empirical Results No access
    1. 2.1 Definitions of Risk No access
      1. 2.2.1 Heuristics and Cognitive Biases No access
      2. 2.2.2 Influence of the Sociocultural Context No access
      3. 2.2.3 The Role of the News Media No access
    3. 2.3 Summary No access
      1. 3.1.1 Terrorism No access
      2. 3.1.2 Demographic Change No access
      3. 3.1.3 Climate Change No access
    2. 3.2 Empirical Approach No access
    3. 3.3 Measurements of Risk Salience and News Media Coverage No access
    1. 4.1 Applying Topic Modeling Analysis No access
    2. 4.2 Text Corpus and Preprocessing No access
      1. 4.3.1 Key News Topics on Terrorism No access
      2. 4.3.2 Key News Topics on Demographic Change No access
      3. 4.3.3 Key News Topics on Climate Change No access
    4. 4.4 Summary No access
    1. 5.1 Variable Construction No access
    2. 5.2 Descriptive Statistics No access
    3. 5.3 Model Specifications No access
      1. 5.4.1 Terrorism in the Public Perception No access
      2. 5.4.2 Demographic Change in the Public Perception No access
      3. 5.4.3 Climate Change in the Public Perception No access
    5. 5.5 Summary No access
    1. 6.1 Variable Construction No access
    2. 6.2 Descriptive Statistics No access
    3. 6.3 Model Specifications No access
      1. 6.4.1 Terrorism in the Public Perception No access
      2. 6.4.2 Demographic Change in the Public Perception No access
      3. 6.4.3 Climate Change in the Public Perception No access
    5. 6.5 Summary and Comparison to the US Results No access
    1. 7.1 Implemented Research Agenda No access
    2. 7.2 Summary of the Empirical Results No access
    3. 7.3 Contribution and Limitations No access
    1. A.1 Newspaper Data Collection and Preparation No access
    2. A.2 Supplementary Material Topic Models No access
    3. A.3 Time Series Analysis: Robustness Check for German News Coverage Variable No access
  10. References No access 227 - 239

Bibliography (183)

  1. Adams, W. C. (1986). Whose Lives Count? TV Coverage of Natural Disasters. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01429.x Open Google Scholar
  2. Alaszewski, A. (2009). The Future of Risk in Social Science Theory and Research. Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903329508 Open Google Scholar
  3. American Society of News Editors - ASNE (2020). ASNE Statement of Principles. Retrieved from https://members.newsleaders.org/asne-principles Open Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, K. T. & Caren, N. (2010). Making the News: Movement Organizations, Media Attention, and the Public Agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841-866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386689 Open Google Scholar
  5. Avdan, N. & Webb, C. (2019). Not in My Back Yard: Public Perceptions and Terrorism. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918776118 Open Google Scholar
  6. Aven, T. (2010a). Misconceptions of Risk. Chichester West Sussex U.K.: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  7. Aven, T. (2010b). On How to Define, Understand and Describe Risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(6), 623-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011 Open Google Scholar
  8. Aven, T. (2012). The Risk Concept: Historical and Recent Development Trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006 Open Google Scholar
  9. Aven, T., Renn, O. & Rosa, E. A. (2011). On the Ontological Status of the Concept of Risk. Safety Science, 49(8-9), 1074-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.015 Open Google Scholar
  10. Bakir, V. (2005). Greenpeace v. Shell: Media Exploitation and the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF). Journal of Risk Research, 8(7-8), 679-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870500166898 Open Google Scholar
  11. Bakir, V. (2006). Policy Agenda Setting and Risk Communication: Greenpeace, Shell, and Issues of Trust. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06289213 Open Google Scholar
  12. Bakir, V. (2010). Media and Risk: Old and New Research Directions. Journal of Risk Research, 13(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903135953 Open Google Scholar
  13. Barthel, M. (2019). Newspapers Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/newspapers/ Open Google Scholar
  14. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (Eds.) (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  16. Beck, U. (2002). The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276402019004003 Open Google Scholar
  17. Beck, U. (2006). Living in the World Risk Society. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140600844902 Open Google Scholar
  18. Beck, U. (2017). Weltrisikogesellschaft: Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit (5th ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  19. Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S. & Matsuo, A. (2018). Quanteda: An R Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774 Open Google Scholar
  20. Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A. & Schultz, P. W. (2019). Experiencing a Severe Weather Event Increases Concern About Climate Change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00220 Open Google Scholar
  21. Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk Perception Research: Socio-Cultural Perspectives on the Public Experience of Air Pollution. Environment International, 30(6), 827-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001 Open Google Scholar
  22. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic Topic Models: Surveying a Suite of Algorithms That Offer a Solution to Managing Large Document Archives. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826 Open Google Scholar
  23. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research. (3), 993-1022. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/944919.944937 Open Google Scholar
  24. Boholm, Å. (1996). Risk Perception and Social Anthropology: Critique of Cultural Theory. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, 61(1-2), 64-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1996.9981528 Open Google Scholar
  25. Boholm, Å. (1998). Comparative Studies of Risk Perception: A Review of Twenty Years of Research. Journal of Risk Research, 1(2), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377231 Open Google Scholar
  26. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Freeman, J. R., Hitt, M. P. & Pevehouse, J. C. W. (2014). Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  27. Boykoff, M. T. (2007). Flogging a Dead Norm? Newspaper Coverage of Anthropogenic Climate Change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39(4), 470-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x Open Google Scholar
  28. Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  29. Boykoff, M. T. & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001 Open Google Scholar
  30. Bradbury, J. A. (1989). The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(4), 380-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398901400404 Open Google Scholar
  31. Breakwell, G. M. (2014). The Psychology of Risk (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  32. Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern over Climate Change in the U.S., 2002-2010. Climatic Change, 114(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y Open Google Scholar
  33. Carvalho, A. & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural Circuits of Climate Change in U.K. Broadsheet Newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457-1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x Open Google Scholar
  34. Chang, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., Boyd-Graber, J. L. & Blei, D. M. (2009). Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models (NIPS'09 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems). Retrieved from http://papers.nips.cc/paper/3700-reading-tea-leaves-how-humans-interpret-topic-models.pdf Open Google Scholar
  35. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The Press and Foreign Policy. NJ: Princeton: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  36. Covello, V. T. (1983). The Perception of Technological Risks: A Literature Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. (23), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(83)90032-X Open Google Scholar
  37. Deerwester, S. C., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Furnas, G. W. & Harshman, R. A. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), 41(6), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9 Open Google Scholar
  38. Dillon, M. (2007). Governing Terror: The State of Emergency of Biopolitical Emergence. International Political Sociology. (1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00002.x Open Google Scholar
  39. Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural Bias. Occasional paper - Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: Vol. 35. London: Royal Anthropological Institute. Open Google Scholar
  40. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982a). How Can We Know the Risks We Face? Why Risk Selection is a Social Process. Risk Analysis, 2(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01365.x Open Google Scholar
  41. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982b). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  42. Duckett, D. & Busby, J. (2013). Risk Amplification as Social Attribution. Risk Management, 15(2), 132-153. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2013.2 Open Google Scholar
  43. Dunwoody, S. & Peters, H. P. (1992). Mass Media Coverage of Technological and Environmental Risks: A Survey of Research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 199-230. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/004 Open Google Scholar
  44. Engels, A., Hüther, O., Schäfer, M. & Held, H. (2013). Public Climate-Change Skepticism, Energy Preferences and Political Participation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1018-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.008 Open Google Scholar
  45. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Open Google Scholar
  46. Europol (2018). European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2018. https://doi.org/10.2813/00041 Open Google Scholar
  47. Firth, J. R. (1957). A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955. In Philological Society (Ed.), Studies in Linguistic Analysis (pp. 1-32). Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  48. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4), 552-564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.552 Open Google Scholar
  49. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. & Combs, B. (1978). How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Science. (9), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739 Open Google Scholar
  50. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, M. (2017). Politbarometer 1977-2016 (Partielle Kumulation) (Datenfile Version 8.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.12824). Köln. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12824 Open Google Scholar
  51. Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M. & Dumais, S. T. (1983). Human Factors and Behavioral Science: Statistical Semantics: Analysis of the Potential Performance of Key-Word Information Systems. Bell System Technical Journal, 62(6), 1753-1806. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1983.tb03513.x Open Google Scholar
  52. Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The Structure of Foreign News: The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Norwegian Newspapers. Journal of International Peace Research, 2, 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104 Open Google Scholar
  53. German Press Council (2017). German Press Code: Guidelines for Journalistic Work as Recommended by the German Press Council. Retrieved from https://www.presserat.de/en.html Open Google Scholar
  54. GESIS Datenarchiv für die Sozialwissenschaften (2017). Politbarometer Partielle Kumulation (1977-2016): Variable Report. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12824 Open Google Scholar
  55. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  56. Giddens, A. & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Standford: Standford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  57. Goerres, A. & Vanhuysse, P. (2012). Mapping the Field: Comparative Generational Politics and Policies in Ageing Democracies. In P. Vanhuysse & A. Goerres (Eds.), Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Policies and Politics (pp. 1-22). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  58. Greenberg, M. R., Sachsman, D. B., Sandman, P. M. & Salomone, K. L. (1989). Risk, Drama and Geography in Coverage of Environmental Risk by Network TV. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600201 Open Google Scholar
  59. Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. (2019). Americans are Increasingly “Alarmed” About Global Warming. Retrieved from https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/americans-are-increasingly-alarmed-about-global-warming/ Open Google Scholar
  60. Hansen, A. (1991). The Media and the Social Construction of the Environment. Media, Culture and Society. (13), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344391013004002 Open Google Scholar
  61. Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, Media and Environment: Towards Reconnecting Research on the Production, Content and Social Implications of Environmental Communication. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386739 Open Google Scholar
  62. Harcup, T. & O’Neill, D. (2001). What is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited. Journalism Studies, 2, 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700118449 Open Google Scholar
  63. Harcup, T. & O’Neill, D. (2017). What is News? News Values Revisited (Again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193 Open Google Scholar
  64. Harris, Z. (1954). Distributional Structure. Word, 10(2-3), 146-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 Open Google Scholar
  65. He, W., Goodkind, D. & Kowal, P. (2016). An Aging World: 2015 (International Population Reports No. P95/16-1). Washington. Retrieved from U.S. Government Publishing Office website: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p95-16-1.pdf Open Google Scholar
  66. Heffington, C., Park, B. B. & Williams, L. K. (2017a). The 'Most Important Problem' Aggregate Dataset (MIDP) Codebook: Release 1.0. Retrieved from University of Missouri website: https://faculty.missouri.edu/~williamslaro/MIPD%20Aggregate%20Codebook--Release%201.0.pdf Open Google Scholar
  67. Heffington, C., Park, B. B. & Williams, L. K. (2017b). The “Most Important Problem” Dataset (MIPD): A New Dataset on American Issue Importance. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/073889421769146⁠3eng Open Google Scholar
  68. Heffington, C., Park, B. B. & Williams, L. K. (2017c). The 'Most Important Problem' Dataset (MIPD) Codebook: Release 1.0. Retrieved from University of Missouri website: https://faculty.missouri.edu/~williamslaro/MIPD%20Codebook--Release%201.0.pdf Open Google Scholar
  69. Hofstede, G. [Geert], Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Revised and expanded third edition). New York, NY: Mc-Graw-Hill. Open Google Scholar
  70. Horstmann, J. (2018). Topic Modeling: forText. Literatur digital erforschen. Retrieved from https://fortext.net/routinen/methoden/topic-modeling Open Google Scholar
  71. Howe, P. D., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R. & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Geographic Variation in Opinions on Climate Change at State and Local Scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 596-603. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2583 Open Google Scholar
  72. Hughes, E., Kitzinger, J. & Murdock, G. (2006). The Media and Risk. In P. Taylor-Gooby & J. O. Zinn (Eds.), Risk in Social Science (pp. 250-270). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  73. Institute for Economics and Peace (2016). Global Terrorism Index 2016: Measuring and Understanding the Impact of Terrorism (IEP Report 43). Open Google Scholar
  74. Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  75. Johnson, B. B., & Covello, V. T. (Eds.) (1987). The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3395-8 Open Google Scholar
  76. Kaiser, J. & Rhomberg, M. (2015). Questioning the Doubt: Climate Skepticism in German Newspaper Reporting on COP17. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 556-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1050435 Open Google Scholar
  77. Kasperson, R. E. & Kasperson, J. X. (1996). The Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296545001010 Open Google Scholar
  78. Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X. & Ratick, S. (1988). The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x Open Google Scholar
  79. Kates, R. W., Hohenemser, C. & Kasperson, J. X. (1985). Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology. Boulder: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Kitzinger, J. (1999). Researching Risk and the Media. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698579908407007 Open Google Scholar
  81. Kitzinger, J. & Reilly, J. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Risk Reporting: Media Coverage of Human Genetics Research, `False Memory Syndrome' and `Mad Cow Disease'. European Journal of Communication, 12(3), 319-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323197012003002 Open Google Scholar
  82. Köcher, R. (2016). Beunruhigt, aber gefasst: Eine Dokumentation des Beitrags von Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher in der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung. Retrieved from https://www.ifd-allensbach.de/fileadmin/kurzberichte_dokumentationen/FAZ_August_01.pdf Open Google Scholar
  83. Langer, R., Fischer, A.‑K., Fischbach, B. & Goerres, A. (2016). Overcoming Theoretical Divisions in Risk Analysis: Expanding the Idea of Integration in the Social Amplification of Risk Framework. Big Risks Working Paper 1. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2876528 Open Google Scholar
  84. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. & Roser-Renouf, C. (2009). Global Warming’s Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis. Retrieved from Yale Program on Climate Change Communication website: https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2009_05_Global-Warmings-Six-Americas.pdf Open Google Scholar
  85. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C. & Feinberg, G., Howe, P. (2013). Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in April 2013. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705 Open Google Scholar
  86. Lichtenberg, J. & MacLean, D. (1991). The Role of the Media in Risk Communication. In R. E. Kasperson & P. J. M. Stallen (Eds.), Technology, Risk, and Society: Vol. 4. Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives (pp. 157-173). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar
  87. Lin, D. & Pantel, P. (2001). DIRT – Discovery of Inference Rules from Text. In ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Open Google Scholar
  88. Lorenzoni, I. & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1-2), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z Open Google Scholar
  89. Lowrance, W. W. (1976). Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann Inc. Open Google Scholar
  90. Luedecke, G. & Boykoff, M. T. (2017). Environment and the Media. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar
  91. Lupton, D. & Tulloch, J. (2002). Risk is Part of Your Life: Risk Epistemologies Among a Group of Australians. Sociology, 36(2), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036002005 Open Google Scholar
  92. Marlon, J. R., van der Linden, S., Howe, P. D., Leiserowitz, A., Woo, S. H. L. & Broad, K. (2019). Detecting Local Environmental Change: The Role of Experience in Shaping Risk Judgments About Global Warming. Journal of Risk Research, 112, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1430051 Open Google Scholar
  93. Mazur, A. (1981). Media Coverage and Public Opinion on Scientific Controversies. Journal of Communication, 31(2), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01234.x Open Google Scholar
  94. Mazur, A. (1990). Nuclear Power, Chemical Hazards, and the Quantity of Reporting. Minerva, 28(3), 294-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096293 Open Google Scholar
  95. Mazur, A. (1998). Global Environmental Change in the News: 1987-90 vs 1992-6. International Sociology, 13(4), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098013004003 Open Google Scholar
  96. Mazur, A. (2009). American Generation of Environmental Warnings: Avian Influenza and Global Warming. Research in Human Ecology, 16(1), 17-26. Retrieved from https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her161/mazur.pdf Open Google Scholar
  97. Mazur, A. & Lee, J. (1993). Sounding the Global Alarm: Environmental Issues in the US National News. Social Studies of Science, 23(4), 681-720. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023004003 Open Google Scholar
  98. McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 67-81). New York: Taylor and Francis. Open Google Scholar
  99. McCombs, M. E. & Guo, L. (2014). Agenda-Setting Influence of the Media in the Public Sphere. In R. S. Fortner & P. M. Fackler (Eds.), The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory (pp. 251-268). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  100. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 Open Google Scholar
  101. Metag, J., Füchslin, T. & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). Global Warming's Five Germanys: A Typology of Germans' Views on Climate Change and Patterns of Media Use and Information. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 434-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592558 Open Google Scholar
  102. Mitchell, A. (2018). Americans Still Prefer Watching to Reading the News – and Mostly Still Through Television. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/2018/12/03/americans-still-prefer-watching-to-reading-the-news-and-mostly-still-through-television/ Open Google Scholar
  103. Morales, L. (2011). Americans Regain Some Confidence in Newspapers, TV News: Confidence still lags behind levels of trust seen through much of the 1990s and into 2003. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/148250/Americans-Regain- Open Google Scholar
  104. Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions. WIREs Climate Change. (1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11 Open Google Scholar
  105. Murdock, G., Petts, J. & Horlick-Jones, T. (2003). After Amplification: Rethinking the Role of the Media in Risk Communication. In N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The Social Amplification of Risk (pp. 156-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461.008 Open Google Scholar
  106. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism - START (2018a). Global Terrorism Database: [Datafile]. Retrieved from https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd Open Google Scholar
  107. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism - START (2018b). GTD Global Terrorism Database: Codebook: Inclusion Criteria and Variables. Retrieved from https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd Open Google Scholar
  108. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23 Open Google Scholar
  109. OECD (2003). Emerging Systemic Risks in the 21st Century: An Agenda for Action. Paris. Retrieved from OECD website: https://www.oecd.org/futures/globalprospects/37944611.pdf Open Google Scholar
  110. Oltedal, S., Moen, B.‑E., Klempe, H. & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining Risk Perception: An Evaluation of Cultural Theory. Trondheim: Rotunde publikasjoner. Open Google Scholar
  111. Oreskes, N. & Conway, E. M. (2010). Defeating the Merchants of Doubt. Nature. (465), 686-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/465686a Open Google Scholar
  112. Palfreman, J. (2006). A Tale of Two Fears: Exploring Media Depictions of Nuclear Power and Global Warming. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00184.x Open Google Scholar
  113. Pasquay, A. (2013). Die deutschen Zeitungen in Zahlen und Daten: Auszug aus dem Jahrbuch „Zeitungen 2011/12“. Retrieved from https://www.bdzv.de/fileadmin/bdzv_hauptseite/markttrends_daten/wirtschaftliche_lage/2011/assets/ZahlenDaten_2011.pdf Open Google Scholar
  114. Pasquay, A. (2016). Die deutschen Zeitungen in Zahlen und Daten 2015. Retrieved from https://www.bdzv.de/fileadmin/bdzv_hauptseite/markttrends_daten/wirtschaftliche_lage/2015/assets/Zahlen_Daten_2015.pdf Open Google Scholar
  115. Pasquay, A. (2017). The Economic Situation of Newspapers in Germany 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bdzv.de/maerkte-und-daten/marktdaten/artikel/detail/the-economic-situation-of-newspapers-in-germany-2017/ Open Google Scholar
  116. Pasquay, A. (2018). Die deutschen Zeitungen in Zahlen und Daten 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bdzv.de/fileadmin/bdzv_hauptseite/aktuell/publikationen/2016/ZDF_2017__002_.pdf Open Google Scholar
  117. Pew Research Center (2014). Attitudes About Aging: A Global Perspective. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2014/01/30/attitudes-about-aging-a-global-perspective/ Open Google Scholar
  118. Pew Research Center (2015). Global Concern About Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/11/05/global-concern-about-climate-change-broad-support-for-limiting-emissions/ Open Google Scholar
  119. Pezzullo, P. C. & Cox, R. (2018). Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere (5th). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  120. Pidgeon, N. F. [Nicholas Frank], Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B. & Gibson, R. (1992). Risk Perception. In The Royal Risk Society (Ed.), Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management: Report of a Royal Society Study Group (pp. 89-134). London. Open Google Scholar
  121. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (Eds.) (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461 Open Google Scholar
  122. Rashid, S. & Olofsson, A. (2020). Worried in Sweden: The Effects of Terrorism Abroad and News Media at Home on Terror-related Worry. Journal of Risk Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1738528 Open Google Scholar
  123. Rayner, S. (1988). Muddling Through Metaphors to Maturity: A Commentary on Kasperson et al., The Social Amplification of Risk. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01172.x Open Google Scholar
  124. Rayner, S. (1992). Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk (pp. 83-115). Westport: CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. Open Google Scholar
  125. Renn, O. (1992). Concepts of Risk: A Classification. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk (pp. 53-79). Westport: CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. Open Google Scholar
  126. Renn, O. (2004). Perception of Risks. Toxicology Letters, 149(1-3), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051 Open Google Scholar
  127. Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World (Reprinted.). Earthscan Risk in Society Series. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  128. Renn, O. (2011). The Social Amplification/Attenuation of Risk Framework: Application to Climate Change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.99 Open Google Scholar
  129. Renn, O., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E. & Slovic, P. (1992). The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x Open Google Scholar
  130. Renn, O., & Rohrmann, B. (Eds.) (2000). Technology, Risk, and Society: Vol. 13. Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar
  131. Renn, O., Schweizer, P.‑J., Dreyer, M. & Klinke, A. (2007). Risiko: Über den gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit Unsicherheit. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  132. Rip, A. (1988). Should Social Amplification of Risk Be Counteracted? Risk Analysis, 8(2), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01170.x Open Google Scholar
  133. Rohrmann, B. & Renn, O. (2000). Risk Perception Research - An Introduction. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Technology, Risk, and Society: Vol. 13. Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar
  134. Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A. & Rosenthal, S. Global Warming’s Six Americas and the Election, 2016. New Haven, CT. Retrieved from https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/six-americas-2016-election/ Open Google Scholar
  135. Saad, L. (2016). Americans' Confidence in Newspapers at New Low. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/192665/americans-confidence-newspapers-new-low.aspx Open Google Scholar
  136. Salton, G., Wong, A. & Yang, C. (1975). A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1145/361219.361220 Open Google Scholar
  137. Sandman, P. M., Weinstein, N. D. & Klotz, M. L. (1987). Public Response to the Risk from Geological Radon. Journal of Communication, 37(3), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb00997.x Open Google Scholar
  138. Schäfer, M. S. (2016). Climate Change Communication in Germany. In S. Ho, E. M. Markowitz, S. O'Neill, M. C. Nisbet, J. Thaker, & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford University Press USA. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.448 Open Google Scholar
  139. Schäfer, M. S. & O'Neill, S. (2017). Frame Analysis in Climate Change Communication - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (Vol. 1): Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.487 Open Google Scholar
  140. Scheufele, B. (2004a). Framing-Effects Approach: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. The European Journal of Communication Research, 29, 401-428. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.401 Open Google Scholar
  141. Scheufele, B. (2004b). Framing-Effekte auf dem Prüfstand: Eine theoretische, methodische und empirische Auseinandersetzung mit der Wirkungsperspektive des Framing-Ansatzes. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(1), 30-55. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-1-30 Open Google Scholar
  142. Scheufele, D. A. & Iyengar, S. (2017). The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 619-633). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  143. Simpson, R. H. (1974). The Hurricane Disaster-Potential Scale. Weatherwise, American Meteorological Society, 27(4), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.1974.9931702 Open Google Scholar
  144. Singer, E. & Endreny, P. (1987). Reporting Hazards: Their Benefits and Costs. Journal of Communication, 37(3), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb00991.x Open Google Scholar
  145. Singer, M. M. (2011). Who Says “It’s the Economy”? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance. Comparative Political Studies, 44(3), 284-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010384371 Open Google Scholar
  146. Sjöberg, L. (1996). A Discussion of the Limitations of the Psychometric and Cultural Theory Approaches to Risk Perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68(3/4), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031868 Open Google Scholar
  147. Sjöberg, L. (1997). Explaining Risk Perception: An Empirical Evaluation of Cultural Theory. Risk Decision and Policy, 2(2), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/135753097348447 Open Google Scholar
  148. Sjöberg, L. (2005). The Perceived Risk of Terrorism. Risk Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240204 Open Google Scholar
  149. Sjöberg, L., Moen, B.‑E. & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining Risk Perception: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Paradigm in Risk Perception Research. Rotunde: Vol. 84. Trondheim: Rotunde publikasjoner. Open Google Scholar
  150. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507 Open Google Scholar
  151. Slovic, P. (2000). Introduction and Overview. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Risk, Society, and Policy Series. The Perception of Risk (pp. xxi-xxxvii). London, England: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  152. Slovic, P. (2002). Terrorism as Hazard: A New Species of Trouble. Risk Analysis, 22(3), 425-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00053 Open Google Scholar
  153. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk. In R. C. Schwing & W. A. Albers (Eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? (pp. 181-216). New York: Plenum Press. Open Google Scholar
  154. Slovic, P. & Weber, E. U. (2002). Perception of Risk Posed by Extreme Events. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2293086 Open Google Scholar
  155. Soroka, S. N. (2003). Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02238783 Open Google Scholar
  156. Soroka, S. N. & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  157. Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Terrorism and Probability Neglect. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(2-3), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024111006336 Open Google Scholar
  158. Taylor-Gooby, P. & Zinn, J. O. (2006). Current Directions in Risk Research: New Developments in Psychology and Sociology. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 26(2), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00746.x Open Google Scholar
  159. Thomas, W. I. & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Oxford: Knopf. Open Google Scholar
  160. Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Political Cultures Series. Boulder: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  161. Turney, P. D. & Littman, M. L. (2003). Measuring Praise and Criticism: Inference of Semantic Orientation from Association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(4), 315-346. https://doi.org/10.1145/944012.944013 Open Google Scholar
  162. Turney, P. D. & Pantel, P. (2010). From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37, 141-188. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2934 Open Google Scholar
  163. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 Open Google Scholar
  164. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in Judgments Reveal Some Heuristics of Thinking Under Uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Open Google Scholar
  165. Van der Linden, S. (2015). The Social-Psychological Determinants of Climate Change Risk Perceptions: Towards a Comprehensive Model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012 Open Google Scholar
  166. Vanhuysse, P., & Goerres, A. (Eds.) (2012). Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Policies and Politics. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  167. Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., McDonald, M. D., & Klingemann, H.‑D. (Eds.) (2014). Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  168. Wåhlberg, A. A. F. & Sjöberg, L. (2000). Risk Perception and the Media. Journal of Risk Research, 3(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698700376699 Open Google Scholar
  169. Ward, S. J. A. (2014). Classical Liberal Theory in a Digital World. In R. S. Fortner & P. M. Fackler (Eds.), The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory (pp. 3-21). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  170. Weaver, W. (1955). Translation. In A. D. Booth & W. N. Locke (Eds.), Machine Translation of Languages: Fourteen Essays (pp. 15-22). Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  171. Whitmarsh, L. (2008). Are Flood Victims More Concerned about Climate Change than other People?: The Role of Direct Experience in Risk Perception and Behavioural Response. Journal of Risk Research, 11(3), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235 Open Google Scholar
  172. Wiedemann, G. (2016). Text Mining for Qualitative Data Analysis in the Social Sciences: A Study on Democratic Discourse in Germany. Kritische Studien zur Demokratie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978­3­658­15309­0 Open Google Scholar
  173. Wildavsky, A. & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why? Daedalus, 119(4), 41-60. Open Google Scholar
  174. Wlezien, C. (2005). On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem’. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 555-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009 Open Google Scholar
  175. Wolling, J. & Arlt, D. (2017). Media Coverage on International Climate Summits and Negotiations. In Oxford University Press (Ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Science (pp. 1-26). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.362 Open Google Scholar
  176. Woods, J. (2007). What We Talk About When We Talk About Terrorism: Elite Press Coverage of Terrorism Risk from 1997 to 2005. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(3), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07302064 Open Google Scholar
  177. World Economic Forum (2006). Global Risks 2006. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2006.pdf Open Google Scholar
  178. World Economic Forum (2011). Global Risks 2011: Sixth Edition. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2011.pdf Open Google Scholar
  179. World Economic Forum (2018). The Global Risks Report 2018: 13th Edition. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRR18_Report.pdf Open Google Scholar
  180. World Economic Forum (2019). The Global Risks Report 2019: 14th Edition. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf Open Google Scholar
  181. Zhao, X. (2009). Media Use and Global Warming Perceptions. Communication Research, 36(5), 698-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338911 Open Google Scholar
  182. Zinn, J. O. (2008a). A Comparison of Sociological Theorizing on Risk and Uncertainty. In J. O. Zinn (Ed.), Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction (pp. 158-210). Malden MA: Blackwell Pub. Open Google Scholar
  183. Zinn, J. O. (2008b). Introduction: The Contribution of Sociology to the Discourse on Risk and Uncertainty. In J. O. Zinn (Ed.), Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction (pp. 1-17). Malden MA: Blackwell Pub. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Media Policy & Media Ethics", "Political Communication", "Terrorism & Genocide"
Cover of book: Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Edited Book Full access
Greta Olson, Christian Schmidt, Benno Zabel, Jochen Bung, Franziska Martinsen, Hanna Meißner
Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Cover of book: Israel in deutschen Medien
Book Titles No access
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover of book: Verhängnisvolle Antizipationen
Book Titles No access
Carina Schatten
Verhängnisvolle Antizipationen
Cover of book: Die Verwaltung der inneren Sicherheit
Edited Book No access
Eckhard Schröter, Michael Ibrahim
Die Verwaltung der inneren Sicherheit
Cover of book: Media Literacy
Edited Book No access
Guido Keel, Wibke Weber
Media Literacy

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex