Cover of book: Digital Transformation and Ethics
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Digital Transformation and Ethics

Ethical Considerations on the Robotization and Automation of Society and the Economy and the Use of Artificial Intelligence
Authors:
Publisher:
 2021

Summary

This book discusses digitalization, robotization, and automation of society and of the economy and the use of artificial intelligence from an ethical perspective. After an introduction on the correlation between morality and technology and an assessment of the moral capability of technologies, the book introduces ethical principles serving the evaluation of the digital transformation and the use of artificial intelligence. Subsequently, the digital transformation and its chances and challenges are analyzed from an ethical standpoint. Finally, ethical approaches addressing the challenges are developed.

One of the research-focuses of Peter G Kirchschlaeger (Full Professor of Theological Ethics and Director of the Institute of Social Ethics ISE at the Department of Theology of the University of Lucerne; prior Visiting Fellow at Yale University) lies on ethics of digitalization, robotization, automatization, and artificial intelligence.

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4287-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8550-4
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
English
Pages
537
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 28
  2. Prologue No access 29 - 30
  3. 1 Introduction No access 31 - 48
    1. 2.1 Introduction No access
      1. 2.2.1 Justifying Ends No access
      2. 2.2.2 Providing Means No access
      3. 2.2.3 Way of Functioning of Technological Progress No access
    3. 2.3 Reciprocal Interactions No access
    4. 2.4 Reciprocal Challenges No access
    5. 2.5 Ethical Principles and Ethical Points of Reference for Technology No access
    1. 3.1 Introduction No access
    2. 3.2 Vulnerability No access
    3. 3.3 Conscience No access
    4. 3.4 Freedom No access
    5. 3.5 Responsibility No access
    6. 3.6 Autonomy No access
    7. 3.7 Ethical Judgement by Humans No access
    8. 3.8 Overcoming the “Humans - Machines” Dichotomy Using the Interactionist Model No access
    1. 4.1 Clarification of Terms No access
    2. 4.2 Robots No access
    3. 4.3 Artificial Intelligence No access
    4. 4.4 Data-Based Systems No access
    5. 4.5 Digital Transformation No access
    6. 4.6 Machine Ethics – Roboethics No access
    1. 5.1 Ethics Is Not Democracy No access
    2. 5.2 Ethics Beyond Principles and Norms No access
    1. 6.1 Introduction No access
      1. 6.2.1 Introduction No access
      2. 6.2.2 Short Outline of the Historical Development of the Term Responsibility No access
      3. 6.2.3 Eighth Dimensions of Responsibility No access
      4. 6.2.4 Responsibility as Ethical Principle for Data-Based Systems No access
      1. 6.3.1 What Is “Justice”? No access
      2. 6.3.2 The Tension Between Law and Justice No access
      3. 6.3.3 Omni-Dynamic Social Justice No access
      4. 6.3.4 Omni-Dynamic Social Justice and Intergenerational Justice No access
      5. 6.3.5 Justice as Ethical Principle for Data-Based Systems No access
      1. 6.4.1 Human Rights – A Minimal Standard No access
      2. 6.4.2 The Multidimensionality of Human Rights No access
      3. 6.4.3 The Characteristics of Human Rights No access
      4. 6.4.4 The Need for an Ethical Justification of the Universality of Human Rights No access
        1. First step of filtering No access
        2. Second step of filtering No access
        3. Third step of filtering No access
      6. 6.4.6 Universal Human Rights Protect From Exclusion No access
      7. 6.4.7 Universal Human Rights Foster Plurality No access
      8. 6.4.8 Human Rights as Ethical Frame of Reference for Data-Based Systems No access
    1. 7.1 Illegitimate Path No access
    2. 7.2 “Dual Use” No access
    3. 7.3 Ambivalence No access
    4. 7.4 Beta Versions No access
    5. 7.5 Coerciveness No access
    6. 7.6 The Paradox of Potent Impotence No access
    7. 7.7 Risk of Anthropocentrism No access
    8. 7.8 Transhumanism No access
      1. 7.9.1 Access to Health Care No access
      2. 7.9.2 Personalized Medicine and Health Care No access
      3. 7.9.3 Data-Based Health Care No access
      1. 7.10.1 Digitalization and Automation of Finance No access
      2. 7.10.2 Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology No access
    11. 7.11 Automated Weapons No access
      1. 7.12.1 Data-Based Systems as Democratizing Force No access
      2. 7.12.2 Data-Based Systems as Threat for Democracy No access
      3. 7.12.3 Online Racist Hate Speech No access
      1. 7.13.1 It Is Not All about “Moral Dilemmas” … No access
      2. 7.13.2 Automated, not “Autonomous” Mobility No access
      3. 7.13.3 Subjectivity of Responsibility No access
      4. 7.13.4 Security Facing the Ironies of Automation No access
      5. 7.13.5 Risks for the Human Right to Privacy and to Data-Protection No access
      6. 7.13.6 Fewer Accidents No access
      7. 7.13.7 Less Pollution No access
      8. 7.13.8 Fewer Vehicles – More Travel Miles No access
      9. 7.13.9 Automated Mobility as Disruption No access
      10. 7.13.10 Globally Unequal Distribution of Advantages and Disadvantages No access
    14. 7.14 Internet of Things No access
    15. 7.15 Internet of Humans No access
    16. 7.16 Wearables No access
      1. 7.17.1 It’s All About Data No access
      2. 7.17.2 Data-Tyranny No access
      3. 7.17.3 Datadeology No access
      4. 7.17.4 Violations of the Human Right to Privacy and Data-Protection No access
      5. 7.17.5 Manipulation of Humans – The Example of “Nudging” No access
      6. 7.17.6 Total Manipulation – the Example of “Hyper-Nudging” No access
      1. 7.18.1 Creation or Destruction of Paid Jobs? No access
      2. 7.18.2 Massive Reduction in Paid Professional Tasks – the Uniqueness of Digital Transformation and Data-Based Systems No access
    19. 7.19 Global Injustice No access
    20. 7.20 Ecological Impact No access
      1. 8.1.1 Data-Based Systems Should Serve Humans and the Earth No access
      2. 8.1.2 Human Responsibility No access
      3. 8.1.3 Ethical and Legal Norms for Data-Based Systems No access
      4. 8.1.4 Datethics No access
      5. 8.1.5 Human Rights-Based Data-Based Systems HRBDS No access
      6. 8.1.6 International Data-Based Systems Agency DSA No access
      7. 8.1.7 Addressing the Second Paradox of Digital Transformation and Data-Based Systems: Empowerment of Data-Based Systems and Human Fear of Powerlessness No access
      8. 8.1.8 Ethics Committees Back to Ethicists! No access
      1. 8.2.1 Relief as a Burden – the End of Striving for Full Employment No access
      2. 8.2.2 Unconditional Basic Income No access
      3. 8.2.3 Society-, Entrepreneurship-, Research-Time-Model (SERT) No access
      4. 8.2.4 SERT as Ethical Impulse for Interdisciplinary Dialogue No access
    3. 8.3 Equal Participation in Digital Transformation and Data-Based Systems No access
    4. 8.4 Insurance No access
    5. 8.5 Taxes No access
      1. 8.6.1 Patents as Conventional Instruments of Innovation No access
      2. 8.6.2 Corporations’ Ethical Responsibilities for Driving Innovation No access
      3. 8.6.3 Legitimate Examination of Conventional Instruments of Innovation No access
      4. 8.6.4 The Impact of Patents on Innovation and Their Ethical Significance No access
      5. 8.6.5 Possibilities for Adaptation of Patents No access
    7. 8.7 Research No access
    8. 8.8 Education “Empowering” Reason, Not Just Training “Technical Rationality” No access
      1. 8.9.1 Humans and the Life With Data-Based Systems No access
      2. 8.9.2 Humans Shaping Digital Transformation and Data-Based Systems No access
      3. 8.9.3 The Responsibility of States and Non-State Actors for Digital Transformation and Data-Based Systems No access
      4. 8.9.4 What World With Data-Based Systems Do We Dream Of? No access
    10. 8.10 One World No access
    11. 8.11 Trust No access
    12. 8.12 Sustainable Development No access
    13. 8.13 “Homo Dignitatis” Instead of “Homo Digitalis” No access
    14. 8.14 The COVID-19-Pandemic and Mastering Threats in Times of Data-Based Systems No access
    15. 8.15 At Last, The Question of Focus and Priorities No access
  11. Epilogue I No access 423 - 424
  12. Epilogue II No access 425 - 426
  13. References No access 427 - 537

Bibliography (1588)

  1. Abney, Keith Yann (2017): “Robots and Space Ethics”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 354-368. Open Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, Daron / Restrepo, Pascual (2020): Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. In: Journal of Political Economy 128(6), 2188-2244. Open Google Scholar
  3. Achtner, Wolfgang (2010): Willensfreiheit in Theologie und Naturwissenschaften: Ein historisch-systematischer Wegweiser. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  4. Adams, Richard / Beth, Kewell / Glenn, Parry (2018): “Blockchain for Good? Digital Ledger Technology and Sustainable Development Goals”. In: Filho, Walter Leal / Marans, Robert W. / Callewaert, John (Eds.): Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. Cham: Springer, 127-140. Open Google Scholar
  5. Adnan, Nadia / Nordin, Shahrina Md / Bin Bahruddin, Mohamad Ariff (2019): “Sustainable Interdependent Networks from Smart Autonomous Vehicle to Intelligent Transportation Networks”. In: Amini, M. Hadi / Boroojeni, Kianoosh / Iyengar, S. Sitharama / Pardalos, Panos M. / Blaabjerg, Frede / Madni, Asad M. (Eds.): Sustainable Interdependent Networks II. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 186. Cham: Springer, 121-134. Open Google Scholar
  6. Aeberhard, Michael / Rauch, Sebastian / Bahram, Mohammed / Tanzmeister, Georg / Thomas, Julian / Pilat, Yves / Homm, Florian / Huber, Werner / Kaempchen, Nico (2015): “Experience, Results and Lessons Learned from Automated Driving on Germany's Highways.” In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 7(1), 42-57. Open Google Scholar
  7. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights of 1981 (1981). Online: https://www.achpr.org/public/Document/file/English/banjul_charter.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  8. Agar, Nicholas (2016): “Don’t Worry about Superintelligence”. In: Journal of Evolution and Technology 26 (1 February), 73-82. Open Google Scholar
  9. Agrawal, Ajay / Gans, Joshua S. / Goldfarb, Avi (2018): Prediction, Judgment and Complexity: A Theory of Decision Making and Artificial Intelligence. Rotman School of Management. Working Paper 3103156. Online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103156 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  10. Aiolfi, Sergio (2019): “Novartis kooperiert mit Microsoft”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, October, 1. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/novartis-kooperiert-mit-microsoft-ld.1512611 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  11. Albert, Anika Christina (2016): “Fremd im vertrauten Quartier. Perspektiven einer kritischen Theologie des Helfens unter den Bedingungen von Alter(n), Demenz und Technik”. In: Ethik und Gesellschaft 2, 1-29. Open Google Scholar
  12. Alessandrini, Adriano / Cattivera, Alessio / Holguin, Carlos / Stam, Daniele (2014): “CityMobil2: Challenges and Opportunities of Fully Automated Mobility”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation: Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 169-184. Open Google Scholar
  13. Aletras, Nikolaos / Tsarapatsanis, Dimitrios / Preoţiuc-Pietro, Daniel / Lampos, Vasileios (2016): “Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A natural language processing perspective”. In: PeerJ Computer Science 2(e93). Online: https://peerj.com/articles/cs-93https://peerj.com/articles/cs-93/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  14. Alexander, Brian (2003): Rapture: How Biotech Became the New Religion. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  15. Alexy, Robert (1986): Theorie der Grundrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  16. Alexy, Robert (1998): “Die Institutionalisierung der Menschenrechte im demokratischen Verfassungsstaat”. In: Gosepath, Stefan / Lohmann, Georg (Eds.): Philosophie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 244-264. Open Google Scholar
  17. Alkim, Tom (2018): “Connected and Automated Driving in The Netherlands – Challenge, Experience and Declaration”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation 4: Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 25-31. Open Google Scholar
  18. Allen, Colin / Wallach, Wendell (2014): “Moral Machines: Contradiction in Terms or Abdication of Human Responsibility?”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Bekey, George A. (Eds.): Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents. New York: MIT Press, 55-68. Open Google Scholar
  19. Altmann, Juergen / Asaro, Peter / Sharkey, Noel / Sparrow, Robert (2013): “Armed military robots: editorial”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 15, 73-76. Open Google Scholar
  20. Allen, Mike (2017): “Sean Parker unloads on Facebook: ‘God only knows what it’s doing to our children's brains’”. In: AXIOS, November 9. Online: https://www.axios.com/sean-parker-unloads-on-facebook-god-only-knows-what-its-doing-to-our-childrens-brains-1513306792-f855e7b4-4e99-4d60-8d51-2775559c2671.htmlhttps://www.axios.com/sean-parker-unloads-on-facebook-god-only-knows-what-its-doing-to-our-childrens-brains-1513306792-f855e7b4-4e99-4d60-8d51-2775559c2671.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  21. Alwang, Jeffrey / Siegel, Paul B. / Jorgenson, Steen L. (2002): “Vulnerability as Viewed from Different Disciplines”. In: International Symposium: Sustaining Food Security and Managing Natural Resources in Southeast Asia: Challenges for the 21st Century. January 8–11, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Online: https://studylib.net/doc/18294386/vulnerability-as-viewed-from-different-disciplines [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  22. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (n.d.): Standards. Online: https://www.asme.org/codes-standardshttps://www.asme.org/codes-standards [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  23. Amnesty International (2016): Kinderarbeit für Mobiltelefone und Elektroautos. January 19. Online: https://www.amnesty.ch/de/laender/afrika/demokr-rep-kongo/dok/2016/bericht-kinderarbeit-fuer-mobiltelefone-und-elektroautoshttps://www.amnesty.ch/de/laender/afrika/demokr-rep-kongo/dok/2016/bericht-kinderarbeit-fuer-mobiltelefone-und-elektroautos [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  24. Amnesty International (2020a): “Digitale Gesellschaft, Stiftung für Konsumentenschutz: Überwachungsmassnahmen müssen auch unter Notrecht verhältnismässig sein”. Online: https://www.amnesty.ch/de/themen/coronavirus/dok/2020/ueberwachungsmassnahmen-muessen-auch-unter-notrecht-verhaeltnismaessig [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  25. Amnesty International (2020b): Human Rights and the Environment: Water Pollution, Water Scarcity and Floods. Submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on Environment and Human Rights. November 13, 2020. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Environment/EnvironmentWater/Civil%20Society/Amensty%20International.docxhttps://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Environment/EnvironmentWater/Civil%20Society/Amensty%20International.docx [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  26. Amnesty International Switzerland (2019): “China: Auf dem Weg zur totalen Kontrolle”. In: Amnesty. Magazin der Menschenrechte 99, 10-23. Open Google Scholar
  27. Amnesty International (n.d.): Corporations. Online: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/corporate-accountabilityhttps://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/corporate-accountability/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  28. Ananny, Mike (2016): “Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness”. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(1), 93-117. Open Google Scholar
  29. Anderson, Chris (2008): “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete”. In: Wired, June 23. Online: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  30. Anderson, Kenneth / Waxman, Matthew C. (2017): “Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems: Their Ethics, and Their Regulation Under International Law”. In: Brownsword, Roger / Scotford, Eloise / Yeung, Karen (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology. Washington: American University Washington College of Law Research Paper 21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1097-1117. Open Google Scholar
  31. Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan (2011): “General Introduction”. In: Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan (Eds.): Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-4. Open Google Scholar
  32. Andrews, Edmund L. (2008): “Greenspan Concedes Error on Regulation”. In: The New York Times, October 23. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/24/business/economy/24panel.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  33. Angel, James / McCabe, Douglas M. (2013): “Fairness in Financial Markets: The Case of High Frequency Trading”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 112(4), 590-591. Open Google Scholar
  34. Anrich, Bert / Mayora, Oscar / Bardram, Jakob E. / Troester, Gerhard (2010): “Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model”. In: Methods of Information in Medicine 49(1), 67-73. Open Google Scholar
  35. Antonopolous, Andreas (2016): “Bitcoin Security Model: Trust by Computation”. In: Medium, June 3. Online: https://medium.com/@aantonop/bitcoin-security-model-trust-by-computation-d5b93a37da6ehttps://medium.com/@aantonop/bitcoin-security-model-trust-by-computation-d5b93a37da6e [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  36. Anzenbacher, Arno (1998): Christliche Sozialethik: Einführung und Prinzipien. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  37. Anzenbacher, Arno (2015): “Moralität, Gewissen und der Wille Gottes: Überlegungen zu Summa theologiae I-II, q. 19”. In: ET-Studies 6(2), 273-300. Open Google Scholar
  38. Apel, Karl-Otto (1986): “Verantwortung heute – nur noch Prinzip der Bewahrung und Selbstbeschränkung oder immer noch der Befreiung und Verwirklichung von Humanität”. In: Meyer, Thomas / Miller, Susanne (Eds.): Zukunftsethik und Industriegesellschaft. Zukunftsethik 1. Muenchen: J. Schweitzer, 15-40. Open Google Scholar
  39. Apel, Karl-Otto (1988): Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Überganges zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  40. Appiah, Kwame Anthony (2006): Cosmopolitanism: ethics in a world of strangers. New York: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  41. Apple (2020): Apple Watch Series 5. You’ve never seen a watch like this. Online: https://www.apple.com/apple-watch-series-5https://www.apple.com/apple-watch-series-5/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  42. Apple (2012): Apple-TV-Commercial: 1984 Apple’s Macintosh Commercial. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtvjbmoDx-Ihttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtvjbmoDx-I [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  43. Arendt, Hannah (1949): “Es gibt nur ein einziges Menschenrecht”. In: Die Wandlung 4, 754-770. Open Google Scholar
  44. Arendt, Hannah (1958): The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  45. Arendt, Hannah (2001): Vita activa oder vom tätigen Leben. Muenchen: Piper. Open Google Scholar
  46. Arendt, Rieke (2016): Völkerrechtliche Probleme beim Einsatz autonomer Waffensysteme, Menschenrechtszentrum der Universitaet Potsdam 41. Berlin: BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  47. Arens, Edmund (2007): “Was ist Religion? Analytische Differenzierungen – theoretische Zugänge – theologische Reflexion”. In: Durst, Michael / Muenk, Hans J. (Eds.): Religion und Gesellschaft, Freiburg im Uechtland: Paulusverlag, 35-93. Open Google Scholar
  48. Aristoteles (1983): Nikomachische Ethik. Dirlmeier, Franz (Ed.). Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  49. Arkin, Ronald C. (1998): Behavior-Based Robotics. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  50. Arkin, Ronald C. (2009): Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots. New York: Chapman and Hall / CRC. Open Google Scholar
  51. Arkin, Ronald C. (2018): “Lethal Autonomous Systems and the Plight of the Non-combatant”. In: AISB Quarterly: Newsletter of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour 137, 1-14. Open Google Scholar
  52. Armand, Jean-Louis (2012): “The bringing together of technology, sustainability and ethics”. In: Sustainability Science 7(2), 113-116. Open Google Scholar
  53. Armstrong, Stuart (2014): Smarter Than Us: The Rise of Machine Intelligence. Berkeley: MIRI. Open Google Scholar
  54. Arnaldi, Simone / Bianchi, Luca (2016): Responsibility in Science and Technology: Elements of a Social Theory. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  55. Article 36 (2015): “Killing by Machine: Key Issues for Understanding Meaningful Human Control”. Online: http://www.article36.org/weapons/autonomous-weapons/killing-by-machine-key-issues-for-understanding-meaningful-human-control/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  56. Asad, Ullah / Wang, Aimin / Mansoora, Ahmed (2018): “Smart Automation, Customer Experience and Customer Engagement in Electric Vehicles”. In: Sustainability 10(5), 1-11. Open Google Scholar
  57. Asaro, Peter M. (2006): “What Should We Want From a Robot Ethic?”. In: International Review of Information Ethics 6(12), 9-16. Open Google Scholar
  58. Asaro, Peter M. (2008): “How just could a robot war be?”. In: Briggle, Adam / Waelbers, Katinka / Brey, Philip A. E. (Eds.): Current Issues in Computing And Philosophy. IOS Press: Amsterdam, 50-64. Open Google Scholar
  59. Asaro, Peter M. (2012): “On banning autonomous weapon systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making”. In: International Review of the Red Cross 94(886), 687-709. Open Google Scholar
  60. Asaro, Peter M. (2019): “Algorithms of Violence: Criticial Social Perspectives on Autonomous Weapons”. In: Social Research 86(2), 537-555. Open Google Scholar
  61. Asimov, Isaac (1982): Meine Freunde, die Roboter. Bibliothek der Science Fiction Literatur. Muenchen: Heyne. Open Google Scholar
  62. Assheuer, Thomas (2019): “Die neue Sklavenhaltergesellschaft”. In: Die Zeit, December 6. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/51/crispr-china-biotechnologie-genomveraenderung-ethik-gentechnik [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  63. Association for Computing Machinery’s Committee on Professional Ethics (2017): “2018 ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct: Draft 3”. Association for Computing Machinery Committee on Professional Ethics. Online: https://ethics.acm.org/2018-code-draft-3/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  64. Association for Computing Machinery US Public Policy Council (2017): Statement on Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability. January 12. Online: https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/public-policy/2017_usacm_statement_algorithms.pdfhttps://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/public-policy/2017_usacm_statement_algorithms.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  65. Aste, Tomaso (2016): “The Fair Cost of Bitcoin Proof of Work”. In: SSRN Electronic Journal, June 27. Online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2801048 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  66. Aste, Tomaso / Tasca, Paolo / Di Matteo, Tiziana (2018): “Blockchain Technologies: The Foreseeable Impact on Society and Industry”. In: Computer 9(50), 18-28. Open Google Scholar
  67. Atkinson, David. J. / Clark, Micah H. (2013): “Autonomous agents and human interpersonal trust: Can we engineer a human-machine social interface for trust?”. In: Trust and Autonomous Systems – Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium. Online: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS13/paper/viewFile/5739/6004 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  68. Atzori, Marcella (2015): Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?. Online: https://static.nzz.ch/files/9/3/1/blockchain+Is+the+State+Still+Necessary_1.18689931.pdfhttps://static.nzz.ch/files/9/3/1/blockchain+Is+the+State+Still+Necessary_1.18689931.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  69. Auer, Alfons (1982): “Darf der Mensch, was er kann?”. In: Busch, Alois J. / Splett, Joerg (Eds.): Wissenschaft – Technik – Humanität. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Josef Knecht, 11-35. Open Google Scholar
  70. Australian Human Rights Commission (2019): “Human Rights and Technology”. Discussion Paper. Online: https://tech.humanrights.gov.au/?_ga=2.211445781.1641337062.1609843370-1930064430.1609843370 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  71. Austrian Council on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (2018): “Die Zukunft Österreichs mit Robotik und Künstlicher Intelligenz: White Paper”. Online: https://www.acrai.at/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ACRAI_whitebook_online_2018.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  72. Austrian Gene Technology Act 1994 (2015): Online: https://www.ecolex.org/details/legislation/genetic-technology-act-lex-faoc089381https://www.ecolex.org/details/legislation/genetic-technology-act-lex-faoc089381/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  73. Austrian Federal Act on Civil Liability for Damage Caused by Radioactivity (1999): Online: https://www.oecd-nea.org/law/legislation/austria/AUSTRIA-AtomicLiabilityAct.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  74. Axhausen, Kay W. (2016): „Autonome Fahrzeuge: Erste Überlegungen: Lecture in the occasion of the Summer-Academy of the Swiss Study Foundation on the topic: Automatization of Mobility”. September 6. Online: https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20.500.11850/119702/v600.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  75. Bachelet, Michelle (2019): “Human rights in the digital age – Can they make a difference?”. Keynote speech by Michelle Bachelet, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Japan Society, New York, October 17. United Nations. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25158&LangID=E [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  76. Bachinger, Leo Matteo / Fuchs, Walter (2013): “Rechtliche Herausforderungen des Technikeinsatzes in der Altenpflege: eine rechtssoziologische Perspektive auf Ambient Assisted Living”. In: SWS-Rundschau 53(1), 73-94. Open Google Scholar
  77. Bacon, Francis (1990): Neues Organon (Novum Organon) 1. Krohn, Wolfgang (Ed.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  78. Bacon, Francis (2000): The Instauratio Magna: Last Writings. Rees, Graham (Ed.). The Oxford Francis Bacon 13. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  79. Bacon, Francis (2003): The Advancement of Learning. Kiernan, Michael (Ed.). The Oxford Francis Bacon 4. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Bacon, Francis (2004): The Instauratio Magna Part II: Novum Organum and Associated Texts. Rees, Graham / Wakely, Maria (Eds.). The Oxford Francis Bacon 11. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  81. Bacon, Francis (2007): The Instauratio Magna Part III: Historia naturalis et experimentalis: Historia ventorum and Historia vitæ & mortis. Rees, Graham / Wakely, Maria (Eds.). The Oxford Francis Bacon 12. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  82. Bahnsen, Ulrich (2018): “Darf er, was er kann?”. In: Die Zeit, November 29. Online: https://www.zeit.de/autoren/B/Ulrich_Bahnsen/index.xml [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  83. Baier, Kurt (1974): Der Standpunkt der Moral: Eine rationale Grundlegung der Ethik. Duesseldorf: Patmos. Open Google Scholar
  84. Bainbridge, Lisanne (1983): Ironies of automation. In: Automatica 19(6), 775-779. Open Google Scholar
  85. Bajari, Patrick / Chernozhukov, Victor / Hortaçsu, Ali / Suzuki, Junichi (2019): “The Impact of Big Data on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation”. In: AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association 109, 33-37. Open Google Scholar
  86. Barlow, John Perry (1996): “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace”. In: Electronic Frontier Foundation, February 8. Online: https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.htmlhttps://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  87. Barnes, Michael (2002): Theology and the Dialogue of Religions. Cambridge Studies in Christian Doctrine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  88. Barocas, Solon / Selbst, Andrew D. (2016): “Big data’s disparate impact”. In: California Law Review 104, 671-729. Online: http://www.californialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/2Barocas-Selbst.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  89. Bartlett, Albert (2007): Dr. Albert Bartlett on Compounding. Online: https://www.peakprosperity.com/dr_albert_bartlett/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  90. Bartoletti, Ivana (2018): “Women must act now, or male-designed robots will take over our lives”. In: The Guardian, March 13. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/13/women-robots-ai-male-artificial-intelligence-automation [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  91. Bashir, Qasim (2000): “Technology vs. morality”. In: Surgical Neurology 54(1), 92. Open Google Scholar
  92. Bassi, Eleonora (2019): “European Drones Regulation: Today’s Legal Challenges”. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (Ed.): International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). Atlanta: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 443-450. Open Google Scholar
  93. Basu, Rounaq / Andrea, Araldo / Arun, Prakash Akkinepally / Bat Hen Nahmias, Biran / Kalaki, Basak / Ravi, Seshadri / Neeraj, Deshmukh / Nishant, Kumar / Lima Azevedo, Carlos / Moshe, Ben-Akiva (2018): “Automated Mobility-on-Demand vs. Mass Transit: A Multi-Modal Activity-Driven Agent-Based Simulation Approach”. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2672(8), 608-618. Open Google Scholar
  94. Bathaee, Yavar (2018): “The Artificial Intelligence Black Box and the Failure of Intent and Causation”. In: Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 31(2), 889-938. Open Google Scholar
  95. Battaglia, Fiorella (2016): “Vorstellungen über die ‘Natur des Menschen’ in Technik-Debatten”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen?. TTN-Studien 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 67-87. Open Google Scholar
  96. Baudrillard, Jean (1993): “Xeros and Infinity”. In: Baudrillard, Jean: The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena. London: Verso, 51-59. Open Google Scholar
  97. Bauer, Emmanuel J. (Ed.) (2007): Freiheit in philosophischer, neurowissen¬schaftlicher und psychotherapeutischer Perspektive. Muenchen: Wilhelm Fink. Open Google Scholar
  98. Bauernhansl, Thomas (Ed.) (2015): Technische Assistenzsysteme in der Pflege. Stuttgart: Verein zur Förderung Produktionstechnischer Forschung. Open Google Scholar
  99. Baumann-Hoelzle, Ruth (1999): “Autonomie und Freiheit in der Medizin-Ethik”. Freiburg im Breisgau / Muenchen: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar
  100. Bavelier, Daphne / Green, C. Shawn / Han, Doug Hyun / Renshaw, Perry / Merzenich, Michael M. / Gentile, Douglas A. (2011): “Brains on video games”. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12(12), 763-768. Open Google Scholar
  101. Bavitz, Christopher / Hessekiel, Kira (2018): Algorithms and Justice: Examining the Role of the State in the Development and Deployment of Algorithmic Technologies. Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society. Online: https://cyber.harvard.edu/story/2018-07/algorithms-and-justice [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  102. Bayertz, Kurt (1995): “Eine kurze Geschichte der Herkunft der Verantwortung”. In: Bayertz, Kurt: Verantwortung. Prinzip oder Problem? Darmstadt: WBG, 3-71. Open Google Scholar
  103. Bayertz, Kurt (2009): “Hat der Mensch eine ‘Natur’? Und ist sie wertvoll?”. In: Weiss, Martin G. (Ed.): Bios und Zoe. Die menschliche Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 191-218. Open Google Scholar
  104. Bayertz, Kurt (2010): “Art. Verantwortung”. In: Sandkuehler, Hans Joerg (Ed.): Enzyklopädie Philosophie 3 (Q-Z). Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2861-2862. Open Google Scholar
  105. Beard, Jack M. (2014): “Autonomous Weapons and Human Responsibilities”. In: Georgetown Journal of International Law 45, 617-681. Open Google Scholar
  106. Beck, Susanne (2012): “Roboter und Cyborgs – erobern sie unsere Welt?”. In: Beck, Susanne (Ed.): Jenseits von Mensch und Maschine. Ethische und rechtliche Fragen zum Umgang mit Robotern, Künstlicher Intelligenz und Cyborgs. Robotik und Recht 1. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 9-21. Open Google Scholar
  107. Beck, Susanne / Grzegorzek, Marcin / Lichtenthaeler, Christina / Macke, Jakob / Muhl, Claudia / Reiser, Ulrich / Scholz, Ingo / Seibel, Benjamin / Urban, Iris (2013): “Mit Robotern gegen den Pflegenotstand”. In: Stiftung Neue Verantwortung 4(13), 1-10. Open Google Scholar
  108. Beer, Stafford (1973): Fanfare for Effective Freedom: Cybernetic Praxis in Government. The Polytechnic: Brighton. Open Google Scholar
  109. Bellamy, Carol / Zermatten, Jean / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas (Eds.) (2007): Realizing the Rights of the Child. Swiss Human Rights Book 2. Zurich: Rueffer & Rub. Open Google Scholar
  110. Benanti, Paolo (2018): Le Macchine Sapienti: Intelligenze artificiali e decisioni umane. Bologna: Marietti. Open Google Scholar
  111. Bendel, Oliver (2015): “Die Industrie 4.0 aus ethischer Sicht”. In: Zeitschrift HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 52, 739-748. Open Google Scholar
  112. Bendel, Oliver (2016): “Die Datenbrille aus Sicht der Informationsethik”. In: Informatik-Spektrum 39(1), 21-29. Open Google Scholar
  113. Benedek, Jávor (2006): “Institutional protection of succeeding generations – Ombudsman for Future Generations in Hungary”. In: Tremmel, Joerg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 282-298. Open Google Scholar
  114. Benedek, Wolfgang (2008): “Internet Governance and human rights”. In: Benedek, Wolfgang / Bauer, Veronika / Kettemann, Matthias C. (Eds.): Internet governance and the information society: global perspectives and European dimensions. Utrecht: Eleven, 31-49. Open Google Scholar
  115. Benedek, Wolfgang / Kettemann, Matthias C. (2013): Freedom of Expression and the Internet. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Open Google Scholar
  116. Bengler, Klaus / Dietmayer, Klaus / Farber, Berthold / Maurer, Markus / Stiller, Christoph / Winner, Hermann (2014): “Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives”. In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 6(4), 6-22. Open Google Scholar
  117. Bensinger, Greg (2020): “Google Gives Cover to Trump’s Lies”. In: The New York Times, March 21. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/21/opinion/google-covid-trump.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  118. Bentham, Jeremy (2007): An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Dover Philosophical Classics. New York: Dover. Open Google Scholar
  119. Berendt, Bettina / Dettmar, Gebhard / Esslinger, Bernhard / Gramm, Andreas / Grillenberger, Andreas / Hug, Alexander / Witten, Helmut (2015): “Datenschutz im 21. Jahrhundert – Ist Schutz der Privatsphäre (noch) möglich?”. In: Gallenbacher, Jens (Ed.): Informatik allgemeinbildend begreifen. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik, 33-42. Open Google Scholar
  120. Berković, Mirza / Kosovac, Amel (2020): “Predictive Model of Personalization of Services of Automated Mobility Based on the Records of User Movement in Mobile Networks”. In: Karabegović, Isak (Ed.): New Technologies: Development and Application III. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 128. Cham: Springer, 581-595. Open Google Scholar
  121. Bernau, Varinia (2017) Joy Boulamwini: “Haben Algorithmen Vorurteile?”. In: Wirtschaftswoche, September 1, 54-57. Open Google Scholar
  122. Bernaz, Nadia (2013): “Enhancing Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations: Is Extraterritoriality the Magic Potion?”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 117, 493-511. Open Google Scholar
  123. Bertarelli, Ernesto (2002): “Science Between Goals and Limits”. In: 32nd ISC-Symposium at the University of St. Gallen (Ed.): Pushing Limits – Questioning Goals. St Gallen: ISC-Symposium, 47-50. Open Google Scholar
  124. Besson, Samantha (2015): “Human Rights and Constitutional Law”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279-299. Open Google Scholar
  125. Betschon, Stefan (2015): “Automatisierung. Ein neues Maschinenzeitalter”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, August 21. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/gesellschaft/lebensart/gesellschaft/ein-neues-maschinenzeitalter-1.18599135 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  126. Betts, Jennifer / Sezer, Sakir (2014): “Ethics and Privacy in National Security and Critical Infrastructure Protection”. In: IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, Chicago, 1-7. Online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6893417/similar#similar [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  127. Bhargava, Vikram / Kim, Tae Wan (2017): “Autonomous Vehicles and Moral Uncertainty”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 5-19. Open Google Scholar
  128. Bieber, Christoph (2013): Die Veränderung politischer Kommunikation im Internetzeitalter: Medien und Demokratie und die These von der Postdemokratie. In: Jahrbuch für Christliche Sozialwissenschaften 54, 155-180. Open Google Scholar
  129. Bielefeldt, Heiner (1993): “Zur Doppeldeutigkeit der staatlichen ‘Neutralität’”. In: Schwartlaender, Johannes (Ed.): Freiheit der Religion: Christentum und Islam unter dem Anspruch der Menschenrechte. Mainz: Matthias-Gruenewald-Verlag, 464-466. Open Google Scholar
  130. Bieri, Matthias / Dickow, Marcel (2014): “Letale autonome Waffensysteme als He-r⁠ausforderung”. In: CSS Analysen zur Sicherheitspolitik 164, 1-4. Open Google Scholar
  131. Birnbacher, Dieter (2006): “Responsibility for future generations”. In: Tremmel, Jo⁠erg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 23-38. Open Google Scholar
  132. Birnbacher, Dieter (2009): “Wieweit lassen sich moralische Normen mit der ‘Natur des Menschen’ begründen?” In: Weiss, Martin G. (Ed.): Bios und Zoe. Die menschliche Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 219-239. Open Google Scholar
  133. Birnie, Patricia / Boyle, Alan / Redgwell, Catherine (1992): International Law and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  134. Birrer, Frans A. J. (2005): “Data mining to combat terrorism and the roots of privacy concerns”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 7(4), 211-220. Open Google Scholar
  135. Bishop, Christopher M. (2006): Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Information Science and Statistics 1. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  136. Bleecker, Julian (2009): Design Function. A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact, and Fiction. Online: http://blog.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  137. Bleich, Erik (2013): “Freedom of Expression versus Racist Hate Speech: Explaining Differences Between High Court Regulations in the US and Europe”. In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40(2), 2-37. Open Google Scholar
  138. Bloch, Ernst (1959): Das Prinzip Hoffnung: Kapitel 1-32. Werkausgabe 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  139. Bloch, Walter (2011): Willensfreiheit? Neue Argumente in einem alten Streit. Hodos – Wege bildungsbezogener Ethikforschung in Philosophie und Theologie 11. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  140. Bloching, Bjoern / Luck, Lars / Ramge, Thomas (2012): Data Unser: Wie Kundendaten die Wirtschaft verändern. Muenchen: Redline. Open Google Scholar
  141. Blumenberg, Hans (2015): “Technik und Wahrheit”. Schmitz, Alexander / Stiegler, Bernd (Eds.). Blumenberg, Hans: Schriften zur Technik. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 42-50. Open Google Scholar
  142. Bobbert, Monika / Scherzinger, Gregor (Eds.) (2019): Gute Begutachtung?: Ethi¬s⁠che Perspektiven der Evaluation von Ethikkommissionen zur medizinischen Forschung am Menschen. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  143. Boddington, Paula (2017): Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  144. Bode, Ingvild / Huelss, Hendrik (2018): “Autonomous weapons systems and changing norms in international relations”. In: Review of International Studies 44(3), 393-413. Open Google Scholar
  145. Boden, Margaret A. (2016): AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. Boeckenfoerde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2006): “Die Entstehung des Staates als Vorgang der Säkularisation”. In: Boeckenfoerde, Ernst-Wolfgang: Recht, Staat, Freiheit. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie, Staatstheorie und Verfassungsgeschichte. 4. Au⁠f¬lage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 92-114. Open Google Scholar
  147. Boesch, Patrick M. / Ciari, Francesco / Axhausen, Kay W. (2016): “Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand”. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2542(1), 111-119. Open Google Scholar
  148. Bołtuć, Piotr (2017): “Church-Turing Lovers”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 214-228. Open Google Scholar
  149. Bond, Robert M. / Fariss, Christopher J. / Jones, Jason / Kramer, Adam D. (2012): “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization”. In: Nature 489(7415), 295-298. Open Google Scholar
  150. Bondolfi, Alberto (2009): “Justice et droit”. In: Causse, Jean-Daniel / Mueller, Denis (Eds.): Introdcution à l’éthique. Penser, croire, agir. Le Champ Éthique 51. Geneva: Éditions Labor et Fides, 481-509. Open Google Scholar
  151. Bonhoeffer, Dietrich (1992): Ethik. Werke 6. Guetersloh: Guetersloher Verlagshaus. Open Google Scholar
  152. Bonnefon, Jean-François / Shariff, Azim / Rahwan, Iyad (2016): “The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles”. In: Science 352(6293), 1573-1576. Open Google Scholar
  153. Borenstein, Jason / Howard, Ayanna / Wagner, Alan R. (2017): “Pediatric Robotics and Ethics. The Robot is Ready to See You Now, But Should it Be Trusted?”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 127-141. Open Google Scholar
  154. Borgman, Albert (1992): Crossing the Postmodern Divide. Chicago: University of Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  155. Borgmann, Albert (1995): “The Moral Significance of Material Culture”. In: Feenberg, Andrew / Hannay, Alistair (Eds.): Technology and the Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 85-93. Open Google Scholar
  156. Bossard, Carl (2018): “Digital first! Reflexion second”. In: Luzerner Zeitung, March 9. Online: https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/schweiz/digital-first-reflexion-second-ld.81789 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  157. Bostrom, Nick (2005): “In defense of posthuman dignity”. In: Bioethics 19(3), 202-214. Open Google Scholar
  158. Bostrom, Nick (2006): “How long before superintelligence?”. In: Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 5(1), 11-30. Open Google Scholar
  159. Bostrom, Nick (2008a): “Why I Want to be a Posthuman When I Grow Up”. In: Gordijn, Bert / Chadwick, Ruth (Eds.): Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. Doldrecht: Springer 107-137. Open Google Scholar
  160. Bostrom, Nick (2008b): “Dignity and Enhancement”. In: Schulman, Alan (Ed.): Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington: US President’s Council on Bioethics, 173-207. Open Google Scholar
  161. Bostrom, Nick (2009): “The Future of Humanity”. In: Olsen, Jan-Kyrre Berg / Selinger, Evan / Riis, Soren (Eds.): New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. New York: Palgrave McMillan, 186-216. Open Google Scholar
  162. Bostrom, Nick (2012): “The Superintelligent Will: Motivation and Instrumental Rationality in Advanced Artificial Agents”. In: Minds and Machines 22(2), 71-85. Open Google Scholar
  163. Bostrom, Nick (2013): “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority”. In: Global Policy 4(1), 15-31. Open Google Scholar
  164. Bostrom, Nick (2014): Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  165. Bostrom, Nick / Sandberg, Anders (2008): Whole Brain Emulation: A Roadmap. Oxford: Future of Humanity Institute. Open Google Scholar
  166. Bostrom, Nick / Yudkowsky, Eliezer (2014): “The ethics of artificial intelligence”. In: Ramsey, William, M. / Frankish, Keith (Eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316-334. Open Google Scholar
  167. Bourg, Dominique (2006): “The French Constitutional Charter for the environment: an effective instrument?”. In: Tremmel, Joerg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 230-243. Open Google Scholar
  168. Boutellier, Roman / Heinzen, Mareike / Raus, Marta (2010): “Paradigms, Science, and Technology: The Case of E-Customs”. In: Becker, S. Ann / Niebuhr, Robert E. (Eds.): Cases on Technology Innovation: Entrepreneurial Successes and Pitfalls. New York: Business Science Reference, 134-155. Open Google Scholar
  169. Bowles, Nellie (2018): “Early Facebook and Google Employees Form Coalition to Fight What They Built”. In: The New York Times, February 4. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/04/technology/early-facebook-google-employees-fight-tech.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/04/technology/early-facebook-google-employees-fight-tech.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  170. Braidotti, Rosi (2014): Posthumanismus. Leben jenseits des Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  171. Braun, Hans (2009): “Verantwortung”. In: Die Neue Ordnung 63(4), 244-252. Open Google Scholar
  172. Braendle, Claudia / Grunwald, Armin (2019): “Autonomes Fahren aus Sicht der Maschinenethik”. In: Rath, Matthias / Krotz, Friedrich / Karmasin, Matthias (Eds.): Maschinenethik. Wiesbaden: Springer, 281-300. Open Google Scholar
  173. Brayne, Sarah / Rosenblat, Alex / Boyd, Danah (2015): “Predictive policing. Data & civil rights: A new era of policing and justice”. In: Data & Civil Rights. Online: https://datacivilrights.org/pubs/2015-1027/Predictive_Policing.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  174. Breazal, Cynthia (2002): Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  175. Breiding, James R. / Christen, Markus / Helbing, Dirk (2015): “Lost Robustness”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 27-37. Open Google Scholar
  176. Brenner, Walter / Witte, Christoph (2011): Business Innovation: CIOs im Wettbewerb der Ideen. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch. Open Google Scholar
  177. Brey, Philip A. E. (2014): “From Moral Agents to Moral Factors: The Structural Ethics Approach”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 124-142. Open Google Scholar
  178. Brey, Philip A. E. / Soraker, Johnny (2009): Philosophy of Computing and Information Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Open Google Scholar
  179. Broad, William J. (2014): “Billionaires With Big Ideas Are Privatizing American Science”. In: The New York Times, March 15. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/science/billionaires-with-big-ideas-are-privatizing-american-science.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/science/billionaires-with-big-ideas-are-privatizing-american-science.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  180. Brodmerkel, Sven (2017): “Dynamic pricing: Retailers using artificial intelligence to predict top price you’ll pay”. In: ABC, June 27. Online: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-27/dynamic-pricing-retailers-using-artificial-intelligence/8638340 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  181. Broeckling, Ulrich (2015): “Heldendämmerung? Der Drohnenkrieg und die Zukunft des militärischen Heroismus”. In: BEHEMOTH, A Journal on Civilisation 8(2), 97-107. Open Google Scholar
  182. Brooks, David (2013): “The Philosophy of Data”. In: The New York Times, February 4. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/opinion/brooks-the-philosophy-of-data.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  183. Brooks, Rodney (2017): “The Seven Deadly Sins of AI Predictions”. In: MIT Technology Review, October 6. Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609048/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-ai-predictions/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  184. Brost, Marc / Hamann, Goetz (2018): “Ein autonom fahrendes Auto erkennt bei Nacht kein Wildschwein”. In: Die Zeit, July 26. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/31/kuenstliche-intelligenz-autonomes-fahren-wolfgang-wahlster-interview [08.02.2021] Open Google Scholar
  185. Broussard, Meredith (2019): “Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World”. In: The Information Society 35(5), 1-3. Open Google Scholar
  186. Brown Weiss, Edith (1989): In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Tokyo: United Nations University / Transnational Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  187. Brown, Jennings (2017): “Former Facebook Exec: ‘You Don’t Realize It But You Are Being Programmed’”. In: Gizmodo, November 12. Online: https://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-exec-you-don-t-realize-it-but-you-are-1821181133https://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-exec-you-don-t-realize-it-but-you-are-1821181133 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  188. Brugger, Walter (1992): “Stufen der Begründung von Menschenrechten”. In: Der Staat 31(1), 19-31. Open Google Scholar
  189. Brundage, Miles / Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford / Centre for the Study of Existential Risk / University of Cambridge / Centre for a New American Security / Electronic Frontier Foundation / Open AI (2018): “The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1802/1802.07228.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  190. Brynjolfsson, Erik / McAffee, Andrew (2011): Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington: Digital Frontier Press. Open Google Scholar
  191. Brynjolfsson, Erik / McAfee, Andrew (2014): The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York / London: W. W. Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
  192. Bryson, Joanna (2010): “Robots Should Be Slaves”. In: Wilks, Yorick (Ed.): Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 63-74. Open Google Scholar
  193. Buchanan, Allen (2015): “Why International Legal Human Rights?”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 244-262. Open Google Scholar
  194. Buchholz, Rogene A. / Rosenthal, Sandra B. (2002): “Technology and Business: Rethinking the Ethical Dilemma”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 41(1), 45-50. Open Google Scholar
  195. Buchwald, Sabine (2019): “Sind die Forscher am von Facebook finanzierten Ethik-Institut wirklich frei?”. In: Sueddeutsche Zeitung, December 13. Online: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/muenchen-tu-finanzierung-facebook-1.4723566https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/muenchen-tu-finanzierung-facebook-1.4723566 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  196. Budde, Jannica / Oevel, Gudrun (2016): “Innovationsmanagement an Hochschulen: Massnahmen zur Unterstützung der Digitalisierung von Studium und Lehre”. In: Mayr, Heinrich C. / Pinzger, Martin (Eds.): INFORMATIK 2016. Series of the Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Bonn: Koellen Druck + Verlag GmbH, 947-960. Open Google Scholar
  197. Buehl, Walter L. (1998): Verantwortung für soziale Systeme: Grundzüge einer globalen Gesellschaftsordnung. Stuttgart: Cotta’sche Buchhandlung. Open Google Scholar
  198. Buiter, Wilhelm H. (2009): Lessons from the global financial crisis for regulators and supervisors. European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, CEPR and NBER. Discussion Paper 635. Online: http://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/workingPapers/discussionPapers/fmgdps/DP635.pdfhttp://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/workingPapers/discussionPapers/fmgdps/DP635.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  199. Buolamwini, Joy / Gebru, Timnit (2018): “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification”. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81, 1-15. Open Google Scholar
  200. Burger, Paul (2007): “Nachhaltigkeitstheorie als Gesellschaftstheorie. Ein philosophisches Plädoyer”. In: Kaufmann-Hayoz, Ruth / Burger, Paul / Stoffel, Martine (Eds.): Nachhaltigkeitsforschung – Perspektiven der Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, Bern: Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften, 13-34. Open Google Scholar
  201. Burgess, Matt (2016): “Holding AI to account: Will algorithms ever be free of bias if they are created by humans?”. In: WIRED, January 11. Online: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/creating-transparent-ai-algorithms-machine-learning [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  202. Burkert, Andreas (2017): “Die Ethik und die Gefahren der künstlichen Intelligenz”. In: ATZ – Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift 119, 8-13. Open Google Scholar
  203. Burrell, Jenna (2016): “How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms”. In: Big Data & Society 3(1), 1-12. Open Google Scholar
  204. Burridge, Brian (2003): “UAVs and the dawn of post-modern warfare: a perspective on recent operations”. In: RUSI Journal 148(5), 18-23. Open Google Scholar
  205. Burt, Andrew / Shirrell, Stuart / Leong, Brenda / Wang, Xiangnong Georg (2018): “Beyond Explainability: A Practical Guide to Managing Risk in Machine Learning Models”. In: The Future of Privacy Forum. Online: https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Beyond-Explainability.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  206. Buschauer, Regine (2014): “Autos und Information”. In: POP. Kultur und Kritik 3, 19-23. Open Google Scholar
  207. Butler, Judith (2004): Le pouvoir des mots. Politique du performatif. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam. Open Google Scholar
  208. Bynum, Terrell Ward (2004): “Ethics and the Information Revolution”. In: Spinello, Richard A. / Tavani, Herman T. (Eds.): Readings in Cyberethics. Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 13-29. Open Google Scholar
  209. Cachelin, Joël Luc (2017): Internetgott: Die Religion des Silicon Valley. Bern: Staempfli. Open Google Scholar
  210. Cadwalladr, Carole (2018): “I Made Steve Bannon’s Psychological Warfare Tool: meet the data war whistleblower”. In: The Guardian, March 18. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/data-war-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-faceook-nix-bannon-trump [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  211. Callicott, Baird (1989): In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany: State University Press of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  212. Calvo, Patrici (2020): “The ethics of Smart City (EoSC): moral implications of hyperconnectivity, algorithmization and the datafication of urban digital society”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 22, 141-149. Open Google Scholar
  213. Cambridge Dictionary (n.d.): Digital. Online: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/digital [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  214. Campaign to Stop Killer Robots (2020): “Who wants to Ban Fully Autonomous Weapons?”. Online: stopkillerrobots.org [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  215. Čapek, Karel (2017): W.U.R. Werstands universal Robots. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents. Translated by Otto Pick. Berlin: Contumax-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  216. Capurro, Rafael (2017): Homo Digitalis. Beiträge zur Ontologie, Anthropologie und Ethik der digitalen Technik. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  217. Carnevale, Antonio (2016): “Will robots know us better than we know ourselves?”. In: Robotics and Autonomous Systems 86 (Supplement C), 144-151. Open Google Scholar
  218. Carrico, Dale (2013): “Futorological Discourses and Posthuman Terrain”. In: Existenz. An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and Arts 8(2), 47-63. Open Google Scholar
  219. Carroll, Archie B. (1991). “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”. In: Business Horizons 34(4), 39-48. Open Google Scholar
  220. Carroll, Archie B. (1999): “Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct”. In: Business and Society 38(3), 268-295. Open Google Scholar
  221. Carvalho, Ashwin / Lefévre, Stéphanie / Schildbach, Georg / Kong, Jason / Borrelli, Francesco (2015): “Automated driving: The role of forecasts and uncertainty – A control perspective”. In: European Journal of Control 24, 14-32. Open Google Scholar
  222. Casanova, José (2015): “Der säkulare Staat, religiöser Pluralismus und Liberalismus”. In: Schwarz, Gerhard / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Holderegger, Adrian / Tag, Brigitte (Eds.): Religion, Liberalität und Rechtsstaat: Ein offenes Spannungsverhältnis. Zuerich: Verlag Neue Zuercher Zeitung, 19-25. Open Google Scholar
  223. Casner, Stephen M. / Hutchins, Edwin L. / Norman, Don (2016): “The challenges of partially automated driving”. In: Communications of the ACM 59(5), 70-77. Open Google Scholar
  224. Cass, Kelly (2015): “Autonomous Weapons and Accountability: Seeking Solutions in the Law of War”. In: Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 48, 1017-1067. Open Google Scholar
  225. Cassirer, Ernst (1985): “Form und Technik”. In: Cassirer, Ernst: Symbol, Technik, Sprache. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 39-91. Open Google Scholar
  226. Castelvecchi, Davide (2016): “Can We Open the Black Box of AI?”. In: Nature 538(7623), 20-23. Open Google Scholar
  227. Catton, William/Dunlap, Riley (1980): “A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology”. In: American Behavioral Scientist 24(1), 15-47. Open Google Scholar
  228. Cellarius, Mathias (2017): “Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Informational Self-determination”. In: The OECD Forum. Online: https://www.oecd-forum.org/users/75927-mathias-cellarius/posts/28608-artificial-intelligence-and-the-right-to-informational-self-determination [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  229. Center of Human Rights Education (ZMRB) (n.d.): International Human Rights Forum Lucerne (IHRF). Online: www.ihrf.ch [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  230. Cernea, Mihail-Valentin (2018): “The Ethical Troubles of Future Warfare. On the Prohibition of Autonomous Weapon Systems”. In: Annals of the University of Bucharest – Philosophy Series 66(2), 67-89. Open Google Scholar
  231. Chalmers, David (2010): “The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis”. In: Journal of Consciousness Studies 17(9-10), 7-65. Open Google Scholar
  232. Chandler, Geoffrey (2000): “Foreword”. In: Frankental, Peter / House, Frances (Eds.): Human Rights – Is It Any of Your Business?. London: Amnesty International / The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum, 5. Open Google Scholar
  233. Chapman, Audrey R. (2009): “Towards an Understanding of the Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and Its Applications”. In: Journal of Human Rights 8(1), 1-36. Open Google Scholar
  234. Charter of Fundamental Digital Rights of the European Union (n.d.): Revised version of 2018. Online: https://digitalcharta.euhttps://digitalcharta.eu/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  235. Cheok, Adrian David / Karunanayaka, Kasun / Zhang, Emma Yann (2017): “Lovotics: Human - Robot Love and Sex Relationships”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 193-213. Open Google Scholar
  236. Childs, James M. Jr. (2015): “Beyond the Boundaries of Current Human Nature: Some Theological and Ethical Reflections on Transhumanism”. In: Dialog, 54(1), 8-19. Open Google Scholar
  237. Chorost, Michael (2005): Rebuilt. How Becoming Part Machine Made Me More Human. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Open Google Scholar
  238. Chouldechova, Alexandra (2016): “Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments”. In: Big Data 5(2), 153-163. Open Google Scholar
  239. Chow, Marvin (2017): “AI and machine learning get us one step closer to relevance at scale”. In: Think with Google, September. Online: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-resources/ai-personalized-marketing/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  240. Christin, Angèle / Rosenblat, Alex / Boyd, Danah (2015): Courts and Predictive Algorithms. Presentation at the Data & Civil Rights: A New Era of Policing and Justice Conference. Washington, October 27. Online: http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Angele%20Christin.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  241. Citron, Danielle K. / Pasquale, Frank A. (2014): “The scored society: Due process for automated predictions”. In: Washington Law Review 89(8), 1-35. Open Google Scholar
  242. Clark, Andy (1999): “An Embodied Cognitive Science?”. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(9), 345-351. Open Google Scholar
  243. Clarke, Cris / Tooker, Lauren (2017): “Social finance meets financial innovation: contemporary experiments in payments, money and debt”. In: Theory, Culture & Society 35(3), 3-11. Open Google Scholar
  244. Clever, Peter / Ramb, Christina (2010): “Freiheit ohne Verantwortung verkommt. Die Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise – Folgen für unternehmerisches Handeln und die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen”. In: Heimbach-Steins, Marianne (Ed.): Weltwirtschaft und Gemeinwohl. Eine Zwischenbilanz der Wirtschaftskrise. Muenster: Aschendorff, 53-63. Open Google Scholar
  245. Clifford, Catherine (2018) Elon Musk: “Mark my words – A.I. is far more dangerous than nukes”. In: CNBC, March 13. Online: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/13/elon-musk-at-sxsw-a-i-is-more-dangerous-than-nuclear-weapons.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/13/elon-musk-at-sxsw-a-i-is-more-dangerous-than-nuclear-weapons.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  246. Clynes, Manfred E. / Kline, Nathan S. (1995): “Cyborgs and Space”. In: Gray, Chris Hables (Ed.): The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge, 29-34. Open Google Scholar
  247. CNN Money (2010): “Facebook broadcasts engagement ring purchase”. In: CNN Money, December 14. Online: https://money.cnn.com/galleries/2010/technology/1012/gallery.5_data_breaches/3.htmlhttps://money.cnn.com/galleries/2010/technology/1012/gallery.5_data_breaches/3.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  248. Coeckelbergh, Mark (2012): Growing Moral Relations: Critique of Moral Status Ascription. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  249. Coeckelbergh, Mark (2013): Human Being @ Risk: Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  250. Coeckelbergh, Mark (2017): New Romantic Cyborgs: Romanticism, Information Technology, and the End of Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  251. Coeckelbergh, Mark (2020): AI Ethics. The MIT Press Essential Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  252. Coeckelbergh, Mark / Wackers, Ger (2007): “Imagination, distributed responsibility, and vulnerability: The case of Snorre A”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 13(2), 235-248. Open Google Scholar
  253. Contratto, Franca (2017): “Technologie und Finanzmarktregulierung: Narrative von Interdependenz und Co-Evolution”. In: Weber, Rolf H. / Stoffel, Walter A. / Chenaux, Jean-Luc / Sethe, Rolf (Eds.): Aktuelle Herausforderungen des Gesellschafts- und Finanzmarktrechts: Festschrift für Hans Caspar von der Crone zum 60. Geburtstag. Zuerich: Schulthess, 421-440. Open Google Scholar
  254. Cooper, Rick / Davis, Michael / Van Vliet, Ben (2016): “The Mysterious Ethics of High-Frequency Trading”. In: Business Ethics Quarterly 26(1), 1-22. Open Google Scholar
  255. Corillon, Carol (1989): “The Role of Science and Scientists in Human Rights”. In: The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 506(1), 129-140. Open Google Scholar
  256. Council of Europe (2018a): Discrimination, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Decision-Making. Online: https://rm.coe.int/discrimination-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithmic-decision-making/1680925d73https://rm.coe.int/discrimination-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithmic-decision-making/1680925d73 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  257. Council of Europe (2018b): Algorithms and human rights – Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques and possible regulatory implications. Online: https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  258. Council of Europe (2018c): Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)7 of the Committee of Ministers: Guidelines to respect, protect and fulfil the rights of the child in the digital environment. Online: https://edoc.coe.int/en/children-and-the-internet/7921-guidelines-to-respect-protect-and-fulfil-the-rights-of-the-child-in-the-digital-environment-recommendation-cmrec20187-of-the-committee-of-ministers.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  259. Council of Europe (2019a): Consultative Committee of the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (Convention 108): Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection. Online: https://rm.coe.int/guidelines-on-artificial-intelligence-and-data-protection/168091f9d8 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  260. Council of Europe (2019b): Committee of Ministers: Declaration on the manipulative capabilities of algorithmic processes. Online: https://search.coe.int/cm/pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=090000168092dd4b [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  261. Council of Europe (2019c): European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment. Online: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699chttps://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  262. Council of Europe (2003): Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalization of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems of January 28, 2003. Online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/189?desktop=truehttps://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/189?desktop=true [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  263. Council of Europe: European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) (2014): Annual Report. Online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/annual-reportshttps://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/annual-reports [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  264. Counts, Laura (2018): “Minority homebuyers face widespread statistical lending discrimination, study finds”. In: Newsroom, November 13. Online: https://newsroom.haas.berkeley.edu/minority-homebuyers-face-widespread-statistical-lending-discrimination-study-finds/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  265. Cowen, Tyler (2013): Average is over: Powering America Beyond the Age of the Great Stagnation. New York: Dutton. Open Google Scholar
  266. Crawford, Kate (2016): “Artificial intelligence’s white guy problem”. In: The New York Times, June 25. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/26/opinion/sunday/artificial-intelligences-white-guy-problem.html?_r=0 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  267. Crawford, Kate / Calo, Ryan (2016): “There is a Blind Spot in AI Research”. In: Nature 538, 311-313. Open Google Scholar
  268. Credit Suisse (2015): Global Wealth Report 2015. Online: https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-report-2015.pdfhttps://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-report-2015.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  269. Crichton, Danny (2018): “Liquid democracy uses blockchain to fix politics, and now you can vote for it”. In: Tech Crunch, February 24. Online: https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/24/liquid-democracy-uses-blockchainhttps://techcrunch.com/2018/02/24/liquid-democracy-uses-blockchain/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  270. Crouch, Colin (2008): Postdemokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  271. Cunningham, Lilian (2011): “Google’s Eric Schmidt Expounds on His Senate Testimony”. In: The Washington Post, September 30. Online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/googles-eric-schmidt-expounds-on-his-senate-testimony/2011/09/30/gIQAPyVgCL_story.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  272. Czarnecki, Krzysztof / Salay, Rick (2018): “Towards a Framework to Manage Perceptual Uncertainty for Safe Automated Driving”. In: Gallina, Barbara / Skavhaug, Amund / Schoitsch, Erwin / Bitsch, Friedemann (Eds.): Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 11094. Cham: Springer, 439-445. Open Google Scholar
  273. Dabrock, Peter (2017): “Wenn Autos Menschen fahren. Warum die wirklichen ethischen Herausforderungen des autonomen Fahrens jenseits der Trolley-Probleme lauern”. In: Zeitschrift für evangelische Ethik 61, 83-88. Open Google Scholar
  274. Daniels, Jessie (2009): Cyber Racism. White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  275. Danish Ministry of Finance, Agency for Digitalisation (n.d.): Denmark’s National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://en.digst.dk/policy-and-strategy/denmark-s-national-strategy-for-artificial-intelligence/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  276. Darling, Kate (2017): “‘Who’s Jonny?’ Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 173-191. Open Google Scholar
  277. Davis, Ernest (2015): “Ethical Guidelines for A Superintelligence”. In: Artificial Intelligence 220, 121-124. Open Google Scholar
  278. Davis, Michael / Kumiega, Andrew / Van Vliet, Ben (2013): “Ethics, Finance, and Automation: A Preliminary Survey of Problems in High Frequency Trading”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 19(3), 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  279. De Jesus, Ayn (2018): “Augmented Reality Shopping and Artificial Intelligence – Near-Term Applications”. In: Emerj, April 20. Online: https://www.techemergence.com/augmented-reality-shopping-and-artificial-intelligence/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  280. De Melo-Martín, Immaculada (2010): “The Two Cultures: An introduction and assessment”. In: Technology in Society 32(1), 5-9. Open Google Scholar
  281. De Saint-Exupéry, Antoine (1948): Citadelle. Paris: Gallimard. Open Google Scholar
  282. De Soto, Hernando (2003): The Mystery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  283. De Soto, Hernando / Cheneval, Francis (2006): Realizing Property Rights. Swiss Human Rights Book 1. Zurich: Rueffer and Rub. Open Google Scholar
  284. De Vries, Katja (2010): “Identity, profiling algorithms and a world of ambient intelligence”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 12(1), 71-85. Open Google Scholar
  285. Decker, Michael (2013): “Mein Roboter handelt moralischer als ich? Ethische Aspekte einer Technikfolgenabschätzung der Robotik”. In: Bogner, Alexander (Ed.): Ethisierung der Technik – Technisierung der Ethik: Der Ethik-Boom im Lichte der Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung 11. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 215-231. Open Google Scholar
  286. Decker, Michael (2019a): “Autonome Systeme und ethische Reflexion”. In: Thimm, Caja / Bächle, Thomas Christian (Eds.): Freund oder Feind?. Wiesbaden: Springer, 135-158. Open Google Scholar
  287. Decker, Michael (2019b): “Ethische Fragen bei autonomen Systemen”. In: Mueller, Oliver / Liggieri, Kevin (Eds.): Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion. Stuttgart: J.B. Met⁠z¬ler, 309-315. Open Google Scholar
  288. DeepMind (n.d.): Exploring the real-world impacts of AI. Online: https://deepmind.com/about/ethics-and-society#fellowshttps://deepmind.com/about/ethics-and-society#fellows [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  289. Deleuze, Gilles (1992): “Postcript on the societies of control”. In: October 59, 3-7. Open Google Scholar
  290. Delmas-Marty, Mireille (2013): “Foreword: The Internet: disrupting, revealing and producing rules”. In: Massit-Folléa, Françoise / Méadel, Cécile / Monnoyer-Smith, Laurence (Eds.): Normative Experience in Internet Politics. Paris: Presses des Mines, 11-18. Open Google Scholar
  291. Demiridi, Elissavet / Kopelias, Pantelis / Nathanail, Efithia / Skabardonis, Alexander (2019): “Connected and Autonomous Vehicles – Legal Issues in Greece, Europe and USA”. In: Nathanail, Eftihia / Karakikes, Ioannis D. (Eds.): Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 879. Cham: Springer, 756-763. Open Google Scholar
  292. Demmer, Klaus (2000): Shaping the Moral Life: An Approach to Moral Theology. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Open Google Scholar
  293. Demmer, Klaus (2010): Bedrängte Freiheit. Die Lehre von der Mitwirkung – neu bedacht. Studien zur Theologischen Ethik 127. Freiburg im Uechtland: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  294. Demuth, Yves (2018) Cathy O’Neil: “Die unheimliche Macht der Algorithmen”. In: Beobachter, April 26. Online: https://www.beobachter.ch/digital/multimedia/big-data-die-unheimliche-macht-der-algorithmen [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  295. Dengler, Katharina / Matthes, Britta (2015): Folgen der Digitalisierung für die Arbeitswelt: Substituierbarkeitspotenziale von Berufen in Deutschland. Forschungsbericht 11. Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung: Nuremberg. Open Google Scholar
  296. Der Grosse Herder (1935): “Verantwortung”. In: Nachschlagewerk für Wissen und Leben 12. 4. Auflage. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 153-154. Open Google Scholar
  297. Derrick, Dominic / Chhawri, Sumeet / Eustice, Ryan M. / Ma, Di / Weimerskirch, André (2016): “Risk Assessment for Cooperative Automated Driving“. In: Association for Computing Machinery (Ed.): CPS-SPC ‘16: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Security and Privacy. Vienna: Association for Computing Machinery, 47-58. Open Google Scholar
  298. Deva, Surya (2007): “Globalisation and its Impact on the Realisation of Human Rights: Indian Perspective on a Global Canvas”. In: Kumar, C. Raj / Chockalingam, Kumaravelu (Eds.): Human rights, Justice and Constitutional Empowerment. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 237-263. Open Google Scholar
  299. Deva, Surya (2012a): “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implications for Companies”. In: European Company Law 9(2), 101-109. Open Google Scholar
  300. Deva, Surya (2012b): “Corporate Human Rights Violations: A Case for Extraterritorial Regulation”. In: Luetge, Christoph (Ed.): Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. New York: Springer, 1077-1090. Open Google Scholar
  301. Deva, Surya (2012c): Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  302. Di Giovanna, James (2017): “Artificial Identity”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 307-321. Open Google Scholar
  303. Di Lorenzo, Giovanni (2018): “Übernehmen Sie Verantwortung!” In: Die Zeit, February 8, 63-64. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/07/studenten-leben-verantwortung-universitaet-idealismushttps://www.zeit.de/2018/07/studenten-leben-verantwortung-universitaet-idealismus [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  304. Dickow, Marcel (2015): Robotik – ein Game-Changer für Militär und Sicher¬heit⁠s¬politik?. SWP-Studie 14. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik – Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit. Open Google Scholar
  305. Dickow, Marcel / Linnenkamp, Hilmar (2012): “Kampfdrohnen – Killing Drones: Ein Plädoyer gegen die fliegenden Automaten”. In: SWP-Aktuell 75, 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  306. Die Zeit (2020): “Social Media: Friedrich Merz weist Kritik an Medien-Äusserung zurück”. In: Die Zeit, February 17. Online: https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2020-02/friedrich-merz-social-media-klassische-medien-berichterstattung-djvhttps://www.zeit.de/kultur/2020-02/friedrich-merz-social-media-klassische-medien-berichterstattung-djv [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  307. Dierksmeier, Claus (2006): “John Rawls on the rights of future generations”. In: Tremmel, Joerg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 72-85. Open Google Scholar
  308. Dierksmeier, Claus (2012): “How should we do Business? Global Ethics in the Age of Globality”. In: Tenth Global Ethic Lecture. Online: https://www.weltethos.org/1-pdf/20-aktivitaeten/eng/we-reden-eng/speech_Dierksmeier_eng.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  309. Dierksmeier, Claus / Seele, Peter (2018): “Cryptocurrencies and Business Ethics”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 152(1), 1-14. Open Google Scholar
  310. Digital Health & AI Research Collaborative (I-DAIR) (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://graduateinstitute.ch/I-DAIR [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  311. Dignum, Virginia (2019): Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  312. Dillard, Jesse (2013): “Human Rights within an Ethic of Accountability”. In: Haynes, Kathryn / Murray, Alan / Dillard, Jesse (Eds.): Corporate Social Responsibility. A research handbook. London: Routledge, 196-220. Open Google Scholar
  313. Dillard, Jesse / Murray, Allan (2013): “Deciphering the Domain of Corporate Social Responsibility”. In: Haynes, Kathryn / Dillard, Jesse / Murray, Allan (Eds.): Corporate Social Responsibility. A research handbook. London: Routledge, 10-27. Open Google Scholar
  314. Dittmann, Frank (2016): “Mensch und Roboter – ein ungleiches Paar”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen?. TTN-Studien 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 17-46. Open Google Scholar
  315. Dix, Alexander (2016): “Datenschutz im Zeitalter von Big Data. Wie steht es um den Schutz der Privatsphäre?”. In: Stadtforschung und Statistik: Zeitschrift des Verbandes Deutscher Städtestatistiker 29(1), 59-64. Open Google Scholar
  316. Donders, Yvonne (2015): “Balancing Interests: Limitations to the Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and Its Applications”. In: European Journal of Human Rights 4, 486-503. Open Google Scholar
  317. Doorn, Neelke / van de Poel, Ibo (2012): “‘Editors’ Overview: Moral Ethical Responsibility in Technology and Engineering”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 18(1), 1-11. Open Google Scholar
  318. Doshi-Velez, Finale / Kortz, Mason (2017): “Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation”. Berkman Klein Center Working Group on Explanation and the Law, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society working paper. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1711/1711.01134.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  319. Dove, Edward S. / Townend, David / Meslin, Eric M. / Bobrow, Martin / Littler, Katherine / Dianne, Nicol / de Vries, Jantina / Junker, Anne / Garattini, Chiara / Bovenberg, Jasper / Shabani, Mahsa / Lévesque, Emmanuelle / Knoppers, Bartha M. (2016): “Ethics review for international data-intensive research”. In: Science 351(6280), 1399-1400. Open Google Scholar
  320. Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1972): What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. New York: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  321. Dreyfus, Hubert L. / Dreyfus, Stuart E. (1986): Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  322. Droesser, Christoph (2018): “Eine Überdosis Facebook”. In: Die Zeit, May 3, 31-32. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/19/medienverhalten-facebook-twitter-youtube-silicon-valley-manipulation-alternativen [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  323. Druga, Stefania / Williams, Randi (2017): “Kids, AI Devices, and Intelligent Toys”. In: MIT Media Lab, June 6. Online: https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/kids-ai-devices/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  324. Duerrenmatt, Friedrich (1962): Die Physiker. Zuerich: Arche. Open Google Scholar
  325. Duewell, Marcus (2010): “Menschenwürde als Grundlage der Menschenrechte”. In: Debus, Tessa / Kreide, Regina / Krennerich, Michael / Malowitz, Karsten / Pollmann, Arnd / Zwingel, Susanne (Eds.): Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte 4, 64-79. Open Google Scholar
  326. Duewell, Marcus / Neumann, Josef J. (Eds.) (2005): Wie viel Ethik verträgt die Medizin?. Paderborn: Mentis. Open Google Scholar
  327. Duttge, Gunnar (2016): “Das Recht auf Nichtwissen in einer informationell vernet⁠z¬ten Gesundheitsversorgung.”. In: Medizinrecht 34(9), 664-669. Open Google Scholar
  328. Dutton, Ian R. (1990): “Engineering code of ethics”. In: IEEE Potentials 9(4), 30-31. Online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/65865https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/65865 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  329. Deutsche Welle (DW) (2020): “‘No time to wait’ for tax reforms, says German finance minister”. Online: https://www.dw.com/en/no-time-to-wait-for-tax-reforms-says-german-finance-minister/a-52475061 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  330. Dziobek, Isabel / Lucke, Ulrike / Manzeschke, Arne (2017): “Emotions-sensitive Trainingssysteme für Menschen mit Autismus”. In: Eibl, Maximilian / Gaedke, Martin (Eds.): INFORMATIK 2017. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik, 369-380. Open Google Scholar
  331. Edwards, Douglas (2011): I’m Feeling Lucky. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Open Google Scholar
  332. Eggers, Dave (2013): The Circle. New York: Penguin Random House. Open Google Scholar
  333. Eggers, William D. (2014): “Social by the numbers: An interview with Sandy Pentland”. In: Deloitte Review 15. Online: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-15/sandy-pentland-mit-interview.html. [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  334. Ehrenhauser, Astrid / Knuth, Hannah (2019): “Wer darf mitmachen?”. In: Die Zeit, August 8, 55-56. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/33/digitalisierung-schule-it-konzerne-kooperation [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  335. Eichhorst, Werner / Hinte, Holger / Rinne, Ulf / Tobsch, Verena (2016): Digitalisierung und Arbeitsmarkt: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und sozialpolitische Her⁠ausforderungen. Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 85. Bonn: Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit. Open Google Scholar
  336. Eiholzer, Stefan (2019): “Schnelleres Digitalisieren: Google Books spannt mit Schweizer Bibliotheken zusammen”. In: Swiss National Radio Television SRF News. Online: https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/schnelleres-digitalisieren-google-books-spannt-mit-schweizer-bibliotheken-zusammen [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  337. Eimler, Sabrina / Geisler, Stefan / Mischewski, Philipp (2018): “Ethik im autonomen Fahrzeug: Zum menschlichen Verhalten in drohenden Unfallsituationen”. In: Dachselt, Raimund / Weber, Gerhard (Eds.): Mensch und Computer. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik, 709-716. Open Google Scholar
  338. Ekmekçi, Asli (2014): “An Examination of the Relationship Between Companies’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Acitivites and Consumers’ Purchase Behavior”. In: Yueksel Mermod, Asli / Idowu, Samuel O. (Eds.): Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Business World. Heidelberg: Springer, 49-73. Open Google Scholar
  339. Elder, Alexis (2017): “Robot Friends for Autistic Children. Monopoly Money or Counterfeit Currency?”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 113-126. Open Google Scholar
  340. Electronic Privacy Information Centre (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://www.epic.orghttps://www.epic.org/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  341. El-Hitami, Hannah (2017): “Kalte Logik der Algorithmen”. In: Amnesty International Switzerland, Magazin der Menschenrechte, June, 28-29. Open Google Scholar
  342. Eliasson, Jan (2015): “Deputy Secretary-General, Marking Fiftieth Anniversary of Anti-Racism Convention, Urges Internet to Be Used as Powerful Tool in Fight against Racial Discrimination”. United Nations, December 2. Online: https://www.un.org/press/en/2015/dsgsm921.doc.htm [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  343. Elliot, Robert (1992): “Intrinsic value, environmental obligation, and naturalness”. In: The Monist 75, 138-160. Open Google Scholar
  344. Ellul, Jacques (1964): The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar
  345. Elsbernd, Astrid / Lehmeyer, Sonja / Schilling, Ulrike (2014): Technikgestützte Pflege: Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Entwicklungen. Online: https://hses.bsz-bw.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/84/file/Grundlagenartikel_Technik_und_PflegeAE08.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  346. Elstner, Steffen / Feld, Lars P. / Schmidt, Christoph M. (2016): “Bedingt abwehrbereit – Deutschland im digitalen Wandel”. In: Wirtschaftspolitische Blaetter 2, 287-308. Open Google Scholar
  347. Emunds, Bernhard (2014): Politische Wirtschaftsethik globaler Finanzmärkte. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  348. Enderle, Georges (2002): “Veränderungen der Ökonomie im Kontext von Globa-l⁠isierungsprozessen”. In: Virt, Guenter (Ed.): Der Globalisierungsprozess: Facetten einer Dynamik aus ethischer und theologischer Perspektive. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 19-40. Open Google Scholar
  349. Enderle, Georges (2015a): “Ethical innovation in business and economy – a challenge that cannot be postponed”. In: Enderle, Georges / Murphy, Patrick E. (Eds.): Ethical Innovation in Business and the Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1-22. Open Google Scholar
  350. Enderle, Georges (2015b): “The Theme of the Sixth World Congress of the International Society of Business, Economics, and Ethics in 2016 in Shanghai, China: ‘Ethics, Innovation, and Well-Being in Business and the Economy’”. In: ISBEE, July 22. Online: http://isbee.org/the-theme-of-the-sixth-world-congress-of-the-international-society-of-business-economics-and-ethics-in-2016-in-shanghai-china-ethics-innovation-and-well-being-in-business-and-the-econom/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  351. Engel Bromwich, Jonah / Victor, Daniel / Isaac, Mike (2016): “Police Use Surveillance Tool to Scan Social Media, A.C.L.U. Says”. In: The New York Times, October 11. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/12/technology/aclu-facebook-twitter-instagram-geofeedia.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  352. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (2011): EPSRC Principles of Robotics 2011. Online: https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofroboticshttps://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  353. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (2010): Principles of robotics. Online: https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofroboticshttps://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  354. Englert, Matthias / Siebert, Sandra / Ziegler, Martin (2014): “Logical Limitations to Machine Ethics with Consequences to Lethal Autonomous Weapons”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2842https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2842 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  355. Etienne, Hubert (2020): “When AI Ethics Goes Astray: A Case Study of Autonomous Vehicles”. In: Social Science Computer Review 28, 608-618. Open Google Scholar
  356. Etzioni, Amitai / Etzioni, Oren (2017): “Pros and Cons of Autonomous Weapons Systems”. In: Military Review (May-June), 72-80. Open Google Scholar
  357. European Commission (2018): Knowledge for Policy. Dual-Use Technologies. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/foresight/topic/changing-security-paradigm/artificial-intelligence-quantum-cryptography_en [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  358. European Commission (n.d.): Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/artificial-intelligencehttps://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/artificial-intelligence [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  359. European Digital Rights (EDRi) (2014): The Charter of Digital Rights. Online: https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/EDRi_DigitalRightsCharter_web.pdfhttps://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/EDRi_DigitalRightsCharter_web.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  360. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2009): Ethics of information and communication technologies. Online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c35a8ab5-a21d-41ff-b654-8cd6d41f6794/language-en/format-PDF/source-77404276 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  361. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2014): Ethics of Security and Surveillance Technologies. Online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6f1b3ce0-2810-4926-b185-54fc3225c969 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  362. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2015): The ethical implications of new health technologies and citizen participation. Online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e86c21fa-ef2f-11e5-8529-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-77404221 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  363. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2018a): Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/research/ege/pdf/ege_ai_statement_2018.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  364. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2018b): Future of Work, Future of Society. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/ege/ege_future-of-work_opinion_122018.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  365. European Parliament (2017a): “Rise of the robots: Mady Delvaux on why their use should be regulated”. In: European Parliament, February 15. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20170109STO57505/rise-of-the-robots-mady-delvaux-on-why-their-use-should-be-regulatedhttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20170109STO57505/rise-of-the-robots-mady-delvaux-on-why-their-use-should-be-regulated [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  366. European Parliament (2017b): “Robots and artificial intelligence: MEPs call for EU-wide liability rules”. In: European Parliament, February 16. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20170210IPR61808/robots-and-artificial-intelligence-meps-call-for-eu-wide-liability-ruleshttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20170210IPR61808/robots-and-artificial-intelligence-meps-call-for-eu-wide-liability-rules [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  367. European Standard (1992): Manipulating industrial robots: Safety. EN775/1992. Brussels: European Comitee for Standardization. Online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/0f2ba937-d2ff-48ce-adc4-ef36fcd95371/en-775-1992 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  368. Evans, David (2014): “Economic Aspects of Bitcoin and Other Decentralized Public-Ledger Currency Platforms”. In: Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 685. Online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2438085_code249436.pdf?abstractid=2424516&mirid=1 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  369. Ewers, Michael (2010): “Vom Konzept zur klinischen Realität – Desiderata und Perspektiven in der Forschung über die technikintensive häusliche Versorgung in Deutschland”. In: Pflege & Gesellschaft 4, 314-328. Open Google Scholar
  370. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning (FAT/ML) (2016): Principles for Accountable Algorithms and a Social Impact Statement for Algorithms. Online: www.fatml.org/resources/principles-for-accountable-algorithms [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  371. Falenczyk, Tanya (2019): “Per Rechtsklick”. In: Die Zeit, August 14. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/34/rechte-propaganda-junge-identitaere-youtubehttps://www.zeit.de/2019/34/rechte-propaganda-junge-identitaere-youtube [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  372. Farooq, Omer / Khan, Salman Ahmed / Khalid, Sadaf (2014): “Financial Ethics: A Review of 2010 Flash Crash”. In: International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering 8(6), 1652-1654. Open Google Scholar
  373. Feige, Edgar L. (1989): Taxing all Transactions: The Automated Payment Transactions (APT) Tax System. Buenos Aires: International Institute of Public Finance Conference on Public Finance and Steady Economic Growth. Open Google Scholar
  374. Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie (2014): “Big Data and Predictive Reasonable Suspicion”. In: University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163(2/1), 327-373. Open Google Scholar
  375. Ferkiss, Victor (1969): Technological Man: The Myth and the Reality. New York: Braziller. Open Google Scholar
  376. Ferrarese, Estelle (2009): “‘Gabba-Gabba, We Accept you, One of us’: Vulnerability and Power in the Relationship of Recognition”. In: Constellations 16(4), 604-614. Open Google Scholar
  377. Ferraris, Maurizio (2019): “Chinesische Briefe 3: China ist das Reich des neuen Kapitals”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, February 12. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/ferraris-chinesische-briefe-3-china-daten-sind-gold-wert-ld.1458857?reduced=true [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  378. Ferrell, O. C. (2017): “Broadening marketing’s contribution to data privacy”. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45(2), 160-163. Open Google Scholar
  379. Fichter, Adrienne (2019): “Der Spion im Schulzimmer”. In: Die Republik, July 2. Online: https://www.republik.ch/2019/07/02/der-spion-im-schulzimmerhttps://www.republik.ch/2019/07/02/der-spion-im-schulzimmer [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  380. Fiedler, Christoph (2002): Meinungsfreiheit in einer vernetzten Welt. Staatliche Inhaltskontrolle, gesetzliche Providerhaftung und die Inhaltsneutralität des Internets. Law and Economics of International Telecommunications 48. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  381. Fields, A. Belden / Narr, Wolf-Dieter (1992): “Human Rights as Holistic Concept”. In: Human Rights Quarterly 14(1), 1-20. Open Google Scholar
  382. Filipović, Alexander (2015): “Die Datafizierung der Welt. Eine ethische Vermessung des digitalen Wandels”. In: Communicatio Socialis 48(1), 6-15. Open Google Scholar
  383. Finanzen.ch (2014): “Finma ermittelt gegen UBS-Banker”. In: Finanzen.ch, November 12. Online: https://www.finanzen.ch/nachrichten/aktien/finma-ermittelt-gegen-ubs-banker-1000371702https://www.finanzen.ch/nachrichten/aktien/finma-ermittelt-gegen-ubs-banker-1000371702 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  384. Finanzen.ch (2018): “Roche will digitaler Vorreiter sein – Kein Kontakt zu Trump-Anwalt”. In: Finanzen.ch, May, 18. Online: https://www.finanzen.ch/nachrichten/aktien/roche-will-digitaler-vorreiter-sein-kein-kontakt-zu-trump-anwalt-1024857354 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  385. Fine, Arthur (2001): “The Natural Ontological Attitude”. In: Papineau, David (Ed.): Oxford Readings in The Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 21-44. Open Google Scholar
  386. Fink, Helmut / Rosenzweig, Rainer (Eds.) (2006): Freier Wille – frommer Wunsch? Gehirn und Willensfreiheit. Paderborn: Mentis. Open Google Scholar
  387. Finn, Rachel L. / Wright, David (2016): “Privacy, data protection and ethics for civil drone practice. A survey of industry, regulators and civil society organisations”. In: Computer Law & Security Review 32(4), 577-586. Open Google Scholar
  388. Flaiz, Bettina / Meiler, Manuela (2014): “Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) und das Heidelberger Instrument zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität Demenzkranker (H.I.L.D.E) – eine pflegewissenschaftliche Betrachtung und Diskussion”. In: Pflege & Gesellschaft 15, 235-367. Open Google Scholar
  389. Fleischer, Margot (2012): Menschliche Freiheit – ein vielfältiges Phänomen: Perspektiven von Aristoteles, Augustin, Kant, Fichte, Sartre und Jonas. Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar
  390. Floridi, Luciano (2011): “On the Morality of Artificial Agents”. In: Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan Leigh (Eds.): Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184-212. Open Google Scholar
  391. Floridi, Luciano (2014): “Artificial Agents and Their Moral Nature”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 185-212. Open Google Scholar
  392. Floridi, Luciano (2015a): “Hyperhistory and the Philosophy of Information Policies”. In: Floridi, Luciano (Ed.): The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Cham: Springer, 36-49. Open Google Scholar
  393. Floridi, Luciano (2015b): Die 4. Revolution: Wie die Infosphäre unser Leben verändert. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  394. Floridi, Luciano / Sanders, Jeff W. (2004a): “On the Morality of Artificial Agents”. In: Minds and Machines 14(3), 349-379. Open Google Scholar
  395. Floridi, Luciano / Sanders, Jeff W. (2004b): “The Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics”. In: Spinello, Richard A. / Tavani, Herman T. (Eds.): Readings in Cyberethics. Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 81-95. Open Google Scholar
  396. Floridi, Luciano (2012): “Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge”. In: Philosophy & Technology 25(4), 435-437. Open Google Scholar
  397. Fofiu, Adela (2013): Apocalypse on the net. Extreme Threat and the Majority-Minority Relationship on the Romanian Internet. European University Studies 451, Series 22 Sociology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  398. Foot, Philippa (2002): The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect, in: Foot, Philippa: Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19-32. Open Google Scholar
  399. Ford, Martin (2009): The Lights in the Tunnel: Automation, Accelerating Technology and the Economy of the Future. United States: Acculant Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  400. Ford, Martin (2015): Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  401. Forman, Lisa (2007): “Trade Rules, Intellectual Property, and the Right to Health”. In: Ethics & International Affairs 21(3), 337-357. Open Google Scholar
  402. Fortmann-Roe, Scott (2012): Understanding the Bias-Variance Tradeoff. Online: http://scott.fortmann-roe.com/docs/BiasVariance.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  403. Foucault, Michael (1984): “What is Enlightenment?”. In: Rabinow, Paul (Ed.): The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, 32-50. Open Google Scholar
  404. Foy, James (2014): “Autonomous Weapon Systems: Taking the Human Out of International Humanitarian Law”. In: Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies 23, 47-70. Open Google Scholar
  405. Fraedrich, Eva / Beiker, Sven / Lenz, Barbara (2015): “Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility”. In: European Journal of Futures Research 3(11), 1-11. Open Google Scholar
  406. Franke, Ulrike Esther / Leveringhaus, Alexander (2015): “Militärische Robotik“. In: Jaeger, Thomas (Ed.): Handbuch Sicherheitsgefahren. Globale Gesellschaft und internationale Beziehungen. Wiesbaden: Springer, 297-311. Open Google Scholar
  407. Franssen, Maarten (2014): “The Good, the Bad, the Ugly … and the Poor: Instrumental and Non-instrumental Value of Artefacts”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 213-234. Open Google Scholar
  408. Frebel, Lisa (2015): “Roboter gegen das Vergessen? Technische Assistenz bei Altersdemenz im Spielfilm aus medizinethischer Sicht”. In: Weber, Karsten / Frommeld, Debora / Manzeschke, Arne / Fingerau, Heiner (Eds.): Technisierung des Alltags. Beitrag für ein gutes Leben? Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 99-116. Open Google Scholar
  409. Frehe, Volker / Teuteberg, Frank / Ickerott, Ingmar (2016): “IKT als Enabler für soziale Innovationen in Smart Rural Areas – Das Alter im ländlichen Raum hat Zukunft”. In: Nissen, Volker / Stelzer, Dirk / Strassburger, Steffen / Fischer, Daniel (Eds.): Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2016. Technische Universität Ilmenau, 09.-11. März 2016, Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag, 631-642. Open Google Scholar
  410. Frey, Carl Benedikt / Osborne, Michael A. (2013): The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Oxford Martin School 7. Online: http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  411. Freyth, Antje (2020): Veränderungsbereitschaft stärken. Impulse und Übungen für Mitarbeiter und Führungskräfte. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  412. Frezzo, Mark (2015): The Sociology of Human Rights: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  413. Fricke, Ernst (2011): “Achtung der Menschenwürde als ständige Herausforderung. Virtualität und Inszenierung – auch ein Rechtsproblem?”. In: Communicatio Socialis 44(4), 455-461. Open Google Scholar
  414. Friederich, Ueli (1993): Kirchen und Glaubensgemeinschaften im pluralistischen Staat: Zur Bedeutung der Religionsfreiheit im schweizerischen Staatskirchenrecht. Bern: Staempfli. Open Google Scholar
  415. Friedman, Batya / Nissenbaum, Helen (1996): “Bias in computer systems”. In: ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14(3), 330-347. Open Google Scholar
  416. Friesacher, Heiner (2014): “Pflege und Technik – eine kritische Analyse”. In: Pflege & Gesellschaft 15, 293-313. Open Google Scholar
  417. Fritsche, Wolfgang / Zerling Lutz (2002): Umwelt und Mensch – Langzeitfolgen und Schlussfolgerungen für die Zukunft. Stuttgart: Hirzel. Open Google Scholar
  418. Fritzsche, K.arl Peter (2016): Menschenrechte: Eine Einführung mit Dokumenten. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  419. Fritzsche, Karl K. Peter. / Kirchschläger, Peter G. / Kirchschläger, Thomas (2017): Grundlagen der Menschenrechtsbildung: Theoretische Überlegungen und Praxisorientierungen. Schwalbach: Wochenschau. Open Google Scholar
  420. Fry, Hannah (2018): Hello World. Being Human in the Age of Algorithms. New York: Independent Publishers Since 1923. Open Google Scholar
  421. Fuchs, Christian (2014): Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  422. Fuchs, Michael (2021): “Digitalisierung als Herausforderung für Anthropologie und Ethik”. In: Ulshoefer, Gotlind / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Huppenbauer, Markus (Eds.): Digitalisierung aus theologischer und ethischer Perspektive. Konzeptionen – Anfragen – Impulse. Zuerich: Pano (in print). Open Google Scholar
  423. Fukuyama, Francis (2002): Our posthuman future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Open Google Scholar
  424. Future of Life Institute (2015): Autonomous Weapons: An Open Letter from AI & Robotics Researchers. Online: https://futureoflife.org/open-letter-autonomous-weapons/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  425. Future of Life Institute (2017): Asilomar AI Principles. Online: https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  426. Future of Life Institute (n.d.): Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems. Online: https://futureoflife.org/lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems/?cn-reloaded=1 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  427. Gabriel, Ingeborg / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Sturn, Michael (Eds.) (2017): Eine Wirtschaft, die Leben fördert. Wirtschafts- und unternehmensethische Reflexionen im Anschluss an Papst Franziskus. Ostfildern: Matthias-Gruenewald-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  428. Gagliardone, Iginio (2015): Countering Online Hate Speech. Paris: UNESCO. Open Google Scholar
  429. Gandia, Rodrigo Marçal / Braga, Ricardo / Antonialli, Fabio / Cavazza, Bruna Habib / Yutaka Sugano, Joel / Castro, Cleber / Luiz Zambalde, André / Neto, Arthur Miranda / Nicolai, Isabelle (2017): The quintuple helix model and the future of mobility: The case of autonomous vehicles. Presentation at the 25th International Colloquium of Gerpisa - R/Evolutions. New technologies and services in the automotive industry. Paris, June. Online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25d6/6e9ed72fb933b3330645e6f44c895bbf2c47.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  430. Gariup, Deane (2011): “Der harzige Weg zum Frauenstimmrecht”. In: POLITHINK.ch, February 7. Online: https://swisspolithink.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/der-harzige-weg-zum-frauenstimmrechthttps://swisspolithink.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/der-harzige-weg-zum-frauenstimmrecht/ [11.15.2020]. Open Google Scholar
  431. Geert, Bernard (1970): The Moral Rules: A New Rational Foundation for Morality. New York: Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar
  432. Geiss, Robin (2015): The International Law-Dimension of Autonomous Weapon Systems. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Online: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/11673.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  433. Gerding, Jonas (2019): “Ein Rohstoff und sein Preis”. In: Die Zeit, July 18. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/30/kobalt-kongo-rohstoff-elektroautos-smartphones-bergbau [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  434. Gerhardt, Volker (2019): Humanität. Über den Geist der Menschheit. Muenchen: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  435. German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection (2015): Gemeinsam gegen Hassbotschaften – Task Force stellt Ergebnisse vor. Online: http://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Artikel/DE/2015/12152015_ErgebnisrundeTaskForce.htmlhttp://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Artikel/DE/2015/12152015_ErgebnisrundeTaskForce.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  436. German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2017): Weissbuch: Arbeiten 4.0. Arbeit weiter denken 48. Online: https://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen/a883-weissbuch.pdf?__blob=publicationFile [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  437. Gertz, Nolen (2016): “Autonomy online: Jacques Ellul and the Facebook emotional manipulation study”. In: Research Ethics 12(1), 55-61. Open Google Scholar
  438. Gesang, Bernward (2007): Perfektionierung des Menschen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  439. Geser, Hans (2011): “Waffensysteme als ‚derivierte‘ Akteure: Kampfroboter im asymmetrischen Krieg”: In: Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 20(1), 52-59. Open Google Scholar
  440. Gibbs, Samuel (2017). “Elon Musk Leads 116 Experts Calling for Outright Ban of Killer Robots”. In: The Guardian, August 20. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/20/elon-musk-killer-robots-experts-outright-ban-lethal-autonomous-weapons-war [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  441. Giddens, Anthony (1995): Die Konsequenzen der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  442. Giers, Joachim (1957): “Zum Begriff der iustitia socialis: Ergebnisse der theologi¬s⁠chen Diskussion seit dem Erscheinen der Enzyklika ‘Quadragesimo anno’ 1931”. In: Muenchener Theologische Zeitschrift 7, 61-74. Open Google Scholar
  443. Gigerenzer, Gerd / Schlegel-Matthies, Kirsten / Wagner, Gert G. (2016): Digitale Welt und Gesundheit. EHealth und mHealth-Chancen und Risiken der Digitalisierung im Gesundheitsbereich. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat für Verbraucherfragen beim Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. Open Google Scholar
  444. Gladden, Matthew E. (2015): “Cryptocurrency with a Conscience: Using Artificial Intelligence to Develop Money that Advances Human Ethical Values.” In: Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 18(4), 85-98. Open Google Scholar
  445. Glatzel, Norbert (2000): “‘Soziale Gerechtigkeit’ – ein umstrittener Begriff”. In: Nothelle-Wildfeuer, Ursula / Glatzel, Norbert (Eds.): Christliche Sozialethik im Dialog: Zur Zukunftsfähigkeit von Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Lothar Roos zum 65. Geburtstag. Grafschaft: Vektor, 139-150. Open Google Scholar
  446. Gobry, Pascal-Emmanuel (2011): “Eric Schmidt To World Leaders at eG8: Don’t Regulate Us, Or Else”. In: Business Insider, May 24. Online: https://static4.businessinsider.com/eric-schmidt-google-eg8-2011-5 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  447. Goebel, Randy / Chander, Ajay / Holzinger, Katharina / Lecue, Freddy / Akata, Zeynep / Stumpf, Simone / Kieseberg, Peter / Holzinger, Andreas (2018): “Explainable AI: The new 42?”. In: Holzinger, Andreas / Kieseberg, Peter / Tjoa, A Min / Weippl, Edgar (Eds.): 2nd International Cross-Domain Conference for Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, Hamburg, August 27-30. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg: Springer, 295-303. Open Google Scholar
  448. Gogoll, Jan / Mueller, Julian F. (2017): “Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 23(3), 681-700. Open Google Scholar
  449. Goldstein, Steve (2018): “Here’s the staggering amount banks have been fined since the financial crisis”. In: Market Watch, February 24. Online: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/banks-have-been-fined-a-staggering-243-billion-since-the-financial-crisis-2018-02-20https://www.marketwatch.com/story/banks-have-been-fined-a-staggering-243-billion-since-the-financial-crisis-2018-02-20 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  450. Good, Irving John (1966): “Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine”. In: Advances in Computers 6, 31-88. Open Google Scholar
  451. Goodall, Noah J. (2014): “Machine Ethics and Automated Vehicles”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 93-102. Open Google Scholar
  452. Goodfellow, Ian / Bengio, Yoshua / Courville, Aaron (2017): Deep Learning. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  453. Google (2011): “Google Management Discusses Q3 (2011): Results – Earnings Call Transcript About Alphabet Inc. (GOOG)”. In: Seeking Alpha, October 14. Online: https://seekingalpha.com/article/299518-google-management-discusses-q3-2011-results-earnings-call-transcript [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  454. Gordon, Robert J. (2016): The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil war. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  455. Gore, Al (2015): “Introduction”. In: World Economic Forum (WEF) (Ed.): Top 10 Trends of 2015. Online: http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-global-agenda-2015/top-10-trends-of-2015http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-global-agenda-2015/top-10-trends-of-2015/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  456. Gosepath, Stefan (2010): “Gerechtigkeit”. In: Sandkuehler, Hans Joerg (Ed.): Enzyklopädie Philosophie 1. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 835-839. Open Google Scholar
  457. Gosseries, Axel (2008): “Theories of intergenerational justice: A synopsis”. In: Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 1(1), 61-71. Open Google Scholar
  458. Gould, Carol C. (2015): “A Social Ontology of Human Rights”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177-195. Open Google Scholar
  459. Graef, Inge / Husovec, Martin / van den Boom, Jasper (2019): Spill-Overs in Data Governance: The Relationship Between the GDPR’s Right to Data Portability and EU Sector-Specific Data Access Regimes. TILEC Discussion Paper No. DP 2019-005. Online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3369509 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  460. Graf, Friedrich Willhelm (2015): “Der freiheitliche Rechtsstaat und die Religion”. In: Schwarz, Gerhard / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Holderegger, Adrian / Tag, Brigitte (Eds.): Religion, Liberalität und Rechtsstaat: Ein offenes Spannungsverhältnis. Zuerich: Verlag Neue Zuercher Zeitung, 79-86. Open Google Scholar
  461. Grahle, Alexander / Song, Young-Woo / Brueske, K. / Bender, Beate / Goehlich, Di⁠etmar (2020): “Autonomous shuttles for urban mobility on demand applications – ecosystem dependent requirement elicitation”. In: International Conference in Engineering Design (Ed.): Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 887-896. Open Google Scholar
  462. Grassie, William J. (2012): “Is Transhumanism Scientifically Plausible? Posthuman Predictions and the Human Predicament”. In: Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava / Mossman, Kenneth L. (Eds.): Building Better Humans? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 465-480. Open Google Scholar
  463. Grassie, William J. (2017): “Foreword”. In: Trothen, Tracy J. / Mercer, Calvin (Eds.): Religion and Human Enhancement: Death, Values, and Morality. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, v-viii. Open Google Scholar
  464. Graves, Mark (2017): “Shared Moral and Spiritual Development Among Human Persons and Artificially Intelligent Agents”. In: Theology and Science 15(3), 333-351. Open Google Scholar
  465. Gray, Alex (2017): “These are the world’s 10 biggest corporate giants”. In: World Economic Forum (WEF), January 16. Online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/worlds-biggest-corporate-giantshttps://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/worlds-biggest-corporate-giants/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  466. Green, Nancy / Rubinelli, Sara / Scott, Donia / Visser, Adriaan (2013): “Introduction: Health communication meets artificial intelligence”. In: Patient Education and Counseling 92, 139-141. Open Google Scholar
  467. Greenblatt, Jeffery B. / Shaheen, Susan (2015): “Automated Vehicles, On-Demand Mobility, and Environmental Impacts”. In: Current Sustainable / Renewable Energy Reports 2, 74-81. Open Google Scholar
  468. Greene, Kate (2009): “TR10: Reality Mining”. In: MIT Technology Review, February 19. Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/2009/02/19/215785/tr10-reality-mining-2/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  469. Grefe, Christian (2018): “Der Stromhunger wächst“. In: Die Zeit, February 1. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/06/digitalisierung-klimaschutz-nachhaltigkeit-strombedarf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  470. Grewe, Torsten (2015): “Subjektive Sicherheit in altersgerechten Assistenzsystemen”. In: Weber, Karsten / Frommeld, Debora / Manzeschke, Arne / Fingerau, Heiner (Eds.): Technisierung des Alltags. Beitrag für ein gutes Leben?, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 151-178. Open Google Scholar
  471. Griffin, James (2001): “First Steps in an Account of Human Rights”. In: European Journal of Philosophy 9(3), 306-327. Open Google Scholar
  472. Griffin, James (2008): On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  473. Griffin, James (2015): “The Relativity and Ethnocentricity of Human Rights”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 555-569. Open Google Scholar
  474. Grimal, Francis / Sundaram, Jae (2018): “Combat Drones: Hives, Swarms, and Autonomous Action?”. In: Journal of Conflict & Security Law 23(1), 105-135. Open Google Scholar
  475. Grimm, Jacob / Grimm, Wilhelm (1956): “Verantwortung”. In: Wörterbuch 12(1). Muenchen: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, columns 79-82. Open Google Scholar
  476. Grimm, Petra / Keber, Tobias O. / Zoellner, Oliver (2015): Anonymität und Transparenz in der digitalen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. Open Google Scholar
  477. Grimm, Petra / Krah, Hans (2014): Ende der Privatheit? Eine Sicht der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Institut für Digitale Ethik. Online: https://www.zbw-mediatalk.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ende_der_Privatheit_Grimm_Krah.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  478. Grimm, Ruediger / Braeunlich, Katharina (2015): “Vertrauen und Privatheit”. In: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit-DuD 39(5), 289-294. Open Google Scholar
  479. Gringsjord, Salendra / Govindarajulu, Naveen Sundar (2018): “Artificial Intelligence”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive. Online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/artificial-intelligence/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  480. Grobner, Cornelia (2018): “Das Paradoxon der digitalen Freiheit“. In: Die Presse, August 25. Online: https://www.diepresse.com/5485360/das-paradoxon-der-digitalen-freiheit [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  481. Gross, Grant (2014): “The future of artificial intelligence: Will computers take your job?”. In: Computerworld, October 7. Online: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2692377/the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-will-computers-take-your-job.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  482. Gruber, Malte C. (2013): “Gefährdungshaftung für informationstechnologische Risiken: Verantwortungszurechnung im ‘Tanz der Agenzien’”. In: Kritische Justiz 46(4), 356-371. Open Google Scholar
  483. Gruber, Malte C. (2014): “Vermittler, Störer, Rechtsverletzer: Zur Hybridhaftung im Internet”. In: Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum 3, 302-324. Open Google Scholar
  484. Grunwald, Armin (2018): “Ethik-Dilemma – Wie schlimm?” In: ATZ – Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift 120(74), 3. Open Google Scholar
  485. Grut, Chantal (2013): “The Challenge of Autonomous Lethal Robotics to International Humanitarian Law”. In: Journal of Conflict & Security Law 18(1), 5-23. Open Google Scholar
  486. Guarini, Marcello / Bello, Paul (2012): “Robotic warfare: some challenges in moving from noncivilian to civilian theaters”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Bekey, George A. (Eds.): Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents. New York: MIT Press, 129-144. Open Google Scholar
  487. Guckes, Barbara (2003): Ist Freiheit eine Illusion? Eine metaphysische Untersuchung. Paderborn: Mentis. Open Google Scholar
  488. Guersenzvaig, Ariel (2018): “Autonomous Weapon Systems. Failing the Principle of Discrimination”. In: IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 55-61. Open Google Scholar
  489. Guetlein, Mike (2005): “Lethal Autonomous Weapons – Ethical and Doctrinal Implications”. In: Joint Military Operations Department. Online: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a464896.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  490. Gunkel, David J. (2018): “The Other Question: Can and Should Robots Have Rights?”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 20(2), 87-99. Open Google Scholar
  491. Gunkel, David J. (2021): “Lingua Ex Machina 2.0: The Theological Origins and Destinations of Machine Translation”. In: Ulshoefer, Gotlind / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Huppenbauer, Markus (Eds.): Digitalisierung aus theologischer und ethischer Perspektive. Konzeptionen – Anfragen – Impulse. Zuerich: Pano (in print). Open Google Scholar
  492. Gurbuz, Ali Osman / Gokmen, Mehpare Karahan / Aybars, Asli (2014): “Do Institutional Investors Prefer to Invest in Socially Responsible Companies? An Empirical Analysis in Turkey”. In: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Business World. Berlin: Springer, 311-324. Open Google Scholar
  493. Gurdus, Lizzy (2019): “Tim Cook: Apple’s greatest contribution will be ‘about health’”. In: CNBC, January 8. Online: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/08/tim-cook-teases-new-apple-services-tied-to-health-care.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  494. Gurkaynak, Gonenc / Yilmaz, Gonenc / Haksever, Gunes (2016): “Stifling Artificial Intelligence: Human Perils”. In: Computer Law & Security Review 32(5), 749-758. Open Google Scholar
  495. Gurney, Jeffrey K. (2017): “Imputing Driverhood. Applying a Reasonable Driver Standard to Accidents Caused by Autonomous Vehicles”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryan (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 51-65. Open Google Scholar
  496. Gut, Walter (2008): “Eine Sternstunde der Menschheit: Die Allgemeine Erklärung der Menschenrechte von 1948”. In: Schweizerische Kirchenzeitung 176(49), 816-819. Open Google Scholar
  497. Guthrie, Clifton F. (2013): “Smart Technology and the Ethical Life”. In: Ethics & Behavior 23(4), 324-337. Open Google Scholar
  498. Haas, Michael Carl / Fischer, Sophie-Charlotte (2017): “The evolution of targeted killing practices: Autonomous weapons, future conflict, and the international order”. In: Contemporary Security Policy 38(2), 281-306. Open Google Scholar
  499. Haasis, Heinrich (2012): “Werte, Werteorientierung und Wertewandel. Die Rolle der Finanzwirtschaft und ihrer Akteure nach der Finanzkrise”. In: Brun-Hagen, Hennerkes / George, Augustin (Eds.): Wertewandel mitgestalten. Guthandeln in Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 493-513. Open Google Scholar
  500. Habermas, Juergen (1998): “Konzeptionen der Moderne, Ein Rückblick auf zwei Traditionen”. In: Habermas, Juergen: Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 195-231. Open Google Scholar
  501. Habermas, Juergen (1999a): “Richtigkeit versus Wahrheit”. In: Habermas, Juergen: Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 271-318. Open Google Scholar
  502. Habermas, Juergen (1999b): “Zur Legitimation durch Menschenrechte”. In: Brunkhorst, Hauke / Niesen, Peter (Eds.): Das Recht der Republik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 386-403. Open Google Scholar
  503. Habermas, Juergen (2001a): Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  504. Habermas, Juergen (2001b): “Glauben und Wissen”. In: Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels (Ed.): Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels 2001: Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 37-54. Open Google Scholar
  505. Habermas, Juergen (2004): “Intoleranz und Diskriminierung”. In: Mattioli, Aram / Ries, Markus / Rudolph, Enno (Eds.): Intoleranz im Zeitalter der Revolutionen – Europa 1770 - 1848. Kultur – Philosophie – Geschichte 1. Zuerich: Orell Fuessli, 43-56. Open Google Scholar
  506. Habermas, Juergen (2008): “Vorwort”. In: Sandel, Michael J.: Plädoyer gegen die Perfektion. Ethik im Zeitalter der genetischen Technik. Berlin: Berlin University Press, 7-14. Open Google Scholar
  507. Habermas, Juergen (2011a): “‘The Political’. The Rational Meaning of Questionable Inheritance of Political Theology”. In: Mendieta, Eduardo / VanAntwerpen, Jonathan (Eds.): The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. New York: Columbia University Press, 15-33. Open Google Scholar
  508. Habermas, Juergen (2011b): “Das Konzept der Menschenwürde und die realistische Utopie der Menschenrechte”. In: Habermas, Juergen: Zur Verfassung Europas: Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 13-38. Open Google Scholar
  509. Habermas, Juergen (2015): “Wie viel Religion verträgt der liberale Staat?”. In: Schwarz, Gerhard / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Holderegger, Adrian / Tag, Brigitte (Eds.): Religion, Liberalität und Rechtsstaat: Ein offenes Spannungsverhältnis. Zuerich: Verlag Neue Zuercher Zeitung. Open Google Scholar
  510. Haerle, Wilfried (2011): Ethik. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  511. Haibach, Holger / Zeidler, Stephan (2005): “Internet-Zensur auf dem Vormarsch”. In: Die Politische Meinung Nr. 428, 49-53. Open Google Scholar
  512. Hamann, Nikolaus (2014): “Ethische Aspekte geistigen Eigentums”. In: Mitteilungen der VOEB 67(1), 88-108. Open Google Scholar
  513. Hammarberg, Thomas (2008): Viewpoint of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. October 6. Online: http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/Viewpoints/081006_en.asphttp://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/Viewpoints/081006_en.asp [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  514. Hammond, Daniel N. (2015): “Autonomous Weapons and the Problem of State Accountability.” In: Chicago Journal of International Law 15(2), 652-687. Open Google Scholar
  515. Hanson, F. Allan (2014): “Which Came First, the Doer or the Deed?”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 55-73. Open Google Scholar
  516. Hao, Karen (2020): “KI: Das ‘Greenwashing’ muss ein Ende haben”. In: heise online. Online: https://www.heise.de/tr/artikel/KI-Das-Greenwashing-muss-ein-Ende-haben-4647795.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  517. Harari, Yuval Noah (2017): Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker. Open Google Scholar
  518. Harari, Yuval Noah (2020): “The World after Coronavirus”. In: Financial Times, March 20. Online: https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  519. Haraway, Donna (1991): “A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century”. In: Haraway, Donna: Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge,149-181. Open Google Scholar
  520. Hare, Richard Mervyn (1992): Moralisches Denken: Seine Ebenen, seine Methode, sein Witz. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  521. Hartmann, Martin (2011): Die Praxis des Vertrauens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  522. Hasselbalch, Gry / Tranberg, Penille (2016): Data Ethics: The New Competitive Advantage. Tel Aviv: Publishare / Spintype. Open Google Scholar
  523. Hauptman, Allyson (2013): “Autonomous Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict”. In: Military Law Review 218, 170-195. Open Google Scholar
  524. Hausmanninger, Thomas / Capurro, Rafael (Eds.) (2002): Netzethik. Grundlegungsfragen der Internetethik. Schriftenreihe des International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE) 1. Muenchen: Fink. Open Google Scholar
  525. Haux, Reinhold (2010): “Medical Informatics: past, present, future”. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics 79(9), 599-610. Open Google Scholar
  526. Haux, Reinhold / Marschollek, Michael / Wolf, Klaus-Hendrik (2016): “Über assistierende Gesundheitstechnologien und neue Formen kooperativer Gesundheitsversorgung durch Menschen und Maschinen”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen?, TTN-Studien Bd. 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 131-143. Open Google Scholar
  527. Hayes, Tom (2011): “America Needs a Department of ‘Creative Destruction’”. In: Huffpost, October 27. Online: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/america-needs-a-departmen_b_1033573 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  528. Heesen, Jessica (2014): “Mensch und Technik. Ethische Aspekte einer Handlungspartnerschaft zwischen Personen und Robotern”. In: Hilgendorf, Eric (Ed.): Robotik im Kontext von Recht und Moral. Robotik und Recht 3. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 251-269. Open Google Scholar
  529. Heidbrink, Ludger (2003): Kritik der Verantwortung: Zu den Grenzen verantwortlichen Handelns in komplexen Kontexten. Weilerswist: Velbrueck. Open Google Scholar
  530. Heilinger, Jan-Christoph (2010): Anthropologie und Ethik des Enhancements. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  531. Heilinger, Jan-Christoph / Mueller, Oliver (2016): “Der Cyborg. Anthropologische und ethische Überlegungen”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen?. TTN-Studien 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 47-66. Open Google Scholar
  532. Heimbach-Steins, Marianne (2012a): Religionsfreiheit. Ein Menschenrecht unter Druck. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  533. Heimbach-Steins, Marianne (2012b): “Christliche Sozialethik – im Gespräch mit der Bibel”. In: Heimbach-Steins, Marianne / Steins, Georg (Eds.): Bibelhermeneutik und Christliche Sozialethik. Stuttgart: Wilhelm Kohlhammer, 11-36. Open Google Scholar
  534. Heinrich, Christian (2018): “Digitaler Hausbesuch”. In: Die Zeit, April 26, 35-36. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/18/telemedizin-digitalisierung-internet-telefon-aerzte-patienten-versorgunghttps://www.zeit.de/2018/18/telemedizin-digitalisierung-internet-telefon-aerzte-patienten-versorgung [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  535. Heinrichs, Dirk / Cyganski, Rita (2015): “Automated Driving: How It Could Enter Our Cities and How This Might Affect Our Mobility Decisions”. In: The Planning Review 51(2), 74-79. Open Google Scholar
  536. Helbing, Dirk (2015a): “Introduction – Have We Opened Pandora’s Box?” In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 1-26. Open Google Scholar
  537. Helbing, Dirk (2015b): “Big Data – A Powerful New Resource of the Twenty-first Century”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 75-81. Open Google Scholar
  538. Helbing, Dirk (2015c): “How and Why Our Conventional Economic Thinking Causes Global Crises”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 39-52. Open Google Scholar
  539. Helbing, Dirk (2015d): “‘Networked Minds’ Require a Fundamentally New Kind of Economics”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 53-56. Open Google Scholar
  540. Helbing, Dirk (2015e): “A New Kind of Economy is Born. Social Decision-Makers Beat the ‘Homo Economicus’”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 57-65. Open Google Scholar
  541. Helbing, Dirk (2015f): “Global Networks Must be Redesigned”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 67-73. Open Google Scholar
  542. Helbing, Dirk (2015g): “Societal, Economic, Ethical and Legal Challenges of the Digital Revolution”. In: Jusletter IT, 21 May, 1-23. Open Google Scholar
  543. Helbing, Dirk (2015h): “From Technology-Driven Society to Socially Oriented Technology: The Future of Information Society – Alternatives to Surveillance”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 95-102. Open Google Scholar
  544. Helbing, Dirk (2015i): “Big Data, Privacy, and Trusted Web: What Needs to Be Done”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 115-176. Open Google Scholar
  545. Helbing, Dirk (2015j): “What the Digital Revolution Means for Us”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 177-187. Open Google Scholar
  546. Helbing, Dirk (2015k): “Creating (‘Making’) a Planetary Nervous System as Citizen Web”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 187-194. Open Google Scholar
  547. Helbing, Dirk (2015l): “Google as God? Opportunities and Risks of the Information Age”. In: Helbing, Dirk: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 83-93. Open Google Scholar
  548. Helbing, Dirk (2015m): “Big Data Society: Age of Reputation or Age of Discrimination?”. In: Dirk Helbing: Thinking Ahead – Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society. Cham: Springer, 103-114. Open Google Scholar
  549. Helbing, Dirk (2018): “Facebook & Co.: How to Stop Surveillance Capitalism”. In: The Globalist, April 26. Online: https://www.theglobalist.com/capitalism-democracy-technology-surveillance-privacyhttps://www.theglobalist.com/capitalism-democracy-technology-surveillance-privacy/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  550. Helft, Miguel (2012): “Larry Page on Google”. In: Fortune, December 11. Online: https://fortune.com/2012/12/11/fortune-exclusive-larry-page-on-google/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  551. Heller, Ágnes (2016): Von der Utopie zur Dystopie: Was können wir uns wünschen?. Wien: Edition Konturen. Open Google Scholar
  552. Hennchen, Esther (2014): “Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria: Where Do Responsibilities End?”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 129(1), 1-25. Open Google Scholar
  553. Henne, Melissa / Friedhof, Sonja / Kopp, Stefan (2016): Übertragung ethischer Bewertungen in das Design und die Ausgestaltung technischer Assistenzsysteme. Presentation at the Conference: Zukunft Lebensräume, 20.04.2016 - 21.04.2016 in Frankfurt am Main. Berlin: VDE-Verlag. Online: https://www.vde-verlag.de/proceedings-en/454212065.htmlhttps://www.vde-verlag.de/proceedings-en/454212065.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  554. Henschke, Adam (2017): “The Internet of Things and Dual Layers of Concern”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 229-243. Open Google Scholar
  555. Herbst, Tobias (2016): “Rechtliche und ethische Probleme des Umgangs mit Proben und Daten bei grossen Biobanken”. In: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit-DuD 40(6), 371-375. Open Google Scholar
  556. Herrmann, Andreas / Brenner, Walter (2018): Die autonome Revolution: Wie selb⁠st¬fahrende Autos unsere Welt erobern. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch. Open Google Scholar
  557. Herrmann, Christian / Rohlfs, Ingo (2011): “DigiTheo – Deutsche Theologie digital”. In: Bibliotheksdienst 45(3/4), 259-273. Open Google Scholar
  558. Hersch, Jeanne (1992): Im Schnittpunkt der Zeit. Zuerich: Benzinger. Open Google Scholar
  559. Herzberg, Stephan (2019): “Die menschliche Natur und das gute Leben. Eine aristotelische Kritik des Transhumanismus”. In: ET-Studies 10(2), 207-228. Open Google Scholar
  560. Herzog, Roman (2016): “Geleitwort”. In: Schliesky, Ute / Schulz, Soenke E. / Got⁠t¬berg, Friedrich / Kuhlmann, Florian: Demokratie im digitalen Zeitalter, DIVSI-Perspektiven 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 5-8. Open Google Scholar
  561. Hessler, Martina (2016): “Zur Persistenz der Argumente im Automatisierungsdiskurs”“. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 66(18-19), 17-24. Online: https://www.bpb.de/apuz/225690/zur-persistenz-der-argumente-im-automatisierungsdiskurs [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  562. Hetzer, Dirk / Muehleisen, Maciej / Kousaridas, Apostolos / Alonso-Zarate, Jesus (2019): “5G Connected and Automated Driving: Use Cases and Technologies in Cross-border Environments”. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE (Ed.): 2019 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Valencia, June 18-21, 78-82. Open Google Scholar
  563. Heuser, Jean (2015): “Die unheimliche Mission von Mr. Google”. In: Die Zeit, May 21, 21-23. Open Google Scholar
  564. Heuser, Jean (2018): “Peter Thiel gründete PayPal und war Facebooks erster Investor – jetzt verliert er den Glauben an das Silicon Valley”. In: Die Zeit, December 19, 21-22. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/53/peter-thiel-gruender-paypal-facebook-silicon-valley [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  565. Heuser, Uwe Jean / Nezik, Ann-Kathrin (2019): “Der Facebook-Fluch”. In: Die Zeit, December 18, 23. Online: https://time.com/5669537/brad-smith-microsoft-big-tech/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  566. Hevelke, Alexander / Nida-Rümelin, Julia (2016): “Selbstfahrende Autos und Trolley Probleme: Zum Aufrechnen von Menschenleben im Falle unausweichlicher Unfälle”. In: Sturma, Dieter / Honnefelder, Ludger / Fuchs, Michael (Eds.): Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik 19(1), Berlin: De Gruyter, 5-24. Open Google Scholar
  567. Heylighen, Francis (2015): “Return to Eden? Promises and Perils on the Road to a Global Superintelligence”. In: Goertzl, Ben / Goertzl, Ted (Eds.): The End of the Beginning: Life, Society and Economy on the Brink of the Singularity. Los Angeles: Humanity+ Press, 243-305. Open Google Scholar
  568. Heyns, Christof (2013): Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extra-Judicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions. United Nations. Online: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A-HRC-23-47_en.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  569. Heyns, Christof (2014): Autonomous weapons systems and human rights law. Presentation made at the informal expert meeting organized by the state parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, May 13-16, Geneva, Switzerland. Online: https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/DDB079530E4FFDDBC1257CF3003FFE4D/$file/Heyns_LAWS_otherlegal_2014.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  570. Hielscher, Volker / Nock, Lukas / Kirchen-Peters, Sabine / Blass, Kerstin (2013): Zwischen Kosten, Zeit und Anspruch: Das alltägliche Dilemma sozialer Dien⁠st¬leistungsarbeit. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  571. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence HLEG AI of the European Commission (2019): Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  572. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence HLEG AI of the European Commission (2020): Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (Unit A.1). Online: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligencehttps://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  573. Hilgendorf, Eric (2012): “Können Roboter schuldhaft handeln? Zur Übertragbarkeit unseres normativen Grundvokabulars auf Maschinen”. In: Beck, Susanne (Ed.): Jenseits von Mensch und Maschine: Ethische und rechtliche Fragen zum Umgang mit Robotern, Künstlicher Intelligenz und Cyborgs. Robotik und Recht 1. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 119-132. Open Google Scholar
  574. Hilgendorf, Eric (2017): “Dilemma-Problem gelöst. Ergebnisse der Ethikkommission zum automatisierten Fahren”. In: ATZelektronik 12, 46-49. Open Google Scholar
  575. Hilgendorf, Eric (2020): “Automatisiertes Fahren als Herausforderung für Ethik und Rechtswissenschaft”. In: Rath, Matthias / Krotz, Friedrich / Karmasin, Matthias (Eds.): Maschinenethik. Wiesbaden: Springer, 1-18. Open Google Scholar
  576. Hilpert, Konrad (1995): “Das Recht, anders zu sein”. In: ETHICA 3, 339-363. Open Google Scholar
  577. Hilpert, Konrad (2006): “Abschied von der Toleranz? Kultur und Religion in der offenen Gesellschaft”. In: Hilpert, Konrad / Bohrmann, Thomas (Eds.): Solidarische Gesellschaft. Christliche Sozialethik als Auftrag zur Weltgestaltung im Konkreten. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 271-282. Open Google Scholar
  578. Hilpert, Konrad (2013): “Christlicher Ethos und Erkenntniszuwachs. Methodologische Vergewisserung über die Notwendigkeit des Lernens in theologischer Ethik”. In: Goertz, Stephan / Hein, Rudolf B. / Kloecker, Katharina (Eds.): Fluchtpunkt Fundamentalismus? Gegenwartsdiagnosen katholischer Moral. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 123-139. Open Google Scholar
  579. Hilty, Reto / Henning-Bodewig, Frauke (2014): “Vorwort und Einführung in die Thematik”. In: Hilty, Reto M. / Henning-Bodewig, Frauke (Eds.): Corporate Social Responsibility – Verbindliche Standards des Wettbewerbsrechts? MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 21. Berlin: Springer, 3-5. Open Google Scholar
  580. Hinds, Rebecca (2018): “How Natural Language Processing is shaping the Future of Communication”. In: MarTechSeries, February 5. Online: https://martechseries.com/mts-insights/guest-authors/how-natural-language-processing-is-shaping-the-future-of-communication/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  581. Hoeffe, Otfried (1991): “Transzendentale Interessen: Zur Anthropologie der Menschenrechte”. In: Kerber, Walter (Ed.): Menschenrechte und kulturelle Identität. Muenchen: Kindt, 15-36. Open Google Scholar
  582. Hoeffe, Otfried (1994): “Wann ist eine Forschungsethik kritisch? Plädoyer für eine judikative Kritik”. In: Baumgartner, Hans Michael / Becker, Werner (Eds.): Grenzen der Ethik. Ethik der Wissenschaften 9, Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink / Ferdinand Schoeningh, 41-56. Open Google Scholar
  583. Hoefling, Wolfram (2014): “Gewissens- und religionsfreiheitlich fundierte Profi¬l⁠ierung kirchlicher Gesundheitseinrichtungen?”. In: Bormann, Franz-Josef / Wet⁠z¬stein, Verena (Eds.): Gewissen: Dimensionen eines Grundbegriffs medizini¬s⁠ch⁠er Ethik. Berlin: De Gruyter, 89-99. Open Google Scholar
  584. Hoernle, Tatjana (2011): “Zur Konkretisierung des Begriffs ‘Menschenwürde’”. In: Joerden, Jan C. / Hilgendorf, Eric / Petrillo, Natalia / Thiele, Felix (Eds.): Menschenwürde und moderne Medizintechnik. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 57-76. Open Google Scholar
  585. Hoffmann, Christian / Luch, Anika / Schulz, Soenke / Borchers, Kim Corinna (2015): Die digitale Dimension der Grundrechte. Das Grundgesetz im digitalen Zeitalter. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  586. Hoffmann, Gerd E. (1979): Computer, Macht und Menschenwürde. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  587. Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang (2001): “Art. 5”. In: Wassermann, Rudolf (Ed.): Alternativkommentar zum Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Neuwied: Hermann Luchterhand. Open Google Scholar
  588. Hoffmaster, Barry (2006): “What Does Vulnerability Mean?” In: Hastings Center Report 36(2), 38-45. Open Google Scholar
  589. Hofheinz, Marco (2008): Gezeugt, nicht gemacht. In-vitro-Fertilisation in theologischer Perspektive. Muenster: LIT-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  590. Hofstetter, Yvonne (2014): Sie wissen alles. Wie intelligente Maschinen in unser Leben eindringen und warum wir für unsere Freiheit kämpfen müssen. Muenchen: C. Bertelsmann. Open Google Scholar
  591. Hofstetter, Yvonne (2017): “EMANZIPIERT EUCH! Menschwerdung im digitalen Zeitalter”. In: Spiess, Brigitte / Fabisch, Nicole (Eds.): CSR und neue Arbeitswelten: Perspektivwechsel in Zeiten von Nachhaltigkeit, Digitalisierung und Industrie 4.0. Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility. Berlin: Springer, 73-90. Open Google Scholar
  592. Hogan, Linda (2004): “Conscience in the Documents of Vatican 2”. In: Curran, Charles E. (Ed.): Conscience. Readings in Moral Theology 14. New York: Paulist Press, 82-88. Open Google Scholar
  593. Holder, Martin Friedrich / Rosenberger, Philipp / Bert, Felix / Winner, Hermann (2018): Data-driven Derivation of Requirements for a Lidar Sensor Model. Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Darmstadt: Darmstadt. Open Google Scholar
  594. Holderegger, Adrian (2006): “Verantwortung”. In: Wils, Jean-Pierre / Huebenthal, Christoph (Eds.): Lexikon der Ethik. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh, 394-403. Open Google Scholar
  595. Holderegger, Adrian (2015): “Religion – Säkularisierung – Postsäkularität: Marginalien zu umstrittenen Begriffen”. In: Schwarz, Gerhard / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Holderegger, Adrian / Tag, Brigitte (Eds.): Religion, Liberalität und Rechtsstaat: Ein offenes Spannungsverhältnis. Zuerich: Verlag Neue Zuercher Zeitung, 65-77. Open Google Scholar
  596. Holderegger, Adrian / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Hess, Christian W. / Rager, Guenther (Eds.) (2007): Hirnforschung und Menschenbild: Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Verständigung. Basel: Schwabe / Academic Press Fribourg. Open Google Scholar
  597. Holderegger, Adrian / Weichlein, Siegfried / Zurbuchen, Simone (Eds.) (2011): Humanismus: Sein kritisches Potential für Gegenwart und Zukunft. Basel: Schwabe. Open Google Scholar
  598. Hollis, Aidan / Pogge, Thomas (2008): The Health Impact Fund: Making new medicines available for all. New Haven: Incentives for Global Health. Open Google Scholar
  599. Holstein, Tobias / Dodig-Crnkovic, Gordana / Pelliccione, Patrizio (2018): “Ethical and Social Aspects of Self-Driving Cars, Computers and Society”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04103 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  600. Holzhey, Helmut (1975): “Soll man sich des Gewissens wegen ein Gewissen machen? (Vorwort)”. In: Holzhey, Helmut (Ed.): Gewissen?. Philosophie aktuell 4. Basel: Schwabe, 7-10. Open Google Scholar
  601. Honecker, Martin (1990): Einführung in die Theologische Ethik: Grundlagen und Grundbegriffe. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  602. Hong, Paul (2017): “Using Machine Learning to Boost Click-Through Rate for your Ads”. In: Linkedin, August 27. Online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/using-machine-learning-boost-click-through-rate-your-ads-tay/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  603. Honnefelder, Ludger (1982): “Praktische Vernunft und Gewissen”. In: Hertz, Anselm / Korff, Wilhelm / Rendtorff, Trutz / Ringeling, Hermann (Eds.): Handbuch der Christlichen Ethik 3. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 19-43. Open Google Scholar
  604. Honnefelder, Ludger (1993): “Vernunft und Gewissen: Gibt es eine philosophische Begründung für die Normativität des Gewissens?”. In: Hoever, Gerhard / Honnefelder, Ludger (Eds.): Der Streit um das Gewissen. Paderborn: Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  605. Honnefelder, Ludger (2012): “Theologische und metaphysische Menschenrechtsbegründungen”. In: Pollmann, Arnd / Lohmann, Georg (Eds.): Menschenrechte. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 171-178. Open Google Scholar
  606. Honnefelder, Ludger (Eds.) (1998): Der Streit um das Gewissen. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  607. Honneth, Axel (2011): Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sit⁠t¬lichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  608. Hood, Joel (2015): “The Equilibrium of Violence: Accountability in the Age of Autonomous Weapons Systems”. In: International Law & Management Review 11, 12-40. Open Google Scholar
  609. Hopkins, Debbie / Schwanen, Tim (2018): “Automated Mobility Transitions: Governing Processes in the UK”. In: Sustainability 10(4), 1-19. Open Google Scholar
  610. Hoppe, Thomas (2002): “Soziale Gerechtigkeit – ein zentrales Anliegen der katholischen Soziallehre”. In: Rauscher, Anton (Ed.): Soziale Gerechtigkeit. Koeln: J.P. Bachem, 31-56. Open Google Scholar
  611. Horizon 2020 Commission Expert Group to advise on specific ethical issues raised by driverless mobility (2020): Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: recommendations on road safety, privacy, fairness, explainability and responsibility. Luxembourg: European Union. Open Google Scholar
  612. House of Commons of the United Kingdom – Science and Technology Committee (2017): Algorithms in Decision-Making. Fourth Report of Session 2017-19, HC351, May 23. Online: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmsctech/351/351.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  613. Howard, Don / Riek, Laurel (2015): A Code of Ethics for the Human-Robot Interaction Profession. Presentation at the Conference “We Robot 2014: Risks & Opportunities”. Miami, April 4-5. Online: http://robots.law.miami.edu/2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/a-code-of-ethics-for-the-human-robot-interaction-profession-riek-howard.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  614. Hubbard, Patrick F. (2011): “‘Do Androids Dream?’ Personhood and Intelligent Artefacts”. In: Temple Law Review 83, 405-441. Open Google Scholar
  615. Huber, Wolfgang (2015): “Human Rights and Globalization”. In: Graeb, Wilhelm / Charbonnier, Lars (Eds.): Religion and Human Rights: Global Challenges from Intercultural Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter, 7-23. Open Google Scholar
  616. Hubig, Christoph (2007): Die Kunst des Möglichen II, Grundlinien einer dialektischen Philosophie der Technik 2: Ethik der Technik als provisorische Moral. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  617. Hubig, Christoph (2008): “Der technisch aufgerüstete Mensch – Auswirkungen auf unser Menschenbild”. In: Rossnagel, Alexander / Sommerlatte, Tom / Winand, Udo (Eds.): Digitale Visionen. Berlin: Springer, 165-176. Open Google Scholar
  618. Hubig, Christoph (2011): “Technikethik”. In: Stoecker, Ralf / Neuhaeuser, Christian / Raters, Marie-Luise (Eds.): Handbuch Angewandte Ethik. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 170-175. Open Google Scholar
  619. Hubig, Christoph (2018): “Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in hybriden Systemen”. In: Hubig, Christoph / Koslowski, Jana / Koslowski, Peter (Eds.): Maschinen, die unsere Brüder werden: Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in hybriden Systemen. Muenchen: Paderborn, 9-17. Open Google Scholar
  620. Huebner, Dietmar / Spranger, Tade Matthias (2010): “Patente”. In: Fuchs, Michael / Heinemann, Thomas / Heinrichs, Bert / Huebner, Dietmar / Kipper, Jens / Rottlaender, Kathrin / Runkel, Thomas / Spranger, Tade Matthias / Vermeulen, Verena / Voelker-Albert, Moritz (Eds.): Forschungsethik: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 136-155. Open Google Scholar
  621. Huebner, Dietmar / White, Lucie / Ahlers, Markus (2020): “Ethische Aspekte von Crash Algorithmen für autonome Fahrzeuge: Rechte, Ansprüche und die Konstitutivität von Verkehrsregeln”. In: Oppermann, Bernd / Stender-Vorwachs, Jutta (Eds.): Autonomes Fahren. Muenchen: C.H. Beck, 61-74. Open Google Scholar
  622. Huebsch, Stefan (1995): Philosophie des Gewissens: Beiträge zur Rehabilitierung des philosophischen Gewissensbegriffs. Neue Studien zur Philosophie 10. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar
  623. Huelsken-Giesler, Manfred (2014): “Technikkompetenzen in der Pflege – Anforderungen im Kontext der Etablierung Neuer Technologien in der Gesundheitsversorgung”. In: Pflege & Gesellschaft 15, 330-352. Open Google Scholar
  624. Huelsken-Giesler, Manfred (2015): “Technische Assistenzsysteme in der Pflege in pragmatischer Perspektive der Pflegewissenschaft”. In: Weber, Karsten / Frommeld, Debora / Manzeschke, Arne / Fingerau, Heiner (Eds.): Technisierung des Alltags. Beitrag für ein gutes Leben?. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 117-130. Open Google Scholar
  625. Hueper, Melanie (2004): Zensur und neue Kommunikationstechnologien. Aachen: Shaker. Open Google Scholar
  626. Human Rights Watch (n.d.): Killer Robot. Online: https://www.hrw.org/topic/arms/killer-robotshttps://www.hrw.org/topic/arms/killer-robots [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  627. Humanity Plus (2009): Transhumanist Declaration. Online: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  628. Hunt, Paul (2008): Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms: The right to health. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. UN Human Rights Council. Sixty-third Session. A/63/263. United Nations. Online: https://undocs.org/A/63/263https://undocs.org/A/63/263 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  629. Hunter, Richard S. (2002): World Without Secrets: Business, Crime, and Privacy in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar
  630. Huriet, Claude (2009): “Ethics Committees”. In: Have, Henk A. M. J. ten / Jean, Michele S. (Eds.): The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Background, principles and application. Ethics Series. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 265-270. Open Google Scholar
  631. Hurlburt, George F. / Miller, Keith W. / Voas, Jeffrey M. (2008): “An Ethical Analysis of Automation, Risk, and the Financial Crisis of 2008”. In: IEEE Reliability Society 2008 Annual Technology Report. Online: https://rs.ieee.org/images/files/Publications/2008/2008-02.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  632. Hurst, Samia / Belser, Eva Maria / Burton-Jeangros, Claudine / Mahon, Pascal / Hummel, Cornelia / Monteverde, Settimio / Krones, Tanja / Dagron, Stéphanie / Bensimon, Cécile / Schaffert, Bianca / Trechsel, Alexander / Chiapperino, Luca / Kloetzer, Laure / Zittoun, Tania / Jox, Ralf / Fischer, Marion / Dalle Ave, Anne / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Moon, Suerie (2020): “Continued Confinement of Those Most Vulnerable to COVID-19”. In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 30(3/4), 401-418. Online: https://kiej.georgetown.edu/continued-confinement-covid-19-special-issuehttps://kiej.georgetown.edu/continued-confinement-covid-19-special-issue/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  633. Hurtz, Simon (2020): “Neues Jahr, neuer Skandal?”. In: Die Sueddeutsche Zeitung, January 7. Online: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/cambridge-analytica-facebook-brittany-kaiser-1.4747594https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/cambridge-analytica-facebook-brittany-kaiser-1.4747594 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  634. Hutson, Matthew (2017): “Artificial intelligence prevails at predicting Supreme Court decisions”. In: Science Magazine, May 2. Online: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/artificial-intelligence-prevails-predicting-supreme-court-decisions [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  635. Huxley, Aldous (1932): Brave New World. London: Vintage Classics. Open Google Scholar
  636. Huxley, Julian (1967): Religion without Revelation. London: Watts. Open Google Scholar
  637. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (1977): Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. Online: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  638. Idowu, Samuel / Yuksel Mermod, Asli (2014): “Investing Peacefully. A Global Overview of Socially Responsible Investing”. In: Yüksel Mermod, Asli / Idowu, Samuel O. (Eds.): Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Business World, Springer: Cham, 325-355. Open Google Scholar
  639. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) (n.d.): Ethically Aligned Design Version 2. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE. Online: https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/ead-v1.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  640. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Standards Association (n.d.): The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. Online: https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/autonomous-systems.htmlhttps://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/autonomous-systems.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  641. Ihde, Don (1990): Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar
  642. Idhe, Don (2011) “Smart: Amsterdam urinals and autonomic computing”. In: Hildebrandt, Mireille / Rouvroy, Antoinette (Eds.): The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology: Autonomic Computing and Transformations of Human Agency. Routledge: London, 12-26. Open Google Scholar
  643. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2018): “Money, Transformed. The future of currency in a digital world”. In: Finance & Development 55(2), June 2018. Online: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/06/pdf/fd0618.pdfhttps://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/06/pdf/fd0618.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  644. Institut für Innovation und Technik (Ed.) (2011): Facetten des Demographischen Wandels. Neue Sichtweisen auf einen gesellschaftlichen Veränderungsprozess. Berlin: IIT. Open Google Scholar
  645. Institute for Ethics in Artificial Intelligence (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://ieai.mcts.tum.dehttps://ieai.mcts.tum.de/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  646. Intel (2017): Artificial Intelligence: The Public Policy Opportunity. Online: https://blogs.intel.com/policy/files/2017/10/Intel-Artificial-Intelligence-Public-Policy-White-Paper-2017.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  647. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://www.iaea.orghttps://www.iaea.org./ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  648. International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners (ICDPP) (2018): Declaration on Ethics and Data Protection in Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/icdppc-40th_ai-declaration_adopted_en_0.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  649. Internet Governance Forum (IGF) (2014): The Global Multistakeholder for Dialogue on Internet Governance Issues. Online: http://intgovforum.org/cms/2014/IGFBrochure.pdfhttp://intgovforum.org/cms/2014/IGFBrochure.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  650. Internet Governance Forum (IGF) (2019): Best Practice Forum on Internet of Things, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/filedepot_download/8398/1915 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  651. Introna, Lucas D. (2014): “Towards a Post-human Intra-actional Account of Sociomaterial Agency (and Morality)”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 31-53. Open Google Scholar
  652. Ionita, Silviu (2017): “Autonomous vehicles: from paradigms to technology”. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 252(1). Online: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/252/1/012098/meta [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  653. Irrgang, Bernhard (2005): Posthumanes Menschsein? Künstliche Intelligenz, Cyberspace, Roboter, Cyborgs und Designer-Mensch – Anthropologie des künstlichen Menschen im 21. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. Open Google Scholar
  654. Isaac, Alistair M. C. / Bridewell, Will (2017): “White Lies on Silver Tongues. Why Robots Need to Deceive (and How)”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 157-172. Open Google Scholar
  655. Isler, Thomas (2019): “Wer die falschen Filme schaut, kann keine Flugtickets mehr kaufen: Wie China den totalen Überwachungsstaat errichtet”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung am Sonntag, June 30, 18-19. Online: https://nzzas.nzz.ch/hintergrund/ein-ueberwachungsstaat-wie-bei-george-orwell-nein-nein-das-ist-viel-konsequenter-und-intensiver-als-bei-orwell-ld.1492616?reduced=true [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  656. ISO (2020): “Information technology – Electronic discovery – Part 3: Code of practice for electronic discovery”. Online: https://www.iso.org/standard/78648.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  657. Issenberg, Sasha (2013): The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Crown. Open Google Scholar
  658. International Transport Forum (ITF) (2018): Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles?. Online: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/safer-roads-automated-vehicles.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  659. Information Technology Industry Council (ITIC) (2017): AI Policy Principles. Online: www.itic.org/resources/AI-Policy-Principles-FullReport2.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  660. Iversen, Gudmund R. / Gergen, Mary (1997): Statistics: The Conceptual Approach. Springer Undergraduate Textbooks in Statistics. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  661. Jacobs Henderson, Jennifer (2013): “The Boundaries of Free Speech in Social Media”. In: Stewart, Daxton R. (Ed.): Social Media and the Law. A Guidebook for Communication Students and Professionals. New York: Routledge, 1-22. Open Google Scholar
  662. Jagtiani, Julapa / Lemieux, Catharine (2019): The roles of alternative data and machine learning in Fintech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub Consumer Platform. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper 18-15. Online: https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/working-papers/2018/wp18-15r.pdf?la=enhttps://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/working-papers/2018/wp18-15r.pdf?la=en [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  663. Jahangir, Asma (2008): “Religionsfreiheit und Meinungsfreiheit”. In: Bielefeldt, Heiner (Ed.): Jahrbuch Menschenrechte 2009. Wien: Boehlau, 117-122. Open Google Scholar
  664. Jain, Devaki (2004): “Human Rights and Development”. In: Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.): Menschenrechte und Wirtschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen State und Nonstate Actors. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) II. Bern: Staempfli, 297-311. Open Google Scholar
  665. Jain, Sarthak (2017): “NanoNets: How to use deep learning when you have limited data: Part 2: Building object detection models with almost no hardware”. In: Medium, January 30. Online: https://medium.com/nanonets/nanonets-how-to-use-deep-learning-when-you-have-limited-data-f68c0b512cabhttps://medium.com/nanonets/nanonets-how-to-use-deep-learning-when-you-have-limited-data-f68c0b512cab [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  666. Jansen, Philip / Broadhead, Stearns / Rodrigues, Rowena / Wright, David / Brey, Philp / Fox, Alice / Wang, Ning (2018): State-of-the-Art Review, Draft of the D4.1 deliverable submitted to the European Commission on April 13, 2018. A report for the SIENNA Project, an EU H2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 741716. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5b9f93f94&appId=PPGMS [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  667. Jarzebski, Sebastian (2014): “Regulierung durch Algorithmen?”. Online: https://regierungsforschung.de/regulierung-durch-algorithmen/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  668. Jaspers, Karl (1931): Die geistige Situation der Zeit. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  669. Jaume-Palasi, Lorena / Spielkamp, Matthias (2017): Ethik und algorithmische Prozesse zur Entscheidungsfindung oder -vorbereitung. AlgorithmWatch Working Papers 4. Online: https://algorithmwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/AlgorithmWatch_Arbeitspapier_4_Ethik_und_Algorithmen.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  670. Javers, Eamon (2020): “Facebook and Twitter decline Pelosi request to delete Trump video”. In: CNBC, February 7. Online: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/07/facebook-and-twitter-decline-pelosi-request-to-delete-trump-video.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/07/facebook-and-twitter-decline-pelosi-request-to-delete-trump-video.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  671. Jedok, Kim / Young-Jun, Moon / Suh, In-Soo (2015): “Smart Mobility Strategy in Korea on Sustainability, Safety and Efficiency Toward 2025”. In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 7(4), 58-67. Open Google Scholar
  672. Jenkins, Holman W. (2010): “Google and the Search for the Future”. In: Wall Street Journal, August 14. Online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704901104575423294099527212 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  673. Jennings, Bruce (2010): “Enlightenment and enchantment: Technology and ethical limits”. In: Technology in Society 32(1), 25-30. Open Google Scholar
  674. Jensen, Bjornar / Koch, Markus (2015): Mensch und Maschine: Roboter auf dem Vormarsch? Folgen der Automatisierung für den Schweizer Arbeitsmarkt. Deloitte: Zuerich. Online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ch/Documents/innovation/ch-de-innovation-automation-report.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  675. Jessen, Jens (2013): “Transhumanismus. Die Besten sind Bestien”. In: Die Zeit, May 23. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2013/22/klonen-optimierter-mensch [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  676. Jessen, Jens (2014): “Der neue Mensch”. In: Die Zeit, December 17. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2014/52/jahresrueckblick-2014-social-freezing-gendertheorie-sterbehilfe [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  677. Joas, Hans (2011): Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  678. Joas, Hans (2015a): Sind die Menschenrechte westlich?. Muenchen: Koesel-Verlag, 71-80. Open Google Scholar
  679. Joas, Hans (2015b): “Führt Säkularisierung zum Moralverfall? Einige empirisch gestützte Überlegungen”. In: Schwarz, Gerhard / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Holderegger, Adrian / Tag, Brigitte (Eds.): Religion, Liberalität und Rechtsstaat: Ein offenes Spannungsverhältnis. Zuerich: Verlag Neue Zuercher Zeitung, 105-120. Open Google Scholar
  680. Joh, Elizabeth E. (2017): “The undue influence of surveillance technology companies on policing”. In: New York University Law Review Online 92(19), 19-47. Online: https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/NYULawReviewOnline-92-Joh_0.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  681. Johannes Reiter (1991): “Die Frage nach dem Gewissen”. In: Seidel, Walter (Ed.): Befreiende Moral: Handeln aus christlicher Verantwortung. Wuerzburg: Echter, 11-31. Open Google Scholar
  682. Johansson, Henrik (2013): High Frequency Trading. Market abuse and how to reestablish confidence in the market?. Master thesis within Economics. Joenkoeping International Business School. Online: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:627869/FULLTEXT01.pdfhttp://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:627869/FULLTEXT01.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  683. Johnson, Bobbie (2010): “Privacy No Longer a Social Norm, Says Facebook Founder”. In: The Guardian, January 10. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  684. Johnson, Deborah (2006a): “Computer Systems: Moral Entities but not Moral Agents”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 195-204. Open Google Scholar
  685. Johnson, Deborah (2011): “Computer Systems: Moral Entities but not Moral Agents”. In: Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan Leigh (Eds.): Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168-183. Open Google Scholar
  686. Johnson, Deborah / Noorman, Merel (2014): “Artefactual Agency and Artefactual Moral Agency”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 143-158. Open Google Scholar
  687. Johnson, Jeffrey Alan (2006b): “Technology and pragmatism: From value neutrality to value criticality”. In: SSRN Scholarly Paper. Online: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2154654http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2154654 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  688. Jonas, Hans (1984): “Warum wir heute eine Ethik der Selbstbeschränkung brauchen”. In: Stoecker, Elisabeth (Ed.): Grenzen der Ethik. Ethik der Wissenschaften 1. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink / Ferdinand Schoeningh, 75-86. Open Google Scholar
  689. Jonas, Hans (1985a): Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Zur Praxis des Prinzips der Verantwortung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  690. Jonas, Hans (1985b): Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. 4. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Insel. Open Google Scholar
  691. Jones, Charles (1999): Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  692. Jones, Emily (2018): “A Posthuman-Xenofeminist Analysis of the Discourse on Autonomous Weapons Systems and Other Killing Machines”. In: Australian Feminist Law Journal 44(1), 93-118. Open Google Scholar
  693. Jonietz, David / Bucher, Dominik (2018): “Continuous Trajectory Pattern Mining for Mobility Behaviour Change Detection”. In: Kiefer, Peter / Huang, Haosheng / van de Weghe, Nico / Raubal, Martin (Eds.): Progress in Location Based Services. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Cham: Springer, 211-230. Open Google Scholar
  694. Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence (JSAI) (2017): The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence Ethical Guidelines. Online: http://ai-elsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/JSAI-Ethical-Guidelines-1.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  695. Joy, Bill (2000): “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us”. In: Wired, April 1. Online: https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  696. Kaelin, Walter (2004): “What Are Human Rights?”. In: Kaelin, Walter / Mueller, Lars / Wyttenbach, Judith (Eds.): The face of human rights. Baden: Lars Mueller Publishers, 14-37. Open Google Scholar
  697. Kaeser, Eduard (2019): “Magie und Technik: Warum Handys unser Voodoo sind”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung am Sonntag, February 9, 49-50. Online: https://nzzas.nzz.ch/wissen/wie-unser-glaube-an-magische-kraefte-unsere-beziehung-zu-moderner-technik-praegt-ld.1458439?reduced=true [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  698. Kahl, Anne / Puig Larrauri, Helena (2013): “Technology for Peacebuilding, Stability”. In: International Journal of Security & Development 2(3), 1-15. Open Google Scholar
  699. Kahn, Leonard (2017): “Military Robots and the Likelihood of Armed Combat”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 274-287. Open Google Scholar
  700. Kainz, Georg Markus (2016): “‘Datenschutz ist Menschenrecht’ – Privatsphäre und das Recht auf Informationsfreiheit”. In: Russmann, Uta / Beinsteiner, Andreas / Ortner, Heike (Eds.): Grenzenlose Enthüllungen. Medien zwischen Öffnung und Schliessung. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press, 111-124. Open Google Scholar
  701. Kaivo-oja, Jari / Roth, Steffen (2015): The Technological Future of Work and Robotics. Kiel and Hamburg: ZBW – Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Open Google Scholar
  702. Kane, Edward J. (2008): Regulation and Supervision: An Ethical Perspective. NBER Working Paper 13895. Online: https://www.nber.org/papers/w13895https://www.nber.org/papers/w13895 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  703. Kant, Immanuel (1784): “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?”. In: Berlinische Monatsschrift 12, 481-494. Open Google Scholar
  704. Kant, Immanuel (1974): Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Weischedel, Wilhelm (Ed.). Werkausgabe 7. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  705. Kant, Immanuel (1990): Eine Vorlesung über Ethik. Gerhardt, Gerd (Ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  706. Kant, Immanuel (1995a): Kritik der reinen Vernunft 2. Weischedel, Wilhelm (Ed.). Werkausgabe 4. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  707. Kant, Immanuel (1995b): “Über Pädagogik”. In: Kant, Immanuel: Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädagogik 2. Weischedel, Wilhelm (Ed.). Werkausgabe 12. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 691-761. Open Google Scholar
  708. Kant, Immanuel (1997): Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Weischedel, Wilhelm (Ed.). Werkausgabe 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  709. Kaplan, Andreas / Haenlein, Michael (2018): “Siri, Siri in my Hand, who’s the Fairest in the Land? On the Interpretations, Illustrations and Implications of Artificial Intelligence”. In: Business Horizons 62(1), 15-25. Open Google Scholar
  710. Karsch, Fabian / Roche, Matthias (2016): “Die Vermessung des Selbst. Digitale Selbstvermessung zwischen Empowerment, Medikalisierung und neuer Technosozialität”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen? TTN-Studien 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 145-160. Open Google Scholar
  711. Kastan, Benjamin (2013): “Autonomous Weapons Systems: A Coming Legal ‘Singularity’?”. In: Journal of Law, Technology & Policy 45(1), 46-82. Open Google Scholar
  712. Katz, Eric (1992): The call of the wild. In: Environmental Ethics 14, 265-273. Open Google Scholar
  713. Kaufmann, Stefan (2010): “Der ‘digitale Soldat’. Eine Figur an der Front der Informationsgesellschaft”. In: Apelt, Maja (Ed.): Forschungsthema: Militär. Wiesbaden: Springer, 271-294. Open Google Scholar
  714. Kavanagh, Camino (2019): New Tech, New Threats, and New Governance Challenges: An Opportunity to Craft Smarter Responses? Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Online: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/WP_Camino_Kavanagh___New_Tech_New_Threats1.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  715. Kaye, David (2018): Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. UN Human Rights Council. Seventy-third Session. A/73/348. United Nations. Online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1643488/files/A_73_348-EN.pdfhttps://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1643488/files/A_73_348-EN.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  716. Kedmey, Dan (2015): “Here’s What Really Makes Microsoft’s Cortana So Amazing”. In: Time, July 20. Online: https://time.com/3960670/windows-10-cortanahttps://time.com/3960670/windows-10-cortana/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  717. Keen, Andrew (2015): Das digitale Debakel. Muenchen: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt (DVA). Open Google Scholar
  718. Keenan, James F. (2010): A History of Catholic Moral Theology in the Twentieth Century: From Confessing Sins to Liberating Conscience. New York: Continuum. Open Google Scholar
  719. Kehl, Danielle / Guo, Priscilla / Kessler, Samuel (2017): Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System: Assessing the Use of Risk Assessment in Sentencing. Responsive Communities Initiative, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School. Online: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/33746041/2017-07_responsivecommunities_2.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  720. Kelleher, John D. / Tierney, Brendan (2018): Data Science. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  721. Kellermann, Paul (2014): “Werden Roboter uns das Grundeinkommen bringen?”. In: Der Standard, November 13. Online: https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000008033740/werden-roboter-uns-das-grundeinkommen-bringen [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  722. Kelley, Scott B. / Lane, Bradley / DeCicco, John (2019): “Pumping the Brakes on Robot Cars: Current Urban Traveler Willingness to Consider Driverless Vehicles”. In: Sustainability 11(18), 1-15. Open Google Scholar
  723. Kergueno, Raphaël (2018): “It’s Always Sunny in Silicon Valley: How Big Tech Dominates Digital Lobbying”. Transparency International EU. Online: https://transparency.eu/sunny-silicon-vallley/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  724. Kernaghan, Kenneth (2014): “Digital dilemmas: Values, ethics and information technology”. In: Canadian Public Administration 57(2), 295-317. Open Google Scholar
  725. Kersten, Jens (2013): “Personalisierte Medizin”. In: Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik 57(1), 23-33. Open Google Scholar
  726. Kersten, Jens (2016): “Die maschinelle Person – Neue Regeln für den Maschinenpark”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen?. TTN-Studien 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 89-105. Open Google Scholar
  727. Kettner, Matthias (2001): “Moralische Verantwortung in individueller und kollektiver Form”. In: Wieland, Josef (Ed.): Die moralische Verantwortung kollektiver Akteure. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 146-170. Open Google Scholar
  728. Keynes, John Maynard (1936): The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge: Macmillian Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  729. Kharpal, Arjun (2017): “Stephen Hawking says A.I. could be ‘worst event in the history of our civilization’”. In: CNBC, November 6. Online: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/06/stephen-hawking-ai-could-be-worst-event-in-civilization.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/06/stephen-hawking-ai-could-be-worst-event-in-civilization.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  730. Kidd, Cory D. / Orr, Robert / Abowd, Gregory D. / Atkeson, Christopher G. / Essa, Irfan A. / MacIntyre, Blair / Mynatt, Elizabeth / Starner, Thad E. / Newstetter, Wendy (1999): “The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research”. In: Streitz, Norbert A. / Hartkopf, Volker / Siegel, Jane / Konomi, Shin’ichi (Eds.): Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture, CoBuild ’99, Pittsburgh on October 1-2, 1999. London: Springer, 191-198. Open Google Scholar
  731. Kim, Gunoo (2017): “Robot Ethics vs. Robot Law: Apart and Together”. In: Studies in Legal Philosophy 20(2), 7-44. Open Google Scholar
  732. King, Hope (2016): “Mark Zuckerberg to tear down and rebuild four houses surrounding his home”. In: CNN Business, May 25. Online: https://money.cnn.com/2016/05/25/technology/mark-zuckerberg-palo-alto-house/index.htmlhttps://money.cnn.com/2016/05/25/technology/mark-zuckerberg-palo-alto-house/index.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  733. Kipke, Roland (2011): Besser werden. Eine ethische Untersuchung zu Selbstformung und Neuro-Enhancement. Paderborn: Mentis. Open Google Scholar
  734. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2007a): “Brauchen die Menschenrechte eine (moralische) Begründung?”. In: Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.): Menschenrechte und Kinder. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) 4. Bern: Staempfli, 55-64. Open Google Scholar
  735. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2010a): “Human Rights Education for a Sustainable Future: The Relationship between Human Rights Education and Education for Sustainable Development”. In: Waldron, Fionnuala / Ruane, Brian (Eds.): Human Rights Education: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Dublin: The Liffexy Press, 67-85. Open Google Scholar
  736. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2010b): Nur ich bin die Wahrheit: Der Absolutheitsanspruch des johanneischen Christus und das Gespräch zwischen den Religionen. Herders Biblische Studien 63. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  737. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2011): “Das ethische Charakteristikum der Universalisierung im Zusammenhang des Universalitätsanspruchs der Menschenrechte”. In: Ast, Stephan / Mathis, Klaus / Haenni, Julia / Zabel, Benno (Eds.): Gleichheit und Universalität. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 128. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 301-312. Open Google Scholar
  738. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2012a): “Evolution of the International Environment Law and Position of Child from a Philosophical Perspective”. In: Institut international des Droits de l’Enfant (Ed.): Changement Climatique: Impacts sur les enfants et leurs droits. Sion: Institut international des Droits de l’Enfant, 73-87. Open Google Scholar
  739. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2012b): “Ich bin der Weg, die Wahrheit und das Leben (Joh 14,6). Der Wahrheitsanspruch des joh Christus und Wahrheit in anderen Religionen”. In: Bibel und Liturgie 85(2), 123-147. Open Google Scholar
  740. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2013a): Wie können Menschenrechte begründet werden? Ein für religiöse und säkulare Menschenrechtskonzeptionen anschlussfähiger Ansatz. ReligionsRecht im Dialog 15. Muenster: LIT-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  741. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2013b). “Human Rights as an Ethical Basis for Science”. In: Journal of Law, Information and Science 22(2), 1-17. Open Google Scholar
  742. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2013c): “Gerechtigkeit und ihre christlich-sozialethische Relevanz”. In: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 135(4), 433-456. Open Google Scholar
  743. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2013d): “Die Multidimensionalität der Menschenrechte – Chance oder Gefahr für den universellen Menschenrechtsschutz?”. In: MenschenRechtsMagazin 18(2), 77-95. Open Google Scholar
  744. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2013e): “Menschenrechte und Politik”. In: Yousefi, Hamid Reza (Ed.): Menschenrechte im Weltkontext: Geschichten – Erscheinungsformen – Neuere Entwicklungen. Heidelberg: Springer, 255-260. Open Google Scholar
  745. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2013f): “Religionsfreiheit – ein Menschenrecht im Konflikt”. In: Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 60(2), 353-374. Open Google Scholar
  746. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2014a): “Verantwortung aus christlich-sozialethischer Perspektive”. In: ETHICA 22(1), 29-54. Open Google Scholar
  747. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2014b): “Human Rights and Corresponding Duties and Duty Bearers”. In: International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 2(4), 309-321. Open Google Scholar
  748. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2014c): “Ethics and Human Rights”. In: Ancilla Juris 9, 59-98. Open Google Scholar
  749. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2014d): “The Relation between Democracy and Human Rights”. In: Grinin, Leonid E. / Ilyin, Ilya V. / Korotayev, Andrey V. (Eds.): Globalistics and Globalization Studies: Aspects & Dimensions of Global Views, Yearbook. Volgograd: Uchitel Publishing House, 112-125. Open Google Scholar
  750. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2015a): “Das Prinzip der Verletzbarkeit als Begründungsweg der Menschenrechte”. In: Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 62(1), 121-141. Open Google Scholar
  751. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2015b): “Wie kann eine humanitäre Intervention begründet werden?”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Reuters, Lars (Eds.): Proceedings from The Ethics of War and Peace. 51st Annual Conference of the Societas Ethica, Maribor, Slovenia, August 21-24. Linkoeping: Linkoeping University Electronic Press, 77-95. Open Google Scholar
  752. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2015c): “Multinationale Konzerne und Menschenrechte”. In: ETHICA 23(3), 261-280. Open Google Scholar
  753. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2015d): “Adaptation – A Model for Bringing Human Rights and Religions Together”. In: Acta Academica 47(2), 163-191. Open Google Scholar
  754. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2015e): “CSR zwischen Greenwashing und ethischer Reflexion – Menschenrechte als ethischer Referenzrahmen für Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)”. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 16(3), 264-287. Open Google Scholar
  755. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2015f): ”Menschenrechte als kontinuierliche Quelle von Wertegeneralisierung”. In: Jahrbuch für Christliche Sozialwissenschaften 56, 227-250. Open Google Scholar
  756. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016a): “Zensur zum Schutz vor Rassismus versus Informationsfreiheit – ein Spannungsfeld im Internet”. In: Communicatio Socialis 49(4), 354-366. Open Google Scholar
  757. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016b): “Digitalisierung und Robotisierung der Gesellschaft aus ethischer Perspektive”. In: feinschwarz.net, March 30. Online: http://www.feinschwarz.net/digitalisierung-und-robotisierung-der-gesellschaft-aus-theologisch-ethischer-perspektive/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  758. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016c): “KonsumActors – mehr Macht beim Einkauf als an der Urne? Konsumethische Überlegungen zur Verantwortung beim Einkaufen”. In: ETHICA 24(2), 133-157. Open Google Scholar
  759. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016d): “Globale Gerechtigkeit aus einer finanzethischen Perspektive”. In: Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 63(2), 534-552. Open Google Scholar
  760. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016e): “How Can We Justify Human Rights?”. In: International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 4(4), 313-329. Open Google Scholar
  761. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016f): Menschenrechte und Religionen. Nichtstaatliche Akteure und ihr Verhältnis zu den Menschenrechten. Gesellschaft – Ethik – Religion 7. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  762. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016g): “The Interplay of the Legal and the Moral Dimension of Human Rights for the Implementation of Human Rights”. In: International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 4(1), 31-44. Open Google Scholar
  763. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016h): “To What Extent Should the State Protect Human Beings from Themselves? An Analysis from a Human Rights Perspective”. In: Mathis, Klaus / Tor, Avishalom (Eds.): ‘Nudging’ – Possibilities, Limitations and Applications in European Law and Economics. Cham: Springer, 59-67. Open Google Scholar
  764. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2016i): “Missachtung der Menschenwürde als Schlüsselerfahrung”. In: Kraemer, Klaus / Vellguth, Klaus (Eds.): Menschenwürde. Diskurse zur Universalität und Unveräusserlichkeit. Theologie der Einen Welt 8. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 193-206. Open Google Scholar
  765. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2017a): “Roboter und Ethik”. In: Aktuelle Juristische Praxis 26(2), 240-249. Open Google Scholar
  766. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2017b): “Automatisierung der Mobilität – theologisch-ethische Überlegungen”. In: feinschwarz.net, January 13. Online: http://www.feinschwarz.net/automatisierung-der-mobilitaet-theologisch-ethische-ueberlegungen/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  767. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2017c): “Die Rede von ‘moral technologies’: Eine Kritik aus theologisch-ethischer Sicht”. In: feinschwarz.net, March 20. Online: https://www.feinschwarz.net/die-rede-von-moral-technologieshttps://www.feinschwarz.net/die-rede-von-moral-technologies/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  768. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2017d). “Gewissen aus moraltheologischer Sicht”. In: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 139(2), 1525-177. Open Google Scholar
  769. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2017f): “Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte”. In: Gabriel, Ingeborg / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Sturn, Michael (Eds.): Eine Wirtschaft, die Leben fördert. Wirtschafts- und unternehmensethische Reflexionen im Anschluss an Papst Franziskus. Ostfildern: Matthias-Gruenewald-Verlag, 241-264. Open Google Scholar
  770. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2017g): “Religionen als moralische Akteure”. In: Bergold, Ralph / Sautermeister, Jochen / Schroeder, André (Eds.): Dem Wandel eine menschliche Gestalt geben. Sozialethische Perspektiven für die Gesellschaft von morgen. Festschrift zur Neueröffnung und zum 70-jährigen Bestehen des Katholisch-Sozialen Instituts. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 133-158. Open Google Scholar
  771. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2018): “Die Menschenrechte als hermeneutischer Schlüssel zu ethischen Grundfragen des 21. Jahrhunderts: Begründung und Ausblick”. In: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 140, 361-379. Open Google Scholar
  772. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2019a): “Homo Dignitatis – ethische Orientierung im Zeitalter digitaler Transformation”. In: Psychologie in Österreich 4, 274-284. Open Google Scholar
  773. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2019b): “Digital Transformation of Society and Economy Ethical Considerations from a Human Rights Perspective”. In: International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 6(4), 301-321. Open Google Scholar
  774. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2019c): “Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen – eine menschenrechtsethische Betrachtung”. In: Hladschik, Patricia / Steinert, Fiona (Eds.): Menschenrechten Gestalt und Wirksamkeit verleihen: Making Human Rights Work. Festschrift für Hannes Tretter und Manfred Nowak. Wien: NWV, 551-563. Open Google Scholar
  775. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2020a): “The Correlation between Ethics and Technology”. In: Isetti, Giulia / Innerhofer, Elisa / Pechlaner, Harald / de Rachewiltz, Michael (Eds.): Religion in the Age of Digitalization: From New Media to Spiritual Machines. Routledge: London, 165-180. Open Google Scholar
  776. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2020b): “Omni-dynamische soziale Gerechtigkeit und ihre Bedeutung für medienethische Überlegungen”. In: Ulshoefer, Gotlind / Wilhelm, Monika (Eds.): Theologische Medienethik im digitalen Zeitalter. Ethik – Grundlagen und Handlungsfelder 14. Stuttgart: Wilhelm Kohlhammer, 237-254. Open Google Scholar
  777. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2020c): “Artificial Intelligence and the Complexity of Ethics”. In: Asian Horizons 14(3), 587-600. Open Google Scholar
  778. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2020d): “Human Dignity and Human Rights: Fostering and Protecting Pluralism and Particularity”. In: Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 6(1), 90-106. Open Google Scholar
  779. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2020e): “Kollektive versus individuelle Religionsfreiheit – was ist gerecht?”. In: Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 67(1), 52-66. Open Google Scholar
  780. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2020f): Wie sähe die Welt ohne UNO aus? 75 Jahre UN-Charta. In: feinschwarz.net, October 22. Online: https://www.feinschwarz.net/75-jahre-un-chartahttps://www.feinschwarz.net/75-jahre-un-charta/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  781. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (2021): “Ethics of Blockchain Technology”. In: Ulshoefer, Gotlind / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Huppenbauer, Markus (Eds.): Digitalisierung aus theologischer und ethischer Perspektive. Konzeptionen – Anfragen – Impulse. Zuerich: Pano (in print). Open Google Scholar
  782. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. (Ed.) (2017e): Die Verantwortung von nichtstaatlichen Akteuren gegenüber den Menschenrechten. Religionsrechtliche Studien 4. Zuerich: TVZ. Open Google Scholar
  783. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Belliger, Andréa / Krieger, David J. (Eds.) (2003): Stammzellenforschung. SCIENCE & SOCIETY 1. Zuerich: Seismo-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  784. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Belliger, Andréa / Krieger, David J. (Eds.) (2005): Forschung am Menschen. SCIENCE & SOCIETY 2. Zuerich: Seismo-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  785. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.) (2005): Menschenrechte und Wirtschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen State und Nonstate Actors. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) 2. Bern: Staempfli. Open Google Scholar
  786. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas (2007): “Rights of the Child and Human Rights”. In: Bellamy, Carol / Zermatten, Jean / Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas (Eds.): Realizing the Rights of the Child. Swiss Human Rights Book 2. Zuerich: Rueffer & Rub, 23-27. Open Google Scholar
  787. Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas (Eds.) (2010): Human Rights and Pervasive Computing. International Human Rights Forum (IHRF) 7. Bern: Staempfli. Open Google Scholar
  788. Kirkpatrick, David (2011): The Facebook Effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World. New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  789. Kirkpatrick, Jesse / Hahn, Erin N. / Haufler, Amy J. (2017): “Trust and Human-Robot Interaction”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 142-156. Open Google Scholar
  790. Kirschbaum, Markus (2015): “Highly automated driving for commercial vehicles”. In: Pfeffer, Peter (Eds.): 6th International Munich Chassis Symposium 2015. Proceedings. Wiesbaden: Springer, 5-15. Open Google Scholar
  791. Kitchin, Rob (2016): “The ethics of smart cities and urban science”. In: Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 374(2083). Online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124065/#idm140704258514688titlehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124065/#idm140704258514688title [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  792. Klaus, Tim / Elzweig, Brian (2017): “The market impact of HFT systems and potential regulation”. In: Law and Financial Markets Review 11(1), 13-19. Open Google Scholar
  793. Klein, Eckart (1997): Menschenrechte: Stille Revolution des Völkerrechts und Auswirkungen auf die innerstaatliche Rechtsanwendung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  794. Klincewicz, Michal (2015): “Autonomous Weapons Systems, the Frame Problem and Computer Security”. In: Journal of Military Ethics 14(2), 162-176. Open Google Scholar
  795. Klincewicz, Michał (2017): “Challenges to Engineering Moral Reasoners”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 244-257. Open Google Scholar
  796. Klumpp, Dieter (2014): “Aufhaltsamer Abstieg zur Heteronomie in einer Softwarewelt?”. In: Coy, Wolfgang / Garstka, Hansjuergen (Eds.): Wovon – für wen – wozu? Systemdenken wider die Diktatur der Daten. Wilhelm Steinmueller zum Gedächtnis. Berlin: Helmholtz Zentrum für Kulturtechnik, 145-160. Open Google Scholar
  797. Kneser, Jakob / Dietsche, Pina (2015): Das Ende des Zufalls. Documentary. Online: https://www.3sat.de/wissen/wissenschaftsdoku/das-ende-des-zufalls-100.html?mode=play&obj=71022 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  798. Knight, Victoria / van de Steene, Steven (2017): “The Capacity and Capability of Digital Innovation in Prisons: Towards Smart Prisons”. In: Advancing Corrections 4(8), 88-101. Open Google Scholar
  799. Knight, Will (2017a): “The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI”. In: MIT Technology Review, April 11. Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  800. Knight, Will (2017b): “The Financial World Wants to Open AI’s Black Boxes”. In: MIT Technology Review, April 13. Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604122/the-financial-world-wants-to-open-ais-black-boxes/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  801. Ko, Insok (2017): “Can Artificial Intelligence Be an Autonomous Entity?”. In: Korean Journal of Philosophy 133, 163-187. Open Google Scholar
  802. Kobrin, Stephen. J. (2009): “Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Transnational Firms, and Human Rights”. In: Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3), 349-374. Open Google Scholar
  803. Koch, Kurt (2012): “‘Ihr seid mehr wert als viele Spatzen’: Zum Beitrag der christlichen Ökumene bei der Revitalisierung menschlicher Werte”. In: Hennerkes, Brun-Hagen / Augustin, George (Eds.): Wertewandel mitgestalten: Gut handeln in Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 119-148. Open Google Scholar
  804. Koch, Sabine / Marschollek, Michael / Wolf, Klaus-Hendrik (2009): “On health-enabling and ambient-assistive technologies. What has been achieved and where do we have to go?” In: Methods of Information in Medicine 48(1), 29-37. Open Google Scholar
  805. Koertner, Ulrich H. J. (2010): “Der machbare Mensch? Ethische Bewertungen und implizite Menschenbilder aus theologischer Sicht”. In: Boehlemann, Peter / Hattenbach, Almut / Klinnert, Lars / Markus, Peter (Eds.): Der machbare Mensch? Moderne Hirnforschung, biomedizinisches Enhancement und christliches Menschenbild. Berlin: LIT-Verlag, 115-133. Open Google Scholar
  806. Koespsell, David R. (2000): The Ontology of Cyberspace. Philosophy, Law, and the Future of Intellectual Property. Open Court: Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  807. Koeszegi, Sabine (2019): “Künstliche Intelligenz: ‘Wenige wissen, wie manipulierbar sie werden’”. In: Die Presse, August 24. Online: https://www.diepresse.com/5678566/kunstliche-intelligenz-bdquowenige-wissen-wie-manipulierbar-sie-werdenldquo [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  808. Kohlberg, Lawrence (1981): Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development, Harper & Row: San Francisco. Open Google Scholar
  809. Kohlberg, Lawrence (1984): Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II: The Psychology of Moral Development, Harper & Row: San Francisco. Open Google Scholar
  810. Koller, Peter (1990): “Die Begründung von Rechten”. In: Koller, Peter / Varga, Csaba / Weinberger, Ota (Eds.): Theoretische Grundlagen der Rechtspolitik. Ungarisch-Österreichisches Symposium der internationalen Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 54. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 74-84. Open Google Scholar
  811. Koller, Peter (2005): Zum Verhältnis von Domestischer und Globaler (Un)Gerechtigkeit. Lecture at the Conference ‘The Diversitiy of Human Rights: Constitution and Human Rights’. Dubrovnik: Inter University Centre, 3-10 September (manuscript kindly provided by the author). Open Google Scholar
  812. Responsible Business Initiative (2020): Homepage. Online: https://konzern-initiative.chhttps://konzern-initiative.ch/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  813. Koreng, Ansgar (2010): Zensur im Internet. Der verfassungsrechtliche Schutz der digitalen Massenkommunikation. Leipzig: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  814. Korff, Wilhelm (1989): “Zur naturrechtlichen Grundlegung der katholischen Soziallehre”. In: Baadte, Guenter / Rauscher, Anton (Eds.): Christliche Gesellschaftslehre: Eine Ortsbestimmung. Graz: Styria, 11-52. Open Google Scholar
  815. Korff, Wilhelm / Wilhelms, Guenter (2001): “Verantwortung”. In: Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche 10, Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 597-600. Open Google Scholar
  816. Kos, Barbara / Krawczyk, Grzegorz / Tomanek, Robert (2020): “The Paradigm of Sustainable Transport and Mobility in Modern Transport Policy – A Case Study of the Mobility of the Creative Class in Poland”. In: Sładkowski, Aleksander (Ed.): Ecology in Transport: Problems and Solutions. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: Springer, 381-439. Open Google Scholar
  817. Kosack, Stephen / Fung, Archon (2014): “Does transparency improve governance?”. In: Annual Review of Political Science 17(1), 65-87. Online: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  818. Kosinski, Michael / Stillwell, David / Graepel, Thore (2013): “Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior”. In: PNAS, March 11. Online: http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2013/03/06/1218772110.full.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  819. Kottow, Miguel H. (2004): “Vulnerability: What kind of principle is it?”. In: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7(3), 281-287. Open Google Scholar
  820. Kraemer, Felicitas / van Overveld, Kees / Peterson, Martin (2011): “Is there an ethics of algorithms?”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 13(3), 251-260. Open Google Scholar
  821. Kramer, Adam / Guillory, Jamie / Hancock, Jeffrey (2014): “Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion Through Social Networks”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(24), 8788-8790. Open Google Scholar
  822. Kramer, Rolf (1992): Soziale Gerechtigkeit – Inhalt und Grenzen. Sozialwissenschaftliche Schriften 18. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
  823. Kranich-Stroetz, Christiane (2008): Selbstbewusstsein und Gewissen: Zur Rekonstruktion der Individualitätskonzeption bei Peter Abaelard. Subjekt – Zeit – Geschichte 2. Muenster: LIT-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  824. Krech, Carol Anne / Ruether, Frauke / Gassmann, Oliver (2015): “Profiting From Invention: Business Models of Patent Aggregating Companies”. In: International Journal of Innovation Management 19(3), 1-26. Open Google Scholar
  825. Kremer, Michael / Glennerster, Rachel (2004): Strong Medicine: Creating Incentives for Pharmaceutical Research on Neglected Diseases. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  826. Krenn, Brigitte (2016): “Multiuse Tool and Ethical Agent”. In: Trappl, Robert (Ed.): A Construction Manual for Ethical Systems. Cham: Springer, 11-29. Open Google Scholar
  827. Krieger, Bernhard / Grubmueller, Verena / Schaefer, Claudia (2014): “Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten”. In: SWS-Rundschau 54(2), 201-216. Open Google Scholar
  828. Krings, Bettina-Johanna / Boehle, Knud / Decker, Michael / Nierling, Linda / Schneider, Christoph (2014): “Serviceroboter in Pflegearrangements”. In: Decker, Michael / Fleischer, Torsten / Schippl, Jens / Weinberger, Nora (Eds.): Zukünftige Themen der Innovations- und Technikanalyse: Lessons learned und ausgewählte Ergebnisse. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 63-121. Open Google Scholar
  829. Krishnan, Armin (2009a): Killer Robots: The Legality and Ethicality of Autonomous Weapons. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  830. Krishnan, Armin (2009b): “Automating War: The Need for Regulation”. In: Contemporary Security Policy 30(1), 172-193. Open Google Scholar
  831. Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.) (2014): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  832. Kroes, Peter (2009): “Technical Artifacts, Engineering Practice, and Emergence”. In: Krohs, Ulrich / Kroes, Peter (Eds.): Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press, 277-292. Open Google Scholar
  833. Krugman, Paul (2013): “The Conscience of a Liberal”. In: The New York Times, December 28. Online: https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evilhttps://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  834. Kshetri, Nir (2014): “Big Data’s Impact on Privacy, Security and Consumer Welfare”. In: Telecommunications Policy 38(1), 1134-1145. Open Google Scholar
  835. Kugler, Logan (2018): “Why Cryptocurrencies Use So Much Energy – and What to Do About It”. In: Communications of the ACM 61(7), 15-17. Open Google Scholar
  836. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  837. Kurzweil, Ray (1999): The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Viking. Open Google Scholar
  838. Kurzweil, Ray (2001): The law of accelerating returns. Kurzweil Accelerating Intelligence. Online: https://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  839. Kurzweil, Ray (2005): The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking. Open Google Scholar
  840. Kyriakidis, Miltos / Happee, Riender / de Winter, Joost (2015): “Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents”. In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 32, 127-140. Open Google Scholar
  841. La Mettrie, Julien Offray (2009): Die Maschine Mensch. Becker, Claudia (Ed.). Philosophische Bibliothek 407. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  842. La Pointe, Cara / Fishbane, Lara (2018): “The Blockchain Ethical Design Framework”. In: Innovations 12(3), 50-71. Open Google Scholar
  843. La Rue, Frank (2011): Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. UN Human Rights Council. U.N. Doc. A/HRC, 17/27. May 16. Online: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/a.hrc.17.27_en.pdfhttp://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/a.hrc.17.27_en.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  844. Laaff, Meike (2020): “Ok, Zoomer”. In: Die Zeit, March 31. Online: https://www.zeit.de/digital/2020-03/videokonferenzen-zoom-app-homeoffice-quarantaene-coronavirus/komplettansichthttps://www.zeit.de/digital/2020-03/videokonferenzen-zoom-app-homeoffice-quarantaene-coronavirus/komplettansicht [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  845. LaBossiere, Michael (2017): “Testing the Moral Status of Artificial Beings; Or ‘I’m Going to Ask You Some Questions…’”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 293-306. Open Google Scholar
  846. Ladwig, Bernd (2007): “Das Recht auf Leben – nicht nur für Personen”. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 55(1), 17-39. Open Google Scholar
  847. Laidlaw, Emily B. (2015): Regulating Speech in Cyberspace. Gatekeepers, Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  848. Land, Molly (2013): “Toward an International Law of the Internet”. In: Harvard International Law Journal 54(2), 393-458. Open Google Scholar
  849. Landini, Sara (2020): “Ethical Issues, Cybersecurity and Automated Vehicles”. In: Marano, Pierpaolo / Noussia, Kyriaki (Eds.): InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View. AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation 1. Cham: Springer, 291-312. Open Google Scholar
  850. Langan, John (1982): “Human Rights in Roman Catholicism”. In: Swidler, Arlene (Ed.): Human Rights in Religious Traditions. New York: The Pilgrim Press, 25-39. Open Google Scholar
  851. Lanier, Jaron (2018): Zehn Gründe, warum du deine Social Media Accounts sofort löschen musst. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe. Open Google Scholar
  852. Lanzing, Marjolein (2019): “Strongly Recommended: Revisiting Decisional Privacy to Judge Hypernudging in Self-Tracking Technologies”. In: Philosophy & Technology 32(3), 549-568. Open Google Scholar
  853. Latour, Bruno (1992): “Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts”. In: Bijker, Wiebe E. / Law, John (Eds.): Shaping Technology / Building Society. Cambridge: MIT Press, 151-180. Open Google Scholar
  854. Latour, Bruno (1994): “On Technical Mediation – Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy”. In: Common Knowledge 3(2), 29-64. Open Google Scholar
  855. Laudan, Larry (1977): Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  856. Lauricella, Tom / McKay, Peter A. (2010): “Dow Takes a Harrowing 1,010.14-point Trip”. In: The Wall Street Journal, May 7. Online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704370704575227754131412596 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  857. Lazarus, Jessica R. / Shaheen, Susan A. / Young, Stanley E. / Fagnant, Daniel (2018): “Shared Automated Mobility and Public Transport”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation 4. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 141-161. Open Google Scholar
  858. Lazer, David / Baum, Matthew / Benkler, Yochai / Berinsky, Adam / Greenhill, Kelly / Menczer, Filippo / Metzger, Miriam / Nyhan, Brendan / Pennycook, Gordon / Rothschild, David / Schudson, Michael / Sloman, Steven / Sunstein, Cass R. / Thorson, Emily / Watts, Duncan / Zittrain, Jonathan (2018): “The Science of Fake News”. In: Science 359, 1094-1096. Open Google Scholar
  859. Le Cun, Yann / Bengio, Yoshua / Hinton, Geoffrey (2015): “Deep learning”. In: Nature 521(7553), 436-444. Open Google Scholar
  860. Lee, Kai-Fu (2018): AI Superpowers. China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Open Google Scholar
  861. Lee, Lisa M. (2017): “Ethics and Subsequent Use of Electronic Health Record Data”. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics 71, 143-146. Open Google Scholar
  862. Lee, Min Kyung / Kusbit, Daniel / Metsky, Evan / Dabbish, Laura (2015): Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. Seoul: Economy Record. Open Google Scholar
  863. Lee, Timothy B. (2018): “Fully driverless Waymo taxis are due out this year, alarming critics”. In: Ars Technica, October 1. Online: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/10/waymo-wont-have-to-prove-its-driverless-taxis-are-safe-before-2018-launch/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  864. Lehmann, Karl (2015): Toleranz und Religionsfreiheit: Geschichte und Gegenwart in Europa. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  865. Lehmann-Maldonado, Stephan (2016) Joël Luc Cachelin: “Du sollst online sein! Interview mit Joël Luc Cachelin”. In: UBS Magazin, October 2016, 6-13. Open Google Scholar
  866. Leibowitz, Jon (2009): “Introductory Remarks for FTC Privacy Roundtable”. Online: https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2009/12/introductory-remarks-ftc-privacy-roundtable [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  867. Lele, Ajey (2019): “Debating Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems”. In: Journal of Defense Studies 13(1), 51-70. Open Google Scholar
  868. Lenartowicz, Marta (2017): “Creatures of the semiosphere: A problematic third party in the ‘humans plus technology’ cognitive architecture of the future global superintelligence”. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 144, 35-42. Open Google Scholar
  869. Lenk, Hans / Maring, Matthias (2001): “Responsibility and Technology”. In: Auhagen, Ann Elisabeth / Bierhoff, Hans-Werner (Eds.): Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. London: Routledge, 93-107. Open Google Scholar
  870. Lepping, Joachim / Palzkill, Matthias (2016): “Die Chance der digitalen Souveränität”. In: Wittpahl, Volker (Eds.): Digitalisierung. Bildung, Technik, Innovation. Berlin: Springer, 17-25. Open Google Scholar
  871. Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, Sabine (2015): “Vom Vergessen und Erinnern“. In: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD 39(9), 586-588. Open Google Scholar
  872. Levy, Frank / Murnane, Richard (2004): The New Division of Labor. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  873. Levy, Steven (2011): In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives. New York: Simon & Schuster Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  874. Lewis, John (2015): “The Case for Regulating Fully Autonomous Weapons”. In: The Yale Law Journal 124, 1309-1325. Open Google Scholar
  875. Lewis, Paul (2017): “‘Our minds can be hijacked’: the tech insiders who fear a smartphone dystopia”. In: The Guardian, October 6. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smartphone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopia [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  876. Leys, Nathan (2018): “Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Crises”. In: Strategic Studies Quarterly 12(1), 48-73. Open Google Scholar
  877. Li, Yeti / Burns, Catherine / Hu, Rui (2015): “Understanding Automated Financial Trading Using work Domain Analysis”. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59(1), 165-169. Open Google Scholar
  878. Liessmann, Konrad Paul (2016): “Neue Menschen! Bilden, optimieren, perfektionieren”. In: Liessmann, Konrad Paul (Ed.): Neue Menschen! Bilden, optimieren, perfektionieren. Philosophicum Lech 19. Wien: Zsolnay, 7-26. Open Google Scholar
  879. Liessmann, Konrad Paul (2019): “In der Ich-Falle”. In: Die Presse, September 28. Online: https://www.diepresse.com/1458209/in-der-ich-falle [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  880. Lim, Hazel Si Min Lim / Taeihagh, Araz (2019): “Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities”. In: Sustainability 11(20), 1-28. Open Google Scholar
  881. Lin, Patrick (2014): “The Robot Car of Tomorrow May Just Be Programmed to Hit You”. In: Wired, June 5. Online: https://www.wired.com/2014/05/the-robot-car-of-tomorrow-might-just-be-programmed-to-hit-youhttps://www.wired.com/2014/05/the-robot-car-of-tomorrow-might-just-be-programmed-to-hit-you/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  882. Lin, Patrick / Bekey, George / Abney, Keith (2008): Autonomous Military Robotics: Risk, Ethics, and Design. Ballston: US Department of Navy, Office of Naval Research. Open Google Scholar
  883. Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (2017): “Moral and Legal Responsibility”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-3. Open Google Scholar
  884. Linke, Anna F. (2015): “Autonomie bei technischen Assistenzsystemen. Ein Trade-Off zwischen Privatheit, Unabhängigkeit und Sicherheit”. In: Weber, Karsten / Frommeld, Debora / Manzeschke, Arne / Fingerau, Heiner (Eds.): Technisierung des Alltags. Beitrag für ein gutes Leben?. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 179-193. Open Google Scholar
  885. Lippert, John / Gruley, Bryan / Inoue, Kae / Coppola, Gabrielle (2018): “Toyota’s vision of autonomous cars is not exactly driverless”. In: Bloomberg Business Week, September 19. Online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-09-19/toyota-s-vision-of-autonomous-cars-is-not-exactly-driverless [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  886. Liu, Hin-Yan (2012): “Categorization and legality of autonomous and remote weapons systems”. In: International Review of the Red Cross 94(886), 627-652. Open Google Scholar
  887. LobbyControl (2020): “Big Tech: Google, Amazon & Co. üben undurchsichtig Einfluss aus”. In: LobbyControl, September 24. Online: https://www.lobbycontrol.de/2020/09/big-tech-google-amazon-co-ueben-undurchsichtigen-einfluss-aushttps://www.lobbycontrol.de/2020/09/big-tech-google-amazon-co-ueben-undurchsichtigen-einfluss-aus/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  888. Locke, John (2006): Versuch über den menschlichen Verstand. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  889. Loh, Janina (2018): Trans- und Posthumanismus zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Open Google Scholar
  890. Loh, Wulf / Loh, Janina (2017): “Autonomy and Responsibility in Hybrid Systems”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 35-50. Open Google Scholar
  891. Lohmann, Georg (2000): “Die unterschiedlichen Menschenrechte”. In: Fritzsche, K. Peter / Lohmann, Georg (Eds.): Menschenrechte zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Wuerzburg: Ergon, 9-23. Open Google Scholar
  892. Lohmann, Georg (2004): “Menschenrechte in Theorie und Praxis”. In: Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.): Menschenrechte und Terrorismus. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) 1. Bern: Staempfli, 305-309. Open Google Scholar
  893. Lohmann, Georg (2008a): “Zu einer relativen Begründung der Universalisierung der Menschenrechte”. In: Nooke, Guenter / Lohmann, Georg / Wahlers, Gerhard (Eds.): Gelten Menschenrechte universal? Begründungen und Infragestellungen. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 218-228. Open Google Scholar
  894. Lohmann, Georg (2008b): “Zur Verständigung über die Universalität der Menschenrechte. Eine Einführung”. In: Nooke, Guenter / Lohmann, Georg / Wahlers, Gerhard (Eds.): Gelten Menschenrechte universal? Begründungen und Infragestellungen. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 47-60. Open Google Scholar
  895. Lohmann, Georg / Pollmann, Arnd / Mahler, Claudia / Weiss, Norman / Gosepath, Stefan (2005): Die Menschenrechte: Unteilbar und gleichgewichtig? Potsdam Studien zu Grund- und Menschenrechten 11. Potsdam: Universitaetsverlag Potsdam. Open Google Scholar
  896. Lohmann, Melinda Florina (2016): “Liability Issues Concerning Self-Driving Vehicles”. In: European Journal of Risk Regulation EJRR 7(2), 335-340. Open Google Scholar
  897. Lohmann, Melinda (2018): “Rise and Regulation of Algorithms”. In: Berkeley Global Society (BGS) Perspectives, November 1. Online: https://berkeleylawsociety.com/en/perspectives/rise-and-regulation-of-algorithmshttps://berkeleylawsociety.com/en/perspectives/rise-and-regulation-of-algorithms [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  898. Loretan, Adrian (2011): “Kirche und Staat in der Schweiz im Horizont einer globalisierten Gesellschaft”. In: Loretan, Adrian (Ed.): Religionsfreiheit im Kontext der Grundrechte: Religionsrechtliche Studien, 2. Zuerich: TVZ, 414-442. Open Google Scholar
  899. Love, James / Hubbard, Tim (2007): “The Big Idea: Prizes to Stimulate R&D for New Medicines”. In: Chicago-Kent Law Review 82(3), 1519-1554. Open Google Scholar
  900. Luca, Michael / Wu, Timothy / Couvidat, Sebastian / Frank, Daniel / Seltzer, William (2015): Does Google Content Degrade Google Search?: Experimental Evidence. Harvard Business School Working Paper 16-035. Online: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23492375 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  901. Lucchi, Nicola (2016): The Impact of Science and Technology on the Rights of the Individual. Law, Governance and Technology 26. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  902. Ludwig, Wolfram / Wolf, Klaus-Hendrik / Duwenkamp, Christopher / Gusew, Nathalie / Hellrung, Nils / Marschollek, Michael / Von Bargen, Tobias / Wag¬n⁠er, Markus / Haux, Reinold (2010): “Health information systems for home telehealth services – a nomenclature for sensor-enhanced transinstitutional information system architectures”. In: Informatics for Health and Social Care 35(3-4), 211-225. Open Google Scholar
  903. Luebbe, Hermann (1990a): Der Lebenssinn der Industriegesellschaft: Über die moralische Verfassung der wissenschaftlich-technischen Zivilisation. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  904. Luebbe, Hermann (1990b): Religion nach der Aufklärung. Graz: Styria. Open Google Scholar
  905. Luebbe, Herrmann (2001): “Religion und Ethik: Sind sie austauschbar?”. In: Luebbe, Herrmann: Aufklärung anlasshalber. Philosophische Essays zu Politik, Religion und Moral. Graefelfing: Resch, 125-129. Open Google Scholar
  906. Luetge, Christoph (2017): “The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving”. In: Philosophy & Technology 30, 547-558. Open Google Scholar
  907. Luetge, Christoph / Kriebitz, Alexander / Raphael, Max (2019): “Ethische und rechtliche Herausforderungen des autonomen Fahrens”. In: Mainzer, Klaus (Ed.): Philosophisches Handbuch Künstliche Intelligenz. Cham: Springer, 1-18. Open Google Scholar
  908. Lugano, Giuseppe (2017): “Virtual assistants and self-driving cars”. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) (Ed.): 15th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications. Warsaw, May 29-31. Online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7972192https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7972192 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  909. Lyotard, Jean-Francois (1988): Le Postmoderne expliqué aux enfants. Correspondence 1982-1985. Paris: Galilée. Open Google Scholar
  910. Macdonald, Kate (2011): “Re-thinking ‘Spheres of Responsibility’: Business Responsibility for Indirect Harm”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 99(4), 549-563. Open Google Scholar
  911. Mackworth, Alan K. (2011): “Architectures and Ethics for Robots: Constraint Satisfaction as a Unitary Design Framework”. In: Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan Leigh (Eds.): Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335-360. Open Google Scholar
  912. Mackworth, Norman H. (1950): Researches on the measurement of human performance. Medical Research Council. Special Report Series 268. London: H. M. Stationery Office. Open Google Scholar
  913. Madrigal, Alexis (2019): “The Coalition Out to Kill Tech as We Know It”. In: The Atlantic, June 4. Online: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/06/how-politicians-and-scholars-turned-against-big-tech/591052/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  914. Mancini, Anna (2005): Internet Justice. Philosophy of Law for the Virtual World. Dover: Buenos Books America. Open Google Scholar
  915. Mangold, Patrizia (2016) Angela Merkel: “Daten sind die Rohstoffe des 21. Jahrhunderts”. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 3. Online: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/cebit/angela-merkel-fordert-mehr-modernisierte-digitale-technologien-14120493.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  916. Mannino, Adriano / Althaus, David / Erhardt, Jonathan / Gloor, Lukas / Hutter, Adrian / Metzinger, Thomas (2015): “Künstliche Intelligenz: Chancen und Risiken”. In: Diskussionspapiere der Stiftung für effektiven Altruismus 2, 1-17. Open Google Scholar
  917. Manzscheke, Arne (2014): “Digitales Operieren und Ethik”. In: Niederlag, Wolfgang / Lemke, Heinz U. / Strauss, Gero / Feussner, Hubertus (Eds.): Der digitale Operationssaal. Berlin: De Gruyter, 227-249. Open Google Scholar
  918. Manzeschke, Arne (2015): “Angewandte Ethik organisieren: MEESTAR – ein Mo¬d⁠ell zur ethischen Deliberation in sozio-technischen Arrangements”. In: Maring, Matthias (Ed.): Vom Praktischwerden der Ethik in interdisziplinärer Sicht: Ansätze und Beispiele der Institutionalisierung, Konkretisierung und Implementierung der Ethik. Zentrum für Technik- und Wirtschaftsethik 7. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 315-330. Open Google Scholar
  919. Manzeschke, Arne (2019): “Roboter in der Pflege: Von Menschen, Maschinen und anderen hilfreichen Wesen”. In: Ethik Journal 5(1), 1-11. Online: https://www.ethikjournal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/ethikjournal/Texte_Ausgabe_1_11_2019/Manzeschke_1.Nov_FINAL.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  920. Manzeschke, Arne / Assadi, Galia / Karsch, Fabian / Viehoever, Willy (2016): “Funktionale Emotionen und emotionale Funktionalität. Über die neue Rolle von Emotionen und Emotionalität in der Mensch-Technik-Interaktion”. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen?. TTN-Studien 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 109-129. Open Google Scholar
  921. Manzeschke, Arne / Brink, Alexander (2020): “Ethik der Digitalisierung in der Automobilbranche am Beispiel selbstfahrender Autos”. In: Walter, Franz (Ed.): Handbuch Industrie 4.0: Recht, Technik und Gesellschaft. Heidelberg: Springer, 713-718. Open Google Scholar
  922. Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (2016): “Einleitung”“. In: Manzeschke, Arne / Karsch, Fabian (Eds.): Roboter, Computer und Hybride. Was ereignet sich zwischen Menschen und Maschinen? TTN-Studien 5, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 7-14. Open Google Scholar
  923. Manzeschke, Arne / Weber, Karsten / Rother, Elisabeth / Fangerau, Heiner (2013): Ethische Fragen im Bereich Altersgerechter Assistenzsysteme: Ergebnisse der Studie. Ludwigsfelde: Druckerei Thiel Gruppe. Open Google Scholar
  924. Marauhn, Thilo (2014): An Analysis of the Potential Impact of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems on Responsibility and Accountability for Violations of International Law. Presentation on the occasion of the CCW expert meeting on lethal autonomous systems, Geneva, May 13-16. Online: https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/35FEA015C2466A57C1257CE4004BCA51/$file/Marauhn_MX_Laws_SpeakingNotes_2014.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  925. Marchant, Gary E. / Allenby, Braden / Arkin, Ronald / Barrett, Edward T. / Borenstein, Jason / Gaudet, Lyn M. / Kittrie, Orde F. / Lin, Patrick / Lucas, George R. / O’Meara, Richard / Silberman, Jared (2011): “International Governance of Autonomous Military Robots”. In: The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 7, 272-315. Open Google Scholar
  926. Marcuse, Herbert (1964): One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar
  927. Mărcuţ, Mirela (2020): The Governance of Digital Policies. Towards a New Competence in the European Union. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  928. Margalit, Avishai (1998): The Decent Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  929. Maritain, Jacques (1948): “Introduction”. In: UNESCO (Ed.): Human Rights: Comments and interpretations. UNESCO/PHS/3 (rev.). Paris: UNESCO, I-IX. Open Google Scholar
  930. Marketers Media (2018): Global Smart Homes Market 2018 by Evolving Technologies, Projections & Estimations, Business Competitors, Cost Structure, Key Companies and Forecast to 2023. Online: https://marketersmedia.com/global-smart-homes-market-2018-by-evolving-technology-projections-estimations-business-competitors-cost-structure-key-companies-and-forecast-to-2023/302165 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  931. Marr, Bernhard (2018): “How AI and machine learning are transforming law firms and the legal sector”. In: Forbes, May 23. Online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/23/how-ai-and-machine-learning-are-transforming-law-firms-and-the-legal-sector/#7587475832c3 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  932. Marschollek, Michel / Becker, Clemens (2013): “Assistierende Gesundheitstechnologien in der geriatrischen Sturzforschung. Auf dem Weg zur Evidenz”. In: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 46(8), 704-705. Open Google Scholar
  933. Marschuetz, Gerhard (2009): Theologisch ethisch nachdenken 1: Grundlagen. Wuerzburg: Echter. Open Google Scholar
  934. Marsh, Sarah (2017): “Girls suffer under pressure of online ‘perfection’, poll finds”. In: The Guardian, August 23. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/23/girls-suffer-under-pressure-of-online-perfection-poll-finds [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  935. Marten, Rainer (1975): “Versuch über die philosophische Bestimmung des Gewissens”. In: Holzhey, Helmut (Ed.): Gewissen? Philosophie aktuell 4. Basel: Schwabe, 119-133. Open Google Scholar
  936. Martinesco, Andrea / Netto, Mariana / Miranda Neto, Arthur / Etgens, Victor H. (2019): “A Note on Accidents Involving Autonomous Vehicles: Interdependence of Event Data Recorder, Human-Vehicle Cooperation and Legal Aspects”. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(34), 407-410. Open Google Scholar
  937. Martínez-Díaz, Margarita / Soriguera, Francesc / Pérez, Ignacio (2018): “Autonomous driving: a bird’s eye view”. In: IET Intelligent Transport Systems 13(4), 563-579. Open Google Scholar
  938. Martini, Carlo Maria (2001): Damit Leben stimmig wird. Orientierungen. Muenchen: Neue Stadt. Open Google Scholar
  939. Martinot, Eric (2000): Ten cases of technology transfer. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/783611480673964102/Ten-cases-of-technology-transfer [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  940. Martinsen, Renate (2004): Staat und Gewissen im technischen Zeitalter: Prolegomena einer politologischen Aufklärung. Weilerswist: Velbrueck. Open Google Scholar
  941. Martin-Shields, Charles (2013): “Inter-ethnic Cooperation Revisited: Why Mobile Phones Can Help Prevent Discrete Events of Violence, Using the Kenyan Case Study”. In: International Journal of Security and Development 2(58), 1-13. Open Google Scholar
  942. Massit-Folléa, Françoise (2013): “Standards, Agreements, and Normative Collissions in Internet Governance”. In: Massit-Folléa, Françoise / Méadel, Cécile / Monnoyer-Smith, Laurence (Eds.): Normative Experience in Internet Politics. Paris: Presses des Mines, 67-89. Open Google Scholar
  943. Mateescu, Alexandra / Brunton, Douglad / Rosenblat, Alex / Patton, Desmond / Gold, Zachary / Boyd, Danah (2015): “Social Media Surveillance and Law Enforcement”. In: Data & Civil rights: A new era of policing and justice. Online: https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Social_Media_Surveillance_and_Law_Enforcement.pdfhttps://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Social_Media_Surveillance_and_Law_Enforcement.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  944. Mathias, Paul (2007): “The last frontier? L’Internet au-delà de tout territoire”. In: Cités 3(31), 93-103. Open Google Scholar
  945. Mathieu, Nadine / Loehnhardt, Benjamin / Gruetz, Romanus / Weil, Philipp / Krawczak, Michael (2013): “Ethische und rechtliche Implikationen der Spe⁠i¬cherung humaner Genomdaten”. In: Medizinische Genetik 25(2), 278-283. Open Google Scholar
  946. Mathis, Klaus / Tor, Avishalom (Eds.) (2016): ‘Nudging’ – Possibilities, Limitations and Applications in European Law and Economics. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  947. Mathis, Leonie (2019): ‘Sexroboter’: Repräsentanten, funktionale Dienstleister und beziehungsstiftende Spielzeuge. Masters Seminar Paper (Supervisor: Peter G. Kirchschlaeger), Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences: Philosophy, University of Lucerne. Open Google Scholar
  948. Mathwig, Frank (2000): Technikethik – Ethiktechnik: Was leistet Angewandte Ethik?. Forum Systematik 3. Stuttgart: Wilhelm Kohlhammer. Open Google Scholar
  949. Matthias, Andreas (2004): “The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata”. In: Ethics Information Technology 6, 175-183. Open Google Scholar
  950. Matzner, Tobias (2019): “Autonome Trolleys und andere Probleme. Konfigurationen Künstlicher Intelligenz in ethischen Debatten über selbstfahrende Kraftfahrzeuge”. In: Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 21(11), 46-55. Open Google Scholar
  951. MaxAudience (2016): “Millennials check their phones 157 times a day!” Online: https://www.facebook.com/maxaudiencemarketing/posts/millennials-check-their-phones-157-times-a-day/1072911816083584https://www.facebook.com/maxaudiencemarketing/posts/millennials-check-their-phones-157-times-a-day/1072911816083584/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  952. Maxwell, Maltz (2015): Psycho-Cybernetics: Updated and Expanded. New York: Tarcher Perigee. Open Google Scholar
  953. Mayer-Tasch, Peter Cornelius (2006): Mitte und Mass: Leitbild des Humanismus von den Ursprüngen bis zur Gegenwart. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  954. McCarthy, John / Minsky, Marvin L. / Rochester, Nathaniel/ Shannon, Claude E. (1995): “A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence: August 31, 1955”. In: AI Magazine 27(4), 12-14. Open Google Scholar
  955. McCorquodale, Robert (2009): “Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 87, 385-400. Open Google Scholar
  956. McCorquodale, Robert / Simons, Penelope (2007): “Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law”. In: Modern Law Review 70, 598-625. Open Google Scholar
  957. McDonald, Aleecia M. / Cranor, Lorrie Faith (2008): “The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies”. In: Journal of Policy for the Information Society 4(3), 540-565. Open Google Scholar
  958. McDonald, Shannon Sanders / Rodier, Caroline (2015): “Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035, and 2050”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation 2. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 225-233. Open Google Scholar
  959. McFarland, Tim / McCormack, Tim (2014): “Mind the Gap: Can Developers of Autonomous Weapons Systems be Liable for War Crimes?”. In: International Law Studies 90, 361-385. Open Google Scholar
  960. McGee, Ellen / Maguire, Gerald (2001): “Implantable Brain Chips: Ethical and Policy Issues”. In: Journal of Medical Ethics 24(2), 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  961. McKinnnon, Rebecca (2012): Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle For Internet Freedom. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  962. McKinsey Global Institute (2017): Jobs lost, jobs gained: What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages. Online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Public%20and%20Social%20Sector/Our%20Insights/What%20the%20future%20of%20work%20will%20mean%20for%20jobs%20skills%20and%20wages/MGI-Jobs-Lost-Jobs-Gained-Executive-summary-December-6-2017.pdf. [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  963. McLaren, Bruce (2011): “Computational Models of Ethical Reasoning: Challenges, Initial Steps, and Future Directions”. In: Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan Leigh (Eds.): Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 297-315. Open Google Scholar
  964. McNamara, Steven (2016): “The Law and Ethics of High-Frequency Trading”. In: Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 17(1), 71-152. Open Google Scholar
  965. Meacharm, Darian / Studley, Matthew (2017): “Could a Robot Care? It’s All in the Movement”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 97-112. Open Google Scholar
  966. Meadows, Donella / Meadows, Dennis / Randers, Jørgen / Behrens, William W. III (1972): The limits to growth. New York: Universe books. Open Google Scholar
  967. Médecins Sans Frontières (2001): A Matter of Life and Death: The Role of Patents in Access to Essential Medicines. Geneva: Médecins Sans Frontières. Open Google Scholar
  968. Médecins Sans Frontières (2016): Patent Opposition Database. Online: https://www.patentoppositions.org/en/about [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  969. Mehta, Krishen / Shubert, Esther / Dayle Siu, Erika (2020): Tax Justice and Global Inequality. London: Zed Books Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  970. Meissner, Anne (2017): “Technisierung der professionellen Pflege. Einfluss. Wirkung. Veränderung”. In: Hagemann, Tim (Ed.): Gestaltung des Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen im Zeitalter von Digitalisierung und technischer Assistenz. Forschung und Entwicklung in der Sozialwirtschaft 11. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 153-172. Open Google Scholar
  971. Meixner, Werner (2016): Die Gefahr der totalen Vernetzung. TU Muenchen, Institut für Informatik, April 25. Online: http://wwwmayr.in.tum.de/personen/meixner/GefahrTotalerVernetzung_Mannheim.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  972. Meixner, Werner (2017): Vernetzte Smarte Diktatur oder Ethische Reformation?. Technische Universität Muenchen, Institut für Informatik, July. Online: http://wwwmayr.in.tum.de/personen/meixner/SmarteDiktaturOderEthischeReformation.pdfhttp://wwwmayr.in.tum.de/personen/meixner/SmarteDiktaturOderEthischeReformation.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  973. Menez, Raphael / Pfeiffer, Sabine / Oestreicher, Elke (2016): Leitbilder von Mensch und Technik im Diskurs zur Zukunft der Fabrik und Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM). Universitaet Hohenheim, Lehrstuhl für Soziologie. Working Paper 01-2016. Online: http://docplayer.org/32557644-Leitbilder-von-mensch-und-technik-im-diskurs-zur-zukun8-der-fabrik-und-computer-integrated-manufacturing-cim.htmlhttp://docplayer.org/32557644-Leitbilder-von-mensch-und-technik-im-diskurs-zur-zukun8-der-fabrik-und-computer-integrated-manufacturing-cim.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  974. Menke, Christoph / Pollmann, Arnd (2007): Philosophie der Menschenrechte zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Open Google Scholar
  975. Mensching, Christian (2014): Hassrede im Internet. Grundrechtsvergleich und re¬g⁠ulatorische Konsequenzen. Schriften zum Internationalen Recht 196. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
  976. Merat, Natasha / Jamson, Hamish A. (2009): “Is Drivers’ Situation Awareness Influenced by a Fully Automated Driving Scenario?”. In: de Waard, Dick / Godthelp, Hans / Kooi, Frank / Brookhuis, Karel (Eds.): Human Factors, Security and Safety. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Conference, Soesterberg, the Netherlands. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing, 15-17. Open Google Scholar
  977. Merkel, Miriam (2018): Mein Kopf gehört mir. Eine Reise durch die schöne neue Welt des Brainhacking. Muenchen: Piper. Open Google Scholar
  978. Mertes, Michael (2010): “Menschenrechtsschutz im Cyberspace”. In: Die Politische Meinung 492, 10-14. Open Google Scholar
  979. Mertz, Marcel / Jannes, Marc / Schlomann, Anna / Manderscheid, Enza / Rietz, Christian / Woopen, Christiane (2016): Digitale Selbstbestimmung. Cologne: Cologne center for ethics, rights, economics, and social sciences of health. Online: https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/6891/1/ceres_Digitale_Selbstbestimmung.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  980. Metzinger, Thomas (2019): “Nehmt der Industrie die Ethik weg!”. In: Tagesspiegel, April 8. Online: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-ethikrichtlinien-fuer-kuenstliche-intelligenz-nehmt-der-industrie-die-ethik-weg/24195388.htmlhttps://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-ethikrichtlinien-fuer-kuenstliche-intelligenz-nehmt-der-industrie-die-ethik-weg/24195388.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  981. Metzler, Marco (2016) Martin Ford: “Automatisierung wird die ganze Arbeitswelt erfassen”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, February 19. Online: https://nzzas.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/martin-ford-automatisierung-wird-die-ganze-arbeitswelt-erfassen-ld.145015?reduced=truehttps://nzzas.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/martin-ford-automatisierung-wird-die-ganze-arbeitswelt-erfassen-ld.145015?reduced=true [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  982. Meyer, Gereon (2019): “European Roadmaps, Programs, and Projects for Innovation in Connected and Automated Road Transport”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation 5. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 27-39. Open Google Scholar
  983. Meyer, Matthias (2015): “Die Digitalisierung als sozialethische Herausforderung”. In: Kirche und Gesellschaft 16(424), 6-7. Open Google Scholar
  984. Meyer, Michelle N. (2014b): “Misjudgements will drive social trials underground”. In: Nature 511, 265. Open Google Scholar
  985. Meyer, Sibylle (2016): Technische Unterstützung im Alter – was ist möglich, was ist sinnvoll? Expertise zum Siebten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin: Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen. Open Google Scholar
  986. Meyer, Stephan (2014a): “Der Einsatz von Robotern zur Gefahrenabwehr”. In: Hilgendorf, Eric (Ed.): Robotik im Kontext von Recht und Moral. Robotik und Recht 3, 211-237. Open Google Scholar
  987. Meyer, Wolfgang / Huffziger, Anne (2015): “Einsatz technischer Assistenzsysteme in ambulanten Wohngemeinschaften. Ein Mehrwert für Bewohner, Mitarbeiter und Unternehmen”. In: Becher, Berthold / Hoelscher, Martin (Eds.): Wohnen und die Pflege von Senioren. Neue Versorgungsarrangements, neue Geschäfts¬modelle. Hannover: Vincentz Network, 284-294. Open Google Scholar
  988. Michels-Riess, Birgit / Johnigk, Ulrich (2017): “Altenhilfe integriert smarte Technik”. In: Heilberufe / Das Pflegemagazin 68(9), 44-45. Open Google Scholar
  989. Mieth, Dietmar (1992): “Gewissen”. In: Wils, Jean-Pierre / Mieth, Dietmar (Eds.): Grundbegriffe der christlichen Ethik. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh, 225-242. Open Google Scholar
  990. Mikkelae, Julius (2015): Should I Cyborg? A study into public opinion on Human Enhancement Technologies. Oerebro: Oerebro University School of Business. Open Google Scholar
  991. Millar, Jason (2017): “Ethics Settings for Autonomous Vehicles”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 20-35. Open Google Scholar
  992. Miller, David (1992): Distributive Justice: What the People Think. In: Ethics 102(April), 555-593. Open Google Scholar
  993. Miller, Paul D. (2012) Bruce Sterling: “Bruce Sterling: Notes From the Near Future”. In: Origin Magazine, May 10. Open Google Scholar
  994. Miller, Seumas (2018): Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  995. Misselhorn, Catrin (2018): Grundfragen der Maschinenethik. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  996. Misselhorn, Catrin (2019): Roboterethik. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Analysen & Argumente 340, February. Online: https://www.kas.de/documents/252038/4521287/AA340_Roboterethik.pdf/34379c53-23dc-bfb0-239f-4b0fcc6a8947?version=1.0&t=1549957355653 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  997. MIT Connection Science (2018): The Technology of Innovation. Online: https://connection.mit.eduhttps://connection.mit.edu/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  998. Mitcham, Carl (2014): “Agency in Humans and in Artifacts: A Contested Discourse”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 11-29. Open Google Scholar
  999. Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel / Wachter, Sandra / Allo, Patrick / Taddeo, Mariarosaria / Floridi, Luciano (2016): “The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate”. In: Big Data & Society 3(2), 1-21. Open Google Scholar
  1000. Mittler, Elmar (2014): “Nachhaltige Infrastruktur für die Literatur- und Informationsversorgung: Im digitalen Zeitalter ein überholtes Paradigma – oder so wichtig wie noch nie?”. In: Bibliothek, Forschung und Praxis 38(3), 344-364. Open Google Scholar
  1001. Mladenović, Milos N. / Abbas, Montasir / McPherson, Tristram (2014): “Development of socially sustainable traffic-control principles for self-driving vehicles: The ethics of anthropocentric design”. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) (Ed.): IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, 1-8. Online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6893448https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6893448 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1002. Mladenović, Milos N. / McPherson, Tristram (2016): “Engineering Social Justice into Traffic Control for Self-Driving Vehicles?”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 22, 1131-1149. Open Google Scholar
  1003. Moeckli, Andreas (2019): “Roche-Präsident über Digitalisierung: ‘Ich halte nichts von Angstmacherei’”. In: Luzerner Zeitung, February 11. Online: https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/wirtschaft/roche-praesident-ueber-digitalisierung-ich-halte-nichts-von-angstmacherei-ld.1092784 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1004. Moehring-Hesse, Matthias (1997): Theozentrik, Sittlichkeit und Moralität christlicher Glaubenspraxis. Theologische Reflexionen. Studien zur Theologischen Ethik 75. Freiburg im Uechtland: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  1005. Mohammed, Amina (2015): “Deepening income inequality”. In: World Economic Forum (WEF) (Ed.): Top 10 Trends of 2015. Online: http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-global-agenda-2015/top-10-trends-of-2015/1-deepening-income-inequalityhttp://reports.weforum.org/outlook-global-agenda-2015/top-10-trends-of-2015/1-deepening-income-inequality/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1006. Montag, Ali (2018): “Nobel-winning economist: Authorities will bring down ‘hammer’ on bitcoin”. In: CNBC, July 9. Online: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/09/nobel-prize-winning-economist-joseph-stiglitz-criticizes-bitcoin.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/09/nobel-prize-winning-economist-joseph-stiglitz-criticizes-bitcoin.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1007. Montreal Declaration (2018): For a Responsible Development of AI. Online: https://www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/the-declarationhttps://www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/the-declaration [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1008. Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987): About Montreal Protocol. UN Environment Programme (UNEP). Online: https://www.unep.org/ozonaction/who-we-are/about-montreal-protocolhttps://www.unep.org/ozonaction/who-we-are/about-montreal-protocol [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1009. Moor, James H. (1985): “What is Computer Ethics?”. In: Metaphilosophy 16(4), 266-275. Open Google Scholar
  1010. Moor, James H. (1995): “Is Ethics Computable?”. In: Metaphilosophy 26(1/2), 1-21. Open Google Scholar
  1011. Moor, James H. (2006): “The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics”. In: IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(4), 18-21. Open Google Scholar
  1012. Moral Machine (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://www.moralmachine.nethttps://www.moralmachine.net/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1013. Moravec, Hans (1988): Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1014. Morgan Stanley (2018): “Power Play: What Impact Will Cryptocurrencies Have on Global Utilities?”. Online: https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/cryptocurrencies-global-utilitieshttps://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/cryptocurrencies-global-utilities [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1015. Morozov, Evgeny (2013): To Save Everything, Click Here. London: Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  1016. Morsink, Johannes (2010): “The Universal Declaration and the Conscience of Humanity”. In: Huhle, Rainer (Ed.): Human Rights and History: A Challenge for Education. Foundation Remembrance, Responsibility and Future. Berlin: Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft, 25-36. Open Google Scholar
  1017. Mousave, Seyed Sajad / Schukat, Michael / Howley, Enda (2018): “Deep reinforcement learning: An overview”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08894 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1018. Moyn, Samuel (2010): The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1019. Mueller, Joerg Paul (2005): “Menschenrechte als Grundlage einer globalen wirtschaftlichen und politischen Ordnung”. In: Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.): Menschenrechte und Wirtschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen State und Nonstate Actors. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) 2. Bern: Staempfli, 185-196. Open Google Scholar
  1020. Mueller, Julian F. / Gogoll, Jan (2020): “Should Manual Driving be (Eventually) Outlawed?”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 26, 1549-1567. Open Google Scholar
  1021. Mueller, Vincent C. (2014): “Autonomous killer robots are probably good news”. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 273, 297-305. Open Google Scholar
  1022. Mueller, Vincent C. / Bostrom, Nick (2014): “Future Progress in artificial intelligence: A poll among experts”. In: AI Matters 1(1), 9-11. Open Google Scholar
  1023. Mueller, Vincent C. / Bostrom, Nick (2016): “Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion”. In: Mueller, Vincent C. (Ed.): Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Synthese Library. Berlin: Springer, 553-571. Open Google Scholar
  1024. Mueller-Dott, Christoph (2019): “KI und Ethik – Wenn autonome Fahrzeuge Fehler machen”. In: ATZelektronik 14(11), 16-19. Open Google Scholar
  1025. Muggah, Robert / Diniz, Gustavo (2013): “Digitally Enhanced Violence Prevention in the Americas”. In: International Journal of Security and Development 2(57), 1-23. Open Google Scholar
  1026. Mukerji, Nikil / Nida-Ruemelin, Julian (2014): “Towards a Moderate Stance on Human Enhancement”. In: Humana.mente – Journal of Philosophical Studies 7(26), 17-33. Open Google Scholar
  1027. Mullins, Brody / Nicas, Jack (2017): “Paying Professors: Inside Google’s Academic Influence Campaign”. In: The Wall Street Journal, July 14. Online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/paying-professors-inside-googles-academic-influence-campaign-1499785286 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1028. Murray, Shanahan (2015): The Technological Singularity. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  1029. Musgrave, Alan (2001): “NOA’s Ark – Fine for Realism”. In: Papineau, David (Ed.): Oxford Readings in The Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 45-60. Open Google Scholar
  1030. Nadella, Satya (2016): “The Partnership of the Future: Microsoft’s CEO explores how humans and A.I. can work together to solve society’s greatest challenges”. In: Slate, June 28. Online: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/06/microsoft_ceo_satya_nadella_humans_and_a_i_can_work_together_to_solve_society.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/06/microsoft_ceo_satya_nadella_humans_and_a_i_can_work_together_to_solve_society.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1031. Nakamura, Lisa (2013): Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  1032. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) (n.d.): Code of Ethics. Online: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1033. Nature (2016): “Digital intuition”. In: Nature, January 27. Online: http://www.nature.com/news/digital-intuition-1.19230 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1034. Neher, Peter (2013): “Zwischen Wirtschaftlichkeit und Menschlichkeit”. In: Kirche und Gesellschaft 41(405), 3-16. Open Google Scholar
  1035. Nemitz, Paul Friedrich (2018): “Constitutional Democracy and Technology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence”. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 376(2133). Online: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1036. Neue Zuercher Zeitung (2011): “Der lange Weg zum Frauenstimmrecht”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, February 4. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/frauenstimmrecht-1.9350588?reduced=true [11.15.2020]. Open Google Scholar
  1037. Neuhaeuser, Christian (2011): Unternehmen als moralische Akteure. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  1038. Neuhaeuser, Christian (2012): “Künstliche Intelligenz und ihr moralischer Standpunkt”. In: Beck, Susanne (Ed.): Jenseits von Mensch und Maschine: Ethische und rechtliche Fragen zum Umgang mit Robotern, Künstlicher Intelligenz und Cyborgs. Robotik und Recht 1. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 23-42. Open Google Scholar
  1039. Neuhaeuser, Christian (2014): “Roboter und moralische Verantwortung”. In: Hilgendorf, Eric (Ed.): Robotik im Kontext von Recht und Moral. Robotik und Recht 3. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 269-286. Open Google Scholar
  1040. Neuman, Gerald (2003): “Human Rights and Constitutional Rights”. In: Stanford Law Review 55(5), 1863-1900. Open Google Scholar
  1041. Neuss, Robert (2001): Usability Engineering als Ansatz zum Multimodalen Men⁠sch-Maschine-Dialog. Muenchen: Technische Universitaet. Open Google Scholar
  1042. Nevejans, Nathalie (2016): European Civil Law Rules in Robotics. Study for the JURI Committee, European Parliament. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STUhttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU(2016)571379_EN.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1043. Newell, Sue / Marabelli, Marco (2015): “Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification’”. In: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 24(1), 3-14. Open Google Scholar
  1044. Newmann, Jared (2009): “Google’s Schmidt Roasted for Privacy Comments”. In: PC World, December 11. Online: https://www.pcworld.com/article/184446/googles_schmidt_roasted_for_privacy_comments.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1045. Newton, Michael A. (2015): “Back to the Future: Reflections on the Advent of Autonomous Weapons Systems”. In: Journal of International Law 47, 5-23. Open Google Scholar
  1046. Nezik, Ann-Kathrin (2019): “Regelt das!”. In: Die Zeit, September 19, 24. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/39/digitalunternehmen-facebook-apple-google-digitalisierung-regelung [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1047. Nickel, James W. (2015): “Personal Deserts and Human Rights”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 153-165. Open Google Scholar
  1048. Nickel, Philip J. / Frank, Lily E. (2020): “Trust in medicine”. In: Simon, Judith (Ed.): Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 367-377. Open Google Scholar
  1049. Nickel, Philip J./ Franssen, Maarten P. M. / Kroes, Peter A. (2010): “Can we make sense of the notion of trustworthy technology?”. In: Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23(3-4), 429-444. Open Google Scholar
  1050. Nida-Ruemelin, Julian (2005): Über menschliche Freiheit. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  1051. Nida-Ruemelin, Julian (2011): Verantwortung. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  1052. Nida-Ruemelin, Julian (2018): “Vorwort von Julian Nida-Rümelin”. In: Nida-Ruemelin, Julian / Weidenfeld, Nathalie (Eds.): Digitaler Humanismus: Eine Ethik für das Zeitalter der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Muenchen: Piper, 9-11. Open Google Scholar
  1053. Nida-Ruemelin, Julian / Weidenfeld, Nathalie (Eds.) (2018): Digitaler Humanismus: Eine Ethik für das Zeitalter der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Muenchen: Piper. Open Google Scholar
  1054. Nienaber, Andre (2017): “Versorgungskonzepte und technische Assistenz”. In: Hagemann, Tim (Ed.): Gestaltung des Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen im Zeitalter von Digitalisierung und technischer Assistenz. Forschung und Entwicklung in der Sozialwirtschaft 11. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 169-182. Open Google Scholar
  1055. Nienhaus, Lisa (2019): “Operation Grössenwahn”. In: Die Zeit, June 27. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/27/digitalwaehrung-facebook-visa-mastercard-geld-notenbanken/komplettansicht [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1056. Noble, Safiya (2018): Algorithms of Oppression. New York: New York University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1057. Nodder, Chris (2013): Evil by Design: Interaction Design to Lead Us into Temptation. Indianapolis: John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar
  1058. Noichl, Franz (1993): Gewissen und Ideologie: Zur Möglichkeit der Rekonstruktion eines unbedingten Sollens. Freiburger theologische Studien 152. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  1059. Norwawi, Norita Md / Alwi, Najwa Hayaati Mohd / Ismail, Roesnita / Wahid, Fauziah / Alkaenay, Nader M. (2014): “Promoting Islamic Ethics on Privacy in Digital Social Network For User Data Protection and Trust”. In: Ulūm Islāmiyyah Journal 13, 115-127. Open Google Scholar
  1060. Nosthoff, Anna-Verena / Maschewski, Felix (2019): Die Gesellschaft der Wearables. Digitale Verführung und soziale Kontrolle. Berlin: Nicolai Publishing & Intelligence GmbH. Open Google Scholar
  1061. Nothelle-Wildfeuer, Ursula (1999): Soziale Gerechtigkeit und Zivilgesellschaft. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh. Open Google Scholar
  1062. Nothelle-Wildfeuer, Ursula (2008): “Die Sozialprinzipien der Katholischen Soziallehre”. In: Rauscher, Anton (Ed.): Handbuch der Katholischen Soziallehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 143-163. Open Google Scholar
  1063. Novet, Jordan (2018): “Facebook forms a special ethics team to prevent bias in its A.I. software”. In: CNBC, May 3. Online: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/03/facebook-ethics-team-prevents-bias-in-ai-software.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/03/facebook-ethics-team-prevents-bias-in-ai-software.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1064. Nowak, Manfred (2002): Einführung in das internationale Menschenrechtssystem. Wien: NWV. Open Google Scholar
  1065. Nussbaum, Martha C. (1993): “Menschliches Tun und soziale Gerechtigkeit. Zur Verteidigung des aristotelischen Essentialismus”. In: Brumlik, Micha / Brunkhorst, Hauke (Eds.): Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 324-363. Open Google Scholar
  1066. Nussbaum, Martha C. (1995): “Human Capabilities, Female Human Beings”. In: Nussbaum, Martha C. / Glover, Jonathan (Eds.): Women, culture, and development: A study of human capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61-104. Open Google Scholar
  1067. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2002): Capabilities and Human Rights. In: De Greiff, Pablo/Ciaran, Cronin P. (Eds.): Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 117–149. Open Google Scholar
  1068. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2006): Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1069. Nyholm, Sven / Smids, Jilles (2020): “Automated cars meet human drivers: responsible human-robot coordination and the ethics of mixed traffic”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 22, 335-344. Open Google Scholar
  1070. O’Connor, Tom (2016): “The Value of Competent Human Advisers”. In: CFA Institute Magazine 27(2), 22. Open Google Scholar
  1071. O’Neil, Cathy (2016): Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Broadway Books. Open Google Scholar
  1072. Odiot, Alice / Gallet, Audrey (2012): Sambia: Wer profitiert vom Kupfer?. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_D2N4QwGOQUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_D2N4QwGOQU [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1073. OECD (2015): Data-Driven Innovation: Big Data for Growth and Well-Being. Online: https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en?format=pdfhttps://read.oecd.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en?format=pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1074. OECD (2016): The Internet of Things: Seizing the Benefits and Addressing the Challenges. Background report for Ministerial Panel 2.2. Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation Committee on Digital Economy Policy. May 24. Online: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/ICCP/CISP%282015%293/FINAL&docLanguage=En [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1075. OECD (2019a): Artificial Intelligence in Society. Online: https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en?format=pdfhttps://read.oecd.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en?format=pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1076. OECD (2019b): OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principleshttps://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1077. OECD (2019c): Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments. OECD/LEGAL/0449. Online: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/api/print?ids=648&lang=enhttps://legalinstruments.oecd.org/api/print?ids=648&lang=en [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1078. OECD (2020): OECD presents analysis showing significant impact of proposed international tax reforms. February 13. Online: https://www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-presents-analysis-showing-significant-impact-of-proposed-international-tax-reforms.htmhttps://www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-presents-analysis-showing-significant-impact-of-proposed-international-tax-reforms.htm [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1079. OECD (n.d.): What is BEPS? Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Online: http://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/about/#mission-impacthttp://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/about/#mission-impact [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1080. Oehler, Andreas (2015): Digitale Welt und Finanzen. Zahlungsdienste und Finanzberatung unter einer Digitalen Agenda. Sachverständigenrat für Verbraucherfragen. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat für Verbraucherfragen beim Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. Online: https://www.svr-verbraucherfragen.de/dokumente/digitale-welt-und-finanzen-ergebnisse-und-handlungsempfehlungenhttps://www.svr-verbraucherfragen.de/dokumente/digitale-welt-und-finanzen-ergebnisse-und-handlungsempfehlungen/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1081. Oerder, Katharina (2016): “Mitbestimmung 4.0. Der Wandel der Arbeitswelt als Chance für mehr Beteiligung”. In: WISO Direkt 24, 1-4. Open Google Scholar
  1082. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (n.d.): The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/digitalage/pages/digitalageindex.aspxhttps://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/digitalage/pages/digitalageindex.aspx [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1083. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2000): Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/BusinessHRen.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1084. Ohly, Lukas (2019a): Ethik der Robotik und der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Theologisch-Philosophische Beiträge zu Gegenwartsfragen 22. Berlin: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  1085. Ohly, Lukas (2019b): “Was heisst hier autonom? Über die moralische Autorenschaft selbstfahrender Autos”. In: Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik 63(4), 294-300. Open Google Scholar
  1086. Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang (2010): “Reconaissance et vulnérabilité: Honneth et Butler”. In: Archives de Philosophie 73(1), 119-141. Open Google Scholar
  1087. Opitz, Peter J. (2002): Menschenrechte und internationaler Menschenrechtsschutz im 20. Jahrhundert: Geschichte und Dokumente. Muenchen: Wilhelm Fink. Open Google Scholar
  1088. On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee, Society of Automotive Engineers SAE International (2016): “Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles”. Online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/j3016_201609 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1089. OSCE (2013): Guidelines on Human Rights Education for Health Workers. Online: https://www.osce.org/odihr/105053 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1090. Organization of American States (OAS) (1988): Protocol of San Salvador. Online: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/Treaties/a-52.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1091. Ortega y Gasset, José (1949): Betrachtungen über die Technik. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar
  1092. Orwell, Georges (1949): Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Ullstein. Open Google Scholar
  1093. Ott, Konrad (2005): “Technikethik”. In: Nida-Ruemelin, Julian (Ed.): Angewandte Ethik: Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung: Ein Handbuch. Stuttgart: Alfred Kroener, 569-590. Open Google Scholar
  1094. Oxfam (2016): An Economy for the 1%. How privilege and power in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped. Online: https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-1https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-1 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1095. Pagallo, Ugo (2014): “The Legal Challenges of the Information Revolution and the Principle of ‘Privacy by Design’”. In: Luppicini, Rocci (Ed.): Evolving Issues Surrounding Technoethics and Society in the Digital Age. Pennsylvania: Hershey, 128-148. Open Google Scholar
  1096. Partnership on AI (PAI) (2016): Tenets. Online: www.partnershiponai.org/tenets/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1097. Parfit, Derek (1984): Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  1098. Palazzani, Laura (2017): Dalla bio-etica alla tecno-etica: nuove sfide al diritto. Torino: Giappichelli. Open Google Scholar
  1099. Palm, Julian (2013): Berechtigung und Aktualität des Böckenförde-Diktums. Eine Überprüfung vor dem Hintergrund der religiös-weltanschaulichen Neutralität des Staates: Möglichkeiten des Staates zur Pflege seiner Voraussetzungen durch Werteerziehung in der öffentlichen Schule. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  1100. Panek, Paul / Dangl, Hannes / Hlauschek, Walter / Mayer, Peter / Wagner, Peter / Werner, Franz / Zagler, Wolfgang (2014): “Ein ambientes Assistenzsystem im Alltagseinsatz – Erfahrungen und Ausblick”. In: Kempter, Guido / Ritter, Walter (Eds.): Conference: uday XII, At FH Vorarlberg, Dornbirn, Volume: Assistenztechnik für betreutes Wohnen, Beiträge zum Usability Day XII, Lengerich: Pabst Science Publisher, 68-77. Open Google Scholar
  1101. Papa, Enrica / Ferreira, Antonio (2018): “Sustainable Accessibility and the Implementation of Automated Vehicles: Identifying Critical Decisions”. In: Urban Science 2(5), 1-14. Open Google Scholar
  1102. Papacharissi, Zizi (2002): “The virtual sphere: the internet as a public sphere”. In: Media & Society 4, 9-27. Open Google Scholar
  1103. Pappenberger, Manfred (2013): “Schattenkriege im 21. Jahrhundert. Die Automatisierung des Krieges durch Drohnen und Roboterwaffen”. In: Forum Pazifismus 2, 38-44. Open Google Scholar
  1104. Pawlikowski, John T. (2001): “The Holocaust: Its Challenges for Understanding Human Responsibility”. In: Bank, Judith H. / Pawolikowski, John T. (Eds.): Ethics in the Shadow of the Holocaust: Christian and Jewish Perspectives. Chicago: Sheed & Ward, 261-289. Open Google Scholar
  1105. Pech, Timo / Gabriel, Matthias / Jaehn, Benjamin / Kuehnert, David / Reisdorf, Pierre / Wanielik, Gerd (2016): “Prototyping Framework for Cooperative Interaction of Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users”. In: Schulze, Tim / Mueller, Beate / Meyer, Gereon (Eds.): Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2016. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 43-53. Open Google Scholar
  1106. Pentland, Alex (2007): “On The Collective Nature of Human Intelligence”. In: Journal of Adaptive Behavior 15(2), 189-198. Open Google Scholar
  1107. Pentland, Alex (2008): Honest Signals: How they shape our world. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  1108. Pentland, Alex (2009): “Society’s Nervous System: A Key to Effective Government, Energy Efficiency, and Public Health”. In: MIT Faculty Newsletter 21(5). Online: http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/215/pentland.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/215/pentland.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1109. Pentland, Alex (2014a): Social Physics: How Social Networks can make us smarter. New York: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  1110. Pentland, Alex (2014b): Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread: The Lessons from a new Science. New York: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  1111. Pentland, Alex (2014c): Alex Pentland’s response to Javier Livas. Online: https://twitter.com/alex_pentland/status/460086689956761600https://twitter.com/alex_pentland/status/460086689956761600 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1112. Pereira, Andre Maia / Anany, Hossam / Přibyl, Ondrej / Přikryl, Jan (2017): “Automated vehicles in smart urban environment: A review”. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) (Ed.): 2017 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP). Prague, May, 25-26. Online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7973864https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7973864 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1113. Pereira, Luís Monz / Saptawijaya, Ari (2016): Programming Machine Ethics. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  1114. Perret, Fabienne / Arnold, Tobias / Fischer, Remo / de Haan, Peter / Haefeli, Ueli (2018): Automatisiertes Fahren in der Schweiz: Das Steuer aus der Hand geben?. Online: https://www.ebp.ch/sites/default/files/2020-02/3996_Automatisiertes-Fahren-in-der-Schweiz_OA.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1115. Perry, Michael J. (2005): “The Morality of Human Rights: A Nonreligious Ground?”. In: Emory Law Journal 54, 97-150. Open Google Scholar
  1116. Peters, Michael A. / Jandrić, Petar / Hayes, Sarah (2018): “The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work?”. In: Educational Philosophy and Theory 51(3), 242-254. Open Google Scholar
  1117. Peters, Ted (2011): “Progress and provolution: Will transhumanism leave sin behind?”. In: Cole-Turner, Ronald (Ed.): Transhumanism and Transcendence: Christian Hope in an Age of Technological Enhancement. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 63-86. Open Google Scholar
  1118. Peters, Ted (2015): “Theologians Testing Transhumanism”. In: Theology and Science 13(2), 130-149. Open Google Scholar
  1119. Petersen, Steve (2017): “Superintelligence as Superethical”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 322-337. Open Google Scholar
  1120. Peterson, Bela (2014): “The vision of automated driving: What is it good for? Answers from society with economical and organizational perspectives”. In: IEEE (Ed.): 11th European Radar Conference, 420-426. Online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6991297https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6991297 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1121. Peterson, Martin (2009): An Introduction to Decision Theory. Stockholm: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1122. Pfeifer, Rolf / Scheier, Christian (1999): Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  1123. Pianalto, Matthew (2012): “Moral Courage and Facing Others”. In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20(2), 165-184. Open Google Scholar
  1124. Piater, Justus (2020): Künstliche Intelligenz: Grundlagen, Erfolge, Herausforderungen. Keynote at the Annual Meeting of the “Innsbrucker Kreis von Moralthe⁠o¬log*innen und Sozialethiker*innen” 2020 (manuscript kindly provided by the author). Open Google Scholar
  1125. Pichai, Sundar (2018): AI at Google: Our Principles. Online: https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1126. Pieper, Annemarie (1994): Einführung in die Ethik. Tuebingen: UTB. Open Google Scholar
  1127. Piepgras, Ilka (2019) Olivia Sudjic: “Je mehr ich poste, desto schlechter fühle ich mich”. In: Die Zeit, November 6. Online: https://www.zeit.de/zeit-magazin/2019/46/olivia-sudjic-roman-internet-psyche-menschenhttps://www.zeit.de/zeit-magazin/2019/46/olivia-sudjic-roman-internet-psyche-menschen [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1128. Pinker, Steven (2007): The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Brilliance Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  1129. Pitts, Chip (2015): For a Treaty on Business & Human Rights. Online: https://international.nd.edu/assets/133586/remarks_pro_treaty_by_chip_pitts.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1130. Platon (1989): Der Staat: Über das Gerechte. Apelt, Otto / Bormann, Karl (Eds.). Philosophische Bibliothek 80. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  1131. Plummer, Libby (2017): “This is how Netflix’s top-secret recommendation system works”. In: Wired, August 22. Online: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/how-do-netflixs-algorithms-work-machine-learning-helps-to-predict-what-viewers-will-like [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1132. Pogge, Thomas (1999): “Menschenrechte als moralische Ansprüche an globale Institutionen”. In: Gosepath, Stefan / Lohmann, Georg (Eds.): Philosophie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 378-400. Open Google Scholar
  1133. Pogge, Thomas (2002): World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  1134. Pogge, Thomas (2011): The Health Impact Fund: More justice and efficiency in global health. Development Policy Centre Discussion Paper 7, Crawford School of Public Policy. Canberra: The Australian National University. Open Google Scholar
  1135. Pogge, Thomas (2012): “The Health Impact Fund: Enhancing Justice and Efficiency in Global Health. The 2011 Mahbub ul Haq Memorial Lecture of the Human Development and Capability Association”. In: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 13(4), 537-559. Open Google Scholar
  1136. Pogge, Thomas / Mehta, Krishen (2016): Global Tax Fairness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1137. Polrot, Simon (2017): “‘Blockchain’: State of the Art and Prospective”. January 31. Online: https://medium.com/@si-monpolrot/blockchain-state-of-the-art-and-prospective-4777e329df14https://medium.com/@si-monpolrot/blockchain-state-of-the-art-and-prospective-4777e329df14 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1138. Portmess, Lisa / Tower, Sara (2014): “Data barns, ambient intelligence and cloud computing: The tacit epistemology and linguistic representation of Big Data”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 17(1), 1-9. Open Google Scholar
  1139. Posé, Ulf (2019): “Digitale Ethik: Digitalisierung und künstliche Intelligenz – wie behalten wir das ethisch im Griff?” In: Ökologisches Wirtschaften 2, 12-13. Open Google Scholar
  1140. Postman, Neil (1985): Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin Random House. Open Google Scholar
  1141. Prainsack, Barbara / Buyx, Alena (2017): Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1142. Prensky, Marc (2001): “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part II: Do They Really Think Differently?”. In: On the Horizon 9(6), 1-9. Open Google Scholar
  1143. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2016): “The Un(der)banked is FinTech’s Largest Opportunity”. In: DeNovo Q2 2016 FinTech ReCap and Funding ReView, 1-48. Open Google Scholar
  1144. PricewaterhouseCoopers United States (2017): Making sense of bitcoin, cryptocurrency and blockchain. Online: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/fintech/bitcoin-blockchain-cryptocurrency.htmlhttps://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/fintech/bitcoin-blockchain-cryptocurrency.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1145. Price, Antoinette. (2018): “First international standards committee for entire AI ecosystem”. In: IE e-tech, Issue 3. Online: https://iecetech.org/Technical-Committees/2018-03/First-International-Standards-committee-for-entire-AI-ecosystem [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1146. Prodhan, Georgina (2017): “European parliament calls for robot law, rejects robot tax”. In: Reuters, February 16. Online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-robots-lawmaking/european-parliament-calls-for-robot-law-rejects-robot-tax-idUSKBN15V2KMhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-robots-lawmaking/european-parliament-calls-for-robot-law-rejects-robot-tax-idUSKBN15V2KM [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1147. Project Baseline (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://www.projectbaseline.com/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1148. Przybylski, Andrew / Murayama, Kou / de Haan, Cody R. / Gladwell, Valerie (2013): “Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Fear of Missing Out”. In: Computers in Human Behavior 29(3), 1841-1848. Open Google Scholar
  1149. Pugh, Jeffrey C. (2017): “The Disappearing Human: Gnostic Dreams in a Transhumanist World”. In: Religions 8(5), 81-91. Open Google Scholar
  1150. Rabossi, Eduardo (1990): “La teoria de los derechos umanos naturalizada”. In: Revista del Centro de Estudio Constitucionales 5(Enero-marzo), 159-175. Open Google Scholar
  1151. Radbruch, Gustav (1932): Rechtsphilosophie. Leipzig: Quelle & Mayer. Open Google Scholar
  1152. Radin, Margaret Jane (2012): Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1153. Radlmayr, Jonas / Gold, Christian / Lorenz, Lutz / Mehdi, Farid / Bengler, Klaus (2014): “How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving”. In: Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58(1), 2063-2067. Open Google Scholar
  1154. Rainey, Stephen / Goujon, Phillipe (2011): “Toward a normative ethics for technology development”. In: Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 9(3), 157-179. Open Google Scholar
  1155. Raisaro, Jean Louis / Ayday, Erman / Hubaux, Jean-Pierre (2014): “Patient privacy in the genomic era”. In: Praxis 103(10), 579-586. Open Google Scholar
  1156. Ramge, Thomas (2019): Mensch und Maschine. Wie künstliche Intelligenz und Roboter unser Leben verändern. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  1157. Rammert, Werner (2003): Die Zukunft der künstlichen Intelligenz: verkörpert – verteilt – hybrid. Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers 4. Fak. VI Planen, Bauen, Umwelt, Institut für Soziologie Fachgebiet Techniksozi⁠o¬logie. Berlin: Technische Universitaet Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  1158. Rammert, Werner (2004): “Technik als verteilte Aktion: Wie technisches Wirken als Agentur in hybridgen Aktionszusammenhängen gedeutet werden kann”. In: Kornwachs, Klaus (Ed.): Technik – System – Verantwortung. Berlin: Technische Universitaet Berlin, 219-231. Open Google Scholar
  1159. Randolph, John / Masters, Gilbert M. (2018): “Whole Community Energy, Mobility, and Land Use”. In: Randolph, John / Masters, Gilbert M. (Eds.): Energy for Sustainability. Washington: Island Press, 461-494. Open Google Scholar
  1160. Rath, Johannes / Ischi, Monique / Perkins, Dana (2014): “Evolution of Different Dual-use Concepts in International and National Law and Its Implications on Research Ethics and Governance”. In: Science and engineering ethics 20(3), 769-790. Open Google Scholar
  1161. Rauterberg, Hanno (2012): “Die Diktatur der Einfachheit”. In: Die Zeit, August 9. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2012/33/Apple-Design-Ideologiekritik [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1162. Rauterberg, Hanno (2019): “Malende Maschinen”. In: Die Zeit, December 14, 57-58. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/52/kuenstliche-intelligenz-kunst-algorithmen [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1163. Ravvin, Michael (2008): “Incentivizing Access and Innovation for Essential Medicines: A Survey of the Problem and Proposed Solutions”. In: Public Health Ethics 1(2), 110-123. Open Google Scholar
  1164. Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1165. Rawls, John (1993): Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1166. Rawls, John (1999): The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1167. Raz, Joseph (1986): The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  1168. Raz, Joseph (2015): “Human Rights in the Emerging World Order”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217-231. Open Google Scholar
  1169. Reder, Michael (2013): Religion in säkularer Gesellschaft. Über die neue Aufmerksamkeit für Religion in der politischen Philosophie. Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar
  1170. Reeder, John P. (2015): “On Grounding Human Rights: Variations on Themes by Little”. In: Twiss, Sumner B. / Simion, Marian G. / Petersen, Rodney L. (Eds.): Religion and Public Policy: Human Rights, Conflict, and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 96-119. Open Google Scholar
  1171. Reiijers, Wessel / Coeckelbergh, Mark (2018): “The Blockchain as a Narrative Technology: Investigating the Social Ontology and Normative Configurations of Cryptocurrencies”. In: Philosophy & Technology 31(1), 103-130. Open Google Scholar
  1172. Remele, Kurt (2009): “Gerechtigkeit lehren, gerecht leben: Katholische Sozialethik und Soziallehre als institutionalisierte Gesellschaftsreflexion und praktisches Handeln”. In: Salzburger Theologische Zeitschrift 13, 192-205. Open Google Scholar
  1173. Remmers, Hartmut (2016): Ethische Implikationen der Nutzung alternsgerechter technischer Assistenzsysteme: Expertise zum Siebten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin: Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen. Open Google Scholar
  1174. Renda, Andrea (2019): “Artificial Intelligence: Ethics, governance, and policy challenges: Report of a CEPS Task Force”. In: CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies. Online: https://www.ceps.eu/download/publication/?id=10869&pdf=AI_TFR.pdfhttps://www.ceps.eu/download/publication/?id=10869&pdf=AI_TFR.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1175. Richter, Wolfgang (2013): “Rüstungskontrolle für Kampfdrohnen”. In: SWP-Aktuell 29, 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  1176. Rietz, Helga (2017): “Autonome Fahrzeuge brauchen keine Ethik-Software”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, August 30. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/autonome-fahrzeuge-brauchen-keine-ethik-software-ld.1308201?reduced=truehttps://www.nzz.ch/meinung/autonome-fahrzeuge-brauchen-keine-ethik-software-ld.1308201?reduced=true [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1177. Righetti, Ludovic / Quang Cuong, Pham / Madhavan, Radhamadhavan / Chatila, Raja (2018): “Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems: Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues”. In: IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 25(1), 123-126. Open Google Scholar
  1178. Rippe, Klaus Peter (2004): “Von der Robo-Roach zum RoboCop. Cyborg-Technologie aus ethischer Sicht”. In: Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zuerich 149(1), 23-28. Open Google Scholar
  1179. Robinson, Joan (1958): The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  1180. Robolaw (2014): Guidelines for regulating robotics. Online: http://www.robolaw.euhttp://www.robolaw.eu/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1181. Roddick, Anita (2009): The Body Shop International. Living Our Values, Values Report 2009. London: The Body Shop International. Open Google Scholar
  1182. Rodrigues, Paulo (2019): “Anthropologie chrétienne et transhumanisme”. In: ET-Studies 10(2), 229-248. Open Google Scholar
  1183. Roemelt, Josef (2011): Das Geschenk der Freiheit: Christlicher Glaube und morali¬s⁠che Verantwortung. Innsbruck: Tyrolia. Open Google Scholar
  1184. Roff, Heather M. (2014): “The Strategic Robot Problem: Lethal Autonomous Weapons in War”. In: Journal of Military Ethics 13(3), 211-227. Open Google Scholar
  1185. Roff, Heather M. (2015): “Lethal Autonomous Weapons and Jus Ad Bellum Proportionality: 47 Case Western Reserve”. In: Journal of International Law 47(1), 37-52. Open Google Scholar
  1186. Rogers, Jay Logan (2014): “Legal Jugement Day for the Rise of the Machines: A National Approach to Regulating Fully Autonomous Weapons”. In: Arizona Law Review 56(4), 1257-1272. Open Google Scholar
  1187. Rolston, Holmes III. (1986): Philosophy Gone Wild: Essays in Environmental Ethics. Amherst: Prometheus. Open Google Scholar
  1188. Romar, Daniel (2015): On the moral agency for high frequency trading systems and their role in distributed morality. Student Thesis. Umea: Umea Universiteit. Open Google Scholar
  1189. Romm, Tony (2020): “Tech giants led by Amazon, Facebook and Google spent nearly half a billion on lobbying over the past decade, new data shows”. In: The Washington Post, January 22. Online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/01/22/amazon-facebook-google-lobbying-2019https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/01/22/amazon-facebook-google-lobbying-2019/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1190. Rorty, Richard (1996): “Menschenrechte, Rationalität und Gefühl”. In: Shute, Stephen / Hurley, Susan (Eds.): Die Idee der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 144-170. Open Google Scholar
  1191. Rosenfeld, Michel (2012): “Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence”. In: Herz, Michael (Ed.): The Content and Context of Hate Speech, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242-289. Open Google Scholar
  1192. Rosenzweig, Franz (1979): Der Mensch und sein Werk: Briefe und Tagebücher 1: Gesammelte Schriften. Rosenzweig, Rachel / Rosenzweig, Edith / Casper, Bernhard (Eds.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  1193. Roth, Gerhard (2003): Aus Sicht des Gehirns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  1194. Rotman, David (2013): “How Technology is Destroying Jobs”. In: MIT Technology Review 16(4), 28-35. Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/515926/how-technology-is-destroying-jobshttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/515926/how-technology-is-destroying-jobs/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1195. Rudin, Cynthia (2019): “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead”. In: Nature Machine Intelligence 1(May), 206-215. Open Google Scholar
  1196. Rueegger, Heinz (2016): “Ethische Fragen zur Technikanwendung im Kontext der Betreuung und Pflege alter Menschen”. In: Angewandte GERONTOLOGIE Appliquée, 15-17. Open Google Scholar
  1197. Runggaldier, Edmund (2003): “Deutung menschlicher Grunderfahrungen im Hinblick auf unser Selbst”. In: Rager, Guenter / Quitterer, Josef / Runggaldier, Edmund (Eds.): Unser Selbst – Identität im Wandel neuronaler Prozesse. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh, 143-221. Open Google Scholar
  1198. Runkel, Thomas (2010): Enhancement und Identität. Die Idee einer biomedizini¬s⁠chen Verbesserung des Menschen als normative Herausforderung. Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar
  1199. Russel, Stuart J. / Norvig, Peter (2009): Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. London: Pearson Education. Open Google Scholar
  1200. Russell, Stuart / Dewey, Daniel / Tegmark, Max (2015): “Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence”. In: AI Magazine 36(4), 105-114. Open Google Scholar
  1201. Russell, Stuart / Dewey, Daniel / Temark, Max (2013): “Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence”. Boston: Future of Life Institute. Open Google Scholar
  1202. Russell, Stuart J. (2015): “Will They Make Us Better People?”. In: Edge. Online: https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26157 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1203. Rutkin, Aviva (2016): “Blockchain grid to let neighbours trade solar power in Australia”. In: NewScientist, August 18. Online: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2101667-blockchain-grid-to-let-neighbours-trade-solar-power-in-australiahttps://www.newscientist.com/article/2101667-blockchain-grid-to-let-neighbours-trade-solar-power-in-australia/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1204. Ryan, Mark (2020): “The Future of Transportation: Ethical, Legal, Social and Economic Impacts of Self-driving Vehicles in the Year 2025”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 26, 1185-1208. Open Google Scholar
  1205. Sabaliauskaite, Giedre / Cui, Jin / Liew, Lin Shen / Zhou, Fengjun (2018): “Integrated Safety and Cybersecurity Risk Analysis of Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems”. In: IEEE (Ed.): Joint 10th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 19th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS)”. Toyama: IEEE, 723-728. Open Google Scholar
  1206. Sachs, Jeffrey D. (2019): “Roundtable: AI and the future of Global Affairs”. In: Ethics & International Affairs 33(2), 159-167. Open Google Scholar
  1207. Sacks, Jonathan (2015): “Sword Into Plowshares”. In: The Wall Street Journal Review, October 3, C1-C2. Online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/swords-to-plowshares-unlikely-any-time-soon-1444422562 RonaldLethal Autonomous Systems [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1208. Salmon, Wesley C. (1983): Logik. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  1209. Samek, Wojciech / Wiegand, Thomas / Mueller, Klaus-Robert (2017): “Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08296 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1210. Sample, Ian (2017): “‘Big Tech Firms’ AI Hiring Frenzy Leads to Brain Drain at UK Universities”. In: The Guardian, November 2. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/nov/02/big-tech-firms-google-ai-hiring-frenzy-brain-drain-uk-universities [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1211. Sandel, Michael (2007): The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1212. Sandkuehler, Hans-Joerg (2010): “Menschenrechte”. In: Sandkuehler, Hans-Joerg (Ed.): Enzyklopädie Philosophie 2. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1530-1553. Open Google Scholar
  1213. Sandler, Ronald L. (2014): Ethics and Emerging Technologies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  1214. Santoni de Sio, Filippo (2016): Ethics and Self-driving Cars: A White Paper on Responsible Innovation in Automated Driving Systems. Online: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:851eb5fb-0271-47df-9ab4-b9edb75b58e1?collection=research [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1215. Santoni de Sio, Filippo / van den Hoven, Jeroen (2018): “Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account”. In: Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5, 1-14. Open Google Scholar
  1216. Santos de Carvalho, Juliana (2018): “A ‘Male’ Future?: An Analysis on the Gendered Discourses Regarding Lethal Autonomous Weapons”. In: Amsterdam Law Forum 10(2), 41-61. Open Google Scholar
  1217. Sartre, Jean-Paul (1943): Das Sein und das Nichts: Versuch einer phänomenologi¬s⁠chen Ontologie. Hamburg: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  1218. Sassòli, Marco (2014): “Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages, Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to be Clarified”. In: International Law Studies Naval War College 90, 308-340. Open Google Scholar
  1219. Savov, Vlad (2018): “Google’s selfish Ledger is an unsettling vision of Silicon Valley social engineering”. In: The Verge, May 17. Online: https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/17/17344250/google-x-selfish-ledger-video-data-privacyhttps://www.theverge.com/2018/5/17/17344250/google-x-selfish-ledger-video-data-privacy [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1220. Savulescu, Julian / Kahane, Guy (2009): “The Moral Obligation to Create Children With the Best Chance of the Best Life”. In: Bioethics 23(5), 274-290. Open Google Scholar
  1221. Saxon, Dan (2014): “A Human Touch: Autonomous Weapons, Directive 3000.09, and the ‘Appropriate Levels of Human Judgment over the Use of Force’”. In: Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 15(2), 100-109. Open Google Scholar
  1222. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2008): Moral Dimensions. Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1223. Schaar, Peter (2016): “Schutz der Privatsphäre im Gesundheitswesen. Zu den rechtlichen Grenzen der Überwachung in der Medizin”. In: Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 62(1), 31-39. Open Google Scholar
  1224. Schaefer, Kristin / Chen, Jessie / Szalma, James / Hancock, Peter (2016): “A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems”. In: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58, 1-62. Open Google Scholar
  1225. Schaeffner, Vanessa (2020): “Wenn Ethik zum Programm wird: Eine risikoethische Analyse moralischer Dilemmata des autonomen Fahrens”. In: Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie 4, 27-49. Open Google Scholar
  1226. Scharre, Paul (2016): Autonomous Weapons and Operational Risk: Ethical Autonomy Project. Online: https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS_Autonomous-weapons-operational-risk.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1227. Scharre, Paul (2018): Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: W.W Norton & CO. Open Google Scholar
  1228. Scharre, Paul (2019): “Killer Apps: The Real Dangers of an AI Arms Race”. In: Foreign Affairs 98, 135-144. Open Google Scholar
  1229. Schaudel, Dieter (2012): “Ethik und/oder/wegen Automatisierung?!”. In: at – Automatisierungstechnik 60(1), 4-9. Open Google Scholar
  1230. Schaupp, Walter (2014): “Zwischen personal beliefs und professional duties: Weltanschaulich-religiöser Pluralismus als neue Herausforderung für das ärztliche Gewissen”. In: Bormann, Franz-Josef / Wetzstein, Verena (Eds.): Gewissen: Dimensionen eines Grundbegriffs medizinischer Ethik. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3-23. Open Google Scholar
  1231. Scheck, Justin / Shifflett, Shane (2018): “How dirty money disappears into the black hole of cryptocurrency”. In: The Wall Street Journal, September 28. Online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-dirty-money-disappears-into-the-black-hole-of-cryptocurrency-1538149743https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-dirty-money-disappears-into-the-black-hole-of-cryptocurrency-1538149743 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1232. Schell, Bernadette H. (2014): Internet Censorship: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Open Google Scholar
  1233. Schildmann, Jan / Marckmann, Georg / Vollmann, Jochen (2013): “Personalisierte Medizin. Medizinische, ethische, rechtliche und ökonomische Analysen”. In: Ethik in der Medizin 25(3), 169-172. Open Google Scholar
  1234. Schindlbeck, Corinne (2008): “Ein übergrosser Teil der Patente ist rein taktisch und nicht innovativ”. In: Markt&Technik, June 24, 62-64. Open Google Scholar
  1235. Schleidgen, Sebastian / Marckmann, Georg (2013): “Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen? Ethische Implikationen der Individualisierten Medizin”. In: Ethik in der Medizin 25(3), 223-231. Open Google Scholar
  1236. Schloegl-Flierl, Kerstin (2016): “Die Tugend der Epikie im Spannungsfeld von Recht und Ethik”. In: Chittilappilly, Paul-Chummar (Ed.): Horizonte gegenwärtiger Ethik. Festschrift Josef Schuster. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 29-39. Open Google Scholar
  1237. Schmidhuber, Juergen (2006): “Gödel Machines: Fully Self-Referential Optimal Universal Self-Improvers”. In: Goertzel, Ben / Pennachin, Cassio (Eds): Artificial General Intelligence. Cognitive Technologies. Berlin: Springer, 119-226. Open Google Scholar
  1238. Schmidt, Eric (2015): “Eric Schmidt on How to Build a Better Web”. In: The New York Times, December 7. Online: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/opinion/eric-schmidt-on-how-to-build-a-better-web.html?_r=1http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/opinion/eric-schmidt-on-how-to-build-a-better-web.html?_r=1 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1239. Schmidt, Eric / Cohen, Jared (2013): Die Vernetzung der Welt. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  1240. Schmidt, Eric / Cohen, Jared (2014): The New Digital Age: Transforming Nations, Businesses, and Our Lives. New York: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar
  1241. Schmidt, Hermann (1941): Denkschrift zur Gründung eines Institutes für Regelungstechnik. Berlin: Schnelle. Open Google Scholar
  1242. Schmitt, Hanspeter (2008): Sozialität und Gewissen. Anthropologische und theologisch-ethische Sondierung der klassischen Gewissenslehre. Studien der Moraltheologie 40. Wien: LIT-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  1243. Schneider, Friedrich / Dreer, Elisabeth (2017): Grundeinkommen in Österreich?. Linz: Linz Johannes Kepler Universitaet. Open Google Scholar
  1244. Schockenhoff, Eberhard (2013): “Vom Ethos der Moraltheologie”. In: Sautermeister, Jochen (Ed.): Verantwortung und Integrität heute: Theologische Ethik unter dem Anspruch der Redlichkeit. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 58-68. Open Google Scholar
  1245. Schockenhoff, Eberhard (2014a): Grundlegung der Ethik: Ein theologischer En⁠t¬wurf. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  1246. Schockenhoff, Eberhard (2014b): “Glaube und Toleranz. Überlegungen zu ihrem schwierigen Verhältnis”. In: Schloegl-Flierl, Kerstin / Prueller-Jagenteufel, Gunter M. (Eds.): Aus Liebe zu Gott – im Dienst der Menschen: Spirituelle, pastorale und ökumenische Dimensionen der Moraltheologie. Festschrift Herbert Schloegel. Muenster: Aschendorff, 465-475. Open Google Scholar
  1247. Schockenhoff, Eberhard (2015): “Aufgaben und gegenwärtige Herausforderungen der Moraltheologie”. In: Amesbury, Richard / Ammann, Christoph (Eds.): Was ist theologische Ethik? Beiträge zu ihrem Selbstverständnis und Profil. Zuerich: Institut fuer Sozialethik der Universitaet Zuerich, 49-73. Open Google Scholar
  1248. Schoenauer, Hermann / Horneber, Markus (2011): “Ethisch vertretbarer Technikeinsatz in der Sozial- und Gesundheitswirtschaft”. In: Rueter, Georg / Da-Cruz, Patrick / Schwegel, Philipp (Eds.): Gesundheitsökonomie und Wirt¬schaft⁠s¬politik. Festschrift Peter Oberender. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, 431-444. Open Google Scholar
  1249. Schoenheit, Ingo (2014): Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  1250. Schoenherr-Mann, Hans-Martin (2010): Die Macht der Verantwortung. Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar
  1251. Schoernig, Niklas (2010): “Die Automatisierung des Krieges”. In: HSFK-Standpunkt 5, 1-12. Open Google Scholar
  1252. Scholz, Olaf / Calvino, Nadia / Gualtieri, Roberto / Le Maire, Bruno (2020): “Ein gerechtes internationales Steuersystem”. In: Die Welt, February 22. Online: https://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/debatte/article206059379/Gastkommentar-Ein-gerechtes-internationales-Steuersystem.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1253. Scholz, Roland W. / Bartelsman, Eric J. / Diefenbach, Sarah / Franke, Lude / Grunwald, Arnim / Helbing, Dirk / Hill, Richard / Hilty, Lorenz / Hoejer, Mattias / Klauser, Stefan / Montag, Christian / Parycek, Peter / Prote, Jan Philipp / Renn, Ortwin / Reichel, André / Schuh, Guenther / Steiner, Gerald / Viale Pereira, Gabriela (2018): “Unintended Side Effects of the Digital Transition: European Scientists Message from a Proposition-Based Expert Round Table”. In: Sustainability 10(6), 1-48. Open Google Scholar
  1254. Scholz, Volker / Kempf, Marius (2016): “Autonomes Fahren: Autos im moralischen Dilemma?”. In: Proff, Heike / Fojcik, Thomas Martin (Eds.): Nationale und internationale Trends in der Mobilität. Wiesbaden: Springer, 217-230. Open Google Scholar
  1255. Schreurs, Miranda A. / Steuwer, Sibyl D. (2015): “Autonomous Driving – Political, Legal, Social, and Sustainability Dimensions”. In: Maurer, Markus / Gerdes, Christan J. / Lenz, Barbara / Winner, Hermann (Eds.): Autonomes Fahren. Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte. Berlin: Springer, 151-173. Open Google Scholar
  1256. Schroeder, Bernd (2003): “Religion und Ethik”. In: Nissen, Ulrich / Andersen, Svend / Reuter, Lars (Eds.): The Sources of Public Morality – On the ethics and religion debate: Proceedings of the annual conference of the Societas Ethica in Berlin. Muenster: LIT-Verlag, 15-35. Open Google Scholar
  1257. Schroeder, Doris / Gefenas, Eugenijus (2009): “Vulnerability: Too Vague and Too Broad?”. In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18(2), 113-121. Open Google Scholar
  1258. Schueller, Bruno (1980): Die Begründung sittlicher Urteile. Typen ethischer Argumentation in der katholischen Moraltheologie. Duesseldorf: Patmos-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  1259. Schulz, Peter J. / Rubinelli, Sara (2010): “Internet-enhanced health communication”. In: Social Semiotics 20(1), 3-7. Open Google Scholar
  1260. Schulz, Soehnke E. (2016): “Ausblick”. In: Schliesky, Ute / Schulz, Soenke E. / Got⁠t¬berg, Friedrich / Kuhlmann, Florian (Eds.): Demokratie im digitalen Zeitalter, DI⁠VSI-Perspektiven 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 136-137. Open Google Scholar
  1261. Schulz, Wolfgang H. / Wieker, Horst / Arnegger, Bettina (2019): “Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility”. In: Kruessel, Peter (Ed.): Future Telco. Cham: Springer, 219-229. Open Google Scholar
  1262. Schulzke, Marcus (2011): “Robots as Weapons in Just Wars”. In: Philosophy and Technology 24(3), 293-306. Open Google Scholar
  1263. Schulzke, Marcus (2013): “Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility”. In: Philosophy and Technology, 26(2), 203-219. Open Google Scholar
  1264. Schumann, Florian (2018): “In der Chat-Therapie”. In: Die Zeit, May 17. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/21/psychotherapie-therapieplatz-online-hilfe-wartezeithttps://www.zeit.de/2018/21/psychotherapie-therapieplatz-online-hilfe-wartezeit [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1265. Schumann, Florian (2019): “Strahlendes Experiment”. In: Die Zeit, January 17, 34. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/04/mobilfunknetz-5g-datenuebertragung-gesundheitsgefahr-strahlenbelastung [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1266. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1972): Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie. Bern: Francke. Open Google Scholar
  1267. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1991): The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1268. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2008): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. Open Google Scholar
  1269. Schuster, Johannes / Kerber, Walter (2016): “Gewissen”. In: Brugger, Walter (Ed.): Philosophisches Wörterbuch. Freiburg im Breisgrau: Herder, 144-146. Open Google Scholar
  1270. Schuurman, Egbert (2010): “Responsible Ethics for Global Technology”. In: Axiomathes 20(1), 107-127. Open Google Scholar
  1271. Schwab, Katharine (2018): “The Exploitation, Injustice, and Waste Powering Our AI”. In: Fast Company, September 18. Online: https://www.fastcompany.com/90237802/the-exploitation-injustice-and-waste-powering-our-ai [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1272. Schwartz, Paul M. (1989): “The Computer in German and American Constitutional Law: Towards an American Right of Informational Self-Determination”. In: American Journal of Comparative Law 37, 675-702. Open Google Scholar
  1273. Schweighofer, Johannes (2016): “Zur Befreiung des Menschen von mühevoller Arbeit und Plage durch Maschinen, Roboter und Computer – Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf die Arbeitsmärkte”. In: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 42(2), 219-255. Open Google Scholar
  1274. Schweitzer, Doris (2017): “Die digitale Person: Die Anrufung des Subjekts im Recht auf Vergessenwerden”. In: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 42(3), 237-257. Open Google Scholar
  1275. Schweizer, Daniel (2015): Dirty Gold War – Dreckiges Gold. Arte Doku. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoK8cmdarIU [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1276. Schweizerische Nationalkommission Justitia et Pax (1998): Machbares Leben? Ethik in der Medizin. Zuerich: NZN Buchverlag. Open Google Scholar
  1277. Searle, John R. (1980): “Minds, Brains, and Programs”. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417-457. Open Google Scholar
  1278. Securities & Exchange Commission / The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2010): Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010. Report of the Staffs of the CFTC and SEC to the Joint Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues. Online: https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2010/marketevents-report.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1279. Seele, Peter (2016): “Digitally unified reporting how XBRL-based real-time transparency helps in combining integrated sustainability reporting and performance control”. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 136 (Part A), 65-77. Open Google Scholar
  1280. Seele, Peter (2018): “Let Us Not Forget: Crypto Means Secret. Cryptocurrencies as Enabler of Unethical and Illegal Business and the Question of Regulation”. In: Humanist Management Journal 3, 133-139. Open Google Scholar
  1281. Segal, Adam (2017): “Teaching Morality to Machines”. In: Council on Foreign Relations, November 14. Online: https://www.cfr.org/blog/teaching-morality-machines [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1282. Sen, Amartya (1999): Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Open Google Scholar
  1283. Sen, Amartya (2004): “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 32(4), 315-356. Open Google Scholar
  1284. Seseri, Rudina (2018): “The Problem with Explainable AI”. In: Tech Crunch, June 14. Online: https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/14/the-problem-with-explainable-ai/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1285. Sevini, Filippo / Colpo, Pascal / Lequarré, Anne-Sophie / Charatsis, Christos / Barrero, Josefa / Michel, Quentin / Janssens, Willem Alfons Marc / Novau, Xavier Arnes (2018): Emerging Dual-Use Technologies and Global Supply Chain Compliance. Presentation at the IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards 2018. Vienna, January: Online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/F-Sevini/publication/330258872_EMERGING_DUAL-USE_TECHNOLOGIES_AND_GLOBAL_SUPPLY_CHAIN_COMPLIANCE/links/5c35f8d7458515a4c718cf94/EMERGING-DUAL-USE-TECHNOLOGIES-AND-GLOBAL-SUPPLY-CHAIN-COMPLIANCE.pdfhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/F-Sevini/publication/330258872_EMERGING_DUAL-USE_TECHNOLOGIES_AND_GLOBAL_SUPPLY_CHAIN_COMPLIANCE/links/5c35f8d7458515a4c718cf94/EMERGING-DUAL-USE-TECHNOLOGIES-AND-GLOBAL-SUPPLY-CHAIN-COMPLIANCE.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1286. Shanahan, Murray (2015): The Technological Singularity. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  1287. Shannon, Claude E. (1950): “XXII. Programming a computer for playing chess”. In: The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41(314), 256-275. Open Google Scholar
  1288. Sharkey, Amanda (2018): “Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity”. In: Ethics and Information Technology 21, 75-87. Open Google Scholar
  1289. Sharkey, Noel E. (2007): “Automated killers and the computing profession”. In: Computer 40(11), 122-124. Open Google Scholar
  1290. Sharkey, Noel E. (2012): “Killing made easy”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Bekey, George A. (Eds.): Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents. New York: MIT Press, 111-128. Open Google Scholar
  1291. Sharkey, Noel E. (2011): “The automation and proliferation of military drones and the protection of civilians”. In: Law Innovation Technology 3, 229-240. Open Google Scholar
  1292. Sharon, Tamar (2016): “The Googlization of health research”. In: Personalized Medicine 13(6), 563-574. Open Google Scholar
  1293. Sharon, Tamar (2018): “When digital health meets digital capitalism, how many common goods are at stake?”. In: Big Data & Society (July-December), 1-12. Open Google Scholar
  1294. Shaver, Lea (2015): “The Right to Science: Ensuring that Everyone Benefits from Scientific and Technological Progress”. In: European Journal of Human Rights 4, 411-430. Open Google Scholar
  1295. Shaw, Gienna (2019): “Hackers Tap Deep Learning and AI for Nefarious Purposes”. In: Health Tech Magazine, May 24. Online: https://healthtechmagazine.net/article/2019/05/hackers-tap-deep-learning-and-ai-nefarious-purposes [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1296. Shead, Sam (2019): “Google Announced An AI Advisory Council, But The Mysterious AI Ethics Board Remains A Secret”. In: Forbes, March 27. Online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/samshead/2019/03/27/google-announced-an-ai-council-but-the-mysterious-ai-ethics-board-remains-a-secret/#34ba580e614ahttps://www.forbes.com/sites/samshead/2019/03/27/google-announced-an-ai-council-but-the-mysterious-ai-ethics-board-remains-a-secret/#34ba580e614a [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1297. Shelton Dinah (1991): “Human Rights, Environmental Rights, and the Right to Environment”. In: Stanford Journal of International Law 28, 103-138. Open Google Scholar
  1298. Shetty, Salil (2015): “Corporations have rights. Now we need a global treaty on their responsibilities”. In: The Guardian, January 21. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/jan/21/corporations-abuse-rights-international-law [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1299. Shibasaki, Fumikazu (2005): “Technology and ethics”. In: Philosophy & Criticism 31(18), 487-498. Open Google Scholar
  1300. Shift Project (2019): “Lean ICT: Towards digital sobriety”. Online: https://theshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Lean-ICT-Report_The-Shift-Project_2019.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1301. Shoham, Shlomo / Lamay, Nira (2006): “Commission for Future Generations in the Knesset: lessons learnt”. In: Tremmel, Joerg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 244-281. Open Google Scholar
  1302. Shooman, Yasemin (2014): “… weil ihre Kultur so ist”. Narrative des antimuslimi¬s⁠chen Rassismus. Bielefeld: Transcript. Open Google Scholar
  1303. Silva, Daniel / Cunha, Liliana / Barros, Carla / Baylina, Pilar (2019): “Preparing the Future Scenario of Automated Vehicles: Recommendations Drawn from the Analysis of the Work Activity of Road Transport Workers”. In: Cotrim, Teresa / Serranheira, Florentino / Sousa, Paulo / Hignett, Sue / Albolino, Sara / Tartaglia, Riccardo (Eds.): Health and Social Care Systems of the Future: Demographic Changes, Digital Age and Human Factors. HEPS 2019: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 1012. Cham: Springer, 301-310. Open Google Scholar
  1304. Simon, Judith (2015): “Distributed Epistemic Responsibility in a Hyperconnected Era”. In: Floridi, Luciano (Ed.): The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Cham: Springer, 135-151. Open Google Scholar
  1305. Simonite, Tom (2018): “Probing the dark side of Google’s ad-targeting system”. In: MIT Technology Review, 6 July. Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/539021/probing-the-dark-side-of-googles-ad-targeting-system/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1306. Singer, Peter (2004): “One Community”. In: Singer, Peter: One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press, 150-193. Open Google Scholar
  1307. Singer, Peter (2009): Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. New York: Penguin Press. Open Google Scholar
  1308. Singularity 2030 (n.d.): Homepage. Online: https://singularity2030.ch/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1309. Smith, Adam (2004): Theorie der ethischen Gefühle. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  1310. Smith, Brad / Browne, Carol Ann (2019): Tools and Weapons: The Promise and the Peril of the Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press. Open Google Scholar
  1311. Smith, Dave (2015): “GOOGLE CHAIRMAN: ‘The Internet Will Disappear’”. In: Business Insider, January 25. Online: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-chief-eric-schmidt-the-internet-will-disappear-2015-1?r=US&IR=Thttps://www.businessinsider.com/google-chief-eric-schmidt-the-internet-will-disappear-2015-1?r=US&IR=T [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1312. Smith, Noah (2013): “The End Of Labor: How to Protect Workers From the Rise of Robots”. In: The Atlantic, January 14. Online: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/01/the-end-of-labor-how-to-protect-workers-from-the-rise-of-robots/267135/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1313. Snower, Dennis J./Twomey, Paul/Farrell, Maria (2020): “Revisiting Digital Governance”. In: Social Macroeconomics Working Paper Series of the Blavatnik School of Governance, Oxford University (30 September 2020). Online: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-10/SM-WP-2020-003%20Revisiting%20digital%20governance.pdfhttps://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-10/SM-WP-2020-003%20Revisiting%20digital%20governance.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1314. Soares, Nate / Fallenstein, Benya (2017): “Agent Foundations for Aligning Machine Intelligence with Human Interests: A Technical Research Agenda”. In: Callaghan, Victor / Miller, James / Yampolskiy, Roman / Armstrong, Stuart (Eds.): The Technological Singularity: Managing the Journey. Berlin: Springer, 103-125. Open Google Scholar
  1315. Soeiro, Diana (2020): “Smart Cities, Well-Being and Good Business: The 2030 Agenda and the Role of Knowledge in the Era of Industry 4.0”. In: Matos, Florinda / Vairinhos, Valter / Salavisa, Leif Edvinsson / Massaro, Maurizio (Eds.): Knowledge, People, and Digital Transformation. Contributions to Management Science. Cham: Springer, 55-67. Open Google Scholar
  1316. Sohangir, Sahar / Wang, Dingding / Pomerantes, Anna / Koshgoftaar, Taghi M. (2018): “Big data: Deep learning for financial sentiment analysis”. In: Journal of Big Data (5)1. Online: https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40537-017-0111-6https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40537-017-0111-6 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1317. Sokolin, Lex / Low, Matthew James (2018): “Machine Intelligence and Augmented Finance: How Artificial Intelligence Creates $1 Trillion Dollar of Change in the Front, Middle and Back Office”. In: Autonomous Research LLP. Online: https://next.autonomous.com/augmented-finance-machine-intelligence [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1318. Solomonoff, Ray (1985): “The Time Scale of Artificial Intelligence: Reflections on Social Effects”. In: Human Systems Management 5, 149-153. Open Google Scholar
  1319. Son, Hugh (2017): “JPMorgan software does in seconds what took lawyers 360,000 hours”. In: Bloomberg, February 28. Online https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-28/jpmorgan-marshals-an-army-of-developers-to-automate-high-finance [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1320. Sonderholm, Jorn (2009): “A Reform Proposal in Need of Reform: A Critique of Thomas Pogge’s Proposal for How to Incentivize Research and Development of Essential Drugs”. In: Public Health Ethics 3(2), 1-11. Open Google Scholar
  1321. Sonderholm, Jorn (2014): “A critique of an argument against patent rights for essential medicines”. In: Ethics & Global Politics 7(3), 119-136. Open Google Scholar
  1322. Sorensen, Roy (2003): A Brief History of the Paradox. Philosophy and Labyrinths of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1323. Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz (2016): Transhumanismus. “Die gefährlichste Idee der Welt”!? Freiburg im Breisgau. Herder. Open Google Scholar
  1324. South African Government (1996): Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Online: https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1325. Sovacool, Benjamin / Griffiths, Steve (2020): “Culture and low-carbon energy transitions”. In: Nature Sustainability, 1-9. Open Google Scholar
  1326. Spahn, Andreas (2013): “Freie Fahrt für freie Maschinen – Zur Ethik des vernetzten Autos”. In: ATZagenda 2, 34-37. Open Google Scholar
  1327. Sparrow, Robert (2009): “Building a Better WarBot: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 15, 169-187. Open Google Scholar
  1328. Sparrow, Robert (2017): “Killer Robots”. In: Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(1), 62-77. Open Google Scholar
  1329. Sparrow, Robert / Howard, Mark (2020): “Make way for the wealthy? Autonomous vehicles, markets in mobility, and social justice”. In: Mobilities 15(4), 514-526. Open Google Scholar
  1330. Spenlé, Christoph A. (2005): “Neue Entwicklungen im Völkerrecht: Zur Umsetzung des internationalen Paktes über wirtschaftliche, soziale und kulturelle Rechte von 1966 (UNO-Pakt I)”. In: Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.): Menschenrechte und Wirtschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen State und Nonstate Actors. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) 2. Bern: Staempfli, 197-224. Open Google Scholar
  1331. Sperling, Daniel / van der Meer, Ellen / Pike, Susan (2018): “Vehicle Automation: Our Best Shot at a Transportation Do-Over?”. In: Sperling, Daniel (Eds.): Three Revolutions. Washington: Island Press, 77-108. Open Google Scholar
  1332. Sperling, Joshua / Young, Stanley E. / Beck, John M. / Garikapati, Venu / Hou, Yi / Duvall, Andrew L. (2019): “Exploring Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Urban Mobility Strategies: An Initial Framework to Curate Data/Models, Measure Performance, and Diffuse Innovation: Preprint”. In: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information. Online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1557548https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1557548 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1333. Spice, Byron (2017): “Carnegie Mellon Artificial Intelligence Beats Top Poker Pros”. In: Carnegie Mellon University, January 31. Online: https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2017/january/AI-beats-poker-pros.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1334. Spiekermann, Sarah (2019): Digitale Ethik: Ein Wertesystem für das 21. Jahrhundert. Muenchen: Droemer. Open Google Scholar
  1335. Spielkamp, Matthias (2019a): “Wenn Algorithmen über den Job entscheiden”. In: Die Presse, July 20. Online: https://www.diepresse.com/5662249/wenn-algorithmen-uber-den-job-entscheiden?from=rsshttps://www.diepresse.com/5662249/wenn-algorithmen-uber-den-job-entscheiden?from=rss [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1336. Spielkamp, Matthias (2019b): Automating Society: Taking Stock of Automated Decision-Making in the EU. Berlin: Bertelsmannstiftung Studies. Open Google Scholar
  1337. Spieser, Kevin / Treleaven, Kyle. / Zhang, Rick / Frazzoli, Emilio / Morton, Daniel / Pavone, Marco (2014): “Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore.” In: Meyer Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 229-245. Open Google Scholar
  1338. Spinello, Richard A. (2002): Regulating Cyberspace. The Policies and Technologies of Control. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group. Open Google Scholar
  1339. Spinello, Richard A. (2011): Cyberethics. Morality and Law in Cyberspace. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Open Google Scholar
  1340. Swiss National Radio Television SRF (2018): Facebook erhält Höchststrafe im Datenskandal. October 25. Online: https://www.srf.ch/news/international/cambridge-analytica-skandal-facebook-erhaelt-hoechststrafe-im-datenskandalhttps://www.srf.ch/news/international/cambridge-analytica-skandal-facebook-erhaelt-hoechststrafe-im-datenskandal [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1341. Srivastava, Lara (2010): “Mobile Phones and the Evolution of Social Behaviour”. In: Behaviour & Information Technology 24(2), 111-129. Open Google Scholar
  1342. Staab, Philipp / Nachtwey, Oliver (2016): “Die Digitalisierung der Dienstleistungsarbeit”. In: Politik und Zeitgeschichte 18-19, 24-31. Open Google Scholar
  1343. Stadler, Wilfried (2017): “Über autonomes Fahren und Denken”. In: Furche-Kolumne 218, 29. Online: https://www.wilfried-stadler.com/218https://www.wilfried-stadler.com/218 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1344. Stadler, Wilfried (2019): Nice to Have. Gedanken zu Gesinnungs- und Verantwortungsethik in der Finanzwirtschaft. EthicsImpulse at the Institute of Social Ethics ISE of the University of Lucerne on October 30, 2019 (manuscript kindly provided by the author). Open Google Scholar
  1345. Stalinsky, Steven (2018): “The cryptocurrency-terrorism connection is too big to ignore”. In: The Washington Post, December 17. Online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-cryptocurrency-terrorism-connection-is-too-big-to-ignore/2018/12/17/69ed6ab4-fe4b-11e8-83c0-b06139e540e5_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d54c66c1e78ahttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-cryptocurrency-terrorism-connection-is-too-big-to-ignore/2018/12/17/69ed6ab4-fe4b-11e8-83c0-b06139e540e5_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d54c66c1e78a [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1346. Staszkiewicz, Piotr (2015): “High Frequency Trading Readiness in Central Europe”. In: Journal on Business Review 4(2), 61-67. Open Google Scholar
  1347. Steil, Jochen J. (2019): “Roboterlernen ohne Grenzen? Lernende Roboter und ethische Fragen”. In: Woopen, Christiane / Jannes, Marc (Eds.): Roboter in der Gesellschaft. Studies on Health and Society 2. Berlin: Springer, 15-33. Open Google Scholar
  1348. Steinbuch, Karl (1963): Automat und Mensch. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  1349. Steiner, Jutta (2015): “Blockchain Can Bring Transparency to Supply Chains. The Business of Fashion”. In: The Business of Fashion, June 19. Online: http://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/opinion/op-ed-blockchain-can-bring-transparency-to-supply-chainshttp://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/opinion/op-ed-blockchain-can-bring-transparency-to-supply-chains [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1350. Stephens, Lara (2018): “Alt und Pummelig”. In: Die Zeit, May 2. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/19/facebook-jugendliche-nutzungsverhalten-soziale-medienhttps://www.zeit.de/2018/19/facebook-jugendliche-nutzungsverhalten-soziale-medien [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1351. Sterckx, Sigrid (2006): “The Moral Justifiability of Patents”. In: Ethical Perspectives 13(2), 249-265. Open Google Scholar
  1352. Sterling, Greg (2014): “Google Co-Founder Sergey Brin: I Wish I Could Forget The Right To Be Forgotten”. In: Search Engine Land, May 28. Online: https://searchengineland.com/google-co-founder-brin-wish-forget-right-forgotten-192648 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1353. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1994): The Role of the State in Financial Markets. Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Open Google Scholar
  1354. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2006): “Scrooge and Intellectual Property Rights”. In: British Medical Journal (BMJ) 333, 1279-1280. Open Google Scholar
  1355. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2015): The Great Divide. Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
  1356. Stocker, Adam / Shaheen, Susan (2018): “Shared Automated Mobility: Early Exploration and Potential Impacts”. In: Meyer, Gereon / Beiker, Sven (Eds.): Road Vehicle Automation 4. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer, 125-139. Open Google Scholar
  1357. Stoeber, Rudolf (2011): “Meinungsfreiheit: zu wichtig, um sie durch Generalverbote zu schützen”. In: Publizistik 56, 127-132. Open Google Scholar
  1358. Storino, John R. / Steffen, Justin C. / Gordon, Matthew T. (2017): “Decrypting the Ethical Implications of Blockchain Technology”. In: Legaltech News, November 13. Online: https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/sites/legaltechnews/2017/11/13/decrypting-the-ethical-implications-of-blockchain-technology/?slreturn=20210021143635https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/sites/legaltechnews/2017/11/13/decrypting-the-ethical-implications-of-blockchain-technology/?slreturn=20210021143635 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1359. Streit, Guenther (1993): Computer und Informatisierung der Gesellschaft. Sozialethische Überlegungen zur dritten Phase der Industriellen Revolution. Erfahrung und Theologie. Schriften zur Praktischen Theologie 22. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 183-191. Open Google Scholar
  1360. Strumpf, Dan / Wenxin, Fan (2017): “Who Wants to Supply China’s Surveillance State? The West”. In: The Wall Street Journal, November 1. Online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/who-wants-to-supply-chinas-surveillance-state-the-west-1509540111 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1361. Sturma, Dieter (2003): “Autonomie: Über Personen, Künstliche Intelligenz und Robotik”. In: Christaller, Thomas / Wehner, Josef (Eds.): Autonome Maschinen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 38-55. Open Google Scholar
  1362. Sudmann, Lena (2015): Schnittstelle Mensch – Maschine: Die Prothese. Diploma thesis, Theatre, Film and Media studies, University of Vienna. Online: http://othes.univie.ac.at/37151/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1363. Sullins, John P. (2006): “When Is a Robot a Moral Agent”. In: International Review of Information Ethics 6(12), 23-30. Open Google Scholar
  1364. Sullins, John P. (2010): “Rights and Computer Ethics”. In: Floridi, Luciano (Ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 116-133. Open Google Scholar
  1365. Sullins, John P. (2013): “An Ethical Analysis of the Case for Robotic Weapons Arms Control”. In: Podins, Karls / Stinissen, Jan / Maybaum, Markus (Eds.): 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict. Tallinn: NATO CCD COE Publications, 1-20. Open Google Scholar
  1366. Summers, Lawrence / Summers, Victoria P. (1989): “When Financial Markets Work Too Well: A Cautious Case for a Securities Transactions Tax”. In: Journal of Financial Services Research 3(2-3), 261-286. Open Google Scholar
  1367. Susskind, Richard / Susskind, Daniel (2015): The Future of the Professions. How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1368. Swan, Melanie (2015): Blockchain. Blueprint for a New Economy. Sebastopol: O’'Reilly Media. Open Google Scholar
  1369. Swan, Melanie / de Filippi, Primavera (2015): “Toward A Philosophy of Blockchain: A Symposium Introduction”. In: Metaphilosophy 48(5), 603-619. Open Google Scholar
  1370. Sweeney, Latanya (2013): “Discrimination in online ad delivery”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6822https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6822 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1371. Swiss Federal Council (2020): “Leitlinien Künstliche Intelligenz für den Bund. Orientierungsrahmen für den Umgang mit künstlicher Intelligenz in der Bundesverwaltung”. Bern: Swiss Federal Council. Open Google Scholar
  1372. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) (2020): Bundesrat entscheidet über weiteres Vorgehen im Bereich Mobilfunk und 5G. Online: https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home/themen/elektrosmog/dossiers/bericht-arbeitsgruppe-mobilfunk-und-strahlung.htmlhttps://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home/themen/elektrosmog/dossiers/bericht-arbeitsgruppe-mobilfunk-und-strahlung.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1373. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (2013): Annual Report 2013. Online: https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/finma-publikationen/geschaeftsbericht/jb13_d_finma.pdf?la=enhttps://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/finma-publikationen/geschaeftsbericht/jb13_d_finma.pdf?la=en [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1374. Swiss Learning Health System (n.d.): About the Project. Online: https://www.slhs.ch/en/about-the-project [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1375. Taddeo, Mariarosaria / Floridi, Luciano (2018): “How AI can be a force for good”. In: Science 361(6404), 751-752. Open Google Scholar
  1376. Taddeo, Mariarosaria / Floridi, Luciano (2015): “The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 22, 1-29. Open Google Scholar
  1377. Taddy, Matt (2019): “The Technological Elements of Artificial Intelligence”. In: Agrawal, Ajay / Gans, Joshua / Goldfarb, Avi (Eds.): The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 61-87. Open Google Scholar
  1378. Taiebat, Morteza / Brown, Austin L. / Safford, Hannah R. / Qu, Shen / Xu, Ming (2018): “A Review on Energy, Environmental, and Sustainability Implications of Connected and Automated Vehicles”. In: Environmental Science Technology 52(20), 11449-11465. Open Google Scholar
  1379. Talbot, Brian / Jenkins, Ryan / Purves, Duncan (2017a): “When Robots Should Do the Wrong Thing”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 258-273. Open Google Scholar
  1380. Talbot, David / Kim, Levin / Goldstein, Elena / Sherman, Jenna (2017b): “Charting a roadmap to ensure AI benefits all”. In: Medium, November 30. Online: https://medium.com/berkman-klein-center/charting-a-roadmap-to-ensure-artificial-intelligence-ai-benefits-all-e322f23f8b59 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1381. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2010): The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable: The Impact of the Highly Improbable With a New Section: ‘on Robustness and Fragility’. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar
  1382. Taparelli, Luigi (1855): Saggio teoretico di diritto naturale appoggiato sul fatto 1. Roma: La Civiltà cattolica. Open Google Scholar
  1383. Tasioulas, John (2015): “On the Foundations of Human Rights”. In: Cruft, Rowan / Liao, S. Matthew / Renzo, Massimo (Eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45-70. Open Google Scholar
  1384. Tavani, Herman T. (2004): Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Open Google Scholar
  1385. Tax Justice Network-Africa (2005): Tax Us If You Can: Why Africa should stand up for Tax Justice. London: Tax Justice Network. Online: https://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/tuiyc_-_eng_-_web_file.pdfhttps://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/tuiyc_-_eng_-_web_file.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1386. Taylor, Charles (2015): “Für eine grundlegende Neubestimmung des Säkularismus”. In: Schwarz, Gerhard / Sitter-Liver, Beat / Holderegger, Adrian (Eds.): Religion, Liberalität und Rechtsstaat: Ein offenes Spannungsverhältnis. Zuerich: Verlag Neue Zuercher Zeitung, 27-45. Open Google Scholar
  1387. Taylor, Kate / Goggin, Benjamin (2019): “49 of the biggest scandals in Uber’s history”. In: Business Insider, May 10. Online: https://www.businessinsider.com/uber-company-scandals-and-controversies-2017-11?r=US&IR=Thttps://www.businessinsider.com/uber-company-scandals-and-controversies-2017-11?r=US&IR=T [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1388. Teichtweiter, Georg (1976): “Moral – wieder gefragt?”. In: Hirschmann, Johannes (Ed.): Der Christ in der Welt 5(7a/b). Aschaffenburg: Paul Pattloch, 102-123. Open Google Scholar
  1389. Teller, Astro (2012): “Speed of Dreams”. In: Think with Google. Online: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-resources/speed-of-dreams-astro-teller/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1390. Tezuka, Osamu (2009): “Ten Principles of Robot Law”. In: Schodt, Frederik L. (Ed.): Inside the Robot Kingdom. Japan, Mechatronics, and the Coming Robotopia. Online: http://www.realtechsupport.org/UB/MC/JapaneseRobots_lecture_2009.pdfhttp://www.realtechsupport.org/UB/MC/JapaneseRobots_lecture_2009.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1391. The Economist (2019): “The rise of the financial machines”. In: The Economist, October 3. Online: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/10/03/the-rise-of-the-financial-machines [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1392. The Seasteading Institute (2017): The Floating Island Project: French Polynesia. Online: https://www.seasteading.org/floating-city-projecthttps://www.seasteading.org/floating-city-project/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1393. the world UNPLUGGED (2019): Homepage. Online: https://theworldunplugged.wordpress.comhttps://theworldunplugged.wordpress.com/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1394. Thierer, Adam (2014): Permissionless Innovation: The Continuing Case for Comprehensive Technological Freedom. Washington: Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Open Google Scholar
  1395. Thimm, Caja / Bächle, Thomas Christian (2018): “Autonomie der Technologie und autonome Systeme als ethische Herausforderung”. In: Rath, Matthias / Krotz, Friedrich / Karmasin, Matthias (Eds.): Maschinenethik. Wiesbaden: Springer, 73-87. Open Google Scholar
  1396. Thomas Aquinas (1937): Summa Theologica 6. Katholischer Akademikerverband (Ed.). Übersetzt von Dominikanern und Benediktinern Deutschlands und Österreichs. Salzburg: Anton Pustet. Open Google Scholar
  1397. Thomas, Bradan T. (2015): “Autonomous Weapon Systems: The Anatomy of Autonomy and the Legality of Lethality”. In: Houston Journal of International Law 37, 235-261. Open Google Scholar
  1398. Thomopoulos, Nikolas / Givoni, Moshe (2015): “The autonomous car – a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes”. In: European Journal of Futures Research 3(14). Online: https://eujournalfuturesresearch.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s40309-015-0071-zhttps://eujournalfuturesresearch.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s40309-015-0071-z [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1399. Thompson, Derek (2010): “Google’s CEO: ‘The Laws Are Written by Lobbyists’”. In: The Atlantic, October 1. Online: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/10/googles-ceo-the-laws-are-written-by-lobbyists/63908/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1400. Thompson, Janna (2010): “What is Intergenerational Justice?”. In: Future Justice, 5-20. Online: http://www.futureleaders.com.au/book_chapters/pdf/Future_Justice/Janna_Thompson.pdfhttp://www.futureleaders.com.au/book_chapters/pdf/Future_Justice/Janna_Thompson.pdf. [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1401. Thompson, Nicholas / Vogelstein, Fred (2018): “Inside the Two Years That Shook Facebook – and the World”. In: Wired, December 2. Online: https://www.wired.com/story/inside-facebook-mark-zuckerberg-2-years-of-hell/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1402. Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1985): “The Trolley Problem”. In: Yale Law Journal 94, 1395-1415. Open Google Scholar
  1403. Thuerkauf, Max (1980): Technomanie – die Todeskrankheit des Materialismus: Ursachen und Konsequenzen der technologischen Masslosigkeiten unserer Zeit. Schaffhausen: Novalis. Open Google Scholar
  1404. Thun-Hohenstein, Christoph (2017): “Sense and Sensibility in the Digital Age: Let Us Wake Up and Take Action! Introductory Essay”. In: Thun-Hohenstein, Christoph (Ed.): Vienna Biennale 2017. Wien: Verlag für Moderne Kunst, 16-30. Open Google Scholar
  1405. Tingyang, Zhao (2020): Alles unter dem Himmel. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Weltordnung. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  1406. Tiqqun, Ronald Voullié (2007): Kybernetik und Revolte. Zuerich: Diaphanes. Open Google Scholar
  1407. Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava (2017): “Technological Transcendence: A Critique of Transhumanism”. In: Trothen, Tracy J. / Mercer, Calvin (Eds.): Religion and Human Enhancement. Death, Values, and Morality, Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 267-283. Open Google Scholar
  1408. Tobin, James (1978). “A proposal for international monetary reform”. In: Eastern Economic Journal 4(3-4), 153-159. Open Google Scholar
  1409. Tomasi, Silvano M. (2013): “Annual Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, 10 October 1980”. In: United Nations (Ed.), Treaty Series 1342. Geneva: UN. Open Google Scholar
  1410. Tomuschat, Christian (2003): Human rights: Between idealism and realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1411. Topol, Sarah A. (2017): “Der Frieden braucht neue Formen”. In: Greenpeace Magazin 2, 21-33. Open Google Scholar
  1412. Torrance, Steve (2008): “Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents”. In: AI & Society 22, 495-521. Open Google Scholar
  1413. Torrance, Steve (2011): “Machine Ethics and the Idea of a More-Than-Human-World”. In: Anderson, Michael / Anderson, Susan Leigh (Eds.): Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115-137. Open Google Scholar
  1414. Toscano, Christopher P. (2015): “Friend of Humans: An Argument for Developing Autonomous Weapons Systems”. In: Journal of National Security and Policy 8, 189-246. Open Google Scholar
  1415. Tracy, David (1981): The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and Culture of Pluralism. New York: Crossroad. Open Google Scholar
  1416. Trappl, Robert (2016): “Robots’ Ethical Systems: From Asimov’s Laws to Principlism, from Assistive Robots to Self-Driving Cars”. In: Trappl, Robert (Ed.): A Construction Manual for Ethical Systems: Requirements, Methods, Implementations. Cham: Springer, 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  1417. Tremmel, Joerg Chet (2006): “Establishing intergenerational justice in national constitutions”. In: Tremmel, Joerg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 187-214. Open Google Scholar
  1418. Tripathi, Salil (2005): “Social human rights and international economical policy”. In: Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. / Kirchschlaeger, Thomas / Belliger, Andrea / Krieger, David (Eds.): Menschenrechte und Wirtschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen State und Nonstate Actors. Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF) 2. Bern: Staempfli, 151-169. Open Google Scholar
  1419. Trotter Cockburn, Catherine (1702): A Defence of Mr. Lock’s [sic.] Essay of Human Understanding. London: William Turner & John Nutt. Open Google Scholar
  1420. Tucker, Patrick / One, Defense (2014): “Can the Military Really Teach Robots Right from Wrong?”. In: The Atlantic, May 14. Online: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/05/the-military-wants-to-teach-robots-right-from-wrong/370855/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1421. Tufekci, Zeynep (2019): “Think You’re Discreet Online? Think Again”. In: The New York Times, April 21. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/21/opinion/computational-inference.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1422. Tuffley, David (2015): “Job survival in the age of robots and intelligent machines”. In: The Conversation, January 1. Online: https://theconversation.com/job-survival-in-the-age-of-robots-and-intelligent-machines-33906 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1423. Tugendhat, Ernst (1999): “Die Kontroverse um die Menschenrechte”. In: Gosepath, Stefan / Lohmann, Georg (Eds.): Philosophie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 48-61. Open Google Scholar
  1424. Turing, Alan M. (2009): “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”. In: Epstein, Robert / Roberts, Gary / Beber, Grace (Eds.): Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer. Springer: Berlin, 23-65. Open Google Scholar
  1425. Turkle, Sherry (2007): “Authenticity in the age of digital companions”. In: Interaction Studies 50(8/3), 501-517. Open Google Scholar
  1426. Turner, Bryan S. (2006): Vulnerability and Human Rights. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1427. Tussyadiah, Iis P. / Zach, Florian J. / Wang, Jianxi (2017): “Attitudes Toward Autonomous on Demand Mobility System: The Case of Self-Driving Taxi”. In: Schegg, Roland / Stangl, Brigitte (Eds.): Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017. Cham: Springer, 755-766. Open Google Scholar
  1428. Tutt, Andrew (2016): “An FDA for algorithms”. In: SSRN Scholarly Paper. Online: http://www.datascienceassn.org/sites/default/files/An%20FDA%20for%20Algorithms.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1429. Tzafestas, Spyros G. (2016): Roboethics: A Navigating Overview. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  1430. Uenver, Halit (2015): Globale Vernetzung, Kommunikation und Kultur – Konflikt oder Konvergenz? Dissertation, Universitaet Ulm. Open Google Scholar
  1431. The Public Voice Coalition (2018): “Universal Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence (UGAI)”. In: The Public Voice Coalition. Online: https://thepublicvoice.org/ai-universal-guidelines/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1432. Ullrich, Stefan (2014): “Informationelle Mü(n)digkeit”. In: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD 38(10), 696-700. Open Google Scholar
  1433. Ulpian, Domitius (2005): Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesten 1. Knuetel, Rolf / Kupisch, Berthold / Seiler, Hans Hermann / Behrends, Okko (Eds.). Heidelberg: C. F. Mueller. Open Google Scholar
  1434. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2000): General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health, 11 August 2000. Online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/425041https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/425041 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1435. UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) (2013): International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination. General recommendation No. 35: Combating racist hate speech. Online: http://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=6QkG1d%2fPPRiCAqhKb7yhssyNNtgI51ma08CMa6o7Bglz8iG4SuOjovEP%2bcqr8joDoVEbW%2bQ1MoWdOTNEV99v6FZp9aSSA1nZya6gtpTo2JUBMI0%2boOmjAwk%2b2xJW%2bC8e [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1436. UN Human Rights Committee (1983): General Comment No. 11: Prohibition of propaganda for war and inciting national, racial or religious hatred (Art. 20). July 29. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/CCPRGeneralCommentNo11.pdfhttps://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/CCPRGeneralCommentNo11.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1437. UN Human Rights Committee (1988): General Comment No. 16: Article 17 (The right to respect of privacy, family, home and correspondence, and protection of honour and reputation). Online: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared%20Documents/1_Global/INT_CCPR_GEC_6624_E.dochttps://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared%20Documents/1_Global/INT_CCPR_GEC_6624_E.doc [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1438. UN Human Rights Council (2019): New and emerging digital technologies and human rights. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/AdvisoryCommittee/Pages/DigitalTechnologiesandHR.aspx [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1439. UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression (2011): International Mechanisms for Promoting Freedom of Expression. Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression on the Internet, June 1. Online: www.osce.org/fom/78309www.osce.org/fom/78309 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1440. UNESCO (2005): Towards knowledge societies: UNESCO world report. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141843https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141843 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1441. UNESCO (2018): The UNESCO Courier: Many Voices, One World. A lexicon for artificial intelligence. Online: https://en.unesco.org/courier/2018-3/lexicon-artificial-intelligence [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1442. UNESCO (2019): Steering AI and Advanced ICTs for Knowledge Societies: A Rights, Openness, Access, and Multi-stakeholder Perspective. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372132https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372132 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1443. UNESCO (2020): Elaboration of a Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Online: https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/ethicshttps://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/ethics [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1444. UNESCO COMEST (2017): Report of COMEST on Robotics Ethics. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST). Online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002539/253952E.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1445. Ungerer, Aria (2019): “Als Vater war er gleichermassen grossartig und furchtbar”. In: Die Zeit Magazin, October 16. Online: https://www.zeit.de/zeit-magazin/2019/43/aria-ungerer-tomi-ungerer-tochter-literatur [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1446. UNI Global Union (2017): “Top 10 Principles for Ethical Artificial Intelligence”. Online: www.thefutureworldofwork.org/media/35420/uni_ethical_ai.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1447. UNICEF (2017): The State of the World’s Children: Children in a Digital World. https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_101992.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1448. Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (1948). United Nations. Online: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1449. United Nations (1950): French Delegate to the Sixth Commission on Human Rights 1950. Summary Record of the 165th meeting: Draft International covenant on human rights. Economic and Social Council. Commission on Human Rights. Sixth Session. E/CN.4/SR.165. Paris: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  1450. United Nations (1987): Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1451. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of 2007 (2007). Online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1452. United Nations (2011): Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework. Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Including the Right to Development. Report of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie. Human Rights Council, Seventeenth Session, A/HRC/17/31. United Nations. Online: https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/17/31https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/17/31 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1453. United Nations (2012): “Countries must boost measures to combat Internet racism – UN independent expert”. In: UN News, November 5. Online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2012/11/424852-countries-must-boost-measures-combat-internet-racism-un-independent-experthttps://news.un.org/en/story/2012/11/424852-countries-must-boost-measures-combat-internet-racism-un-independent-expert [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1454. United Nations (2015): UN Sustainable Development Goals. Online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1455. United Nations (2019): Moving Together to build a healthier World. High-level Meeting at the UN General Assembly. Political Declaration on Universal Health Coverage, September 23, para. 5. United Nations. Online: https://www.un.org/pga/73/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2019/07/FINAL-draft-UHC-Political-Declaration.pdfhttps://www.un.org/pga/73/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2019/07/FINAL-draft-UHC-Political-Declaration.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1456. UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation (2019): The Age of Digital Interdependence. Report of the UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation, June 2019. Online: http://www.un.org/en/pdfs/DigitalCooperation-report-for%20web.pdfhttp://www.un.org/en/pdfs/DigitalCooperation-report-for%20web.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1457. Urban, Tim (2015): “The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence”. In: Wait but Why: New post every sometimes, January 22. Online: https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1458. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: National Toxicology Program (2018): Cell Phone Radio Frequency Radiation. Online: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.htmlhttps://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1459. U.S. President National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology (2016a): Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. October 12. Online: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1460. U.S. President National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology (2016b): The national artificial intelligence research and development strategic plan. October 13. Online: https://www.nitrd.gov/PUBS/national_ai_rd_strategic_plan.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1461. University of Washington (2006): The History of Artificial Intelligence. University of Washington. History of Computing Course (CSEP 590A). Online: https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep590/06au/projects/history-ai.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1462. Vallor, Shannon / Bekey, George A. (2017): “Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics of Self-Learning”. In: Lin, Patrick / Jenkins, Ryan / Abney, Keith (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0 from Autonomous cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 338-353. Open Google Scholar
  1463. Van Eeten, Michel (2017): “Patching Security Governance: An Empirical View of Emergent Governance Mechanisms for Cybersecurity”. In: Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 19(6), 429-448. Open Google Scholar
  1464. Van Est, Rinie / Stemerding, Dirk (2012): Making Perfect Life. European Governance Challenges in 21st Century Bioengineering. STOA Science and Technology Options Assessment. Brussels: European Union. Open Google Scholar
  1465. Van Opstal, Rocus / Timmerhuis, Jacqueline (2006): “The role of CPB in Dutch economic policy”. In: Tremmel, Joerg Chet (Ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 299-316. Open Google Scholar
  1466. Van Vliet, Benjamin Edward (2012): Systematic Finance: Essays on Ethics, Methodology and Quality Control in High Frequency Trading. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology. Open Google Scholar
  1467. Van Wynsberghe, Aimee (2015): Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design and Implementation. Farnham: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar
  1468. Vance, Ashlee (2010) Andrew Orlowski: “Merely Human? That’s So Yesterday”. In: The New York Times, June 12. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/business/13sing.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/business/13sing.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1469. Varian, Hal (2014a): “Beyond Big Data”. In: Business Economics 49(1), 27-31. Open Google Scholar
  1470. Varian, Hal (2014b): “Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics”. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(2), 3-28. Open Google Scholar
  1471. Varian, Hal (2018): Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Industrial Organization. NBER Working Paper 24839. Online: https://www.nber.org/papers/w24839https://www.nber.org/papers/w24839 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1472. Veith, Werner (2014): “Gerechtigkeit”. In: Heimbach-Steins, Marianne (Ed.): Christliche Sozialethik: Ein Lehrbuch 1. Studienliteratur. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 315-326. Open Google Scholar
  1473. Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2005): What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1474. Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2011a): Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1475. Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2011b): “Subject to Technology: on autonomic computing and human autonomy”. In: Rouvroy, Antoinette / Hildebrandt, Mireille (Eds.): Law, Human Agency, and Autonomic Computing: The Philosophy of Law meets the Philosophy of Technology. London: Routledge, 27-45. Open Google Scholar
  1476. Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2014): “Some Misunderstandings About the Moral Significance of Technology”. In: Kroes, Peter / Verbeek, Peter-Paul (Eds.): The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 75-88. Open Google Scholar
  1477. Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2015a): “Designing the Public Sphere: Information Technologies and the Politics of Mediation”. In: Floridi, Luciano (Ed.): The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Cham: Springer, 208-219. Open Google Scholar
  1478. Veruggio, Gianmarco / Operto, Fiorella (2008): “Roboethics: Social and Ethical Implications of Robotics”. In: Siciliano, Bruno / Katib, Oussama (Eds.): Springer Handbook of Robotics. Berlin: Springer, 1499-1524. Open Google Scholar
  1479. Viehl, Alexander / Gleich, Udo / Post, Hendrik / ASSUME Partners (2017): “Affordable Safe and Secure Mobility Evolution”. In: Watzenig, Daniel / Horn, Martin (Eds.): Automated Driving. Cham: Springer, 583-588. Open Google Scholar
  1480. Villani, Cédric (2018): For a Meaningful Artificial Intelligence: Towards a French and European Strategy. Online: https://www.aiforhumanity.fr/pdfs/MissionVillani_Report_ENG-VF.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1481. Villhauer, Bernd (2016): “Finanzmarktkriminalität und Ethik”. In: Zoche, Peter / Kaufmann, Stefan / Arnold, Harald (Eds.): Grenzenlose Sicherheit?: Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen der Sicherheitsforschung. Berlin: LIT-Verlag, 235-250. Open Google Scholar
  1482. Virt, Guenter (2007): Damit Menschsein Zukunft hat: Theologische Ethik im Einsatz für eine humane Gesellschaft. Marschuetz, Gerhard / Prueller-Jagenteufel, Gunter M. (Eds.). Wuerzburg: Echter. Open Google Scholar
  1483. Voegeli, Vogeli (2016): “Credit Suisse, CIA-funded palantir to target rogue bankers”. In: Bloomberg, March 22. Online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-22/credit-suisse-cia-funded-palantir-build-joint-compliance-firm [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1484. Vogel, Johan (2019): “Spielregeln für Giganten”. In: Die Zeit, July 25. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/31/datenschutz-internetkonzerne-kontrolle-eu-wettberwerbsrecht [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1485. Vogel, Kenneth (2017): “Google Critic Ousted From Think Tank Funded by the Tech Giant”. In: The New York Times, August 30. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/30/us/politics/eric-schmidt-google-new-america.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1486. Vogt, Markus (2005): “Natürliche Ressourcen und intergenerationelle Gerechtigkeit”. In: Heimbach-Steins, Marianne (Ed.): Christliche Sozialethik: Ein Lehrbuch 2. Studienliteratur. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 137-162. Open Google Scholar
  1487. Von Cranach, Xaver (2019): “Er hat einen Traum”“. In: Die Zeit, October 30. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/45/raj-chetty-big-data-soziale-ungleichheit-oekonomie [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1488. Wachter, Sandra / Mittelstadt, Bernt / Russell, Chris (2017): “Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR”. In: Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 31(2), 841-887. Open Google Scholar
  1489. Wagner, Markus (2014): “The Dehumanization of International Humanitarian Law: Legal, Ethical, and Political Implications of Autonomous Weapon Systems”. In: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 47, 1371-1424. Open Google Scholar
  1490. Waid, Bill (2018): “AI-enabled personalization: The new frontier in dynamic pricing”. In: Forbes, July 9. Online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/07/09/ai-enabled-personalization-the-new-frontier-in-dynamic-pricing/#71e470b86c1b [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1491. Wakefield, Jane (2019): “Google’s ethics board shut down”. In: BBC News, April 5. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47825833https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47825833 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1492. Walker, Francesco / Verwey, Willem / Martens, Marieke (2018): “Gaze Behaviour as a Measure of Trust in Automated Vehicles”. In: Van Nes, Nicole / Voegelé, Charlotte (Eds.): Proceedings of the 6th Humanist Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, June 13-14. Online: https://www.humanist-vce.eu/fileadmin/contributeurs/humanist/TheHague2018/29-walker.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1493. Walker-Smith, Bryant (2013): “Automated vehicles are probably legal in the United States”. In: Texas A&M Law Review 1(3), 411-521. Open Google Scholar
  1494. Wallace-Wells, Benjamin (2015): “As Jeopardy! Robot Watson Grows Up, How Afraid of It Should We Be?”. In: New York Magazine, May 20. Online: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/05/jeopardy-robot-watson.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1495. Wallach, Wendell (2015): A Dangerous Master: How to Keep Technology from Slipping Beyond Our Control. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  1496. Wallach, Wendell (2017): “Toward a ban on lethal autonomous weapons: surmounting the obstacles”. In: Communications of the ACM 60(5), 28-34. Open Google Scholar
  1497. Wallach, Wendell / Allen, Collin (2009): Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  1498. Wallach, Wendell / Allen, Collin / Smit, Iva (2008): “Machine Morality: Bottom-up and Top-down Approaches for Modeling Human Moral Faculties”. In: AI & Society 22(4), 565-582. Open Google Scholar
  1499. Walsh, James Igoe (2015): “Political Accountability and autonomous weapons”. In: Research & Politics 2(4), 1-6. Open Google Scholar
  1500. Wandschneider, Dieter (1993): “‘Neuer ‘Ethikbedarf’. Technische Machbarkeit und Massentechnisierung als philosophisch-ethisches Problem”. In: Daecke, Sigurd Martin / Henning, Klaus (Eds.): Verantwortung in der Technik: Ethische Aspekte der Ingenieurwissenschaften. Mannheim: BI Wissenschaftsverlag, 47-65. Open Google Scholar
  1501. Wang, Zhangjing / Yu, Wu / Qingqing, Niu (2020): “Multi-Sensor Fusion in Automated Driving: A Survey”. In: IEEE Access 8, 2847-2868. Open Google Scholar
  1502. Wardrop, Murray (2010): “‘Young will have to change names to escape cyber past’ warns Google”. In: Telegraph, August 18. Online: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/7951269/Young-will-have-to-change-names-to-escape-cyber-past-warns-Googles-Eric-Schmidt.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1503. Warwick, Kevin (2002): I, Cyborg. London: Century. Open Google Scholar
  1504. Waters, Richard (2014a): “Google’s Larry Page resists secrecy but accepts privacy concerns”. In: Financial Times, May 30. Online: https://www.ft.com/content/f3b127ea-e708-11e3-88be-00144feabdc0 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1505. Waters, Richard (2014b): “FT interview with Google co-founder and CEO Larry Page”. In: Financial Times, October 31. Online: https://www.ft.com/content/3173f19e-5fbc-11e4-8c27-00144feabdc0 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1506. Watzenig, Daniel / Horn, Martin (Eds.) (2016): Automated Driving: Safer and More Efficient Future Driving. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  1507. Weber, Karsten (2014). “Normative Herausforderungen an Technik für die Pflege im Alter. Hauswirtschaft und Wissenschaft”. In: Europäische Zeitschrift für Haushaltsökonomie, Haushaltstechnik und Sozialmanagement 62, 116-121. Open Google Scholar
  1508. Weber, Karsten (2015): “MEESTAR: Ein Modell zur ethischen Evaluierung sozio-technischer Arrangements in der Pflege- und Gesundheitsversorgung”. In: Weber, Karsten / Frommeld, Debora / Manzeschke, Arne / Fangerau, Heiner (Eds.): Technisierung des Alltags – Beitrag für ein gutes Leben?. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 247-262. Open Google Scholar
  1509. Weber, Karsten / Wackerbarth, Alena (2015): “Partizipative Gestaltung verlässlicher Assistenzsysteme für die Pflege alter und hochbetagter Menschen”. In: Cunningham, Douglas / Hofstedt, Petra / Meer, Klaus / Schmitt, Ingo (Eds.): Informatik 2015. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik, 1247-1249. Open Google Scholar
  1510. Weber, Sebastian / Hanke, John (2015): “Reality as Virtual Playground”. In: Making Games, January 22. Online: https://www.makinggames.biz/feature/reality-as-a-virtual-playground7286.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1511. Wegmann, Fabian (2014): Autonomie unbemannter Waffensysteme: das CCW-Expertentreffen zum Thema ‘lethal autonomous weapons systems’ und der gegenwärtige Stand der Technik. IFSH IFAR Working Paper 19. Online: http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2014/5677/pdf/IFAR_WP_19.pdfhttp://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2014/5677/pdf/IFAR_WP_19.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1512. Wegner, Jochen (2018): “Künstliche Intelligenzen überlegen nicht, was sie nach Feierabend machen”. In: Die Zeit, April 17, 29-30. Online: https://www.zeit.de/wissen/2019-04/computerlinguistik-kuenstliche-intelligenz-sprachverarbeitung-richard-socher [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1513. WeGovNow (2020): Towards #WeGovernment: Collective and participative approaches for addressing local policy challenges. Online: https://wegovnow.eu// [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1514. Weichert, Thilo (2014): “Big Data, Gesundheit und der Datenschutz”. In: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD 38(12), 831-838. Open Google Scholar
  1515. Weinberger, David (2018): “Optimization over explanation: Maximizing the benefits of machine learning without sacrificing its intelligence”. In: Medium, January 28. Online: https://medium.com/@dweinberger/optimization-over-explanation-maximizing-the-benefits-we-want-from-machine-learning-without-347ccd9f3a66 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1516. Weiser, Mark (1999): “The Computer for the 21st Century”. In: Scientific American 265(3), 94-105. Open Google Scholar
  1517. Weiss, Norman (2007): “Menschenrechtsschutz”. In: Volger, Helmut (Ed.): Grundlagen und Strukturen der Vereinten Nationen. Muenchen: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 163-188. Open Google Scholar
  1518. Weizenbaum, Joseph (1976): Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. Open Google Scholar
  1519. Weizenbaum, Joseph (1987): “Not Without Us”. In: ETC: A Review of General Semantics 44(1), 42-48. Open Google Scholar
  1520. Welzer, Harald (2019): “Fröhliche Unbedarftheit in Sachen Wirklichkeit”. In: Die Zeit, August 14. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/34/digitalisierung-kuenstliche-intelligenz-algorithmen-denken-dummheithttps://www.zeit.de/2019/34/digitalisierung-kuenstliche-intelligenz-algorithmen-denken-dummheit [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1521. Wertheim, Margaret (1999): The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. New York: W.W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
  1522. Wettstein, Florian (2010): “The Duty to Protect: Corporate Complicity, Political Responsibility, and Human Rights Advocacy”. In: Journal of Business Ethics 96(1), 33-47. Open Google Scholar
  1523. Wettstein, Florian (2012a): “Human Rights as a Critique of Instrumental CSR: Corporate Responsibility Beyond the Business Case”. In: Notizie di Politeia 28(106), 18-33. Open Google Scholar
  1524. Wettstein, Florian (2012b): “CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide”. In: Business Ethics Quarterly 22(4), 739-770. Open Google Scholar
  1525. Wettstein, Florian (2012c): “Human Rights as Ethical Imperatives for Business: The UN Global Compact’s Human Rights Principles”. In: Lawrence, Joanne T. / Beamish, Paul W. (Eds.): Globally Responsible Leadership: Managing According to the UN global compact. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 73-88. Open Google Scholar
  1526. Wetz, Franz Josef (1998): Die Würde des Menschen ist antastbar: Eine Provokation. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Open Google Scholar
  1527. Weyer, Johannes (2015): “Creating Order in Hybrid Systems: Reflexions on the Interaction of Man and Smart Machines”. Working Paper 7. Dortmund: Technische Universitaet Dortmund. Online: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/10974/ssoar-2005-weyer_et_al-creating_order_in_hybrid_systems.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2005-weyer_et_al-creating_order_in_hybrid_systems.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1528. White, Trevor N. / Baum, Seth D. (2017): “Liability for Present and Future Robotics Technology”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 66-79. Open Google Scholar
  1529. Wiemeyer, Joachim (2013): “Unternehmensethik aus christlich-sozialethischer Sicht”. In: Kirche und Gesellschaft 41(403), 3-16. Open Google Scholar
  1530. Wiener, Nobert (1988): The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Cambridge: Da Capo Press. Open Google Scholar
  1531. Wiener, Norbert (1948): Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  1532. Wildhaber, Isabelle / Lohmann, Melinda F. / Kasper, Gabriel (2019): “Diskriminierung durch Algorithmen – Überlegungen zum schweizerischen Recht am Beispiel von prädiktiver Analytik am Arbeitsplatz”. In: Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht 138(1), 459-489. Open Google Scholar
  1533. Wilhelms, Guenter (2018): “Wie die Digitalisierung das Verhältnis des Menschen zu seiner Arbeit verändert: Versuch einer Kritik”. In: Amosinternational 12, 3-9. Open Google Scholar
  1534. Wilk, Asher (2019): “Teaching AI, Ethics, Law and Policy, Computers and Society”. In: arXiv. Online: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1904/1904.12470.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1535. Willoweit, Dietmar (1992): “Die Veräusserung der Freiheit. Über den Unterschied von Rechtsdenken und Menschenrechtsdenken”. In: Bielefeldt, Heiner / Brugger, Winfried / Dicke, Klaus (Eds.): Würde und Recht des Menschen. Festschrift Johannes Schwartlaender. Wuerzburg: Koenigshausen & Neumann, 255-268. Open Google Scholar
  1536. Wils, Jean-Pierre (2004): “Sakrale Gewalt. Elemente einer Urgeschichte der Transzendenz”. In: Wils, Jean-Pierre (Ed.): Die Moral der Religion. Kritische Sichtungen und konstruktive Vorschläge. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoeningh, 9-51. Open Google Scholar
  1537. Wils, Jean-Pierre / Mieth, Dietmar (1989): “Vorwort der Herausgeber”. In: Wils, Jean-Pierre / Mieth, Dietmar (Eds.): Ethik ohne Chance? Erkundungen im technologischen Zeitalter. Tuebingen: Attempto, VII-XII. Open Google Scholar
  1538. Winfield, Alan F. T. / Jirotka, Marina (2017): “The Case for an Ethical Black Box”. In: Gao, Yang / Fallah, Saber / Jin, Yaochu / Lekakou, Constantina (Eds.): Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. Proceedings of TAROS 2017, Cham: Springer, 262-273. Open Google Scholar
  1539. Winikoff, Michael (2018): “Towards Trusting Autonomous Systems”. In: El Fallah Segrouchni, Amal / Ricci, Alessandro / Trao, Son (Eds.): Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. Cham: Springer, 3-20. Open Google Scholar
  1540. Winkler, Eva C. / Ose, Dominik / Glimm, Hanno / Tanner, Klaus / Von Kalle, Christof (2013): “Personalisierte Medizin und Informed Consent. Klinische und ethische Erwägungen im Rahmen der Entwicklung einer Best Practice Leitlinie für die biobankbasierte Ganzgenomforschung in der Onkologie”. In: Ethik in der Medizin 25(3), 195-203. Open Google Scholar
  1541. Winner, Hermann / Wachenfeld, Walter / Junietz, Phillip (2018): “Validation and Introduction of Automated Driving”. In: Winner, Hermann / Prokop, Gunter / Maurer, Markus (Eds.): Automotive Systems Engineering II. Cham: Springer, 177-196. Open Google Scholar
  1542. Winner, Langdon (1980): “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” In: Daedalus 109(1), 121-136. Open Google Scholar
  1543. Winston, Patrick Henry (1992): Artificial Intelligence. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing. Online: https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.034f/ai3/rest.pdf [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1544. Winter, Clemens (2005): Robotik in der Medizin. Eine strafrechtliche Untersuchung. Recht & Medizin 74. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  1545. Winter, Sabrina (2020): “Undurchsichtige Lobbyarbeit der US-Techkonzerne aufgedeckt. Verstösse gegen EU-Transparenzregeln”. In: Der Spiegel, September 28. Online: https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/facebook-google-amazon-apple-microsoft-undurchsichtige-lobbyarbeit-aufgedeckt-a-432bb716-0844-4a1a-95c0-6bfec6e733c5https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/facebook-google-amazon-apple-microsoft-undurchsichtige-lobbyarbeit-aufgedeckt-a-432bb716-0844-4a1a-95c0-6bfec6e733c5 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1546. Witschen, Dieter (1999): “Menschenrechte – Menschenpflichten: Anmerkungen zu einer Korrelation”. In: Theologie und Glaube 42, 191-202. Open Google Scholar
  1547. Witschen, Dieter (2002): Christliche Ethik der Menschenrechte: Systematische Studien. Studien der Moraltheologie 28. Muenster: LIT-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  1548. Witt, Elke (2015): “Digitale Spiegelbilder – Ethische Aspekte grosser Datensammlungen”. In: Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheits¬s⁠chutz 58(8), 853-858. Open Google Scholar
  1549. Woelm, Erik (2018): “Warum mein Auto nie allein schuld sein wird”. In: Rath, Matthias / Krotz, Friedrich / Karmasin, Matthias (Eds.): Maschinenethik. Wiesbaden: Springer, 173-191. Open Google Scholar
  1550. Wodak, Ruth (2016): Politik mit der Angst: Zur Wirkung rechtspopulistischer Diskurse. Horn: Edition Konturen. Open Google Scholar
  1551. Wohlfart, Guenter (2002): “Alte Geschichten zum wuwei”. In: Eberfeld, Rolf / Wohlfart, Guenter (Eds.): Komparative Ethik: Das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen. Koeln: Edition Chora. Open Google Scholar
  1552. Woisetschlaeger, David M. (2016): “Consumer Perceptions of Automated Driving Technologies: An Examination of Use Cases and Branding Strategies”. In: Mau¬r⁠er, Markus / Gerdes, Christian J. / Lenz, Barbara / Winner, Hermann (Eds.): Autonomous Driving. Berlin: Springer, 687-706. Open Google Scholar
  1553. Wolbert, Werner (2003): “Menschenwürde, Menschenrechte und Theologie”. In: Salzburger Theologische Zeitschrift 7(2), 161-179. Open Google Scholar
  1554. Wolbert, Werner (2008): Gewissen und Verantwortung: Gesammelte Studien. Studien zur Theologischen Ethik 118. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  1555. Wolf, Clark (2003): “Intergenerational Justice”. In: Frey, Raymond G. / Wellman, Christopher Heath (Eds.): A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden: Wiley Blackwell Publishing, 279-294. Open Google Scholar
  1556. Wolf, Ingo (2015): “Wechselwirkung Mensch und autonomer Agent”. In: Maurer, Markus / Gerdes, Christan J. / Lenz, Barbara / Winner, Hermann (Eds.): Autonomes Fahren. Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte. Berlin: Springer, 103-125. Open Google Scholar
  1557. Wolf, Jean-Claude (1993): Utilitarismus, Pragmatismus und kollektive Verantwortung. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  1558. Wolfangel, Eva (2019): “Die Angst der Maschine”. In: Die Zeit, August 8, 27-28. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2019/33/robotik-kuenstliche-intelligenz-emotionen-angst [08.02.2021] Open Google Scholar
  1559. Woodward, Alan (2012): “Viewpoint: Changing the way the internet is governed is risky”. In: BBC, June 14. Online: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-18440558http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-18440558 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1560. World Food Programme (2020): “COVID-19 will double number of people facing food crises unless swift action is taken”. In: World Food Programme News. Online: https://www.wfp.org/news/covid-19-will-double-number-people-facing-food-crises-unless-swift-action-takenhttps://www.wfp.org/news/covid-19-will-double-number-people-facing-food-crises-unless-swift-action-taken [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1561. World Government Summit (2017): The future of money. Back to the future – the internet of money. Online: https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org/api/publications/document?id=23747dc4-e97c-6578-b2f8-ff0000a7ddb6https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org/api/publications/document?id=23747dc4-e97c-6578-b2f8-ff0000a7ddb6 [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1562. World Health Organization (n.d.): Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC). Online: https://www.who.int/csr/durc/enhttps://www.who.int/csr/durc/en/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1563. World Summit on the Information Society (2003): Declaration of Principles, Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium. December 12, 2003. Document WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/4-E. Online: https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.htmlhttps://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1564. Worstall, Tim (2012): “That Robot Economy And The Rentier Class”. In: Forbes, December 10. Online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/12/10/that-robot-economy-and-the-rentier-class/#4e678294763f [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1565. Wrobel, Stefan / Voss, Hans / Koehler, Joachim / Beyer, Uwe / Auer, Soeren (2015): “Big Data, Big Opportunities”. In: Informatik-Spektrum 38(5), 370-378. Open Google Scholar
  1566. Wyllie, Doug (2013): “How ‘big data’ is helping law enforcement”. In: Police One, August 20. Online: https://www.policeone.com/police-products/software/Data-Information-Sharing-Software/articles/6396543-How-Big-Data-is-helping-law-enforcement/ [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1567. Yampolski, Roman V. (2013): “Artificial Intelligence Safety Engineering: Why Machine Ethics Is a Wrong Approach”. In: Mueller, Vincent C. (Ed.): Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer, 289-296. Open Google Scholar
  1568. Yampolskiy, Roman V. (2018): “Could an artificial intelligence be considered a person under the law?”. In: Science, October 7. Online: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/could-an-artificial-intelligence-be-considered-a-person-under-the-law [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1569. Yang, Xifan (2018): “Europa ist abgemeldet”. In: Die Zeit, September 20. Online: https://www.zeit.de/2018/39/weltkonferenz-kuenstliche-intelligenz-shanghai-technologie-china-usa [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1570. Yarrow, Jay (2013): “Google CEO Larry Page Wants a Totally Separate World Where Tech Companies Can Conduct Experiments On People”. In: Business Insider, May 16. Online: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-ceo-larry-page-wants-a-place-for-experiments-2013-5?r=US&IR=T [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1571. Yehya, Naief (2005): Homo cyborg: Il corpo postumano tra realtà e fantascienza. Milano: Elèuthera. Open Google Scholar
  1572. Yeung, Karen (2017): “‘Hypernudge’: Big data as a mode of regulation by design”. In: Information, Communication & Society 20(1), 118-136. Open Google Scholar
  1573. Yom-Tov, Elad / Horvitz, Eric J. / White Ryen, William / De Choudhury, Munmun / Counts, Scott J. (2016): User behavior monitoring on a computerized device. US9427185. Online: https://www.freshpatents.com/-dt20141225ptan20140377727.php [08.02.2021] Open Google Scholar
  1574. Young, Simon (2006): Designer Evolution: A Transhumanist Manifesto. New York: Amherst. Open Google Scholar
  1575. Zenger, Erich (2009): “Du sollst keine anderen Götter haben neben mir: Der biblische Dekalog als Verfassungsurkunde einer humanen Gesellschaft”. In: Nacke, Bernhard (Ed.): Orientierung und Innovation: Beiträge der Kirche für Staat und Gesellschaft. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 207-222. Open Google Scholar
  1576. Zentrum für Digitalen Fortschritt D 64 (n.d.): Der Einfluss künstlicher Intelligenz auf Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Solidarität. Online: d-64.org [08.02.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  1577. Zhenji, Lua / Happee, Riender / Cabrall, Christopher D. D. / Kyriakidis, Miltos / de Winter, Joost C.F. (2016): “Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey”. In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 43, 183-198. Open Google Scholar
  1578. Zhou, Yijia / Huang, Jiaqi / Li, Guiqin / Chen, Feng / Gao, Zhiyuan (2019): “Autonomous Driving Ethics Case Study for Engineering Ethics Education”. In: Association for Computing Machinery (Ed.): Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Modern Educational Technology. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 106-110. Open Google Scholar
  1579. Ziegler, Sven (2016): “Robotik in der Pflege von Personen mit Demenz”. In: Burzan, Nicole / Hitzler, Ronald / Kirschner, Heiko (Eds.): Materiale Analysen. Erlebniswelten. Wiesbaden: Springer, 53-69. Open Google Scholar
  1580. Ziemer, Laura (2001): “Application to Tibet of the principles on human rights and the environment”. In: Harvard Human Rights Journal 14, 233-275. Open Google Scholar
  1581. Zimmer, Oliver: “Mythos Fortschritt: Jene, die sich auf ihn berufen, beanspruchen oftmals bloss das Deutungsmonopol über die Gegenwart”. In: Neue Zuercher Zeitung, February 9, 43. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/mythos-fortschritt-es-geht-staendig-und-nur-um-deutungshoheit-ld.1457501?reduced=true [08.02.2021] Open Google Scholar
  1582. Zimmerli, Walther C. (1993): “Wandelt sich Verantwortung mit technischem Wandel?”. In: Lenk, Hans / Rophl, Guenther (Eds.): Technik und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, 92-111. Open Google Scholar
  1583. Zimmermann, Klaus F. (2015b): Nur noch Roboter und Selbstausbeutung? Über die Herausforderungen und Chancen der neuen Welt der Arbeit. IZA-Standpunkte 80. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics IZA. Open Google Scholar
  1584. Zimmermann, Markus (2015a): “Grenzverschiebungen – Zur Natur des Menschen in bioethischen Diskursen”. In: Bogner, Daniel / Muegge, Cornelia (Eds.): Natur des Menschen. Brauchen die Menschenrechte ein Menschenbild? Studien zur Theologischen Ethik 144. Freiburg im Uechtland: Academic Press, 175-195. Open Google Scholar
  1585. Zlotowski, Jakub / Proudfoot, Diane / Yogeeswaran, Kumar / Bartneck, Christoph (2014): “Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and challenges in human-robot interaction”. In: International Journal of Social Robotics 7(3), 347-360. Open Google Scholar
  1586. Zoglauer, Thomas (2006): “Klone, Chimären und Cyborgs: Hybridwesen zwischen Natur und Technik”. In: Erwägen – Wissen – Ethik 17, 611-612. Open Google Scholar
  1587. Zoller, David (2017): “Skilled Perception, Authenticity, and the Case Against Automation”. In: Lin, Patrick / Abney, Keith / Jenkins, Ryans (Eds.): Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 97-188. Open Google Scholar
  1588. Zuboff, Shoshana (2019): The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: PublicAffairs. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Ethics", "Philosophical Practice"
Cover of book: Ethik der Kryptographie
Book Titles Full access
Laurence Lerch
Ethik der Kryptographie
Cover of book: Ideale der Menschlichkeit
Book Titles No access
Paul R. Tarmann
Ideale der Menschlichkeit
Cover of book: Cultivating Character
Book Titles Full access
Tuba Işık
Cultivating Character
Cover of book: Der innere Kompass
Book Titles No access
Bettina Kremberg
Der innere Kompass
Cover of book: Existenzielle Selbstakzeptanz
Book Titles No access
Kai Hoffmann
Existenzielle Selbstakzeptanz

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex