, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Methods of Measuring the Added Value of Facility Management for Generating Competitive Advantages

Illustrated by the Example of the German Shopping Center Market
Authors:
Publisher:
 2021

Summary

The example of a tangible shopping experience clearly demonstrates that a customer journey in terms of operational excellence is closely related to modern Facility Management activities. FM takes over a decisive role when it comes to creating future marketplaces. The Added Value Model is supportive through the identification of actual AVs by integrating various stakeholder perspectives. Insights related to all stakeholders’ demands and the subordinate corporate strategy are essential in terms of identifying the individual needs that sustainably influence the customer journey. This study assists in generating additional important insights regarding the method of measuring the AV of FM as a competitive advantage and knowledge-generating tool for corporates.



Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4595-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7657-6
Publisher
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Series
Wissenschaftliche Beiträge aus dem Tectum Verlag: Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Volume
93
Language
English
Pages
CXLVI
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages I - XXXVI
      1. 1.1.1 VUCA – Progress is imperative No access
      2. 1.1.2 The German Shopping Center Market No access
      3. 1.1.3 Key stakeholders and trends – the retail market on the move No access
        1. 1.1.4.1 Impact for investors No access
        2. 1.1.4.2 Impact for tenants No access
        3. 1.1.4.3 Impact for visitors No access
        4. 1.1.4.4 Impact for operators No access
      4. 1.1.5 Conceptual delimitation of FM No access
      5. 1.1.6 FM as part of the company’s value chain No access
      6. 1.1.7 Conceptual delimitation of CREM No access
        1. 1.1.8.1 Current situation No access
        2. 1.1.8.2 VUCA and FM No access
        3. 1.1.8.3 The development of new real estate concepts No access
        4. 1.1.8.4 Influencing factors No access
        5. 1.1.8.5 Holistic approach and challenges in FM No access
        6. 1.1.8.6 Use cases of digitalization and new technologies No access
    1. 1.2 Hypotheses and research questions No access
    2. 1.3 Goal and work methodology No access
    1. 2.1 Introduction No access
    2. 2.2 Definition of the review focus and the goal No access
    3. 2.3 Description of the coverage No access
    4. 2.4 Conceptualization of the topic No access
    5. 2.5 Literature search No access
      1. 2.6.1 Operationalizability No access
      2. 2.6.2 Transferability No access
      3. 2.6.3 Efficiency No access
      4. 2.6.4 Up-to-datedness No access
      1. 2.7.1 Balanced Scorecard No access
      2. 2.7.2 Tableau de bord No access
      3. 2.7.3 Value Map No access
      4. 2.7.4 Economic Value Added No access
      5. 2.7.5 ORMM method No access
      6. 2.7.6 Guest Model No access
      7. 2.7.7 Beyond budgeting No access
      8. 2.7.8 Comparison of the models and concepts No access
    6. 2.8 Summary No access
    1. 3.1 Introduction No access
    2. 3.2 Theory of planned behavior No access
    3. 3.3 Development of indicators No access
    4. 3.4 Development and formulation of hypotheses No access
    5. 3.5 Pre-test No access
    6. 3.6 Data collection No access
    7. 3.7 Data preparation No access
      1. 3.8.1 Descriptive Statistics No access
      2. 3.8.2 Inductive Statistics No access
    8. 3.9 Data interpretation and limitations No access
    1. 4.1 Introduction of ECE Projektmanagement G.m.b.H. & Co. KG No access
    2. 4.2 Objectives and structure of the case study No access
      1. 4.3.1 Data collection No access
      2. 4.3.2 Data evaluation and interpretation No access
    3. 4.4 Development of the AVIC model No access
    4. 4.5 Summary No access
    1. 5.1 Introduction No access
    2. 5.2 The service concept of ECE “At your Service” No access
      1. 5.3.1 FM is making the customer journey a tangible experience No access
      2. 5.3.2 The innovation partner – UVIS No access
      3. 5.3.3 The innovative product – ESCALITE No access
      4. 5.3.4 The location – Phoenix-Center Hamburg No access
        1. 5.3.5.1 Research design No access
        2. 5.3.5.2 POS survey No access
        3. 5.3.5.3 Results and interpretation No access
      5. 5.3.6 Summary No access
    1. 6.1 Closing the research gap No access
    2. 6.2 Concluding summary No access
        1. 6.3.1.1 Plan-phase No access
        2. 6.3.1.2 Do-phase No access
        3. 6.3.1.3 Check-phase No access
        4. 6.3.1.4 Act-phase No access
        5. 6.3.1.5 Integration into the corporate strategy No access
      1. 6.3.2 The Ishikawa Model – The theory behind the model No access
      2. 6.3.3 The vision of the Digital Marketplace No access
      3. 6.3.4 Options for potential scientific connectivity No access
    1. Literature No access
    2. Online sources No access
    1. Appendix A – Mega trends No access
    2. Appendix B – Template of the online survey No access
    3. Appendix C – Results of the online survey No access
      1. Interview transcript protocol – E1 No access
      2. Interview transcript protocol – E2 No access
      3. Interview transcript protocol – E3 No access
      4. Interview transcript protocol – E4 No access
      5. Interview transcript protocol – E5 No access
      6. Interview transcript protocol – E6 No access
      7. Interview transcript protocol – E7 No access
      8. Interview transcript protocol – E8 No access
      9. Interview transcript protocol – E9 No access
      1. Interview transcript protocol – E10 No access
      2. Interview transcript protocol – E11 No access
      3. Interview transcript protocol – E12 No access
    4. Appendix F – The Bernhold model No access
    5. Appendix G – Tableau de bord No access
    6. Appendix H – Explanation of the AVIC model No access
    7. Appendix I – Phoenix-Center Harburg No access
    8. Appendix J – Vision: Digital Marketplace No access
    9. Appendix K – List of academic activities No access

Bibliography (140 entries)

  1. Literaturverzeichnis Open Google Scholar
  2. Abidi, S., & Manoj, J. (2015). The VUCA COMPANY, p. 4–14, Mumbai, India, Jaico Publishing House. Open Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, No. 50, pp. 179–211. Open Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22nd Edition, pp. 453–474. Open Google Scholar
  5. Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., & Sarshar, M. (2000). Assessment of facilities management performance. What next? Facilities 18(1/2), pp. 66–75. Open Google Scholar
  6. Andresen, M., & Nowak, C. (2015). Human Resource Management Practices-Assessing Added Value. p. 1–13, Nuremberg: Leoni AG. Open Google Scholar
  7. Axelsson, B., & Wynstra, F. (2002). Buying business services, p. 2, Chichester, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  8. Becker, M. (2012). Hinweise zur Anfertigung eines Literatur-Reviews [Notes on the preparation of a literature review] (Paper), University of Leipzig. Open Google Scholar
  9. Bergsma, F. V. (2016). A step-by-step plan to manage and measure adding value by FM/CREM., Research papers for EuroFM 15th Research Symposium at EFMC 2016, Milan, Italy, Lyngby, Polyteknisk Forlag. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bernhold, T. (2010). Sourcing-Strategien für öffentliche Auftraggeber in der Beschaffung facilitärer Dienstleistungen. Eine empirische Analyse unterschiedlicher institutioneller Arrangements aus institutionsökonomischer Sicht [Sourcing strategies for public clients in the procurement of facilitary services. An empirical analysis of different institutional arrangements from an institutional economics perspective], p. 34 ff., Marburg: Tectum. Open Google Scholar
  11. Bernhold, T. (2017). Vorlesungsskript Projekt A [Lecture notes project A]- WS 2017/2018, University of Applied Sciences Münster, Münster. Open Google Scholar
  12. Bernhold, T. (2018). Project A – Added Value CREM/ FM, Projektberichte Gruppe A–D [Project A – Added Value CREM/ FM, Project reports Group A-D], University of Applied Sciences Münster, Münster. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bernhold, T., Büttner, B., May, M., Riemenschneider, F. (2007). Rechnergestützte Implementierung eines Facility Management. Ergebnisse aus dem aktuellen BMBF-Forschungsprojekt „FM-ASSIST“ [Computer-aided implementation of facility management. Results from the current BMBF research project „FM-ASSIST“], p. 37–54 in: K. Gellenbeck, H. Eiling und F. Riemenschneider (Hg.): Münsteraner Schriften zum Facility Management. Münster. INFA-ISFM. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bernhold, T., Schlicht, C., & Lellek, V. (2018). Added Value in CREM/FM: Research results – Past – Present – Future, p. 1–52, University of Applied Sciences Münster, Münster. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bernhold, T., Schlicht, C., & Lellek, V. (2019). Become an Outperformer! – Measurement of added value, Research Paper for the 18th EuroFM Research Symposium, Matthew Tucker (Ed.) pp. 44–56. Open Google Scholar
  16. Blanz, M. (2015). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik für die Soziale Arbeit, Grundlagen und Anwendungen [Research methods and statistics for social work, principles and applications], p. 215, Kohlhammer Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bortz, J. D. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften [Research methods and evaluation in the social and human sciences], p. 215, Berlin / Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bourguignonan, A., Malleret, V., & Nørreklit, H. (2004). The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: the ideological dimension. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 107–134. Open Google Scholar
  19. Brake, K., & Herfert, G. (2012). Reurbanisierung: Materialität und Diskurs in Deutschland. [Reurbanization: Materiality and Discourse in Germany] p. 174, Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  20. Bringmann, H. (2013). Touchpointpower: How to get and keep more customers touchpoint by touchpoint, Atlantic Beach: Wilhem Henry Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  21. Cadez, I. (1998). Risikowertanalyse als Entscheidungshilfe zur Wahl des optimalen Bauvertrags [Risk value analysis as a decision-making aid for choosing the optimal construction contract], p. 55, Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  22. Cooper, R. G. (1999). From Experience: The Invisible Success Factors in Product Innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16th Edition, pp. 115–133. Open Google Scholar
  23. Daum, J. H. (2005). Tableau de Bord: Besser als die Balanced Scorecard? [Tableau de Bord: Better than the Balanced Scorecard?], Der Controlling Berater, Booklet No. 7. Open Google Scholar
  24. Daum, J. H, Beyond Budgeting (2002). Ein Management- und Controlling-Modell für nachhaltigen Unternehmenserfolg [A management and controlling model for sustainable corporate success], Der Controlling Berater, Booklet No. 7, pp. 459–502. Open Google Scholar
  25. Dickmann, P. (2009). Schlanker Materialfluss mit Lean Production, Kanban und Innovationen [Lean material flow with lean production, Kanban and innovations], p. 76, Berlin / Heidelberg, Springer Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  26. DIN EN 15221 (2006). Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2006), Facility Management – Teil 1: Begriffe [Facility Management – Part 1: Terms], DIN EN 15221-1:2006, p. 7. Open Google Scholar
  27. Ehrbar, A. (1999). Economic added value, der Schlüssel zur wertschöpfenden Unternehmensführung [Economic added value, the key to value-creating corporate management], p. 22, Wiesbaden, Gabler Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  28. Eller, B. (2009). Usability Engineering in der Anwendungsentwicklung: Systematische Integration zur Unterstützung einer nutzerorientierten Entwicklungsarbeit [Usability engineering in application development: systematic integration to support user-oriented development work], p. 108, Darmstadt, Gabler. Open Google Scholar
  29. Ellgering, D. (2017). Einfluss der Unternehmensabspaltung auf den Shareholder-Value, Open Google Scholar
  30. Eine Analyse der Excess-Return-Determinanten von Spinn-off-Transaktionen [Influence of spin-offs on shareholder value, An analysis of the excess return determinants of spin-off transactions], Wiesbaden, Springer Gabler. Open Google Scholar
  31. Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable Value Added – Ein neues Maß des Nachhaltigkeitsbeitrags von Unternehmen am Beispiel der Henkel KGaA [A new measure of the sustainability contribution of companies using the example of Henkel KGaA], Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung. Quarterly Economic Research Journals (73), 126–141. Open Google Scholar
  32. Frenz, W. (2007). Handbuch Europarecht: Beihilfe- und Vergaberecht. [Handbook on European Law: State Aid and Public Procurement Law] p. 188, Volume 3. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  33. GEFMA 100-1 (2004). GEFMA 100-1. Facility Management. Grundlagen [Facility Management Basics], p. 2, Bonn: GEFMA e. V. Deutscher Verband für Facility Management. Open Google Scholar
  34. Geißler, K. A., & Hege, M. (1991). Konzepte Sozialpädagogischen Handelns [Concepts of social pedagogical action], p. 25–29, Weinheim / Basel, Beltz Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  35. Glatte, T. (2014). Entwicklung betrieblicher Immobilien: Beschaffung und Verwertung von Immobilien im Corporate Real Estate Management [Development of operational real estate: Procurement and utilisation of real estate in Corporate Real Estate Management], p. 17 ff., Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. Open Google Scholar
  36. Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2009). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Expert interviews and qualitative content analysis], p. 157, 3rd Edition, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  37. Greiner, S. (2011). Schuldrecht Besonderer Teil: Vertragliche Schuldverhältnisse [Law of obligations Special Part: Contractual obligations], p. 82, Heidelberg: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  38. Guest, D., Michie, J., Sheehan, M., Conway, N., & Metochie, M. (2000). Effective People Management: Initial findings of the Future of Work study, p. 5, London, CIPD. Open Google Scholar
  39. Hahn, M. (2003). Wende und Wandlung: Bildungsgeschichten ostdeutscher ReligionslehrerInnen in Zeiten gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche [Change and transformation: Educational histories of East German religion teachers in times of social upheaval], p. 67. Münster, LIT Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  40. Hammerich, K., & Klein, M. (1978). Materialien zur Soziologie des Alltags [Materials on the sociology of everyday life], p. 395, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  41. Hascher, T. (2004). Wohlbefinden in der Schule [Well-being at school], p. 14, Münster. Waxmann Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  42. Hellerforth, M. (2006). Handbuch Facility Management für Immobilienunternehmen [Handbook Facility Management for Real Estate Companies], p. 478 ff & p. 507 ff., Berlin / Heidelberg, Springer. Open Google Scholar
  43. Henzelmann, T. (2004). Stand und Perspektiven des Corporate Real Estate Managements in Deutschland und Europa. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Status and perspectives of Corporate Real Estate Management in Germany and Europe. Results of an empirical study], pp. 57–74, in: K.-W. Schulte & W. Schäfers (Ed.): Handbook Corporate Real Estate Management. With the collaboration of S. Gier and M. Wiffler. 2nd, updated and extended edition. Cologne: Müller. Open Google Scholar
  44. Hostettler, S. (2002). Economic Value Added (EVA), Darstellung und Anwendung auf Schweizer Aktiengesellschaften [Presentation and application to Swiss corporations], p. 39 ff., Bern, Haupt. Open Google Scholar
  45. Hussy, W., Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2013). Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften [Research methods in psychology and social sciences], p. 186, p. 199, Berlin / Heidelberg, Springer. Open Google Scholar
  46. Honacker, S. (2020). IBM Digital Marketplace, Concept idea, Frankfurt. Open Google Scholar
  47. Jensen, P. A. (2010). The Facilities Management Value Map: A conceptual Framework. Facilities Journal, 28(3/4), 175–188. Open Google Scholar
  48. Jensen, P.A., van der Voordt, T., Coenen, C., & Sarasoja, A-L. (2012). The Added Value of FM – Comparisons and Lessons Learned, The Added Value of Facilities Management. Concepts, Findings and Perspectives, pp. 268–291, Danemark, Polyteknisk Forlag. Open Google Scholar
  49. Jensen, P. A., & van der Voordt, T. (2016). Towards an Integrated Value Adding Management Model for FM and CREM. CIB World Building Congress 2016: Volume I – Creating built environments of new opportunities. Tampere University of Technology. Open Google Scholar
  50. Jensen, P. A., & van der Voordt, T. (2017). New Model for Adding Value by FM and CREM, eFMinsight No. 4, pp. 41–46, Denmark and Netherlands: A EuroFM publication. Open Google Scholar
  51. Jensen, P. A., Sarasoja, A. L., van der Voordt, D. J. M., & Cuenen, C. (2013). How can Facilities Management add value to organizations as well as to society?, p. 1–11, Conference paper, Brisbane, CIB World Building Congress. Open Google Scholar
  52. Jensen, P. A., van der Voordt, T., Coenen, C., von Felten, D., Lindholm, A-L., Balslev Nielsen, S. Riratanaphong, C., & Schmid, M. (2009). The Added Value of FM: Different Research Perspectives, p. 6., Conference paper for EFMC 2009 Research Symposium. Open Google Scholar
  53. Jacksona, S. E., Schulera, R. S., & Jiang, K. (2012). An Aspirational Framework for Strategic Human Resource Management, London, Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  54. Kaplan, R. S., & De Pinho, R. R. (2014). Volkswagen to Brazil: Driving Strategy with the Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School. Open Google Scholar
  55. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that drive Performance, p. 72 ff., Harvard Business School Case 111-049, Harvard Business Review. Open Google Scholar
  56. Karmasin, M., & Ribing, R. (2012). Die inhaltliche und formale Gestaltung wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten [The content and formal design of scientific work], p. 12, 7th Edition, Wien, Facultas. Open Google Scholar
  57. Kingston, J. (2014). Ein Werkzeug im Werkzeugkasten. In: Michler, I. (Hrsg.): Das große Los? Reportagen aus der Praxis des Impact Investing. [A tool in the toolbox. In: Michler, I. (Eds.): The jackpot? Reports from the practice of impact investing.] Berlin: Active Philanthropy. Open Google Scholar
  58. Kunke, R. T. (2001). Value-Added Services in der Automobilbranche: Der Planungsprozess neuer Services am Beispiel der Audi AG [Value-Added Services in the Automotive Industry: The Planning Process for New Services at Audi AG], p. 128, Hamburg, Diplomica. Open Google Scholar
  59. Kurzrock, B. M. (2016). Einflussfaktoren auf die Performance von Immobilien-Direktanlagen. [Factors influencing the performance of direct real estate investments.], p. 47, Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  60. Krampf, P. (2016). Strategisches Prozessmanagement Instrumente und Philosophien für mehr Effizienz, Qualität und Kundenzufriedenheit [Strategic process management Instruments and philosophies for more efficiency, quality and customer satisfaction], p. 93 ff., München, Vahlen. Open Google Scholar
  61. Lellek, V. (2016). Produktivitätsmessung von Dienstleistungen – Entwicklung eines Mess­ansatzes für die Produktivitätsbewertung von Dienstleistungen am Beispiel von Facility Services [Productivity measurement of services – Development of a measurement approach for the productivity assessment of services using the example of facility services], p. 55, Dissertation thesis, Ulm University. Open Google Scholar
  62. Lindholm & Leväinen (2006). Lindholm, A., Leväinen, K.: A framework for identifying and measuring value added by corporate real estate, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Volume 8, number 1, p. 38–46., Helsinki, Emerald Group Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  63. Mayer, H. O. (2013). Interview und schriftliche Befragung: Grundlagen und Methoden empirischer Sozialforschung [Interview and written questioning: Fundamentals and methods of empirical social research], p. 47, 6th Edition, Munich, Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar
  64. Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken [Introduction to qualitative research. A guide to qualitative thinking]. Weinheim, Beltz. Open Google Scholar
  65. McLennan, P. (2004). Service operations management as a conceptual framework for facility management. Facilities, 22(13/14), 344–348. Open Google Scholar
  66. Meermann, A., Lellek, V., & Serbin, D. (2014). The Path to Excellence: Integrating Customer Satisfaction in Productivity Measurement in Facility Management, 2014, p. 10, 13th EuroFM Research Symposium. Open Google Scholar
  67. Mittag, N. (2018). Strategic Scenario Planning for a German Shopping Center Company in 2015 – Applying the HHL-Roland Berger Scenario Development Approach, p. 1–80, Master thesis, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management. Open Google Scholar
  68. Mudrak, T., Van Wagenberg, A., & Wubben, E. (2004). Assessing the innovative ability of FM teams: A review. Facilities 22 (11/12), 290–295. Open Google Scholar
  69. Nävy, J. (2012). Management. Grundlagen, Computerunterstützung, Einführungsstrategie, Praxisbeispiele [Management. Basics, computer support, implementation strategy, practical examples], p. 3–9, 4th updated and extended edition, Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  70. Ngoc, N. M. (2017). Welchen Mehrwert stiftet das Facility Management für die Stakeholder im Immobilienbetrieb von Shopping-Centern? [What added value does facility management create for the stakeholders in the real estate operation of shopping centers], p. 20–73, Master thesis, SRH Hochschule Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  71. Nowak, K. (2003). Marktorientierte Unternehmensbewertung, Discounted Cash Flow, Realoption, Economic Value Added und der Direct Comparison Approach [Market-oriented company valuation, discounted cash flow, real option, economic value added and the direct comparison approach], p. 142, Wiesbaden, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  72. Payne, A., & Holt, S. (1999). A Review of the Value Literature and Implications for Relationship Marketing. Australian Marketing Journal, 7(1). Open Google Scholar
  73. Regber, H., &. Zimmermann, K. (2007). Change-Management in der Produktion: Pro­zesse effizient verbessern im Team [Change-Management in production: improving processes efficiently in a team], p. 180 ff., mi-Fachverlag Redline, Landsberg am Lech, Germany. Open Google Scholar
  74. Rehkugler, H. (2009). Die Immobilie als Kapitalmarktprodukt [Real estate as a capital market product], p. 437 ff., Munich, Oldenbourg, Open Google Scholar
  75. Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855. Open Google Scholar
  76. Schaller, P.D. (2016). Experimentelle Organisationsentwicklung: Wandlungsfähige, lernende Organisationen nach dem Vorbild wissenschaftlicher Empirie [Experimental organisational development: adaptable, learning organisations based on the model of scientific empiricism], 1st Edition, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar
  77. Schäfers, W. (2004). Strategische Ausrichtung im Immobilien-Management in Schulte, K.-W., Handbuch Corporate Real Estate Management [Strategic orientation in real estate management in Schulte, K.-W., Handbook Corporate Real Estate Management], 2nd Edition, Köln: Immobilien Informationsverl. Müller, Rudolf. Open Google Scholar
  78. Schlicht, C. (2019). The Value Creation Model in Lünendonk – Handbuch Facility Management 2019 [Lünendonk – Handbook Facility Management 2019], p. 41, Freiburg, Haufe-Lexware GmbH & Co. KG. Open Google Scholar
  79. Schneider, J., Geiger, G., & Scheuring, I. (2008). Grundlagen der Prozessgestaltung und Qualitätsverbesserung mit zahlreichen Beispielen, Repetitionsfragen und Antworten [Basics of process design and quality improvement with numerous examples, repetition questions and answers], p. 70, Zürich, Compendio. Open Google Scholar
  80. Stern, J. M., Shiely, J. S., & Ross, I. (2002). Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung mit E(conomic) V(alue) A(dded) [Value-oriented corporate management with Economic Value Added], p. 35 ff., München, Econ. Open Google Scholar
  81. Stroebe, W., Hewstone, M., & Stephenson, G. (1996). Sozialpsychologie, Eine Einführung [Social Psychology, An Introduction], 1996, p. 247 ff., Berlin, Springer. Open Google Scholar
  82. Tay, L., & Ooi, J. T. (2001). Facilities management. “A Jack of all trades?” Facilities 19(10), 357–363. MCB UP Limited. Open Google Scholar
  83. Thomzik, M. (2014). FM-Branchenreport 2014 [FM industry report 2014], published by GEFMA Deutscher Verband für Facility Management e.V. und Institut für angewandte Innovationsforschung e. V. an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Bonn, Beuth. Open Google Scholar
  84. UVIS & ECE (2018). POS survey results based on Measurement of satisfaction & recommendation behavior regarding the disinfection of handrails of escalators in PCH, Hamburg, Germany. Open Google Scholar
  85. van der Voordt, T., Jensen, P. A., Hoendervanger, J. G., & Bergsma, F. (2016). A step-by-step plan to manage and measure adding value by FM/CREM, p. 40–50, Research papers for EuroFM’s 15th Research Symposium. Open Google Scholar
  86. Van Wagenberg, A. (2003). The Netherlands. Facility management in Dutch municipalities. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 1 (Special Series), pp. 89–97. Open Google Scholar
  87. Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review, 26 (2), p xiii–xxiii, University of Minnesota, MIS Quarterly. Open Google Scholar
  88. Winter, E. (2013). Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon Taschenbuch, 18th Edition, Wiesbaden, Springer Gabler. Open Google Scholar
  89. Witzel, A. (1985). “Das problemzentrierte Interview“ in Jüttemann, G.: Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie: Grundfragen, Verfahrensweisen, Anwendungsfelder [„Das problemzentrierte Interview“ in Jüttemann, G.: Qualitative Research in Psychology: Basic Questions, Procedures, Fields of Application], p. 227–255. Weinheim, Beltz. Open Google Scholar
  90. Witzel, A. (2001). Sozialarbeitsforschung konkret. Problemzentrierte Interviews als qualitative Erhebungsmethode [Social work research concrete. Problem-centred interviews as a qualitative survey method], p. 1, Qualitative Social Research, 2(2), Art. 19. Open Google Scholar
  91. Würtele, G. (2019). Rethink Real Estate & Facility Management – Interview with Christian Schlicht, Board Report 02/2019, Special Edition, Bad Homburg, Dr. Günther Würtele Information GmbH. Open Google Scholar
  92. Yeung, A. K., & Berman, B. (1997). Adding value through Human resources: Reorienting Human resources measurement to drive business performance, p. 321–335, Human Resource Management 36(3). New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  93. Online sources: Open Google Scholar
  94. AKNW (2020). Definition Corporate Real Estate Management, p. 20, Retrieved March 3, 2020, from: https://www.aknw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Publikationen-Broschueren/facility_management_final.pdf Open Google Scholar
  95. Becker, M. (2012). Notes on the preparation of a literature review. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from: http://www.caterdev.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/reviews.pdf, 09.02.2020. Open Google Scholar
  96. Bundesregierung (2020). Klimaschutzprogramm [Climate protection program]. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/klimaschutz/klimaschutzprogramm-2030-1673578 Open Google Scholar
  97. C2C (2020). Cradle to Cradle – Circular Economy. Retrieved June 19, 2020, from: https://www.cradletocradle.com/ Open Google Scholar
  98. CNG (2020). Definition Corporate Real Estate. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from: https://www.corenetglobal.org/about/tcontent.aspx?ItemNumber=21088&navItemNumber=20812 Open Google Scholar
  99. DIN EN ISO 41001 (2018). Facility management – Management systems – Requirements with guidance for use. Retrieved January 3, 2018, from: https://www.iso.org/standard/68021.html Open Google Scholar
  100. Dreso (2015). Buildings as material banks. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from: https://www.dreso.com/en/company/news/2015/13082015-eu-research-project-buildings-as-material-banks-gets-under-way/ Open Google Scholar
  101. ECE Market Report (2015). ECE Market Report, p. 3 ff., Retrieved January 3, 2020, from: http://www.ece.com/fileadmin/PDF_englisch/Unternehmensbroschueren/ECE_Market_Report_2015_eng.pdf Open Google Scholar
  102. ECE At your Service (2016). At your Service Brochure, p. 2 ff., Retrieved January 3, 2020, from: http://www.ece.com/fileadmin/PDF_englisch/Studies/ECE_At_Your_Service_eng.pdf Open Google Scholar
  103. ECE Shopper Types (2017). Shopper types, who shops how? Retrieved January 3, 2020, from: http://www.ece.com/fileadmin/Blaetterbroschueren/ECE_Shopper-Ana­lyse_ePaper/PDF/ECE_Shopper_Types_Who_shops_and_how_eng.pdf Open Google Scholar
  104. ECE (2020). ECE Company information. Retrieved March 16, 2020, from: http://www.ece.com/en/company/facts-and-figures/ Open Google Scholar
  105. ECE (2019). Ideas to Innovations. Retrieved December 3, 2019, from: https://www.ece.com/en/company/ideas-to-innovations/ Open Google Scholar
  106. ECE Digital Mall (2020). Connected Commerce – Digital Mall. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from: https://www.ece.com/en/company/ideas-to-innovations/digital-mall/ Open Google Scholar
  107. ECE PCH (2020). ECE Phoenix-Center Hamburg. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from: https://www.ece.com/de/center-projekte/shopping–1/?tx_eceprojects_detail %5Bproject %5D=7&tx_eceprojects_detail %5Bcontroller %5D=Detail&tx_eceprojects_detail %5Baction %5D=index&cHash=fb10ea1532e65418a5f5caf49c4ccff3 Open Google Scholar
  108. Escalite (2020). The ESCALITE UVC disinfection module for escalator handrails. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://www.uv-is.com/escalite?lang=en Open Google Scholar
  109. European Commission (2011). The AV of the EU budget – A budget for Europe 2020, Retrieved January 3, 2020, from: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/biblio/documents/fin_fwk1420/working_paper_added_value_EU_budget_SEC-867_en.pdf Open Google Scholar
  110. GMA (2011). Shopping-Center Revitalisierung in Deutschland. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: http://gma.biz/downloads/publikationen/sonstiges/GMA %20Shoppingcenter-Revitalisierung %20in %20Deutschland %202011.pdf Open Google Scholar
  111. Hans Böckler Stiftung (2011). Die Balanced Scorecard: Mehr als Kennzahlen, [The Balanced Scorecard: More than metrics] p. 1 ff, Retrieved January 3, 2020, from: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/mbf_bsc_konzept.pdf Open Google Scholar
  112. HDE (2019). Online Monitor 2019. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from: https://einzelhandel.de/index.php?option=com_attachments&task=download&id=10168 Open Google Scholar
  113. IFMA (2019). What is Facility Management? Retrieved March 19, 2019, from: https://einzelhandel.de/index.php?option=com_attachments&task=download&id=10168 Open Google Scholar
  114. IGI Global (2020). Definition Corporate Real Estate Management, Retrieved March 3, 2020, from: https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/computer-aided-facility-management-cafm/5969) Open Google Scholar
  115. ICSC (2018). [online]: Retrieved from: Shopping Center Definitions, Global Shopping Center Classifications. Retrieved March 15, 2020, from: https://www.icsc.com/news-and-views/research/shopping-center-definitions Open Google Scholar
  116. Jukusai, 2020. EVA Formula. Retrieved March 12, 2020, from: http://jukusai.ch/betriebswirtschaftliche-grundlagen/, retrieved on 14.07.2018 Open Google Scholar
  117. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). The balanced scorecard and strategy map, Retrieved March 14, 2020, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326195660_Experiences_of_Embedding_Long-Term_Thinking_in_an_Environment_of_Short-Termism_and_Sub-par_Business_Performance_Investing_in_Intangibles_for_Sustainable_Growth/figures?lo=1 Open Google Scholar
  118. Onpulson (2018) [online]. “Added value”. Retrieved March 14, 2020, from: http://www.onpulson.de/lexikon/added-value/ Open Google Scholar
  119. Marktforschung (2020). Definition Faktorenanalyse, [Definition factor analysis]. Retrieved February 25, 2020, from: https://www.marktforschung.de/wiki-lexikon/marktforschung/Faktorenanalyse/ Open Google Scholar
  120. McKinsey (2020). Trends in facilities management. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/six-emerging-trends-in-facilities-management-sourcing Open Google Scholar
  121. ResearchGate 1 (2018). Impact of real estate interventions on organisational performance. Retrieved February 24, 2018, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228667122_Impact_of_real_estate_interventions_on_organisational_performance Open Google Scholar
  122. ResearchGate 2 (2018). Measuring the AV of Corporate Real Estate management’. Retrieved February 24, 2018, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228866836_Measuring_the_added_value_of_Corporate_Real_Estate_management’ Open Google Scholar
  123. ResearchGate 3 (2018). Anforderungen an Personalcontrolling: (Weiter-)Entwicklungen im Personalcontrolling in den letzten 25 Jahren: Ein interdisziplinäres Kompendium, [Requirements for personnel controlling: (Further) developments in personnel controlling over the last 25 years: An interdisciplinary compendium]. Retrieved February 24, 2018, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326869135_Anforderungen_an_Personalcontrolling_Weiter-Entwicklungen_im_Personalcontrolling_in_den_letzten_25_Jahren_Ein_interdisziplinares_Kompendium Open Google Scholar
  124. Springer Gabler 1 (2020). Definition Arithmetisches Mittel, [Definition Arithmetic mean]. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from: http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/2410/arithmetisches-mittel-v15.html Open Google Scholar
  125. Springer Gabler 2 (2020). Definition Median. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from: http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/6871/median-v13.html Open Google Scholar
  126. Springer Gabler 3 (2020). Definition Inferenzstatistik, [Definition of inferential statistics]. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from: http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/2213/inferenzstatistik-v10.html Open Google Scholar
  127. Springer Gabler 4 (2020). Definition Reliabilität, [Definition Reliability]. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from: http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/57492/reliabilitaet-v6.html Open Google Scholar
  128. Statista 1 (2020). Definition Deskriptive Statistik, [Definition Descriptive Statistics]. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/definition/49/deskriptive_statistik/ Open Google Scholar
  129. Statista 2 (2020) [online]. Definition Varianz, [Definition Variance] Retrieved February 24, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/definition/138/varianz/ Open Google Scholar
  130. Statista 3 (2020). Definition Standardabweichung, [Definition Standard Deviation]. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/definition/126/standardabweichung/ Open Google Scholar
  131. Statista 4 (2020). Definition Korrelation, [Definition Correlation]. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/definition/77/korrelation/ Open Google Scholar
  132. Statista 5 (2020). Definition Signifikanz, [Definition Significance]. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/definition/122/signifikanz/ Open Google Scholar
  133. Statista 6 (2020). Definition Alternativhypothese, [Definition alternative hypothesis]. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/definition/19/alternativhypothese/ Open Google Scholar
  134. Statista 7 (2020). Definition Nullhypothese, [Definition Nullhypothesis]. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/lexikon/defintion/96/nullhypothese/ Open Google Scholar
  135. StatistikGuru (2018). Definition Cronbachs Alpha, [Definition Cronbach’s Alpha]. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://statistikguru.de/spss/reliabilitaetsanalyse/einleitung-5.html Open Google Scholar
  136. UCLA (2020): Explanation Cronbach’s Alpha. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/faq/what-does-cronbachs-alpha-mean/ Open Google Scholar
  137. UVIS (2020). UVIS Company information. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from: https://www.uv-is.com/about Open Google Scholar
  138. VDI 6009 (2002). Facility Management – Introduction of building management in several properties – Example. Retrieved March 20, 2019, from: https://www.vdi.de/richtlinien/details/vdi-6009-blatt-2-facility-management-einfuehrung-von-gebaeudemanagement-fuer-mehrere-liegenschaften-anwendungsbeispiele Open Google Scholar
  139. VDMA 24196 (1996). Facility Management – Introduction of building management in several properties – Example. Retrieved March 20, 2019, from: https://www.imsware.de/wiki-faq/vdma–24196/ Open Google Scholar
  140. zukunftsInstitut (2020). Megatrend-Map. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from: https://www.zukunftsinstitut.de/documents/downloads/MegatrendMapZukunftsinstitut_120918.pdf Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Corporate Management & Management & Organization"
Cover of book: Projektmanagement in der Pflege
Educational Book No access
Thomas Busse, Wolfram Burkhardt
Projektmanagement in der Pflege
Cover of book: Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Book Titles Full access
Isabelle Hinsche-McLardy
Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Cover of book: Sportmanagement
Edited Book No access
Albert Galli, Markus Breuer, Rainer Tarek Cherkeh, Christian Keller
Sportmanagement
Cover of book: Siedlungsbausteine für bestehende Wohnquartiere
Edited Book No access
Anette von Ahsen, Jens Schneider, Stephan Rinderknecht, Dirk Schiereck
Siedlungsbausteine für bestehende Wohnquartiere
Cover of book: Beschaffung unter Risiko
Book Titles No access
Alexander F. J. Hasenau
Beschaffung unter Risiko