Cover of book: Third-Person-Effekt
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Third-Person-Effekt

Authors:
Publisher:
 2013

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2013
ISBN-Print
978-3-8329-6801-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6028-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume
8
Language
German
Pages
114
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
  2. Grundzüge der Theorie No access 11 - 28
  3. Entwicklungsgeschichte des Ansatzes No access 29 - 40
  4. Forschungslogik No access 41 - 55
  5. Empirische Befunde No access 56 - 74
  6. Kritik und Weiterentwicklungen No access 75 - 86
  7. Verwandte und konkurrierende Ansätze No access 87 - 96
  8. „Top Ten“ der Forschungsliteratur No access 97 - 98
  9. Literaturverzeichnis No access 99 - 111
  10. Bildnachweise No access 112 - 112
  11. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände No access 113 - 114

Bibliography (162)

  1. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2. Aufl.). Maidenhead: Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
  2. Andsager, J. L. & White H. A. (2007). Self versus others: Media, messages, and the third person effect. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  3. Atwood, L. E. (1994). Illusions of media power: the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 269-281. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100202
  4. Brosius, H.-B. & Engel, D. (1997). „Die Medien beeinflussen vielleicht die anderen, aber mich doch nicht“: Zu den Ursachen des Third-Person-Effekts. Publizistik, 42, 325-345. Open Google Scholar
  5. Brosius, H.-B. & Esser, F. (1998). Mythen in der Wirkungsforschung: Auf der Suche nach dem Stimulus-Response-Modell. Publizistik, 43, 341-361. Open Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, J. & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662-704. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x
  7. Carolus, A. & Schwab, F. (2008). Third Person Effect. In N. C. Krämer, S. Schwan, D. Unz & M. Suckfüll (Hrsg.), Medienpsychologie. Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte (S. 269-272). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Open Google Scholar
  8. Chambers, J. R. (2008). Explaining false uniqueness: Why we are both better and worse than others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 878-894. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00076.x
  9. Chapin, J. (2000). Third-person perception and optimistic bias among urban minority at-risk youth. Communication Research, 27, 51-81. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365000027001003
  10. Cheng, H. & Riffe, D. (2008). Attention, perception, and perceived effects: Negative political advertising in a battleground state of the 2004 presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 177-196. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15205430701592859
  11. Chia, S. C. (2006). How peers mediate media influence on adolescents’ sexual attitudes and sexual behaviour. Journal of Communication, 56, 585-606. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00302.x
  12. Chia, S. C. (2007). Third-person perceptions about idealized body image and weight-loss behavior. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 677-694. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400402
  13. Choi, Y. Y., Leshner, G. & Choi, J. (2008). Third-person effects of idealized body image in magazine advertisements. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 147-164. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764208321348
  14. Choi, J., Yang, M. & Chang, J. J. C. (2009). Elaboration of the hostile media phenomenon. The roles of involvement, media skepticism, congruency of perceived media influence, and perceived opinion climate. Communication Research, 36, 54-75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650208326462
  15. Cohen, J., Mutz, D. C., Price, V. & Gunther, A. C. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/269092
  16. Cohen, J. & Tsfati, Y. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting. Communication Research, 36, 359-378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333026
  17. Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y. & Sheafer, T. (2008). The influence of presumed media influence in politics. Do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter? Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 331-344. Open Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. & Weimann, G. (2008). Who’s afraid of reality shows? Exploring the effects of perceived influence of reality shows and the concern over their social effects on willingness to censor. Communication Research, 35, 382-397. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315964
  19. David, P., Liu, K. & Myser, M. (2004). Methodological artifact or persistant bias? Testing the robustness of the third-person and reverse third-person effects for alcohol messages. Communication Research, 31, 206-233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650203261513
  20. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268763
  21. Davison, W. P. (1996). The third-person effect revisited. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 113-119. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.113
  22. Davison, W. P. (2006). A personal history of world war II. How a pacifist draftee accidentally became a military government official in postwar Germany. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse. Open Google Scholar
  23. Dohle, M. (2011). Third-Person-Effekte bei der Wahrnehmung von Schönheitsidealen durch Frauen und Männer. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59, 180-198. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2011-2-180
  24. Dohle, M. & Hartmann, T. (2008). Alles eine Frage hoher Reichweite? Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zur Ursache der Entstehung von Hostile-Media-Effekten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 56, 21-41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2008-1-21
  25. Dohle, M. & Vowe, G. (2010). Wahrnehmung der politischen Einflüsse von Medienangeboten. Third-Person-Effekte bei Bürgern, Journalisten und Politikern im Vergleich. In C. Schemer, W. Wirth & C. Wünsch (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation. Wahrnehmung, Verarbeitung, Wirkung (S. 11-29). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  26. Dohle, M. & Vowe, G. (2012). Mediatisierung aus subjektiver Sicht. Die Einschätzung der politischen Relevanz von Medien in Deutschland 2008 bis 2010. In J. Hagenah & H. Meulemann (Hrsg.), Mediatisierung der Gesellschaft? (S. 277-295). Münster: LIT Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  27. Dohle, M. & Vowe, G. (2013). Indirekte Medienwirkungen in neuen Medienumgebungen. In O. Jandura, A. Fahr & H.-B. Brosius (Hrsg.), Theorieanpassungen in der digitalen Medienwelt (S. 105-121). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  28. Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, us and them: political identification and the third-person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195-215. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250206
  29. Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1999). Social identity and perceptions of media persuasion: Are we always less influenced than others? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1879-1899. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00156.x
  30. Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J. & Hogg, M. G. (1995). The perceived influence of AIDS advertising: Third-person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 305-325. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_2
  31. Dupagne, M., Salwen, M. B. & Paul, B. (1999). Impact of question order on the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 334-345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.4.334
  32. Eisend, M. (2008). Explaining the impact of scarcity appeals in advertising. The mediating role of perceptions of susceptibility. Journal of Advertising, 37, 33-40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370303
  33. Eveland, W. P. (2002). The impact of news and entertainment media on perceptions of social reality. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Hrsg.), The persuasion handbook. Developments in theory and practice (S. 691-727). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  34. Eveland, W. P. & McLeod, D. M. (1999). The effect of social desirability on perceived media impact: Implications for third-person perceptions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 315-333. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.4.315
  35. Eveland, W. P., Nathanson, A. I., Detenber, B. H. & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary. Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research, 26, 275-302. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365099026003001
  36. Feng, G. C. & Guo S. Z. (2012). Support for censorship: A multilevel meta-analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Reports, 25, 40-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2012.661019
  37. Fields, J. M. & Schuman, H. (1976). Public beliefs about the beliefs of the public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 427-448. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268330
  38. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Believe, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar
  39. Golan, G. J. & Banning, S. A. (2008). Exploring a link between the third-person effect and the theory of reasoned action: beneficial ads and social expectations. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 208-224. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764208321352
  40. Golan, G. J., Banning, S. A. & Lundy, L. (2008). Likelihood to vote, candidate choice, and the third-person effect: Behavioral implications of political advertising in the 2004 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 278-290. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764208321356
  41. Golan, G. J. & Day, A. G. (2008). The first-person effect and its behavioral consequences: A new trend in the twenty-five year history of third-person effect research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 539-556. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15205430802368621
  42. Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think. Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365091018003004
  43. Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the x-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45, 27-38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00712.x
  44. Gunther, A. C. (1998). The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communications Research, 25, 486-504. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365098025005002
  45. Gunther, A. C., Bolt, D., Borzekowski, D. L. G., Liebhart, J. L. & Dillard, J. P. (2006). Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking. Journal of Communication, 56, 52-68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00002.x
  46. Gunther, A. C. & Chia, S. C.-Y. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 688-701. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800405
  47. Gunther, A. C. & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56, 449-466. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00295.x
  48. Gunther, A. C. & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 78, 58-67. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000107
  49. Gunther, A. C., Perloff, R. M. & Tsfati, Y. (2007). Public opinion and the third-person effect. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (S. 184-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  50. Gunther, A. C. & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55-70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
  51. Gunther, A. C. & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199-215. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
  52. Gunther, A. C. & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365092019005002
  53. Hartmann, T. & Dohle, M. (2005). Publikumsvorstellungen im Rezeptionsprozess. Publizistik, 50, 287-303. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0133-5
  54. Hautzer, L., Lünich, M. & Rössler, P. (2012). Social Navigation. Neue Orientierungsmuster bei der Mediennutzung im Internet. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845243191
  55. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
  56. Henriksen, L. & Flora, J. A. (1999). Third-person perception and children. Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research, 26, 643-665. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365099026006001
  57. Hofer, M. & Sommer, K. (2013). Seeing the others … Der Einfluss von Kommentaren zu redaktionellen Inhalten auf den Third-Person-Effekt. In O. Jandura, A. Fahr & H.-B. Brosius (Hrsg.), Theorieanpassungen in der digitalen Medienwelt (S. 159-174). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  58. Hoffner, C. & Buchanan, M. (2002). Parents’ responses to television violence: The third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship. Media Psychology, 4, 231-252. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_02
  59. Hoffner, C., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J. D., Hubbs, L. A., Kamigaki, S. K., Kowalczyk, L., Pastorek, A., Plotkin, R. S. (1999). Support for censorship of television violence. The role of the third-person effect and news exposure. Communication Research, 26, 726-742. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365099026006004
  60. Hoffner, C., Plotkin, R. S., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J. D., Kamigaki, S. K., Hubbs, L. A., Kowalczyk, L., Silberg, K. & Pastorek, A. (2001). The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Journal of Communication, 51, 283-299. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02881.x
  61. Hohlfeld, R. (2005). „Der missachtete Leser revisited“. Zum Wandel von Publikumsbild und Publikumsorientierung im Journalismus. In M. Behmer, B. Blöbaum, A. Scholl & R. Stöber (Hrsg.), Journalismus im Wandel. Analysedimensionen, Konzepte, Fallstudien (S. 195-224). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  62. Hollander, S. (1979). On the strength of a newspaper endorsement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 405-407. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268532
  63. Hoorens, V. & Ruiter, S. (1996). The optimal impact phenomenon: beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 599-610. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<599::AID-EJSP773>3.0.CO;2-7
  64. Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. W. (1947). Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam: Querido. Open Google Scholar
  65. Huck, I. (2009). Wahrnehmungen und Wahrnehmungsphänomene in Agenda-Setting-Prozessen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845220451
  66. Huck, I. & Brosius, H.-B. (2007). Der Third-Person-Effekt – Über den vermuteten Einfluss der Massenmedien. Publizistik, 52, 355-374. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-007-0171-2
  67. Huck, I., Quiring, O. & Brosius, H. B. (2009). Perceptual phenomena in the agenda setting process. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21, 139-164. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp019
  68. Huh, J., DeLorme, D. E. & Reid, L. N. (2004). The third-person effect and its influence on behavioral outcomes in a product advertising context: The case of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Communication Research, 31, 568-599. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650204267934
  69. Huh, J. & Langteau, R. (2007a). Presumed influence of DTC prescription drug advertising. Do experts and novices think differently? Communication Research, 34, 25-52. Open Google Scholar
  70. Huh, J. & Langteau, R. (2007b). Presumed influences of direct-to consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising on patients. The physicians’ perspective. Journal of Advertising, 36, 151-172. Open Google Scholar
  71. Innes, J. M. & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public’s view of the impact of mass media: a test of the ‚third person‘ effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457-463. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180507
  72. Jeffres, L. W., Neuendorf, K., Bracken, C. C. & Atkin, D. (2008). Integrating theoretical traditions in media effects: Using third-person effects to link agenda-setting and cultivation. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 470-291. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15205430802375303
  73. Joslyn, M. R. (2003). Framing the Lewinsky affair: Third-person judgments by scandal frame. Political Psychology, 24, 829-844. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00356.x
  74. Katz, D. & Allport, F. H. (1931). Students’ attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman Press. Open Google Scholar
  75. Lambe, J. L. & McLeod, D. M. (2005). Understanding third-person perception processes: Predicting perceived impact on self and others for multiple expressive contexts. Journal of Communication, 55, 277-291. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02672.x
  76. LaPrelle, J., Hoyle, R. H., Insko, C. A. & Bernthal, P. (1990). Interpersonal attraction and descriptions of the traits of others: Ideal similarity, self similarity, and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 216-240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(90)90018-2
  77. Lazarsfeld, P. F. & Merton, R. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. In L. Bryson (Hrsg.), The communication of ideas (S. 95-118). New York, London: Harper & Brothers. Open Google Scholar
  78. Lee, B. K. & Tamborini, R. (2005). Third-person effect and Internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and Internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55, 292-310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02673.x
  79. Li, X. G. (2008). Third-person effect, optimistic bias, and sufficiency resource in Internet use. Journal of Communication, 58, 568-587. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00400.x
  80. Lim, J. S. & Golan, G. J. (2011). Social media activism in response to the influence of political parody videos on YouTube. Communication Research, 38, 710-727. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650211405649
  81. Lo, V. & Paddon, A. R. (2000). Third-person perception and support for pornography restrictions: Some methodological problems. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 80-89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.1.80
  82. Marcinkowski, F. (2006). Warum täuscht sich die Öffentlichkeit über ihre eigene Meinung? Kommunikative und soziokulturelle Ursachen der Fehleinschätzung politischer Mehrheiten. Publizistik, 51, 313-332. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0109-0
  83. Maurer, M. (2010). Agenda-Setting. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  84. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267990
  85. McCroskey, L. L., McCroskey, J. C. & Richmond, V. P. (2006). Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophiliy. Communication Quarterly, 54, 1-31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01463370500270322
  86. McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H. & Eveland, W. P. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678-695. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02902.x
  87. McLeod, D. M., Eveland, W. P. & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics. An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365097024002003
  88. Meirick, P. C. (2004). Topic-relevant reference groups and dimensions of distance. Political advertising and first- and third-person effects. Communication Research, 31, 234-255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650203261514
  89. Meirick, P. C. (2005a). Self-enhancement motivation as a third variable in the relationship between first- and third-person effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 473-483. Open Google Scholar
  90. Meirick, P. C. (2005b). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32, 822-843. Open Google Scholar
  91. Meirick, P. C. (2006). Media schemas, perceived effects, and person perceptions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 632-649. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300310
  92. Milkie, M. A. (1999). Social comparisons, reflected appraisals, and mass media: The impact of pervasive beauty images on black and white girls’ self concepts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 190-210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2695857
  93. Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S. & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889-922. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700
  94. Moser, K. & Leitl, J. (2006). Der Dritte-Person-Effekt, Thema der Werbung und Distanz der „dritten Person“. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 18, 2-8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.1.2
  95. Müller, P. (2010). Der Third-Person-Effekt als Darstellungsphänomen. Münster: LIT Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  96. Mullen, B., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E. & Vanderklok, M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262-283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4
  97. Mutz, D. C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third person effects and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 4-23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/1.1.3
  98. Mutz, D. C. (1994). The political effects of perceptions of mass opinion. Research in Micropolitics, 4, 143-167. Open Google Scholar
  99. Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175074
  100. Neuwirth, K. & Frederick, E. (2002). Extending the framework of third-, first-, and second-person effects. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 113-140. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0502_2
  101. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1980). Die Schweigespirale. Öffentliche Meinung – unsere soziale Haut. München: Piper. Open Google Scholar
  102. O’Gorman, H. J. & Garry, S. L. (1976). Pluralistic ignorance – a replication and extension. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 449-458. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268331
  103. Oliver, M. B., Yang, H., Ramasubramanian, S., Kim, J. & Lee, S. (2008). Exploring implications of perceived media reinforcement on third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 35, 745-769. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650208324267
  104. Pan, Z. D., Abisaid, J. L., Paek, H. J., Sun, Y. & Houden, D. (2005). Exploring the perceptual gap in perceived effects of media reports of opinion polls. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 340-350. Open Google Scholar
  105. Park, S. Y. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on woman’s desire to be thin. Communication Research, 32, 594-614. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279350
  106. Paul, B., Salwen, M. B. & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 57-85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_04
  107. Peiser, W. & Peter, J. (2000). Third-person perception of television-viewing behavior. Journal of Communication, 50, 25-45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02832.x
  108. Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-Person effect research 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/5.2.167
  109. Perloff, R. M. (2002). The third-person effect. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Hrsg.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2. Aufl., S. 489-506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  110. Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (3. Aufl., S. 252-268). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  111. Price, V., Huang, L.-N. & Tewksbury, D. (1997). Third-person effects of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 74, 525-540. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400307
  112. Price, V. & Tewksbury, D. (1996). Measuring the third-person effect of news: The impact of question order, contrast and knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 120-141. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.120
  113. Rauch, J. (2010). Superiority and susceptibility: How activist audiences imagine the influence of mainstream news messages on self and others. Discourse & Communication, 4, 263-277. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1750481310373216
  114. Reid, S. A., Byrne, S., Brundidge, J. S., Shoham, M. D. & Marlow, M. L. (2007). A critical test of self-enhancement, exposure, and self-categorization explanations for first- and third-person perceptions. Human Communication Research, 33, 143-162. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00294.x
  115. Reid, S. A. & Hogg, M. A. (2005). A self-categorization explanation for the third-person effect. Human Communication Research, 31, 129-161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00867.x
  116. Roessing, T. (2011). Schweigespirale. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  117. Rössler, P. (2009). Wie Menschen die Wirkungen politischer Medienberichterstattung wahrnehmen – und welche Konsequenzen daraus resultieren. Zum Zusammenhang von politischer Willensbildung, Second- und Third-Person-Effekten. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie (= Politische Vierteljahresschrift – Sonderheft 42) (S. 468-495). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  118. Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 343-363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq018
  119. Rojas, H., Shah, D. V. & Faber, R. F. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.163
  120. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 10 (S. 173-220). New York: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  121. Ross, L., Greene, D. & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 133, 279-301. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
  122. Rossmann, C. (2011). Theory of Reasoned Action – Theory of Planned Behavior. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  123. Rucinski, D. & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The ‘other’ as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/2.4.345
  124. Salwen, M. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship. The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365098025003001
  125. Salwen, M. B. & Driscoll, P. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47, 60-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02706.x
  126. Salwen, M. B. & Dupagne, M. (2003). News of Y2K and experiencing Y2K: Exploring the relationship between the third-person effect and optimistic bias. Media Psychology, 5, 57-82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0501_3
  127. Scharrer, E. (2002). Third-person perception and television violence. The role of out-group stereotyping in perceptions of susceptibility to effects. Communication Research, 29, 681-704. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365002237832
  128. Scharrer, E. & Leone, R. (2008). First-person shooters and the third-person effect. Human Communication Research, 34, 210-233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00319.x
  129. Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P. & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Understanding person perceptions: Comparing four common statistical approaches to third-person research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 492-513. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15205430802375311
  130. Schütz, A. & Luckmann, T. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  131. Schulz, A. & Rössler, P. (2013). Schweigespirale Online. Die Theorie der öffentlichen Meinung und das Internet (unter Mitarbeit von K. Bienhaus, J. Ebert, M. Kling, M. Mewes, K. Ramcke, J. Schade & A. Schorr). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845244730
  132. Schweiger, W. (2007). Theorien der Mediennutzung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  133. Speier, H. & Davison, W. P. (1957). (Hrsg.). West German leadership and foreign policy. Evanston, IL: Row, Person and Company. Open Google Scholar
  134. Stiehler, H.-J. (1999). Subjektive Medientheorien – Zum Begriff. In B. Schorb & H.-J. Stiehler (Hrsg.), Idealisten oder Realisten? Die deutschen Kinder- und JugendfernsehmacherInnen und ihre subjektiven Medientheorien (S. 12-25). München: kopaed. Open Google Scholar
  135. Sun, Y., Pan, Z. D. & Shen, L. J. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280-300. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
  136. Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y. & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37, 801-824. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362684
  137. Tal-Or, N. & Drukman, D. (2010). Third-person perception as an impression management tactic. Media Psychology, 13, 301-322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.503516
  138. Tal-Or, N., Lazar, T., Angrest, T., Bloom, R., Ner, A. & Oren, Y. (2012). The first person perception: Exploring its behavioral consequences and the nature of perceived influence. Paper präsentiert auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, Phoenix, USA. Open Google Scholar
  139. Tal-Or, N. & Tsfati, Y. (2007). On the substitutability of the third-person perception. Media Psychology, 10, 231-249. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15213260701375637
  140. Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y. & Gunther, A. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence. Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (S. 99-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  141. Tewksbury, D. (2002). The role of comparison group size in the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 247-263. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.247
  142. Tewksbury, D., Moy, P. & Weis, D. S. (2004). Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 138-155. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02618.x
  143. Thomas, W. I. & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf. Open Google Scholar
  144. Thomsen, S. (2002). Health and beauty magazine reading and body shape concerns among a group of college woman. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 988-1007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900413
  145. Tsfati, Y. (2007). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: The case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57, 632-651. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x
  146. Tsfati, Y. & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the “third-person effect”: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711-727. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02919.x
  147. Tsfati, Y. & Cohen, J. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy. The case of Gaza settlers. Communication Research, 32, 794-821. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650205281057
  148. Tsfati, Y. & Cohen, J. (2011). Perceptions of media and media effects: The third person effect, trust in media and hostile media perceptions. Paper präsentiert auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, Boston, USA. Open Google Scholar
  149. Tsfati, Y., Cohen, J. & Gunther, A. C. (2011). The influence of presumed media influence on news about science and scientists. Science Communication, 33, 143-166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1075547010380385
  150. Tsfati, Y. & Livio, O. (2008). Exploring journalists’ perception of media impact. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, 113-130. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500108
  151. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
  152. Vester, H.-G. (2009). Kompendium der Soziologie I: Grundbegriffe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91590-6
  153. Vowe, G. (2010). Von der Massengesellschaft zur Mediengesellschaft. Antworten der Kommunikationswissenschaft auf die Frage „Wie ist Gesellschaft möglich?“. In C. Reinemann & R. Stöber (Hrsg.), Wer die Vergangenheit kennt, hat eine Zukunft. Festschrift für Jürgen Wilke (S. 35-61) Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  154. Wei, R. & Lo, V. H. (2007). The third-person effects of political attack ads in the 2004 US presidential election. Media Psychology, 9, 367-388. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15213260701291338
  155. Wei, R., Lo, V. H. & Lu, H. Y. (2007). Reconsidering the relationship between the third-person perception and optimistic bias. Communication Research, 34, 665-684. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650207307903
  156. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
  157. Willnat, L. (1996). Mass media and political outspokenness in Hong Kong: Linking the third-person effect and the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 187-212. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.187
  158. Wolf, S. (2008). Medienwirkungen aus Rezipientensicht. Third-Person-Wahrnehmungen in sozialen Netzwerken. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845214825
  159. Xu, J. & Gonzenbach, W. J. (2008). Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 375-385. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn031
  160. Youn, S., Faber, R. J. & Shah, D. V. (2000). Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 633-649. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200007)17:7<633::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2-B
  161. Zhao, X. Q. & Cai, X. M. (2008). From self-enhancement to supporting censorship: The third-person effect process in the case of Internet pornography. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 437-462. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15205430802071258
  162. Zhong, Z. J. (2009). Third-person perceptions and online games: A comparison of perceived antisocial and prosocial game effects. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 286-306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01441.x

Similar publications

from the topics "Theories and Methods of Communication Science"
Cover of book: Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Edited Book Full access
Nora Benterbusch
Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Cover of book: Social Media
Edited Book No access
Stefan Stumpp, Daniel Michelis, Thomas Schildhauer
Social Media
Cover of book: „Wir wollen Sonne statt Reagan!"
Book Titles No access
Manuel Kögelmaier
„Wir wollen Sonne statt Reagan!"
Cover of book: Transkulturelle Medien und Kommunikation
Educational Book No access
Nadja-Christina Schneider
Transkulturelle Medien und Kommunikation
Cover of book: Medienrezeption
Edited Book No access
Volker Gehrau, Helena Bilandzic, Holger Schramm, Carsten Wünsch
Medienrezeption

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex