Cover of book: Domestizierung
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Domestizierung

Authors:
Publisher:
 2013

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2013
ISBN-Print
978-3-8329-4279-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6026-6
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume
9
Language
German
Pages
174
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
  2. Der Domestizierungsansatz No access 13 - 38
  3. Entwicklungsgeschichte des Domestizierungsansatzes No access 39 - 52
  4. Methoden No access 53 - 70
  5. Empirische Befunde No access 71 - 100
  6. Kritik und Weiterentwicklungen No access 101 - 134
  7. Verwandte und konkurrierende Ansätze No access 135 - 146
  8. Top 10 der Forschungsliteratur No access 147 - 150
  9. Zitierte Literatur No access 151 - 172
  10. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände No access 173 - 174

Bibliography (263)

  1. Ang, Ien (1985): Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen. Open Google Scholar
  2. Ang, Ien (1996): Living Room Wars: Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203289549
  3. Ang, Ien (2008):‚Radikaler Kontextualismus und Ethnografue in der Rezeptionsforschung’. In: Hepp, Andreas & Winter, Rainer (Hrsg.): Kultur – Medien – Macht. 4. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 61-79. Open Google Scholar
  4. Aune, Margrethe (2007): ‚Energy comes home’. In: Energy Policy, 35 (11), S. 5457-5465. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.007
  5. Bakardjieva, Maria (2005): Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  6. Bakardjieva, Maria & Smith, Richard (2001): ‚The Internet in Everyday Life: Computer Networking from the Standpoint of the Domestic User.’ In: New Media and Society. 3 (1), S. 67-83. Open Google Scholar
  7. Balasubramaniana, K.; Thamizolib, P.; Umara, Abdurrahman & Kanwara, Asha (sic) (2010): ‚Using mobile phones to promote lifelong learning among rural women in Southern India’. In: Distance Education, 31 (2), S. 193-209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.502555
  8. Bannister, Don & Fransella, Fay (1986): Inquiring Man: the psychology of personal constructs. 3. Ausgabe. London: Croom Helm. Open Google Scholar
  9. Bassett, Caroline (2007a): The arc and the machine. Narrative and new media. Mancherster & New York: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bassett, Caroline (2007b): ‚Of distance and closeness: the work of Roger Silverstone’. In: New Media & Society, 9 (1), S. 42-48. Open Google Scholar
  11. Bausinger, Hermann (1983): ‚Alltag, Technik, Medien’. In: Pross, Harry & Rath, Claus-Dieter (Hrsg.): Rituale der Medienkommunikation. Gänge durch den Medienalltag. Berlin: Guttandin & Hoppe, S. 24-36. Open Google Scholar
  12. Bausinger, Hermann (1984): ‚Media, technology and daily life’. In: Media, Culture and Society. 6, S. 343-351. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bausinger, Hermann (2005 1961): Volkskultur in der technischen Welt. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  14. Beck, Ulrich (1986): Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  15. Beck, Ulrich (1997): Was ist Globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus – Antworten auf Globalismus. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  16. Belliger, Andréa & Krieger, David J. (2006): ANThology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Bielefeld: Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9663-9_20
  17. Berg, Anne-Jorunn. (1997): Digital feminism. Dragvoll: Senter for Teknologi of Samfum & Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Rapport Nr. 28. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bergman, Simone (1994): ‚Communication technology in the household: The gendering of artefacts and practices’. In: Frissen, Valerie (Hrsg.): Gender, ITCs and everyday life: Mutual shaping processes. Brüssel: Europäische Kommission. S. 135-153. Open Google Scholar
  19. Berker, Thomas; Hartmann, Maren; Punie, Yves & Ward, Katie (2006) (Hrsg.): Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
  20. Bijker, Wiebe E. & Pinch, Trevor J. (1987): ‚The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit of Each Other’. In: Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P. & Pinch, Trevor J. (Hrsg.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA/USA: MIT Press, S. 17-50. Open Google Scholar
  21. Blechar, Jennifer; Knutsen, Lars & Damsgaard, Jan (2005): ‚Reflexivity, the Social Actor and M-Service Domestication: Linking the human, technological and contextual’. In: Proceedings of the IFIP 8.2 Working Conference on Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments. 1.-3. August, Cleveland, USA. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28918-6_7
  22. Boczkowski, Pablo & Lievrouw, Leah A. (2008): Bridging STS and Communication Studies. Scholarship on Media and Information Technologies. In: Hackett, Edward J. et al. (Hrsg.): The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, S. 951-977. Open Google Scholar
  23. Bolger, Niall; Davis, Angelina & Rafaeli, Eshkol (2003): ‚Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived’. In: Annual Review Psychology. 54, S. 579-616. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
  24. Bolin, Göran (2010): ‚Domesticating the mobile in Estonia’. In: New Media Society. 12(1), S. 55-73. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1461444809355112
  25. Bolter, Jay David & Grusin, Richard (1999): Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA/USA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  26. Bonfadelli, Heinz & Friemel, Thomas N. (2011): Medienwirkungsforschung: Grundlagen und theoretische Perspektiven. 4 überarbt. Aufl. Stuttgart: UVK/UTB. Open Google Scholar
  27. Bourdieu, Pierre (1982): Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  28. Bowlby, Rachel (2000): ‚Domestication’. In: McQuillan, Martin (Hrsg.): Deconstruction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, S. 304-310. Open Google Scholar
  29. Brosveet, Jarle & Sørensen, Knut H. (2000): ‚Fishing for Fun and Profit? National Domestication of Multimedia: The Case of Norway.’ In: The Information Society: An International Journal. 16 (4), S. 263-276. Open Google Scholar
  30. Büscher, Monika; Urry, John & Witchger, Katian (Hrsg.)(2010): Mobile Methods. Londn: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  31. Burgess, Jean (2007): Vernacular Creativity and New Media. Unveröffentlicher PhD Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology (AUS). Open Google Scholar
  32. Castells, Manuel (1996): The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1. Cambridge & Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  33. Chen, Yanpei & Zhang, Xinrong (2009): Internet Enabled Personal Choice - The Culmination of Domesticated Information and Communication Technologies. Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2009-146. http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2009/EECS-2009-146.html (eingesehen am 4/10/2012) Open Google Scholar
  34. Chiumbu, Sarah (2012): Exploring mobile phone practices in social movements in South Africa – the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign. In: African Identities. Vol. 10, Nr. 2, S. 193-206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2012.657863
  35. Clausen, Lisbeth (2004): ‚Localizing the global: ‘domestication’ processes in international news production’. In: Media, Culture & Society. 26 (19), S. 25-44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0163443704038203
  36. Commission of the European Communities (1993): Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century (White Paper). Luxemborg: Office for the Official Publications of the EC, Mai 1993. Open Google Scholar
  37. Couldry, Nick (2003): Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  38. Couldry, Nick (2008): ‚Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089414
  39. emergent space of digital storytelling’. In: New Media & Society. 10 (3). S. 373-391. Open Google Scholar
  40. Couldry, Nick; Livingstone, Sonia & Markham, Tim (2007): Media Consumption and Public Engagement. Beyond the Presumption of Attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  41. Courtois, Cédric; Mechant, Peter; Paulussen, Steve & De Marez, Lieven (2012): The triple articulation of media technologies in teenage media. In: New Media & Society. Vol. 14, Nr. 3; S. 401-420. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1461444811415046
  42. Courtois, Cédric; Verdegem, Pieter & De Marez, Lieven (im Erscheinen): The triple articulation of media technologies in audiovisual media consumption. In: Television & New Media. Open Google Scholar
  43. Curtis, Bruce (2010): Domestication and regulation of online gambling and pornography. In: Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. Vol. 3, Nr. 2, S. 85-96. Open Google Scholar
  44. Dayan, Daniel (2007): ‚ On Morality, Distance and the Other – Roger Silverstone’s Media and Morality’. In: International Journal of Communication. 1, S. 113-122. Open Google Scholar
  45. De Certeau, Michel (1988): Kunst des Handelns. Berlin: Merve. Open Google Scholar
  46. De Souza E Silva, Adriana & Frith, Jordan (2010): Locative Mobile Social Networks: Mapping Communication and Location in Urban Spaces. In: Mobilities, Vol. 5, Nr. 4, S. 485–505. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2010.510332
  47. Denzin, Norman K. (1989): The Research Act (3. Aufl.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar
  48. Deuze, Mark (2012): Media Life. Cambridge: Polity. Open Google Scholar
  49. Dutton, William H. (Hrsg.) (1996): Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  50. Dutton, William H. (Hrsg.) (1999): Society on the Line: Information Politics in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2586149
  51. Düvel, Caroline & Berg, Matthias (2010): Communication Diaries in Mobile Ethnography: A Qualitative Methodological Approach to Mediatized Interpersonal Communication. Unveröffentlichter Vortrag auf der ECREA Tagung 2010. Hamburg. Open Google Scholar
  52. Fallan, Kjetil (2010): Design History: Understanding theory and method. Oxford & New York: Berg. Open Google Scholar
  53. Feenberg, Andrew (1999): Questioning Technology. London & New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  54. Flick, Uwe (2009): Sozialforschung: Methoden und Anwendungen. Ein Überblick für die BA-Studiengänge. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  55. Flick, Uwe; von Kardorff, Ernst & Steinke, Ines (Hrsg.) (2005): Qualitative Forschung – Ein Handbuch. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  56. Frissen, Valerie & Punie, Yves (2001): Present users, future homes–A theoretical perspective on acceptance and use of ICT in the home environment. TNO rapport STB-01-30a. Delft: TNO. Open Google Scholar
  57. Froschauer, Ulrike & Lueger, Manfred (2003): Das qualitative Interview. Wien: WUV: Open Google Scholar
  58. Früh, Werner & Schönbach, Klaus (1982): Der dynamisch-transaktionale Ansatz. Ein neues Paradigma der Medienwirkungen. In: Publizistik. Vol. 27, Nr. 1/2, S. 74-88. Open Google Scholar
  59. Früh, Werner (1991): Medienwirkungen : Das dynamisch-transaktionale Modell. Theorie und empirische Forschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10777-4_4
  60. Geertz, Clifford (1983): Dichte Beschreibung. Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  61. Giddens, Anthony (1996): Konsequenzen der Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Open Google Scholar
  62. Gillespie, Marie (1995): Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. London: Comedia & Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  63. Green, Eileen; Singleton, Carrie & Davies, Paul (2011): Sustaining digital inclusion in everyday life. Vortrag beim iCS-OII 2011 Symposium, ‘A Decade in Internet Time’, Oxford: Oxford University, 21.-24.09.2011. Open Google Scholar
  64. Green, Nicola & Haddon, Leslie (2009): Mobile Communications – An Introduction to New Media. London: Berg. Open Google Scholar
  65. Grönman, Heidi (2006): It’s ugly and thick – Displeasing design in private households. Proceedings der ‚Design &Emotion’ Konferenz. Chalmers University of Technology, 27.-29.09.2006, Göteborg, Schweden. Open Google Scholar
  66. Groves, Colin P. (1999): The advantages and disadvantages of being domesticated. In: Perspectives in Human Biology. 4, S.1-12. Open Google Scholar
  67. Habib, Laurence (2000): Computers and the Family: a study of technology in the domestic sphere. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/PhDProgramme/abstractsOfPhDTheses/2000-2004/habib.htm (eingesehen am 1/12/2011) Open Google Scholar
  68. Habib, Laurence (2005a): ‚Domesticating learning technologies in a higher education institution: a tale of two virtual learning environments’. In: Bjarnø, Vibeke (Hrsg.): New Teaching and Learning Practices: Experiences with e-Learning Projects at Oslo University College 1998-2005. Oslo: Oslo University College, S. 79-87. Open Google Scholar
  69. Habib, Laurence (2005b): Finding a place and a space for online learning environments in an institutional setting: issues of mental and physical objectification, IPSI BgD Transactions on Internet Research. Vol.1, Nr. 2, S. 7-13. Open Google Scholar
  70. Hack, Josh (2007): Taming Technology: Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Families and their Domestication of the Internet. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/mediaWorkingPapers/ (eingesehen am 1/12/2011) Open Google Scholar
  71. Haddon, Leslie (1995): ‚Information and Communication Technologies: A View from the Home’. In: Kollman, K. & Zimmer, M. (Hrsg.): Neue Kommunikations- und Informationstechnologie für Verbraucher. Wien: Verlag des Österreichischen Gewerkschaftsbundes, S. 127-144|. Open Google Scholar
  72. Haddon, Leslie (1998): ‚The Experience of Teleworking: A View from the Home.’ In: Jackson, Paul J. & Van der Wielen, Jos (Hrsg.): Teleworking: International Perspectives. From Telecommuting to the Virtual Organisation. London: Routledge, S. 136-143. Open Google Scholar
  73. Haddon, Leslie (2000): ‚Social Exclusion and Information and Communication Technologies: Lessons from Studies of Single Parents and the Young Elderly’. In: New Media and Society. 2 (4), S. 387-406. Open Google Scholar
  74. Haddon, Leslie (2003): ‚Domestication and Mobile Telephony’. In: Katz, James (Hrsg.): Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, S.43-56. Open Google Scholar
  75. Haddon, Leslie (2004): Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg. Open Google Scholar
  76. Haddon, Leslie (2006a): ‚The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption.’ In: The Information Society. 22 (4), S. 195-203. Open Google Scholar
  77. Haddon, Leslie (2006b): Empirical studies using the domestication framework. In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hg.): Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 103-122. Open Google Scholar
  78. Haddon, Leslie (2007): Roger Silverstone's legacies: domestication. In: New Media & Society. 9, 1, S. 25-32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1461444807075201
  79. Haddon, Leslie & Silverstone, Roger (1993): ‚Teleworking in the 1990s: A View from the Open Google Scholar
  80. Home’. SPRU/CICT Report Series, Nr. 10. Falmer: University of Sussex. Open Google Scholar
  81. Haddon, Leslie & Silverstone, Roger (1994): ‚Telework and the Changing Relationship of Home and Work’. In: Mansell, Robin (Hrsg.): Management of Information and Communication Technologies: Emerging Patterns of Control. London: Aslib, S. 234-47. Open Google Scholar
  82. Haddon, Leslie & Silverstone, Roger (1995): ‚Lone Parents and their Information and Communication Technologies’. SPRU/CICT report series, Nr.12. Falmer: SPRU. Open Google Scholar
  83. Haddon, Leslie & Silverstone, Roger (1996):’ Information and Communication Technologies and the Young Elderly’. SPRU/CICT report series, Nr.13. Falmer: SPRU. Open Google Scholar
  84. Hahn, Hans Peter & Kibora, Ludovica (2008): ‚The domestication of the mobile phone. Oral society and new ICT in Burkina Faso’. In: Journal of Modern African Studies. 46 (1), S. 87-109. Open Google Scholar
  85. Hall, Stuart (1973): ‚Encoding / Decoding’. In: Hall, Stuart et al. (Hrsg.)(1980): Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. London: Hutchinson, S. 128-138. Open Google Scholar
  86. Håpnes, Tove (1996): ‚Not in Their Machines: How Hackers Transform Computers into Subcultural Artefacts.’ In: Lie, Merete & Sørensen, Knut H. (Hrsg.): Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo. Scandinavian University Press, S. 121-150. Open Google Scholar
  87. Hartmann, Maren (2005): ‚The Web Generation? Domestication, Moral Economies & Double Articulations at Play’. In: Silverstone, Roger (Hrsg.): From Information to Communication: Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, S. 143-160. Open Google Scholar
  88. Hartmann, Maren (2006a): ‚A Mobile Ethnographic View on (Mobile) Media Usage?’. In: Höflich, Joachim R. & Hartmann, Maren (Hrsg.): Mobile Communication in Everyday Life: Ethnographic Views, Observations and Reflections. Berlin: Frank & Timme, S. 273-297. Open Google Scholar
  89. Hartmann, Maren (2006b): ‚The triple articulation of ICTs: Media as technological objects, symbolic environments and individual texts’. In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 80-102. Open Google Scholar
  90. Hartmann, Maren (2006c): ‚Media ethnography: Method, methodology or research philosophy?’ In: Carpentier, Nico; Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, Pille; Nordenstreng, Kaarle; Hartmann, Maren; Vihalemm, Peeter & Cammaerts, Bart (Hrsg.)(2006): Researching Media, Democracy and Participation. The Intellectual Work of the 2006 European Media and Communication Summer School. Tartu:University of Tartu Press, S. 251-261. Open Google Scholar
  91. Hartmann, Maren (2008a): ‚Everyday Life: Domesticating the Invisible’. In: Pierson, Jo; Mante-Meijer, Enid; Loos, Eugene & Sapio, Bartolomeo (Hrsg.): Innovating for and by users. Brüssel: COST Office, S. 3-11. Open Google Scholar
  92. Hartmann, Maren (2008b): ‚Domestizierung 2.0: Grenzen und Chancen eines Medienaneignungskonzeptes’. In: Winter, Carsten; Hepp, Andreas & Krotz, Friedrich (Hrsg.): Theoriediskussion in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 401-416. Open Google Scholar
  93. Hartmann, Maren (2009a): ‚Roger Silverstone: Medienobjekte und „Domestizierung“’. In: Hepp, Andreas; Krotz, Friedrich & Thomas, Tanja (Hrsg.): Schlüsselwerke der Cultural Studies. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 304-315. Open Google Scholar
  94. Hartmann, Maren (2009b): ‚Everyday: Domestication of Mediatization or Mediatized Domestication?’ In: Lundby, Knut (Hrsg.): Mediatization: concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang, S. 225-242. Open Google Scholar
  95. Hartmann, Maren (2009c): ‚The Changing Urban Landscapes of Media Consumption and Production’. In: European Journal of Communication. 24 (4), S. 421-436. Open Google Scholar
  96. Hartmann, Maren (2010): ‚Mediatisierung als Mediation: Vom Normativen und Diskursiven’. In: Hartmann, Maren & Hepp, Andreas (Hrsg.): Die Mediatisierung der Alltagswelt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 35-48. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92014-6_3
  97. Hartmann, Maren (2013): ‚From domestication to mediated mobilism’. In: Mobile Media and Communication. 1 (1), S. 42-49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/2050157912464487
  98. Hartmann, Maren & Krotz, Friedrich (2010): ‚Online-Kommunikation als Kultur.’ In: Schweiger, Wolfgang & Beck, Klaus (Hrsg.): Handbuch Onlinekommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 234-256. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92437-3_10
  99. Harwood, Stephen A. (2011): The domestication of online technologies by smaller businesses and the ‚busy day.’ In: Information & Organization. Vol. 21, S. 84-106. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.002
  100. Hebrok, Marie (2010): Developing a Framework of Disdomestication: The Disdomestication of Furniture in Norwegian Households. ESST MA thesis (htpp://www.esst.uio.no) Open Google Scholar
  101. Helle-Valle, Jo & Sletermeas, Dag (2008): ‚ICTs, domestication and language games: a Wittgensteinian approach to media uses’. In: New Media & Society. 10 (1), S. 45-66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1461444807085326
  102. Helsper, Ellen J. (2011): Buchrezension zu Loos, Haddon & Mante-Meijer, 2008 – The Social Dynamics of Information and Communication Technology. In: Information, Communication & Society. Vol. 14, Nr. 2, S. 294-297. Open Google Scholar
  103. Hepp, Andreas (2004): Netzwerke der Medien. Medienkultur und Globalisierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81002-1_4
  104. Hepp, Andreas (2005): ‚Kommunikative Aneignung’. In: Mikos, Lothar & Wegener, Claudia (2005)(Hrsg.): Qualitative Medienforschung: Ein Handbuch. Konstanz: UVK, S. 67-79. Open Google Scholar
  105. Hepp, Andreas (2006): Transkulturelle Kommunikation. Konstanz: UVK (UTB). Open Google Scholar
  106. Hepp, Andreas (2011): ‚Netzwerke, Kultur und Medientechnologie: Möglichkeiten einer kontextualisierten Netzkulturforschung’. In: Hartmann, Maren & Wimmer, Jeffrey (Hrsg.): Digitale Medientechnologien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 53-74. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93275-0_3
  107. Hepp, Andreas; Berg, Matthias & Roitsch, Cindy (2011): Monothematische und multithematische mediatisierte Vergemeinschaftungshorizonte: Grundmuster kommunikativer Vernetzung und medienvermittelter Vergemeinschaftung. In: Studies in Communication Media (SCM); 2 (1): S. 295-332. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2011-2-295
  108. Highmore, Ben (Hrsg.)(2001): The Everyday Life Reader. London, Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  109. Hine, Christine (2011): ‚Towards an ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities’. In: Media, Culture and Society. 33 (4), S. 567-602. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0163443711401940
  110. Hirsch, Eric (1992): ‚The long term and the short term of domestic consumption.’ In: Silverstone, Roger & Hirsch, Eric (Hrsg.): Consuming Technologies. Media and information in domestic spaces. London & New York: Routledge, S. 208-226. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203401491_chapter_13
  111. Hirsch, Eric (1998a): ‚New Technologies and Domestic Consumption.’ In: Geraghty, Christine & Lusted, David (Hrsg.): The Television Studies Book. London: Arnold, S. 158-174. Open Google Scholar
  112. Hirsch, Eric (1998b): ‚Domestic Appropriations: Multiple Contexts and Relational Limits in the Home-making of Greater Londoners’. In: Rapport, Nigel & Dwason, Andrew (Hrsg.): Migrants of Identity. Perceptions of Home in a World of Movement. Oxford: Berg, S. 139-179. Open Google Scholar
  113. Hjorth, Larissa (2009): Mobile Media in the Asia-Pacific: Gender and the art of being mobile. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  114. Hobson, Dorothy (1982): Crossroads: The Drama of a Soap Opera. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  115. Höflich, Joachim R. & Hartmann, Maren (2007): ‚Grenzverschiebungen – Mobile Kommunikation im Spannungsfeld von öffentlichen und privaten Sphären’. In: Röser, Jutta (Hrsg.): MedienAlltag: Domestizierungsprozesse alter und neuer Medien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 211-221. Open Google Scholar
  116. Holzer, Boris (2006): Netzwerke. Bielefeld: Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14361/9783839403655
  117. Hopf, Susanne & Meier, Natalja (2009): Plattenbau privat: 60 Interieurs. Berlin: Nicolai Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  118. Hradil, Stefan (1987): Sozialstrukturanalyse in einer fortgeschrittenen Gesellschaft. Opladen: Leske & Budrich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97175-3_5
  119. Humphreys, Lee (2007): ‚Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball’. In: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/humphreys.html (eingesehen am 11/11/2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00399.x
  120. Hynes, Deirdre & Rommes, Els (2006): ‚„Fitting the Internet into our lives”: IT courses for disadvantaged users’. In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 123-144. Open Google Scholar
  121. Hynes, Deirdre & Richardson, Helen (2009): What Use is Domestication Theory to Information Systems Research?’ In: Dwivedi, Yogesch et al. (Hrsg.): The Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems. Ideas Publishing Group, S. 482-494. Open Google Scholar
  122. Janasik, Nina (2011): A cognitive and pragmatic account of innovation: domesticating the probiotic Gefilus in Finland. Aalto Universität, Finnland: Promotion. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2011.041871
  123. Kalthoff, Herbert (2006): Beobachtung und Ethnografie. In: Ayas, Ruth & Bergmann, Jörg (Hrsg.): Qualitative Methoden der Medienforschung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag, S.146-182. Open Google Scholar
  124. Karl, Irmi (2007a): ‚Domesticating the Lesbian? Queer Strategies and Technologies of Home-Making’. In: M/C Journal 10.4. http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0708/06-karl.php (eingesehen am 18/6/2009) Open Google Scholar
  125. Karl, Irmi (2007b): ‚On-/off line: gender, sexuality and the techno-politics of everyday life’. In: O’Riordan, Kate & Phillips, David J. (Hrsg.): Queers Online: Media Technology and Sexuality, New York: Peter Lang Publishing, S. 45-64. Open Google Scholar
  126. Karl, Irmi (2009): ‚Technology and Women’s Lives; Queering Media Ethnography’. In: Reconstruction 9.1. Special Issue on Fieldwork and Interdisciplinary Research. http://reconstruction.eserver.org/091/karl.shtml (eingesehen am 18/6/2009) Open Google Scholar
  127. Karnowski, Veronika; von Pape, Thilo & Wirth, Werner (2006): ‚Zur Diffusion Neuer Medien: Kritische Bestandsaufnahme aktueller Ansätze und Überlegungen zu einer integrativen Diffusions- und Aneignungstheorie Neuer Medien.’ In: Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 54 (1), S. 56-74. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2006-1-56
  128. Karnowski, Veronika (2011): Diffusionstheorien. Baden-Baden: Nomos Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845260334
  129. Katz, Elihu (1957): ‚The Two-Step-Flow of Communication. An Up-To-Date Report on a Hypothesis.’ In: Public Opinion Quarterly. 21(1), S. 61-78. Open Google Scholar
  130. Katz, Elihu; Blumler, Jay G. & Gurevitch, Michael (1974): ‘Uses and Gratifications Research.’ In: The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37 (4), S. 509-523. Open Google Scholar
  131. Katz, James E. & Aakhus, Mark (2002): Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489471
  132. Keppler, Angela (1994): Tischgespräche. Über Formen kommunikativer Vergemeinschaftung am Beispiel der Konversation in Familien. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  133. Knoblauch, Hubert; Baer, Alejandro; Laurier, Eric; Petschke, Sabine & Schnettler, Bernt (2008): Visual Analysis. New Developments in the Interpretative Analysis of Video and Photography. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (FQS); 9 (3), Art. 14. Open Google Scholar
  134. Kopytoff, Igor (1986): The Cultural Biography of Things. In: Appadurai, Arjun (Hrsg.): The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 64-91. Open Google Scholar
  135. Koschnick, Wolfgang J. (Hrsg.) (2005): FOCUS-Jahrbuch 2005. Beiträge zu Werbe- und Mediaplanung, Markt-, Kommunikations- und Mediaforschung. München: Burda. Open Google Scholar
  136. Koskinen, Ilpo (2005): Design and Domestication. Vortrag beim ‚Design and consumption: ideas at the interface’ Workshop in Durham, GB; 12.-13.1.2005. Open Google Scholar
  137. Krotz, Friedrich (1997): ‚Kontexte des Verstehens audiovisueller Kommunikate’. In: Charlton, Michael & Schneider, Silvia (Hrsg.): Rezeptionsforsehung.. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, S. 73-89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08111-1_4
  138. Krotz, Friedrich (2001): Die Mediatisierung kommunikativen Handelns: der Wandel von Alltag und sozialen Beziehungen, Kultur und Gesellschaft durch die Medien. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  139. Krotz, Friedrich (2005): Neue Theorien entwickeln. Eine Einführung in die Grounded Theory, die Heuristische Sozialforschung und die Ethnografie anhand von Beispielen aus der Kommunikationsforschung. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  140. Krotz, Friedrich (2006): ‚Rethinking the Digital Divide Approach. From a Technically Based Understanding to a Concept Referring to Bourdieu’s Social Capital.’ In: Carpentier, Nico et al. (Hrsg.): Researching Media, Democracy and Participation. Tartu: Tartu University Press, S. 177-188. Open Google Scholar
  141. Krotz, Friedrich (2007): Mediatisierung. Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  142. Lacey, Kate (2007): Home, Work and Everyday Life: Roger Silverstone at Sussex. International Journal of Communication. 1, S. 61-69. Open Google Scholar
  143. Laegren, Anne Sofie (2008): ‚Domesticating home ancored work: Negotiating flexibility when bringing ICT based work home in rural communities.’ In: Geoforum. Vol. 39, Nr. 6, S. 1991-1999. Open Google Scholar
  144. Latour, Bruno (1993): We have never been modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press Open Google Scholar
  145. Lenhardt, Amanda & Horrigan, John B. (2003): Re-visualizing the digital divide as a digital spectrum. In: IT&Society. Vol. 1, Nr. 5, S.23-29. Open Google Scholar
  146. Lesage, Frederik (2008): Making Exceptions: Media Art and Everyday Life. EDS Innovation Research Programme – Discussion Paper, Nr. 11. London: LSE. Open Google Scholar
  147. Lie, Merete & Sørensen, Knut H. (1996): Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo. Scandinavian University Press. Open Google Scholar
  148. Lim, Sun Sun (2006): ‚From cultural to information revolution: ICT domestication by middle-class families in urban China’. In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 185-204. Open Google Scholar
  149. Lindner, Rolf (2004): Walks on the Wild Side: Eine Geschichte der Stadtforschung. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  150. Ling, Rich (2001): The diffusion of mobile telephony among Norwegian teens: A report from after the revolution. Konferenzbeitrag zu ICUST 2001, Paris, Frankreich. Open Google Scholar
  151. Ling, Rich (2004): The Mobile Connection. The Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. Amsterdam etc.: Morgan Kaufmannn Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  152. Ling, Rich & Haddon, Leslie (2003): ‚Mobile Telephony, Mobility and the Co-ordination of Everyday Life’. In: Katz, James (Hrsg.): Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, S.245-266. Open Google Scholar
  153. Livingstone, Sonia (2007): ‚On the material and the symbolic: Silverstone's double articulation of research traditions in New Media Studies’. In: New Media & Society. 9 (1), S. 16-24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1461444807075200
  154. Livingstone, Sonia (2009): Children and the Internet: great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  155. Löfgren, Orvar & Wikdahl, Magnus (1999): ‚Domesticating Cyberdreams’. In: Lundin, Susanne & Åkesson, Lynn (Hrsg.): Amalgamations: Fusing Technology and Culture. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, S. 40-62. Open Google Scholar
  156. Löfström, Erica (2007): Visualizing Energy in Households: The Power Aware Cord as a Means to Create Energy Awareness. In: Proceedings of the European Network for Housing Research conference. Rotterdam, NL: ENHR. Open Google Scholar
  157. Lull, James (1990): Inside Family Viewing: Ethnographic Research on Television’s Audiences. London. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  158. Lull, James (1988): World Families Watch Television. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  159. Lundby, Knut (Hrsg.) (2009): Mediatization: concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  160. Luomanen, Jari & Peteri, Virve (2011): Constructung iDeal machines and iDeal users: iPad as a cultural object. Konferenzbeitrag zur ‚Media, Technology and Aesthetics Division’, Nordic Conference on Media and Communication Research / NordMedia, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  161. Marcus, George (1995): ‘Ethnography In/Of the World System: the Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’. In: Annual Review of Anthropology. 24, S. 95-117. http://cio.ceu.hu/extreading/CIO/Marcus_on_multi_locale_fieldwork.html (eingesehen am 23/10/2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
  162. Marcus, George (1998): Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  163. Margolis, Eric & Pauwels, Luc (2011): The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  164. Marvin, Carolyn (1988): When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  165. Merton, Robert K. (1968): Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  166. Meyen, Michael (2009): ‚Medialisierung’. In: Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft. 57 (1), S. 23-38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2009-1-23
  167. Meyer, Sibylle & Schulze, Eva (Hrsg.) (1993): Technisiertes Familienleben – Blick zurück und nach vorn. Berlin: edition sigma. Open Google Scholar
  168. Michael, Mike (2000): Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  169. Michalitsch, Gabriele (2006): Die neoliberale Domestizierung des Subjekts: Von den Leidenschaften zum Kalkül. Frankfurt & New York: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  170. Miklosi, Adam (2011): Hunde: Evolution, Kognition und Verhalten. Stuttgart: Kosmos. Open Google Scholar
  171. Miller, Daniel (2008): The Comfort of Things. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  172. Miller, Daniel (1987): Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Basil Blackwell: Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  173. Moores, Shaun (1993): Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  174. Morley, David (1986): Family Television. Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  175. Morley, David (1992): Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  176. Morley, David (2000): Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203444177
  177. Morley, David (2001): Familienfernsehen und Medienkonsum zu Hause. http://www.familienhandbuch.de/cmain/f_Fachbeitrag/a_Familienforschung/s_381.html (eingesehen am 20/11/2009) Open Google Scholar
  178. Morley, David (2003): ‘What’s ‘Home’ Got to Do with It? Contradictory Dynamics in the Domestication of Technology and the Dislocation of Domesticity’. In: European Journal of Cultural Studies 6 (4), S. 435-458. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/13675494030064001
  179. Morley, David (2006): Media, Modernity and Technology: The Geography of the New. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203413050
  180. Morley, David & Silverstone, Roger (1990): ‚Domestic communication – technologies and meanings’. In: Media, Culture & Society. 12 (1), S. 31-55. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/016344390012001003
  181. Morley, David & Silverstone, Roger (1991): ‚Communication and context: ethnographic perspectives on the media audience’. In: Jensen, Klaus Bruhn & Jankowski, Nick (Hrsg.): A handbook of qualitative methodologies. London: Routledge, S. 149-162. Open Google Scholar
  182. Murphy, Patrick & Kraidy, Marwan (2003): Global Media Studies. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  183. Nahuis, Roel (2011): The rise and fall of self-service in Amsterdam trams: User technology relations in a case of service innovation. ISU Working Papers 08.11. Utrecht: Utrecht University. Open Google Scholar
  184. Neice, David C. (1998): Measuring Participation in the Digital Techno-structure. Internet Access. ACTS/FAIR Working Paper, Nr.44, Brighton: SPRU. Open Google Scholar
  185. Pedersen, Per E. & Ling, Rich (2003): Modifying adoption research for mobile Internet service adoption: Crossdisciplinary interactions. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174217
  186. Pellegrino, Giuseppina (2007): Discourses on Mobility and Technological Mediation: The Texture of Ubiquitous Interaction. In: PsychNology. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 59-81. Open Google Scholar
  187. Pierson, Jo (2006): ‚Domestication at Work in Small Businesses’. In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 205-226. Open Google Scholar
  188. Prosser, Jon & Loxley, Andrew (2008): Introducing Visual Methods. Discussion Paper. NCRM. Open Google Scholar
  189. Punie, Yves (2000). Domesticatie van informatie- en communicatietechnologie. Adoptie, gebruik en betekenis van media in het dagelijks leven: continue beperking of discontinue bevrijding? Unveröffentlichte Dissertation. Freie Universität Brüssel (VUB). Open Google Scholar
  190. Pürer, Heinz (2003): Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft: Ein Handbuch. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  191. Quandt, Thorsten & von Pape, Thilo (2010): ‚Living in the mediatope. A multi-method study on the evolution of media technologies in the domestic environment’. In: The Information Society, 26 (5), S. 330-345. Open Google Scholar
  192. Radway, Janince (1984): Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: Univ of North Carolina Press. Open Google Scholar
  193. Rehberg, Karl Siegbert (2003): Kultur. In: Joas, Hans (Hrsg.): Lehrbuch der Soziologie. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, S. 63-92. Open Google Scholar
  194. Rickard, Scott (2011): The new Aussie wireless hotspot – home: End user investigations into wireless communications technologies within the home. Unveröffentlichter Konferenzbeitrag. ANZCA Konferenz, 6.-8. Juli, Hamilton (AUS). Open Google Scholar
  195. Ridder, Christa-Maria & Engel, Bernhard (2010): Massenkommunikation 2010: Mediennutzung im Intermediavergleich. Ergebnisse der 10. Welle der ARD/ZDF-Langzeitstudie zur Mediennutzung und –bewertung. In: Media Perspektiven. 11/2010, S. 537-548. Open Google Scholar
  196. Ridder, Christa-Maria & Turecek, Irina (2011): Medienzeitbudgets und Tagesablaufverhalten. Ergebnisse auf Basis der ARD/ZDF-Studie Massenkommunikation 2010. In: Media Perspektiven. 12/2011, S. 570-582. Open Google Scholar
  197. Røpke, Inge; Christensen, Toke Haunstrup & Jensen, Jesper Ole (2008): Domestication of information and communication technologies in an energy perspective. Unveröffentlichter Konferenzbeitrag. ISEE Konferenz, 7.-11. August, Nairobi (Kenia). Open Google Scholar
  198. Røpke, Inge; Christensen, Toke Haunstrup & Jensen, Jesper Ole (2010): ‚Information and communication technologies - A new round of household electrification’. In: Energy Policy. 38 (4), S. 1764-1773. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.052
  199. Röser, Jutta (2003): Fragmentierung der Familie durch Medientechnologien? Häusliches Medienhandeln der Generationen und Geschlechter. In: Medienheft Dossier (CH), Nr.19, S. 28-38. (http://www.medienheft.ch/dossier/bibliothek/d19_RoeserJutta.html) Open Google Scholar
  200. Röser, Jutta (2005): Das Zuhause als Ort der Aneignung digitaler Medien: Domestizierungsprozesse und ihre Folgen. MERZ Wissenschaft. 49 (5), S. 86-96. Open Google Scholar
  201. Röser, Jutta (2007a): ‚Der Domestizierungsansatz und seine Potenziale zur Analyse alltäglichen Medienhandelns’. In: Röser, Jutta (Hrsg.): MedienAlltag. Domestizierungsprozesse alter und neuer Medien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 15-30. Open Google Scholar
  202. Röser, Jutta (2007b): ‚Wenn das Internet das Zuhause erobert: Dimensionen der Veränderung aus ethnografischer Perspektive’. In: Röser, Jutta (Hg.): MedienAlltag. Domestizierungsprozesse alter und neuer Medien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 157-171. Open Google Scholar
  203. Röser, Jutta (Hg.) (2007c): MedienAlltag. Domestizierungsprozesse alter und neuer Medien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  204. Röser, Jutta (2009): ‚David Morley: Aneignung, Ethnografie und die Politik des Wohnzimmers’. In: Hepp, Andreas; Krotz, Friedrich & Thomas, Tanja (Hrsg.): Schlüsselwerke der Cultural Studies. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 277-289. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91839-6_23
  205. Röser, Jutta & Peil, Corinna (2010): ‚Diffusion und Teilhabe durch Domestizierung – Zugänge zum Internet im Wandel 1997-2007’. In: Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft. 58 (4), S. 481-502. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2010-4-481
  206. Röser, Jutta & Peil, Corinna (2011): Das mediatisierte Zuhause. Wandel häuslicher Kommunikationskulturen. Kurzbeschreibung des Projekts. http://www.leuphana.de/jutta-roeser/forschung-projekte/das-mediatisierte-zuhause.html (eingesehen am 16/08/2011) Open Google Scholar
  207. Röser, Jutta & Peil, Corinna (2012): Das Zuhause als mediatisierte Welt im Wandel. Fallstudien und Befunde zur Domestizierung des Internets als Mediatisierungsprozess. In: Hepp, Andreas & Krotz, Friedrich (Hrsg.): Mediatisierte Welten: Beschreibungsansätze und Forschungsfelder. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 137-163. Open Google Scholar
  208. Rose, Gillian (2007): Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  209. Routarinne, Sara & Redström, Johan (2007): ‚Domestication as Design Intervention’. In: The proceedings of Design Inquiries, the Second Nordic Design Research Conference 2007. www.nordes.org (eingesehen am 12/04/2009) Open Google Scholar
  210. Russo Lemor, Anna-Maria (2006): ‘Making a “home”. The Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies in Single Parents’ Households’. In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of Media and Technologies. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S.165-84. Open Google Scholar
  211. Schenk, Michael (2007): Medienwirkungsforschung. 3. (überarb.) Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar
  212. Schnell, Rainer; Hill ,Paul B.& Esser, Elke (2008): Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. 8. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar
  213. Schulz, Winfried (2004): ‚Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept’. In: European Journal of Communication Copyright. 19 (1), S. 87-101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696
  214. Scifo, Barbara (2005): The Domestication of Camera-Phone and MMS Communication: The Early Experiences of Young Italians. In: Nyíri, Kristof (Hrsg.): A Sense of Place. The Global and the Local in Mobile Communication. Wien: Passagen Verlag, S. 363-74. Open Google Scholar
  215. Shekar, Madhuri (2009): Domestication of the Cell Phone on a College Campus: A Case Study. MSc Dissertation. London: LSE. Open Google Scholar
  216. Silverstone, Roger (1981): The message of television: myth and narrative in contemporary culture. London: Heinemann Educational. Open Google Scholar
  217. Silverstone, Roger (1990): ‚Television and Everyday Life: Towards an Anthropology of the Television Audience’. In: Ferguson, Marjorie (Hrsg.): Public Communication: the New Imperatives. Newbury Park & London: Sage, S. 173-189. Open Google Scholar
  218. Silverstone, Roger (1991): Beneath the Bottom Line: Households and Information and Communication Technologies in an Age of the Consumer. PICT Policy Research Paper Nr.17, Brunel University (UK). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006002002
  219. Silverstone, Roger (1993): Domesticating the Revolution: Information and Communication Technologies and Everyday Life. Unveröffentlichter Konferenzbeitrag zur ‚PICT National Conference’, Kenilworth (GB), Mai 1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1108/eb051328
  220. Silverstone, Roger (1994): Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203358948
  221. Silverstone, Roger (1999): Why Study the Media? London: Routledge. (2007 als ‚Anatomie der Massenmedien’ bei Suhrkamp erschienen) Open Google Scholar
  222. Silverstone, Roger (2005a): ‚Mediation and communication’. In: Calhoun, Craig; Rojek, Chris & Turner, Brian (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of sociology. London: Sage, S. 188-207. Open Google Scholar
  223. Silverstone, Roger (Hrsg.) (2005b): Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe: From Information to Communication. Aldershot: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar
  224. Silverstone, Roger (2005c): ‚Introduction’. In: Silverstone, Roger (Hrsg.): Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe: From Information to Communication. Aldershot: Ashgate, S. 1-18. Open Google Scholar
  225. Silverstone, Roger (2006a): ‚Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of a concept.’ In: Berker, Thomas et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 229-248. Open Google Scholar
  226. Silverstone, Roger (2006b): Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity Press. (2008 als ‚Mediapolis: Die Moral der Massenmedien’ bei Suhrkamp erschienen) Open Google Scholar
  227. Silverstone, Roger & Haddon, Leslie (1996): ‚Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life’. In: Mansell, Robin & Silverstone, Roger (Hg.): Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 44-74. Open Google Scholar
  228. Silverstone, Roger & Hartmann, Maren (Hrsg.) (1996a): The Smart Home: Research Perspectives. EMTEL Working Paper Nr.1, GRC CulCom, Brighton, Mai. Open Google Scholar
  229. Silverstone, Roger & Hartmann, Maren (Hrsg.) (1996b): Media and Information Technologies and the Changing Relationship to Public and Private Space. EMTEL Working Paper Nr.2, GRC CulCom, Brighton, November. Open Google Scholar
  230. Silverstone, Roger & Hartmann, Maren (Hrsg.) (1997a): Regulating New Media: Perspectives from Everyday Life. EMTEL Working Paper Nr.3, GRC CulCom, Brighton, Mai. Open Google Scholar
  231. Silverstone, Roger & Hartmann, Maren (Hrsg.) (1997b): Technology, Cultural Identity and Citizenship. EMTEL Working Paper Nr.4, GRC CulCom, Brighton, Oktober. Open Google Scholar
  232. Silverstone, Roger & Hartmann, Maren (Hrsg.) (1998): Methodologies for Media and Information Technology Research in Everyday Life. EMTEL Working Paper Nr.5, GRC CulCom, Brighton, Februar. Open Google Scholar
  233. Silverstone, Roger; Hirsch, Eric & Morley, David (1991): ‚Listening to a long conversation: an ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home’. In: Cultural Studies: theorizing politics, politicising theory. 5 (2), S. 204-227. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09502389100490171
  234. Silverstone, Roger, Hirsch, Eric & Morley, David (1992): ‚Information and communication technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household’. In: Silverstone, Roger & Hirsch, Eric (Hrsg.): Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge, S. 15-31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203401491_chapter_1
  235. Silverstone, Roger; Morley, David; Dahlberg, Andrea & Livingstone, Sonia (1989): Families, technologies and consumption: the household and information and communication technologies. CRICT discussion paper. Brunel University (UK). Open Google Scholar
  236. Simpson, Lorenzo C. (1995): Technology, Time and the Conversations of Modernity. New York & London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  237. Sørensen, Knut H. (1994): Technology in Use. Two essays on the domestication of artifacts. Dragvoll: STS Working Paper 2/94. Open Google Scholar
  238. Sørensen, Knut H. (2006): ‚Domestication: The Enactment of Technology’. In: Berker et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 40-61. Open Google Scholar
  239. Sørensen, Knut H.; Aune, Magrethe & Hatling, Morten (2000): ‚Against linearity – On the cultural appropriation of science and technology.’ In: Dierkes, Meinolf & von Grote, Claudia (Hrsg.): Between Understanding and Trust - The Public, Science and Technology. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, S. 237-57. Open Google Scholar
  240. Spradley, James (1980): Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston. Open Google Scholar
  241. Spradley, James (1979): The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston. Open Google Scholar
  242. Stang, Michael (2009): Beschleunigte Evolution: Wie die Domestikation die Tierwelt nachhaltig verändert. Sendung des Deutschlandfunk (Wissenschaft im Brennpunkt) am 12.04.2009. http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/wib/948011/ (eingesehen am 28/03/2011) Open Google Scholar
  243. Stegbauer, Christian (Hrsg.)(2008): Netzwerkanalyse und Netzwerktheorie: Ein neues Paradigma in den Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91107-6_1
  244. Stewart, James (2007) Local Experts in the Domestication of Information and communication Technologies. In: Information, Communication and Society. 10 (4), S. 547-569. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13691180701560093
  245. Storm-Mathisen, Ardis (2009): ‚Contextualising adolescents’ egaming’. Unveröffentlichter Konferenzbeitrag. DGPuK Jahrestagung 2009, 29. April – 1.Mai, Bremen. Open Google Scholar
  246. Sussex Technology Group (2001): ‚In the company of strangers: mobile phones and the conception of space’. In: Munt, Sally (Hrsg.): Technospaces – Inside the New Media. London & New York: Continuum, S. 205-223. Open Google Scholar
  247. Thrane, Kristin (2003): Adoption of ICT in Norwegian teenage homes. Telenor. Open Google Scholar
  248. Tiainen, Tarja; Hynes, Deirdre; Koivunen, Emma-Reetta & Paakki, Minna-Kristiina (2005): Beyong Objectivity: Conversing Subjective Information Society Discourse. Unpublished paper presented at the IADIS International Conference e-Society. Open Google Scholar
  249. Toft, Monica Duffy; Philpott, Daniel & Shah, Timothy Samuel (2011): God's Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. New York: W.W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
  250. Urry, John (2007): Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  251. Verhaegh, Stefan (2007): From Simple Customer to Warm User: Who Cares about the Maintenance of Community Innovations? In: Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 3, S. 155-184. Open Google Scholar
  252. von Pape, Thilo (2008): Aneignung neuer Kommunikationstechnologien in sozialen Netzwerken: Am Beispiel des Mobiltelefons unter Jugendlichen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91214-1
  253. von Pape, Thilo; Karnowski, Veronika & Wirth, Werner (2008): ‚Eine integrative Skala zur Messung des Konstruktes der Aneignung.’ In: Matthes, Jörg; Wirth, Werner; Fahr, Andreas & Daschmann, Gregor (Hrsg.): Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie: Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag, S. 96-127. Open Google Scholar
  254. Vuojarvi, Hanna; Isomaki, Hannakaisa & Hynes, Deirdre (2010): ‚Domestication of a laptop on a wireless campus: a case study’. In: Australasian Journal of Educational Technologies. 26 (2), S. 250-267. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1094
  255. Wacquant, Loic (2003): Leben für den Ring. Boxen im amerikanischen Ghetto. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  256. Wagner, Michael (2009): ‚The Domestication of Ford Model T in Denmark’. Unveröffentlichter Konferenzbeitrag. ‚Appropriating America’ Konferenz, 15.-17.01., Amsterdam (NL). Open Google Scholar
  257. Wakkary, Ron & Maestri, Leah (2007): The Resourcefulness of Everyday Design. Konferenzbeitrag. C&C’07, 13.-15.6.2007, Washington, DC (USA). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254984
  258. Ward, Katie (2006): ‚The bald guy just ate an orange. Domestication, work and the home’. In In: Berker et al. (Hrsg.): Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, S. 145-164. Open Google Scholar
  259. Williams, Robin; Stewart, James & Slack, Roger (2004): Social Learning in Technological Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  260. Wirth, Werner; von Pape, Thilo & Karnowski, Veronika (2008): ‚An Integrative Model of Mobile Phone Appropriation’. In: Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 13 (3), S. 593-617. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00412.x
  261. Wittel, Andreas (2000): Ethnography on the Move: From Field to Net to Internet. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1(1), Art. 21, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001213 (eingesehen am 13/05/2010) Open Google Scholar
  262. Wünsch, Carsten (2007): Der praktische Wert einer Metatheorie für die Kommunikationswissenschaft. In: Wirth, Werner, Stiehler, Hans-Jörg, Wünsch, Carsten (Hrsg.)(2007): Dynamisch-Transaktional denken. Theorie und Empirie der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag, S. 17-37. Open Google Scholar
  263. Zickuhr, Kathryn & Smith, Aaron (2012): Digital differences. Studie des Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences.aspx (eingesehen am 04/09/2012) Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Media History"
Cover of book: Die Realität, existiert sie?
Book Titles No access
Leonardo Quaresima
Die Realität, existiert sie?
Cover of book: Aktenzeichen XY…ungelöst (1967–1997)
Book Titles No access
Karsten Köhler
Aktenzeichen XY…ungelöst (1967–1997)
Cover of book: Medienregulierung
Edited Book No access
Hardy Gundlach
Medienregulierung
Cover of book: Les journalistes dans la presse en langues étrangères
Edited Book No access
Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, Anaïs Nagel
Les journalistes dans la presse en langues étrangères
Cover of book: Journalismusforschung
Edited Book No access
Thomas Hanitzsch, Wiebke Loosen, Annika Sehl
Journalismusforschung

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex