Cover of book: The Bush Doctrine Revisited
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

The Bush Doctrine Revisited

Eine Untersuchung der Auswirkungen der Bush-Doktrin auf das geltende Völkerrecht
Authors:
Publisher:
 12.06.2018

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2018
Publication date
12.06.2018
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4503-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8747-8
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Völkerrecht und Außenpolitik
Volume
88
Language
German
Pages
478
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. I. Fragestellung und Gang der Untersuchung No access
    2. II. Antizipative, präventive und präemptive Selbstverteidigung No access
      1. 1. Allgemeine Übung No access
      2. 2. Rechtsüberzeugung (opinio iuris) No access
    2. II. Nachweis von Völkergewohnheitsrecht No access
    3. III. Entstehung von neuem Völkergewohnheitsrecht und ius cogens No access
    4. IV. Bindungswirkung des Völkergewohnheitsrechts No access
    5. V. Zusammenfassung No access
    1. I. Einführung No access
      1. 1. Reagan-Administration (1981–1989) No access
      2. 2. Bush (sen.)-Administration (1989–1993) No access
      3. 3. Clinton-Administration (1993–2001) No access
      1. 1. 11. September 2001 No access
      2. 2. Antwort der USA No access
      3. 3. National Security Strategy 2002 No access
      4. 4. National Security Strategies 2006 und 2008 No access
      1. 1. National Security Strategy 2010 No access
      2. 2. Ende des „War On Terrorism“? No access
      3. 3. National Security Strategy 2015 No access
    5. V. Ergebnis No access
      1. 1. Entstehungsgeschichte No access
        1. 2.1 Definition von Gewalt No access
        2. 2.2 Indirekte Aggression durch bewaffnete Gruppen und Kriterien der Zurechnung No access
          1. 2.3.1 Praxis des Sicherheitsrats No access
          2. 2.3.2 Der Sicherheitsrat und internationaler Terrorismus No access
          3. 2.3.3 Ergebnis No access
      3. 3. Das Gewaltverbot im Völkergewohnheitsrecht No access
      1. 1. Befugnisse des Sicherheitsrats nach Kapitel VII UN-Charta No access
      2. 2. Die Feindstaatenklauseln No access
          1. 3.1.1 Bewaffneter Angriff No access
          2. 3.1.2 Der Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz No access
          3. 3.1.3 Benachrichtigung des Sicherheitsrats No access
          4. 3.1.4 Umfang und Dauer der Selbstverteidigung No access
          5. 3.1.5 Notwendigkeit eines Verteidigungswillens No access
        2. 3.2 Das Selbstverteidigungsrecht im Völkergewohnheitsrecht No access
        3. 3.3 Zwischenergebnis No access
        4. 3.4 Präventive Selbstverteidigung No access
        5. 3.5 Selbstverteidigung gegen Non-State Actors No access
          1. 3.6.1 Staatlich bedingte Gefahrenlagen No access
          2. 3.6.2 Terroristisch bedingte Gefahrenlagen No access
      1. 1. Suezkrise (1951) No access
      2. 2. Krise um die Föderation Süd-Arabien (1964) No access
      3. 3. Tongkin Zwischenfall (1964) No access
      4. 4. USA vs. Libyen (1986) No access
      5. 5. USA vs. Irak (1993) No access
      6. 6. Libyen – Lieferung von F-15 Kampfflugzeugen an Israel (1998) No access
      7. 7. Zwischenergebnis No access
      1. 1. Israel vs. Libanon (1968) No access
      2. 2. Portugal vs. Sambia, Senegal und Guinea (1969) No access
      3. 3. Südafrika vs. die „front-line“ Staaten (1976-1987) No access
      4. 4. Israel vs. Tunesien (1985) No access
      5. 5. Türkei – Angriffe auf die PKK im Irak (1995-1997) No access
      6. 6. Iran – Angriffe auf die MEK im Irak (1993-1999) No access
      7. 7. USA vs. Afghanistan und Sudan (1998) No access
      8. 8. Zwischenergebnis No access
        1. 1.1 Reaktionen im Sicherheitsrat No access
        2. 1.2 Reaktionen in der Generalversammlung No access
      2. 2. Zwischenergebnis No access
    4. IV. Ergebnis No access
      1. 1. Vereinte Nationen No access
      2. 2. NATO, andere regionale Organisationen und einzelne Staaten No access
      3. 3. Deutschland No access
      4. 4. Resolution des UN-Sicherheitsrats 1373 (2001) No access
      5. 5. Operation Enduring Freedom No access
      6. 6. Zwischenergebnis No access
    2. II. 9/11 in der Völkerrechtsliteratur No access
    3. III. Ergebnis No access
        1. 1.1 OIF als Testfall der Bush-Doktrin No access
          1. 1.2.1 Staaten No access
          2. 1.2.2 „The Fork in the Road“ No access
          3. 1.2.3 Das High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change (2004) und der World Summit (2005) No access
          4. 1.2.4 Völkerrechtsliteratur No access
        1. 2.1 Nadimarg-Massaker No access
        2. 2.2 Anschläge von Mumbai No access
      3. 3. Zwischenergebnis No access
        1. 1.1 Ausdehnung von OEF No access
        2. 1.2 „Tornado-Urteil“ des Bundesverfassungsgerichts No access
        3. 1.3 OEF und der UN-Sicherheitsrat No access
        4. 1.4 Operation Freedom’s Sentinel No access
      2. 2. Georgien vs. Russische Föderation (2002) No access
      3. 3. Israel vs. Syrien (2003) No access
      4. 4. USA – Drohnenangriffe in Pakistan und Yemen (seit 2004) No access
      5. 5. Israel vs. Libanon (2006) No access
      6. 6. Türkei – Angriffe auf die PKK im Irak (2007-2008) No access
      7. 7. Kolumbien vs. Ecuador (2008) No access
        1. 8.1 Somalia – „The Burbur“ No access
        2. 8.2 Kenia: Operation Linda Nchi (2011) No access
        3. 8.3 Äthiopien vs. Eritrea (2012) No access
      9. 9. USA – Angriff auf Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan (2011) No access
      10. 10. Israel vs. Sudan (2012) No access
      11. 11. Israel vs. Syrien (2013) No access
        1. 12.1 Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant No access
        2. 12.2 Global Coalition To Counter ISIL No access
        3. 12.3 Ausdehnung der Bekämpfung von ISIL nach Syrien No access
        4. 12.4 Syrischer Protest No access
        5. 12.5 Resolution des Sicherheitsrats 2249 (2015) No access
      13. 13. Türkei – Angriffe auf ISIL und die PKK im Irak (2015) No access
      14. 14. Zwischenergebnis No access
      1. 1. Israel – Zerstörung des syrischen Reaktors al-Kibar (2007) No access
      2. 2. Iran No access
      3. 3. Zwischenergebnis No access
      1. 1. Wall-Gutachten (2004) No access
      2. 2. Armed Activities-Fall (2005) No access
      3. 3. Bosnian Genocide-Fall (2007) No access
      1. 1. Oil Platforms-Fall (2003) No access
      2. 2. Armed Activities-Fall (2005) No access
    3. III. Gewaltsamer Regierungswechsel No access
    4. IV. Ergebnis No access
      1. 1. Angriffe von Non-State Actors als bewaffnete Angriffe No access
          1. 2.1.1 “Unable or unwilling” No access
          2. 2.1.2 Auswirkung auf die „Rettung eigener Staatsangehöriger“ No access
        2. 2.2 Aufgabe des Zurechnungserfordernisses? No access
            1. Sicherheitsrat No access
            2. Generalversammlung No access
            3. Regionale Organisationen No access
            4. Einzelne Staaten No access
            5. Zwischenergebnis No access
          2. 2.3.2 Ergebnis No access
      1. 1. Sturz der Taliban No access
      2. 2. Sturz der Regierung Saddam Hussein No access
      3. 3. Ergebnis No access
      1. 1. Fallgruppe Internationaler Terrorismus No access
      2. 2. Fallgruppe Nukleare Bedrohung durch Staaten No access
      3. 3. Ergebnis No access
    4. IV. Zeitdauer der Selbstverteidigungsmaßnahmen No access
      1. 1. Die Harboring-Doktrin No access
      2. 2. Die unwilling/unable-Doktrin No access
      3. 3. Regime Change No access
      4. 4. Präemptive Selbstverteidigung No access
    6. VI. Erosion des Gewaltverbots? Die Kontroverse um das ius ad bellum als statisches Völkerrecht No access
  11. Zitierte Rechtsprechung No access 455 - 458
  12. Literaturverzeichnis No access 459 - 478

Bibliography (321)

  1. Ago, Roberto, Droit des traités à la lumière de la Convention de Vienne, Recueil des cours de I'Academie de droit international de La Haye, 134 (1971-III), S. 297-332 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028603523.297-331
  2. ders., Addendum to the 8th Report on State Responsibility, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1980, Vol. II (1), UN Doc. A/CN.4/318/Add.5-7 Open Google Scholar
  3. Akande, Dapo; Milanovic, Marko, The Constructive Ambiguity of the Security Council’s ISIS Resolution, ejiltalk!, 21. November 2015, http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-constructive-ambiguity-of-the-security-councils-isis-resolution/ Open Google Scholar
  4. Akehurst, Michael, Custom as Source of International Law, British Yearbook of International Law, 1975, Vol. 47, No. 1, S. 1-53 Open Google Scholar
  5. Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Self-Defense Against the Use of Force in International Law, The Hague, 1996 Open Google Scholar
  6. Altenburg, John; Beard, Jack M., America’s New War on Terror: The Case for Self-Defence under International Law, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 25, 2001, S. 559-590 Open Google Scholar
  7. Alvarez, Jose E., Judging the Security Council, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 90, No. 1, 1996, S. 1-39 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2203749
  8. Antonopoulos, Constantine, Force by Armed Groups as Armed Attack and the Broadening of Self-Defence, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 55, Issue 2, 2008, S. 159-180 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X08001599
  9. Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, Shifting Boundaries of the Right of Self-Defence – Appraising the Impact of the September 11 Attacks on Jus Ad Bellum, International Lawyer, Vo. 36, 2002, S. 1081-1102 Open Google Scholar
  10. Arend, Anthony Clark, Legal Rules and International Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 1999 Open Google Scholar
  11. ders., International Law and the Preemptive Use of Military Force, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2003, S. 89-103 Open Google Scholar
  12. Arimatsu, Louise; Schmitt, Michael N., Attacking “Islamic State” and the Khorasan Group: Surveying the International Law Landscape, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Bulletin, Vol. 53, Issue 1, 2014, S. 1-29 Open Google Scholar
  13. Arnauld, Andreas von, Völkerrecht, 3. Auflage, C. F. Müller, Heidelberg, 2016 Open Google Scholar
  14. Barbour, Stephanie A.; Salzman, Zoe A., “The Tangled Web”: The Right of Self-Defense Against Non-State Actors in the Armed Activities Case, International Law and Politics, Vol. 40, 2008, S. 53-106 Open Google Scholar
  15. Barnard, Anne, Syrian Rebels Say Saudi Arabia Is Stepping Up Weapons Deliveries, The New York Times, 12. September 2013 Open Google Scholar
  16. Beard, Jack M., America’s New War on Terror: The Case for Self-Defense Under International Law, Harvard Journal on Law & Public Policy, Vol. 25, 2001, S. 559-590 Open Google Scholar
  17. Bernasconi, Pierre; Bonita, Tracey; Jun, Ryun; Pasternak, James; Sandhu, Anjula; Hildreth, Steven A., Foreign Support of the U.S. War on Terrorism, Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, RL31152, 11. Juli 2002 Open Google Scholar
  18. Bethlehem, Daniel, Self-Defense Against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, No 4, 2012, S. 769-777 Open Google Scholar
  19. Beyerlin, Ulrich, Die Israelische Befreiungsaktion von Entebbe in völkerrechtlicher Sicht, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 37, 1977, S. 213-242 Open Google Scholar
  20. Birkett, Daley J., The Legality of the 2011 Kenyan Invasion of Somalia and its Implications for the Jus Ad Bellum, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 2013, S. 1-25 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krt014
  21. Boeglin, Nicolas, Arguments based on UN resolution 2249 in Prime Minister´s report on airstrikes in Syria: some clarifications needed, human rights investigations, 4. Dezember 2015, http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2015/12/04/arguments-based-on-un-resolution-2249-in-prime-ministers-report-on-airstrikes-in-syria-some-clarifications-needed/ Open Google Scholar
  22. Bothe, Michael, Terrorism and the Legality of Pre-emptive Force, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, 2003, S. 227-240 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.2.227
  23. ders., Rechtliche Hegung von Gewalt zwischen Theorie und Praxis, in: International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation, Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner, Isabelle Buffard/James Crawford/Alain Pellet/Stephan Wittich (Hrsg.), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston, 2008, S. 141-169 Open Google Scholar
  24. Bothe, Michael; Martenczuk, Bernd, Die NATO und die Vereinten Nationen nach dem Kosovo-Konflikt, Vereinte Nationen, Heft 47, 1999, S. 125-132 Open Google Scholar
  25. Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1958 Open Google Scholar
  26. Brecher, Irving, In Defence of Preventive War. A Canadian’s Perspective, International Journal, Vol. 58, No. 3, 2003, S. 253-280 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/40203859
  27. Brownlie, Ian, International Law and the Activities of Armed Bands, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1958, S. 712-735 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/7.4.712
  28. ders., International Law and the Use of Force by States, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 1963 Open Google Scholar
  29. ders., Humanitarian Intervention, in: John Norton Moore (Hrsg.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1974 Open Google Scholar
  30. ders., Chapter II: Voluntarism versus Majority Rule, Comment, in: Change and Stability in International Law-Making, Antonio Cassese und Joseph H. H. Weiler (Hrsg.), European University Institute: Ser. A, Law, 9, 1988 Open Google Scholar
  31. ders., Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Policy of Preemptive Action, Memorandum, United Kingdom House of Commons – Foreign Affairs, Oktober 2002, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmfaff/196/2102407.htm Open Google Scholar
  32. Bruha, Thomas, Gewaltverbot, in: Handbuch Vereinte Nationen, Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), 2. Auflage, C.H. Beck, München, 1991, S. 234-244 Open Google Scholar
  33. ders., Gewaltverbot und humanitäres Völkerrecht nach dem 11. September 2001, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 40, 2002, S. 383-421 Open Google Scholar
  34. ders., Irak-Krieg und Vereinte Nationen, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 41, 2003, S. 295-313 Open Google Scholar
  35. ders., „Neue Kriege“ – Neues Völkerrecht?, Wissenschaft & Frieden, Heft 1, 2004 Open Google Scholar
  36. Butcher, Tim; Moore, Matthew, Brown to meet Turkey PM as invasion looms, The Telegraph, 22. Oktober 2007, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1567006/Brown-to-meet-Turkey-PM-as-invasion-looms.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S1553-3212(07)70130-9
  37. Byers, Michael, Terrorism, The use of Force and International Law After 11 September, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 51, Issue 2, 2002, S. 401-414 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.2.401
  38. Cannizzaro, Enzo, Contextualizing proportionality: jus ad bellum and jus in bello in the Lebanese war, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 88, No. 864, 2006, S. 779-792 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1816383107000896
  39. Cassese, Antonio, The International Community’s “Legal” Response to Terrorism, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 38, Issue 3, 1989, S. 589-608 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/38.3.589
  40. ders., Terrorism is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories of International Law, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2001, S. 993-1001 Open Google Scholar
  41. ders., The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, S. 649-668 Open Google Scholar
  42. Chandran, Suba, Preemptive Strike: Will it Secure Indian Interests?, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Issue Brief, No. 7, New Delhi, May 2003 Open Google Scholar
  43. Chayes, A., The Use of Force in the Persian Gulf, in: L.F. Damrosch und D.J. Scheffer (Hrsg.), Law and Force in the New International Order, Boulder, 1991, S. 3 Open Google Scholar
  44. Clark, Colin, Obama’s ‘Strategic Patience’, Folly or The Future?, Breaking Defense, 10. Februar 2015 Open Google Scholar
  45. Cohan, John Alan, The Bush Doctrine and the Emerging Norm of Anticipatory Self-Defense in Customary International Law, Pace International Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2003, S. 283-357 Open Google Scholar
  46. Combacau, Jean, The Exception of Self-Defense in United Nations Practice, in: The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force, Antonio Cassese (Hrsg.), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1986, S. 9-32 Open Google Scholar
  47. Corten, Oliver, The Controversies Over the Customary Prohibition on the Use of Force: A Methodological Debate, The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2005, S. 803-822 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi147
  48. ders., Self-Defence against Terrorism: What Can be Learned from Recent Practice (2005-2010)?, Journal of International Law and Diplomacy, 2010, S. 129-152 Open Google Scholar
  49. Crail, Peter, IAEA Sends Syria Nuclear Case to UN, Arms Control Today, Juli/August 2011, Arms Control Association, http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011_%2007-08/%20IAEA_Sends_Syria_Nuclear_Case_to_UN Open Google Scholar
  50. Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8. Auflage, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199699698.003.0004
  51. D’Amato, Anthony, Trashing Customary International Law, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 81, No. 1, 1987, S. 101-105 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2202136
  52. ders., It’s a Bird. It’s a Plane. It’s Jus Cogens!, Connecticut Journal of International Law, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1990, S. 1-6 Open Google Scholar
  53. ders., The Invasion of Panama Was A Lawful Response to Tyranny, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 84, No. 2, 1990, S. 516-524 Open Google Scholar
  54. Dahm, Georg; Delbrück, Jost; Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht, Band I/3, 2. Auflage, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, 2002 Open Google Scholar
  55. Dale, Catherine, Operation Iraqi Freedom: Strategies, Approaches, Results, and Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service, RL 34387, 2. April 2009 Open Google Scholar
  56. Daloglu, Tulin, Kurdish Terror and the West: A Terrorist is a Terrorist, Plain and Simple, The Washington Times (Washington DC, US) 30. Oktober 2007 Open Google Scholar
  57. Danilenko, G.M., Law-Making in the International Community, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1993 Open Google Scholar
  58. Davidson, Janine, Obama’s Last National Security Strategy, Foreign Affairs, 2. März 2015 Open Google Scholar
  59. Deeks, Ashley S., “Unwilling or Unable”: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 52, 2012, S. 483-549 Open Google Scholar
  60. Delahunty, Robert J.; Yoo, John, The “Bush Doctrine”: Can Preventive War Be Justified?, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 32, 2009, S. 843-865 Open Google Scholar
  61. Delbrück, Jost, Staatliche Souveränität und die neue Rolle des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen, Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 1993, S. 6-21 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1993-1-6
  62. Dimitrakis, Panagiotis, The 1978 Battle of Larnaca Airport, Cyprus, and UK Diplomacy, The Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center, 7. Juni 2009, http://www.gloria-center.org/2009/06/dimitrakis-2009-06-07/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00263200903009676
  63. Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5. Auflage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012 Open Google Scholar
  64. ders., The Gulf War 1990 -2004 (And Still Counting), International Law Studies, Vol. 81, International Law Challenges: Homeland Security and Combating Terrorism, Thomas McK. Sparks/Glenn M. Sulmasy (Hrsg.), U.S. Naval War College, 2006, S. 337-349 Open Google Scholar
  65. Doehring, Karl, Völkerrecht, 2. Auflage, C.F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg, 2004 Open Google Scholar
  66. Dörr, Oliver, Gewalt und Gewaltverbot im modernen Völkerrecht, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vereinte Nationen, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, B 43, 2004, S. 14-20 Open Google Scholar
  67. Drehle, David von; Smith, R. Jeffrey, U.S. Strikes Iraq for Plot to Kill Bush, Washington Post, 27. Juni 1993, S. A01 Open Google Scholar
  68. Drumble, Mark A., Judging the 11 September Terrorist Attack, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2002, S. 323-360 Open Google Scholar
  69. Evans, Dominic; Oweis, Khaled Yacoub, Israel hits Syria arms convoy to Lebanon: sources, Reuters.com, 30. Januar 2013 Open Google Scholar
  70. Falk, Richard, Einer flog über das Völkerrecht, Le Monde diplomatique, 13. Dezember 2002 Open Google Scholar
  71. Fassbender, Bardo, The Better Peoples of the United Nations? Europe’s Practice and the United Nations, The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2004, S. 857-884 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.5.857
  72. ders., Die Gegenwartskrise des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots vor dem Hintergrund der geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift, 2004, S. 241-256 Open Google Scholar
  73. Fisler Damrosch, Lori; Oxman, Bernhard H., Agora: Future Implication of the Iraq Conflict: Editors' Introduction, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2003, S. 553-557 Open Google Scholar
  74. Folz, Hans-Ernst, Bemerkungen zur völkerrechtlichen Beurteilung der Vorgänge um die amerikanischen Geiseln im Iran, in: Ingo von Münch (Hrsg.), Staatsrecht – Völkerrecht – Europarecht, Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 1981 Open Google Scholar
  75. Ford, Stuart, Legal Process of Change: Article 2 (4) and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 4, 1999, S. 75-116 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/4.1.75
  76. Franck, Thomas, Who Killed Article 2(4)? or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 64, No. 4, 1970, S. 809-837 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2198919
  77. ders., Terrorism and the Right of Self-Defense, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 95, No. 4, 2001, S. 839-843 Open Google Scholar
  78. ders., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002 Open Google Scholar
  79. ders., What Happens Now? The United Nations after Iraq, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2003, S. 607-620 Open Google Scholar
  80. ders., Recourse to Force, Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures No. 15, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 Open Google Scholar
  81. ders., Preemption, Prevention and Anticipatory Self-Defense: New Law Regarding Recourse to Force?, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 27, 2004, S. 425-435 Open Google Scholar
  82. ders., The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 100, No. 1, 2006, S. 88-106 Open Google Scholar
  83. Franck, Thomas M.; Patel, Faiza, Police Action in Lieu of War: The Old Order Changeth, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 1, 1991, S. 63-74 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2203558
  84. Frowein, Jochen A., Ius Cogens, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, März 2013 Open Google Scholar
  85. Gardner, Richard N., Neither Bush nor the “Jurisprudes”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2003, S. 585-590 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3109843
  86. Garwood-Gowers, Andrew, Self-Defence against Terrorism in the Post-9/11 World, Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2004, S. 1-18 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v4i2.200
  87. ders., Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America) – Did the ICJ Miss the Boat on the Law on the Use of Force?, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 2004, S. 241-255 Open Google Scholar
  88. ders., Israel’s Airstrike on Syria’s Al-Kibar Facility, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2011, S. 263-291 Open Google Scholar
  89. Gaur, Mahendra, Foreign Policy Annual, 2004: Events, Kalpaz Publications, Delhi, 2005 Open Google Scholar
  90. Gazzini, Tarcisio, The Rules on the Use of Force at the Beginning of the XXI Century, Journal of Conflict Studies & Security Law, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2006, S. 319-342 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krl017
  91. Gebauer, Matthias, Deutscher Einsatz: Bundestagsjuristen halten Irak-Mandat für verfassungswidrig, Der Spiegel Online, 15. Januar 2015, http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/irak-experten-halten-mandat-der-bundeswehr-fuer-verfassungswidrig-a-1013141.html Open Google Scholar
  92. Gill, T. D., The Temporal Dimension of Self-Defence: Anticipation, Pre-emption, Prevention and Immediacy, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2006, S. 361-369 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krl018
  93. Glennon, Michael, Military Action Against Terrorists Under International Law: The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Volume 25, 2002, S. 539-558 Open Google Scholar
  94. ders., Preempting Terrorism – The Case for Anticipatory Self-Defense, The Weekly Standard, 28. Januar 2002, http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2105 Open Google Scholar
  95. ders., How International Rules Die, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 93, 2005, S. 939-991 Open Google Scholar
  96. ders., The Emerging Use-of-Force Paradigm, Journal of Conflict Study & Security Law, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2006, S. 309-317 Open Google Scholar
  97. ders., Pre-empting Proliferation: International Law, Morality, and Nuclear Weapons, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2013, S. 109-127 Open Google Scholar
  98. Gordon, Michael R., Israel Airstrike Targeted Advanced Missiles That Russia Sold to Syria, U.S. Says, The New York Times, 13. Juli 2013 Open Google Scholar
  99. Grant, David, War Games: Republicans Could Write Obama Blank Check on Iran, The Christian Science Monitor, 7. März 2012 Open Google Scholar
  100. Gray, Christine, The US National Security Strategy and the New “Bush Doctrine” on Preemptive Self-defense, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2002, S. 437-448 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000440
  101. dies., The Use of Force and the International Legal Order, in: Evans (Hrsg.) International Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2006, S. 589-620 Open Google Scholar
  102. dies., The Bush Doctrine Revisited: The 2006 National Security Strategy of the USA, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2006, S. 555-578 Open Google Scholar
  103. dies., International Law and the Use of Force, 3. Auflage, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2008 Open Google Scholar
  104. dies., President Obama’s 2010 United States National Security Strategy and International Law on the Use of Force, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, 2011, S. 35-53 Open Google Scholar
  105. dies., The International Court of Justice and the Use of Force, in: Tams/Sloan (Hrsg.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2013, S. 237-259 Open Google Scholar
  106. Green, James A., The Oil Platforms Case: An Error in Judgment?, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2004, S. 357-386 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/9.3.357
  107. ders., Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, Issue 2, 2011, S. 215-257 Open Google Scholar
  108. Greenberg, Joel, Iran, Russia defend Syria after Israeli attack, The Washington Post, 31. Januar 2013 Open Google Scholar
  109. Greenwood, Christopher, International Law and the United States’ Air Operation Against Libya, West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 89, 1986-1987, S. 933-960 Open Google Scholar
  110. ders., International Law and the ‘War on Terrorism’, International Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 2, 2002, S. 301-317 Open Google Scholar
  111. ders., International Law and the Pre-emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq, San Diego International Law Journal, Vol. 4, 2003, S. 7-37 Open Google Scholar
  112. ders., Caroline, The, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, April 2009 Open Google Scholar
  113. ders., Self-Defence, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, April 2011 Open Google Scholar
  114. Greig, D.W., Self-Defence and the Security Council: What does Article 51 Require?, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1991, S. 366-402 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/40.2.366
  115. Guoliang, Gu, Redefine Cooperative Security, Not Preemption, Washington Quarterly, Spring 2003, S. 135-145 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/01636600360569748
  116. Gupta, Sanjay, The Doctrine of Pre-emptive Strike: Application and Implications During the Administration of President George W. Bush, International Political Science Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2008, S. 181-196 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0192512107085611
  117. Hadzi-Vidanovic, Vidan, Kenya Invades Somalia Invoking the Right of Self-Defense, EJIL Talk!, 18. Oktober 2011, http://www.ejiltalk.org/kenya-invades-somalia-invoking-the-right-of-self-defence/ Open Google Scholar
  118. Hakimi, Monica, Defensive Force against Non-State Actors: The State of Play, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 91, 2015, S. 1-31 Open Google Scholar
  119. Happold, Matthew, Security Council Resolution 1373 and the Constitution of the United Nations, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, Issue 3, 2003, S. 593-610 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0922156503001304
  120. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, Iraq, Invasion of (2003), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Juni 2009 Open Google Scholar
  121. Heinze, Eric A., The evolution of international law in light of the ‘Global War on Terror’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, Issue 3, 2011, S. 1069-1094 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001014
  122. Hendel, Yoaz, Iran’s Nukes and Israel’s Dilemma, Middle East Quarterly, Winter 2012, S. 31-38 Open Google Scholar
  123. Henderson, Christian, The Obama Doctrine of ‘Necessary Force’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010, S. 403-434 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krq025
  124. ders., The Persistent Advocate and the Use of Force: The Impact of the United States Upon the Jus ad Bellum in the Post-Cold War Era, Ashgate International Law Series, Aldershot/Burlington, 2010 Open Google Scholar
  125. ders., The Bush Doctrine: From Theory to Practice, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2004, S. 3-24 Open Google Scholar
  126. Hendl, Yoaz, Iran’s Nukes and Israel’s Dilemma, Middle East Quarterly, Winter 2012, S. 31-38. Open Google Scholar
  127. Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave, 2. Edition, Council on Foreign Relations, New York, 1979 Open Google Scholar
  128. ders., Right v. Might, International Law and the Use of Force, Council on Foreign Relations Book, New York, 1991 Open Google Scholar
  129. Henninger, Daniel, Georg Shultz, Father of the Bush-Doctrine, Wall Street Journal, 29. April 2006 Open Google Scholar
  130. Herdegen, Matthias, Asymmetrien in der Staatenwelt und die Herausforderungen des „konstruktiven Völkerrechts”, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 64, 2004, S. 571-582 Open Google Scholar
  131. ders., Völkerrecht, 16. Auflage, C.H. Beck, München, 2017 Open Google Scholar
  132. Hermann, Rainer, Der Terror erfasst die Türkei, FAZ.net, 25. Juli 2015 Open Google Scholar
  133. Hestermeyer, Holger P., Die völkerrechtliche Beurteilung des Irak-Krieges im Lichte transatlantischer Rechtskulturunterschiede, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 64, 2004, S. 315-341 Open Google Scholar
  134. Hobe, Stephan, Einführung in das Völkerrecht, 9. Auflage, UTB, Tübingen, 2008 Open Google Scholar
  135. Hofmeister, Hannes, „To harbour or not to harbour“? Die Auswirkungen des 11. September auf das Konzept des „bewaffneten Angriffs“ nach Art 51 UN-Charta, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 2007, S. 475-500 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s00708-007-0195-0
  136. Ipsen, Knut, Völkerrecht, 6. Auflage, C.H. Beck, München, 2014 Open Google Scholar
  137. ders., Völkerrecht, 5. Auflage, C.H. Beck, München, 2004 Open Google Scholar
  138. James, Michael, Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan, abc News, 27. März 2009, http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2009/03/exclusive-three.html Open Google Scholar
  139. Jessup, Philip C., A Modern Law of Nations, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1948 Open Google Scholar
  140. Kammerhofer, Jörg, The Armed Activities Case and Non-state Actors in Self-Defence Law, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, 2007, S. 89-113 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S092215650600392X
  141. Kaplan, Eben, Backgrounder: Somalia’s High Stakes Power Struggle, Council on Foreign Relations, 7. August 2006, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/somalias-high-stakes-power-struggle Open Google Scholar
  142. Kastenberg, Joshua, The Use of Conventional International Law in Combating Terrorism: A Maginot Line for Modern Civilization Employing the Principles of Anticipatory Self-Defense & Preemption, Air Force Law Review, Vol. 55, 2004, S. 87-125 Open Google Scholar
  143. Katzman, Kenneth, Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy, Congressional Research Service, RL30588, 15. Oktober 2015 Open Google Scholar
  144. Kelsen, Hans, Collective Security and Collective Self-Defense Under the Charter of the United Nations, The American Journal of International Law Vol. 42, No. 4, 1948, S. 783-796 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2193350
  145. ders., The Law of the United Nations – A Critical Analysis of its Fundamental Problems, London, 1950 Open Google Scholar
  146. Kershner, Isabel, Official Silence in Israel Over Sudan’s Accusations of Air Attack, The New York Times, 25. Oktober 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/26/world/africa/official-silence-in-israel-over-sudans-accusations-of-air-attack.html?_r=0 Open Google Scholar
  147. Khoury, Jack; Siryoti, Daniel; Cohen, Gili, Report: Israel strikes Syrian military bases, Hezbollah targets near Syria-Lebanon border, Haaretz, 25. April 2015 Open Google Scholar
  148. Kimminich, Otto, Der Mythos der Humanitären Intervention, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 33, 1995, S. 430-458 Open Google Scholar
  149. Kirgis, Frederic L., Israel's Intensified Military Campaign Against Terrorism, ASIL Insights, Dezember 2001 Open Google Scholar
  150. Kittrich, Jan, Can Self-Defense Serve as an Appropriate Tool Against International Terorism?, Maine Law Review, Vol. 61, Issue 1, 2009, S. 134-169 Open Google Scholar
  151. Kohen, Marcelo G., The Use of Force by the United States after the End of the Cold War, and its Impact Upon International Law, in: Byers/Nolte (Hrsg.) United States Hegemony and the Foundation sof International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003, S. 197-231 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494154.009
  152. Kotzur, Markus, Gewissensfreiheit contra Gehorsamspflicht oder: der Irak-Krieg auf verwaltungsgerichtlichem Prüfstand, JuristenZeitung, 2006, S. 25-30 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/002268806775351776
  153. Krajewski, Markus, Selbstverteidigung gegen bewaffnete Angriffe nicht-staatlicher Organisationen – Der 11. September 2001 und seine Folgen, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 40, 2002, S. 183-214 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/0003892024012496
  154. Kramer, Heinz, Unruhen im türkischen Kurdengebiet, SWP-Aktuell 20, April 2006 Open Google Scholar
  155. Kranz, Jerzy, Der Kampf um den Frieden und sein besonderer Facilitator. Anmerkungen zur Georgienkrise, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 46, 2008, S. 481-501 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/000389208787287515
  156. ders., Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Sovereign Democracy: Some Remarks on the Annexation of Crimea by Russia, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 52, 2014, S. 205–221 Open Google Scholar
  157. Kreps, Sarah E.; Fuhrmann, Matthew, “Attacking the Atom: Does Bombing Nuclear Facilities Affect Proliferation?”, The Journal of Strategic Studies 34, No. 2, 2011, S. 161-187 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.559021
  158. Kreß, Claus, Die Rettungsoperation der Bundeswehr in Albanien am 14. März 1997 aus völker- und verfassungsrechtlicher Sicht, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 57, 1997, S. 329-362 Open Google Scholar
  159. ders., Staat und Individuum in Krieg und Bürgerkrieg – Völkerrecht im Epochenwandel, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1999, S. 3077-3084 Open Google Scholar
  160. ders., The Fine Line Between Collective Self-Defense and Intervention by Invitation: Reflections on the Use of Force against ‘IS’ in Syria, Just Security, 17. Februar 2015, https://www.justsecurity.org/20118/claus-kreb-force-isil-syria/ Open Google Scholar
  161. Kreß, Claus; von Holtzendorff, Leonie, Durchbruch in Kampala – Die Einigung über das Verbrechen der Aggression, Vereinte Nationen, Heft 6, 2010, S. 260-265 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-384X-2010-6-260
  162. Kronstadt, K. Alan, Terrorist Attacks in Mumbai, India and Implication for U.S. Interests, Congressional Research Service, R40087, 19. Dezember 2008 Open Google Scholar
  163. Kunde, Martin, Der Präventivkrieg – Geschichtliche Entwicklung und gegenwärtige Bedeutung, in: Gilbert Gornig, Burkhard Schöbener und Winfried Bausback (Hrsg.), Schriften zum Staats- und Völkerrecht – Band 125, Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, 2007 Open Google Scholar
  164. Kunig, Philip, Das Völkerrecht als Recht der Weltbevölkerung, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 41, 2003, S. 327-335 Open Google Scholar
  165. ders., Macht und Recht in den internationalen Beziehungen – und Schlussfolgerungen für den internationalen Diskurs über Völker- und Verfassungsrecht, Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 2005, S. 105-113 Open Google Scholar
  166. ders., Internationale Sicherheit und Ordnung, fundiert, Freie Universität Berlin, Heft 1, 2005 Open Google Scholar
  167. ders., Intervention, Prohibition of, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2008 Open Google Scholar
  168. ders., Über Stärken und Schwächen des Völkerrechts, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, XLVI, N. 63, 2014, S. 85-98 Open Google Scholar
  169. Kunig, Philip; Uerpmann-Wittzack, Robert, Übungen im Völkerrecht, 2. Auflage, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110906219.vii
  170. Kunz, Joseph, Individual and Collective Self-Defence in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 41, 1947, S. 872-879 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2193095
  171. Langille, Benjamin, It’s “Instant Custom“: How the Bush Doctrine Became Law After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 26, Issue 1, 2003, S. 143-156 Open Google Scholar
  172. Laqueur, Walter, Terrorismus – Die globale Herausforderung, Ullstein Buchverlage, Berlin, 1987 Open Google Scholar
  173. Leon, Eli Siryoti, Daniel, Sudan threatens Israel after Khartoum arms factory hit, Israel Hayom, 24. Oktober 2012, http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=6202 Open Google Scholar
  174. Lepel, Oskar Matthias Frhr. von, Die präemptive Selbstverteidigung im Lichte des Völkerrechts, Humanitäres Völkerrecht, Heft 2, 2003, S. 77-81 Open Google Scholar
  175. Lillich, Richard, Lillich on the Forcible Protection of Nationals Abroad: in Memory of Professor Richard B. Lillich, Thomas C. Wingfield und James E. Meyen (Hrsg.), International Law Studies, Volume 77, Naval War College, Newport, 2002 Open Google Scholar
  176. Lucas, Nathan J.; McInnis, Kathleen J., The 2015 National Security Strategy: Authorities, Changes, Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service, R44023, 1. Oktober 2015 Open Google Scholar
  177. Maogoto, Jackson Nyamuya, War on the Enemy: Self-Defence and State-Sponsored Terrorism, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2003 Open Google Scholar
  178. ders., Battling Terrorism – Legal Perspectives on the Use of Force and the War on Terror, Ashgate, Aldershot/Burlington, 2005 Open Google Scholar
  179. ders., Walking an International Law Tightrope: Use of Military Force to Counter Terrorism – Willing the Ends, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2006, S. 405-461 Open Google Scholar
  180. Martens, Michael, Die Geister, die Erdogan rief, FAZ.net, 20. Juli 2015 Open Google Scholar
  181. ders., Terror sagen, Kurden meinen, Neuwahlen denken?, FAZ.net, 26. Juli 2015 Open Google Scholar
  182. ders., Auf dem alten Pfad der Gewalt, FAZ.net, 11. Oktober 2015 Open Google Scholar
  183. Masters, Jonathan, Targeted Killings, Council on Foreign Relations, 30. April 2012, http://www.cfr.org/counterterrorism/targeted-killings/p9627 Open Google Scholar
  184. ders., Backgrounder: Al-Shabaab, Council on Foreign Relations, 13. März 2015, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/al-shabab Open Google Scholar
  185. Matthees, Kevin; Seufert, Günter, Erdoğan und Öcalan verhandeln, SWP-Aktuell 25, April 2013 Open Google Scholar
  186. McCarthy, Rory, Attack that killed arms smugglers in Sudan 'carried out by Israel', The Guardian, 26. März 2009, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/26/sudan-arms-strike-israel Open Google Scholar
  187. McDougal, Myres S., The Soviet-Cuban Quarantine and Self-Defense, Yale Law School, Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 2607, 1963, S. 597-604 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2196083
  188. ders., The Hydrogen Bomb Tests and the International Law of the Sea, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 49, No. 3, 1955, S. 356-361 Open Google Scholar
  189. ders., The Soviet-Cuban Quarantine and Self-Defense, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 57, No. 3, 1963, S. 597-604 Open Google Scholar
  190. McGrath, Kevin, Confronting Al Qaeda: New Strategies to Combat Terrorism, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, 2011 Open Google Scholar
  191. Menzel, Jörg; Pierlings, Tobias; Hoffmann, Jeannine, Völkerrechtsprechung, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2005 Open Google Scholar
  192. Meyer, Heinrich, Ein Anschlag und seine Folgen – Zur aktuellen politischen Lage in Kolumbien, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Länderberichte, Sankt Augustin/Berlin, 16. April 2003 Open Google Scholar
  193. Mills, Claire; Smith, Ben; Brooke-Holland, Louisa, ISIS/Daesh: the military response in Iraq and Syria, House of Commons Library, Briefing Paper. 06995, 3. November 2015 Open Google Scholar
  194. Moynihan, Harriet, Assessing the Legal Basis for UK Military Action in Syria, Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 26. November 2015, https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/assessing-legal-basis-uk-military-action-syria Open Google Scholar
  195. Murphy, Sean D., Terrorism and the concept of “armed attack” in Article 51 of the UN Charter, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 43, 2002, S. 41-51 Open Google Scholar
  196. ders., Terrorism and the Concept of "Armed Attack" in Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 43, 2002, S. 41-51 Open Google Scholar
  197. ders., Self-Defense and the Israeli Wall Advisory Opinion: An Ipse Dixit from the ICJ?, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 1, 2005, S. 62-76 Open Google Scholar
  198. ders., Protean Jus Ad Bellum, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2009, S. 22-52 Open Google Scholar
  199. Murswiek, Dietrich, Die amerikanische Präventivkriegsstrategie und das Völkerrecht, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2003, S. 1015-1020 Open Google Scholar
  200. Myjer, Eric P. J.; White, Nigel D., The Twin Towers Attack: An Unlimited Right to Self-Defence?, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, S. 5-17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/7.1.5
  201. Nolte, Georg, Kosovo und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur humanitären Intervention der NATO-Staaten, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 59, 1999, S. 941-960 Open Google Scholar
  202. O’Connell, Mary Ellen, The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense, The American Society of International Law, Task Force on Terrorism, August 2002 Open Google Scholar
  203. dies., Lawful Self-Defense to Terrorism, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 63, 2002, S. 889-908 Open Google Scholar
  204. dies., Unlawful Killing with Combat Drones, A Case Study of Pakistan 2004-2009, Notre Dame Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-43, Juli 2010 Open Google Scholar
  205. dies., Dangerous Departures, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, No. 2, 2013, S. 380-386 Open Google Scholar
  206. Odhiambo, E.O.S.; Onkware, K.; Kassilly, J.; Maito, L.T.; Oboka, W.A.; Wakhungu, J.W.; Ntabo, O.M., Kenya’s Pre-emptive and Preventive Incursion Against Al-Shabaab in the Light of International Law, Journal of Defense Resources Management, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (4), 2012, S. 27-36 Open Google Scholar
  207. Oellers-Frahm, Karin, IGH: Bosnien-Herzegowina gegen Jugoslawien, Vereinte Nationen, 2007, Heft 4, S. 163-167 Open Google Scholar
  208. Oppenheim, L.A., International Law: A Treatise, Vol. 1 Peace, London, 1905 Open Google Scholar
  209. Paech, Norman, Epochenwechsel im Völkerrecht? Über die Auswirkungen der jüngsten Kriege auf das UNO-Friedenssystem, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vereinte Nationen, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2004 Open Google Scholar
  210. Page, Rob, International legal implications of military action, in: Smith, ISIS and the sectarian conflict in the Middle East, House of Commons, Research Paper 15/16, 19. März 2015 Open Google Scholar
  211. Pardo, Rafael, Colombia’s Two-Front War, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 4, 2000, S. 64-73 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20049809
  212. Paulus, Andreas, The War Against Iraq and the Future of International Law: Hegemony or Pluralism, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 25, 2004, S. 691-733 Open Google Scholar
  213. ders., The Judge and International Custom, Presentation, 44. Réunion du Comité des Conseillers Juridiques sur le Droit International Public (CAHDI), Council of Europe, Paris, 21. September 2012, S. 85-97 Open Google Scholar
  214. Paust, Jonathan, J., Entebbe and self-help: the Israeli response to terrorism, Fletcher Forum on World Affairs, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 1978, S. 86-92 Open Google Scholar
  215. ders., Self-Defense Targetings of Non-State Actors and Permissibility of U.S. Use of Drones in Pakistan, Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2010, S. 237-280 Open Google Scholar
  216. ders., Use of Armed Force against Terrorists in Afghanistan, Iraq and Beyond, University of Houston Law Center, Public Law and Legal Theory Series No. 2011-A-2, 2002, S. 533-556 Open Google Scholar
  217. Payandeh, Mehrdad, Rechtskontrolle des UN-Sicherheitsrates durch staatliche und überstaatliche Gerichte, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 66, 2006, S. 41-71 Open Google Scholar
  218. ders., The United Nations, Military Intervention, and Regime Change in Libya, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 52, 2012, S. 355-403 Open Google Scholar
  219. Pellet, Alain, Article 38, in: Andreas Zimmermann, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat, Christian J. Tams (Hrsg.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice, A Commentary, 2. Auflage, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2012 Open Google Scholar
  220. Pert, Alison, Are air strikes against IS in Syria lawful?, The Drum, 24. August 2015 Open Google Scholar
  221. Pintore, Eduardo José, Der Verteidigungswille: Eine noch unerforschte inhärente Voraussetzung des Selbstverteidigungsrechts?, Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 2013, S. 60-81 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2013-1-60
  222. Piper, Elizabeth; MacLellan, Kylie, Parliament votes to bomb Islamic State in Syria, Reuters, 2. Dezember 2015, http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-mideast-crisis-syria-britain-idUKKBN0TK4QO20151202 Open Google Scholar
  223. Polke-Majewski, Karsten; Faigle, Philip; Biermann, Kai; Meiborg, Mounia; Joeres, Annika, Drei Tage Terror in Paris, 11. Mai 2015, Zeit Online, http://www.zeit.de/feature/attentat-charlie-hebdo-rekonstruktion Open Google Scholar
  224. Ratner, Steven R., Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello after September 11, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, No. 4, 2002, S. 905-921 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3070687
  225. Reichler, Paul S.; Wippman, David, United States Armed Intervention in Nicaragua: A Rejoinder, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, 1985-86, S. 462-473 Open Google Scholar
  226. Reinold, Theresa, State Weakness, Irregular Warfare, and the Right to Self-Defense Post-9/11, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 105, No. 2, 2011, S. 244-286 Open Google Scholar
  227. Reisman, W. Michael, Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Article 2(4), The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 78, No. 3, 1984, S. 642-645 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2202601
  228. ders., Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2003, S. 82-90 Open Google Scholar
  229. ders., The Manley O. Hudson Lecture: Why Regime Change Is (Almost Always) a Bad Idea, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 3, 2004, S. 516-525 Open Google Scholar
  230. Reisman, W. Michael; Armstrong, Andrea, The Past and Future of the Claim of Preemptive Self-Defense, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 100, No. 3, 2006, S. 525-550 Open Google Scholar
  231. Rivkin, Jr., David B., The Virtues of Preemptive Deterrence, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 1, 2005, S. 85-102 Open Google Scholar
  232. Rivkin, Jr., David B.; Casey, Lee A.; DeLaquil, Mark Wendell, War, International Law, and Sovereignty: Reevaluating the Rules of the Game in a New Century: Preemption and Law in the Twenty-First Century, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 5, 2005, S. 467-498 Open Google Scholar
  233. Roberts, Anthea, Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating And Enforcing International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 60, 2011, S. 57-92 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000679
  234. Ronzitti, Natalino, Rescuing Nationals Abroad Through Military Coercion and Intervention on Grounds of Humanity, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1985 Open Google Scholar
  235. ders., The Expanding Law of Self-Defence, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2006, S. 343-359 Open Google Scholar
  236. Rostow, Eugene V., The Gulf Crisis in International and Foreign Relations Law, Continued: Until What? Enforcement Action or Collective Self-Defense?, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 3, 1991, S. 506-516 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2203109
  237. Rostow, Nicholas, Determining the Lawfulness of the 2003 Campaign against Iraq, International Law Studies, Vol. 80, Issues in International Law and Military Operations, Richard B. Jaques (Hrsg.), U.S. Naval War College, 2006, S. 21-39 Open Google Scholar
  238. Rudolf, Peter, Die USA, Israel und die Legitimität eines Präventivangriffs gegen Iran, SWP-Studie, S 14, Juni 2012 Open Google Scholar
  239. Rudolf, Peter; Schaller, Christian, „Targeted Killing“ Zur völkerrechtlichen, ethischen und strategischen Problematik gezielten Tötens in der Terrorismus- und Aufstandsbekämpfung, SWP-Studie S 1, Januar 2012 Open Google Scholar
  240. Ruffert, Matthias, Terrorismusbekämpfung zwischen Selbstverteidigung und kollektiver Sicherheit – Die Anschläge vom 11. 9. 2001 und die Intervention in Afghanistan, ZRP 2002, S. 247-252 Open Google Scholar
  241. Ruys, Tom, Quo Vadit Jus ad Bellum?: A Legal Analysis of Turkey’s Military Operations Against the PKK in Northern Iraq, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, 2008, S. 1-31 Open Google Scholar
  242. ders., Armed Attack' and Article 51 of the UN Charter, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge, No. 74, 2010 Open Google Scholar
  243. Ruys, Tom; Verhoeven, Sten, Attacks by Private Actors and the Right of Self-Defence, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2005, S. 289-320 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kri016
  244. Schachter, Oscar, The Right of States to Use Armed Force, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 5/6, 1984, S. 1620-1646 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1288499
  245. ders., The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 78, No. 3, 1984, S. 645-650 Open Google Scholar
  246. ders., International Law: The Right of States to Use Armed Force, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 82, 1984, S. 1620-1646 Open Google Scholar
  247. ders., In Defense of International Rules on the Use of Force, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 1986, S. 113-146 Open Google Scholar
  248. ders., International Law in Theory and Practice, Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 1991 Open Google Scholar
  249. ders., United Nations Law in the Gulf Conflict, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 3, 1991, S. 452-473 Open Google Scholar
  250. ders., International Law in Theory and Practice, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, 1991 Open Google Scholar
  251. Schaller, Christian, Massenvernichtungswaffen und Präventivkrieg – Möglichkeiten der Rechtfertigung einer militärischen Intervention im Irak aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 62, 2002, S. 641-668 Open Google Scholar
  252. ders., Das Friedenssicherungsrecht im Kampf gegen den Terrorismus, SWP-Studie S3, Februar 2004 Open Google Scholar
  253. ders., Die völkerrechtliche Dimension der 'Responsibility to Protect', SWP-Aktuell 46, Juni 2008 Open Google Scholar
  254. Schanzer, Jonathan, The Islamic Republic of Sudan?, Foreign Policy, 10. Juni 2010 Open Google Scholar
  255. Scharf, Michael P., Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change – Recognizing Grotian Moments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013 Open Google Scholar
  256. Schneider, Friedrich; Hofer, Bernhard, Ursachen und Wirkungen des weltweiten Terrorismus, VS Research, 2007 Open Google Scholar
  257. Schrijver, Nico, Responding to International Terrorism: Moving the Frontiers of International Law for ‘Enduring Freedom’?, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 48, Issue 3, 2001, S. 271-291 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00001339
  258. Schrijver, Nico; van den Herik, Larissa, Leiden Policy Recommendations on Counter-terrorism and International Law, Grotius Center for International Legal Studies, Universität Leiden, 1. April 2010 Open Google Scholar
  259. Schröder, Meinhard, Die Geiselbefreiung von Entebbe – ein völkerrechtswidriger Akt Israels?, JuristenZeitung 1977, S. 420-426 Open Google Scholar
  260. Schwartz, Jonathan B., Dealing with a Rogue State – The Libya Precedent, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 101, No. 3, 2007, S. 553-580 Open Google Scholar
  261. Schwebel, Stephen M, Aggression, Intervention, and Self-Defense in Modern International Law, in: Justice in International Law, Selected Writings of Justice Stephen M. Schwebel, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, S. 529- 592 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551765.034
  262. Schwehm, Johannes, Präventive Selbstverteidigung, Archiv des Völkerrechts, Band 46, 2008, S. 368-406 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/000389208785968999
  263. Schweisfurth, Theodor, Völkerrecht, 1. Auflage, Utb, Stuttgart, 2006 Open Google Scholar
  264. Scobbie, Iain, Words My Mother Never Taught Me: ‘In Defense of the International Court’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 1, 2005, S. 76-88 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3246091
  265. Shah, Niaz A., Self-Defence, Anticipatory Self-Defence and Pre-emption: International Law’s Response to Terrorism, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 12 No.1, 2007, S. 95-126 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krm006
  266. Shankar Kaura, Girja, Link between Dar, Pandits' killings, The Tribune (New Delhi), 25. März 2003 Open Google Scholar
  267. Shelton, Dinah, Normative Hierarchy in International Law, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2006, S. 291-323 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000016675
  268. Shultz, George P., Low-Intensity Warfare: The Challenge of Ambiguity, Address at National Defense University, 15. Januar 1986, Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Current Policy No. 783, in: International Legal Materials, Vol. 25, Issue 1, 1986, S. 204-207 Open Google Scholar
  269. Sievers, Loraine; Daws, Sam, The Procedure of the UN Security Council, 4th Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, Oktober 2014, http://www.scprocedure.org/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199685295.003.0004
  270. Simon, Sven, ‘Has Recent State Practice transformed the Law on the Use of Force?’, State Practice and International Law Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2014, S. 161-170 Open Google Scholar
  271. Sinclair, Sir Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Manchester University Press, Manchester/Dover, 2. Auflage, 1984 Open Google Scholar
  272. Smith, Ben, ISIS and the sectarian conflict in the Middle East, House of Commons, Research Paper 15/16, 19. März 2015 Open Google Scholar
  273. Snider, Don M., The National Security Strategy, Documenting Strategic Vision, Second Edition, Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 15. März 1995 Open Google Scholar
  274. Sofaer, Abraham D., Terrorism, the Law and the National Defense, Military Law Review, Vol. 126, 1989, S. 89-123 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3312230
  275. ders., On the Necessity of Pre-emption, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2003, S. 209-226 Open Google Scholar
  276. Stahn, Carsten, Terrorist Acts as “Armed Attack”: The Right to Self-Defense, Article 51(1/2) of the UN Charter, and International Terrorism, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, Vol. 27, Issue 2, 2003, S. 35-54 Open Google Scholar
  277. ders., Enforcement of the Collective Will after Iraq, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2003, S. 804-823 Open Google Scholar
  278. ders., “Nicaragua is Dead, Long Live Nicaragua” – the Right to Self-defence Under Art. 51 UN-Charter and International Terrorism, in: C. Walter et al. (Hrsg.), Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law: Security versus Liberty?, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 169, 2004, S. 827-877 Open Google Scholar
  279. ders., Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 101, No. 1, 2007 S. 99-120 Open Google Scholar
  280. Starr-Deelen, Donna G., Presidential Policies on Terrorism: from Ronald Reagan to Barack Obama, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2014 Open Google Scholar
  281. Starski, Paulina, Right to Self-Defense, Attribution and the Non-State Actor – Birth of the “Unable or Unwilling” Standard?, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 75, 2015, S. 455-501 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2692422
  282. Steenberghe, Raphaël van, Self-Defense in Response to Attacks by Non-state Actors in the Light of Recent State Practice, A Step Forward?, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, 2010, S. 183-208 Open Google Scholar
  283. ders., From Passive Consent to Self-Defence after the Syrian Protest against the US-led Coalition, ejiltalk!, 23. Oktober 2015, http://www.ejiltalk.org/13758-2/ Open Google Scholar
  284. Steinberg, Guido, Der Islamische Staat im Irak und Syrien, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 26. August 2014, http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/islamismus/190499/der-islamische-staat-im-irak-und-syrien-isis Open Google Scholar
  285. Taft, IV, William H., Reflections on the ICJ's Oil Platform Decision: Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol 29, 2004, S. 295-306 Open Google Scholar
  286. Taft IV, William H.; Buchwald, Todd F., Preemption, Iraq and International Law, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2003, S. 557-563 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3109840
  287. Tams, Christian J., Light Treatment of a Complex Problem: The Law of Self-Defence in the Wall-Case, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2006, S. 963-978 Open Google Scholar
  288. ders., Note Analytique – Swimming With the Tide or Seeking to Stem It? Recent ICJ Rulings on the Law of Self-Defence, Revue québécoise de droit international, Vol. 18.2, 2005, S. 275-290 Open Google Scholar
  289. ders., The Use of Force Against Terrorists, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2009, S. 359-397 Open Google Scholar
  290. Tams, Christian J.; Devaney, James G., Applying Necessity and Proportionality to Anti-Terrorist Self-Defence, Israel Law Review, Vol. 45, Issue 1, 2012, S. 91-106 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0021223711000033
  291. Tezkan, Mehmet, Erdogan attempts to re-brand IS, Al-Monitor.com, 3. November 2014, http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2014/11/turkey-isis-becomes-deash-erdogan.html# Open Google Scholar
  292. Throup, David W., Kenya’s Intervention in Somalia, Center for Strategic & International Studies, Basic Info Commentary, 16. Februar 2012 Open Google Scholar
  293. Thürer, Daniel, Testfall Irak – Ist das Völkerrecht wirklich am Ende?, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 8. Februar 2003 Open Google Scholar
  294. Tomka, Peter, The Judge and International Custom, Presentation, 44. Réunion du Comité des Conseillers Juridiques sur le Droit International Public (CAHDI), Council of Europe, Paris, 21. September 2012, S. 27-48 Open Google Scholar
  295. Tomuschat, Christian, Der 11. September 2001 und seine rechtlichen Konsequenzen, Rechtspolitisches Forum, Heft 5, Institut für Rechtspolitik an der Universität Trier, 2001 Open Google Scholar
  296. ders., Der selbstverliebte Hegemon. Die USA und der Traum von einer unipolaren Welt, Internationale Politik 5, Mai 2003, S. 39-47 Open Google Scholar
  297. Trapp, Kimberley N., Back to Basics: Necessity, Proportionality, and the Right of Self Defence Against Non State Terrorist Actors, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 56, S. 141-156 Open Google Scholar
  298. Travalio, Greg; Altenburg, John, State Responsibility for Sponsorship of Terrorist and Insurgent Groups: Terrorism, State Responsibility, and the Use of Military Force, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, 2003, S. 97-119 Open Google Scholar
  299. Turner, Camilla; Swinford, Steven, David Cameron 'knew British pilots were bombing Syria' – as it happened, July 17, 2015, The Telegraph, 17. März 2015, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/11745689/British-pilots-in-air-strikes-against-Isil-in-Syria-live.html Open Google Scholar
  300. Vergau, Hans-Joachim, Können Kriege durch internationale Intervention verhindert oder beendet werden?, Florian Gerster (Hrsg.), Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Studie zur Außenpolitik No. 66, 1998 Open Google Scholar
  301. Graf Vitzthum, Wolfgang; Proelß, Alexander, Völkerrecht, 7. Auflage, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110441628-005
  302. Waisberg, Tatiana, Columbia’s Use of Force in Ecuador Against a Terrorist Organization: International Law and the Use of Force Against Non-State Actors, ASIL Insights, Vol. 12, Issue 17, 22. August 2008 Open Google Scholar
  303. Waldock, Sir Claud H.M., The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law, Recueil des Cours, Vol. 81, 1952, S. 451-517 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028611825.451-517
  304. Walser, Ray, The Crisis in the Andes: Ecuador, Venezuela, and Colombia, The Heritage Lectures No. 1080, The Heritage Foundation, Washington D.C., 2. Mai 2008 Open Google Scholar
  305. Walsh, Frank M., Rethinking the Legality of Columbia’s Attack in the FARC in Ecuador: A New Paradigm for Balancing Territorial Integrity, Self-Defense and the Duties of Sovereignty, Pace International Law Review, Vol. 21, 2009, S. 137-161 Open Google Scholar
  306. Wedgwood, Ruth, Responding to Terrorism: The Strikes Against bin Laden, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, 1999, S. 559-576 Open Google Scholar
  307. dies., The Fall of Saddam Hussein: Security Council Mandates and Preemptive Self-Defense, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2003, S. 576-585 Open Google Scholar
  308. dies., The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Israeli Security Fence and the Limits of Self-Defense, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 1, 2005, S. 52-61 Open Google Scholar
  309. Weed, Matthew C., 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force: Issues Concerning Its Continued Application, Congressional Research Service, R43983, 14. April 2015 Open Google Scholar
  310. Weiner, Alan S., The Use of Force and Contemporary Security Threats: Old Medicine for New Ills?, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 59, Issue 2, 2006, S. 415-504 Open Google Scholar
  311. Weisburd, Arther M., Use of Force: the Practice of States Since World War II, Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania, 1997 Open Google Scholar
  312. Weitz, Richard, Israeli Airstrike in Syria: International Reactions, Center for Nonproliferation Studies Feature Story, 1. November 2007 Open Google Scholar
  313. Wheatley, Steven, The Security Council, Democratic Legitimacy and Regime Change in Iraq, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, S. 531-551 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl018
  314. Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2006, S. 963-972 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei137
  315. Wintour, Patrick, UK could launch strikes against Isis in Syria without Assad's support, says PM, The Guardian, 4. September 2014, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/04/uk-launch-air-strikes-isis-syria-assad-support-pm Open Google Scholar
  316. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Irak – eine Krise auch für das System der kollektiven Sicherheit, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Heidelberg, 2003, http://www.mpil.de/files/pdf3/irak4.pdf Open Google Scholar
  317. ders., The Attack of September 11th, 2001, the Wars against the Taliban and Iraq: Is there a Need to Reconsider International Law on the Recourse to Force and the Rules in Armed Conflict?, in: Armin von Bogdandy/Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Vol. 7, Leiden/Boston, 2003, S. 1-78 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/138946303775160269
  318. Wright, Quincy, The Cuban Quarantine, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 57, No. 3, 1963, S. 546-565 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2196079
  319. Yoo, John, International Law and the War in Iraq, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2003, S. 563-576 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3109841
  320. ders., Using Force, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2004, S. 729-797 Open Google Scholar
  321. Zanotti, Jim; Katzman, Kenneth; Gertler, Jeremiah; Hildreth, Steven A., Israel: Possible Military Strike Against Iran’s Nuclear Facilities, Congressional Research Service, R42433, 28. September 2012 Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: »Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«
Book Titles No access
Hans G. Gnodtke
»Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex