Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Volume Open Access Full access

Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1

Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Authors:
Journal:
Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Publisher:
 2025

Summary

Culture, Practice and Europeanization (CPE) is an open access peer reviewed platform for publishing research-based articles predominantly dealing with research into the multiplicity of social processes, interactions, and policies relating to Europeanization and international encounters in Europe. Perspectives may be interdisciplinary. Empirical, theoretical and conceptual texts of significant originality will be considered for publication. CPE publishes foremost full-length original articles, but will also consider original reviews, conference speeches, and notes in order to inform the research community of most recent developments. CPE welcomes contributions that seek to enhance understanding of social processes relating to internationalization and further trans-national activities and processes in Europe.


Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
English
Product type
Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page I - II
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 1 - 2
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 3 - 26
In the process of Europeanisation, the local level takes an intermediary position between citizens and the European level. A special feature of local authorities’ European involvement is that many local Europe-related activities are developed and...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 27 - 46
When Russia launched its war of aggression against Ukraine on February 24, 2022, it was seen as a watershed moment in European history, dividing time into “before” and “after”. The German chancellor’s talk of a “turning point”...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 47 - 84
Digital platforms are reshaping how career success is understood in the music industry. Existing research has mainly focused on the effects of platforms on music production, visibility, and professional practices, yet it has seldom explored how...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 85 - 97
This article examines how the Schengen system generates new tensions between European integration and state sovereignty. Schengen challenges the traditional concept of sovereignty by transferring border control to the European level, while...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 98 - 109
Motivated by the growing political and economic significance of global talent mobility, this study focuses on municipal initiatives that aim to foster inclusion and retention. The purpose of this paper is to examine how Danish municipalities...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 110 - 126
The book Anti-Gender Mobilisations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (Smrdelj & Kuhar, 2025a) asks how feminists adapt their strategies over time in response to a new, hostile environment of anti-feminism. This review...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025
Authors:

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 127 - 127
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2025

Bibliography (398 entries)

  1. Ansell, Christopher K.; Sørensen, Eva; Torfing, Jacob (2022): Co-creation for sustainability. The UN SDGs and the power of local partnership. Bingley, UK: emerald publishing. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/58054/9781800437982.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  2. Bacon, Claudia (2016): Europa im Rathaus. EU-Arbeit der deutschen Großstädte. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  3. Baldassarri, Delia; Diani, Mario (2007): The Integrative Power of Civic Networks. In: American Journal of Sociology 113 (3), 735–780. DOI: 10.1086/521839. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  4. Barbehön, Marlon (2016): Europeanisation as Discursive Process: Urban Constructions of Europe and the Local Implementation of EU Directives. In: Journal of European Integration 38 (2), 163–177. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2015.1110147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  5. Benington, John; Harvey, Janet (1999): Networking in Europe. In: Gerry Stoker (Hg.): The New Management of British Local Governance. London: Macmillan Education UK, 197–221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  6. Bever, Eline; Reynaert, Herwig; Steyvers, Kristof (Hg.) (2011a): The road to Europe: main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe. Brruges: Vanden Broele Academics. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  7. Bever, Eline; Reynaert, Herwig; Steyvers, Kristof (2011b): Together we are strong(er). Cross-border cooperation in a EU multi-level system. In: Eline Bever, Herwig Reynaert und Kristof Steyvers (Hg.): The road to Europe: main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe. Brruges: Vanden Broele Academics, 233–252. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  8. Börzel, Tanja A.; Panke, Diana (2019): 8. Europeanization. In: Michelle Cini und Nieves Pérez-Solórzano Borragán (Hg.): European Union politics. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom, New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press, 115–126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  9. Callanan, Mark; Tatham, Michaël (2014): Territorial interest representation in the European Union: actors, objectives and strategies. In: Journal of European Public Policy 21 (2), 188–210. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.829579. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  10. Crossey, Nora; Weber, Florian (2024): Borderlands of Governance – Multilevel Cross-border Governance and Trajectories of Local Cross-border Ties in the Franco-German Moselle-Saarland Region. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 39 (6), 1061–1081. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2023.2276458. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  11. Dossi, Samuele (2017): Cities and the European Union: Mechanisms and Modes of Europeanisation: ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  12. European Commission (2008): Special Eurobarometer 307 (2008). The role and impact of local and regional authorities within the European Union. Opinions on the different levels of public authorities and awareness of the Committee of the Regions. Online verfügbar unter https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/939, last accessed 10.6.2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  13. Falkenhain, Mariella; Hoelscher, Michael; Ruser, Alexander (2012): Twinning Peaks—Potential and Limits of an Evolving Network in Shaping Europe as a Social Space. In: Journal of Civil Society 8 (3), 229–250. DOI: 10.1080/17448689.2012.738881. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  14. Frątczak-Müller, Joanna; Mielczarek-Żejmo, Anna (2020): Networks of cross-border cooperation in Europe – the interests and values. The case of Spree–Neisse–Bober Euroregion. In: European Planning Studies 28 (1), 8–34. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1623972. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  15. Gröbe, Benjamin; Grohs, Stephan; Porth, Jan (2023): Local responses to European Integration: patterns of Europe-related activities of German local governments. In: Local Government Studies 49 (6), 1410–1433. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2022.2105840. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  16. Gröbe, Benjamin; Grohs, Stephan; Reiter, Renate; Riese, Dorothee (2022): Die Europaaktivitäten der deutschen Städte und Gemeinden: Ergebnisbericht der schriftlichen Befragung Teil 1. In: KommZuEU Working Paper (2). DOI: 10.18445/20220706–115110–0. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  17. Guderjan, Marius (2015): Theorising European Integration of Local Government – Insights from the Fusion Approach. In: Local Government Studies 41 (6), 937–955. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2015.1057277. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  18. Guderjan, Marius; Miles, Lee (2016): The fusion approach – applications for understanding local government and European integration. In: Journal of European Integration 38 (6), 637–652. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1176028. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  19. Guderjan, Marius; Verhelst, Tom (2021): Local Government in the European Union. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  20. Hamedinger, Alexander; Wolffhardt, Alexander (2010): Understanding the interplay between Europe and the cities: Framework and Perspectives. In: Alexander Hamedinger und Alexander Wolffhardt (Hg.): The Europeanization of cities. Policies, urban change, & urban networks. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 9–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  21. Heidenreich, Martin (Hg.) (2019): Horizontal Europeanisation. The Transnationalisation of Daily Life and Social Fields in Europe. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  22. Heinelt, Hubert (2017): The role of cities in the institutional framework of the European Union. Study for the AFCO Committee. Hg. v. European Union. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  23. Huggins, Christopher (2018): Subnational Government and Transnational Networking: The Rationalist Logic of Local Level Europeanization. In: J Common Mark Stud 56 (6), 1263–1282. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12740. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  24. Jańczak, Jarosław (2017): Town Twinning in Europe. Understanding Manifestations and Strategies. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 32 (4), 477–495. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1267589. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  25. Joenniemi, Pertti; Jańczak, Jarosław (2017): Theorizing Town Twinning—Towards a Global Perspective. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 32 (4), 423–428. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1267583. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  26. John, Peter (2000): The Europeanisation of Sub-national Governance. In: Urban Studies 37 (5–6), 877–894. DOI: 10.1080/00420980050011136. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  27. Kajta, Justyna; Opiłowska, Elżbieta (2022): The Impact of Covid-19 on Structure and Agency in a Borderland. The Case of Two Twin Towns in Central Europe. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 37 (4), 699–721. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2021.1996259. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  28. Kapustāns, Jānis (2022): Effectiveness of the European Union grants to civil society in the Baltic states: an evaluation of the EU program ‘Europe for Citizens’ (2007–2020). In: EJES 13 (Special issue), 99–119. DOI: 10.47743/ejes-2022-SI06. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  29. Kern, Kristine; Bulkeley, Harriet (2009): Cities, Europeanization and Multi-level Governance: Governing Climate Change through Transnational Municipal Networks. In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (2), 309–332. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 5965.2009.00806.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  30. Klausen, Kurt Klaudi; Goldsmith, Michael (1997): Conclusion: Local Government and European Union. In: Michael Goldsmith und K. K. Klausen (Hg.): European Integration and Local Government. Cheltenham, Brookfield: Edward Elgar, 237–254. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  31. Klijn, E. H.; Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000): Public Management and Policy Networks. In: Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 2 (2), 135–158. DOI: 10.1080/14719030000000007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  32. Knoke, David (2011): Policy Networks. In: John Scott und Peter J. Carrington (Hg.): The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London, England: SAGE Publications, 210–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  33. Ladrech, Robert (1994): Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France. In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 32 (1), 69–88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 5965.1994.tb00485.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  34. Marshall, Adam (2005): Europeanization at the urban level: Local actors, institutions and the dynamics of multi-level interaction. In: Journal of European Public Policy 12 (4), 668–686. DOI: 10.1080/13501760500160292. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  35. Mau, Steffen (2015): Horizontale Europäisierung – eine soziologische Perspektive. In: Ulrike Liebert und Janna Wolff (Hg.): Interdisziplinäre Europastudien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 93–113. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  36. Mau, Steffen; Verwiebe, Roland (2010): European Societies. Mapping structure and change. Bristol: Policy Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  37. Münch, Claudia (2006): Emanzipation der lokalen Ebene? Kommunen auf dem Weg nach Europa. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  38. Olsen, Johan P. (2002): The Many Faces of Europeanization. In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5), 921–952. DOI: 10.1111/1468–5965.00403. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  39. Paasch, Jana (2022): Revisiting Policy Preferences and Capacities in the EU: Multi‐level policy implementation in the subnational authorities. In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (3), 783–800. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13286. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  40. Radaelli, Claudio M. (2003): The Europeanization of Public Policy. In: Kevin Featherstone und Claudio M. Radaelli (Hg.): The Politics of Europeanization: Oxford University Press, 27–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  41. Reiter, Renate; Riese, Dorothee; Grohs, Stephan; Gröbe, Benjamin (2024): Framing Europe on the local level – policy networks in German cities and their activities for political cohesion in Europe. In: Urban Research & Practice 17 (5), 737–757. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2024.2342456. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  42. Risse, Thomas; Cowles, Maria Green; Caporaso, James (2001): 1. Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction. In: James Caporaso, Maria Green Cowles und Thomas Risse (Hg.): Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (Cornell Studies in Political Economy), 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  43. Røiseland, Asbjørn; Sørensen, Eva; Torfing, Jacob (2024): What to do when co-creation clashes with old public governance paradigms? In: Asbjørn Røiseland, Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing, Mette Aagaard, Janne Paulsen Breimo und Sofie Loklindt Christensen (Hg.): Advancing co-creation in local governance. The role of coping strategies and constructive hybridization. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing (Policy, administrative and institutional change), 1–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  44. Rooij, Rob de (2002): The impact of the European Union on local government in the Netherlands. In: Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3), 447–467. DOI: 10.1080/13501760210139713. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  45. Svensson, Sara (2015): The Bordered World of Cross-border Cooperation: The Determinants of Local Government Contact Networks within Euroregions. In: Regional & Federal Studies 25 (3), 277–295. DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2015.1043995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  46. Teles, Filipe; Gendźwiłł, Adam; Stănuș, Cristina; Heinelt, Hubert (Hg.) (2021): Close ties in European local governance. Linking local state and society. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan (Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  47. Verhelst, Tom (2017): Processes and patterns of urban Europeanisation: Evidence from the EUROCITIES network. In: Territorio della Ricerca su Insediamenti e Ambiente 10 (1), 75–96. DOI: 10.6092/2281–4574/5310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  48. Vink, Maarten P.; Graziano, Paolo (2008): Challenges of a New Research Agenda. In: Paolo Graziano und Maarten P. Vink (Hg.): Europeanization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 3–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  49. Zerbinati, Stefania (2004): Europeanization and EU funding in Italy and England. A comparative local perspective. In: Journal of European Public Policy 11 (6), 1000–1019. DOI: 10.1080/1350176042000298075. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  50. Zerbinati, Stefania; Massey, Andrew (2008): Italian and English Local Funding Networks: Is there a Winning Formula? In: Local Government Studies 34 (1), 81–104. DOI: 10.1080/03003930701770504. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-3
  51. Kraemer, K. (2022). How do state authorities act under existential uncertainty? Hypoth-eses on the social logic of political decision-making processes during the Coronavirus pandemic. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 7(1), 5–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  52. Kraemer, K., & Steg, J. (2025). When normality collapses from one moment to the next. A sociological theory of singular crisis. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  53. Luhmann, N. (1991). Am Ende der kritischen Soziologie. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 20(2), 147–152. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  54. Luhmann, N. (2003). Soziologie des Risikos (Unveränd. Nachdr. der Ausg. von 1991). Ber-lin, New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  55. Luhmann, N. (2008). Ökologische Kommunikation (5th ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  56. Nassehi, A. (2012). Der Ausnahmezustand als Normalfall. Kursbuch, 48(170), 34–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  57. Thorén, H., & Olsson, L. (2017). Is resilience a normative concept? Resilience, 6(2), 112–128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  58. Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  59. Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, ad 990-1992. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  60. Tilly, C. (1993). European revolutions, 1492-1992. Oxford, UK, Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  61. Tilly, C. (2004). Contention and democracy in Europe, 1650-2000. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  62. Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy (1st ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-27
  63. Airoldi, M. (2018). Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 661–673. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  64. Anacin, C. (2023). “Can you hear me? Are we live yet?”: An autoethnography of online live mu-sic performances amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 10(3), 256–280. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  65. Anderson, T. L., Grunert, C., Katz, A., & Lovascio, S. (2010). Aesthetic capital: A research review on beauty perks and penalties. Sociology Compass, 4(8), 564–575. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  66. Arditi, D. (2020). Getting signed: Record contracts, musicians, and power in society. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  67. Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory ex-periments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 73–93. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  68. Aspers, P. (2009). Knowledge and valuation in markets. Theory and Society, 38(2), 111–131. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  69. Aspers, P. (2011). Markets. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  70. Aspray, W. (2008). File sharing and the music industry. In W. Aspray & P. E. Ceruzzi (Eds.), The Internet and American business (451–489). MIT Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  71. Barna, E. (2019). Curators as taste entrepreneurs in the digital music industries. In E. Mazierska, L. Gillon, & T. Rigg (Eds.), Popular music in the post-digital age: Politics, economy, culture and technology (253–268). Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  72. Bartleet, B. L., Ballico, C., Bennett, D., Bridgstock, R., Draper, P., Tomlinson, V., & Harrison, S. (2019). Building sustainable portfolio careers in music: Insights and implications for higher edu-cation. Music Education Research, 21(3), 282–294. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  73. Bataille, P., & Perrenoud, M. (2021). “One for the money”? The impact of the “disk crisis” on “ordinary musicians” income: The case of French speaking Switzerland. Poetics, 86, 101552. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  74. Baym, N. K. (2011). The Swedish model: Balancing markets and gifts in the music industry. Popu-lar Communication, 9(1), 22–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  75. Baym, N. K. (2013). Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics. First Monday, 18(10). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  76. Baym, N. K. (2018). Playing to the crowd: Musicians, audiences, and the intimate work of connec-tion. New York University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  77. Bernardo, F., & Martins, L. G. (2014). Disintermediation effects on independent approaches to music business. International Journal of Music Business Research, 3(2), 7–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  78. Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1994). All hits are flukes: Institutionalized decision making and the rhetoric of network prime-time program development. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5), 1287–1313. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  79. Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019). “First week is editorial, second week is algorithmic”: Platform gatekeepers and the platformization of music curation. Social Media + Society, 5(4). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  80. Bonini, T., & Magaudda, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Where the music of the future is head-ing. In Platformed! How streaming, algorithms and artificial intelligence are shaping music cul-tures (121–148). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  81. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  82. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Har-vard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  83. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and re-search for the sociology of education (241–258). Greenwood Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  84. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  85. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  86. Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television (P. P. Ferguson, Trans.). The New Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  87. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  88. Bourdieu, P. (2005). Principles of an economic anthropology. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (2nd ed., 75–89). Princeton University Press; Russell Sage Foundation. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  89. Breen, M. (2004). The music industry, technology and utopia: An exchange between Marcus Breen and Eamonn Forde. Popular Music, 23(1), 79–89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  90. Brock, A., Kvasny, L., & Hales, K. (2010). Cultural appropriations of technical capital: Black wom-en, weblogs, and the digital divide. Information, Communication & Society, 13(7), 1040–1059. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  91. Bröndum, L. (2019). Where do we go from here? The future of composers in the post-digital era. In E. Mazierska, L. Gillon, & T. Rigg (Eds.), Popular music in the post-digital age: Politics, economy, culture and technology (155–170). Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  92. Brooks, T. (2004). Introduction: Lost, stolen, or strayed? In Lost sounds: Blacks and the birth of the recording industry, 1890–1919 (1–11). University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  93. Brown, H. (2012). Valuing independence: Esteem value and its role in the independent music scene. Popular Music and Society, 35(4), 519–539. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  94. Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  95. Bucher, T. (2016). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algo-rithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  96. Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  97. Burgess, J. (2021). Platform studies. In S. Cunningham & D. Craig (Eds.), Creator culture: An intro-duction to global social media entertainment (21–38). NYU Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  98. Cannizzo, F., Strong, C., & Brunt, S. (2023). Career reconstruction: Mid-career transformations in the Australian music industries. Creative Industries Journal, 18(2), 305–322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  99. Carter, E. (2024). Poverty among riches: Understanding the contracted economy for recorded music and its impact on market actors. Journal of Cultural Economy, 17(3), 345–359. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  100. Cayari, C. (2011). The YouTube effect: How YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12(6), 1–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  101. Charles, C. D. (2020). Genre in practice: Categories, metadata and music-making in psytrance culture. Dancecult: Journal of Electronic Dance Music Culture, 12(1), 22–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  102. Charlesworth, S. J. (2000). A phenomenology of working class experience (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  103. Chen, W. (2013). The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America. The Infor-mation Society, 29(1), 13–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  104. Chen, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Surviving in the digital age: The impacts of technology evolutions on classical musicians’ career development. In C. Leone (Ed.), Career development: Challenges and opportunities in contemporary societies. IntechOpen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  105. Chircu, A. M., & Kauffman, R. J. (1999). Strategies for Internet middlemen in the intermedia-tion/disintermediation/reintermediation cycle. Electronic Markets, 9(1–2), 109–117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  106. Cho, D., Hwang, Y., & Park, J. (2018). More buzz, more vibes: Impact of social media on concert distribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 156, 103–113. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  107. Choi, G. Y. (2016). “Who Run the Music? Girls!”: Examining the construction of female digital musicians’ online presence. Popular Music and Society, 40(4), 474–487. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  108. Connell, K., Brown, A. R., & Baker, S. (2020). The rise and fall of professional singers: A typology of creative career stages in the performing arts. In A. de Dios & L. Kong (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of creativity (200–215). Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  109. da Silva Henrique, J., Machado, A. F., & Antigo, M. F. (2023). Work satisfaction and job perma-nence in artistic careers: The case of musicians in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Journal of Cultural Eco-nomics, 47(4), 693–718. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  110. De Notaris, D., & Savonardo, L. (2022). The digitalization of sound: How the consumption of mu-sic changed from vinyl to hybrid experiences. Italian Sociological Review, 12(1), 159. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  111. de Zúñiga, H. G., Barnidge, M., & Scherman, A. (2018). Social media social capital, offline social capital, and citizenship: Exploring asymmetrical social capital effects. In Digital politics: Mobiliza-tion, engagement and participation (44–68). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  112. Deldjoo, Y., Schedl, M., & Knees, P. (2024). Content-driven music recommendation: Evolution, state of the art, and challenges. Computer Science Review, 51, 100618. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  113. deWaard, A. (2021). Wall Street’s content wars: Financing media consolidation (Working paper). UC San Diego. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  114. Eiriz, V., & Leite, F. P. (2017). The digital distribution of music and its impact on the business models of independent musicians. The Service Industries Journal, 37(13–14), 875–895. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  115. Emmison, M., & Frow, J. (1998). Information technology as cultural capital. Australian Universi-ties’ Review, 41(1), 41–45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  116. Evans, J. M., & Baym, N. K. (2022). The audacity of clout (chasing): Digital strategies of Black youth in Chicago DIY hip-hop. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2669–2687. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  117. Everts, R. (2023). Making it big in live music: A multilevel analysis of careers in live music. Cultur-al Trends, 33(5), 660–679. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  118. Everts, R., Berkers, P., & Hitters, E. (2022). Milestones in music: Reputations in the career build-ing of musicians in the changing Dutch music industry. Poetics, 92, 101647. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  119. Everts, R., Hitters, E., & Berkers, P. (2021). The working life of musicians: Mapping the work activ-ities and values of early-career pop musicians in the Dutch music industry. Creative Industries Journal, 15(1), 97–117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  120. Florina, P., & Andreea, M. (2012). Social media and marketing of the “popcorn” music wave: The success of Romanian commercial musicians analysed through their perceived image on Face-book and YouTube. Economics & Sociology, 5(2A), 125–139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  121. Fry, A. (2019). An echoic chamber: Algorithmic curation and personalized listening. In E. Mazi-erska, L. Gillon, & T. Rigg (Eds.), Popular music in the post-digital age: Politics, economy, culture and technology (269–290). Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  122. Galuszka, P., & Wyrzykowska, K. M. (2017). Artist and repertoire goes online: Evidence from Po-land. Media Industries Journal, 4(1). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  123. Gandini, A. (2016). Digital work: Self-branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 123–141. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  124. Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  125. Giuffre, K. (1999). Sandpiles of opportunity: Success in the art world. Social Forces, 77(3), 815–832. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  126. Gourévitch, B. (2023). Billboard 200: The lessons of musical success in the U.S. Music & Science, 6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  127. Graf, A., & Lueg, K. (2025). Reworking boundaries: A qualitative case study on engineers’ profes-sional identity and habitus in the face of digital transformation. Management Revue, 36(3), Arti-cle 46861. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  128. Gross, S.-A., & Musgrave, G. (2020). Can music make you sick? Measuring the price of musical ambition. University of Westminster Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  129. Gupta, S., Kaur, K., & Jain, S. (2024). EqBal-RS: Mitigating popularity bias in recommender sys-tems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 62, 509–534. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  130. Hagen, A. N. (2021). Datafication, literacy, and democratization in the music industry. Popular Music and Society, 45(2), 184–201. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  131. Hansen, K. A., & Bickford, T. (2023). Negotiating girlhood in rock music: Nandi Bushell, prodigy discourse and adult mentor-fans. Popular Music, 42(2), 123–142. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  132. Haynes, J., & Marshall, L. (2018). Beats and tweets: Social media in the careers of independent musicians. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1973–1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  133. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. SAGE. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  134. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2006). Bourdieu, the media and cultural production. Media, Culture & Socie-ty, 28(2), 211–231. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  135. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2020). Is music streaming bad for musicians? Problems of evidence and ar-gument. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3593–3615. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  136. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Meier, L. M. (2014). Popular music, independence and the concept of the alternative in contemporary capitalism. In J. Bennett & N. Strange (Eds.), Media independence: Working with freedom or working for free? (94–116). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  137. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Meier, L. M. (2017). What the digitalisation of music tells us about capital-ism, culture and the power of the information technology sector. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1555–1570. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  138. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Sun, H. (2024). How working musicians (finally) became a matter of main-stream political interest. In D. Arditi & R. Nolan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical music industry studies. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  139. Hirsch, P. M. (1972). Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural indus-try systems. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 639–659. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  140. Hodgson, T. (2021). Spotify and the democratisation of music. Popular Music, 40(1), 1–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  141. Holla, S., & Kuipers, G. (2016). Aesthetic capital. In L. Hanquinet & M. Savage (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of the sociology of art and culture (290–303). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  142. Hracs, B. J. (2012). A creative industry in transition: The rise of digitally driven independent mu-sic production. Growth and Change, 43(3), 442–461. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  143. Hracs, B. J. (2016). Working harder and working smarter: The survival strategies of contemporary independent musicians. In B. J. Hracs, M. Seman, & T. E. Virani (Eds.), The production and con-sumption of music in the digital age (41–55). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  144. Hughes, D., Keith, S., Morrow, G., Evans, M., & Crowdy, D. (2013). What constitutes artist success in the Australian music industries? International Journal of Music Business Research, 2(2), 61–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  145. Ignatow, G., & Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital. Information, Commu-nication & Society, 20(7), 950–966. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  146. Järvekülg, M., & Wikström, P. (2022). The emergence of promotional gatekeeping and converged local music professionals on social media. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 28(5), 1358–1375. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  147. Jerasa, S., & Burriss, S. K. (2024). Writing with, for, and against the algorithm: TikTokers’ relation-ships with AI as audience, co-author, and censor. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(1), 118–134. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  148. Jones, E. (2021). The popular: Metrics, measurements and the DIY imagination. In DIY music and the politics of social media (103–119). Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  149. Jones, M. L. (1997). Organising pop: Why so few pop acts make pop music (Publication No. 2473824692) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  150. Julien, C. (2015). Bourdieu, social capital and online interaction. Sociology, 49(2), 356–373. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  151. Leguina, A., & Downey, J. (2021). Getting things done: Inequalities, Internet use and everyday life. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1824–1849. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  152. Karakayali, N., Kostem, B., & Galip, I. (2018). Recommendation systems as technologies of the self: Algorithmic control and the formation of music taste. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(2), 3–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  153. Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Algorithmic folk theories and iden-tity: How TikTok users co-produce knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  154. Kjus, Y. (2016). Musical exploration via streaming services: The Norwegian experience. Popular Communication, 14(3), 127–136. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  155. Kopf, S. (2025). Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS) – four approaches to studying social media through the critical lens. Critical Discourse Studies. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  156. Kozbelt, A. (2005). Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of the musical genres of Mozart. Psychology of Music, 33(3), 235–255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  157. Kukkonen, I., Pajunen, T., Sarpila, O., & Åberg, E. (2024). Is beauty-based inequality gendered? A systematic review of gender differences in socioeconomic outcomes of physical attractiveness in labor markets. European Societies, 26(1), 117–148. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  158. Kwon, H., Kim, S., & Yang, J. (2018). What makes them dream on?: The influence of social and psychological assets on young musicians’ decision to stay in the profession. Development and Society, 47(3), 371–400. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  159. Laor, T., & Galily, Y. (2020). The annual music charts: The communal musical taste mix in Israel. Israel Affairs, 26(6), 928–959. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  160. Leenders, M. A. A. M., Farrell, M. A., Zwaan, K., & ter Bogt, T. F. M. (2015). How are young music artists configuring their media and sales platforms in the digital age? Journal of Marketing Man-agement, 31(17–18), 1799–1817. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  161. Levina, N., & Arriaga, M. (2014). Distinction and status production on user-generated content platforms: Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural production to understand social dynamics in online fields. Information Systems Research, 25(3), 468–488. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  162. Leyshon, A. (2009). The software slump?: Digital music, the democratisation of technology, and the decline of the recording studio sector within the musical economy. Environment and Plan-ning A: Economy and Space, 41(6), 1309–1331. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  163. Liebowitz, S. J. (2004). Will MP3 downloads annihilate the record industry? The evidence so far. In G. D. Libecap (Ed.), Intellectual property and entrepreneurship (229–260). Emerald Group Pub-lishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  164. Lueg, K., Graf, A., & Boje, D. (2023). A Danish case study of a sociomaterial construction of a new nomos and purpose of higher education. Higher Education, 85(2), 455–472. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  165. Lundahl, O. (2020). Algorithmic meta-capital: Bourdieusian analysis of social power through al-gorithms in media consumption. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1440–1455. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  166. Maasø, A., & Hagen, A. N. (2019). Metrics and decision-making in music streaming. Popular Communication, 18(1), 18–31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  167. Maasø, A., & Spilker, H. S. (2022). The streaming paradox: Untangling the hybrid gatekeeping mechanisms of music streaming. Popular Music and Society, 45(3), 300–316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  168. Malcomson, H. (2013). Composing individuals: Ethnographic reflections on success and prestige in the British new music network. Twentieth-Century Music, 10(1), 115–136. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  169. Maliński, J. (2017). Attention capital as a result of the emergence of social media. Adeptus, (10), 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  170. Marrington, M. (2024). Cultural entrepreneurship in historical and contemporary context: Per-spectives on repertoire construction and recording practice in the field of classical guitar per-formance. In R. Hepworth-Sawyer, M. Marrington, J. Hall, & E. Beaumont (Eds.), Contemporary enterprise and entrepreneurship in context (213–228). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  171. Maudonnet, D. L., Wood, T., & Bendassolli, P. F. (2019). From know-how to know-when: Strate-gies that Brazilian musicians use to reorient their careers in the face of technological and insti-tutional changes. International Journal of Arts Management, 21(3), 14–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  172. McLeod, K. (2005). MP3s are killing home taping: The rise of Internet distribution and its chal-lenge to the major label music monopoly. Popular Music and Society, 28(4), 521–531. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  173. Meier, L. M. (2017). Popular music as promotion: Music and branding in the digital age. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  174. Menger, P.-M. (2014). The economics of creativity: Art and achievement under uncertainty (S. Rendall, A. Jacobs, A. Dorval, L. Eskinazi, E. Saada, & J. Karaganis, Trans.). Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  175. Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  176. Merisalo, M. (2016). Electronic capital: Economic and social geographies of digitalization [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. University of Helsinki. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  177. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  178. Messitte, N. (2014, November 30). How payola laws keep independent artists off mainstream radio. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmessitte/2014/11/30/how-payola-laws-keep-independent-artists-off-mainstream-radio/ (last accessed: 2025, November 25). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  179. Morgan, B. A. (2019). Revenue, access, and engagement via the in-house curated Spotify playlist in Australia. Popular Communication, 18(1), 32–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  180. Morris, J. W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 446–463. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  181. Morris, J. W. (2020). Music platforms and the optimization of culture. Social Media + Society, 6(3). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  182. Murphy, S., & Hume, M. (2023). The new digital music marketing ecosystem: Artist direct. Crea-tive Industries Journal, 18(2), 172–204. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  183. Negus, K. (2002). The work of cultural intermediaries and the enduring distance between pro-duction and consumption. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 501–515. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  184. Negus, K. (2011). Producing pop: Culture and conflict in the popular music industry (Original work published 1992). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  185. Negus, K. (2019). From creator to data: The post-record music industry and the digital conglom-erates. Media, Culture & Society, 41(3), 367–384. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  186. Netherton, J. (2017). The entrepreneurial imperative: Recording artists in extreme metal music proto-markets. Metal Music Studies, 3(3), 369–386. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  187. Ng, J., & Gamble, S. (2024). Hip-hop music producers’ labour in the digital music economy: Self-promotion, social media and platform gatekeeping. New Media & Society, Advance online publi-cation. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  188. Nørholm Lundin, A. (2022). “Where is your fixed point?” Dealing with ambiguous freelance mu-sician careers. Cultural Trends, 32(3), 231–246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  189. O’Dair, M., & Fry, A. (2019). Beyond the black box in music streaming: The impact of recommen-dation systems upon artists. Popular Communication, 18(1), 65–77. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  190. Ogden, J. R., Ogden, D. T., & Long, K. (2011). Music marketing: A history and landscape. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(2), 120–125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  191. Ollier-Malaterre, A., Jacobs, J. A., & Rothbard, N. P. (2019). Technology, work, and family: Digital cultural capital and boundary management. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 425–447. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  192. Österblom, H., Jouffray, J.-B., Folke, C., Crona, B., Troell, M., Merrie, A., & Rockström, J. (2015). Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0127533. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  193. Paino, M., & Renzulli, L. A. (2013). Digital dimension of cultural capital: The (in)visible ad-vantages for students who exhibit computer skills. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 124–138. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  194. Perrin, A. (2020). The innovative business model of Daft Punk. In P. Roy & E. Pellegrin-Boucher (Eds.), Innovation in the cultural and creative industries (55–75). John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  195. Peterson, R. A., & Berger, D. G. (1975). Cycles in symbol production: The case of popular music. American Sociological Review, 40(2), 158–173. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  196. Pilati, F., Houssard, A., & Sacco, P. L. (2024). Mirroring the inequalities of mainstream music platforms: Popularity, revenue, and monetization strategies on Bandcamp. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 31(3), 338–357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  197. Podolny, J. (2005). Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  198. Polak, N., & Schaap, J. (2025). Write, record, optimize? How musicians reflect on music optimiza-tion strategies in the creative production process. New Media & Society, 27(8), 4773–4789. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  199. Pras, A., Guastavino, C., & Lavoie, M. (2013). The impact of technological advances on recording studio practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 612–626. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  200. Prey, R. (2018). Nothing personal: Algorithmic individuation on music streaming platforms. Me-dia, Culture & Society, 40(7), 1086–1100. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  201. Prey, R. (2020a). Locating power in platformization: Music streaming playlists and curatorial power. Social Media + Society, 6(2). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  202. Prey, R. (2020b). Performing numbers: Musicians and their metrics. In D. Stark (Ed.), The perfor-mance complex: Competition and competitions in social life (241–258). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  203. Prey, R., & Lee, S. (2024). Platform closure and creator creep: What we can learn from Korean indie musicians. International Journal of Communication, 18, 4167–4186. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  204. Qu, S., Hesmondhalgh, D., & Xiao, J. (2021). Music streaming platforms and self-releasing musi-cians: The case of China. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 699–715. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  205. Raffa, M. (2025). Self-brand or be branded out: The convergence of mainstream and independ-ent music talent scouting under platform capitalism. Cultural Sociology, 0(0). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  206. Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  207. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2020). Measuring digital capital: An empirical investiga-tion. New Media & Society, 22(5), 793–816. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  208. Rauh, A. (2024). Showing off as selling out: Online (self-)promotional strategies of grassroots electronic dance musicians. Popular Music and Society, 47(5), 582–603. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  209. Reitsamer, R. (2011). The DIY careers of techno and drum ’n’ bass DJs in Vienna. Dancecult: Jour-nal of Electronic Dance Music Culture, 3(1), 28–43. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  210. Rogers, I. (2013a). The hobbyist majority and the mainstream fringe: The pathways of independ-ent music-making in Brisbane, Australia. In S. Baker, A. Bennett, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining mainstream popular music (162–173). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  211. Rogers, J. (2013b). The death and life of the music industry in the digital age. Bloomsbury Aca-demic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  212. Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  213. Sarpila, O., Kukkonen, I., Pajunen, T., & Åberg, E. (2021). Introduction. In O. Sarpila, I. Kukkonen, T. Pajunen, & E. Åberg (Eds.), Appearance as capital: The normative regulation of aesthetic capital accumulation and conversion (1–19). Emerald Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  214. Schmitz, A. (2017). The structure of digital partner choice: A Bourdieusian perspective. Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  215. Schmutz, V. (2016). Commercialization and consecration: Media attention to popular music in the US and the Netherlands, 1975–2005. Poetics, 59, 82–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  216. Schwetter, H. (2019). From record contract to artrepreneur? Musicians’ self-management and the changing illusio in the music market. Kritika Kultura, (32), Article 11. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  217. Scott, M. (2012). Cultural entrepreneurs, cultural entrepreneurship: Music producers mobilising and converting Bourdieu’s alternative capitals. Poetics, 40(3), 237–255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  218. Seaver, N. (2022). Computing taste: Algorithms and the makers of music recommendation. Univer-sity of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  219. Sen, A. (2010). Music in the digital age: Musicians and fans around the world “come together” on the net. Global Media Journal, 9(16), 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  220. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). Longman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  221. Simonton, D. K. (1986). Aesthetic success in classical music: A computer analysis of 1935 compo-sitions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4(1), 1–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  222. Smith, C., Smith, J. B., & Shaw, E. (2017). Embracing digital networks: Entrepreneurs’ social capi-tal online. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 18–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  223. Smith, N. T., & Thwaites, R. (2019). The composition of precarity: ‘Emerging’ composers’ experi-ences of opportunity culture in contemporary classical music. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 589–609. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  224. Spilker, H. S. (2012). The network studio revisited: Becoming an artist in the age of “piracy cul-tures”. International Journal of Communication, 6, 773–794. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  225. Spotify for Artists. (2023, November 21). Modernizing our royalty system to drive an additional 1 billion toward emerging and professional artists. Retrieved from https://artists.spotify.com/en/blog/modernizing-our-royalty-system (last accessed: 2025, No-vember 25). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  226. Sutton, A. C. (2020). The composition of success: Competition and the creative self in contempo-rary art music. Qualitative Sociology, 43(4), 489–513. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  227. Tessler, H., & Flynn, M. (2015). From DIY to D2F: Contextualizing entrepreneurship for the artist/musician. In A. Dumbreck & G. McPherson (Eds.), Music entrepreneurship (47–73). Me-thuen Drama. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  228. Thomson, K. (2013). Roles, revenue, and responsibilities: The changing nature of being a work-ing musician. Work and Occupations, 40(4), 514–525. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  229. Tintiangko, J., Fung, A. Y. H., & Leo-Liu, J. (2023). Compelled TikTok creators? The ambivalent affordances of the short video app for Filipino musicians. Media, Culture & Society, 45(8), 1600–1615. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  230. Toval-Gajardo, M., Soto Roy, Á., Manríquez, F., & Fortes, G. (2025). Voices and melodies of artis-tic precarity: The unbearable flexibility of subjectivity in Chilean independent musicians. Human Arenas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  231. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203–217. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  232. Vakalopoulos, K. (2023). Shedding some (more) light in Bourdieu’s habitus and doxa: A socio‐phenomenological approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 53(2), 255–270. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  233. van den Berg, M., & Arts, J. (2019). The aesthetics of work-readiness: Aesthetic judgements and pedagogies for conditional welfare and post-Fordist labour markets. Work, Employment & Socie-ty, 33(2), 298–313. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  234. van Kan, M. (2025). Digitalization and the long tail: Perspectives of music producers from Småland. In M. Knust (Ed.), Pop music made in Småland: Music production and entrepreneurship in Sweden (127–139). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  235. Verwiebe, R., & Hagemann, S. (2024). Bourdieu revisited: New forms of digital capital – emer-gence, reproduction, inequality of distribution. Information, Communication & Society, 28(11), 1861–1883. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  236. Villanueva-Mansilla, E., Nakano, T., & Evaristo, I. (2015). From divides to capitals: An exploration of digital divides as expressions of social and cultural capital. In L. Robinson, J. Schulz, S. R. Cotten, T. M. Hale, A. A. Williams, & J. L. Hightower (Eds.), Communication and information tech-nologies annual (89–117). Emerald Group. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  237. Wang, Q., & de Kloet, J. (2016). From “nothing to my name” to “I am a singer”: Market, capital, and politics in the Chinese music industry. In M. Keane (Ed.), Handbook of cultural and creative industries in China (293–310). Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  238. Watson, A., Watson, J. B., & Tompkins, L. (2022). Does social media pay for music artists? Quanti-tative evidence on the co-evolution of social media, streaming and live music. Journal of Cultural Economy, 16(1), 32–46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  239. Westby, D. L. (1960). The career experience of the symphony musician. American String Teacher, 10(3), 16–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  240. Wikström, P. (2019). The music industry: Music in the cloud (3rd ed.). Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  241. Woods, C. R. (2023). Orchestrating the ecosystem: How music-making is transformed in the digital age (Publication No. 31104528) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool]. ProQuest Disser-tations & Theses Global. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  242. Woods, C., & Davis, J. (2024). Exploring the origins of digital burnout in the music industries and what to do about it. In D. Arditi & R. Nolan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical music indus-try studies (169–187). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  243. Zhang, X., Chu, X., Liang, H., & He, J. (2024). Exploring music geography beyond the West: Clus-tering and mobility of Chinese musicians in the digital era. Geoforum, 150, 103990. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  244. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mime-sis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  245. Zwaan, K., & ter Bogt, T. F. M. (2009). Research note: Breaking into the popular record industry: An insider’s view on the career entry of pop musicians. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 89–101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  246. Zwaan, K., ter Bogt, T. F. M., & Raaijmakers, Q. (2009). So you want to be a rock ‘n’ roll star? Career success of pop musicians in the Netherlands. Poetics, 37(3), 250–266. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-47
  247. Bach, Maurizio 2010. Die Konstitution von Räumen und Grenzbildung in Europa. Von verhandlungsresistenten zu verhandlungsabhängigen Grenzen. In: Monika Eigmüller, Steffen Mau (Hg.), Gesellschaftstheorie und Europapolitik. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 153–178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  248. Bach, Maurizio 2013. Jenseits der Souveränitätsfiktion. Der Nationalstaat in der Europä-ischen Union. In: Maurizio Bach (Hg.), Der entmachtete Leviathan. Löst sich der souve-räne Staat auf? für Politik, Sonderband 5. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 105–124. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  249. Cantó i Milà, Natalia 2016. Die Grenze als Relation. Spanische Grenzrealität und euro-päische Grenzpolitik. In: Monika Eigmüller, Georg Vobruba (Hg.), Grenzsoziologie. Die politische Strukturierung des Raumes. Wiesbaden. Springer VS. 183–195. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  250. Eigmüller, Monika 2007. Grenzsicherungspolitik. Funktion und Wirkungen der europäi-schen Außengrenze. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  251. Eigmüller, Monika 2016. Der duale Charakter der Grenze. Bedingungen einer aktuellen Grenz-theorie. In: Monika Eigmüller, Georg Vobruba (Hg.), Grenzsoziologie. Die politi-sche Strukturierung des Raumes. Wiesbaden. Springer VS. 49–68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  252. Hilpert, Isabel 2020. Die doppelt codierte Grenze und der Nationalstaat in Europa. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  253. Hilpert, Isabel, Georg Vobruba 2025. Grenzen. In: Martin Endreß, Benjamin Rampp (Hg.) Politische Soziologie. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 851–855. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  254. Jellinek, Georg 1900/1960. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buch-gesellschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  255. Koselleck, Reinhard 1990. Staat und Souveränität (Vorbemerkung). In: Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, Reinhard Koselleck (Hg.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Bd. 6. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. 1–4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  256. Lepsius, M. Rainer 2000/2013. Die Europäische Union als rechtlich konstituierte Verhal-tensstrukturierung. In: M. Rainer Lepsius, Institutionalisierung politischen Handelns. Wiesbaden Springer VS. 204–221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  257. Luhmann Niklas 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. 2 Bände. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhr-kamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  258. Luhmann, Niklas 2000. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  259. Müller, Andreas 2014. Governing Mobility Beyond the State. Centre, Periphery and the EU’s External Borders. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  260. Müller, Jan-Werner 2016. Was ist Populismus? Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  261. Mudde, Cas 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, Vol. 39/4. 541–563. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  262. Nail, Thomas 2021. Critical Limology – ein Ansatz kritischer Grenzforschung. In: Dominik Gerst, Maria Klessmann, Hannes Krämer (Hg.), Grenzforschung. Handbuch für Wissen-schaft und Studium. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 475–489. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  263. Schindler, Larissa 2021. Grenze und Mobilität – ein vielfältiges Forschungsgebiet. In: Dominik Gerst, Maria Klessmann, Hannes Krämer (Hg.), Grenzforschung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 331–344. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  264. Simmel, Georg 1908/1992. Soziologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  265. Schmitt, Carl 1932/1996. Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  266. Vobruba, Georg 2003. The enlargement crisis of the European Union: limits of the dia-lectics of integration and expansion. Journal of European Social Policy, 13/1. 35–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  267. Vobruba, Georg 2007. Die Dynamik Europas. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  268. Vobruba, Georg 2016a. Borders Within the Dynamism of Europe: European Migration Regimes Between Exclusion and Inclusion. In: David L. Leal, Nestor P. Rodríguez (eds.), Migration in an Aera of Restriction and Recession. Springer International. 165–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  269. Vobruba, Georg 2016b. Grenzsoziologie als Beobachtung zweiter Ordnung. In: Monika Eigmüller, Georg Vobruba (Hg.), Grenzsoziologie. Die politische Strukturierung des Raumes. Wiesbaden. Springer VS. 215–223. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  270. Vobruba, Georg 2019. The logic of populism. Consequences of the clash between com-plexity and simple thinking. Culture, Practice & Europeanization. Vol. 4, No. 2. 102–106. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  271. Vobruba, Georg 2023. European Integration as Complementary Institution-Building: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Stefanie Börner, Martin Seeleib-Kaiser (eds.), Eu-ropean Social Policy and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Oxford: OUP. 306–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  272. Vobruba, Georg 2024. Das Verschwörungsweltbild. Denken gegen die Moderne. Basel, Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-85
  273. Aarhus International Strategi 2025–2030. Aarhus Municipality, https://deltag.aarhus.dk/sites/default/files/documents/International%20strategi_EN.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  274. Aarhus i Tal. Aarhus Municipality, https://ledelsesinformation.aarhuskommune.dk/Embed#vfs://global/AARHUS-I-TAL/BEFOLKNING_I_TAL-Indhold.xview Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  275. About Newcomer Service. Esbjerg Municipality, https://esbjerg.eu/new-in-esbjerg/newcomer-service Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  276. Aragones, Anna Maria and Uberto, Salgado. “Denmark and Norway: Matching Labor Market Needs with Qualified Migrants.” Two Homelands, vol. 44, 2016, 93–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/dd.2016.2.08 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  277. Aterini, Davide and Wolff, Zita. “International Talent Retention: Empirical Field Study at Copenhagen Business School.” https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/60702227/790868_Master_Thesis_FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  278. Bauder, Harald. “Neoliberalism and the Economic Utility of Immigration: Media Perspectives of Germany’s Immigration Law.” Antipode, vol. 40, 2008, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00571.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  279. Borjas, George and Bratsberg, Bernt. “Who leaves? The out-migration of the foreign born.” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, 1996, 165–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  280. Brown, Samantha Ruth. “Pork. What’s for Lunch: Food, Race and the Politics of Migration in Denmark.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2024.2431296 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  281. Brodmann, Stefanie and Polavieja, Javier. “Immigrants in Denmark: Access to Employment, Class Attainment and Earnings in a High-Skilled Economy.” International Migration, vol. 49, no. 1, 2010, 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00608.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  282. Bjerregaard, Toke. “Engaging institutions in global careers: highly skilled self-initiated expatriates’ journeys through a Nordic welfare state.” European Management Journal, vol 32, 2014, 903–915. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  283. Budget 2025. Odense Kommune, https://www.odense.dk/politik/oekonomi-og effektstyring/budgetter/budget-2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  284. Cengiz, Paula Manuela and Eklund Karlsson, Leena. “Portrayal of immigrants in Danish media – a qualitative content analysis.” Societies, vol. 11, no. 45, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOC11020045 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  285. Constant, Amelie and Schultz-Nielse, Marie Louise. “Labor Force Participation and Unemployment: Incentives and Preferences.” Migrants, Work, and the Welfare State, edited by Torben Tranæs and Klaus F. Zimmermann, University Press of Southern Denmark and The Rockwool Foundation Research Uni, 2004, 147–184. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  286. De Fina, Anna and Tseng, Amelia. “Narrative in the study of migrants.” The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language, edited by Canagarajah S, Routledge, 2017, 381–396. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  287. Deal reached to bring more foreign workers to Danmark. The Copenhagen Post, 2025, https://cphpost.dk/2025-06-27/business-education/career/deal-reached-to-bring-more-foreign-workers-to-denmark/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  288. Denmark’s National Reform Programme 2023. European Commission, https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-05/2023-Denmark-NRP_en.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  289. Ellena, Silvia. “Commission unveils package to attract migrant workers to EU labour market.” Euractiv, 2023, https://www.euractiv.com/news/commission-unveils-package-to-attract-migrant-workers-to-eu-labour-market/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  290. Esbjerg Kommune indvier internationalt hus for tilflyttere. Esbjerg Kommune, 2021. https://via.ritzau.dk/pressemeddelelse/13627764/esbjerg-kommune-indvier-internationalt-hus-for-tilflyttere?publisherId=13560064 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  291. Esbjerg International House. Esbjerg Municipality, https://www.esbjerg.dk/om-kommunen/ny-i-esbjerg-kommune/internationalt-hus Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  292. Expat Survey 2025. Copenhagen Capacity. https://www.copcap.com/hubfs/_copenhagen-capacity/talent/talent-events/expat%20survey%202025/Copcap_ExpatSurvey2025_online.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  293. Expat in Herning & Ikast-Brande. https://expat-in.dk/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  294. Friis, Sigrid, and Nyegaard, Mia. “Denmark’s outdated policies block international talent and slow down economic growth.” Copenhagen Capacity, 2024, https://cphpost.dk/2024-05-29/life-in-denmark/opinion/outdated-policies-block-international-talent-and-slow-down-economic-growth/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  295. Gee, James Paul. An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. Routledge: 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  296. Hall, Sarah and Beaverstock, Jonathan. “Competing for talent: Global Mobility, Immigration and the City of London’s Labour Market.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, 2012, 271–287. DOI:10.1093/cjres/rss005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  297. Hedetoft, Ulf. “Denmark: Integrating Immigrants into a Homogeneous Welfare State.” Migration Policy Institute, November 1, 2006. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/denmark-integrating-immigrants-homogeneous-welfare-state Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  298. Highly skilled foreign manpower boosts growth and welfare. Beskæftigelsesministeriet (Danish Ministry of Employment), https://bm.dk/media/6968/easier-acces-to-highly-skilled-people-reforming-international-recruitment.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  299. Hultin, Lotta and Introna, Lucas. “On receiving asylum seekers: Identity working as a process of material discursive interpellation.” Organization Studies, vol. 40, no. 9, 2019, 1361–1386. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  300. International Community by Erhverv Aarhus. Aarhus Municipality, https://internationalcommunity.dk/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  301. International Communities. Work in Denmark. https://www.workindenmark.dk/working-in-denmark/international-communities Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  302. International House Copenhagen. Copenhagen Municipality, Copenhagen Municipality, https://ihcph.kk.dk/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  303. International House North Denmark. Aalborg Municipality, https://ihnd.dk/about-ihnd Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  304. International House Odense. Odense Municipality, https://www.internationalhouseodense.dk/k-about-us Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  305. International Migration Outlook 2024. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/50b0353e-en. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  306. International Network Horsens. https://faellesskab.horsens.dk/faellesskaber/i-l/internationalnetworkhorsens Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  307. Invest in Denmark. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, https://investindk.com/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  308. Jensen, Peter and Pedersen, Peder. “To Stay or Not to Stay? Out-Migration of Immigrants from Denmark.” International Migration, vol. 45, no. 5, 2007, 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00428.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  309. Jensen, Tina Gudrun et al. “There is no racism here’: public discourses on racism, immigrants and integration in Denmark.” Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 51, no. 1, 2017, 51–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2016.1270844 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  310. Jorgensen, Danny. Participant Observation: a methodology for human studies. Sage Publications,1989. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  311. Klintefelt, Thomas M. “Højtuddannede indvandrere er en god forretning for Danmark.” Dansk Industri, 2024, https://www.danskindustri.dk/arkiv/analyser/2023/5/hojtuddannede-udlandinge-2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  312. Krueger, Richard A. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  313. Loseke, Donileen R. “The Study of Identity as Cultural, Institutional, Organizational, and Personal Narratives: Theoretical and Empirical Interrogations.” The Sociological Quarterly, vol 48, no. 4, 2007, 661–688. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40220047?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  314. Lueg, Klarissa et al. “Introduction: What counter- narratives are: Dimensions and levels of a theory of middle range.” Routledge Handbook of Counter- Narratives, edited by Klarissa Lueg and Marianne Wolff Routledge, 2021, 1–15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  315. Lueg, Klarissa et al. “A Danish case study of a sociomaterial construction of a new nomos and purpose of higher education.” Higher Education, vol 85, no. 2, 2023, 455–472. 10.1007/s10734–022–00844–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  316. Lueg, Klarissa. “Microaggressions at work: how highly qualified migrants experience individual discrimination at work settings.” Zeitschrift für Politik, no. 12, 2023, 175–195. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748949398 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  317. Lueg, Klarissa and Carlson, Sören Olav. “Narrative and Europeanization.” Culture, Practice & Europeanization, vol 5, no. 1, 2020, 1–15 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  318. Menini, Bernardo B. “More internationals are leaving Denmark, and retention rates are declining.” The Copenhagen Post, March 24, 2025. https://cphpost.dk/2025-03-24/business-education/career/more-internationals-are-leaving-denmark-and-retention-rates-are-declining/#:~:text=Rather%20than%20improving%2C%20the%20retention,technically%20called%20emigrated%20foreign%20citizens Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  319. More international graduates must stay and work in Danmark. Ministry of Higher Education and Science, 2018, https://ufm.dk/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018/more-international-graduates-must-stay-and-work-in-denmark?utm_source=chatgpt.com Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  320. Naumann, Elias et al. “Attitudes towards highly skilled and low-skilled immigration in Europe: A survey experiment in 15 European countries.” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 57, 2018, 1009–1030. doi: 10.1111/1475–6765.12264 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  321. New agreement-based business scheme for non-EU nationals in Denmark. KPMG, 2025. https://kpmg.com/dk/en/insights/mobility/new-agreement-based-business-scheme-for-non-eu-nationals-in-denmark.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  322. Newcomer Service Billund. Billund Municipality, https://billunderhverv.dk/newcomer-service/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  323. Newcomer Service Esbjerg. Esbjerg Municipality,https://esbjerg.eu/new-in-esbjerg Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  324. Newcomer Service Kalundborg. Kalundborg Municipality, https://goto.kalundborg.dk/move Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  325. Newcomers Service Lolland. Lolland Municipality, https://newcomers.lolland.dk/new-to-lolland/newcomers-service Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  326. Newcomer Service Vejle. Vejle Municipality, https://www.vejle.dk/en/welcome-to-vejle/newcomer-service. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  327. Newcomer Service Sonderborg. Sonderborg Municipality, https://sonderborg.dk/en/newcomer/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  328. Odense Byråd 2018–2021- Byrådssalen. Evaluering og forlængelse af vækstindsatser 00.00.00-A00–338–20. Odense Kommune, https://dagsordener.odense.dk/vis?Referat-Odense-Byraad-2018-2021-d.28-10-2020-kl.17.00&id=df3d83ae-e086-4adb-9ecb-7a907017a3b7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  329. Odense i Tal. Odense Municipality, https://www.odense.dk/om-kommunen/statistikker-og-regnskaber/odense-i-tal/odense-i-tal Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  330. Outside of Copenhagen. International House Copenhagen. https://ihcph.kk.dk/registration-guidance/outside-of-copenhagen Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  331. Pekkala, Sari et al. “Global Talent Flows.” CESifo Working Paper No. 6203, 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/149290 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  332. Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. “The Discourse- Historical Approach (DHA).” Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, Sage Publications, 2001, 87–119. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  333. Richardson, Julia. “Geographic Flexibility in Academia: A Cautionary Note.” British Journal of Management, vol. 20, 2001, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00641.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  334. Riessman, Cathrine K. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage Publications, 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  335. Risberg, Annette and Romani, Laurence. “Underemploying highly skilled migrants: An organizational logic protecting corporate ‘normality’.” Human Relations, vol. 75, no. 4, 2022, 655–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721992854 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  336. 1.100 nye engelsksprogede studiepladser åbner for flere internationale studerende, 2024. The Ministry of Higher Education and Science, https://ufm.dk/aktuelt/pressemeddelelser/2024/1-100-nye-engelsksprogede-studiepladser-abner-for-flere-internationale-studerende Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  337. The University of Southern Denmark towards 2030, https://www.sdu.dk/en/om-sdu/strategi-politikker/strategi2030 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  338. Tung, Rosalie et al. “How Small Nations Fare in the Global War on Talent: The Case of Denmark.” Journal of Small Business Strategy, vol 19, no. 1, 2008, 3–15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  339. Udlændingepolitik (Immigration policy) 2024. Socialdemokratiet (The Social Democrats), https://www.socialdemokratiet.dk/det-vil-vi/udlaendinge/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  340. van, Leeuwen, T. The representation of social actors. London and New York: Routledge, 1996. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  341. Van Maanen JE. Representation in Ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  342. Vejle becomes a university city: SDU is establishing a campus focusing on IT and STEM programme. https://www.sdu.dk/en/nyheder/pm-sdu-vejle Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  343. Weick, Karl E. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage, 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  344. Young, Mike. “The International House is now open!” University Post, 2013, https://uniavisen.dk/en/the-international-house-is-now-open/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-98
  345. Alnıaçık, A., & Altan-Olcay, Ö. (2025). Anti-feminist and anti-gender coalitions and femi-nist resilience in Turkey. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 137–165). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  346. Altay, T., Al-Ali, N., & Galor, K. (Eds.). (2024). Resisting Far-Right Politics in the Middle East and Europe: Queer Feminist Critiques (Critiquing Gender & Islam). Edinburgh: Edin-burgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399526524 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  347. Amirali, A., Cabral Grinspan, M., Gill-Peterson, J., Nyanzi, S., & McEwen, H. (2024). Troubling anti-gender attacks: transnational activist and academic perspectives. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg, & T. Ojeda (Eds.), Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Sol-idarity in Times of Global Attacks (pp. 245–263). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7_12 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  348. Avanza, M. (2018). Plea for an emic approach towards ‘ugly movements’: lessons from the divisions within the Italian pro-life movement. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1479 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  349. Beck, D., Habed, A. J., & Henninger, A. (Eds.). (2024). Blurring Boundaries – ‘Anti-Gender’ Ideology Meets Feminist and LGBTIQ+ Discourses. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  350. Beyer Gregersen, A., Meret, S., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2025). So common to score cheap points on being an antifeminist: the rise of antifeminist and anti-gender mobili-zations in Denmark and the feminist response. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 229–254). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  351. Boese, V. A., Edgell, A. B., Hellmeier, S., Maerz, S. F., & Lindberg, S. I. (2021). How de-mocracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process. Democratization, 28(5), 885–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  352. Brown, K., Mondon, A., & Winter, A. (2023). The far right, the mainstream and main-streaming: towards a heuristic framework. Journal of Political Ideologies, 28(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1949829 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  353. Browne, V. (2013). Backlash, repetition, untimeliness: the temporal dynamics of femi-nist politics. Hypatia, 28(4), 905–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  354. Calderaro, C. (2023). The racialisation of sexism: how race frames shape anti-street harassment policies in Britain and France. Policy & Politics, 51(3), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16832763188290 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  355. Campillo, I., Romanos, E., Sádaba, I., & Fernández-Vázquez, G. (2025). From confronta-tion to avoidance: feminist responses to anti-gender mobilization in Spain. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Re-sponse: Productive Resistance (pp. 107–135). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  356. Cattien, J. (2023). Antigenderism and white feminist reconstructions in Germany. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 48(4), 825–848. https://doi.org/10.1086/723254 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  357. Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2018a). Conservatism and women’s political representation. Poli-tics & Gender, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000575 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  358. Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2018b). Introduction to special issue on gender and conservatism. Politics & Gender, 14(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000654 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  359. Chiva, C. (2023). Gender and democratic resilience against autocratisation: the case of Romania’s ‘gender identity’ bill. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 6(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16735398665628 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  360. Corredor, E. S. (2019). Unpacking ‘gender ideology’ and the global right’s antigender countermovement. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1086/701171 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  361. Enyedi, Z., Guasti, P., Schafer, D., & Mikola, B. (2025). Illiberal politics in Europe: ideolo-gy, policies, and impact. Politics and Governance, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10797 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  362. Escoffier, S., Payne, L. A., & Zulver, J. (2023). Introduction: the right against rights in Latin America. In L. A. Payne, J. Zulver, & S. Escoffier (Eds.), The Right Against Rights in Latin America (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197267394.003.0001 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  363. Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: the undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  364. Farris, S. (2017). In the name of women's rights: the rise of femonationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  365. Farvardin, F. (2024). Why do we ‘care’? neoliberal governance and the emergence of the feminist subject in Iran. In T. Altay, N. Al-Ali, & K. Galor (Eds.), Resisting Far-Right Politics in the Middle East and Europe: Queer Feminist Critiques (pp. 240–256). Edin-burgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399526524-013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  366. Fillieule, O., & Broqua, C. (2020). Sexual and reproductive rights movements and coun-ter movements from an interactionist perspective. Social Movement Studies, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1709434 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  367. Galán, S. (2025). Transnational explorations of anti-gender politics: toward a decenter-ing of the field. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 27(3), 735–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2025.2513118 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  368. Göker, Z. G., & Çelik, A. B. (2025). Between coping, co-optation, and resistance: strate-gies of (en)countering anti-gender challenges in local governance in the context of democratic backsliding. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society (Advance article), jxaf055. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaf055 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  369. Holvikivi, A., Holzberg, B., & Ojeda, T. (Eds.). (2024). Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Solidarity in Times of Global Attacks. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  370. Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2024). Feminist institutional responses to anti-gender poli-tics in parliamentary contexts. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 26(4), 833–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2024.2366478 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  371. Kioupkiolis, A. (2025). Patriarchal backlash and feminist responses in Greece today. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Re-sponse: Productive Resistance (pp. 197–227). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  372. Kitlinski, T., & Leszkowicz, P. (2024). Feminist and queer action and art in Poland’s illib-eral democracy. In T. Altay, N. Al-Ali, & K. Galor (Eds.), Resisting Far-Right Politics in the Middle East and Europe: Queer Feminist Critiques (pp. 211–239). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399526524-012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  373. Krizsán, A., & Roggeband, C. (2018). Towards a conceptual framework for struggles over democracy in backsliding states: gender equality policy in central eastern Europe. Poli-tics and Governance, 6(3), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1414 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  374. Krizsán, A., & Roggeband, C. (Eds.). (2019). Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Agenda. Budapest: Central European University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  375. Krizsán, A., & Roggeband, C. (2021a). Politicizing Gender and Democracy in the Context of the Istanbul Convention. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79069-1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  376. Krizsán, A., & Roggeband, C. (2021b). Reconfiguring state–movement relations in the context of de-democratization. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 28(3), 604–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab027 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  377. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  378. Kuhar, R., & Smrdelj, R. (2025). The rise of anti-gender mobilizations. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 1–24). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87693-6_1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  379. Lavizzari, A., Barone, A., & Bonu Rosenkranz, G. (2025). Contentious gender politics in Italy: feminist responses to anti-gender mobilizations. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 25–52). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  380. Lombardo, E., & Caravantes, P. (2024). Co-creating inclusive intersectional democratic spaces across Europe (CCINDLE): counteracting anti-gender through feminist knowledge. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 52(1–2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2024.a924313 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  381. Lorey, I. (2022). Democracy in the political present: a queer-feminist theory. Lon-don/New York: Verso. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  382. Lührmann, A. (2021). Disrupting the autocratization sequence: towards democratic resil-ience. Democratization, 28(5), 1017–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1861814 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  383. Meneses Sala, D., & Rueda-Borrero, C. (2024). The other gender ideology: how ‘anti-gender’ presidential candidates produce and reproduce gender: the case of Peruvian 2021 presidential elections. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg, & T. Ojeda (Eds.), Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Solidarity in Times of Global Attacks (pp. 75–95). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7_4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  384. Merkel, W., & Lührmann, A. (2021). Resilience of democracies: responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges. Democratization, 28(5), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1928081 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  385. Minj, N. S., & Pandit, N. (2024). Anti-gender and anti-feminist politics in India: notes on fascism, feminist solidarity and liberatory politics. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg, & T. Ojeda (Eds.), Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Solidarity in Times of Global Attacks (pp. 119–140). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7_6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  386. Muszel, M. (2025). Not just ranting in the streets, but also concrete actions: Polish fem-inist and LGBT+ responses to anti-gender politics. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 167–195). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  387. Newth, G. H., Brown, K., & Mondon, A. (2025). Researching and understanding far-right politics in times of mainstreaming. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2025.32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  388. Ojeda, T., Holzberg, B., & Holvikivi, A. (2024). A transnational feminist approach to anti-gender politics. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg, & T. Ojeda (Eds.), Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Solidarity in Times of Global Attacks (pp. 1–32). Cham: Palgrave Mac-millan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7_1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  389. Paternotte, D. (2020). Backlash: a misleading narrative. Engenderings (London School of Economics and Political Science). Retrieved from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2020/03/30/backlash-a-misleading-narrative/ (last ac-cessed: 2025, December 2). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  390. Petö, A. (2024). Strategies of progressive actors against anti-gender movements. GATE: Global Action for Trans Equality. Retrieved from: https://gate.ngo/knowledge-portal/article/strategies-of-progressiveactors-against-anti-gender-movements/ (last ac-cessed: 2025, October 22). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  391. Pruvot, S. (2025). The battle of concepts: French feminist mobilizations against the far right’s appropriation of the feminist legacy. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 81–105). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  392. Serrano Amaya, J. F. (2017). La tormenta perfecta: ideología de género y articulación de públicos. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro), (27), 149–171. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  393. Shevtsova, M. (2024). ‘for the sake of the kids’: national security and family values in the Ukrainian sexuality education debate. In T. Altay, N. Al-Ali, & K. Galor (Eds.), Re-sisting Far-Right Politics in the Middle East and Europe: Queer Feminist Critiques (pp. 87–109). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399526524-007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  394. Smrdelj, R. (2025). Navigating antagonism: feminist and LGBT+ responses to Slovenian anti-gender mobilizations. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 53–80). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  395. Smrdelj, R., & Kuhar, R. (Eds.). (2025a). Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87693-6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  396. Smrdelj, R., & Kuhar, R. (2025b). Productive resistance. In R. Smrdelj & R. Kuhar (Eds.), Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance (pp. 255–277). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  397. Valentim, V. (2024). The normalization of the radical right: a norms theory of political supply and demand. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198926740.001.0001 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110
  398. Vivaldi, L. (2024). Anti-gender campaigns and abortion: feminist strategies against reac-tionary biopolitics in Chile. In A. Holvikivi, B. Holzberg, & T. Ojeda (Eds.), Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Solidarity in Times of Global Attacks (pp. 161–180). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54223-7_8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2025-1-110

Latest issues

Culture, Practice & Europeanization
See all issues
Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 2
Volume Full access
Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Volume 10 (2025), Edition 2
Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Volume Full access
Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Volume 10 (2025), Edition 1
Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 9 (2024), Edition 2
Volume Full access
Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Volume 9 (2024), Edition 2
Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 9 (2024), Edition 1
Volume Full access
Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Volume 9 (2024), Edition 1
Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 8 (2023), Edition 2
Volume Full access
Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Volume 8 (2023), Edition 2