, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Foreign Terrorist Fighters: Phenomenon and Legal Countermeasures

A Comparative Study between Germany and China
Authors:
Series:
Schriften zur Kriminologie, Volume 27
Publisher:
 02.02.2023

Summary

This book is the result of a study on the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters and the respective measures from a comparative perspective. The phenomenon triggered an international panic after the outbreak of the Syrian civil war. Fear and panic, especially when unprecedented, severe, or enduring, lead to mistrust and wrong decisions that have far-reaching effects. In this context, this book examines two questions: whether a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon is at hand, which is a prerequisite for reasonable solutions, and whether the present legal responses to the problem are reasonable and responsible in terms of the rule of law.

Keywords



Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2023
Publication date
02.02.2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0492-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3817-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Schriften zur Kriminologie
Volume
27
Language
English
Pages
318
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 18
    1. 1. Statement of the Problem No access
    2. 2. Methodology No access
    3. 3. Definition of Foreign Terrorist Fighters No access
    4. 4. Structure No access
    1. 1. Overall Introduction No access
          1. 2.1.1.1 Main manifestations No access
          2. 2.1.1.2 Main characteristics No access
            1. 2.1.2.1.1 The Sauerland Group No access
            2. 2.1.2.1.2 German Taliban Mujahidin No access
          1. 2.1.2.2 Main characteristics No access
        1. 2.1.3 Unprecedented outbreak period (2012–) No access
          1. 2.2.1.1 Age, gender and marital status No access
          2. 2.2.1.2 Nationality and residence before departure No access
          3. 2.2.1.3 Educational background and professional status No access
          4. 2.2.1.4 Criminal records and travel experience No access
          5. 2.2.1.5 Religious orientation No access
          1. 2.2.2.1 Departure No access
          2. 2.2.2.2 Return No access
        1. 2.2.3 Affiliated organisations and activities in Syria and Iraq No access
        1. 2.3.1 Recruitment by Islamic State No access
        2. 2.3.2 Influence of domestic Salafist networks No access
        3. 2.3.3 The role of social networks No access
      1. 2.4 Threats assessment of German Terrorist Fighters in Syria and Iraq No access
        1. 3.1.1 Transnational rampant period (1996–2001) No access
        2. 3.1.2 International spreading period (2002–2010) No access
        3. 3.1.3 Global jihad period (2011–) No access
          1. 3.2.1.1 Age, gender and marital status No access
          2. 3.2.1.2 Nationality and residence before departure No access
          3. 3.2.1.3 Educational background and professional status No access
          4. 3.2.1.4 Criminal records and travel experience No access
          5. 3.2.1.5 Religious orientation No access
          1. 3.2.2.1 Departure No access
          2. 3.2.2.2 Return No access
        1. 3.2.3 Affiliated organisations and activities in Syria and Iraq No access
        1. 3.3.1 Recruitment by Islamic State No access
        2. 3.3.2 Recruitment by the Turkestan Islamic Party No access
        3. 3.3.3 Influence of the “Hijrah Jihad” idea No access
        4. 3.3.4 The role of social networks No access
      1. 3.4 Threats assessment of Chinese Terrorist Fighters in Syria and Iraq No access
    2. 4. Comparative Summary No access
    1. 1. Introduction No access
      1. 2.1 Resolution 2170 (2014) of the United Nations Security Council No access
          1. 2.2.1.1 The Preamble No access
            1. 2.2.1.2.1 Compulsory measures No access
            2. 2.2.1.2.2 Optional measures No access
          1. 2.2.2.1 Improper connection with armed conflicts No access
          2. 2.2.2.2 Lack of a definition of terrorism and over-criminalisation No access
          3. 2.2.2.3 Challenges in implementation No access
        1. 2.3.1 Compulsory measures No access
        2. 2.3.2 Optional measures No access
      1. 3.1 Detailed content of the Additional Protocol No access
        1. 3.2.1 De facto narrow applicability No access
        2. 3.2.2 Over-expansion of criminal liability No access
        1. 4.1.1 Detailed content of CT-Directive No access
          1. 4.1.2.1 Ambiguous phrasing No access
          2. 4.1.2.2 Over-expansion of criminal responsibility No access
          3. 4.1.2.3 Restriction on the freedom of movement No access
          4. 4.1.2.4 Lack of logical consistency No access
        1. 4.2.1 Detailed content of PNR Directive No access
        2. 4.2.2 A comment on PNR Directive No access
        1. 4.3.1 Detailed content of SIS Regulations No access
        2. 4.3.2 A comment on the SIS No access
      1. 4.4 Enhancing external border control through the Schengen Borders Code No access
    2. 5. Summary and Conclusion No access
    1. 1. Introduction No access
            1. 2.1.1.1.1 Criminalising preparing activities by a single perpetrator No access
            2. 2.1.1.1.2 Criminalising travelling abroad for terrorist training or ESSG No access
          1. 2.1.1.2 Criminalising travelling abroad for joining terrorist organisations No access
          2. 2.1.1.3 Criminalising financing of travelling abroad for terrorist purposes No access
            1. 2.1.2.1.1 Special pretrial detention rules for terrorist suspects and defendants No access
            2. 2.1.2.1.2 Restriction on the communication with defence counsel No access
            1. 2.1.2.2.1 Special jurisdictional rules No access
            2. 2.1.2.2.2 Special investigative measures No access
            3. 2.1.2.2.3 Non-prosecution of offences linked to foreign terrorist organisations No access
            4. 2.1.2.2.4 Seizure of property No access
            5. 2.1.2.2.5 Trial without the presence of the defendant No access
          1. 2.2.1.1 Enhancing information exchanging through anti-terror data systems No access
          2. 2.2.1.2 Collecting and exchanging personal data through PNR Database No access
          1. 2.2.2.1 Citizenship revocation No access
          2. 2.2.2.2 Measures regarding personal travel documents and travel bans No access
          3. 2.2.2.3 Upgraded residency policies No access
      1. 2.3 Summary No access
          1. 3.1.1.1 Criminalising illegal travelling abroad for terrorist purposes No access
          2. 3.1.1.2 Criminalising travelling abroad for joining terrorist organisations No access
          3. 3.1.1.3 Criminalising travelling abroad for terrorist training and terrorist activities No access
          4. 3.1.1.4 Criminalising facilitation of travelling abroad for terrorist purposes No access
            1. 3.1.2.1.1 Restriction on the communication with defence counsel No access
            2. 3.1.2.1.2 Special pretrial detention rules for terrorist suspects and defendants No access
            1. 3.1.2.2.1 Special jurisdictional rules No access
            2. 3.1.2.2.2 Technical investigative measures No access
            3. 3.1.2.2.3 Confiscating the illegal income of terrorist suspects and defendants No access
            4. 3.1.2.2.4 Trial in absentia No access
          1. 3.2.1.1 Basic content No access
            1. 3.2.1.2.1 Enhancing border control No access
            2. 3.2.1.2.2 Restrictions on exit/entry travels and travel documents No access
            3. 3.2.1.2.3 Detaining and transferring terrorist suspects or items No access
            4. 3.2.1.2.4 Restrictive measures on terrorist suspects No access
          1. 3.2.2.1 Citizenship revocation No access
          2. 3.2.2.2 Measures regarding personal travel documents and travel bans No access
            1. 3.2.2.3.1 Legal basis No access
            2. 3.2.2.3.2 Law enforcement No access
      1. 3.3 Summary No access
        1. 4.1.1 Violating the principle of harm and culpability No access
        2. 4.1.2 Overemphasising the preventive function of criminal law No access
        3. 4.1.3 Rejecting the principle of ultima ratio No access
        4. 4.1.4 Ineffectiveness in legal practice No access
        1. 4.2.1 Justification of administrative measures No access
        2. 4.2.2 Citizenship revocation No access
        3. 4.2.3 Restrictions on travel documents and travel bans No access
    2. 5. Summary and Conclusion No access
  2. Chapter V Conclusion No access Pages 281 - 290
  3. Literature No access Pages 291 - 318

Bibliography (228 entries)

  1. Ackerman, G. & Peterson, H. (2020): Terrorism and COVID-19: Actual and Potential Impacts, Perspectives on Terrorism 14/3, pp. 59–73. Open Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ghadhawi, A. (2020): Uighur Jihadists in Syria, Newlines Institute, 18 March 2020, https://newlinesinstitute.org/uyghurs/uighur-jihadists-in-syria/ [17.12.2021] Open Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht, H.J. (2020): Data, Data Banks and Security, European Journal for Security Research 5, pp. 5–23. Open Google Scholar
  4. Albrecht, H.J. (2006): Counterterrorism Policies in Germany, Forschung aktuell/Research in Brief Vol. 38, Max-Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg i. Br., 1 September 2006, http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-48D3-9 [17.10.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  5. Alfifi, M., Kaghazgaran, P., Caverlee, J., & Morstatter, F. (2018): Measuring the Impact of ISIS Social Media Strategy, https://snap.stanford.edu/mis2/files/MIS2_paper_23.pdf [17.10.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez, J.E. (2003): Hegemonic International Law Revisited, American Journal of International Law 97/4, pp. 873–888. Open Google Scholar
  7. Ambos, K. (2014): Our Terrorists, Your Terrorists? The United Nations Security Council Urges States to Combat “Foreign Terrorist Fighters”, but Does Not Define “Terrorism”, EJIL Talk, 2 October 2014, https://www.ejiltalk.org/our-terrorists-your-terrorists-the-united-nations-security-council-urges-states-to-combat-foreign-terrorist-fighters-but-does-not-define-terrorism/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  8. Archick, K., Belkin, P., Blanchard, C.M & Humud. C.E. (2015): European Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, Responses, and Issues for the United States, Congressional Research Service. Open Google Scholar
  9. Arnell, P. (2020): The Legality of the Citizenship Deprivation of UK Foreign Terrorist Fighters, Journal of the Academy of European Law, ERA Forum 21, pp. 395–412. Open Google Scholar
  10. Ashworth, A. & Zedner, L. (2014): Preventive Justice, Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  11. Baele, S.J., Boyd, K.A. & Coan, T.G. (2021): The Matrix of Islamic State’s Propaganda —Magazines, in Baele, S. J., Boyd, K. A. & Coan, T.G. (eds.), ISIS Propaganda: A Full-Spectrum Extremist Message, Oxford, pp. 84–126. Open Google Scholar
  12. Baker, R. (2008): China and the Enduring Uighurs, Security Weekly, 6 August 2008, https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/china-and-enduring-uighurs [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bakker, E. (2008): Jihadi Terrorists in Europe and Global Salafi Jihadis, in Coolsaet, R. (ed.), Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalisation Challenge in Europe, Farnham, pp. 69–84. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bakker, E. & Grol, P. (2015): Motives and Considerations of Potential Foreign Fighters from the Netherlands, ICCT Policy Brief. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bakker, E. & de Bont, R. (2016): Belgian and Dutch Jihadist Foreign Fighters (2012–2015): Characteristic, Motivations, and Roles in the War in Syria and Iraq, Small Wars and Insurgencies 27/5, pp. 837–857. Open Google Scholar
  16. Bąkowski, P. & Voronova, S. (2015): The Proposed EU Passenger Name Records (PNR) Directive Revived in the New Security Context, European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing. Open Google Scholar
  17. Benton, M. & Banulescu–Bogdan, N. (2019): Foreign Fighters: Will Revoking Citizenship Mitigate the Threat? MPI Migration Information Source, 3 April 2019, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/foreign-fighters-will-revoking-citizenship-mitigate-threat [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bock, S. & Stark, F. (2018): Preparatory Offences, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 64/2018. Open Google Scholar
  19. Botobekov, U. (2021): How Central Asian Salafi-Jihadi Groups are Exploiting the COVID-19 Pandemic: New Opportunities and Challenges, in Käsehage, N. (ed.), Religious Fundamentalism in the Age of Pandemic, Bielefeld, pp. 107–148. Open Google Scholar
  20. Boutin, B. (2016): Administrative Measures against Foreign Fighters: In Search of Limits and Safeguards, ICCT Research Paper. Open Google Scholar
  21. Braun, K. (2018): “Home, Sweet Home”: Managing Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters in Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia, International Community Law Review 20, pp. 311–346. Open Google Scholar
  22. Butt, R. & Tuck, H. (2016): European Counter-Radicalisation and De-radicalisation: A Comparative Evaluation of Approaches in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, European Commission Report. Open Google Scholar
  23. Caiola, A. (2017): The European Parliament and the Directive on Combating Terrorism, ERA Forum 18, pp. 409–424. Open Google Scholar
  24. Cai, Y. (2020): An Empirical Study on the Application of Residential Confinement in Designated Places by Public Security Authorities—A sample of 703 judgments from 2018–2019, Journal of People’s Public Security University of China (Social Sciences Edition) 206/4, pp. 38–47. Open Google Scholar
  25. Chen, F. (2014): Research on Deradicalisation in Xinjiang, Phoenix Weekly, April 2014, https://news.ifeng.com/mainland/special/xjqjdh/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  26. Chen, G. (2019): The Amendment of Criminal Procedure Law and the New Development of Criminal Procuratorial Work, Journal of National Prosecutors College 1, pp. 16–39. Open Google Scholar
  27. Chen, S. (2021): On the Empowering Function of Duty Lawyer System—Taking the Right to See Duty Counsel for Criminal Suspects as an Entry Point, Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law 3, pp. 113–125. Open Google Scholar
  28. Chen, R. (2011): Criminal Procedural Law: A Law on Citizens’ Rights, Not A Law Governing Citizens, Southern Weekend, 9 September 2011, http://www.infzm.com/contents/62958 [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  29. Chen, R. (2001): Legal Control of Pretrial Detention — from a Comparative Perspective, Tribune of Political Science and Law 4, pp. 99–112. Open Google Scholar
  30. Chen, X. (2015): A Dogmatic Critique on the Risk Criminal Law Theory, Peking University Law Journal 1, pp. 103–127. Open Google Scholar
  31. Chen, Z. (2017): Analysis of the Characteristics and Countermeasures of Current “Hijrah” Activities in China, Journal of Yunnan Police College 120/1, pp. 31–36. Open Google Scholar
  32. Christien, A., Jouenne, E. & Scott-Kakures, E. (2020): How COVID-19 Underscores the Urgent Need to Repatriate Women and Children from Northeast Syria Camps, Georgetown Institution for Women, Peace and Security, 9 December 2020. Open Google Scholar
  33. Clarke, C.P. & Kan, P. R. (2017): Uyghur Foreign Fighters: An Underexamined Jihadist Challenge, ICCT Policy Brief, November 2017. Open Google Scholar
  34. Coca‑Vila, I. (2020): Our “Barbarians” at the Gate: On the Undercriminalized Citizenship Deprivation as a Counterterrorism Tool, Criminal Law and Philosophy 14, pp. 149–167. Open Google Scholar
  35. Cook, J. & Vale, G. (2018): From Daesh to ‘Diaspora’: Tracing the Women and Minors of Islamic State, ICSR. Open Google Scholar
  36. Coolsaet, R. (2017): Anticipating the Post-Daesh Landscape, EGMONT Paper 97. Open Google Scholar
  37. Coolsaet, R. (2016): Facing the Fourth Foreign Fighters Wave: What Drives Europeans to Syria and to Islamic State? Insights from the Belgian Case, EGMONT Paper 81. Open Google Scholar
  38. Cuyckens, H. (2021): Foreign Fighters and the Tension between Counterterrorism and International Humanitarian Law: A Case for Cumulative Prosecution Where Possible, International Review of the Red Cross (IRRC). Open Google Scholar
  39. Dantschke, C. (2019): Attraktivität, Anziehungskraft und Akteure des politischen und militanten Salafismus in Deutschland, in Toprak, A. & Weitzel, G. (eds.), Salafismus In Deutschland, Berlin, pp. 61–67. Open Google Scholar
  40. Dantschke, C. (2013): “Pop-Jihad”: History and Structure of Salafism and Jihadism in Germany, Institute for the Study of Radical Movements, Working Paper 2/13. Open Google Scholar
  41. Dawson, L.L. (2021): A Comparative Analysis of the Data on Western Foreign Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Who Went and Why? ICCT Research Paper. Open Google Scholar
  42. Dowson, L.L. (2018): Debating the Role of Religion in the Motivation of Religious Terrorism, Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 31/2, pp. 98–117. Open Google Scholar
  43. Dawson, L.L. (2015): Challenging the Curious Erasure of Religion from the Study of Religious Terrorism, NUMEN 63, pp. 141–164. Open Google Scholar
  44. Dawson, L.L. & Amarasingam, A. (2017): Talking to Foreign Fighters: Insights into the Motivations for Hijrah to Syria and Iraq, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 40/3, pp. 191–210. Open Google Scholar
  45. Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte (DIM) (2021): Abschiebungen nach Syrien — Eine menschenrechtliche Bewertung der aktuellen Debatte, June 2021. Open Google Scholar
  46. Dodwell, B. & Milton, D. (2018): Jihadi Brides? Examining a Female Guesthouse Registry from the Islamic State’s Caliphate, CTC Sentinel 11/5. pp. 16–22. Open Google Scholar
  47. Dodwell, B., Milton, D. & Rassler, D. (2016): The Caliphate’s Global Workforce: An Inside Look at the Islamic State’s Foreign Fighter Paper Trail, West Point: Combating Terrorism Centre. Open Google Scholar
  48. Duchâtel, M. (2019): China’s Foreign Fighters Problem, War on the Rocks, 25 January 2019, https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/chinas-foreign-fighters-problem/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  49. Dworkin, A. (2019): Beyond Good and Evil: Why Europe Should Bring ISIS Foreign Fighters Home, European Council on Foreign Relations/305, 25 October 2019. Open Google Scholar
  50. Eijkman, Q. (2014): The German Sauerland Cell Reconsidered, Perspective on Terrorism 8/4, pp. 82–90. Open Google Scholar
  51. Eriksson, B. (2021): A Visit to Northeast Syria Shows the Urgency for Governments to Repatriate Their Citizens, Many of Them Children, to Thwart ISIS, Just Security, 2 September 2021, https://www.justsecurity.org/78064/a-visit-to-northeast-syria-shows-the-urgency-for-governments-to-repatriate-their-citizens-many-of-them-children-to-thwart-isis/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  52. Eser, A. (2021): Straftheorien — reflektiert aus der Sicht von Hans-Jörg Albrecht, in Haverkamp, R., Kilchling, M., Kinzig, J., Oberwittler, D. & Wössner, G. (eds.), Unterwegs in Kriminologie und Strafrecht — Exploring the World of Crime and Criminology: Festschrift für Hans-Jörg Albrecht zum 70. Geburtstag, Berlin, pp. 543–560. Open Google Scholar
  53. Feng, X. & Ma, Y. (2018): Extraterritorial Study of the Deprivation of Nationality of Transnational Terrorists and China’s Reference, Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition) 2, pp. 90–97. Open Google Scholar
  54. Foster, D. & Milton, D. (2018): Children at War: Foreign Child Recruits of the Islamic State, CTC Sentinel 11/6, pp. 11–17. Open Google Scholar
  55. Frissen,T., Toguslu, E., Van Ostaeyen, P. & d’Haenens, L. (2018): Capitalizing on the Koran to Fuel Online Violent Radicalisation: A taxonomy of Koranic References in ISIS’s Dabiq, Telematics and Informatics 35/2, pp. 491–503. Open Google Scholar
  56. GCTF (2015): “Foreign Terrorist Fighters” (FTF) Initiative, The Hague–Marrakech Memorandum on Good Practices for a More Effective Response to the FTF Phenomenon, GCTF FTF Initiative. Open Google Scholar
  57. Georges, A. (2015): ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah, Trends Working Paper 6/2015. Open Google Scholar
  58. German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) (2021): Not a Storm in a Teacup: The Islamic State after the Caliphate, GIGA Focus No. 3, April 2021, https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/24482149-storm-teacup-islamic-state-after-caliphate/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  59. Ginkel, B.V. (2014): The New Security Council Resolution 2178 on Foreign Terrorist Fighters: A Missed Opportunity for a Holistic Approach, ICCT Commentary. Open Google Scholar
  60. Ginkel, B.V. & Minks, S. (2018): Addressing the Challenge of Returnees: Threat Perceptions, Policies and Practices in the Netherlands, in Renard, T. & Coolsaet, R. (eds): Returnees: Who Are They, Why Are They (not) Coming Back and How Should We Deal With Them? EGMONT Paper 101, pp. 55–70. Open Google Scholar
  61. Glušac, L. (2020): Criminalization as Anxious and Ineffective Response to Foreign Fighters Phenomenon in the West Balkans, Journal of Regional Security 15/1, pp. 39–74. Open Google Scholar
  62. Gohel, S. M. (2011): Germany Increasingly a Centre for Terrorism in Europe, CTC Sentinel 4/8, pp. 12–15. Open Google Scholar
  63. Goodie, C. (2021): Repatriation: A Short-Term Risk for Long-Term Security, Australian Institute of International Affairs, 13 August 2021, https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/repatriation-a-short-term-risk-for-long-term-security/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  64. Gröpl, C., Windthorst, K. & von Coelln, C. (2020): Studienkommentar GG. 4. Aufl. München. Open Google Scholar
  65. Gu. L. (2014): On Essence Characteristics of Violent Terror Crimes in Xinjiang, Journal of Xinjiang Police Officer’s Academy 34/2, pp. 3–8. Open Google Scholar
  66. Gu, L. & Wang, M. (2016): Study of the Legal Properties of “Ijilat” and its Legal Application, Journal of Shandong Police College 150/6, pp. 36–42. Open Google Scholar
  67. Gunaratna, R. (2003): Inside Al-Qaida, Global Network of Terror, New York. Open Google Scholar
  68. Gunaratna, R. & Pereire, K.G. (2006): An Al-Qaida Associate Group Operating in China? China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4/2, pp. 55–61. Open Google Scholar
  69. Gunaratna, R., Acharya, A. & Wang, P. (2010): Ethnic Identity and National Conflict in China, London, pp. 72–74. Open Google Scholar
  70. Guo, S. (2016): Residential Confinement at Designated Residence as “Harsher than Detention”, Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences) 6, pp. 119–125. Open Google Scholar
  71. Guttry, A. (2016): The Role Played by the UN in Countering the Phenomenon of Foreign Terrorist Fighters, in Guttry, A., Capone, F. & Paulussen, C. (eds), Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond, Berlin, pp. 259–282. Open Google Scholar
  72. Han, X. (2011): The Improvement and Shortcomings of the Provision Regarding Defence Lawyer’s Right to Meet and Communicate — Comment and Analysis on the Relevant Provisions of the “Criminal Procedure Law Amendment (Draft)”, Journal of National Prosecutors College 10, pp. 134–140. Open Google Scholar
  73. Hao, L. (2020): A Study on Legal Preventive Mechanism to Curb the Cross-border Movement of Terrorists, Chinese Review of International Law 1, pp. 16–34. Open Google Scholar
  74. Hassan, H. (2016): The Sectarianism of the Islamic State: Ideological Roots and Political Context, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 2016. Open Google Scholar
  75. Hegghammer, T. (2013): Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Variation in Western Jihadists’ Choice between Domestic and Foreign Fighting, American Political Science Review 107/1, pp. 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  76. Hegghammer, T. (2011): The Rise of Muslim Foreign Fighters: Islam and the Globalization of Jihad, International Security 35/3, pp. 53–94. Open Google Scholar
  77. Hegghammer, T. & Nesser, P. (2015): Assessing the Islamic State’s Commitment to Attacking the West, Perspective on Terrorism 9/4, pp. 14–30. Open Google Scholar
  78. Heinke, D. (2017): German Foreign Fighters in Syria and Iraq: The Updated Data and its Implications, CTC Sentinel 10/3, pp. 17–22. Open Google Scholar
  79. Hellmuth, D. (2016): Of Alienation, Association, and Adventure: Why German Fighters Join ISIL, Journal for Deradicalisation 6, pp. 24–50. Open Google Scholar
  80. Hert, P. & Papakonstantinou, V. (2015): Repeating the Mistakes of the Past Will Do Little Good for Air Passengers in the EU: The Comeback of the EU PNR Directive and a Lawyer’s Duty to Regulate Profiling, New Journal of European Criminal Law 6/2, pp. 160–165. Open Google Scholar
  81. Hoffman, B., Rosenau, W., Curiel, A.J. & Zimmermann, D. (2007): The Radicalisation of Diasporas and Terrorism — A Joint Conference by RAND Corporation and the Centre for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, RAND Conference Proceedings. Open Google Scholar
  82. Hofinger, V. & Schmidinger, T. (2020). ‘Muhajirun’ from Austria. Why They Left to Join ISIS and Why They Don’t Return, Journal for Deradicalisation, pp. 287–318. Open Google Scholar
  83. Hu, D. (2021): The Application and Reflection of China’s Constitutional Review from Regulation to Practice, People’s Congress Studying 2, pp. 10–22. Open Google Scholar
  84. Huang, P. (2016): Artistic Features of Traditional Uyghur Female Costume, Journal of Heihe University 3, pp. 99–103. Open Google Scholar
  85. Huang, X. (2019): Assessing Security Issues in the Return of “East Turkestan” Terrorists, Anti-Terrorism Law Research Association of Law Society in Shaanxi Province, 15 June 2019. Open Google Scholar
  86. ID-Verlag (1977): Rote Armee Fraktion — Texte und Materialien zur Geschichte der RAF, Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  87. Ingram, H.J. (2021): The Strategic Logic of Islamic State’s Full-Spectrum Propaganda — Coherence, Comprehensiveness, and Multidimensionality, in Baele, S. J., Boyd, K. A. & Coan, T. G. (eds.), ISIS Propaganda: A Full-Spectrum Extremist Message, Oxford, pp. 20–46. Open Google Scholar
  88. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2020): ISIS Foreign Fighters after the Fall of the Caliphate, Armed Conflict Survey 6/1, pp. 23–30. Open Google Scholar
  89. Ip, J. (2020): Reconceptualising the Legal Response to Foreign Fighters, British Institute of International and Comparative Law 69, pp. 103–134. Open Google Scholar
  90. Jareborg, N. (2004): Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio), Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2, pp. 521–534. Open Google Scholar
  91. Jia, Y. & Li, H. (2017): A Study of the Criteria for Designation of Terrorist Organisations and Individuals — From the Redefinition of Terrorism, Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 47/3, pp. 46–57. Open Google Scholar
  92. Jiang, W. (2011): Research on the Ultima Ratio, Legal Forum 2, pp. 88–92. Open Google Scholar
  93. Johnstone, I. (2008): Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit, American Journal of International Law 102/2, pp. 275–308. Open Google Scholar
  94. Jokinen, C. (2018): “Deutsche Schabab”: The Story of German Foreign Fighters in Somalia, 2010–2016, CTC Sentinel 11/5, pp. 30–37. Open Google Scholar
  95. Joyner, D. (2017): Legal Bindingness of Security Council Resolutions Generally, and Resolution 2334 on the Israeli Settlements in Particular, EJIL Talk, 9 January 2017, https://www.ejiltalk.org/legal-bindingness-of-security-council-resolutions-generally-and-resolution-2334-on-the-israeli-settlements-in-particular/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  96. Karagiannis, E. (2013): Transnational Islamist Networks: Western Fighters in Afghanistan, Somalia and Syria, The International Spectator 48/4, pp. 119–134. Open Google Scholar
  97. Käsehage, N. (2021): Towards a COVID-Jihad — Millennialism in the Field of Jihadism, in Käsehage, N. (ed.), Religious Fundamentalism in the Age of Pandemic, Bielefeld, pp. 81–105. Open Google Scholar
  98. Kerchove, G. & Höhn, C. (2016): The Regional Answers and Governance Structure for Dealing with Foreign Fighters: The Case of the EU, in Guttry, A., Capone, F. & Paulussen, C. (eds.), Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond, Berlin, pp. 299–331. Open Google Scholar
  99. Kindhäuser, U. (2019): Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, 8. Aufl., Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar
  100. Kingsbury, B., Krish, N. & Stewart, R.B. (2005): The Emergence of Global Administrative law, Law and Contemporary Problems 68/3, pp. 15–61. Open Google Scholar
  101. Klandermans, B. (1984): Mobilization and Participation: Social-psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory, American Sociological Review 49/5, pp. 583–600. Open Google Scholar
  102. Knauer, C., Kudlich, H. & Schneider, H. (2014): Münchener Kommentar zur Strafprozessordnung, München. Open Google Scholar
  103. Kopitzke, C. (2017): Security Council Resolution 2178 (2014): An Ineffective Response to the Foreign Terrorist Fighter Phenomenon, Indianan Journal of Global Legal Studies 24/1, pp. 309–341. Open Google Scholar
  104. Krähenmann, S. (2019): The Interplay Between International Humanitarian Law, Terrorism and the “Foreign Terrorist Fighter” Regime, Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 112, pp. 307–310. Open Google Scholar
  105. Krähenmann, S. (2014): Foreign Fighters under International Law, Geneva Academy Briefing, No. 7. Open Google Scholar
  106. Lahoud, N. (2017): A Cappella Songs (anashid) in Jihadi Culture, in Hegghammer, T. (ed.), Jihadi Culture: The Art and Social Practices of Militant Islamists, Cambridge, pp. 42–62. Open Google Scholar
  107. Lao, D. (2007): Public Policy and Criminal Law in a Risk Society, Social Sciences in China 3, pp. 126–139 + 206. Open Google Scholar
  108. Li, L. (2021): Constitutional Review by the Constitutional and Law Commission in China: Principles and Functions, Local Legislation Journal 6/2, pp. 76–97. Open Google Scholar
  109. Li, C. & Song, S. (2016): Discussion on Illegal Outflow of Uyghur Immigrants from Xinjiang to Southeast Asia, Xinjiang Social Science 1, pp. 70–76. Open Google Scholar
  110. Li, M. (2017): Progress and Shortcomings: Reflections on the Provisions Regarding Technical Investigative Measures in the New Criminal Procedural Code, Present-day Law Science 1, pp. 59–66. Open Google Scholar
  111. Li, Q. (2005): On the Formation and Evolution of the “East Turkestan” Separatist Forces, Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 34/1, pp. 20–27. Open Google Scholar
  112. Liang G. (2011): The Dilemma and Breakthrough of the Principle of General Punishment for Preparatory Acts — Interpretation and Reconstruction of Article 22 of the Criminal Code, China Legal Science 2, pp. 156–176. Open Google Scholar
  113. Lin, X. (2017): China’s Pretrial Detention System: A Comparative Analysis with Other Countries, Wuhan University Journal (Social Science) 6, pp. 83–95. Open Google Scholar
  114. Lindekilde, L., Bertelsen, P. & Stohl, M. (2016): Who Goes, Why, and with What Effects: The Problem of Foreign Fighters from Europe, Small Wars and Insurgencies 27/5, pp. 858–877. Open Google Scholar
  115. Liu, G. & Li, X. (2017): Research on Vague Language and its Limitation in Provisions on Technical Investigation Measures of the Criminal Procedural Code, Criminal Science 1, pp. 113–130. Open Google Scholar
  116. Liu, T. (2018): On the Crime of Preparing for Terrorist Activities — Unfolding of Formalized Preparation Crime, Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice 1, pp. 88–96. Open Google Scholar
  117. Luo, H. (2022): On the Overall Improvement of China’s Counter-Terrorism Legal System — An Analysis from the Perspective of Measures of Xinjiang and Other Three Places for Implementing Anti-Terrorism Law, Political Science and Law 5, pp. 150–161. Open Google Scholar
  118. Ma, P. (2008): Nature of Religious Extremism and its Hazards, Xinjiang Social Science 6, pp. 63–69. Open Google Scholar
  119. Malet, D. (2015): What Does the Evidence Tell Us about the Impact of Foreign Fighters on Home-grown Radicalisation? Radicalisation Research Briefing, 6 July 2015. Open Google Scholar
  120. Malet, D. (2013): Foreign Fighters: Transnational Identity in Civil Conflicts, Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  121. Malet, D. & Hayes, R. (2020): Foreign Fighter Returnees: An Indefinite Threat? Terrorism and Political Violence 32/8, pp. 1617–1635. Open Google Scholar
  122. Marume, S.B.M., Jubenkanda, R.R., Namusi, C.W. & Madziyire, N. C. (2016): An Analysis of Essential Elements of the State, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 5/3, pp. 24–28. Open Google Scholar
  123. Mayk, L. (2018): Tatbestandsprobleme des §89a StGB–Struktur und Reichweite der Vorbereitung einer schweren staatsgefährdenden Gewalttat, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar
  124. Minkkinen, P. (2013): The “Last Resort”: A Moral and/or Legal Principle? Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3/1, pp. 21–30. Open Google Scholar
  125. Miron, L. (2021): Listening to the “Voice of Islam”: The Turkestan Islamic Party’s Online Propaganda Strategy, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, pp. 1–26. Open Google Scholar
  126. Mitsilegas, V. (2016a): EU Criminal Law after Lisbon, Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  127. Mitsilegas, V. (2016b): Transnational Criminal Law and the Global Rule of Law, in Capaldo, G.Z. (ed.): The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2016, Oxford, pp. 47–80. Open Google Scholar
  128. Mol, C.V. & Valk, H. (2016): Migration and Immigrants in Europe: A Historical and Demographic Perspective, in Garcés-Mascareñas, B. & Penninx, R. (eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe, Berlin, pp. 36–37. Open Google Scholar
  129. Möller, V. & Mischler, A. (2020): The Soundtrack of the Extreme: Nasheeds and Right-Wing Extremist Music as a “Gateway Drug” into the Radical Scene? International Annals of Criminology 58, pp. 291–334. Open Google Scholar
  130. Müller T. N. (2014): Preventive Detention as A Counter–terrorism Instrument in Germany, Crime, Law and Social Change 62, pp. 323–335. Open Google Scholar
  131. Nakamichi, Y., Cai., S. (Trans.) (2021): The Two-stage Construction of the Analysis of Criminal Legislation and the Preparation of Terrorist Activities, Journal of Political Science and Law 2, pp. 134–144. Open Google Scholar
  132. Neriah, J. (2017): Chinese Troops Arrive in Syria to Fight Uyghur Rebels, Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs, 20 December 2017, http://www.uighur.nl/chinese-troops-arrive-in-syria-to-fight-uyghur-rebels/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  133. Nilsson, M. (2019): Motivations for Jihad and Cognitive Dissonance — A Qualitative Analysis of Former Swedish Jihadist, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, pp. 1–19. Open Google Scholar
  134. Oehmichen, A. (2008): Incommunicado Detention in Germany: An Example of Reactive Anti-Terror Legislation and Long-term Consequences, German Law Journal 9/7, pp. 855–888. Open Google Scholar
  135. Olsen, H.P. & Wiesener, C. (2020): Beyond Data Protection Concerns — The European Passenger Name Record System, iCourts Working Paper Series 207. Open Google Scholar
  136. Pan, G. (2013): The Development of Extremist and Terrorist Organisations in the Hinterland of Eurasia and the Threats to China, Global Review 5/5, pp. 89–98. Open Google Scholar
  137. Pan, G. (2006): East Turkestan Terrorism and the Terrorist Arc: China’s Post-9/11 Anti-Terror Strategy, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4/2, pp.19 – 24. Open Google Scholar
  138. Pan, G. & Zhao, G. (2008): New Changes of the “East Turkestan” Forces since 9/11 and Driving Factors, Contemporary International Relations 10, pp. 47–54. Open Google Scholar
  139. Pantucci, R. (2010): Uyghurs Convicted in East Turkestan Islamic Movement Plot in Dubai, Terrorism Monitor 8/29, pp. 5–6. Open Google Scholar
  140. Pei, X. & Wang, X. (2019): Global Perspective on Trial in Absentia, Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition 59/6, pp. 59–72. Open Google Scholar
  141. Pei, X., Wang, X. & Liu, X. (2017): Interpretation of Difficult Issues in the Confiscation of Illegal Income, Journal of Law Application 13, pp. 2–15. Open Google Scholar
  142. Perteshi, S. (2020): Foreign Fighters and Kosovo’s Diaspora: The Case of Germany, KCSS Policy Background Paper. Open Google Scholar
  143. Pew Research Centre (2013): The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, 30 April 2013, https://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  144. Pîrvulescu, C. (2016): Opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Combating Terrorism and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on Combating Terrorism, European Economic and Social Committee. Open Google Scholar
  145. Puschke, J. (2018): Das neue Terrorismusstrafrecht im Lichte der Verfassung, Kriminalpolitische Zeitschrift 2, pp. 101–108. Open Google Scholar
  146. Qi, J. (2018): Discussion on the Unjustifiability of Anti-Terrorism Administrative Confirmation, Peking University Law Journal 30/4, pp. 976–991. Open Google Scholar
  147. Ratelle. J. (2020): Jihad at Home or Leaving for Syria and Iraq: Understanding the Motivations of Dagestani Salafists, Perspectives on Terrorism 14/2, pp. 57–68. Open Google Scholar
  148. Reed, J.T. & Raschke, D. (2010): The ETIM — China’s Islamic Militants and the Global Islamist Threat, Santa Barbara, pp. 1–9. Open Google Scholar
  149. Reem, A. & Pisoiu. D. (2014): Ausländische Kämpfer: Ein Überblick über die Forschung und eine vergleichende Studie über britische und deutsche ausländische Kämpfer, in IFSH Jahres Bericht 2014, pp. 43–48. Open Google Scholar
  150. Ren, W. (2018): The Legal Effect and Implement of Resolutions of the Security Council in the Context of Global Governance, Legal Daily, 28 November 2018. Open Google Scholar
  151. Ren, X. & Xie, L. (2019): The Spread and Developmental Trend of “Eastern Turkestan” Forces in Syria and the Countermeasures, Journal of Jiangnan Social University 21/2, pp. 32–37. Open Google Scholar
  152. Rigotti, C. & Barboza, J.B. (2021): Unfolding the Case of Returnees: How the European Union and Its Member States are Addressing the Return of Foreign Fighters and Their Families, International Review of the Red Cross, 30 July 2021. Open Google Scholar
  153. Robinson, G. E. (2020): Global Jihad: A Brief History, Stanford. Open Google Scholar
  154. Rosenblatt, N. (2016): All Jihad is Local: What ISIS’ Files Tell Us about its Fighters, New America Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  155. Roxin, C. & Greco, L. (2020): Strafrecht — Allgemeiner Teil, 5. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar
  156. Sandee, R. (2008): The Islamic Jihad Union, The NEFA Foundation, 14 October 2008. Open Google Scholar
  157. Satzger, H. & Schluckebier, W. (2020): StPO–Kommentar, 4. Aufl., Köln. Open Google Scholar
  158. Scheinin, M. (2014): Back to Post-9/11 Panic? Security Council Resolution on Foreign Terrorist Fighters, Verfassungsblog, 23 September 2014, https://verfassungsblog.de/back-post-911-panic-security-council-resolution-foreign-terrorist-fighters/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  159. Scheinin, M. (2015): The Council of Europe’s Draft Protocol on Foreign Terrorist Fighters is Fundamentally Flawed, Just Security, 18 March 2015, https://www.justsecurity.org/21207/council-europe-draft-protocol-foreign-terrorist-fighters-fundamentally-flawed/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  160. Schmid, A.P. (2015): Foreign (Terrorist) Fighter Estimates: Conceptual and Data Issues, ICCT Policy Brief, 27 October 2015. Open Google Scholar
  161. Schmid, A.P. & Tinnes, J. (2015): Foreign (Terrorist) Fighters with IS: A European Perspective, ICCT Research Paper, 23 December 2015. Open Google Scholar
  162. Schönke, A., & Schröder, H. (2019): Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar. 30. Aufl. München. Open Google Scholar
  163. Sieber, U. (2018): The New Architecture of Security Law — Crime Control in the Global Risk Society, in Sieber, U., Mitsilegas, V., Mylonopoulos, C., Billis, E., & Knust, N. (eds.): Alternative Systems of Crime Control, Berlin, pp. 3–38. Open Google Scholar
  164. Sieber, U. (2016): The Paradigm Shift in the Global Risk Society: from Criminal Law to Global Security Law — an Analysis of the Changing Limits of Crime Control, Journal of Eastern-European Criminal Law 1, pp. 14–27. Open Google Scholar
  165. Shanahan, R. (2021): Foreign Fighters: The Question of Justice, The Interpreter, 15 October 2021, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/foreign-fighters-question-justice [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  166. Shiva, J. (2016): International Terrorism and Stateless Revoking Citizenship of Foreign Fighters, Chicago Journal of International Law 17/1, pp. 178–216. Open Google Scholar
  167. Shultz, T. (2018): Combating Statelessness in the Wake of the Syrian Conflict: Right without Remedy, Notre Dame Journal of International Comparative Law 8/2, pp. 131–156. Open Google Scholar
  168. Soliev, N. (2017): Uyghur Militancy in and beyond Southeast Asia: An Assessment, Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses 9/2, February 2017. Open Google Scholar
  169. Soloshcheva, M. A. (2017): The Uyghur Terrorism: Phenomenon and Genesis, Iran and the Caucasus 21, pp. 415–430. Open Google Scholar
  170. Soufan Group (2014): Foreign Fighters in Syria. Open Google Scholar
  171. Soufan Group (2015): Foreign Fighters: An Updated Assessment of the Flow of Foreign Fighters into Syria and Iraq. Open Google Scholar
  172. Soufan Group (2017): Beyond the Caliphate: Foreign Fighters and the Threat of Returnees. Open Google Scholar
  173. Speckhard, A. & Ellenberg, M. D. (2020): ISIS in Their Own Words: Recruitment History, Motivations for Joining, Travel, Experiences in ISIS, and Disillusionment over Time — Analysis of 220 In-depth Interviews of ISIS Returnees, Defectors and Prisoners, Journal of Strategic Security 13/1, pp. 82–127. Open Google Scholar
  174. Steinberg, G.W. (2017): Islamist Terrorism in Germany: Threats, Responses, and the Need for a Strategy, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies Policy Report 66. Open Google Scholar
  175. Steinberg, G.W. (2013): German Jihad: On the Internationalization of Islamist Terrorism, New York. Open Google Scholar
  176. Steinberg, G.W. (2008): A Turkish Al-Qaida: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism, Strategic Insights, July 2008. Open Google Scholar
  177. Stenersen, A. (2017): Al-Qaida in Afghanistan, Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  178. Stenersen, A. (2011): Al Qaida’s Foot Soldiers: A Study of the Biographies of Foreign Fighters Killed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Between 2002 and 2006, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 3, pp. 171–198. Open Google Scholar
  179. Stewart, E. (2021): The Islamic State Stopped Talking about China, Works on the Rocks, 19 January 2021, https://warontherocks.com/2021/01/the-islamic-state-stopped-talking-about-uighurs/ [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  180. Sulce, M. (2019): The Syrian Armed Conflict: Nearing the End? Geneva Academy. Open Google Scholar
  181. Talmon, S. (2005): The Security Council as World Legislature, The American Journal of International Law 99/1, pp. 175–193. Open Google Scholar
  182. Thielmann, J. (2014): Salafism in Germany, in Peter, F. & Ortega, R. (eds.), Islamic Movements of Europe: Public Religion and Islamophobia in the Modern World, Bloomsbury, pp. 165–168. Open Google Scholar
  183. Tohti, N (2014): Developmental Characteristics of Uyghurs’ Religion in History, Information of Social Sciences in Xinjiang 2, pp. 15–22. Open Google Scholar
  184. Toprak, A. & Weitzel, G. (2019): Warum Salafismus den jugendkulturellen Aspekt erfüllt, in Toprak, A. & Weitzel, G. (eds.), Salafismus In Deutschland, Berlin, pp. 47–59. Open Google Scholar
  185. Tuori, K. (2013): Ultima Ratio as a Constitutional Principle, Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3/1, pp. 6–20. Open Google Scholar
  186. Tursun, G. (2014): On Individual Features of “Eastern Turkestan” Terrorism and its Future Developments, Contemporary International Relations 1, pp. 56–62. Open Google Scholar
  187. van Ginkel, B. (2015): The (In-)Effectiveness of “Deterrence” as an Instrument Against Jihadist Terrorist Threats, International Centre for Counterterrorism. Open Google Scholar
  188. van Ginkel, B. & Entenmann, E. (2016): The Foreign Fighters Phenomenon in the European Union. Profiles, Threats & Policies, ICCT Research Paper No. 2. Open Google Scholar
  189. von Hirsch, A. (2014): Harm and Wrongdoing in Criminalization Theory, Criminal Law and Philosophy 8, pp. 245–256. Open Google Scholar
  190. von Hirsch, A. (2011): Crimes, Harms and Wrongs: on the Principles of Criminalization, Bloomsbury. Open Google Scholar
  191. von Hirsch, A. (2003): Der Rechtsgutbegriff und das “Harm Principle”, in Hefendehl, R., von Hirsch, A. & Wohlers, W. (eds.), Die Rechtsgutstheorie: Legitimationsbasis des Strafrechts oder dogmatisches Glasperlenspiel? Baden-Baden, pp. 13–25. Open Google Scholar
  192. Vavoula, N. (2018): Prevention, Surveillance, and the Transformation of Citizenship in the ‘Security Union’: The case of Foreign Terrorist Fighters, Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 293. Open Google Scholar
  193. Vermaat, E. (2007): Homegrown Terrorism in Germany: The Case of Christian Ganczarski, Militant Islam Monitor, 8 October 2007. Open Google Scholar
  194. Walmsley, R. (2020): World Pre-trial/Remand Imprisonment List, 4th edition, World Prison Brief. Open Google Scholar
  195. Walther, S. (2007): Präventivhaft für terrorismusverdächtige „Gefährder“: eine Option für Deutschland? Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 12, pp. 464–475. Open Google Scholar
  196. Wang, L. (2018): Historical Causes of Terrorism in Xinjiang and Reflections on Countermeasures, Journal of Shanxi Police College 26/1, pp. 12–16. Open Google Scholar
  197. Wang, S. (2017): Justification of “Committing Perpetration Acts” Legislation — Viewing Based on Article 120b of the Criminal Code Regarding “Preparing for the Commission of Terrorist Activities”, Journal of Shihezi University (Philosophy and Social Science) 6, pp. 12–19. Open Google Scholar
  198. Wang, S. (2008): The Concept of the Subsidiary Principle and Modesty Principle of Criminal Law, Hebei Law Science 26/10, pp. 6–14. Open Google Scholar
  199. Wang, S. (2003): Modern Theories of Punishment and Choice of China, Chinese Journal of Law 3, pp. 107–131. Open Google Scholar
  200. Wang, Z. (2014): Analysis of the Characteristics and Assessment of the Current Situation of Terrorist Crime, Criminal Law Review 35/2, pp. 645–672. Open Google Scholar
  201. Widagdo, S., Indrayanti, K.W. & Saraswati, A.A.A.N. (2021): Repatriation as a Human Rights Approach to State Options in Dealing with Returning ISIS Foreign Terrorist Fighters, SAGE Open, July 2021. Open Google Scholar
  202. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2006): Anatomy of the Salafi Movement, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29/3, pp. 207–239. Open Google Scholar
  203. Williams, B.G. (2011): On the Trail of the “Lions of Islam”: Foreign Fighters in Afghanistan and Pakistan, 1980–2010, Orbis 55/2, pp. 216–239. Open Google Scholar
  204. Wolter, J. (2015a): Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, 9. Aufl. Köln. Open Google Scholar
  205. Wolter, J. (2015b): Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafprozeßordnung, 5. Aufl. Köln. Open Google Scholar
  206. Wright, L. (2006): The Looming Tower, New York. Open Google Scholar
  207. Wu, P. (2015): Formation and Distinction of the “Three Forces” in Xinjiang, Exploration and Free Views 10, pp. 54–59. Open Google Scholar
  208. Wu, S. (2009): The Art Wearing on the Head — Uyghur Dopa, Art Observation 12, p. 115. Open Google Scholar
  209. Wu, Y. (2002): Islamic Fundamentalism, Religious Extremism and International Terrorism, Social Sciences Abroad 1, pp. 14–20. Open Google Scholar
  210. Xie, X. & Zhu. C. (2019): An Empirical Study on the Application of Designated Residence Surveillance by Public Security Authorities — A Big Data Sample of 5955, China Law Review 6, pp. 74–87. Open Google Scholar
  211. Xu, J. (2018): The “Hijra Movement” of East Turkestan Forces and the International Game behind It, Journal of United Front Science 3, pp. 55–60. Open Google Scholar
  212. Xu, J. (2009): A Look at the “East Turkestan” Separatist Forces Abroad, China Economic Weekly 27, pp. 19–21. Open Google Scholar
  213. Yu, S. (2015): The So-called “Wahhabis” in Xinjiang is in Nature Contemporary Islamic Extremism, Social Sciences in Xinjiang 4, pp. 64–67. Open Google Scholar
  214. Zedner, L. (2016): Citizenship Deprivation, Security and Human Rights, European Journal of Migration and Law 18/2, pp. 222–242. Open Google Scholar
  215. Zedner, L. & Ashworth, A. (2019): The Rise and Restraint of the Preventive State, The Annual Review of Criminology 2, pp. 429–450. Open Google Scholar
  216. Zenn, J. (2014a): Turkestan Islamic Party Increases Its Media Profile, CACI Analyst, 2 February 2014, https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/12909-Turkestan-islamic-party-increases-its-media-profile.html [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  217. Zestos, G.K. & Cooke, R.N. (2020): Challenges for the EU as Germany Approaches Recession, Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No. 948. Open Google Scholar
  218. Zhang, C. (2014): Terrorist Violent Videos Spread in Xinjiang, Phoenix Weekly, 26 May 2014, http://www.ynmm.gov.cn/xxyd/wzsb/07603330185604365478 [17.12.2021]. Open Google Scholar
  219. Zhang, J. (2012): Risk Criminal Law: Development from the Perspective of Preventive Function, Beijing. Open Google Scholar
  220. Zhang, J. (2008): A Basic Analysis of the Last Resort Principle of Criminal law, Western Law Review 3, pp. 50–57. Open Google Scholar
  221. Zhang, Y. (2017): On South Line Invasion of ETO from the Status Quo Analysis of Southeast Asian Terrorism, Journal of Political Science and Law 34/1, pp. 121–128. Open Google Scholar
  222. Zhao, T. (2020): The Normative Application of the Accusation of Preparing to Commit Terrorist Activities, Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute 9, pp. 32–38. Open Google Scholar
  223. Zheng, X. (2018): The Dual Nature of the Constitutional and Legal Committee of the NPCSC —Legislative Review in Constitutional Review, China Law Review 22/4, pp. 33–42. Open Google Scholar
  224. Zhou, C. (2019): The Applicable Conditions of Trial by Default for Defendants Fleeing the Country in Legal Dogmatic Angle, Law Science Magazine 8, pp. 1–10. Open Google Scholar
  225. Zhou, M. (2019): The Relationship and Connection between Procedure regarding Confiscation of illegal income and Criminal Procedure regarding Trial in Absentia, Social Science Review 11, pp. 98–103. Open Google Scholar
  226. Zhou, Z. (2016): Comparative Study on Anti-Terrorism Measures from the Perspective of Entry and Exit — Taking Article 39 of the Counterterrorism Law as an Example, Jiangsu Social Sciences 9, pp. 143–149. Open Google Scholar
  227. Zou, D. & Cai, C. (2014): Report of the Application of Residential Confinement at Designated Places by the Prosecutorate of Gunlin City in 2013, Criminal Science 1, pp. 127–132. Open Google Scholar
  228. Zyada, M. & Qian, L. (2018): Brewed the Bitter Wine: Reasons for the Radicalisation of Salafism in Europe — with Germany and France as a Case Study, Chinese Journal of European Studies 5, pp. 92–126 + 7–8. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Criminal Law & Criminology", "Law General, Comprehensive Works and Collections"
Cover of book: Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Book Titles No access
Stefan Holzmaier
Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Cover of book: Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Book Titles No access
Patricia Magdalena Labussek
Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Cover of book: Die Rolle des Gerichts im Rahmen des Prozessvergleichs
Book Titles No access
Adomas Jankauskis
Die Rolle des Gerichts im Rahmen des Prozessvergleichs
Cover of book: Kostenübersichtstabellen
Book Titles No access
Manfred Schmeckenbecher, Karin Scheungrab
Kostenübersichtstabellen