Cover des Buchs: Foreign Terrorist Fighters: Phenomenon and Legal Countermeasures
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Foreign Terrorist Fighters: Phenomenon and Legal Countermeasures

A Comparative Study between Germany and China
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 02.02.2023

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Buch ist das Ergebnis einer rechtsvergleichenden Untersuchung des Phänomens ausländischer terroristischer Kämpfer sowie der diesbezüglichen rechtlichen Maßnahmen. Das Phänomen löste nach dem Aus-bruch des syrischen Bürgerkriegs internationale Besorgnis aus. Zustände von Angst oder gar Panik können zu Misstrauen und Fehlentscheidungen mit weitreichenden Auswirkungen führen. In diesem Zusammenhang werden zwei Fragen untersucht: Ob ein umfassendes Verständnis des Phänomens vorhanden ist, das als Grundlage für vernünftige Lösungen dienen kann, und ob die derzeitigen rechtlichen Reaktionen auf das Problem im Lichte des Rechtsstaatsprinzips angemessen und vertretbar sind.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2023
Erscheinungsdatum
02.02.2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0492-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3817-0
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriften zur Kriminologie
Band
27
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
318
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 18
    1. 1. Statement of the Problem Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Methodology Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Definition of Foreign Terrorist Fighters Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Structure Kein Zugriff
    1. 1. Overall Introduction Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.1.1.1 Main manifestations Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.1.1.2 Main characteristics Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.1.2.1.1 The Sauerland Group Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.1.2.1.2 German Taliban Mujahidin Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.1.2.2 Main characteristics Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.1.3 Unprecedented outbreak period (2012–) Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.1.1 Age, gender and marital status Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.1.2 Nationality and residence before departure Kein Zugriff
          3. 2.2.1.3 Educational background and professional status Kein Zugriff
          4. 2.2.1.4 Criminal records and travel experience Kein Zugriff
          5. 2.2.1.5 Religious orientation Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.1 Departure Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.2.2 Return Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.2.3 Affiliated organisations and activities in Syria and Iraq Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.1 Recruitment by Islamic State Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.2 Influence of domestic Salafist networks Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.3 The role of social networks Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.4 Threats assessment of German Terrorist Fighters in Syria and Iraq Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.1.1 Transnational rampant period (1996–2001) Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.1.2 International spreading period (2002–2010) Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.1.3 Global jihad period (2011–) Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.1.1 Age, gender and marital status Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.2.1.2 Nationality and residence before departure Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.2.1.3 Educational background and professional status Kein Zugriff
          4. 3.2.1.4 Criminal records and travel experience Kein Zugriff
          5. 3.2.1.5 Religious orientation Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.2.1 Departure Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.2.2.2 Return Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.2.3 Affiliated organisations and activities in Syria and Iraq Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.3.1 Recruitment by Islamic State Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.3.2 Recruitment by the Turkestan Islamic Party Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.3.3 Influence of the “Hijrah Jihad” idea Kein Zugriff
        4. 3.3.4 The role of social networks Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4 Threats assessment of Chinese Terrorist Fighters in Syria and Iraq Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Comparative Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1 Resolution 2170 (2014) of the United Nations Security Council Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.1.1 The Preamble Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.2.1.2.1 Compulsory measures Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.2.1.2.2 Optional measures Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.1 Improper connection with armed conflicts Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.2.2 Lack of a definition of terrorism and over-criminalisation Kein Zugriff
          3. 2.2.2.3 Challenges in implementation Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.1 Compulsory measures Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.2 Optional measures Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1 Detailed content of the Additional Protocol Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.1 De facto narrow applicability Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.2 Over-expansion of criminal liability Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.1.1 Detailed content of CT-Directive Kein Zugriff
          1. 4.1.2.1 Ambiguous phrasing Kein Zugriff
          2. 4.1.2.2 Over-expansion of criminal responsibility Kein Zugriff
          3. 4.1.2.3 Restriction on the freedom of movement Kein Zugriff
          4. 4.1.2.4 Lack of logical consistency Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.1 Detailed content of PNR Directive Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.2 A comment on PNR Directive Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.3.1 Detailed content of SIS Regulations Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.3.2 A comment on the SIS Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.4 Enhancing external border control through the Schengen Borders Code Kein Zugriff
    5. 5. Summary and Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.1.1.1.1 Criminalising preparing activities by a single perpetrator Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.1.1.1.2 Criminalising travelling abroad for terrorist training or ESSG Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.1.1.2 Criminalising travelling abroad for joining terrorist organisations Kein Zugriff
          3. 2.1.1.3 Criminalising financing of travelling abroad for terrorist purposes Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.1.2.1.1 Special pretrial detention rules for terrorist suspects and defendants Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.1.2.1.2 Restriction on the communication with defence counsel Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.1.2.2.1 Special jurisdictional rules Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.1.2.2.2 Special investigative measures Kein Zugriff
            3. 2.1.2.2.3 Non-prosecution of offences linked to foreign terrorist organisations Kein Zugriff
            4. 2.1.2.2.4 Seizure of property Kein Zugriff
            5. 2.1.2.2.5 Trial without the presence of the defendant Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.1.1 Enhancing information exchanging through anti-terror data systems Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.1.2 Collecting and exchanging personal data through PNR Database Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.1 Citizenship revocation Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.2.2 Measures regarding personal travel documents and travel bans Kein Zugriff
          3. 2.2.2.3 Upgraded residency policies Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3 Summary Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.1.1.1 Criminalising illegal travelling abroad for terrorist purposes Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.1.1.2 Criminalising travelling abroad for joining terrorist organisations Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.1.1.3 Criminalising travelling abroad for terrorist training and terrorist activities Kein Zugriff
          4. 3.1.1.4 Criminalising facilitation of travelling abroad for terrorist purposes Kein Zugriff
            1. 3.1.2.1.1 Restriction on the communication with defence counsel Kein Zugriff
            2. 3.1.2.1.2 Special pretrial detention rules for terrorist suspects and defendants Kein Zugriff
            1. 3.1.2.2.1 Special jurisdictional rules Kein Zugriff
            2. 3.1.2.2.2 Technical investigative measures Kein Zugriff
            3. 3.1.2.2.3 Confiscating the illegal income of terrorist suspects and defendants Kein Zugriff
            4. 3.1.2.2.4 Trial in absentia Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.1.1 Basic content Kein Zugriff
            1. 3.2.1.2.1 Enhancing border control Kein Zugriff
            2. 3.2.1.2.2 Restrictions on exit/entry travels and travel documents Kein Zugriff
            3. 3.2.1.2.3 Detaining and transferring terrorist suspects or items Kein Zugriff
            4. 3.2.1.2.4 Restrictive measures on terrorist suspects Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.2.1 Citizenship revocation Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.2.2.2 Measures regarding personal travel documents and travel bans Kein Zugriff
            1. 3.2.2.3.1 Legal basis Kein Zugriff
            2. 3.2.2.3.2 Law enforcement Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3 Summary Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.1.1 Violating the principle of harm and culpability Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.1.2 Overemphasising the preventive function of criminal law Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.1.3 Rejecting the principle of ultima ratio Kein Zugriff
        4. 4.1.4 Ineffectiveness in legal practice Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.1 Justification of administrative measures Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.2 Citizenship revocation Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.2.3 Restrictions on travel documents and travel bans Kein Zugriff
    5. 5. Summary and Conclusion Kein Zugriff
  6. Chapter V Conclusion Kein Zugriff 281 - 290
  7. Literature Kein Zugriff 291 - 318

Literaturverzeichnis (228)

  1. Ackerman, G. & Peterson, H. (2020): Terrorism and COVID-19: Actual and Potential Impacts, Perspectives on Terrorism 14/3, pp. 59–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Al-Ghadhawi, A. (2020): Uighur Jihadists in Syria, Newlines Institute, 18 March 2020, https://newlinesinstitute.org/uyghurs/uighur-jihadists-in-syria/ [17.12.2021] Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Albrecht, H.J. (2020): Data, Data Banks and Security, European Journal for Security Research 5, pp. 5–23. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Albrecht, H.J. (2006): Counterterrorism Policies in Germany, Forschung aktuell/Research in Brief Vol. 38, Max-Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg i. Br., 1 September 2006, http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-48D3-9 [17.10.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Alfifi, M., Kaghazgaran, P., Caverlee, J., & Morstatter, F. (2018): Measuring the Impact of ISIS Social Media Strategy, https://snap.stanford.edu/mis2/files/MIS2_paper_23.pdf [17.10.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Alvarez, J.E. (2003): Hegemonic International Law Revisited, American Journal of International Law 97/4, pp. 873–888. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Ambos, K. (2014): Our Terrorists, Your Terrorists? The United Nations Security Council Urges States to Combat “Foreign Terrorist Fighters”, but Does Not Define “Terrorism”, EJIL Talk, 2 October 2014, https://www.ejiltalk.org/our-terrorists-your-terrorists-the-united-nations-security-council-urges-states-to-combat-foreign-terrorist-fighters-but-does-not-define-terrorism/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Archick, K., Belkin, P., Blanchard, C.M & Humud. C.E. (2015): European Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, Responses, and Issues for the United States, Congressional Research Service. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Arnell, P. (2020): The Legality of the Citizenship Deprivation of UK Foreign Terrorist Fighters, Journal of the Academy of European Law, ERA Forum 21, pp. 395–412. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Ashworth, A. & Zedner, L. (2014): Preventive Justice, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Baele, S.J., Boyd, K.A. & Coan, T.G. (2021): The Matrix of Islamic State’s Propaganda —Magazines, in Baele, S. J., Boyd, K. A. & Coan, T.G. (eds.), ISIS Propaganda: A Full-Spectrum Extremist Message, Oxford, pp. 84–126. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Baker, R. (2008): China and the Enduring Uighurs, Security Weekly, 6 August 2008, https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/china-and-enduring-uighurs [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Bakker, E. (2008): Jihadi Terrorists in Europe and Global Salafi Jihadis, in Coolsaet, R. (ed.), Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalisation Challenge in Europe, Farnham, pp. 69–84. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Bakker, E. & Grol, P. (2015): Motives and Considerations of Potential Foreign Fighters from the Netherlands, ICCT Policy Brief. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Bakker, E. & de Bont, R. (2016): Belgian and Dutch Jihadist Foreign Fighters (2012–2015): Characteristic, Motivations, and Roles in the War in Syria and Iraq, Small Wars and Insurgencies 27/5, pp. 837–857. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bąkowski, P. & Voronova, S. (2015): The Proposed EU Passenger Name Records (PNR) Directive Revived in the New Security Context, European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Benton, M. & Banulescu–Bogdan, N. (2019): Foreign Fighters: Will Revoking Citizenship Mitigate the Threat? MPI Migration Information Source, 3 April 2019, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/foreign-fighters-will-revoking-citizenship-mitigate-threat [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Bock, S. & Stark, F. (2018): Preparatory Offences, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 64/2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Botobekov, U. (2021): How Central Asian Salafi-Jihadi Groups are Exploiting the COVID-19 Pandemic: New Opportunities and Challenges, in Käsehage, N. (ed.), Religious Fundamentalism in the Age of Pandemic, Bielefeld, pp. 107–148. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Boutin, B. (2016): Administrative Measures against Foreign Fighters: In Search of Limits and Safeguards, ICCT Research Paper. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Braun, K. (2018): “Home, Sweet Home”: Managing Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters in Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia, International Community Law Review 20, pp. 311–346. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Butt, R. & Tuck, H. (2016): European Counter-Radicalisation and De-radicalisation: A Comparative Evaluation of Approaches in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, European Commission Report. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Caiola, A. (2017): The European Parliament and the Directive on Combating Terrorism, ERA Forum 18, pp. 409–424. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Cai, Y. (2020): An Empirical Study on the Application of Residential Confinement in Designated Places by Public Security Authorities—A sample of 703 judgments from 2018–2019, Journal of People’s Public Security University of China (Social Sciences Edition) 206/4, pp. 38–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Chen, F. (2014): Research on Deradicalisation in Xinjiang, Phoenix Weekly, April 2014, https://news.ifeng.com/mainland/special/xjqjdh/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Chen, G. (2019): The Amendment of Criminal Procedure Law and the New Development of Criminal Procuratorial Work, Journal of National Prosecutors College 1, pp. 16–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Chen, S. (2021): On the Empowering Function of Duty Lawyer System—Taking the Right to See Duty Counsel for Criminal Suspects as an Entry Point, Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law 3, pp. 113–125. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Chen, R. (2011): Criminal Procedural Law: A Law on Citizens’ Rights, Not A Law Governing Citizens, Southern Weekend, 9 September 2011, http://www.infzm.com/contents/62958 [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Chen, R. (2001): Legal Control of Pretrial Detention — from a Comparative Perspective, Tribune of Political Science and Law 4, pp. 99–112. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Chen, X. (2015): A Dogmatic Critique on the Risk Criminal Law Theory, Peking University Law Journal 1, pp. 103–127. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Chen, Z. (2017): Analysis of the Characteristics and Countermeasures of Current “Hijrah” Activities in China, Journal of Yunnan Police College 120/1, pp. 31–36. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Christien, A., Jouenne, E. & Scott-Kakures, E. (2020): How COVID-19 Underscores the Urgent Need to Repatriate Women and Children from Northeast Syria Camps, Georgetown Institution for Women, Peace and Security, 9 December 2020. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Clarke, C.P. & Kan, P. R. (2017): Uyghur Foreign Fighters: An Underexamined Jihadist Challenge, ICCT Policy Brief, November 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Coca‑Vila, I. (2020): Our “Barbarians” at the Gate: On the Undercriminalized Citizenship Deprivation as a Counterterrorism Tool, Criminal Law and Philosophy 14, pp. 149–167. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Cook, J. & Vale, G. (2018): From Daesh to ‘Diaspora’: Tracing the Women and Minors of Islamic State, ICSR. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Coolsaet, R. (2017): Anticipating the Post-Daesh Landscape, EGMONT Paper 97. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Coolsaet, R. (2016): Facing the Fourth Foreign Fighters Wave: What Drives Europeans to Syria and to Islamic State? Insights from the Belgian Case, EGMONT Paper 81. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Cuyckens, H. (2021): Foreign Fighters and the Tension between Counterterrorism and International Humanitarian Law: A Case for Cumulative Prosecution Where Possible, International Review of the Red Cross (IRRC). Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Dantschke, C. (2019): Attraktivität, Anziehungskraft und Akteure des politischen und militanten Salafismus in Deutschland, in Toprak, A. & Weitzel, G. (eds.), Salafismus In Deutschland, Berlin, pp. 61–67. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Dantschke, C. (2013): “Pop-Jihad”: History and Structure of Salafism and Jihadism in Germany, Institute for the Study of Radical Movements, Working Paper 2/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Dawson, L.L. (2021): A Comparative Analysis of the Data on Western Foreign Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Who Went and Why? ICCT Research Paper. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Dowson, L.L. (2018): Debating the Role of Religion in the Motivation of Religious Terrorism, Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 31/2, pp. 98–117. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Dawson, L.L. (2015): Challenging the Curious Erasure of Religion from the Study of Religious Terrorism, NUMEN 63, pp. 141–164. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Dawson, L.L. & Amarasingam, A. (2017): Talking to Foreign Fighters: Insights into the Motivations for Hijrah to Syria and Iraq, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 40/3, pp. 191–210. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte (DIM) (2021): Abschiebungen nach Syrien — Eine menschenrechtliche Bewertung der aktuellen Debatte, June 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Dodwell, B. & Milton, D. (2018): Jihadi Brides? Examining a Female Guesthouse Registry from the Islamic State’s Caliphate, CTC Sentinel 11/5. pp. 16–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Dodwell, B., Milton, D. & Rassler, D. (2016): The Caliphate’s Global Workforce: An Inside Look at the Islamic State’s Foreign Fighter Paper Trail, West Point: Combating Terrorism Centre. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Duchâtel, M. (2019): China’s Foreign Fighters Problem, War on the Rocks, 25 January 2019, https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/chinas-foreign-fighters-problem/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Dworkin, A. (2019): Beyond Good and Evil: Why Europe Should Bring ISIS Foreign Fighters Home, European Council on Foreign Relations/305, 25 October 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Eijkman, Q. (2014): The German Sauerland Cell Reconsidered, Perspective on Terrorism 8/4, pp. 82–90. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Eriksson, B. (2021): A Visit to Northeast Syria Shows the Urgency for Governments to Repatriate Their Citizens, Many of Them Children, to Thwart ISIS, Just Security, 2 September 2021, https://www.justsecurity.org/78064/a-visit-to-northeast-syria-shows-the-urgency-for-governments-to-repatriate-their-citizens-many-of-them-children-to-thwart-isis/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Eser, A. (2021): Straftheorien — reflektiert aus der Sicht von Hans-Jörg Albrecht, in Haverkamp, R., Kilchling, M., Kinzig, J., Oberwittler, D. & Wössner, G. (eds.), Unterwegs in Kriminologie und Strafrecht — Exploring the World of Crime and Criminology: Festschrift für Hans-Jörg Albrecht zum 70. Geburtstag, Berlin, pp. 543–560. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Feng, X. & Ma, Y. (2018): Extraterritorial Study of the Deprivation of Nationality of Transnational Terrorists and China’s Reference, Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition) 2, pp. 90–97. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Foster, D. & Milton, D. (2018): Children at War: Foreign Child Recruits of the Islamic State, CTC Sentinel 11/6, pp. 11–17. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Frissen,T., Toguslu, E., Van Ostaeyen, P. & d’Haenens, L. (2018): Capitalizing on the Koran to Fuel Online Violent Radicalisation: A taxonomy of Koranic References in ISIS’s Dabiq, Telematics and Informatics 35/2, pp. 491–503. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. GCTF (2015): “Foreign Terrorist Fighters” (FTF) Initiative, The Hague–Marrakech Memorandum on Good Practices for a More Effective Response to the FTF Phenomenon, GCTF FTF Initiative. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Georges, A. (2015): ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah, Trends Working Paper 6/2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) (2021): Not a Storm in a Teacup: The Islamic State after the Caliphate, GIGA Focus No. 3, April 2021, https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/24482149-storm-teacup-islamic-state-after-caliphate/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Ginkel, B.V. (2014): The New Security Council Resolution 2178 on Foreign Terrorist Fighters: A Missed Opportunity for a Holistic Approach, ICCT Commentary. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Ginkel, B.V. & Minks, S. (2018): Addressing the Challenge of Returnees: Threat Perceptions, Policies and Practices in the Netherlands, in Renard, T. & Coolsaet, R. (eds): Returnees: Who Are They, Why Are They (not) Coming Back and How Should We Deal With Them? EGMONT Paper 101, pp. 55–70. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Glušac, L. (2020): Criminalization as Anxious and Ineffective Response to Foreign Fighters Phenomenon in the West Balkans, Journal of Regional Security 15/1, pp. 39–74. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Gohel, S. M. (2011): Germany Increasingly a Centre for Terrorism in Europe, CTC Sentinel 4/8, pp. 12–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Goodie, C. (2021): Repatriation: A Short-Term Risk for Long-Term Security, Australian Institute of International Affairs, 13 August 2021, https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/repatriation-a-short-term-risk-for-long-term-security/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Gröpl, C., Windthorst, K. & von Coelln, C. (2020): Studienkommentar GG. 4. Aufl. München. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Gu. L. (2014): On Essence Characteristics of Violent Terror Crimes in Xinjiang, Journal of Xinjiang Police Officer’s Academy 34/2, pp. 3–8. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Gu, L. & Wang, M. (2016): Study of the Legal Properties of “Ijilat” and its Legal Application, Journal of Shandong Police College 150/6, pp. 36–42. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Gunaratna, R. (2003): Inside Al-Qaida, Global Network of Terror, New York. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Gunaratna, R. & Pereire, K.G. (2006): An Al-Qaida Associate Group Operating in China? China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4/2, pp. 55–61. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Gunaratna, R., Acharya, A. & Wang, P. (2010): Ethnic Identity and National Conflict in China, London, pp. 72–74. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Guo, S. (2016): Residential Confinement at Designated Residence as “Harsher than Detention”, Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences) 6, pp. 119–125. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Guttry, A. (2016): The Role Played by the UN in Countering the Phenomenon of Foreign Terrorist Fighters, in Guttry, A., Capone, F. & Paulussen, C. (eds), Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond, Berlin, pp. 259–282. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Han, X. (2011): The Improvement and Shortcomings of the Provision Regarding Defence Lawyer’s Right to Meet and Communicate — Comment and Analysis on the Relevant Provisions of the “Criminal Procedure Law Amendment (Draft)”, Journal of National Prosecutors College 10, pp. 134–140. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Hao, L. (2020): A Study on Legal Preventive Mechanism to Curb the Cross-border Movement of Terrorists, Chinese Review of International Law 1, pp. 16–34. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Hassan, H. (2016): The Sectarianism of the Islamic State: Ideological Roots and Political Context, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Hegghammer, T. (2013): Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Variation in Western Jihadists’ Choice between Domestic and Foreign Fighting, American Political Science Review 107/1, pp. 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Hegghammer, T. (2011): The Rise of Muslim Foreign Fighters: Islam and the Globalization of Jihad, International Security 35/3, pp. 53–94. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Hegghammer, T. & Nesser, P. (2015): Assessing the Islamic State’s Commitment to Attacking the West, Perspective on Terrorism 9/4, pp. 14–30. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Heinke, D. (2017): German Foreign Fighters in Syria and Iraq: The Updated Data and its Implications, CTC Sentinel 10/3, pp. 17–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Hellmuth, D. (2016): Of Alienation, Association, and Adventure: Why German Fighters Join ISIL, Journal for Deradicalisation 6, pp. 24–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Hert, P. & Papakonstantinou, V. (2015): Repeating the Mistakes of the Past Will Do Little Good for Air Passengers in the EU: The Comeback of the EU PNR Directive and a Lawyer’s Duty to Regulate Profiling, New Journal of European Criminal Law 6/2, pp. 160–165. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Hoffman, B., Rosenau, W., Curiel, A.J. & Zimmermann, D. (2007): The Radicalisation of Diasporas and Terrorism — A Joint Conference by RAND Corporation and the Centre for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, RAND Conference Proceedings. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Hofinger, V. & Schmidinger, T. (2020). ‘Muhajirun’ from Austria. Why They Left to Join ISIS and Why They Don’t Return, Journal for Deradicalisation, pp. 287–318. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Hu, D. (2021): The Application and Reflection of China’s Constitutional Review from Regulation to Practice, People’s Congress Studying 2, pp. 10–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Huang, P. (2016): Artistic Features of Traditional Uyghur Female Costume, Journal of Heihe University 3, pp. 99–103. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Huang, X. (2019): Assessing Security Issues in the Return of “East Turkestan” Terrorists, Anti-Terrorism Law Research Association of Law Society in Shaanxi Province, 15 June 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. ID-Verlag (1977): Rote Armee Fraktion — Texte und Materialien zur Geschichte der RAF, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Ingram, H.J. (2021): The Strategic Logic of Islamic State’s Full-Spectrum Propaganda — Coherence, Comprehensiveness, and Multidimensionality, in Baele, S. J., Boyd, K. A. & Coan, T. G. (eds.), ISIS Propaganda: A Full-Spectrum Extremist Message, Oxford, pp. 20–46. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2020): ISIS Foreign Fighters after the Fall of the Caliphate, Armed Conflict Survey 6/1, pp. 23–30. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Ip, J. (2020): Reconceptualising the Legal Response to Foreign Fighters, British Institute of International and Comparative Law 69, pp. 103–134. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Jareborg, N. (2004): Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio), Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2, pp. 521–534. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Jia, Y. & Li, H. (2017): A Study of the Criteria for Designation of Terrorist Organisations and Individuals — From the Redefinition of Terrorism, Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 47/3, pp. 46–57. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Jiang, W. (2011): Research on the Ultima Ratio, Legal Forum 2, pp. 88–92. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Johnstone, I. (2008): Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit, American Journal of International Law 102/2, pp. 275–308. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Jokinen, C. (2018): “Deutsche Schabab”: The Story of German Foreign Fighters in Somalia, 2010–2016, CTC Sentinel 11/5, pp. 30–37. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Joyner, D. (2017): Legal Bindingness of Security Council Resolutions Generally, and Resolution 2334 on the Israeli Settlements in Particular, EJIL Talk, 9 January 2017, https://www.ejiltalk.org/legal-bindingness-of-security-council-resolutions-generally-and-resolution-2334-on-the-israeli-settlements-in-particular/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Karagiannis, E. (2013): Transnational Islamist Networks: Western Fighters in Afghanistan, Somalia and Syria, The International Spectator 48/4, pp. 119–134. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Käsehage, N. (2021): Towards a COVID-Jihad — Millennialism in the Field of Jihadism, in Käsehage, N. (ed.), Religious Fundamentalism in the Age of Pandemic, Bielefeld, pp. 81–105. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Kerchove, G. & Höhn, C. (2016): The Regional Answers and Governance Structure for Dealing with Foreign Fighters: The Case of the EU, in Guttry, A., Capone, F. & Paulussen, C. (eds.), Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond, Berlin, pp. 299–331. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Kindhäuser, U. (2019): Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, 8. Aufl., Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Kingsbury, B., Krish, N. & Stewart, R.B. (2005): The Emergence of Global Administrative law, Law and Contemporary Problems 68/3, pp. 15–61. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Klandermans, B. (1984): Mobilization and Participation: Social-psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory, American Sociological Review 49/5, pp. 583–600. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Knauer, C., Kudlich, H. & Schneider, H. (2014): Münchener Kommentar zur Strafprozessordnung, München. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Kopitzke, C. (2017): Security Council Resolution 2178 (2014): An Ineffective Response to the Foreign Terrorist Fighter Phenomenon, Indianan Journal of Global Legal Studies 24/1, pp. 309–341. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Krähenmann, S. (2019): The Interplay Between International Humanitarian Law, Terrorism and the “Foreign Terrorist Fighter” Regime, Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 112, pp. 307–310. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Krähenmann, S. (2014): Foreign Fighters under International Law, Geneva Academy Briefing, No. 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Lahoud, N. (2017): A Cappella Songs (anashid) in Jihadi Culture, in Hegghammer, T. (ed.), Jihadi Culture: The Art and Social Practices of Militant Islamists, Cambridge, pp. 42–62. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Lao, D. (2007): Public Policy and Criminal Law in a Risk Society, Social Sciences in China 3, pp. 126–139 + 206. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Li, L. (2021): Constitutional Review by the Constitutional and Law Commission in China: Principles and Functions, Local Legislation Journal 6/2, pp. 76–97. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Li, C. & Song, S. (2016): Discussion on Illegal Outflow of Uyghur Immigrants from Xinjiang to Southeast Asia, Xinjiang Social Science 1, pp. 70–76. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Li, M. (2017): Progress and Shortcomings: Reflections on the Provisions Regarding Technical Investigative Measures in the New Criminal Procedural Code, Present-day Law Science 1, pp. 59–66. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Li, Q. (2005): On the Formation and Evolution of the “East Turkestan” Separatist Forces, Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 34/1, pp. 20–27. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Liang G. (2011): The Dilemma and Breakthrough of the Principle of General Punishment for Preparatory Acts — Interpretation and Reconstruction of Article 22 of the Criminal Code, China Legal Science 2, pp. 156–176. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Lin, X. (2017): China’s Pretrial Detention System: A Comparative Analysis with Other Countries, Wuhan University Journal (Social Science) 6, pp. 83–95. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Lindekilde, L., Bertelsen, P. & Stohl, M. (2016): Who Goes, Why, and with What Effects: The Problem of Foreign Fighters from Europe, Small Wars and Insurgencies 27/5, pp. 858–877. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Liu, G. & Li, X. (2017): Research on Vague Language and its Limitation in Provisions on Technical Investigation Measures of the Criminal Procedural Code, Criminal Science 1, pp. 113–130. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Liu, T. (2018): On the Crime of Preparing for Terrorist Activities — Unfolding of Formalized Preparation Crime, Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice 1, pp. 88–96. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Luo, H. (2022): On the Overall Improvement of China’s Counter-Terrorism Legal System — An Analysis from the Perspective of Measures of Xinjiang and Other Three Places for Implementing Anti-Terrorism Law, Political Science and Law 5, pp. 150–161. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Ma, P. (2008): Nature of Religious Extremism and its Hazards, Xinjiang Social Science 6, pp. 63–69. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Malet, D. (2015): What Does the Evidence Tell Us about the Impact of Foreign Fighters on Home-grown Radicalisation? Radicalisation Research Briefing, 6 July 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Malet, D. (2013): Foreign Fighters: Transnational Identity in Civil Conflicts, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Malet, D. & Hayes, R. (2020): Foreign Fighter Returnees: An Indefinite Threat? Terrorism and Political Violence 32/8, pp. 1617–1635. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Marume, S.B.M., Jubenkanda, R.R., Namusi, C.W. & Madziyire, N. C. (2016): An Analysis of Essential Elements of the State, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 5/3, pp. 24–28. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Mayk, L. (2018): Tatbestandsprobleme des §89a StGB–Struktur und Reichweite der Vorbereitung einer schweren staatsgefährdenden Gewalttat, Hamburg. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Minkkinen, P. (2013): The “Last Resort”: A Moral and/or Legal Principle? Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3/1, pp. 21–30. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Miron, L. (2021): Listening to the “Voice of Islam”: The Turkestan Islamic Party’s Online Propaganda Strategy, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, pp. 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Mitsilegas, V. (2016a): EU Criminal Law after Lisbon, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Mitsilegas, V. (2016b): Transnational Criminal Law and the Global Rule of Law, in Capaldo, G.Z. (ed.): The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2016, Oxford, pp. 47–80. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Mol, C.V. & Valk, H. (2016): Migration and Immigrants in Europe: A Historical and Demographic Perspective, in Garcés-Mascareñas, B. & Penninx, R. (eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe, Berlin, pp. 36–37. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Möller, V. & Mischler, A. (2020): The Soundtrack of the Extreme: Nasheeds and Right-Wing Extremist Music as a “Gateway Drug” into the Radical Scene? International Annals of Criminology 58, pp. 291–334. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Müller T. N. (2014): Preventive Detention as A Counter–terrorism Instrument in Germany, Crime, Law and Social Change 62, pp. 323–335. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Nakamichi, Y., Cai., S. (Trans.) (2021): The Two-stage Construction of the Analysis of Criminal Legislation and the Preparation of Terrorist Activities, Journal of Political Science and Law 2, pp. 134–144. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Neriah, J. (2017): Chinese Troops Arrive in Syria to Fight Uyghur Rebels, Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs, 20 December 2017, http://www.uighur.nl/chinese-troops-arrive-in-syria-to-fight-uyghur-rebels/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Nilsson, M. (2019): Motivations for Jihad and Cognitive Dissonance — A Qualitative Analysis of Former Swedish Jihadist, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, pp. 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Oehmichen, A. (2008): Incommunicado Detention in Germany: An Example of Reactive Anti-Terror Legislation and Long-term Consequences, German Law Journal 9/7, pp. 855–888. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Olsen, H.P. & Wiesener, C. (2020): Beyond Data Protection Concerns — The European Passenger Name Record System, iCourts Working Paper Series 207. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Pan, G. (2013): The Development of Extremist and Terrorist Organisations in the Hinterland of Eurasia and the Threats to China, Global Review 5/5, pp. 89–98. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Pan, G. (2006): East Turkestan Terrorism and the Terrorist Arc: China’s Post-9/11 Anti-Terror Strategy, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4/2, pp.19 – 24. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Pan, G. & Zhao, G. (2008): New Changes of the “East Turkestan” Forces since 9/11 and Driving Factors, Contemporary International Relations 10, pp. 47–54. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Pantucci, R. (2010): Uyghurs Convicted in East Turkestan Islamic Movement Plot in Dubai, Terrorism Monitor 8/29, pp. 5–6. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Pei, X. & Wang, X. (2019): Global Perspective on Trial in Absentia, Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition 59/6, pp. 59–72. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Pei, X., Wang, X. & Liu, X. (2017): Interpretation of Difficult Issues in the Confiscation of Illegal Income, Journal of Law Application 13, pp. 2–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Perteshi, S. (2020): Foreign Fighters and Kosovo’s Diaspora: The Case of Germany, KCSS Policy Background Paper. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Pew Research Centre (2013): The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, 30 April 2013, https://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Pîrvulescu, C. (2016): Opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Combating Terrorism and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on Combating Terrorism, European Economic and Social Committee. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Puschke, J. (2018): Das neue Terrorismusstrafrecht im Lichte der Verfassung, Kriminalpolitische Zeitschrift 2, pp. 101–108. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Qi, J. (2018): Discussion on the Unjustifiability of Anti-Terrorism Administrative Confirmation, Peking University Law Journal 30/4, pp. 976–991. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Ratelle. J. (2020): Jihad at Home or Leaving for Syria and Iraq: Understanding the Motivations of Dagestani Salafists, Perspectives on Terrorism 14/2, pp. 57–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Reed, J.T. & Raschke, D. (2010): The ETIM — China’s Islamic Militants and the Global Islamist Threat, Santa Barbara, pp. 1–9. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Reem, A. & Pisoiu. D. (2014): Ausländische Kämpfer: Ein Überblick über die Forschung und eine vergleichende Studie über britische und deutsche ausländische Kämpfer, in IFSH Jahres Bericht 2014, pp. 43–48. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Ren, W. (2018): The Legal Effect and Implement of Resolutions of the Security Council in the Context of Global Governance, Legal Daily, 28 November 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Ren, X. & Xie, L. (2019): The Spread and Developmental Trend of “Eastern Turkestan” Forces in Syria and the Countermeasures, Journal of Jiangnan Social University 21/2, pp. 32–37. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Rigotti, C. & Barboza, J.B. (2021): Unfolding the Case of Returnees: How the European Union and Its Member States are Addressing the Return of Foreign Fighters and Their Families, International Review of the Red Cross, 30 July 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Robinson, G. E. (2020): Global Jihad: A Brief History, Stanford. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Rosenblatt, N. (2016): All Jihad is Local: What ISIS’ Files Tell Us about its Fighters, New America Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Roxin, C. & Greco, L. (2020): Strafrecht — Allgemeiner Teil, 5. Aufl., München. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Sandee, R. (2008): The Islamic Jihad Union, The NEFA Foundation, 14 October 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Satzger, H. & Schluckebier, W. (2020): StPO–Kommentar, 4. Aufl., Köln. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Scheinin, M. (2014): Back to Post-9/11 Panic? Security Council Resolution on Foreign Terrorist Fighters, Verfassungsblog, 23 September 2014, https://verfassungsblog.de/back-post-911-panic-security-council-resolution-foreign-terrorist-fighters/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Scheinin, M. (2015): The Council of Europe’s Draft Protocol on Foreign Terrorist Fighters is Fundamentally Flawed, Just Security, 18 March 2015, https://www.justsecurity.org/21207/council-europe-draft-protocol-foreign-terrorist-fighters-fundamentally-flawed/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Schmid, A.P. (2015): Foreign (Terrorist) Fighter Estimates: Conceptual and Data Issues, ICCT Policy Brief, 27 October 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Schmid, A.P. & Tinnes, J. (2015): Foreign (Terrorist) Fighters with IS: A European Perspective, ICCT Research Paper, 23 December 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Schönke, A., & Schröder, H. (2019): Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar. 30. Aufl. München. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Sieber, U. (2018): The New Architecture of Security Law — Crime Control in the Global Risk Society, in Sieber, U., Mitsilegas, V., Mylonopoulos, C., Billis, E., & Knust, N. (eds.): Alternative Systems of Crime Control, Berlin, pp. 3–38. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Sieber, U. (2016): The Paradigm Shift in the Global Risk Society: from Criminal Law to Global Security Law — an Analysis of the Changing Limits of Crime Control, Journal of Eastern-European Criminal Law 1, pp. 14–27. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Shanahan, R. (2021): Foreign Fighters: The Question of Justice, The Interpreter, 15 October 2021, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/foreign-fighters-question-justice [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Shiva, J. (2016): International Terrorism and Stateless Revoking Citizenship of Foreign Fighters, Chicago Journal of International Law 17/1, pp. 178–216. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Shultz, T. (2018): Combating Statelessness in the Wake of the Syrian Conflict: Right without Remedy, Notre Dame Journal of International Comparative Law 8/2, pp. 131–156. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Soliev, N. (2017): Uyghur Militancy in and beyond Southeast Asia: An Assessment, Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses 9/2, February 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Soloshcheva, M. A. (2017): The Uyghur Terrorism: Phenomenon and Genesis, Iran and the Caucasus 21, pp. 415–430. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Soufan Group (2014): Foreign Fighters in Syria. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Soufan Group (2015): Foreign Fighters: An Updated Assessment of the Flow of Foreign Fighters into Syria and Iraq. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Soufan Group (2017): Beyond the Caliphate: Foreign Fighters and the Threat of Returnees. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Speckhard, A. & Ellenberg, M. D. (2020): ISIS in Their Own Words: Recruitment History, Motivations for Joining, Travel, Experiences in ISIS, and Disillusionment over Time — Analysis of 220 In-depth Interviews of ISIS Returnees, Defectors and Prisoners, Journal of Strategic Security 13/1, pp. 82–127. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Steinberg, G.W. (2017): Islamist Terrorism in Germany: Threats, Responses, and the Need for a Strategy, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies Policy Report 66. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Steinberg, G.W. (2013): German Jihad: On the Internationalization of Islamist Terrorism, New York. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Steinberg, G.W. (2008): A Turkish Al-Qaida: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism, Strategic Insights, July 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Stenersen, A. (2017): Al-Qaida in Afghanistan, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Stenersen, A. (2011): Al Qaida’s Foot Soldiers: A Study of the Biographies of Foreign Fighters Killed in Afghanistan and Pakistan Between 2002 and 2006, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 3, pp. 171–198. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Stewart, E. (2021): The Islamic State Stopped Talking about China, Works on the Rocks, 19 January 2021, https://warontherocks.com/2021/01/the-islamic-state-stopped-talking-about-uighurs/ [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Sulce, M. (2019): The Syrian Armed Conflict: Nearing the End? Geneva Academy. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Talmon, S. (2005): The Security Council as World Legislature, The American Journal of International Law 99/1, pp. 175–193. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Thielmann, J. (2014): Salafism in Germany, in Peter, F. & Ortega, R. (eds.), Islamic Movements of Europe: Public Religion and Islamophobia in the Modern World, Bloomsbury, pp. 165–168. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Tohti, N (2014): Developmental Characteristics of Uyghurs’ Religion in History, Information of Social Sciences in Xinjiang 2, pp. 15–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Toprak, A. & Weitzel, G. (2019): Warum Salafismus den jugendkulturellen Aspekt erfüllt, in Toprak, A. & Weitzel, G. (eds.), Salafismus In Deutschland, Berlin, pp. 47–59. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Tuori, K. (2013): Ultima Ratio as a Constitutional Principle, Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3/1, pp. 6–20. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Tursun, G. (2014): On Individual Features of “Eastern Turkestan” Terrorism and its Future Developments, Contemporary International Relations 1, pp. 56–62. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. van Ginkel, B. (2015): The (In-)Effectiveness of “Deterrence” as an Instrument Against Jihadist Terrorist Threats, International Centre for Counterterrorism. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. van Ginkel, B. & Entenmann, E. (2016): The Foreign Fighters Phenomenon in the European Union. Profiles, Threats & Policies, ICCT Research Paper No. 2. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. von Hirsch, A. (2014): Harm and Wrongdoing in Criminalization Theory, Criminal Law and Philosophy 8, pp. 245–256. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. von Hirsch, A. (2011): Crimes, Harms and Wrongs: on the Principles of Criminalization, Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. von Hirsch, A. (2003): Der Rechtsgutbegriff und das “Harm Principle”, in Hefendehl, R., von Hirsch, A. & Wohlers, W. (eds.), Die Rechtsgutstheorie: Legitimationsbasis des Strafrechts oder dogmatisches Glasperlenspiel? Baden-Baden, pp. 13–25. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Vavoula, N. (2018): Prevention, Surveillance, and the Transformation of Citizenship in the ‘Security Union’: The case of Foreign Terrorist Fighters, Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 293. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Vermaat, E. (2007): Homegrown Terrorism in Germany: The Case of Christian Ganczarski, Militant Islam Monitor, 8 October 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Walmsley, R. (2020): World Pre-trial/Remand Imprisonment List, 4th edition, World Prison Brief. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Walther, S. (2007): Präventivhaft für terrorismusverdächtige „Gefährder“: eine Option für Deutschland? Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 12, pp. 464–475. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Wang, L. (2018): Historical Causes of Terrorism in Xinjiang and Reflections on Countermeasures, Journal of Shanxi Police College 26/1, pp. 12–16. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Wang, S. (2017): Justification of “Committing Perpetration Acts” Legislation — Viewing Based on Article 120b of the Criminal Code Regarding “Preparing for the Commission of Terrorist Activities”, Journal of Shihezi University (Philosophy and Social Science) 6, pp. 12–19. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Wang, S. (2008): The Concept of the Subsidiary Principle and Modesty Principle of Criminal Law, Hebei Law Science 26/10, pp. 6–14. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Wang, S. (2003): Modern Theories of Punishment and Choice of China, Chinese Journal of Law 3, pp. 107–131. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Wang, Z. (2014): Analysis of the Characteristics and Assessment of the Current Situation of Terrorist Crime, Criminal Law Review 35/2, pp. 645–672. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Widagdo, S., Indrayanti, K.W. & Saraswati, A.A.A.N. (2021): Repatriation as a Human Rights Approach to State Options in Dealing with Returning ISIS Foreign Terrorist Fighters, SAGE Open, July 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2006): Anatomy of the Salafi Movement, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29/3, pp. 207–239. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Williams, B.G. (2011): On the Trail of the “Lions of Islam”: Foreign Fighters in Afghanistan and Pakistan, 1980–2010, Orbis 55/2, pp. 216–239. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Wolter, J. (2015a): Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, 9. Aufl. Köln. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Wolter, J. (2015b): Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafprozeßordnung, 5. Aufl. Köln. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Wright, L. (2006): The Looming Tower, New York. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Wu, P. (2015): Formation and Distinction of the “Three Forces” in Xinjiang, Exploration and Free Views 10, pp. 54–59. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Wu, S. (2009): The Art Wearing on the Head — Uyghur Dopa, Art Observation 12, p. 115. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Wu, Y. (2002): Islamic Fundamentalism, Religious Extremism and International Terrorism, Social Sciences Abroad 1, pp. 14–20. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Xie, X. & Zhu. C. (2019): An Empirical Study on the Application of Designated Residence Surveillance by Public Security Authorities — A Big Data Sample of 5955, China Law Review 6, pp. 74–87. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Xu, J. (2018): The “Hijra Movement” of East Turkestan Forces and the International Game behind It, Journal of United Front Science 3, pp. 55–60. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Xu, J. (2009): A Look at the “East Turkestan” Separatist Forces Abroad, China Economic Weekly 27, pp. 19–21. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Yu, S. (2015): The So-called “Wahhabis” in Xinjiang is in Nature Contemporary Islamic Extremism, Social Sciences in Xinjiang 4, pp. 64–67. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Zedner, L. (2016): Citizenship Deprivation, Security and Human Rights, European Journal of Migration and Law 18/2, pp. 222–242. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Zedner, L. & Ashworth, A. (2019): The Rise and Restraint of the Preventive State, The Annual Review of Criminology 2, pp. 429–450. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Zenn, J. (2014a): Turkestan Islamic Party Increases Its Media Profile, CACI Analyst, 2 February 2014, https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/12909-Turkestan-islamic-party-increases-its-media-profile.html [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Zestos, G.K. & Cooke, R.N. (2020): Challenges for the EU as Germany Approaches Recession, Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No. 948. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Zhang, C. (2014): Terrorist Violent Videos Spread in Xinjiang, Phoenix Weekly, 26 May 2014, http://www.ynmm.gov.cn/xxyd/wzsb/07603330185604365478 [17.12.2021]. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Zhang, J. (2012): Risk Criminal Law: Development from the Perspective of Preventive Function, Beijing. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Zhang, J. (2008): A Basic Analysis of the Last Resort Principle of Criminal law, Western Law Review 3, pp. 50–57. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Zhang, Y. (2017): On South Line Invasion of ETO from the Status Quo Analysis of Southeast Asian Terrorism, Journal of Political Science and Law 34/1, pp. 121–128. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Zhao, T. (2020): The Normative Application of the Accusation of Preparing to Commit Terrorist Activities, Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute 9, pp. 32–38. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Zheng, X. (2018): The Dual Nature of the Constitutional and Legal Committee of the NPCSC —Legislative Review in Constitutional Review, China Law Review 22/4, pp. 33–42. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Zhou, C. (2019): The Applicable Conditions of Trial by Default for Defendants Fleeing the Country in Legal Dogmatic Angle, Law Science Magazine 8, pp. 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Zhou, M. (2019): The Relationship and Connection between Procedure regarding Confiscation of illegal income and Criminal Procedure regarding Trial in Absentia, Social Science Review 11, pp. 98–103. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Zhou, Z. (2016): Comparative Study on Anti-Terrorism Measures from the Perspective of Entry and Exit — Taking Article 39 of the Counterterrorism Law as an Example, Jiangsu Social Sciences 9, pp. 143–149. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Zou, D. & Cai, C. (2014): Report of the Application of Residential Confinement at Designated Places by the Prosecutorate of Gunlin City in 2013, Criminal Science 1, pp. 127–132. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Zyada, M. & Qian, L. (2018): Brewed the Bitter Wine: Reasons for the Radicalisation of Salafism in Europe — with Germany and France as a Case Study, Chinese Journal of European Studies 5, pp. 92–126 + 7–8. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Strafrecht & Kriminologie", "Recht allgemein, Übergreifende Werke und Sammlungen"
Cover des Buchs: Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Stefan Holzmaier
Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Cover des Buchs: Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Patricia Magdalena Labussek
Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Cover des Buchs: Die Rolle des Gerichts im Rahmen des Prozessvergleichs
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Adomas Jankauskis
Die Rolle des Gerichts im Rahmen des Prozessvergleichs
Cover des Buchs: Kostenübersichtstabellen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Manfred Schmeckenbecher, Karin Scheungrab
Kostenübersichtstabellen

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex