Ourselves and Our Posterity
Essays in Constitutional Originalism- Editors:
- Publisher:
- 2009
Summary
Arguments over constitutional interpretation increasingly highlight the full range of political, moral, and cultural fault lines in American society. Yet all the contending parties claim fealty to the Constitution. This volume brings together some of America's leading scholars of constitutional originalism to reflect on the nature and significance of various approaches to constitutional interpretation and controversies. Throughout the book, the contributors highlight the moral and political dimensions of constitutional interpretation. In doing so, they bring constitutional interpretation and its attendant disputes down from the clouds, showing their relationship to the concerns of the citizen. In addition to matters of interpretation, the book deals with the proper role of the judiciary in a free society, the relationship of law to politics, and the relationship of constitutional originalism to the deepest concerns of political thought and philosophy.
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2009
- ISBN-Print
- 978-0-7391-2789-6
- ISBN-Online
- 978-0-7391-3633-1
- Publisher
- Lexington, Lanham
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 306
- Product type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Contents No access
- Acknowledgments No access
- Introduction No access
- Chapter 1. Original Meaning and Responsible Citizenship No access
- Chapter 2. "Common-Sense Constitutionalism": Why Constitutional Structure Matters for Justice Scalia No access
- Chapter 3. Judicial Usurpation: Perennial Temptation, Contemporary Challenge No access
- Chapter 4. Authority Doctrines and the Proper Judicial Role: Judicial Supremacy, Stare Decisis, and the Concept of Judicial Constitutional Violations No access
- Chapter 5. Freedom Questions, Political Questions: Republicanism and the Myth of a “Bill of Rights” No access
- Chapter 6. Confirmations to the Court in Times Turned Mean: A Strategy for the Hearings No access
- Chapter 7. The Supreme Court and Changing Social Mores No access
- Chapter 8. The Devil’s Pitchfork: Scientism, Human Nature, and Modern Constitutional Thought No access
- Chapter 9. A Constitution to Die For? Congressional Authority to Raise an Army No access
- Chapter 10. Neoconservatives and the Courts: The Public Interest, 1965–1980 No access
- Index No access Pages 297 - 302
- About the Contributors No access Pages 303 - 306





