Enforcement of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 TFEU

Dr. Tuire Anniina Väisänen

doi:10.5771/9783845229843

Summary

Die Autorin beschäftigt sich umfassend mit der FRAND-Erklärung des Patentinhabers. Mit Blick auf Artikel 102 AEUV erläutert sie auch den unionsrechtlichen Kontext des Wettbewerbsrechts.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2011
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8329-5837-4
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-2984-3
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies
Volume: 9
Language: English
Pages: 82
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 2 - 6 Download chapter (PDF)
AbstractPages 7 - 10 Download chapter (PDF)
IntroductionPages 11 - 14 Download chapter (PDF)
1. ETSI GSM StandardsPages 15 - 19 Download chapter (PDF)
2. The Role of SSOs and Rational Behind the FRAND CommitmentsPages 19 - 21 Download chapter (PDF)
3. 1. The Patent Hold-Up ProblemPages 21 - 23 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Royalty StackingPages 23 - 26 Download chapter (PDF)
Download chapter (PDF)
1. The Objectives of Article 102 TFEU
1. Market Definition in Technology MarketsPages 33 - 35 Download chapter (PDF)
2. Dominance in Technology MarketsPages 35 - 37 Download chapter (PDF)
3. 1. Excessive Pricing Under Article 102 (a) TFEUPages 37 - 41 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Price Discrimination under Article 102 (c) TFEUPages 41 - 44 Download chapter (PDF)
4. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. The Misuse of Intellectual Property Rights
5. Conclusion on the Applicability of Article 102 TFEU on FRAND CommitmentsPages 45 - 46 Download chapter (PDF)
1. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. What is the Object of the European Commission’s Decision to Initiate Proceedings in the Qualcomm case?
2. 1. The Meaning of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 (a) and (c) TFEU - Possible Doctrinal Solutions Based on Established EC Case LawPages 50 - 55 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Deceptive Conduct in the Standard-Setting Process - Is the AstraZeneca “Doctrine” Applicable to FRAND Commitments?Pages 55 - 60 Download chapter (PDF)
3. Need for a Precedent from the European CommissionPages 60 - 64 Download chapter (PDF)
1. FRAND Defence and Limited Right to InjunctionsPages 65 - 69 Download chapter (PDF)
2. The IPCom v Nokia CasePages 69 - 72 Download chapter (PDF)
ConclusionPages 73 - 74 Download chapter (PDF)
ReferencesPages 75 - 82 Download chapter (PDF)