Cover of book: Migration Impact Assessment
Book Titles Open Access Full access

Migration Impact Assessment

A Toolbox for Participatory Practices
Authors:
Series:
Migration & Integration, Volume 13
Publisher:
 2024

Summary

This handbook is designed as a toolbox for applied and practice-orientated migration and integration research. After a concise introduction to the most important concepts of transdisciplinary and participatory research, key methodological requirements and challenges are presented. At the heart of the book are the individual instruments that encourage collaborative evaluation of integration work and the impact of migration. This practice handbook, which also contains suggestions for reflection on and the dissemination of results, is aimed at academics, policymakers, practitioners in public administration and civil society organisations as well as volunteers.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2024
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0447-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3941-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Migration & Integration
Volume
13
Language
English
Pages
109
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 12 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. How to use this book
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 2.1.1. Access and trust
      2. 2.1.2. Language and cultural peculiarities
      3. 2.1.3. Interview settings
    2. 2.2. Becoming familiar with the locality
    3. 2.3. Ethical issues
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 3.1.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.1.2. Preparation
      3. 3.1.3. Implementation
      1. 3.2.1. Facts and Figures
      2. 3.2.2. Preparation
      3. 3.2.3. Implementation
      1. 3.3.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.3.2. Preparation
      3. 3.3.3. Implementation
      1. 3.4.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.4.2. Preparation
      3. 3.4.3. Implementation
      1. 3.5.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.5.2. Preparation
      3. 3.5.3. Implementation
      1. 3.6.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.6.2. Preparation
      3. 3.6.3. Implementation
      1. 3.7.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.7.2. Preparation
      3. 3.7.3. Implementation
      1. 3.8.1. Facts and figures
      2. 3.8.2. Preparation
      3. 3.8.3. Implementation
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. 4.1. General approach
      1. 4.2.1 Thematic analysis
      2. 4.2.2 Sequence analysis
    3. 4.3. Participatory data analysis
  6. 5. Dissemination and stimulating transformation with research 79 - 82 Download chapter (PDF)
  7. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How it is done
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How it is done
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How focus groups are done
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How they are done
      1. What is it used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How it is done
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How it is done
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How it is done
      1. What they are used for
      2. Pros and cons to consider
      3. What to watch out for
      4. How they are done
  8. 7. Bibliography 99 - 109 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (185)

  1. 7. Bibliography Open Google Scholar
  2. Althaus, J., Grunwald, N., Kreuzer, V. (2009): Ortserkundung in der Raumplanung. Dortmund: IRPUD. Open Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (2009): Social interaction. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  4. Arnstein, S. (1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4), 216–224. Open Google Scholar
  5. Arnstein, S. (2019): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association 85(1), 24–34. Open Google Scholar
  6. Azungah, T. (2018): Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. In: Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035 (accessed last: 17 July 2023). Open Google Scholar
  7. Atteslander, P. (2000): Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. Open Google Scholar
  8. Bagnoli, A. (2009): Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. In: Qualitative Research. SAGE 9/5, 547–570. Open Google Scholar
  9. Batra, G., Uitto, J., Feinstein, O. (2022): Environmental Evaluation and Global Development Institutions. A Case Study of the Global Environment Facility. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  10. Baumann, F., Detlefsen, M. (2005): Open Space – oder: Kaffeepausen in der Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung. In: RaumPlanung 123, 249–253. Open Google Scholar
  11. Beazley, H., Ennew, J. (2006); Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. In: Desai, V., Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 189–199. Open Google Scholar
  12. Bedford, T., Burgess, J. (2001): The focus group experience. In: Limb, M., Dwyer, C. (Eds.): Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers. London: Arnold. Pp. 121–136. Open Google Scholar
  13. Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T. (2009): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Hoffmann, E., Loibl, M. C., Rehaag, R., Schramm, E., Voß, J. (2005): QuaIitätskriterien transdiszipIinärer Forschung. Ein Leitfaden für die formative Evaluation von Forschungsprojekten. Frankfurt: lnstitut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (lSOE) GmbH. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bergold, J., Thomas, S. (2012): Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 13(1), URL: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3335. Open Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, K. (2002): Interviews and Focus Groups. In: Shurmer-Smith, P. (Ed.): Doing Cultural Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 151–164. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bernard, H. R. (2006): Research Methods in Anthropology. Lanham: Altamira Press. Open Google Scholar
  18. Blackburn, J., Holland, J. (1998): Who changes: Institutionalizing participation in development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. Open Google Scholar
  19. Blee, K.M. (2003): Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. London: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  20. Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L., Riggs, E. (2013): Addressing Ethical and Methodological Challenges in Research with Refugee-background Young People: Reflections from the Field. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 26(1), 69–87. Open Google Scholar
  21. Bogner, A., Littig, B., Menz, W. (2009): Interviewing Experts. Basinstoke: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (2013): Einleitung. In: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (Eds.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp- 9–23. Open Google Scholar
  23. Bohnsack, R., Nohl, A.-M. (2013): Exemplarische Textinterpretation: Die Sequenzanalyse der dokumentarischen Methode. In: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (Eds.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 325–329. Open Google Scholar
  24. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. In: Qualitative Research in psychology 3, 77–101. Open Google Scholar
  25. Brown, J., Isaacs, D. (2005): The World Cafe: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  26. Burja, J. (2006): Lost in Translation? The Use of Interpreters in Fieldwork. In: Desai, V., Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 172–179 Open Google Scholar
  27. Buttimer, A. (1999): Humanism and relevance in Geography. In: Scottish Geographical Journal 115, 103–116. Open Google Scholar
  28. Callens, K. (2002): Methodological Guide: Participatory Appraisal and Analysis of Nutrition and Household Food Security Situations and Interventions from a Livelihoods Perspective. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/y4094e/y4094e05.htm#fn13 (accessed last: 27 August 2020). Open Google Scholar
  29. Carey, M.A. (2015): Focus Groups. In: Smelser, N., Baltes, P. (Eds.): International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier. Pp. 274–279. Open Google Scholar
  30. Chambers, R. (1994a): The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. In: World Development 22(7), 953–969. Open Google Scholar
  31. Chambers, R. (1994b): Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience. In: World Development 22(9), 1253–1268. Open Google Scholar
  32. Chametzky, B. (2016): Coding in Classic Grounded Theory: I’ve done an interview; Now what? In: Sociology Mind 6, 163–172. Open Google Scholar
  33. Chandra, Y., Shang, L. (2017): An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research. In: Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(1), pp. 90–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2016-0014 (last accessed: 17 July 2023). Open Google Scholar
  34. Clandinin, J. (2007) (Ed.): Handbook of Narrative Inquiry. Mapping a Methodology. London: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  35. Clark-Kazak, C. (2017). Ethical Considerations: Research with People in Situations of Forced Migration. In: Refuge 33/2, 11–17. Open Google Scholar
  36. Collier, M. (2001): Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In: Van Leeuwen, T., Jewitt, C. (Eds.): Handbook of visual analysis. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Pp. 35–60. Open Google Scholar
  37. Collier, J. JR. (2003): Photography and visual anthropology. In: Hockings, P. (Ed.): Principles of visual Anthropology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 235–254. Open Google Scholar
  38. Collier, J. JR., Collier, M. (1986): Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Open Google Scholar
  39. Cubas, A. (2020): Migrants as Knowledge Producers: Participatory Photography as a (limited) tool for Inclusion. In: Migration Letters 17/2, 265–277. Open Google Scholar
  40. Curry, O., Smedley, C., Lenette, C. (2017): What Is “Successful” Resettlement? Refugee Narratives from Regional New South Wales in Australia. In: Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 94(3), 1–19. Open Google Scholar
  41. Cyr, J. (2016): The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method. In: Sociological Methods & Research 45(2), 231–259. Open Google Scholar
  42. Dandy, J., Pe-Pua, R. (2015): The Refugee Experience of Social Cohesion in Australia: Exploring the Roles of Racism, Intercultural Contact, and the Media. In: Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13(4), 339–357. Open Google Scholar
  43. De Leeuw, E.D. (1992): Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publikaties. Open Google Scholar
  44. Deakin, H., Wakefield, K. (2014): Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. In: Qualitative Research 14(5), 603–616. Open Google Scholar
  45. Dey, I. (2005): Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  46. Dittrich-Brauner, K., Dittmann, E., List, V., Windisch, C. (2013): Interaktive Großgruppen. Change-Prozesse in Organisationen gestalten. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  47. Döring, N., Bortz, J. (2016): Evaluationsforschung. In: Döring, N., Bortz, J. (Eds.): Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Pp. 975–1036. Open Google Scholar
  48. Donà, G. (2007): The Microphysics of Participation in Refugee Research. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2), 210–229. Open Google Scholar
  49. Driscoll, D.L. (2011). Introduction to primary research: Observations, surveys, and interviews. In: Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, 2, 153–174. Open Google Scholar
  50. Edwards, E. (1992): Introduction. In: Edwards, E. (Ed.): Anthropology and photography, 1860–1920. New Haven: Yale University. Pp. 3–17. Open Google Scholar
  51. Elliott, S., Yusuf, I. (2014): ‘Yes, we can; but together’: Social capital and refugee resettlement. In: Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 9(2), 101–110. Open Google Scholar
  52. Emmel, N. (2008): Participatory Mapping: An innovative sociological method. Real Life Methods. NCRM: Southampton. http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/schools/soss/morgancentre/toolkits/2008-07-toolkit-participatory-map.pdf (accessed last, 21 August 2020). Open Google Scholar
  53. Farber, S., Mifsud, A., Allen, J., Widener, M., Newbold, K., Moniruzzaman, M. (2018): Transportation barriers to Syrian newcomer participation and settlement in Durham Region. In: Journal of Transport Geography 68, 181–192. Open Google Scholar
  54. Ferguson, O., Heinz, K. (2014): Participatory Methods and Tools for Extension. Social Map. Modernizing Extension and Advisory Services: Illinois. https://assets.echocommunity.org/secure/publication_issue/53f99bb6-f532-4606-8229-0327c16dbd3c/en/participatory-methods-and-tools-in-community-development.pdf (accessed last, 21⁠ ⁠August 2020). Open Google Scholar
  55. Fetterman, D. M. (1994): Empowerment evaluation. In: Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  56. Fetterman, D. M. (2001): The transformation of evaluation into a collaboration: A vision of evaluation in the 21st century. In: The American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 381–385. Open Google Scholar
  57. Finlay, L. (2002): “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. In: Qualitative Health Research 12(4), 531–545. Open Google Scholar
  58. Flick, U. (2009): Sozialforschung. Methoden und Anwendungen. Ein Überblick über für die BA-Studiengänge. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  59. Fozdar F., Hartley L. (2014): Housing and the Creation of Home for Refugees in Western Australia. In: Housing, Theory and Society 31(2), 148–173. Open Google Scholar
  60. Freire, P. (1968): Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press. Open Google Scholar
  61. Freitag, M. (2009): Open Space. In: Kühl, S., Strodtholz, P., Taffertshofer, A. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung quantitative und qualitative Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 180–194. Open Google Scholar
  62. Gailing, L., Naumann, M. (2019): Effizient und partizipativ? Fokusgruppen am Beispiel der geographischen Energieforschung. In: Geographische Zeitschrift 107(2), 107–129. Open Google Scholar
  63. Gamper, M. (2020): Netzwerktheorie(n) – Ein Überblick. In: Klärner, A., Gamper, M., Keim-Klärner, S., Moor, I., von der Lippe, H., Vonneilich, N. (Eds..): Soziale Netzwerke und gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 49–64. Open Google Scholar
  64. Gangarova, E., von Unger, H. (2020): Community Mapping als Methode. Erfahrungen aus der partizipativen Zusammenarbeit mit Migrant*innen. In: Hartung, S., Wihofszky, P., Wright, M. (Eds.): Partizipative Forschung. Ein Forschungsansatz für Gesundheit und seine Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 143–177. Open Google Scholar
  65. Gifford, S.M., Bakopanos, C., Kaplan, I., Correa-Velez, I. (2007): Meaning or Measurement? Research the Social Contexts of Health and Settlement Among Newly-arrived Refugee Youth in Melbourne, Australia. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 20(3), 414–440. Open Google Scholar
  66. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction. Open Google Scholar
  67. Gold, R.L. (1958): Roles in sociological field observations. In: Social forces 36, 217–223. Open Google Scholar
  68. Gregory, D. (1998): Geographical imaginations. Cambridge: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  69. Gruber, M. (2021): Kommunale Handlungsfelder im Bereich Integration. In: Stainer-Hämmerle, K., Oppitz, F. (Eds.): Handbuch Gemeindepolitik. Wien: Verlag Österreich. Pp. 413–447. Open Google Scholar
  70. Gruber, M. (2013): Integration im ländlichen Raum. Ein Praxishandbuch. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag. Open Google Scholar
  71. Gruber, M., Lobnig, C., Scheiflinger, S., Stainer-Hämmerle, K. (2020): Stakeholder involvement plan. MATILDE Deliverable 2.8. Villach: Carinthia University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4005933. Open Google Scholar
  72. Gubrium, J., Holstein, J. (2002) (Eds.): Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  73. Guest, G. (2015): Sampling and Selecting Participants in Field Research. In: Bernard, H. R., Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 215–249. Open Google Scholar
  74. Hagendorfer-Jauk, G., Gruber, M. (2022): Research on the GOOD LIFE. Citizens ask questions, collect needs, outline solutions. In: Proceedings of Science, PoS(ACSC2022)016. DOI:10.22323/1.407.0016. Open Google Scholar
  75. Harper, D. (2002): Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. In: Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. Open Google Scholar
  76. Harris, J., Roberts, K. (2011): Challenging barriers to participation in qualitative research: involving disabled refugees. In: Temple, B., Moran, R. (Eds.): Doing research with refugees. Issues and guidelines. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press. Pp. 155–166. Open Google Scholar
  77. Hearne, R., Murphy, M. (2019): Participatory action research: a human rights and capabilities approach. Part 1: The Theory. Maynooth: Maynooth University. Open Google Scholar
  78. Hecker, J. and Sybing, R. (n.d.): What is Inductive Reasoning? Berlin: ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/inductive-analysis (accessed last, 17 July 2023). Open Google Scholar
  79. Hertz, R. (Ed.) (1997): Reflexivity & voice. Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  80. Hollander, J.A. (2004): The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33(5), 602–637. Open Google Scholar
  81. Hübner, R. (2012): Interventionsbegriffe im Vergleich. In: Krainer, L., Lerchster, R. E. (Eds.): Interventionsforschung. Paradigmen, Methoden, Reflexionen. Vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 155–172. Open Google Scholar
  82. Huisman, K. (2011): Why Maine? Secondary Migration Decisions of Somali Refugees. In: Ìrìnkèrindò: A Journal of African Migration 5, 55–98. Open Google Scholar
  83. Husseini de Araújo, S. (2011): Jenseits vom “Kampf der Kulturen”. Imaginative Geographien des Eigenen und des Anderen in arabischen Printmedien. Bielefeld: Transcript. Open Google Scholar
  84. Husserl, E. (1970): The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar
  85. International Association for Public Participation (2017): Code of ethics. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/2017_code_of_ethics-24x36_ia.pdf (accessed last, 23 August 2020). Open Google Scholar
  86. Iosifides, T. 2011: Qualitative methods in migration studies: a critical realist perspective. Farnham: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar
  87. Jagger, P., Duchelle, A., Dutt, S., Wyman, M. (2011): Preparing for the Field: Managing AND Enjoying Fieldwork. In: Angelsen, A., Larsen, H., Lund, J., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S. (Eds.): Measuring livelihhods: methods for research and fieldwork. London: Earthscan. Pp. 147–162. Open Google Scholar
  88. Jansen, D. (2006): Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse: Grundlagen, Methoden, Forschungsbeispiele. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  89. Kabranian-Melkonian, S. (2015): Ethical Concerns With Refugee Research. In: Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 25 (7), 714–722. Open Google Scholar
  90. Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G. (2013): Focus Groups. From structured interviews to collective conversations. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  91. Kearns, R.A. (2010): Seeing with clarity. Undertaking observational research. In: Hay, I. (Eds.): Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Ontario: Oxford University Press. Pp. 241–258. Open Google Scholar
  92. Kiger, M.E., Varpio, L. (2020): Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Open Google Scholar
  93. Kissoon, P. (2011): Home/lessness as an indicator of integration: interviewing refugees about the meaning of home and accommodation. In: Temple, B., Moran, R. (Eds.): Doing research with refugees: Issues and guidelines. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press. Pp. 75–96. Open Google Scholar
  94. Knodel, J. (1993): Focus groups as a qualitative method for crosscultural research in social gerontology. In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10, 7–20. Open Google Scholar
  95. Kordel, S. (2015): Striving for the „good life“ – home-making among senior citizens on the move. An analysis of German (pre)retirees in Spain and Germany in a continuum of tourism and migration. Diss. Univ. Erlangen. Open Google Scholar
  96. Kordel, S. (2016): Transnational Mobility and ‚Insideness‘. Visual Methods in the Study of Home(s) in Retirement Migrants‘ Daily Lives. In: Walsh, K., L. Näre (Eds.): Transnational Migration and Home in Older Age. London: Routledge. Pp. 87–98. Open Google Scholar
  97. Kordel, S., Weidinger, T., Hachmeister, S. (2018): Lebenswelten geflüchteter Menschen in ländlichen Räumen qualitativ erforschen. Methodische Überlegungen zu einem partizipativ orientierten Forschungsansatz (= Thünen Working Paper 106). Braunschweig: Thünen-Institut. Open Google Scholar
  98. Krainer, L., Lerchster, R., Goldmann, H. (2012): Interventionsforschung in der Praxis. In: Krainer, L., Lerchster, R. E. (Eds.): Interventionsforschung. Paradigmen, Methoden, Reflexionen. Vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 175–243. Open Google Scholar
  99. Krueger, R.A. (1994): Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  100. Kumar, S. (2002): Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  101. Kumar, S. (2007): Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  102. Lamnek, S. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz. Open Google Scholar
  103. Lattanzi, M. (1998): Transdiscipliarity at UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114694 (accessed last, 29 May 2023). Open Google Scholar
  104. Legard, R., Keegan, J., Ward, K. (2003): In-depth Interviews. In: Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (Eds.): Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE. Pp. 139–168. Open Google Scholar
  105. Legewie, H. (1991): Feldforschung und teilnehmende Beobachtung. In: Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., Keupp, H., von Rosentstiel, L., Wolff., S. (Eds.): Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen. München: Beltz. Pp. 189–193. Open Google Scholar
  106. Lester, J.N., Cho, Y., Lochmiller, C.R. (2020): Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. 19 (1), pp. 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843209038. Open Google Scholar
  107. Littig, B., Wallace, C. (1997): Fokus-Gruppendiskussionen für die sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS). Open Google Scholar
  108. Lloyd-Evans, S. (2006): Focus Groups. In: Desai, V, Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 153–162. Open Google Scholar
  109. Löhr, K., Weinhardt, M., Sieber, S. (2020): The “World Café“ as a Participatory Method for Collecting Qualitative Data. In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. Open Google Scholar
  110. Lüders, C. (2010): Beobachten im Feld und Ethnographie. In: Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., Steinke, I. (Eds.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Pp. 384–401. Open Google Scholar
  111. Lutz, M., Behnke, I., Zinnecker, J. (2003): Narrative Landkarten: Ein Verfahren zu Rekonstruktion aktueller und biographisch erinnerter Lebensräume. In: Friebertshäuser, B., Prengel, A. (Eds.): Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft. Weinheim/München: Beltz Juventa. Pp. 414–435. Open Google Scholar
  112. Manahl, C. (2023). Herausforderungen in der Regimeforschung auf Mikroebene mit partizipativen Zugängen begegnen? Eine Analyse anhand der Methode Social Mapping. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(2), Art. 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.2.3995. Open Google Scholar
  113. Marshall, M. (1996): Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13. Pp. 522–525. Open Google Scholar
  114. Marshall, C., Rossman, G.B. (1989): Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  115. Mattissek, A., Pfaffenbach, C., Reuber, P. (2013): Methoden der empirischen Humangeographie: Beobachtung und Befragung. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und ausgewählte Verfahren. Braunschweig: Westermann. Open Google Scholar
  116. Mayring, P. (2014): Qualitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173. Open Google Scholar
  117. McDowell, L. (2010): Interviewing. Fear and Liking in the field. In: DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., McDowell, L. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 156–171. Open Google Scholar
  118. McGregor, S. L. T. (2004): The Nature of Transdisciplinary Research and Practice. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238606943_The_Nature_of_Transdisciplinary_Research_and_Practice. Open Google Scholar
  119. Merriam, S., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M., Kee, Y, Ntseane, G., Muhamad, M. (2010): Power and Positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. In: International Journal of Life-long Education 20(5), 405–416. Open Google Scholar
  120. Mertens, D. M., McLaughlin, J. A. (2004): Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. Open Google Scholar
  121. Miller, K. (2004): Beyond the Frontstage: Trust, Access and the Relational Context in Research with Refugee Communities. In: American Journal of Community Psychology 33(3/4), 217–227. Open Google Scholar
  122. Mitchell, J.C. (1969): Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relation-ships in central African towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  123. Misoch, S. (2015): Qualitative Interviews. Oldenburg: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  124. Morgan, D.L. (1996): Focus Groups. In: Annual Review of Sociology 22, 129–152. Open Google Scholar
  125. Musante, K. (2015): Participant Observation. In: Bernard, H. R., Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 251–292. Open Google Scholar
  126. Nanz, P., Fritsche, M. (2012): Handbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Verfahren und Akteure, Chancen und Grenzen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar
  127. Nehls, K., Smith, B., Schneider, H. (2015): Video-Conferencing Interviews in Qualitative Research. In: Hai-Jew, S. (Ed.): Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology. Hershey: IGI Global. Pp. 140–157. Open Google Scholar
  128. Neuburger, M., Schmitt, T. (2012): Theorie der Entwicklung – Entwicklung der Theorie. Post-Development und Postkoloniale Theorien als Herausforderung für eine Geographische Entwicklungsforschung. In: Geographica Helvetica 67, 121–124. Open Google Scholar
  129. Novick, G. (2008): Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? In: Research in Nursing & Health 31(4), 391–398. Open Google Scholar
  130. OECD (2022): Frascati Manual, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/Frascati_Manual_2002_EN.pdf (accessed last, 29 May 2023). Open Google Scholar
  131. OECD (2020): Addressing Societal Challenges using transdisciplinary research. DSTI/STP/GSF(2020)4/FINAL. Policy Paper No. 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957. Open Google Scholar
  132. OECD (2021): Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en. Open Google Scholar
  133. Ostrower, F. (1998): Nonparticipant Observation as an Introduction to Qualitative Research. In: Teaching Sociology 26(1), 57–61. Open Google Scholar
  134. Owen, H. (1997): Open Space Technology. A User‘s Guide. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  135. Owen, H. (2008): Open Space Technology. A User’s Guide. 3rd revised and expanded edition. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  136. Owen, H., Stadler, A. (1999): Open Space Technology. In: Holman, P., Devane, T. (Eds.): The Change Handbook. Group Methods for Shaping the Future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Pp- 233–244. Open Google Scholar
  137. Parker, A., Tritter, J. (2006): Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate. In: International Journal of Research & Method in Education 29(1), 23–37. Open Google Scholar
  138. Pelz, C., Schmitt, A., Meis, M. (2004): Knowledge Mapping als Methode zur Auswertung und Ergebnispräsentation von Fokusgruppen in der Markt- und Evaluationsforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Research 5(2), Art. 35. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-5.2.601. Open Google Scholar
  139. Penman, J., Goel, K. (2017): Coping and resilience of rural and regional Australian immigrants: imperatives for successful settlement. In: Rural Society 26(2), 178–193. Open Google Scholar
  140. Poppe, W. (2013): Patterns and Meanings of Housing: Residential Mobility and Homeownership among Former Refugees. In: Urban Geography 34(2), 218–241. Open Google Scholar
  141. Pratt, G. (2002): Studying Immigrants in Focus Groups. In: Moss, P. (Ed.): Feminist Geography in Practice. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell. Pp. 214–230. Open Google Scholar
  142. Pretty, J. N., Guijt, I., Scoones, I., Thompson, J. (1995): A Trainer’s Guide for Participatory Learning and Action. London: IEED. Open Google Scholar
  143. RatSWD (Rat für Sozial- und WirtschaftsDaten) (2017): Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Berlin: RatSWD. https://www.ratswd.de/dl/RatSWD_Output9_Forschungsethik.pdf (accessed last, 03 September 2020). Open Google Scholar
  144. Reason, R. (1998): Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (Eds.): Strategies of Qualitative Research. London: Sage. Pp. 261–291. Open Google Scholar
  145. Regeer, B. (2002): Transdisciplinarity. http://www.bio.vu.nl/vakgroepen/bens/HTML/transdiscipliNl.html (accessed last, 19 May 2004). Open Google Scholar
  146. Rodgers, G. (2004): ‘Hanging out’ with forced migrants: methodological and ethical challenges. In: Forced Migration Review 21, 48–49. Open Google Scholar
  147. Rose, G. (2008): Using Photographs as Illustrations in Human Geography. In: Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 151–160. Open Google Scholar
  148. Roth, W. M., von Unger, H. (2018) (Eds.): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. In: Forum Qualitative Social Science Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 19(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/62 Open Google Scholar
  149. Ruddat, M. (2012): Auswertung von Fokusgruppen mittels Zusammenfassung zentraler Diskussionsaspekte. In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., Renn, O. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 195–206. Open Google Scholar
  150. Said, E. (1978): Orientalism. New York: Pantheon. Open Google Scholar
  151. Schammann, H., Gluns, D. (2021): Migrationspolitik. Nomos: Baden Baden. Open Google Scholar
  152. Schammann, H., Gluns, D., Heimann, C., Müller, S., Wittchen, T., Younso, F., Ziegler, F. (2021): Defining and transforming local migration policies: a conceptual approach backed by evidence from Germany. In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47:13, 2897–2915. Open Google Scholar
  153. Schetula, V., Gallego Carrera, D. (2012): Konfliktsituationen in Fokusgruppen: Eine Herausforderung für den Moderator. Strategien im Umgang mit Konfliktsituationen, dargestellt am Fallbeispiel des Projektes „Energie nachhaltig konsumieren – nachhaltig Energie konsumieren. Wärmeenergie im Spannungsfeld von sozialen Bestimmungsfaktoren, ökonomischen Bedingungen und ökologischem Bewusstsein.“ In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., Renn, O. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 90–110. Open Google Scholar
  154. Schöhnhut, M., Jerrentrup, M.T. (2019): Partizipation und nachhaltige Entwicklung. Ein Überblick. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  155. Schulz, M. (2012): Quick and easy!? Fokusgruppen in der angewandten Sozialwissenschaften. In: Schulz, M. et al. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 9–23. Open Google Scholar
  156. Schulz, M., Ruddat, M. (2012): „Let’s talk about sex!“ Über die Eignung von Telefoninterviews in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Research 13(3), Art. 2. Open Google Scholar
  157. Schweizer, T. (1996): Muster sozialer Ordnung. Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Berlin: Reimer. Open Google Scholar
  158. Scott, J. (1988): Trend Report. Social Network Analysis. Sociology 22(1), 109–127. Open Google Scholar
  159. Sen, A. (2001): Development as Freedom. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Skop, E. (2006): The Methodological Potential of Focus Groups in Population Geography. In: Population, Space and Place 12, 113–124. Open Google Scholar
  160. Sontheimer, S., Callens, K., Seiffert, B. (1999): Conducting a PRA Training and Modifying PRA Tools to Your Needs. An Example from a Participatory Household Food Security and Nutrition Project in Ethiopia. Rome: FAO. Open Google Scholar
  161. Spittler, G. (2001): Teilnehmende Beobachtung als Dichte Teilnahme. In: Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 126, 1–25. Open Google Scholar
  162. Spradley, J.P. (1980): Participant Observation. New York: Rinehart & Winston. Open Google Scholar
  163. Straßburger, G., Rieger, J. (Eds.) (2014): Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar
  164. Straßburger, G., Rieger, J. (Eds.) (2019): Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. 2. Auflage. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar
  165. Spencer, S. (2011): Visual research methods in the social sciences. Milton Park: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  166. Stachowksi, J. (2020): Positioning in ‘relational claustrophobia’ – ethical reflections on researching small international migrant communities in rural areas. In: Journal of Rural Studies 78, 176–184. Open Google Scholar
  167. State University of New York at Fredonia (2023): Assessment – Definition and Overview. URL: https://www.fredonia.edu/about/offices/academic-affairs/assessment/assessment-information-resources (accessed last, 28 April 2023). Open Google Scholar
  168. Täubig, V. (2009): Totale Institution Asyl: Empirische Befunde zu alltäglichen Lebensführungen in der organisierten Desintegration. Weinheim, München: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar
  169. Thierbach C., Petschick G. (2014) Beobachtung. In: Baur N., Blasius J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: Wiesbaden. Pp. 855–866. Open Google Scholar
  170. Tuckett, A. (2004): Qualitative research sampling-the very real complexities. Nurse Researcher 12(1), Pp. 47–61. Open Google Scholar
  171. United Nations (n.d.): International Day of Disabled Persons 2004. Nothing about Us, Without Us, URL: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/international-day-of-persons-with-disabilities-3-december/international-day-of-disabled-persons-2004-nothing-about-us-without-us.html (accessed last, 26 May 2023). Open Google Scholar
  172. Vaismoradi, M., Snelgrove, S. (2019): Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. In: Forum Qualitative Social Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 20(3), Art. 23. Open Google Scholar
  173. von Unger, H. (2014): Partizipative Forschung. Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  174. von Unger, H. (2021): Ethical reflexivity as research practice. In: Historical Social Research 46 (2), 186–204. Open Google Scholar
  175. Vogl, S. (2014): Gruppendiskussion. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 581–586. Open Google Scholar
  176. Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994): Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  177. Watson, A., Till, K. (2010): Ethnography and participant observation. In: DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., McDowell, L. (Eds.): The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 121–137. Open Google Scholar
  178. Weidinger, T., Kordel, S., Kieslinger, J. (2019 (2021)): Unravelling the meaning of place and spatial mobility: analysing the everyday life-worlds of refugees in host societies by means of mobility mapping. In: Journal of Refugee Studies. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fez004. Open Google Scholar
  179. Weischer, C., Gehrau, V. (2017): Die Beobachtung als Methode in der Soziologie. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  180. Wenzel, F., Boeser-Schnebel, C. (2019): Dorfgespräch. Ein Beitrag zur Demokratieentwicklung im ländlichen Raum. Bonn: Stiftung Mitarbeit. Open Google Scholar
  181. Wernesjö, U. (2015): Landing in a rural village: home and belonging from the perspectives of unaccompanied young refugees. In: Identities 22(4), 451–467. Open Google Scholar
  182. White, H.C. (2008): Identity and control: How social formations emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  183. Yin, R. K. (2003): Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, London, New Dehli: SAGE Publications. Open Google Scholar
  184. Želinský, D. (2019): From Deduction to Abduction: Constructing a Coding Frame for Communist Secret Police Documents. In: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3377 (accessed last, 17 July 2023). Open Google Scholar
  185. Ziersch, A., Walsh, M., Due, C., Duivesteyn, E. (2017): Exploring the Relationship between Housing and Health for Refugees and Asylum Seekers in South Australia: A Qualitative Study. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, 1036. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Migration Sociology & Ethnicity", "International Relations", "Politics General", "Sociology General"
Cover of book: Musical Traces of a Lost Past
Edited Book No access
Dilek Kızıldağ, Martin Greve
Musical Traces of a Lost Past
Cover of book: Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Educational Book No access
Gert Krell, Peter Schlotter, Alexandra Homolar, Frank A. Stengel
Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Cover of book: (Neu-)Ordnung
Edited Book No access
Uwe Wagschal, Marius Fröhle
(Neu-)Ordnung
Cover of book: Arenen des Diskurses
Edited Book No access
Thomas Schölderle, Laura Martena
Arenen des Diskurses
Cover of book: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Book Titles No access
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex