Migration Impact Assessment: A Toolbox for Participatory Practices

Dr. Stefan Kordel; Marika Gruber Mag. (FH)

doi:10.5771/9783748939412

Zusammenfassung

Das vorliegende Buch ist als Werkzeugkasten für die angewandte und praxisorientierte Migrations- und Integrationsforschung konzipiert. Nach einer Einführung in die wichtigsten Konzepte der transdisziplinären und partizipativen Forschung werden zentrale methodische Voraussetzungen und Herausforderungen dargestellt. Kernstück des Buches sind die einzelnen Instrumente, die zur kollaborativen Bewertung der Integrationsarbeit und der Auswirkungen von Migration anregen. Das Praxiswerk, das auch Anregungen für die Reflexion und Ergebnisverbreitung enthält, richtet sich an Personen aus Wissenschaft, Politik sowie an Praktikerinnen und Praktiker in öffentlichen Verwaltungen, zivilgesellschaftlichen Einrichtungen und an Ehrenamtliche.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage: 1/2024
Copyrightjahr: 2024
ISBN-Print: 978-3-7560-0447-8
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-3941-2
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Migration & Integration
Band: 13
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 109
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 12 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. How to use this book
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 2.1.1. Access and trust
  2. 2.1.2. Language and cultural peculiarities
  3. 2.1.3. Interview settings
2. 2.2. Becoming familiar with the locality
3. 2.3. Ethical issues
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 3.1.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.1.2. Preparation
  3. 3.1.3. Implementation
2. 1. 3.2.1. Facts and Figures
  2. 3.2.2. Preparation
  3. 3.2.3. Implementation
3. 1. 3.3.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.3.2. Preparation
  3. 3.3.3. Implementation
4. 1. 3.4.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.4.2. Preparation
  3. 3.4.3. Implementation
5. 1. 3.5.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.5.2. Preparation
  3. 3.5.3. Implementation
6. 1. 3.6.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.6.2. Preparation
  3. 3.6.3. Implementation
7. 1. 3.7.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.7.2. Preparation
  3. 3.7.3. Implementation
8. 1. 3.8.1. Facts and figures
  2. 3.8.2. Preparation
  3. 3.8.3. Implementation
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 4.1. General approach
2. 1. 4.2.1 Thematic analysis
  2. 4.2.2 Sequence analysis
3. 4.3. Participatory data analysis
5. Dissemination and stimulating transformation with researchSeiten 79 - 82 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How it is done
2. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How it is done
3. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How focus groups are done
4. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How they are done
5. 1. What is it used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How it is done
6. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How it is done
7. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How it is done
8. 1. What they are used for
  2. Pros and cons to consider
  3. What to watch out for
  4. How they are done
7. BibliographySeiten 99 - 109 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (185 Einträge)

7. Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Althaus, J., Grunwald, N., Kreuzer, V. (2009): Ortserkundung in der Raumplanung. Dortmund: IRPUD. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Argyle, M. (2009): Social interaction. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Arnstein, S. (1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4), 216–224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Arnstein, S. (2019): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association 85(1), 24–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Azungah, T. (2018): Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. In: Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035 (accessed last: 17 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Atteslander, P. (2000): Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bagnoli, A. (2009): Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. In: Qualitative Research. SAGE 9/5, 547–570. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Batra, G., Uitto, J., Feinstein, O. (2022): Environmental Evaluation and Global Development Institutions. A Case Study of the Global Environment Facility. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Baumann, F., Detlefsen, M. (2005): Open Space – oder: Kaffeepausen in der Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung. In: RaumPlanung 123, 249–253. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Beazley, H., Ennew, J. (2006); Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. In: Desai, V., Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 189–199. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bedford, T., Burgess, J. (2001): The focus group experience. In: Limb, M., Dwyer, C. (Eds.): Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers. London: Arnold. Pp. 121–136. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T. (2009): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Hoffmann, E., Loibl, M. C., Rehaag, R., Schramm, E., Voß, J. (2005): QuaIitätskriterien transdiszipIinärer Forschung. Ein Leitfaden für die formative Evaluation von Forschungsprojekten. Frankfurt: lnstitut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (lSOE) GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bergold, J., Thomas, S. (2012): Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 13(1), URL: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3335. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bennett, K. (2002): Interviews and Focus Groups. In: Shurmer-Smith, P. (Ed.): Doing Cultural Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 151–164. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bernard, H. R. (2006): Research Methods in Anthropology. Lanham: Altamira Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Blackburn, J., Holland, J. (1998): Who changes: Institutionalizing participation in development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Blee, K.M. (2003): Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. London: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L., Riggs, E. (2013): Addressing Ethical and Methodological Challenges in Research with Refugee-background Young People: Reflections from the Field. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 26(1), 69–87. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bogner, A., Littig, B., Menz, W. (2009): Interviewing Experts. Basinstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (2013): Einleitung. In: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (Eds.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp- 9–23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Bohnsack, R., Nohl, A.-M. (2013): Exemplarische Textinterpretation: Die Sequenzanalyse der dokumentarischen Methode. In: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (Eds.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 325–329. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. In: Qualitative Research in psychology 3, 77–101. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Brown, J., Isaacs, D. (2005): The World Cafe: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Burja, J. (2006): Lost in Translation? The Use of Interpreters in Fieldwork. In: Desai, V., Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 172–179 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Buttimer, A. (1999): Humanism and relevance in Geography. In: Scottish Geographical Journal 115, 103–116. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Callens, K. (2002): Methodological Guide: Participatory Appraisal and Analysis of Nutrition and Household Food Security Situations and Interventions from a Livelihoods Perspective. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/y4094e/y4094e05.htm#fn13 (accessed last: 27 August 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Carey, M.A. (2015): Focus Groups. In: Smelser, N., Baltes, P. (Eds.): International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier. Pp. 274–279. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Chambers, R. (1994a): The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. In: World Development 22(7), 953–969. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Chambers, R. (1994b): Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience. In: World Development 22(9), 1253–1268. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Chametzky, B. (2016): Coding in Classic Grounded Theory: I’ve done an interview; Now what? In: Sociology Mind 6, 163–172. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Chandra, Y., Shang, L. (2017): An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research. In: Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(1), pp. 90–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2016-0014 (last accessed: 17 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Clandinin, J. (2007) (Ed.): Handbook of Narrative Inquiry. Mapping a Methodology. London: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Clark-Kazak, C. (2017). Ethical Considerations: Research with People in Situations of Forced Migration. In: Refuge 33/2, 11–17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Collier, M. (2001): Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In: Van Leeuwen, T., Jewitt, C. (Eds.): Handbook of visual analysis. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Pp. 35–60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Collier, J. JR. (2003): Photography and visual anthropology. In: Hockings, P. (Ed.): Principles of visual Anthropology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 235–254. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Collier, J. JR., Collier, M. (1986): Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Cubas, A. (2020): Migrants as Knowledge Producers: Participatory Photography as a (limited) tool for Inclusion. In: Migration Letters 17/2, 265–277. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Curry, O., Smedley, C., Lenette, C. (2017): What Is “Successful” Resettlement? Refugee Narratives from Regional New South Wales in Australia. In: Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 94(3), 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Cyr, J. (2016): The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method. In: Sociological Methods & Research 45(2), 231–259. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Dandy, J., Pe-Pua, R. (2015): The Refugee Experience of Social Cohesion in Australia: Exploring the Roles of Racism, Intercultural Contact, and the Media. In: Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13(4), 339–357. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
De Leeuw, E.D. (1992): Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publikaties. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Deakin, H., Wakefield, K. (2014): Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. In: Qualitative Research 14(5), 603–616. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Dey, I. (2005): Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Dittrich-Brauner, K., Dittmann, E., List, V., Windisch, C. (2013): Interaktive Großgruppen. Change-Prozesse in Organisationen gestalten. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Döring, N., Bortz, J. (2016): Evaluationsforschung. In: Döring, N., Bortz, J. (Eds.): Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Pp. 975–1036. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Donà, G. (2007): The Microphysics of Participation in Refugee Research. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2), 210–229. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Driscoll, D.L. (2011). Introduction to primary research: Observations, surveys, and interviews. In: Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, 2, 153–174. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Edwards, E. (1992): Introduction. In: Edwards, E. (Ed.): Anthropology and photography, 1860–1920. New Haven: Yale University. Pp. 3–17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Elliott, S., Yusuf, I. (2014): ‘Yes, we can; but together’: Social capital and refugee resettlement. In: Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 9(2), 101–110. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Emmel, N. (2008): Participatory Mapping: An innovative sociological method. Real Life Methods. NCRM: Southampton. http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/schools/soss/morgancentre/toolkits/2008-07-toolkit-participatory-map.pdf (accessed last, 21 August 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Farber, S., Mifsud, A., Allen, J., Widener, M., Newbold, K., Moniruzzaman, M. (2018): Transportation barriers to Syrian newcomer participation and settlement in Durham Region. In: Journal of Transport Geography 68, 181–192. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Ferguson, O., Heinz, K. (2014): Participatory Methods and Tools for Extension. Social Map. Modernizing Extension and Advisory Services: Illinois. https://assets.echocommunity.org/secure/publication_issue/53f99bb6-f532-4606-8229-0327c16dbd3c/en/participatory-methods-and-tools-in-community-development.pdf (accessed last, 21⁠ ⁠August 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Fetterman, D. M. (1994): Empowerment evaluation. In: Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Fetterman, D. M. (2001): The transformation of evaluation into a collaboration: A vision of evaluation in the 21st century. In: The American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 381–385. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Finlay, L. (2002): “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. In: Qualitative Health Research 12(4), 531–545. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Flick, U. (2009): Sozialforschung. Methoden und Anwendungen. Ein Überblick über für die BA-Studiengänge. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Fozdar F., Hartley L. (2014): Housing and the Creation of Home for Refugees in Western Australia. In: Housing, Theory and Society 31(2), 148–173. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Freire, P. (1968): Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Freitag, M. (2009): Open Space. In: Kühl, S., Strodtholz, P., Taffertshofer, A. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung quantitative und qualitative Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 180–194. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gailing, L., Naumann, M. (2019): Effizient und partizipativ? Fokusgruppen am Beispiel der geographischen Energieforschung. In: Geographische Zeitschrift 107(2), 107–129. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gamper, M. (2020): Netzwerktheorie(n) – Ein Überblick. In: Klärner, A., Gamper, M., Keim-Klärner, S., Moor, I., von der Lippe, H., Vonneilich, N. (Eds..): Soziale Netzwerke und gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 49–64. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gangarova, E., von Unger, H. (2020): Community Mapping als Methode. Erfahrungen aus der partizipativen Zusammenarbeit mit Migrant*innen. In: Hartung, S., Wihofszky, P., Wright, M. (Eds.): Partizipative Forschung. Ein Forschungsansatz für Gesundheit und seine Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 143–177. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gifford, S.M., Bakopanos, C., Kaplan, I., Correa-Velez, I. (2007): Meaning or Measurement? Research the Social Contexts of Health and Settlement Among Newly-arrived Refugee Youth in Melbourne, Australia. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 20(3), 414–440. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gold, R.L. (1958): Roles in sociological field observations. In: Social forces 36, 217–223. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gregory, D. (1998): Geographical imaginations. Cambridge: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gruber, M. (2021): Kommunale Handlungsfelder im Bereich Integration. In: Stainer-Hämmerle, K., Oppitz, F. (Eds.): Handbuch Gemeindepolitik. Wien: Verlag Österreich. Pp. 413–447. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gruber, M. (2013): Integration im ländlichen Raum. Ein Praxishandbuch. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gruber, M., Lobnig, C., Scheiflinger, S., Stainer-Hämmerle, K. (2020): Stakeholder involvement plan. MATILDE Deliverable 2.8. Villach: Carinthia University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4005933. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Gubrium, J., Holstein, J. (2002) (Eds.): Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Guest, G. (2015): Sampling and Selecting Participants in Field Research. In: Bernard, H. R., Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 215–249. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Hagendorfer-Jauk, G., Gruber, M. (2022): Research on the GOOD LIFE. Citizens ask questions, collect needs, outline solutions. In: Proceedings of Science, PoS(ACSC2022)016. DOI:10.22323/1.407.0016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Harper, D. (2002): Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. In: Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Harris, J., Roberts, K. (2011): Challenging barriers to participation in qualitative research: involving disabled refugees. In: Temple, B., Moran, R. (Eds.): Doing research with refugees. Issues and guidelines. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press. Pp. 155–166. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Hearne, R., Murphy, M. (2019): Participatory action research: a human rights and capabilities approach. Part 1: The Theory. Maynooth: Maynooth University. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Hecker, J. and Sybing, R. (n.d.): What is Inductive Reasoning? Berlin: ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/inductive-analysis (accessed last, 17 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Hertz, R. (Ed.) (1997): Reflexivity & voice. Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Hollander, J.A. (2004): The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33(5), 602–637. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Hübner, R. (2012): Interventionsbegriffe im Vergleich. In: Krainer, L., Lerchster, R. E. (Eds.): Interventionsforschung. Paradigmen, Methoden, Reflexionen. Vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 155–172. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Huisman, K. (2011): Why Maine? Secondary Migration Decisions of Somali Refugees. In: Ìrìnkèrindò: A Journal of African Migration 5, 55–98. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Husseini de Araújo, S. (2011): Jenseits vom “Kampf der Kulturen”. Imaginative Geographien des Eigenen und des Anderen in arabischen Printmedien. Bielefeld: Transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Husserl, E. (1970): The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
International Association for Public Participation (2017): Code of ethics. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/2017_code_of_ethics-24x36_ia.pdf (accessed last, 23 August 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Iosifides, T. 2011: Qualitative methods in migration studies: a critical realist perspective. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Jagger, P., Duchelle, A., Dutt, S., Wyman, M. (2011): Preparing for the Field: Managing AND Enjoying Fieldwork. In: Angelsen, A., Larsen, H., Lund, J., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S. (Eds.): Measuring livelihhods: methods for research and fieldwork. London: Earthscan. Pp. 147–162. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Jansen, D. (2006): Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse: Grundlagen, Methoden, Forschungsbeispiele. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kabranian-Melkonian, S. (2015): Ethical Concerns With Refugee Research. In: Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 25 (7), 714–722. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G. (2013): Focus Groups. From structured interviews to collective conversations. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kearns, R.A. (2010): Seeing with clarity. Undertaking observational research. In: Hay, I. (Eds.): Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Ontario: Oxford University Press. Pp. 241–258. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kiger, M.E., Varpio, L. (2020): Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kissoon, P. (2011): Home/lessness as an indicator of integration: interviewing refugees about the meaning of home and accommodation. In: Temple, B., Moran, R. (Eds.): Doing research with refugees: Issues and guidelines. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press. Pp. 75–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Knodel, J. (1993): Focus groups as a qualitative method for crosscultural research in social gerontology. In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10, 7–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kordel, S. (2015): Striving for the „good life“ – home-making among senior citizens on the move. An analysis of German (pre)retirees in Spain and Germany in a continuum of tourism and migration. Diss. Univ. Erlangen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kordel, S. (2016): Transnational Mobility and ‚Insideness‘. Visual Methods in the Study of Home(s) in Retirement Migrants‘ Daily Lives. In: Walsh, K., L. Näre (Eds.): Transnational Migration and Home in Older Age. London: Routledge. Pp. 87–98. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kordel, S., Weidinger, T., Hachmeister, S. (2018): Lebenswelten geflüchteter Menschen in ländlichen Räumen qualitativ erforschen. Methodische Überlegungen zu einem partizipativ orientierten Forschungsansatz (= Thünen Working Paper 106). Braunschweig: Thünen-Institut. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Krainer, L., Lerchster, R., Goldmann, H. (2012): Interventionsforschung in der Praxis. In: Krainer, L., Lerchster, R. E. (Eds.): Interventionsforschung. Paradigmen, Methoden, Reflexionen. Vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 175–243. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Krueger, R.A. (1994): Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kumar, S. (2002): Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Kumar, S. (2007): Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Lamnek, S. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Lattanzi, M. (1998): Transdiscipliarity at UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114694 (accessed last, 29 May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Legard, R., Keegan, J., Ward, K. (2003): In-depth Interviews. In: Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (Eds.): Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE. Pp. 139–168. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Legewie, H. (1991): Feldforschung und teilnehmende Beobachtung. In: Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., Keupp, H., von Rosentstiel, L., Wolff., S. (Eds.): Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen. München: Beltz. Pp. 189–193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Lester, J.N., Cho, Y., Lochmiller, C.R. (2020): Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. 19 (1), pp. 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843209038. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Littig, B., Wallace, C. (1997): Fokus-Gruppendiskussionen für die sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Lloyd-Evans, S. (2006): Focus Groups. In: Desai, V, Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 153–162. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Löhr, K., Weinhardt, M., Sieber, S. (2020): The “World Café“ as a Participatory Method for Collecting Qualitative Data. In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Lüders, C. (2010): Beobachten im Feld und Ethnographie. In: Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., Steinke, I. (Eds.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Pp. 384–401. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Lutz, M., Behnke, I., Zinnecker, J. (2003): Narrative Landkarten: Ein Verfahren zu Rekonstruktion aktueller und biographisch erinnerter Lebensräume. In: Friebertshäuser, B., Prengel, A. (Eds.): Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft. Weinheim/München: Beltz Juventa. Pp. 414–435. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Manahl, C. (2023). Herausforderungen in der Regimeforschung auf Mikroebene mit partizipativen Zugängen begegnen? Eine Analyse anhand der Methode Social Mapping. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(2), Art. 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.2.3995. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Marshall, M. (1996): Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13. Pp. 522–525. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Marshall, C., Rossman, G.B. (1989): Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Mattissek, A., Pfaffenbach, C., Reuber, P. (2013): Methoden der empirischen Humangeographie: Beobachtung und Befragung. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und ausgewählte Verfahren. Braunschweig: Westermann. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Mayring, P. (2014): Qualitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
McDowell, L. (2010): Interviewing. Fear and Liking in the field. In: DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., McDowell, L. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 156–171. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
McGregor, S. L. T. (2004): The Nature of Transdisciplinary Research and Practice. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238606943_The_Nature_of_Transdisciplinary_Research_and_Practice. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Merriam, S., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M., Kee, Y, Ntseane, G., Muhamad, M. (2010): Power and Positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. In: International Journal of Life-long Education 20(5), 405–416. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Mertens, D. M., McLaughlin, J. A. (2004): Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Miller, K. (2004): Beyond the Frontstage: Trust, Access and the Relational Context in Research with Refugee Communities. In: American Journal of Community Psychology 33(3/4), 217–227. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Mitchell, J.C. (1969): Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relation-ships in central African towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Misoch, S. (2015): Qualitative Interviews. Oldenburg: De Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Morgan, D.L. (1996): Focus Groups. In: Annual Review of Sociology 22, 129–152. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Musante, K. (2015): Participant Observation. In: Bernard, H. R., Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 251–292. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Nanz, P., Fritsche, M. (2012): Handbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Verfahren und Akteure, Chancen und Grenzen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Nehls, K., Smith, B., Schneider, H. (2015): Video-Conferencing Interviews in Qualitative Research. In: Hai-Jew, S. (Ed.): Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology. Hershey: IGI Global. Pp. 140–157. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Neuburger, M., Schmitt, T. (2012): Theorie der Entwicklung – Entwicklung der Theorie. Post-Development und Postkoloniale Theorien als Herausforderung für eine Geographische Entwicklungsforschung. In: Geographica Helvetica 67, 121–124. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Novick, G. (2008): Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? In: Research in Nursing & Health 31(4), 391–398. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
OECD (2022): Frascati Manual, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/Frascati_Manual_2002_EN.pdf (accessed last, 29 May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
OECD (2020): Addressing Societal Challenges using transdisciplinary research. DSTI/STP/GSF(2020)4/FINAL. Policy Paper No. 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
OECD (2021): Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Ostrower, F. (1998): Nonparticipant Observation as an Introduction to Qualitative Research. In: Teaching Sociology 26(1), 57–61. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Owen, H. (1997): Open Space Technology. A User‘s Guide. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Owen, H. (2008): Open Space Technology. A User’s Guide. 3rd revised and expanded edition. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Owen, H., Stadler, A. (1999): Open Space Technology. In: Holman, P., Devane, T. (Eds.): The Change Handbook. Group Methods for Shaping the Future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Pp- 233–244. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Parker, A., Tritter, J. (2006): Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate. In: International Journal of Research & Method in Education 29(1), 23–37. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Pelz, C., Schmitt, A., Meis, M. (2004): Knowledge Mapping als Methode zur Auswertung und Ergebnispräsentation von Fokusgruppen in der Markt- und Evaluationsforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Research 5(2), Art. 35. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-5.2.601. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Penman, J., Goel, K. (2017): Coping and resilience of rural and regional Australian immigrants: imperatives for successful settlement. In: Rural Society 26(2), 178–193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Poppe, W. (2013): Patterns and Meanings of Housing: Residential Mobility and Homeownership among Former Refugees. In: Urban Geography 34(2), 218–241. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Pratt, G. (2002): Studying Immigrants in Focus Groups. In: Moss, P. (Ed.): Feminist Geography in Practice. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell. Pp. 214–230. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Pretty, J. N., Guijt, I., Scoones, I., Thompson, J. (1995): A Trainer’s Guide for Participatory Learning and Action. London: IEED. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
RatSWD (Rat für Sozial- und WirtschaftsDaten) (2017): Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Berlin: RatSWD. https://www.ratswd.de/dl/RatSWD_Output9_Forschungsethik.pdf (accessed last, 03 September 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Reason, R. (1998): Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (Eds.): Strategies of Qualitative Research. London: Sage. Pp. 261–291. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Regeer, B. (2002): Transdisciplinarity. http://www.bio.vu.nl/vakgroepen/bens/HTML/transdiscipliNl.html (accessed last, 19 May 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Rodgers, G. (2004): ‘Hanging out’ with forced migrants: methodological and ethical challenges. In: Forced Migration Review 21, 48–49. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Rose, G. (2008): Using Photographs as Illustrations in Human Geography. In: Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 151–160. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Roth, W. M., von Unger, H. (2018) (Eds.): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. In: Forum Qualitative Social Science Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 19(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/62 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Ruddat, M. (2012): Auswertung von Fokusgruppen mittels Zusammenfassung zentraler Diskussionsaspekte. In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., Renn, O. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 195–206. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Said, E. (1978): Orientalism. New York: Pantheon. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schammann, H., Gluns, D. (2021): Migrationspolitik. Nomos: Baden Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schammann, H., Gluns, D., Heimann, C., Müller, S., Wittchen, T., Younso, F., Ziegler, F. (2021): Defining and transforming local migration policies: a conceptual approach backed by evidence from Germany. In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47:13, 2897–2915. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schetula, V., Gallego Carrera, D. (2012): Konfliktsituationen in Fokusgruppen: Eine Herausforderung für den Moderator. Strategien im Umgang mit Konfliktsituationen, dargestellt am Fallbeispiel des Projektes „Energie nachhaltig konsumieren – nachhaltig Energie konsumieren. Wärmeenergie im Spannungsfeld von sozialen Bestimmungsfaktoren, ökonomischen Bedingungen und ökologischem Bewusstsein.“ In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., Renn, O. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 90–110. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schöhnhut, M., Jerrentrup, M.T. (2019): Partizipation und nachhaltige Entwicklung. Ein Überblick. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schulz, M. (2012): Quick and easy!? Fokusgruppen in der angewandten Sozialwissenschaften. In: Schulz, M. et al. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 9–23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schulz, M., Ruddat, M. (2012): „Let’s talk about sex!“ Über die Eignung von Telefoninterviews in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Research 13(3), Art. 2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Schweizer, T. (1996): Muster sozialer Ordnung. Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Berlin: Reimer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Scott, J. (1988): Trend Report. Social Network Analysis. Sociology 22(1), 109–127. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Sen, A. (2001): Development as Freedom. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Skop, E. (2006): The Methodological Potential of Focus Groups in Population Geography. In: Population, Space and Place 12, 113–124. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Sontheimer, S., Callens, K., Seiffert, B. (1999): Conducting a PRA Training and Modifying PRA Tools to Your Needs. An Example from a Participatory Household Food Security and Nutrition Project in Ethiopia. Rome: FAO. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Spittler, G. (2001): Teilnehmende Beobachtung als Dichte Teilnahme. In: Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 126, 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Spradley, J.P. (1980): Participant Observation. New York: Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Straßburger, G., Rieger, J. (Eds.) (2014): Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Straßburger, G., Rieger, J. (Eds.) (2019): Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. 2. Auflage. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Spencer, S. (2011): Visual research methods in the social sciences. Milton Park: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Stachowksi, J. (2020): Positioning in ‘relational claustrophobia’ – ethical reflections on researching small international migrant communities in rural areas. In: Journal of Rural Studies 78, 176–184. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
State University of New York at Fredonia (2023): Assessment – Definition and Overview. URL: https://www.fredonia.edu/about/offices/academic-affairs/assessment/assessment-information-resources (accessed last, 28 April 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Täubig, V. (2009): Totale Institution Asyl: Empirische Befunde zu alltäglichen Lebensführungen in der organisierten Desintegration. Weinheim, München: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Thierbach C., Petschick G. (2014) Beobachtung. In: Baur N., Blasius J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: Wiesbaden. Pp. 855–866. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Tuckett, A. (2004): Qualitative research sampling-the very real complexities. Nurse Researcher 12(1), Pp. 47–61. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
United Nations (n.d.): International Day of Disabled Persons 2004. Nothing about Us, Without Us, URL: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/international-day-of-persons-with-disabilities-3-december/international-day-of-disabled-persons-2004-nothing-about-us-without-us.html (accessed last, 26 May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Vaismoradi, M., Snelgrove, S. (2019): Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. In: Forum Qualitative Social Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 20(3), Art. 23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
von Unger, H. (2014): Partizipative Forschung. Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
von Unger, H. (2021): Ethical reflexivity as research practice. In: Historical Social Research 46 (2), 186–204. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Vogl, S. (2014): Gruppendiskussion. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 581–586. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994): Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Watson, A., Till, K. (2010): Ethnography and participant observation. In: DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., McDowell, L. (Eds.): The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 121–137. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Weidinger, T., Kordel, S., Kieslinger, J. (2019 (2021)): Unravelling the meaning of place and spatial mobility: analysing the everyday life-worlds of refugees in host societies by means of mobility mapping. In: Journal of Refugee Studies. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fez004. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Weischer, C., Gehrau, V. (2017): Die Beobachtung als Methode in der Soziologie. Konstanz: UVK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Wenzel, F., Boeser-Schnebel, C. (2019): Dorfgespräch. Ein Beitrag zur Demokratieentwicklung im ländlichen Raum. Bonn: Stiftung Mitarbeit. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Wernesjö, U. (2015): Landing in a rural village: home and belonging from the perspectives of unaccompanied young refugees. In: Identities 22(4), 451–467. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
White, H.C. (2008): Identity and control: How social formations emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Yin, R. K. (2003): Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, London, New Dehli: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Želinský, D. (2019): From Deduction to Abduction: Constructing a Coding Frame for Communist Secret Police Documents. In: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3377 (accessed last, 17 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412
Ziersch, A., Walsh, M., Due, C., Duivesteyn, E. (2017): Exploring the Relationship between Housing and Health for Refugees and Asylum Seekers in South Australia: A Qualitative Study. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, 1036. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748939412

Migration Impact Assessment