Cover of book: Die Aufmerksamkeitsspanne der Öffentlichkeit
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Die Aufmerksamkeitsspanne der Öffentlichkeit

Eine Studie zur Dauer und Intensität von Meinungsbildungsprozessen
Authors:
Publisher:
 22.10.2015

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2015
Publication date
22.10.2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2145-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6244-4
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Politische Kommunikation und demokratische Öffentlichkeit
Volume
12
Language
German
Pages
355
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 14
    1. 1.1 Problemaufriss und Fragestellung No access
    2. 1.2 Arbeitsmodell der MTDS No access
    3. 1.3 Weiteres Vorgehen No access
    1. 2.1 Öffentlichkeit und öffentliche Meinungsbildung No access
    2. 2.2 Nachrichten – Erzählungen – Öffentlichkeit No access
      1. 2.3.1 Nutzungsmotive und Aktualität No access
      2. 2.3.2 Aktualitätsdimensionen No access
      3. 2.3.3 Aktualitätssignale No access
    4. 2.4 Erzählebenen No access
    5. 2.5 Ereignis- und Themenlandschaft No access
    6. 2.6 Zwischenfazit No access
    1. 3.1 Aufbau von und Workflow in Redaktionen No access
    2. 3.2 Konstruktion von Nachrichten No access
      1. 3.3.1 Themenkapazität No access
      2. 3.3.2 Thematisierungsdauer No access
      3. 3.3.3 Themenkonkurrenz No access
      4. 3.3.4 Bewertungskriterien für Themen und Nachrichten No access
      5. 3.3.5 Einflussgruppen und Einflussquellen No access
      6. 3.3.6 Journalistische Koorientierung No access
      7. 3.3.7 Publikumsorientierung No access
      1. 3.4.1 Kapazität, Aufmerksamkeitsspanne und Konkurrenz No access
      2. 3.4.2 Auswirkungen medialer Aktualitätssignale No access
      3. 3.4.3 Koorientierung der Rezipienten No access
      1. 3.5.1 Informationssuche und Informationsvermeidung No access
      2. 3.5.2 Erklärungen des Informationsverhaltens No access
      1. 3.6.1 Wandel der Nachrichtenangebote No access
      2. 3.6.2 Wandel der Nachrichtenrezeption No access
    7. 3.7 Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 4.1.1 Was ist die Publikumsagenda? No access
      2. 4.1.2 Effekte auf Aggregat- und Individualebene No access
    2. 4.2 Themensetzungseffekte im Aggregat No access
      1. 4.3.1 Quellen der Wichtigkeitscues No access
      2. 4.3.2 Wege der Informationsverarbeitung No access
      3. 4.3.3 Individuelle Unterschiede No access
      1. 4.4.1 Zeitverzögerung und Wirkrichtung No access
      2. 4.4.2 Themenkarrierenmodelle No access
      3. 4.4.3 Decken-, Boden-, und Schwelleneffekte No access
      4. 4.4.4 Abnahmegeschwindigkeit No access
      5. 4.4.5 Wear-out von Themen No access
    5. 4.5 Zwischenfazit No access
    1. 5.1 Konzept und Operationalisierung No access
    2. 5.2 Kollektiver Wissenserwerb und seine Dynamik No access
    3. 5.3 Individueller Wissenserwerb No access
    4. 5.4 Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 6.1.1 Meinung und Einstellung No access
      2. 6.1.2 Pseudomeinungen No access
      3. 6.1.3 Meinungsrichtung und Meinungsstärke No access
      4. 6.1.4 Konzeptualisierung der Meinungssättigung No access
    2. 6.2 Kollektive Meinungsbildung No access
      1. 6.3.1 Modelle der Informationsverarbeitung No access
      2. 6.3.2 Medieneinfluss auf die Meinungsbildungsroute No access
      3. 6.3.3 Medieneinfluss auf die Meinungsstärke No access
    4. 6.4 Kopplung zwischen Individuum und Kollektiv No access
    5. 6.5 Zwischenfazit No access
    1. 7.1 Grundlagen von Meinungsbildungsprozessen No access
    2. 7.2 Komponenten im Meinungsbildungsprozess No access
      1. 7.3.1 Ereignislandschaft und Informationsangebot No access
      2. 7.3.2 Verarbeitungsmechanismen bei der Meinungsbildung No access
      3. 7.3.3 Einflussfaktoren auf die Aktualitätsbewertungen No access
      4. 7.3.4 Ablauf des Meinungsbildungsprozesses No access
    1. 8.1 Überblick über die Untersuchung No access
    2. 8.2 Themenauswahl No access
      1. 8.3.1 Stichprobe und Einheiten No access
      2. 8.3.2 Durchführung No access
        1. Formale Betonung No access
        2. Themencharakterisierungen No access
        3. Aktualitätssignale No access
        4. Informationselemente und Sprecherpositionen No access
      4. 8.3.5 Indikatoren No access
      1. 8.4.1 Grundgesamtheit und Stichprobe No access
      2. 8.4.2 Durchführung No access
      3. 8.4.3 Fragebogen No access
      4. 8.4.4 Indikatoren und Indizes No access
      1. 8.5.1 Kontakt, Aufmerksamkeit und Rezeptionsdauer No access
      2. 8.5.2 Wirkungsverzögerung und Wirkungsdauer No access
      3. 8.5.3 Wirkungsmodellierung No access
    1. 9.1 Syrien-Konflikt No access
    2. 9.2 Betreuungsgeld-Debatte No access
    3. 9.3 Breivik-Prozess No access
    4. 9.4 Weitere Entwicklungen der Themen No access
    1. 10.1 Überblick über die Medienberichterstattung No access
    2. 10.2 Abnutzungstendenzen in der Berichterstattung No access
    3. 10.3 Konsonanz der Berichterstattung No access
    4. 10.4 Diskussion No access
    1. 11.1 Überblick über den Medieninput No access
    2. 11.2 Abnutzungserscheinungen in der genutzten Berichterstattung No access
    3. 11.3 Heterogenität der rezipierten Inhalte No access
    4. 11.4 Erklärungsfaktoren für Abnutzung und Heterogenität No access
    5. 11.5 Diskussion No access
    1. 12.1 Aktualitätsbewertungen im Zeitverlauf No access
    2. 12.2 Meinungsbildungsintensität im Zeitverlauf No access
      1. 12.3.1 Unterschiede der Aktualitätsbewertungen No access
      2. 12.3.2 Veränderungen der Aktualitätsbewertungen No access
      3. 12.3.3 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 12.4.1 Unterschiede in der Meinungsbildungsintensität No access
      2. 12.4.2 Veränderungen der Meinungsbildungsintensität No access
      3. 12.4.3 Zusammenfassung No access
        1. Aktualitätsbewertungen No access
        2. Meinungsbildungsintensität No access
        3. Kontextabhängigkeit der Mechanismen No access
        1. Aktualitätsbewertungen No access
        2. Meinungsbildung No access
        3. Kontextabhängigkeit der Mechanismen No access
      3. 12.5.3 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 12.6.1 Identifikation der Meinungsbildungsmodi No access
      2. 12.6.2 Entwicklung der Meinungsbildungsmodi No access
        1. Unterschiede der Meinungsbildungsmodi No access
        2. Veränderungen der Meinungsbildungsmodi No access
      4. 12.6.4 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 12.7.1 Wear-out in der Meinungsbildung No access
      2. 12.7.2 Verallgemeinerung der Mechanismen No access
      3. 12.7.3 Einflüsse auf Aktualitätsbewertungen No access
      4. 12.7.4 Einflüsse auf die Meinungsbildung No access
      5. 12.7.5 Meinungsbildungsmodi No access
      1. 13.1.1 Prozesscharakter der Meinungsbildung No access
      2. 13.1.2 Qualität der Meinungsbildung und ihr Gefälle No access
      3. 13.1.3 Dynamik und Rationalität der Meinungsbildung No access
      4. 13.1.4 Themen als gesellschaftlicher Synchronisator No access
      5. 13.1.5 Heuristiken und Aktualitätssignale No access
      6. 13.1.6 Brauchbarkeit der Medienwirkungsmodelle No access
      7. 13.1.7 Onlinemedien, Internetnutzung und Nutzungsstile No access
    2. 13.2 Alternative Interpretationen No access
    3. 13.3 Methodische Kritikpunkte No access
    1. 14.1 Folgerungen für die Forschung No access
    2. 14.2 Folgerungen für Publikum und Journalismus No access
  16. Literatur No access 322 - 354
  17. Zusammenfassung No access 355 - 355

Bibliography (589)

  1. Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (Hrsg.). (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency. A sourcebook. Chicago, IL: McNally. Open Google Scholar
  2. Adatto, K. (1990). Sound Bite Democracy. Network Evening News Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1968 and 1988 (Joan Shorenstein Baron Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy Research Paper Nr. 2). Verfügbar unter http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/papers/research_papers/r02_adatto.pdf Open Google Scholar
  3. Aders, T. (Autor), 16.04.2012a. Einsatz der UN-Beobachter., Tagesschau 20:00. Open Google Scholar
  4. Aders, T. (Autor), 19.04.2012b. Syrien-Konflikt, Tagesschau 20:00. Open Google Scholar
  5. Aders, T. (Autor), 07.05.2012c. Umstrittene Parlamentswahl in Syrien, Tagesschau 20:00. Open Google Scholar
  6. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  7. Allern, S. & Pollack, E. (Hrsg.). (2012). Scandalous! The mediated construction of po-litical scandals in four Nordic countries. Göteborg: Nordicom. Open Google Scholar
  8. Allport, F. H. (1937). Toward a science of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1, 7–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/265034
  9. Althaus, S. L. (2003). Collective preferences in democratic politics. Opinion surveys and the will of the people. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610042
  10. Althaus, S. L. & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the 'new' news. Patterns of issue importance on the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Com-munication Research, 29, 180–207. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029002004
  11. Altmeppen, K.-D. (2006). Journalismus und Medien als Organisationen. Leistun-gen, Strukturen und Management. Wiesbaden: VS. Open Google Scholar
  12. Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Mi-chigan Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15100
  13. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard Definitions. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (7. Aufl.), American Association for Public Opinion Research. Verfügbar unter http://www.aapor.org Open Google Scholar
  14. Anand, P. & Sternthal, B. (1990). Ease of Message Processing as a Moderator of Re-petition Effects in Advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (8), 345–353. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3172591
  15. Anderson, C. W. (2011). Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences. Journalism's vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. International Journal of Communication, 5, 529–547. Open Google Scholar
  16. Andreß, H.-J., Golsch, K. & Schmidt, A. W. (2013). Applied Panel Data Analysis for Economic and Social Surveys. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32914-2
  17. Arceneaux, K. (2006). Do campaigns helf voters learn? A cross national analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 36 (1), 159–173. Open Google Scholar
  18. Armitage, C. J. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour. A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
  19. Aronson, E., Turner, J. A. & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67 (1), 31–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/h0045513
  20. Asseburg, M. (2013). Syrien. Ziviler Protest, Aufstand, Bürgerkrieg und Zukunftsaus-sichten. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 63 (8), 11–17. Open Google Scholar
  21. Atkin, C. K., Galloway, J. & Nayman, O. (1976). News media exposure, political knowledge, and campaign interest. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 231–237. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907605300206
  22. Atkin, C. K. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In P. Clarke (Hrsg.), New models in communication research (S. 205–242). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  23. Avenarius, T. (2012, 19. April). Zweifel am Friedenswillen. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11298-012-5092-3
  24. Baden, C. & Lecheler, S. (2012). Fleeting, fading, or far-reaching? A knowledge-based model of the persistence of framing effects. Communication Theory, 22, 359–382. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01413.x
  25. Badii, N. & Ward, W. J. (1980). The Nature of News in Four Dimensions. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 243–248. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908005700206
  26. Baerns, B. (1985). Öffentlichkeitsarbeit oder Journalismus? Zum Einfluß im Medien-system. Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik. Open Google Scholar
  27. Baldassare, M. & Katz, C. (1996). Measures of attitude strength as predictors of willingness to speak to the media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 147–158. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300113
  28. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3 (3), 265–299. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  29. Bannas, G. (2012, 25. April). Vom Feeling her kein gutes Gefühl. Frankfurter Allge-meine Zeitung, S. 2. Open Google Scholar
  30. Barabas, J. & Jerit, J. (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 73–89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00358.x
  31. Barnhurst, K. & Steele, C. A. (1997). Image Bite News. The Coverage of Elections on U.S. Television, 1968-1992. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2 (1), 40–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1081180X97002001005
  32. Bass, A. Z. (1969). Refining the 'Gatekeeping' Concept. A UN Radio Case Study. Journalism Quarterly, 46, 69–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769906904600110
  33. Bauer, R. (1964). The obstinate audience. The influence process from the point of view of social communication. American Psychologist, 19 (5), 319–328. Open Google Scholar
  34. Baumgartner, F. R. & Jones, B. D. (2002). Positive and negative feedback in politics. In F. R. Baumgartner & B. D. Jones (Hrsg.), Policy dynamics (S. 3–28). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  35. Behr, R. L. & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38–57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268900
  36. Belch, G. E. (1982). The Effects of Television Commericial Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (6), 56–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/208896
  37. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press–state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40 (2), 103–127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
  38. Bennett, W. L. & Iyengar, S. (2008). A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
  39. Benton, M. & Frazier, P. J. (1976). The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of information holding. Communication Research, 3, 261–274. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300302
  40. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F. & McPhee, W. N. (1963). Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  41. Berinsky, A. J. (2002). Silent voices. Social welfare policy opinion and political equality in America. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 276–287. Open Google Scholar
  42. Bernt, J. P., Fee, F. E., Gifford, J. & Stempel, G. H. (2000). How Well Can Editors Predict Reader Interest in News? Newspaper Research Journal, 21 (2), 2–10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/073953290002100201
  43. Best, K.-H. (2007). Kürzungstendenzen im Deutschen aus Sicht der Quantitati-ven Linguistik. In J. Bär, T. Roelcke & A. Steinhauer (Hrsg.), Sprachliche Kürze. Konzeptuelle, strukturelle und pragmatische Aspekte (S. 45–62). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  44. Beyers, H. (2006). What constitutes a good online news site? A comparative analysis of American and European awards. Communications, 31, 215–240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.014
  45. Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., Tuchfarber, A. J. & Bennett, S. E. (1980). Pseudo-opinions on public affairs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 198–209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268584
  46. Blödorn, S. & Gerhards, M. (2004). Informationsverhalten der Deutschen. Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativbefragung. Media Perspektiven, 2004 (1), 2–14. Open Google Scholar
  47. Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13, 542–549. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2087146
  48. Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Technology, monitoring, and imitation in contemporary news work. Communication, Culture and Critique, 2, 39–59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.01028.x
  49. Boczkowski, P. J. & Santos, M. de. (2007). When more media equals less news. Pat-terns of content homogenization in Argentina's leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication, 24, 167–180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584600701313025
  50. Boetzkes, C.-E. (2008). Organisation als Nachrichtenfaktor. Wie das Organisatorische den Content von Fernsehnachrichten beeinflusst. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  51. Bohner, G., Rank, S., Reinhard, M.-A., Einwiller, S. & Erb, H.-P. (1998). Motivational determinants of systematic processing. Expectancy moderates effects of desired confidence on processing effort. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28 (2), 185–206. Open Google Scholar
  52. Bonfadelli, H. (1994). Die Wissenskluftperspektive. Massenmedien und gesellschaftliche Information. Konstanz: UVK (zugl. Zürich, Univ., Habil.-Schr., 1992-1993). Open Google Scholar
  53. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps. A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17, 65–84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607
  54. Bowers, D. (1967). A Report on Activities by Publishers in Directing Newsroom Decisions. Journalism Quarterly, 44, 43–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769906704400106
  55. Brandstetter, B. & Range, S. (2009). Die Sprache der Journalisten. Von der Gefahr, arm in den Ausdrucksformen und banal in der Wortwahl zu werden. In Christoph Moss (Hrsg.), Die Sprache der Wirtschaft (S. 75–94). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  56. Breed, W. (1955a). Newspaper 'Opinion Leaders' and Processes of Standardization. Journalism Quarterly, 32, 277-284, 328. Open Google Scholar
  57. Breed, W. (1955b). Social control in the newsroom. Social Forces, 33, 326–335. Open Google Scholar
  58. Brettschneider, F. (1995). Öffentliche Meinung und Politik. Eine empirische Studie zur Responsivität des Deutschen Bundestags zwischen 1949 und 1990. Opladen: West-deutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97063-3
  59. Brosius, H.-B. (1994). Agenda-Setting nach einem Vierteljahrhundert Forschung. Me-thodischer und theoretischer Stillstand? Publizistik, 39, 269–288. Open Google Scholar
  60. Brosius, H.-B. (1995). Alltagsrationalität in der Nachrichtenrezeption. Ein Modell zur Wahrnehmung und Verarbeitung von Nachrichteninhalten. Opladen: Westdeut-scher Verlag (Zugl. Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Hablilitationsschrift). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09247-6
  61. Brosius, H.-B. & Eps, P. (1995). Prototyping through Key Events. News Selection in the Case of Violence against Aliens and Asylum Seekers in Germany. European Journal of Communication, 10, 391–412. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323195010003005
  62. Brosius, H.-B. & Kepplinger, H. M. (1990). The agenda-setting function of television. Static and dynamic views. Communication Research, 17, 183–211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002003
  63. Brosius, H.-B. & Kepplinger, H. M. (1992). Linear and nonlinear models of agenda setting in television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36, 5–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364151
  64. Brosius, H.-B. & Kepplinger, H. M. (1995). Killer and victim issues. Issue competiton in the agenda-setting process of German television. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 211–231. Open Google Scholar
  65. Brosius, H.-B. & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the Agenda? Agenda-Setting as a Two-Step Flow. Communication Research, 23, 561–580. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365096023005002
  66. Brown, N. R. (1990). Organzization of public events in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119 (3), 297–314. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.297
  67. Brüggemann, M. (2013). Transnational trigger constellations. Reconstructing the story behind the story. Journalism, 14, 401–418. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1464884912453284
  68. Buchensteiner, R. & Schröder, K. (2012, 2. Mai). »Keine Fernbleibeprämie«. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 2. Open Google Scholar
  69. Bucher, H.-J. & Schumacher, P. (2012). Zeitungsformate aus Lesersicht. Eine verglei-chende Rezeptionsstudie zur Leser-Blatt-Interaktion in Tabloids and Broadsheets. In H.-J. Bucher & P. Schumacher (Hrsg.), Interaktionale Rezeptionsforschung. Theorie und Methode der Blickaufzeichnung in der Medienforschung (S. 177–204). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  70. Buchsteiner, R. (2012, 24. April). Merkels Friedensangebot. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11298-012-5092-3
  71. Buckalew, J. K. (1969a). News Elements and Selection by Television News Editors. Journal of Broadcasting, 14, 47–54. Open Google Scholar
  72. Buckalew, J. K. (1969b). A Q-Analysis of Television News Editors' Decisions. Journalism Quarterly, 46, 135–137. Open Google Scholar
  73. Buckalew, J. K. (1974). The Radio News Editor as a Gatekeeper. Journal of Broadcasting, 18, 211–221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08838157409363736
  74. Bucy, E. P. & Grabe, M. E. (2007). Taking Television Seriously. A Sound and Image Bite Analysis of Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1992-2004. Journal of Commu-nication, 57, 652–675. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00362.x
  75. Bulkow, K., Urban, J. & Schweiger, W. (2013). The Duality of Agenda-Setting: The Role of Information Processing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 43–63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds003
  76. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. (2014, 24. Juli). Fragen und Antworten zum Betreuungsgeld. Verfügbar unter http://www.bmfsfj.de Open Google Scholar
  77. Burger, R., Eppelsheim, P., Kittlitz, A. von & Kraft, H. »Bildung muss in der Kita be-ginnen«. Interview mit Hannelore Kraft. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, S. 2. Open Google Scholar
  78. BVerfG (05.08.1966). BVerfGE, S. 162–230. Open Google Scholar
  79. Calder, B. J. & Sternthal, B. (1980). Television Commercial Wearout. An Information Processing View. Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (5), 173–186. Open Google Scholar
  80. Cantril, H. (2005). The invasion from Mars. A study in the psychology of panic. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Originalarbeit erschienen 1940). Open Google Scholar
  81. Case, D. O. (2012). Looking for information. A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. London: Emerald. Open Google Scholar
  82. Casey, R. D. & Copeland, T. H. (1958). Use of Foreign News by 19 Minnesota Dailies. Journalism Quarterly, 35, 87–89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769905803500112
  83. Chaffee, S. H. & Frank Kanihan, S. (1997). Learning about politics from the news. Po-litical Communication, 14, 421–430. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/105846097199218
  84. Chaffee, S. H. & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00096.x
  85. Chaffee, S. H., Zhao, X. & Leshner, G. (1994). Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992. Communication Research, 21, 305–324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003004
  86. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Hrsg.), Unintended thought (S. 212–242). New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  87. Chan, P. A. & Rabinowitz, T. (2006). A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Video Games and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Adolescents. Annals of Ge-neral Psychiatry, 5 (16), 10 pp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-5-16
  88. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodnes of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  89. Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The Heuristic–Systematic Model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (S. 73–96). New York: Guilford. Open Google Scholar
  90. Chen, S., Shechter, D. & Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along. Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (2), 262–275. Open Google Scholar
  91. Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  92. Christakis, D. A., Zimmerman, F. J., DiGiuseppe, D. L. & McCarty, C. A. (2004). Early Television Exposure and Subsequent Attentional Problems in Children. Pediatrics, 113, 708–713. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.4.708
  93. Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K. & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media. Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana, IL: Univerity of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Clayman, S. E. & Reisner, A. E. (1998). Gatekeeping in Action. Editorial Conferences and Assessments of Newsworthiness. American Sociological Review, 63, 178–199. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2657322
  95. Clyde, R. W. & Buckalew, J. K. (1969). Inter-Media Standardization. A Q-Analysis of News Editors. Journalism Quarterly, 46, 349–351. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769906904600219
  96. Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes. Continuiation of a dialogue. In E. R. Tufte (Hrsg.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (S. 168–189). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar
  97. Converse, P. E. (1987). Changing conceptions of public opinion in the political process. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 512–524. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/poq/51.4_PART_2.S12
  98. Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Critical Review, 18, 1–74. Originalarbeit erschienen 1964. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
  99. Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. T., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D. L., Leff, D. R. et al. (1983). Media and agenda setting. Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 16–35. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268764
  100. Cowan, N. (2008). Attention and memory. An integrated framework. New York: Ox-ford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  101. Cox, D. S. & Cox, A. D. (1988). What Does Familiarity Breed? Complexity as a Mo-derator of Repetition Effects in Advertising Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Re-search, 15 (6), 111–116. Open Google Scholar
  102. Cozzens, M. D. & Contractor, N. S. (1987). The effects of conflicting information on media skepticism. Communication Research, 14, 437–451. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365087014004004
  103. Craig, C. S., Sternthal, B. & Leavitt, C. (1976). Advertising Wearout. An Experimen-tal Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (11), 365–372. Open Google Scholar
  104. Craig, S. C., Kane, J. G. & Gainous, J. (2005). Issue-Related Learning in a Gubernatorial Campaign. A Panel Study. Political Communication, 22, 483–503. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584600500311501
  105. Curtin, P. A. & Rhodenbaugh, E. (2001). Building the news media agenda on the envi-ronment. A comparison of public relations and journalistic sources. Public Relations Review, 27 (2), 179–195. Open Google Scholar
  106. Dahinden, U. (2006). Framing. Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. Konstanz: UVK (Zugl. Zürich, Universität, Habil.-Schrift). Open Google Scholar
  107. Dahl, R. A. (2000). On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  108. Davis, D. K. & Robinson, J. P. (1986). News story attributes and comprehension. In J. P. Robinson & M. R. Levy (Hrsg.), The main source. Learning from television news (S. 179–210). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  109. Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E. & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence. A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1094–1102. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1094
  110. De Sola Pool, I. & Shulman, I. (1959). Newsmen's fantasies, audiences, and newswriting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23, 145–158. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/266860
  111. Delli Carpini, M. X. & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring Political Knowledge. Putting First Things First. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1179–1206. Open Google Scholar
  112. Demers, D. P., Craff, D., Choi, Y.-H. & Pessin, B. M. (1989). Issue obtrusiveness and the agenda-setting effects of national network news. Communication Research, 16, 793–812. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365089016006004
  113. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice. An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2 (2), 36–46. Open Google Scholar
  114. Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically. The implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing and Management, 36, 727–750. Open Google Scholar
  115. Deutscher Bundestag (Hrsg.). (2012, 09. November). Plenarprotokoll 17/205. Steno-graphischer Bericht. Open Google Scholar
  116. DeWerth-Pallmeyer, D. (1997). The Audience in the News. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  117. Dillard, J. P. & Shen, L. (2005). On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication. Communication Monographs, 72 (2), 144–168. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
  118. Dimmick, J. (1974). The Gate-Keeper. An uncertain theory. Journalism Monographs, 37, 45 pp. Open Google Scholar
  119. Discroll, P. D. & Salwen, M. B. (1997). Self-perceived knowledge of the O.J. Simp-son Trial. Third-person perception and perceptions of guilt. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 541–556. Open Google Scholar
  120. Dohle, M. (2013). Third-Person-Effekt. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  121. Donsbach, W. (1981). Journalisten zwischen Publikum und Kollegen. [Journalists between audience and colleagues]. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 29, 168–184. Open Google Scholar
  122. Donsbach, W. (1991). Medienwirkung trotz Selektion. Einflussfaktoren auf die Zuwen-dung zu Zeitungsinhalten. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
  123. Donsbach, W. (2004). Psychology of news decisions. Factors behind journalists' pro-fessional behavior. Journalism, 5, 131–157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/146488490452002
  124. Donsbach, W. & Büttner, K. (2005). Boulevardisierungstrend in deut-schen Fernsehnachrichten. Darstellungsmerkmale der Politikberichterstattung vor den Bundestagswahlen 1983, 1990 und 1998. Publizistik, 50, 21–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0116-6
  125. Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology. The issue attention cycle. Public Inter-est, 28, 38–50. Open Google Scholar
  126. Dpa (2012a, 16. April). UN-Beobachter nach Syrien. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar
  127. Dpa (2012b, 17. April). Erste UN-Beobachter in Syrien. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar
  128. Dpa (2012c, 17. April). Rente statt »Herdprämie«? Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar
  129. Dpa (2012d, 19. April). Wirbel um Kristina Schröders neues Buch. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  130. Dpa (2012e, 25. April). Merkel: Betreuungsgeld wird kommen. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  131. Dpa (2012f, 26. April). Betreuugsgeld auf Hartz IV angerechnet? Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  132. Dpa (2012g, 26. April). Keine Waffen an Bord. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar
  133. Dpa (2012h, 8. Mai). Syrer wählen neues Parlament. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar
  134. Drentwett, C. (2009). Vom Nachrichtenvermittler zum Nachrichtenthema. Metabe-richterstattung bei Medienereignissen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissen-schaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91474-9
  135. Drew, D. & Weaver, D. H. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 Presidential Election: Did the media matter? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 25–42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300103
  136. Druckman, J. N. (2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review, 24 (2), 199–216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2012.711022
  137. Druckman, J. N. & Lupia, A. (2000). Preference formation. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 1–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1
  138. Dye, M. W. G. & Bavelier, D. (2004). Playing Video Games Enhances Visual Attention in Children. Journal of Vision, 4 (11), 40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1167/4.11.40
  139. Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T. & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality. Experiencing commonality with others' inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521. Open Google Scholar
  140. Edy, J. A. (1999). Journalistic uses of collective memory. Journal of Communication, 49, 71–85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02794.x
  141. Edy, J. A. & Daradanova, M. (2006). Reporting through the lens of the past. From Challenger to Columbia. Journalism, 7 (2), 131–151. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1464884906062602
  142. Ehrhardt, C. (2012, 11. Mai). Dutzende Tote bei Doppelanschlag in Damaskus. Frank-furter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  143. Eichhorn, W. (2005). Agenda-Setting-Prozesse. Eine theoretische Analys individueller und gesellschaftlicher Themenstrukturierung. München: Fischer. (Originalarbeit er-schienen 1995). Open Google Scholar
  144. Eilders, C. (1997). Nachrichtenfaktoren und Rezeption. Eine empirische Analyse zur Auswahl und Verarbeitung politischer Information (Studien zur Kommunikations-wissenschaft, Bd. 20). Opladen: Westdt. Verl. Open Google Scholar
  145. Eilders, C. (2006). News factors and news decisions. Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany. Communications, 31, 5–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.002
  146. Eilders, C. & Wirth, W. (1999). Die Nachrichtenwertforschung auf dem Weg zum Publikum. Eine experimentelle Überprüfung des Einflusses von Nachrichten-faktoren bei der Rezeption. Publizistik, 44, 35–57. Open Google Scholar
  147. Emmer, M., Füting, A. & Vowe, G. (2006). Wer kommuniziert wie über politische Themen? Eine empirisch basierte Typologie individueller politischer Kommunikation. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 54, 216–236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2006-2-216
  148. Engelmann, I. (2012). Nachrichtenfaktoren und die organisationsspezifische Nachrich-tenselektion. Eine Erweiterung der Nachrichtenwerttheorie um die Meso-Ebene journalistischer Organisationen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 60, 41–63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2012-1-41
  149. Entman, R. M. (2012). Scandal and silence. Media responses to Presidential misconduct. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  150. Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues. A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Politi-cal Science, 24, 16–49. Open Google Scholar
  151. Erikson, R. S., Panagopoulos, C. & Wlezien, C. (2010). The Crystallization of Voter Preferences During the 2008 Presidential Campaign. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40, 482–496. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2010.03782.x
  152. Esser, F. (1998). Die Kräfte hinter den Schlagzeilen. Englischer und deutscher Journa-lismus im Vergleich. Freiburg i. Br.: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  153. Esser, F. & Hanitzsch, T. (2012). On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of comparative communication research (S. 3–22). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  154. Ettema, J. S. & Kline, F. G. (1977). Deficits, differences, and ceilings. Communication Research, 4, 179–202. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400204
  155. Ettenhuber, A. (2007). Die Beschleunigung des Fernsehverhaltens. Sekundäranalyse von Daten aus dem GfK-Fernsehpanel (Reihe Rezeptionsforschung, Bd. 9). Mün-chen: Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845213989
  156. Europäische Kommission. (2012). Eurobarometer 76.3 (2011). Verfügbar unter www.gesis.org Open Google Scholar
  157. Eveland, W. P. (2001). The Cognitive Mediation Model of Learning From the News: Evidence From Nonelection, Off-Year Election, and Presidential Election Contexts. Communication Research, 28, 571–601. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005001
  158. Eveland, W. P. (2002). News Information Processing as Mediator of the Relationship between Motivations and Political Knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 26–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900103
  159. Eveland, W. P., McLeod, D. M. & Signorielli, N. (1995). Actual and perceived U.S. public opinion. The spiral of silence during the Persian Gulf War. Internatio-nal Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 91–109. Open Google Scholar
  160. Eveland, W. P., Shah, D. V. & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model. A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359–386. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253369
  161. Eysenck, M. W. & Keane, M. T. (2010). Cognitive Psychology. A Student's Handbook. Hove: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar
  162. Falchikov, N. & Boud, D. (1989). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59 (4), 395–430. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3102/00346543059004395
  163. Fengler, S. & Ruß-Mohl, S. (2005). Der Journalist als "Homo oeconomicus". Kon-stanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  164. Festinger, L. (1965). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  165. Findahl, O. & Höijer, B. (1985). Some characteristics of news memory and comprehension. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29, 379–396. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08838158509386594
  166. Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm. The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51 (1), 1–22. Open Google Scholar
  167. Fishkin, J. S. & Luskin, R. C. (2005). Experimenting with a Democratic ideal. Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. Acta Politica, 40, 284–298. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
  168. Fishman, M. (1978). Crime waves as ideology. Social Problems, 25, 531–543. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/800102
  169. Fishman, M. (1980). Manufacturing the news. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press. Open Google Scholar
  170. Fiske, S. T. & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes. Influences and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. Open Google Scholar
  171. Flegel, R. C. & Chaffee, S. H. (1971). Influences of editors, readers, and personal opinions on reporters. Journalism Quarterly, 48, 645–651. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907104800404
  172. Focus.de [Redaktion] (2012, 28. März). USA fordern von Assad Taten statt Worte. Focus.de. Verfügbar unter http://www.focus.de Open Google Scholar
  173. Foehr, U. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth. Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  174. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2012a, 16. April). Gefahrgut an Bord. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  175. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2012b, 21. April). Ruf nach militärischer Intervention in Syrien wird lauter. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1–2. Open Google Scholar
  176. Franzmann, B. (2001). Lesezapping und Portionslektüre. Veränderungen des Lesever-haltens, besonders bei Jugendlichen. Media Perspektiven, 2001 (2), 90–98. Open Google Scholar
  177. Fretwurst, B. (2008). Nachrichten im Interesse der Zuschauer. Eine konzeptionelle und empirische Neubestimmung der Nachrichtenwerttheorie. Konstanz: UVK Verl.-Ges. Open Google Scholar
  178. Fried, N. (2012, 25. April). Auf Kosten der Ärmsten. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11298-012-5092-3
  179. Friedrich, K. & Jandura, O. (2012). Politikvermittlung durch Boulevardjournalismus. Eine öffentlichkeitstheoretische Neubewertung. Publizistik, 57, 403–417. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-012-0158-5
  180. Früh, W. (1980). Lesen, Verstehen, Urteilen. Untersuchungen über den Zusammenhang von Textgestaltung und Textwirkung. Freiburg i. Br.: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  181. Früh, W. (Hrsg.). (1991). Medienwirkungen. Das dynamisch-transaktionale Modell - Theorie und empirische Forschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  182. Früh, W. & Schönbach, K. (1982). Der dynamisch-transaktionale Ansatz. Ein neues Paradigma der Medienwirkungen. Publizistik, 27, 74–88. Open Google Scholar
  183. Funkhouser, G. R. (1973a). The issues of the sixties. An exploratory study in the dy-namics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 62–75. Open Google Scholar
  184. Funkhouser, G. R. (1973b). Trends in media coverage of the issues of the 60ies. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 533–538. Open Google Scholar
  185. Gallup, G. (1947). The quintamensional plan of question design. Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 385–393. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/poq/11.3.385
  186. Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
  187. Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting. Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Open Google Scholar
  188. Gans, H. J. (1980). Deciding what's news. A study of 'CBS Evening News', 'NBC Nightly News', 'Newsweek', and 'Time'. New York, NY: Vintage. Open Google Scholar
  189. Gantz, W. (1978). How uses and gratifications affect recall of television news. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 664-672, 681. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907805500402
  190. García Avilés, J. A., Meier, K., Kaltenbrunner, A., Carvajal, M. & Kraus, D. (2009). Newsroom integration in Austria, Spain and Germany. Journalism Practice, 3, 285–303. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/17512780902798638
  191. Gehrau, V. & Goertz, L. (2010). Gespräche über Medien unter veränderten media-len Bedingungen. Publizistik, 55, 153–172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-010-0082-5
  192. Geiß, S. (2008). Aufmerksamkeitszyklen der Medien. Unveröffentlichte Magisterarbeit, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität. Mainz. Open Google Scholar
  193. Geiß, S. (2010, Juni). Dynamics of the Media’s Issue Attention. Some Implications for Agenda Setting Research. Vortrag auf der 60. Jahrestagung der International Com-munication Association (ICA) “Matters of Communication”, Singapur. Open Google Scholar
  194. Geiß, S. (2011). Patterns of relationships between issues. An analysis of German pres-tige newspapers. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 265–286. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq050
  195. Geiß, S. (2013a). Entwicklung und Wettbewerb der Deutungsmuster. Konkurrierende Frames und Deutungshoheit in der Berichterstattung. In O. Quiring, H. M. Kepplinger, M. Weber & S. Geiß (Hrsg.), Lehman Brothers und die Folgen. Be-richterstattung zu wirtschaftlichen Interventionen des Staates (S. 153–183). Wies-baden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  196. Geiß, S. (2013b). Zwischenmediale Einflüsse. Ko-orientierung und Verselbständi-gungstendenzen der Medien in Orientierungs- und Routinephasen. In O. Quiring, H. M. Kepplinger, M. Weber & S. Geiß (Hrsg.), Lehman Brothers und die Folgen. Be-richterstattung zu wirtschaftlichen Interventionen des Staates (S. 91–110). Wiesba-den: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  197. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2009). Data analysis using regression and multile-vel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  198. Genova, B. K. L. & Greenberg, B. S. (1979). Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 79–91. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268493
  199. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S. & Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural Indicators. Violence Profile No. 9. Journal of Communication, 28 (3), 176–207. Open Google Scholar
  200. Gerhards, J. & Neidhardt, F. (1990). Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlich-keit. Fragestellungen und Ansätze. WZB: FS III 90-101. Verfügbar unter http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49817 Open Google Scholar
  201. Gieber, W. (1956). Across the Desk. A Study of 16 Telegraph Editors. Journalism Quarterly, 33, 423–432. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769905603300401
  202. Gill, P., Arlitt, M., Li, Z. & Mahanti, A. (2007). YouTube Traffic Characterization. A View From the Edge. Proceedings of the IMC, 7, 15–28. Open Google Scholar
  203. Gleick, J. (1999). Faster. The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York, NY: Pantheon Books. Open Google Scholar
  204. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C. & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597–602. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3758/BF03202442
  205. Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F. & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out. A meta-analysis of survey studies on the 'spiral of si-lence'. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452–463. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/297808
  206. Glynn, C. J., Ostman, R. E. & McDonald, D. G. (1995). Opinions, perceptions, and social reality. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Hrsg.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (S. 249–279). New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  207. Golan, G. & Wanta, W. (2001). Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire Primary. A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 247–259. Open Google Scholar
  208. Gonzenbach, W. J. (1992). A time-series analysis of the drug issue, 1985–1990. The press, the President and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 126–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/4.2.126
  209. Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S., Lang, A. & Bolls, P. (2000). Packaging television news. The effects of tabloid on information processing and evaluative responses. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 581–598. Open Google Scholar
  210. Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news. How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman. Open Google Scholar
  211. Graber, D. A. (2003). The rocky road to new paradigms. Modernizing news and citizenship standards. Political Communication, 20, 145–148. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211163
  212. Green, C. S. & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action Video Game Modifies Visual Selective At-tention. Nature, 423, 534–537. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1038/nature01647
  213. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds. The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
  214. Gunter, B. (1979). Recall of breif television news items. Effects of presentation mode, picture content, and serial position. Journal of Educational Television, 5, 57–61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/0260741790050207
  215. Gunther, A. C. & Storey, J. D. (2003). The Influence of Presumed Influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199–215. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
  216. Habermas, J. (1979). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Ka-tegorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Darmstadt: Luchterhand. (Originalarbeit er-schienen 1962). Open Google Scholar
  217. Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing. Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11 (3), 205–242. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02
  218. Hallin, D. C. (1992). Sound Bite News. Television Coverage of Elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication, 42 (2), 5–24. Verfügbar unter DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x
  219. Hardin, C. D. & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality. How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Hrsg.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (S. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford. Open Google Scholar
  220. Harless, J. D. (1974). Mail Call. A Case Study of a Broadcast Gatekeeper. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 87–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907405100113
  221. Harmon-Jones, E. (2002). A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Hrsg.), The persuasion handbook. Developments in theory and practice (S. 99–116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  222. Häusermann, J. (2011). Journalistisches Texten (3. Aufl.). Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  223. Heinonen, A. (2011). The journalists' relationship with users. In J. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt et al. (Hrsg.), Participatory journalism. Guarding open gates at online newspapers (S. 34–55). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  224. Hennis, W. (1957). Meinungsforschung und repräsentative Demokratie. Zur Kritik po-litischer Umfragen. Tübingen: Mohr. Open Google Scholar
  225. Herberich, E., Sikorski, J., & Hothorn, T. (2010). A robust procedure for comparing multiple means under heteroskedasticity in unbalanced designs. PLoS ONE, 5(3), e9788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009788 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009788
  226. Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion. How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  227. Hermann, R. (2012, 5. Mai). Amerika spricht vom Scheitern des Annan-Plans. Frank-furter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  228. Hermann, R., Ross, A. & Pergande, F. (2012, 16. April). UN-Beobachter sollen heute ihre Mission in Syrien beginnen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1–2. Open Google Scholar
  229. Hermann, R. & Sattar, M. (2012, 19. April). Syrische Armee verstärkt Angriffe auf Protesthochburgen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1–2. Open Google Scholar
  230. Herzog, H. (1944). What Do We Really Know about Daytime Serial Listeners. In P. F. Lazarsfeld & F. N. Stanton (Hrsg.), Radio Research 1942-1943 (S. 3–33). New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce. Open Google Scholar
  231. Hestermann, T. (2010). Fernsehgewalt und die Einschaltquote. Welches Publikumsbild Fernsehschaffende leitet, wenn sie über Gewaltkriminalität berichten. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845224213
  232. Heute [Redaktion] (Autor), 18.04.2012a. Waffen für Syrien auf deutschem Frachter?, Heute 19:00. Open Google Scholar
  233. Heute [Redaktion] (Autor), 19.04.2012b. Kritik an Syrien, Heute 19:00. Open Google Scholar
  234. Heute [Redaktion] (Autor), 03.05.2012c. Studentenproteste gewaltsam beendet, Heute 19:00. Open Google Scholar
  235. Heute Journal (Redaktion) (Autor), 28.04.2012. Weiter Gewalt trotz Waffenruhe, Heute Journal. Open Google Scholar
  236. Hilgartner, S. & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems. A public are-nas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 53–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/228951
  237. Hofsäss, M. & Engel, D. (2003). Praxishandbuch Mediaplanung. Forschung, Studien und Werbewirkung; Mediaagenturen und Planungsprozess; Mediagattungen und Werbeträger. Berlin: Cornelsen. Open Google Scholar
  238. Hohlfeld, R. (2003). Journalismus und Medienforschung. Theorie, Empirie, Transfer. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  239. Holliday, J. (December 2011). The Struggle for Syria in 2011. An Operational and Re-gional Analysis, Institute for the Study of War. Middle East Security Report: 2. Open Google Scholar
  240. Holst, I.-A. (2000). Realitätswahrnehmung in politischen Konflikten. Grundlagen einer Theorie der Wissenskluft. Konstanz: UVK (zugl. Mainz, Univ., Diss., 1998). Open Google Scholar
  241. Hovland, C. I. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 14 (1), 8–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/h0042210
  242. Huck, I., Quiring, O. & Brosius, H.-B. (2009). Perceptual phenomena in the agenda setting process. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21, 139–164. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp019
  243. Hügel, R., Degenhardt, W. & Weiss, H.-J. (1989). Structural equation models for the analysis of the agenda-setting process. European Journal of Communication, 4, 191–210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323189004002005
  244. Hughes, G. D. (1992). Real Time Response Measures Redefine Advertising Wearout. Journal of Advertising Research, 32 (3), 61–77. Open Google Scholar
  245. Imhof, K. (2011). Die Krise der Öffentlichkeit. Kommunikation und Medien als Faktor des sozialen Wandels. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  246. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chi-cago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001
  247. Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red Media, Blue Media. Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
  248. Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matter. Television and American Opini-on. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  249. Jackob, N. (2010). No Alternatives? The Relationship between Perceived Media Dependency, Use of Alternative Information Sources, and General Trust in Mass Media. International Journal of Communication, 4, 589–606. Open Google Scholar
  250. Jackob, N. (2012). Gesehen, gelesen – geglaubt? Warum die Medien nicht die Wirk-lichkeit abbilden und die Menschen ihnen trotzdem vertrauen. München: Olzog. Open Google Scholar
  251. Jerit, J., Barabas, J. & Bolsen, T. (2006). Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 266–282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00183.x
  252. Johnson, B. T. & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106 (2), 290–314. Open Google Scholar
  253. Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Kasen, S. & Brook, J. S. (2007). Extensive Television Viewing and the Development of Attention and Learning Difficulties During Adolescence. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 480–486. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.5.480
  254. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (Hrsg.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477
  255. Kaltenhäuser, B. (2005). Abstimmung am Kiosk. Der Einfluss der Titelseitengestaltung politischer Publikumszeitschriften auf die Einzelverkaufsauflage. Wiesbaden: Dt. Univ.-Verl. (Mainz, Univ., Diss.). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81373-2
  256. Katz, E., Adoni, H. & Parness, P. (1977). Remembering the news. What the picture adds to recall. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 231–239. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907705400201
  257. Keene, K. H. & Sackett, V. A. (1981). An editor's report on the Yankelovich, Skelly and White ›Mushiness index‹. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4, 50–51. Open Google Scholar
  258. Kepplinger, H. M. (1985). Die aktuelle Berichterstattung des Hörfunks. Eine Inhalts-analyse der Abendnachrichten und politischen Magazine. Freiburg i. Br.: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  259. Kepplinger, H. M. (1989). Theorien der Nachrichtenauswahl als Theorien der Realität. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 15, 3–16. Open Google Scholar
  260. Kepplinger, H. M. (1992). Ereignismanagement. Wirklichkeit und Massenmedien. Zü-rich: Edition Interfrom. Open Google Scholar
  261. Kepplinger, H. M. (1998). Die Demontage der Politik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Freiburg i. Br.: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  262. Kepplinger, H. M. (2000). Vom Kompetenz- zum Machtverlust. In E. Noelle-Neumann, H. M. Kepplinger & W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), Kampa. Meinungsklima und Medienwirkung im Bundestagswahlkampf 1998 (2. Aufl., S. 215–236). Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  263. Kepplinger, H. M. (2001). Der Ereignisbegriff in der Publizistikwissenschaft. Publizis-tik, 46, 117–139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-001-0032-3
  264. Kepplinger, H. M. (2007). Reciprocal Effects. Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12 (2), 3–23. Open Google Scholar
  265. Kepplinger, H. M. (2008). Ereignishäufigkeiten, Bedenkzeiten und Entscheidungskor-ridore. Zur Verarbeitung gesellschaftlicher Probleme. In K.-M. Kodalle & H. Rosa (Hrsg.), Rasender Stillstand. Beschleunigung des Wirklichkeitswandels - Konse-quenzen und Grenzen. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Open Google Scholar
  266. Kepplinger, H. M. (2010). Meinungsverteilung und Medienwirkung. In Medieneffekte (S. 245–258). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  267. Kepplinger, H. M. (2011a). Der prognostische Gehalt der Nachrichtenwerttheorie. In Journalismus als Beruf (S. 77–99). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  268. Kepplinger, H. M. (2011b). Theorien der Nachrichtenauswahl als Theorien der Realität. In Realitätskonstruktionen (Theorie und Praxis öffentlicher Kommunikation, Bd. 5, S. 47–65). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  269. Kepplinger, H. M. (2011c). Die Verdunkelung des publizistischen Ereignishorizonts. In Realitätskonstruktionen (Theorie und Praxis öffentlicher Kommunikation, Bd. 5, S. 117–137). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  270. Kepplinger, H. M. (2012). Die Mechanismen der Skandalisierung. zu Guttenberg, Ka-chelmann, Sarrazin & Co. München: Olzog (Warum einige öffentlich untergehen – und andere nicht). Open Google Scholar
  271. Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H.-B. & Dahlem, S. (1994). Wie das Fernsehen Wahlen beeinflußt. Theoretische Modelle und empirische Analysen. München: R. Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  272. Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H.-B. & Staab, J. (1991a). Instrumental Actualization. A Theory of Mediated Conflicts. European Journal of Communication, 6, 263–290. Open Google Scholar
  273. Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H.-B. & Staab, J. (1991b). Opinion Formation in Mediated Conflicts and Crises. A Theory of Cognitive-Affective Media Effects. Internatio-nal Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3, 132–156. Open Google Scholar
  274. Kepplinger, H. M. & Daschmann, G. (1997). Today's news - tomorrow's context. A dynamic model of news processing. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 548–565. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08838159709364426
  275. Kepplinger, H. M. & Ehmig, S. C. (1997). Der Einfluss politischer Einstellungen von Journalisten auf die Beurteilung aktueller Kontroversen. Medienpsychologie, 9, 271–292. Open Google Scholar
  276. Kepplinger, H. M., Geiß, S. & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing scandals. Cognitive and emotional media effects. Journal of Communication, 62, 659–681. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01653.x
  277. Kepplinger, H. M., Gotto, K., Brosius, H.-B. & Haak, D. (1989). Der Einfluß der Fernsehnachrichten auf die politische Meinungsbildung. Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  278. Kepplinger, H. M. & Habermeier, J. (1995). The Impact of Key Events on the Presentation of Reality. European Journal of Communication, 10, 371–390. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323195010003004
  279. Kepplinger, H. M. & Hartung, U. (1997). Die Lokal- und Regionalberichterstattung des Hörfunks und der Presse in Rheinland-Pfalz. Ludwigshafen: Landeszentrale für private Rundfunkveranstalter. Open Google Scholar
  280. Kepplinger, H. M. & Hartung, U. (1999). Die Lokal- und Regionalberichterstattung des Hörfunks und der Presse in Rheinland-Pfalz II. Rheinhessen und Raum Koblenz / Montabaur. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  281. Kepplinger, H. M. & Martin, V. (1986). Die Funktionen der Massenmedien in der All-tagskommunikation. Publizistik, 31, 118–128. Open Google Scholar
  282. Kepplinger, H. M. & Maurer, M. (2001). Saldo oder Mittelwert? Eine vorläufige Ant-wort auf eine ungestellte Frage. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Die Politik der Mas-senmedien. Heribert Schatz zum 65. Geburtstag (S. 166–180). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  283. Kepplinger, H. M., Tullius, C. & Augustin, S. (1994). Objektiver Inhalt und subjektives Verständnis aktueller Zeitungsberichte. Medienpsychologie, 6, 302–322. Open Google Scholar
  284. Kim, J. & Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107–135. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365097024002001
  285. Kim, S.-H., Scheufele, D. A. & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way. Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7–25. Open Google Scholar
  286. Kiousis, S. (2005). Compelling Arguments and Attitude Strength. Exploring the Impact of Second-Level Agenda Setting on Public Opinion of Presidential Candidate Images. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10 (2), 3–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05276095
  287. Kiousis, S., Kim, S.-Y., McDevitt, M. & Ostrowski, A. (2009). Competing for attention. Subsidy influence in agenda building during election campaigns. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 545–562. Open Google Scholar
  288. Kiousis, S. & McCombs, M. E. (2004). Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength. Political figures during the 1996 Presidential election. Communication Research, 31, 36–57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650203260205
  289. Klapper, J. T. (1965). The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  290. Kleinnijenhuis, J. (1991). Newspaper complexity and the knowledge gap. European Journal of Communication, 6, 499–522. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006004006
  291. Klinenberg, E. (2005). Convergence. News production in a digital age. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (597), 48–64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270346
  292. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Keplinger, C. Thrilling News. Factors Generating Suspense during News Exposure. Media Psychology, 9, 193–210. Open Google Scholar
  293. Knoche, M. & Lindgens, M. (1988). Selektion, Konsonanz und Wirkungspotential der deutschen Tagespresse. Politikvermittlung am Beispiel der Agentur- und Pressebe-richterstattung über die Grünen zur Bundestagswahl 1987. Media Perspektiven, 1988 (8), 490–510. Open Google Scholar
  294. Kohring, M. (2004). Vertrauen in Journalismus. Theorie und Empirie. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  295. Königsberger, P. (2012, 19. April). Blanker Hohn. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 2. Open Google Scholar
  296. Kriesi, H. (2005). Direct democratic choice. The Swiss experience. Lanham, MD: Le-xington, Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  297. Kröger, T. (Autor), 04.05.2012a. Ohne Titel, Heute Journal. Open Google Scholar
  298. Kröger, T. (Autor), 07.05.2012b. Parlamentswahl in Syrien, Heute 19:00. Open Google Scholar
  299. Kröger, T. (Autor), 09.05.2012c. Ohne Titel, Heute Journal. Open Google Scholar
  300. Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K. & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength. One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (6), 1132–1151. Open Google Scholar
  301. Kuhlmann, C. & Wolling, J. (2004). Fernsehen als Nebenbeimedium. Befragungsdaten und Tagebuchdaten im Vergleich. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52, 386–411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-3-386
  302. Kuhlmann, J. S. & Beitel, P. A. (1991). Videogame Experience. A Possible Explanation for Differences in Anticipation of Coincidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 483–488. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2466/pms.1991.72.2.483
  303. Kunczik, M. & Zipfel, A. (2001). Publizistik. Ein Studienhandbuch. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
  304. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108 (3), 480–498. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  305. Kwak, N. (1999). Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis. Education, motivation, and media use, Communication Research, 26, 385–413. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004002
  306. Lamp, E. (2009). Die Macht öffentlicher Meinung - und warum wir uns ihr beugen. Über die Schattenseite der menschlichen Natur. München: Olzog. Open Google Scholar
  307. Landman, T. (2002). Issues and methods in comparative politics. An introduction. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203133828
  308. Lang, A., Bolls, P., Potter, R. F. & Kawahara, K. (1999). The Effects of Production Pacing and Arounsing Content on the Information Processing of Televisi-on Messages. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 451–475. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364504
  309. Lang, A., Zhou, S., Schwartz, N., Bolls, P. D. & Potter, R. F. (2000). The Effects of Edits on Arousal, Attention, and Memory for Television Messages. When an Edit Is an Edit Can an Edit Be Too Much? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 94–109. Open Google Scholar
  310. Lang, G. E. & Lang, K. (1981). Watergate. An exploration of the agenda-building pro-cess. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 2, 447–468. Open Google Scholar
  311. Lang, K. (2008). Reply to the comments. International Journal of Public Opini-on Research, 20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn003
  312. Lasorsa, D. L. & Wanta, W. (1990). Effects of personal, interpersonal and media experiences on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 804–813. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909006700435
  313. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. R. & Gaudet, H. (1965). The people's choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a Presidential campaign (2. Aufl.). New York, NY: Co-lumbia University Press. (Originalarbeit erschienen 1944). Open Google Scholar
  314. Lee, B., Lancendorfer, K. M. & Lee, K. J. (2005). Agenda-setting and the internet. The intermedia influence of internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 15, 57–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/0129298042000329793
  315. Lee, E.-J. & Oh, S. Y. (2013). Seek and you shall find? How need for orientation mo-derates knowledge gain from Twitter use. Journal of Communication, 63, 745–765. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12041
  316. Lee, J. K. (2007). The effects of the Internet on homogeneity of the media agenda. A test of the fragmentation thesis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 745–760. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400406
  317. Leippe, M. R. & Elkin, R. A. (1987). When motives clash. Issue involvement and res-ponse involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269–278. Open Google Scholar
  318. Lenhart, A., Madden, M. & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology. Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew. Verfügbar unter http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Teens_Tech_ July2005web.pdf.pdf Open Google Scholar
  319. Lippmann, W. (1961/1922). Public opinion. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Originalarbeit erschienen 1922). Open Google Scholar
  320. Loosen, W. & Schmidt, J.-H. (2012). (Re-)Discovering the audience. The relationship between journalism and audience in networked digital media. Informati-on, Communication and Society, 15, 867–887. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.665467
  321. Löwenstein, S. (2012, 24. April). Koalition streitet weiter über Betreuungsgeld. Frank-furter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 1–2. Open Google Scholar
  322. Löwenstein, S. & Schröder, K. (2012, 30. April). »Es gibt keine Einheitsfamilien«. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 2. Open Google Scholar
  323. Luenberger, D. G. (2006). Information science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  324. Lüger, H.-H. (1995). Pressesprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110929522
  325. Luhmann, N. (1970). Öffentliche Meinung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 11, 2–28. Open Google Scholar
  326. Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias. Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88 (1), 63–76. Open Google Scholar
  327. Luskin, R. C. (1987). Measuring Political Sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 856–899. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2111227
  328. Luskin, R. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12 (4), 331–361. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00992793
  329. MacKuen, M. B. (1981). Social communication and the mass policy agenda. In M. B. MacKuen & S. L. Coombs (Hrsg.), More than news. Media power in public affairs (S. 119–146). Beverly Hills: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  330. MacKuen, M. B. (1984). Exposure to information, belief integration and individual responsiveness to agenda change. American Political Science Review, 78, 372–391. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1963370
  331. Mahrt, M. & Begenat, M. (2013). Von Lebenswelten und ihren Horizonten. Medien-nutzung und Themenwahrnehmung in politischen Milieus. Medien & Kommunika-tionswissenschaft, 61, 21–37. Open Google Scholar
  332. Maier, M., Stengel, K. & Marschall, J. (2010). Nachrichtenwerttheorie. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  333. Mainzer Rhein-Zeitung (2012, 26. April). Merkel: Betreuungsgeld kommt. Mainzer Rhein-Zeitung, S. 17. Open Google Scholar
  334. Malik, M. (2004). Journalismus-journalismus. Funktionen, Strukturen und Strategien der journalistischen Selbstthematisierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissen-schaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80552-2
  335. Matthes, J. (2006). The need for orientation towards news media. Revising and validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 422–444. Open Google Scholar
  336. Matthes, J. (2008). Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects. Causal evidence from a two-wave panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Re-search, 20, 440–453. Open Google Scholar
  337. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2003). Operationalisierung von Vertrauen in Journalismus. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51, 5–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2003-1-5
  338. Maurer, M. (2004). Das Paradox der Medienwirkungsforschung. Verän-dern Massenmedien die Bevölkerungsmeinung, ohne Einzelne zu beeinflussen? Publizistik, 49, 405–422. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-004-0108-y
  339. Maurer, M. (2010). Agenda-Setting (Konzepte, Bd. 1). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  340. Maurer, M. & Reinemann, C. (2006). Medieninhalte. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  341. McClure, R. D. & Patterson, T. E. (1976). Print vs. network news. Journal of Commu-nication, 26 (2), 23–28. Open Google Scholar
  342. McComas, K. & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change. Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26, 30–57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365099026001003
  343. McCombs, M. (2007). Setting the agenda. The mass media and public opinion (Reprinted.). Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  344. McCombs, M. E. (1977). Newspaper versus Television. Mass communication effects across time. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Hrsg.), The emergence of American political issues (S. 89–106). St. Paul: West Publ. Open Google Scholar
  345. McCombs, M. E., Lopez-Escobar, E. & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of at-tributes in the 1996 Spanish General Election. Journal of Communication, 50 (2), 77–92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x
  346. McCombs, M. E. & Poindexter, P. (1983). The duty to keep informed. News exposure and civic obligation. Journal of Communication, 33 (2), 88–96. Open Google Scholar
  347. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267990
  348. McCombs, M. E. & Zhu, J.-H. (1995). Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda. Trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 495–525. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/269491
  349. McLeod, D. M. & Perse, E. M. (1994). Direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic status on public affairs knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 433–441. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100216
  350. McLeod, J. M. & Becker, L. B. (1974). Testing the validity of gratifications through political effects analysis. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Hrsg.), The uses of mass communications. Current perspektives on gratifications research (S. 137–164). Be-verly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  351. McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B. & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 1, 131–165. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365027400100201
  352. McLeod, J. M. & McDonald, D. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure. Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12, 3–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365085012001001
  353. McLuhan, M. (1967). Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Open Google Scholar
  354. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance. Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  355. McQuail, D. (2005). Mass Communication Theory (5. Aufl.). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  356. Merten, K. (1973). Aktualität und Publizität. Zur Kritik der Publizistikwissenschaft. Publizistik, 18, 216–235. Open Google Scholar
  357. Merten, K. (1985). Re-Rekonstruktion von Wirklichkeit durch Zuschauer von Fern-sehnachrichten. Media Perspektiven, 1985 (10), 753–763. Open Google Scholar
  358. Miller, J. M. & Peterson, D. A. M. (2004). Theoretical and empirical implications of attitude strength. Journal of Politics, 66, 847–867. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00279.x
  359. Miller, W. E. & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57 (1), 45–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1952717
  360. Min, Y., Ghanem, S. & Evatt, D. (2007). Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ›MIP‹ question in agenda setting research. A methodological study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 221–236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edm003
  361. Miyo, Y. (1983). The knowledge-gap hypothesis and media dependency. Communica-tion Yearbook, 7, 626–651. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1983.11678557
  362. Mondak, J. J. (1999). Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge. Political Analysis, 8 (1), 57–82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029805
  363. Morley, D. D. (1987). Subjective message constructs. A theory of persuasion. Com-munication Monographs, 54 (2), 183–203. Open Google Scholar
  364. Morley, D. D. & Walker, K. B. (1987). The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change. Communication Monographs, 54 (4), 436–442. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390243
  365. Moy, P. (2008). Pluralistic ignorance and nonattitudes. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Hrsg.), The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research (S. 164–171). Los Angeles: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  366. Mutz, D. C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence. Third person ef-fects and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 3–23. Open Google Scholar
  367. Naab, T. (2013). Naive Medientheorien und Third-Person Perception. Eine Untersu-chung zur Integrierbarkeit beider Konzepte. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845245911
  368. Naik, P. A., Mantrala, M. K. & Sawyer, A. G. (1998). Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Science, 17 (3), 214–235. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.3.214
  369. Neuberger, C. (2000). Journalismus im Internet. Auf dem Weg zur Eigenständigkeit. Media Perspektiven, 2000 (7), 310–318. Verfügbar unter http://www.media-perspektiven.de/uploads/tx_mppublications/07-2000_Neuberger.PDF Open Google Scholar
  370. Neuberger, C., Nuernbergk, C. & Rischke, M. (2009). Journalismus im Internet. Zwi-schen Profession, Partizipation und Technik. Media Perspektiven, 2009 (4), 174–188. Ergebnisse eines DFG-Forschungsprojekts. Open Google Scholar
  371. Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics. Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar
  372. Neuman, W. R. (1976). Patterns of recall among television news viewers. Public Opi-nion Quarterly, 40, 115–123. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268274
  373. Neuman, W. R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 159–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/269194
  374. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias. A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  375. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Kumulation, Konsonanz und Öffentlichkeitseffekt. Ein neuer Ansatz zur Analyse der Wirkung der Massenmedien. Publizistik, 18, 26–55. Open Google Scholar
  376. Noelle-Neumann, E. (2001). Die Schweigespirale. Öffentliche Meinung - unsere soziale Haut. München: Langen Müller. Open Google Scholar
  377. Noelle-Neumann, E. & Mathes, R. (1987). The 'event as event' and the 'event as news'. The significance of 'consonance' for media effects research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 391–414. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323187002004002
  378. Nohn, C. (2012, 26. April). Ein armseliges Signal. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 4. Open Google Scholar
  379. Ohl, C. M., Pincus, J. D., Rimmer, T. & Harrison, D. (1995). Agenda building role of news releases in corporate takeovers. Public Relations Review, 21 (2), 89–101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(95)90001-2
  380. Ophir, E., Nass, C. & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15583–15587. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
  381. Page, B. I. & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). The effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77 (1), 175–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1956018
  382. Page, B. I. & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public. Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001
  383. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A. & Rayburn, J. D. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained. A study of television news. Communication Research, 7, 161–192. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700202
  384. Park, C.-Y. (2001). News media exposure and self-perceived knowledge. The illusion of knowing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 419–425. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.4.419
  385. Patterson, T. E. (1998). Time and news. The media's limitations as an instrument of Democracy. International Political Science Review, 19, 55–67. Open Google Scholar
  386. Pechman, C. & Stewart, D. W. (1988). Advertising Repetition. A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 11 (2), 285–329. Open Google Scholar
  387. Perse, E. M. (1990a). Audience Selectivity and Involvement in the Newer Media Envi-ronment. Communication Research, 17, 675–697. Open Google Scholar
  388. Perse, E. M. (1990b). Media involvement and local news effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 17–36. Open Google Scholar
  389. Perse, E. M. (2001). Media effects and society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  390. Peter, J. (2004). Our long 'return to the concept of powerful mass media'. A cross-national comparative investigation of the effects of consonant media coverage. In-ternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16, 144–168. Open Google Scholar
  391. Peter, J. & de Vreese, C. H. (2003). Agenda-rich, agenda-poor. A cross-national comparative investigation of nominal and thematic public agenda diversity. Interna-tional Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 44–64. Open Google Scholar
  392. Petersen, T. (2002). Das Feldexperiment in der Umfrageforschung. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus (zugl. Mainz, Univ., Diss., 2001). Open Google Scholar
  393. Peterson, D. A. M. (2009). Campaign learning and vote determinants. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (2), 445–460. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00380.x
  394. Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L. & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty. Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (1), 30–41. Open Google Scholar
  395. Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L. & Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and Presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 599–626. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00407.x
  396. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  397. Pfau, M., van Bockern, S. & Kang, J. G. (1992). Use of inoculation to promote resis-tance to smoking initiation among adolescents. Communication Monographs, 59 (3), 213–230. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376266
  398. Pielen, B. (2012, 20. April). Kristina Schröder, die überforderte Ministerin. Mainzer Rhein-Zeitung, S. 18. Open Google Scholar
  399. Pingree, R. J., Quenette, A. M., Tchernev, J. M. & Dickinson, T. (2013). The effects of media criticism on gatekeeping trust and implications for agenda setting. Journal of Communication, 63, 351–372. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12016
  400. Pingree, R. J. & Stoycheff, E. (2013). Differentiating cueing from reasoning in agenda-setting effects. Journal of Communication, 63, 852–872. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12051
  401. Podschuweit, N. (2012). Warum Wahlwerbung schaden kann. Wirkung von Parteien-werbung im Kontext der Medienberichterstattung. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  402. Poindexter, P. & McCombs, M. E. (2001). Revisiting the civic duty to keep informed in the new media environment. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 113–126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800108
  403. Price, V. (1988). On the public aspects of opinion. Linking levels of analysis in public opinion research. Communication Research, 15, 659–679. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365088015006001
  404. Price, V. (1989). Social identification and public opinion. Effects of communicating group conflict. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 197–224. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/269503
  405. Price, V. (1992). Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781483326061
  406. Price, V. & Neijens, P. (1997). Opinion quality in public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 336–360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/9.4.336
  407. Proner, H. (2011). Ist keine Antwort auch eine Antwort? Die Teilnahme an politischen Umfragen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92721-3
  408. Quandt, T. (2008). News tuning and content management. An observation study of old and new routines in German online newsrooms. In C. A. Paterson & D. Domingo (Hrsg.), Making online news. The ethnography of new media production (S. 77–97). New York: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  409. Quinn, S. & Stark Adam, P. (2008). Eyetracking the news. A study of print and online reading, The Poynter Institute. Verfügbar unter http://www.poynter.org/extra/Eyetrack Open Google Scholar
  410. Quiring, O. (2003). Die Fernsehberichterstattung über die Arbeitslosigkeit und ihr Ein-fluss auf wahlrelevante Vorstellungen der Bevölkerung – eine Zeitreihenanalyse 1994-1998. Publizistik, 48, 1–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-003-0001-0
  411. Ratneshwar, S. & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension's Role in Persuasion. The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of Source Cues. Journal of Con-sumer Research, 18 (1), 52. Open Google Scholar
  412. Reese, S. D. & Danielian, L. H. (1989). Intermedia Influence and the Drug Issue. Converging on Cocaine. In P. J. Shoemaker (Hrsg.), Communication campaigns about drugs. Government, Media, and the Public (S. 29–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  413. Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer. Kommunikations- und Ein-flussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
  414. Reinemann, C. (2004). Routine reliance revisited. Exploring media importance for German political journalists. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 857–876. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100409
  415. Reith, K.-H. (2012, 19. April). »Vielleicht der letzte Kulturkampf«. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 2. Open Google Scholar
  416. Rhee, J. W. & Capella, J. N. (1997). The role of political sophistication in learning from news. Measuring schema development. Communication Research, 24, 197–233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365097024003001
  417. Ricker, R. & Seehaus, C. (2009). Medienrecht. In E. Noelle-Neumann, W. Schulz & J. Wilke (Hrsg.), Fischer Lexikon Publizistik/Massenkommunikation (5. Aufl., S. 265–290). Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  418. Ridder, C.-M. & Engel, B. (2010). Massenkommunikation 2010. Funktionen und Images der Medien im Vergleich. Ergebnisse der 10. Welle der ARD/ZDF-Langzeitstudie zur Mediennutzung und -Bewertung. Media Perspektiven, 2010 (11), 523–536. Open Google Scholar
  419. Roberts, M., Wanta, W. & Dzwo, T.-H. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience on-line. Communication Research, 29, 452–465. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029004004
  420. Robinson, G. J. (1970). Foreign News Selection is Non-Linear in Yugoslavia's Tanjug Agency. Journalism Quarterly, 47, 340–351. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907004700216
  421. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Ame-rican Sociological Review, 15, 351–357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2087176
  422. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5. Aufl.). New York: Free Press. (Ori-ginalarbeit erschienen 1962). Open Google Scholar
  423. Rosa, H. (2003). Social Acceleration. Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High-Speed Society. Constellations, 10 (1), 3–33. Open Google Scholar
  424. Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing. A meta-analysis and ana-lysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15 (1), 1–20. Open Google Scholar
  425. Rössler, P. (1997). Agenda-Setting. Theoretische Annahmen und empirische Evidenzen einer Medienwirkungshypothese. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09228-5
  426. Rössler, P. (1999). The Individual Agenda-Designing Process. How Interpersonal Communication, Egocentric Networks, and Mass Media Shape the Perception of Political Issues by Individuals. Communication Research, 26, 666–700. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365099026006002
  427. Rössler, P. (2002). Viele Programme, dieselben Themen? Vielfalt und Fragmentierung: Konvergenz und Divergenz in der aktuellen Berichterstattung - eine Inhaltsanalyse internationaler TV-Nachrichten auf der Mikroebene. In K. Imhof, O. Jarren & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Integration und Medien (S. 148–167). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  428. Rössler, P. (2003). Themenvielfalt im Politikressort. Ein Vergleich der Berichtsanlässe von 27 deutschen Tageszeitungen. In W. Donsbach & O. Jandura (Hrsg.), Chancen und Gefahren der Mediendemokratie (S. 174–187). Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  429. Rössler, P. (2006). Zur Logik der Agenda-Setting-Forschung. In W. Wirth, A. Fahr & E. Lauf (Hrsg.), Anwendungsfelder in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (For-schungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft, Bd. 2, S. 139–167). Open Google Scholar
  430. Rössler, P. & Schenk, M. (2000). Cognitive Bounding and the German Unification. Agenda Setting and Persuasion Effects of Mass Media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 29–47. Open Google Scholar
  431. Roßmann, R. (2012a, 17. April). Firmen rebellieren gegen das Betreuungsgeld. Süd-deutsche Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  432. Roßmann, R. (2012b, 25. April). Arme gehen beim Betreuungsgeld leer aus. Süddeut-sche Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  433. Roßmann, R. (2012c, 26. April). Betreuungsgeld wird zum Rechtsfall. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 5. Open Google Scholar
  434. Roßmann, R. (2012d, 26. April). Empörung über Vorstoß beim Betreuungsgeld. Süd-deutsche Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  435. Roßmann, R. (2012e, 11. Mai). Betreuungsgeld wird im Juni beschlossen. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 1, 6. Open Google Scholar
  436. Roßmann, R. & Fried, N. (2012, 30. April). »Kita-Zwang«. CSU greift Kraft an. Süd-deutsche Zeitung, S. 7. Open Google Scholar
  437. RTL aktuell (Redaktion) (Autor), 20.04.2012a. Kämpfe gehen weiter, RTL aktuell. Open Google Scholar
  438. RTL aktuell (Redaktion) (Autor), 28.04.2012b. Waffenlieferung gestoppt, RTL aktuell. Open Google Scholar
  439. Rubin, A. M. (1984). Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing. Journal of Communication, 34 (3), 67–77. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x
  440. Rühl, M. (1979). Die Zeitungsredaktion als organisiertes soziales System (2., überarb. und erw. Aufl.). Freiburg (CH): Univ. Pr. Open Google Scholar
  441. Ruhrmann, G. (1989). Rezipient und Nachricht. Struktur und Prozess der Nachrichten-rekonstruktion. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  442. Russmann, U. (2007). Agenda Setting und Internet. Themensetzung im Spannungsfeld von Onlinemedien und sozialen Netzwerken. München: Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845214535
  443. Said, S. (2013). Gesellschaftliche und sozioökonomische Entwicklung Syriens. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 63 (8), 49–55. Open Google Scholar
  444. Salwen, M. B. & Discroll, P. D. (1995). Feeling informed? The ›assurance function‹ of the mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 270–276. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/7.3.270
  445. Sande, Ø. (1971). The Perception of Foreign News. Journal of Peace Research, 8 (3/4), 221–237. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/002234337100800303
  446. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance. A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Informati-on Science, 26, 321–343. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260604
  447. Saracevic, T. (2007a). Relevance. A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science - Part II: Nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58, 1915–1933. Open Google Scholar
  448. Saracevic, T. (2007b). Relevance. A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science - Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58, 2126–2144. Open Google Scholar
  449. Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory. The real story. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Hrsg.), Advances in social cognition (S. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  450. Schenk, M. (2007). Medienwirkungsforschung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151656-6
  451. Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J. & Kim, S.-H. (2002). Who Cares about Local Politics? Media Influences on Local Political Involvement, Issue Awareness, and Attitude Strength. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 427–444. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900211
  452. Schlesinger, P. (1978). Putting "Reality" Together. BBC News. London: Constable. Open Google Scholar
  453. Schmid, W. (2010). Narratology. An introduction. Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  454. Schmitt-Beck, R., Faas, T. & Wolsing, A. (2010). Kampagnendynamik bei der Bun-destagswahl 2009. Die Rolling Cross-Section-Studie im Rahmen der "German Lon-gitudinal Election Study" 2009 (Arbeitspapiere - Working Papers Nr. 134). : Mann-heimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung. Open Google Scholar
  455. Schnell, R., Hill, P. B. & Esser, H. (1992). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München: Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar
  456. Schoen, H. (2006). Der demokratische Musterbürger als Normalfall? Kognitionspsy-chologische Einblicke in die 'black box' politischer Meinungsbildung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 47, 89–101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11615-006-0006-1
  457. Scholl, A. (2004). Die Inklusion des Publikums. In M. Löffelholz (Hrsg.), Theorien des Journalismus. Ein diskursives Handbuch (S. 517–536). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  458. Schönbach, K. (1981). Agenda-Setting im Europawahlkampf 1979. Die Funktionen von Presse und Fernsehen (1). Media Perspektiven, 1981 (7), 129–140. Open Google Scholar
  459. Schönbach, K. & Semetko, H. A. (1992). Agenda-Setting, Agenda-Reinforcing or Agenda-Deflating. A Study of the 1990 German National Election. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 837–846. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900404
  460. Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen. A history of American civic life. New York: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  461. Schultz, F., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., Utz, S. & van Atteveldt, W. (2012). Stra-tegic framing in the BP crisis. A semantic network analysis of associative frames. Public Relations Review, 38 (1), 97–107. Open Google Scholar
  462. Schulz, B. (2012, 10. April). Gutachter erklären Breivik für zurechnungsfähig, Spie-gel.de. Verfügbar unter http://http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/neues-gutachten-erklaert-anders-breivik-fuer-zurechnungsfaehig-a-826481.html Open Google Scholar
  463. Schulz, B. & Hans, B. (2011, 29. November). Norwegischer Attentäter. Breivik für un-zurechnungsfähig erklärt, Spiegel.de. Verfügbar unter http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/norwegischer-attentaeter-breivik-fuer-unzurechnungsfaehig-erklaert-a-800607.html Open Google Scholar
  464. Schulz, W. (1975). Wirkungsqualitäten verschiedener Medien. Experimentelle Unter-suchungen über die Vermittlung von konnotativer Bedeutung durch unterschiedliche Formen medialer Darstellung. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 23, 57–72. Open Google Scholar
  465. Schulz, W. (1982). News structure and people's awareness of political events. Interna-tional Communication Gazette, 30, 139–153. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/001654928203000301
  466. Schulz, W. (1989). Massenmedien und Realität. Die ›ptolemäische‹ und ›kopernikani-sche‹ Auffassung. In M. Kaase & W. Schulz (Hrsg.), Massenkommunikation. Theo-rien, Methoden, Befunde (S. 135–149). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  467. Schulz, W. (1990). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien. Analyse der aktuellen Berichterstattung. Freiburg i. Br.: Alber. (Originalarbeit erschienen 1976). Open Google Scholar
  468. Schuman, H. & Presser, S. (1980). Public opinion and public ignorance. The fine line between attitudes and nonattitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1214–1225. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/227131
  469. Schumann, D. W., Petty, R. E. & Clemons, D. S. (1990). Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Advertising Variation. A Test of the Repetition-Variation Hypotheses. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (9), 192–202. Open Google Scholar
  470. Schütz, A. (1946). The well-informed citizen. An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 13, 463–478. Open Google Scholar
  471. Schütz, A. (1982). Das Problem der Relevanz. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  472. Schütz, A. & Luckmann, T. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  473. Schwartz, S. (1994). The fallacy of the ecological fallacy. The potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 819–824. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.84.5.819
  474. Schweiger, W. (2005). Gibt es einen transmedialen Nutzungsstil? Theoretische Über-legungen und empirische Hinweise. Publizistik, 50, 173–200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0125-5
  475. Schweiger, W. (2006). Transmedialer Nutzungsstil und Rezipientenpersönlichkeit. Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Hinweise. Publizistik, 51, 290–312. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0108-1
  476. Sciarini, P. & Kriesi, H. (2003). Opinion stability and change during an electoral campaign. Results from the 1999 Swiss election panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 431–453. Open Google Scholar
  477. Scott, D. R. & Solomon, D. (1998). What Is Wearout Anyway? Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (5), 19–28. Open Google Scholar
  478. Sears, D. O. & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective Exposure to Information. A Critical Review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194–213. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267513
  479. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294-308. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
  480. Seethaler, J. & Melischek, G. (2010). Journalismus und Politik in den österreichischen Nationalratswahlkämpfen 1999–2008. In A. Kaltenbrunner, M. Karmasin & D. Kraus (Hrsg.), Der Journalisten-Report III. Politikjournalismus in Österreich (S. 139–160). Wien: Facultas. Open Google Scholar
  481. Semetko, H. A. & Schönbach, K. (1994). Germany's 'unity' election. Voters and the media. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Open Google Scholar
  482. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P. & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and Expression in a Digital Age. Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209
  483. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (3), 379–423. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  484. Shaw, D. L. & Martin, S. E. (1992). The function of mass media agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 902–920. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900410
  485. Shaw, E. F. (1977). The interpersonal agenda. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Hrsg.), The emergence of American political issues (S. 69–88). St. Paul: West Publ. Open Google Scholar
  486. Sheafer, T. (2007). How to Evaluate It: The Role of Story-Evaluative Tone in Agenda Setting and Priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 21–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00327.x
  487. Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for News. Using Biological and Cultural Evolution to Explain the Surveillance Function. Journal of Communication, 46 (3), 32–47. Open Google Scholar
  488. Shoemaker, P. J. & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653
  489. Silvia, P. J. (2003). Self-efficacy and Interest. Experimental Studies of Optimal Incompetence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 237–249. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00013-1
  490. Silvia, P. J. (2005). What Is Interesting? Exploring the Appraisal Structure of Interest. Emotion, 5 (1), 89–102. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89
  491. Silvia, P. J. (2006). Reactance and the Dynamics of Disagreement. Multiple Paths from Threatened Freedom to Resistance to Persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 673–685. Open Google Scholar
  492. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest. The Curious Emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17 (1), 57–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x
  493. Simon, H. (1982). ADPLUS. An Advertising Model with Wearout and Pulsation. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 352–363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3151569
  494. Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G. & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge. A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management – Learning and Education, 9 (2), 169–191. Open Google Scholar
  495. Slangen, C. (2012, 20. April). »Ein Geschmäckle«. Allgemeine Zeitung (Mainz), S. 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11298-012-5092-3
  496. Smith, T. W. (2009). A Revised Review of Methods to Estimate the Status of Cases with Unknown Eligibility, NORC/University of Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  497. Snider, P. (1967). 'Mr. Gates' Revisited. A 1966 Version of the 1949 Case Study. Journalism Quarterly, 44, 419–427. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769906704400301
  498. Sommer, D., Fretwurst, B., Sommer, K. & Gehrau, V. (2012). Nachrichtenwert und Gespräche über Medienthemen. Publizistik, 57, 381–401. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-012-0162-9
  499. Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 264–285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
  500. Soroka, S. N. & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy. Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge, MA: Univerity Press. Open Google Scholar
  501. Spitzer, M. (2009). Multitasking – Nein danke! Nervenheilkunde, 28, 861–864. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1628706
  502. Staab, J. (1990). Nachrichtenwert-Theorie. Formale Struktur und empirischer Gehalt. Freiburg i. Br.: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  503. Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 240–261. Open Google Scholar
  504. Stark, B. & Magin, M. (2013). Komparative Forschungsansätze. Theoretische Grund-lagen und methodische Verfahrensweisen. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 145–164). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  505. Stenzel, A. (Autor), 05.05.2012. Anschläge in Syrien, Tagesschau 20:00. Open Google Scholar
  506. Stiftung Lesen (Hrsg.). (2009). Lesen in Deutschland 2008. Eine Studie der Stiftung Lesen. Mainz: Stiftung Lesen. Open Google Scholar
  507. Stone, G. C. & McCombs, M. E. (1981). Tracing the time-lag in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 51–55. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908105800108
  508. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions. Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
  509. Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Commu-nication, 60, 556–576. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
  510. Sturgis, P. (2003). Knowledge and collective preferences. A comparison of two app-roaches to estimating the opinions of a better informed public. Sociological Methods and Research, 31, 453–485. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0049124103251949
  511. Süddeutsche Zeitung (2012a, 23. April). SPD droht mit Klage. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  512. Süddeutsche Zeitung (2012b, 30. April). Krafts Kita-Äußerung empört die Union. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  513. Süddeutsche Zeitung (2012c, 11. Mai). Dutzende Tote bei Bombenanschlag in Da-maskus. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 1. Open Google Scholar
  514. Taber, C. S., Lodge, M. & Glathar, J. (2001). The motivated construction of political judgments. In J. H. Kuklinski (Hrsg.), Citizens and politics. Perspectives from poli-tical psychology (S. 198–226). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  515. Tagesschau (Redaktion) (Autor), 24.04.2012a. Gewalt in Syrien, Tagesschau 20:00. Open Google Scholar
  516. Tagesschau (Redaktion) (Autor), 30.04.2012b. Idlib/Syrien, Tagesschau 20:00. Open Google Scholar
  517. Tagesschau.de. (2012a, 18. April). Deutscher Frachter wird auf Waffen für Syrien ge-prüft, Tagesschau.de. Verfügbar unter http://www.tagesschau.de Open Google Scholar
  518. Tagesschau.de. (2012b, 20. April). Clinton will Assad notfalls zum Frieden zwingen, Tagesschau.de. Verfügbar unter http://www.tagesschau.de Open Google Scholar
  519. Tagesschau.de. (2012c, 21. April). 300 UN-Beobachter für Syrien, Tagesschau.de. Verfügbar unter http://www.tagesschau.de Open Google Scholar
  520. Tagesschau.de. (2012d, 22. April). Bremser, Bedenkenträger und die Bündnisfrage. Verfügbar unter http://www.tagesschau.de Open Google Scholar
  521. Tagesschau.de. (2012e, 25. April). Lage in Syrien ist »düster und inakzeptabel«, Ta-gesschau.de. Verfügbar unter http://www.tagesschau.de Open Google Scholar
  522. Tagesthemen (Redaktion) (Autor), 27.04.2012. Erneute Gewalt in Syrien, Tagesthemen. Open Google Scholar
  523. Tardy, C. H., Gaughan, B. J., Hemphill, M. R. & Crockett, N. (1981). Media agendas and political participation. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 624–627. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908105800416
  524. Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2013). Bridging Collective Memories and Public Agendas: Toward a Theory of Mediated Prospective Memory. Communication Theory, 23, 91–111. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/comt.12006
  525. Terrell, J. (1990). Storytelling and prehistory. Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 1–29. Open Google Scholar
  526. Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation. Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49, 332–348. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5
  527. Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal. Power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  528. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A. & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differen-tial growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267786
  529. Todorov, A., Chaiken, S. & Henderson, M. D. (2002). The Heuristic-Systematic Model of social information processing. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Hrsg.), The persuasion handbook. Developments in theory and practice (S. 195–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  530. Tormala, Z. L. & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Attitude certainty. A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1 (1), 469–492. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x
  531. Tsfati, Y. (2003). Does Audience Skepticism of the Media Matter in Agenda Setting? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 157–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_1
  532. Tsfati, Y. & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do People Watch What They Do Not Trust? Exploring the Association between News Media Skepticism and Exposure. Com-munication Research, 30, 504–529. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
  533. Tsfati, Y. & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Why Do People Watch What They Do Not Trust? The Need for Cognition as a Moderator in the Association Between Media Skepticism and Exposure. Media Psychology, 7, 251–271. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2
  534. Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual. An examination of newsmen's notion of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 660–679. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/225193
  535. Tuchman, G. (1973). Making news by doing work. Routinizing the unexpected. Ame-rican Journal of Sociology, 79, 110–131. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/225510
  536. Tuchman, G. (1976). Telling stories. Journal of Communication, 26 (4), 93–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01942.x
  537. Tuchman, G. (1978). The news net. Social Research, 45, 253–276. Open Google Scholar
  538. United Nations Security Council. (2012a, 21. März). Statement by the President of the Security Council. Verfügbar unter http://www.securitycouncilreport.org Open Google Scholar
  539. United Nations Security Council. (2012b, 14. April). Resolution 2042. Verfügbar unter http://www.securitycouncilreport.org Open Google Scholar
  540. Urban, J. (2011). Journalistische Wichtigkeitszuschreibung im Agenda-Setting-Prozess. Zum Einfluss einer bisher vernachlässigten Wirkgröße. Medien & Kom-munikationswissenschaft, 59, 379–400. Open Google Scholar
  541. Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
  542. Van Eimeren, B. & Ridder, C.-M. (2011). Trends in der Nutzung und Bewertung der Medien 1970–2010. Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Langzeitstudie Massenkommunika-tion. Media Perspektiven, 2011 (1), 2–15. Open Google Scholar
  543. Vasterman, P. L. M. (2005). Media-hype. Self-reinforcing news waves, journalistic standards, and the construction of social problems. European Journal of Communi-cation, 20, 508–530. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058254
  544. Volkenandt, A. (2012). Worüber man sprechen sollte, worüber man spricht. Das sub-jektive Gefühl der Informiertheit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung interpersonaler Kommunikation über massenmediale Inhalte. Magisterarbeit, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität. Mainz. Open Google Scholar
  545. Voltmer, K. (1999). Medienqualität und Demokratie. Eine empirische Analyse publi-zistischer Informations- und Orientierungsleistungen in der Wahlkampfkommunika-tion. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  546. Wang, Z. & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “Myth” of Media Multitasking. Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493–513. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x
  547. Wanta, W. & Ghanem, S. (2007). Effects of agenda setting. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen & J. Bryant (Hrsg.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis (S. 37–51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  548. Wanta, W. & Hu, Y.-W. (1994a). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting. A path analysis model. Journalism and Mass Communicati-on Quarterly, 71, 90–98. Open Google Scholar
  549. Wanta, W. & Hu, Y.-W. (1994b). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process. An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 225–240. Open Google Scholar
  550. Wanta, W. & Wu, Y.-C. (1992). Interpersonal communication and the agenda-setting process. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 847–855. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900405
  551. Ward, W. J. (1973). The nature of news in three dimensions. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University, Bureau of Media Research School of Journalism &. Broadcasting. Open Google Scholar
  552. Watt, J. H., Mazza, M. & Snyder, L. (1993). Agenda-Setting Effects of Television News Coverage and the Effects Decay Curve. Communication Research, 20, 408–435. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003004
  553. Weaver, D. H. (1977). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Hrsg.), The emergence of American political issues (S. 107–120). St. Paul: West Publ. Open Google Scholar
  554. Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7, 361–373. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700305
  555. Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M. E. & Eyal, C. E. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a Presidential Election. Issues, images, and interest. New York, NY: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  556. Weaver, D. H., Zhu, J.-H. & Willnat, L. (1992). The bridging function of interpersonal communication in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 856–867. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900406
  557. Weibull, L., Lindahl, R. & Rosengren, K. E. (1987). News diffusion in Sweden. The role of the media. European Journal of Communication, 2, 143–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323187002002003
  558. Weichselbaum, P. (2010). Die Relevanz der Massenmedien für die Tätigkeit von Inte-ressenverbänden. Unveröffentlichte Magisterarbeit, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität. Mainz. Open Google Scholar
  559. Weimann, G. (1994). The influentials. People who influence people. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  560. Weimann, G. & Brosius, H.-B. (1994). Is there a two-step flow of agenda-setting? In-ternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 173–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/6.4.323
  561. Weischenberg, S., Malik, M. & Scholl, A. (2006). Journalismus in Deutschland 2005. Zentrale Befunde der aktuellen Repräsentativbefragung deutscher Journalisten. Media Perspektiven, 2006 (7), 346–361. Open Google Scholar
  562. White, D. M. (1950). The ‘Gate-Keeper’. A Case Study in the Selection of News. Journalism Quarterly, 34 (2), 383–390. Open Google Scholar
  563. Whitney, C. D. & Becker, L. B. (1982). 'Keeping the Gates' for Gatekeepers. The Effects of Wire News. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 60–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908205900109
  564. Wilke, J. (2008). Grundzüge der Medien- und Kommunikationsgeschichte. Köln: Böh-lau. Open Google Scholar
  565. Wilke, J. & Rosenberger, B. (1991). Die Nachrichten-Macher. Eine Untersuchung zu Strukturen und Arbeitsweisen von Nachrichtenagenturen am Beispiel von AP und dpa. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
  566. Williams, W. & Semlak, W. (1978). Campaign '76. Agenda setting during the New Hampshire Primary. Journal of Broadcasting, 22 (4), 531–540. Open Google Scholar
  567. Winterhoff-Spurk, P., Unz, D. & Schwab, F. (2005). Häufiger, schneller, variabler. Er-gebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung über Gewalt in TV-Nachrichten. Publizistik, 50, 225–237. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0127-3
  568. Wirth, W. (1997). Von der Information zum Wissen. Die Rolle der Rezeption für die Entstehung von Wissensunterschieden – ein Beitrag zur Wissenskluftforschung. Op-laden: Westdeutscher Verlag (teilw. zugl. München, Univ., Diss., 1994). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91678-5
  569. Wirth, W., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Friemel, T., Hänggli, R. et al. (2010). Agenda building and setting in a referendum campaign. Investigating the flow of arguments among campaigners, the media, and the public. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87 (2), 328–345. Open Google Scholar
  570. Wolff, V. (2006). ABC des Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenjournalismus. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  571. Wolling, J. & Kuhlmann, C. (2006). Zerstreute Aufmerksamkeit. Empirischer Test eines Erklärungsmodells für die Nebenbeinutzung des Fernsehens. Medien & Kom-munikationswissenschaft, 54, 386–411. Open Google Scholar
  572. Wolling, J., Wünsch, C. & Gehrau, V. (1998). Was ich nicht weiß, macht mich nicht heiß? Eine Agenda-Setting-Untersuchung aus schematheoretischer Perspektive. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 46, 447–462. Open Google Scholar
  573. Wood, B. D. & Doan, A. (2003). The politics of problem definition. Applying and testing threshold models. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 640–653. Open Google Scholar
  574. Wurzel, S. (2012, 16. April). Neue Kämpfe und erste Beobachter, Tagesschau.de. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9781400831937.280
  575. Yang, J. & Stone, G. (2003). The powerful role of interpersonal communication in agenda setting. Mass Communication and Society, 6 (1), 57–74. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0601_5
  576. Yoo, H. J., Cho, S. C., Ha, J., Yune, S. K., Kim, S. J., Hwang, J. et al. (2004). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms and Internet Addiction. Psychiatry and Clini-cal Neurosciences, 58, 487–494. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01290.x
  577. Yuji, H. (1996). Computer Games and Information-Processing Skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 643–647. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.643
  578. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, MA: Camb-ridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691
  579. Zaller, J. R. (2003). A new standard of news quality. Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20 (2), 109–130. Open Google Scholar
  580. Zekri, S. (2012, 21. April). Zeitgewinn für alle. Süddeutsche Zeitung, S. 11. Open Google Scholar
  581. Zelizer, B. (2008). Why memory's work on journalism does not reflect journalism's work on memory. Memory Studies, 1 (1), 79–87. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1750698007083891
  582. Zerback, T. (2013). Publizistische Vielfalt. Demokratischer Nutzen und Einflussfaktoren. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  583. Zhao, X., Liu, J. S. & Deng, K. (2012). Assumptions behind intercoder reliability indi-ces. Communication Yearbook, 36, 419–480. Open Google Scholar
  584. Zhu, J.-H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction. A zero-sum theory of agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 825–836. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900403
  585. Zimmerman, F. J. & Christakis, D. A. (2007). Associations Between Content Types of Early Media Exposure and Subsequent Attentional Problems. Pediatrics, 120, 986–992. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3322
  586. Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Hrsg.), Communication Yearbook, Volume 2 (S. 225–240). New Brunswick, NJ: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  587. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C. & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension. An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6 (5), 292–297. Verfügbar unter http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063035 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386
  588. Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123 (2), 162–185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
  589. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E. & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2 (3), 199–220. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_2

Similar publications

from the topics "Media Policy & Media Ethics", "Media Effects Research & Media Usage Research", "Political Communication"
Cover of book: Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Edited Book Full access
Greta Olson, Christian Schmidt, Benno Zabel, Jochen Bung, Franziska Martinsen, Hanna Meißner
Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Cover of book: Israel in deutschen Medien
Book Titles No access
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover of book: Medienmanagement
Educational Book No access
Ingo Knuth, Thomas Kilian
Medienmanagement
Cover of book: Politischer Journalismus
Edited Book Full access
Christian Nuernbergk, Nina Fabiola Schumacher, Jörg Haßler, Jonas Schützeneder
Politischer Journalismus
Cover of book: Propaganda on-Demand
Book Titles No access
Lennart Hagemeyer
Propaganda on-Demand

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex