Cover of book: CSR in the German Mittelstand
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

CSR in the German Mittelstand

Development and Implementation
Authors:
Publisher:
 2021

Summary

Increasingly aware of the advantages and rewards of corporate social responsibility (CSR), more small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) are interested in engaging in CSR. This book focuses on the German Mittelstand, which consists mostly of SMEs and is considered a role model for other economies. It examines the development of CSR engagement in the German Mittelstand and outlines trends that will allow better recommendations for CSR implementation. The positive trend toward the issue leads to the necessity of a structured CSR approach. Thus, this book offers an overview of important theoretical perspectives, an analysis of the CSR development in the German Mittelstand, and strategic considerations for a successful CSR implementation.

With a foreword by Olga Kuznetsova.

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2021
Copyright Year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4614-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7683-5
Publisher
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Series
Wissenschaftliche Beiträge aus dem Tectum Verlag: Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Volume
98
Language
English
Pages
102
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access I - XIV
  2. 1. Introduction No access 1 - 4
    1. 2.1 The Applicability of CSR in SMEs No access
    2. 2.2 Development of CSR in the SME Context No access
      1. 2.3.1 Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR No access
        1. 2.3.2.1 Main Features of Stakeholder Theory No access
        2. 2.3.2.2 Limitations of Stakeholder Theory No access
        3. 2.3.2.3 CSR and Stakeholder Theory No access
        4. 2.3.2.4 Business Strategy and Stakeholder Influence No access
        5. 2.3.2.5 Stakeholder Management in SMEs No access
        1. 2.3.3.1 Main Features of Social Capital No access
        2. 2.3.3.2 Limitations of Social Capital No access
        3. 2.3.3.3 Social Capital in SMEs No access
      4. 2.3.4 Total Responsibility Management No access
      5. 2.3.5 Conceptual Framework No access
    1. 3.1 The Research Onion No access
    2. 3.2 Methodology and Methods of the Secondary Sources No access
    3. 3.3 Suitability of Secondary Data No access
    1. 4.1 Results No access
    2. 4.2 Awareness of CSR No access
    3. 4.3 Motivation and Goals of CSR Implementation No access
    4. 4.4 Challenges of CSR Implementation No access
      1. 4.5.1 Commitment to Employees No access
      2. 4.5.2 Commitment to Society No access
      3. 4.5.3 Commitment to Environment No access
    6. 4.6 Communication of CRS Engagement No access
    1. 5.1 Awareness, Motivation and Goals of CSR Engagement No access
    2. 5.2 Challenges of CSR Engagement No access
      1. 5.3.1 Employees No access
      2. 5.3.2 Society No access
      3. 5.3.3 Environment No access
      4. 5.3.4 Summary No access
    4. 5.4 CSR Communication No access
    1. 6.1 Approaches for Analysis and Strategy Development No access
    2. 6.2 Benefits and Goals of the CSR Implementation No access
    3. 6.3 Possible Model for CSR Implementation in SMEs No access
    4. 6.4 Orientation for CSR Communication and Reporting No access
    1. 7.1 Main Findings of the Study No access
    2. 7.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research No access
  9. References No access 87 - 98
    1. Appendix 1 – Data No access
    2. Appendix 2 – Index Numbers and Percentage Change Analysis No access

Bibliography (126)

  1. References Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  2. Abel-Koch, J. (2017) Weltweit machen sich Mittelständler für gesell-schaftliche Interessen stark. Unknown place of publication: KfW Research. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-Fokus-Volkswirtschaft/Fokus-Nr.-159-Januar-2017-CSR-im-Mittelstand.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  3. Ackerman, R.W. (1975) The social challenge to business. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  4. Aguinis, H. and Glavas, A. (2012) ‘What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda.’ Journal of Management, 38(4), pp. 932-968. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  5. Argenti, P.A., and Druckenmiller, B. (2004) ‘Reputation and the corporate brand.’ Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4) pp. 368-374. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  6. Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern, J. (2006) ‘Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), pp. 1-22. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  7. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. (2020) CSR-Politik in Deutschland. [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.csr-in-deutschland.de/DE/Politik/CSR-national/csr-national.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  8. Baden, D., Harwood, I.A, Woodward, D.G. (2009) ‘The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counterproductive?’ European Management Journal, 27(6) pp. 429-441. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  9. Baden, D., Harwood, I.A., Woodward, D.G. (2011) ‘The effects of procure-ment policies on ‘downstream’ corporate social responsibility activity: Content-analytic insights into the views and actions of SME owner-managers.’ International Small Business Journal, 29(3) pp. 259-277. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  10. Barnett, A. (1997) ‘Towards a stakeholder democracy’. In Kelly, G., Kelly, D. and Gamble, A. (eds.) Stakeholder Capitalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 82–95. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  11. BDI. (2014) In 7 Schritten zum Nachhaltigkeitsbericht: Ein praxisorientierter Leitfaden für mittelständische Unternehmen in Anlehnung an die G4-Leitlinien der Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Berlin: BDI. [Online] [Accessed on 7th January 2021] https://bdi.eu/publikation/news/in-7-schritten-zum-nachhaltigkeitsbericht/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  12. Besser, T. and Miller, N. (2001) ‘Is the Good Corporation Dead? The Community Social Responsibility of Small Business’, Journal of Socio-economics, 30(3) pp. 221-230. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  13. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2007) Das Gesellschaftliche Engagement von Familienunternehmen. Dokumentation der Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiD4drkg_roAhUOilwKHRS1CmQQFjABegQIBBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.familienunternehmen.de%2Fmedia%2Fpublic%2Fpdf%2Fpublikationen-studien%2Fstudien%2FStudie_Stiftung_Familienunternehmen_Das-Gesellschaftliche-Engagement-von-Familienunternehmen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2bi-IBUZQTWBJZFq4uWX53 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  14. Bocken, N.M.P, Short, S.W., Rana, P. and Evans, S. (2014) ‘A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes.’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 65 pp. 42-56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  15. Bos-Brouwers, H.E.J. (2010) ‘Corporate Sustainability and Innovation in SMEs: Evidence of Themes and Activities in Practice.’ Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7) pp. 417-435. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  16. Buschhausen, B. (2016) Trau, schau, wem! Unternehmen in Deutschland. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.google.com/ url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiH79Tf4NjoAhVlolwKHQ3fCdAQFjAAegQIAxAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bertelsmann-stiftung.de %2Ffileadmin%2Ffiles%2FBSt%2FPublikationen%2FGrauePublikationen%2FStudie__BS_Trau__schau__wem._Unternehmen_in_Deutschland_2016.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2CS1MeB19O8_D4fWLzAxHj Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  17. Carroll, A.B. (1979) ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance.’ Academy of Management Review, 4(4) pp. 497-505. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  18. Carroll, A.B. (1991) ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders.’ Business Horizons, 34(4) pp. 39-48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  19. Carroll, A.B. (2016) ‘Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look.’ International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 1(1) pp. 1-8. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  20. Carroll, A.B. and Brown, J.A. (2018) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Current Concepts, Research, and Issues.’ In Weber, J and Wasielewski, D. (eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility. U.K: Emerald Publishing Co., pp. 39-69. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  21. Carroll, A.B. and Shabana, K.M. (2010) ‘The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice.’ International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1) pp. 85-105. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  22. Castka, P., Balzarova, M., Bamber, C., Sharp, J. (2004) ‘How Can SMEs Effectively Implement the CSR Agenda? A UK Case Study Perspective.’ Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(3) pp. 140-149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  23. Choi, J. and Wang, H. (2009) ‘Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance.’ Strategic Management Journal, 30(8) pp. 895-907. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  24. CSR Europe and GRI. (2017) Member State Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU. Unknown place of publication: CSR Europe and GRI. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/1711-NFRpublication-GRI-CSR-Europe.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  25. Davies, I. and Crane, A. (2010) ‘Corporate social responsibility in small and medium-size enterprises: investigating employee engagement in fair trade companies.’ Business Ethics 19(2) pp. 126-139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  26. Dincer, C. and Dincer, B. (2010) ‘An investigation of Turkish small and medium‐sized enterprises online CSR communication.’ Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2) pp. 197-207. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  27. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, & implications.’ Academy of Management Review, 20(1), pp. 65-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  28. Ellerup Nielsen, A. and Thomsen, C. (2009) ‘CSR communication in small and medium‐sized enterprises: A study of the attitudes and beliefs of middle managers.’ Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(2) pp. 176-189. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  29. Elkington, J. (1997) Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  30. Ernst & Young GmbH. (2012) Nachhaltige Unternehmensführung. Lage und aktuelle Entwicklungen im Mittelstand. Essen: Ernst & Young GmbH. [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://docplayer.org/57413318-Nachhaltige-unternehmensfuehrung.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  31. European Commission. (2011) Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: European Commission. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ae5ada03-0dc3-48f8-9a32-0460e65ba7ed/language-en Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  32. European Commission. (2015) Opportunity and Responsibility: How to help more small businesses to integrate social and environmental issues into what they do. Unknown place of publication: European Commission. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwjUoczo2djoAhUEUcAKHTSFBOkQFjABegQIAxAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2FDocsRoom%2Fdocuments%2F11866%2Fattachments%2F1%2Ftranslations%2Fen%2Frenditions%2Fpdf&usg=AOvVaw1aLadsXad7Y5HcseZZ6fiu Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  33. European Commission. (2020) Corporate Social Responsibility & Responsible Business Conduct. European Commission. [Online] [Accessed on 25th June 2020] https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility_en Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  34. Fassin, Y. (2008) ‘SMEs and the fallacy of formalizing CSR.’ Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4) pp. 364-378. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  35. Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A. Buelens, M. (2011) ‘Small-business owner-managers’ perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3) pp. 425-453. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  36. Fisher, K., Geenen, J., Jurcevic, M. McClintock, K., Davis, G. (2009) ‘Applying asset-based community development as a strategy for CSR: a Canadian perspective on a win–win for stakeholders and SMEs.’ Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1) pp. 66-82. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  37. Freeman, R.E. (2010) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  38. Freeman, R.E. and Evan, W. (1990) ‘Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation.’ The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), pp. 337-359. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  39. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., Colle, S. (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  40. Fuller, T. and Tian, Y. (2006) ‘Social and Symbolic Capital and Responsible Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Investigation of SME Narratives.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3) pp. 287-304. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  41. Garriga, E. and Melé, D. (2004) ‘Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2) pp. 51–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  42. Gilde GmbH. (2007) Commitment to society by small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany – Current situation and future development. Detmold: Gilde GmbH. [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwig7ealiProAhUME8AKHYGJBLYQFjAAegQIAhAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csr-mittelstand.de%2Fpdf%2FStudie_CSR_im_Mittelstand_Deutschland_EN.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  43. Graves, S.B. and Waddock, S.A. (1994) ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance.’ Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), pp. 1034-1046. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  44. Gray, E.R. and Balmer, J.M.T. (1998) ‘Managing corporate image and corporate reputation.’ Long Range Planning, 31(5) pp. 695-702. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  45. GRI. (2014) Bereit für den Nachhaltigkeitsbericht? Nachhaltigkeitsbericht für KMU. Amsterdam: GRI. [Online] [Accessed on 7th January 2021] https://docplayer.org/35454-Bereit-fuer-den-nachhaltigkeitsbericht.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  46. Habisch, A. (2004) ‘Social Responsibility, Social Capital and SMEs.’ In Spence, L.J., Habisch, A. and Schmidpeter R. (eds.) Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25-34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  47. Harrison, J.S., Bosse, D.A. and Phillips, R.A. (2010) ‘Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions and competitive advantage.’ Strategic Management Journal, 31(1) pp. 58-74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  48. Heblich, S. and Gold, R. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility. Eine win-win Strategie für Unternehmen und Regionen. Jena: IHK für Niederbay-ern in Passau/Max-Planck Institut für Ökonomik. [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42241763_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_eine_win-win_Strategie_fur_Unternehmen_und_Regionen Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  49. Hendry, J. (2001) ‘Missing the Target: Normative Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Governance Debate.’ Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1) pp. 159-176. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  50. Humber, J.M. (2002) ‘Beyond stockholders and stakeholders: A plea for corporate moral autonomy.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3) pp. 207-221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  51. Hungenberg, H. (2014) Strategisches Management in Unternehmen: Ziele – Prozesse – Verfahren. 8th ed., Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  52. Icks, A., Levering, B., Maaß, F. and Werner, A. (2015) Chancen und Risiken von CSR im Mittelstand. Bonn: IfM [Online] [Accessed on 25th June 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/IfM-Materialien-236_2015.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  53. IfM Bonn. (2020a) Definitionen. IfM Bonn. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org/definitionen/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  54. IfM Bonn. (2020b) KMU-Definition der IfM Bonn. IfM Bonn. [Online][Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org/definitionen/kmu-definition-des-ifm-bonn/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  55. IfM Bonn. (2020c) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). IfM Bonn. [Online] [Accessed on 25th June 2020] https://en.ifm-bonn.org/faq/#accordion=0&tab=1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  56. IfM Bonn. (2020d) Unternehmensbestand. IfM Bonn. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org/statistiken/unternehmensbestand/#accordion=0&tab=0 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  57. Jamali, D., Zanhour, M., Keshishian, T. (2009) ‘Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), pp. 355-377. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  58. Jenkins, H. (2004) ‘A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective.’ Journal of General Management, 29(4), pp. 37-57. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  59. Jenkins, H. (2006) ‘Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises & Corporate Social Responsibility: Identifying the Knowledge Gaps.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), pp. 241-256. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  60. Jenkins, H. (2009) ‘A ‚business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small-and medium-sized enterprises.’ Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), pp. 21-36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  61. Jensen, M.C. (2002) ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Cor-porate Objective Function.’ Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2) pp. 235-256. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  62. Jonker, J., Stark, W. and Tewes, S. (2011) Corporate Social Responsibility und nachhaltige Entwicklung: Einführung, Strategie und Glossar. Heidelberg: Gabler Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  63. Kechiche, A. and Soparnot, R. (2012) ‘CSR within SMEs: Literature Review.’ International Business Research, 5(7) pp. 97-104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  64. Kim, H.L., Rhou, Y., Uysal, M. and Kwon, N. (2017) ‘An examination of the links between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its internal consequences.’ International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61 pp. 26-34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  65. Knudson, H. (2018) Making the business case: The effects of corporate social responsibility on SME competitiveness. Unknown place of publication: Interreg Europe [Online] [Accessed on 7th January 2021] https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1523518061.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  66. Kranzusch, P., May-Strobl, E., Levering, B., Welter, F., Ettl, K. (2017) Das Zukunftspanel Mittelstand 2017 – Update einer Expertenbefragung zu aktuellen und zukünftigen Herausforderungen des deutschen Mittelstands. Bonn: IfM Bonn. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/IfM-Materialien-256_2017.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  67. Księżak, P. and Fischbach, B. (2017) ‘Tripple Bottom Line: The Pillars of CSR.’ Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 4(3) pp. 96-110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  68. Lepoutre, J. and Heene, A. (2006) ‘Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3) pp. 257-273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  69. Lu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Ahmed, R. R., Streimikis, J. (2020) ‘Modified Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility to enhance organizational performance of SMEs industry.’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 271 pp. 1-18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  70. Lynch-Wood, G., Williamson, D., Jenkins, W. (2009) ‘The over-reliance on self-regulation in CSR policy.’ Business Ethics,18(1) pp. 52-65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  71. Maaß, F. and Clemens, R. (2002) Corporate Citizenship: Das Unternehmen als ‘guter Bürger’. Wießbaden: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM). [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/94_nf.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  72. Maaß, F. (2007) CSR and Competitiveness European SMEs’ Good Practice: National Report Germany. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM). [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/CSR-Germany.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  73. Maaß, F. (2010) Wirtschaftspolitische Ansätze zur Unterstützung von Corpo-rate Social Responsibility-Aktivitäten. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsfor-schung (IfM). [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/IfM-Materialien-194_2010.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  74. Maaß, F., Chlosta, S., Icks, A., Welter, F. (2014) Konzepte und Wirkungen nachhaltigen Unternehmertums. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn (IfM). [Online] [Accessed on 21st April 2020] https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/IfM-Materialien-227.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  75. Maldonado-Erazo, C.P., Álvarez-García, J., de la Cruz del Río-Rama, M., Correa-Quezada, R. (2020) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Perfor-mance in SMEs: Scientific Coverage.’ Sustainability, 12(6) pp. 47-62. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  76. Marcoux, A. M. (2000) ‘Balancing Act.’ In DesJardins, J. R. and McCall, J. J. (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics. 4th ed., Wadsworth Publishing, pp. 92-100. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  77. Margolis, D. J. and Walsh J. P. (2003) ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2) pp. 268-305. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  78. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S, Wright, P.M. (2006) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications.’ Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), pp. 1-18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  79. Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., Siegel, D. (2016) ‘A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature: Toward a Multi-Theoretical Integration.’ Journal of Management, 42(1) pp. 143-173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  80. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997) ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.’ The Academy of Management Review, 22(4) pp. 853-886. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  81. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B R., Chrisman, J.J. and Spence, L.J. (2011) ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms.’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2) pp. 235-255. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  82. Mohnen, A. (2018) Familienunternehmen als Arbeitgeber: Die Einstell-ungen und Erwartungen junger Fach- und Führungskräfte. München: Stiftung Familienunternehmen. [Online] [Accessed on 25th June 2020] https://www.familienunternehmen.de/media/public/pdf/publikationen-studien/studien/Die-Einstellungen-und-Erwartungen-junger-Fach-und-Fuehrungskraefte_Studie_Stiftung-Familienunternehmen.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  83. Morsing, M. and Perrini, F. (2009) ‘CSR in SMEs: do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda?’ Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1) pp. 1-6. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  84. Murillo, D. and Lozano, J.M. (2006) ‘SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in their Own Words.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3) pp. 227-240. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  85. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.’ The Academy of Management Review, 23(2) pp. 242-266. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  86. OECD. (2009) Human Capital: How what you know shapes your life. Paris: OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  87. Orts, E. W. and Alan Strudler (2002) ‘The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory.’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2) pp. 215-234. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  88. Parker, C.M., Bellucci, E., Zutshi, A., Torlina, L. and Fraunholz, B. (2015) ‘SME stakeholder relationship descriptions in website CSR communications.’ Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2) pp. 364-386. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  89. Parmar, B.L, Freeman, R.E, Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., De Colle, S. and Rurnell, L. (2010) ‘Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art.’ The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), pp. 403-445. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  90. Perrini, F. (2006) ‘SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3) pp. 305-316. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  91. Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A. (2007) ‘CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), pp. 285-300. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  92. Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E. and Wicks, A.C. (2003) ‘What stakeholder theory is not.’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), pp. 479-502. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  93. Pivato, S., Misnai, N. and Tencati, A. (2008) ‘The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organize food.’ Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1) pp. 3-12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  94. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006) ‘Strategy and society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.’ Harvard Business Review, December, pp. 1-13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  95. Post, J.E, Preston, L.E. and Sachs, S. (2002) ‘Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view.’ California Management Review, 45(1) pp. 6-28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  96. Pott, C., Axjonow, A., Weinland, M. (2017) Nachhaltigkeit im Mittelstand: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Strategien, Organisation und Berichtswesen. Unknown place of publication: Bakertilly. [Online] [Accessed on 7th April 2020] https://www.bakertilly.de/aktuelles/publikationen/detailansicht/corporate-social-responsibility-csr-studie-nachhaltigkeit-im-mittelstand.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  97. Preuss, L. and Perschke, J. (2010) ‘Slipstreaming the Larger Boats: Social Responsibility in Medium-Sized Businesses.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4) pp. 531-551. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  98. Puncheva, P. (2008) ‘The role of corporate reputation in the stakeholder decision-making process.’ Business & Society, 47(3) pp. 272-290. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  99. Putnam, R. D. (1995) ‘Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.’ PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4) pp. 664-683. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  100. Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  101. Roberts, S., Lawson, R., Nicholls, J. (2006) ‘Generating Regional-Scale Improvements in SME Corporate Responsibility Performance: Lessons from Responsibility Northwest.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3) pp. 275-286. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  102. Russo, A., Tencati, A. (2009) ‘Formal Vs informal CSR strategies: evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized and large firms.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 85(S2) pp. 339-353. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  103. Russo, A. and Perrini, F. (2010) ‘Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2) pp. 207-221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  104. Sachs, S. and Rühli, E. (2005) ‘Changing Managers’ Values towards a Broader Stakeholder Orientation.’ Corporate Governance: International Journal for Business in Society, 5(2) pp. 89-98. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  105. Saunders, M. and Lewis, P. (2012) Doing Research in Business & Management: An Essential Guide to Planning Your Project. Essex: Pearson. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  106. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2019) Research methods for business students. 8th ed. New York: Pearson. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  107. Scrivens, K. and Smith, C. (2013) Four Interpretations of Social Capital: An Agenda for Measurement. OECD Statistics Working Papers 2013/06, Working Paper No 55. [Online] [Accessed on 7th June 2021] https://doi.org/10.1787/5jzbcx010wmt-en Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  108. Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001) ‘Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility.’ Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2) pp. 225-243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  109. Smith, N.C. (2003) ‘Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how?’ California Management Review, 45(4) pp. 52-76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  110. Spence, L.J. (1999) ‘Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics.’ Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3) pp. 163-174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  111. Spence, L.J. and Lozano, J.F. (2000) ‘Communicating about ethics with small firms: experiences from the UK and Spain.’ Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2) pp. 43-53. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  112. Spence, L.J. and Rutherfoord, R. (2001) ‘Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner‐manager.’ Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(2) pp. 126-139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  113. Spence, L.J., Schmidtpeter, R., and Habisch, A. (2003) ‘Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany and the U.K.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1) pp. 17-29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  114. Spence, L.J., Rutherfoord, R. (2003) ‘Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1) pp. 1-5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  115. Taneja, S., Taneja, P., Gupta, R. (2011) ‘Researches in CSR: a review of shifting focus, paradigms and methodologies.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3) pp. 343-364. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  116. UN. (2020) Sustainable Development Goals. Unknown place of publication: UN. [Online] [Accessed on 7th January 2021] https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SDG_Guidelines_AUG_2019_Final.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  117. UN Global Compact. (2020) The Ten Pinciples of the UN Global Compact. [Online] [Accessed on 7th January 2021] https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  118. Vázquez-Carrasco, R. and López-Pérez, M.E. (2013) ‘Small & medium-sized enterprises and corporate social responsibility: A systematic review of the literature.’ Qual Quant, 47(6) pp. 3205–3218. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  119. Von Weltzien, H. and Shankar, D. (2011) ‘How can SMEs in a cluster respond to global demands for CSR.’ Journal of Business Ethics,101(2) pp. 175-195. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  120. Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R. and George, G. (2016) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview And New Research Directions.’ Academy of Management Journal, 59(2) pp. 534-544. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  121. Waddock, S. (2004) ‘Parallel universes: Companies, Academics, and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship.’ Business and Society Review,109(1) pp. 5-42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  122. Waddock, S., Bodwell, C. and Graves, S. B. (2002) ‘Responsibility: The new business imperative.’ Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(2) pp. 132-148. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  123. Weber, M. (2008) ‘The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR.’ European Management Journal, 26(4), pp. 247-261. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  124. Weiß, M. (2005) ‘Which social responsibility for the enterprise? The German case.’ Managerial Law, 47(5) pp. 47-70. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  125. Welge, M. Al-Laham, M., and Eulerich, M. (2017) Strategisches Management: Grundlagen - Prozess - Implementierung. 7th ed. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835
  126. Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., and Ramsay, J. (2006) ‘Drivers of environmental behavior in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3) pp. 317-330. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783828876835

Similar publications

from the series "Wissenschaftliche Beiträge aus dem Tectum Verlag: Wirtschaftswissenschaften"
Cover of book: Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Monograph Full access
Isabelle Hinsche-McLardy
Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Cover of book: Unternehmenssicherheit
Monograph No access
Anton Dörig
Unternehmenssicherheit
Cover of book: Marktorientierte Bewertung und Finanzierung
Monograph No access
Tim Alexander Herberger
Marktorientierte Bewertung und Finanzierung
Cover of book: Multinationale Unternehmen im Welthandel
Monograph No access
Stefan Weller
Multinationale Unternehmen im Welthandel
Cover of book: Aktuelle Veränderungsprozesse von Innenstädten
Monograph No access
Anemone Bippes
Aktuelle Veränderungsprozesse von Innenstädten

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex