Cover of book: Europeanization through Equality Bodies
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Europeanization through Equality Bodies

A Baltic Sea Region Perspective
Authors:
Publisher:
 2015

Summary

Die Arbeit ist eine interdisziplinäre Studie über die Rolle der nationalen Gleichbehandlungsstellen (GBS) und des Europäischen Netzes der GBS in Europa. Sie gibt Aufschluss über den Zusammenhang zwischen der Vernetzung der GBS und der Europäisierung im Bereich der Förderung der Gleichstellung. Die Entwicklung eines gemeinsamen Ansatzes zur Förderung der Gleichstellung in der EU ist auf zwei Arten möglich – durch Rechtsharmonisierung und Europäisierung. Mit Hilfe der Untersuchung der Ostseeregion kann gezeigt werden, dass die nationalen GBS und deren Vernetzung zur Europäisierung in der Gleichstellungsförderung führen können. Die Forschungsarbeit trägt dazu bei, eine bedeutende Lücke in der wissenschaftlichen Debatte über die GBS zu schließen und treibt die Debatte über Politiknetzwerke in der EU voran. Darüber hinaus wird belegt, dass der einzigartige Charakter der GBS und deren Vernetzung einen erheblichen Beitrag zu der Entwicklung fragmentierter, nationaler Ansätze hin zu einem gemeinsamen europäischen Konzept für die Gleichstellungsförderung liefern.

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2148-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6247-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Europawissenschaftliche Schriften der Europa-Universität Flensburg | Miscellanies of the Europa-Universität Flensburg
Volume
3
Language
English
Pages
246
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
  2. List of abbreviations No access 13 - 14
    1. Problem definition No access
      1. Setting the scene: the current view towards equality policy network No access
      2. Policy networks in general No access
      3. Objectives of research No access
      1. Grounded Theory No access
      2. Policy network analysis No access
    4. Structure of the work No access
    1. Introduction No access
    2. 1.1. The concept of integration in the European context No access
      1. 1.2.1. The concept of harmonisation No access
      2. 1.2.2. The reasoning of harmonisation No access
      3. 1.2.3. The process of harmonisation No access
      1. 1.3.1. What is Europeanization? No access
      2. 1.3.2. Different models of Europeanization No access
    5. Concluding remarks: From harmonisation to Europeanization and back No access
    1. Introduction No access
      1. 2.1.1. Beginnings of the EU equality legislation (1950-1996) No access
      2. 2.1.2. Article 13 and equality Directives – a leap further (1997-2006) No access
      3. 2.1.3. The Lisbon Treaties and the way forward (2007 and onwards) No access
      4. 2.1.4. Other initiatives of the EU No access
    3. Concluding remarks No access
    4. 2.2. EU equality legislation and its implications No access
    5. 2.3. Equality legislation in the EU – an overview No access
      1. 2.4.1. Information gathering on equality harmonisation across Member States No access
      2. 2.4.2. The reflection of EU equality legislation in the Member States No access
      3. 2.4.3. A step further from legal harmonisation No access
    7. Concluding remarks No access
    1. Introduction No access
    2. 3.1. Equality bodies in the EU law No access
    3. 3.2. Equality bodies in the International law No access
      1. 3.3.1. Composition of body No access
      2. 3.3.2. Finances of the equality bodies No access
      3. 3.3.3. Role of external actors in the work of equality bodies No access
      4. 3.3.4. Equality bodies across Europe – divided or united? No access
      1. 3.4.1. Assistance No access
      2. 3.4.2. Conduct of surveys No access
      3. 3.4.3. Impact on the development of laws No access
      4. 3.4.4. Promote equality No access
      1. 3.5.1. Independence No access
      2. 3.5.2. Effectiveness No access
      3. 3.5.3. Strategies for effectiveness No access
      1. 3.6.1. Potential No access
      2. 3.6.2. Challenges of using the potential of the equality bodies No access
      1. 3.7.1. Denmark No access
      2. 3.7.2. Sweden No access
      3. 3.7.3. Finland No access
      4. 3.7.4. Estonia No access
      5. 3.7.5. Latvia No access
      6. 3.7.6. Lithuania No access
      7. 3.7.7. Poland No access
      8. 3.7.8. Germany No access
      9. 3.7.9. Overview No access
    9. Concluding remarks No access
    1. Introduction No access
      1. 4.1.1. Bilateral cooperation No access
        1. 4.1.2.1. Nordic forum for equality bodies No access
        2. 4.1.2.2. Baltic forum for equality bodies No access
        1. 4.1.3.1. The functioning of the Network of equality bodies No access
        2. 4.1.3.2. The actions of Equinet No access
        3. 4.1.3.3. Historical overview of activities No access
        4. 4.1.3.3. What opportunities networking provides for the equality bodies No access
    3. 4.2. Similarity - From networking to Europeanization and a step further? No access
    4. Concluding remarks No access
  8. Conclusion No access 226 - 232
  9. Bibliography No access 233 - 246

Bibliography (235)

  1. Bibliography Open Google Scholar
  2. AGE: AGE Factsheet on Equinet: the European network of equality bodies, checked on 3/19/2014. Open Google Scholar
  3. Allen, robin (2007): Article 13 EC, evolution and current contexts. In Helen Meenan (Ed.): Equality law in an enlarged European Union. Understanding the Article 13 Directives, pp. 38–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493898.003
  4. Ammer, Margit; Crowley, Niall; Liegl, Barbara; Holzleithner, Elisabeth; Wladasch, Katrin; Yesilkagit, Kutsal (Eds.) (2010): Study on Equality Bodies set up under Di⁠r¬ec⁠t¬i⁠v⁠es 2000/43/EC, 2004/113/EC and 2006/54/EC: Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte. Open Google Scholar
  5. Andenas, Mads; Andersen, Camilla Baasch (Eds.) (2011): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, checked on 4/12/2014. Open Google Scholar
  6. Andenas, Mads; Andersen, Camilla Baasch; Aschroft, Ross (2011): Towards a theory of harmonisation. In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 572–594. Open Google Scholar
  7. Andersen, Camilla Baasch (2011): Applied uniformity of a uniform commercila law: ensuring functional harmonisation of uniform texts through a global ju⁠r¬i⁠s⁠co⁠n¬su⁠t⁠o⁠r⁠i⁠um of the CISG. In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 30–51. Open Google Scholar
  8. Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes (2014.): Homepage. Available online at http://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/DE/UeberUns/ueberUns_node.html, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  9. Armstrong, Kenneth A. (1998): Legal Integration: Theorizin the Legal Dimension of European Integration. In Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (2), pp. 155–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00104
  10. Bell, Mark (2008): The Implementation of European Anti-Discrimination Directives: Converging towards a Common Model? In The Political Quarterly 79 (1). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00900.x
  11. Bell, Mark (2009): Advancing EU Anti-Discrimination Law: the European Commission’s 2008 Proposal for a New Directive. In The Equality Rights Review 3, pp. 7–18. Open Google Scholar
  12. Berger, Klaus Peter (2001): Harmonisation of European Contract Law the Influence of Comparative Law. In The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50 (4), pp. 877–900. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/iclq/50.4.877
  13. Besson, Samantha (2008): Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the TwainMeet? In Human Rights Law Review 8 (4), pp. 647–682. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn023
  14. Blaikie, Norman (2000): Designing Social Researcg: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Boerzel, Tanja A. (1998): Organizing Babylon - On the Different Conceptions of Po⁠l⁠i⁠cy Networks. In Public Administration 76, pp. 253–273. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00100
  16. Bogason, Peter; Toonen, Theo A.J. (1998): Introduction: Networks in Public Administration. In Public Administration 76, pp. 205–227. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00098
  17. Burca de, Grainne (2010): Stumbling into Experimentalism: The EU Anti-Discrimination Regime. In Charles F. Sabel, Jonathan Zeitlin (Eds.): Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–236. Open Google Scholar
  18. Carbonara, Emanuela; Parisi, Francesco (2007): The paradox of legal harmonization. In Public Choice 132, pp. 367–400. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9162-0
  19. Charmaz, Kathy (2014): Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd: SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  20. Chopin, Isabelle; Gounari, Eirini-Maria: Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in E⁠u⁠r⁠o⁠pe. The 27 EU Member States compared. Open Google Scholar
  21. Christopoulos, Dimitrios C. (2008): The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker. In Political Studies 56, pp. 475–481. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00733.x
  22. Commission Of The European Communities: Growth, competitiveness, employment: The Challenges and way forward into the 21st century. White Paper. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  23. Commission Of The European Communities (1985): Completing the Internal Market. White Paper from the Commission to the European Council COM(85)310final. Open Google Scholar
  24. Conant, Lisa (2007): Review Article: The Politics of Legal Integration. In Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (Annual Review), pp. 45–66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00734.x
  25. Cormack, Janet (Ed.) (2004): Considerations For Establishing Single Equality Bodies And Integrated Equality Legislation. Seventh Experts' Meeting, Hosted By The Equality Commission. Open Google Scholar
  26. Cormack, Janet (Ed.) (2004a): Strategic Enforcement And The Ec Equal Treatment Di⁠r¬ec⁠t-i⁠v⁠es. Towards The Uniform And Dynamic Implementation Of Eu Anti-Discrimination Legislation: The Role Of Specialised Bodies. Sixth Experts’ Meeting, Hosted By The Irish Equality Authority. Open Google Scholar
  27. Council of Europe; Commissioner for Human Rights (2011): Opinion of the Commissioner for human rights on national structures for promoting equality. Commissioner for Human Rights. Available online at https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1761031, checked on 3/19/2014. Open Google Scholar
  28. Danish Institute for Human Rights (2013): INTERVIEW: Spotlight on promoting equality in Denmark. Available online at http://www.humanrights.dk/news/interview-spotlight-on-promoting-equality-in-denmark, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  29. Danish Institute for Human Rights (2014): Homepage. Available online at http://www.humanrights.dk/our-work, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  30. Daugbjerg, Carsten (1998): Linking Policy Networks and Environmental Policies: Nitrate Policy Making in Denmark and Sweden 1970-1995. In Public Administration 76, pp. 275–294. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00101
  31. Deakin, Simon (2006): Legal Diversity and Regulatory Competition: Which Model for Europe? In European Law Journal 12 (4), pp. 440–454. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00326.x
  32. Diekmann, Andreas (2009): Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwedungen: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  33. Dowding, Keith (1995): Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. In Political Studies 48 (136-158). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01705.x
  34. Dunne, Ciarán (2011): The Place of Literature in Grounded theory research. In International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14 (2), pp. 111–124. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
  35. Ellis, Evelyn (2005): EU Anti-Discrimination Law: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  36. Equal opportunities Ombudsman's Office Lithuania (2014.): Homepage. Available online at http://www.lygybe.lt/en/about-office.html, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  37. Equality and Human Rights Commission (2011): The National Equality Body contribution to closing the gender pay gap. Open Google Scholar
  38. Equality Ombudsman Sweden: Homepage. Available online at http://www.do.se/en/, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  39. Equinet (2006): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  40. Equinet (2006a): Strategic Enforcement Powers and Competences of Equality Bodies. Edited by Soraya Obura, Fiona Palmer. Open Google Scholar
  41. Equinet (2007): Dynamic Interpretation. European ANti-Discrimination Law in Practice II. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  42. Equinet (2007a): Equinet Statutes. Open Google Scholar
  43. Equinet (2007b): Dynamic Interpretation. European ANti-Discrimination Law in Practice II. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  44. Equinet (2007c): Equality Mainstreaming. A Perspective from the Equality Bodies. Equinet Opinions 2005-2006. Open Google Scholar
  45. Equinet (2007d): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  46. Equinet (2008a): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice III. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  47. Equinet (2008b): New Tools for Promoting Equality. An Equinet Opinion on a E⁠u⁠r⁠o⁠p⁠e⁠an Commission Communication on New Tools for Promoting Equality. An Equinet opinion. Open Google Scholar
  48. Equinet (2008c): Promoting Equality. Overview of positive measures used by national equality bodies. Open Google Scholar
  49. Equinet (2009): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice IV. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  50. Equinet (2009a): Equinet Annual Report 2009. Open Google Scholar
  51. Equinet (2009b): Equinet Business Plan 2009. Open Google Scholar
  52. Equinet (2009c): EQUINET statement on proposal of the eu anti-discrimination directive - role and position of equality bodies. Open Google Scholar
  53. Equinet (2009d): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice IV. Case Studies. Open Google Scholar
  54. Equinet (2009e): Letter to Swedish Presidency. Open Google Scholar
  55. Equinet (2009f): Strategic Role of Equality Bodies. Open Google Scholar
  56. Equinet (2010a): Equinet Annual Report 2010. Open Google Scholar
  57. Equinet (2010b): EQUINET Business Plan 2010. Open Google Scholar
  58. Equinet (2010c): STRATEGIC PLAN 2011-2014. Open Google Scholar
  59. Equinet (2010d): Influencing the law through legal proceedings. The Powers and Practices of equality bodies. Open Google Scholar
  60. Equinet (2011a): Equinet Annual Report 2011. Open Google Scholar
  61. Equinet (2011b): Equinet Work Plan and Budget 2011. Open Google Scholar
  62. Equinet (2011c): Providing Independent Assistance to Victims of Discrimination. Open Google Scholar
  63. Equinet (2011d): Equality Bodies and National Human Rights Institutions. Making the Link to Maximise Impact. An Equinet Perspective. Open Google Scholar
  64. Equinet (2011e): Equinet Work Plan and Budget 2012. Open Google Scholar
  65. Equinet (2011f): Tackling Ageism and Discrimination. Open Google Scholar
  66. Equinet (2012): Equality Law in Practice. Comparative analysis of discrimination ca⁠s⁠es in Europe. An Equinet Report. Open Google Scholar
  67. Equinet (2012a): Agenda of the EQUINET Training for Equality Bodies. Open Google Scholar
  68. Equinet (2012b): Annual Report 2012. Equinet. Open Google Scholar
  69. Equinet (2012c): Equinet High-Level Legal Seminar 2012. Open Google Scholar
  70. Equinet (2012e): Board of Equal Treatment – Denmark. Open Google Scholar
  71. Equinet (2012f): Danish Institute for Human Rights – Denmark. Open Google Scholar
  72. Equinet (2012g): Equality Law in Practice. Comparative analysis of discrimination cases in Europe. Open Google Scholar
  73. Equinet (2012h): Equality Ombudsman – Sweden. Open Google Scholar
  74. Equinet (2012i): Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency – Germany. Open Google Scholar
  75. Equinet (2012j): Human Rights Defender – Poland. Open Google Scholar
  76. Equinet (2012k): Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson – Lithuania. Open Google Scholar
  77. Equinet (2012l): Office of the Ombudsman – Latvia. Open Google Scholar
  78. Equinet (2012m): Ombudsman for Equality – Finland. Open Google Scholar
  79. Equinet (2012n): Ombudsman for Minorities – Finland. Open Google Scholar
  80. Equinet (2012o): Equinet Work Plan and budget 2013. Open Google Scholar
  81. Equinet (2012p): Equality bodies. Current Challenges. An Equinet Perspective. Open Google Scholar
  82. Equinet (2013a): Vice-President Reding confirms full EC support to equality bodies in answer to MEPs' question - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Ava⁠il⁠ab⁠le online at http://www.equineteurope.org/Vice-President-Reding-confirms, checked on 5/5/2014. Open Google Scholar
  83. Equinet (2013b): Processes and indicators for measuring the impact of equality bodies. Open Google Scholar
  84. Equinet (2014): Equinet Work Plan 2014. Open Google Scholar
  85. Equinet (2014a): What are equality bodies? - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Equality-bodies-, che⁠c⁠k⁠ed on 6/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  86. European Commission (2005): Report On Putting Rights Into Practice. Open Google Scholar
  87. European Commission (2006a): Equality and non-discrimination: Annual report 2006. Open Google Scholar
  88. European Commission (2006b): 2007 — European Year of Equal Opportunities for All. Open Google Scholar
  89. European Commission (2006c): European Handbook on Equality Data. Why and how to build to a national knowledge base on equality and discrimination on the grounds of racial and ethnic origin, religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation. Open Google Scholar
  90. European Commission (2006d): Measuring Discrimination: Data Collection and EU Equality Law. Open Google Scholar
  91. European Commission (2007): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 25 EU Member States compared. Edited by European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  92. European Commission (2008a): Communicating Equality and Non-Discrimination in the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  93. European Commission (2008b): Equality in Action. Open Google Scholar
  94. European Commission (2008c): The fight against discrimination and the promotion of equality. How to measure progress done. Open Google Scholar
  95. European Commission (2009a): Equality in Action. Open Google Scholar
  96. European Commission (2009b): Equality in Action. Open Google Scholar
  97. European Commission (2009c): EU action against discrimination. Activity report 2007-08. Open Google Scholar
  98. European Commission (2010a): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 27 EU Member States compared. Open Google Scholar
  99. European Commission (2010b): Promoting equality: activities on fighting discrimination in 2009. Open Google Scholar
  100. European Commission (2010c): Communication From The Commission Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Open Google Scholar
  101. European Commission (2011): Need help? Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/help/index_en.htm, checked on 5/29/2014. Open Google Scholar
  102. European Commission (2011a): Compendium of practice on Non-Discrimination/Equality Mainstreaming. Open Google Scholar
  103. European Commission (2011b): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 27 EU Member States, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey compared. Open Google Scholar
  104. European Commission (2011c): Equality - driving forward regional and local development. Stop Discrimination Newsletter. Open Google Scholar
  105. European Commission (2011d): Raising awareness. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/awareness/index_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Open Google Scholar
  106. European Commission (2011e): Tackling discrimination - Newsroom. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/discrimination/index_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Open Google Scholar
  107. European Commission (2011f): Tackling discrimination. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/index_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Open Google Scholar
  108. European Commission (2012a): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 27 EU Member States, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey compared. Open Google Scholar
  109. European Commission (2012b): Diversity Management. Support for voluntary initiatives promoting diversity management at the workplace across the EU. Open Google Scholar
  110. European Commission (2013): Summaries of projects selected for funding under the call for proposals JUST/2013/PROG/AG/NGOS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34676
  111. European Commission (2013a): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 28 EU Member States, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey compared. Open Google Scholar
  112. European Commission (2013b): National protection beyond the two. The grounds of religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation beyond employment. E⁠d¬i⁠t⁠ed by European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  113. European Commission (2013c): Specific Programme "Progress" (2007-2013) Section 4 - Antidiscrimination And Diversity. Support to national activities aiming at combating discrimination and promoting equality. Restricted Call For Proposals For Action Grants. Open Google Scholar
  114. European Commission (2013d): Discrimination in the EU in 2012. Special Eurobarometer 393. Open Google Scholar
  115. European Commission (2013e): Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion: New programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI). European Commission. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=1093, checked on 6/24/2014. Open Google Scholar
  116. European Commission (2014a): Annex to the Commission Implementing Decision concerning the adoption of the work programme for 2014 and the financing for the. Open Google Scholar
  117. European Commission (2014b): Report From The Commission To The European Parliament And The Council. Joint Report on the application of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (‘Racial Equality Directive’) and of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (‘Employment Equality Directive’). Open Google Scholar
  118. European Commission (2014c): EUROPA - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Equality: EU rules to tackle discrimination now in place in all 28 EU Member States. Available online at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-27_en.htm, updated on 1/17/2014., checked on 6/15/2014. Open Google Scholar
  119. European Commission (2014d): Equality: EU rules to tackle discrimination now in place in all 28 EU Member States. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/discrimination/news/140117_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Open Google Scholar
  120. European Communities (1957): The Treaty of Rome. Open Google Scholar
  121. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2008): Limits and potential of the concept of indirect discrimination. Open Google Scholar
  122. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Open Google Scholar
  123. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009b): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  124. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009c): European Gender Equality Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Open Google Scholar
  125. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009d): European Gender Equality Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Open Google Scholar
  126. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2010a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review 10. Open Google Scholar
  127. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2010b): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Open Google Scholar
  128. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2010c): In search of a balance between the right to equality and other fundamental rights. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Open Google Scholar
  129. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2011a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  130. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2011b): The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human Rights Law - EN. Open Google Scholar
  131. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012): European Anti-discrimination Law Review (12). Open Google Scholar
  132. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  133. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012b): European Anti-discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  134. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012c): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  135. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2013a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  136. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2013b): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Open Google Scholar
  137. European Union (2006): Summaries of EU legislation: Glossary. Official website of the European Union. Available online at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/glossary/open_method_coordination_en.htm, checked on 5/6/2014. Open Google Scholar
  138. European Union (2010a): Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2010/C83/02. In Official Journal of the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  139. European Union (2010b): Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2010/C 83/01. In Official Journal of the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  140. European Union (2012): The Amsterdam treaty: a comprehensive guide. Fundamental rights and non-discrimination. Available online at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/amsterdam_treaty/a10000_en.htm, checked on 6/27/2014. Open Google Scholar
  141. Eurostat (2013): European demography. Open Google Scholar
  142. Exadaktylos, Theofanis; Radaelli, Claudio M. (2009): Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization. In JCMS: J Common Market Studies 47 (3), pp. 507–530. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00820.x
  143. Falkner, Gerda (2000): Policy networks in a multi‐level system: Convergence towards moderate diversity? In West European Politics 23 (4), pp. 94–120. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425402
  144. Falkner, Gerda (2013): Is the EU a Non-Compliance Community? Towards “compliance for credibility” and EU action for the protection of democracy in Europe. In Les Cahiers Europeens De Sciences Po. 1. Open Google Scholar
  145. Falkner, Gerda; Treib, Oliver; Hartlapp Miriam; Leiber Simone (2005): Complying with Europe. EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491931.001
  146. Ferreira, Nuno (2011): The harmonisation of private law in Europe and children's tor liability: A case of fundamental and children's rights mainstreaming. In In¬ter¬na¬ti⁠o⁠n⁠al Journal of Children's Rights 19, pp. 571–594. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/157181811X587359
  147. Garrett, Geoffrey (1995): The politics of legal integration in the European Union. In In⁠te⁠r⁠na⁠ti⁠onal Organization 49 (1), pp. 171–181, checked on 3/17/2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001612
  148. Garrett, Geoffrey; Kelemen, R. Daniel; Schulz, Heiner (1998): The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. In International Organization 52 (1), pp. 149–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/002081898550581
  149. Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner (2004): Gender Equality Act Estonia Estonia. RT2 I 2004, 27, 181. Available online at http://www.svv.ee/index.php?id=484, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  150. Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner Estonia: Homepage. Available online at http://www.svv.ee/index.php?t=2, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  151. Glaser, Barney G.; Strauss, Anselm (2010): The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research: Aldine Transaction. Open Google Scholar
  152. Grewal, Herpreet Kaur (2008): Equality body in talks over 2012 contracts. In Community Renewal News, 8/5/2008, p. 7. Open Google Scholar
  153. Griffith, Nathan D. (2006): ‘‘Deja Vu All Over Again:’’ Constitutional economics and European legal integration. In Springer Science+Business Media - Constit Polit Econ 17, pp. 15–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10602-006-6791-0
  154. Guiraudon, Virginie (2009): Equality in the making: implementing European non-discrimination law. In Citizenship Studies 13 (5), pp. 527–549. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13621020903174696
  155. Hachmann, Verena (2011): From Mutual Learning to Joint Working: Europeanization Processes in the INTERREG B Programmes. In European Planning Studies 19 (8), pp. 1537–1555. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.594667
  156. Healy, Marilyn; Perry, Chad (2000): Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. In Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 3 (3), pp. 118–126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1108/13522750010333861
  157. Howard, Erica (2009): Equality: a Fundamental Right in the European Union? In International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 10, pp. 19–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/135822910901000103
  158. Howard, Erica (2011): EU Equality Law: Three Recent Developments. In European Law Journal 17 (6), pp. 785–803. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00578.x
  159. Human Rights Defender Poland: Homepage. Available online at http://www.rpo.gov.pl/en/content/what-we-do. Open Google Scholar
  160. Human Rights Defender Poland (2013): Report on the Activity of the Ombudsman in Poland in the Area of Equal Treatment in 2012 and the Observance of Equal Treatment Principle in the Republic of Poland. Open Google Scholar
  161. Jacobsen, Bjørn Dilou (2010): Assistance to victims of discrimination by equality bodies of the EU member states. A Scandinavian perspective : legal issues arising from combining the function of providing assistance to victims of discrimination with the function of hearing and investigating complaints. 1st ed. Copenhagen: DJØF. Open Google Scholar
  162. Jans, Jan H. (2008): Minimum Harmonisation and the Role of the Principle of Proportionality. In Social Science Research Network. Open Google Scholar
  163. Jenny, Marcelo; Mueller, Andwolfgang C. (2010): From The Europeanization Of Lawmaking To The Europeanization Of National Legal Orders: The Case Of Austria. In Public Administration 88 (1), pp. 36–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01815.x
  164. Kassim, Hussein (1994): Policy networks, networks and European Union policy making: A sceptical view. In West European Politics 17 (4), pp. 15–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425041
  165. Kim, Junki (2006): Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks. In International Review of Public Administration 11 (1). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2006.10805075
  166. Krizsan, Andrea; Skjeie, Hege; Squires, Judith (2014): The changing nature of Eu⁠ro⁠pe⁠an equality regimes: explaining convergence and variation. In Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 30 (1-16). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2014.886612
  167. Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (1997): Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality - the Viability of the Network Concept. In European Law Journal 3 (1), pp. 33–54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00018
  168. Ladrech, Robert (1994): Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France. In Journal of Common Market Studies 32 (1), pp. 69–88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1994.tb00485.x
  169. Lohse, Eva J. (2011): The meaning of harmonisation in the context of European Union law - a process in need of definition. In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 282–313. Open Google Scholar
  170. Marella, Maria Rosaria (2006): The Non-Subversive Function of European Private Law: The Case of Harmonisation of Family Law. In European Law Journal 12 (1), pp. 78–105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00308.x
  171. Marsh, David; Smith, Martin (2000): Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Di⁠a¬lec⁠t¬i⁠c⁠al Approach. In Political Studies 48, pp. 4–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00247
  172. McCauley, Darren (2011): BottomUp Europeanization Exposed: Social Movement Theory and Nonstate Actors in France. In JCMS: Common Market Studies 49 (5), pp. 1019–1042. Open Google Scholar
  173. McColgan, Aileen (2013): National protection beyond the two EU anti-discrimination directives. The grounds of religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation beyond employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Open Google Scholar
  174. McCrudden, Christopher (1993): The Effecte tiveness of European Equality Law: National Mechanisms for Enforcing gender Equality Law in the Light of European Requirements. In Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (3), pp. 320–367. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ojls/13.3.320
  175. Meenan, Helen (Ed.) (2007): Equality law in an enlarged European Union. Understanding the Article 13 Directives. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493898.001
  176. Mills, Jane; Bonner, Ann; Francis, Karen (2006): The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. In International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1), pp. 1–10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103
  177. Mueller, Wolfgang C.; Bovens, Mark; Grønnegaard, Jørgen (2010): Legal Eu⁠r⁠o⁠p⁠e⁠an-i⁠z¬a¬ti⁠on: Comparative Perspectives. In Public Administration 88 (1), pp. 75–87. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01817.x
  178. Nousiainen, Kevät (2008): Unification (or not) of Equality Bodies and Legislation. In European Gender Equality Law Review 2. Open Google Scholar
  179. Olsen, Johan P. (2002): The Many Faces of Europeanization. In JCMS: Common Market Studies 40 (5), pp. 921–952. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00403
  180. Ombudsman for Minorities Finland: Homepage. Available online at http://www.ofm.fi/en/front_page, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  181. Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia (Tiesibsargs): Homepage. Available online at http://www.tiesibsargs.lv/lv, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  182. Pate, Robert A. (2009): The Future Of Harmonization: Soft Law Instruments And The Principled Advance Of International Lawmaking. In Selected Works of Robert A Pate. Available online at http://works.bepress.com/robert_pate/1, checked on 3/19/2014. Open Google Scholar
  183. Peters, Guy B. (1998): Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination. In Public Administration 76, pp. 295–311. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102
  184. Petersen, Jørn Henrik (1991): Harmonization of Social Security in the EC Revisited. In Journal of Common Market Studies 29 (5), pp. 505–526. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1991.tb00405.x
  185. Peterson, John (1995): Policy networks and European union policy making: A reply to Kassim. In West European Politics 18 (2), pp. 389–407. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425077
  186. Peterson, John (2003): Policy Networks. In Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien: Reihe Politikwissenschaft 90. Open Google Scholar
  187. Peterson, John (2004): Policy Networks. In Antje Wiener, Thomas Diez (Eds.): E⁠u⁠r⁠o⁠p⁠e⁠an Intergation Theory: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–136. Open Google Scholar
  188. Prinssen, Jolande (Ed.) (2001): Direct Effect: Rethinking a Classic of EU Legal Doctrine. International Law FORUM du droit international 3. International Law FORUM du droit international: Kluwer Law International. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/15718040120962932
  189. Radaelli, Claudio M. (2000): Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. In European Integration online papers 4 (8), pp. 1–25. Open Google Scholar
  190. Ravluševičius, Pavelas (2011): Kriterien der EU – Richtlinienumsetzung Kriterien der EU – Richtlinienumsetzung und Folgen ihren Nichtbeachtung nach dem Recht der Europäischen Union. In Jurisprudence 18 (3), pp. 883–904. Open Google Scholar
  191. Rudolf, Beate; Mahlmann, Matthias (Eds.) (2007): Gleichbehandlungsrecht. Handbuch. Nomos Praxis. Open Google Scholar
  192. Sabel, Charles F.; Zeitlin, Jonathan (Eds.) (2010): Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  193. Salinger, Ulrike (2007): Mediation as a Tool for Specialised Equality Bodies? - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/Lorem-ipsum-dolor-sit-amet, checked on 3/20/2014. Open Google Scholar
  194. Schaefer, Burkhard; Bankowski, Zenon (2003): Emerging Legal Orders. Formalism and the Theory of Legal Integration. In Ratio Juris. 16 (4), pp. 486–505. Open Google Scholar
  195. Scharpf, Fritz W. (1994): Community and autonomy: Multi‐level policy‐making in the European Union. In Journal of European Public Policy 1 (2), pp. 219–242. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501769408406956
  196. Scharpf, Fritz W. (2002): The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity. In Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4), pp. 645–670. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00392
  197. Schiek, Dagmar (2011): Comparative law and European harmonisation - a match made in heaven or uneasy bedfellows? In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 425–449. Open Google Scholar
  198. Shifrin, Tash (2010): Commons committee attacks equalities body. In Public Finance, 3/5/2010. Open Google Scholar
  199. Spencer, Sarah (2014): Context, institution or accountability? Exploring the factors that shape the performance of national human rights and equality bodies. In Policy & Politics 42 (1), pp. 89–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655567
  200. Squires, Judith (2008): Intersecting Inequalities: Reflecting on the Subjects and Objects of Equality. In The Political Quarterly 79 (1), pp. 53–61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00902.x
  201. Teague, Paul (1989): European Community Labour Market Harmonisation. In Journal of Public Policy 9 (1), pp. 1–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007959
  202. The Council of the European Communities (1978): Council Directive of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security. 79/7/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  203. The Council of the European Communities (1992): Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding. Official Journal of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  204. The Council Of The European Union (2000): Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Open Google Scholar
  205. The Council Of The European Union (2000a): Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Official Journal of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  206. The Council Of The European Union (2000b): Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. Official Journal of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  207. The Council Of The European Union (2000c): Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. In Official Journal of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  208. The Council Of The European Union (2004): Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. In Official Journal of the European Communities. Open Google Scholar
  209. The Council Of The European Union (2004): Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. Official Journal of the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  210. The Council Of The European Union (2006): Directive 2006/54/EC Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast). Official Journal of the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  211. The Council Of The European Union (2008): Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. Open Google Scholar
  212. The Council Of The European Union (2010a): Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Di⁠r¬ec⁠t¬i⁠ve 96/34/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  213. The Council Of The European Union (2010b): Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union. Open Google Scholar
  214. The Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner: Estonia Promoting Gender Equality through Empowerment and Mainstreaming. Open Google Scholar
  215. The Office Of The Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson (2010): Annual Report 2009. Open Google Scholar
  216. The Ombud for Equality: gender Equality Finland: Homemage. Available online at http://www.tasa-arvo.fi/en/home, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  217. The Ombud for Equality: gender Equality Finland (2005): The Act on Equality between Women and Men: Finland. Available online at http://www.tasa-arvo.fi/en/publications/act2005, checked on 6/11/2014. Open Google Scholar
  218. Thompson, Dennis (1965): Harmonization Of Laws. In Journal of Common Market Studies 3 (3), pp. 302–314. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1965.tb01115.x
  219. Thornberg, Robert (2012): Informed Grounded Theory. In Scandinavian Journal of E⁠du¬ca-ti⁠o⁠n⁠al Research 56 (3), pp. 243–259. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
  220. Tiesībsargs (2011): The Ombudsman Strategies for the years 2011 – 2013. Open Google Scholar
  221. Weiler, Joseph (2011): The political and legal culture of European integration: An exploratory essay. In I-CON 9 (3-4), pp. 678–694. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor054
  222. Wiener, Antje; Diez, Thomas (Eds.) (2004): European Intergation Theory: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  223. Wilkinson, Amanda (2008): How the EU scores on harmonisation. www. employeebenefits.co.uk, checked on 3/17/2014. Open Google Scholar
  224. Wilner, Tamar; Townsend, Sarah (2009): Equality body considers revamp. In Regeneration & Renewal, 8/17/2009, p. 3. Open Google Scholar
  225. Witte de, Bruno (2010): From a ''Common Principle of Equality'' to ''European Antidiscrimination Law". In American Behavioral Scientist 53 (12), pp. 1715–1730. Open Google Scholar
  226. www.equineteurope.org (a): 2012 Equinet High-Level Legal Seminar - 28 March, Brussels - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/2012-Equinet-High-Level-Legal,342, checked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  227. www.equineteurope.org (b): Ad-hoc Initiatives - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Networking-Initiatives-, checked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  228. www.equineteurope.org (c): Equinet Activities - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Activities-, che¬cked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  229. www.equineteurope.org (d): Equinet at a Glance - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-About-us-, checked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  230. www.equineteurope.org (e): Events - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Events-, che¬cked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  231. www.equineteurope.org (f): "Using Communications to Tackle Under-Reporting" - 2012 Equinet Training in Malta - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/Using-Communications-to-Tackle, che¬cked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  232. www.equineteurope.org (g): Working Groups - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Thematic-Working-Groups-, checked on 7/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  233. www.equineteurope.org (h): Legislative Framework - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Legislative-framework,82-, updated on 6/7/2014., checked on 6/7/2014. Open Google Scholar
  234. www.migpolgroup.com: Project: Equality Bodies - Description - Migration Policy Group. Available online at http://www.migpolgroup.com/projects_detail.php?id=26, checked on 5/29/2014. Open Google Scholar
  235. Yesilkagit, Kutsal; Snijders, Berend (Eds.) (2008): Between Impartiality and Responsiveness. Equality Bodies and Practices of independence. Equinet. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380801940147

Similar publications

from the topics "Gender Sociology & Body Sociology", "European Politics & European Union", "History of European Integration"
Cover of book: Gender Studies
Educational Book No access
Helma Lutz, Julia Schuster
Gender Studies
Cover of book: Europa
Book Titles No access
Hans Jörg Schrötter
Europa
Cover of book: Auf dem Weg zur Europäischen Union
Book Titles No access
Felix Diekmann
Auf dem Weg zur Europäischen Union
Cover of book: Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Edited Book No access
Antonino Alì
Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Cover of book: Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda
Book Titles No access
Sara Arezes
Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex