, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Europeanization through Equality Bodies

A Baltic Sea Region Perspective
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2015

Zusammenfassung

Die Arbeit ist eine interdisziplinäre Studie über die Rolle der nationalen Gleichbehandlungsstellen (GBS) und des Europäischen Netzes der GBS in Europa. Sie gibt Aufschluss über den Zusammenhang zwischen der Vernetzung der GBS und der Europäisierung im Bereich der Förderung der Gleichstellung. Die Entwicklung eines gemeinsamen Ansatzes zur Förderung der Gleichstellung in der EU ist auf zwei Arten möglich – durch Rechtsharmonisierung und Europäisierung. Mit Hilfe der Untersuchung der Ostseeregion kann gezeigt werden, dass die nationalen GBS und deren Vernetzung zur Europäisierung in der Gleichstellungsförderung führen können. Die Forschungsarbeit trägt dazu bei, eine bedeutende Lücke in der wissenschaftlichen Debatte über die GBS zu schließen und treibt die Debatte über Politiknetzwerke in der EU voran. Darüber hinaus wird belegt, dass der einzigartige Charakter der GBS und deren Vernetzung einen erheblichen Beitrag zu der Entwicklung fragmentierter, nationaler Ansätze hin zu einem gemeinsamen europäischen Konzept für die Gleichstellungsförderung liefern.


Publikation durchsuchen


Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2148-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6247-5
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Europawissenschaftliche Schriften der Europa-Universität Flensburg | Miscellanies of the Europa-Universität Flensburg
Band
3
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
246
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 12
  2. List of abbreviations Kein Zugriff Seiten 13 - 14
    1. Problem definition Kein Zugriff
      1. Setting the scene: the current view towards equality policy network Kein Zugriff
      2. Policy networks in general Kein Zugriff
      3. Objectives of research Kein Zugriff
      1. Grounded Theory Kein Zugriff
      2. Policy network analysis Kein Zugriff
    2. Structure of the work Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.1. The concept of integration in the European context Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.2.1. The concept of harmonisation Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2.2. The reasoning of harmonisation Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.2.3. The process of harmonisation Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.3.1. What is Europeanization? Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.3.2. Different models of Europeanization Kein Zugriff
    3. Concluding remarks: From harmonisation to Europeanization and back Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1.1. Beginnings of the EU equality legislation (1950-1996) Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2. Article 13 and equality Directives – a leap further (1997-2006) Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.1.3. The Lisbon Treaties and the way forward (2007 and onwards) Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.1.4. Other initiatives of the EU Kein Zugriff
    2. Concluding remarks Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.2. EU equality legislation and its implications Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.3. Equality legislation in the EU – an overview Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.4.1. Information gathering on equality harmonisation across Member States Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.4.2. The reflection of EU equality legislation in the Member States Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.4.3. A step further from legal harmonisation Kein Zugriff
    5. Concluding remarks Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.1. Equality bodies in the EU law Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.2. Equality bodies in the International law Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.3.1. Composition of body Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.3.2. Finances of the equality bodies Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3.3. Role of external actors in the work of equality bodies Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.3.4. Equality bodies across Europe – divided or united? Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.4.1. Assistance Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.4.2. Conduct of surveys Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.4.3. Impact on the development of laws Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4.4. Promote equality Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.5.1. Independence Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.5.2. Effectiveness Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.5.3. Strategies for effectiveness Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.6.1. Potential Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.6.2. Challenges of using the potential of the equality bodies Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.7.1. Denmark Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.7.2. Sweden Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.7.3. Finland Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.7.4. Estonia Kein Zugriff
      5. 3.7.5. Latvia Kein Zugriff
      6. 3.7.6. Lithuania Kein Zugriff
      7. 3.7.7. Poland Kein Zugriff
      8. 3.7.8. Germany Kein Zugriff
      9. 3.7.9. Overview Kein Zugriff
    4. Concluding remarks Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1.1. Bilateral cooperation Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.1.2.1. Nordic forum for equality bodies Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.1.2.2. Baltic forum for equality bodies Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.1.3.1. The functioning of the Network of equality bodies Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.1.3.2. The actions of Equinet Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.1.3.3. Historical overview of activities Kein Zugriff
        4. 4.1.3.3. What opportunities networking provides for the equality bodies Kein Zugriff
    2. 4.2. Similarity - From networking to Europeanization and a step further? Kein Zugriff
    3. Concluding remarks Kein Zugriff
  3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff Seiten 226 - 232
  4. Bibliography Kein Zugriff Seiten 233 - 246

Literaturverzeichnis (235 Einträge)

  1. Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen
  2. AGE: AGE Factsheet on Equinet: the European network of equality bodies, checked on 3/19/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Allen, robin (2007): Article 13 EC, evolution and current contexts. In Helen Meenan (Ed.): Equality law in an enlarged European Union. Understanding the Article 13 Directives, pp. 38–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493898.003
  4. Ammer, Margit; Crowley, Niall; Liegl, Barbara; Holzleithner, Elisabeth; Wladasch, Katrin; Yesilkagit, Kutsal (Eds.) (2010): Study on Equality Bodies set up under Di⁠r¬ec⁠t¬i⁠v⁠es 2000/43/EC, 2004/113/EC and 2006/54/EC: Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Andenas, Mads; Andersen, Camilla Baasch (Eds.) (2011): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, checked on 4/12/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Andenas, Mads; Andersen, Camilla Baasch; Aschroft, Ross (2011): Towards a theory of harmonisation. In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 572–594. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Andersen, Camilla Baasch (2011): Applied uniformity of a uniform commercila law: ensuring functional harmonisation of uniform texts through a global ju⁠r¬i⁠s⁠co⁠n¬su⁠t⁠o⁠r⁠i⁠um of the CISG. In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 30–51. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes (2014.): Homepage. Available online at http://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/DE/UeberUns/ueberUns_node.html, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Armstrong, Kenneth A. (1998): Legal Integration: Theorizin the Legal Dimension of European Integration. In Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (2), pp. 155–174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00104
  10. Bell, Mark (2008): The Implementation of European Anti-Discrimination Directives: Converging towards a Common Model? In The Political Quarterly 79 (1). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00900.x
  11. Bell, Mark (2009): Advancing EU Anti-Discrimination Law: the European Commission’s 2008 Proposal for a New Directive. In The Equality Rights Review 3, pp. 7–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Berger, Klaus Peter (2001): Harmonisation of European Contract Law the Influence of Comparative Law. In The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50 (4), pp. 877–900. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/iclq/50.4.877
  13. Besson, Samantha (2008): Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the TwainMeet? In Human Rights Law Review 8 (4), pp. 647–682. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn023
  14. Blaikie, Norman (2000): Designing Social Researcg: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Boerzel, Tanja A. (1998): Organizing Babylon - On the Different Conceptions of Po⁠l⁠i⁠cy Networks. In Public Administration 76, pp. 253–273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00100
  16. Bogason, Peter; Toonen, Theo A.J. (1998): Introduction: Networks in Public Administration. In Public Administration 76, pp. 205–227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00098
  17. Burca de, Grainne (2010): Stumbling into Experimentalism: The EU Anti-Discrimination Regime. In Charles F. Sabel, Jonathan Zeitlin (Eds.): Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–236. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Carbonara, Emanuela; Parisi, Francesco (2007): The paradox of legal harmonization. In Public Choice 132, pp. 367–400. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9162-0
  19. Charmaz, Kathy (2014): Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Chopin, Isabelle; Gounari, Eirini-Maria: Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in E⁠u⁠r⁠o⁠pe. The 27 EU Member States compared. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Christopoulos, Dimitrios C. (2008): The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker. In Political Studies 56, pp. 475–481. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00733.x
  22. Commission Of The European Communities: Growth, competitiveness, employment: The Challenges and way forward into the 21st century. White Paper. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Commission Of The European Communities (1985): Completing the Internal Market. White Paper from the Commission to the European Council COM(85)310final. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Conant, Lisa (2007): Review Article: The Politics of Legal Integration. In Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (Annual Review), pp. 45–66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00734.x
  25. Cormack, Janet (Ed.) (2004): Considerations For Establishing Single Equality Bodies And Integrated Equality Legislation. Seventh Experts' Meeting, Hosted By The Equality Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Cormack, Janet (Ed.) (2004a): Strategic Enforcement And The Ec Equal Treatment Di⁠r¬ec⁠t-i⁠v⁠es. Towards The Uniform And Dynamic Implementation Of Eu Anti-Discrimination Legislation: The Role Of Specialised Bodies. Sixth Experts’ Meeting, Hosted By The Irish Equality Authority. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Council of Europe; Commissioner for Human Rights (2011): Opinion of the Commissioner for human rights on national structures for promoting equality. Commissioner for Human Rights. Available online at https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1761031, checked on 3/19/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Danish Institute for Human Rights (2013): INTERVIEW: Spotlight on promoting equality in Denmark. Available online at http://www.humanrights.dk/news/interview-spotlight-on-promoting-equality-in-denmark, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Danish Institute for Human Rights (2014): Homepage. Available online at http://www.humanrights.dk/our-work, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Daugbjerg, Carsten (1998): Linking Policy Networks and Environmental Policies: Nitrate Policy Making in Denmark and Sweden 1970-1995. In Public Administration 76, pp. 275–294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00101
  31. Deakin, Simon (2006): Legal Diversity and Regulatory Competition: Which Model for Europe? In European Law Journal 12 (4), pp. 440–454. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00326.x
  32. Diekmann, Andreas (2009): Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwedungen: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Dowding, Keith (1995): Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. In Political Studies 48 (136-158). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01705.x
  34. Dunne, Ciarán (2011): The Place of Literature in Grounded theory research. In International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14 (2), pp. 111–124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
  35. Ellis, Evelyn (2005): EU Anti-Discrimination Law: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Equal opportunities Ombudsman's Office Lithuania (2014.): Homepage. Available online at http://www.lygybe.lt/en/about-office.html, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Equality and Human Rights Commission (2011): The National Equality Body contribution to closing the gender pay gap. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Equality Ombudsman Sweden: Homepage. Available online at http://www.do.se/en/, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Equinet (2006): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Equinet (2006a): Strategic Enforcement Powers and Competences of Equality Bodies. Edited by Soraya Obura, Fiona Palmer. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Equinet (2007): Dynamic Interpretation. European ANti-Discrimination Law in Practice II. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Equinet (2007a): Equinet Statutes. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Equinet (2007b): Dynamic Interpretation. European ANti-Discrimination Law in Practice II. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Equinet (2007c): Equality Mainstreaming. A Perspective from the Equality Bodies. Equinet Opinions 2005-2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Equinet (2007d): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Equinet (2008a): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice III. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Equinet (2008b): New Tools for Promoting Equality. An Equinet Opinion on a E⁠u⁠r⁠o⁠p⁠e⁠an Commission Communication on New Tools for Promoting Equality. An Equinet opinion. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Equinet (2008c): Promoting Equality. Overview of positive measures used by national equality bodies. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Equinet (2009): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice IV. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Equinet (2009a): Equinet Annual Report 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Equinet (2009b): Equinet Business Plan 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Equinet (2009c): EQUINET statement on proposal of the eu anti-discrimination directive - role and position of equality bodies. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Equinet (2009d): Dynamic Interpretation. European Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice IV. Case Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Equinet (2009e): Letter to Swedish Presidency. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Equinet (2009f): Strategic Role of Equality Bodies. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Equinet (2010a): Equinet Annual Report 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Equinet (2010b): EQUINET Business Plan 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Equinet (2010c): STRATEGIC PLAN 2011-2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Equinet (2010d): Influencing the law through legal proceedings. The Powers and Practices of equality bodies. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Equinet (2011a): Equinet Annual Report 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Equinet (2011b): Equinet Work Plan and Budget 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Equinet (2011c): Providing Independent Assistance to Victims of Discrimination. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Equinet (2011d): Equality Bodies and National Human Rights Institutions. Making the Link to Maximise Impact. An Equinet Perspective. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Equinet (2011e): Equinet Work Plan and Budget 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Equinet (2011f): Tackling Ageism and Discrimination. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Equinet (2012): Equality Law in Practice. Comparative analysis of discrimination ca⁠s⁠es in Europe. An Equinet Report. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Equinet (2012a): Agenda of the EQUINET Training for Equality Bodies. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Equinet (2012b): Annual Report 2012. Equinet. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Equinet (2012c): Equinet High-Level Legal Seminar 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Equinet (2012e): Board of Equal Treatment – Denmark. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Equinet (2012f): Danish Institute for Human Rights – Denmark. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Equinet (2012g): Equality Law in Practice. Comparative analysis of discrimination cases in Europe. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Equinet (2012h): Equality Ombudsman – Sweden. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Equinet (2012i): Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency – Germany. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Equinet (2012j): Human Rights Defender – Poland. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Equinet (2012k): Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson – Lithuania. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Equinet (2012l): Office of the Ombudsman – Latvia. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Equinet (2012m): Ombudsman for Equality – Finland. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Equinet (2012n): Ombudsman for Minorities – Finland. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Equinet (2012o): Equinet Work Plan and budget 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Equinet (2012p): Equality bodies. Current Challenges. An Equinet Perspective. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Equinet (2013a): Vice-President Reding confirms full EC support to equality bodies in answer to MEPs' question - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Ava⁠il⁠ab⁠le online at http://www.equineteurope.org/Vice-President-Reding-confirms, checked on 5/5/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Equinet (2013b): Processes and indicators for measuring the impact of equality bodies. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Equinet (2014): Equinet Work Plan 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Equinet (2014a): What are equality bodies? - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Equality-bodies-, che⁠c⁠k⁠ed on 6/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. European Commission (2005): Report On Putting Rights Into Practice. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. European Commission (2006a): Equality and non-discrimination: Annual report 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. European Commission (2006b): 2007 — European Year of Equal Opportunities for All. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. European Commission (2006c): European Handbook on Equality Data. Why and how to build to a national knowledge base on equality and discrimination on the grounds of racial and ethnic origin, religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. European Commission (2006d): Measuring Discrimination: Data Collection and EU Equality Law. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. European Commission (2007): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 25 EU Member States compared. Edited by European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. European Commission (2008a): Communicating Equality and Non-Discrimination in the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. European Commission (2008b): Equality in Action. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. European Commission (2008c): The fight against discrimination and the promotion of equality. How to measure progress done. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. European Commission (2009a): Equality in Action. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. European Commission (2009b): Equality in Action. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. European Commission (2009c): EU action against discrimination. Activity report 2007-08. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. European Commission (2010a): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 27 EU Member States compared. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. European Commission (2010b): Promoting equality: activities on fighting discrimination in 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. European Commission (2010c): Communication From The Commission Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. European Commission (2011): Need help? Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/help/index_en.htm, checked on 5/29/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. European Commission (2011a): Compendium of practice on Non-Discrimination/Equality Mainstreaming. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. European Commission (2011b): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 27 EU Member States, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey compared. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. European Commission (2011c): Equality - driving forward regional and local development. Stop Discrimination Newsletter. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. European Commission (2011d): Raising awareness. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/awareness/index_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. European Commission (2011e): Tackling discrimination - Newsroom. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/discrimination/index_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. European Commission (2011f): Tackling discrimination. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/index_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. European Commission (2012a): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 27 EU Member States, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey compared. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. European Commission (2012b): Diversity Management. Support for voluntary initiatives promoting diversity management at the workplace across the EU. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. European Commission (2013): Summaries of projects selected for funding under the call for proposals JUST/2013/PROG/AG/NGOS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34676
  111. European Commission (2013a): Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 28 EU Member States, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey compared. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. European Commission (2013b): National protection beyond the two. The grounds of religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation beyond employment. E⁠d¬i⁠t⁠ed by European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. European Commission (2013c): Specific Programme "Progress" (2007-2013) Section 4 - Antidiscrimination And Diversity. Support to national activities aiming at combating discrimination and promoting equality. Restricted Call For Proposals For Action Grants. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. European Commission (2013d): Discrimination in the EU in 2012. Special Eurobarometer 393. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. European Commission (2013e): Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion: New programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI). European Commission. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=1093, checked on 6/24/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. European Commission (2014a): Annex to the Commission Implementing Decision concerning the adoption of the work programme for 2014 and the financing for the. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. European Commission (2014b): Report From The Commission To The European Parliament And The Council. Joint Report on the application of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (‘Racial Equality Directive’) and of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (‘Employment Equality Directive’). Google Scholar öffnen
  118. European Commission (2014c): EUROPA - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Equality: EU rules to tackle discrimination now in place in all 28 EU Member States. Available online at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-27_en.htm, updated on 1/17/2014., checked on 6/15/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. European Commission (2014d): Equality: EU rules to tackle discrimination now in place in all 28 EU Member States. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/discrimination/news/140117_en.htm, checked on 6/15/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. European Communities (1957): The Treaty of Rome. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2008): Limits and potential of the concept of indirect discrimination. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009b): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009c): European Gender Equality Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2009d): European Gender Equality Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2010a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review 10. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2010b): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2010c): In search of a balance between the right to equality and other fundamental rights. Edited by European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2011a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2011b): The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human Rights Law - EN. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012): European Anti-discrimination Law Review (12). Google Scholar öffnen
  132. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012b): European Anti-discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2012c): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2013a): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (2013b): European Anti-Discrimination Law Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. European Union (2006): Summaries of EU legislation: Glossary. Official website of the European Union. Available online at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/glossary/open_method_coordination_en.htm, checked on 5/6/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. European Union (2010a): Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2010/C83/02. In Official Journal of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. European Union (2010b): Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2010/C 83/01. In Official Journal of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. European Union (2012): The Amsterdam treaty: a comprehensive guide. Fundamental rights and non-discrimination. Available online at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/amsterdam_treaty/a10000_en.htm, checked on 6/27/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Eurostat (2013): European demography. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Exadaktylos, Theofanis; Radaelli, Claudio M. (2009): Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization. In JCMS: J Common Market Studies 47 (3), pp. 507–530. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00820.x
  143. Falkner, Gerda (2000): Policy networks in a multi‐level system: Convergence towards moderate diversity? In West European Politics 23 (4), pp. 94–120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425402
  144. Falkner, Gerda (2013): Is the EU a Non-Compliance Community? Towards “compliance for credibility” and EU action for the protection of democracy in Europe. In Les Cahiers Europeens De Sciences Po. 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Falkner, Gerda; Treib, Oliver; Hartlapp Miriam; Leiber Simone (2005): Complying with Europe. EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491931.001
  146. Ferreira, Nuno (2011): The harmonisation of private law in Europe and children's tor liability: A case of fundamental and children's rights mainstreaming. In In¬ter¬na¬ti⁠o⁠n⁠al Journal of Children's Rights 19, pp. 571–594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/157181811X587359
  147. Garrett, Geoffrey (1995): The politics of legal integration in the European Union. In In⁠te⁠r⁠na⁠ti⁠onal Organization 49 (1), pp. 171–181, checked on 3/17/2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001612
  148. Garrett, Geoffrey; Kelemen, R. Daniel; Schulz, Heiner (1998): The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. In International Organization 52 (1), pp. 149–176. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1162/002081898550581
  149. Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner (2004): Gender Equality Act Estonia Estonia. RT2 I 2004, 27, 181. Available online at http://www.svv.ee/index.php?id=484, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner Estonia: Homepage. Available online at http://www.svv.ee/index.php?t=2, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Glaser, Barney G.; Strauss, Anselm (2010): The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research: Aldine Transaction. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Grewal, Herpreet Kaur (2008): Equality body in talks over 2012 contracts. In Community Renewal News, 8/5/2008, p. 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Griffith, Nathan D. (2006): ‘‘Deja Vu All Over Again:’’ Constitutional economics and European legal integration. In Springer Science+Business Media - Constit Polit Econ 17, pp. 15–29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10602-006-6791-0
  154. Guiraudon, Virginie (2009): Equality in the making: implementing European non-discrimination law. In Citizenship Studies 13 (5), pp. 527–549. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13621020903174696
  155. Hachmann, Verena (2011): From Mutual Learning to Joint Working: Europeanization Processes in the INTERREG B Programmes. In European Planning Studies 19 (8), pp. 1537–1555. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.594667
  156. Healy, Marilyn; Perry, Chad (2000): Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. In Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 3 (3), pp. 118–126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1108/13522750010333861
  157. Howard, Erica (2009): Equality: a Fundamental Right in the European Union? In International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 10, pp. 19–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/135822910901000103
  158. Howard, Erica (2011): EU Equality Law: Three Recent Developments. In European Law Journal 17 (6), pp. 785–803. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00578.x
  159. Human Rights Defender Poland: Homepage. Available online at http://www.rpo.gov.pl/en/content/what-we-do. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Human Rights Defender Poland (2013): Report on the Activity of the Ombudsman in Poland in the Area of Equal Treatment in 2012 and the Observance of Equal Treatment Principle in the Republic of Poland. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Jacobsen, Bjørn Dilou (2010): Assistance to victims of discrimination by equality bodies of the EU member states. A Scandinavian perspective : legal issues arising from combining the function of providing assistance to victims of discrimination with the function of hearing and investigating complaints. 1st ed. Copenhagen: DJØF. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Jans, Jan H. (2008): Minimum Harmonisation and the Role of the Principle of Proportionality. In Social Science Research Network. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Jenny, Marcelo; Mueller, Andwolfgang C. (2010): From The Europeanization Of Lawmaking To The Europeanization Of National Legal Orders: The Case Of Austria. In Public Administration 88 (1), pp. 36–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01815.x
  164. Kassim, Hussein (1994): Policy networks, networks and European Union policy making: A sceptical view. In West European Politics 17 (4), pp. 15–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425041
  165. Kim, Junki (2006): Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks. In International Review of Public Administration 11 (1). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2006.10805075
  166. Krizsan, Andrea; Skjeie, Hege; Squires, Judith (2014): The changing nature of Eu⁠ro⁠pe⁠an equality regimes: explaining convergence and variation. In Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 30 (1-16). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2014.886612
  167. Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (1997): Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality - the Viability of the Network Concept. In European Law Journal 3 (1), pp. 33–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00018
  168. Ladrech, Robert (1994): Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France. In Journal of Common Market Studies 32 (1), pp. 69–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1994.tb00485.x
  169. Lohse, Eva J. (2011): The meaning of harmonisation in the context of European Union law - a process in need of definition. In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 282–313. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Marella, Maria Rosaria (2006): The Non-Subversive Function of European Private Law: The Case of Harmonisation of Family Law. In European Law Journal 12 (1), pp. 78–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00308.x
  171. Marsh, David; Smith, Martin (2000): Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Di⁠a¬lec⁠t¬i⁠c⁠al Approach. In Political Studies 48, pp. 4–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00247
  172. McCauley, Darren (2011): BottomUp Europeanization Exposed: Social Movement Theory and Nonstate Actors in France. In JCMS: Common Market Studies 49 (5), pp. 1019–1042. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. McColgan, Aileen (2013): National protection beyond the two EU anti-discrimination directives. The grounds of religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation beyond employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. McCrudden, Christopher (1993): The Effecte tiveness of European Equality Law: National Mechanisms for Enforcing gender Equality Law in the Light of European Requirements. In Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (3), pp. 320–367. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ojls/13.3.320
  175. Meenan, Helen (Ed.) (2007): Equality law in an enlarged European Union. Understanding the Article 13 Directives. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493898.001
  176. Mills, Jane; Bonner, Ann; Francis, Karen (2006): The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. In International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1), pp. 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103
  177. Mueller, Wolfgang C.; Bovens, Mark; Grønnegaard, Jørgen (2010): Legal Eu⁠r⁠o⁠p⁠e⁠an-i⁠z¬a¬ti⁠on: Comparative Perspectives. In Public Administration 88 (1), pp. 75–87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01817.x
  178. Nousiainen, Kevät (2008): Unification (or not) of Equality Bodies and Legislation. In European Gender Equality Law Review 2. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Olsen, Johan P. (2002): The Many Faces of Europeanization. In JCMS: Common Market Studies 40 (5), pp. 921–952. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00403
  180. Ombudsman for Minorities Finland: Homepage. Available online at http://www.ofm.fi/en/front_page, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia (Tiesibsargs): Homepage. Available online at http://www.tiesibsargs.lv/lv, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Pate, Robert A. (2009): The Future Of Harmonization: Soft Law Instruments And The Principled Advance Of International Lawmaking. In Selected Works of Robert A Pate. Available online at http://works.bepress.com/robert_pate/1, checked on 3/19/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Peters, Guy B. (1998): Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination. In Public Administration 76, pp. 295–311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102
  184. Petersen, Jørn Henrik (1991): Harmonization of Social Security in the EC Revisited. In Journal of Common Market Studies 29 (5), pp. 505–526. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1991.tb00405.x
  185. Peterson, John (1995): Policy networks and European union policy making: A reply to Kassim. In West European Politics 18 (2), pp. 389–407. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425077
  186. Peterson, John (2003): Policy Networks. In Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien: Reihe Politikwissenschaft 90. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Peterson, John (2004): Policy Networks. In Antje Wiener, Thomas Diez (Eds.): E⁠u⁠r⁠o⁠p⁠e⁠an Intergation Theory: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–136. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Prinssen, Jolande (Ed.) (2001): Direct Effect: Rethinking a Classic of EU Legal Doctrine. International Law FORUM du droit international 3. International Law FORUM du droit international: Kluwer Law International. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/15718040120962932
  189. Radaelli, Claudio M. (2000): Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. In European Integration online papers 4 (8), pp. 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Ravluševičius, Pavelas (2011): Kriterien der EU – Richtlinienumsetzung Kriterien der EU – Richtlinienumsetzung und Folgen ihren Nichtbeachtung nach dem Recht der Europäischen Union. In Jurisprudence 18 (3), pp. 883–904. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Rudolf, Beate; Mahlmann, Matthias (Eds.) (2007): Gleichbehandlungsrecht. Handbuch. Nomos Praxis. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Sabel, Charles F.; Zeitlin, Jonathan (Eds.) (2010): Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Salinger, Ulrike (2007): Mediation as a Tool for Specialised Equality Bodies? - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/Lorem-ipsum-dolor-sit-amet, checked on 3/20/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Schaefer, Burkhard; Bankowski, Zenon (2003): Emerging Legal Orders. Formalism and the Theory of Legal Integration. In Ratio Juris. 16 (4), pp. 486–505. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Scharpf, Fritz W. (1994): Community and autonomy: Multi‐level policy‐making in the European Union. In Journal of European Public Policy 1 (2), pp. 219–242. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501769408406956
  196. Scharpf, Fritz W. (2002): The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity. In Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4), pp. 645–670. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00392
  197. Schiek, Dagmar (2011): Comparative law and European harmonisation - a match made in heaven or uneasy bedfellows? In Mads Andenas, Camilla Baasch Andersen (Eds.): Theory and practice of harmonisation: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 425–449. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Shifrin, Tash (2010): Commons committee attacks equalities body. In Public Finance, 3/5/2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Spencer, Sarah (2014): Context, institution or accountability? Exploring the factors that shape the performance of national human rights and equality bodies. In Policy & Politics 42 (1), pp. 89–107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655567
  200. Squires, Judith (2008): Intersecting Inequalities: Reflecting on the Subjects and Objects of Equality. In The Political Quarterly 79 (1), pp. 53–61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00902.x
  201. Teague, Paul (1989): European Community Labour Market Harmonisation. In Journal of Public Policy 9 (1), pp. 1–33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007959
  202. The Council of the European Communities (1978): Council Directive of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security. 79/7/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. The Council of the European Communities (1992): Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding. Official Journal of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. The Council Of The European Union (2000): Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. The Council Of The European Union (2000a): Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Official Journal of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. The Council Of The European Union (2000b): Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. Official Journal of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. The Council Of The European Union (2000c): Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. In Official Journal of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. The Council Of The European Union (2004): Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. In Official Journal of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. The Council Of The European Union (2004): Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. Official Journal of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. The Council Of The European Union (2006): Directive 2006/54/EC Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast). Official Journal of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. The Council Of The European Union (2008): Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. The Council Of The European Union (2010a): Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Di⁠r¬ec⁠t¬i⁠ve 96/34/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. The Council Of The European Union (2010b): Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. The Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner: Estonia Promoting Gender Equality through Empowerment and Mainstreaming. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. The Office Of The Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson (2010): Annual Report 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. The Ombud for Equality: gender Equality Finland: Homemage. Available online at http://www.tasa-arvo.fi/en/home, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. The Ombud for Equality: gender Equality Finland (2005): The Act on Equality between Women and Men: Finland. Available online at http://www.tasa-arvo.fi/en/publications/act2005, checked on 6/11/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Thompson, Dennis (1965): Harmonization Of Laws. In Journal of Common Market Studies 3 (3), pp. 302–314. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1965.tb01115.x
  219. Thornberg, Robert (2012): Informed Grounded Theory. In Scandinavian Journal of E⁠du¬ca-ti⁠o⁠n⁠al Research 56 (3), pp. 243–259. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
  220. Tiesībsargs (2011): The Ombudsman Strategies for the years 2011 – 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Weiler, Joseph (2011): The political and legal culture of European integration: An exploratory essay. In I-CON 9 (3-4), pp. 678–694. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor054
  222. Wiener, Antje; Diez, Thomas (Eds.) (2004): European Intergation Theory: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Wilkinson, Amanda (2008): How the EU scores on harmonisation. www. employeebenefits.co.uk, checked on 3/17/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Wilner, Tamar; Townsend, Sarah (2009): Equality body considers revamp. In Regeneration & Renewal, 8/17/2009, p. 3. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Witte de, Bruno (2010): From a ''Common Principle of Equality'' to ''European Antidiscrimination Law". In American Behavioral Scientist 53 (12), pp. 1715–1730. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. www.equineteurope.org (a): 2012 Equinet High-Level Legal Seminar - 28 March, Brussels - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/2012-Equinet-High-Level-Legal,342, checked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. www.equineteurope.org (b): Ad-hoc Initiatives - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Networking-Initiatives-, checked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. www.equineteurope.org (c): Equinet Activities - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Activities-, che¬cked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. www.equineteurope.org (d): Equinet at a Glance - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-About-us-, checked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. www.equineteurope.org (e): Events - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Events-, che¬cked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. www.equineteurope.org (f): "Using Communications to Tackle Under-Reporting" - 2012 Equinet Training in Malta - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/Using-Communications-to-Tackle, che¬cked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. www.equineteurope.org (g): Working Groups - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Thematic-Working-Groups-, checked on 7/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. www.equineteurope.org (h): Legislative Framework - Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies. Available online at http://www.equineteurope.org/-Legislative-framework,82-, updated on 6/7/2014., checked on 6/7/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. www.migpolgroup.com: Project: Equality Bodies - Description - Migration Policy Group. Available online at http://www.migpolgroup.com/projects_detail.php?id=26, checked on 5/29/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Yesilkagit, Kutsal; Snijders, Berend (Eds.) (2008): Between Impartiality and Responsiveness. Equality Bodies and Practices of independence. Equinet. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402380801940147

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Geschlechtersoziologie & Körpersoziologie", "Europapolitik & Europäische Union", "Geschichte der Europäischen Integration"
Cover des Buchs: Gender Studies
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Helma Lutz, Julia Schuster
Gender Studies
Cover des Buchs: Europa
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hans Jörg Schrötter
Europa
Cover des Buchs: Auf dem Weg zur Europäischen Union
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Felix Diekmann
Auf dem Weg zur Europäischen Union