Cover of book: The Added Value of Equality
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

The Added Value of Equality

Reframing Legal Perspectives on Muslim Veiling Bans
Authors:
Publisher:
 2025

Summary

Courts tend to prioritise liberty over equality rights, particularly in cases concerning Muslim veiling bans. Using these bans as a case study, Shino Ibold shows how this ‘eclipse’ of equality by liberty rights leads to significant blind spots in legal analysis, underscoring the necessity for an independent assessment of equality rights. Drawing on Sandra Fredman’s multidimensional concept of equality, Shino Ibold highlights the added value of an equality law perspective, providing both concrete insights that can guide future jurisprudence and a contribution to the further evolution of equality law and its instruments.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2025
Copyright Year
2025
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0119-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4727-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Schriften zur Gleichstellung
Volume
54
Language
English
Pages
537
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. 1 The Veiling Ban Trend No access
    2. 2 The ‘Shadowy Existence’ of the Right to Equality No access
    3. 3 Necessity of an Equality Perspective on Veiling Bans No access
    4. 4 Course and Methods of Investigation No access
      1. 1.1 Two Different Constitutional Frameworks No access
        1. 1.2.1 Article 4(1) and (2) Basic Law No access
        2. 1.2.2 Article 9 ECHR No access
        1. 1.3.1 Article 3(2) and (3) Basic Law No access
        2. 1.3.2 Article 33(3) Basic Law No access
        3. 1.3.3 Article 14 ECHR No access
    2. 2 The Courts’ Focus on Freedom of Religion No access
    3. 3 Is Equality Redundant? No access
      1. 1.1 Formal Equality: The Aristotelian Concept of Treating Likes Alike No access
        1. 1.2.1 Who is relevantly alike? No access
        2. 1.2.2 The Lack of a Substantive Foundation No access
        3. 1.2.3 The Requirement of a Comparator No access
        4. 1.2.4 Inability to Tackle Structural Disadvantage No access
        5. 1.2.5 Treatment of Difference No access
        1. 1.3.1 Equality of Results No access
        2. 1.3.2 Equality of Opportunity No access
        3. 1.3.3 Recourse to Substantive Values No access
      4. 1.4 Equality as Non-Domination No access
        1. 1.5.1 The Redistributive Dimension of Equality No access
            1. 1.5.2.1.1 Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Stigma as a Matter of Anti-Discrimination Law No access
            2. 1.5.2.1.2 Implications for the Legal Assessment of Veiling Bans No access
            3. 1.5.2.1.3 Stereotypes and Prejudices at the Basis of Bans and Case Law on the Muslim Veil No access
            4. 1.5.2.1.4 Reinforced Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Stigma Resulting from the Bans No access
          2. 1.5.2.2 Humiliation No access
          3. 1.5.2.3 Violence No access
          1. 1.5.3.1 Political Participation No access
          2. 1.5.3.2 Participation in Society at Large No access
          3. 1.5.3.3 Exclusionary Effects of Bans on Muslim Veils No access
        4. 1.5.4 The Transformative Dimension of Equality No access
        5. 1.5.5 Balancing the Different Dimensions No access
      6. 1.6 Conclusion No access
      1. 2.1 Development of the Concept No access
      2. 2.2 The Essence of the Concept of Indirect Discrimination No access
      3. 2.3 Establishing Indirect Discrimination No access
          1. 2.4.1.1 Explicit Reference to a Protected Characteristic No access
          2. 2.4.1.2 Inseparable Link No access
          3. 2.4.1.3 Discriminatory Intent No access
          4. 2.4.1.4 Bans on the Muslim Veil: Direct or Indirect Discrimination? No access
        2. 2.4.2 A Different Degree of Moral Wrong? No access
        3. 2.4.3 A Sliding Scale for the Justification Test No access
      5. 2.5 Conclusion and Outlook No access
      1. 3.1 Development of the Concept No access
      2. 3.2 The Essence of the Concept of Reasonable Accommodation No access
        1. 3.3.1 Reasonable Accommodation as a Remedy against Discrimination No access
          1. 3.3.2.1 Participative Dimension No access
          2. 3.3.2.2 Redistributive Dimension No access
          3. 3.3.2.3 Recognition Dimension No access
          4. 3.3.2.4 Transformative Dimension No access
        1. 3.4.1 Exemptions vs. Inclusive Normality No access
        2. 3.4.2 Proactive vs. Reactive Duty No access
        3. 3.4.3 Individual vs. Structural Accommodation No access
      5. 3.5 Accommodation as a Matter of Proportionality No access
      6. 3.6 Time to Extend the Duty to Accommodate Beyond Disability No access
      7. 3.7 Conclusion and Outlook No access
      1. 4.1 Development of the Concept No access
      2. 4.2 Intersectionality as a ‘Way of Seeing’ No access
      3. 4.3 Intersectionality as a ‘Backtalk against Power’ No access
        1. 4.4.1 Religion No access
        2. 4.4.2 Gender No access
          1. 4.4.3.1 The Close Entanglement of Religion and Race No access
          2. 4.4.3.2 Veiling Bans as Racial Discrimination No access
          1. 4.4.4.1 Discrimination against Muslim Women is Relevant Discrimination under Equality Law No access
          2. 4.4.4.2 Seeing the Context No access
          3. 4.4.4.3 Grasping the Intersectional Discrimination Caused by Veiling Bans No access
        5. 4.4.5 Listening to the Voices of Muslim Women No access
        1. 4.5.1 A Stricter Level of Scrutiny in Cases of Intersectional Discrimination? No access
          1. 4.5.2.1 Is Religion Different from Other Grounds of Discrimination? No access
          2. 4.5.2.2 No Hierarchy in Cases of Intersectional Discrimination No access
      6. 4.6 Conclusion and Outlook No access
      1. 5.1 Beyond Formal Equality No access
      2. 5.2 The Contextual Disadvantage Test No access
      3. 5.3 Four Dimensions as Normative Arguments No access
      1. 1.1 Facts of the Case No access
      2. 1.2 The ECtHR’s Decision No access
          1. 1.3.1.1 Stereotypes and Prejudice at the Basis of the Law No access
          2. 1.3.1.2 Recognition Harms Flowing from the Ban No access
        2. 1.3.2 Participation No access
        3. 1.3.3 Redistribution No access
        4. 1.3.4 Transformation No access
        5. 1.3.5 Indirect Discrimination No access
        6. 1.3.6 The French Legislature’s Intent No access
        7. 1.3.7 Reasonable Accommodation No access
        8. 1.3.8 Intersectionality No access
        1. 1.4.1 The Margin of Appreciation No access
        2. 1.4.2 Balancing the Rights at Stake No access
      5. 1.5 Conclusion No access
      1. 2.1 Facts of the Case No access
      2. 2.2 The FCC’s Decision No access
        1. 2.3.1 Explicit Unequal Treatment No access
        2. 2.3.2 The Basic Law’s Egalitarian Concept of State Neutrality No access
        3. 2.3.3 Recognition No access
        4. 2.3.4 Participation No access
        5. 2.3.5 Redistribution No access
        6. 2.3.6 Transformation No access
        7. 2.3.7 Indirect Discrimination No access
        8. 2.3.8 Reasonable Accommodation No access
        9. 2.3.9 Intersectionality No access
      4. 2.4 Consequences for the Level of Scrutiny and the Balancing Process No access
      5. 2.5 Conclusion No access
      1. 1.1 The Comparative Perspective No access
      2. 1.2 Multidimensional Inequality No access
      3. 1.3 Indirect Discrimination No access
      4. 1.4 Reasonable Accommodation No access
      5. 1.5 Intersectionality No access
    2. 2 Liberty is not lex specialis to Equality No access
    3. 3 Liberty and Equality are not Antagonists No access
    4. 4 Outlook No access
  7. Bibliography No access 507 - 530
    1. UN Human Rights Committee No access
    2. European Court of Human Rights No access
    3. European Commission of Human Rights No access
    4. European Court of Justice No access
    5. Germany No access
    6. Canada No access
    7. United Kingdom No access
    8. United States No access
    9. South Africa No access

Bibliography (415)

  1. Bibliography Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  2. Abdelgadir A and Fouka V, ‘Political Secularism and Muslim Integration in the West: Assessing the Effects of the French Headscarf Ban’ (2020) 114 American Political Science Review 707 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  3. Adamietz L, Geschlecht als Erwartung (Nomos 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  4. Alfermann D, ‘Männlich – Weiblich – Menschlich: Androgynie’ in Ursula Pasero and Friederike Braun (eds), Konstruktion von Geschlecht (2nd edn, Centaurus 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  5. Ali S, ‘I am the “Veil Woman”: A Muslim Narrative’ in Anja Matwijkiw and Anna Oriolo (eds), Law, Cultural Studies and the “Burqa Ban” Trend: An Interdisciplinary Handbook (Intersentia 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  6. Alidadi K, ‘Reasonable Accommodations for Religion and Belief: Adding Value to Article 9 ECHR and the European Union’s Anti-Discrimination Approach to Employment’ (2012) 37 European Law Review 693 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  7. Alidadi K and Foblets MC, ‘Framing Multicultural Challenges in Freedom of Religion Terms’ (2012) 30 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 388, 415 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  8. Allport G, The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1954) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  9. Almquist EM, ‘Untangling the Effects of Race and Sex: The Disadvantaged Status of Black Women’ (1975) 56 Social Science Quarterly 129 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  10. Amir-Moazami S, ‘Dämonisierung und Einverleibung: Die „muslimische Frage“ in Europa’ in María do Mar Castro Varela and Paul Mecheril (eds) Die Dämonisierung der Anderen: Rassismuskritik der Gegenwart (transcript 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  11. Anidjar G, Semites: Race, Religion, Literature (Stanford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  12. Anti-Defamation League, ‘Pyramid of Hate’ (2018) <www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/pyramid-of-hate.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  13. Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes, Diskriminierung in Deutschland – Erfahrungen, Risiken und Fallkonstellationen (2021) <www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/BT_Bericht/gemeinsamer_bericht_vierter_2021.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  14. Arnardóttir OM, Equality and Non-Discrimination in the European Convention on Human Rights: Towards a Substantive Approach (The University of Edinburgh 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  15. Arnardóttir OM, Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  16. Arnardóttir OM, ‘The Differences that Make a Difference: Recent Developments on the Discrimination Grounds and the Margin of Appreciation under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2014) 4 Human Rights Law Review 647 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  17. Ashmore R and Del Boca F, ‘Sex Stereotypes and Implicit Personality Theory’ (1979) 5 Sex Roles Journal 219 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  18. Ateş S, ‘Das Kopftuch ist zur Waffe der Frau geworden’, (Emma, 1 September 2009) <www.emma.de/artikel/seyran-ates-das-kopftuch-ist-zur-waffe-geworden-264112> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  19. Athenstaedt U and Alfermann D, Geschlechterrollen und ihre Folgen (Kohlhammer 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  20. Atrey S, ‘Comparison in Intersectional Discrimination’ (2018) 38 Legal Studies 379 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  21. Atrey S, ‘Illuminating the CJEU’s Blind Spot of Intersectional Discrimination in Parris v Trinity College Dublin’ (2018) 47 Industrial Law Journal 278 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  22. Atrey S, Intersectional Discrimination (Oxford University Press 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  23. Attia I, Die “westliche Kultur“ und ihr Anderes: Zur Dekonstruktion von Orientalismus und antimuslimischem Rassismus (transcript 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  24. Attia I, ‘Islamkritik zwischen Orientalismus, Postkolonialismus und Postnationalsozialismus’ in Bülent Ucar (ed), Die Rolle der Religion im Integrationsprozess: Die deutsche Islamdebatte (Peter Lang 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  25. Attia I, ‘Privilegien sichern, nationale Identität revitalisieren: Gesellschafts- und handlungstheoretische Dimensionen der Theorie des antimuslimischen Rassismus im Unterschied zu Modellen von Islamophobie und Islamfeindlichkeit’ (2013) 21 Journal für Psychologie Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  26. Attia I, ‘Diskursverschränkungen des antimuslimischen Rassismus’ in Karim Fereidooni and Meral El (eds), Rassismuskritik und Widerstandsformen (Springer VS 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  27. Avenarius T, ‘Unsere Wut gilt nicht nur dem Kopftuchzwang’ (Süddeutsche Zeitung, 22 September 2022) <www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/iran-aufruhr-mahsa-amini-kopftuch-1.5661984?reduced=true>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  28. Baer S, Würde oder Gleichheit? Zur angemessenen grundrechtlichen Konzeption von Recht gegen Diskriminierung am Beispiel sexueller Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den USA (Nomos 1995) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  29. Baer S, ‘Geschlecht und Recht – zur rechtspolitischen Steuerung der Geschlechterverhältnisse’, in Michael Meuse and Claudia Neusüß (eds), Gender Mainstreaming: Konzepte – Handlungsfelder – Instrumente (Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  30. Baer S, ‘Ungleichheit der Gleichheiten? Zur Hierarchisierung von Diskriminierungsverboten’ in Eckart Klein and Christoph Menke (eds), Universalität – Schutzmechanismen – Diskriminierungsverbote: 15 Jahre Wiener Menschenrechtskonferenz (Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  31. Baer S, ‘Dignity, Liberty, Equality: A Fundamental Rights Triangle of Constitutionalism’ (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 417 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  32. Baer S, ‘Intersectional Discrimination and Fundamental Rights in Germany’ (2016) 43 Sociologia del Diritto 65 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  33. Baer S, Rechtssoziologie: Eine Einführung in die interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung (5th edn, Nomos 2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  34. Baer S and Wrase M, ‘Zwischen Integration und “westlicher” Emanzipation: Verfassungsrechtliche Perspektiven zum Kopftuch(-verbot) und der Gleichberechtigung’ (2006) 89 Kritische Vierteljahresschrift 401 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  35. Baer S and others, ‘Mehrdimensionale Diskriminierung: Begriffe, Theorien und juristische Analyse’ (Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes 2010) <www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/Expertisen/expertise_mehrdimensionale_diskriminierung_jur_analyse.pdf?__blob=publicationFile> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  36. Bahners P, ‘Kopftuch, Teil drei’ (FAZ, 5 July 2017) <www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/eilantrag-zurueckgewiesen-kein-kopftuch-auf-der-richterbank-15091193.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  37. Bakht N, ‘Veiled Objections: Facing Public Opposition to the Niqab’ in Lori Beaman (ed), Reasonable Accommodation: Managing Religious Diversity (UBC Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  38. Balibar E, ‘Gibt es einen „Neo-Rassismus?“’ in Étienne Balibar and Immanuel Wallerstein (eds), Rasse, Klasse, Nation (2nd edn, Argument 1992) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  39. Barak A, ‘Response to the Judge as Comparatist: Comparison in Public Law’ (2005) 80 Tulane Law Review 195 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  40. Barczak T, ‘“Zeig mir dein Gesicht, zeig mir, wer du wirklich bist” – Zur religionsverfassungsrechtlichen Zulässigkeit eines Burka-Verbots unter dem Grundgesetz’ (2011) 64 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 54 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  41. Barczak T, ‘Die Glaubens- und Gewissensfreiheit des Grundgesetzes Mit ihren verfassungsgeschichtlichen Grundlagen und konventionsrechtlichen Bezügen’ (2015) 37 Juristische Ausbildung 463 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  42. Barczak T, ‘Normenkonkurrenz und Normenkollision’ (2015) 55 Juristische Schulung 969 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  43. Barnard C and Hepple B, ‘Substantive Equality’ (2000) 59 Cambridge Law Journal 562 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  44. Barskanmaz C, ‘Das Kopftuch als das Andere. Eine notwendige postkoloniale Kritik des deutschen Rechtsdiskurses’ in Sabine Berghahn und Petra Rostock (eds), Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (transcript 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  45. Barskanmaz C, ‘Rasse – Unwort des Antidiskriminierungsrechts?’ (2011) 44 Kritische Justiz 382 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  46. Barskanmaz C, ‘Reading antidiscrimination law with Crenshaw, but without “Rasse”?’ in Gunda Werner Institute in the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung and Center for Intersectional Justice (eds), “Reach Everyone on the Planet...”: Kimberlé Crenshaw and Intersectionality (Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  47. Barskanmaz C, Recht und Rassismus: Das menschenrechtliche Verbot der Diskriminierung aufgrund der Rasse (Springer 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  48. Barskanmaz C and Samour N, ‘Das Diskriminierungsverbot aufgrund der Rasse’ (Verfassungsblog, 16 June 2020) <https://verfassungsblog.de/das-diskriminierungsverbot-aufgrund-der-rasse/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  49. Bausback W, ‘Die Religionsfreiheit neu denken’ (FAZ, 29 June 2016) <www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/winfried-bausback-religionsfreiheit-neu-denken-14541461.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_3> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  50. Bax D, ‘Muslimfeindlichkeit in Deutschland: Hassbriefe und Hakenkreuze’ (taz, 1 December 2023) <https://taz.de/Muslimfeindlichkeit-in-Deutschland/!5972673/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  51. Beaman L, ‘Conclusion: Alternatives to Reasonable Accommodation’ in Lori Beaman (ed), Reasonable Accommodation: Managing Religious Diversity (UBC Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  52. Beaman L, ‘Deep equality: moving beyond tolerance and accommodation’ (Luther College 2012) <www.luthercollege.edu/university/academics/impetus/winter-2012-impetus/deep-equality-moving-beyond-tolerance-and-accommodation> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  53. Bell M, ‘Leaving Religion at the Door? The European Court of Justice and Religious Symbols in the Workplace’ (2017) 17 Human Rights Law Review 784 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  54. Benn EKT and others, ‘Skin Bleaching Among African and Afro-Caribbean Women in New York City: Primary Findings from a P30 Pilot Study’ (2019) <www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522580/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  55. Bennett AM, ‘On Wearing the Kippa in Public – and in Public Service’ (Verfassungsblog, 28 May 2019) <https://verfassungsblog.de/on-wearing-the-kippa-in-public-and-in-public-service/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  56. Benvenisti E, ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards’ (1999) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 843 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  57. Berg W, Konkurrenzen schrankendivergenter Freiheitsrechte im Grundrechtsabschnitt des Grundgesetzes (Vahlen 1968) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  58. Berghahn S, ‘Die Kopftuchdebatte in Deutschland’ in Karim Fereidooni and Meral El (eds), Rassismuskritik und Widerstandsformen (Springer VS 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  59. Berghahn S, ‘Staatliche Neutralität zwischen religiösem Pluralismus und wohlfeilem Populismus: Ist ein Kopftuchverbot für Richterinnen und Rechtsreferendarinnen verfassungskonform?’ (2018) 51 Kritische Justiz 167 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  60. Berry S, ‘SAS v France: Does Anything Remain of the Right to Manifest Religion?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 2 July 2014) <www.ejiltalk.org/sas-v-france-does-anything-remain-of-the-right-to-manifest-religion/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  61. Berry S, ‘The UN Human Rights Committee Disagrees with the European Court of Human Rights Again: The Right to Manifest Religion by Wearing a Burqa’ (EJIL: Talk!, 3 January 2019) <www.ejiltalk.org/the-un-human-rights-committee-disagrees-with-the-european-court-of-human-rights-again-the-right-to-manifest-religion-by-wearing-a-burqa/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  62. Besson S, ‘Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the Twain Meet?’ (2008) 8 Human Rights Law Review 647 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  63. Bielefeldt H, ‘Freedom of Religion or Belief – A Human Right under Pressure’ (2012) 1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 15 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  64. Bielefeld H, ‘Foreword’ in David Kirkham (ed), State Responses to Minority Religions (Routledge 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  65. Bielefeld H, ‘Misperceptions of Freedom of Religion or Belief’ (2013) 35 Human Rights Quarterly 33 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  66. Bilge S, ‘Beyond Subordination vs. Resistance: An Intersectional Approach to the Agency of Veiled Muslim Women’ (2010) 31 Journal of Intercultural Studies 9 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  67. Böckenförde EW, ‘Das Kopftuch ist ein Stück Integration’ Süddeutsche Zeitung (17 July 2006) 6 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  68. Boll C and others, ‘Geschlechtsspezifische Berufswahl: Literatur- und Datenüberblick zu Einflussfaktoren, Anhaltspunkten struktureller Benachteiligung und Abbruchskosten’ (Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut 2015) <http://hdl.handle.net/10419/121251> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  69. Boos-Niazy G, ‘Ebenen der Muslimfeindlichkeit und des antimuslimischen Rassismus am Beispiel der Regelungen religiös konnotierter Kleidung’ (2023) <www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/DE/DIK/Themenschwerpunkte/Praevention/praevention_node.html#a_1530320_2> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  70. Borowsi M, Die Glaubens- und Gewissensfreiheit des Grundgesetzes (Mohr Siebeck 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  71. Breckwoldt M, Grundrechtskombinationen (Mohr Siebeck 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  72. Brems E, ‘S.A.S. v. France as a Problematic Precedent’ (Strasbourg Observers, 9 July 2014) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2014/07/09/s-a-s-v-france-as-a-problematic-precedent> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  73. Brems E and Timmer A (eds), Stereotypes and Human Rights Law (Intersentia 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  74. Brems E and others, ‘Head-Covering Bans in Belgian Courtrooms and Beyond: Headscarf Persecution and the Complicity of Supranational Courts’ (2017) 39 Human Rights Quarterly 882 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  75. Brettschneider C, ‘Why Trump’s Immigration Rules are Unconstitutional’ (Politico Magazine, 1 February 2017) <www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/why-trumps-immigration-rules-are-unconstitutional-214722/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  76. Bribosia E and others, ‘Reasonable Accommodation for Religious Minorities: A Promising Concept for European Antidiscrimination Law’ (2010) 17 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 137 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  77. Bribosia E and Rorive I, ‘Reasonable Accommodation Beyond Disability in Europe?’ (Office for Official Publications of the EU 2013) <https://op.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/d7715f13-cd38-428e-873b-e21b8c6ecb71> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  78. Britz G, ‘Das verfassungsrechtliche Dilemma doppelter Fremdheit: Islamische Bekleidungsvorschriften für Frauen und Grundgesetz’ (2003) 36 Kritische Justiz 95 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  79. Britz G, Einzelfallgerechtigkeit versus Generalisierung: Verfassungsrechtliche Grenzen statistischer Diskriminierung (Mohr Siebeck 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  80. Brosius-Gersdorf F and Gersdorf H, ‘Fehlverständnis des Neutralitätsgebots für den Staat’ (Verfassungsblog, 3 March 2020) <https://verfassungsblog.de/fehlverstaendnis-des-neutralitaetsgebots-fuer-den-staat/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  81. Brosius-Gersdorf F and Gersdorf H, ‘Kopftuchverbot für Rechtsreferendarin: Unanwendbarkeit des Neutralitätsgebots’ (2020) 39 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 428 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  82. Buchholz C, ‘Antimuslimischer Rassismus und Diskriminierung im Bundestag’ (Die Linke im Bundestag, 14 February 2020) <www.linksfraktion.de/themen/nachrichten/detail/antimuslimischer-rassismus-und-diskriminierung-von-muslimen-in-deutschland-1/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  83. Bühl A, Islamfeindlichkeit in Deutschland: Ursprünge Akteure Stereotype (VSA Verlag 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  84. Buncombe A, ‘Islamophobia even worse under Trump than after 9/11 attacks, says top Muslim activist’ (The Independent, 27 December 2017) <www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-islam-muslim-islamophobia-worse-911-says-leader-a8113686.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  85. von Campenhausen A, ‘Glaubens- und Bekenntnisfreiheit’ in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof, Handbuch des Staatsrechts, VII (3rd edn, CF Müller 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  86. Canadian Council of Muslim Women, ‘Women in Niqab Speak: A Study of the Niqab in Canada’ (2013) <www.ccmw.com/publications/2019/1/22/women-in-niqab-speak-a-study-of-the-niqab-in-canada> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  87. Carbado D and Crenshaw K, ‘An Intersectional Critique of Tiers of Scrutiny: Beyond “Either/Or” Approaches to Equal Protection’ (2019) 129 The Yale Law Journal Forum 108 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  88. Center for Intersectional Justice and European Network Against Racism, ‘Intersectional discrimination in Europe: relevance, challenges and ways forward’ (2020) <www.enar-eu.org/intersectionalityreport/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  89. Cervera J, ‘La larga historia del control de las faldas cortas y la ropa femenina’ (El Diario, 27 August 2016) <www.eldiario.es/sociedad/larga-historia-control-faldas-cortas_1_3858127.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  90. Chrisafis A, ‘Nicolas Sarkozy says Islamic veils are not welcome in France’ (The Guardian, 23 June 2009) <www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jun/22/islamic-veils-sarkozy-speech-france> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  91. Classen CD, ‘Anmerkung’ (2020) 75 Juristen Zeitung 417 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  92. Collectif contre l’Islamophobie en Belgique, ‘Existe-t-il une dimension sexiste dans les actes de l’islamophobie en Belgique?’ (8 March 2016) <https://fr.slideshare.net/CCIB/droits-des-femmes-et-dimension-sexiste-de-lislamophobie> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  93. Collins H, ‘Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 16 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  94. Collins H, ‘Justice for Foxes: Fundamental Rights and Justification of Indirect Discrimination’ in Hugh Collins and Tarunabh Khaitan (eds), Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  95. Collins H and Khaitan T, ‘Indirect Discrimination Law: Controversies and Critical Questions’ in Hugh Collins and Tarunabh Khaitan (eds), Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  96. Combahee River Collective, ‘A Black Feminist Statement’ in Cherríe Moraga and Gloria Anzaldúa (eds), This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (40th edn, SUNY Press 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  97. Conseil d’État, ‘Study of possible legal grounds for banning the full veil’ (30 March 2010) <www.conseil-etat.fr/publications-colloques/etudes/etude-relative-aux-possibilites-juridiques-d-interdiction-du-port-du-voile-integral> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  98. Cook R and Cusack S, Gender Stereotyping: Transnational Legal Perspectives (University of Pennsylvania Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  99. Corvino J and others, Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (Oxford University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  100. Cox N, Behind the Veil: A Critical Analysis of European Veiling Laws (Edward Elgar Publishing 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  101. Cremer H, ‘„…und welcher Rasse gehören Sie an?“: Zur Problematik des Begriffs „Rasse“ in der Gesetzgebung’ (2nd edn, Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  102. Cremer H, ‘Ein Grundgesetz ohne „Rasse“: Vorschlag für eine Änderung des Artikels 3 Grundgesetz’ (Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  103. Crenshaw K, ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’ (1989) University of Chicago Legal Forum 139 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  104. Crenshaw K, ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color’ (1991) 43 Stanford Law Review 1241 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  105. Crenshaw K, ‘Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward’ (2011) 43 Connecticut Law Review 1253 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  106. Crenschaw K, ‘Why Intersectionality Can’t Wait’ (The Washington Post, 24 September 2015) <www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2015/09/24/why-intersectionality-cant-wait/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  107. Crenshaw K, ‘The urgency of intersectionality’ (TEDWomen 2016) <www.ted.com/talks/kimberle_crenshaw_the_urgency_of_intersectionality/transcript#t-446548> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  108. Däubler W, ‘Was bedeutet Diskriminierung nach künftigem Recht?’ (2006) 37 Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 479 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  109. Day S and Brodsky G, ‘The Duty to Accommodate: Who Will Benefit?’ (1996) 75 Canadian Bar Review 433 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  110. de Féo A, Derriere le niqab: 10 ans d’enquête sur les femmes qui ont porté et enlevé le voile integral (Armand Colin 2020) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  111. Deckha M, ‘Is Culture Taboo: Feminism, Intersectionality, and Culture Talk in Law’ (2004) 16 Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 14 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  112. Degener T, ‘Angemessene Vorkehrungen’ in Anna Katharina Mangold and Mehrdad Payandeh (eds), Handbuch Antidiskriminierungsrecht: Strukturen, Rechtsfiguren und Konzepte (Mohr Siebeck 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  113. Deutsche Islam Konferenz, ‘Muslimisches Leben in Deutschland 2020’ (BAMF 2020) <www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Forschung/Forschungsberichte/fb38-muslimisches-leben.html?nn=282614> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  114. Deutsches Zentrum für Integrations- und Migrationsforschung, ‘Kopftuch und Arbeit?’ (DEZIM 2022) <www.dezim-institut.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Demo_FIS/publikation_pdf/FA-5433.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  115. Dörr O and others (eds), Dörr/Grote/Marauhn, EMRK/GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  116. Dörr O and others (eds), Dörr/Grote/Marauhn, EMRK/GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  117. Douglas Laycock, ‘Formal, Substantive, and Disaggregated Neutrality’ (1990) 39 DePaul Law Review 993 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  118. Dreier H, ‘Religion und Verfassungsstaat im Kampf der Kulturen’ in Horst Dreier and Eric Hilgendorf (eds), Kulturelle Identität als Grund und Grenze des Rechts: Akten der IVR-Tagung vom 28.-30. September 2006 in Würzburg (Nomos 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  119. Dreier H (ed), Dreier, Basic Law Commentary (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  120. Dreier H (ed), Dreier, Basic Law Commentary (4th edn, Mohr Siebeck 2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  121. Du Bois WEB, ‘The Negro and the Warsaw Ghetto’ in Phil Zuckerman (ed) Du Bois on Religion (Alta Mira Press 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  122. Durham WC, ‘State Reactions to Minority Religions: A Legal Overview’ in David Kirkham (ed) State Responses to Minority Religions (Routledge 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  123. Durham WC and Thayer DD (eds), Religion and Equality: Law in Conflict (Routledge 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  124. Dworkin R, ‘Rights as Trumps’ in Jeremy Waldron (ed), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press 1985) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  125. Dworkin R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1987) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  126. Dworkin R, Justice for Hedgehogs (Harvard University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  127. Eckertz-Höfer M, ‘Kein Kopftuch auf der Richterbank’ (2018) Zeitschrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  128. Eckes T, ‘Geschlechterstereotype’ in Ruth Becker and Beate Kortendiek (eds), Handbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung: Theorie, Methoden, Empirie (3rd edn, Springer 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  129. Eichenhofer E, ‘Angemessene Vorkehrungen als Diskriminierungsdimension im Recht: Menschenrechtliche Forderungen an das Allgemeine Gleichbehandlungsgesetz’ in Julia Druschel and others (eds), Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf Soziale Menschenrechte - Fachtagung des Promotionskollegs Soziale Menschenrechte am 11./12. April 2019 (Nomos 2020) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  130. Ely JH, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press 1980) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  131. Epping V and Hillgruber C (eds), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar: Grundgesetz (57 edn, CH Beck 2024) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  132. European Network Against Racism, ‘Forgotten Women: The impact of Islamophobia on Muslim Women’ (2016) <www.enar-eu.org/Forgotten-Women-the-impact-of-Islamophobia-on-Muslim-women> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  133. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, ‘Inequalities and multiple discrimination in access to and quality of healthcare’ (2013) <https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2013/inequalities-and-multiple-discrimination-access-and-quality-healthcare> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  134. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, ‘Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey: Muslims – Selected findings’ (2017) <https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2017-eu-minorities-survey-muslims-selected-findings_en.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  135. Evans C, ‘The “Islamic Scarf” in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law 52 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  136. Expert group on gender equality, social inclusion, health and long-term care, ‘Ethnic Minority and Roma Women in Europe: A case for Gender Equality?’ (European Commission 2008) <https://fnasat.centredoc.fr/doc_num.php?explnum_id=95> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  137. Farkas L and O’Farrel O, ‘Reversing the burden of proof: Practical dilemmas at the European and national level’ (European Commission 2014) <https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a763ee82-b93c-4df9-ab8c-626a660c9da8/language-en> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  138. Fehling M, ‘Mittelbare Diskriminierung und Art. 3 (Abs. 3) GG: Vom europäischen Recht lernen!?’ in Dirk Heckmann and others (eds), Verfassungsstaatlichkeit im Wandel: Festschrift für Thomas Würtenberger zum 70. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humblot 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  139. Finke J, ‘Warum das „Burka-Verbot“ gegen die EMRK verstößt’ (2010) 29 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 1127 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  140. Finke J, ‘Man bleibt halt gerne unter sich’ (JuWiss, 2 July 2014) <www.juwiss.de/84-2014/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  141. Fischer T, ‘Vor dem Gesetz ist jeder Glaube gleich’ (SPIEGEL, 2 March 2020) <www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/kopftuch-urteil-vom-bundesverfassungsgericht-hauptsache-neutral-kolumne-a-7be575a3-4804-4c47-8402-c0aac93045f7> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  142. Fornerod A, ‘The Burqa Affair in France’ in Alessandro Ferrari and Sabrina Pastorelli (eds), The Burqa Affair Across Europe: Between Public and Private Space (Routledge 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  143. France A, Le Lys Rouge (Calmann-Lévy 1894) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  144. Franklin C, ‘The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law’ (2010) 85 NYU Law Review 83 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  145. Fraser N, ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation’ in Charles Taylor, ‘The Politics of Recognition’ Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth (eds), Redistribution or Recognition? (Verso 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  146. Fraser N, ‘Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World’ in Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin (ed), Jahrbuch 2004/2005 (2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  147. Fredman S, ‘A Difference with Distinction: Pregnancy and Parenthood Reassessed’ (1994) 110 LQR 106 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  148. Fredman S, ‘Reversing Discrimination’ (1997) 113 Law Quarterly Review 575 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  149. Fredman S, ‘Redistribution and Recognition: Reconciling Inequalities’ (2007) 23 South African Journal on Human Rights 214 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  150. Fredman S, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  151. Fredman S, Discrimination Law (2nd edition, Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  152. Fredman S, ‘Foreign Fads or Fashions: The Role of Comparativism in Human Rights Law’ (2015) 64 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 631 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  153. Fredman S, ‘Intersectional Discrimination in EU Gender Equality and Non-discrimination Law’ (European Commission 2016) <https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d73a9221-b7c3-40f6-8414-8a48a2157a2f> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  154. Fredman S, ‘Substantive Equality Revisited’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 712 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  155. Fredman S, ‘Substantive Equality Revisited: A Rejoinder to Catharine MacKinnon’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 747 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  156. Fredman S, ‘The Reason Why: Unravelling Indirect Discrimination’ (2016) 45 Industrial Law Journal 231 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  157. Fredman S, Comparative Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  158. Fredman S, ‘Direct and Indirect Discrimination: Is There Still a Divide?’ in Hugh Collins and Tarunabh Khaitan (eds), Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  159. Fredman S, Discrimination Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  160. Frings D, ‘Diskriminierung aufgrund der islamischen Religionszugehörigkeit im Kontext Arbeitsleben – Erkenntnisse, Fragen und Handlungsempfehlungen’ (Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes 2010) <www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/Expertisen/expertise_diskr_aufgrund_islam_religionszugehoerigkeit_rechtswissenschaftlich.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  161. Froio C, ‘Race, Religion, or Culture? Framing Islam between Racism and Neo-Racism in the Online Network of the French Far Right’ (2018) 16 Perspectives on Politics 696 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  162. Gärditz KF, ‘Ein Bundesverfassungsgericht des Ressentiments’ (Legal Tribune Online, 27 February 2020) <www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/bverfg-2bvr1333-17-kopftuch-referendarin-islam-religion-neutralitaet-ressentiment/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  163. Gärditz KF and Abdulsalam MK, ‘Allgemeines „Kopftuchverbot“ durch die Hintertür?’ (Verfassungsblog, 2 April 2021) <verfassungsblog.de/allgemeines-kopftuchverbot-durch-die-hintertur/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  164. Gardner J, ‘Liberals and Unlawful Discrimination’ (1989) 9 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  165. Gerards J, Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases (Martinus Nijhoff 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  166. Gibson M, ‘The God “Dilution”: Religion, Discrimination and the Case for Reasonable Accommodation’ (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal 578 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  167. Goldberg S, ‘Discrimination by Comparison’ (2011) 120 Yale Law Journal 728 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  168. Gordon RJF and others, The Strasbourg Case Law: Leading Cases from the European Human Rights Reports (Sweet & Maxwell 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  169. Griffin J, On Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  170. Grillo R and Shah P, ‘The Anti-Burqa Movement in Western Europe’ in Alessandro Ferrari and Sabrina Pastorelli (eds), The Burqa Affair Across Europe: Between Public and Private Space (Routledge 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  171. Grillo T, ‘Anti-Essentialism and Intersectionality: Tools to Dismantle the Master’s House’ (1995) 10 Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 16 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  172. Grünberger M and others (eds), Diversität in Rechtswissenschaft und Rechtspraxis: Ein Essay (Nomos 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  173. van Gulik G, ‘Headscarves: The Wrong Battle: Excluding Muslim Women Who Wear Headscarves from the Public Sphere Does Nothing for Gender Equality or Peaceful Integration’ (Human Rights Watch 14 March 2009) <www.hrw.org/news/2009/03/14/headscarves-wrong-battle> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  174. Gurol S, ‘Challenging Gender Stereotyping before the ECtHR: Case of Carvalho Pinto v. Portugal’ (EJIL: Talk!, 21 September 2017) <www.ejiltalk.org/challenging-gender-stereotyping-before-the-ecthr-case-of-carvalho-pinto-v-portugal/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  175. Habermas J, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (MIT Press 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  176. Halliday F, ‘“Islamophobia” Reconsidered’ (1999) 22 Ethnic and Racial Studies 892 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  177. Halrynjo S and Jonker M, ‘Naming and Framing of Intersectionality in Hijab Cases – Does It Matter? An Analysis of Discrimination Cases in Scandinavia and the Netherlands’ (2016) 23 Gender, Work and Organization 278 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  178. Hammarberg T, ‘Human rights in Europe: no grounds for complacency’ (Council of Europe Publishing 2011) <https://rm.coe.int/human-rights-in-europe-no-grounds-for-complacency-compilation-of-viewp/16808d2513> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  179. Haupt C, Religion-State Relations in the United States and Germany. The Quest for Neutrality (Cambridge University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  180. Haverkort-Speekenbrink S, European Non-Discrimination Law: A Comparison of EU Law and the ECHR in the Field of Non-discrimination and Freedom of Religion in Public Employment with an Emphasis on the Islamic Headscarf Issue (Intersentia 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  181. Hecker W, ‘Das BVerfG, das Kopftuchverbot im Justizbereich und die Folgen für die öffentliche Verwaltung’ (2020) 39 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 423 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  182. Hegel GWF, Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  183. Heinig HM, ‘Säkular, aber nicht säkularistisch’ (FAZ, 8 January 2018) <www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/die-gegenwart/der-deutsche-staat-muss-seine-religionsneutralitaet-ueberdenken-15378888.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  184. Henrard K, ‘Duties of Reasonable Accommodation on Grounds of Religion in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: A Tale of (Baby) Steps Forwards and Missed Opportunities’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 961 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  185. Hepple B, ‘Discrimination and Equality of Opportunity – Northern Irish Lessons’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 408 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  186. Hepple B, ‘The aims of equality law’ (2008) 61 Current Legal Problems 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  187. Hernandez Aguilar LM and Zubair A, ‘Persistence of Eurocentric Orders and Divisions: Reflections on “Postcolonial Scholarship” and the Disentanglement of “Race” and “Religion”’ (2017) 8 InterDisciplines: Journal of History and Sociology 123 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  188. Herzog R and others (eds), Dürig/Herzog/Scholz, Basic Law Commentary (CH Beck 2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  189. Heß R, Grundrechtskonkurrenzen: zugleich ein Beitrag zur Normstruktur der Freiheitsrechte (Duncker & Humblot 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  190. Hoffmann J, ‘Die Feststellung mittelbarer Diskriminierung’ in Reinhard Bork and others (eds), Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 214 (Mohr Siebeck 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  191. Hofmann E, ‘Grundrechtskombinationen in der Fallbearbeitung – Konkurrenzen, Kollisionen, Verstärkungswirkungen’ (2008) 30 Juristische Ausbildung 667 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  192. Hofmann E, ‘Grundrechtskonkurrenz oder Schutzbereichsverstärkung? Die Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zum „additiven“ Grundrechtseingriff’ (2008) 133 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 523 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  193. Holzleithner E, ‘Gendergleichheit und Mehrfachdiskriminierung: Herausforderungen für das Europarecht’ in Kathrin Arioli and others (eds), Wandel der Geschlechterverhältnisse durch Recht? (Nomos 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  194. Holzleithner E, ‘Intersecting Grounds of Discrimination: Women, Headscarves and Other Variants of Gender Performance’ (2008) Juridikum 33 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  195. Holzleithner E, ‘Die Situation von Muslimen, insbesondere von muslimischen Frauen in Österreich‘ in Österreichische Juristenkommission (ed), Diskriminierung in der Schweiz und in Österreich: Kritik und Fortschritt im Rechtsstaat Band 45 (Linde Verlag 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  196. Holzleithner E, ‘Gender Equality and Physical Requirements in Employment’ (2017) European Equality Law Review 13 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  197. Holzleithner E, ‘Zum Verbot der Gesichtsverhüllung in Österreich – eine rechtliche Farce’ (2018) 27 Femina Politica 127 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  198. Holzleithner E, ‘Intersektionale (mehrdimensionale) Diskriminierung’ in Anna Katharina Mangold and Mehrdad Payandeh (eds), Handbuch Antidiskriminierungsrecht: Strukturen, Rechtsfiguren und Konzepte (Mohr Siebeck 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  199. Honneth A, ‘Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser’ in Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth (eds), Redistribution or Recognition? (Verso 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  200. Hörnle T, ‘Warum Vertrauen in die Neutralität der Justiz ein schützenswertes Verfassungsgut ist’ (Verfassungsblog, 15 January 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/warum-vertrauen-in-die-neutralitaet-der-justiz-ein-schuetzenswertes-verfassungsgut-ist/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  201. Howard E, ‘Bans on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in British Schools: A Violation of the Right to Non-Discrimination?’ (2011) 6 Religion & Human Rights 127 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  202. Howard E, ‘Banning Islamic Veils: Is Gender Equality a Valid Argument?’ (2012) 12 International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 147 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  203. Howard E, ‘S.A.S. v France: Living Together or Increased Social Division’ (EJIL: Talk!, 7 July 2014) <www.ejiltalk.org/s-a-s-v-france-living-together-or-increased-social-division/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  204. Huber PM and Voßkuhle A (eds), Huber/Voßkuhle, Basic Law Commentary (8th edn, CH Beck w in2024) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  205. Hübsch KM, ‘Frauen im Islam: Die Religion ist nicht das Problem’ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 12 April 2011) <www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/frauen-im-islam-die-religion-ist-nicht-das-problem-1625364.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  206. Hull G and others (eds), All the Women Are White, all the Blacks Are Men, but Some of Us Are Brave: Black Women’s Studies (The Feminist Press 1982) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  207. Human Rights Centre of Ghent University, ‘Wearing the Face Veil in Belgium: Views and Experiences of 27 Women Living in Belgium concerning the Islamic Full Face Veil and the Belgian Ban on Face Covering’ <www.hrc.ugent.be/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/face-veil-report-hrc.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  208. Hunter-Henin M, ‘Why the French Don’t Like the Burqa: Laïcité, National Identity and Religious Freedom’ (2012) 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 613 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  209. Hunter-Henin M, ‘Living Together in an Age of Religious Diversity: Lessons from Baby Loup and SAS’ (2015) 4 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 94 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  210. Huq A, ‘What is Discriminatory Intent?’ (2018) 103 Cornell Law Review 1211 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  211. Ibold S, ‘Bei Burka und Nikab hört die Toleranz auf: Kritische Anmerkungen zum Urteil S.A.S. v. France’ (2015) 48 Kritische Justiz 83 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  212. Ibold S, ‘Unveiling Judicial Neutrality: Do Headscarves belong in German Courtrooms?’ (Oxford Human Rights Hub, 4 June 2018) <https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/unveiling-judicial-neutrality-do-headscarves-belong-in-german-courtrooms/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  213. Ibold S, ‘Burkaverbot im Hörsaal: Zwang zur „offenen Kommunikation“ statt Grundrechtsschutz?’ (JuWiss, 27 February 2019) <www.juwiss.de/30-2019/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  214. Ibold S, ‘Richterliche Zurückhaltung gegenüber diskriminierenden Vorurteilen’ (JuWiss, 2 March 2020) <www.juwiss.de/16-2020/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  215. Ibold S and Oeter S, ‘Conflicting Human Rights Perspectives on the French Burqa Ban. European Court of Human Rights vs. UN Human Rights Committee’ in Anja Matwijkiw and Anna Oriolo (eds), Law, Cultural Studies and the “Burqa Ban” Trend: An Interdisciplinary Handbook (Intersentia 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  216. Institut for Tværkulturelle og Regionale Studier ‘Rapport um brugen af niqab og burka’ (University of Copenhagen 2009) <https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/library-document/rapport-om-brugen-af-niqab-og-burka-0_de> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  217. Jarass H and Kment M (eds), Jarass/Pieroth, Basic Law Commentary (17th edn, CH Beck 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  218. Jegher S and Fischer R, ‘Kleidervorschriften, die Religionsfreiheit und das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Frauen’ (2010) 31 Olympe: Feministische Arbeitshefte zur Politik 42 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  219. Jessen F and von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff U, ‘Das Kopftuch – Entschleierung eines Symbols?’ (Konrad Adenauer Stiftung 2006) <www.kas.de/de/zukunftsforum-politik/detail/-/content/das-kopftuch-entschleierung-eines-symbols-1> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  220. Karakaşoğlu Y, ‘Stellungnahme zu den Motiven von jungen Musliminnen in Deutschland für das Anlegen eines Kopftuches’ (28 May 2003) <https://nafisa.de/sites/default/files/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/karakasoglu_gutachten_kopftuch.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  221. Karpenstein U and Mayer F (eds), Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten – Kommentar (3rd edn, CH Beck 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  222. Kellogg FR, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint (Cambridge University Press 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  223. Khaitan T, A Theory of Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  224. Kimber C, ‘Equality or Self-determination?’ in Conor Gearty and Adam Tomkins (eds), Understanding Human Rights (Mansell 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  225. Kimmich D, ‘Einleitung’, in Dorothee Kimmich and others (eds), Was ist Rassismus? Kritische Texte (Reclam 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  226. Kischel U, ‘Anmerkung’ (2008) 63 Juristen Zeitung 1110 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  227. Kischel U, ‘Rasse, Rassismus und Grundgesetz’ (2020) 145 Archiv des Öffentlichen Rechts 227 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  228. Klatt M, Das Sondervotum beim Bundesverfassungsgericht (Mohr Siebeck 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  229. Knights S, ‘Face Veils and the Law: A Critical Reflection’ (2016) 25 Nottingham Law Journal 97 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  230. Kohleiss A, ‘Frauen in und vor der Justiz: Der lange Weg zu den Berufen der Rechtspflege’ (1988) 71 Kritische Vierteljahresschrift 115 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  231. Kokott J and Mager U (eds), Religionsfreiheit und Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter: Spannungen und Ungelöste Konflikte (Mohr Siebeck 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  232. Kukuczka C and Herbolsheimer V, ‘Von der zunehmenden Dogmatisierung verfassungstheoretischer Postulate’ (2020) 73 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 724 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  233. L’Heureux-Dube C, ‘The Importance of Dialogue: Globalization and the International Impact of the Rehnquist Court’ (1998) 34 Tulsa Law Journal 15 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  234. Laborde C, ‘State Paternalism and Religious Dress’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 398 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  235. Legg A, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  236. Leijten I, Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  237. Leiter B, Why Tolerate Religion? (Princeton University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  238. Leitmeier L, ‘Das Kopftuchverbot für Rechtsreferendarinnen’ (2020) 73 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1036 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  239. Lembke U, ‘Burka-Verbot: Der EGMR verkürzt den menschenrechtlichen Diskriminierungsschutz in Europa’ (JuWiss, 9 July 2014) <www.juwiss.de/87-2014/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  240. Lembke U, ‘Religionsfreiheit und Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter’ in Ulrike Lembke (ed), Menschenrechte und Geschlecht (Nomos 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  241. Lenarz J, ‘The Burka: Trapped in a Mobile Prison’ (The Times of Israel, 18 September 2013) <https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-burkatrapped-in-a-mobile-prison/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  242. Liebenberg S, ‘Grootboom and the seduction of the negative/positive rights dichotomy’ (2011) 26 South African Public Law 37 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  243. Liebscher D, Rasse im Recht – Recht gegen Rassismus: Genealogie einer ambivalenten rechtlichen Kategorie (Suhrkamp 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  244. Limbach J, ‘Die Akzeptanz verfassungsgerichtlicher Entscheidungen’ in Jürgen Brand (ed), Soziologie des Rechts: Festschrift für Erhard Blankenburg zum 60. Geburtstag (Nomos 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  245. Lippert-Rasmussen K, ‘Indirect Discrimination, Affirmative Action and Relational Egalitarianism’ in Hugh Collins and Tarunabh Khaitan (eds), Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  246. Loenen T, ‘A Symbol of Intersectionality in Legal Discourse: The Headscarf Enigma’ in Dagmar Schiek and Victoria Chege (eds), European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law (Routledge 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  247. Logel C and others, ‘Unleashing Latent Ability: Implications of Stereotype Threat for College Admissions (2012) 47 Educational Psychologist 42 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  248. Looschelders D (ed), Beck-online Großkommentar: AGG (CH Beck 2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  249. Lorde A, ‘There is no Hierarchy of Oppressions’ (1983) 14 Interracial books for children bulletin: homophobia and education 9 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  250. Lorde A, ‘Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference’ in Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches (Crossing Press 1984) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  251. MacKinnon C, Sexual Harassment of Working Women (Yale University Press 1979) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  252. MacKinnon C, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Harvard University Press 1987) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  253. MacKinnon C, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press 1989) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  254. MacKinnon C, Only Words (Harvard University Press 1993) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  255. MacKinnon C, ‘Substantive Equality: A Perspective’ (2011) 96 Minnesota Law Review 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  256. MacKinnon C, ‘Substantive Equality Revisited: A Reply to Sandra Fredman’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 739 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  257. MacKinnon C, ‘Three Crises, or Saving the World’, German Law Journal (forthcoming) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  258. MacKinnon C and Crenshaw K, ‘Reconstituting the Future: An Equality Amendment’ (2019) 129 The Yale Law Journal Forum 343 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  259. Maher J, Manifesting Religious Belief: A Matter of Religious Freedom, Religious Discrimination, or Freedom of Expression? (DPhil thesis, University of Oxford 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  260. Mancini L, ‘Burqa, Nicab and Women’s Rights’ in Alessandro Ferrari and Sabrina Pastorelli (eds), The Burqa Affair Across Europe (Routledge 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  261. Mangold AK, ‘Justitias Dresscode: Wie das BVerfG Neutralität mit „Normalität“ verwechselt’ (Verfassungsblog, 6 July 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/justitias-dresscode-wie-das-bverfg-neutralitaet-mit-normalitaet-verwechselt/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  262. Mangold AK, ‘Für sichtbare demokratische Vielfalt in deutschen Gerichten’ (2018) Zeitschrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes 10 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  263. Mangold AK, ‘Repräsentation von Frauen und Minderheiten als Problem der Demokratietheorie’ in Marion Eckertz-Höfer and Margarete Schuler-Harms (eds), Gleichberechtigung und Demokratie – Gleichberechtigung in der Demokratie: (Rechts-)Wissenschaftliche Annäherungen (Nomos 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  264. Mangold AK, ‘Justitias Dresscode, zweiter Akt’ (Verfassungsblog, 27 February 2020) <https://verfassungsblog.de/justitias-dresscode-zweiter-akt/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  265. Mangold AK, Demokratische Inklusion durch Recht: Antidiskriminierungsrecht als Ermöglichungsbedingung der demokratischen Begegnung von Freien und Gleichen (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  266. Mangold AK and Payandeh M, ‘Diskriminierungsschutz und unternehmerische Freiheit im Unionsrecht: Anmerkungen zu den Urteilen des EuGH v. 14.3.2017 in den Rs. C-157/15 (Achbita) und C-188/15 (Bougnaoui)’ (2017) 52 Euoparecht 620 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  267. Markard N, ‘Die andere Frage stellen: Intersektionalität als Analysekategorie im Recht’ (2009) 42 Kritische Justiz 353 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  268. Markard N, ‘Private but equal? Why the right to privacy will not bring full equality for same-sex couples’ in Günter Frankenberg (ed), Order from Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture (Edward Elgar Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  269. Markard N, ‘Struktur und Teilhabe: Zur gleichheitsdogmatischen Bedeutung der “dritten Option”’ (Verfassungsblog, 14 November 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/struktur-und-teilhabe-zur-gleichheitsdogmatischen-bedeutung-der-dritten-option/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  270. Marshall J, ‘Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey’ (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 452 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  271. McAuley J, ‘France mandates masks to control the coronavirus. Burqas remain banned.’ (The Washington Post, 10 May 2020) <www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/france-face-masks-coronavirus/2020/05/09/6fbd50fc-8ae6-11ea-80df-d24b35a568ae_story.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  272. McCall L, ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’ (2005) 30 Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1171 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  273. McColgan A, ‘Class Wars? Religion and (In)Equality in the Workplace’ (2009) 38 Industrial Law Journal 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  274. McCrudden C, ‘Changing Notions of Discrimination’ in Stephen Guest and Alan Milne (eds), Equality and Discrimination: Essays in Freedom and Justice’ (Steiner 1985) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  275. McCrudden C, Equality in Law Between Men and Women in the European Community (Martinus Nijhoff 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  276. McCrudden C ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 655 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  277. McCrudden C, Litigating Religions: An Essay on Human Rights, Courts, and Beliefs (Oxford University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  278. Meck G, ‘Debatte ums Betreuungsgeld: Herdprämie’ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 21 April 2021) <www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/debatte-ums-betreuungsgeld-herdpraemie-11725961.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  279. Meer N, ‘Racialization and Religion: Race, Culture and Difference in the Study of Antisemitism and Islamophobia’ (2013) 36 Ethnic and Racial Studies 385 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  280. Meer N and Modood T, ‘The Racialisation of Muslims’ in Salman Sayyid and Abdoolkarim Vakil (eds), Thinking Through Islamophobia: Global Perspectives (Columbia University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  281. Meyer-Ladewig J and others (eds), EMRK, ECHR Commentary (5th edn, CH Beck 2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  282. Mill JS, On Liberty – Edited by Stefan Collini (Cambridge University Press 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  283. Millgramm KH, Separate Opinion und Sondervotum in der Rechtsprechung des Supreme Court of the United States und des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Duncker & Humblot 1985) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  284. Mitchell AM and Powell EJ, Domestic Law Goes Global: Legal Traditions and International Courts (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  285. Modood T, Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea (Polity 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  286. Möllers C, ‘Das Gesicht und die Freiheit’ (Süddeutsche Zeitung, 5 September 2016) <www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/debatte-das-burka-verbot-das-gesicht-und-die-freiheit-1.3147602> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  287. Moreau S, ‘Equality Rights and the Relevance of Comparator Groups’ (2006) 5 Journal of Law and Equality 81 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  288. Moreau S, ‘The Moral Seriousness of Indirect Discrimination’ in Hugh Collins and Tarunabh Khaitan (eds), Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  289. Möschel M, Law, Lawyers and Race: Critical Race Theory from the United States to Europe (Routledge 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  290. Muckel S, ‘Schutz von Religion und Weltanschauung’ in Detlef Merten and Hans-Jürgen Papier, Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, IV (CF Müller 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  291. von Münch I and Kunig P (eds), von Münch/Kunig, Basic Law Commentary (7th edn, CH Beck 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  292. Nejaime D and Siegel RB, ‘Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics’ (2015) 124 The Yale Law Journal 2516 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  293. Nielsen J (ed), Muslim Political Participation in Europe (Edinburgh University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  294. Nussbaum M, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge University Press 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  295. Nussbaum M, Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America’s Tradition of Religious Equality (Basic Books 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  296. Nussbaum M, ‘Veiled Threats?’ (The New York Times, 11 July 2010) <https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/veiled-threats/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  297. Nußberger A, ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion’ in Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack and others, Religion and International Law: Living Together (Brill 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  298. Oestreich H, Der Kopftuch-Streit: das Abendland und ein Quadratmeter Islam (Brandes & Apsel 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  299. Open Society Foundations, ‘Muslime in Europa’ (2010) <www.opensocietyfounda-tions.org/uploads/833432b2-d368-4e35-9f14-7dd262b36499/g-muslims-in-europe-german-20110519_0.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  300. Open Society Foundations, ‘Unveiling the Truth: Why 32 Muslim Women Wear the Full-face Veil in France’ (2011) <https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/unveiling-truth-why-32-muslim-women-wear-full-face-veil-france#publications_download> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  301. Ouald Chaib S, ‘S.A.S. v. France: A short summary of an interesting hearing’ (Strasbourg Observers, 29 November 2013) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2013/11/29/s-a-s-v-france-a-short-summary-of-an-interesting-hearing/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  302. Ouald Chaib S, ‘ECJ Headscarf Series (6): The Vicious Circle of Prejudices Against Muslim Women’ (Strasbourg Observers, 20 September 2016) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2016/09/20/ecj-headscarf-series-6-the-vicious-circle-of-prejudices-against-muslim-women/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  303. Ouald Chaib S and Peroni L, ‘S.A.S. v. France: Missed Opportunity to Do Full Justice to Women Wearing a Face Veil’ (Strasbourg Observers, 3 July 2014) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2014/07/03/s-a-s-v-france-missed-opportunity-to-do-full-justice-to-women-wearing-a-face-veil/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  304. Parker R and Aggleton P, ‘HIV and AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination: A Conceptual Framework and Implications for Action’ (2003) 57 Social Science & Medicine 13 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  305. Payandeh M, ‘Das Kopftuch der Richterin aus verfassungsrechtlicher Perspektive’ (2018) 71 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 482 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  306. Pei S, ‘Unveiling Inequality: Burqa Bans and Nondiscrimination Jurisprudence at the European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 122 Yale Law Journal 1089 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  307. Penny L, ‘Angela Merkel’s Burqa Ban is Sexist, Racist and Wrong’ (New Statesman, 7 December 2016) <www.newstatesman.com/world/2016/12/angela-merkels-burqa-ban-sexist-racist-and-wrong> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  308. Perolini M, ‘Requiring face masks to fight COVID-19 while upholding niqab bans shows irony lost on leaders’ (euronews, 25 May 2020) <www.euronews.com/2020/05/25/requiring-face-masks-to-fight-covid-19-upholding-niqab-bans-shows-irony-lost-on-lead-view> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  309. Peroni L, ‘Age and Gender Discrimination: Laudable Anti-Stereotyping Reasoning in Carvalho Pinto v. Portugal’ (Strasbourg Observers, 28 September 2017) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2017/09/28/age-and-gender-discrimination-laudable-anti-stereotyping-reasoning-in-carvalho-pinto-v-portugal/#more-3897> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  310. Pfündel K and Stichs A, ‘BAMF-Kurzanalyse: Interreligiosität und interreligiöse Offenheit von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund aus muslimisch geprägten Herkunftsländern’ (BAMF 2023) <www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Forschung/Kurzanalysen/kurzanalyse2-2023-interreligiositaet.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=13> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  311. Power-Forde A, ‘Freedom of Religion and “Reasonable Accommodation” in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2016) 5 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 575 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  312. Rath C, ‘Richter als Integrationshindernis’ (taz, 4 Juy 2017) <http://www.taz.de/Kommentar-Kopftuch-Urteil/!5423012/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  313. Raz J, ‘On the Value of Distributional Equality’ Oxford University Legal Research Paper Series No 41/2008 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1288545> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  314. Reßing M, Die Grundrechtskonkurrenz: Kohärenz im freiheitsrechtlichen System des Grundgesetzes (Nomos 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  315. Rhode D, ‘The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law’ (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  316. Rodriguez Martinez M and Sarno V, ‘Has COVID-19 destroyed the case for banning the burqa in Europe?’ (euronews, 23 September 2020) <www.euronews.com/2020/09/23/has-covid-19-destroyed-the-case-for-banning-the-burqa-in-europe> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  317. Röhner C, Ungleichheit und Verfassung: Vorschlag für eine relationale Rechtsanalyse (Velbrück Wissenschaft 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  318. Rohrer B, Beziehungen der Grundrechte untereinander (Schulthess Polygraph 1982) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  319. Roig E and Barskanmaz C, ‘La République gegen Rasse’ (Verfassungsblog, 22 May 2013) <https://verfassungsblog.de/la-republique-against-race/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  320. Rommelspacher B, ‘Feminismus und kulturelle Dominanz. Kontroversen um die Emanzipation der muslimischen Frau’ in Sabine Berghahn and Petra Rostock (eds), Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (transcript 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  321. Roseberry L, ‘A Symbol of Intersectionality in Legal Discourse: The Headscarf Enigma’ in Dagmar Schiek and Victoria Chege (eds), European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law (Routledge 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  322. Rössler B, Autonomie: Ein Versuch über das gelungene Leben (Suhrkamp 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  323. Runnymede Trust, ‘Islamophobia – Still a challenge for us all’ (Runnymede 2017) <https://assets-global.website-files.com/61488f992b58e687f1108c7c/61bcd30e26cca7688f7a5808_Islamophobia%20Report%202018%20FINAL.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  324. Russell K and others, The Color Complex. The Politics of Skin Color among African Americans (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1992) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  325. Rusteberg B, ‘Kopftuchverbote als Mittel zur Abwehr nicht existenter Gefahren’ (2015) 70 Juristen Zeitung 637 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  326. Rusteberg B, ‘Normative Selbstvergewisserung der liberalen Gesellschaft durch symbolische Gesetzgebung’ (JuWiss, 30 April 2015) <www.juwiss.de/40-2015/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  327. Sachs M, ‘Gleichheitssätze „in Verbindung mit“ anderen Vorschriften’ in Simon Kempny and Phillip Reimer (eds), Gleichheitssatzdogmatik heute (Mohr Siebeck 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  328. Sachs M (ed), Sachs, Basic Law Commentary (8th edn, CH Beck 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  329. Sachs M (ed), Sachs, Basic Law Commentary (9th edn, CH Beck 2021) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  330. Sacksofsky U, Das Grundrecht auf Gleichberechtigung: Eine rechtsdogmatische Untersuchung zu Artikel 3 Absatz 2 des Grundgesetzes (2nd edn, Nomos 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  331. Sacksofsky U, ‘Grundrechtsdogmatik ade – Zum neuen Doppelnamen-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (2002) 8 Familie Partnerschaft Recht 121 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  332. Sacksofsky U, ‘Rolle der Religion im liberalen Staat’ (2004) STREIT 103 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  333. Sacksofsky U, ‘Religion and Equality – The Headscarf Debate from a Constitutional Perspective’ in Dagmar Schiek and Victoria Chege (eds), European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law (Routledge 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  334. Sacksofsky U, ‘Religiöse Freiheit als Gefahr?’ (2009) 68 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 7 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  335. Sacksofsky U, ‘Mittelbare Diskriminierung und das Allgemeine Gleichbehandlungsgesetz’ (Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes 2010) <www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/Expertisen/expertise_mittelbare_diskriminierung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  336. Sacksofsky U, ‘Was heißt Ungleichbehandlung “wegen”?’ in Simon Kempny and Phillip Reimer (eds), Gleichheitssatzdogmatik heute (Mohr Siebeck 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  337. Sacksofsky U, ‘Gegen ein Kopftuchverbot für Richterinnen’ (2018) Zeitschrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes 8 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  338. Samour N, ‘Rechtsreferendarin mit Kopftuch: Rosa Parks im Zuschauerraum des Gerichts’ (Verfassungsblog, 7 July 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/rechtsreferendarin-mit-kopftuch-rosa-parks-im-zuschauerraum-des-gerichts/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  339. Samour N, ‘Die erkennbare Muslimin als Richterin’ (2018) Zeitschrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes 12 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  340. Sandhu A, ‘Der „Anschein der Neutralität“ als schützenswertes Verfassungsgut?’ (Verfassungsblog, 9 January 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/der-anschein-der-neutralitaet-als-schuetzenswertes-verfassungsgut/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  341. Sandhu A, ‘Gleichmacherei statt Gleichheit’ (Verfassungsblog, 28 February 2020) <https://verfassungsblog.de/gleichmacherei-statt-gleichheit/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  342. Sandhu A, ‘Justizneutralitätsgesetze als Exklusionsmechanismen’ in Elisabeth Dux and others (eds), Frau.Macht.Recht. 100 Jahre Frauen in juristischen Berufen (Nomos 2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  343. Sarrazin T, Feindliche Übernahme: Wie der Islam den Fortschritt behindert und die Gesellschaft bedroht (FinanzBuch Verlag 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  344. Sauer B, ‘Migration, Geschlecht, Gewalt: Überlegungen zu einem intersektionellen Gewaltbegriff’ (2011) 3 GENDER - Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft 44 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  345. Schabas W, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  346. Schadendorf S, ‘(Un-)Verschleierte Diskriminierung’ (JuWiss, 9 July 2014) <www.juwiss.de/88-2014/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  347. Scherr A, ‘Diskriminierung/Antidiskriminierung – Begriffe und Grundlagen’ (2016) 66 Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  348. Schiek D, ‘Just a piece of cloth? German Courts and Employees with Headscarves’ (2004) 33 Industrial Law Journal 68 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  349. Schiek D (ed), Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz (AGG): Ein Kommentar aus europäischer Perspektive (Otto Schmidt Verlagskonto 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  350. Schiek D, ‘Intersektionelle Diskriminierung vor dem Europäischen Gerichtshof: Ein erster verfehlter Versuch?’ (2017) 10 Europäische Arbeitsrechtszeitschrift 407 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  351. Schiek D, ‘On uses, mis-uses and non-uses of intersectionality before the Court of Justice (EU)’ (2018) 18 International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 82 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  352. Schlachter M, ‘Kopftuchverbot auf „Kundenwunsch“? – Die Religionsfreiheit als notweniger Bestandteil der Rechtfertigungsprüfung im Diskriminierungsrecht’ (2018) 11 Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 173 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  353. Schmader T and others, ‘An Integrated Process Model of Stereotype Threat Effects on Performance’ (2008) 115 Psychological Review 336 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  354. Schönfeld A, ‘Forschungszugänge zum Themenfeld Islam-/ Muslimfeindlichkeit und Antimuslimischer Rassismus: Eine Bestandsaufnahme’ (CLAIM 2018) <www.vielfalt-mediathek.de/material/antimuslimischer-rassismus/forschungszugaenge-zum-themenfeld-islam_muslimfeindlichkeit-und-antimuslimischer-rassismus-eine-bestandsaufnahme> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  355. von Schwanenflug N and others, ‘Die Relevanz der „Kopftuchentscheidung vom 27. Juni 2017“’ (2018) Zeitschrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes 3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  356. Schwarzer A, ‘Ludin – die Machtprobe: Die Kopftuch-Entscheidung des Verfassungsgerichtes ist für uns alle von großer Bedeutung’ (Emma, 1 July 2003) <www.emma.de/artikel/editorial-von-alice-schwarzer-ludin-die-machtprobe-263364> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  357. Schwarzer A, ‘Burka Verbot: Der Schleier der Fundamentalisten’ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 22 July 2010) <www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/burka-verbot-der-schleier-der-fundamentalisten-1625372.html?printPagedArti-cle=true#pageIndex_2> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  358. Seglow J, ‘Religious Accommodation: Responsibility, Integrity, and Self-Respect’ in Cécile Laborde and Aurélia Bardon (eds), Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy (Oxford Academic 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  359. Seifert A, ‘Federal Labor Court Strengthens Religious Freedom at the Workplace’ (2003) 4 German Law Journal 559 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  360. Sen A, Inequality Reexamined (Harvard University Press 1995) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  361. Sen A, Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press 1999) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  362. Sharpston E, ‘Headscarves at work (Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19)’ (Shadow Opinion of 23 March 2021) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2021/03/shadow-opinion-of-former-advocate.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  363. Shooman Y, …weil ihre Kultur so ist: Narrative des antimuslimischen Rassismus (transcript 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  364. Shooman Y, ‘Antimuslimischer Rassismus – Ursachen und Erscheinungsformen’ (Informations- und Dokumentationszentrum für Antirassismusarbeit eV 2016) <www.vielfalt-mediathek.de/data/expertise_antimuslimischer_rassismus_ida.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  365. Slaughter AM, ‘A Global Community of Courts’ (2003) 44 Harvard International Law Journal 191 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  366. Solanke I, Discrimination as Stigma: A Theory of Anti-discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  367. Somek A, Rationalität und Diskriminierung: Zur Bindung der Gesetzgebung an das Gleichheitsrecht (Springer 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  368. Somek A, Engineering Equality: An Essay on European Anti-Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  369. Somin I, ‘Why Trump’s Refugee Order is Unconstitutional’ (The Washington Post, 5 February 2017) <http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/02/05/why-trumps-refugee-order-is-unconstitutional-discrimination-on-the-basis-of-religion/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  370. Spencer S and others, ‘Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance’ (1999) 35 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  371. Spielmann S, Konkurrenz von Grundrechtsnormen (Nomos 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  372. Steele C and Aaronson J, ‘Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans’ (1995) 69 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 797 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  373. Stein A, ‘Angemessene Vorkehrungen am Arbeitsplatz – auch für Fragen der Religion und Weltanschauung?’ (2014) 31 Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 1053 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  374. Steinbeis M, ‘Burkaverbot: Grundrechtsschutz auf Proportionalitäts-Fläschchen gezogen’ (Verfassungsblog, 1 July 2014) <https://verfassungsblog.de/burkaverbot-grundrechtsschutz-auf-proportionalitaetsflaeschchen-gezogen/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  375. Stone J and others, ‘Stereotype Threat Effects on Black and White Athletic Performance’ (1999) 77 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1213 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  376. Stoppard L, ‘Will Mandatory Face Masks End the Burqa Bans?’ (The New York Times, 19 May 2020) <www.nytimes.com/2020/05/19/style/face-mask-burqa-ban.html> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  377. Taylor C, ‘The Politics of Recognition’ in Charles Taylor and Amy Gutmann (eds), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton University Press 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  378. Tebbe N, Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age (Harvard University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  379. Thurner I, ‘Der nackte Zwang’, Süddeutsche Zeitung (25 June 2010) <www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/feminismus-kopftuchdebatte-der-nackte-zwang-1.963023> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  380. Thüsing G, ‘Kleiderordnungen’ (2006) 61 Juristen Zeitung 223 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  381. Timmer A, ‘A Strasbourg Victory for the Mentally Disabled’ (Strasbourg Observers, 21 May 2010) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2010/05/21/a-strasbourg-victory-for-the-mentally-disabled/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  382. Timmer A, ‘Toward an Anti-Stereotyping Approach for the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review 707 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  383. Timmer A, ‘Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law’ (2015) 68 The American Journal of Comparative Law 239 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  384. Tischbirek A and Wihl T, ‘Verfassungswidrigkeit des “Racial Profiling”: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Systematik des Art. 3 GG’ (2013) 68 Juristen Zeitung 219 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  385. Tobler C, Indirect Discrimination: A Case Study into the Development of the Legal Concept of Indirect Discrimination under EC Law (Intersentia 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  386. Tobler C, ‘Grenzen und Möglichkeiten des Konzepts der mittelbaren Diskriminierung’ (European Commission 2009) <https://op.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/aa081c13-197b-41c5-a93a-a1638e886e61/language-de > Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  387. Tobler C, ‘Equality and Non-Discrimination under the ECHR and EU Law: A Comparison Focusing on Discrimination against LGBTI Persons’ (2014) 74 ZaöRV 521 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  388. Topolski A, ‘The Race-Religion Constellation’ (2018) 6 Critical Philosophy of Race 58 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  389. Trigg R, Equality, Freedom, and Religion (Oxford University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  390. Trispiotis I, Freedom of Religion, Equality and Discrimination in the European Convention on Human Rights (PhD thesis, University College London 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  391. Trispiotis I, ‘Two Interpretations of “Living Together” in European Human Rights Law’ (2016) 75 The Cambridge Law Journal 580 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  392. Trotter S, ‘“Living together”, “learning together”, and “swimming together”: Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v Switzerland (2017) and the construction of collective life’ (2018) 18 Human Rights Law Review 157 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  393. Uerpmann-Wittzack R, ‘Die Bedeutung der EMRK für den deutschen und den unionalen Grundrechtsschutz’ (2014) 36 JURA 916 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  394. von Ungern-Sternberg A, Religionsfreiheit in Europa: Die Freiheit individueller Religionsausübung in Großbritannien, Frankreich und Deutschland – ein Vergleich (Mohr Siebeck 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  395. von Ungern-Sternberg A, ‘Religionsfreiheit – ein ausuferndes Grundrecht?’ in Hartmut Rensen and Stefan Brink (eds), Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: Erörtert von den wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeitern (De Gruyter Recht 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  396. von Ungern-Sternberg A, ‘Die Richterin als Mensch – zugleich Anmerkung zum Kopftuch-III-Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (2020) 68 Recht der Jugend und des Bildungswesens 367 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  397. Vakulenko A, ‘“Islamic Headscarves” and the European Convention on Human Rights: An Intersectional Perspective’ (2007) 16 Social & Legal Studies 183 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  398. Vickers L, ‘Religion and Belief Discrimination in Employment: the EU Law’ (Publications Office of the EU 2006) <https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e4285a0c-d43a-4cf8-81aa-ceac422e1b7b> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  399. Vickers L, Religious Freedom, Religious Discrimination and the Workplace (Hart Publishing 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  400. Vickers L, ‘Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: An Emerging Hierarchy?’ (2010) 12 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 280 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  401. Vickers L, ‘Conform or be confined: S.A.S. v France’ (Oxford Human Rights Hub, 8 July 2014) <http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/conform-or-be-confined-s-a-s-v-france/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  402. Völzmann B, ‘Gleiche Freiheit für alle! Zur freiheitsrechtlichen Begründung des BVerfG in der Entscheidung zur Dritten Option’ (Verfassungsblog, 17 November 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/gleiche-freiheit-fuer-alle-zur-freiheitsrechtlichen-begruendung-des-bverfg-in-der-entscheidung-zur-dritten-option/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  403. Waddington L, ‘Reasonable Accommodation’ in Dagmar Schiek and others (eds), Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Non-Discrimination Law (Hart Publishing 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  404. Waddington L, ‘Reasonable Accommodation: Time to Extend the Duty to Accommodate Beyond Disability’ (2011) 36 Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Mensenrechten 186 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  405. Waddington L and Hendriks A, ‘The expanding concept of employment discrimination in Europe: From direct and indirect discrimination to reasonable accommodation discrimination’ (2002) 18 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 403 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  406. Waldron J, ‘Indirect Discrimination’ in Stephen Guest and Alan Milne (eds), Equality and Discrimination: Essays in Freedom and Justice (Steiner 1985) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  407. Walter C and Tremml K, ‘Religion und Weltanschauung als Diskriminierungskategorien’ in Anna Katharina Mangold and Mehrdad Payandeh (eds), Handbuch Antidiskriminierungsrecht: Strukturen, Rechtsfiguren und Konzepte (Mohr Siebeck 2022) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  408. Weiler J, ‘Je Suis Achbita!’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 989 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  409. Welti F, ‘Barrierefreiheit als Rechtsbegriff’ (2013) 66 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 795 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  410. Westen P, ‘The Empty Idea of Equality’ (1982) 95 Harvard Law Review 537 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  411. Williams B, ‘The Idea of Equality’ in Peter Laslett and Walter Garrision Runciman (eds), Philosophy, Politics and Society (Basil Blackwell 1962) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  412. Wintemute R, ‘Accommodating Religious Beliefs: Harm, Clothing or Symbols, and Refusals to Serve Others’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 223 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  413. Yeginsu C and Elliott J, ‘Veils and the Choice of Society’ (OUPBlog, 13 July 2014) <https://blog.oup.com/2014/07/protection-of-religious-rights> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  414. Young IM, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press 1990) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271
  415. Yuval-Davis N, ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’ (2006) 13 European Journal of Women’s Studies 193 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748947271

Similar publications

from the series "Schriften zur Gleichstellung"
Cover of book: Gerechtigkeit als Thema der Rechtswissenschaft
Edited Book Full access
Anna Katharina Mangold, Berit Völzmann
Gerechtigkeit als Thema der Rechtswissenschaft
Cover of book: Geschlechtergerechtigkeit in globalen Lieferketten
Monograph Full access
Isabell Hensel, Anne-Christin Mittwoch
Geschlechtergerechtigkeit in globalen Lieferketten
Cover of book: Aufgedrängte Natürlichkeit
Monograph Full access
Lucy Chebout
Aufgedrängte Natürlichkeit
Cover of book: Bloße „Objekte staatlicher Maßnahmen"?
Monograph No access
Leonie Kemper
Bloße „Objekte staatlicher Maßnahmen"?
Cover of book: „Das Gesetz kennt keine Mutterrechte“
Monograph No access
Katharina Lakisa
„Das Gesetz kennt keine Mutterrechte“

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex