Cover of book: Ökologie der Teilhabe
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Ökologie der Teilhabe

Am Wandel kompetent und mündig mitwirken
Authors:
Publisher:
 2024

Summary

In the ecological crisis and the transformation of the economy and society, people are being called upon to embrace the necessary changes in their lives and actions. They participate in those changes either actively or passively. If the environment does not appear to be at odds with people, but as their ecological, social and economic situation, participation in sustainable development is required. This book develops a concept of ecological participation in which individual and collective existence extends into the sphere of the life contexts of nature and society. In these contexts, sustainable and prosperous conditions must be ensured. Key eco-centred approaches are discussed, which ask how such conditions can be maintained and how those involved can contribute to them in a responsible and competent manner. Individual, collective and institutional actors play a key role in the ecosystem of their relationship to one another in the changing organisation of existence.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2024
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-1850-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4583-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Ökologie – Kultur – Gesellschaft
Volume
1
Language
German
Pages
180
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 6
    1. 1.1 Von wirtschaftlicher und sozialer zu ökologischer Tüchtigkeit und Teilhabe No access
    2. 1.2 Wo wir zu Hause sind No access
    1. 2.1 Interdisziplinäre Vorgaben No access
    2. 2.2 Die ökosoziale Perspektive. Haushalten No access
    3. 2.3 Teilhabe. In der Nische partizipativ im Ökosystem No access
    4. 2.4 Der ökologische Raum und das Leitbild der Bestellung eines Feldes No access
    5. 2.5 In Netzen verbunden No access
    6. 2.6 Nachhaltigkeit, generell und persönlich No access
    7. 2.7 Auf dem Weg zur ökologischen Zivilisation No access
    1. 3.1 Mit Umweltbewusstsein ist es nicht getan No access
    2. 3.2 Inmitten des persönlichen und sozialen Raumes No access
    3. 3.3 Das Erfordernis ökologischer Literalität No access
    4. 3.4 Bahnungen der Beteiligung zwischen öffentlicher Aufklärung und persönlichen Einsichten No access
    1. 4.1 Wie Mündigkeit begriffen wird No access
    2. 4.2 Politisch frei und mündig? No access
    3. 4.3 Ökologisch kundig vor ökonomisch befähigt und sozial mündig No access
    4. 4.4 Auf dem Weg zu ökologischer Bürgerschaft No access
    5. 4.5 Ausgreifen in ökologischem Regieren No access
    6. 4.6 Im Lebenshaushalt kompetent und wirtlich No access
    1. 5.1 Mitgestaltung ist gefragt No access
    2. 5.2 Teilhabe ermöglichen No access
    3. 5.3 Eingebunden und dabei sein im ökologischen Feld No access
    4. 5.4 Existenzielle Teilhabe No access
    5. 5.5 Ein ethisches Anliegen No access
    6. 5.6 Konklusion. Ökologisch vielseitig teilnehmen und teilhaben No access
  7. Literaturverzeichnis No access 157 - 180

Bibliography (357)

  1. Literaturverzeichnis Open Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann, Nicole (2021): Zum Bildungsideal des „mündigen Wirtschaftsbürgers“: Kompetenzmodell für ökonomische Bildung und Domänenanalyse des gesamtgesellschaftlichen/gesamtwirtschaftlichen Lebensbereichs. In: Fridrich, Christian / Hagedorn, Udo / Hedtke, Reinhold / Mittnik, Philipp / Tafner, Georg (Hrsg.): Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft und Politik. Sozioökonomische Bildung und Wissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. S. 147–178. Open Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, Theodor W. (1971): Erziehung zur Mündigkeit. Vorträge und Gespräche mit Hellmut Becker 1959 bis 1969. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  4. Akulukjuk, Tommy, Erkaeva, Nigora, Rasmussen, Derek, & Martusewicz, Rebecca (2020). Stories of love and loss: Recommitting to each other and the land. In: Heesoon Bai, David Chang, & Charles Scott (Hrsg.), A Book of Ecological Virtues: Living Well in the Anthropocene. Regina, SK: University of Regina Press. S. 233–252. Open Google Scholar
  5. Aldrin, Philippe / Hubé, Nicolas (2016): L’État participatif. Le participationnisme saisi par la pensée d’État. In: Gouvernement et action publique, 5, 2. S. 9–29. Open Google Scholar
  6. Aleissa, Yazeed M. / Xue, Ying / Bakshi, Bhavik R. (2023): Ecosystem Goods and Services. In: Bakshi, Bhavik R. (Hrsg.): Engineering and Ecosystems. Seeking Synergies Toward a Nature-Positive World. Cham: Springer Nature. S. 19–46. Open Google Scholar
  7. Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 4. S. 216–224. Open Google Scholar
  8. Baerlocher, Bianca / Burger, Paul (2010): Ecological Regimes. Towards a Conceptual Integration of Biophysical Environment into Social Theory. In: Gross, Matthias / Heinrich, Harald (Hrsg.), Environmental Sociology. European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer. S. 79–93. Open Google Scholar
  9. Bai, Heesoon / Chang, David / Scott, Charles (Hrsg.) (2020): A Book of Ecological Virtues. Living Well in the Anthropocene. Regina, SK: University of Regina Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bai, H., Chang, D., & Scott, C. (2020b). Introduction: The call for an ecological virtue ethics. In H. Bai, D. Chang, & C. Scott (Hrsg.), A book of ecological virtues: Living well in the Anthropocene. (S. xi–xvi). Regina, SK: University of Regina Press. Open Google Scholar
  11. Barry, John (1999): Rethinking Green Politics. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  12. Barry, John (2006): Resistance is fertile: From environmental to sustainability citizenship. In: Andrew Dobson and Derek Bell (Hrsg.), Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. S. 21–48. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bartelheimer, Peter / Behrisch, Birgit / Daßler, Henning, et al. (2020): Teilhabe – eine Begriffsbestimmung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bateson, Gregory (1985): Ökologie des Geistes. Anthropologische, psychologische, biologische und epistemologische Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bauwens, Michael / Kostakis, Vasilis / Pazaitis, Alex (2019): Peer to Peer. The Commons Manifesto. London: University of Westminster Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Baxter, Brian (1999): Ecologism. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar
  17. Becker, Christian (2006): The human actor in ecological economics: Philosophical approach and research perspectives. In: Ecological Economics, 60, 1. S. 17–34. Open Google Scholar
  18. Becker, Egon / Jahn, Thomas (2006): Sozialökologie. Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  19. Beier, Thomas (2018): Erziehung zur politischen Mündigkeit? Studien zur Kompetenzorientierung in der schulischen Politischen Bildung. Frankfurt am Main: Wochenschau Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  20. Berkowitz, Alan R. / Ford, Mary E. / Brewer, Carol A. (2005): A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy and environmental citizenship in environmental education. In: E. A. Johnson, and M. J. Mappin (Hrsg.). Environmental Education and Advocacy: Changing Perspectives of Ecology and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. S. 27–266. Open Google Scholar
  21. Berry, Thomas (2014): Selected Writings on the Earth Community. Selected with an Introduction by Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim. Modern Spiritual Masters Series. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bertelsmann Stiftung (Hrsg.) (2020): Partizipation im kommunalen Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement. Methoden für die Praxis. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Open Google Scholar
  23. Biedermann, Horst (2006): Junge Menschen an der Schwelle politischer Mündigkeit. Partizipation: Patentrezept politischer Identitätsfindung? Münster: Waxmann. Open Google Scholar
  24. Bina, Olivia / Vaz, Sofia Guedes (2011): Humans, environment and economies: From vicious relationships to virtuous responsibility. In: Ecological Economics, 72. S. 10–178. Open Google Scholar
  25. Binder, Arnold (1972): A new context for psychology: Social ecology. In: American Psychologist, 27, Sept. S. 903–908. Open Google Scholar
  26. Binder, Arnold / Stokols, Daniel / Catalano, R. (1975): Social Ecology: An Emerging Multidiscipline. In: Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 2. S. 32–43. Open Google Scholar
  27. Binswanger, Mathias (2019): Der Wachstumszwang. Warum die Volkswirtschaft immer weiter wachsen muss, selbst wenn wir genug haben. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. Open Google Scholar
  28. Birnbacher, Dieter (Hrsg.) (2001): Ökologie und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  29. Blühdorn, Ingolfur, Felix Butzlaff, Michael Deflorian, Daniel Hausknost, und Mirijam Mock (2019): Nachhaltige Nicht-Nachhaltigkeit. Warum die ökologische Transformation der Gesellschaft nicht stattfindet. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar
  30. Bohnenberger, Katharina (2020). Money, Vouchers, Public Infrastructures? A Framework for Sustainable Welfare Benefits. In: Sustainability, 12, 2. S. 596. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bohnenberger, Katharina / Fritz, Martin (2020): Making welfare resilient. Creating stable & sustainable welfare systems in times of declining economic growth. Transformation Policy Briefs #2. Köln: ZOE-Institute for future-fit economies. Open Google Scholar
  32. Bonvin, Jean-Michel / Laruffa, Francesco (2022): Towards a Capability-Oriented Eco-Social Policy: Elements of a Normative Framework. In: Social Policy and Society, 21, 3. S. 484 – 495. Open Google Scholar
  33. Bourdieu, Pierre (1987): Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  34. Bourdieu, Pierre, et al. (1997): Das Elend der Welt. Zeugnisse und Diagnosen alltäglichen Leidens an der Gesellschaft. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  35. Boyatzis, Richard E. / Goleman, Daniel / Dhar, Udayan / Osiri, Kalu (2021): Thrive and survive: Assessing personal sustainability. In: Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 73, 1. S. 27–50. Open Google Scholar
  36. Brand, Ulrich / Welzer, Harald (2019): Alltag und Situation. Soziokulturelle Dimensionen sozialökologischer Transformation. In: Berliner Journal für Soziologie. Sonderband „Große Transformation? Zur Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften“. S. 313–332. Open Google Scholar
  37. Brand, Ulrich / Wissen, Markus (2017): Imperiale Lebensweise. Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur im globalen Kapitalismus. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  38. Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1976): Ökologische Sozialisationsforschung. Stuttgart: Klett. Open Google Scholar
  39. Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1981): Die Ökologie der menschlichen Entwicklung. Natürliche und geplante Experimente. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Open Google Scholar
  40. Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1986): Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives. In: Developmental Psychology, 22, 6. S. 723–742. Open Google Scholar
  41. Brosius, J. Peter, Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing and Charles Zerner (Hrsg.) (2005): Communities and Conservation. History and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. Open Google Scholar
  42. Brown, Peter G. and Geoffrey Garver (2009): Right Relationship: Toward a Whole Earth Economy. San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  43. Brown, Peter G. and Peter Timmerman (2015): „The Unfinished Journey of Ecological Economics“. In: P.G. Brown and P. Timmerman (Hrsg.): Ecological Economics for the Anthropocene: An Emerging Paradigm. New York: Columbia University Press. S. 1–14. Open Google Scholar
  44. Bruckmeier, Karl (2003): Die unbekannte Geschichte der Humanökologie. In: Serbser, Wolfgang: Humanökologie: Ursprünge – Trends – Zukünfte. Münster: Lit. S. 45–120. Open Google Scholar
  45. Büchs, Milena / Koch, Max (2017): Postgrowth and Wellbeing. Challenges to Sustainable Welfare. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  46. Bundesregierung (2023): Nationale Strategie für Soziale Innovationen und Gemeinwohlorientierte Unternehmen. Berlin: BMWK/BMBF. Open Google Scholar
  47. Cafaro, Philip / Sandler, Ronald (Hrsg.) (2011): Virtue Ethics and the Environment. Dordrecht: Springer Nature. Open Google Scholar
  48. Calafati, Luca / Froud, Julie (2023): Households and foundational liveability. In: Calafati, Luca / Froud, Julie / Haslam, Colin / Johal, Sukhdev / Williams, Karel (Hrsg.): When nothing works. From cost of living to foundational liveability. Manchester: Manchester University Press, https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526173720.00012. Open Google Scholar
  49. Calicott, J. Baird (2013): Thinking Like a Planet: The Land Ethic and the Earth Ethic. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  50. Calzada, Igor (2021): Smart City Citizenship. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Open Google Scholar
  51. Cannaday, Thomas (2018): Mündigkeit. Eine Praxis der Selbstbestimmung und Mitbestimmung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  52. Capgemini Research Institute (2021): Sustainable Operations – a Comprehensive Guide for Manufacturers. Paris: Capgemini. Open Google Scholar
  53. Carcea, Marco (2021): The Road Towards DemocraCity. A Creative Approach to Transition in a Post-Development Based Society. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  54. Carlowitz, Hans Carl von (2022): Sylvicultura oeconomica. Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht. München: oecom. Open Google Scholar
  55. Catton, William R. (1993): Sociology as an ecological science. In: Wright, Scott D. et al. (Hrsg.): Human Ecology. Crossing Boundaries. Fort Collins, CO: Society for Human Ecology. S. 74–86. Open Google Scholar
  56. Chapin III, F. Stuart / S. T. A. Pickett / Mary E. Power, et al. (2015): Earth Stewardship. An Initiative by the Ecological Society of America to Foster Engagement to Sustain Planet Earth. In: Rozzi. Ricardo et al.: Earth Stewardship. Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer. S. 173–194. Open Google Scholar
  57. Chawla, Louise (2008): Participation and the Ecology of Environmental Awareness and Action. In: Reid, Alan, et al. (Hrsg.): Participation and Learning. Dordrecht: Springer. S. 98–110. Open Google Scholar
  58. Chilvers, Jason / Helen Pallett, Tom Hargreaves (2018): Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions. In: Energy Research & Social Science, 42. S. 199–210 Open Google Scholar
  59. Chilvers, Jason / Kearnes, Matthew (2016): Participation in the making: rethinking public engagement in co-productionist terms. In: Jason Chilvers, Matthew Kearnes (Hrsg.), Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Abingdon: Routledge. S. 31–63. Open Google Scholar
  60. Clayton, Philip / Heinzekehr, Justin (2014): Organic Marxism: An Alternative to Capitalism and Ecological Catastrophe. Anoka, MN: Process Century Press. Open Google Scholar
  61. Clayton, Philip, and Wm. Andrew Schwartz (2019). What is Ecological Civilization? Crisis, Hope, and the Future of the Planet. Anoka, MN: Process Century Press. Open Google Scholar
  62. Cobb, John B., Jr. (1971): Is It Too Late? A Theology of Ecology. Denton, TX: Environmental Ethic Books. Open Google Scholar
  63. Code, Lorraine (2006): Ecological Thinking. The Politics of Epistemic Location. New York: Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar
  64. Coote, Anna (2022): Towards a Sustainable Welfare State: The Role of Universal Basic Services. In: Social Policy and Society, 21. S. 473–483. Open Google Scholar
  65. Cotta, Heinrich (1819): Die Verbindung des Feldbaus mit dem Waldbau oder die Baumfeldwirthschaft. Dresden: Arnoldische Buchhandlung. Open Google Scholar
  66. Crist, Eileen (2019): Abundant Earth. Toward an ecological civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  67. Cronon, William (Hrsg.) (1995): Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: W. W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
  68. Curry, Patrick (2011): Ecological Ethics. An Introduction. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  69. Curry, Patrick (2017): The Ecological Citizen: An impulse of life, for life. In: The Ecological Citizen 1,1. S. 5–9. Open Google Scholar
  70. Curry, Patrick (2020): Eco republicanism. In: The Ecological Citizen 3 (Suppl C). S. 31⁠–⁠38. Open Google Scholar
  71. Curtis, Fred (2003): Eco-localism and sustainability, In: Ecological Economics, 46, 1. S. 83–102. Open Google Scholar
  72. Dahlberg, Helena / Ranheim, Albertine / Dahlberg Karin (2016): Ecological caring-Revisiting the original ideas of caring science. In: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 2016 Nov 30;11:33344. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.33344. Open Google Scholar
  73. Dahrendorf, Ralf (1979): Lebenschancen. Anläufe zur sozialen und politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  74. Daily, Gretchen C. (1997): Introduction: What Are Ecosystem Services? In: Daily, Gretchen C. (Hrsg.): Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press. S. 1–10. Open Google Scholar
  75. Daly, Herman E. / Cobb, John B., Jr. (1989): For the Common Good. Redirecting the Economy toward Community, Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar
  76. Davies, Sarah R. (2016): Participation as pleasure: citicenship and science communication. In: Jason Chilvers, Matthew Kearnes (Hrsg.), Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Abingdon: Routledge. S. 162–177. Open Google Scholar
  77. Deckard, Sharae (2016): World-Ecology and Ireland: The Neoliberal Ecological Regime. In: Journal of World-Systems Research, 22, 1. S. 145–176. Open Google Scholar
  78. De Haan, Gerhard (2008): Gestaltungskompetenz als Handlungskonzept der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In: Bormann, Inka / de Haan, Gerhard (Hrsg.): Kompetenzen der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. S. 23⁠–⁠43. Open Google Scholar
  79. Dhar, Udayan, Han Liu, and Richard E. Boyatzis (2021): Towards Personal Sustainability: Renewal as an Antidote to Stress. In: Sustainability 13, no. 17: 9945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179945 Open Google Scholar
  80. Disch, Lea (2016): Ecological Democracy and the Co-participation of Things. In: Teena Gabrielson, et al. (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford Academic. Open Google Scholar
  81. Dobson, Andrew (2003): Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  82. Dobson, Andrew (2007): Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development. In: Sustainable Development, 15, 5. S. 276–285. Open Google Scholar
  83. Dryzek, John S. (1996): Foundations for environmental political economy: The search for homo ecologicus? In: New Political Economy, 1, 1. S. 27–40. Open Google Scholar
  84. Duncan, H. G. (1928): The Concept of Personal Ecology. In: Social Forces, 6, 3. S. 426⁠–⁠429. Open Google Scholar
  85. Dunn, Winnie / Brown, Catana / McGuigan, Ann (1994): The Ecology of Human Performance: A Framework for Considering the Effect of Context. In: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 7. S. 595–607. Open Google Scholar
  86. Eckersley, Robyn (1992): Environmentalism and Political Theory. Toward an Ecocentric Approach. London: UCL Press. Open Google Scholar
  87. Eckersley, Robyn (2004): The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  88. Eckersley, Robyn (2019): Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: Looking back, looking forward. In: Environmental Politics, 6, 1. S. 1–21. Open Google Scholar
  89. Eisinger, Peter K. (1973): The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities. In: American Political Science Review, 67, 1. S.11 – 28. Open Google Scholar
  90. Ellard, Colin (2015): Places of the Heart. The Psychogeography of Everyday Life. New York: Bellevue Literary Press. Open Google Scholar
  91. Elsen, Susanne (1998): Gemeinwesenökonomie – eine Antwort auf Arbeitslosigkeit, Armut und soziale Ausgrenzung. Neuwied. Luchterhand. Open Google Scholar
  92. Elsen, Susanne / Sergio Angeli, Armin Bernhard, Sara Nicli (2020): Perspektiven der Sozialen Landwirtschaft unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Entwicklungen in Italien. Bozen: Bozen-Bolzano University Press. Open Google Scholar
  93. Elton, Charles (1927): Animal Ecology. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. Open Google Scholar
  94. Esbjörn-Hargens, Sean / Zimmerman, Michael E. (2009): Integral Ecology. Uniting Multiple Perspectives on the Natural World. Boston: Integral Books. Open Google Scholar
  95. Estika, Nita Dwi / Kusuma, Yudistira / Prameswari, Dewi / Sudradjat, Iwan (2020): The hedonistic sustainability concept in the works of Bjarke Ingels. In: ARTEKS Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 5, 3. S.339 – 346. Open Google Scholar
  96. Falkenberg, Thomas (2020). The ethic of sustainable well-being and well-becoming: A systems approach to virtue ethics. In: Bai, Heesoon / Chang, David / Scott, Charles (Hrsg.): A Book of Ecological Virtues. Living Well in the Anthropocene. Regina, SK: University of Regina Press. S. 157–177. Open Google Scholar
  97. Fellizar, Francisco P. (1992): Community-Based Resource management as a Strategy for Sustainable Development. In: Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development, II, 2. S. 15–35. Open Google Scholar
  98. Fischer, Frank (2017): Climate Crisis and the Democratic Prospect: Participatory Governance in Sustainable Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  99. Fischer, Gerhard (2011): Understanding, Fostering, and Supporting Cultures of Participation. In: ACM Interactions, 16, 3. S. 42–53. Open Google Scholar
  100. Forbes, Rachel / Smith, Kelly (Hrsg.) (2023): Ecosocial Work. Environmental Practice and Advocacy. Washington, DC: NASW Press. Open Google Scholar
  101. Foundational Economy Collective (2019): Die Ökonomie des Alltagslebens. Für eine neue Infrastrukturpolitik. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  102. Fritz, Judith / Tomaschek, Nino (Hrsg.) (2023): Partizipation. Das Zusammenwirken der Vielen für Demokratie, Wirtschaft und Umwelt. Münster: Waxmann. Open Google Scholar
  103. Fritz, Martin / Koch, Max (2019): Public Support for Sustainable Welfare Compared: Links between Attitudes towards Climate and Welfare Policies. In: Sustainability, 11(15), 4146. Open Google Scholar
  104. Furusawa Koyu (2002): Towards A Sustainable Civilization and Society: A Socio-cultural Ecological Perspective from Japan. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Area Studies Japan. Paris: UNESCO. Open Google Scholar
  105. Funakura, Masanori / Negrotti, Massimo (2006): Kyosei, or Association in Shared Environment – From the Viewpoint of Ecosemiotics. In: Negrotti, Massimo / Satofuka, Fumihiko (Hrsg.): Kyosai, Culture and Sustainable Technology. Yearbook of the Artificial, Volume 4. Bern: Peter Lang. S. 165–183. Open Google Scholar
  106. Gadow, Sally (1992): Existential ecology: The human/natural world. In: Social Science & Medicine, 35, 4. S. 597–602. Open Google Scholar
  107. Gare, Arran (2017): The Philosophical Foundations of Ecological Civilization. A Manifesto for the Future. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  108. Geels, Frank W. (2002): Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. In: Research Policy 31 (8/9). S. 1257–1274. Open Google Scholar
  109. Gehlen, Arnold (2016): Der Mensch. Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Open Google Scholar
  110. Germain, Carel B. / Gitterman, Alex (1999): Praktische Sozialarbeit. Das „Life Model“ der Sozialen Arbeit. Fortschritte in Theorie und Praxis. 3. Aufl., Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke. Open Google Scholar
  111. Gibson-Graham, J.K. / Miller, Ethan (2015). Economy as ecological livelihood. In: Gibson, Katherine / Rose, Deborah Bird / Fincher, Ruth (Hrsg.): Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn NY: Punctum Books. S. 7–16. Open Google Scholar
  112. Gilbert, Scott F./ Sapp, Jan / Tauber, Alfred I. (2012): A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals. In: The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87, 4. S. 325–340. Open Google Scholar
  113. Glaeser, Bernhard / Teherani-Krönner, Parto (Hrsg.) (1992): Humanökologie und Kulturökologie. Grundlagen – Ansätze – Praxis. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  114. Görg, Christoph (1999). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot. Open Google Scholar
  115. Goleman, Daniel / Bennett, Lisa / Barlow, Zenobia (2012): Ecoliterate. How Educators Are Cultivating Emotional, Social, and Ecological Intelligence. San Francisco: Jossey⁠-⁠Bass. Open Google Scholar
  116. Goodwin, Kate (2022): From service delivery to building social cohesion: the role of participatory ecosystems. In: The Democratic Society, June 14. Open Google Scholar
  117. Gosetti-Ferencei, Jennifer (2022): Towards an Existentialist Ecology. In: MLN Modern Language Notes, 137, 5. S. 892–916. Open Google Scholar
  118. Gottschlich, Daniela, Sarah Hackfort, Tobias Schmitt, Uta von Winterfeld (Hrsg.) (2022): Handbuch Politische Ökologie. Theorien, Konflikte, Begriffe, Methoden, Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar
  119. Gough, Ian (2021). Two Scenarios for Sustainable Welfare: A Framework for an Eco-Social Contract. In: Social Policy and Society, 21, 3. S. 460–472. Open Google Scholar
  120. Gough, Ian (2021 b): Two scenarios for sustainable welfare. New ideas for an eco-social contract. Working Paper 2021.12. Brüssel: European Trade Union Institute. Open Google Scholar
  121. Graumann, C. F. (1983): On multiple identities. In: International Social Science Journal 35 (2), 309–321. Open Google Scholar
  122. Greif, Hajo / Hjorth, Larissa / Lasén, Amparo / Lobet-Maris, Claire (Hrsg.) (2011): Cultures of Participation. Media Practices, Politics and Literacy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  123. Grim, John (Hrsg.) (2001): Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The Interbeing of Cosmology and Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Divinity School Center for the Study of World Religions. Open Google Scholar
  124. Grinnell, Joseph (1917): The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. In: American Ornithologist Union, 34. S. 427–433. Open Google Scholar
  125. Guattari, Félix (1989): Les trois écologies. Paris: Éditions Galilée. Open Google Scholar
  126. Haberl, Helmut / Fischer-Kowalski, Martin / Krausmann, Fridolin / Winiwarter, Verena (Hrsg.) (2016): Social Ecology. Society-Nature Relations across Time and Space. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  127. Hadjichambis, Andreas Ch. / Reis, Pedro / Paraskeva Hadjichambi, Demetra et al. (Hrsg.) (2020): Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  128. Haeckel, Ernst (1866): Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. Zweiter Band: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte der Organismen. Berlin: Georg Reimer. Open Google Scholar
  129. Haeckel, Ernst (1870): Über Entwicklungsgang und Aufgabe der Zoologie. In: Jenaische Zeitung für Medizin und Naturwissenschaft, 5. S. 352–370. Open Google Scholar
  130. Haeckel, Ernst (1905): Die Lebenswunder. Gemeinverständliche Studien über Biologische Philosophie. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner. Open Google Scholar
  131. Hale, Monica (Hrsg.) (1993): Ecology in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  132. Hauff, Volker (Hrsg.) (1987): Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft. Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung. Greven: Eggenkamp. Open Google Scholar
  133. Hawley, Amos H. (1950): Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York: Ronald Press. Open Google Scholar
  134. Hayward, Tim (2006): Ecological Citizenship: Justice, Rights and the Virtue of Resourcefulness. In: Environmental Politics, 15, 3. S. 435–446. Open Google Scholar
  135. Heid, Helmut / Hoff, Ernst-H. / Rodax, Klaus (Hrsg.) (2000): Ökologische Kompetenz (Jahrbuch Bildung und Arbeit '98). Opladen: Leske+Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  136. Heidegger, Martin (1954): Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit. Mit einem Brief über den Humanismus. Bern: Francke. Open Google Scholar
  137. Heidenreich, Felix (2023): Nachhaltigkeit und Demokratie. Eine politische Theorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  138. Helfrich, Silke (2012): Commons sind nicht, sie werden gemacht. In: Helfrich, Silke / Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (Hrsg.): Commons. Für eine Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat. Bielefeld: transcript. S. 85–91. Open Google Scholar
  139. Helfrich, Silke / Bollier, David (2019): Frei, fair und lebendig. Die Macht der Commons. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar
  140. Hemer, Oscar / Povrzanović Frykman, Maja / Ristilammi, Per-Markku (Hrsg.) (2020): Conviviality at the Crossroads: The Poetics and Politics of Everyday Encounters. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  141. Hermanni, Alfred-Joachim (2022): Personal sustainability. Eine Petition für individuelle Bedürfnisse der Gegenwart. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  142. Herrmann, Bernd (2019): Das menschliche Ökosystem. Ein humanökologisch-erkenntnistheoretischer Essay. Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. Open Google Scholar
  143. Hester, Randolph T. (2010): Design for Ecological Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  144. Hirvilammi, Tuuli / Koch, Max (2020): Sustainable Welfare Beyond Growth. In: Sustainability, 12 (5), 1824. Open Google Scholar
  145. Hörl, Erich (2016): Die Ökologisierung des Denkens. In: Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft. Heft 14: Medienökologien, 8, 1. S. 33–45 Open Google Scholar
  146. Hörl, Erich / Burton, James E. (Hrsg.) (2017): General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm, London: Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar
  147. Hörl, Erich / Ochsner, Beate (2023): Mediale Teilhabe in Technologien relationaler Verschaltung. In: Ochsner, Beate (Hrsg.): Mediale Teilhabe: Partizipation zwischen Anspruch und Inanspruchnahme. Lüneburg: Meson Press. S. 21–46. Open Google Scholar
  148. Hoff, Ernst-H. / Lecher, Thomas (1995): Ökologisches Verantwortungsbewusstsein. In: Jänicke, Martin u. a. (Hrsg.): Umwelt global: Veränderungen, Probleme, Lösungsansätze. Berlin: Springer. S. 213–224. Open Google Scholar
  149. Holden, John (2015): The Ecology of Culture. A Report commissioned by the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Cultural Value Project. Swindon. Open Google Scholar
  150. Hooimeijer, F. (2021). Ecosystem participation in vulnerable geographies. In: The Evolving Scholar | IfoU, The 14th edition of the International Forum on Urbanism. Open Google Scholar
  151. Huang Ping, Linda Westman (2021): China's imaginary of ecological civilization: A resonance between the state-led discourse and sociocultural dynamics. In: Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102253. Open Google Scholar
  152. Huntjens, Patrick (2021): Towards a Natural Social Contract. Transformative Social-Ecological Innovation for a Sustainable, Healthy and Just Society. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  153. Ibisch, Pierre Leonhand / Sommer, Jörg (2022): Das ökohumanistische Manifest. Unsere Zukunft in der Natur. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel. Open Google Scholar
  154. Illich, Ivan (1996): Selbstbegrenzung. Eine politische Kritik der Technik. München: C.H.Beck. Open Google Scholar
  155. Ingels, Bjarke. 2012. Hedonistic Sustainability. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Open Google Scholar
  156. IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991): Caring for the Earth. A Strategy for Sustainable Living. Gland Open Google Scholar
  157. Jahn, Thomas / Wehling, Peter (1998): Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse – Konturen eines theoretischen Konzepts. In Karl-Werner Brand (Hrsg.), Soziologie und Natur. Theoretische Perspektiven. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. S. 75–93. Open Google Scholar
  158. Jennings, Bruce (2016): Ecological Governance. Toward a New Social Contract with the Earth. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  159. Jonas, Hans (1979): Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  160. Jonas, Hans (1997): Das Prinzip Leben. Ansätze zu einer philosophischen Biologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  161. Kahn, Peter H. (2020): Ecological Presence as a Virtue. In: Bai, Heesoon / Chang, David / Scott, Charles (Hrsg.): A Book of Ecological Virtues. Living Well in the Anthropocene. Regina, SK: University of Regina Press. S. 31–48. Open Google Scholar
  162. Kant, Immanuel (1968): Werkausgabe XI: Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädagogik 1, hrsg. von Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  163. Kant, Immanuel (1983): Die Metaphysik der Sitten. In: Ders.: Werke in zehn Bänden. Band 7, hrsg. von Wilhelm Weischedel. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. S. 309–634. Open Google Scholar
  164. Kasper, Debbie V.S. (2009): Ecological Habitus:Toward a Better Understanding of Socioecological Relations. In: Organization & Environment, 22, 3. S. 311–326. Open Google Scholar
  165. Keller R, Clivaz M, Backhaus N, Reynard E, Lehmann P, Schüpbach U (2022): Leistungen von Landschaften fassbar machen. Swiss Academies Factsheets 17 (1). DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6036112. Open Google Scholar
  166. Knierim, Andrea / Baasch, Stefanie / Gottschick, Manuel (Hrsg.) (2013): Partizipation und Klimawandel. Ansprüche, Konzepte und Umsetzung. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  167. Knight, Richard L. / Riedel, Suzanne (Hrsg.) (2002): Aldo Leopold and the Ecological Conscience. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  168. Koch, Max / Gullberg, Anne Therese / Schoyen, Mi Ah / Hvinden, Björn (2016): Sustainable welfare in the EU: Promoting synergies between climate and social policies. In: Critical Social Policy, 36, 4. S. 704–715. Open Google Scholar
  169. Koch, Max / Mont, Oksana (Hrsg.) (2016): Sustainability and the Political Economy of Welfare. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  170. Kopatz, Michael (2016): Ökoroutine. Damit wir tun, was wir für richtig halten. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  171. Kotre, John N. (1984): Outliving the Self. Generativity and the Interpretation of Lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  172. Kruber, Klaus.-Peter (2005): Ökonomische und politische Bildung – der mehrperspektivische Zugriff auf Wirtschaft und Politik. In: Dietmar Kahsnitz (Hrsg.), Integration von politischer und ökonomischer Bildung? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. S. 75-109. Open Google Scholar
  173. Kurokawa Kisho (1997): Each One a Hero. The Philosophy of Symbiosis. Towards the Age of Symbiosis. Tokio: Kodansha International. Open Google Scholar
  174. Kurokawa Kisho (2005): Das Kurokawa Manifest. Texte zum symbiotischen Denken. Berlin: Jovis Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  175. Landström, Catharina (2020): Ecological Participation. Practices engaging the public with science and governance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  176. Laruffa, Francesco (2020): What is a capability-enhancing social policy? Individual autonomy, democratic citizenship and the insufficiency of the employment-focused paradigm. In: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21, 1. S. 1–16. Open Google Scholar
  177. Laruffa, Francesco (2022): The dilemma of „sustainable welfare“ and the problem of the future in capacitating social policy. In: Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18, 1. S. 822–836. Open Google Scholar
  178. Latouche, Serge (2007): Petit traité de la décroissance sereine. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard. Open Google Scholar
  179. Latouche, Serge (2015): Es reicht! Abrechnung mit dem Wachstumswahn. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  180. Latour, Bruno (2010): Das Parlament der Dinge. Für eine politische Ökologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  181. Latour, Bruno und Nikolaj Schultz (2022): Zur Entstehung einer ökologischen Klasse. Ein Memorandum. Aus dem Französischen von Bernhard Schwibs. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  182. Laudato si’ (2015): Über die Sorge für das gemeinsame Haus. Die Umwelt-Enzyklika mit Einführung und Themenschlüssel. Stuttgart: kbw. Open Google Scholar
  183. Lecher, Thomas unter Mitarbeit von Hoff, Ernst-H. (1997): Die Umweltkrise im Alltagsdenken. München: Psychologie Verlags Union. Open Google Scholar
  184. Lecher, Thomas; Hoff, Ernst-H. (1993): Ökologisches Bewußtsein. Theoretische Grundlagen für ein Teilkonzept im Projekt „Industriearbeit und ökologisches Verantwortungsbewußtsein“. Berichte aus dem Bereich „Arbeit und Entwicklung“ am Institut für Arbeits-, Organisations- und Gesundheitspsychologie der FU Berlin, 4. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  185. Lelkes, Orsolya (2021): Sustainable Hedonism. A Thriving Life That Does not Cost the Earth. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Open Google Scholar
  186. Leopold, Aldo (2013): A Sand County Almanac & Other Writings on Ecology and Conservation. New York: Library of America. Open Google Scholar
  187. Leopold, Aldo (2019): Ein Jahr im Sand County. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz. Open Google Scholar
  188. Leßmann, Sophia (2016): Determinanten der Nachhaltigkeit. Armut als Einflussgröße des individuellen Nachhaltigkeitsverhaltens. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. Open Google Scholar
  189. Levins, Richard / Lewontin, Richard C. (1985): The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  190. Limbrunner, Alfons / van Elsen, Thomas (2013). Boden unter den Füßen. Grüne Sozialarbeit – Soziale Landwirtschaft – Social Farming. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar
  191. Lundqvist, Lennart J. (2009): Sweden and ecological governance. Straddling the fence. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  192. Lutz, Christoph / Hoffmann, Christian Pieter (2017): The dark side of online participation: exploring non-, passive and negative participation. In: Information, Communication & Society, 20, 6. S. 876–897 Open Google Scholar
  193. Lysaker, Odin (2024): Ecological Democracy. Caring for the Earth in the Anthropocene. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  194. MacGregor, Sherilyn (2007): Beyond Mothering Earth. Ecological Citizenship and the Politics of Care. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press. Open Google Scholar
  195. MacGregor, Sherilyn (2010): Earthcare or Feminist Ecological Citizenship? In: Femina Politica, 16, 1. S. 22–32. Open Google Scholar
  196. Malo, Meshack / Odera, Jeff / Ochuodho, Thomas (2007): Challenges and Opportunities in community-based dryland natural resources management. Nairobi: RPSUD. Open Google Scholar
  197. Malpas, Jeff (1999): Place and Experience. Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  198. Manzini, Ezio (1990): Artefatti. Verso una nuova ecologia dell'ambiente artificiale. Milano: Edizioni Domus Academy. Open Google Scholar
  199. Manzini, Ezio (2015): Design. When Everybody Designs. An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  200. Manzini, Ezio (2019): Politics of the Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts. Open Google Scholar
  201. Manzini, Ezio (2022): Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City That Cares. Milano: Egea. Open Google Scholar
  202. Marasigan, Sherry B. and Serrano, Joane V. (2012): Citizenship and Ecology: A Closer Look at Obligations, Rights and Expectations to and from Nature. In: Journal of Nature Studies, 11, 1–2. S. 64–70. Open Google Scholar
  203. Marres, Noortje (2015): Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and E⁠v⁠e⁠r⁠y⁠d⁠a⁠y Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  204. Martins, Rogério P. (2017): To what degree are philosophy and the ecological niche concept necessary in the ecological theory and conservation? In: European Journal of Ecology, 3, 1. S. 42–54. Open Google Scholar
  205. Márton, Attila (2022): Steps toward a Digital Ecology. Ecological Principles for the Study of Digital Ecosystems. In: Journal of Information Technology, 37, 3. S. 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211043222. Open Google Scholar
  206. Mazzocchi, Fulvio (2020): A deeper meaning of sustainability: Insights from indigenous knowledge. In: The Anthropocene Review, 7, 1. S. 77–93. Open Google Scholar
  207. Mathews, Freya (Hrsg.) (1996): Ecology and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  208. Mathews, Freya (2020): Ecological civilization: A premise, a promise and perhaps a prospect. In: The Ecological Citizen 3(Suppl C). S. 47–54. Open Google Scholar
  209. Mayer-Tasch, Peter Cornelius (1985): Aus dem Wörterbuch der Politischen Ökologie. München: dtv. Open Google Scholar
  210. McAdams, Dan P. / St. Aubin, Ed de / Kim, Tae-Chang (Hrsg.) (2004): The Generative Society. Caring for Future Generations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Open Google Scholar
  211. McBride, B. B., C. A. Brewer, A. R. Berkowitz, and W. T. Borrie. 2013. Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? In: Ecosphere 4 (5): 67. S. 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1. Open Google Scholar
  212. McKenzie, Roderick D. (1926): The scope of human ecology. American Sociological Society, 20th Annual Meeting, 1925, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 20. American Sociological Society, Washington, D.C., S. 141–154. Open Google Scholar
  213. McRae, James (2017): From Kyōsei to Kyōei: Symbiotic Flourishing in Japanese Environmental Ethics. In: Callicott, J. Baird / McRae, James (Hrsg.): Japanese Environmental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. S. 47–62. Open Google Scholar
  214. Meinberg, Eckhard (1995): Homo Oecologicus. Das neue Menschenbild im Zeichen der ökologischen Krise. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  215. Melo-Escrihuela, Carme (2015). Promoting Ecological Citizenship: Rights, Duties and Political Agency. In: ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 7, 2. S. 113–134. Open Google Scholar
  216. Meng, Yue (2022). Unspeakable Ecology: Eco-Science and Environmental Awareness Through Thick Inquiries, 1910s-1980s. In: Twentieth-Century China 47, 2. S. 91–111. Open Google Scholar
  217. Merchant, Carolyn (1996): Earthcare: Women and the Environment. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  218. Mertens, Gerhard (1989): Umwelterziehung. Eine Grundlegung ihrer Ziele. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh. Open Google Scholar
  219. Metzner-Szigeth, Andreas (2018): Zukunftsfähige Entwicklung und Generative Organisationskulturen – Wie wir Systeme anders wahrnehmen und Veränderung gestalten können. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  220. Meyer-Abich, Klaus Michael (1990): Aufstand für die Natur. Von der Umwelt zur Mitwelt. München: Carl Hanser. Open Google Scholar
  221. Mickey, Sam (2014): On the Verge of a Planetary Civilization. A Philosophy of Integral Ecology. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  222. Mickey, Sam / Robbert, Adam / Kelly, Sean (Hrsg.) (2017): The Variety of Integral Ecologies. Nature, Culture, and Knowledge in the Planetary Era. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  223. Mickey, Sam, Mary Evelyn Tucker, and John Grim (Hrsg.) (2020), Living Earth Community: Multiple Ways of Being and Knowing. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  224. Milbrath, Lester W. (1989): Envisioning a Sustainable Society. Learning Our Way Out. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  225. Milner, Henry (2002): Civic Literacy. How informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. Open Google Scholar
  226. Mitscherlich, Alexander (1965): Die Unwirtlichkeit unserer Städte. Anstiftung zum Unfrieden. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  227. Moore, Jason W. (2003): Capitalism as World-Ecology: Braudel and Marx on Environmental History. In: Organization & Environment, 16, 4. S. 431–458. Open Google Scholar
  228. Moore, Jason W. (2015): Capitalism in the Web of Life. Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso. Open Google Scholar
  229. Morrison, Roy (1995): Ecological Democracy. Boston, MA: South End Press. Open Google Scholar
  230. Morrison, Roy (2017): Sustainability Sutra. An Ecological Investigation. New York: SelectBooks. Open Google Scholar
  231. Moscovici, Serge (1982): Versuch über die menschliche Geschichte der Natur. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  232. Moscovici, Serge (2002): De la Nature. Pour penser l’écologie. Paris: Editions Métailié. Open Google Scholar
  233. Naess, Arne (1989): Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  234. Naess, Arne (1995): An Ecological Approach to Being in the World. In: Sessions, George (Hrsg.), Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. Readings on the Philo¬sophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism. Boston and London: Shambhala. S. 225–239. Open Google Scholar
  235. Negt, Oskar (2004): Politische Bildung ist die Befreiung der Menschen. In: Klaus-Peter Hufer/ Kerstin Pohl/ Imke Scheurich (Hrsg.), Positionen der politischen Bildung 2. Ein Interviewbuch zur außerschulischen Jugend- und Erwachsenenbildung. Schwalbach/Ts: Wochenschau Verlag. S. 196–213. Open Google Scholar
  236. Newton, Lisa (2003): Ethics and Sustainability. Sustainable Development and the Moral Life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar
  237. Nesmith, Ande A. et al. (2021): The Intersection of Environmental Justice, Climate Change, Community, and the Ecology of Life. Cham: Springer Nature. Open Google Scholar
  238. Netting, Robert McC. / Wulk, Richard R. / Arnould, Eric J. (Hrsg.) (1984): Households. Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  239. Niehaus, Michael / Schmidt, Dirk / Homburg, Shirli (2019): Care of the self and „Bildung“ as condition for and result of personal sustainability. In: Patodi, Oliver / Tamm, Kaidi (Hrsg.): Personal Sustainability. Exploring the Far Side of Sustainable Development. Abingdon: Routledge. S. 51–64. Open Google Scholar
  240. Odling-Smee, F. John / Laland, Kevin N. / Feldman, Marcus W. (2003): Niche Construction. The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  241. Ophüls-Kashima, Reinold (2015): The concept of kyōsei – Symbiosis or Convivality in Japan –– Social-ecological thinking after „Fukushima“. In: Kankyō shisō – kyōiku kenkyū－ Journal of Environment Thought and Education, ５, 8 (jap.). S. 89 – 98. Open Google Scholar
  242. Ophüls-Kashima, Reinold (2020): Kyōsei: Symbiose- und Konvivialitäts-Diskurse im gegenwärtigen Japan. Ein Überblick. Köln: Gesellschaft für Japanforschung. Open Google Scholar
  243. Orr, David W. (1992): Ecological Literacy. Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  244. Ozeki Shuji (2010): Agricultural Thought and Philosophical Perspectives on a New Civilization. In: Journal of Environmental Thought and Education (jap.), 4. S. 56–67. Open Google Scholar
  245. Oziewicz, Marek (2023): What Is Climate Literacy? In: Climate Literacy in Education, 1, 1. S. 34–38. Open Google Scholar
  246. Pan Yue (2006): On a socialist ecological civilization. Lvye [Green Leaf] 10. S. 10–18. Open Google Scholar
  247. Pappas, Jesse B. / Pappas, Eric (2015): The Sustainable Personality: Values and Behaviors in Individual Sustainability. In: International Journal of Higher Education, 4, 1. S. 12–21. Open Google Scholar
  248. Park, Robert E. (1936): Human ecology. In: American Journal of Sociology, 42, 1. S. 1⁠–⁠15. Open Google Scholar
  249. Parodi, Oliver / Tamm, Kaidi (Hrsg.) (2019): Personal Sustainability. Exploring the Far Side of Sustainable Development. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  250. Participatory City Foundation (2018): Made to Measure: Building a Participatory Ecosystem in Barking and Dagenham through the Every One Every Day initiative. Year 1 Report. London: Participatory City Foundation. http://www.participatorycity.org/made-to-measure. Open Google Scholar
  251. Participatory City Foundation (2019): Tools to Act. Building a Participatory Ecosystem in Barking and Dagenham through the Every One Every Day initiative. London: Participatory City Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  252. Participatory City Foundation (2023): Places to Practise. Building participatory practises in Barking & Dagenham through the Every One Every Day initiative. London: Participatory City Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  253. Pelluchon, Corine (2015): Les Nourritures. Philosophie du corps politique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Open Google Scholar
  254. Pelluchon, Corine (2020): Wovon wir leben. Eine Philosophie der Ernährung und der Umwelt. Darmstadt: wbg Academic. Open Google Scholar
  255. Pelluchon, Corine (2021): Ecology as new Enlightenment. In: Global Solutions Journal. The World policy Forum, 7. S. 218–223. hal-03240808. Open Google Scholar
  256. Pfordten, Dietmar von der (1996): Ökologische Ethik. Zur Rechtfertigung menschlichen Verhaltens gegenüber der Natur. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  257. Pickering, Jonathan / Bäckstrand, Karin / Schlosberg, David (2020): Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus. In: Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22, 1. S. 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  258. Pirages, Dennis C. (1977): The Sustainable Society. Implications for limited growth. New York: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  259. Pötter, Bernhard (2010): Ausweg Ökodiktatur? Wie unsere Demokratie in der Umweltkrise scheitert. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  260. Polanyi, Karl (1973): The Great Transformation. Politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  261. Pomeroy, Eva, & Herrmann, Lukas (2023). Social Fields: Knowing the Water We Swim in. In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231174957 Open Google Scholar
  262. Powell, William (2010): Personal Ecology. Self Management and the Art of Cultivating Healthy Relationships. Helsinki: The Leadership Advisor. Open Google Scholar
  263. Proshansky, Harold M. / Fabian, Abbe K. / Kaminoff, Robert (1983): Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 1. S. 57–83. Open Google Scholar
  264. Purvis, Ben / Mao, Yong / Robinson, Darren (2019): Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. In: Sustainability Science 14. S. 681–695. Open Google Scholar
  265. Radtke, Jörg (2022): Schnell oder demokratisch? Dilemmata demokratischer Beteiligung in der Nachhaltigkeitstransformation. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 72, 21–22. S. 35–40. Open Google Scholar
  266. Read, Rupert (2020): This civilization is finished: Time to build an ecological civilization. In: The Ecological Citizen 3, 2. S. 157–162. Open Google Scholar
  267. Reid, Alan / Jensen, Bjarne Bruun / Nikel, Jutta / Simovska, Venka (Hrsg.) (2008): Participation and Learning. Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  268. Reijers, Wessel / Liav Orgad / Primavera de Filippi (2023): The rise of cybernetic citizenship. In: Citizenship Studies, 27, 2. S. 210–229. Open Google Scholar
  269. Retkowski, Alexandra / van Elsen, Thomas (2021): Soziale Landwirtschaft als inte¬grierte Perspektive von Sozialer Arbeit und ökologischer Landwirtschaft. In: Staats, Martin (Hrsg.): Lebensqualität. Ein Metathema. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. S. 727–739. Open Google Scholar
  270. Reuter, Katrin (2014): Ökologische Tugenden und gutes Leben. Der Schutz der Biodiversität im Zeitalter von ökologischer Krise und nachhaltiger Entwicklung. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  271. Richerson, Peter J. / Boyd, Robert (2005): Not by Genes alone. How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  272. Richter, Hedwig / Ulrich, Bernd (2024): Demokratie und Revolution. Wege aus der selbstverschuldeten ökologischen Unmündigkeit. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch. Open Google Scholar
  273. Rieger-Ladich, Markus (2002): Mündigkeit als Pathosformel. Beobachtungen zur pädagogischen Semantik. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  274. Risser, Paul G. (1986): Ecological literacy. In: Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 67. S. 264–270. Open Google Scholar
  275. Rockström, Johan / Gupta, Joyeeta / Qin, Dahe, et al. (2023): Safe and just Earth system boundaries. In: Nature, 619. S. 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8. Open Google Scholar
  276. Roczen, Nina / Kaiser, Florian G. / Bogner, Franz X. (2010): Umweltkompetenz – Modellierung, Entwicklung und Förderung. Projekt Umweltkompentenz. In: Klieme, Eckhard (Hrsg.); Leutner, Detlev (Hrsg.); Kenk, Martina (Hrsg.): Kompetenzmodellierung. Eine aktuelle Zwischenbilanz des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms. Weinheim: Beltz. S. 126–134. Open Google Scholar
  277. Rozzi, Ricardo / Chapin III, F. Stuart / Callicott, J. Baird et al. (Hrsg.) (2015). Earth Stewardship. Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  278. Sahle, Rita / Scurrell, Babette (Hrsg.) (2001): Lokale Ökonomie. Aufgaben und Chancen für die Soziale Arbeit. Freiburg i.Br.: Lambertus. Open Google Scholar
  279. Sallis, J.F., Owen, N., Fisher, E.B. (2008). Ecological Models of Health Behavior. In: K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Hrsg.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. S. 465–486. Open Google Scholar
  280. Sandmeyer, Bob (2017): The Idea of an Existential Ecology. In: Donohoe, Jane (Hrsg.): Place and Phenomenology. London: Rowman & Littlefield. S. 39–55. Open Google Scholar
  281. Sattmann-Frese, Werner J. / Hill, Stuart B. (2008): Learning for Sustainable Living. Psychology of Ecological Transformation. Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press. Open Google Scholar
  282. Sattmann-Frese, Werner / Hill, Stuart B. (2021): Sustainability Work. In: Wright, David / Hill, Stuart B. (Hrsg.): Social Ecology and Education. Transforming Worldviews and Practices. London: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar
  283. Scheu, Bringfriede / Autrata, Otger (2013): Partizipation und Soziale Arbeit. Einflussnahme auf das subjektiv Ganze. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  284. Schneidewind, Uwe / Zahrnt, Angelika (2013): Damit gutes Leben einfacher wird. Perspektiven einer Suffizienzpolitik. München: oekom. Open Google Scholar
  285. Schoyen, Mi Ah / Hvinden, Bjørn / Leiren, Merethe D. (Hrsg.) (2022): Towards Sustainable Welfare States in Europe. Social Policy and Climate Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  286. Schultz, Nikolaj (2024): Landkrank. Berlin: Suhrkamp Open Google Scholar
  287. Schumacher, Ernst F. (1973): Small is Beautiful. A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond and Briggs. Open Google Scholar
  288. Seeber, Günther / Retzmann, Thomas / Remmele, Bernd / Jongebloed, Hans-Carl (2012): Bildungsstandards der ökonomischen Allgemeinbildung: Kompetenzmodell, Aufgaben, Handlungsempfehlungen. Schwalbach/Ts.: Wochenschau Verlag Open Google Scholar
  289. Seibert, Thomas (2017): Zur Ökologie der Existenz – Freiheit, Gleichheit, Umwelt. Hamburg: Laika. Open Google Scholar
  290. Serbser, Wolfgang (2003): Humanökologie: Ursprünge – Trends – Zukünfte. Münster: Lit. Open Google Scholar
  291. Siebenhüner, Bernd (2000): Homo sustinens — towards a new conception of humans for the science of sustainability. In: Ecological Economics, 32, 1. S. 15–25. Open Google Scholar
  292. Siebenhüner, Bernd (2001): Homo sustinens. Auf dem Weg zu einem Menschenbild der Nachhaltigkeit. Gießen: Metropolis.⁠ Open Google Scholar
  293. Smith, Caroline (2007): Education and Society: The Case for Ecoliteracy. In: Education and Society, 25, 1. S. 25–37. Open Google Scholar
  294. Smith, Gregory A. & Williams, Dilafruz R. (1998): Ecological Education in Action. On Weaving Education, Culture, and the Environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar
  295. Smith, Gregory A., and Dilafruz R. Williams (1999): Ecological education: Extending the definition of environmental education. In: Australian Journal of Environmental Education 15. S. 139 – 146. Open Google Scholar
  296. Smith, Mark J. (1998): Ecologism: Towards Ecological Citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
  297. Smith, Mark J. / Pangsapa, Piya (2008): Environment and Citizenship. Integrating Justice, Responsibility, and Civic Engagement. London: Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  298. Smith, Mick (2001): An Ethic of Place, Radical Ecology, Postmodernity, and Social Theory. Albany, NY: New York State University Press. Open Google Scholar
  299. Soda, Osamu (2023): Knowledge Integration and Open Social Innovation for Sustain¬able Development. In: Shujiro Urata, Ken-Ichi Akao, Ayu Washizu (Hrsg.): Sustain-able Development Disciplines for Society. Breaking Down the 5Ps – People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnerships. Singapore: Springer. S. 3–12. Open Google Scholar
  300. Sommer, Jörg / Brunnengräber, Achim / Göpel, Maja, et al. (2019): Die Ökologie der digitalen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel. Open Google Scholar
  301. Song Bing / Zhan Yiwen (Hrsg.) (2024): Gongsheng Across Contexts. A Philosophy of Co-Becoming. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  302. Steiner, Dieter / Nauser, Markus (Hrsg.) (1993): Human Ecology. Fragments of anti-fragmentary views of the world. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  303. Steward, Julian H. (1955): Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  304. Stibbe, Arran (2021): Ecolinguistics. Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Second edition. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  305. Stivers, Robert L. (1976): The sustainable society. Ethics and economic growth. Philadelphia: Westminster Press. Open Google Scholar
  306. Stokols, Daniel (1996): Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion. In: American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 4. S. 282⁠–⁠298. Open Google Scholar
  307. Stone, Michael K. / Barlow, Zenobia (Hrsg.) (2005): Ecological Literacy. Educating Our Children for a Sustainable World. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books Open Google Scholar
  308. Streit Krug, Aubrey (2020): Ecospheric Care Work. In: The Ecological Citizen, 3, 2. S. 143–148. Open Google Scholar
  309. Stumpf, Harald (1976): Leben und Überleben. Einführung in die Zivilisationsökologie. Stuttgart: Seewald. Open Google Scholar
  310. Sutton, Mark Q. / Anderson, E.N. (2010): Introduction to Cultural Ecology. 2. Aufl., Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press. Open Google Scholar
  311. Tengström, Emin (1985): Human Ecology – A New Discipline? A short tentative description of the institutional and intellectual history of human ecology. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet. Open Google Scholar
  312. Tomashow, Mitchel (2003): Bringing the Biosphere Home. Learning to Perceive Global Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  313. Tomassi, Andrea / Caforio, Alessandro / Romano, Elpidio / Lamponi, Ernestina / Pollini, Alessandro (2024): The development of a Competence Framework for Environmental Education complying with the European Qualifications Framework and the European Green Deal. In: The Journal of Environmental Education, 55, 2. S. 153–179 Open Google Scholar
  314. Tuan, Yi-Fu (1977): Space and Place. The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  315. Tuan, Yi-Fu (1990): Topophilia. A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  316. Tucker, Mary Evelyn and John Berthong (Hrsg.) (1998): Confucianism and Ecology: the Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  317. Tyfield, David / Rodriguez, Fabricio (2022): Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation: Economising the Bios or „Life-ising“ Transition. In: International Quarterly for Asian Studies, 53, 3. S. 441–469. Open Google Scholar
  318. Uexküll, Jacob von (1909): Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Julius Springer. Open Google Scholar
  319. Ulrich, Peter (2005): Sozialökonomische Bildung für mündige Wirtschaftsbürger: Ein programmatischer Entwurf für die gesellschaftliche Rekontextualisierung der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Lehre. Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Wirtschaftsethik. Open Google Scholar
  320. Umweltbundesamt (Hrsg.) (2015): Transformationsstrategien und Models of Change für nachhaltigen gesellschaftlichen Wandel: Gesellschaftlicher Wandel als Mehrebenenansatz -Bericht des AP2 – von Dierk Bauknecht, Bettina Brohmann, Rainer Grießhammer. Texte 66/2015. Dessau: Umweltbundesamt. Open Google Scholar
  321. UNESCO (1997): Educating for a Sustainable Future. A Transdisciplinary Action for a Concerted Action. Paris: UNESCO. Open Google Scholar
  322. UNRISD Flagship Report (2002): Crises of Inequality: Shifting Power for a New Eco-Social Contract. Geneva: UNRISD. Open Google Scholar
  323. Unuigbe, Ngozi (2023): What can we learn from indigenous ecological knowledge? In: The Ecological Citizen 6 (2). S. 135–139. Open Google Scholar
  324. Visser, Jan (2001): Learning communities. Wholeness and partness, autonomy and dependence in the learning ecology. 10.13140/RG.2.1.5039.8165. Open Google Scholar
  325. Wang Zhihe (2012): Process and Pluralism: Chinese Thought on the Harmony of Diversity. Ontos. Open Google Scholar
  326. Watts, Michael J. (2015): Now and Then. The origins of political ecology and the rebirth of adaptation as a form of thought. In: McCarthy, James / Perreault, Thomas (Hrsg.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, Abingdon: Routledge. S. 19⁠–⁠50. Open Google Scholar
  327. WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (Hrsg.) (2011): Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. Hauptgutachten. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  328. Weber, Andreas (2016): Biopoetics. Towards an Existential Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer.eng Open Google Scholar
  329. Weibust, Inger / Paterson, Norman / Meadowcroft, James (Hrsg.) (2014): Multilevel Environmental Governance. Managing Water and Climate Change in Europe and North America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  330. Weichhart, Peter (1990): Raumbezogene Identität. Bausteine zu einer Theorie räumlich-sozialer Kognition und Identifikation. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. Open Google Scholar
  331. Weichhart, Peter (2018): Identität, raumbezogene. In: ARL – Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung. Hannover: ARL. S. 909–913. Open Google Scholar
  332. Weinert, Franz E. (2001). Concept of Competence: A Conceptual Clarification. In: Dominique S. Rychen & Laura H. Salganik (Hrsg.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations (DeSeCo). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber. S. 45–65. Open Google Scholar
  333. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (1982): Ökologie und soziale Arbeit. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke. Open Google Scholar
  334. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (2010): Das ökosoziale Prinzip. Soziale Arbeit, ökologisch verstanden. Freiburg i.Br.: Lambertus. Open Google Scholar
  335. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (2018): Wirtlich handeln in Sozialer Arbeit. Die ökosoziale Theorie in Revision. Opladen: Barbara Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  336. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (2019): Die Ordnung der Welt in Haus und Staat. Gesellschaftliche Steuerung im westöstlichen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  337. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (2022): Sorgen und Wirtschaften. Zur Ökologie sozialer und ökonomischer Daseinsgestaltung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  338. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (2023): Wirtliche Verhältnisse. Zur Ökologie lebensgemeinschaftlicher und individueller Existenz. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  339. Wendt, Wolf Rainer (2024): Hosthood. An ecological state of being and character of a living sphere. In: Zeitschrift für Gemeinwirtschaft und Gemeinwohl, 47, 2. S. 238⁠–250. Open Google Scholar
  340. Wensveen, Louke van (2000): Dirty Virtues: The Emergence of Ecological Virtue Ethics. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press. Open Google Scholar
  341. Wheeler, Demian / Conner, David E. (Hrsg.) (2019): Conceiving an Alternative. Philosophical Resources for an Ecological Civilization. Anoka, MN: Process Century Press. Open Google Scholar
  342. WHO (1999): Partners in Life Skills Education. Conclusions from a United Nations Inter-Agency Meeting. Geneva: World Health Organization. Open Google Scholar
  343. Willke, Helmut (2023): Klimakrise und Gesellschaftstheorie. Zu den Herausforderungen und Chancen globaler Umweltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Open Google Scholar
  344. Winter, Mick (2007): Sustainable Living. For Home, Neighborhood and Community. Napa, CA: Westsong Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  345. Woolley, Olivia (2014): Ecological Governance. Reappraising Law’s Role in Protecting Ecosystem Functionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  346. Wright, David / Hill, Stuart B. (Hrsg.) (2021): Social Ecology and Education. Transforming Worldviews and Practices. London: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar
  347. Xia Mingfang (2017): The Ecology of Home. In: RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society, no. 3. doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8018. Open Google Scholar
  348. Xue, Bing / Han, Bin / Li, Hongqing, et al. (2023): Understanding ecological civilization in China: From political context to science. In: Ambio. A journal of human environment, 52. S. 1895–1909, doi:10.1007/s13280–023–01897–2. Open Google Scholar
  349. Yan, Jun / Bocharnikov, Vladimir (2022): Knowledge and Understanding of Ecological Civilization: A Chinese Perspective. In: BRICS Journal of Economics, 3, 4. S. 231–247. Open Google Scholar
  350. Yao Xinzhong (2014): An Eco-Ethical Interpretation of Confucian Tianren Heyi. In: Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 9, 4. S. 570–585. Open Google Scholar
  351. Yao Xinzhong (2017): The Confucian Aspiration at the Heart of „Tianren Heyi“: Eco-centrism, Anthropocentrism, and the Anthrocosmic Relationship in Traditional Confucian Thought. In: ders. (Hrsg.): Reconceptualizing Confucian Philosophy in the 21st Century. Singapore: Springer Nature. S. 413–426. Open Google Scholar
  352. YolJung, Hwa (1991). Marxism and Deep Ecology in Postmodernity: From Homo Oeconomicus to Homo Ecologicus. In: Thesis Eleven, 28, 1. S. 86–99. Open Google Scholar
  353. Yoon, Changhee / Moon, Seungyeon / Lee, Heesang (2022): Symbiotic Relationships in Business Ecosystem. A Systematic Literature Review. In: Sustainability, 14, 2252. https: //doi.org/10.3390/su14042252. Open Google Scholar
  354. Young, Gerald L. (1974): Ecology as an Interdisciplinary Concept. A Critical Inquiry. In: Advances in Ecological Research, 8. S. 1–105. Open Google Scholar
  355. Young, Gerald L. (Hrsg.) (1983): Origins of Human Ecology. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross. Open Google Scholar
  356. Zacharias, Wolfgang (Hrsg.) (2000): Interaktiv: Medienökologie zwischen Sinnenreich und Cyberspace. München: kopaed. Open Google Scholar
  357. Zandbergen, Dorien / Uitermark, Justus (2020): In search of the Smart Citizen: Republican and cybernetic citizenship in the smart city. In: Urban Studies, 57, 8. S. 1733–1748. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Sociology General", "Social Work", "Social Welfare & Social Systems"
Cover of book: Vergütung von Gründungsarbeit
Book Titles Full access
Lila Nettsträter
Vergütung von Gründungsarbeit
Cover of book: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Book Titles No access
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Cover of book: Umbruch, Druck, Transformation?
Edited Book Full access
Andrea Walter, Benjamin Haas, Andreas Kewes, Katharina Mangold, Julia Schlicht
Umbruch, Druck, Transformation?
Cover of book: Die geformte Kindheit
Book Titles Full access
Corinna Pilgermann, Gary Jürgens
Die geformte Kindheit
Cover of book: Kinder- und jugendgerechte Raumgestaltung von Kinderschutzteams
Book Titles Full access
Gina Emily Sommer
Kinder- und jugendgerechte Raumgestaltung von Kinderschutzteams

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex