Cover des Buchs: Designing Realistic Utopia
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Designing Realistic Utopia

Ideal Theory in Practical Political Philosophy
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

Im Anschluss an John Rawls entwickelt der Autor eine praktisch-politisch relevante und kritische Konzeption idealer Theorie. Dies erfolgt auf der Grundlage einer Auseinandersetzung mit der Kritik an idealer Theorie durch Autoren wie Amartya Sen und Raymond Geuss. Als Antwort auf Sen wird eine Konzeption von Machbarkeitsrestriktionen für ideale Theorie entwickelt, insbesondere für die Konstruktion idealer institutioneller Gesellschaftsentwürfe. Als Antwort auf Geuss werden konstruktivistische Ansätze zur Konstruktion normativer Theorien diskutiert und für eine Konzeption idealtheoretischen Denkens argumentiert, die eine kritische Perspektive auf den Status Quo erlaubt.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2020
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7802-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2206-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriftenreihe der Sektion Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte in der DVPW | Studies in Political Theory
Band
38
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
274
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 12
    1. Outline of the course of the argument Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 The output of ideal theory: ideal principles and ideal institutions Kein Zugriff
      1. The first type: conceptions of the person Kein Zugriff
      2. The second type: idealized assumptions in thought experiments Kein Zugriff
      3. The third type: idealization regarding the range of outcomes being considered Kein Zugriff
      4. The fourth type: idealization in the sense of assuming moral ideals Kein Zugriff
      5. The fifth type: Idealization as assuming away feasibility restrictions Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.1.1 “Clinical theory” as an alternative to the ideal guidance approach Kein Zugriff
          1. The problem of the second-best Kein Zugriff
          2. The legitimacy critique Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2 A reasonable compromise? Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1 Institutional design Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.1 Technical feasibility and accessibility Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.2 Modal dimensions of feasibility restrictions Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.2.3 Ontological dimensions of feasibility restrictions Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3 Mapping different approaches to normative theory Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1 Principles for designing institutions and the status quo bias Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2 The importance of long-term consequences for evaluating incremental reform options Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.3 Do we need ideal theory? Kein Zugriff
      4. 5.4 Feasibility in the construction of ideal institutions Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1 Geuss’ conception of critical political philosophy Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.2.1 Recognizing power in ideal theory? Kein Zugriff
        2. 6.2.2 Ideology and moral intuitions Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.1 Rawls’ constructivism Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.2 Justifying moral construction assumptions: the universalist interpretation of Rawls’ theory Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.3 Problems of Rawls’ approach: Justifying moral construction assumptions Kein Zugriff
      4. 7.4 The contextualist interpretation of Rawls’ constructivism Kein Zugriff
      5. 7.5 O’Neill’s minimalist version of constructivism Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.1 The need for fundamental moral assumptions in constructivism Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.2 Methodological foundations for moral reasoning? Kein Zugriff
      3. 8.3 Investigating proceduralism: subjective desires as inputs? Kein Zugriff
      4. 8.4 Starting from substantive moral reasons: a defense of an objectivist conception of moral reasoning Kein Zugriff
    4. 9. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
  6. References Kein Zugriff 263 - 274

Literaturverzeichnis (204)

  1. References: Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  2. Acemoglu, Daron / Robinson, James A. (2013): Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  3. Alexander, Larry / Moore, Michael (2012): Deontological Ethics. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 Edition. URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/ethics-deontological/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  4. Alexy, Robert (1996): Theorie der Grundrechte. 3. Auflage. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  5. Bagnoli, Carla (2011): Constructivism in Metaethics. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2011 Edition. URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/constructivism-ethics/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  6. Barry, Brian (1989): Theories of Justice: A Treatise on Social Justice. Volume I. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  7. Barry, Brian (1995): Justice as Impartiality: A Treatise on Social Justice. Volume II. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  8. Barry, Brian (2005): Why Social Justice Matters. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  9. Berker, Selim (2009): The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 37: 4, 293‒329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  10. Birnbacher, Dieter (2003): Analytische Einführung in die Ethik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  11. Birnbaum, Simon (2010): Radical Liberalism, Rawls and the Welfare State: Justifying the Politics of Basic Income. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13: 4, 495–516. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  12. Birnbaum, Simon (2011): Should Surfers be Ostracized? Basic Income, Liberal Neutrality, and the Work Ethos. In: Politics Philosophy Economics, DOI: 10.1177/1470594X10386569 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  13. Brendel, Elke (2004): Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments. In: Dialectica 58: 1, 89–108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  14. Brennan, Geoffrey (2013): Feasibility in Optimizing Ethics. In: Social Philosophy & Policy 30: 1–2, 314–329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  15. Brennan, Geoffrey / Hamlin, Alan (2004): Analytic Conser-vatism. In: British Journal of Political Science 34: 4, 675–691. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  16. Brennan, Geoffrey / Lomasky, Loren (1993): Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  17. Brennan, Geoffrey / Pettit, Philip (2007): The Feasibility Issue. In: Jackson, Frank / Smith, Michael (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online, Oxford University Press, 258–279. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  18. Brennan, Geoffrey / Southwood, Nicholas (2007): Feasibility in Action and Attitude. In: Ronnow-Rasmussen, T. / Petersson, B. / Josefsson, J. / Egonsson, D. (eds.): Hommage a´ Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, URL = <www.fil.lu.se/hommagwawlodek>. (21.07.2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  19. Brennan, Jason (2014): Why not Capitalism? New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  20. Brink, David O. (1987): Rawlsian Constructivism in Moral Theory. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17: 1, 71–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  21. Buchanan, James M. (1984): Die Grenzen der Freiheit: Zwischen Anarchie und Leviathan. Tübingen: Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  22. Budde, Kerstin (2009): Constructivism all the Way Down – Can O’Neill Succeed Where Rawls Failed? In: Contemporary Political Theory 8: 2, 199–223. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  23. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce / Smith, Alastair / Siverson, Randolph M. / Morrow, James (2005): The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, (Mass.): MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  24. Chambers, Simone (2012): Justice or Legitimacy, Barricades or Public Reason? The Politics of Property-Owning Democracy. In: O’Neill, Martin / Williamson, Thad (eds.): Property-Owning Democracy. Rawls and Beyond. Oxford: Blackwell, 17–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  25. Celikates, Robin (2006): From Critical Social Theory to a Social Theory of Critique: On the Critique of Ideology after the Pragmatic Turn. In: Constellations 13, 21‒40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  26. Ceva, Emmanuela (2012): Beyond Legitimacy: Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant About Justice? In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15: 2, 183–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  27. Cohen, Gerald A. (2008): Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  28. Cohen, Gerald A. (2009): Why not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  29. Crouch, Colin (2005): Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  30. D'Agostino, Fred / Gaus, Gerald / Thrasher, John (2011): Con-temporary Approaches to the Social Contract. In: Zalta, Edward N. (Hg.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  31. Downs, Anthony (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  32. Dworkin, Ronald (2011): Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  33. Edmundson, William A. (2017): John Rawls: Reticent Socialist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  34. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2005): Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform. MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/2, 5–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  35. Elster, John (2007): Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge (Mass.) and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  36. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990): The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  37. Esser, Hartmut (1996): What is Wrong with ‘Variable Sociology’? In: European Sociological Review 12: 2, 159–166. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  38. Esser, Hartmut (1999): Soziologie: Allgemeine Grundlagen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  39. Estlund, David M. (2008): Democratic Authority: A Philo-sophical Framework. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  40. Estlund, David (2011a): Human Nature and the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 39: 3, 207–237. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  41. Estlund, David (2011b): What Good Is It? Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work. In: Analyse & Kritik 33: 2, 395–416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  42. Farrelly, Colin (2007): Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation. In: Political Studies 55: 4, 844–864. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  43. Floyd, Jonathan (2009): Is Political Philosophy Too Ahistorical? In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12: 4, 513–533. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  44. Floyd, Jonathan / Stears, Marc (2011): Introduction. In: Floyd, Jonathan/Stears, Marc (ed.): Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  45. Forrester, Katrina (2012): Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism. In: European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3): 247–272 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  46. Frazer, Michael L. (2016): Utopophobia as a Vocation: The Professional Ethics of Ideal and Nonideal Political Theory. In: Social Philosophy & Policy 33: 1–2, 175–192. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  47. Freeman, Samuel (2003) (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  48. Freeman, Samuel (2007): Rawls. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  49. Freyenhagen, Fabian / Schaub, Jörg, 2010: Hat hier jemand gesagt, der Kaiser sei nackt? Eine Verteidigung der Geussschen Kritik an Rawls’ idealtheoretischem Ansatz. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58: 3, 457‒477. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  50. García Gibson, Francisco (2016): Utopias and Comparative Assessments of Justice. In: Metaphilosophy 47, 92–107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  51. Gaus, Gerald F. (2008): On Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  52. Gaus, Gerald F. (2011): The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  53. Gaus, Gerald F. (2016): The Tyranny of the Ideal: Justice in a Diverse Society. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  54. Geuss, Raymond (2005): Outside Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  55. Geuss, Raymond (2008): Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  56. Geuss, Raymond (2010): Realismus, Wunschdenken, Utopie. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58, 419‒429. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  57. Geuss, Raymond (2011): Kritik der politischen Philosophie: Eine Streitschrift. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition HIS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  58. Gilabert, Pablo (2012): Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15: 1, 39–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  59. Gilabert, Pablo / Lawford-Smith, Holly (2012): Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration. In: Political Studies 60: 4, 809–825. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  60. Goodin, Robert E. (1995): Political Ideals and Political Practice. In: British Journal of Political Science 25: 1, 37‒56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  61. Goodin, Robert E. (1996): Institutions and Their Design. In: Goodin, Robert E. (ed.): The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  62. Goodin, Robert E. (ed.) (1996): The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  63. Goodin, Robert E. / Rice, James M. / Parpo, Antti / Eriksson, Lina (2008): Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  64. Hacker, Jacob S. (2010): The Road to Somewhere: Why Health Reform Happened. Or Why Political Scientists Who Write about Public Policy Shouldn’t Assume They Know How to Shape It. In: Reflections 10: 3, 861–876. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  65. Haddock, Bruce (2006): Thin Universalism as Weak Foundationalism. In: Haddock, Bruce / Roberts, Peri / Sutch, Peter (eds.): Principles and Political Order: The Challenge of Diversity. Abingdon: Routledge, 60–76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  66. Haddock, Bruce (2011): Systemic Evil and the Limits of Pluralism. In: Haddock, Bruce / Roberts, Peri / Sutch, Peter (eds.): Evil in Contemporary Political Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 62–80. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  67. Hall, Peter A. / Gingerich, Daniel W. (2004): “Spielarten des Kapitalismus” und institutionelle Komplementaritäten in der Makroökonomie – Eine empirische Analyse. In: Berliner Journal für Soziologie 1, 5–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  68. Hall, Peter A. / Soskice, David (2001): Introduction. In: Hall, Peter A. / Soskice, David: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1–68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  69. Hamlin, Alan / Stemplowska, Zofia (2012): Theory, Ideal Theory and the Theory of Ideals. In: Political Studies Review 10, 48–62 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  70. Hardin, Russell (1996): Institutional Morality. In: Goodin (ed.): The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 126–154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  71. Hayek, Friedrich A. (2006): The Constitution of Liberty. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  72. Hedström, Peter (2008): Anatomie des Sozialen – Prinzipien der Analytischen Soziologie. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  73. Hempel, Carl G. (1942): The Function of General Laws in History. In: The Journal of Philosophy 39: 2, 35–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  74. Hempel, Carl G. (1972): Wissenschaftliche und Historische Erklärungen. In: Albert, Hans (ed.): Theorie und Realität. Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur Wissen-schaftslehre der Sozialwissenschaften. Second Edition. Tübingen: Mohr, 237–261. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  75. Hendrix, Burke A. (2013): Where Should We Expect Social Change in Non-Ideal Theory? In: Political Theory 41: 1, 116–143. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  76. Hilmer, Richard / Merz, Stefan (2014): Die Bundestagswahl vom 22. September 2013: Merkels Meisterstück. In: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 1, 175–206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  77. Hinsch, Wilfried (2011): Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent. A Critique of Amartya Sen’s ‘The Idea of Justice’. In: Analyse & Kritik 2, 371–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  78. Hirschman, Albert O. (1974): Abwanderung und Widerspruch: Reaktionen auf Leistungsabfall bei Unternehmungen, Organisation und Staaten. Tübingen: Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  79. Jörke, Dirk / Nullmeier, Frank (2012): Realismusstreit und Methodendiskussion: Zur aktuellen Lage der Politischen Theorie. In: Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 1, 3–8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  80. Jubb, Robert (2012): Tragedies of Non-Ideal Theory. In: European Journal of Political Theory 11: 3, 229–246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  81. Kamm, Frances M. (2011): Sen on Justice and Rights: A Review Essay. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 39: 1, 83–104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  82. Kelly, Paul (2011): Rescuing Political Theory from the Tyranny of History. In: Jonathan Floyd / Marc Stears (ed.), Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Though. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13‒38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  83. Kingdon, John W. (2003): Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Second Edition, New York: Longman. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  84. Kliemt, Hartmut (1996): Macht und Ohnmacht der Moral in der Demokratie. In: Bayertz, Kurt (ed.): Politik und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, 168–193. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  85. Korpi, Walter (2001): Contentious Institutions: An Augmented Rational-Action Analysis of the Origins and Path-Dependence of Welfare State Institutions in Western Countries. In: Rationality and Society 13: 2, 235–283. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  86. Krupp, Tyler (2008): Genealogy as Critique? In: Journal of the Philosophy of History 2: 3, 315–337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  87. Kunz, Volker (2004): Rational Choice. Frankfurt am Main & New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  88. Lakatos, Imre (1970): Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Lakatos, Imre / Musgrave, Alan (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  89. Landwehr, Claudia (2011): Substantielle und prozedurale Gerechtigkeit in der Verteilung von Gesundheitsgütern. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 52: 1, 29–50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  90. Laurence, Ben (2019): The Question of the Agent of Change. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy 0: 0, DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  91. Lawford-Smith, Holly (2010): Feasibility Constraints for Political Theories. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  92. Lawford-Smith, Holly (2013): Non-Ideal Accessibility. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 3, 653–669. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  93. Leopold, David / Stears, Marc (eds.): Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11‒29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  94. Levy, Jacob T. (2016): There is no such Thing as Ideal Theory. In: Social Philosophy & Policy 33: 1–2, 312–333. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  95. List, Christian / Valentini, Laura (2016): The Methodology of Political Theory. In: Cappelen, Herman / Gendler, Tamar S. / Hawthorne, John (Eds.): Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 525–553. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  96. Lovett, Frank (2010): A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  97. Lovett, Frank / Pettit, Philip (2009): Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program. In: The Annual Review of Political Science 12, 11–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  98. Lukes, Steven (2005): Power: A Radical View. Second Edition, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  99. March, James G. / Olsen, Johan P. (1989): Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  100. Markell, Patchen (2010): Philosophy and Real Politics, by Raymond Geuss. In: Political Theory 38: 1, 172–177. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  101. Marx, Johannes (2012): Geistige Eigentumsrechte als Problem der Internationalen Gerechtigkeit: Metatheoretische Anmerkungen zum Rechtfertigungsproblem geistiger Eigentumsrechte. In: Regina Kreide / Claudia Landwehr / Katrin Toens (eds.): Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit in Verteilungskonflikten. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 283–313. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  102. Mason, Andrew (2010): Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics. In: Political Theory 38: 5, 658‒683. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  103. Matthew, Dale C. (2019): Rawls’s Ideal Theory: A Clarification and Defense. In: Res Publica 25: 4, 553–570. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  104. McDermott, Daniel (2008): Analytical Political Philosophy. In: Leopold, David / Stears, Marc (eds.): Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11‒29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  105. McLeod, Owen (2013): Desert. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 Edition. URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/desert/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  106. Menke, Christoph (2010): Neither Rawls Nor Adorno: Raymond Geuss’ Programme for a ‘Realist’ Political Philosophy. In: European Journal of Philosophy 18: 1, 139–147. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  107. Miller, Alexander (2003): An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  108. Miller, Clarence H. (2001): Introduction. In: More, Thomas (2001): Utopia. Translated and introduced by Clarence H. Miller. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, vii-xxiii. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  109. Miller, David (2008): Political Philosophy for Earthlings. In: Leopold, David / Stears, Marc (eds.): Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  110. Mills, Charles W. (2005): “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. In: Hypatia 20: 3, 165–184. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  111. Mulhall, Stephen / Swift, Adam (2003): Rawls and Communitarianism. In: Freeman, Samuel (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 460‒487. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  112. Norcross, Alistair (1997): Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 26: 2, 135–167. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  113. North, Douglass C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  114. Nozick, Robert (1974): Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  115. Olson, Mancur (1991): Ein weniger ideologiegebundenes Verfahren der Entscheidung über die Umverteilung zu den Armen. In: Olson, Mancur (ed.): Umfassende Ökonomie. Tübingen: Mohr, 363–390. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  116. Olson, Mancur (2000): Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  117. O’Neill, Onora (1989): Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  118. O’Neill, Onora (1996): Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  119. O’Neill, Onora (2000): Bounds of Justice. Cambridge and New York: University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  120. O’Neill, Onora (2003): Constructivism vs. Contractualism. In: Ratio (new series) 16: 4, 319–331. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  121. Parfit, Derek (2011a): On What Matters: Volume One. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  122. Parfit, Derek (2011b): On What Matters: Volume Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  123. Parfit, Derek (2017): Future People, the Non-Identity Problem, and Person-Affecting Principles. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 45: 2, 118–157. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  124. Pech, Wesley, J. (2010): Behavioral Economics and the Basic Income Guarantee. In: Basic Income Studies 5: 2, 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  125. Pettit, Philip (1996): Institutional Design and Rational Choice. In: Goodin, Robert E. (ed.): The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 54–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  126. Pettit, Philip (1997): Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  127. Pettit, Philip (2012): On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  128. Pierson, Paul (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  129. Pierson, Paul (2000): Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. In: American Political Science Review 94, 2, 251–267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  130. Pogge, Thomas W. (1989): Realizing Rawls. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  131. Pogge, Thomas W. (2008): Cohen to the Rescue. In: Ratio (new series) 21: 4, 454–475. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  132. Pollack, Mark A. (2005): Theorizing EU Policy-Making. In: Wallace, Helen / Wallace, William / Pollack, Mark A. (eds.): Policy-Making in the European Union. Fifth Edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 13–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  133. Popper, Karl R. (1994): Logik der Forschung. 10th edition, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  134. Popper, Karl R. (2003): Das Elend des Historizismus. 7th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  135. Räikkä, Juha (1998): The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy 6: 1, 27–40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  136. Rawls, John (1975): The Independence of Moral Theory. In: Rawls, John (1999): Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press, 286–302. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  137. Rawls, John (1980): Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. In: Rawls, John (1999): Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press, 303–358. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  138. Rawls, John (1982): Social Unity and Primary Goods. In: Rawls, John (1999): Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press, 359–387. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  139. Rawls, John (1985): Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. In: Rawls, John (1999): Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 388–415. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  140. Rawls, John (1999a): A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Cambridge (Mass.): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  141. Rawls, John (1999b): The Law of Peoples: with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  142. Rawls, John (2001): Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Erin Kelly. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  143. Rawls, John (2005): Political Liberalism. Expanded Edition, New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  144. Roberts, Peri (2006): Why Thin Universalism Needs Conceptions of Society and Person. In: Haddock, Bruce / Roberts, Peri / Sutch, Peter (eds.): Principles and Political Order. Abingdon: Routledge, 111–128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  145. Roberts, Peri (2007): Political Constructivism. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  146. Robeyns, Ingrid (2008): Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice. In: Social Theory and Practice 34: 3, 341–362. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  147. Roemer, John E. (1994): A Future for Socialism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  148. Ronzoni, Miriam / Valentini, Laura (2008): On the Meta-Ethical Status of Constructivism: Reflections on G.A. Cohen’s ‘Facts and Principles’. In: Politics Philosophy Economics 7: 4, 403–422. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  149. Ross, Michael L. (1999): The Political Economy of the Resource Curse. In: World Politics 51: 2, 297–322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  150. Rothstein, Bo (2011): Creating a Sustainable Solidaristic Society: A Manual. QoG Working Paper Series 2011:7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  151. Sandel, Michael J. (1984): The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self. In: Political Theory 12, 81–96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  152. Sandel, Michael J. (2009): Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  153. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2003): Rawls on Justification. In: Samuel Freeman (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139‒167. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  154. Scanlon, Tomas M. (2014): Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  155. Scharpf, Fritz W. (2000): Economic Changes, Vulnerabilities, and Institutional Capabilities. In: Scharpf, Fritz W. / Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.): Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 21–124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  156. Schaub, Jörg (2010): Ideale und/oder nicht-ideale Theorie – oder weder noch? Ein Literaturbericht zum neuesten Methodenstreit in der politischen Philosophie. In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 64: 3, 393‒409. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  157. Schaub, Jörg (2012): Politische Theorie als angewandte Moralphilosophie? In: Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 3: 1, 8–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  158. Schmidtz, David (2016): A Realistic Political Ideal. In: Social Philosophy & Policy 33: 1–2, 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  159. Schmitt, Annette (2005): Die Umstände der Gerechtigkeit: Handlungs- und motivationstheoretische Annahmen liberaler Theorien am Beispiel von John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  160. Schnell, Rainer / Hill, Paul B. / Esser, Elke (2013): Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München: Olden-bourg. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  161. Sen, Amartya (1982): Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  162. Sen, Amartya (2006): What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice? In: The Journal of Philosophy 103: 5, 215–238. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  163. Sen, Amartya (2009): The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  164. Silva, Renan (2019): The Two-Dimensional Analysis of Feasibility: A Restatement. In: Moral Philosophy and Politics 6: 2, 357–378. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  165. Simmons, John A. (2010): Ideal and Nonideal Theory. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 38: 1, 5–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  166. Singer, Peter (1972): Famine, Affluence, and Morality. In: Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 3, 229–243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  167. Singer, Peter (1974): Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium. In: The Monist 58: 3, 490‒517. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  168. Singer, Peter (2005): Ethics and Intuitions. In: The Journal of Ethics 9: 3–4, 331–352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  169. Singer, Peter (2011a): Practical Ethics. Third Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  170. Singer, Peter (2011b): The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  171. Sinnot-Armstrong, Walter (2014): Consequentialism. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 Edition. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/consequentialism/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  172. Sirsch, Jürgen (2012): Die Relevanz idealer Theorie bei der Beurteilung praktischer Probleme. In: Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 3: 1, 25–41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  173. Sirsch, Jürgen (2020): Should Liberal-Egalitarians Support a Basic Income? An Examination of the Effectiveness and Stability of Ideal Welfare Regimes. In: Moral Philosophy and Politics 0: 0, DOI: doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019–0024. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  174. Sirsch, Jürgen / Unger, Doris (2019): The Neorepublican Challenge to Egalitarian-Liberalism: Evaluating Justifications of Redistributive Institutions. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 0: 0, DOI: doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1644580. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  175. Sirsch, Jürgen / Unger, Doris (unpublished): Neorepublicanism as a Public Philosophy: Some Arguments for Freedom as Non-Domination. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  176. Southwood, Nick (2016): Does “Ought” Imply “Feasible”? In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 44: 1, 7–45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  177. Southwood, Nick / Wiens, David (2016): “Actual” Does not Imply “Feasible”. In: Philosophical Studies 17: 11, 3037–3060. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  178. Stemplowska, Zofia (2008): What’s Ideal about Ideal Theory? In: Social Theory and Practice 34: 3, 319–340. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  179. Stemplowska, Zofia / Swift, Adam (2012): Ideal and Nonideal Theory. In: Estlund, David (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 373–393. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  180. Stiglitz, Joseph (2012): Der Preis der Ungleichheit: Wie die Spaltung der Gesellschaft unsere Zukunft bedroht. München: Siedler. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  181. Swift, Adam (2008): The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances. In: Social Theory and Practice 34: 3, 363–387. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  182. Thelen, Kathleen (1999): Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. In: Annual Review of Political Science 2, 369–404. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  183. Thomas, Alan (2016): Republic of Equals: Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  184. Unger, Doris (2013): Das Recht auf Gleichbehandlung und die (Ir)Relevanz von gruppenspezifischen Merkmalen am Beispiel des Antidiskriminierungsrechts. In: Bonn, Eva / Knöppler, Christian / Souza, Miguel (eds.): Was machen Marker? Logik, Materialität und Politik von Differenzierungsprozessen. Bielefeld: Transcript, 317–342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  185. Valentini, Laura (2009): On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 3, 332–350. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  186. Valentini, Laura (2012): Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. In: Philosophy Compass 7: 9, 654–664. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  187. Valentini, Laura (2017): On the Messy “Utopophobia vs. Factophobia” Controversy. In: Weber, Michael / Vallier, Kevin (Eds.): Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  188. Valentini, Laura (2018): The Case for Ideal Theory. In: Brown, Chris / Eckersley, Robyn (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 663–676. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  189. Van Lancker, Wim / Van Mechelen, Natascha (2015) Universalism under Siege? Exploring the Association between Targeting, Child Benefits and Child Poverty Across 26 Countries. Social Science Research 50: 60–75. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  190. Van Parijs, Philippe (1995): Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  191. Van Parijs, Philippe (2011): Just Democracy: The Rawls-Machiavelli Programme. Colchester: ECPR Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  192. Waldron, Jeremy (1999): Law and Disagreement. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  193. Watkins, Eric / Fitzpatrick, William (2002): O’Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity. In: The Journal of Value Inquiry 36: 2–3, 349–367. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  194. Wiens, David (2012): Prescribing Institutions without Ideal Theory. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy 20: 1, 45–70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  195. Wiens, David (2013): Demands of Justice, Feasible Alternatives, and the Need for Causal Analysis. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 2, 325–338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  196. Wiens, David (2015): Political Ideals and the Feasibility Frontier. In: Economics and Philosophy 31, 447–477. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  197. Wiens, David (2016): Assessing ideal theories: Lessons from the theory of second best. In: Politics, Philosophy & Economics 15, 2: 132–149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  198. Williams, Bernard (2007): In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  199. Williamson, Thad (2009): Who Owns What? An Egalitarian Interpretation of John Rawls’ Idea of a Property-Owning Democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy 40, 3: 434–453. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  200. Wood, Allen (2011): Humanity as an End in Itself. In: Parfit, Derek: On What Matters. Volume Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 58–83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  201. Wright, Erik Olin (2010): Envisioning Real Utopias. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  202. Zahariadis, Nikolaos (2007): The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects. In: Sabatier, Paul A. (ed): Theories of the Policy Process. Cambridge: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  203. Zimmerling, Ruth (1996): Wissenschaft und Verantwortung: Ist die traditionelle Gegenüberstellung von empirischer und normativer Wissenschaft haltbar? In: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 6, 51‒82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063
  204. Zimmerling, Ruth (2005): Influence and Power: Variations on a Messy Theme. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748922063

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Schriftenreihe der Sektion Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte in der DVPW | Studies in Political Theory"
Cover des Buchs: Kämpfe um Diversität
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Christian Leonhardt, Franziska Martinsen, Samia Zahra Mohammed, Sabrina Zucca-Soest
Kämpfe um Diversität
Cover des Buchs: Personen und Subjekte des Politischen
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Michel Dormal, Jürgen Förster, Edgar Hirschmann, Emanuel Richter, Hans-Jörg Sigwart
Personen und Subjekte des Politischen
Cover des Buchs: Migration
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Oliviero Angeli, Andreas Niederberger, Hans Vorländer
Migration
Cover des Buchs: Institutionen der politischen Differenz
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Malte Miram
Institutionen der politischen Differenz
Cover des Buchs: Politische Grundbegriffe im 21. Jahrhundert
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Tobias Adler-Bartels, Sven Altenburger, Verena Frick, Tobias Schottdorf, Tine Stein
Politische Grundbegriffe im 21. Jahrhundert

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex