Cover des Buchs: A Reflexive Islamic Modernity
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

A Reflexive Islamic Modernity

Academic Knowledge and Religious Subjectivity in the Global Ismaili Community
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

Die Nizari-Ismailiten gehören zu den muslimischen Gemeinschaften, die sich am intensivsten in der akademischen Ausbildung und Wissensproduktion in den Islam- und Geisteswissenschaften engagieren. Zu diesem Zweck betreiben sie zwei akademische Institutionen in London: das Institute of Ismaili Studies und das Institute for the Study of Muslim Civilisations.

Die vorliegende Studie untersucht im Rückgriff auf religions- und wissenssoziologische Ansätze den akademischen Diskurs der beiden Institute und die religiösen Ausrichtungen innerhalb ihrer internationalen Studentenschaft. Dabei wird deutlich, dass sich die Gemeinschaft vorwiegend mit drei Themenbereichen auseinandersetzt: dem Verhältnis zur säkularen Moderne, zu den Hauptströmungen des Islam und zu sich selbst. Der ismailitische Umgang mit dieser dreifachen Herausforderung lässt sich als ein Prozess der reflexiven Modernisierung verstehen, in dem der Islam als Kultur anstatt als Religion neu konzeptualisiert und Ungewissheit in religiöser Subjektivität verinnerlicht wird.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2020
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-95650-636-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-95650-637-6
Verlag
Ergon, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Religion in der Gesellschaft
Band
47
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
230
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 14
    1. 1. Development and Conceptualization Kein Zugriff
      1. Objectives: Kein Zugriff
      2. Relevance: Kein Zugriff
      1. Summary of Chapter One: Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1. A Response to Postmodern Theory Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2. Defining Reflexivity Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.3. Boundaries and Subjectivity in First vs. Late Modernity Kein Zugriff
      4. 1.4. Community and Shared Meanings in Late Modernity Kein Zugriff
      5. 1.5. Social Sciences and Modernity Kein Zugriff
      6. 1.6. Relevance for this Study Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1. Religion Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2. Knowledge and Belief Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3. Faith and Reason Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.4. Culture Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1. Revisiting the Secularization Thesis Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2. Secularism and the Secular – The Epistemic Dimension Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3. The Debate about Religion in the Public Sphere Kein Zugriff
        1. Summary of Chapter Two: Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1. Promotional Materials and Institutional Documents Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2. Articles Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.3. Speeches, Lectures, and Other Public Events Kein Zugriff
      4. 1.4. Selected Speeches of the Aga Khan Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1. Ontological and Epistemological Basis Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2. Research Design Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.1. Insider vs. Outsider Research Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.2. The Ismaili Community and Academic Research Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.3. Personal Experience of Researching Ismailis Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.1.1. Sample Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.1.2. Sampling Methods Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.1.3. Outline and Questions Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2. Participant Observation Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3. Meetings with Experts Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Analysis Kein Zugriff
      1. Summary of Chapter Three: Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1. Historical Overview Kein Zugriff
        1. 1.2.1. Early Ismaili Thought Kein Zugriff
        2. 1.2.2. Fatimid Ismaili Thought Kein Zugriff
        3. 1.2.3. Ismaili Thought during the Alamut Era Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.3. Organization Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Post-Alamut Ismailism (1256 – 1817) Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1. Aga Khan I: From Qajar Iran to British India Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2. Aga Khan III: The Modernization of Ismailism Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3. Aga Khan IV: From Modernization to Globalization Kein Zugriff
        1. a) National Contexts Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Socio-economic Conditions Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Political Orientation Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Geographic Mobility Kein Zugriff
        5. e) Rituals and Places of Worship Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2. Relationship to Mainstream Islam Kein Zugriff
        1. Summary of Chapter Four: Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1. The Classical Period Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2. Contemporary Ismailism Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1. IIS Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2. ISMC Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.1. Curriculum and Structure Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.4. The IIS and the ISMC in the Context of Higher Education and Religion Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.1.1. Critiquing Secularism Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.1.2. Critiquing Fundamentalism Kein Zugriff
          1. Why Culture? Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.2. Culture as a Medium to Deconstruct Fundamentalist Conceptions Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3. From Islam to Muslims Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4. From Islamic to Inter-Disciplinarily Studies Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1. Harmony through Culture Kein Zugriff
        1. Summary of Chapter Five: Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1. Expectations of Similarity, Encounters with Heterogeneity Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2. A Compact Social Environment: Living in a “Bubble” Kein Zugriff
        1. 1.3.1. Ritual Differences Kein Zugriff
        2. 1.3.2. Ethnic and Social Distinctions Kein Zugriff
        3. 1.3.3. Multiple Differentiations of the Religious and the Secular Kein Zugriff
        4. 1.3.4. Khojas’ View of other Ismailis Kein Zugriff
      4. 1.4. Summary of Section 1 Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.1.1. The Challenge of Defining Relationship to Mainstream Islam Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.1.2. Religiously ‘Introverted’ Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2. Narratives of Doubt and Internal Struggles Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.1. Normalization of Doubt Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.2. A Separatist Approach to Faith and Reason Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.3. Focus on Social and Psychological Functions of Religion Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.3.4. Drawing on Ismaili Doctrines Kein Zugriff
        5. 2.3.5. Deconstructing Questions and Normative Presumptions Kein Zugriff
        6. 2.3.6. Some Remarks about the Strategies Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.4. Summary of Section 2 Kein Zugriff
    1. 1. The Three-Dimensional Challenge Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Boundaries and fundamental distinctions lose their unequivocal character Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Multiplicity of ways to draw and justify boundaries and the recognition thereof Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. The destabilization of reference systems Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Subject drawing its boundaries and continuously revising its position Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Boundaries handled practically depending on context and individual Kein Zugriff
      6. 6. Uncertainty incorporated as an institutional learning process Kein Zugriff
      7. 7. Subjects are more knowledgeable, but less certain Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Future Research Kein Zugriff
  9. Appendix I – Details of Quoted Interviews Kein Zugriff 211 - 212
  10. Appendix II – Details of Quoted Fieldnotes Kein Zugriff 213 - 214
  11. Appendix III – Sources for the Analysis of Ismaili Discourse on Religion Kein Zugriff 215 - 218
  12. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 219 - 230

Literaturverzeichnis (172)

  1. Adatia, A.K. and King, N.Q. (1969) “Some East African Firmans of H. H. Aga Khan III”, Journal of Religion in Africa, p. 179–191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  2. Ahmed, S.S. (1975) “Religious Leadership and Social Change in the Ismaili Khoja Community”, M. Soc. Sc. Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  3. Akhtar, I. (2016) The Khōjā of Tanzania: Discontinuities of a Postcolonial Religious Identity, Brill, Leiden. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  4. Al-Azmeh, A. (2001) “Civilization, Concept and History of” in Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B. (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed., Elsevier, Pergamon, Amsterdam, p. 1903–1909. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  5. Al-Azmeh, A. (2001) “Civilization, (2009) Islams and Modernities, 3rd ed., Verso, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  6. Al-Azmeh, A. (2001) “Civilization, (2012) “Civilization as a Political Disposition”, Economy and Society, Vol. 41, No. 4, p. 501–512. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  7. Aldridge, A. (2007) Religion in the Contemporary World: A Sociological Introduction, 2nd ed., Polity, Cambridge, Malden, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  8. Al-Ghazali, A.H. (1980) Freedom and Fulfillment, an annotated translation of al-Ghazaliʼs al-Munqidh min al-Ḍalāl by R. J. McCarthy, Twayne Publishers, Boston. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  9. Amesbury, R. “Fideism” in Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 Edition, [Online], available at <plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/fideism/> (accessed 22 April 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  10. Amiji, H.M. (1971) “Some Notes on Religious Dissent in Nineteenth-Century East Africa”, African Historical Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, p. 603–616. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  11. Amiji, H.M. (1971) “Some Notes on Religious Dissent in Nineteenth-Century East Africa”, (1975) “The Bohras of East Africa”, Journal of religion in Africa, Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 27–61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  12. Amin, M. (1983) Salamiyya fi Khamsin Qarnan, Matbaʿat Karam, Damascus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  13. Anderson, E. (2013) The Impact of Self-Disclose, Drinking, and Sex in Ethnography, Lecture presented at the British Sociological Association Regional Postgraduate Event: Demystifying the "Insider/Outsider" Debate in Qualitative Research, 8 March, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  14. Anderson, J.N.D. (1964) “The Isma’ili Khojas of East Africa: A New Constitution and Personal Law for the Community”, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 21–39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  15. Arkoun, M. (2007) “The Answers of Applied Islamology”, Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 24, No. 2, p. 21–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  16. Arthur, J. (2006) Faith and Secularisation in Religious Colleges and Universities, Routledge, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  17. Asad, T. (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  18. Asad, T. (2001) “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith's 'The Meaning and End of Religion'”, History of Religions, Vol. 40 No. 3, p. 205–222. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  19. Asad, T. (2001) “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith's 'The Meaning and End of Religion'”, (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  20. Asad, T. (2001) “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith's 'The Meaning and End of Religion'”, (2011) “Thinking about the Secular Body, Pain, and Liberal Politics”, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 26, No. 4, p. 657–675. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  21. Barron, L. (2006) “Ontology” in Jupp, V. (Ed.) The SAGE Dictionary of Social and Cultural Research Methods, SAGE, London, p. 202–203. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  22. Barton, A. (2006) “Ismaili Success: Made in Vancouver”, BCBusiness, 1 July [Online], available at <www.bcbusiness.ca/people/ismaili-success-made-in-vancouverwww.bcbusiness.ca/people/ismaili-success-made-in-vancouver> (accessed 26 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  23. BBC News (2007) “Dawkins: I’m a cultural Christian” [Online], available at <news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_politics/7136682.stm> (accessed 27 July 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  24. Beck, U., Bonss, W. and Lau, C. (2003) “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme”, Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 1–33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  25. Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (1994) Reflexive Modernization, Polity Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  26. Beckford, J.A. (2012) “SSSR Presidential Address – Public Religions and the Postsecular: Critical Reflections”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 51, No. 1, p. 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  27. Berger, P.L. (1967) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, Anchor Books, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  28. Berger, P.L. (1967) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, (1999) “The Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview” in Berger, P.L. (Ed.) The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Washington, D.C, p. 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  29. Berger, P.L. (1967) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, (2002) “Introduction: The Cultural Dynamics of Globalization” in Berger, P.L. and Huntington, S.P. (Eds.) Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, p. 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  30. Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Penguin Books, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  31. Berger, P.L. and Neuhaus, R.J. (1977) To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  32. Bishop, J. “Faith” in Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2010 Edition, [Online], available at <plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/faith/> (accessed 22 April 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  33. Bocock, R.J. (1971) “The Ismailis in Tanzania: A Weberian Analysis”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 22, No. 4, p. 365–380. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  34. Boivin, M. (1994) “The Reform of Islam in Ismaili Shi’ism from 1885 to 1957” in Delvoye, F. (Ed.) Confluence of Cultures: French Contributions to Indo-Persian Studies, Manohar Centre for Human Sciences; Institut Fracais De Recherche En Iran, New Delhi, Tehran, p. 197–216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  35. Boivin, M. (2010) “Gināns and the Management of the Religious Heritage of the Ismaili Khoja in Sindh” in Kassam, T.R. and Mallison, F. (Eds.) Gināns: Texts and Contexts, Essays on Ismaili Hymns from South Asia in Honour of Zawahir Moir, Rev. ed., Primus Books, Delhi, p. 25–53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  36. Bremborg, A.D. (2011) “Interviewing” in Stausberg, M. and Engler, S. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, Routledge, London, New York, p. 310–322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  37. British Sociological Association (2002) “Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association”, (March 2002) [Online], available at <www.britsoc.co.uk/media/27107/StatementofEthicalPractice.pdfwww.britsoc.co.uk/media/27107/StatementofEthicalPractice.pdf> (accessed 18 November 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  38. Bruce, S. (2009) “The Importance of Social Science in the Study of Religion”, Fieldwork in Religion, Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 7–28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  39. Bruce, S. (2009) “The Importance of Social Science in the Study of Religion”, (2011) “Defining Religion: A Practical Response”, International Review of Sociology—Revue Internationale de Sociologie, Vol. 21, No. 1, p. 107–120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  40. Bruce, S. and Yearley, S. (2006) The Sage Dictionary of Sociology, Sage Publications Ltd, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  41. Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (1994) “Reflections on Qualitative Data Analysis” in Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (Eds.) Analyzing Qualitative Data, Routledge, London, p. 216–226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  42. Casanova, J. (2005) “Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A EU/US Comparison”, paper presented at The New Religious Pluralism and Democracy Conference, 21-22 April 2005, Georgetown University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  43. Casanova, J. (2005) “Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A EU/US Comparison”, (2006a) “Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective”, The Hedgehog Review, Vol. 8, No. 1-2, p. 7–22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  44. Casanova, J. (2005) “Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A EU/US Comparison”, (2006b) “Secularization Revisited: A Reply to Talal Asad” in Scott, D. and Hirschkind, C. (Eds.) Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and his Interlocutors, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif., p. 12–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  45. Casanova, J. (2005) “Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A EU/US Comparison”, (2008) “Public Religions Revisited” in Vries, H.d. (Ed.) Religion: Beyond a Concept, Fordham University Press, New York, p. 101–119. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  46. Casanova, J. (2005) “Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A EU/US Comparison”, (2012) “Are We Still Secular? Explorations on the Secular and the Post-Secular” in Nynäs, P., Lassander, M. and Utriainen, T. (Eds.) Post-Secular Society, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, N.J, p. 27–46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  47. Chaves, M. (1993) “Intraorganizational Power and Internal Secularization in Protestant Denominations”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 99, No. 1, p. 1–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  48. Chaves, M. (1993) “Intraorganizational Power and Internal Secularization in Protestant Denominations”, (1994) “Secularization as Declining Religious Authority”, Social Forces, Vol. 72, No. 3, p. 749–774. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  49. Clarke, P.B. (1976) “The Ismailis: A Study of Community”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 27, No. 4, p. 484–494. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  50. Culler, J. (2001) “Deconstruction: Cultural Concerns” in Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B. (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed., Elsevier, Pergamon, Amsterdam, p. 3343–3346. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  51. Dabashi, H. (1989) Authority in Islam: From the Rise of Muhammad to the Establishment of the Umayyads, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, N.J, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  52. Daftary, F. (1995) The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Ismaʿilis, I.B. Tauris, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  53. Daftary, F. (1995) The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Ismaʿilis, (1998) A Short History of the Ismailis: Traditions of a Muslim community, M. Wiener, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  54. Daftary, F. (1995) The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Ismaʿilis, (2004) Ismaili Literature: A Bibliography of Sources and Studies, I.B. Tauris, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  55. Daftary, F. (1995) The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Ismaʿilis, (2007) The Ismāʿı̄lı̄s: Their History and Doctrines, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  56. Daftary, F. (1995) The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Ismaʿilis, (2011) “Introduction” in Daftary, F. (Ed.) A Modern History of the Ismailis: Continuity and Change in a Muslim Community, I. B. Tauris, London, p. 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  57. Dakake, M.M. (2007) The Charismatic Community: Shiʿite Identity in Early Islam, State University of New York Press, Albany. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  58. Davies, D. and Northam-Jones, D. (2012) “The Sea of Faith: Exemplifying Transformed Retention” in Guest, M. and Arweck, E. (Eds.) Religion and Knowledge, Ashgate, Aldershot, p. 227–243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  59. Devji, F. (2009) “Preface” in Grondelle, M.v. The Ismailis in the Colonial Era: Modernity, Empire and Islam, Columbia University Press, New York, p. ix–xvi. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  60. Devji, F. (2009) “Preface” in Grondelle, (2014) “The Idea of Ismailism”, Critical Muslim, No. 10, p. 51–62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  61. Dobbelaere, K. (1999) “Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization”, Sociology of Religion, Vol. 60, No. 3, p. 229–247. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  62. Douwes, D. (2011) “Modern History of the Nizari Ismailis of Syria” in Daftary, F. (Ed.) A Modern History of the Ismailis: Continuity and Change in a Muslim Community, I. B. Tauris, London, p. 19–43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  63. Douwes, D. and Lewis, N.N. (1989) “The Trials of Syrian Ismailis in the First Decade of the 20th Century”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 215–232. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  64. Dressler, M. (2006) “The Modern Dede: Changing Parameters for Religious Authority in Contemporary Turkish Alevism” in Krämer, G. and Schmidtke, S. (Eds.) Speaking for Islam: Religious Authorities in Muslim Societies, Brill, Leiden, Boston, p. 269–294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  65. Eagleton, T. (2014) Culture and the Death of God, Yale University Press, New Haven. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  66. Ecklund, E.H. and Scheitle, C.P. (2007) “Religion among Academic Scientists: Distinctions, Disciplines, and Demographics”, Social Problems, Vol. 54, No. 2, p. 289–307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  67. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I. and Shaw, L.L. (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  68. Engineer, A.A. (2011) A Living Faith: My Quest for Peace, Harmony, and Social Change: An Autobiography of Asghar Ali Engineer, Orient BlackSwan, New Delhi. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  69. Engler, S. (2011) “Grounded Theory” in Stausberg, M. and Engler, S. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, Routledge, London, New York, p. 256–274. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  70. Evans, J.H. (2011) “Epistemological and Moral Conflict between Religion and Science”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 50, No. 4, p. 707–727. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  71. Fairweather, I. (2012) “Faith and the Student Experience” in Guest, M. and Arweck, E. (Eds.) Religion and Knowledge, Ashgate, Aldershot, p. 39–55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  72. Fitzgerald, T. (2000) The Ideology of Religious Studies, Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  73. Gellner, E. (1973) “Post-Traditional Forms in Islam: The Turf and Trade, and Votes and Peanuts”, Daedalus, Vol. 102, No. 1, p. 191–206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  74. Gellner, E. (1973) “Post-Traditional Forms in Islam: The Turf and Trade, (1983) Nations and Nationalism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  75. Gellner, E. (1973) “Post-Traditional Forms in Islam: The Turf and Trade, (1992) Postmodernism, Reason and Religion, Routledge, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  76. Ghalib, M. (1965) Tarikh al-Daʿwa al-Ismaʿiliyya, 2nd ed., Dar al-Andalus, Beirut. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  77. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  78. Glock, C.Y. (1962) “On the Study of Religious Commitment”, Religious Education: The official journal of the Religious Education Association, Vol. 57, No. S4, p. 98–110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  79. Good, B.J. (2001) “Belief, Anthropology of” in Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B. (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed., Elsevier, Pergamon, Amsterdam, p. 1137–1141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  80. GOV.UK (2015) “The National Curriculum: 4. Other compulsory subjects” [Online], available at <www.gov.uk/national-curriculum/other-compulsory-subjectswww.gov.uk/national-curriculum/other-compulsory-subjects> (accessed 14 July 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  81. Green, N. (2011) Bombay Islam: The Religious Economy of the West Indian Ocean, 1840-1915, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  82. Grondelle, M.v. (2009) The Ismailis in the Colonial Era, Columbia University Press, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  83. Guest, M. (2012) “Religion and Knowledge: The Sociological Agenda” in Guest, M. and Arweck, E. (Eds.) Religion and Knowledge, Ashgate, Aldershot, p. 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  84. Günther, U. (2004) Mohammed Arkoun: Ein moderner Kritiker der islamischen Vernunft, Ergon, Würzburg. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  85. Habermas, J. (2008) “Notes on Post-Secular Society”, Sign and Sight [Online], available at <www.signandsight.com/features/1714.htmlwww.signandsight.com/features/1714.html> (accessed 31 May 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  86. Habermas, J. (2008) “Notes on Post-Secular Society”, (2010) “An Awareness of What is Missing” in Habermas, J. and et al. An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age, trans. by C. Cronin, Polity Press, Cambridge, p. 15–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  87. Habermas, J. and et al. (2010) An Awareness of What is Missing, Polity Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  88. Halm, H. (1997) The Fatimids and their Traditions of Learning, I.B. Tauris, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  89. Hamilton, M.B. (2001) The Sociology of Religion: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives, 2nd ed., Routledge, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  90. Harvey, G. (2011) “Field Research: Participant Observation” in Stausberg, M. and Engler, S. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, Routledge, London, New York, p. 217–244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  91. Hepburn, A. (2006) “Constructionism” in Jupp, V. (Ed.) The SAGE Dictionary of Social and Cultural Research Methods, SAGE, London, p. 38–40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  92. Hirschkind, C. (2011) “Is There a Secular Body?”, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 26, No. 4, p. 633–647. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  93. Hobbs, D. (2006) “Fieldwork” in Jupp, V. (Ed.) The SAGE Dictionary of Social and Cultural Research Methods, SAGE, London, p. 119–121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  94. Hodgson, M.G.S. (1960) “Bāṭiniyya” in Gibb, H.A.R., Kramers, J.H., Lévi-Provençal, E. and Schacht, J. (Eds.) The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Brill, Leiden, p. 1098–1100. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  95. Holyoake, G.J. (1871) The Principles of Secularism, 3rd ed., Austin and Company, London, available at < http://www.gutenberg.org/files/36797/36797-h/36797-h.htmhttp://www.gutenberg.org/files/36797/36797-h/36797-h.htm> (accessed 24 May 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  96. Jacobsen, D.G. and Jacobsen, R.H. (Eds.) (2008) The American University in a Postsecular Age, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  97. James, W. (2007 [1897]) The Will to Believe and other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Cosimo Classics, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  98. Kadiwal, L. (2015) “Religious Pluralism in Ismaili Muslim Religious Education. From Difference to Diversity”, PhD Thesis, University of Sussex. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  99. Kant, I. (1977) “What is Enlightenment?” in Kant, I. Friedrich, C.J. (Ed.) The Philosophy of Kant: Immanuel Kant’s Moral and Political Writings, Random House, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  100. Kassam, T.R. (1995) Songs of Wisdom and Circles of Dance: Hymns of the Satpanth Ismāʿīlī Muslim saint, Pīr Shams, State University of New York Press, Albany. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  101. Kassam, T.R. (1995) Songs of Wisdom and Circles of Dance: Hymns of the Satpanth Ismāʿīlī Muslim saint, (2001) “The Daily Prayer (Duʿa) of Shiʿa Ismaʿili Muslim” in McDannell, C. (Ed.) Religions of the United States in Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  102. Kassam, T.R. (1995) Songs of Wisdom and Circles of Dance: Hymns of the Satpanth Ismāʿīlī Muslim saint, (2004) “Balancing Acts: Negotiating the Ethics of Scholarship and Identity” in Cabezón, J.I. and Davaney, S.G. (Eds.) Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, Routledge, London, New York, p. 133–161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  103. Kassam-Remtulla, A. (2000) “(Dis)placing Khojahs: Forging Identities, Revitalizing Islam and Crafting Global Ismailism”, Honors Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  104. Kerrine, T.M. and Neuhaus, R.J. (1979) “Mediating structures: A paradigm for democratic pluralism”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 446, No. 10, p. 10–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  105. Keyes, C.F. (2002) “Weber and Anthropology”, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 31, p. 233–255. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  106. Klemm, V. (2003) Memoirs of a Mission: The Ismaili Scholar, Statesman and Poet al-Mu’ayyad fi’l-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, I.B. Tauris, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  107. Klemm, V. (2003) Memoirs of a Mission: The Ismaili Scholar, (2012) “Devianz und Dynamik: Die Netze der Ismailiyya” in Klemm, V. and Biesterfeldt, H. (Eds.) Differenz und Dynamik im Islam: Festschrift für Heinz Halm zum 70. Geburtstag, Ergon, Würzburg. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  108. Klemm, V. and Walker, P.E. (Eds.) (2011) A Code of Conduct: A Treatise on the Etiquette of the Fatimid Ismaili Mission, A critical Arabic edition and English translation of Ahmad b. Ibrāhīm al-Naysābūrī´s al-Risāla al-mūjaza al-kāfiya fi-ādāb al-duʿāt, I.B. Tauris, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  109. Lapidus, I.M. (1992) “The Golden Age: The Political Concepts of Islam”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 524, p. 13–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  110. Lash, S. (1994) “Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structure, Aesthetic, Community” in Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Polity Press, Cambridge, p. 110–173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  111. Lautsi and Others v. Italy (2011) European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg, Case No. 30814/06, 18 March 2011, [Online], available at <hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104040> (accessed 11 August 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  112. Leonard, K. (2009) “Transnational and Cosmopolitan Forms of Islam in the West”, Harvard Middle Eastern and Islamic Review, No. 8, p. 176–199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  113. Lewis, N.N. (1952) “The Isma’ilis of Syria Today”, Journal of The Royal Central Asian Society, Vol. 39, No. 1, p. 69–77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  114. Lewis, N.N. (1952) “The Isma’ilis of Syria Today”, (2009) Nomads and Settlers in Syria and Jordan, 1800-1980, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  115. Lohmann, R.I. (2005) “Culture” in Jones, L. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Religion, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, Macmillan Reference USA, Detroit, p. 2086–2090. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  116. Luckmann, T. (1967) The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society, Macmillan, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  117. Lyon, L., Beaty, M. and Mixon, S.L. (2002) “Making Sense of a ‘Religious’ University: Faculty Adaptations and Opinions at Brigham Young, Baylor, Notre Dame, and Boston College”, Review of Religious Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, p. 326–348. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  118. Madelung, W. (1978) “Ismāʿīliyya” in Donzel, v.E., Lewis, B. and Pellat, C. (Eds.) The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., Vol. 4, Brill, Leiden, p. 198–206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  119. Madelung, W. (1978) “Ismāʿīliyya” in Donzel, (1986) “Khödja” in Bosworth, C.E., Donzel, v.E., Lewis, B. and Pellat, C. (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Islam, Vol. 5, Brill, Leiden, p. 25–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  120. Magout, M. (2015) “Ismaili Discourse on Religion in the Public Sphere: Culture as a Mediating Concept” in Suleiman, Y. (Ed.) Muslims in the UK and Europe I, Centre of Islamic Studies, University of Cambridge, p. 140–149, available at <http://www.cis.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Muslims-in-the-UK-and-Europe-I-.pdfhttp://www.cis.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Muslims-in-the-UK-and-Europe-I-.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  121. Magout, M. (2019) “Transnationalizing Multiple Secularities: A Comparative Study of the Global Isma'ili Community”, Historical Social Research, Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 150–179, available at <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26747453https://www.jstor.org/stable/26747453> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  122. Mamodaly, A. (2012) “Rethinking the Role of Religious Education in a Knowledge Society: A Shia Ismaili Muslim Perspective” in van der Zee, T. and Lovat, T.J. (Eds.) New Perspectives on Religious and Spiritual Education, Waxmann, Münster, p. 179–194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  123. Marcus, G.E. (2001) “Reflexivity in Anthropology” in Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B. (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed., Elsevier, Pergamon, Amsterdam, p. 12877–12881. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  124. Masuzawa, T. (1998) “Culture”, in Taylor, M.C. (Ed.), Critical Terms for Religious Studies, University of Chicago Press, p. 70–93. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  125. Meja, V. and Stehr, N. (2003) “Sociology of Knowledge” in Outhwaite, W. (Ed.) The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought, 2nd ed., Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA, p. 650–652. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  126. Mitha, F. (2001) Al-Ghazālī and the Ismailis: A Debate on Reason and Authority in Medieval Islam, I.B. Tauris, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  127. Moberg, M., Granholm, K. and Nynäs, P. (2012) “Trajectories of Post-Secular Complexity: An Introduction” in Nynäs, P., Lassander, M. and Utriainen, T. (Eds.) Post-Secular Society, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, N.J, p. 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  128. Morris, H. (1958) “The Divine Kingship of the Aga Khan: A Study of Theocracy in East Africa”, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 14, No. 4, p. 454–472. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  129. Nanji, A. (1974) “Modernization and Change in the Nizari Ismaili Community in East Africa: A perspective”, Journal of religion in Africa, Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 123–139. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  130. Nelson, T.D. (2000) “Cognitive Consistency Theories” in Borgatta, E.F. and Montgomery, R.J.V. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Macmillan Reference USA, New York, p. 334–342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  131. Neuhaus, R.J. (2002) “The Secularism of the West”, National Post, 11 October, republished by the Catholic Education Resource Center [Online], available at <www.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/politics-and-the-church/the-secularism-of-the-west.htmlwww.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/politics-and-the-church/the-secularism-of-the-west.html> (accessed 8 April 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  132. Neuhaus, R.J. (2002) “The Secularism of the West”, (1982) “Educational Diversity in Post-Secular America”, Religious Education, Vol. 77, No. 3, p. 309–320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  133. Neuhaus, R.J. (2002) “The Secularism of the West”, (1984) The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America, W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co, Grand Rapids Mich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  134. Neuhaus, R.J. (2002) “The Secularism of the West”, (2007) “A University of a Particular Kind”, First Things, April 2007 [Online], available at <www.firstthings.com/article/2007/04/004-a-university-of-a-particular-kindwww.firstthings.com/article/2007/04/004-a-university-of-a-particular-kind> (accessed 9 June 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  135. Orsi, R.A. (2004) Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars who Study Them, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  136. Otto, R. (1950) The Idea of the Holy, trans. by J. W. Harvey., 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  137. Patel, E. (2003) “Ismaili Religious Education and Modernity”, Journal of Islamic Law and Culture, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 69–87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  138. Poor, D.M. (2012) “The Metamorphosis of Authority: A Case Study of the Aga Khan Development Network and the Ismaili Imamate”, PhD Thesis, University of Westminister, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  139. Poor, D.M. (2012) “The Metamorphosis of Authority: A Case Study of the Aga Khan Development Network and the Ismaili Imamate”, (2014) Authority without Territory: The Aga Khan Development Network and the Ismaili Imamate, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  140. Purohit, T. (2012) The Aga Khan Case: Religion and Identity in Colonial India, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  141. Rattansi, D. (1981) “The Nizārī Ismāʿīlis of Pakistan: Ismāʿīlism, Islam and Westernism viewed through the Firmāns, 1936-1980”, MA Thesis, McGill University, Montreal. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  142. Rattansi, D. (1981) “The Nizārī Ismāʿīlis of Pakistan: Ismāʿīlism, (1987) “Islamization and the Khojah Ismāʿīlī Community in Pakistan”, PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montreal. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  143. Reder, M. and Schmidt, J. (2010) “Habermas and Religion” in Habermas, J. and et al. An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age, trans. by C. Cronin, Polity Press, Cambridge, p. 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  144. Ruthven, M. (1997) “Aga Khan III and the Isma’ili Renaissance” in Clarke, P.B. (Ed.) New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam, Luzac Oriental, London, p. 371–395. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  145. Saler, B. (1999) “Family Resemblance and the Definition of Religion”, Historical reflections/Reflexions historiques, Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 391–404. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  146. Sapsford, R. (2006) “Methodology” in Jupp, V. (Ed.) The SAGE Dictionary of Social and Cultural Research Methods, SAGE, London, p. 175–177. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  147. Schmalzbauer, J. and Mahoney, K. (2009) “Religion and Knowledge in the Post-Secular Academy”, SSRC Working Papers, Social Science Research Council, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  148. Schwitzgebel, E. “Belief” in Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 Edition, [Online], available at <plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/belief/> (accessed 31 May 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  149. Sharot, S. (1991) “Judaism and the Secularization Debate”, Sociological Analysis, Vol. 52, No. 3, p. 255–275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  150. Spickard, V.J. (2011) “Phenomenology” in Stausberg, M. and Engler, S. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, Routledge, London, New York, p. 333–345. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  151. Smith, W.C. (1964) The Meaning and End of Religion, Mentor Books, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  152. Stark, R. (1999) “Secularization: R.I.P.”, Sociology of Religion, Vol. 60, No. 3, p. 249–273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  153. Steinberg, J. (2011) Ismaʿili Modern: Globalization and Identity in a Muslim community, North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  154. Suen, Y.T. and Howard, H. (Eds.) (2011) Case studies of International Students Studying Social Sciences in the UK, C-SAP: Higher Education Academy Subject Network for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics, Birmingham. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  155. Sumner, M. (2006) “Verstehen” in Jupp, V. (Ed.) The SAGE Dictionary of Social and Cultural Research Methods, SAGE, London, p. 317–318. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  156. Swatos, W.H. and Christiano, K.J. (1999) “Secularization Theory: The Course of a Concept”, Sociology of Religion, Vol. 60, No. 3, p. 209–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  157. Swedberg, R. and Agevall, O. (2005) The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts, Stanford Social Sciences, Stanford, Calif. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  158. Swindal, J. (2008) “Faith and Reason” in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at <www.iep.utm.edu/faith-rewww.iep.utm.edu/faith-re/> (accessed 24 April 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  159. Takim, L. (2007) Heirs of the Prophet: Charisma and Religious Authority in Shi’ite Islam, State University of New York Press, Albany. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  160. The Christian Post (2013) “Richard Dawkins Loses Debate Against Former Anglican Head Rowan Williams at Cambridge University” [Online], available at <www.christianpost.com/news/richard-dawkins-loses-debate-against-former-anglican-head-rowan-williams-at-cambridge-university-full-video-89364www.christianpost.com/news/richard-dawkins-loses-debate-against-former-anglican-head-rowan-williams-at-cambridge-university-full-video-89364/> (accessed 14 June 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  161. Tillich, P. (1964) Theology of Culture, Kimball, R.C. (Ed.), Oxford University Press, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  162. Todd, D. (2005) “Aga Khan is Everything to his Followers”, The Vancouver Sun, 9 June, republished by Ismaili.NET [Online], available at <ismaili.net/timeline/2005/20050609vs.html> (accessed 22 August 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  163. Turner, B.S. (2010) “Religion in a Post-secular Society” in Turner, B.S. (Ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, p. 649–667. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  164. Turner, B.S. (2010) “Religion in a Post-secular Society” in Turner, (2011) Religion and Modern Society: Citizenship, Secularisation, and the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  165. Walker, P.E. (2002) Exploring an Islamic Empire: Fatimid History and its Sources, I.B. Tauris, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  166. Walker, P.E. (2002) Exploring an Islamic Empire: Fatimid History and its Sources, (2004) “Institute of Ismaili Studies” in Yarshater, E. (Ed.) Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol 8, Fasc. 2, New York, p. 164–166, [Online], available at <www.iranicaonline.org/articles/institute-of-ismaili-studieswww.iranicaonline.org/articles/institute-of-ismaili-studies> (accessed 19 June 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  167. Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society, Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  168. Williams, R. (1988) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, Fontana Press, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  169. Wohlrab-Sahr, M. and Burchardt, M. (2012) “Multiple Secularities: Toward a Cultural Sociology of Secular Modernities”, Comparative Sociology, Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 875–909. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  170. Wohlrab-Sahr, M. and Burchardt, (2013) “Multiple Secularities: Religion and Modernity in the Global Age – Introduction”, International Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 6, p. 605–611. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  171. Wohlrab-Sahr, M. and Przyborski, A. (2008) Qualitative Sozialforschung: Ein Arbeitsbuch, 1st ed., Oldenbourg, München. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376
  172. Wright, K. (1998) “Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1900-)” in Craig, E. (Ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [CD-ROM], Routledge, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783956506376

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Religion in der Gesellschaft"
Cover des Buchs: Secular Humanism in Sweden
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Susanne Kind
Secular Humanism in Sweden
Cover des Buchs: Der Islam als akademische Praxis
Monographie Vollzugriff
Lena Dreier
Der Islam als akademische Praxis
Cover des Buchs: Jüdische Gemeinden im Umbruch
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Melanie Eulitz
Jüdische Gemeinden im Umbruch
Cover des Buchs: Säkularisierung und die Veränderungsdynamiken religiöser Organisation
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Miriam Zimmer
Säkularisierung und die Veränderungsdynamiken religiöser Organisation
Cover des Buchs: Religionssoziologie um 1900
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Volkhard Krech, Hartmann Tyrell
Religionssoziologie um 1900

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex