Cover des Buchs: Innovative Capacity Allocations for All-IP Networks
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Innovative Capacity Allocations for All-IP Networks

A Network Economic Analysis of Evolution and Competition in the Internet Ecosystem
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

Das Internet-Ökosystem ist gekennzeichnet durch eine starke Dynamik und ausgeprägte Evolutorik. Während sich das Spektrum an Inhalten und Anwendungsdiensten, welche integriert über „General-Purpose“-Breitbandnetze bereitgestellt werden sollen, fortwährend wandelt, werden sowohl die Anforderungen an die Datenübermittlung als auch entsprechende Kapazitätsallokationsprobleme zunehmend komplexer. Die erwartete Rolle des Internets der Dinge, 5G oder Virtual-Reality-Anwendungen unterstreicht, wie wichtig es für Anbieter von breitbandigen Zugangsdiensten sein wird, diesen sich wandelnden Anforderungen in einer ökonomisch effizienten Weise gerecht werden zu können. Dieses Buch untersucht Evolution und den Wettbewerb im Internet-Ökosystem und führt eine netzökonomische Analyse effizienter Kapazitätsallokationen in All-IP-Netzen durch. In diesem Zusammenhang wird die Rolle von Netzneutralitätsregulierungen kritisch bewertet.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2020
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6137-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0260-7
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Freiburger Studien zur Netzökonomie
Band
22
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
450
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 20
  2. Acknowledgements Kein Zugriff 21 - 22
  3. Papers Kein Zugriff 23 - 24
  4. List of Abbreviations Kein Zugriff 25 - 32
  5. 1 Introduction Kein Zugriff 33 - 38
      1. 2.1 The Economic Side of Layering: Disaggregating the Value Chain Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2 The Technical Side of Layering: Modularity and the OSI and TCP/IP Reference Models Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3 Reconciling the Economic and the Technical Sides of Layering: Towards a Layer Scheme for All-IP Networks Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1 From ARPANET to the Internet: A Historical Perspective Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2 From Narrowband Access to the Broadband Internet Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.3.1 Broadband Network Evolution: A Dual Lineage Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.3.2 Upgrading the PSTN: From First-Generation xDSL to “Future-Proof” FTTH Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.3.3 Upgrading CATV Networks: From First-Generation Broadband to RFoG Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.3.4.1 (Cellular) Mobile Broadband: Fiberization and the Road Towards 5G Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.3.4.2 (Fixed) Wireless Broadband Access: WLAN, WiMAX, and Satellite Access Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4 Evolution in the Broadband Access Ecosystem: A Brief Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1 Quality of Service and Quality of Experience Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.1 Why Location Matters: End-to-End Network Performance and the Role of the Geographical and Virtual Location Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.2 Delay Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.2.3 Jitter Kein Zugriff
        4. 4.2.4 Packet Loss Rate Kein Zugriff
        5. 4.2.5 Throughput, Bandwidth, and Data Rates Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3 Heterogeneous QoS Requirements and the Evolution of Application Services Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1 The End-to-End Arguments and the Best Effort Service Model Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.1 The IP Packet Header: Beyond Addressing Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.2 IP Packet Forwarding and Routing Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.3 Some Fundamentals on Intra-Domain Routing Kein Zugriff
      4. 5.4 Some Fundamentals on Inter-Domain Routing: The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.5.1 Flow Control Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.5.2 Congestion Control Kein Zugriff
        3. 5.5.3 TCP and Network Performance Kein Zugriff
      6. 5.6 An Alternative to TCP: The User Datagram Protocol (UDP) Kein Zugriff
      7. 5.7 Transport Layer Protocols: A Brief Summary Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.8.1 Peering, Transit, and the Hierarchical Structure of the Traditional Interconnection Ecosystem Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.8.2 Innovations in Interconnection Agreements Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1 Over-Provisioning Strategies Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.2 Usage Constraints: Ad Hoc Quantity Rationing Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.3 Data Compression and Endpoint-Based Upper Layer Mechanisms Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.4.1 Overlay Networks and Content Delivery Networks Kein Zugriff
        2. 6.4.2 Edge Computing and Distributed Cloud Infrastructures Kein Zugriff
        3. 6.4.3 Internet Exchange Points, Remote Peering, and Growing Interconnection Diversity Kein Zugriff
      5. 6.5 The Limits of Enhancing Performance in a Best Effort Internet Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.1 Guaranteed Services and Flow-Based QoS: The Integrated Services Architecture and the Resource Reservation Protocol Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.2.1 Per-Hop Behaviors (PHBs) Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.2.2 QoS Differentiations and the DiffServ Architecture: A Closer Look Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.3.1 Some MPLS Basics Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.3.2 MPLS TE Kein Zugriff
        3. 7.3.3 DS-TE Kein Zugriff
      4. 7.4 The Generalized DiffServ Architecture Kein Zugriff
    1. The evolving demand for heterogeneous QoS levels is the key driver for the introduction of QoS differentiations. As described in Sections 6 and 7, a wide variety of technologically complementary traff... Kein Zugriff 191 - 196
      1. 8.1 An Introduction to Scarcity and Economic Efficiency on the Internet Kein Zugriff
        1. 8.2.1 Rivalry, Congestion, and Negative Externalities Kein Zugriff
        2. 8.2.2 Direct (Positive) Network Effects Kein Zugriff
        3. 8.2.3 Indirect Network Effects and Two-Sided Markets Kein Zugriff
        1. 9.1.1 Internet Congestion from an Economic Perspective Kein Zugriff
        2. 9.1.2 Algorithm-Based Capacity Rationing by the TCP Kein Zugriff
        3. 9.1.3 M/M/1 Queueing Models Kein Zugriff
        4. 9.1.4 Bandwidth Partitioning Approaches Kein Zugriff
        5. 9.1.5 Preliminary Conclusions on Congestion Modeling in Two-Sided Market Models Kein Zugriff
        1. 9.2.1 A Primer on Usage-Independent versus Usage-Dependent Pricing Kein Zugriff
        2. 9.2.2 A Brief Survey of Traditional Internet Pricing Models Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.1 Some Basics on Optimal Congestion Pricing and Capacity Expansions Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.2 A Simple Model of Congestion Pricing for a Single-Class Internet Kein Zugriff
      1. 11.1 Paris Metro Pricing and its Implications for Multi-Channel Congestion Pricing Kein Zugriff
        1. 11.2.1 Incentive Compatible Pricing and Optimal Investment: Social Welfare Maximization Kein Zugriff
        2. 11.2.2 Incentive Compatible Pricing and Optimal Investment: Profit Maximization Kein Zugriff
        3. 11.2.3 Interclass Externality Pricing Kein Zugriff
        4. 11.2.4 A Brief Assessment Kein Zugriff
      1. 12.1 The Basic Idea Kein Zugriff
      2. 12.2 Capacity Reservation versus Packet Prioritization: On the Provision of Deterministic and Stochastic QoS Guarantees Kein Zugriff
      3. 12.3 Interclass Externalities and the Opportunity Costs of Different Types of Network Usage Kein Zugriff
      4. 12.4 Opportunity Costs and Interclass Externality Pricing for All-IP Networks Kein Zugriff
      5. 12.5 Optimal Capacity Allocations in All-IP Networks: Incentive Compatible Price and QoS Differentiations and Optimal Network Investment Kein Zugriff
      6. 12.6 A Brief Summary Kein Zugriff
      7. 12.7 An Example of a Price and QoS Differentiation Based on the Introduction of a Deterministic Traffic Class Kein Zugriff
      8. 12.8 Model Implications and Limitations: Extensions and Future Research Kein Zugriff
      1. 13.1 Legacy Interconnections for an All-IP Ecosystem: A Growing Mismatch? Kein Zugriff
      2. 13.2 Challenges and Evolution in the Interconnection Ecosystem Kein Zugriff
      3. 13.3 A Summary and (Forward-Looking) Discussion Kein Zugriff
      1. 14.1 The Many Facets of Competition in Network Industries Kein Zugriff
      2. 14.2 Remedying Market Power Problems: Regulatory Policy versus Active Competition Policy Kein Zugriff
      1. 15.1 Disaggregated Market Power Regulation for the Internet Kein Zugriff
      2. 15.2 Technical Regulations and Consumer Protection Measures Kein Zugriff
      3. 15.3 Universal Service Regulations Kein Zugriff
      1. 16.1 Network Neutrality: Normative Proposition and Regulatory Paradigm Kein Zugriff
      2. 16.2 On the Need for a Market-Driven Network Neutrality Concept Kein Zugriff
        1. 16.3.1 Network Neutrality Regulation in the U.S. Kein Zugriff
        2. 16.3.2 Network Neutrality Regulation in the EU Kein Zugriff
        3. 16.3.3 A Brief Summary of the Regulations in the U.S. and the EU Kein Zugriff
      1. 17.1 Brief Overview of the Two-Sided Market Literature on Network Neutrality Kein Zugriff
        1. 17.2.1 The Many Facets of Network Neutrality Regulations and Their Impact on Optimal Capacity Allocations and Innovation Kein Zugriff
        2. 17.2.2 Regulatory Market Splits and Structural Traffic Regulations Kein Zugriff
        3. 17.2.3 Reasonable Traffic Management and the Ban on Paid Prioritization Kein Zugriff
        4. 17.2.4 Minimum QoS Regulations and the Dirt Road Argument Kein Zugriff
      3. 17.3 Conclusions and Policy Implications Kein Zugriff
    5. 18 Summary Kein Zugriff 393 - 398
  9. References Kein Zugriff 399 - 450

Literaturverzeichnis (764)

  1. Knieps, G. (2013). ‘Regulierungsfehler in Netzindustrien’, Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 60(4), 717-729. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  2. Knieps, G. (2015a). ‘Entrepreneurial Traffic Management and the Internet Engineering Task Force’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 11(3), 727-745. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  3. Knieps, G. (2015b). Network Economics – Principles, Strategies, Competition Policy, Berlin et al.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  4. Knieps, G. (2017). ‘Internet of Things, Future Networks, and the Economics of Virtual Networks’, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 18(3-4), 240-255. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  5. Knieps, G. (2018). ‘Internet of Things, Big Data and the Economics of Networked Vehicles’, Telecommunications Policy, First Published Online September 27, available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.09.002 [accessed 19 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  6. Knieps, G. and Bauer, J.M. (2016). ‘The Industrial Organization of the Internet’, in: Bauer, J.M. and Latzer, M. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 23-54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  7. Knieps, G. and Stocker, V. (2014). Market Driven Network Neutrality and the Fallacy of a Two-Tiered Internet Traffic Regulation, Discussion Paper No. 149, Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik, University of Freiburg, Germany, available: http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/vw/files/files-publikationen/disk/disk149 [accessed 19 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  8. Knieps, G. and Stocker, V. (2015). ‘Network Neutrality Regulation: The Fallacies of Regulatory Market Splits’, Intereconomics, 50(1), 46-51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  9. Knieps, G. and Stocker, V. (2016). ‘Price and QoS Differentiations in All-IP Networks’, International Journal of Management and Network Economics, 3(4), 317-335. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  10. Knieps, G. and Vogelsang, I. (1982). ‘The Sustainability Concept under Alternative Behavioral Assumptions’, Bell Journal of Economics, 13(1), 234-241. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  11. Knieps, G. and Zenhäusern, P. (2008). ‘The Fallacies of Network Neutrality Regulation’, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 9(2), 119-134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  12. Knieps, G. and Zenhäusern, P. (2010). ‘Phasing Out Sector-Specific Regulation in European Telecommunications’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 6(4), 995-1006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  13. Knieps, G. and Zenhäusern, P. (2014). ‘Regulatory Fallacies in Global Telecommunications: The Case of International Mobile Roaming’, International Economics and Economic Policy, 11(1-2), 63-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  14. Knieps, G. and Zenhäusern, P. (2015). ‘Broadband Network Evolution and Path Dependency’, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 16(4), 335-353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  15. Knight, F.H. (1924). ‘Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38(4), 582–606. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  16. Kompella, K. and Lang, J. (2004). ‘Procedures for Modifying the Resource reSerVation Protocol (RSVP)’, RFC 3936, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3936 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  17. Kompella, K., Andersson, L. and Farrell, A. (2014). ‘Allocating and Retiring Special-Purpose MPLS Labels’, RFC 7274, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7274 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  18. Kourandi, F., Krämer, J. and Valletti, T. (2015). ‘Net Neutrality, Exclusivity Contracts and Internet Fragmentation’, Information Systems Research, 26(2), 320-338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  19. Krämer, J. and Peitz, M. (2018). ‘A Fresh Look at Zero-Rating’, Telecommunications Policy, 42(7), 501-513. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  20. Krämer, J. and Wiewiorra, L. (2012). ‘Network Neutrality and Congestion Sensitive Content Providers: Implications for Content Variety, Broadband Investment, and Regulation’, Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1303-1321. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  21. Krämer, J., Wiewiorra, L. and Weinhardt, C. (2013). ‘Net Neutrality: A Progress Report’, Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 794-813. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  22. Kranz, J.J. and Picot, A. (2016). ‘Internet Business Strategies’, in: Bauer, J.M. and Latzer, M. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 365-384. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  23. Kreutz, D., Ramos, F.M.V., Verissimo, P.E., Rothenberg, C.E., Azodolmolky, S. and Uhlig, S. (2015). ‘Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey’, Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14-76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  24. Kroes, N. (2010). Net Neutrality – The Way Forward, SPEECH/10/643, European Commission and European Parliament Summit on ‘The Open Internet and Net Neutrality in Europe’, 11 November, Brussels, Belgium, available: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-10-643_en.htm [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  25. Kroes, N. (2012). ‘Next Steps on Net Neutrality – Making Sure You Get Champagne Service if That’s What You’re Paying For’, 29 May, available: http://ec.europa.eu/archives/commission_2010-2014/kroes/en/blog/netneutrality.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  26. Kruse, J. (2008). ‘Network Neutrality and Quality of Service’, Intereconomics, 43(1), 25-30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  27. Kua, J., Armitage, G. and Branch, P. (2017). ‘A Survey of Rate Adaptation Techniques for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming Over HTTP’, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1842-1866. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  28. Kurose, J.F. and Ross, K.W. (2013). Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach, 6th ed., Boston et al.: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  29. Laffont, J.-J. (2008). ‘Externalities’, in: Durlauf, S.N. and Blume, L.E. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed., London: Palgrave Macmillan, available: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_126-2 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  30. Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (2000). Competition in Telecommunications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  31. Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. (1998a). ‘Network Competition I: Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing’, RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 1-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  32. Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. (1998b). ‘Network Competition II: Price Discrimination’, RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 38-56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  33. Laffont, J.-J., Marcus, S., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. (2001). ‘Internet Peering’, American Economic Review, 91(2), 287-291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  34. Laffont, J.-J., Marcus, S., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. (2003). ‘Internet Interconnection and the Off-Net-Cost Pricing Principle’, RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 370-390. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  35. Lai, W. (2005). ‘Bandwidth Constraints Models for Differentiated Services (Diffserv)-Aware MPLS Traffic Engineering: Performance Evaluation’, RFC 4128, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4128 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  36. Lancaster, L. (1990). ‘The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey’, Marketing Science, 9(3), 189-206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  37. Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (1981). ‘Market Power in Antitrust Cases’, Harvard Law Review, 94(5), 937-997.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  38. Langley, A., Riddoch, A., Wilk, A., Vicente, A., Krasic, C., Zhang, D., Yang, F., Kouranov, F., Swett, I., Iyengar, J., Bailey, J., Dorfman, J., Roskind, J., Kulik, J., Westin, P., Tenneti, R., Shade, R., Hamilton, R., Vasiliev, V., Chang, W.-T. and Shi, Z. (2017). ‘The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment’, Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM ’17), 21-25 August, Los Angeles, CA, 183-196, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3098822.3098842 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  39. Layton, R. (2017). Which Open Internet Framework is Best for Mobile App Innovation? An Empirical Inquiry of Net Neutrality Rules Around the World, PhD Thesis, Aalborg University Copenhagen, available: https://doi.org/10.5278/vbn.phd.engsci.00181 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  40. Le Callet, P., Möller, S. and Perkis, A. (eds.) (2013). Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience, Output From the Fifth Qualinet Meeting, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), Version 1.2, 12 March, Novi Sad, Serbia, available: http://www.qualinet.eu/images/stories/QoE_whitepaper_v1.2.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  41. Le Faucheur, F. (ed.) (2005a). ‘Protocol Extensions for Support of Diffserv-Aware MPLS Traffic Engineering’, RFC 4124, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4124 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  42. Le Faucheur, F. (ed.) (2005b). ‘Russian Dolls Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diffserv-Aware MPLS Traffic Engineering’, RFC 4127, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4127 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  43. Le Faucheur, F. and Lai, W. (2003). ‘Requirements for Support of Differentiated Services-Aware MPLS Traffic Engineering’, RFC 3564, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3564 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  44. Le Faucheur, F. and Lai, W. (2005). ‘Maximum Allocation Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diffserv-Aware MPLS Traffic Engineering’, RFC 4125, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4125 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  45. Le Faucheur, F. (ed.), Wu, L., Davie, B., Davari, S., Vaananen, P., Krishnan, R., Cheval, P. and Heinanen, J. (2002). ‘Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated Services’, RFC 3270, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3270 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  46. Lee, T.B. (2014). ‘Comcast’s Deal with Netflix Makes Network Neutrality Obsolete’, Washington Post, 23 February, available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/02/23/comcasts-deal-with-netflix-makes-network-neutrality-obsolete/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6f3abed5499f [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  47. Lee, R.S. and Wu, T. (2009). ‘Subsidizing Creativity through Network Design: Zero-Pricing and Net Neutrality’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 61–76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  48. Lehr, W.H. and McKnight, L.W. (2002). ‘Show Me the Money: Contracts and Agents in Service Level Agreement Markets’, info, 4(1), 24-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  49. Lehr, W.H. and Sicker, D. (2017). ‘Would You Like Your Internet With or Without Video?’, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2017(1), 73-140. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  50. Lehr, W.H. and Sicker, D. (2018). ‘Communications Act 2021’, Journal of High Technology Law, 18(2), 270-330. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  51. Lehr, W.H., Bauer, S. and Clark, D.D. (2013). ‘Measuring Performance when Broadband is the New PSTN’, Journal of Information Policy, 3, 411-441. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  52. Lehr, W.H., Clark, D.D., Bauer, S., Berger, A. and Richter, P. (2018). ‘Whither the Public Internet?’, Paper presented at the 46th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 21-22 September, Washington, D.C., available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3141969 [accessed 29 August 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  53. Leighton, T. (2009). ‘Improving Performance on the Internet’, Communications of the ACM, 52(2), 44-51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  54. Leiner, B.M., Cerf, V.G., Clark, D.D., Kahn, R.E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D.C., Postel, J., Roberts, L.G. and Wolff, S. (2009). ‘A Brief History of the Internet’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(5), 22-31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  55. Lemley, M.A. and Lessig, L. (2001). ‘The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era’, UCLA Law Review, 48(4), 925-972. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  56. Lessig, L. and McChesney, R.W. (2006). ‘No Tolls on the Internet’, Washington Post, June 8, available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/07/AR2006060702108.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  57. Li, T., Iraqi, Y. and Boutaba, R. (2004). ‘Pricing and Admission Control for QoS-Enabled Internet’, Computer Networks, 46(1), 87-110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  58. Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E. (1994). ‘Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 133–150.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  59. Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E. (1996). ‘Should Technological Choice Be a Concern of Antitrust Policy?’, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 9(2), 283–318.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  60. Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E. (2002). ‘Network Effects’, in: Cave, M.E., Majumdar, S.K. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics: Volume 1, Amsterdam et al.: North-Holland, 75-96.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  61. Limelight Networks (2018a). ‘Limelight Networks and Ericsson to Accelerate Content Delivery and Edge Cloud Adoption’, Press Release, 18 October, available: http://investors.limelight.com/file/Index?KeyFile=395394914 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  62. Limelight Networks (2018b). Global Private Network, available: https://www.limelight.com/orchestrate-platform/global-infrastructure/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  63. Limelight Networks (2018c). Deep Dive Into the Limelight Networks Technology Stack, available: https://www.limelight.com/news/deep-dive-into-the-limelight-networks-technology-stack/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  64. Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J.O.S. and Goddard, J. (2013). Industrial Organization: Competition, Strategy and Policy, 4th ed., Harlow et al.: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  65. Littlechild, S.C. (1983). Regulation of British Telecommunications’ Profitability, Report to the Secretary of State, London: Department of Industry.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  66. Littmann, D., Wigginton, C., Wilson, P., Haan, B. and Fritz, J. (2017). Communications Infrastructure Upgrade: The Need for Deep Fiber, Deloitte, July, available: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/us-tmt-5GReady-the-need-for-deep-fiber-pov.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  67. Lougheed, K. and Rekhter, Y. (1989). ‘A Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)’, RFC 1105, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1105 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  68. Lyons, D.A. (2013). ‘Internet Policy’s Next Frontier: Data Caps, Tiered Service Plans, and Usage-Based Broadband Pricing’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 66(1), 1-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  69. Ma, R.T.B. and Misra, V. (2013). ‘The Public Option: A Nonregulatory Alternative to Network Neutrality’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 21(6), 1866-1879. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  70. MacKie-Mason, J.K. and Varian, H.R. (1995a). ‘Pricing the Internet’, in: Kahin, B. and Keller, J. (eds.), Public Access to the Internet, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, 269-314. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  71. MacKie-Mason, J.K. and Varian, H.R. (1995b). ‘Pricing Congestible Network Resources’, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(7), 1141-1149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  72. MacKie-Mason, J.K., Murphy, L. and Murphy, J. (1998). ‘Responsive Pricing in the Internet’, in: McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.), Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 279-303. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  73. Madiega, T. (2015). The EU Rules on Network Neutrality: Key Provisions, Remaining Concerns, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Briefing, November. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  74. Maier, M., Chowdhury, M., Rimal, B.P. and Van, D.P. (2016). ‘The Tactile Internet: Vision, Recent Progress, and Open Challenges’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(5), 138-145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  75. Maillé, P. and Tuffin, B. (2014). Telecommunication Network Economics: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  76. Malkin, G. (1998). ‘RIP Version 2’, RFC 2453, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2453 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  77. Marcus, J.S. (1999). Designing Wide Area Networks and Internetworks: A Practical Guide, Reading, MA et al.: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  78. Marcus, J.S. (2006). Interconnection in an NGN Environment, ITU Background Paper, NGN/02, 15 April, available: https://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ngn/documents/Papers/Marcus-060323-Fin-v2.1.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  79. Marcus, J.S. (2014). Network Neutrality Revisited: Challenges and Responses in the EU and in the US, Study for the IMCO Committee, IP/A/IMCO/2014-02, December. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  80. Marcus, J.S. (2016). ‘New Network Neutrality Rules in Europe: Comparisons to those in the U.S.’, Colorado Technology Law Journal, 14(2), 259-280.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  81. Marcus, J.S., Elixmann, D. and Carter, K.R. (2008). The Future of IP Interconnection: Technical, Economic, and Public Policy Aspects, Study for the European Commission, Final Report, 29 January, Bad Honnef: WIK-Consult. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  82. Marcus, J.S., Wernick, C., Gantumur, T. and Gries, C. (2017). Ökonomische Chancen und Risiken einer Weitreichenden Harmonisierung und Zentralisierung der TK-Regulierung in Europa, WIK Discussion Paper No. 420, June, Bad Honnef: WIK. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  83. Markham, J.W. (1950). ‘An Alternative Approach to the Concept of Workable Competition’, American Economic Review, 40(3), 349-361. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  84. Marsden, C.T. (2010). Net Neutrality: Towards a Co-Regulatory Solution, London, UK and New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  85. Marsden, C.T. (2013). ‘Net Neutrality Law: Past Policy, Present Proposals, Future Regulation?’, Proceedings of the United Nations Internet Governance Forum: Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality, 25 October, Nusa Dua Bali, Indonesia, available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2335359 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  86. Marsden, C.T. (2016). ‘Comparative Case Studies in Implementing Net Neutrality: A Critical Analysis of Zero Rating’, SCRIPTted, 13(1), 1-39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  87. Marsden, C.T. and Belli, L. (2015). ‘Not Neutrality but ‘Open Internet’ à l’Européenne’, LSE Media Policy Project Blog, 29 October, available: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2015/10/29/not-neutrality-but-open-internet-a-la-europeenne/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  88. Martin, S. (1993). Advanced Industrial Economics, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  89. Martin, S., Minet, P. and George, L. (2004). ‘Deterministic End-to-End Guarantees for Real-Time Applications in a DiffServ-MPLS Domain’, in: Ramamoorthy, C.V., Lee, R.L. and Lee, K.W. (eds.), Software Engineering Research and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3026, Berlin et al.: Springer, 51-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  90. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D. and Green, J.R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory, New York, NY and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  91. Mason, R. (2000). ‘Simple Competitive Internet Pricing’, European Economic Review, 44(4-6), 1045-1056. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  92. Maxwell, W.J. and Bourreau, M. (2015). ‘Technology Neutrality in Internet, Telecoms and Data Protection Regulation’, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 21(1), 1-4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  93. McCann, K., Mattei, A. Gledhill, J. and Kirson, G. (2012). Technical Evolution of the DTT Platform, An Independent Report by ZetaCast, Commissioned by Ofcom, Version 1.3, available: http://www.zetacast.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Evolution-of-DTT.pdf [accessed 09 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  94. McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.) (1998). Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  95. McPherson, D. (2009). ‘Atlas Internet Observatory’, Presentation at ISOC Researchers @ IETF 76, 8-13 November, Hiroshima, Japan, available: https://wiki.tools.isoc.org/@api/deki/files/2426/=isoc-researchers-lunch.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  96. McTaggart, C. (2006). ‘Was the Internet Ever Neutral?’, Paper presented at the 34th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 29 September-1 October, Arlington, VA, available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2117601 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  97. Mell, P. and Grance, T. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 800-145, available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/legacy/sp/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  98. Mendelson, H. and Whang, S. (1990). ‘Optimal Incentive‐Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue’, Operations Research, 38(5), 870‐883. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  99. Milgrom, P., Mitchell, B.M. and Srinagesh, P. (2000). ‘Competitive Effects of Internet Peering Policies’, in: Vogelsang, I. and Compaine, B.M. (eds.), The Internet Upheaval – Raising Questions, Seeking Answers in Communications Policy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 175-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  100. Miniwatts Marketing Group (2018). ‘Internet Usage Statistics: The Internet Big Picture – World Internet Users and 2018 Population Stats’, Internet World Stats, 30 June, available: https://internetworldstats.com/stats.htm [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  101. Mitchell, B.M. and Vogelsang, I. (1991). Telecommunications Pricing: Theory and Practice, Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  102. Möller, S. and Raake, A. (eds.) (2014). Quality of Experience – Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods, Heidelberg et al.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  103. Mohring, H. (1970). ‘The Peak Load Problem with Increasing Returns and Pricing Constraints’, American Economic Review, 60(4), 693-705. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  104. Mohring, H. and Harwitz, M. (1962). Highway Benefits: An Analytical Approach, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  105. Moldovanu, B. and Tietzel, M. (1998). ‘Goethe’s Second-Price Auction’, The Journal of Political Economy, 106(4), 854-859. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  106. Morrison, S.A. (1987). ‘The Equity and Efficiency of Runway Pricing’, Journal of Public Economics, 34(1), 45-60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  107. Motta, M. (2004). Competition Policy – Theory and Practice, Cambridge et al: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  108. Moy, J. (1989). ‘The OSPF Specification’, RFC 1131, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1131 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  109. Mueller, M. (1993). ‘Universal Service in Telephone History: A Reconstruction’, Telecommunications Policy, 17(5), 352-369. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  110. Mueller, M. (2013). Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System, Books, 18, available: http://surface.syr.edu/books/18 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  111. Nagy, C.I. (2013). ‘The Metamorphoses of Universal Service in the European Telecommunications and Energy Sector: A Trans-Sectoral Perspective’, German Law Journal, 14(9), 1731-1756. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  112. Naor, P. (1969). ‘The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls’, Econometrica, 37(1), 15‐24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  113. Netflix (2018). Fill, Updates, and Maintenance, available: https://openconnect.netflix.com/en_gb/fill/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  114. Network Technical Advisory Group (1986). ‘Requirements for Internet Gateways – Draft’, RFC 985, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc985 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  115. Nichols, K., Blake, S., Baker, F. and Black, D. (1998). ‘Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the I⁠P⁠v⁠4 and I⁠P⁠v⁠6 Headers’, RFC 2474, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2474 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  116. Nieminen, K. (2017). ‘Net Neutrality Measurements: Regulatory Use Case and Problem Statement’, Internet-Draft, IP Performance Working Group, 28 August, available: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-nieminen-ippm-nn-measurements-01.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  117. Noam, E.M. (1994). ‘Beyond Liberalization II: The Impending Doom of Common Carriage’, Telecommunications Policy, 18(6), 435-452. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  118. Nomikos, G., Kotronis, V., Sermpezis, P., Gigis, P., Manassakis, L., Dietzel, C., Konstantaras, S., Dimitropoulos, X. and Giotsas, V. (2018). ‘O Peer, Where Art Thou?: Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs’, Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018 (IMC ‘18), 31 October-2 November, Boston, MA, 265-278. available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3278532.3278556 [accessed 10 January 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  119. Norton, W.B. (2014). The 2014 Internet Peering Playbook: Connecting to the Core of the Internet, DrPeering Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  120. Norton, W.B. (2016). Cloud Interconnections, White Paper, Version 1.6, available: https://www.caida.org/workshops/wie/1612/slides/wie1612_wnorton.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  121. Nuechterlein, J.E. and Yoo, C.S. (2015). ‘A Market-Oriented Analysis of the ‘Terminating Access Monopoly’ Concept’, Colorado Technology Law Journal, 14(1), 21-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  122. Nygren, E., Sitaraman, R.K. and Sun, J. (2010). ‘The Akamai Network: A Platform for High-Performance Internet Applications’, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 44(3), 2-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  123. Odlyzko, A. (1999). ‘Paris Metro Pricing for the Internet’, Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on E-Commerce (EC’99), 3-5 November, Denver, CO, 140-147, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/336992.337030 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  124. Odlyzko, A. (2014). ‘Will Smart Pricing Finally Take Off?’, in: Sen, S., Joe-Wong, C., Ha, S. and Chiang, M. (eds.), Smart Data Pricing, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 3-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  125. OECD (2008). Broadband and the Economy, Ministerial Background Report, DSTI/ICCP/IE(2007)3/FINAL, Paris: OECD, available: https://www.oecd.org/sti/40781696.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  126. OECD (2012). Market Definition, Policy Roundtables, DAF/COMP(2012)19, Paris: OECD, available: http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Marketdefinition2012.pdf [accessed 08 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  127. OECD (2015a). ‘Broadband Access Network Speed Tests by Country’, available: http://www.oecd.org/sti/broadband/speed-tests.htm [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  128. OECD (2015b). Triple and Quadruple Play Bundles of Communication Services, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 23, Paris: OECD, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js04dp2q1jc-en [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  129. OECD (2017). The Evolving Role of Satellite Networks in Rural and Remote Broadband Access, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 264, Paris: OECD, available: https://doi.org/10.1787/7610090d-en [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  130. Ofcom (2018a). Enabling 5G in the UK, Discussion Document, 9 March, London, UK: Ofcom, available: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/111883/enabling-5g-uk.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  131. Ofcom (2018b). Wholesale Local Access Market Review: Statement – Volume 1: Markets, Market Power Determinations and Remedies, Statement, 28 March, London, UK: Ofcom, available: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/112475/wla-statement-vol-1.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  132. Ofcom (2018c). UK Home Broadband Performance: The Performance of Fixed-Line Broadband Delivered to UK Residential Consumers, Research Report, 9 May, London, UK: Ofcom, available: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/113796/home-broadband-2017.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  133. Ong, T. (2017). ‘Microsoft and Facebook Just Laid a 160-Terabits-Per-Second Cable 4,100 Miles Across the Atlantic’, The Verge, 25 September, available: https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/25/16359966/microsoft-facebook-transatlantic-cable-160-terabits-a-second [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  134. Ookla (2018). Help, available: http://www.speedtest.net/de/help [accessed 24 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  135. Oran, D. (ed.) (1990). ‘OSI IS-IS Intra-domain Routing Protocol’, RFC 1142, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1142 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  136. Ordonez-Lucena, J., Ameigeiras, P., Lopez, D., Ramos-Munoz, J.J., Lorca, J. and Folgueira, J. (2017). ‘Network Slicing for 5G with SDN/NFV: Concepts, Architectures, and Challenges’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(5), 80-87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  137. Ou, G. (2008). Managing Broadband Networks: A Policymaker’s Guide, The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, December, available: http://www2.itif.org/2008-managing-broadband-policymakers-guide.pdf?_ga=2.198385327.1411444044.1542745432-1969726516.1542745432 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  138. Oxman, J. (1999). ‘The FCC and the Unregulation of the Internet’, OPP Working Paper Series, No. 31, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission, available: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  139. Pan, P., Swallow, G. and Atlas, A. (eds.) (2005). ‘Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels’, RFC 4090, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4090 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  140. Pankert, G., Faggiano, A. and Taga, K. (2014). The Future of the Internet: Innovation and Investment in IP Interconnection, Arthur D. Little and Liberty Global. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  141. Panwar, N., Sharma, S. and Singh, A.K. (2016). ‘A Survey on 5G: The Next Generation of Mobile Communication’, Physical Communication, 18(2), 64-84. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  142. Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1977). ‘Free Entry and the Sustainability of Natural Monopoly’, Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  143. Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1981). ‘Economies of Scope’, American Economic Review, 71(2), 268-272. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  144. Parker, G., van Alstyne, M.W. and Choudary, S.P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You, New York, NY and London, UK: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  145. Parris, C. and Ferrari, D. (1992). A Resource Based Pricing Policy for Real-Time Channels in a Packet-Switching Network, Technical Report, TR-92-018, Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  146. Parris, C., Ferrari, D. and Keshav, S. (1992). A Framework for the Study of Pricing in Integrated Networks, Technical Report, TR-92-016, Berkely, CA: International Computer Science Institute. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  147. Parvez, I., Rahmati, A., Guvenc, I., Sarwat, A.I. and Dai, H. (2018). ‘A Survey on Low Latency Towards 5G: RAN, Core Network and Caching Solutions’, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 20(4), 3098-3130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  148. Paschalidis, I.C. and Tsitsiklis, J.N. (2000). ‘Congestion-Dependent Pricing of Network Services’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 8(2), 171-184. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  149. Paxson, V. and Floyd, S. (1995). ‘Wide Area Traffic: The Failure of Poisson Modeling’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 3(3), 226-244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  150. Pehnelt, G. (2008). ‘The Economics of Net Neutrality Revisited’, Jena Economic Research Papers # 2008-080, available: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/31724 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  151. Peitz, M. and Schuett, F. (2016). ‘Net Neutrality and the Inflation of Traffic’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 46, 16-62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  152. Peltzman, S. (1976). ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’, Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211-240.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  153. Peterson, L.L. and Davie, B.S. (2012). Computer Networks: A Systems Approach, 5th ed., Amsterdam et al.: Morgan Kaufman. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  154. Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F. and Ashmore, F. (2017). ‘The Digital Divide: Patterns, Policy and Scenarios for Connecting the ‘Final Few’ in Rural Communities Across Great Britain’, Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 386-398. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  155. Phlips, L. (1983). The Economics of Price Discrimination, Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  156. Pigou, A. (1920). The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  157. Posner, R.A. (1971). ‘Taxation by Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 22-50.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  158. Posner, R.A. (1974). ‘Theories of Economic Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 335-358. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  159. Postel, J. (1977). ‘Comments on Internet Protocol and TCP’, IEN 2, available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/ien/ien2.txt [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  160. Postel, J. (ed.) (1980a). ‘Internet Protocol: DOD Standard’, RFC 760, IEN 128, available: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc760.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  161. Postel, J. (1980b). ‘User Datagram Protocol’, RFC 768, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc768 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  162. Postel, J. (ed.) (1981a). ‘Internet Protocol – DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification’, RFC 791, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  163. Postel, J. (ed.) (1981b). ‘Transmission Control Protocol – DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification’, RFC 793, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc793 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  164. Postel, J. and Reynolds, J. (1983). ‘TELNET Protocol Specification’, RFC 854, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc854 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  165. Powell, M.K. (2004a). ‘Preserving Internet Freedom: Guiding Principles for the Industry’, Remarks at the Silicon Flatirons Symposium, University of Colorado School of Law, 8 Febuary, Boulder, CO, available: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243556A1.pdf [accessed 15 August 2017]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  166. Powell, M.K. (2004b). ‘Preserving Internet Freedom: Guiding Principles for the Industry’, Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 3(1), 5-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  167. Premsankar, G., Di Francesco, M. and Taleb, T. (2018). ‘Edge Computing for the Internet of Things: A Case Study’, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(2), 1275-1284. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  168. Pujol, E., Richter, P., Chandrasekaran, B., Smaragdakis, G., Feldmann, A., Maggs, B. and Ng, K.-C. (2014). ‘Back-Office Web Traffic on The Internet’, Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC ‘14), 5-7 November, Vancouver, BC, 257-270, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663756 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  169. QoS Working Group (2006). Inter-Provider Quality of Service, White Paper Draft 1.1, MIT Communications Futures Program, 17 November, available: http://cfp.mit.edu/docs/interprovider-qos-nov2006.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  170. Quoitin, B., Pelsser, C., Swinnen, L., Bonaventure, O. and Uhlig, S. (2003). ‘Interdomain Traffic Engineering with BGP’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(5), 122-128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  171. Raake, A. and Egger, S. (2014). ‘Quality and Quality of Experience’, in: Möller, S. and Raake, A. (eds.), Quality of Experience – Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods, Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 11-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  172. Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S. and Black, D. (2001). ‘The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP’, RFC 3168, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3168 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  173. Ramsey, F.P. (1927). ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation’, The Economic Journal, 37(145), 47-61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  174. Reding, V. (2008). Net Neutrality and Open Networks – Towards a European Approach, SPEECH/08/473, 30 September, Copenhagen, Denmark, available: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-08-473_en.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  175. Reed, D.P., Saltzer, J.H. and Clark, D.D. (1998). ‘Commentaries on “Active Networking and End-to-End Arguments”’, IEEE Network, 12(3), 69-71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  176. Reed, D., Warbritton, D. and Sicker, D. (2014). ‘Current Trends and Controversies in Internet Peering and Transit: Implications for the Future Evolution of the Internet’, Paper presented at the 42nd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 12-14 September, Arlington, VA, available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2418770 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  177. Reggiani, C. and Valletti, T. (2016). ‘Net Neutrality and Innovation at the Core and the Edge’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 45, 16-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  178. Reichert, C. (2018). ‘Vodafone Deutschland Launches Gigabit Cable Broadband‘, ZDNet.com, 2 October, available: https://www.zdnet.com/article/vodafone-deutschland-launches-gigabit-cable-broadband/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  179. Reichl, P., Flury, P., Gerke, J. and Stiller, B. (2001). ‘How to Overcome the Feasibility Problem for Tariffing Internet Services: The Cumulus Pricing Scheme’, Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Communications (ICC 2001), 11-14 June, Helsinki, Finland, 2079-2083, available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/937025 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  180. Reiter, U., Brunnström, K., De Moor, K., Larabi, M.-C., Pereira, M., Pinheiro, A., You, J. and Zgank, A. (2014). ‘Factors Influencing Quality of Experience’, in: Möller, S. and Raake, A. (eds.), Quality of Experience – Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods, Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 55-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  181. Rekhter, Y. and Li, T. (eds.) (1994). ‘A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)’, RFC 1654, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1654 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  182. Rekhter, Y. and Li, T. (eds.) (1995). ‘A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)’, RFC 1771, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1771 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  183. Rekhter, Y., Li, T. and Hares, S. (eds.) (2006). ‘A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)’, RFC 4271, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4271 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  184. Reynolds, J. (ed.) (2002). ‘Assigned Numbers: RFC 1700 is Replaced by an On-Line Database’, RFC 3232, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3232 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  185. Reynolds, J. and Postel, J. (1994). ‘Assigned Numbers’, RFC 1700, available: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1700.txt [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  186. Roberts, L.G. (1988). ‘The ARPANET and Computer Networks’, in: Goldberg, A. (ed.), A History of Personal Workstations, New York, NY: ACM Press, 141-172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  187. Rochet, J.-C. and Tirole, J. (2003). ‘Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  188. Rochet, J.-C. and Tirole, J. (2006). ‘Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report’, RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  189. Rohlfs, J.H. (1974). ‘A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(1), 16-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  190. Rohlfs, J.H. (2001). Bandwagon Effects in High Tech Industries, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  191. Ros, D. and Tuffin, B. (2004). ‘A Mathematical Model of the Paris Metro Pricing Scheme for Charging Packet Networks’, Computer Networks, 46(1), 73-85. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  192. Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A. and Callon, R. (2001a). ‘Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture’, RFC 3031, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3031 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  193. Rosen, E., Tappan, D., Fedorkow, G., Rekhter, Y., Farinacci, D., Li, T. and Conta, A. (2001b). ‘MPLS Label Stack Encoding’, RFC 3032, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3032 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  194. Rosston, G.L. and Wimmer, B.S. (2000). ‘The ‘State’ of Universal Service’, Information Economics and Policy, 12(3), 261-283. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  195. Rysman, M. (2009). ‘The Economics of Two-Sided Markets’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125-143. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  196. Salant, S. and Seegert, N. (2018). ‘Should Congestion Tolls be Set by the Government or by the Private Sector? The Knight-Pigou Debate Revisited’, Economica, 85(339), 428-448. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  197. Salemink, K., Strijker, D. and Bosworth, G. (2017). ‘Rural Development in the Digital Age: A Systematic Literature Review on Unequal ICT Availability, Adoption, and Use in Rural Areas’, Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  198. Salop, S.C. (1979). ‘Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 141-156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  199. Saltzer, J.H., Reed, D.P. and Clark, D.D. (1984). ‘End-to-End Arguments in System Design’, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2(4), 277-288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  200. Sandvig. C. (2007). ‘Network Neutrality is the New Common Carriage’, info, 9(2/3), 136-147. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  201. Sandvine (2015a). Global Internet Phenomena Report: Latin America & North America, May. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  202. Sandvine (2015b). Global Internet Phenomena Report: Asia-Pacific & Europe, September. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  203. Sandvine (2015c). Global Internet Phenomena Report: Africa, Middle East & North America, December. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  204. Sandvine (2016). Global Internet Phenomena Report: Latin America & North America, June. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  205. Sandvine (2018). The Global Internet Phenomena Report, available: https://www.sandvine.com/hubfs/downloads/phenomena/2018-phenomena-report.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  206. Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). ‘The Emergence of Edge Computing’, Computer, 50(1), 30-39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  207. Sawers, P. (2018). ‘Google Announces its First Private Transatlantic Subsea Cable, Stretching from Virginia to France’, Venturebeat.com, 17 July, available: https://venturebeat.com/2018/07/17/google-announces-its-first-private-transatlantic-subsea-cable-stretching-from-virginia-to-france/ [accessed 14 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  208. Scales, I. (2018). ‘How ‘Multi-Access’ is the 5G Edge?’, TelecomTV.com, 27 June, available: https://www.telecomtv.com/content/edge/how-multi-access-is-the-5g-edge-31460/ [accessed 14 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  209. Schatz, R., Fiedler, M. and Skorin-Kapov, L. (2014). ‘QoE-Based Network and Application Management’, in: Möller, S. and Raake, A. (eds.), Quality of Experience – Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods, Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 411-426. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  210. Scherer, J. (ed.) (2013). Telecommunication Laws in Europe: Law and Regulation of Electronic Communications in Europe, 6th ed., West Sussex: Bloomsbury Professional. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  211. Schlinker, B., Kim, H., Cui, T., Katz-Bassett, E., Madhyastha, H.V., Cunha, I., Quinn, J., Hasan, S., Lapukhov, P. and Zeng, H. (2017). ‘Engineering Egress with Edge Fabric: Steering Oceans of Content to the World’, Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM ‘17), 21-25 August, Los Angeles, CA, 418-431, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3098822.3098853 [accessed 14 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  212. Schuett, F. (2010). ‘Network Neutrality: A Survey of the Economic Literature’, Review of Network Economics, 9(2), 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  213. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  214. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York, NY: Harper Brothers.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  215. Schwartz, M. and Weiser, P.J. (2009). ‘Introduction to a Special Issue on Network Neutrality’, Review of Network Economics, 8(1), 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  216. Sen, S., Joe-Wong, C., Ha, S. and Chiang, M. (2012). ‘Incentivizing Time-Shifting of Data: A Survey of Time-Dependent Pricing for Internet Access’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(11) 91-99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  217. Sen, S., Joe-Wong, C., Ha, S. and Chiang, M. (eds.) (2014). Smart Data Pricing, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  218. Sengupta, S., Chatterjee, M. and Ganguly, S. (2008). ‘Improving Quality of VoIP Streams over WiMax’, IEEE Transctions on Computers, 57(2), 145-156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  219. Seufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., Zinner, T., Hoßfeld, T. and Tran-Gia, P. (2015). ‘A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming’, IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials, 17(1), 469-492. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  220. Shah, P., Mukhopadhyaya, U. and Sathiamurthi, A. (2006). ‘Overview of QoS in Packet-based IP and MPLS Networks’, Presentation at NANOG 36, 12-15 February, Dallas, TX, available: https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog36/presentations/sathiamurthi.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  221. Shah, A., Sicker, D.C. and Hatfield, D.N. (2003). ‘Thinking About Openness in the Telecommunications Policy Context’, Paper presented at the 31st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 19-21 September, Arlington, VA, available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2060641 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  222. Shand, M. and Ginsberg, L. (2014). ‘Reclassification of RFC 1142 to Historic’, RFC 7142, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7142 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  223. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  224. Shenker, S. and Wroclawski, J. (1997). ‘General Characterization Parameters for Integrated Services Network Elements’, RFC 2215, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2215 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  225. Shenker, S., Partridge, C. and Guerin, R. (1997). ‘Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service’, RFC 2212, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2212 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  226. Shenker, S., Clark, D.D., Estrin, D. and Herzog, S. (1996). ‘Pricing in Computer Networks: Reshaping the Research Agenda’, Telecommunications Policy, 20(3), 183-201. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  227. Shortle, J.F., Thompson, J.M., Gross, D. and Harris, C.M. (2018). Fundamentals of Queueing Theory, 5th ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  228. Sidak, J.G. and Teece, D.J. (2010). ‘Innovation Spillovers and the “Dirt Road” Fallacy: The Intellectual Bankruptcy of Banning Optional Transactions for Enhanced Delivery over the Internet’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 6(3), 521-594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  229. Smith, J.M. (2009). ‘Fighting Physics: A Tough Battle’, ACM Queue, 7(3), 20-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  230. Solum, L.B. and Chung, M. (2003). The Layers Principle: Internet Architecture and the Law, University of San Diego School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 55, available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=416263 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  231. Spence, A.M. (1976). ‘Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition’, Review of Economic Studies, 43(2), 217-235. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  232. Speta, J.B. (2000). ‘Handicapping the Race for the Last Mile?: A Critique of Open Access Rules for Broadband Platforms’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 17(1), 39-91. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  233. Spiegler, R (2000). ‘Extracting Interaction-Created Surplus’, Games and Economic Behavior, 30(1), 142-162. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  234. Spring, N., Mahajan, R. and Anderson, T. (2003). ‘The Causes of Path Inflation’, Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM ’03), 25-29 August, Karlsruhe, Germany, 113-124, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/863955.863970 [accessed 12 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  235. Spulber, D.F. (1989). Regulation and Markets, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  236. Sridharan, M., Tan, K., Bansal, D. and Thaler, D. (2008). ‘Compound TCP: A New TCP Congestion Control for High-Speed and Long-Distance Networks’, Internet Draft, Version 02, IETF Network Working Group, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp-02 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  237. Statt, N. (2018). ‘FCC Approves SpaceX’s Ambitious Satellite Internet Plans: Starlink Is Well on Its Way to Serving Customers on Earth’, The Verge, 29 March, available: https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/29/17178126/spacex-satellite-broadband-internet-fcc-approval-license-starlink-spectrum [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  238. Steenbergen, R. (2010). ‘MPLS for Dummies’, Presentation at NANOG 49, 13-16 June, San Francisco, CA, available: https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?meet=49&pt=MTU2OCZuYW5vZzQ5&nm=nanog49 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  239. Steiner, P.O. (1957). ‘Peak Loads and Efficient Pricing’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(4), 585-610. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  240. Stigler, G.J. (1968). ‘Barriers to Entry, Economies of Scale, and Firm Size’, in: Stigler, G.J., The Organization of Industry, Homewood, Ill: R.D. Irwin, 67-70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  241. Stigler, G.J. (1971). ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  242. Stiller, B., Reichl, P. and Leinen, S. (2001a). ‘Pricing and Cost Recovery for Internet Services: Practical Review, Classification, and Application of Relevant Models’, NETNOMICS – Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 3(2), 149-171. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  243. Stiller, B., Gerke, J., Reichl, P. and Flury, P. (2001b). ‘A Generic and Modular Internet Charging System for the Cumulus Pricing Scheme’, Journal of Network and Systems Management, 9(3), 293–325. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  244. Stiller, B., Gerke, J., Reichl, P. and Flury, P. (2001c). ‘Management of Differentiated Services Usage by the Cumulus Pricing Scheme and a Generic Internet Charging System’, 2001 IEEE/IFIP International Symposium on Integrated Network Management Proceedings: Integrated Network Management VII – Integrated Management Strategies for the New Millennium (Cat. No.01EX470), 14-18 May, Seattle, WA, 93-106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  245. Stocker, V. (2013). ‘On the Weal and Woe of Traffic Management in Europe – A Critical Appraisal from a Network Economic Perspective’, Paper presented at the 24th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), 20-23 October, Florence, Italy, available: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/88542 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  246. Stocker, V. (2015). ‘Interconnection and Capacity Allocation for All-IP Networks: Walled Gardens or Full Integration?’, Paper presented at the 43rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 25-27 September, Arlington, VA, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2587833 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  247. Stocker, V. and Whalley, J. (2017). ‘Who Replies to Consultations, and What Do They Say? The Case of Broadband Universal Service in the UK’, Paper presented at the 28th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), 30 July-2 August, Passau, Germany, available: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/169499 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  248. Stocker, V. and Whalley, J. (2018). ‘Speed Isn’t Everything: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Broadband Consumer Experience in the UK’, Telecommunications Policy, 42(1), 1-14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  249. Stocker, V., Smaragdakis, G., Lehr, W.H. and Bauer, S. (2017). ‘The Growing Complexity of Content Delivery Networks: Challenges and Implications for the Internet Ecosystem’, Telecommunications Policy, 41(10), 1003-1016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  250. Streibelt, F., Lichtblau, F., Beverly, R., Feldmann, A., Pelsser, C., Smaragdakis, G. and Bush, R. (2018). ‘BGP Communities: Even more Worms in the Routing Can’, Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018 (IMC ‘18), 31 October-2 November, Boston, MA, 279-292, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3278532.3278557 [accessed 10 January 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  251. Strotz, R.H. (1965). ‘Urban Transportation Parables’, in: Margolis, J. (ed.), The Public Economy of Urban Communities, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 127-169. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  252. Sullivan, M. (2014). ‘Netflix ‘Fast Lanes’ Make it a Net Neutrality Hypocrite, FCC Commissioner Says’, VentureBeat.com, 2 December, available: https://venturebeat.com/2014/12/02/netflix-fast-lanes-make-it-a-net-neutrality-hypocrite-fcc-commissioner-says/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  253. Svensson, P. (2007). ‘Comcast Blocks Some Internet Traffic’, Washington Post, 19 October, available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/19/AR2007101900842.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  254. Szigeti, T. and Hattingh, C. (2005). End-to-End QoS Network Design: Quality of Service in LANs, WANs, and VPNs, Indianapolis, IN: Cisco Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  255. Szigeti, T., Hattingh, C., Barton, R. and Briley, K.R. (2015). End-to-End QoS Network Design: Quality of Service for Rich-Media & Cloud Networks, 2nd ed., Indianapolis, IN: Cisco Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  256. Tanenbaum, A.S. and Wetherall, D.J. (2011). Computer Networks, 5th ed., Boston et al.: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  257. TeleGeography (2018). Submarine Cable Frequently Asked Questions, available: https://www2.telegeography.com/submarine-cable-faqs-frequently-asked-questions [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  258. TeleGeography (2019). Submarine Cable Map, available: https://www.submarinecablemap.com [accessed 18 January 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  259. Timmers, M., Zhao, R., Mau, J. and Salgado, J. (2018). Migrating from Copper to Fibre: The Telco Perspective, A White Paper by the Deployment & Operations Committee, FTTH Council Europe, available: https://www.ftthcouncil.eu/documents/Publications/DandO_White_Paper2018_Cu_FTTH_Migration.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  260. Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  261. Tirole, J. (2015). ‘Market Failures and Public Policy’, American Economic Review, 105(6), 1665-1682. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  262. Train, K.E. (1991). Optimal Regulation: The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  263. Trevisan, M., Giordano, D., Drago, I., Mellia, M. and Munafo, M. (2018). ‘Five Years at the Edge: Watching Internet from the ISP Network’, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT ‘18), 4-7 December, Heraklion, Greece, 1-12, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3281411.3281433 accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  264. Tuffin, B. (2003). ‘Charging the Internet Without Bandwidth Reservation: An Overview and Bibliography of Mathematical Approaches’, Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 19(5), 765-786. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  265. Ungern-Sternberg, T. von (1991). ‘Monopolistic Competition on the Pyramid’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(4), 355-368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  266. United States Department of Justice (2011). Antitrust Division Policy Guide to Merger Remedies, Antitrust Division, June, available: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2011/06/17/272350.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  267. Valdar, A. (2006). Understanding Telecommunication Networks, Series 52, London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  268. van Eijk, N.A.N.M. (2016). ‘Does Net Neutrality Work? The Dutch Case’, Paper presented at the 27th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), 7-9 September, Cambridge, UK, available: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/148715 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  269. Van Hove, L. (2014). ‘Metcalfe’s Law: Not So Wrong After All’, Netnomics, 15(1), 1-8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  270. van Schewick, B. (2007). ‘Towards an Economic Framework for Network Neutrality Regulation’, Journal on Telecommunications and High Technolology Law, 5, 329-392. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  271. van Schewick, B. (2010). Internet Architecture and Innovation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  272. van Schewick, B. (2016). ‘Internet Architecture and Innovation in Applications’, in: Bauer, J.M. and Latzer, M. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 288-322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  273. Vanberg, M. (2009). Competition and Cooperation Among Internet Service Providers – A Network Economic Analysis, Freiburger Studien zur Netzökonomie, Band 14, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  274. Varela, M., Skorin-Kapov, L. and Ebrahimi, T. (2014). ‘Quality of Service Versus Quality of Experience’, in: Möller, S. and Raake, A. (eds.), Quality of Experience – Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods, Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 85-96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  275. Varian, H.R. (1989). ‘Price Discrimination’, in: Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization: Volume 1, Amsterdam et al: North-Holland, 597-654. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  276. Varian, H.R. (2002). ‘The Demand for Bandwidth: Evidence from the INDEX Project’, in: Crandall, R.W. and Alleman, J.H. (eds.), Broadband – Should We Regulate High-Speed Internet Access?, Washington, D.C.: AEI Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 39-56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  277. Varian, H.R. (2010). ‘Congestion Pricing Principles’, Presentation at IETF 78, 25-30 July, Maastricht, Netherlands, available: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/slides/plenaryt-3.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  278. Vasseur, J.P. (ed.), Swallow, G. and Minei, I. (2010). ‘Node Behavior upon Originating and Receiving Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Path Error Messages’, RFC 5711, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5711 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  279. Verhoef, E.T. and Mohring, H. (2009). ‘Self-Financing Roads’, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3(5-6), 293-311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  280. Vickrey, W. (1955). ‘A Proposal for Revising New York’s Subway Fare Structure’, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 3(1), 38-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  281. Vickrey, W. (1959). ‘Statement on the Pricing of Urban Street Use’, Hearings: U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Metropolitan Washington Problems, 11 November. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  282. Vickrey, W. (1961). ‘Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders’, Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  283. Vickrey, W. (1963). ‘Pricing in Urban and Suburban Transport’, American Economic Review, 53(2), 452-465. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  284. Viscusi, W.K., Vernon, J.M. and Harrington, J.E. (2005). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 4th ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  285. Vogelsang, I. (1988). ‘Deregulation and Privatization in Germany’, Journal of Public Policy, 8(2), 195–212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  286. Vogelsang, I. (2002). ‘Incentive Regulation and Competition in Public Utility Markets: A 20-Year Perspective’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 22(1), 5-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  287. Vogelsang, I. (2013). ‘The Endgame of Telecommunications Policy? A Survey’, Review of Economics, 64(3), 193-270. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  288. Waidmann, M. (2016). Marktöffnung, Marktmachtregulierung und Qualität im Wassersektor – Eine Netzökonomische Analyse, Freiburger Studien zur Netzökonomie, Band 20, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  289. Wakefield, J. (2017). ‘Net Neutrality Debate 'Controlled by Bots'’, BBC News, 4 October, available: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41497342 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  290. Waldmann, K.H. and Stocker, U.M. (2004). Stochastische Modelle: Eine A⁠n⁠w⁠e⁠n⁠d⁠u⁠n⁠g⁠s¬o⁠r⁠i⁠e⁠ntierte Einführung, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  291. Walras, L. (1874/1877). Eléments d’Économie Politique pure ou Théorie de la Richesse Sociale, Lausanne: L. Corbaz & cie. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  292. Wannstrom, J. (2013). ‘LTE-Advanced’, 3GPP, available: http://www.3gpp.org/technologies/keywords-acronyms/97-lte-advanced [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  293. Weizsäcker, C.C. von (1984). ‘Rights and Relations in Modern Economic Theory’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5(2), 133-157. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  294. Weller, D. and Woodcock, B. (2013). Internet Traffic Exchange: Market Developments and Policy Challenges, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 207, Paris: OECD, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k918gpt130q-en [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  295. Welzl, M. (2005). Network Congestion Control: Managing Internet Traffic, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  296. Welzl, M. (2017). ‘TCP in Painful Detail (and some SCTP and QUIC as well)’, Presentation at the Net Group: University of Rome Tor Vergata, 22 September, Rome, Italy, available: https://heim.ifi.uio.no/michawe/research/publications/tor-vergata_tcp-tutorial_2017.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  297. Werbach, K. (2002). ‘A Layered Model for Internet Policy’, Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 1(1), 37-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  298. Whitt, R.S. (2004). ‘A Horizontal Leap Forward: Formulating a New Communications Public Policy Framework Based on the Network Layers Model’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 56(3), 587-672. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  299. Wilhelm, A. (2014). ‘The FCC Fires Back at the President’s Net Neutrality Plan’, Tech Crunch, 10 November, available: https://techcrunch.com/2014/11/10/the-fcc-fires-back-at-the-presidents-net-neutrality-plan/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  300. Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York, NY and London, UK: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  301. Witt, U. (ed.) (1993). Evolutionary Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  302. Woodcock, B. and Frigino, M. (2016). 2016 Survey of Internet Carrier Interconnection Agreements, BoR (16) 237, 21 November, available: https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/others/6574-2016-survey-of-internet-carrier-interconnection-agreements [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  303. Wright, J.D. (2015). ‘Net Neutrality Meets Regulatory Economics 101’, Engage, 16(2), 76-81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  304. Wroclawski, J. (1997a). ‘The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services’, RFC 2210, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2210 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  305. Wroclawski, J. (1997b). ‘Specification of Controlled-Load Network Element Service’, RFC 2211, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2211 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  306. Wu, T. (2002). ‘A Proposal for Network Neutrality’, June, available: http://www.timwu.org/OriginalNNProposal.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  307. Wu, T. (2003). ‘Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination’, Journal on Telecommunication and High Technology Law, 2, 141-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  308. Xiao, X. and Ni, L.M. (1999). ‘Internet QoS: A Big Picture’, IEEE Network, 13(2), 8-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  309. Xu, K., Zhong, Y. and He, H. (2014). Internet Resource Pricing Models, New York et al.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  310. Yap, K.-K., Motiwala, M., Rahe, J., Padgett, S., Holliman, M., Baldus, G., Hines, M., Kim, T., Narayanan, A., Jain, A., Lin, V., Rice, C., Rogan, B., Singh, A., Tanaka, B., Verma, M., Sood, P., Tariq, M., Tierney, M., Trumic, D., Valancius, V., Ying, C., Kallahalla, M., Koley, B. and Vahdat, A. (2017). ‘Taking the Edge off with Espresso: Scale, Reliability and Programmability for Global Internet Peering’, Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM ‘17), 21-25 August, Los Angeles, CA, 432-445, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3098822.3098854 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  311. Yoo, C.S. (2005). ‘Beyond Network Neutrality’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 19(1), 1-77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  312. Yoo, C.S. (2006). ‘Network Neutrality and the Economics of Congestion’, The Georgetown Law Journal, 94(6), 1847-1908. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  313. Yoo, C.S. (2013). ‘Protocol Layering and Internet Policy’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161(6), 1707-1771. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  314. Yoo, C.S. (2016). ‘Modularity Theory and Internet Regulation’, University of Illinois Law Review, 2016(1), 1-62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  315. Zarnekow, R., Wulf, J. and Bornstaedt, F. von (2013). Internetwirtschaft – Das Geschäft des Datentransports im Internet, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  316. Zhao, R., Fischer, W., Aker, E. and Rigby, P. (2014). Broadband Access Technologies, White Paper, FTTH-Council Europe, available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/white-paper-broadband-access-technologies [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  317. Zhao, S., Li, Z., Medhi, D., Lai, P. and Liu, S. (2017). ‘Study of User QoE Improvement for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (MPEG-DASH)’, 2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 26-29 January, Santa Clara, CA, 566-570. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  318. Zhao, M., Aditya, P., Chen, A., Lin, Y., Haeberlen, A., Druschel, P., Maggs, B., Wishon, B. and Ponec, M. (2013). ‘Peer-Assisted Content Distribution in Akamai NetSession’, Proceedings of the 2013 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC ’13), 23-25 October, Barcelona, Spain, 31-42, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2504730.2504752 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  319. Zimmermann, H. (1980). ‘OSI Reference Model – The ISO Model of Architecture for Open System Interconnection’, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(4), 425-432. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  320. Zittrain, J.L. (2008). The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It, New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  321. 3GPP (2018). LTE, available: http://www.3gpp.org/technologies/keywords-acronyms/98-lte [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  322. 451 Alliance (2017). ‘451 Research VoCUL Survey Finds Original Content Investment Paying Off for Netflix And Amazon Video: Consumers Increasingly Paying for Three or More Streaming Video Services’, Press Release, 20 March, available: https://451research.com/images/Marketing/productsheets/VoCUL_video_PR_FINALff.pdf [accessed 9 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  323. 5G Americas (2016). Network Slicing for 5G Networks & Services, White Paper, November, available: http://www.5gamericas.org/files/3214/7975/0104/5G_Americas_Network_Slicing_11.21_Final.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  324. Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  325. Abichar, Z., Chang, J.M. and Hsu, C.-Y. (2010). ‘WiMAX vs. LTE: Who will Lead the Broadband Mobile Internet?’, IT Professional, 12(3), 26-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  326. Acton, J.P and Vogelsang, I. (1989). ‘Introduction’, RAND Journal of Economics, 20(3), 369-372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  327. Adan, I. and Resing, J. (2015). ‘Queueing Systems’, Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, 26 March, available: https://www.win.tue.nl/~iadan/queueing.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  328. Adtran (2017). G.FAST: Enabling the Gigabit Society, White Paper, available: https://portal.adtran.com/web/fileDownload/doc/33602 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  329. Adtran (2018). 5G and Next Generation FTTH: A Symbiotic Relationship, White Paper, available: https://www.telecompetitor.com/clients/adtran/5G_nextgen/5GandNextGenFTTH.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  330. Ai, Y., Peng, M. and Zhang, K. (2018). ‘Edge Computing Technologies for Internet of Things: A Primer’, Digital Communications and Networks, 4(2), 77-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  331. Aicent (2012). Aicent IPX – Aicent IPX Solution Overview, White Paper, available: http://www.gsma.com/membership/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/aicent_ipx_wp_071712.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  332. Akamai (2018). Facts & Figures, available: https://www.akamai.com/uk/en/about/facts-figures.jsp [accessed 05 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  333. Akerlof, G.A. (1970). ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  334. Al-shawi, M. and Laurent, A. (2017). Designing for Cisco Network Service Architectures (ARCH): Foundation Learning Guide (CCDP ARCH 300-320), 4th ed., Indianapolis, IN: Cisco Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  335. Aldmour, I. (2013). ‘LTE and WiMAX: Comparison and Future Perspective’, Communications and Networks, 5(4), 360-368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  336. Allman, M., Paxson, V. and Blanton, E. (2009). ‘TCP Congestion Control’, RFC 5681, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5681 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  337. Almes, G., Kalidindi, S. and Zekauskas, M. (1999). ‘A Round-Trip Delay Metric for IPPM’, RFC 2681, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2681 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  338. Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M. and Morton, A. (ed.) (2016a). ‘A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)’, RFC 7679, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7679 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  339. Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M. and Morton, A. (ed.) (2016b). ‘A One-Way Loss Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)’, RFC 7680, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7680 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  340. Ameigeiras, P., Navarro-Ortiz, J., Andres-Maldonado, P., Lopez-Soler, J.M., Lorca, J., Perez-Tarrero, Q. and Garcia-Perez, R. (2016). ‘3GPP QoS-Based Scheduling Framework for LTE’, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Article 78, available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-016-0565-9 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  341. Analysys Mason (2017). Study on Net-Neutrality Regulation, Final Report to BEREC, BoR (17) 159, 18 September, available: https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/others/7243-study-on-net-neutrality-regulation [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  342. Anania, L. and Salomon, R.J. (1998). ‘Flat – The Minimalist Price’, in: McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.), Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 91-118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  343. Andersen, D., Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, F. and Morris, R. (2001). ‘Resilient Overlay Networks’, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 35(5), 131-145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  344. Antonello, R., Fernandes, S., Kamienski, C., Sadok, D., Kelner, J., Gódor, I., Szabó, G. and Westholm, T. (2012). ‘Deep Packet Inspection Tools and Techniques in Commodity Platforms: Challenges and Trends’, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(6), 1863-1878. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  345. APNIC (Asia-Pacific Network Information Center) (2008). ‘Operational Policies for National Internet Registries in the APNIC Region’, APNIC-103, available: https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/operational-policies-nirs/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  346. Armstrong, M. (1998). ‘Network Interconnection in Telecommunications’, Economic Journal, 108(448), 545-564. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  347. Armstrong, M. (2002). ‘The Theory of Access Pricing and Interconnection’, in: Cave, M., Majumdar, S. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics: Volume 1, Amsterdam et al.: North-Holland, 297-386. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  348. Armstrong, M. (2006). ‘Competition in Two-Sided Markets’, RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  349. Arrow, K.J. (1962). ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in: National Bureau of Economic Research (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 609–626. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  350. Ash, G., Morton, A., Dolly, M., Tarapore, P., Dvorak, C. and El Mghazli, Y. (2010). ‘Y.1541-QOSM: Model for Networks using Y.1541 Quality-of-Service Classes’, RFC 5976, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5976 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  351. AT&T (2018a). Network Latency, available: https://ipnetwork.bgtmo.ip.att.net/pws/network_delay.html [accessed 25 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  352. AT&T (2018b). Global Network Latency Averages, available: https://ipnetwork.bgtmo.ip.att.net/pws/global_network_avgs.html [accessed 25 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  353. Averch, H. and Johnson, L.L. (1962). ‘Behaviour of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint’, American Economic Review, 52(5), 1052-1069. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  354. Awduche, D., Chiu, A., Elwalid, A., Widjaja, I. and Xiao, X. (2002). ‘Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering’, RFC 3272, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3272 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  355. Awduche, D., Malcolm, J., Agogbua, J., O’Dell, M. and McManus, J. (1999). ‘Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLS’, RFC 2702, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2702 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  356. Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V. and Swallow, G. (2001). ‘RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels’, RFC 3209, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3209 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  357. Babiarz, J., Chan, K. and Baker, F. (2006). ‘Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes’, RFC 4594, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4594 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  358. Bailey, E.E. (1981). ‘Contestability and the Design of Regulatory and Antitrust Policy’, American Economic Review, 71(2), 178-183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  359. Bailey, J.P. (1998). ‘The Economics of Internet Interconnection Agreements’, in: McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.), Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 155-168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  360. Bain, J.S. (1951). ‘Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293-324. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  361. Bain, J.S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  362. Baker, F., Polk, J. and Dolly, M. (2010). ‘A Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) for Capacity-Admitted Traffic’, RFC 5865, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5865 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  363. Baker, F., Iturralde, C., Le Faucheur, F. and Davie, B. (2001). ‘Aggregation of RSVP for I⁠P⁠v⁠4 and I⁠P⁠v⁠6 Reservations’, RFC 3175, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3175 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  364. Bangeman, E. (2006). ‘FCC classifies Broadband over Power Line as Information Service’, Arstechnica.com, 6 November, available: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2006/11/8154/ [accessed 30 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  365. Barwick, R. (2017). ‘The Future of the Internet is Up for Grabs — Theoretically: Critics Say New FCC Chair Ajit Pai Has Already Made Up his Mind on Net Neutrality’, The Center for Public Integrity, 3 October, available: https://www.publicintegrity.org/2017/10/03/21196/future-internet-grabs-theoretically [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  366. Bates, T., Smith, P. and Huston, G. (2018). CIDR Report, 10 December, available: http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#General_Status [accessed 10 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  367. Bator, F.M. (1958). ‘The Anatomy of Market Failure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351-379. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  368. Batura, O. (2016). Universal Service in WTO and EU Law: Liberalisation and Social Regulation in Telecommunications, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  369. Bauer, J.M. (2005). ‘Unbundling Policy in the United States Players, Outcomes and Effects’, Communications & Strategies, 57(1), 59-82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  370. Bauer, S. (2008). Congestion on the Internet: Operator Responses, Economic Analysis, and Improving the Network Architecture, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  371. Bauer, J.M. and Bohlin, E. (2008). ‘From Static to Dynamic Regulation: Recent Developments in US Telecommunications Policy’, Intereconomics, 43(1), 38-50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  372. Bauer, J.M. and Knieps, G. (2018). ‘Complementary Innovation and Network Neutrality’, Telecommunications Policy, 42(2), 172-183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  373. Bauer, J.M. and Obar, J.A. (2014). ‘Reconciling Political and Economic Goals in the Net Neutrality Debate’, The Information Society, 30(1), 1-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  374. Bauer, S., Clark, D.D. and Lehr, W. (2009). ‘The Evolution of Internet Congestion’, Paper presented at the 37th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 26-27 September, Arlington, VA, available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1999830 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  375. Bauer, S., Lehr. W.H. and Hung, S. (2015). ‘Gigabit Broadband, Interconnection Propositions, and the Challenge of Managing Expectations’, Paper presented at the 43rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 25-27 September, Arlington, VA, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586805 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  376. Bauer, S., Lehr, W.H. and Mou, M. (2016). ‘Improving the Measurement and Analysis of Gigabit Broadband Networks’, 31 March, available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757050 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2757050 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  377. Baumgartner, J. (2014). ‘Netflix to Pai: ‘Open Connect Is Not a Fast Lane’: Responds to FCC Commissioner’s Concern About Private CDN Program’, Multichannel NEWS, 11 December, available: http://www.multichannel.com/news/tv-apps/netflix-pai-open-connect-not-fast-lane/386236 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  378. Baumgartner, F., Braun, T. and Habegger, P. (1998). ‘Differentiated Services: A New Approach for Quality of Service in the Internet’, in: van As, H.R. (ed.), High Performance Networking, HPN 1998, IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 8, Boston, MA: Springer, 255-273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  379. Baumol, W.J. (1977). ‘On the Proper Cost Test for Natural Monopolies in a Multiproduct Industry’, American Economic Review, 67(5), 809-822. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  380. Baumol, W.J. (1982). ‘Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure’, American Economic Review, 72(1), 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  381. Baumol, W.J. and Bradford, D.F. (1970). ‘Optimal Departures from Marginal Cost Pricing’, American Economic Review, 60(3), 265-283. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  382. Baumol, W.J. and Willig, R.D. (1983). ‘Pricing Issues in the Deregulation of Railroad Rates’, in: Finsinger, J. (ed.), Economic Analysis of Regulated Markets, London and Basingstoke: McMillan, 11-47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  383. Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  384. Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1983). ‘Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: Reply’, American Economic Review, 73(3), 491-496. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  385. Baumol, W.J., Litan, R.E., Cave, M.E., Cramton, P., Hahn, R.W., Hazlett, T.W., Joskow, P.L., Kahn, A.E., Mayo, J.W., Messerlin, P.A., Owen, B.M., Pindyck, R.S., Smith, V.L., Wallsten, S., Waverman, L., White, L.J. and Savage, S. (2007). ‘Economists’ Statement on Network Neutrality Policy’, AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper, No. RP07-08, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.976889 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  386. Beath, J. and Katsoulacos, Y. (1991). The Economic Theory of Product Differentiation, Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  387. Becker, G.S., Carlton, D.W. and Sider, H.S. (2010). ‘Net Neutrality and Consumer Welfare’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 6(3), 497-519. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  388. Beesley, M.E. and Littlechild, S.C. (1989). ‘The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom’, RAND Journal of Economics, 20(3), 454-472. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  389. Begen, A.C. and Timmerer, C. (2017). ‘Adaptive Streaming of Traditional and Omnidirectional Media’, ACM SIGCOMM Tutorial, 21-25 August, Los Angeles, CA, available: http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2017/files/tutorial-adaptive-streaming.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  390. Belleflamme, P. and Peitz, M. (2015). Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies, 2nd ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  391. Belli, L. and De Filippi, P. (eds.) (2016). Net Neutrality Compendium: Human Rights, Free Competition and the Future of the Internet, Cham et al: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  392. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2011). BEREC Guidelines on Net Neutrality and Transparency: Best Practices and Recommended Approaches, Draft, BoR (11) 44, 3 October. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  393. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2012a). Differentiation Practices and Related Competition Issues in the Scope of Net Neutrality, Draft Report for Public Consultation, BoR (12) 31, 29 May. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  394. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2012b). BEREC
Guidelines for Quality of Service in the Scope of Net Neutrality, Draft Report for Public Consultation, BoR (12) 32, 29 May. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  395. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2012c). An Assessment of IP-Interconnection in the Context of Net Neutrality, Draft Report for Public Consultation, BoR (12) 33, 29 May. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  396. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2012d). BEREC Public Consultations on Net Neutrality, Explanatory Paper, Draft, BoR (12) 34, 29 May. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  397. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2012e). An Assessment of IP Interconnection in the Context of Net Neutrality, Report, BoR (12) 130, 6 December. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  398. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2014). Monitoring Quality of Internet Access Services in the Context of Net Neutrality: Update after Public Consultation, Report, BoR (14) 117, 25 September. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  399. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2016a). BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules, Draft, BoR (16) 94, 2 June. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  400. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2016b). BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules, Guidelines, BoR (16) 127, 30 August. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  401. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2017a). Net Neutrality Regulatory Assessment Methodology, BoR (17) 178, 5 October. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  402. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2017b). Net Neutrality Measurement Tool Specification, Report, BoR (17) 179, 5 October. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  403. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2017c). BEREC Report on IP-Interconnection Practices in the Context of Net Neutrality, Report, BoR (17) 184, 5 October. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  404. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2017d). Report on the Implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and BEREC Net Neutrality Guidelines, Report, BoR (17) 240, 7 December. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  405. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2018a). Tender Specifications No BEREC/2018/01/OT Net Neutrality Measurement Tool, BoR (18) 32, March. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  406. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2018b). Report on the Implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and BEREC Net Neutrality Guidelines, Report, BoR (18) 170, 4 October. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  407. BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) (2018c). BEREC Report on the Outcome of the Consultation on the Evaluation of the Application of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and the BEREC Net Neutrality Guidelines, Report, BoR (18) 245, 6 December. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  408. Berger, A.W. and Whitt, W. (1998). ‘Extending the Effective Bandwidth Concept to Networks with Priority Classes’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 36(8), 78-83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  409. Berger-Kögler, U. and Kruse, J. (2011). ‘Net Neutrality Regulation of the Internet?’, International Journal of Management and Network Economics, 2(1), 3-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  410. Bernet, Y., Ford, P., Yavatkar, R., Baker, F., Zhang, L., Speer, M., Braden, R., Davie, B., Wroclawski, J. and Felstaine, E. (2000). ‘A Framework for Integrated Services Operation over Diffserv Networks’, RFC 2998, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2998 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  411. Bertsekas, D.P. (2002). ‘Traffic Behavior and Queuing in a QoS Environment’, Session 1813, Networking Tutorials, available: web.mit.edu/dimitrib/www/OPNET_Full_Presentation.ppt [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  412. Besen, S., Milgrom, P., Bridger, M. and Padmanabhan, S. (2001). ‘Advances in Routing Technologies and Internet Peering Agreements’, American Economic Review, 91(2), 292-296. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  413. Birke, F. (2009). Zum Wandel des Universaldienstes in der Telekommunikation – Eine netzökonomische Analyse, Freiburger Studien zur Netzökonomie, Band 15, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  414. Black, D. (ed.) and Jones, P. (2015). ‘Differentiated Services (Diffserv) and Real-Time Communication’, RFC 7657, available: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc7657.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  415. Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z. and Weiss, W. (1998). ‘An Architecture for Differentiated Services’, RFC 2475, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2475 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  416. Blanchette, J.-F. (2011). ‘A Material History of Bits’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1042-1057. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  417. Blankart, C.B. and Knieps, G. (1989). ‘What Can We Learn from Comparative Institutional Analysis? The Case of Telecommunications’, Kyklos, 42(4), 579-598. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  418. Blankart, C.B., Knieps, G. and Zenhäusern, P. (2007). ‘Regulation of New Markets in Telecommunications: Market Dynamics and Shrinking Monopolistic Bottlenecks’, European Business Organization Law Review, 8(3), 413-428. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  419. Blanton, E., Allman, M., Wang, L., Jarvinen, I., Kojo, M. and Nishida, Y. (2012). ‘A Conservative Loss Recovery Algorithm Based on Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) for TCP’, RFC 6675, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6675 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  420. Bless, R., Nichols, K. and Wehrle, K. (2003). ‘A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for Differentiated Services’, RFC 3662, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3662 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  421. Blumenthal, M.S. and Clark, D.D. (2001). ‘Rethinking the Design of the Internet: The End-to-End Arguments vs. the Brave New World’, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 9(2), 70-109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  422. Böttger, T., Cuadrado, F. and Uhlig, S. (2018a). ‘Looking for Hypergiants in PeeringDB’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 48(3), 13-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  423. Böttger, T., Cuadrado, F., Tyson, G., Castro, I. and Uhlig, S. (2018b). ‘Open Connect Everywhere: A Glimpse at the Internet Ecosystem through the Lense of the Netflix CDN’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 48(1), 28-34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  424. Böttger, T., Antichi, G., Fernandes, E.L., di Lallo, R., Bruyere, M., Uhlig, S. and Castro, I. (2018c). ‘The Elusive Internet Flattening: 10 Years of IXP Growth’, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1810.10963v2, 7 November, available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.10963 [accessed 15 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  425. Bohn, R.E., Braun, H.-W., Claffy, kc and Wolff, S. (1994). ‘Mitigating the Coming Internet Crunch: Multiple Service Levels via Precedence’, Journal of High Speed Networks, 3(4), 335-349. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  426. Boorstin, J. (2015). ‘BitTorrent’s Original Content Push’, CNBC.com, 11 February, available: https://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/11/bittorrents-original-content-push.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  427. Borella, M.S., Upadhyay, V. and Sidhu, I. (1999). ‘Pricing Framework for a Differential Services Internet’, European Transactions on Telecommunications, 10(3), 275-288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  428. Bork, R.H. (1965). ‘The Rule of Reason and the Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Division’, Yale Law Journal, 74(5), 775-847. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  429. Bork, R.H. (1966). ‘The Rule of Reason and the Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Division’, Yale Law Journal, 75(3), 373-475. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  430. Bornstaedt, F. von (2012). Deutsche Telekom Group – Quality-of-Service (QoS) for IP-Transit and Peering, White Paper, Version 1.02. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  431. Bornstaedt, F. von, Roettgermann, M., Korthals, I., Johansen, F.T. and Lønsethagen, H. (2011). ‘“The Sending Party Network Pays”: A First Step towards End-to-End Quality of Service’, Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), 4-7 October, Berlin, Germany, 1-5, available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6081074 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  432. Borrmann, J. and Finsinger, J. (1999). Markt und Regulierung, München: Verlag Vahlen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  433. Botta, A., de Donato, W., Persico, V. and Pescapé, A. (2016). ‘Integration of Cloud Computing and Internet of Things: A Survey’, Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 684-700. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  434. Bouras, C. and Sevasti, A. (2005). ‘Service Level Agreements for DiffServ-based Services’ Provisioning’, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 28(4), 285-302. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  435. Bourreau, M., Kourandi, F. and Valletti, T. (2015). ‘Net Neutrality with Competing Internet Platforms’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 63(1), 30-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  436. Boyle, J., Gill, V., Hannan, A., Cooper, D., Awduche, D., Christian, B. and Lai, W.S. (2002). ‘Applicability Statement for Traffic Engineering with MPLS’, RFC 3346, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3346 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  437. Braden, R. (ed.) (1989). ‘Requirements for Internet Hosts—Communication Layers’, RFC 1122, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  438. Braden, R., Clark, D.D. and Shenker, S. (1994). ‘Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview’, RFC 1633, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1633 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  439. Braden, R. (ed.), Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S. and Jamin, S. (1997). ‘Resource ReSerVation Protocol – Version 1 Functional Specification’, RFC 2205, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2205 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  440. Brakmo, L.S. and Peterson L.L. (1995). ‘TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet’, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(8), 1465-1480. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  441. Brand X (2005). National Cable and Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  442. Brennan, T.J. (2011). ‘Net Neutrality or Minimum Quality Standards: Network Effects vs. Market Power Justifications’, in: Spiecker gen. Döhmann, I. and Krämer, J. (eds.), Network Neutrality and Open Access, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 61-80. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  443. Brennan, T.J. (2017). ‘The Post-Internet Order Broadband Sector: Lessons from the Pre-Open Internet Order Experience’, Review of Industrial Organization, 50(4), 469-486. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  444. Bresnahan, T. (2010). ‘General Purpose Technologies’, in: Hall, B.H. and Rosenberg, N. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation: Volume 2, Amsterdam et al.: North-Holland, 761-791. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  445. Bresnahan, T. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995). ‘General Purpose Technologies ‘Engines of growth’?’, Journal of Econometrics, 65 (1), 83-108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  446. Briglauer, W. (2014). ‘The Impact of Regulation and Competition on the Adoption of Fiber-Based Broadband Services: Recent Evidence from the European Union Member States’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46(1), 51-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  447. Briglauer, W. (2015). ‘How EU Sector-Specific Regulations and Competition Affect Migration from Old to New Communications Infrastructure: Recent Evidence from EU27 Member States’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 48(2), 194-217. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  448. Briglauer, W. and Cambini, C. (2017). The Role of Regulation in Incentivizing Investment in New Communications Infrastructure, Report Prepared for Deutsche Telekom, available: http://www.zew.de/en/forschung/analyzing-the-role-of-various-regulation-schemes-in-incentivizing-investment-in-new-communications-infrastructure/?cHash=a198b45c72aa4ba99f2c0e3cde780f0d [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  449. Briglauer, W., Cambini, C. and Grajek, M. (2018a). ‘Speeding Up the Internet: Regulation and Investment in the European Fiber Optic Infrastructure’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61, 613-652. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  450. Briglauer, W., Stocker, V. and Whalley, J. (2018b). ‘Public Policy Targets in EU Broadband Markets: The Role of Technological Neutrality’, Paper presented at the 29th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), 1-4 August, Trento, Italy, available: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/184936 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  451. Briscoe, B. (2007). ‘Flow Rate Fairness: Dismantling a Religion’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(2), 65-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  452. Briscoe, B. (2008). ‘A Fairer, Faster Internet’, IEEE Spectrum, 45(12), 42-47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  453. Briscoe, B. and Rudkin, S. (2005). ‘Commercial Models for IP Quality of Service Interconnect’, BT Technology Journal, 23(2), 171-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  454. Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A. and Tilly, B. (2006). ‘Metcalfe’s Law is Wrong: Communications Networks increase in Value as they add Members – But by How Much? The Devil is in the Detail’, IEEE Spectrum, 43(7), 34-39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  455. Brito, J., Cave, M.E., Crandall, R.W., Darby, L.F., Ehrlich, E., Eisenach, J.A., Ellig, J., Ergas, H., Farber, D.J., Faulhaber, G.R., Hahn, R.W., Kahn, A.E., Leighton, W.A., Litan, R.E., Robinson, G.O., Singer, H.J., Smith, V.L., Taylor, W.E., Tardiff, T.J., Waverman, L. and Weisman, D. (2010). ‘Net Neutrality Regulation: The Economic Evidence’, 12 April, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1587058 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  456. Broadband Stakeholder Group (2016). Open Internet Code of Practice 2016, available: http://www.broadbanduk.org/policies/the-open-internet/open-internet-code-of-practice-2016/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  457. Brodkin, J. (2014). ‘Netflix Performance on Verizon and Comcast has been Dropping for Months: Latest Netflix Data Shows some ISPs Struggling, while Google Fiber Soars’, ArsTechnica, 10 February, available: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/02/netflix-performance-on-verizon-and-comcast-has-been-dropping-for-months/ [accessed 22 October 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  458. Brown, S.J. and Sibley, D.S. (1986). The Theory of Public Utility Pricing, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  459. Bush, R. and Meyer, D. (2002). ‘Some Internet Architectural Guidelines and Philosophy’, RFC 3439, available: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3439.txt [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  460. Button, K. (2004). ‘The Rationale for Road Pricing: Standard Theory and Latest Advances’, in: Santos, G. (ed.), Road Pricing: Theory and Evidence, Research in Transportation Economics: Volume 9, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier, 3-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  461. CableLabs (2018). Search Specifications Library, available: http://www.cablelabs.com/specs/specification-search/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  462. Caillaud, B. and Jullien, B. (2003). ‘Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers’, RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309-328. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  463. Cannon, R. (2003). ‘The Legacy of the Federal Communications Commission’s Computer Inquiries’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 55(2), 167-206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  464. Carlton, D.W. (2004). ‘Why Barriers to Entry Are Barriers to Understanding’, American Economic Review, 94(2), 466-470. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  465. Carlton, D.W. and Perloff, J.M. (2005). Modern Industrial Organization, 4th ed. (Internat. ed.), Boston et al.: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  466. Carpenter, B.E. and Nichols, K. (2002). ‘Differentiated Services in the Internet’, Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(2), 1479-1494. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  467. Carr, C.S. (1969). ‘Network Subsystem for Time Sharing Hosts’, RFC 15, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc15 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  468. Carter, K., Marcus, J.S. and Wernick, C. (2008). Network Neutrality: Implications for Europe, WIK Discussion Paper No. 314, December, Bad Honnef: WIK. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  469. Castro, I., Cardona, J.C., Gorinsky, S. and Francois, P. (2014). ‘Remote Peering: More Peering without Internet Flattening’, Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT ‘14), 2-5 December, Sydney, Australia, 185-198, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2674005.2675013 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  470. Cave, M. (2018). ‘How Disruptive is 5G?’, Telecommunications Policy, 42(8), 653-658. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  471. Cave, M. and Crocioni, P. (2007). ‘Does Europe Need Network Neutrality Rules?’, International Journal of Communication, 1, 669-679. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  472. Cave, M. and Mason, R. (2001). ‘The Economics of the Internet: Infrastructure and Regulation’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(2), 188–201.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  473. Cave, M. and Vogelsang, I. (2015). ‘Net Neutrality: an E.U./U.S. Comparison’, Competition Policy International, 11(1), 85-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  474. Caves, K.W. (2012). ‘Modeling the Welfare Effects of Net Neutrality Regulation: A Comment on Economides and Tåg’, Information Economics and Policy, 24(3-4), 288-292. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  475. Cerf, V.G. and Kahn, R.E. (1974). ‘A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication’, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 22(5), 637-648. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  476. Chadwick, E. (1859). ‘Results of Different Principles of Legislation and Administration in Europe; of Competition for the Field, as Compared with Competition within the Field, of Service’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 22(3), 381-420. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  477. Chamberlin, E.H. (1933). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  478. Chan, K., Babiarz, J. and Baker, F. (2008). ‘Aggregation of Diffserv Service Classes’, RFC 5127, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5127 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  479. Chandra, R., Traina, P. and Li, T. (1996). ‘BGP Communities Attribute’, RFC 1997, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1997 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  480. Chatzis, N., Smaragdakis, G., Feldmann, A. and Willinger, W. (2013). ‘There is More to IXPs Than Meets the Eye’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43(5), 19-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  481. Chau, C.-K., Wang, Q. and Chiu, D.-M. (2010). ‘On the Viability of Paris Metro Pricing for Communication and Service Networks’, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 14-19 March, San Diego, CA, 929-937. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  482. Chau, C.-K., Wang, Q. and Chiu, D.-M. (2014). ‘Economic Viability of Paris Metro Pricing for Digital Services’, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 14(2-3), Article 12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  483. Chen, J-Y. and Zhang, T. (2004). IP-Based Next-Generation Wireless Networks: Systems, Architectures, and Protocols, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  484. Cheng, H.K., Bandyopadhyay, S. and Guo, H. (2011). ‘The Debate on Net Neutrality: A Policy Perspective’. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 60-82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  485. Choffnes, D., Gill, P. and Mislove, A. (2017). ‘An Empirical Evaluation of Deployed DPI Middleboxes and Their Implications for Policymakers’, Paper presented at the 45th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 7-9 September, Arlington, VA, available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2941535 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  486. Choi, J.P. and Kim, B.-C. (2010). ‘Net Neutrality and Investment Incentives’, RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 446-471. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  487. Choi, J.P., Jeon, D.-S. and Kim, B.-C. (2015). ‘Net Neutrality, Business Models, and Internet Interconnection’, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7(3), 104-141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  488. Choi, J.P., Jeon, D.-S. and Kim, B.-C. (2018). ‘Net Neutrality, Network Capacity, and Innovation at the Edges’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 66(1), 172-204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  489. Cisco (2006a). DiffServ – The Scalable End-to-End Quality of Service Model, White Paper, available: https://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk543/tk766/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a3e2f.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  490. Cisco (2006b). I⁠P⁠v⁠6 Extension Headers Review and Considerations, White Paper, available: https://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk872/technologies_white_paper0900aecd8054d37d.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  491. Cisco (2013). Cisco Nexus 7000 Series NX-OS MPLS Configuration Guide, available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/5_x/nx-os/mpls/configuration/guide/mpls_cg.html [accessed 28 November 2018] Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  492. Cisco (2017a). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2016–2021, 7 February, available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-paper-c11-520862.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  493. Cisco (2017b). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2016–2021, 6 June. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  494. Cisco (2018a). MPLS Traffic Engineering – DiffServ Aware (DS-TE), available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_te_diffserv/configuration/xe-3s/mp-te-diffserv-xe-3s-book/mp-te-diffserv-aw.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  495. Cisco (2018b). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017–2022, 26 November, available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html [accessed 10 January 2019]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  496. Claffy, kc and Clark, D.D. (2014). ‘Platform Models for Sustainable Internet Regulation’, Journal of Information Policy, 4, 463-488. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  497. Claffy, kc and Clark, D.D. (2016). ‘Adding Enhanced Services to the Internet: Lessons from History’, Journal of Information Policy, 6, 206-251. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  498. Claffy, kc, Clark, D.D., Bauer, S. and Dhamdhere, A. (2016). ‘Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain Congestion’, Paper presented at the 44th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 30 September-1 October, Arlington, VA, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756868 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  499. Clark, D.D. (1982). ‘Modularity and Efficiency in Protocol Implementation’, RFC 817, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc817 [accessed: 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  500. Clark, D.D. (1988). ‘The Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 18(4), 106-114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  501. Clark, D.D. (1998). ‘Internet Cost Allocation and Pricing’, in: McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.), Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 215-252. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  502. Clark, D.D. (2007). ‘Network Neutrality: Words of Power and 800-Pound Gorillas’, International Journal of Communication, 1, 701-708. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  503. Clark, D.D. (2018). Designing an Internet, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  504. Clark, J.M. (1940). ‘Toward a Concept of Workable Competition’, American Economic Review, 30(2), 241-256.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  505. Clark, J.M. (1961). Competition as a Dynamic Process, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  506. Clark, D.D. and Blumenthal, M.S. (2011). ‘The End-to-End Argument and Application Design: The Role of Trust’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 63(2), 357-390. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  507. Clark, D.D., Lehr, W.H. and Bauer, S. (2016). ‘Interconnection in the Internet: Peering, Interoperability and Content Delivery’, in: Bauer, J.M. and Latzer, M. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 344-362. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  508. Clark, D.D., Shenker, S. and Zhang, L. (1992). ‘Supporting Real-Time Applications in an Integrated Services Packet Network: Architecture and Mechanism’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 22(4), 14-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  509. Clark, D.D., Wroclawski, J., Sollins, K. and Braden, R. (2005). ‘Tussle in Cyberspace: Defining Tomorrow’s Internet’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 13(3), 462-475. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  510. Clark, D.D., Lehr, B., Bauer, S., Faratin, P., Sami, R. and Wroclawski, J. (2006). ‘Overlay Networks and the Future of the Internet’, Communications & Strategies, 63(3), 109-129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  511. Claypool, M., Wang, T. and Watts, M. (2015). ‘A Taxonomy for Player Actions with Latency in Network Games’, Proceedings of the 25th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV ’15), 18-20 March, Portland, OR, 67-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  512. Coase, R.H. (1960). ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  513. Cocchi, R., Estrin, D., Shenker, S. and Zhang, L. (1991). ‘A Study of Priority Pricing in Multiple Service Class Networks’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 21(4), 123-130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  514. Cocchi, R., Shenker, S., Estrin, D. and Zhang, L. (1993). ‘Pricing in Computer Networks: Motivation, Formulation, and Example’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1(6), 614-627. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  515. Collins, K. (2018). ‘Net Neutrality Has Officially Been Repealed. Here’s How That Could Affect You.’, New York Times, 11 June, available: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/11/technology/net-neutrality-repeal.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  516. Comcast (2010). ‘Comcast Statement on U.S. Court of Appeals Decision on Comcast v. FCC’, 6 April, available: http://corporate.comcast.com/news-information/news-feed/comcast-statement-on-us-court-of-appeals-decision-on-comcast-v-fcc [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  517. Comer, D.E. (2009). Computer Networks and Internets, 5th ed., New Jersey: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  518. Cooper, A. (2013). How Regulation and Competition Influence Discrimination in Broadband Traffic Management: A Comparative Study of Net Neutrality in the United States and the United Kingdom, PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, available: https://alissacooperdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/thesis.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  519. Cotton, M., Eggert, L., Touch, J., Westerlund, M. and Cheshire, S. (2011). ‘Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry’, RFC 6335, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6335 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  520. Courcoubetis, C. and Weber, R. (2003). Pricing Communication Networks: Economics, Technology and Modelling, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  521. Courcoubetis, C., Kelly, F.P. and Weber, R. (2000). ‘Measurement-Based Usage Charges in Communications Networks’, Operations Research, 48(4), 535–548. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  522. Crandall, R.W. and Waverman, L. (2000). Who Pays for Universal Service? When Telephone Subsidies Become Transparent, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  523. Crémer, J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. (2000). ‘Connectivity in the Commercial Internet’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), 433-472. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  524. Cremer, H., Gasmi, F., Grimaud, A. and Laffont, J.-J. (2001). ‘Universal Service: An Economic Perspective’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 72(1), 5-43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  525. Crocioni, P. (2011). ‘Net Neutrality in Europe: Desperately Seeking a Market Failure’, Telecommunications Policy, 35(1), 1-11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  526. Crocker, S., Carr, S. and Cerf, V. (1970). ‘New HOST-Host Protocol’, RFC 33, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc33 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  527. Crowcroft, J. (2007). ‘Net Neutrality: The Technical Side of the Debate’, International Journal of Communication, 1, 567-579.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  528. Crowcroft, J. (2011). ‘The Affordance of Asymmetry or a Rendezvous with the Random?’, Communications & Convergence Review, 3(1), 40-56.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  529. David, P.A. (1985). ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  530. David, P.A. (2007). ‘Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science’, Cliometrica, 1(2), 91-114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  531. Davie, B., Charny, A., Bennett, J.C.R., Benson, K., Le Boudec, J.Y., Courtney, W., Davari, S., Firoiu, V. and Stiliadis, D. (2002). ‘An Expedited Forwarding PHB (Per-Hop- Behavior)’, RFC 3246, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3246 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  532. Davies, R. (2014). Net Neutrality in Europe, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Briefing, 25 March. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  533. Davies, R. (2016). Broadband as a Universal Service, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Briefing, April. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  534. Davis, A., Parikh, J. and Weihl, W.E. (2004). ‘EdgeComputing: Extending Enterprise Applications to the Edge of the Internet’, Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers & Posters (WWW Alt. ‘04), 19-21 May, New York, NY, 180-187, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1013367.1013397 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  535. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  536. Deering, S. and Hinden, R. (1995). ‘Internet Protocol, Version 6 (I⁠P⁠v⁠6) Specification’, RFC 1883, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1883 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  537. Deering, S. and Hinden, R. (1998). ‘Internet Protocol, Version 6 (I⁠P⁠v⁠6) Specification’, RFC 2460, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2460 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  538. Deering, S. and Hinden, R. (2017). ‘Internet Protocol, Version 6 (I⁠P⁠v⁠6) Specification’, RFC 8200, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8200 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  539. Delgrossi, L. and Ferrari, D. (1999). ‘Charging Schemes for Reservation-Based Networks’, Telecommunication Systems, 11(1), 127-137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  540. Delp, A.B. and Mayo, J.W. (2017). ‘The Evolution of “Competition”: Lessons for 21st Century Telecommunications Policy’, Review of Industrial Organization, 50(4), 393-416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  541. Demichelis, C. and Chimento, P. (2002). ‘IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)’, RFC 3393, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3393 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  542. Demsetz, H. (1968). ‘Why Regulate Utilities?’, Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 55-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  543. Demsetz, H. (2011). ‘The Problem of Social Cost: What Problem? A Critique of the Reasoning of A.C. Pigou and R.H. Coase’, Review of Law and Economics, 7(1), 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  544. Dewan, S. and Mendelson, H. (1990). ‘User Delay Costs and Internal Pricing for a Service Facility’, Management Science, 36(12), 1502-1517. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  545. Dhamdhere, A. and Dovrolis, C. (2010). ‘The Internet is Flat: Modeling the Transition from a Transit Hierarchy to a Peering Mesh’, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (ACM CoNEXT 2010), 30 November-3 December, Philadelphia, PA, Article No 21, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1921168.1921196 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  546. Dilley, J., Maggs, B.M., Parikh, J., Prokop, H., Sitaraman, R. and Weihl, B. (2002). ‘Globally Distributed Content Delivery’, IEEE Internet Computing, 6(5), 50-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  547. Dischinger, M., Marcon, M., Guha, S., Gummadi, K.P., Mahajan, R. and Saroiu, S. (2010). ‘Glasnost: Enabling End Users to Detect Traffic Differentiation’, Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation (NSDI ‘10), 28-30 April, San Jose, CA, available: https://ratul.org/papers/nsdi2010-glasnost.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  548. Dixit, A.K. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1977). ‘Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity’, American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  549. Dodd, M., Jung, A., Mitchell, B., Paterson, P. and Reynolds, P. (2009). ‘Bill-and-Keep and the Economics of Interconnection in Next-Generation Networks’, Telecommunications Policy, 33(5-6), 324-337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  550. Dolan, T. (2000). ‘Internet Pricing: Is the End of the World Wide Wait in View?’, Communications & Strategies, 37(1), 15-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  551. Dordick, H.S. (1990). ‘The Origins of Universal Service: History as a Determinant of Telecommunications Policy’, Telecommunications Policy, 14(3), 223-231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  552. DotEcon and Axon (2018). Study on Implications of 5G Deployment on Future Business Models, A Report by DotEcon Ltd and Axon Partners Group, No BEREC/2017/02/NP3, BoR (18) 23, 14 March. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  553. Duke, M., Braden, R., Eddy, W., Blanton, E. and Zimmermann, A. (2015). ‘A Roadmap for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Specification Documents’, RFC 7414, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7414 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  554. Easley, R., Guo, H. and Krämer, J. (2018). ‘Research Commentary–From Net Neutrality to Data Neutrality:
A Techno-Economic Framework and Research Agenda’, Information Systems Research, 29(2), 253-272. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  555. EC (European Commission) (1999). Towards a New Framework for Electronic Communications Infrastructure and Associated Services: The 1999 Communications Review, COM (1999) 539final, 10 November, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  556. EC (European Commission) (2002a). Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Framework Directive), Official Journal of the European Communities, L 108, 33-50, 24 April, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  557. EC (European Commission) (2002b). Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on Universal Service and Users' Rights Relating to Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Universal Service Directive), Official Journal of the European Communities, L 108, 51-77, 24 April, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  558. EC (European Commission) (2003). Commission Recommendation of 11 February 2003 on Relevant Product and Service Markets within the Electronic Communications Sector Susceptible to Ex Ante Regulation in Accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communication Networks and Services, 2003/311/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, L 114, 45-49, 8 May, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  559. EC (European Commission) (2009a). Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 Amending Directive 2002/22/EC on Universal Service and Users’ Rights Relating to Electronic Communications Networks and Services, Directive 2002/58/EC Concerning the Processing of Personal Data and the Protection of Privacy in the Electronic Communications Sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on Cooperation Between National Authorities Responsible for the Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws, Official Journal of the European Union, L 337, 11-36, 18 December, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  560. EC (European Commission) (2009b). Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 Amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services, 2002/19/EC on Access to, and Interconnection of, Electronic Communications Networks and Associated Facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the Authorisation of Electronic Communications Networks and Services, Official Journal of the European Union, L 337, 37-69, 18 December, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  561. EC (European Commission) (2010a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Digital Agenda for Europe, COM (2010)245 final, 19 May, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  562. EC (European Commission) (2010b). ‘Digital Agenda: Commission Launches Consultation on Net Neutrality’, IP/10/860, 30 June, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  563. EC (European Commission) (2012a). ‘Digital Agenda: Commission Opens Public Consultation on Preservation of The Open Internet (Net Neutrality)’, Press Release, 23 July, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  564. EC (European Commission) (2012b). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 47-390, 26 October, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  565. EC (European Commission) (2013). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Measures Concerning the European Single Market for Electronic Communications and to Achieve a Connected Continent, and Amending Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1211/2009 and (EU) No 531/2012, COM(2013) 627 final, 11 September, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  566. EC (European Commission) (2016a). Connectivity for a Competitive Digital Single Market – Towards a European Gigabit Society, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM 2016(587) final, 14 September, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  567. EC (European Commission) (2016b). Review of the Scope of Universal Service, A Study Prepared for the European Commission, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by Tech4i2 Limited, Time.lex BV CVBA, Acreo and Genesis Media GmbH, SMART 2014/0011, 30 September, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  568. EC (European Commission) (2016c). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast), COM(2016) 590 final/2, 12 October, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  569. EC (European Commission) (2016d). Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Document ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Connectivity for a Competitive Digital Single Market – Towards a European Gigabit Society’, SWD(2016) 300 final, 14 September, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  570. EC (European Commission) (2018). Telecom Rules, available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/telecoms-rules [accessed 17 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  571. Economides, N. (2005). ‘The Economics of the Internet Backbone’, in: Majumdar, S., Vogelsang, I. and Cave, M. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications: Volume 2, Amsterdam et al.: North-Holland, 375-413. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  572. Economides, N. (2008). ‘Net Neutrality, Non-Discrimination and Digital Distribution of Content Through the Internet’, I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 4(2), 209-233. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  573. Economides, N. and Hermalin, B.E. (2012). ‘The Economics of Network Neutrality’, RAND Journal of Economics, 43(4), 602-629. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  574. Economides, N. and Tåg, J. (2012). ‘Network Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-Sided Market Analysis’, Information Economics and Policy, 24(2), 91-104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  575. Edell, R.J. and Varaiya, P.P. (1999). ‘Providing Internet Access: What we Learn from INDEX’, IEEE Network, 13(5), 18-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  576. Edell, R.J., McKeown, N. and Varaiya, P.P. (1995). ‘Billing Users and Pricing for TCP’, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(7), 1162-1175. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  577. Edelson, N.M. and Hildebrand, D.K. (1975). ‘Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes’, Econometrica, 43(1), 81‐92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  578. EDRi (European Digital Rights) (2016). Net Neutrality in Europe, available: http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/108784/Net-neutrality-in-Europe/#vars!date=2016-07-19_10:02:41! [accessed 5 September 2017]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  579. Emerson (2010). Impact of Weather on Smart Wireless Networks, available: https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/impact-of-weather-on-smart-wireless-networks-en-42650.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  580. EPRA (European Platform for Regulatory Authorities) (2016). ‘Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Under Review’, 6 October, available: https://www.epra.org/news_items/regulatory-framework-for-electronic-communications-under-review [accessed 13 July 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  581. ERG (European Regulators Group) (2008). Supplementary Document to the ERG Common Statement on Regulatory Principles of IP-IC/NGN Core – A work program towards a Common Position, ERG (08) 26b final. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  582. Erman, J., Gerber, A., Hajiaghayi, M.T., Pei, D. and Spatscheck, O. (2009). ‘Network-Aware Forward Caching’, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’09), 20-24 April, Madrid, Spain, 291–300. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  583. Esbin, B. (1998). ‘Internet over Cable: Defining the Future in Terms of the Past’, OPP Working Paper Series, No. 30, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission, available: https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  584. Estrin, D., Rekhter, Y. and Hotz, S. (1992). ‘A Unified Approach to Inter-Domain Routing’, RFC 1322, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1322 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  585. ETICS (2013). Dissemination Activity Report, Deliverable 8.2, Version: 0.1, March, available: https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/projects/cnect/7/248567/080/deliverables/001-eticsd82v3final.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  586. ETICS (2014). Final White Paper: January 2010 – March 2013, FP7 ETICS Consortium, January. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  587. EU (European Union) (2015). Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 Laying Down Measures Concerning Open Internet Access and Amending Directive 2002/22/EC on Universal Service and Users’ Rights Relating to Electronic Communications Networks and Services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on Roaming on Public Mobile Communications Networks within the Union, Official Journal of the European Union, L 310, 1-18, 26 November, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  588. EU (European Union) (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast), Official Journal of the European Union, L 321, 36-214, 17 December, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  589. Eucken, W. (1990). Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik, 6th ed., Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  590. European Parliament (2011). The Open Internet and Net Neutrality in Europe, European Parliament Resolution of 17 November 2011 on the Open Internet and Net Neutrality in Europe, P7_TA(2011)0511, available: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P7-TA-2011-0511+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN [accessed 5 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  591. European Parliament (2014). European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 April 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning the European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent, and amending Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC, 2002/22/EC, and Regulations (EC) No 1211/2009 and (EU) No 531/2012 (COM(2013)0627 – C7-0267/2013 – 2013/0309(COD)), P7_TA(2014)0281, 3 April, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  592. European Parliament (2017). Procedure File: 2013/0309(COD) Open Internet Access, available: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2013/0309(COD)&l=en [accessed 5 September 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  593. Evans, D. (2003). ‘Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-Sided Platform Industries’, Review of Network Economics, 2(3), 191-209. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  594. Evans, J. and Filsfils, C. (2007). Deploying IP and MPLS QOS for Multiservice Networks: Theory and Practice, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  595. Evans, D. and Schmalensee, R. (2007). ‘The Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-Sided Platforms’, Competition Policy International, 3(1), 151-179.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  596. Evans, D. and Schmalensee, R. (2015). ‘The Antitrust Analysis of Multisided Platform Businesses’, in: Blair, R.D. and Sokol, D.D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Antitrust Economics: Volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 404-449. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  597. Evans, D. and Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  598. Falkner, M., Devetsikiotis, M. and Lambadaris, I. (2000). ‘An Overview of Pricing Concepts for Broadband IP Networks’, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 3(2), 2-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  599. Faratin, P., Clark, D., Bauer, S., Lehr, W., Gilmore, P. and Berger, A. (2008). ‘The Growing Complexity of Internet Interconnection’, Communications & Strategies, 72(4), 51-71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  600. Farrell, J. and Klemperer, P. (2007). ‘Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects’, in: M. Armstrong and Porter, R.H. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization: Volume 3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1967-2072. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  601. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1985). ‘Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation’, RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70-83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  602. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1986). ‘Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation’, American Economic Review, 76(5), 940-955. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  603. Farrell, J. and Weiser, P. (2003). ‘Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age’, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 17(1), 85-134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  604. Farrell, A. (ed.), Ayyangar, A. and Vasseur, J.-P. (2008). ‘Inter-Domain MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering – Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions’, RFC 5151, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5151 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  605. Farrell, A. (ed.), Papadimitriou, D., Vasseur, J.-P. and Ayyangar, A. (2006). ‘Encoding of Attributes for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Establishment using Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)’, RFC 4420, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4420 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  606. Faulhaber, G.R. (1975). ‘Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises’, American Economic Review, 65(5), 966-977. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  607. Faulhaber, G.R. (2011). ‘Economics of Net Neutrality: A Review’, Communications & Convergence Review, 3(1), 7-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  608. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2002). In the Matter of Inquiring Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet Over Cable and Other Facilities; Internet Over Cable Declaratory Ruling; Appropriate Regulatory Treatment for Broadband Access to the Internet Over Cable Facilities, Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GN Docket No. 00-185, CS Docket No. 02-52 (FCC 02-77), adopted: 14 March, released: 15 March, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  609. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2004). Availability of Advanced Telecommunications Capability in the United States, Fourth Report to Congress, GN Docket No. 04-54 (FCC 04-208), 9 September, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  610. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2005a). In the Matter of Madison River Communications, LLC and Affiliated Companies, Order, File No. EB-05-IH-0110 (DA 05-543), adopted: 3 March, released: 3 March, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  611. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2005b). In the Matter of Madison River Communications, LLC and Affiliated Companies, Consent Decree, File No. EB-05-IH-0110 (DA 05-543), Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  612. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2005c). In the Matters of Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to the Internet over Wireline Facilities et al., Policy Statement, CC Docket No. 02-33 et al. (FCC 05-151), adopted: 5 August, released: 23 September, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  613. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2007). In the Matter of Appropriate Regulatory Treatment for Broadband Access to the Internet Over Wireless Networks, Declaratory Ruling, WT Docket No. 07-53 (FCC 07-30), adopted: 22 March, released: 23 March, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  614. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2008). In the Matters of Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge against Comcast Corporation for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications; Broadband Industry Practices Petition of Free Press et al. for Declaratory Ruling that Degrading an Internet Application Violates the FCC’s Internet Policy Statement and Does Not Meet an Exception for “Reasonable Network Management”, Memorandum Opinion and Order, File No. EB-08-IH-1518, WC Docket No. 07-52 (FCC 08-183), adopted: August 1, released: August 20, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  615. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2009). In the Matter of Preserving the Open Internet; Broadband Industry Practices, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No.07-52 (FCC 09-93), adopted: 22 October, released: 22 October, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  616. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2010). In the Matter of Preserving the Open Internet; Broadband Industry Practices, Report and Order, GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52 (FCC 10-201), adopted: 21 December, released: 23 December, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  617. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2014a). In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GN Docket No. 14-28 (FCC 14-61), adopted: 15 May, released: 15 May, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  618. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2014b). ‘FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s Statement on President Barack Obama’s Statement Regarding Open Internet’, 10 November, available: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-330414A1.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  619. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2015a). ‘Fact Sheet: Chairman Wheeler Proposes New Rules for Protecting the Open Internet’, 4 February, available: https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-wheeler-proposes-new-rules-protecting-open-internet [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  620. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2015b). In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order, GN Docket No. 14-28 (FCC 15-24), adopted: 26 February, released: 12 March, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  621. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2016). Measuring Broadband America Fixed Broadband Report – A Report on Consumer Fixed Broadband Performance in the United States, Office of Engineering and Technology and Office of Strategic Planning & Policy Analysis, 1 December, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission, available: https://data.fcc.gov/download/measuring-broadband-america/2016/2016-Fixed-Measuring-Broadband-America-Report.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  622. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2017). In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WC Docket No. 17-108 (FCC 17-60), adopted: 18 May, released: 23 May, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  623. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2018a). In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, Declaratory Ruling, Report and Order, and Order, WC Docket No. 17-108 (FCC 17-166), adopted: 14 December, released: 4 January, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  624. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2018b). ‘Fact Sheet on Draft 2018 Broadband Deployment Report’, available: https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2018/db0118/DOC-348770A2.pdf [accessed: 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  625. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2018c). In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, 2018 Broadband Deployment Report, GN Docket No. 17-199 (FCC 18-10), adopted: 2 February, released: 2 February, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  626. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2018d). Universal Service, available: https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service [accessed 25 June 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  627. Feamster, N., Rexford, J. and Zegura, E. (2014). ‘The Road to SDN: An Intellectual History of Programmable Networks’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 44(2), 87-98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  628. Festraets, E. and Zhao, R. (2014). G.Fast, Paper by the D&O Committee, available: https://www.ftthcouncil.eu/documents/Publications/DandO_Gfast_Paper_2014_Final.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  629. Fettweis, G.P. (2014). ‘The Tactile Internet: Application and Challenges’, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 9(1), 64-70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  630. Finger, M. and Künneke, R.W. (eds.) (2011). International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructure, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  631. Florence School of Regulation, Communications & Media Area (2017). The Future of Broadband Policy, Part 2: Technological Neutrality, Path Dependency and Public Financing, Florence: European University Institute, available: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/46724/FSR_RR_2017_01.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  632. Floyd, S. (1994). ‘TCP and Explicit Congestion Notification’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 24(5), 8-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  633. Floyd, S. and Fall, K. (1999). ‘Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(4), 458-472. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  634. Frank, B., Poese, I., Lin, Y., Smaragdakis, G., Feldmann, A., Maggs, B.M., Rake, J., Uhlig, S. and Weber, R. (2013). ‘Pushing CDN-ISP Collaboration to the Limit’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43(3), 35-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  635. Freedman, M.J., Vutukuru, M., Feamster, N. and Balakrishnan, H. (2005). ‘Geographic Locality of IP Prefixes’, Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (IMC ’05), 19-21 October, Berkeley, CA, 153-158. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  636. Frieden, R. (2015). ‘Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches to Network Neutrality: A Comparative Assessment’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30(2), 1561-1612. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  637. Frischmann, B.M. and van Schewick, B. (2007). ‘Network Neutrality and the Economics of an Information Superhighway: A Reply to Professor Yoo’, Jurimetrics, 47(4), 383-428. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  638. FTTH Council Europe (2018). FTTH Handbook, Edition 8, D&O Committee, revision date: 13 February 2018, available: https://www.ftthcouncil.eu/documents/Publications/FTTH%20Handbook_2017_V8_FINAL.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  639. Fuller, V. and Li, T. (2006). ‘Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan’, RFC 4632, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4632 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  640. Gans, J.S. (2015). ‘Weak versus Strong Net Neutrality’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 47(2), 183-200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  641. Gartner (2017). Leading the IoT: Gartner Insights on How to Lead in a Connected World, available: https://www.gartner.com/imagesrv/books/iot/iotEbook_digital.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  642. Geib, R. (ed.) and Black, D. (2017). ‘Diffserv-Interconnection Classes and Practice’, RFC 8100, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8100 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  643. Genakos, C. and Valletti, T. (2011). ‘Testing the “Waterbed” Effect in Mobile Telephony’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(6), 1114-1142. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  644. Genakos, C. and Valletti, T. (2012). ‘Regulating Prices in Two-Sided Markets: The Waterbed Experience in Mobile Telephony’, Telecommunications Policy, 36(5), 360-368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  645. Gibbens, R.J., Mason, R. and Steinberg, R. (2000a). ‘Internet Service Classes Under Competition’, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(12), 2490-2498. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  646. Gibbens, R.J., Sargood, S.K., Kelly, F.P., Azmoodeh, H., MacFadyen, R. and MacFadyen, N. (2000b). ‘An Approach to Service Level Agreements for IP Networks with Differentiated Services’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 358(1773), 2165-2182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  647. Gilroy, A.A. (2006). Net Neutrality: Background and Issues, Congressional Research Service Report, 22 December. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  648. Gilroy, A.A. (2015). Access to Broadband Networks: The Net Neutrality Debate, Congressional Research Service Report, 1 July, available: http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/R40616.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  649. Gilroy, A.A. (2018). The Net Neutrality Debate: Access to Broadband Networks, Congressional Research Service Report, 22 June, available: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40616.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  650. Giotsas, V., Smaragdakis, G., Huffaker, B., Luckie, M. and Claffy, kc (2015). ‘Mapping Peering Interconnections to a Facility’, Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT ’15), 1-4 December, Heidelberg, Germany, Article No. 37, available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2716281.2836122 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  651. Godlovitch, I., Plueckebaum, T., Strube Martins, S., Gantumur, T., Elixmann, D., Tas, S., Arnold, R. and Wernick, C. (2018). The Benefits of Ultrafast Broadband Deployment, Final Report by WIK-Consult for Ofcom, 20 February, Bad Honnef: WIK-Consult. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  652. Google (2018a). Autoplay Videos, available: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6327615?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en&oco=0 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  653. Google (2018b). Our Infrastructure, available: https://peering.google.com/#/infrastructure [accessed 29 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  654. Graber, A. (2005). Internet Pricing – Economic Approaches to Transport Services and Infrastructure, European University Studies, Series V Economics and Management, Volume 3137, Bern et al.: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  655. Greenstein, S.M. (2015). How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  656. Greenstein, S.M., Peitz, M. and Valletti, T.M. (2016). ‘Net Neutrality: A Fast Lane to Understanding the Trade-Offs’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 127-150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  657. Grossman, D. (2002). ‘New Terminology and Clarifications for Diffserv’, RFC 3260, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3260 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  658. Guo, H. and Easley, R.F. (2016). ‘Network Neutrality Versus Paid Prioritization: Analyzing the Impact on Content Innovation’, Production and Operations Management, 25(7), 1261-1273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  659. Guo, H., Cheng, H.K. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2012). ‘Net Neutrality, Broadband Market Coverage and Innovation at the Edge’, Decision Sciences, 43(1), 141-172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  660. Guo, H., Cheng, H.K. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). ‘Broadband Network Management and the Net Neutrality Debate’, Production and Operations Management, 22(5), 1287-1298. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  661. Guo, H., Bandyopadhyay, S., Lim, A., Yang, Y. and Cheng, H.K. (2017). ‘Effects of Competition among Internet Service Providers and Content Providers on the Net Neutrality Debate’, MIS Quarterly, 41(2), 353-370. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  662. Gupta, A., Stahl, D.O. and Whinston, A.B. (1996). ‘An Economic Approach to Networked Computing with Priority Classes’, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 71-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  663. Gupta, A., Stahl, D.O. and Whinston, A.B. (1997). ‘A Stochastic Equilibrium Model of Internet Pricing’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(4-5), 697-722. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  664. Gupta, A., Stahl, D.O. and Whinston A.B. (1998). ‘Priority Pricing for Integrated Services Networks’, in: McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.), Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 323-352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  665. Gupta, A., Calder, M., Feamster, N., Chetty, M., Calandro, E. and Katz-Bassett, E. (2014). ‘Peering at the Internet’s Frontier: A First Look at ISP Interconnectivity in Africa’, in: Faloutsos, M. and Kuzmanovic, A. (eds.), Passive and Active Measurement: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (PAM 2014), Cham et al.: Springer, 204-213. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  666. Hagiu, A. and Wright, J. (2015). ‘Multi-Sided Platforms’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162-174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  667. Hahn, R.W. and Litan, R.E. (2007). ‘The Myth of Network Neutrality and What We Should Do About It’, International Journal of Communication, 1, 595-606. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  668. Hall, B.H. and Rosenberg, N. (eds.) (2010a). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation: Volume 1, Amsterdam et al.: North-Holland. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  669. Hall, B.H. and Rosenberg, N. (eds.) (2010b). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation: Volume 2, Amsterdam et al.: North-Holland. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  670. Hamzeh, B. (2015). ‘DOCSIS 3.1® Update: Get Your Engines Running….The Engines ARE Running!’, CableLabs, 24 August, available: http://www.cablelabs.com/docsis-3-1-update-get-your-engines-running-the-engines-are-running/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  671. Hamzeh, B. (2016). ‘Full Duplex DOCSIS® 3.1 Technology: Raising the Ante with Symmetric Gigabit Service’, CableLabs, 16 February, available: https://www.cablelabs.com/full-duplex-docsis-3-1-technology-raising-the-ante-with-symmetric-gigabit-service/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  672. Hardin, G. (1968). ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162(3859), 1243-1247.
 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  673. Hashem, I.A.T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N.B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A. and Khan, S.U. (2015). ‘The Rise of “Big Data” on Cloud Computing: Review and Open Research Issues’, Information Systems, 47, 98-115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  674. Haucap, J. and Kruse, J. (2004). ‘Ex-Ante-Regulierung oder Ex-Post-Aufsicht für Netzgebundene Industrien?’, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WuW) – Zeitschrift für Deutsches und Europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht, 54(3), 266-275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  675. Haucap, J. and Stühmeier, T. (2016). ‘Competition and Antitrust in Internet Markets’, in: Bauer, J.M. and Latzer, M. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 183-210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  676. Hausman, J.A. and Taylor, W.E. (2013). ‘Telecommunication in the US: From Regulation to Competition (Almost)’, Review of Industrial Organization, 42(2), 203-230. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  677. Hayek, F.A. von (1948). ‘The Meaning of Competition’, in: Hayek, F.A. von (ed.) Individualism and Economic Order, London, UK: George Routledge & Sons, 92-106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  678. Hayek, F.A. von (1978). ‘Competition as a Discovery Procedure’, in: Hayek, F.A. von (ed.) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 171-190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  679. Hayel, Y. and Tuffin, B. (2005). ‘A Mathematical Analysis of the Cumulus Pricing Scheme’, Computer Networks, 47(6), 907-921. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  680. Hazlett, T.W. and Caliskan, A. (2008). ‘Natural Experiments in U.S. Broadband Regulation’, Review of Network Economics, 7(4), 460-480. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  681. Hazlett, T.W. and Wright, J.D. (2012). ‘The Law and Economics of Network Neutrality’, Indiana Law Review, 45(3), 767-840. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  682. Hazlett, T.W. and Wright, J.D. (2017). ‘The Effect of Regulation on Broadband Markets: Evaluating the Empirical Evidence in the FCC’s 2015 “Open Internet” Order’, Review of Industrial Organization, 50(4), 487-507. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  683. Hedrick, C. (1988). ‘Routing Information Protocol’, RFC 1058, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1058 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  684. Heinanen, J., Baker, F., Weiss, W. and Wroclawski, J. (1999). ‘Assured Forwarding PHB Group’, RFC 2597, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2597 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  685. Henderson, T., Crowcroft, J. and Bhatti, S. (2001). ‘Congestion Pricing: Paying Your Way in Communication Networks’, IEEE Internet Computing, 5(5), 85-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  686. Hermalin, B.E. and Katz, M.L. (2007). ‘The Economics of Product-Line Restrictions with an Application to the Network Neutrality Debate’, Information Economics and Policy, 19(2), 215-248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  687. Hogendorn, C. (2007). ‘Broadband Internet: Net Neutrality versus Open Access’, International Economics and Economic Policy, 4(2), 185-208. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  688. Hotelling, H. (1929). ‘Stability in Competition’, Economic Journal, 39(153), 41-57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  689. Hurwicz, L. (1960). ‘Optimality and Informational Efficiency in Resource Allocation Processes’, in: Arrow, K.J., Karlin, S. and Suppes, P. (eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 27-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  690. Hurwicz, L. (1972). ‘On Informationally Decentralized Systems’, in: Radner, R. and McGuire, B. (eds.), Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 297-336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  691. Hussain, F. (2017). Internet of Things: Building Blocks and Business Models, Cham et al.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  692. Huston, G. (2007). ‘Inter-Domain Routing’, Presentation at the 70th Internet Engineering Task Force Meeting (IETF 70), 2-7 December, Vancouver, BC, available: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/70/slides/IDRTut-0.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  693. Huston, G. (2017). ‘The Rise and Rise of Content Distribution Networks’, Presentation at the 8th Workshop on Internet Economics (WIE 2017), 13-14 December, La Jolla, CA, available: http://www.caida.org/workshops/wie/1712/slides/wie1712_ghuston.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  694. Hwang, J. and Weiss, M.B.H. (2000). ‘Market-Based QoS Interconnection Economy in the Next-Generation Internet’, iSchool Faculty Scholarship, Paper 111, available: https://surface.syr.edu/istpub/111/ [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  695. IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) (2018a). Number Resources, available: http://www.iana.org/numbers [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  696. IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) (2018b). Autonomous System (AS) Numbers, available: http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xhtml [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  697. IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) (2018c). Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry, available: https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?&page=2 [accessed 7 October 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  698. IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) (2018d). Differentiated Services Field Codepoints (DSCP), available: https://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/dscp-registry.xhtml [accessed 20 December 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  699. IHS Markit and Point Topic (2018). Broadband Coverage in Europe 2017, Final Report, Study Prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  700. Intel (2018). Support: Different Wi-Fi Protocols and Data Rates, 13 September, available: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000005725/network-and-i-o/wireless-networking.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  701. Isenberg, D.S. (1997). ‘Rise of the Stupid Network’, Computer Telephony, August, 16-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  702. ITU (2017). Quality of Service: Regulation Manual, Manual, Geneva: ITU. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  703. ITU-R (2015). ‘IMT Vision – Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond’, ITU-R Recommendation M.2083-0, 09/2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  704. ITU-T (2003). ‘One-Way Transmission Time’, ITU-T Recommendation G.114, 05/2003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  705. ITU-T (2004a). ‘General Principles and General Reference Model for Next Generation Networks’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.2011, 10/2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  706. ITU-T (2004b). ‘Next Generation Networks – Frameworks and Functional Architecture Models: General Overview of NGN’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.2001, 12/2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  707. ITU-T (2005). ‘Multi-Pair Bonding Using Time-Division Inverse Multiplexing’, ITU-T Recommendation G.998.3, 01/2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  708. ITU-T (2006). ‘Functional Requirements of the NGN’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.2012, 09/2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  709. ITU-T (2008a). ‘Requirements for the Support of Flow-State-Aware Transport Technology in an NGN’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.2121, 01/2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  710. ITU-T (2008b). ‘Definitions of Terms Related to Quality of Service’, ITU-T Recommendation E.800, 09/2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  711. ITU-T (2010a). ‘Traffic Control and Congestion Control in IP-based Networks’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.1221, 06/2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  712. ITU-T (2010b). ‘Framework for Achieving End-to-End IP Performance Objectives’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.1542, 06/2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  713. ITU-T (2011a). ‘Future Networks: Objectives and Design Goals’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.3001, 05/2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  714. ITU-T (2011b). ‘Network Performance Objectives for IP-Based Services’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.1541, 12/2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  715. ITU-T (2014a). ‘Fast Access to Subscriber Terminals (G.fast) – Power Spectral Density Specification’, ITU-T Recommendation G.9700, 04/2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  716. ITU-T (2014b). ‘Information Technology – Cloud Computing – Overview and Vocabulary’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.3500, 08/2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  717. ITU-T (2014c). The Tactile Internet, ITU-T Technology Watch Report, August. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  718. ITU-T (2014d). ‘Fast Access to Subscriber Terminals (G.fast) – Physical Layer Specification’, ITU-T Recommendation G.9701, 12/2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  719. ITU-T (2015). ‘Self-FEXT Cancellation (Vectoring) for Use with VDSL2 Transceivers’, ITU-T Recommendation G.993.5, 01/2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  720. ITU-T (2016a). ‘Internet Protocol Data Communication Service – IP Packet Transfer and Availability Performance Parameters’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.1540, 07/2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  721. ITU-T (2016b). ‘Next Generation Network Evolution Phase 1 – Overview’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.2340, 09/2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  722. ITU-T (2017). ‘Vocabulary for Performance, Quality of Service and Quality of Experience’, ITU-T Recommendation P.10/G.100, 11/2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  723. ITU-T (2018). ‘High-level Technical Characteristics of Network Softwarization for IMT-2020’, ITU-T Recommendation Y.3150, 01/2018. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  724. Iyengar, J. (ed.) and Thomson, M. (ed.) (2018). ‘QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport’, Internet-Draft, available: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-quic-transport-16.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  725. Jacobson, V. (1988). ‘Congestion Avoidance and Control’, ACM Computer Communication Review, 18(4), 314-329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  726. Jacobson, V., Nichols, K. and Poduri, K. (1999). ‘An Expedited Forwarding PHB’, RFC 2598, available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2598 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  727. Jain, R., Mullen, T. and Hausman, R. (2001). ‘Analysis of Paris Metro Pricing Strategy for QoS with a Single Service Provider’, in: Wolf, L., Hutchison, D. and Steinmetz, R. (eds.) Quality of Service – IWQoS 2001, Berlin et al.: Springer, 44-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  728. Jamison, M.A., Connolly, M.P., Faulhaber, G.R., Hauge, J. and Prieger, J. (2017). ‘Economic Scholars’ Summary of Economic Literature Regarding Title II Regulation of the Internet’, Comments filed Before the Federal Communications Commission in the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom (WC Docket No. 17-108), available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3008900 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  729. Jayakar, K.P. and Sawhney, H. (2004). ‘Universal Service: Beyond Established Practice to Possibility Space’, Telecommunications Policy, 28(3-4), 339-357. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  730. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  731. Jordan, S. (2007). ‘A Layered Network Approach to Net Neutrality’, International Journal of Communication, 1, 427-460. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  732. Jordan, S. (2009). ‘Implications of Internet Architecture on Net Neutrality’, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 9(2), Article 5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  733. Jordan, S. and Jiang, H. (1995). ‘Connection Establishment in High-Speed Networks’, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(7), 1150-1161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  734. Joskow, P.L. and Klevorick, A.K. (1979). ‘A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy’, Yale Law Journal, 89(2), 213-270. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  735. Kahn, A.E. (1988). The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  736. Kahn, A.E. (2007). Network Neutrality, AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper, No. RP07-05, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.973513 [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  737. Kamecke, U. and Körber, T. (2008). ‘Technological Neutrality in the EC Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications: A Good Principle Widely Misunderstood’, European Competition Law Review, 29(5), 330-337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  738. Kang, C. (2017). ‘F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules’, New York Times, 14 December, available: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/14/technology/net-neutrality-repeal-vote.html [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  739. Kaserman, D.L., Mayo, J.W. and Flynn, J.E. (1990). ‘Cross-Subsidization in Telecommunications: Beyond the Universal Service Fairy Tale’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(3), 231-249. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  740. Katz, M.L. (2017). ‘Wither U.S. Net Neutrality Regulation?’, Review of Industrial Organization, 50(4), 441-468. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  741. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1985). ‘Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility’, American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  742. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1986). ‘Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities’, Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822-841. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  743. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1999). ‘Antitrust in Software Markets’, in: Eisenach, J.A. and Lenard, T.M. (eds.) Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 29-81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  744. Kaufmann, C. (2018). ‘ICN – Akamai’s Backbone’, Presentation at LINX Meeting 101, 22 May, London, UK, available: https://www.linx.net/wp-content/uploads/LINX101-Akamai-ICN-ChristianKaufmann.pdf [accessed 30 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  745. Keeler, T.E. and Small, K.A. (1977). ‘Optimal Peak-Load Pricing, Investment, and Service Levels on Urban Expressways’, Journal of Political Economy, 85(1), 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  746. Kelly, F.P. (1994). ‘On Tariffs, Policing and Admission Control for Multiservice Networks’, Operations Research Letters, 15(1), 1-9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  747. Kelly, F.P. (1996). ‘Notes on Effective Bandwidths’, in: Kelly, F.P., Zachary, S. and Ziedins, I.B. (eds.), Stochastic Networks: Theory and Applications, Royal Statistical Society Lecture Note Series 4, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141-168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  748. Kelly, F.P. (1998). ‘Charging and Accounting for Bursty Connections’, in: McKnight, L.W. and Bailey, J.P. (eds.), Internet Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253-278. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  749. Kende, M. (2000). ‘The Digital Handshake: Connecting Internet Backbones’, OPP Working Paper Series, No. 32, Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission, available: https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp32.pdf [accessed 20 November 2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  750. Kirzner, I.M. (1997). ‘Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60-85. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  751. Kleinrock, L. (1975). Queueing Systems – Volume I: Theory, New York et al.: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  752. Kleinrock, L. (1976). Queueing Systems – Volume II: Computer Applications, New York et al.: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  753. Kleinrock, L. (2008). ‘History of the Internet and its Flexible Future’, IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(1), 8-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  754. Kleinrock, L. (2010). ‘An Early History of the Internet’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(8), 26-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  755. Knieps, G. (1997). ‘Phasing out Sector-Specific Regulation in Competitive Telecommunications’, Kyklos, 50(3), 325-339. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  756. Knieps, G. (2003). ‘Competition in Telecommunications and Internet Services: A Dynamic Perspective’, in: Barfield, C.E., Heiduk, G. and Welfens, P.J.J. (eds.), Internet, Economic Growth and Globalization: Perspectives on the New Economy in Europe, Japan and the US, Berlin et al.: Springer, 217-227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  757. Knieps, G. (2006a). ‘Sector-Specific Market Power Regulation versus General Competition Law: Criteria for Judging Competitive versus Regulated Markets’, in: Sioshansi, F.P. and Pfaffenberger, W. (eds.), Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier, 49-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  758. Knieps, G. (2006b). ‘Competition in the Post-Trade Markets: A Network Economic Analysis of the Securities Business’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(1), 45-60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  759. Knieps, G. (2007). ‘Information and Communication Technologies in Germany: Is there a Remaining Role for Sector-Specific Regulations?’ in: Moerke, A. and Storz, C. (eds.) Competitiveness of New Industries. Institutional Framework and Learning in Information Technology in Japan, the US and Germany, London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 57-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  760. Knieps, G. (2008). Wettbewerbsökonomie – Regulierungstheorie, Industrieökonomie, Wettbewerbspolitik, 3rd ed., Berlin et al.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  761. Knieps, G. (2009). ‘Wettbewerb und Netzevolutorik’, in: Vanberg, V.J. (ed.), Evolution und Freiheitlicher Wettbewerb, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 193-210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  762. Knieps, G. (2011a). ‘Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet’, International Journal of Management and Network Economics, 2(1), 24-38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  763. Knieps, G. (2011b). ‘Market Driven Network Neutrality and the Fallacies of Internet Traffic Regulation’, International Telecommunications Policy Review, 18(3), 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607
  764. Knieps, G. (2011c). ‘The Three Criteria Test, the Essential Facilities Doctrine and the Theory of Monopolistic Bottlenecks’, Intereconomics, 46(1), 17-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748902607

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Freiburger Studien zur Netzökonomie"
Cover des Buchs: Perspektiven der Netzökonomie
Sammelband Teilzugriff
Volker Stocker, Franziska Birke, Gert Brunekreeft, Hans-Jörg Weiß
Perspektiven der Netzökonomie
Cover des Buchs: The Future of the Internet
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Günter Knieps, Volker Stocker
The Future of the Internet
Cover des Buchs: Marktöffnung, Marktmachtregulierung und Qualität im Wassersektor
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Marei Waidmann
Marktöffnung, Marktmachtregulierung und Qualität im Wassersektor
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Martin Keller
Effiziente Netznutzungspreise im Ferngastransport und im Elektrizitäts-Höchstspannungsnetz in Deutschland
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Patrique Wolfrum
Die Rolle von Komitees bei der Standardsetzung in den Bereichen des Internets und der Informationstechnologien

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex