Cross-Border Dissemination of Online Content

Prof. Dr. Mark D. Cole; Christina Etteldorf; Carsten Ullrich LL.M.

doi:10.5771/9783748906438

Zusammenfassung

Können die Regelungen der bereits im Jahr 2000 verabschiedeten europäischen E-Commerce-Richtlinie angesichts der sich stetig weiterentwickelnden Online-Welt und der auf neuen Geschäftsmodellen beruhenden veränderten Rolle von Plattformen bei der Inhalteverbreitung fortbestehen?

Die einschlägigen Rechtsgrundlagen auf EU- und nationaler Ebene sind vielschichtig und das Zusammenspiel oftmals unklar. Die daraus resultierende Unsicherheit darüber, wer für einen Inhalt verantwortlich und daher haftbar ist, erfordert die Überprüfung des geltenden Rechtsrahmens.

Die vom Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht (EMR) im Auftrag der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW erstellte Studie analysiert den aktuellen Rechtsrahmen und zeigt rechtliche Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der Rechtsdurchsetzung bei als rechtswidrig einzustufenden Inhalten auf. Besonderes Augenmerk wird dabei auf den Reformbedarf der E-Commerce-Richtlinie vor dem Hintergrund der sich wandelnden Rolle von Plattformen gelegt.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2020
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-6501-0
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-0643-8
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW
Band: 81
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 280
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 18 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. Background of the Study
  2. Aim of the Study
  3. Fundamental Rights, Freedoms and Values
  4. Relevant EU Legislative Acts for Online Services
  5. Significance of the E-Commerce Directive and Challenges in Its Application
  6. Conclusions
2. 1. Hintergrund der Studie
  2. Ziel der Studie
  3. Grundrechte, Grundfreiheiten und Werte
  4. Relevante Rechtsakte der EU für Online-Dienste
  5. Bedeutung der E-Commerce-Richtlinie und Herausforderungen bei ihrer Anwendung
  6. Schlussfolgerungen
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1.1. Online Dissemination of Content
2. 1.2. The Role of Platforms in the Online Dissemination of Content
3. 1.3. The Role of Supervisory Authorities in the Online Dissemination of Content
4. 1.4. The EU Digital Single Market Context
5. 1.5. Structure of the Study
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 2.1.1. Fundamental Rights Sources: EU Charter, European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutional Law
  2. 1. 2.1.2.1. Human Dignity
    2. 2.1.2.2. Rights of the Child and Protection of Minors
    3. 2.1.2.3. Respect for Private and Family Life
    4. 2.1.2.4. Freedom of Expression and the Media
    5. 2.1.2.5. Freedom to Conduct a Business
    6. 2.1.2.6. Right to Property
  3. 2.1.3. Fundamental Rights Protection Obligations
2. 1. 2.2.1. Freedom of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services
  2. 2.2.2. Free Movement of Goods
3. 1. 2.3.1. Fundamental Principles and Goals of the EU
  2. 1. 2.3.2.1. Legal Bases for an EU Competence in the Media Sector
    2. 2.3.2.2. The Specific Legal Bases for the ECD
4. 1. 1. 2.4.1.1. Historical Background
    2. 2.4.1.2. Further Developments
    3. 2.4.1.3. Main Goals and Principles of the Original ECD
  2. 1. 2.4.2.1. Historical Development up to the Latest Revision in 2018
    2. 1. 2.4.2.2.1. Personal Scope of Application
      2. 2.4.2.2.2.1. Importance of the Principle and Changes Related to It in the Recent Reform
        2.4.2.2.2.2. Home State Jurisdiction Rule
        2.4.2.2.2.3. Exceptional Derogation of Free Flow of Information
        2.4.2.2.2.4. Exception in Case of Circumvention
      3. 2.4.2.2.3. Minimum Harmonisation Concerning Specific Types of Content
      4. 2.4.2.2.4. Supervision and Sanctions
  3. 1. 2.4.3.1. Data Processing and the Media Privilege
    2. 2.4.3.2. ePrivacy Directive and GDPR
    3. 2.4.3.3. Market Location Principle
    4. 2.4.3.4. Supervision and Sanctioning
    5. 2.4.3.5. Jurisdiction and Cooperation of Authorities
  4. 1. 2.4.4.1. The InfoSoc and Enforcement Directives
    2. 2.4.4.2. The DSM Directive
  5. 1. 2.4.5.1. Platform-to-Business Regulation
    2. 2.4.5.2. Proposal for a Regulation on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online
5. 1. 2.5.1. The Recommendations on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity
  2. 2.5.2. The Actions Concerning the Tackling of Illegal Content Online
  3. 2.5.3. The Actions Concerning the Tackling of Online Disinformation
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 3.1.1. Territorial Scope
  2. 3.1.2. Functional Scope
  3. 3.1.3. Personal Scope of Application
2. 1. 3.2.1. Application
  2. 3.2.2. Derogations
  3. 3.2.3. Exemptions to the Scope of Application
3. 1. 3.3.1. Historical Backdrop
  2. 3.3.2. The Approach Chosen by the EU
  3. 3.3.3. Categories of Specific Information Society Service Providers
  4. 1. 3.3.4.1. “Mere Conduits” According to Art. 12 ECD
    2. 3.3.4.2. Caching According to Art. 13 ECD
    3. 3.3.4.3. Hosting According to Art. 14 ECD
    4. 3.3.4.4. No General Monitoring Obligations According to Art. 15 ECD
  5. 3.3.5. Delineation between National and EU Responsibilities
  6. 3.3.6. Illegal Content – Challenges to EU Intermediary Liability Exemptions
  7. 1. 3.3.7.1. Challenge : The Question of Neutrality of Hosts
    2. 3.3.7.2. Challenge 2: Actual Knowledge
    3. 1. 3.3.7.3.1. L’Oréal v Ebay (C-324/09)
      2. 3.3.7.3.2. Scarlet Extended (C-70/10) & Netlog (C-360/10)
      3. 3.3.7.3.3. McFadden (C-484/14)
      4. 3.3.7.3.4. Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland (C-18/18)
    4. 3.3.7.4. Other Intermediary-Related Case Law
  8. 1. 3.3.8.1. The Reasoning behind New Responsibilities for Internet Intermediaries
    2. 3.3.8.2. Proposals for a “Duty of Care”-Approach
    3. 3.3.8.3. Illegal Content, Technical Standards and the New Approach
    4. 3.3.8.4. Duty of Care for Internet Intermediaries in the EU Framework
  9. 1. 1. 3.3.9.1.1. Audiovisual Media Services Directive
      2. 3.3.9.1.2. DSM Directive
    2. 1. 3.3.9.2.1. InfoSoc and Enforcement Directive
      2. 3.3.9.2.2. 2016 Guidance Note to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
      3. 3.3.9.2.3. Regulation on Market Surveillance and Compliance of Products
      4. 3.3.9.2.4. Directive on Combating Terrorism
      5. 3.3.9.2.5. Proposal for a Regulation on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online
      6. 3.3.9.2.6. General Data Protection Regulation
      7. 3.3.9.2.7. Platform-to-Business Regulation
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 4.1.1. Difficulties in the Application of the ECD
  2. 4.1.2. New Actors, New Approaches and New Regulatory Models
  3. 4.1.3. Margin for Member States in Implementation: the Example of GDPR
  4. 1. 4.1.4.1. The European Data Protection Board Compared to Other Sectors
    2. 4.1.4.2. Essential Factors for Institutional Organisation
    3. 4.1.4.3. The Setup between National DPAs and Their Cooperation on EU Level
  5. 4.1.5. Application to the ECD of Interim Findings Relating to the GDPR to the ECD
2. 1. 4.2.1. Value-based Approach Necessitates Effective Enforcement
  2. 1. 4.2.2.1. Defining Self- and Co-regulation
    2. 4.2.2.2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Self- and Co-regulation
    3. 4.2.2.3. Existing Forms of Self- and Co-regulation in the Online Environment
    4. 4.2.2.4. Possible Forms and Conditions of Co-regulation on EU Level
  3. 4.2.3. The Principle of Proportionality
3. 1. 4.3.1. General Considerations
  2. 4.3.2. Adjusting Country-of-Origin and Market Location Principle
  3. 4.3.3. Institutional Setup and Cooperation in Enforcement
  4. 4.3.4. Improving Conditions for Enforcement
4. 4.4. Looking Ahead
5. BibliographySeiten 265 - 280 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. I. EU Primary Law und Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
2. 1. A. e-Commerce Directive
  2. B. Audiovisual Media Services Directive
  3. C. General Data Protection Regulation
  4. D. DSM Directive
  5. E. P2B-Regulation
  6. F. TERREG Proposal
3. 1. A. 2006 Recommendation on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity
  2. B. Recommendation on Tackling Illegal Content Online

Literaturverzeichnis (305 Einträge)

Albath, L.; Giesel, M. : Das Herkunftslandprinzip in der Dienstleistungsrichtlinie – eine Kodifizierung der Rechtsprechung?, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 2, 2006, pp. 38–42. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Albath/Giesel, in: EuZW 2, 2006, p. 38, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Angelopoulos, C.: European Intermediary Liability in Copyright. A Tort-Based Analysis, 2017, Wolters Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Angelopoulos, European Intermediary Liability in Copyright. A Tort-Based Analysis. Google Scholar öffnen
Baistrocchi, P.: Liability of Intermediary Service Providers in the EU Directive on Electronic Commerce, in: Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 19(1), 2003, pp. 111–130. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Baistrocchi, in: Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 19(1), 2003, p. 111, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Banks, J.: Regulating Hate Speech Online, in: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24(3), 2010, pp. 233–239. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Banks, in: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24(3), 2010, p. 233, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Barata, J.: New EU Proposal on the Prevention of Terrorist Content Online – An Important Mutation of the E-Commerce Intermediaries’ Regime, white paper available at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/new-eu-proposal-prevention-terrorist-content-online-important-mutation-e-commerce. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Barata, New EU Proposal on the Prevention of Terrorist Content Online – An Important Mutation of the E-Commerce Intermediaries’ Regime. Google Scholar öffnen
Belavusau, U.: Fighting Hate Speech Through EU Law, in: Amsterdam Law Forum 4(1), 2012, pp. 20–35. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Belavusau, in: Amsterdam Law Forum 4(1), 2012, p. 20, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Belli, L.; Sappa, C.: The Intermediary Conundrum: Cyber-Regulators, Cyber-Police or Both?, in: JIPITEC 8, 2017, pp. 183–198. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Belli/Sappa, in: JIPITEC 8, 2017, p. 183, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Bertolini, E.; Franceschelli, V.; Pollicino, O.: Analysis of ISP Regulation under Italian Law, in: Dinwoodie, G. B. (ed.), Secondary liability of internet service providers, 2017, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Bertolini/Franceschelli/Pollicino, Analysis of ISP Regulation under Italian Law. Google Scholar öffnen
Büllesbach, A. (ed.): Concise European IT Law, 2nd ed., 2010, Kluwer Law International. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Büllesbach (ed.), Concise European IT Law. Google Scholar öffnen
Burk, D. L.: Toward an Epistemology of ISP Secondary Liability, in: Philosophy & Technology 24(4), 2011, pp. 437–454. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Burk, in: Philosophy & Technology 24(4), 2011, p. 437, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Busch, C.: Towards a ‘New Approach’ for the Platform Ecosystem: A European Standard for Fairness in Platform-to-Business Relations, in: Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 6(6), 2017, pp. 227–228. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Busch, in: Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 6(6), 2017, p. 227, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Calliess, C.: Der Schlüsselbegriff der „ausschließlichen“ Zuständigkeit im Subsidiaritätsprinzip des Art. 3b II EGV, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 1995, pp. 693–700. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Calliess, in: EuZW 1995, p. 693, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Calliess, C.; Ruffert, M.: EUV/AEUV, Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 5th ed., 2016, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Callies/Ruffert, Art. para. Google Scholar öffnen
Classen, C. D.: Die Grundfreiheiten im Spannungsfeld von europäischer Marktfreiheit und mitgliedstaatlichen Gestaltungskompetenzen, in: Zeitschrift für Europarecht (EuR) 39(3), 2004, pp. 416–438. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Classen, in: EuR 39(3), 2004, p. 416, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Cappello, M. (ed.): The protection of minors in a converged media environment, IRIS plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2015, available at https://rm.coe.int/1680783486. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Capello (ed.), The protection of minors in a converged media environment, IRIS plus 2015-1. Google Scholar öffnen
Cappello, M. (ed.): Journalism and media privilege, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2017, available at https://rm.coe.int/journalism-and-media-privilege-pdf/1680787381. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cappello (ed.), Journalism and media privilege, IRIS Special 2017-2. Google Scholar öffnen
Cappello, M. (ed.): Media law enforcement without frontiers, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2018, available at https://rm.coe.int/media-law-enforcement-without-frontiers/1680907efe. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cappello (ed.), Media law enforcement without frontiers, IRIS Special 2018-2. Google Scholar öffnen
Cappello, M. (ed.): The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2019, available at https://rm.coe.int/the-independence-of-media-regulatory-authorities-in-europe/168097e504. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cappello (ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe, IRIS Special, IRIS Special 2019-1. Google Scholar öffnen
Cappello, M. (ed.): Self- and Co-regulation in the new AVMSD, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2019, available at https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2019-2-self-and-co-regulation-in-the-new-avmsd/1680992dc2. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cappello (ed.), Self- and Co-regulation in the new AVMSD, IRIS Special 2019-2. Google Scholar öffnen
Castendyk, O.; Dommering, E.; Scheuer, A.: European Media Law, 2008, Kluwer Law International BV. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Castendyk/Dommering/Scheuer, European Media Law. Google Scholar öffnen
Cohen, J.: The Regulatory State in the Information Age, in: Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17(2), 2016, pp. 369–414. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cohen, in: Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17(2), 2016, p. 369, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D.: The Country of Origin Principle – From State Sovereignty under Public International Law to Inclusion in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive of the European Union, in: Meng, W.; Ress, G.; Stein, T. (eds.), Europäische Integration und Globalisierung – Festschrift zum 60-jährigen Bestehen des Europa-Instituts, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cole, The Country of Origin Principle. Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D.: The AVMSD Jurisdiction Criteria concerning Audiovisual Media Service Providers after the 2018 Reform, 2018, available at https://emr-sb.de/study-avmsd-jurisdiction-criteria/. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cole, AVMSD Jurisdiction Criteria after the 2018 Reform. Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D.: Guiding Principles in establishing the Guidelines for Implementation of Article 13 (6) AVMSD – Criteria for exempting certain providers from obligations concerning European Works, 2019, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Study-AVMSD-guidelines-Art-13.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cole, Guiding Principles in establishing the Guidelines for Implementation of Article 13 (6) AVMSD. Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D., with contributions by Etteldorf C. and Henrich, J.: Die Neuregelung des Artikel 7b Richtlinie 2010/13/EU (AVMD-RL) – Spielraum und zu beachtende Vorgaben bei der mitgliedstaatlichen Umsetzung der Änderungs-Richtlinie (EU) 2018/1808, 2019, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/emr-gutachten_neuregelung-des-artikel-7b-avmd_11.2019.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cole, Die Neuregelung des Artikel 7b Richtlinie 2010/13/EU (AVMD-RL). Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D.; Etteldorf, C.: Von „Fernsehen ohne Grenzen“ zu Video-sharing-Plattformen, Hate Speech und Overlays – die Anpassung der EU-Richtlinie über audiovisuelle Mediendienste an das digitale Zeitalter, in: Medienhandbuch Österreich 2019, pp. 56–65. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cole/Etteldorf, Medienhandbuch Österreich 2019, p. 56, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D.; Fink, U.; Keber, T.: Europäisches und Internationales Medienrecht, 2008, C. F. Müller. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Cole/Fink/Keber, Europäisches Medienrecht. Google Scholar öffnen
Cole, M. D.; Haus, F. C.: Dienstleistungsfreiheit brutto oder netto? Probleme der europäischen Sprachenvielfalt am Beispiel der EG-Fernsehrichtlinie – EuGH, Slg. 1999, I-7599, in: Juristische Schulung (JuS) 5/2001, pp. 435–439. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Cole/Haus, in: JuS 5/2001, p. 435, p. Google Scholar öffnen
de Gregorio, G.: The e-Commerce Directive and GDPR: Towards Convergence of Legal Regimes in the Algorithmic Society?, in: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/36. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: de Gregorio, The e-Commerce Directive and GDPR: Towards Convergence of Legal Regimes in the Algorithmic Society? Google Scholar öffnen
de Streel, A.; Buiten, M.; Peitz, M.: Liability of online hosting platforms: should exceptionalism end?, 2018, Brussels: CERRE, available at https://www.cerre.eu/sites/cerre/files/180912_CERRE_LiabilityPlatforms_Final_0.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: de Streel/Buiten/Streintz, Liability of online hosting platforms. Google Scholar öffnen
Dittrich, P.: Social Networks and Populism in the EU – Four Things You Should Know, Policy Paper no. 192, Jaques Delors Institut Berlin, 2017, available at https://www.delorsinstitut.de/2015/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/20170419_SocialNetworksandPopulism-Dittrich.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dittrich, Social Networks and Populism in the EU – Four Things You Should Know. Google Scholar öffnen
Dittrich, P.: Online Platforms and How to Regulate Them, Policy Paper no. 227, Jaques Delors Institut Berlin, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dittrich, Online Platforms and How to Regulate Them. Google Scholar öffnen
Dörr, D., with contributions by Cole, M. D.: Big Brother und die Menschenwürde, 2000, Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dörr/Cole, Big Brother und die Menschenwürde. Google Scholar öffnen
Dörr, D.; Cole, M. D.: Menschenwürde als Grenze der Programmfreiheit, in: Kommunikation und Recht (K&R) 8/2000, pp. 369–378. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dörr/Cole, in K&R 8/2000, p. 369, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Dröge, C.: Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, 2003, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dröge, Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention. Google Scholar öffnen
Dumortier, J.; Kosta, E.: ePrivacy Directive: assessment of transposition, effectiveness and compatibility with proposed Data Protection Regulation, study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, 2015, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eprivacy-directive-assessment-transposition-effectiveness-and-compatibility-proposed-data. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dumortier/Kosta, ePrivacy Directive: assessment of transposition, effectiveness and compatibility with proposed Data Protection Regulation. Google Scholar öffnen
Dutt, R.; Deb, A.; Ferrara, E.: “Senator, We Sell Ads”: Analysis of the 2016 Russian Facebook Ads Campaign, International Conference on Intelligent Information Technologies, pp. 151–168, available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.10158.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Dutt/Deb/Ferrara, “Senator, We Sell Ads”: Analysis of the 2016 Russian Facebook Ads Campaign. Google Scholar öffnen
Edwards, L.: The fall & rise of intermediary liability online, in: Edwards, L.; Waelde, Ch. (eds.), Law and the Internet, (Hart Publishing) 3rd ed., 2009, Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Edwards, The fall & rise of intermediary liability. Google Scholar öffnen
Edwards, L.; Veale, M.: Slave to the Algorithm? Why a ‘Right to Explanation’ Is Probably Not the Remedy You Are Looking For, in: Duke Law & Technology Review 16(1), 2017/18, pp. 18–84. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Edwards/Veale, in: Duke Law & Technology Review 16(1), 2017/18, p. 18, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Ehmann, E.; Selmayr, M.: Datenschutz-Grundverordnung: DS-GVO, 2nd ed., 2018, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Ehmann/Selmayr, Art. para. Google Scholar öffnen
Ensthaler, J.; Weidert, S.: Urheberrecht und Internet, 3rd ed., 2017, Deutscher Fachverlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Ensthaler/Weidert. Google Scholar öffnen
Etteldorf, C.: EDPB on the Interplay between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, in: European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL) 5(2), 2019, pp. 224–231. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Etteldorf, in: EDPL 5(2), 2019, p. 224, p. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission: Defining a framework for the monitoring of advertising rules under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, study prepared for the European Commission by Ramboll Management Consulting and the Institute of European Media Law, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/audiovisual-and-media-services-directive-avmsd-study-advertising-rules. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Defining a framework for the monitoring of advertising rules under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, study prepared for the European Commission by Ramboll Management Consulting and the Institute of European Media Law. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission: AVMS-RADAR: AudioVisual Media Services – Regulatory Authorities’ Independence and Efficiency Review, Update on recent changes and developments in Member States and Candidate Countries that are relevant for the analysis of independence and efficient functioning of audiovisual media services regulatory bodies (SMART 2013/0083), study prepared for the Commission DG CNECT by the EMR and the University of Luxembourg, available at https://op.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/b6e4a837-8775-11e5-b8b7-01aa75ed71a1/language-de. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: AVMS-RADAR, study prepared for the European Commission by the EMR and the University of Luxembourg. Google Scholar öffnen
European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on material jurisdiction in a converged environment, 18 December 2015, available at https://www.die-medienanstalten.de/fileadmin/user_upload/die_medienanstalten/Ueber_uns/Positionen/Europa/Bericht_der_ERGA_zum_materiellen_Anwendungsbereich_der_AVMD-Richtlinie.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: ERGA, Report on material jurisdiction in a converged environment. Google Scholar öffnen
European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on the independence of NRAs, 15 December 2015, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_indep_nra_2015.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: ERGA, Report on the independence of NRAs. Google Scholar öffnen
European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on the protection of minors in a converged environment, 27 November 2015, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_minors_2015.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: ERGA, Report on the protection of minors in a converged environment. Google Scholar öffnen
European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on territorial jurisdiction in a converged environment, 17 May 2016, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_territ_2016.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: ERGA, Report on territorial jurisdiction in a converged environment. Google Scholar öffnen
European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on Protection of Minors in the Audiovisual Media Services: Trends & Practices, 19 April 2017, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ERGA-PoM-Report-2017-wordpress.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: ERGA, Report on Protection of Minors in the Audiovisual Media Services: Trends & Practices. Google Scholar öffnen
European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report of the activities carried out to assist the European Commission in the intermediate monitoring of the Code of practice on disinformation, June 2019, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ERGA-2019-06_Report-intermediate-monitoring-Code-of-Practice-on-disinformation.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: ERGA, Report of the activities carried out to assist the European Commission in the intermediate monitoring of the Code of practice on disinformation. Google Scholar öffnen
Everling, U.: Durch die Grundrechtecharta zurück zu Solange, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 8/2003, p. 225. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Everling, in: EuZW 8/2003, p. 225. Google Scholar öffnen
Finck, M.: Digital co-regulation: designing a supranational legal framework for the platform economy, in: LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers (15/2017). Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Finck, in: LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers (15/2017). Google Scholar öffnen
Freeman, J.: Consumer Legislation and E-Commerce Challenges, in: Italian Antitrust Review 2(1), 2015, pp. 75–82. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Freeman, in: Italian Antitrust Review 2(1), 2015; p. 75, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Frenz, W.: Handbuch Europarecht, 2nd ed., 2012, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Frenz: Handbuch Europarecht. Google Scholar öffnen
Freytag, S.: Digital Millennium Copyright Act und europäisches Urheberrecht für die Informationsgesellschaft, in: Multimedia und Recht (MMR) 4/1999, pp. 207–212. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Freytag, MMR 4/2019, p. 207, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Friedmann, D.: Sinking the safe harbour with the legal certainty of strict liability in sight, in: Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 9(2), 2014, pp. 148–155. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Friedmann, in Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 9(2), 2014, p. 148, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Furnémont, J.; Smokvina, T. K.: European co-regulation practices in the media, comparative analysis and recommendations with a focus on the situation in Serbia, study commissioned by the Council of Europe at the request of Serbia’s national regulatory authority, available at https://rm.coe.int/european-co-regulation-practices-in-the-media/16808c9c74. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Furnémont/Smokvina, European co-regulation practices in the media, comparative analysis and recommendations with a focus on the situation in Serbia. Google Scholar öffnen
Frosio, G.: Reforming Intermediary Liability in the Platform Economy: A European Digital Single Market Strategy, in: Northwestern University Law Review 112, 2017, pp. 20–45. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Frosio, in: Northwestern University Law Review 112, 2017, p. 20, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Frosio, G.; Mendis, S.: Monitoring and Filtering: European Reform or Global Trend?, in: Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI), Research Paper No. 2019-05, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3411615. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Frosio/Mendis, Monitoring and Filtering: European Reform or Global Trend? Google Scholar öffnen
Grabenwarter, C.: Die Charta der Grundrechte für die Europäische Union, in: Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt (DVBl) 2001, pp. 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Grabenwarter, in: DVBl. 2001, p. 1, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Hans, S.; Ukrow, J.; Knapp, D.; Cole, M. D.: (Neue) Geschäftsmodelle der Mediaagenturen, EMR/Script, vol. 4, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/EMR-SCRIPT-Band-4.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Hans/Ukrow/Knapp/Cole, Neue Geschäftsmodelle der Mediaagenturen. Google Scholar öffnen
Harrison, J.; Woods, L.: European Broadcasting Law and Policy, 2007, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Harrison/Woods, European Broadcasting Law and Policy. Google Scholar öffnen
Hartstein, R.; Ring. W.; Kreile, J.; Dörr, D.; Stettner, R.; Cole, M. D.; Wagner, E. E. (eds.): Rundfunkstaatsvertrag Jugendmedienschutz-Staatsvertrag, Handkommentar, 81th ed., 2019, C. F. Müller. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: HK-RStV. Google Scholar öffnen
Hatzopoulos, V.: The Collaborative Economy and EU Law, (Hart Publishing ed.) 2018, Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Hatzopoulos, The Collaborative Economy and EU Law. Google Scholar öffnen
Helberger, N.; Pierson, J.; Poell, T.: Governing Online Platforms: From Contested to Cooperative Responsibility, in: The Information Society 34(1), 2018, pp. 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Helberger/Pierson/Poell, in: The Information Society 34(1), 2018, p. 1, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Helman, L.; Parchomovsky, G.: The Best Available Technology Standard, in: Columbia Law Review 111(6), 2011, pp. 1194–1243. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Helman/Parchomovsky, in: Columbia Law Review 111(6), 2011, p. 1194, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Henrich, J.: Nach der Abstimmung ist (fast) vor der Umsetzung – Ein kurzer Einblick in die Bedeutung der „Upload-Filter“ Regelung der Richtlinie über das Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt, in: EMR – das aktuelle Stichwort, 2019, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/EMR-Aktuelles-Stichwort-EU-Urheberrechtsreform.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Henrich, Nach der Abstimmung ist (fast) vor der Umsetzung. Google Scholar öffnen
Herold, A.: Country of Origin Principle in the EU Market for Audiovisual Media Services: Friend or Foe?, in: Journal of Consumer Policy 31(1), 2008, pp. 5–24. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Herold, in: Journal of Consumer Policy 31(1), 2008, p. 5, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Hofmann, H.: Delegation, Discretion and the Duty of Care in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2018-004, 2018, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3169744. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Hofmann, Delegation, Discretion and the Duty of Care in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
Hörnle, J.: Country of Origin Regulation in Cross-Border Media: One Step Beyond the Freedom to Provide Services?, in: International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54(1), 2005, pp. 89–126. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Hörnle, in: International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54(1), 2005, p. 89, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Jaeckel, L.: Schutzpflichten im deutschen und europäischen Recht, Eine Untersuchung der deutschen Grundrechte, der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten der EMRK sowie der Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten der Europäischen Gemeinschaf, 2001, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Jaeckel, Schutzpflichten im deutschen und europäischen Recht. Google Scholar öffnen
Jaensch, M.: Die unmittelbare Drittwirkung der Grundfreiheiten. Untersuchung der Verpflichtung von Privatpersonen durch Art. 30, 48, 52, 59, 73b EGV, 1997, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Jaensch, Die unmittelbare Drittwirkung der Grundfreiheiten. Google Scholar öffnen
Nielsen, C. and others: Study on the Economic Impact of the Electronic Commerce Directive, 2007, Copenhagen Economics (DG Internal Market and Services, European Commission 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Nielsen and others, Study on the Economic Impact of the Electronic Commerce Directive. Google Scholar öffnen
Keller, D.: The Right Tools: Europe’s Intermediary Liability Laws and the EU 2016 General Data Protection Regulation, in: Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33(1), 2018, pp. 287–364. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Keller, in: Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33(1), 2018, p. 287, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Kilkelly, U.: The right to respect for private and family life, A guide to the implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human rights handbook No. 1, 2001, available at https://rm.coe.int/168007ff47. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Kilkelly, Human rights handbook No. 1. Google Scholar öffnen
Kirtiklis, K.: Manuel Castell’s theory of information society as media theory, in: Lingua Posnaniensis 59(1), 2017, pp. 65–77, available at https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/linpo.2017.59.issue-1/linpo-2017-0006/linpo-2017-0006.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Kirtiklis, in: Lingua Posnaniensis 59(1), p. 65, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Klatt, M.: Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) 71, 2011, pp. 691–718. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Klatt, in: ZaöRV 71, 2011, p. 69, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Koenen, T.: Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte, Staatliche Schutzpflichten auf der Basis regionaler und internationaler Menschenrechtsverträge, 2012, Drucker & Humboldt. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Koenen, Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte. Google Scholar öffnen
Kogler, M.: Audiovisuelle Mediendienste-Richtlinie, in: Kommunikation und Recht (K&R) 9/2018, pp. 537–544. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Kogler, in: K&R 9/2018, p. 537, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Koopman, C.; Mitchell, M.; Thierer, A.: The Sharing Economy and Consumer Protection Regulation: The Case for Policy Change, in: The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law 8(2), 2015, pp. 529–545. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Koopman/Mitchell/Thierer, in: The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law 8(2), 2015, p. 529, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Korte, S.: Die Geldtransport-Verordnung – Sinnvoller Rechtsakt im falschen Gewand?, in: Gewerbearchiv (GewArch) 6, 2013, pp. 230–235. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Korte, in: GewArch 6, 2013, p. 230, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuczerawy, A.: EU Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Compatibility of Article 13 with the EU Intermediary Liability Regime, in: Petkova, B.; Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries, 2019 (forthcoming), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3309099. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Kuczerawy, EU Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Compatibility of Article 13 with the EU Intermediary Liability Regime. Google Scholar öffnen
Lenski, S.: Öffentliches Kulturrecht. Materielle und immaterielle Kulturwerke zwischen Schutz, Förderung und Wertschöpfung, 2013, Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Lenski, Öffentliches Kulturrecht. Google Scholar öffnen
Lievens, E.: Protecting Children in the Digital Era: The Use of Alternative Regulatory Instruments, (International Studies in Human Rights, Vol. 105) 2010, Brill. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Lievens, Protecting Children in the Digital Era: The Use of Alternative Regulatory Instruments. Google Scholar öffnen
Lodder, A. R.; Murray, A. D.: EU Regulation of E-Commerce: A Commentary, (Elgar Commentaries series) 2017, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Lodder/Murray, EU Regulation of E-Commerce: A Commentary. Google Scholar öffnen
Löffler, M.: Presserecht, vol. 6, 2015, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Löffler, Presserecht, §, para. Google Scholar öffnen
Ludwigs, M.: Dezentralisierung der Europäischen Beihilfenkontrolle: Ein Dilemma für den Beihilfeempfänger?, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 19/2004, p. 577. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ludwigs, in: EuZW 19/2004), p. 577. Google Scholar öffnen
Marsden, C.: Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace, 2011, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Marsden, European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace. Google Scholar öffnen
Martens, B.: An Economic Policy Perspective on Online Platforms, in: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (ed.), Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/05, 2016, available at https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/JRC101501.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Martens, An Economic Policy Perspective on Online Platforms. Google Scholar öffnen
McCrudden, C.: Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights, in: European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 19(4), 2008, pp. 655–724. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: McCrudden, in: EJIL 19(4), 2008, p. 655, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Meyer-Ladewig, J.; Nettesheim, M.; von Raumer, S. (eds.): EMRK Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Handkommentar, vol. 4, 2017, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Meyer-Ladewig/Nettesheim/von Raumer, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Moore, M.; Tambini, D. (eds.): Digital Dominance – The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, 2018, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Moore/Tambini (eds.), Digital Dominance – The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Google Scholar öffnen
Naughton, J.: Platform Power and Responsibility in the Attention Economy, in: Moore, M.; Tambini, D. (eds.), Digital Dominance – The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, 2018, Oxford University Press, pp. 371–395. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Naughton, Platform Power and Responsibility in the Attention Economy. Google Scholar öffnen
Nikoltchev, S. (ed.): Protection of Minors and Audiovisual Content On-Demand, European Audiovisual Observatory, IRIS plus, Strasbourg 2012, available at https://rm.coe.int/1680783db7. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Nikoltchev (ed.), Protection of Minors and Audiovisual Content On-Demand, IRIS plus 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
Nolte, G.; Wimmers, J.: Wer stört? Gedanken zur Haftung von Intermediären im Internet – von praktischer Konkordanz, richtigen Anreizen und offenen Fragen, in: Zeitschrift für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 16(1), 2014, pp. 16–27. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Nolte/Wimmers, in: GRUR 16(1), 2014, p. 16, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Nordemann, J. B.: Liability of Online Service Providers for Copyrighted Content – Regulatory Action Needed?, In-Depth Analysis for the IMCO Committee, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Nordemann, Liability of Online Service Providers for Copyrighted Content. Google Scholar öffnen
Ohiagu, O. P.: The Internet: The Medium of the Mass Media, in: Kiabara Journal of Humanities 16(2), 2011, pp. 225–232. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ohiagu, in: Kiabara Journal of Humanities 16(2), 2011, p. 225, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Ory, S.: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit in Medienunternehmen, in: UFITA 82(1), 2018, pp. 131–169. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ory, UFITA 82(1), 2018, p. 131, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Pechstein, M.; Nowak, C.; Häde, U.: Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, 2017, Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Pechstein/Nowak/Häde, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Penski, U.; Elsner, R.: Siegen, Eigentumsgewährleistung und Berufsfreiheit als Gemeinschaftsgrundrechte in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, in: Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht und Verwaltungswissenschaften (DöV) 7/2001, pp. 265–274. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Penski/Elsner, in: DöV 7/2001, p. 265, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Perrin, W.; Woods, L.: Reducing Harm in Social Media through a Duty of Care, Carnegie UK Trust, 8 May 2018, available at https://www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/blog/reducing-harm-social-media-duty-care. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Perrin/Woods, Reducing Harm in Social Media through a Duty of Care. Google Scholar öffnen
Peukert, W.: Der Schutz des Eigentums nach Art. 1 des Ersten Zusatzprotokolls zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, in: Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift (EuGRZ) 1981, pp. 97 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Peukert, in: EuGRZ 1981, p. 97, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Quintel, T.; Ullrich, C.: Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, Related Initiatives and Beyond, in: Petkova, B.; Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation Of Intermediaries, 2019, Edward Elgar (forthcoming), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3298719. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Quintel/Ullrich, Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, Related Initiatives and Beyond. Google Scholar öffnen
Ress, G.: Supranationaler Menschenrechtsschutz und der Wandel der Staatlichkeit, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) 64, 2004, pp. 621–639. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ress, in: ZaöRV 64, 2004, p. 621, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Rhee, R. J.: The Tort Foundation of Duty of Care and Business Judgment, in: Notre Dame Law Review 88(3), 2013, pp. 1138–1198. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Rhee, in: Notre Dame Law Review 88(3), 2013, p. 1138, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Rosati, E.: The CJEU Pirate Bay judgement and its impact on the liability of online platforms, in: European Intellectual Property Review 39(12), 2017, pp. 737–748. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Rosati, in: European Intellectual Property Review 39(12), 2017, p. 737, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Rowland, D.; Kohl, U.; Charlesworth, A.: Information Technology Law, 4th ed., 2012, Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Rowland/Kohl/Charlesworth, Information Technology Law. Google Scholar öffnen
Sartor, G.: Providers Liability: From the eCommerce Directive to the future, in-depth analysis for the IMCO Committee, 2017, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/614179/IPOL_IDA(2017)614179_EN.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Sartor, Providers Liability: From the eCommerce Directive to the future. Google Scholar öffnen
Savin, A.: Electronic Services with a Non-Electronic Component and Their Regulation in EU Law, in: Journal of Internet Law 23(3), 2019, pp. 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Savin, in: Journal of Internet Law 23(3), 2019, p. 1, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Savin, A.: EU Internet Law, (Elgar European Law series) 2nd ed., 2017, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Savin, EU Internet Law. Google Scholar öffnen
Schantz, P.: Die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung – Beginn einer neuen Zeitrechnung im Datenschutzrecht, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 26(69), 2016, pp. 1841–1847. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Schantz, in: NJW 26(69), 2016, p. 1841, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Schepel, H.: Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law, in: European Law Journal (ELJ) 18(2), 2012, pp. 177–200. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Schepel, in ELJ 18(2), 2012, p. 177, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmidt-Kessel, M.; Erler, K.; Grimm, A.; Kramme, M.: Die Richtlinienvorschläge der Kommission zu digitalen Inhalten und Online-Handel – Teil 1, in: Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (ZPEU) 13(1), 2016, pp. 2–8. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Schmidt-Kessel/Erler/Grimm/Kramme, in: ZPEU 13(1), 2016, p. 2, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Schulz, W.: „Menschenwürde“ im Konzept der Regulierung digitaler Gewaltdarstellungen, in: Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft (M&K) 48(3), 2000, pp. 354–370. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Schulz, in: M&K 48(3), 2000, p. 354, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Schulz, W.; Held, T.: Regulated Self-regulation as a Form of Modern Government: An Analysis of Case Studies from Media and Telecommunications Law, 2004, John Libbey. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Schulz/Held, Regulated Self-regulation as a Form of Modern Government. Google Scholar öffnen
Schwarz, C.: Web search engines, in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(11), 1998, pp. 973–982. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Schwarz, in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(11), 1998, p. 973, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Senden, L. A. J.; Kica, E.; Hiemstra, M.; Klinger, M.: Mapping Self- and Co-regulation. Approaches in the EU Context, Explorative Study for the European Commission, DG Connect, 2015, available at https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/documents/mapping-self-and-co-regulation-approaches-eu-context. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Senden et al., Mapping Self- and Co-regulation. Approaches in the EU Context. Google Scholar öffnen
Senftleben, M.; Angelopoulos, C.; Frosio, G.; Moscon, V.; Peguera, M.; Rognstad, O.: The Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Fundamental Rights and the Open Internet in the Framework of the EU Copyright Reform, in: European Intellectual Property Review 40(3) 2018, pp. 149–163, available at https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/56655974. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Senftleben et al., in: European Intellectual Property Review 40(3), 2018, p. 149, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Seufert, W. (ed.): Media Economics revisited: (Wie) Verändert das Internet die Ökonomie der Medien?, 2018, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Seufert (ed.), Media Economics revisited: (Wie) Verändert das Internet die Ökonomie der Medien? Google Scholar öffnen
Sjurts, I. (ed.): Gabler Lexikon Medienwirtschaft. 2011, Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Sjurts (ed.), Gabler Lexikon Medienwirtschaft. Google Scholar öffnen
Sørensen, K. E.: The Country-of-Origin Principle and Balancing Jurisdiction Between Home Member States and Host Member State, in: Nordic & European Company Law, LSN Research Paper Series No. 16-32. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Sørensen, in: Nordic & European Company Law, LSN Research Paper Series No. 16-32. Google Scholar öffnen
Soppe, M.: Datenverarbeitungen zu journalistischen Zwecken – das datenschutzrechtliche Medienprivileg in der Verlagspraxis, in: Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht (ZUM) 63(6), 2019, pp. 467–472. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Soppe, in: ZUM 63(6), 2019, p. 467, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Steindorff-Classen: Europäischer Kinderrechtsschutz nach dem EU-Reformvertrag von Lissabon, in: Zeitschrift für Europarecht (EuR) 46(1), 2011, pp. 19–38. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Steindorff-Classen, in: EuR 46(1), 2011, p. 19, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Stern, K.; Sachs, M.: Europäische Grundrechte-Charta: GRCh, 2016, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Stern/Sachs, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Stöger, K.: Gedanken zur Institutionellen Autonomie der Mitgliedstaaten am Beispiel der neuen Energieregulierungsbehörden, in: Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht (ZöR) 65(2), 2010, pp. 247–267. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Stöger, in: ZöR 65(2), 2010, p. 247, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Streintz, R.: EUV/AEUV, Vertrag über die Europäische Union, Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, 3rd ed., 2018, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Streintz, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Streintz, R., Michl, W., Die Drittwirkung des europäischen Datenschutzgrundrechts (Art. 8 GRCh) im deutschen Privatrecht, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW), 10, 2011, pp. 384-387. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Streintz/Michl, EuZW 2011, 384, p Google Scholar öffnen
Sydow, G.: Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Handkommentar, 2nd ed., 2018, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Sydow, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Taddeo, M.; Floridi, L.: The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers, in: Science and Engineering Ethics 22(6), 2016, pp. 1575–1603. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Taddeo/Floridi, in: Science and Engineering Ethics 22(6), 2016, p. 1575, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Technopolis Group: Ex-post evaluation of the application of the market surveillance provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/473872dd-12cc-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Technopolis Group, Ex-post evaluation of the application of the market surveillance provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. Google Scholar öffnen
Ullrich, C.: A risk-based approach towards infringement prevention on the internet: Adopting the antimoney laundering framework to online platforms, in: International Journal of Law and Information Technology 26(3), 2018, pp. 226–251. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ullrich, in: International Journal of Law and Information Technology 26(3), 2018, p. 226, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Ullrich, C.: New Approach meets new economy: Enforcing EU product safety in e-commerce, in: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26(4), 2019, pp. 558–584. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ullrich, in: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26(4), 2019, p. 558, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Ukrow, J.: Jenseits der Grenze – Rechtspopulismus in Polen und Ungarn, in: vorgänge No. 224, 4/2018, pp. 57–75. Cited: Ukrow, in: vorgänge No. 224, 4/2018, p. 57, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Ukrow, J.: Por-No Go im audiovisuellen Binnenmarkt? Jugendmedienschutz im Level-Playing-Field und die geplante Abkehr vom absoluten Pornographieverbot im Fernsehen, EMR, 2017, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/EMR-AVMD-Impulse-1710-01-Jugendschutz.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ukrow, Por-No Go im audiovisuellen Binnenmarkt? Google Scholar öffnen
Ukrow, J., with contributions by Cole, M. and Broy, D.: Zur Zuständigkeit der Landesmedienanstalten/KJM für ausländische Anbieter – Eine rechtswissenschaftliche Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung völker , europa- und rechtsvergleichender Aspekte, 2017 (legal study not yet published). Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ukrow, Zuständigkeit der Landesmedienanstalten/KJM für ausländische Anbieter. Google Scholar öffnen
Ukrow, J.; Cole, M. D., with contributions by Etteldorf, C. and Henrich, J.: Aktive Sicherung lokaler und regionaler Vielfalt. Rechtliche Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Förderung inhaltlicher Qualität in Presse , Rundfunk- und Online-Angeboten, (Schriftenreihe der Thüringer Landesmedienanstalt, vol. 25) 2019, Vistas. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ukrow/Cole, Aktive Sicherung lokaler und regionaler Vielfalt. Google Scholar öffnen
Ukrow, J.; Etteldorf, C.: „Fake News“ als Rechtsproblem, EMR/Script, vol. 5, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/EMR-SCRIPT-Band-5_Fake-News-als-Rechtsproblem.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Ukrow/Etteldorf, „Fake News“ als Rechtsproblem. Google Scholar öffnen
Valcke, P.; Kuczerawy, A.; Ombelet, P.: Did the Romans Get it Right? What Delfi, Google, eBay, and UPC TeleKabel Wien Have in Common, in: Floridi, L.; Taddeo, M. (eds.), The Responsibilities of Online Service Providers, 2016, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Valcke/Kuczerawy/Ombelet, Did the Romans Get it Right? What Delfi, Google, eBay, and UPC TeleKabel Wien Have in Common. Google Scholar öffnen
van Eecke, P.; Truyens, M.: EU study on the Legal Analysis of a Single Market for the Information Society, New Rules for a New Age?, SMART 2007/0037, 2009, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/legal-analysis-single-market-information-society-smart-20070037. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: van Eecke/Truyens, Legal analysis of a Single Market for the Information Society. Google Scholar öffnen
van Gestel, R.; Micklitz, H. W.: European Integration through Standardization: How Judicial Review Is Breaking down the Club House of Private Standardization Bodies, in: Common Market Law Review 50(1), 2013, pp. 145–182. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: van Gestel/Micklitz, in: Common Market Law Review 50(1), 2013, p. 145, p. Google Scholar öffnen
van Hoboken, J.; Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.: Scoping Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services and Values, in: JIPITEC 6(3), 2015, pp. 198–210. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: van Hoboken/Zuiderveen Borgesius, in: JIPITEC 6(3), 2015, p. 198, p. Google Scholar öffnen
van Hoboken, J.; Quintas, J. P.; Poort, J.: Hosting intermediary services and illegal content, an analysis of the scope or article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape, study prepared for the European Commission by the Institute for Information Law (IViR), SMART 2018/0033, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: van Hoboken/Quintas/Poort, Hosting intermediary services and illegal content. Google Scholar öffnen
Verbiest, T.; Spindler, G.; Riccio, G. M.: Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries, Markt/2006/09/E, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Verbiest/Spindler/Riccio, Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries. Google Scholar öffnen
von Rimscha, B.; Siegert, G.: Medienökonomie. Eine problemorientierte Einführung, 2015, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: von Rimscha/Siegert, Medienökonomie. Google Scholar öffnen
von Schwichow, L.: Die Menschenwürde in der EMRK, 2016, Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: von Schwichow. Die Menschenwürde in der EMRK. Google Scholar öffnen
Vedder, C.; Heintschel von Heinegg, W.: Europäisches Unionsrecht, vol. 2, 2018, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Vedder/Heintschel von Heinegg, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Wagner, B.: Global Free Expression – Governing the Boundaries of Internet Content, 2016, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Wagner, Global Free Expression – Governing the Boundaries of Internet Content. Google Scholar öffnen
Waisman, A.; Hevia, M.: Theoretical Foundations of Search Engine Liability, in: International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 42(7), 2011, pp. 785–803. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Waisman/Hevia, in: International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 42(7), 2011, p. 785, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Waldheim, S. J.: Dienstleistungsfreiheit und Herkunftslandprinzip. Prinzipielle Möglichkeiten und primärrechtliche Grenzen der Liberalisierung eines integrierten europäischen Binnenmarktes für Dienstleistungen, 2008, Cuvillier. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Waldheim, Dienstleistungsfreiheit und Herkunftslandprinzip. Google Scholar öffnen
Walk, F.: Das Herkunftsprinzip der E-Commerce-Richtlinie: Art. 3 der Richtlinie 2000/31/EG und seine Umsetzung im deutschen Recht, 2002, Herbert Utz. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Walk, Das Herkunftslandprinzip der E-Commerce-Richtlinie. Google Scholar öffnen
Wolff, A. H.; Brink, S.: Beck’scher Online-Kommentar Datenschutzrecht, 19th ed., 2019, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: author in: Wolff/Brink, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen
Woods, L.: Duty of care, in: InterMEDIA 46(4), 2018/19, pp. 17–21. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Woods, in: InterMEDIA 46(4), 2018/19, p. 17, p. Google Scholar öffnen
Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, 2019, Profile Books. Google Scholar öffnen
Cited: Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Google Scholar öffnen