Cover des Buchs: Cross-Border Dissemination of Online Content
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Cross-Border Dissemination of Online Content

Current and Possible Future Regulation of the Online Environment with a Focus on the EU E-Commerce Directive
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

Können die Regelungen der bereits im Jahr 2000 verabschiedeten europäischen E-Commerce-Richtlinie angesichts der sich stetig weiterentwickelnden Online-Welt und der auf neuen Geschäftsmodellen beruhenden veränderten Rolle von Plattformen bei der Inhalteverbreitung fortbestehen?

Die einschlägigen Rechtsgrundlagen auf EU- und nationaler Ebene sind vielschichtig und das Zusammenspiel oftmals unklar. Die daraus resultierende Unsicherheit darüber, wer für einen Inhalt verantwortlich und daher haftbar ist, erfordert die Überprüfung des geltenden Rechtsrahmens.

Die vom Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht (EMR) im Auftrag der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW erstellte Studie analysiert den aktuellen Rechtsrahmen und zeigt rechtliche Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der Rechtsdurchsetzung bei als rechtswidrig einzustufenden Inhalten auf. Besonderes Augenmerk wird dabei auf den Reformbedarf der E-Commerce-Richtlinie vor dem Hintergrund der sich wandelnden Rolle von Plattformen gelegt.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2020
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6501-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0643-8
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW
Band
81
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
280
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 18 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Background of the Study
      2. Aim of the Study
      3. Fundamental Rights, Freedoms and Values
      4. Relevant EU Legislative Acts for Online Services
      5. Significance of the E-Commerce Directive and Challenges in Its Application
      6. Conclusions
      1. Hintergrund der Studie
      2. Ziel der Studie
      3. Grundrechte, Grundfreiheiten und Werte
      4. Relevante Rechtsakte der EU für Online-Dienste
      5. Bedeutung der E-Commerce-Richtlinie und Herausforderungen bei ihrer Anwendung
      6. Schlussfolgerungen
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1.1. Online Dissemination of Content
    2. 1.2. The Role of Platforms in the Online Dissemination of Content
    3. 1.3. The Role of Supervisory Authorities in the Online Dissemination of Content
    4. 1.4. The EU Digital Single Market Context
    5. 1.5. Structure of the Study
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 2.1.1. Fundamental Rights Sources: EU Charter, European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutional Law
        1. 2.1.2.1. Human Dignity
        2. 2.1.2.2. Rights of the Child and Protection of Minors
        3. 2.1.2.3. Respect for Private and Family Life
        4. 2.1.2.4. Freedom of Expression and the Media
        5. 2.1.2.5. Freedom to Conduct a Business
        6. 2.1.2.6. Right to Property
      3. 2.1.3. Fundamental Rights Protection Obligations
      1. 2.2.1. Freedom of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services
      2. 2.2.2. Free Movement of Goods
      1. 2.3.1. Fundamental Principles and Goals of the EU
        1. 2.3.2.1. Legal Bases for an EU Competence in the Media Sector
        2. 2.3.2.2. The Specific Legal Bases for the ECD
        1. 2.4.1.1. Historical Background
        2. 2.4.1.2. Further Developments
        3. 2.4.1.3. Main Goals and Principles of the Original ECD
        1. 2.4.2.1. Historical Development up to the Latest Revision in 2018
          1. 2.4.2.2.1. Personal Scope of Application
            1. 2.4.2.2.2.1. Importance of the Principle and Changes Related to It in the Recent Reform
            2. 2.4.2.2.2.2. Home State Jurisdiction Rule
            3. 2.4.2.2.2.3. Exceptional Derogation of Free Flow of Information
            4. 2.4.2.2.2.4. Exception in Case of Circumvention
          3. 2.4.2.2.3. Minimum Harmonisation Concerning Specific Types of Content
          4. 2.4.2.2.4. Supervision and Sanctions
        1. 2.4.3.1. Data Processing and the Media Privilege
        2. 2.4.3.2. ePrivacy Directive and GDPR
        3. 2.4.3.3. Market Location Principle
        4. 2.4.3.4. Supervision and Sanctioning
        5. 2.4.3.5. Jurisdiction and Cooperation of Authorities
        1. 2.4.4.1. The InfoSoc and Enforcement Directives
        2. 2.4.4.2. The DSM Directive
        1. 2.4.5.1. Platform-to-Business Regulation
        2. 2.4.5.2. Proposal for a Regulation on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online
      1. 2.5.1. The Recommendations on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity
      2. 2.5.2. The Actions Concerning the Tackling of Illegal Content Online
      3. 2.5.3. The Actions Concerning the Tackling of Online Disinformation
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 3.1.1. Territorial Scope
      2. 3.1.2. Functional Scope
      3. 3.1.3. Personal Scope of Application
      1. 3.2.1. Application
      2. 3.2.2. Derogations
      3. 3.2.3. Exemptions to the Scope of Application
      1. 3.3.1. Historical Backdrop
      2. 3.3.2. The Approach Chosen by the EU
      3. 3.3.3. Categories of Specific Information Society Service Providers
        1. 3.3.4.1. “Mere Conduits” According to Art. 12 ECD
        2. 3.3.4.2. Caching According to Art. 13 ECD
        3. 3.3.4.3. Hosting According to Art. 14 ECD
        4. 3.3.4.4. No General Monitoring Obligations According to Art. 15 ECD
      5. 3.3.5. Delineation between National and EU Responsibilities
      6. 3.3.6. Illegal Content – Challenges to EU Intermediary Liability Exemptions
        1. 3.3.7.1. Challenge : The Question of Neutrality of Hosts
        2. 3.3.7.2. Challenge 2: Actual Knowledge
          1. 3.3.7.3.1. L’Oréal v Ebay (C-324/09)
          2. 3.3.7.3.2. Scarlet Extended (C-70/10) & Netlog (C-360/10)
          3. 3.3.7.3.3. McFadden (C-484/14)
          4. 3.3.7.3.4. Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland (C-18/18)
        4. 3.3.7.4. Other Intermediary-Related Case Law
        1. 3.3.8.1. The Reasoning behind New Responsibilities for Internet Intermediaries
        2. 3.3.8.2. Proposals for a “Duty of Care”-Approach
        3. 3.3.8.3. Illegal Content, Technical Standards and the New Approach
        4. 3.3.8.4. Duty of Care for Internet Intermediaries in the EU Framework
          1. 3.3.9.1.1. Audiovisual Media Services Directive
          2. 3.3.9.1.2. DSM Directive
          1. 3.3.9.2.1. InfoSoc and Enforcement Directive
          2. 3.3.9.2.2. 2016 Guidance Note to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
          3. 3.3.9.2.3. Regulation on Market Surveillance and Compliance of Products
          4. 3.3.9.2.4. Directive on Combating Terrorism
          5. 3.3.9.2.5. Proposal for a Regulation on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online
          6. 3.3.9.2.6. General Data Protection Regulation
          7. 3.3.9.2.7. Platform-to-Business Regulation
  6. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 4.1.1. Difficulties in the Application of the ECD
      2. 4.1.2. New Actors, New Approaches and New Regulatory Models
      3. 4.1.3. Margin for Member States in Implementation: the Example of GDPR
        1. 4.1.4.1. The European Data Protection Board Compared to Other Sectors
        2. 4.1.4.2. Essential Factors for Institutional Organisation
        3. 4.1.4.3. The Setup between National DPAs and Their Cooperation on EU Level
      5. 4.1.5. Application to the ECD of Interim Findings Relating to the GDPR to the ECD
      1. 4.2.1. Value-based Approach Necessitates Effective Enforcement
        1. 4.2.2.1. Defining Self- and Co-regulation
        2. 4.2.2.2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Self- and Co-regulation
        3. 4.2.2.3. Existing Forms of Self- and Co-regulation in the Online Environment
        4. 4.2.2.4. Possible Forms and Conditions of Co-regulation on EU Level
      3. 4.2.3. The Principle of Proportionality
      1. 4.3.1. General Considerations
      2. 4.3.2. Adjusting Country-of-Origin and Market Location Principle
      3. 4.3.3. Institutional Setup and Cooperation in Enforcement
      4. 4.3.4. Improving Conditions for Enforcement
    4. 4.4. Looking Ahead
  7. 5. Bibliography 265 - 280 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  8. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. EU Primary Law und Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
      1. A. e-Commerce Directive
      2. B. Audiovisual Media Services Directive
      3. C. General Data Protection Regulation
      4. D. DSM Directive
      5. E. P2B-Regulation
      6. F. TERREG Proposal
      1. A. 2006 Recommendation on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity
      2. B. Recommendation on Tackling Illegal Content Online

Literaturverzeichnis (305)

  1. Albath, L.; Giesel, M. : Das Herkunftslandprinzip in der Dienstleistungsrichtlinie – eine Kodifizierung der Rechtsprechung?, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 2, 2006, pp. 38–42. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  2. Cited: Albath/Giesel, in: EuZW 2, 2006, p. 38, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  3. Angelopoulos, C.: European Intermediary Liability in Copyright. A Tort-Based Analysis, 2017, Wolters Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  4. Cited: Angelopoulos, European Intermediary Liability in Copyright. A Tort-Based Analysis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  5. Baistrocchi, P.: Liability of Intermediary Service Providers in the EU Directive on Electronic Commerce, in: Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 19(1), 2003, pp. 111–130. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  6. Cited: Baistrocchi, in: Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 19(1), 2003, p. 111, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  7. Banks, J.: Regulating Hate Speech Online, in: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24(3), 2010, pp. 233–239. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  8. Cited: Banks, in: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24(3), 2010, p. 233, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  9. Barata, J.: New EU Proposal on the Prevention of Terrorist Content Online – An Important Mutation of the E-Commerce Intermediaries’ Regime, white paper available at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/new-eu-proposal-prevention-terrorist-content-online-important-mutation-e-commerce. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  10. Cited: Barata, New EU Proposal on the Prevention of Terrorist Content Online – An Important Mutation of the E-Commerce Intermediaries’ Regime. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  11. Belavusau, U.: Fighting Hate Speech Through EU Law, in: Amsterdam Law Forum 4(1), 2012, pp. 20–35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  12. Cited: Belavusau, in: Amsterdam Law Forum 4(1), 2012, p. 20, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  13. Belli, L.; Sappa, C.: The Intermediary Conundrum: Cyber-Regulators, Cyber-Police or Both?, in: JIPITEC 8, 2017, pp. 183–198. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  14. Cited: Belli/Sappa, in: JIPITEC 8, 2017, p. 183, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  15. Bertolini, E.; Franceschelli, V.; Pollicino, O.: Analysis of ISP Regulation under Italian Law, in: Dinwoodie, G. B. (ed.), Secondary liability of internet service providers, 2017, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  16. Cited: Bertolini/Franceschelli/Pollicino, Analysis of ISP Regulation under Italian Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  17. Büllesbach, A. (ed.): Concise European IT Law, 2nd ed., 2010, Kluwer Law International. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  18. Cited: Büllesbach (ed.), Concise European IT Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  19. Burk, D. L.: Toward an Epistemology of ISP Secondary Liability, in: Philosophy & Technology 24(4), 2011, pp. 437–454. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  20. Cited: Burk, in: Philosophy & Technology 24(4), 2011, p. 437, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  21. Busch, C.: Towards a ‘New Approach’ for the Platform Ecosystem: A European Standard for Fairness in Platform-to-Business Relations, in: Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 6(6), 2017, pp. 227–228. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  22. Cited: Busch, in: Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 6(6), 2017, p. 227, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  23. Calliess, C.: Der Schlüsselbegriff der „ausschließlichen“ Zuständigkeit im Subsidiaritätsprinzip des Art. 3b II EGV, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 1995, pp. 693–700. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  24. Cited: Calliess, in: EuZW 1995, p. 693, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  25. Calliess, C.; Ruffert, M.: EUV/AEUV, Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 5th ed., 2016, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  26. Cited: author in: Callies/Ruffert, Art. para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  27. Classen, C. D.: Die Grundfreiheiten im Spannungsfeld von europäischer Marktfreiheit und mitgliedstaatlichen Gestaltungskompetenzen, in: Zeitschrift für Europarecht (EuR) 39(3), 2004, pp. 416–438. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  28. Cited: Classen, in: EuR 39(3), 2004, p. 416, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  29. Cappello, M. (ed.): The protection of minors in a converged media environment, IRIS plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2015, available at https://rm.coe.int/1680783486. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  30. Cited: Capello (ed.), The protection of minors in a converged media environment, IRIS plus 2015-1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  31. Cappello, M. (ed.): Journalism and media privilege, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2017, available at https://rm.coe.int/journalism-and-media-privilege-pdf/1680787381. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  32. Cited: Cappello (ed.), Journalism and media privilege, IRIS Special 2017-2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  33. Cappello, M. (ed.): Media law enforcement without frontiers, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2018, available at https://rm.coe.int/media-law-enforcement-without-frontiers/1680907efe. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  34. Cited: Cappello (ed.), Media law enforcement without frontiers, IRIS Special 2018-2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  35. Cappello, M. (ed.): The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2019, available at https://rm.coe.int/the-independence-of-media-regulatory-authorities-in-europe/168097e504. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  36. Cited: Cappello (ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe, IRIS Special, IRIS Special 2019-1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  37. Cappello, M. (ed.): Self- and Co-regulation in the new AVMSD, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2019, available at https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2019-2-self-and-co-regulation-in-the-new-avmsd/1680992dc2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  38. Cited: Cappello (ed.), Self- and Co-regulation in the new AVMSD, IRIS Special 2019-2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  39. Castendyk, O.; Dommering, E.; Scheuer, A.: European Media Law, 2008, Kluwer Law International BV. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  40. Cited: author in: Castendyk/Dommering/Scheuer, European Media Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  41. Cohen, J.: The Regulatory State in the Information Age, in: Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17(2), 2016, pp. 369–414. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  42. Cited: Cohen, in: Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17(2), 2016, p. 369, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  43. Cole, M. D.: The Country of Origin Principle – From State Sovereignty under Public International Law to Inclusion in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive of the European Union, in: Meng, W.; Ress, G.; Stein, T. (eds.), Europäische Integration und Globalisierung – Festschrift zum 60-jährigen Bestehen des Europa-Instituts, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  44. Cited: Cole, The Country of Origin Principle. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  45. Cole, M. D.: The AVMSD Jurisdiction Criteria concerning Audiovisual Media Service Providers after the 2018 Reform, 2018, available at https://emr-sb.de/study-avmsd-jurisdiction-criteria/. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  46. Cited: Cole, AVMSD Jurisdiction Criteria after the 2018 Reform. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  47. Cole, M. D.: Guiding Principles in establishing the Guidelines for Implementation of Article 13 (6) AVMSD – Criteria for exempting certain providers from obligations concerning European Works, 2019, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Study-AVMSD-guidelines-Art-13.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  48. Cited: Cole, Guiding Principles in establishing the Guidelines for Implementation of Article 13 (6) AVMSD. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  49. Cole, M. D., with contributions by Etteldorf C. and Henrich, J.: Die Neuregelung des Artikel 7b Richtlinie 2010/13/EU (AVMD-RL) – Spielraum und zu beachtende Vorgaben bei der mitgliedstaatlichen Umsetzung der Änderungs-Richtlinie (EU) 2018/1808, 2019, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/emr-gutachten_neuregelung-des-artikel-7b-avmd_11.2019.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  50. Cited: Cole, Die Neuregelung des Artikel 7b Richtlinie 2010/13/EU (AVMD-RL). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  51. Cole, M. D.; Etteldorf, C.: Von „Fernsehen ohne Grenzen“ zu Video-sharing-Plattformen, Hate Speech und Overlays – die Anpassung der EU-Richtlinie über audiovisuelle Mediendienste an das digitale Zeitalter, in: Medienhandbuch Österreich 2019, pp. 56–65. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  52. Cited: Cole/Etteldorf, Medienhandbuch Österreich 2019, p. 56, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  53. Cole, M. D.; Fink, U.; Keber, T.: Europäisches und Internationales Medienrecht, 2008, C. F. Müller. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  54. Cited: author in: Cole/Fink/Keber, Europäisches Medienrecht. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  55. Cole, M. D.; Haus, F. C.: Dienstleistungsfreiheit brutto oder netto? Probleme der europäischen Sprachenvielfalt am Beispiel der EG-Fernsehrichtlinie – EuGH, Slg. 1999, I-7599, in: Juristische Schulung (JuS) 5/2001, pp. 435–439. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  56. Cited: Cole/Haus, in: JuS 5/2001, p. 435, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  57. de Gregorio, G.: The e-Commerce Directive and GDPR: Towards Convergence of Legal Regimes in the Algorithmic Society?, in: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  58. Cited: de Gregorio, The e-Commerce Directive and GDPR: Towards Convergence of Legal Regimes in the Algorithmic Society? Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  59. de Streel, A.; Buiten, M.; Peitz, M.: Liability of online hosting platforms: should exceptionalism end?, 2018, Brussels: CERRE, available at https://www.cerre.eu/sites/cerre/files/180912_CERRE_LiabilityPlatforms_Final_0.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  60. Cited: de Streel/Buiten/Streintz, Liability of online hosting platforms. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  61. Dittrich, P.: Social Networks and Populism in the EU – Four Things You Should Know, Policy Paper no. 192, Jaques Delors Institut Berlin, 2017, available at https://www.delorsinstitut.de/2015/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/20170419_SocialNetworksandPopulism-Dittrich.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  62. Cited: Dittrich, Social Networks and Populism in the EU – Four Things You Should Know. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  63. Dittrich, P.: Online Platforms and How to Regulate Them, Policy Paper no. 227, Jaques Delors Institut Berlin, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  64. Cited: Dittrich, Online Platforms and How to Regulate Them. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  65. Dörr, D., with contributions by Cole, M. D.: Big Brother und die Menschenwürde, 2000, Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  66. Cited: Dörr/Cole, Big Brother und die Menschenwürde. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  67. Dörr, D.; Cole, M. D.: Menschenwürde als Grenze der Programmfreiheit, in: Kommunikation und Recht (K&R) 8/2000, pp. 369–378. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  68. Cited: Dörr/Cole, in K&R 8/2000, p. 369, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  69. Dröge, C.: Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, 2003, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  70. Cited: Dröge, Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  71. Dumortier, J.; Kosta, E.: ePrivacy Directive: assessment of transposition, effectiveness and compatibility with proposed Data Protection Regulation, study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, 2015, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eprivacy-directive-assessment-transposition-effectiveness-and-compatibility-proposed-data. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  72. Cited: Dumortier/Kosta, ePrivacy Directive: assessment of transposition, effectiveness and compatibility with proposed Data Protection Regulation. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  73. Dutt, R.; Deb, A.; Ferrara, E.: “Senator, We Sell Ads”: Analysis of the 2016 Russian Facebook Ads Campaign, International Conference on Intelligent Information Technologies, pp. 151–168, available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.10158.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  74. Cited: Dutt/Deb/Ferrara, “Senator, We Sell Ads”: Analysis of the 2016 Russian Facebook Ads Campaign. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  75. Edwards, L.: The fall & rise of intermediary liability online, in: Edwards, L.; Waelde, Ch. (eds.), Law and the Internet, (Hart Publishing) 3rd ed., 2009, Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  76. Cited: Edwards, The fall & rise of intermediary liability. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  77. Edwards, L.; Veale, M.: Slave to the Algorithm? Why a ‘Right to Explanation’ Is Probably Not the Remedy You Are Looking For, in: Duke Law & Technology Review 16(1), 2017/18, pp. 18–84. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  78. Cited: Edwards/Veale, in: Duke Law & Technology Review 16(1), 2017/18, p. 18, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  79. Ehmann, E.; Selmayr, M.: Datenschutz-Grundverordnung: DS-GVO, 2nd ed., 2018, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  80. Cited: author in: Ehmann/Selmayr, Art. para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  81. Ensthaler, J.; Weidert, S.: Urheberrecht und Internet, 3rd ed., 2017, Deutscher Fachverlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  82. Cited: author in: Ensthaler/Weidert. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  83. Etteldorf, C.: EDPB on the Interplay between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, in: European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL) 5(2), 2019, pp. 224–231. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  84. Cited: Etteldorf, in: EDPL 5(2), 2019, p. 224, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  85. European Commission: Defining a framework for the monitoring of advertising rules under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, study prepared for the European Commission by Ramboll Management Consulting and the Institute of European Media Law, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/audiovisual-and-media-services-directive-avmsd-study-advertising-rules. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  86. Cited: Defining a framework for the monitoring of advertising rules under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, study prepared for the European Commission by Ramboll Management Consulting and the Institute of European Media Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  87. European Commission: AVMS-RADAR: AudioVisual Media Services – Regulatory Authorities’ Independence and Efficiency Review, Update on recent changes and developments in Member States and Candidate Countries that are relevant for the analysis of independence and efficient functioning of audiovisual media services regulatory bodies (SMART 2013/0083), study prepared for the Commission DG CNECT by the EMR and the University of Luxembourg, available at https://op.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/b6e4a837-8775-11e5-b8b7-01aa75ed71a1/language-de. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  88. Cited: AVMS-RADAR, study prepared for the European Commission by the EMR and the University of Luxembourg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  89. European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on material jurisdiction in a converged environment, 18 December 2015, available at https://www.die-medienanstalten.de/fileadmin/user_upload/die_medienanstalten/Ueber_uns/Positionen/Europa/Bericht_der_ERGA_zum_materiellen_Anwendungsbereich_der_AVMD-Richtlinie.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  90. Cited: ERGA, Report on material jurisdiction in a converged environment. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  91. European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on the independence of NRAs, 15 December 2015, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_indep_nra_2015.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  92. Cited: ERGA, Report on the independence of NRAs. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  93. European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on the protection of minors in a converged environment, 27 November 2015, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_minors_2015.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  94. Cited: ERGA, Report on the protection of minors in a converged environment. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  95. European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on territorial jurisdiction in a converged environment, 17 May 2016, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_territ_2016.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  96. Cited: ERGA, Report on territorial jurisdiction in a converged environment. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  97. European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report on Protection of Minors in the Audiovisual Media Services: Trends & Practices, 19 April 2017, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ERGA-PoM-Report-2017-wordpress.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  98. Cited: ERGA, Report on Protection of Minors in the Audiovisual Media Services: Trends & Practices. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  99. European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media (ERGA): Report of the activities carried out to assist the European Commission in the intermediate monitoring of the Code of practice on disinformation, June 2019, available at http://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ERGA-2019-06_Report-intermediate-monitoring-Code-of-Practice-on-disinformation.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  100. Cited: ERGA, Report of the activities carried out to assist the European Commission in the intermediate monitoring of the Code of practice on disinformation. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  101. Everling, U.: Durch die Grundrechtecharta zurück zu Solange, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 8/2003, p. 225. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  102. Cited: Everling, in: EuZW 8/2003, p. 225. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  103. Finck, M.: Digital co-regulation: designing a supranational legal framework for the platform economy, in: LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers (15/2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  104. Cited: Finck, in: LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers (15/2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  105. Freeman, J.: Consumer Legislation and E-Commerce Challenges, in: Italian Antitrust Review 2(1), 2015, pp. 75–82. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  106. Cited: Freeman, in: Italian Antitrust Review 2(1), 2015; p. 75, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  107. Frenz, W.: Handbuch Europarecht, 2nd ed., 2012, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  108. Cited: Frenz: Handbuch Europarecht. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  109. Freytag, S.: Digital Millennium Copyright Act und europäisches Urheberrecht für die Informationsgesellschaft, in: Multimedia und Recht (MMR) 4/1999, pp. 207–212. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  110. Cited: Freytag, MMR 4/2019, p. 207, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  111. Friedmann, D.: Sinking the safe harbour with the legal certainty of strict liability in sight, in: Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 9(2), 2014, pp. 148–155. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  112. Cited: Friedmann, in Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 9(2), 2014, p. 148, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  113. Furnémont, J.; Smokvina, T. K.: European co-regulation practices in the media, comparative analysis and recommendations with a focus on the situation in Serbia, study commissioned by the Council of Europe at the request of Serbia’s national regulatory authority, available at https://rm.coe.int/european-co-regulation-practices-in-the-media/16808c9c74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  114. Cited: Furnémont/Smokvina, European co-regulation practices in the media, comparative analysis and recommendations with a focus on the situation in Serbia. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  115. Frosio, G.: Reforming Intermediary Liability in the Platform Economy: A European Digital Single Market Strategy, in: Northwestern University Law Review 112, 2017, pp. 20–45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  116. Cited: Frosio, in: Northwestern University Law Review 112, 2017, p. 20, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  117. Frosio, G.; Mendis, S.: Monitoring and Filtering: European Reform or Global Trend?, in: Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI), Research Paper No. 2019-05, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3411615. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  118. Cited: Frosio/Mendis, Monitoring and Filtering: European Reform or Global Trend? Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  119. Grabenwarter, C.: Die Charta der Grundrechte für die Europäische Union, in: Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt (DVBl) 2001, pp. 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  120. Cited: Grabenwarter, in: DVBl. 2001, p. 1, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  121. Hans, S.; Ukrow, J.; Knapp, D.; Cole, M. D.: (Neue) Geschäftsmodelle der Mediaagenturen, EMR/Script, vol. 4, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/EMR-SCRIPT-Band-4.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  122. Cited: Hans/Ukrow/Knapp/Cole, Neue Geschäftsmodelle der Mediaagenturen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  123. Harrison, J.; Woods, L.: European Broadcasting Law and Policy, 2007, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  124. Cited: Harrison/Woods, European Broadcasting Law and Policy. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  125. Hartstein, R.; Ring. W.; Kreile, J.; Dörr, D.; Stettner, R.; Cole, M. D.; Wagner, E. E. (eds.): Rundfunkstaatsvertrag Jugendmedienschutz-Staatsvertrag, Handkommentar, 81th ed., 2019, C. F. Müller. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  126. Cited: author in: HK-RStV. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  127. Hatzopoulos, V.: The Collaborative Economy and EU Law, (Hart Publishing ed.) 2018, Bloomsbury. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  128. Cited: Hatzopoulos, The Collaborative Economy and EU Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  129. Helberger, N.; Pierson, J.; Poell, T.: Governing Online Platforms: From Contested to Cooperative Responsibility, in: The Information Society 34(1), 2018, pp. 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  130. Cited: Helberger/Pierson/Poell, in: The Information Society 34(1), 2018, p. 1, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  131. Helman, L.; Parchomovsky, G.: The Best Available Technology Standard, in: Columbia Law Review 111(6), 2011, pp. 1194–1243. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  132. Cited: Helman/Parchomovsky, in: Columbia Law Review 111(6), 2011, p. 1194, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  133. Henrich, J.: Nach der Abstimmung ist (fast) vor der Umsetzung – Ein kurzer Einblick in die Bedeutung der „Upload-Filter“ Regelung der Richtlinie über das Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt, in: EMR – das aktuelle Stichwort, 2019, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/EMR-Aktuelles-Stichwort-EU-Urheberrechtsreform.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  134. Cited: Henrich, Nach der Abstimmung ist (fast) vor der Umsetzung. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  135. Herold, A.: Country of Origin Principle in the EU Market for Audiovisual Media Services: Friend or Foe?, in: Journal of Consumer Policy 31(1), 2008, pp. 5–24. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  136. Cited: Herold, in: Journal of Consumer Policy 31(1), 2008, p. 5, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  137. Hofmann, H.: Delegation, Discretion and the Duty of Care in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2018-004, 2018, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3169744. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  138. Cited: Hofmann, Delegation, Discretion and the Duty of Care in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  139. Hörnle, J.: Country of Origin Regulation in Cross-Border Media: One Step Beyond the Freedom to Provide Services?, in: International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54(1), 2005, pp. 89–126. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  140. Cited: Hörnle, in: International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54(1), 2005, p. 89, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  141. Jaeckel, L.: Schutzpflichten im deutschen und europäischen Recht, Eine Untersuchung der deutschen Grundrechte, der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten der EMRK sowie der Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten der Europäischen Gemeinschaf, 2001, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  142. Cited: Jaeckel, Schutzpflichten im deutschen und europäischen Recht. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  143. Jaensch, M.: Die unmittelbare Drittwirkung der Grundfreiheiten. Untersuchung der Verpflichtung von Privatpersonen durch Art. 30, 48, 52, 59, 73b EGV, 1997, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  144. Cited: Jaensch, Die unmittelbare Drittwirkung der Grundfreiheiten. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  145. Nielsen, C. and others: Study on the Economic Impact of the Electronic Commerce Directive, 2007, Copenhagen Economics (DG Internal Market and Services, European Commission 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  146. Cited: Nielsen and others, Study on the Economic Impact of the Electronic Commerce Directive. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  147. Keller, D.: The Right Tools: Europe’s Intermediary Liability Laws and the EU 2016 General Data Protection Regulation, in: Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33(1), 2018, pp. 287–364. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  148. Cited: Keller, in: Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33(1), 2018, p. 287, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  149. Kilkelly, U.: The right to respect for private and family life, A guide to the implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human rights handbook No. 1, 2001, available at https://rm.coe.int/168007ff47. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  150. Cited: Kilkelly, Human rights handbook No. 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  151. Kirtiklis, K.: Manuel Castell’s theory of information society as media theory, in: Lingua Posnaniensis 59(1), 2017, pp. 65–77, available at https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/linpo.2017.59.issue-1/linpo-2017-0006/linpo-2017-0006.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  152. Cited: Kirtiklis, in: Lingua Posnaniensis 59(1), p. 65, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  153. Klatt, M.: Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) 71, 2011, pp. 691–718. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  154. Cited: Klatt, in: ZaöRV 71, 2011, p. 69, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  155. Koenen, T.: Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte, Staatliche Schutzpflichten auf der Basis regionaler und internationaler Menschenrechtsverträge, 2012, Drucker & Humboldt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  156. Cited: Koenen, Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  157. Kogler, M.: Audiovisuelle Mediendienste-Richtlinie, in: Kommunikation und Recht (K&R) 9/2018, pp. 537–544. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  158. Cited: Kogler, in: K&R 9/2018, p. 537, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  159. Koopman, C.; Mitchell, M.; Thierer, A.: The Sharing Economy and Consumer Protection Regulation: The Case for Policy Change, in: The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law 8(2), 2015, pp. 529–545. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  160. Cited: Koopman/Mitchell/Thierer, in: The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law 8(2), 2015, p. 529, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  161. Korte, S.: Die Geldtransport-Verordnung – Sinnvoller Rechtsakt im falschen Gewand?, in: Gewerbearchiv (GewArch) 6, 2013, pp. 230–235. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  162. Cited: Korte, in: GewArch 6, 2013, p. 230, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  163. Kuczerawy, A.: EU Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Compatibility of Article 13 with the EU Intermediary Liability Regime, in: Petkova, B.; Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries, 2019 (forthcoming), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3309099. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  164. Cited: Kuczerawy, EU Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Compatibility of Article 13 with the EU Intermediary Liability Regime. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  165. Lenski, S.: Öffentliches Kulturrecht. Materielle und immaterielle Kulturwerke zwischen Schutz, Förderung und Wertschöpfung, 2013, Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  166. Cited: Lenski, Öffentliches Kulturrecht. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  167. Lievens, E.: Protecting Children in the Digital Era: The Use of Alternative Regulatory Instruments, (International Studies in Human Rights, Vol. 105) 2010, Brill. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  168. Cited: Lievens, Protecting Children in the Digital Era: The Use of Alternative Regulatory Instruments. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  169. Lodder, A. R.; Murray, A. D.: EU Regulation of E-Commerce: A Commentary, (Elgar Commentaries series) 2017, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  170. Cited: Lodder/Murray, EU Regulation of E-Commerce: A Commentary. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  171. Löffler, M.: Presserecht, vol. 6, 2015, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  172. Cited: Löffler, Presserecht, §, para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  173. Ludwigs, M.: Dezentralisierung der Europäischen Beihilfenkontrolle: Ein Dilemma für den Beihilfeempfänger?, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 19/2004, p. 577. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  174. Cited: Ludwigs, in: EuZW 19/2004), p. 577. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  175. Marsden, C.: Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace, 2011, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  176. Cited: Marsden, European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  177. Martens, B.: An Economic Policy Perspective on Online Platforms, in: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (ed.), Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/05, 2016, available at https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/JRC101501.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  178. Cited: Martens, An Economic Policy Perspective on Online Platforms. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  179. McCrudden, C.: Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights, in: European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 19(4), 2008, pp. 655–724. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  180. Cited: McCrudden, in: EJIL 19(4), 2008, p. 655, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  181. Meyer-Ladewig, J.; Nettesheim, M.; von Raumer, S. (eds.): EMRK Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Handkommentar, vol. 4, 2017, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  182. Cited: author in: Meyer-Ladewig/Nettesheim/von Raumer, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  183. Moore, M.; Tambini, D. (eds.): Digital Dominance – The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, 2018, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  184. Cited: Moore/Tambini (eds.), Digital Dominance – The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  185. Naughton, J.: Platform Power and Responsibility in the Attention Economy, in: Moore, M.; Tambini, D. (eds.), Digital Dominance – The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, 2018, Oxford University Press, pp. 371–395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  186. Cited: Naughton, Platform Power and Responsibility in the Attention Economy. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  187. Nikoltchev, S. (ed.): Protection of Minors and Audiovisual Content On-Demand, European Audiovisual Observatory, IRIS plus, Strasbourg 2012, available at https://rm.coe.int/1680783db7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  188. Cited: Nikoltchev (ed.), Protection of Minors and Audiovisual Content On-Demand, IRIS plus 2012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  189. Nolte, G.; Wimmers, J.: Wer stört? Gedanken zur Haftung von Intermediären im Internet – von praktischer Konkordanz, richtigen Anreizen und offenen Fragen, in: Zeitschrift für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 16(1), 2014, pp. 16–27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  190. Cited: Nolte/Wimmers, in: GRUR 16(1), 2014, p. 16, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  191. Nordemann, J. B.: Liability of Online Service Providers for Copyrighted Content – Regulatory Action Needed?, In-Depth Analysis for the IMCO Committee, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  192. Cited: Nordemann, Liability of Online Service Providers for Copyrighted Content. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  193. Ohiagu, O. P.: The Internet: The Medium of the Mass Media, in: Kiabara Journal of Humanities 16(2), 2011, pp. 225–232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  194. Cited: Ohiagu, in: Kiabara Journal of Humanities 16(2), 2011, p. 225, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  195. Ory, S.: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit in Medienunternehmen, in: UFITA 82(1), 2018, pp. 131–169. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  196. Cited: Ory, UFITA 82(1), 2018, p. 131, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  197. Pechstein, M.; Nowak, C.; Häde, U.: Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, 2017, Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  198. Cited: author in: Pechstein/Nowak/Häde, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  199. Penski, U.; Elsner, R.: Siegen, Eigentumsgewährleistung und Berufsfreiheit als Gemeinschaftsgrundrechte in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, in: Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht und Verwaltungswissenschaften (DöV) 7/2001, pp. 265–274. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  200. Cited: Penski/Elsner, in: DöV 7/2001, p. 265, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  201. Perrin, W.; Woods, L.: Reducing Harm in Social Media through a Duty of Care, Carnegie UK Trust, 8 May 2018, available at https://www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/blog/reducing-harm-social-media-duty-care. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  202. Cited: Perrin/Woods, Reducing Harm in Social Media through a Duty of Care. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  203. Peukert, W.: Der Schutz des Eigentums nach Art. 1 des Ersten Zusatzprotokolls zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, in: Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift (EuGRZ) 1981, pp. 97 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  204. Cited: Peukert, in: EuGRZ 1981, p. 97, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  205. Quintel, T.; Ullrich, C.: Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, Related Initiatives and Beyond, in: Petkova, B.; Ojanen, T. (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation Of Intermediaries, 2019, Edward Elgar (forthcoming), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3298719. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  206. Cited: Quintel/Ullrich, Self-Regulation of Fundamental Rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, Related Initiatives and Beyond. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  207. Ress, G.: Supranationaler Menschenrechtsschutz und der Wandel der Staatlichkeit, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) 64, 2004, pp. 621–639. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  208. Cited: Ress, in: ZaöRV 64, 2004, p. 621, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  209. Rhee, R. J.: The Tort Foundation of Duty of Care and Business Judgment, in: Notre Dame Law Review 88(3), 2013, pp. 1138–1198. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  210. Cited: Rhee, in: Notre Dame Law Review 88(3), 2013, p. 1138, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  211. Rosati, E.: The CJEU Pirate Bay judgement and its impact on the liability of online platforms, in: European Intellectual Property Review 39(12), 2017, pp. 737–748. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  212. Cited: Rosati, in: European Intellectual Property Review 39(12), 2017, p. 737, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  213. Rowland, D.; Kohl, U.; Charlesworth, A.: Information Technology Law, 4th ed., 2012, Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  214. Cited: Rowland/Kohl/Charlesworth, Information Technology Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  215. Sartor, G.: Providers Liability: From the eCommerce Directive to the future, in-depth analysis for the IMCO Committee, 2017, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/614179/IPOL_IDA(2017)614179_EN.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  216. Cited: Sartor, Providers Liability: From the eCommerce Directive to the future. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  217. Savin, A.: Electronic Services with a Non-Electronic Component and Their Regulation in EU Law, in: Journal of Internet Law 23(3), 2019, pp. 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  218. Cited: Savin, in: Journal of Internet Law 23(3), 2019, p. 1, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  219. Savin, A.: EU Internet Law, (Elgar European Law series) 2nd ed., 2017, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  220. Cited: Savin, EU Internet Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  221. Schantz, P.: Die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung – Beginn einer neuen Zeitrechnung im Datenschutzrecht, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 26(69), 2016, pp. 1841–1847. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  222. Cited: Schantz, in: NJW 26(69), 2016, p. 1841, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  223. Schepel, H.: Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law, in: European Law Journal (ELJ) 18(2), 2012, pp. 177–200. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  224. Cited: Schepel, in ELJ 18(2), 2012, p. 177, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  225. Schmidt-Kessel, M.; Erler, K.; Grimm, A.; Kramme, M.: Die Richtlinienvorschläge der Kommission zu digitalen Inhalten und Online-Handel – Teil 1, in: Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (ZPEU) 13(1), 2016, pp. 2–8. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  226. Cited: Schmidt-Kessel/Erler/Grimm/Kramme, in: ZPEU 13(1), 2016, p. 2, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  227. Schulz, W.: „Menschenwürde“ im Konzept der Regulierung digitaler Gewaltdarstellungen, in: Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft (M&K) 48(3), 2000, pp. 354–370. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  228. Cited: Schulz, in: M&K 48(3), 2000, p. 354, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  229. Schulz, W.; Held, T.: Regulated Self-regulation as a Form of Modern Government: An Analysis of Case Studies from Media and Telecommunications Law, 2004, John Libbey. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  230. Cited: Schulz/Held, Regulated Self-regulation as a Form of Modern Government. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  231. Schwarz, C.: Web search engines, in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(11), 1998, pp. 973–982. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  232. Cited: Schwarz, in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(11), 1998, p. 973, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  233. Senden, L. A. J.; Kica, E.; Hiemstra, M.; Klinger, M.: Mapping Self- and Co-regulation. Approaches in the EU Context, Explorative Study for the European Commission, DG Connect, 2015, available at https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/documents/mapping-self-and-co-regulation-approaches-eu-context. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  234. Cited: Senden et al., Mapping Self- and Co-regulation. Approaches in the EU Context. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  235. Senftleben, M.; Angelopoulos, C.; Frosio, G.; Moscon, V.; Peguera, M.; Rognstad, O.: The Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Fundamental Rights and the Open Internet in the Framework of the EU Copyright Reform, in: European Intellectual Property Review 40(3) 2018, pp. 149–163, available at https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/56655974. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  236. Cited: Senftleben et al., in: European Intellectual Property Review 40(3), 2018, p. 149, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  237. Seufert, W. (ed.): Media Economics revisited: (Wie) Verändert das Internet die Ökonomie der Medien?, 2018, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  238. Cited: Seufert (ed.), Media Economics revisited: (Wie) Verändert das Internet die Ökonomie der Medien? Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  239. Sjurts, I. (ed.): Gabler Lexikon Medienwirtschaft. 2011, Gabler. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  240. Cited: Sjurts (ed.), Gabler Lexikon Medienwirtschaft. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  241. Sørensen, K. E.: The Country-of-Origin Principle and Balancing Jurisdiction Between Home Member States and Host Member State, in: Nordic & European Company Law, LSN Research Paper Series No. 16-32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  242. Cited: Sørensen, in: Nordic & European Company Law, LSN Research Paper Series No. 16-32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  243. Soppe, M.: Datenverarbeitungen zu journalistischen Zwecken – das datenschutzrechtliche Medienprivileg in der Verlagspraxis, in: Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht (ZUM) 63(6), 2019, pp. 467–472. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  244. Cited: Soppe, in: ZUM 63(6), 2019, p. 467, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  245. Steindorff-Classen: Europäischer Kinderrechtsschutz nach dem EU-Reformvertrag von Lissabon, in: Zeitschrift für Europarecht (EuR) 46(1), 2011, pp. 19–38. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  246. Cited: Steindorff-Classen, in: EuR 46(1), 2011, p. 19, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  247. Stern, K.; Sachs, M.: Europäische Grundrechte-Charta: GRCh, 2016, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  248. Cited: author in: Stern/Sachs, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  249. Stöger, K.: Gedanken zur Institutionellen Autonomie der Mitgliedstaaten am Beispiel der neuen Energieregulierungsbehörden, in: Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht (ZöR) 65(2), 2010, pp. 247–267. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  250. Cited: Stöger, in: ZöR 65(2), 2010, p. 247, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  251. Streintz, R.: EUV/AEUV, Vertrag über die Europäische Union, Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, 3rd ed., 2018, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  252. Cited: author in: Streintz, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  253. Streintz, R., Michl, W., Die Drittwirkung des europäischen Datenschutzgrundrechts (Art. 8 GRCh) im deutschen Privatrecht, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW), 10, 2011, pp. 384-387. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  254. Cited: Streintz/Michl, EuZW 2011, 384, p Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  255. Sydow, G.: Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Handkommentar, 2nd ed., 2018, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  256. Cited: author in: Sydow, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  257. Taddeo, M.; Floridi, L.: The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers, in: Science and Engineering Ethics 22(6), 2016, pp. 1575–1603. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  258. Cited: Taddeo/Floridi, in: Science and Engineering Ethics 22(6), 2016, p. 1575, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  259. Technopolis Group: Ex-post evaluation of the application of the market surveillance provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/473872dd-12cc-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  260. Cited: Technopolis Group, Ex-post evaluation of the application of the market surveillance provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  261. Ullrich, C.: A risk-based approach towards infringement prevention on the internet: Adopting the antimoney laundering framework to online platforms, in: International Journal of Law and Information Technology 26(3), 2018, pp. 226–251. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  262. Cited: Ullrich, in: International Journal of Law and Information Technology 26(3), 2018, p. 226, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  263. Ullrich, C.: New Approach meets new economy: Enforcing EU product safety in e-commerce, in: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26(4), 2019, pp. 558–584. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  264. Cited: Ullrich, in: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26(4), 2019, p. 558, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  265. Ukrow, J.: Jenseits der Grenze – Rechtspopulismus in Polen und Ungarn, in: vorgänge No. 224, 4/2018, pp. 57–75. Cited: Ukrow, in: vorgänge No. 224, 4/2018, p. 57, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  266. Ukrow, J.: Por-No Go im audiovisuellen Binnenmarkt? Jugendmedienschutz im Level-Playing-Field und die geplante Abkehr vom absoluten Pornographieverbot im Fernsehen, EMR, 2017, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/EMR-AVMD-Impulse-1710-01-Jugendschutz.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  267. Cited: Ukrow, Por-No Go im audiovisuellen Binnenmarkt? Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  268. Ukrow, J., with contributions by Cole, M. and Broy, D.: Zur Zuständigkeit der Landesmedienanstalten/KJM für ausländische Anbieter – Eine rechtswissenschaftliche Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung völker , europa- und rechtsvergleichender Aspekte, 2017 (legal study not yet published). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  269. Cited: Ukrow, Zuständigkeit der Landesmedienanstalten/KJM für ausländische Anbieter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  270. Ukrow, J.; Cole, M. D., with contributions by Etteldorf, C. and Henrich, J.: Aktive Sicherung lokaler und regionaler Vielfalt. Rechtliche Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Förderung inhaltlicher Qualität in Presse , Rundfunk- und Online-Angeboten, (Schriftenreihe der Thüringer Landesmedienanstalt, vol. 25) 2019, Vistas. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  271. Cited: Ukrow/Cole, Aktive Sicherung lokaler und regionaler Vielfalt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  272. Ukrow, J.; Etteldorf, C.: „Fake News“ als Rechtsproblem, EMR/Script, vol. 5, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/EMR-SCRIPT-Band-5_Fake-News-als-Rechtsproblem.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  273. Cited: Ukrow/Etteldorf, „Fake News“ als Rechtsproblem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  274. Valcke, P.; Kuczerawy, A.; Ombelet, P.: Did the Romans Get it Right? What Delfi, Google, eBay, and UPC TeleKabel Wien Have in Common, in: Floridi, L.; Taddeo, M. (eds.), The Responsibilities of Online Service Providers, 2016, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  275. Cited: Valcke/Kuczerawy/Ombelet, Did the Romans Get it Right? What Delfi, Google, eBay, and UPC TeleKabel Wien Have in Common. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  276. van Eecke, P.; Truyens, M.: EU study on the Legal Analysis of a Single Market for the Information Society, New Rules for a New Age?, SMART 2007/0037, 2009, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/legal-analysis-single-market-information-society-smart-20070037. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  277. Cited: van Eecke/Truyens, Legal analysis of a Single Market for the Information Society. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  278. van Gestel, R.; Micklitz, H. W.: European Integration through Standardization: How Judicial Review Is Breaking down the Club House of Private Standardization Bodies, in: Common Market Law Review 50(1), 2013, pp. 145–182. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  279. Cited: van Gestel/Micklitz, in: Common Market Law Review 50(1), 2013, p. 145, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  280. van Hoboken, J.; Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.: Scoping Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services and Values, in: JIPITEC 6(3), 2015, pp. 198–210. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  281. Cited: van Hoboken/Zuiderveen Borgesius, in: JIPITEC 6(3), 2015, p. 198, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  282. van Hoboken, J.; Quintas, J. P.; Poort, J.: Hosting intermediary services and illegal content, an analysis of the scope or article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape, study prepared for the European Commission by the Institute for Information Law (IViR), SMART 2018/0033, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  283. Cited: van Hoboken/Quintas/Poort, Hosting intermediary services and illegal content. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  284. Verbiest, T.; Spindler, G.; Riccio, G. M.: Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries, Markt/2006/09/E, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  285. Cited: Verbiest/Spindler/Riccio, Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  286. von Rimscha, B.; Siegert, G.: Medienökonomie. Eine problemorientierte Einführung, 2015, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  287. Cited: von Rimscha/Siegert, Medienökonomie. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  288. von Schwichow, L.: Die Menschenwürde in der EMRK, 2016, Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  289. Cited: von Schwichow. Die Menschenwürde in der EMRK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  290. Vedder, C.; Heintschel von Heinegg, W.: Europäisches Unionsrecht, vol. 2, 2018, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  291. Cited: author in: Vedder/Heintschel von Heinegg, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  292. Wagner, B.: Global Free Expression – Governing the Boundaries of Internet Content, 2016, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  293. Cited: Wagner, Global Free Expression – Governing the Boundaries of Internet Content. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  294. Waisman, A.; Hevia, M.: Theoretical Foundations of Search Engine Liability, in: International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 42(7), 2011, pp. 785–803. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  295. Cited: Waisman/Hevia, in: International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 42(7), 2011, p. 785, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  296. Waldheim, S. J.: Dienstleistungsfreiheit und Herkunftslandprinzip. Prinzipielle Möglichkeiten und primärrechtliche Grenzen der Liberalisierung eines integrierten europäischen Binnenmarktes für Dienstleistungen, 2008, Cuvillier. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  297. Cited: Waldheim, Dienstleistungsfreiheit und Herkunftslandprinzip. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  298. Walk, F.: Das Herkunftsprinzip der E-Commerce-Richtlinie: Art. 3 der Richtlinie 2000/31/EG und seine Umsetzung im deutschen Recht, 2002, Herbert Utz. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  299. Cited: Walk, Das Herkunftslandprinzip der E-Commerce-Richtlinie. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  300. Wolff, A. H.; Brink, S.: Beck’scher Online-Kommentar Datenschutzrecht, 19th ed., 2019, Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  301. Cited: author in: Wolff/Brink, Art., para. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  302. Woods, L.: Duty of care, in: InterMEDIA 46(4), 2018/19, pp. 17–21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  303. Cited: Woods, in: InterMEDIA 46(4), 2018/19, p. 17, p. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  304. Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, 2019, Profile Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438
  305. Cited: Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748906438

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW"
Cover des Buchs: Interoperabilität als Gegenstand von (Medien-) Regulierung
Monographie Vollzugriff
Mark D. Cole, Christina Etteldorf, Daniel Knapp
Interoperabilität als Gegenstand von (Medien-) Regulierung
Cover des Buchs: Future Regulation of Cross-Border Audiovisual Content Dissemination
Monographie Vollzugriff
Mark D. Cole, Christina Etteldorf
Future Regulation of Cross-Border Audiovisual Content Dissemination
Cover des Buchs: Updating the Rules for Online Content Dissemination
Monographie Vollzugriff
Mark D. Cole, Christina Etteldorf, Carsten Ullrich
Updating the Rules for Online Content Dissemination
Cover des Buchs: Money for Nothing and Content for Free?
Monographie Vollzugriff
Christian-Mathias Wellbrock, Christopher Buschow
Money for Nothing and Content for Free?

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex