Cover des Buchs: Kontextuale und individuelle Determinanten strategischen Wahlverhaltens
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Kontextuale und individuelle Determinanten strategischen Wahlverhaltens

Eine international vergleichende Analyse
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 24.11.2020

Zusammenfassung

Wer wählt in welchem Kontext strategisch? Dieses Buch systematisiert erstmals die gesamte international vergleichende Forschung zu den Determinanten strategischen Wählens bei Legislativwahlen. Eigene Analysen der CSES schließen die im Literaturbericht identifizierten Forschungslücken. Durch die systematische theoretische Herleitung aller Hypothesen, die bis dato umfangreichste Datenbasis und eine adäquate methodische Modellierung hebt sich die Untersuchung von der einschlägigen Literatur ab. Ein normativ bedeutsamer neuer Befund besteht in der verminderten Verbreitung strategischen Wählens in jungen Demokratien. Ursächlich für dessen Relevanz ist, dass ausbleibende taktische Voten dort zur Instabilität des demokratischen Systems beitragen.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Erscheinungsdatum
24.11.2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7663-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1038-1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Nomos Universitätsschriften - Politik
Band
198
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
463
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 16
  2. 1. Einleitung Kein Zugriff 17 - 25
    1. 2.1 Operationalisierung der Fragmentierung des Parteiensystems Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 Gesellschaftsstruktur Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Wahlerfahrung Kein Zugriff
    5. 2.5 Kontaminierung Kein Zugriff
    6. 2.6 Lokale Parteienkonkurrenz Kein Zugriff
    7. 2.7 Weitere Erklärungsgrößen Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 Aufteilung in psychologische und mechanische Komponente Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.1.2 Aufschlüsselung der psychologischen Komponente in strategisches Antritts- und Wahlverhalten Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.2 Vorstellung des Designs einschlägiger Fallstudien Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3 Determinanten der Gesamtwirkung des Wahlsystems Kein Zugriff
    4. 3.4 Relative Bedeutsamkeit der mechanischen und psychologischen Effekte Kein Zugriff
    5. 3.5 Determinanten der relativen Bedeutsamkeit strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
    6. 3.6 Zusammenführung der Befunde Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1.1 Aggregatinferenz Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.1.2 Klassische Individualinferenz Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.1.3 Modifizierte Individualinferenz Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.1.4 Selbstauskunft Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.1.1 Klassische und modifizierte Individualinferenz Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.1.2 Klassische Individualinferenz und Selbstauskunft Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.2.1 Klassische Individualinferenz und Selbstauskunft Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.2.2 Modifizierte Individualinferenz im Vergleich mit der Selbstauskunft und der klassischen Individualinferenz Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3 Zusammenführung der Befunde Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1.1 Spezifika verwendeter Operationalisierungen des strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.1.2 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.1.3 Gesellschaftsstruktur Kein Zugriff
      4. 5.1.4 Wahlerfahrung Kein Zugriff
      5. 5.1.5 Kontaminierung Kein Zugriff
      6. 5.1.6 Nationale und lokale Parteienkonkurrenz Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.1.1 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.1.2 Parteien und Parteiensysteme Kein Zugriff
        3. 5.2.1.3 Lokale Parteienkonkurrenz Kein Zugriff
        4. 5.2.1.4 Individuelle Disposition Kein Zugriff
          1. 5.2.2.1.1 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
          2. 5.2.2.1.2 Regierungsbildung Kein Zugriff
          3. 5.2.2.1.3 Parteiensystem Kein Zugriff
          4. 5.2.2.1.4 Individuelle Disposition Kein Zugriff
          1. 5.2.2.2.1 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
          2. 5.2.2.2.2 Wahlerfahrung und Kontaminierung Kein Zugriff
          3. 5.2.2.2.3 Parteien und individuelle Disposition Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.1 Systematisierung grundlegender Argumente für erwartete Wirkungen auf strategisches Wahlverhalten Kein Zugriff
    2. 6.2 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
    3. 6.3 Wahlerfahrung Kein Zugriff
    4. 6.4 Kontaminierung Kein Zugriff
    5. 6.5 Nationale und lokale Parteienkonkurrenz Kein Zugriff
    6. 6.6 Individuelle Disposition Kein Zugriff
    7. 6.7 Kontrollvariablen Kein Zugriff
    1. 7.1 Datenbasis Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.2.1 Gesamtheit strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.2.2 Duverger-strategisches Wahlverhalten Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.2.3 Umgang mit nicht-eindeutigen Präferenzordnungen Kein Zugriff
      4. 7.2.4 Umgang mit Anhängern von Kleinparteien Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.3.1 Häufigkeit strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.3.2.1 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.3.2.2 Wahlerfahrung Kein Zugriff
        3. 7.3.2.3 Kontaminierung Kein Zugriff
        4. 7.3.2.4 Nationale und lokale Parteienkonkurrenz Kein Zugriff
        5. 7.3.2.5 Individuelle Disposition Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.4.1 Häufigkeit Duverger-strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.4.2.1 Wahlsystem Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.4.2.2 Wahlerfahrung Kein Zugriff
        3. 7.4.2.3 Kontaminierung Kein Zugriff
        4. 7.4.2.4 Nationale und lokale Parteienkonkurrenz Kein Zugriff
        5. 7.4.2.5 Individuelle Disposition Kein Zugriff
    5. 7.5 Zusammenführung der Befunde Kein Zugriff
  9. 8. Resümee Kein Zugriff 382 - 389
    1. Anhang A: Fallzahlen Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1 Fehlende Werte für Berechnung strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2 Anteilswerte strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1 Anteilswerte für strategisches Wahlverhalten Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2 Determinanten strategischen Wahlverhaltens Kein Zugriff
    4. Anhang B: Operationalisierungen und externe Datenquellen Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.1 Stimmen- und Mandatsverteilungen Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2 Umgang mit Wahlallianzen Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1 Gallagher-Index und effektive Anzahl der Parteien (ENEP) Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2 Dalton-Index Kein Zugriff
  11. Literaturverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 445 - 463

Literaturverzeichnis (307)

  1. Abramson, Paul R./Aldrich, John H./Blais, André/Diskin, Abraham/Indridason, Indridi H./Lee, Daniel J./Levine, Renan (2010): Comparing strategic voting under FPTP and PR. In: Comparative Political Studies 43(1): 61-90. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Abramson, Paul R./Aldrich, John H./Paolino, Phil/Rohde, David W. (1992): “Sophisticated” voting in the 1998 presidential primaries. In: The American Political Science Review 86(1): 55-69. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Abramson, Paul R./Aldrich, John H./Diskin, Abraham/Houck, Aaron M./Levine, Renan/Scotto, Thomas J. (2013): The British general election of 2010 under different voting rules. In: Electoral Studies 32(1): 134-139. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Aldrich, John H./Houck, Aaron/Abramson, Paul R./Levine, Renan/Scotto, Thomas J. (2011): Strategic voting in the 2010 UK election. APSA 2011 Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Alesina, Alberto/Rosenthal, Howard (1995): Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Allen, Geoff (2015): The resilience of ethnic minority parties in the face of strategic voting incentives. In: Party Politics 23(5): 560-565. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Alvarez, Michael/Sinclair, Betsy/Hasen, Richard L. (2006): How much is enough? The “Ballot Order Effect” and the use of social science research in election law disputes. In: Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 5(1): 40-56. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Alvarez, R. Michael/Boehmke, Frederick J./Nagler, Jonathan (2006): Strategic voting in British elections. In: Electoral Studies 25(1): 1-19. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Alvarez, R. Michael/Nagler, Jonathan (2000): A new approach for modeling strategic voting in multiparty elections. In: British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 57-75. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Ames, Barry/Baker, Andy/Renno, Lucio R. (2009): Split-ticket voting as the rule: Voters and permanent divided government in Brazil. In: Electoral Studies 28(1): 8-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Amorim Neto, Octavio/Cox, Gary W. (1997): Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. In: American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 149-174. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Anckar, Carsten (1997): Determinants of disproportionality and wasted votes. In: Electoral Studies 16(4): 501-515. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Andrews, Josephine T./Jackman, Robert W. (2005): Strategic fools: Electoral rule choice under extreme uncertainty. In: Electoral Studies 24(1): 65-84. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Armstrong, David A./Duch, Raymond M. (2010): Why can voters anticipate post-election coalition formation likelihoods. In: Electoral Studies 29(3): 308-315. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Arnold, Jason R. (2012): The electoral consequences of voter ignorance. In: Electoral Studies 31(4): 796-815. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Artabe, Alaitz/Gardeazabal, Javier (2014): Strategic votes and sincere counterfactuals. In: Political Analysis 22(2): 243-257. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bäck, Hanna/Rosema, Martin (2008): Government formation and strategic voting in multi-party systems: Voting for coalitions in the Netherlands. Workshop “The Politics of Change: How Parties, Elections and Voters Adjust to Changing Political Environments”, Amsterdam. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Banducci, Susan A./Karp, Jeffrey A. (2009): Electoral systems, efficacy, and voter turnout. In: The comparative study of electoral systems. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 109-136. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Barberá, Pablo (2012): When Duverger becomes autocratic: Electoral systems and opposition fragmentation in non-democratic regimes, 1950-2008. 22nd World Congress of Political Science, Madrid. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Bargsted, Matías/Blings, Steffen/Anderson, Christopher J./Dalton, Russel J. (2011): Appendix: Macro-level data. In: Citizens, context, and choice: How context shapes citizens' electoral choices. Dalton, Russel J. und Anderson, Christopher J. (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 257-268. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Bargsted, Matías A./Kedar, Orit (2009): Coalition-targeted Duvergerian voting: How expectations affect voters choice under proportional representation. In: American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 307-323. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Behnke, Joachim (2016): Anreize für strategisches Wählen unter dem neuen Wahlgesetz. In: Wahlen und Wähler. Schoen, Harald und Weßels, Bernhard (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien: 223-244. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Behnke, Joachim/Bader, Florian (2013): Sophistiziertes Wählen bei der Bundestagswahl 2009 – gibt es diesbezügliche Anzeichen für Lerneffekte? In: Wahlen und Wähler. Weßels, Bernhard, Schoen, Harald und Gabriel, Oscar W. (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer: 249-268. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bernhagen, Patrick/Marsh, Michael (2006): The partisan effects of low turnout: Analyzing vote abstention as a missing data problem. In: Electoral Studies 26(3): 548-560. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Best, Robin E. (2010): Increasing irrationality? The equilibrium relationship between electoral and legislative party system size, 1950-2005. In: Electoral Studies 29(1): 105-116. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Birnir, Jóhanna K. (2007): Divergence in diversity? The dissimilar effects of cleavages on electoral politics in new democracies. In: American Journal of Political Science 51(3): 602-619. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Bischoff, Carina S. (2013): Electorally unstable by supply or demand? – an examination of the causes of electoral volatility in advanced industrial democracies. In: Public Choice 156(3-4): 537-561. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Black, Jerome H. (1978): The multicandidate calculus of voting: Application to Canadian federal elections. In: American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 609-638. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Blais, André (1991): The debate over electoral systems. In: International Political Science Review 12(3): 239-260. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Blais, André/Aldrich, John H./Indridason, Indridi H./Levine, Renan (2006): Do voters vote for government coalitions? In: Party Politics 12(6): 691-705. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Blais, André/Bodet, Marc A. (2006): How do voters form expectations about the parties' chances of winning the election? In: Social Science Quarterly 87(3): 477-493. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Blais, André/Carty, R. Kenneth (1987): The impact of electoral formulae on the creation of majority governments. In: Electoral Studies 6(3): 209-218. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Blais, André/Carty, R. Kenneth (1991): The psychological impact of electoral laws: Measuring Duverger's elusive factor. In: British Journal of Political Science 21(1): 79-93. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Blais, André/Dostie-Goulet, Eugénie/Bodet, Marc A. (2009): Voting strategically in Canada and Britain. The logic of party competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States. In: Duverger's Law of plurality voting. Bowler, Shaun, Blais, André und Grofman, Bernard (Hrsg.). New York, Springer: 13-25. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Blais, André/Gschwend, Thomas (2011): Strategic defection across elections, parties, and voters. In: Citizens, context, and choice: How the political context shapes electoral behavior. Dalton, Russell J. und Anderson, Christopher J. (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 176-193. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Blais, André/Héroux-Legault, Maxime/Stephenson, Laura/Cross, William/Gidengil, Elisabeth (2012): Assessing the psychological and mechanical impact of electoral rules: A quasi-experiment. In: Electoral Studies 31(4): 829-837. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Blais, André/Lachat, Romain/Hino, Airo/Doray-Demers, Pascal (2011): The mechanical and psychological effects of electoral systems. A quasi-experimental study. In: Comparative Political Studies 44(12): 1599-1621. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Blais, André/Massicotte, Louis (2002): Electoral systems. In: Comparing democracies 2. Leduc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard und Norris, Pippa (Hrsg.). Thousand Oaks, SAGE: 40-69. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Blais, André/Nadeau, Richard (1996): Measuring strategic voting: A two-step procedure. In: Electoral Studies 15(1): 39-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Blais, André/Nadeau, Richard/Gidengil, Elisabeth/Nevitte, Neil (2001): Measuring strategic voting in multiparty plurality elections. In: Electoral Studies 20(3): 343-352. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Blais, André/Rheault, Ludovic (2011): Optimists and skeptics: Why do people believe in the value of their single vote? In: Electoral Studies 30(1): 77-82. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Blais, André/Turgeon, Mathieu (2004): How good are voters at sorting out the weakest candidate in their constituency? In: Electoral Studies 23(3): 455-461. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Blais, André/Young, Robert/Turcotte, Martin (2005): Direct or indirect? Assessing two approaches to the measurement of strategic voting. In: Electoral Studies 24(2): 163-176. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Blumenstiel, Jan-Eric/Rattinger, Hans (2012): Warum haben Sie das getan? Subjektive Gründe der Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 45 „Wählen in Deutschland”: 251-275. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bochsler, Daniel (2010): Who gains from apparentments under D'Hondt? In: Electoral Studies 29(4): 617-627. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Bølstad, Jørgen/Dinas, Elias/Riera, Pedro (2013): Tactical voting and party preferences. A test of cognitive dissonance theory. In: Political Behavior 35(3): 429-452. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Bormann, Nils-Christian/Golder, Matt (2013): Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2011. In: Electoral Studies 32(2): 360-369. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Bowler, Shaun/Farrell, David M./Pettitt, Robin T. (2005): Expert opinion on electoral systems. So which electoral system is “best”? In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 15(1): 3-19. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Bowler, Shaun/Grofman, Bernard/Blais, André (2009): The United States: A case of Duvergerian equilibrium. In: Duverger's Law of plurality voting. Grofman, Bernard, Blais, André und Bowler, Shaun (Hrsg.). New York, Springer: 135-146. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Bowler, Shaun/Karp, Jeffrey A./Donovan, Todd (2010): Strategic coalition voting: evidence from New Zealand. In: Electoral Studies 29(3): 350-357. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Brambor, Thomas/Clark, William R./Golder, Matt (2006): Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. In: Political Analysis 14(1): 63-82. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Brancati, Dawn (2007): Global Elections Database. New York, Harvard University. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Brancati, Dawn (2008): The origins and strengths of regional parties. In: British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 135-159. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Broscheid, Andreas/Gschwend, Thomas (2005): Zur statistischen Analyse von Vollerhebungen. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46(1): 16-26. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Brown, Adam R. (2011): Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: Accuracy and completeness of coverage. In: PS: Political Science & Politics 44(2): 339-343. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Burden, Barry C. (2005): Minor parties and strategic voting in recent U.S. presiden-tial elections. In: Electoral Studies 24(4): 603-618. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Bytzek, Evelyn/Gschwend, Thomas/Huber, Sascha (2011): Koalitionssignale bei der Bundestagswahl 2009 und deren Auswirkungen auf strategisches Wahlverhalten. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift -Sonderheft 45 „Wählen in Deutschland“: 1-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Cain, Bruce E. (1978): Strategic voting in Britain. In: American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 639-655. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Campbell, Angus/Converse, Philip E./Miller, Warren E./Stokes, Donald E. (1960): The American voter. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Caramani, Daniele/Kollman, Ken (2017): Symposium on “The nationalization of electoral politics: Frontiers of research”. In: Electoral Studies 47: 51-54. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Carey, John M./Shugart, Matthew S. (1995): Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. In: Electoral Studies 14(4): 417-439. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Carroll, Royce/Kubo, Hiroki (2018): Explaining citizen perceptions of party ideological positions. The mediating role of political contexts. In: Electoral Studies, 51: 14-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Casal Bértoa, Fernando (2017): Political parties or party systems? Assessing the ‘myth’ of institutionalisation and democracy. In: West European Politics 40(2): 402-429. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Choi, Jungug (2009): Strategic voting in India: Its extent and determinants in the 2004 general election. In: Asian Survey 49(4): 609-624. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Clark, William R./Golder, Matt (2006): Rehabilitating Duverger's theory. Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. In: Comparative Political Studies 39(6): 679-708. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Cohen, Jonathan/Tsfati, Yariv (2009): The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting. In: Communication Research 36(3): 359-378. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Colomer, Josep M. (2005): It's parties that choose electoral systems (or, Duverger's laws upside down). In: Political Studies 53(1): 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Colomer, Josep M./Puglisi, Riccardo (2005): Cleavages, issues and parties: A critical review. In: European Political Science 4(4): 502-520. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Converse, Philip E. (1969): Of time and partisan stability. In: Comparative Political Studies 2(2): 139-171. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Cox, Gary W. (1990): Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. In: American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 903-935. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Cox, Gary W. (1997): Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Cox, Gary W. (1999): Electoral rules and electoral coordination. In: Annual Review of Political Science 2: 145-161. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Cox, Gary W./Katz, Jonathan N. (1996): Why did the incumbency advantage in US House elections grow? In: American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 478-497. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Cox, Gary W./Shugart, Matthew S. (1996): Strategic voting under proportional representation. In: Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12(2): 299-324. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Cox, Karen E./Schoppa, Leonard J. (2002): Interaction effects in mixed-member electoral systems. Theory and evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy. In: Comparative Political Studies 35(9): 1027-1053. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Crisp, Brian F./Olivella, Santiago/Potter, Joshua D. (2012): Electoral contexts that impede voter coordination. In: Electoral Studies 31(1): 143-158. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Crisp, Brian F./Olivella, Santiago/Potter, Joshua D. (2013): Party-system nationalization and the scope of public policy: The importance of cross-district constituency similarity. In: Comparative Political Studies 46(4): 431-456. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Curini, Luigi/Hino, Airo (2012): Missing links in party-system polarization: How institutions and voters matter. In: The Journal of Politics 74(2): 460-473. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Dahlberg, Stefan/Holmberg, Sören/Rothstein, Bo/Khomenko, Anna/Svensson, Richard (2017): The Quality of Government Basic Dataset, version Jan17. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Dalton, Russell J. (2008): The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. In: Comparative Political Studies 41(7): 899-920. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Dalton, Russell J./McAllister, Ian (2015): Random walk or planned excursion? Continuity and change in the left-right positions of political parties. In: Comparative Political Studies 48(6): 759-787. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Daoust, Jean-François (2015): Vote stratégique au Québec: analyse de l’élection de 2012. In: Politique et Sociétés 34(2): 3-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Daoust, Jean-François/Bol, Damien (2015): Does strategic voting vary with (perceived) polarization? ECPR General Conference. Montreal. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Debus, Marc (2007): Bestimmungsfaktoren des Wahlverhaltens in Deutschland bei den Bundestagswahlen 1987, 1998 und 2002: Eine Anwendung des Modells von Adams, Merrill und Grofman. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48(2): 269-292. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Dolan, Kathleen A./Holbrook, Thomas M. (2001): Knowing versus caring: The role of affect and cognition in political perceptions. In: Political Psychology 22(1): 27-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Downs, Anthony (1957): An economic theory of democracy. New York, Harper & Row. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Drummond, Andrew (2006): The impact of party affect on voter sincerity in open and closed electoral systems. In: Center for the Study of Democracy Working Papers 06-09. Irvine, University of California: 1-29. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Duch, Raymond M./Palmer, Harvey D. (2002): Strategic voting in post-communist democracy? In: British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 63-91. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Dunleavy, Patrick/Boucek, Françoise (2003): Constructing the number of parties. In: Party Politics 9(3): 291-315. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Dupraz, Stéphane/Müller, Daniel/Page, Lionel (2013): Tactical voting and voter's sophistication in British elections. In: QuBE Working Papers 11. Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Duverger, Maurice (1954): Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. London, Methuen & Co. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Eilfort, Michael (1994): Die Nichtwähler: Wahlenthaltung als Form des Wahlverhaltens. Paderborn, Schöningh. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Elff, Martin (2009): Political knowledge in comparative perspective: The problem of cross-national equivalence of measurement. Midwest Political Science Association 2009 Annual National Conference. Chicago, IL. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Elff, Martin/Kosmidis, Spyros (2013): Umfragen, Wählererwartungen und strategisches Wählen: ein deutsch-britischer Vergleich. In: Wahlen und Wähler. Weßels, Bernhard, Schoen, Harald und Gabriel, Oscar W. (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien: 533-552. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. European Election Database (2017): European Election Database. Bergen: Norwegian Social Science Data Services. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Evans, Geoffrey (2002): On the validation of measures of strategic motivations: A critical comment on Alvarez and Nagler. In: British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 185-188. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Evans, Geoffrey/Curtice, John/Norris, Pippa (1998): New Labour, new tactical voting? The causes and consequences of tactical voting in the 1997 general election. In: British Elections & Parties Review 8(1): 65-79. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Evans, Geoffrey/Heath, Anthony (1993): A tactical error in the analysis of tactical voting: A response to Niemi, Whitten and Franklin. In: British Journal of Political Science 23(1): 131-137. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Ezrow, Lawrence (2008): Parties' policy programmes and the dog that didn't bark: No evidence that proportional systems promote extreme party positioning. In: British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 479-497. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Fagerholm, Andreas (2016): Ethnic and regionalist parties in western Europe: A party family? In: Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 16(2): 304-339. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Falter, Jürgen W./Schoen, Harald/Caballero, Claudio (2000): Dreißig Jahre danach: Zur Validierung des Konzepts ‘Parteiidentifikation’ in der Bundesrepublik. In: 50 Jahre Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland. Klein, Markus, Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, Mochmann, Ekkehard und Ohr, Dieter (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer VS: 235-271. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Fearon, James D. (2003): Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. In: Journal of Economic Growth 8(2): 195-222. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Felsenthal, Dan S./Brichta, Avraham (1985): Sincere and strategic voters: An Israeli study. In: Political Behavior 7(4): 311-324. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Ferrara, Federico/Herron, Erik S. (2005): Going it alone? Strategic entry under mixed electoral rules. In: American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 16-31. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Ferree, Karen E./Powell, G. Bingham/Scheiner, Ethan (2014): Context, electoral rules, and party systems. In: Annual Review of Political Science 17: 421-439. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Festinger, Leon (1957): A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL, Row, Peterson. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Fiorina, Morris P. (1990): Information and Rationality in Elections. In: Information and Democratic Processes. Ferejohn, John A. und Kuklinski, James H. (Hrsg.). Urbana, University of Illinois Press: 329-342. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Fisher, Stephen D. (2000): Intuition versus formal theory: Tactical voting in England 1987-1997. APSA meeting. Washington DC. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Fisher, Stephen D. (2001): Extending the rational voter theory of tactical voting. Mid-West Political Science Association Meeting. Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Fisher, Stephen D. (2004): Definition and measurement of tactical voting: The role of rational choice. In: British Journal of Political Science 34(1): 152-166. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Fisher, Stephen D. (2014): Change in tactical and other motivations for party vote choice. In: Sociology Working Papers 2014-04. Oxford, University of Oxford: 1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Fisher, Stephen D./Curtice, John (2006): Tactical unwind? Changes in party preference structure and tactical voting in Britain between 2001 and 2005. In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16(1): 55-76. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Fisher, Stephen D./Myatt, David P. (2016): Strategic voting in plurality rule elections. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: https://economics.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pe_05_17_myatt.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Fiva, Jon H./Folke, Olle (2014): Online appendix to “Mechanical and psychological effects of electoral reform”. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://www.jon.fiva.no/docs/FivaFolke_OnlineAppendix.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Fiva, Jon H./Folke, Olle (2016): Mechanical and psychological effects of electoral reform. In: British Journal of Political Science 46(2): 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Flores-Macias, Francisco (2009): Who votes strategically? An individual-level model that accounts for measurement error in the dependent variable with an application to the 2006 Mexican presidential election. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Toronto. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Fredén, Annika (2011): Tactical voting: A study of voters' tactical considerations in the 2010 Swedish general election. Department of Political Science Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg. Master. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Freeman, Stephen/Walker, Marcus R./Borden, Richard/Latané, Bibb (1975): Diffusion of responsibility and restaurant tipping: Cheaper by the bunch. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1(4): 584-587. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Gaines, Brian J. (1999): Duverger's law and the meaning of Canadian exceptionalism. In: Comparative Political Studies 32(7): 835-861. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Galbraith, John W./Rae, Nicol C. (1989): A test of the importance of tactical voting: Great Britain, 1987. In: British Journal of Political Science 19(1): 126-136. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Gallagher, Michael (1991): Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. In: Electoral Studies 10(1): 33-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Gallagher, Michael (2019): Election indices dataset. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Gallagher, Michael/Mitchell, Paul (2005): The politics of electoral systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Geys, Benny (2006): Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. In: Electoral Studies 25(4): 637-663. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Golder, Sona N. (2006): The logic of pre-electoral coalition formation. Columbus, Ohio State University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Gordon, Stacy B./Segura, Gary M. (1997): Cross-national variation in the political sophistication of individuals: Capability or choice? In: The Journal of Politics 59(1): 126-147. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Granberg, Donald/Holmberg, Sören (1991): Self-reported turnout and voter validation. In: American Journal of Political Science 35(2): 448-459. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Granberg, Donald/Holmberg, Sören (2002): A mass–elite comparison of wishful thinking. In: Social Science Quarterly 83(4): 1079-1085. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Grofman, Bernard (2016): Perspectives on the comparative study of electoral systems. In: Annual Review of Political Science 19: 523-540. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Grönlund, Kimmo/Milner, Henry (2006): The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective. In: Scandinavian Political Studies 29(4): 386-406. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Gschwend, Thomas (2004a): Comparative politics of strategic voting: A hierarchy of electoral systems. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Gschwend, Thomas (2004b): Strategic voting in mixed electoral systems. Wiesbaden, Statistisches Bundesamt. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Gschwend, Thomas (2006): Comparative politics of strategic voting: A hierarchy of electoral systems. Conference on Contextual Effects in Electoral Research. Florenz. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Gschwend, Thomas (2007a): Institutional incentives for strategic voting and party system change in Portugal. In: Portuguese Journal of Social Science 6(1): 15-32. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Gschwend, Thomas (2007b): Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany. In: European Journal of Political Research 49(1): 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Gschwend, Thomas (2008): Studying contamination effects in multi-level systems of governance: First thoughts about hypotheses and research design. In: The multilevel electoral system of the EU. Eijk, Cees van der und Schmitt, Hermann (Hrsg.). Mannheim, CONNEX: 229-240. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Gschwend, Thomas (2009): District magnitude and the comparative study of strategic voting. In: The comparative study of electoral systems. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 289-307. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Gschwend, Thomas/Stoiber, Michael (2014): Strategic voting in proportional systems: The case of Finland. In: IHS Political Science Series No. 138: 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Gschwend, Thomas/Stötzer, Lukas/Zittlau, Steffen (2016): What drives rental votes? How coalitions signals facilitate strategic coalition voting. In: Electoral Studies 44: 293-306. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Gschwend, Thomas/Zittel, Thomas (2015): Do constituency candidates matter in German federal elections? The personal vote as an interactive process. In: Electoral Studies 39: 338-349. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Guinjoan, Marc (2016): Parties, elections and electoral contests: Competition and contamination effects. London and New York, Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Guinjoan, Marc/Simón, Pablo/Bermúdez, Sandra/Lago, Ignacio (2013): Expectations in mass elections: Back to the future? In: Social Science Quarterly 95(5): 1346-1359. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Heath, Anthony/Jowell, Roger/Curtice, John/Evans, Geoff/Field, Julia/Witherspoon, Sharon (1991): Understanding political change. Oxford, Pergamon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Hepburn, Eve (2010): Using Europe: Territorial party strategies in a multi-level system. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Herrmann, Michael (2010): Wenn Wenige den Ausschlag geben... Strategisches Erststimmenwählen bei deutschen Bundestagswahlen 1994-2009. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 51(4): 665-689. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Herrmann, Michael (2015): Strategisches Wählen in Deutschland. Logik und politische Konsequenzen. Wiesbaden, Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Hobolt, Sara B./Karp, Jeffrey A. (2010): Voters and coalition governments. In: Electoral Studies 29(3): 299-307. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Horowitz, Jeremy/Long, James (2016): Strategic voting, information, and ethnicity in emerging democracies: Evidence from Kenya. In: Electoral Studies 44: 351-361. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Huang, Kai-Ping (2016): Beyond electoral systems: How party system polarization affects strategic voting. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://www.academia.edu/15535302/Beyond_Electoral_Sytems_How_Party_System_Polarization_Affects_Strategic_Vo. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Huber, John D./Kernell, Georgia/Leoni, Eduardo L. (2005): Institutional context, cognitive resources and party attachments across democracies. In: Political Analysis 13(4): 365-386. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Hyde, Susan D./Marinov, Nikolay (2012): Which elections can be lost? In: Political Analysis 20(2): 191-210. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Irwin, Galen A./Van Holsteyn, Joop J. M. (2012): Strategic electoral considerations under proportional representation. In: Electoral Studies 31(1): 184-191. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Iyer, Sundeep (2011): Do self-identified tactical voters actually vote tactically?: What tactical voting meant (and didn't mean) to British voters in the 2010 election. Department of Government. Cambridge, Harvard University. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Jenssen, Anders T. (2016): Tactical voting in Norway: Context, motives and occurrence. In: Scandinavian Political Studies 39(1): 22-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Johansson, Petter/Hall, Lars/Sikström, Sverker/Olsson, Andreas (2005): Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. In: Science 310(5745): 116-119. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Johnson, Joel W./Wallack, Jessica S. (2012): Electoral systems and the personal vote. Harvard Dataverse, V1. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Johnston, Richard J./Pattie, Charles J. (1991): Tactical voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: an alternative approach. In: British Journal of Political Science 21(1): 95-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Jusko, Karen L./Shively, W. Philips (2005): Applying a two-step strategy to the analysis of coss-national public opinion data. In: Political Analysis 13(4): 327-344. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Karp, Jeffrey A./Brockington, David (2005): Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of overreporting voter turnout in five countries. In: The Journal of Politics 67(3): 825-840. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Karp, Jeffrey A./Vowles, Jack/Banducci, Susan A./Donovan, Todd (2002): Strategic voting, party activity, and candidate effects: testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand's new mixed system. In: Electoral Studies 21(1): 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Karpov, Alexander (2008): Measurement of disproportionality in proportional representation systems. In: Mathematical and Computer Modelling 48(9-10): 1421-1438. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Kawai, Kei/Watanabe, Yasutora (2013): Inferring strategic voting. In: The American Economic Review 103(2): 624-662. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Keating, Michael/Wilson, Alex (2009): Renegotiating the state of autonomies: Statute reform and multi-level politics in Spain. In: West European Politics 32(3): 536-558. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Kedar, Orit (2012): Voter choice and parliamentary politics: An emerging research agenda. In: British Journal of Political Science 42(3): 537-553. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Kiewiet, D. Roderick (2013): The ecology of tactical voting in Britain. In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23(1): 86-110. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Kim, HeeMin/Fording, Richard C. (2001): Does tactical voting matter? The political impact of tactical voting in recent British elections. In: Comparative Political Studies 34(3): 294-311. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Kim, HeeMin/Kostadinova, Tatiana (2011): Does tactical voting matter? The political impact of tactical voting in Canadian elections. In: International Area Studies Review 14(1): 49-72. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter/Weßels, Bernhard (2002): Sincere voting in different electoral systems. Berlin Conference “The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems”. Berlin, Wissenschaftzentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Knutsen, Oddbjørn (2013): Structural determinants of party choice: The changing impact of socio-structure variables on party choice in comparative perspective. In: Party governance and party democracy. Müller, Wolfgang C. und Narud, Hanne M. (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer VS: 175-203. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Kollman, Ken/Hicken, Allen/Caramani, Daniele/Becker, David/Lublin, David (2011): Constituency-level elections archive, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Center for Political Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Kölln, Ann-Kristin (2017): Political sophistication affects how citizens’ social policy preferences respond to the economy. In: West European Politics 41(1): 196-217. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Kranenpohl, Uwe/Niedermayer, Oskar (2013): Kleinstparteien. In: Handbuch Parteienforschung. Niedermayer, Oskar (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien: 663-681. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Krippendorff, Klaus (2004): Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Krizan, Zlatan/Miller, Jeffrey C./Johar, Omesh (2010): Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. In: Psychological Science 21(1): 140-146. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Kroh, Martin (2009): The ease of ideological voting: Voter sophistication and party system complexity. In: The comparative study of electoral systems. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 220-236. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Kselman, Daniel/Niou, Emerson (2010): Strategic voting in plurality elections. In: Political Analysis 18(2): 227-244. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Kühnel, Steffen/Mays, Anja (2009): Das Michigan-Modell des Wahlverhaltens und die subjektive Sicht der Wähler. Zur Korrespondenz der Effekte von Parteineigung, Kandidatenbewertungen und Urteilen zu politischen Sachthemen mit der subjektiven Begründung von Wahlentscheidungen. In: Wähler in Deutschland. Kühnel, Steffen, Niedermayer, Oskar und Westle, Bettina (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer: 313-328. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Laakso, Markku/Taagepera, Rein (1979): Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. In: Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Lachat, Romain (2011): Partisan and ideological bias in citizens’ perceptions of parties’ electoral chances. Conference of the International Society of Political Psychology. Istanbul. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Lachat, Romain (2012): Party strategies, institutions, and electoral system effects. Conference “Duty and Choice: Participation and Preferences in Democratic Elections”. Montreal. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Lachat, Romain/Blais, André/Lago, Ignacio (2015): Assessing the mechanical and psychological effects of district magnitude. In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 25(3): 284-299. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Lachat, Romain/Selb, Peter (2010): Strategic overshooting in national council elections. In: Swiss Political Science Review 16(3): 481-498. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Lago, Ignacio (2008): Rational expectations or heuristics? Strategic voting in proportional representation systems. In: Party Politics 14(1): 31-49. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Lago, Ignacio/Martínez i Coma, Ferran (2012): Forgetting to make votes count: The role of previous democratic experience. In: Electoral Studies 31(2): 413-421. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Lago, Ignacio/Montero, José R. (2009): Coordination between electoral arenas in multilevel countries. In: European Journal of Political Research 48(2): 176-203. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Lago-Peñas, Ignacio/Costa Lobo, Marina/Lago-Peñas, Santiago (2016): Coattail effects and electoral coordination. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://infogen.webs.uvigo.es/WPB/WP1603.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Lane, Jan-Erik/Ersson, Svante (2007): Party system instability in Europe: Persistent differences in volatility between west and east? In: Democratization 14(1): 92-110. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Lee, Nam-Young/Kim, Hyung-Joon/Kim, Young-Tae/Kim, Wook (2005): The political effects of the introduction of “two-ballot votes” system in Korea: Comparison with Japan, New Zealand, and Germany. CSES Conference. Taipeh. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Leiter, Debra (2015): Split ticket voting and social networks in new and established democracies: A quasi-experiment in the 1990 German unification elections. Political Networks Workshops & Conference 2015. Portland, OR. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Levine, Renan (2007): Sources of bias in voter expectations under proportional representation. In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 17(3): 215-234. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Leys, Colin (1959): Models, theories, and the theory of political parties. In: Political Studies 7(2): 127-146. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Lijphart, Arend (1994): Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Lijphart, Arend (1999): Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six democracies. New Haven, Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Linhart, Eric (2007): Rationales Wählen als Reaktion auf Koalitionssignale am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2005. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48(3): 461-484. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Lipset, Seymour M./Rokkan, Stein (1967): Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In: Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. Lipset, Seymour M. und Rokkan, Stein (Hrsg.). New York, The Free Press: 1-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Listhaug, Ola/Aardal, Bernt/Ellis, Ingunn O. (2009): Institutional variation and political support: An analysis of CSES data from 29 countries. In: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 311-332. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Llaudet, Elena (2014): Voting for parties or for candidates: Do electoral institutions make a difference? Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/ellaudet/files/voting_for_parties_or_for_candidates.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Llaudet, Elena (2015): Voting for parties or for candidates: Do electoral institutions make a difference? Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/ellaudet/files/voting_for_parties_or_for_candidates_0.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Lublin, David (2015): Electoral systems, ethnic heterogeneity and party system fragmentation. In: British Journal of Political Science 47(2): 373-389. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Luskin, Robert C. (1990): Explaining political sophistication. In: Political Behavior 12(4): 331-361. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Mainwaring, Scott/Zoco, Edurne (2007): Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition. Electoral volatility in old and new democracies. In: Party Politics 13(2): 155-178. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Massetti, Emanuele (2009): Explaining regionalist party positioning in a multi-dimensional ideological space: A framework for analysis. In: Regional & Federal Studies 19(4-5): 501-531. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Massicotte, Louis/Blais, André (1999): Mixed electoral systems: a conceptual and empirical survey. In: Electoral Studies 18(3): 341-366. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Matakos, Konstantinos/Troumpounis, Orestis/Xefteris, Dimitrios (2016): Electoral rule disproportionality and platform polarization. In: American Journal of Political Science 60(4): 1026-1043. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Mazzoleni, Oscar/Mueller, Sean (2016): Introduction: Explaining the policy success of regionalist parties in Western Europe. In: Regionalist parties in Western Europe. Dimensions of success. Mazzoleni, Oscar und Mueller, Sean (Hrsg.). New York, Routledge: 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. McGann, Anthony (2013): Fairness and bias in electoral systems. In: Representation: Elections and beyond. Smith, Rogers M. und Nagel, Jack H. (Hrsg.). Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Press: 90-113. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. McKelvey, Richard D./Ordeshook, Peter (1972): A general theory of the calculus of voting. In: Mathematical applications in political science. Herndon, James F. und Bernd, Joseph L. (Hrsg.). Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia: 32-78. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Medeiros, Mike/Noël, Alain (2014): The forgotten side of partisanship. Negative party identification in four Anglo-American democracies. In: Comparative Political Studies 47(7): 1022-1046. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Meffert, Michael F./Gschwend, Thomas (2010): Strategic coalition voting: evidence from Austria. In: Electoral Studies 29(3): 339-349. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Meffert, Michael F./Gschwend, Thomas (2011): Polls, coalition signals and strategic voting: An experimental investigation of perceptions and effects. In: European Journal of Political Research 50(5): 636-667. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Meffert, Michael F./Huber, Sascha/Gschwend, Thomas/Pappi, Franz U. (2011): More than wishful thinking: Causes and consequences of voters electoral expectations about parties and coalitions. In: Electoral Studies 30(4): 804-815. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Merolla, Jennifer L./Stephenson, Laura B. (2007): Strategic voting in Canada: A cross time analysis. In: Electoral Studies 26(2): 235-246. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Milazzo, Caitlin/Moser, Robert G./Scheiner, Ethan (2018): Social diversity affects the number of parties even under first-past-the-post rules. In: Comparative Political Studies, 51(7): 938-974. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Monroe, Burt L./Rose, Amanda G. (2002): Electoral systems and unimagined consequences: Partisan effects of districted proportional representation. In: American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 67-89. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Moser, Robert G./Scheiner, Ethan (2009): Strategic voting in established and new democracies: Ticket splitting in mixed-member electoral systems. In: Electoral Studies 28(1): 51-61. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Moser, Robert G./Scheiner, Ethan/Milazzo, Caitlin (2011): Social diversity affects the number of parties even under first past the post rules. APSA 2011 Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Moser, Robert G./Scheiner, Ethan/Stoll, Heather (2018): Social diversity, electoral systems, and the party system. In: The Oxford handbook of electoral systems. Herron, Erik S., Pekkanen, Robert und Shugart, Matthew S. (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 134-158. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Myatt, David P. (2002): Idiosyncrasy, information and the impact of strategic voting. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0d373bf8-2833-40c7-9410-b856c785dc5b/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=Impact.pdf&type_of_work=Working+paper. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Myatt, David P./Fisher, Stephen D. (2002): Everything is uncertain and uncertainty is everything: Strategic voting in simple plurality elections. In: Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series 115. Oxford, University of Oxford: 1-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Niemi, Richard G./Whitten, Guy/Franklin, Mark N. (1992): Constituency characteristics, individual characteristics and tactical voting in the 1987 British general election. In: British Journal of Political Science 22(2): 229-240. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Niemi, Richard G./Whitten, Guy/Franklin, Mark N. (1993): People who live in glass houses: A response to Evans and Heath's critique of our note on tactical voting. In: British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 549-553. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Nisbett, Richard E./Wilson, Timothy D. (1977): Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. In: Psychological Review 84(3): 231-259. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Nohlen, Dieter (2004): Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem. Stuttgart, UTB. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Nohlen, Dieter (2005): Elections in the Americas: A data handbook: Volume 2 South America. Oxford University Press on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Nohlen, Dieter/Grotz, Florian/Hartmann, Christof (2001): Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A data handbook: Volume I: Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Nohlen, Dieter/Stöver, Philip (2010): Elections in Europe. Baden-Baden, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Norris, Pippa (1997): Choosing electoral systems: Proportional, majoritarian and mixed systems. In: International Political Science Review 18(3): 297-312. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Ordeshook, Peter C./Shvetsova, Olga V. (1994): Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. In: American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 100-123. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Oscarsson, Henrik/Rosema, Martin (2019): Consideration set models of electoral choice: Theory, method, and application: In: Electoral Studies 57: 256-262. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Page, Benjamin I./Jones, Calvin C. (1979): Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. In: American Political Science Review 73(4): 1071-1089. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Pellicer, Miquel/Wegner, Eva (2014): The mechanical and psychological effects of legal thresholds. In: Electoral Studies 33: 258-266. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Peress, Michael (2008): Strategic voting in multi-office elections. In: Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(4): 619-642. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Petrocik, John R. (1996): Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. In: American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825-850. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Plescia, Carolina (2017): On the mismeasurement of sincere and strategic voting in mixed-member electoral systems. In: Electoral Studies 48: 19-29. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Poier, Klaus (2010): Austria. In: Elections in Europe. A data handbook. Nohlen, Dieter und Stöver, Philip (Hrsg.). Baden-Baden, Nomos: 169-232. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Potter, Joshua D. (2018): Constituency diversity, district magnitude and voter co-ordination. In: British Journal of Political Science 48(1): 91-113. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Powell, G. Bingham (2011): Party system polarization and ideological congruence: Causal mechanisms. In: Citizens, context and choice: How context shapes citizens' electoral choices. Dalton, Russell J. und Anderson, Christopher J. (Hrsg.). New York, Oxford University Press: 197-213. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Queralt, Dídac (2009): Learning the mechanical effect of electoral systems. In: Estudio/Working Paper 241. Getafe, Instituto Juan March: 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Rae, Douglas W. (1967): The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven, Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Rashkova, Ekaterina R. (2014a): Ethnic heterogeneity and party system size: A district-level analysis. In: Comparative European Politics 12(3): 249-278. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Rashkova, Ekaterina R. (2014b): Learning the game: Explaining party system convergence in European democracies. In: Political Studies 62(4): 804-823. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Raymond, Christopher D. (2013): Increasingly 'irrational' party systems: Evidence that there are increasingly more than two parties at the district level. In: Government and Opposition 48(4): 506-525. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Raymond, Christopher D. (2015): The organizational ecology of ethnic cleavages: The nonlinear effects of ethnic diversity on party system fragmentation. In: Electoral Studies 37: 109-119. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Raymond, Christopher D./Huelshoff, Michael/Rosenblum, Marc R. (2016): Electoral systems, ethnic cleavages and experience with democracy. In: International Political Science Review 37(4): 550-566. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Rich, Timothy S. (2013): Voter perceptions and behavior in east Asian mixed systems. In: Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 12(1): 21-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Rich, Timothy S. (2015): Duverger's law in mixed legislative systems: The impact of national electoral rules on district competition. In: European Journal of Political Research 54(1): 182-196. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Riera, Pedro (2013): Electoral coordination in mixed-member systems: Does the level of democratic experience matter? In: European Journal of Political Research 52(1): 119-141. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Riera, Pedro (2016): Tactical voting. Oxford Handbooks Online. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780199935307.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935307-e-55?print=pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Riker, William (1982): The two-party system and Duverger's law: An essay on the history of political science. In: American Political Science Review 76(4): 753-766. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Riker, William/Ordeshook, Peter (1968): A theory of the calculus of voting. In: American Political Science Review 62(1): 25-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Robinson, W. S. (1950): Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. In: American Sociological Review 15(3): 351-357. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Roeder, Philip G. (2001): Ethnolinguistic fractionalization (ELF) indices, 1961 and 1985. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Rohrbach, Katharina/Rosar, Ulrich (2013): Merkel reloaded: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zur Relevanz von Geschlecht und physischer Attraktivität aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009. In: Koalitionen, Kandidaten, Kommunikation. Faas, Thorsten, Arzheimer, Kai, Roßteutscher, Sigrid und Weßels, Bernhard (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer: 79-103. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Rosema, Martin (2004): The sincere vote: A psychological study of voting. Faculteit der Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen en die der Geneeskunde. Leiden, Universiteit Leiden. Doctor of Philosophy. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Sartori, Giovanni (1968): Political development and political engineering. In: Public Policy. Montgomery, John D. und Hirschman, Albert O. (Hrsg.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 261-298. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Scheiner, Ethan (2008): Does electoral system reform work? Electoral system lessons from reforms of the 1990s. In: Annual Review of Political Science 11: 161-181. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Schmitt, Hermann (1998): Issue-Kompetenz oder Policy-Distanz? Zwei Modelle des Einflusses politischer Streitfragen auf das Wahlverhalten und die empirische Evidenz aus drei Nachwahlumfragen zur Bundestagswahl 1994. In: Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlaß der Bundestagswahl 1994. Kaase, Max und Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien: 145-172. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Schmitt, Hermann (2009): Multiple party identifications. In: The comparative study of electoral systems. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 137-157. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Scotto, Thomas J./LaFone, H. Frank (2006): A possible case of strategically targeted strategic voting? The 1990 Ontario election and its importance to the wider strategic voting literature. Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association. York University, Ontario. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Selb, Peter/Grofman, Bernard (2014): Wasted votes: A conceptual synthesis and generalization to the case of PR elections. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: https://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/b5e20845-7084-4643-ba93-18c87e2fe0a4.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Shachar, Ron (2003): Party loyalty as habit formation. In: Journal of Applied Economics 18(3): 251-269. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Sheppard, Jill (2015): Compulsory voting and political knowledge: Testing a ‘compelled engagement’ hypothesis. In: Electoral Studies 40: 300-307. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Shikano, Susumu/Herrmann, Michael/Thurner, Paul W. (2009): Strategic voting under proportional representation: Threshold insurance in German elections. In: West European Politics 32(3): 634-656. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Shugart, Matthew S./Carey, John M. (1992): Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Shugart, Matthew S./Valdini, Melody E./Suominen, Kati (2005): Looking for locals: Voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation. In: American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437-449. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Shugart, Matthew S./Wattenberg, Martin P. (2001): Mixed-member electoral systems: A definition and typology. In: Mixed-member electoral systems. The best of both worlds? Shugart, Matthew S. und Wattenberg, Martin P. (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 9-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Singer, Matthew M. (2013): Was Duverger correct? Single-member district election outcomes in fifty-three countries. In: British Journal of Political Science 43(1): 201-220. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Singer, Matthew M./Stephenson, Laura B. (2009a): The political context and Duverger's theory: Evidence at the district level. In: Electoral Studies 28(3): 480-491. Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Singer, Matthew M./Stephenson, Laura B. (2009b): Web appendix A for “The political context and Duverger's theory: Evidence at the district level”. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379409000651. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Singh, Shane P. (2010): Contextual influences on the decision calculus: A cross-national examination of proximity voting. In: Electoral Studies 29(3): 425-434. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Smets, Kaat/van Ham, Carolien (2013): The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. In: Electoral Studies 32(2): 344-359. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Sønderholm, Jørn D. (2016): Is the publication of exit poll results morally permissible? In: Public Affairs Quarterly 30(1): 53-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Stoll, Heather (2008a): Social cleavages and the number of parties: How the measures you choose affect the answers you get. In: Comparative Political Studies 41(11): 1439-1465. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Stoll, Heather (2008b): Supplemental materials for “Social cleavages and the number of parties: How the measures you choose affect the answers you get”. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://hstoll.faculty.polsci.ucsb.edu/research/stoll2008_supp.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Stone, Walter J./Fulton, Sarah A./Maestas, Cherie D./Maisel, L. Sandy (2010): Incumbency reconsidered: Prospects, strategic retirement, and incumbent quality in US House elections. In: The Journal of Politics 72(1): 178-190. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Stötzer, Lukas/Zittlau, Steffen/Gschwend, Thomas/Witt, Tobias (2015): Leihstimmen im Bundestagswahljahr 2013. In: Politische Psychologie 1(1): 88-107. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Taagepera, Rein (1998): Effective magnitude and effective threshold. In: Electoral studies 17(4): 393-404. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Taagepera, Rein (1999): The number of parties as a function of heterogeneity and electoral system. In: Comparative Political Studies 32(5): 531-548. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Taagepera, Rein (2007): Predicting party sizes. The logic of simple electoral systems, Oxford University Press on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Taagepera, Rein/Shugart, Matthew S. (1989): Seats and votes. New Haven, Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Taagepera, Rein/Shugart, Matthew S. (1993): Predicting the number of parties: A quantitative model of Duverger's mechanical effect. In: American Political Science Review 87(2): 455-464. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Tavits, Margit (2005): The development of stable party support: Electoral dynamics in post-communist Europe. In: American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 283-298. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Tavits, Margit/Annus, Taavi (2006): Learning to make votes count: The role of democratic experience. In: Electoral Studies 25(1): 72-90. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Taylor, Michael/Herman, Valentine M. (1971): Party systems and government stability. In: The American Political Science Review 65(1): 28-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2003): CSES module 1 full release. [4.8.2003]. Google Scholar öffnen
  286. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2004): CSES Module 2: Macro report. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2007): CSES module 2 full release. [27.6.2007]. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2011): CSES Module 4: Theoretical statement, approved by a plenary session of CSES collaborators Mexico City, Mexico and the CSES module 4 planning committee. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2013): CSES module 3 full release. [27.3.2013]. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Tiemann, Guido (2013): Mehrheitswahl als Ausweg? Zur Debatte um die Reform des Österreichischen Wahlsystems. In: Austrian Journal of Political Science 42(1): 5-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Tiemann, Guido (2015): Local districts, national contexts, and the number of parties. In: West European Politics 38(1): 123-144. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Van der Straeten, Karine/Sauger, Nicolas/Laslier, Jean-François/Blais, André (2013): Sorting out mechanical and psychological effects in candidate elections: An appraisal with experimental data. In: British Journal of Political Science 43(4): 937-944. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Viñuela, Enrique G./Artés, Joaquín (2012): Strategic voting and effective representation thresholds: Evidence from three Spanish general elections. In: European Journal of Political Research 51(3): 289-315. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Viñuela, Enrique G./Artés, Joaquín/Jurado, Ignacio (2013): Strategic voting and non-voting in Spanish elections. In: Party Politics 21(5): 738-749. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Vowles, Jack (2002): Did the Polls influence the vote? A case study of the 1999 New Zealand general election. In: Political Science 54(1): 67-78. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Vraga, Emily K. (2015): How party affiliation conditions the experience of dissonance and explains polarization and selective exposure. In: Social Science Quarterly 96(2): 487-502. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Wagner, Aiko (2013): Die Mikrofundierung von Duvergers Gesetz. Strategisches Wahlverhalten als Wirkungsweise politischer Institutionen. Baden-Baden, Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Wagner, Aiko (2014a): Parteispezifisches Wählen bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. Tagung der DVPW-Arbeitskreise „Politik und Kommunikation“ und „Wahlen und politische Einstellungen“. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Wagner, Aiko (2014b): Party-specific vote functions. In: Voters on the move or on the run? Weßels, Bernhard, Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid und Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (Hrsg.). Oxford, Oxford University Press: 40-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Wagner, Markus (2012): When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance. In: European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 64-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Wei, Judy C. Y. (2017): The strategic coordination under quasi-SNTV: A case study of Hong Kong. In: Japanese Journal of Political Science 18(1): 155-175. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Weisberg, Herbert F./Miller, Arthur H. (1979): Evaluation of the feeling thermometer: a report to the national election study board based on data from the 1979 pilot survey. ANES Pilot Study Report. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: https://electionstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/nes002241.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Wilson, Carole J. (2008): Consideration sets and political choices: A heterogeneous model of vote choice and sub-national party strength. In: Political Behavior 30(2): 161-183. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Wilson, Timothy D./Nisbett, Richard E. (1978): The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations and behavior. In: Social Psychology 41(2): 118-131. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Zaller, John R. (1992): The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Zhirnov, Andrei (2016): Limited information and coordinated voting in multi-party elections under plurality rule: The role of campaigns. In: Electoral Studies 41: 190-201. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Ziegfeld, Adam (2014): Electoral rules and elite collusion: Achieving Duvergerian outcomes in India through pre-electoral alliances. Aufgerufen am 22.10.2019: http://www.adamziegfeld.com/uploads/1/6/9/1/16910526/electoral_rules_and_elite_collusion_feb_2014.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Parteienforschung & Wahlforschung", "Politische Psychologie", "Vergleichende Politikforschung & Länderstudien", "Politische Soziologie"
Cover des Buchs: Haltung zeigen – Demokratie stärken
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Wirtschafts- und unternehmensethische Perspektiven
Haltung zeigen – Demokratie stärken
Cover des Buchs: Judicial Diplomacy in African REC Courts
Monographie Vollzugriff
Navigating the Strategic Space in the East African Court of Justice
Judicial Diplomacy in African REC Courts
Cover des Buchs: Verschwörungsideologie und Demokratie
Monographie Vollzugriff
Strukturen, Ursachen, Effekte und Antworten
Verschwörungsideologie und Demokratie
Cover des Buchs: Die kommunale Gleichstellungsbeauftragte als Element der Gleichstellungspolitik
Monographie Vollzugriff
Die kommunale Gleichstellungsbeauftragte als Element der Gleichstellungspolitik
Cover des Buchs: The Diffusion of Morality Policies
Monographie Kein Zugriff
State-Level Comparative Analyses in the United States of America
The Diffusion of Morality Policies

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Willkommen auf Inlibra – Ihrer Plattform für digitale Fachinformationen

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI und über 100 weitere Verlage bündeln hier ihre Inhalte zu einer der größten Plattformen für digitale Fachinformationen.

Effizient recherchieren, langfristig zitieren, verlässlich nutzen – alles vereint an einem Ort.

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex