The Diffusion of Morality Policies
State-Level Comparative Analyses in the United States of America- Autor:innen:
- Reihe:
- Nomos Universitätsschriften - Politik, Band 201
- Verlag:
- 2021
Zusammenfassung
Diese Studie erforscht die Diffusion von „morality policies“ in den US-Bundesstaaten mittels u.a. statistischer Ereigniszeitanalyse und zeigt, dass das Ausmaß in dem Politikdiffusion stattfindet, in Abhängigkeit vom „morality policy“ Grad variiert. Die Bereitschaft, aus der zeitlich vorhergehenden Verabschiedung von Moralpolitiken in anderen Bundesstaaten mit ähnlichen moralischen Werten zu lernen nimmt mit abnehmenden Moralpolitikcharakteristiken zu. Als Folge davon steigt die Stärke des Diffusionseffektes auf die Politikverabschiedungswahrscheinlichkeit mit abnehmenden Moralpolitikcharakteristiken. Bei weniger hervorstechenden, technisch komplexeren Moralpolitiken wird auch Information von ideologisch unähnlichen Staaten herangezogen.
Schlagworte
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Copyrightjahr
- 2021
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-8420-2
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-2796-9
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Reihe
- Nomos Universitätsschriften - Politik
- Band
- 201
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Seiten
- 206
- Produkttyp
- Monographie
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 18
- Abstract Kein Zugriff Seiten 19 - 20
- 1.1. Contribution and Research Questions Kein Zugriff
- 1.2. Structure of the Dissertation Kein Zugriff
- 1.3. Findings Kein Zugriff
- Conflict over Belief Systems Kein Zugriff
- Intractability Kein Zugriff
- Simplicity and Salience Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.1 Political Representation Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.2 Morality Policy Kein Zugriff
- 2.2.3 Morality Policy Types Kein Zugriff
- 2.3.1 Policy Diffusion Mechanisms Kein Zugriff
- 2.3.2 Subnational Policy Diffusion in the USA Kein Zugriff
- 2.3.3 Morality Policy Diffusion Kein Zugriff
- 2.4 Policy Attributes Kein Zugriff
- 3.1.1 Morality Policy Learning Kein Zugriff
- 3.1.2 Morality-Policy Uncertainty Kein Zugriff
- 3.2 Morality Policy Diffusion Theory and Hypotheses Kein Zugriff
- 3.3 Comparative Morality Diffusion Theory and Expectations Kein Zugriff
- 3.4 Domestic Factors Kein Zugriff
- 4.1.1 Morality Continuum Kein Zugriff
- 4.1.2 Same-Sex Marriage (SSM) Bans Kein Zugriff
- 4.1.3 Medical Marijuana Laws (MML) Kein Zugriff
- 4.1.4 Anti-Obesity (AO) Laws Kein Zugriff
- 4.2.1 General Diffusion Kein Zugriff
- 4.2.2 Specific Diffusion Kein Zugriff
- 4.2.3 Domestic Factors Kein Zugriff
- Discrete-time Specification Kein Zugriff
- 4.4 Cross-Case comparison Kein Zugriff
- 4.5.1 Multicollinearity Kein Zugriff
- 4.5.2 Duration Dependency/Time Specification in EHA Models Kein Zugriff
- 4.5.3 Model Selection Kein Zugriff
- 5.1.1 Dependent Variable Kein Zugriff
- 5.1.2 Descriptive Statistics Kein Zugriff
- 5.1.3 Model Selection Kein Zugriff
- 5.1.4.1 Reduced Models Kein Zugriff
- 5.1.4.2 Final Model Kein Zugriff
- 5.1.5 Discussion Kein Zugriff
- 5.2.1 Dependent Variable Kein Zugriff
- 5.2.2 Descriptive Statistics Kein Zugriff
- 5.2.3 Model Selection Kein Zugriff
- 5.2.4.1 Reduced Models Kein Zugriff
- 5.2.4.2 Final Model Kein Zugriff
- 5.2.5 Discussion Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.1 Dependent Variable Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.2 Descriptive Statistics Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.3 Model Selection Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.4.1 Reduced Models by Component Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.4.2 Reduced Pooled Models Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.4.3 Final Models by Component Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.4.4 Final Pooled Models Kein Zugriff
- 5.3.5 Discussion Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.1 Internal Determinants Results Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.2 Diffusion Results Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.3.1 Internal Determinants Kein Zugriff
- 5.4.3.2 Diffusion Kein Zugriff
- 6.1 Limitations and Avenues for further Research Kein Zugriff
- 6.2 Generalizability Kein Zugriff
- Appendix Kein Zugriff Seiten 157 - 194
- References Kein Zugriff Seiten 195 - 206
Literaturverzeichnis (192 Einträge)
Es wurden keine Treffer gefunden. Versuchen Sie einen anderen Begriff.
- Agresti, Alan. 1990. Categorical data analysis. Google Scholar öffnen
- Aldrich, J., and D. Rhode. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Congress reconsidered. 7th ed., eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Allison, Paul D. 1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological Methods & Research 28 (2): 186–208. Google Scholar öffnen
- Allison, Paul D. 2014. Event history and survival analysis [en]. Los Angeles: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
- Barclay, Scott, and Shauna Fisher. 2003. “The States and the Differing Impetus for Divergent Paths on Same-Sex Marriage, 1990-2001.” Policy Studies Journal 31 (3): 331–52. Google Scholar öffnen
- Beer, Caroline and Cruz-Aceves, Victor. 2018 “Extending Rights to Marginalized Minorities: Same-Sex Relationship Recognition in Mexico and the United States”, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 18(1), pp. 3–26. doi: 10.1177/1532440017751421. Google Scholar öffnen
- Berry, Frances S., and William D. Berry. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Berry, Frances S., and William D. Berry. eds. 2007. Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research [en]. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Berry, Frances S., and William D. Berry. 2014. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” [en]. In Theories of the Policy Process [en]. 3rd ed., eds. Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible. New York: Westview Press, 307–59. Google Scholar öffnen
- Berry, W. D., R. C. Fording, E. J. Ringquist, R. L. Hanson, and C. E. Klarner. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10 (2): 117–35. Google Scholar öffnen
- Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bewley-Taylor, David R. 2009. “The American Crusade: The Internationalization of Drug Prohibition.” Addiction Research & Theory 11 (2): 71–81. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boehmer, Tegan K., Douglas A. Luke, Debra L. Haire-Joshu, Hannalori S. Bates, and Ross C. Brownson. 2008. “Preventing childhood obesity through state policy. Predictors of bill enactment.” [eng]. American journal of preventive medicine 34 (4): 333–40. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boehmke, F. J. 2009. “Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies with Multiple Components.” [en]. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9 (2): 229–52. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boehmke, F. J., and R. P. Branton. 2014. “Sub-National Politics: A Methodological Perspective.” In The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, ed. Donald P. Haider-Markel. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy diffusion dynamics in America [en]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boushey, Graeme. 2012. “Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and the Diffusion of Innovations.” Policy Studies Journal 40 (1): 127–46. Google Scholar öffnen
- Boushey, Graeme. 2016. “Targeted for Diffusion?: How the Use and Acceptance of Stereotypes Shape the Diffusion of Criminal Justice Policy Innovations in the American States.” American Political Science Review 110 (01): 198–214. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bowen Jr., William R. 2005. “Policy Innovation and Health Insurance Reform in the American States: An Event History Analysis of State Medical Savings Account Adoptions (1993-1996).” [en]. Doctoral Dissertation. Florida State University. Google Scholar öffnen
- Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists [da]. Analytical methods for social research. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Bradford, Ashley C., and David W. Bradford. 2016. “Factors driving the diffusion of medical marijuana legalisation in the United States.” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 24 (1): 75–84. Google Scholar öffnen
- Buckley, Jack, and Chad Westerland. 2004. “Duration Dependence, Functional Form, and Corrected Standard Errors: Improving EHA Models of State Policy Diffusion.” [en]. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (1): 94–113. Google Scholar öffnen
- Buis, Maarten. 2017. “Logistic regression: When can we do what we think we can do?” http://maartenbuis.nl/wp/oddsratio.html. Google Scholar öffnen
- Butz, Adam M., Michael P. Fix, and Joshua L. Mitchell. 2015. “Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Stand-Your-Ground Laws.” Politics & Policy 43 (3): 347–77. Google Scholar öffnen
- Carley, Sanya, Sean Nicholson-Crotty, and Chris J. Miller. 2017. “Adoption, reinvention and amendment of renewable portfolio standards in the American states.” Journal of Public Policy 37 (04): 431–58. Google Scholar öffnen
- Carter, David B., and Curtis S. Signorino. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis 18 (03): 271–92. Google Scholar öffnen
- Cawley, John, and Feng Liu. 2008. “Correlates of state legislative action to prevent childhood obesity.” [eng]. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 16 (1): 162–67. Google Scholar öffnen
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “BRFSS Prevalence & Trends Data.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/ (2015). Google Scholar öffnen
- Chamberlain, Robert, and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2005. ““Lien On Me”: State Policy Innovation in Response to Paper Terrorism.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (3): 449–60. Google Scholar öffnen
- Chen, X., P. Ender, M. Mitchell, and C. Wells. 2003 “Stata FAQ.” http://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/faq/how-can-i-perform-the-likelihood-ratio-wald-and-lagrange-multiplier-score-test-in-stata/ (March 8, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
- Cleves, Mario A. 2010. An introduction to survival analysis using Stata [en]. 3rd ed. College Station Tex.: Stata Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Crawford, Seth S. 2013. “The political economy of medical marijuana.” [en]. PhD dissertation. University of Oregon. Google Scholar öffnen
- Cruz-Aceves,Victor and Mallinson, Daniel J. 2019. “Clarifying the Measurement of Relative Ideology in Policy Diffusion Research”. State and Local Government Review. 51(3):179-186. doi:10.1177/0160323X20902818 Google Scholar öffnen
- Dennis, Christopher, and Marshall H. Medoff. 2011. “Public Preferences, Political Party Control, and Restrictive State Abortion Laws.” The American Review of Politics 30: 307–31. Google Scholar öffnen
- Doan, A. E., and D. R. McFarlane. 2012. “Saying No to Abstinence-Only Education: An Analysis of State Decision-Making.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42 (4): 613–35. Google Scholar öffnen
- Doan, Alesha E. 2014. “Morality Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, ed. Donald P. Haider-Markel. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dodson, Elizabeth A., Chris Fleming, Tegan K. Boehmer, Debra Haire-Joshu, Douglas A. Luke, and Ross C. Brownson. 2009. “Preventing childhood obesity through state policy: qualitative assessment of enablers and barriers.” [eng]. Journal of public health policy 30 Suppl 1: S161-76. Google Scholar öffnen
- Doyle, W. R. 2006. “Adoption of Merit-Based Student Grant Programs: An Event History Analysis.” [en]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 28 (3): 259–85. Google Scholar öffnen
- Dutton, Sarah, Jennifer de Pinto, Anthony Salvanto, and Fred Backus. 2014. “Majority of Americans now support legal pot, poll says.” CBS News Poll Report. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/majority-of-americans-now-support-legal-pot-poll-says/. Google Scholar öffnen
- Eaton, Lisa J. 2013. “Policy Adoption By State Governments: An Event History Analysis Of Factors Influencing States To Enact Inpatient Health Care Transparency Laws.” Google Scholar öffnen
- Ekins, Emily, and Jonathan Haidt 2016. “Donald Trump supporters think about morality differently than other voters. Here’s how.” Vox Media. https://www.vox.com/2016/2/5/10918164/donald-trump-morality (Accessed March 5, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
- Elazar, Daniel J. 1994. The American mosaic: The impact of space, time, and culture on American politics / Daniel J. Elazar. Boulder, Colo, Oxford: Westview. Google Scholar öffnen
- Engeli, Isabelle, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, and Lars T. Larsen, eds. 2012. Morality politics in Western Europe: Parties, agendas and policy choices. Comparative studies of political agendas series. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
- Fernandez, J. J., and M. Lutter. 2013. “Supranational cultural norms, domestic value orientations and the diffusion of same-sex union rights in Europe, 1988-2009.” International Sociology 28 (1): 102–20. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ferraiolo, Kathleen. 2004. “Popular ‘Medicine’: Policymaking by Direct Democracy and the Medical Marijuana Movement of the 1990s.” [en]. PhD. University of Virginia. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ferraiolo, Kathleen. 2007. “From Killer Weed to Popular Medicine: The Evolution of American Drug Control Policy, 1937-2000.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ferraiolo, Kathleen. 2009. “Marketing a Policy Idea: Elite Frame Selection and Development in Ballot Initiative Campaigns.” [en]. Politics & Policy 37 (2): 337–68. Google Scholar öffnen
- Ferraiolo, Kathleen. 2014. “Morality Framing in U.S. Drug Control Policy: An Example From Marijuana Decriminalization.” [en]. World Medical & Health Policy 6 (4): 347–74. Google Scholar öffnen
- Foster, John L. 1978. “Regionalism and Innovation in the American States.” The Journal of Politics 40 (1): 179–87. Google Scholar öffnen
- Frum, D. 2012. “Bloomberg's visionary move against obesity.” CNN. Google Scholar öffnen
- Füglister, K., F. Gilardi, and S. Luyet. 2009. Learning From Others The Diffusion of Hospital Financing Reforms in OECD Countries. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gardner, James A., and Jim Rossi, eds. 2010. New Frontiers of State Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Garson, David. 2013. Parametric Survival Analysis (Event History Analysis). Google Scholar öffnen
- Gibson, M. T. 2004. “Culture Wars in State Education Policy: A Look at the Relative Treatment of Evolutionary Theory in State Science Standards*.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (5): 1129–49. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2004. “Delegation in the regulatory state. Origins and diffusion of independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe.” [eng]. PhD. University of Lausanne. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2015. Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Goldman, Gretchen, Christina Carlson, Deborah Bailin, Lindsey Fong, and Pallavi Phartiyal. 2014. “Appendix C: Lobbying and Political Contribution Analysis.” In Added Sugar, Subtracted Science: How Industry Obscures Science and Undermines Public Health Policy on Sugar. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” [en]. The American Political Science Review 67 (4): 1174–85. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gray, Virginia. 1994. “Competition, Emulation, and Policy Innovation.” In New perspectives on American politics, eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Calvin Jillson. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 2001. “The Institutionalization of State Communities of Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 265–84. Google Scholar öffnen
- Grossback, L. J. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” [en]. American Politics Research 32 (5): 521–45. Google Scholar öffnen
- Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2001a. “Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2001b. “Shopping for Favorable Venues in the States: Institutional Influences on Legislative Outcomes of Same-Sex Marriage Bills.” The American Review of Politics. Google Scholar öffnen
- Haider-Markel, Donald P, ed. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Matthew S. Kaufman. 2006. “Public Opinion and Policy Making in the Culture Wars: Is There a Connection Between Opinion and State Policy on Gay and Lesbian Issues?” [en]. In Public opinion in state politics [en], ed. Jeffrey E. Cohen. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 163–82. Google Scholar öffnen
- Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” [en]. Journal of Politics 58 (2): 332–49. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hannah, A. L., and Daniel J. Mallinson. 2017. “Defiant Innovation: The Adoption of Medical Marijuana Laws in the American States.” Policy Studies Journal 4 (3): 318. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hays, Scott P., and Henry R. Glick. 1997. “The Role of Agenda Setting in Policy Innovation.” American Politics Quarterly 25 (4): 497–516. Google Scholar öffnen
- Heidt-Forsythe, Erin. 2017. “Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states.” [eng]. AJOB empirical bioethics 8 (1): 58–67. Google Scholar öffnen
- Heidt-Forsythe, Erin A. 2013. “Reconveiving the State: Morals, Markets and State Regulation of Assisted reproductive Technologies.” [en]. PhD Dissertation. State University of New Jersey. Google Scholar öffnen
- Henderson, Carrie. 2014. “The Community College Baccalaureate Degree in the United States: An Event History Analysis.” [en]. PhD thesis. Florida State University. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hill, Kim Q., and Carl Klarner. 2002. “The Many Faces of Elite Power in the "System of 1896".” The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1115–36. Google Scholar öffnen
- Holbrook, Thomas M., and Emily van Dunk. 1993. “Electoral competition in the American states.” [en]. American Political Science Review 87 (4): 955. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hollander, Robyn, and Haig Patapan. 2016. “Morality Policy and Federalism: Innovation, Diffusion and Limits.” Publius 47 (1): 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen
- Hosmer, David W., Stanley Lemeshow, and Susanne May. 2008. Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time-to-event data [en]. 2nd ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar öffnen
- Imhof, Sara L. “Promoting a “Good Death”: Determinants of Pain Management Policies in the United States.” PhD. Google Scholar öffnen
- Imhof, Sara L., and Brian Kaskie. 2008. “Promoting a "good death": determinants of pain-management policies in the United States.” [eng]. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 33 (5): 907–41. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jacoby, William G., and Saundra K. Schneider. 2001. “Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis.” The Journal of Politics 63 (2): 544–68. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jensen, J. L. 2003. “Policy Diffusion through Institutional Legitimation: State Lotteries.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 521–41. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jones, B. S., and R. P. Branton. 2005. “Beyond Logit and Probit: Cox Duration Models of Single, Repeating, and Competing Events for State Policy Adoption.” [en]. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5 (4): 420–43. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jones, Dale E., Clifford G. Sherry Doty, James E. Horsch, Mac L. Richard Houseal, John P. Marcum, Kenneth M. Sanchagrin, and Richard H. Taylor. 2002. Religious congregations & membership in the United States 2000: An enumeration by region, state and county based on data reported for 149 religious bodies [en]. Nashville, Tenn.: Glenmary Research Center. Google Scholar öffnen
- Jordana, J., D. Levi-Faur, and i Marin, X. F. 2011. “The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies: Channels of Transfer and Stages of Diffusion.” [en]. Comparative Political Studies 44 (10): 1343–69. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kam, Cindy D. 2017. “Obesity.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (4): 973–95. Google Scholar öffnen
- Karch, A., and M. Cravens. 2014. “Rapid Diffusion and Policy Reform: The Adoption and Modification of Three Strikes Laws.” [en]. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 14 (4): 461–91. Google Scholar öffnen
- Karch, Andrew. 2007a. Democratic laboratories: Policy diffusion among the American states [en]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Karch, Andrew. 2007b. “Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research.” [en]. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (1): 54–80. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kim, Gook J. 2016. “Policy innovation and diffusion through policy typologies: Examining the predictors of medical marijuana legalization in states.” The Florida State University. Google Scholar öffnen
- King, David C., Richard J. Zeckhauser, and Mark T. Kim. 2004. “The Management Performance of the U.S. States.” SSRN Electronic Journal. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kingdon, John W. 2003. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies [en]. 2nd ed. Longman classics in political science. New York: Longman. Google Scholar öffnen
- Klawitter, Marieka, and Brian Hammer. 1999. “Spatial and Temporal Diffusion ofLocal Antidiscrimination Policies for Sexual Orientation.” In Gays and lesbians in the democratic process: Public policy, public opinion, and political representation / edited by Ellen D.B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock. Power, conflict, and democracy, eds. Ellen D. B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock. New York: Columbia University Press, 22–38. Google Scholar öffnen
- Knill, Christoph. 2013. “The study of morality policy: analytical implications from a public policy perspective.” [en]. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (3): 309–17. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kreitzer, Rebecca. 2015a. “Policy making at the margins: the modern politics of abortion.” PhD. University of Iowa. Google Scholar öffnen
- Kreitzer, Rebecca. 2015b. “Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy.” [en]. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (Accessed December 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
- Lacy, T. A., and David A. Tandberg. 2014. “Rethinking Policy Diffusion: The Interstate Spread of “Finance Innovations”.” Research in Higher Education 55 (7): 627–49. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lankford, Tina, Dominique Hardman, Chris Dankmeyer, and Tom Schmid. 2013. “Analysis of state obesity legislation from 2001 to 2010.” [eng]. Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP 19 (3 Suppl 1): 8. Google Scholar öffnen
- Larsen, Lars T. 2010. “Sinners in the Laboratory. Morality Issues from the Politics of Sin to Biomedical Regulation.” [eng]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1996. “The Politics of Morality Policy: An Event History Analysis of U.S. States Death Penalty Policy Adoption.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Leiser, S. 2015. “The Diffusion of State Tax Incentives for Business.” Public Finance Review. Google Scholar öffnen
- Leiser, Stephanie. 2014. “Essays on State Business Tax Incentives and Policy Diffusion.” PhD. University of Washington. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lewis, Daniel C. 2011. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the U.S. States*.” [en]. Social Science Quarterly 92 (2): 364–83. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lewis, G. B., and S. S. Oh. 2008. “Public Opinion and State Action on Same-Sex Marriage.” [en]. State and Local Government Review 40 (1): 42–53. Google Scholar öffnen
- Li, Amy Y. 2017. “Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0.” Research in Higher Education 58 (7): 746–71. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lindaman, K., and D. P. Haider-Markel. 2002. “Issue Evolution, Political Parties, and the Culture Wars.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (1): 91–110. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, John Cluverius, and Jeffrey J. Harden. 2013. “Explaining the Anomalous Growth of Public Sector Lobbying in the American States, 1997–2007.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43 (4): 580–99. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lowi, T. J. 1988. “Foreword: New dimensions in policy and politics.” [en]. In Social regulatory policy: Moral controversies in American politics [en], eds. Raymond Tatalovich and Byron W. Daynes. Boulder: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory.” World Politics 16 (04): 677–715. Google Scholar öffnen
- Lutz, James M. 1987. “Regional Leadership Patterns In The Diffusion Of Public Policies.” American Politics Quarterly 15 (3): 387–98. Google Scholar öffnen
- Maggetti, Martino, and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2015. “Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms.” [en]. Journal of Public Policy: 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen
- Makse, Todd, and Craig Volden. 2011. “The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 108–24. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mallinson, Daniel J. 2016. “Building a Better Speed Trap: Measuring Policy Adoption Speed in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (1): 98–120. Google Scholar öffnen
- Marijuana Policy Project. 2013. “State-By-State Medical Marijuana Laws: How to Remove the Threat of Arrest 2013.” [en]. Marijuana Policy Project. http://www.mpp.org/assets/pdfs/library/State-by-State-Laws-Report-2013.pdf (February 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
- Marlow, Michael L. 2013. “Determinants of state laws addressing obesity.” [en]. Applied Economics Letters 21 (2): 84–89. Google Scholar öffnen
- Martin, Christian W. 2010. “Interdependence and Political Ideology: The Conditional Diffusion of Cigarette Taxation in U.S. States.” World Political Science 6 (1). Google Scholar öffnen
- Martin, Christian W., Federica Genovese, and Florian Kern. 2017. “Policy Alteration: Rethinking Diffusion Processes when Policies have Alternatives.” International Studies Quarterly. Google Scholar öffnen
- McNeal, R. S., C. J. Tolbert, K. Mossberger, and L. J. Dotterweich. 2003. “Innovating in Digital Government in the American States.” [en]. Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) 84 (1): 52–70. Google Scholar öffnen
- Medoff, Marshall H., Christopher Dennis, and Kerri Stephens. 2011. “The Impact of Party Control on the Diffusion of Parental Involvement Laws in the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (3): 325–47. Google Scholar öffnen
- Meier, Kenneth J. 1992. “The Politics of Drug Abuse: Laws, Implementation, and Consequences.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. “The Politics of Funding Abortion: State Responses to the Political Environment.” [en]. American Politics Quarterly 21 (1): 81. Google Scholar öffnen
- Meier, Kenneth J. 1994. “The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol, And Public Policy.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Meier, Kenneth J. 1999. “Drugs, Sex, Rock, and Roll: A Theory of Morality Politics.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 681–95. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mendes, Elizabeth. 2010. New High of 46% of Americans Support Legalizing Marijuana [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Meseguer, C. 2006. “Rational Learning and Bounded Learning in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” [en]. Rationality and Society 18 (1): 35–66. Google Scholar öffnen
- Miller, C. R., and B. Richard. 2010. “The Policy Diffusion of the State R&D Investment Tax Credit.” State and Local Government Review 42 (1): 22–35. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mintrom, Michael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” [en]. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 738–70. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mitchell, Joshua L., and Elizabeth Petray. 2016. “The march toward marriage equality: Reexamining the diffusion of same-sex marriage among states.” Public Policy and Administration 31 (4): 283–302. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mohr, Lawrence B. 1969. “Determinants of innovation in organizations.” [af]. The American Political Science Review Vol. 63: 111–26. Google Scholar öffnen
- Monogan, Jamie. 2012. The Fifty American States in Space and Time: Applying Conditionally Autoregressive Models to State Politics [en]. University of Georgia (Accessed February 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
- Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It.” European Sociological Review 26 (1): 67–82. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z. 1999. “The Politics of Morality Policy: Symposium Editor's Introduction.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 675–80. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001a. “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.” [en]. Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 103–24. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z. ed. 2001b. The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy [en]. New York: Chatham House. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1995. “Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1999a. “Morality Policy Reinvention: State Death Penalties.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566 (1): 80–92. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1999b. “The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states.” [English]. Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 766–80. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee.2000. “The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956–82.” [en]. The Journal of Politics 62 (01). Google Scholar öffnen
- Mooney, Christopher Z., and Richard G. Schuldt. 2008. “Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption.” [en]. Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 199–218. Google Scholar öffnen
- Mossberger, Karen. 2000. The politics of ideas and the spread of enterprise zones [en]. American governance and public policy series. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Musto, David F. 1987. The American disease: Origins of narcotic control [en]. Oxford paperbacks. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nelson, Bakeyah S. 2007. “Innovation Diffusion: An Event History Analysis Of States’ Adoption Of The 1915(C) Waiver For People Living With HIV/AIDS.” [en]. PhD. University of Maryland. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nice, David C. 1994. Policy innovation in state government [en]. 1st ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2009. “The Politics of Diffusion: Public Policy in the American States.” [en]. The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 192–205. Google Scholar öffnen
- Oliver, J. E., and Taeku Lee. 2005. “Public Opinion and the Politics of Obesity in America.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law 30 (5): 923–54. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pacheco, Julianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (4): 415–39. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pacheco, Julianna. 2012. “The Social Contagion Model: Exploring the Role of Public Opinion on the Diffusion of Antismoking Legislation across the American States.” The Journal of Politics 74 (1): 187–202. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pacheco, Julianna, and Graeme Boushey. 2014. “Public health and agenda setting: Determinants of state attention to tobacco and vaccines.” [eng]. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39 (3): 565–89. Google Scholar öffnen
- Paynter, Sharon R. 2008. “Judicial Performance Evaluaion: Policy Diffusion Across the American States.” [en]. Doctoral. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pew Research Center. 2011. “Fewer Are Angry at Government, But Discontent Remains High: Republicans, Tea Party Supporters More Mellow.” Washington, D.C. http://www.people-press.org/2011/03/03/fewer-are-angry-at-government-but-discontent-remains-high/# (2016). Google Scholar öffnen
- Philander, Kahlil S., and B. L. Abarbanel. 2014. “Determinants of internet poker adoption.” [eng]. Journal of gambling studies 30 (3): 609–23. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pierce, Patrick A. 2009. The Comparative Politics of Policy Diffusion Across the States [en]. Prepared for presentation at the annual meetings of the Western Political Science Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 19 – 21, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pierce, Patrick A., and Donald E. Miller. 2000. Variations in the Diffusion of State Lottery Adoptions: How Revenue Dedication Changes Morality Politics [en]. Vol. 1226 of ICPSR. Ann Arbor, Mich: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Pierce, Patrick A., and Donald E. Miller. 2004. Gambling politics: State government and the business of betting [en]. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
- Raftery, A. E. 1996. “Hypothesis testing and model selection.” [ca]. In Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice [af]. Interdisciplinary statistics, eds. W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson and D. J. Spiegelhalter. London: Chapman & Hall, 163–89. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rodriguez, Gail M. 2010. “Weighted Policymaking: The Federal, State and Individual Politics of Obesity.” [en]. PhD. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rogers, Everett M. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; London : Collier Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
- Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations [af]. 5th ed. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Roh, J., and F. S. Berry. 2008. “Modeling the Outcomes of State Abortion Funding Referenda: Morality or Redistributive Policy, or Both?” [en]. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8 (1): 66–87. Google Scholar öffnen
- Roh, Jongho, and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2003. “All Politics is Not Local: National Forces in State Abortion Initiatives.” [en]. Social Science Quarterly 84 (1): 15–31. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sabatier, Paul A., ed. 2007. Theories of the Policy Process [en]. 2nd ed. Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Schlager, Edella. 2007. “A Comparison of Frameworks,Theories, and Models of Policy Processes.” [en]. In Theories of the Policy Process [en]. 2nd ed., ed. Paul A. Sabatier. Westview Press, 293–319. Google Scholar öffnen
- Seljan, E. C., and N. Weller. 2011. “Diffusion in Direct Democracy: The Effect of Political Information on Proposals for Tax and Expenditure Limits in the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (3): 348–68. Google Scholar öffnen
- Smith, Kevin B. 2002. “Typologies, Taxonomies, and the Benefits of Policy Classification.” Policy Studies Journal 30 (3): 379–95. Google Scholar öffnen
- Smith, Daniel A., and Dustin Fridkin. 2008. “Delegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States.” American Political Science Review 102 (03): 333–50. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sponsler, Brian A. 2010. “Coveting more than thy neighbor: Beyond geographically proximate explanations of postsecondary policy diffusion.” [en]. Higher Education in Review. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sponsler, Brian A. 2011. “State Adoption of Undocumented Student Tuition Policy: An Event History Analysis.” [en]. PhD. The George Washington University. Google Scholar öffnen
- Stoutenborough, James W. 2010. “State and Federal Renewable Energy Policy: Understanding Influences and Impacts.” [en]. Phd dissertation. University of Kansas. Google Scholar öffnen
- Stoutenborough, James W., and Matthew Beverlin. 2008. “Encouraging Pollution-Free Energy: The Diffusion of State Net Metering Policies *.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (5): 1230–51. Google Scholar öffnen
- Stream, Christopher. 1999. “Health Reform in the States: A Model of State Small Group Health Insurance Market Reforms.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (3): 499. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sylvester, Steven M. 2016. “Putting the Public into Public Health: Health Policy Related Opinion and Public Policy.” Phd. University of Kansas. Google Scholar öffnen
- Sylvester, Steven M., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2016. “Buzz Kill: State Adoption of DUI Interlock Laws, 2005-11.” Policy Studies Journal 44 (4): 491–509. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tatalovich, Raymond, and Byron W. Daynes, eds. 1988. Social regulatory policy: Moral controversies in American politics [en]. Boulder: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Tatalovich, Raymond, and Byron W. Daynes. 2011. Moral controversies in American politics [en]. 4th ed. Armonk NY: M.E. Sharpe. Google Scholar öffnen
- Taylor, J. K. 2007. “The Adoption of Gender Identity Inclusive Legislation in the American States.” PhD. Google Scholar öffnen
- Taylor, J. K., D. C. Lewis, M. L. Jacobsmeier, and B. DiSarro. 2012. “Content and Complexity in Policy Reinvention and Diffusion: Gay and Transgender-Inclusive Laws against Discrimination.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (1): 75–98. Google Scholar öffnen
- U.S. Census Bureau. “Census Divisions and Census Regions.” https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_census_divreg.html (March 6, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
- United States Census Bureau. Various years. “Intercensal Estimates of the Resident Population by Race for States and the United States.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- United States Census Bureau. Various Years. “Statistical Abstract of the United States.” [en]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Google Scholar öffnen
- Walker, Jack L. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states [en]. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Public Policy Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weesie, Jeroen. 1999. “Seemingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator.” Stata Technical Bulletin 52: 34–47. Google Scholar öffnen
- Welch, Philip J., Joseph A. Dake, James H. Price, Amy J. Thompson, and Sunday E. Ubokudom. 2012. “State legislators' support for evidence-based obesity reduction policies.” [eng]. Preventive medicine 55 (5): 427–29. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wellever, Anthony L., Amanda Reichard, and Marc Velasco. 2004. Obesity and public policy: Legislation passed by states, 1999 to 2003: Interim Report to the Sunflower Foundation on Project 02-103-20 KHI/R 04-2 [en]. Topeka, Kan. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weyland, Kurt. 2005a. “The Diffusion of Innovations: How Cognitive Heuristics Shaped Bolivia's Pension Reform.” [en]. Comparative Politics 38 (1): 21–42. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weyland, Kurt. 2005b. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” [en]. World Politics 57 (2): 262–95. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weyland, Kurt. 2009. “The Diffusion of Revolution: ‘1848’ in Europe and Latin America.” [en]. International Organization 63 (03): 391. Google Scholar öffnen
- Weyland, Kurt G. 2006. Bounded rationality and policy diffusion: Social sector reform in Latin America [en]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
- Williams, R. L. 2000. “A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.” [en]. Biometrics. Google Scholar öffnen
- Witte, Tracie. 2013. “Battling Moralities: Competing For Medical Marijuana Legislation.” [da]. PhD dissertation. State University of New Jersey. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wong, Kenneth K., and Warren E. Langevin. 2007. “Policy Expansion of School Choice in the American States.” [en]. Peabody Journal of Education 82 (2-3): 440–72. Google Scholar öffnen
- Wong, Kenneth K., and Francis X. Shen. 2002. “Politics of State-Led Reform in Education. Market Competition and Electoral Dynamics.” [en]. Google Scholar öffnen
- Yackee, Susan W. 2009. “Private Conflict and Policy Passage: Interest-Group Conflict and State Medical Malpractice Reform.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (2): 213–31. Google Scholar öffnen
- Zhu, Ling. 2009. “Beyond the Neighbor Effect: Policy Learning in Managing the Risk of Childhood Obesity in Schools.” In 104th Annual National Conference of the American Political Science Association Google Scholar öffnen





