Cover des Buchs: Finding a Cue through "Q"
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Teilzugriff

Finding a Cue through "Q"

Applying Q-Methodology to Compare German and U.S. Diplomats' Attitudes towards U.N. Security Council Reform
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4306-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7239-4
Verlag
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Wissenschaftl.Beitr.a.d.Tectum Verlag: Politikwissenschaft
Band
81
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
84
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Teilzugriff I - X Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff 1 - 4
      1. 2.1.1. The Federal Republic of Germany Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2. The United States of America Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1. The “Razali Reform Paper” Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2.2. The High-Level Panel Report Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.2.3. The Group of Four Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.2.4. The Group “Uniting for Consensus” Kein Zugriff
      5. 2.2.5. The African Union Kein Zugriff
      6. 2.2.6. The “Small Five” Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3. An Academic Approach: The “Schwartzberg Reform Proposal” Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4. Assessment of Main Initiatives Kein Zugriff
  4. 3. Methodology Kein Zugriff 33 - 38
    1. 4.1. Analysis of Interviews Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.2.1. Convinced Institutionalism (Factor A) Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2.2. Cautious Institutionalism (Factor B) Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.2.3. Diplomats’ Alignment to the two Discourses (Factor Loadings) Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3. Assessment of Typologies Kein Zugriff
  6. 5. Limitations Kein Zugriff 55 - 56
  7. 6. Conclusion Kein Zugriff 57 - 60
  8. References Kein Zugriff 61 - 68
  9. Appendix Kein Zugriff 69 - 82
  10. About the author Kein Zugriff 83 - 84

Literaturverzeichnis (115)

  1. References Google Scholar öffnen
  2. African Union. (2005). The Common African Position On The Proposed Reform Of The United Nations – “The Ezulwini Consensus”. (March 8th, 2005). http://www.un.org/en/africa/osaa/pdf/au/cap_screform_2005.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. African Union. (2005). Sirte Declaration On The Reform Of The United Nations. (July 5th, 2005). Assembly/AU/Decl. 2 (V). http://www.au.int/en/sites/default/files/decisions/9552-assembly_en_4_5_july_2005_auc_fifth_ordinary_session_decisions_declarations_and_resolution.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Alexopoulos, A. & Bourantonis, D. (2007). The Reform of the UN Security Council: A Veto-Player Analysis. Department of Political Science, University of Crete. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Alker, H. R., Jr. & Sylvan, D. (1986). Political Discourse Analysis. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Ariyoruk, A. (2005). Players and Proposals in the Security Council Debate. Global Policy Forum. https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/200/41204.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Asthana, A. & Grierson, J. (2016, May 10th). Afghanistan and Nigeria 'possibly most corrupt countries', Cameron lets slip. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/may/10/david-cameron-afghanistan-nigeria-possibly-most-corrupt-countries. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Auswärtiges Amt. (2014). Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den Vereinten Nationen und einzelnen, globalagierenden, internationalen Organisationen und Institutionen im Rahmen des VN-Systems in den Jahren 2012 und 2013. (September 3rd, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Auswärtiges Amt. (2016). Deutsche Kandidatur für den Sicherheitsrat 2019/2020. http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/nn_582140/sid_1D24DC9675AA84A941A88CC236A8F6FF/DE/Aussenpolitik/Friedenspolitik/VereinteNationen/07_Sicherheitsrat/Sicherheitsrat.html?nnm=582138. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Auswärtiges Amt. (2016). Reform des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen. http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Aussenpolitik/Friedenspolitik/VereinteNationen/5_Reformen/ReformSR_node.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Baas, L. R. (1997). The interpersonal sources of the development of political images: An intensive, longitudinal study. Operant Subjectivity, Vol. 20, pp. 117–142.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Bertrand, M. (1985). Some Reflections of Reform of the United Nations. United Nations Joint Inspection Unit. Geneva: United Nations. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Bosco, D. (2015). The United States Doesn't Want To Reform The UN Security Council. Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/09/29/the-united-states-doesnt-want-to-reform-the-u-n-security-council/. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society – A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press: New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bull, H. (1984). The Expansion of International Society. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bundesregierung. (2015). Joint Press Statement at the Meeting of Leaders of the G-4 countries- Brazil, Germany, India and Japan – on United Nations Security Council Reform. https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/EN/Pressemitteilungen/BPA/2015/2015-09-29-g4-sicherheitsrat_en.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Butler, R. (2012). Reform of the United Nations Security Council. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs. Vol. 1 (1), 23–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Buzan, B. (2014). An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge, Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Byung, S. L. & Wonhi, S. (2001). Investor response to online stock trading: A study using Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, Vol. 24, pp. 109–131. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Carlson, J. M. & Trichtinger, R. (2001). Perspectives on entertainment television's portrayal of a racial incident: An intensive analysis. Communication Review, Vol. 4, pp. 253–278.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter V, Article 24, Paragraph 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter V, Article 24, Paragraph 2. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter V, Article 25. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter VI. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter VII. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter VIII. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter VIII, Article 53. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter XII. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter XII, Article 77. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Charter of the United Nations. (1946). Chapter XVII, Article 107. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Chen, A. (1996). Student interest in activities in a second physical education curriculum: An analysis in student subjectivity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, Vol. 67, pp. 424–432. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Council on Foreign Relations. (2015). The Role of the General Assembly. http://www.cfr.org/international-organizations-and-alliances/role-un-general-assembly/p13490. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Das Bundesarchiv. Die Hallstein-Doktrin. (1955). https://www.bundesarchiv.de/oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/bilder_dokumente/01366/index-2.html.de. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen. (2016). 40 Years of German Membership in the United Nations. http://www.dgvn.de/germany-in-the-united-nations/40-years-of-german-membership-in-the-united-nations/.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Doyle, M. (1983). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Phylosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12 (3), pp. 205–235. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Doyle, M. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 80 (4), pp. 1151–1169. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Dryzek, J. S. & Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive Democratic Theory. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 87 (1), pp. 48–60. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Dryzek, J. S. & Braithwaite, V. (2000). On the prospects for democratic deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics. Political Psychology, Vol. 21, pp. 241–266. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Febbraro, A. R. (1995). On the epistemology, metatheory, and ideology of Q methodology: A critical analysis. In Ian Lubek, Rene Van Hezewijk, Gail Pheterson & Charles. W. Tolman, Trends and issues in theoretical psychology (pp.144–150). New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Fischer, J. (2004). Speech before the German Bundestag http://dip.bundestag.de/btp/15/15122.pdf. (September 8th, 2004).eng Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Gallivan, J. (1994). Subjectivity and the psychology of gender: Q as a feminist methodology. In Joanne Gallivan, Sharon D. Crozier & Vivian M. Lalande, Women, girls, and achievement (pp. 29–36). Toronto: Captus University Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Genscher, H. D. (1990). Speech by Foreign Minister Genscher at the 45th United Nations General Assembly in New York. Bulletin 115/1990: 1201–1206. (September 26th, 1990).eng Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Gowan, R. (2013). Germany and the Security Council: Neither too strong nor too weak. VereinteNationen: German Review on the United Nations, Vol. 61 (1), pp. 3–8.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change In World Politics. Cambridge University Press: UK.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Gilpin, R. (1987). Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Hellmann, G. & Roos, U. (2007). Das deutsche Streben nach einem ständigen Sitz im UN-Sicherheitsrat – Analyse eines Irrwegs und Skizzen eines Auswegs. Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden. Universität Duisburg-Essen. INEF-Report 92/2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Hosli, M. O.; Moody, R.; O'Donovan, B.; Kaniovski, S. & Little, A. C. H. (2011). Squaring the Circle? Collective and distributive effects of United Nations Security Council reform. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 6, pp. 163–187. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Intergovernmental Negotiations. Framework Document – As populated by states. (May 4th, 2015). http://centerforunreform.org/sites/default/files/050515_security-council-reform-framework-document.pdf#overlay-context=. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. (July, 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Ikenberry, J. (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Kant, I. (1795). Zum ewigen Frieden – Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Power and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Keohane, R. (1993). Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War. In "Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press: New York. NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Kogan, S. M.; Walters, L. H. & Daniels, T. (2002). Contextual assessment of couples therapy: the clinical discourse Q-set. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, Vol. 28 (4), pp. 409–422. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Lecouteur, A. & Delfabbro, P. H. (2001). Repertoires of teaching and learning: A comparison of university teachers and students using Q methodology. Higher Education, Vol. 42, pp. 205–235. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Lyman, P. N. (2000). Saving the UN Security Council – A Challenge for the United States. Max Planck Yearbook of the United Nations. Vol. 4, 127–146. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. McDonald, K.C. & Patrick, S. M. (2010). Security Council Enlargement and U.S. Interests. Council on Foreign Relations. Special Report No. 59. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Mearsheimer, J. (1983). Conventional Deterrence. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company: New York, NY.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Meisler, S. (1995). United Nations: The First Fifty Years. Atlantic Monthly Press. New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics Among Nations. Knopf: New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Mosyagina, N. I.; Kashin, A. B. & Peck, R. L. (1997). Emerging Russian consumerism. A Q-Methodology study of consumer attitudes after Perestroika. Congress Manuscipt. Presented at the "Annual Conference on the Scientific Study of Subjectivity". Syracuse, New York. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Müller, F. H. & Kals, E. (2004). Die Q-Methode. Ein innovatives Verfahren zur Erhebung subjektiver Einstellungen und Meinungen. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, Vol. 5 (2), Art. 34. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Plett, B. (2012). Small countries call for more transparency at the United Nations. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-18123768. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Pleuger, G. (2003). Die Reform des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen. In Sabine von Schorlemer. Praxishandbuch UNO – Die Vereinten Nationen im Lichte globaler Herausforderungen, Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Richard, R. (2000). A methodological approach to national identity in Europe. Politique Européenne, Vol. 1, pp. 84–107. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Schwartzberg, J. E. (2005). Getting it wrong on Security Council Reform. Institute for Global Policy, World Federalist Movement. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Schwartzberg, J. E. (2004). Revitalizing the United Nations – Reform through weighted voting. Institute for Global Policy, World Federalist Movement. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Schwartzberg, J. E. (2007). Small States and UN Reform. Institute for Global Policy, World Federalist Movement. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Schwartzberg, J. E. (2013). Transforming the United Nations System: Designs for a Workable World. United Nations University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. (2009). Intergovernmental Negotiations on the Reform of the Security Council, Debate on Working Methods, Informal Plenary. Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Seidel, G. (1985). Political Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis ed. Teun A. van Dijk. London: Academic. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Shepsle, K. A. (2005). “Rational Choice Institutionalism”. Harvard University. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Shilin, M.; Khaimina, O.; Kluikov, Y. & Lukyanov, S. (2000). Coping strategies: The white sea case (Northern Russia). http://www.uit.no/MostCCPP/Huhmari/joe_pap/JOE_Michael-S.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Singer, J. B. (1997). Chances and consistencies: Newspaper journalists contemplate an online uture. Newspaper Research Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 2–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Singer, J. B.; Craig, D.; Allen, C. W.; Whitehouese, V., Dimitrova, A. & Sanders, K. P. (1996). Attitudes of professors and students about new media technology. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, Vol. 51 (2), pp. 36–45. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Stephenson, W. (1935). Correlation persons instead of tests. Character and Personality, 4, 17–24. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. The Economist. (2016). Brazil's Fall. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21684779-disaster-looms-latin-americas-biggest-economy-brazils-fall. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Thomas, D. B. & Baas, L. R. (1996). The postelection campaign: Competing constructions of the Clinton victory in 1992. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 58, pp. 309–331. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. The White House. National Security Strategy. (May, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Ullmann, J. E. (1990). Who Won Cold War? Japanese and Germans. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/03/opinion/l-who-won-cold-war-japanese-and-germans-664690.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. UN Summit Agenda. (2000, September 7th). BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/904903.stm. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. United Nations. General Assembly Decision 62/557. Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. (September 15th, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  89. United Nations. General Assembly Draft Resolution A/59/L.64. Security Council Reform. (July 6th, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  90. United Nations. General Assembly Draft Resolution A/59/L.67. Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. (July 18h, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  91. United Nations. General Assembly Draft Resolution A/59/L.68. Reform of the Security Council. (July 21st, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  92. United Nations. General Assembly Draft Resolution A/60/L.49. Improving the working methods of the Security Council. (March 17th, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  93. United Nations. General Assembly Presidential Note A/59/565. Follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. (December 2nd, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  94. United Nations. General Assembly Resolution A/RES/47/62. Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council. (December 11th, 1992). Google Scholar öffnen
  95. United Nations. General Assembly Resolution A/RES/48/26. Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council. (December 3rd, 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  96. United Nations. High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. A more secure world: Our shared responsibility. (December 2nd, 2004). http://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pdf/historical/hlp_more_secure_world.pdf.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  97. United Nations. Secretariat Assessment ST/ADM/SER.B/932. Assessment of Member States’ advances to the Working Capital Fund for the biennium 2016–2017 and contributions to the United Nations regular budget for 2016. (December 28th, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  98. United Nations. Security Council Presidential Note S/2006/507. Note by the President of the Security Council. (July 19th, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  99. United Nations. Security Council Resolution S/RES/687. (April 8th, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
  100. United Nations. Security Council Resolution S/RES/688. (April 5th, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
  101. United Nations. United Nations Millennium Declaration A/55/L.2. (December 14th, 2000).eng Google Scholar öffnen
  102. United States Congress. 2005 United Nations Reform Act H.R.2745. (June 17th, 2005).eng Google Scholar öffnen
  103. United States Department of State. (1999). Reform of the UN System. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. United States Department of State. (2003). Reform of the UN System. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. United States Department of State. (2004). Reform of the UN System. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. United States Institute of Peace. (2006). American Interests and UN Reform – Report of the Task Force on the United Nations. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Uniting for Consensus Group. (2009). Security Council Reform. Global Policy Forum. https://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/UFC_2009_Proposal.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State, and War. Columbia University Press: New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Webler, T.; Danielson, S. & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. Social and Environmental Research Institute. Greenfield, MA. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Wight, M. (1977). Systems of States. Leicester University Press, UK. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Wight, M. (1996). International Theory: The three Traditions. Leicester University Press, UK. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Wight, M. (2002). Power Politics. Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Winter, E. (1996). Voting and Vetoing. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90 (4), pp. 813–823.eng Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Wirkola, E. R. H. (2010). Reform of the UN Security Council and Veto Player Theory. University of Oslo. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Internationale Beziehungen"
Cover des Buchs: Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Gert Krell, Peter Schlotter, Alexandra Homolar, Frank A. Stengel
Weltbilder und Weltordnung
Cover des Buchs: (Neu-)Ordnung
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Uwe Wagschal, Marius Fröhle
(Neu-)Ordnung
Cover des Buchs: The Multipolar Turn
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Carla Fetcas, Martin Kreutner
The Multipolar Turn
Cover des Buchs: European Union, How Comes?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hartmut Marhold
European Union, How Comes?
Cover des Buchs: Türkiye und Österreich im 21. Jahrhundert
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Mehmet Soytürk
Türkiye und Österreich im 21. Jahrhundert

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex