Cover des Buchs: Conventionality Control of Domestic Law
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Conventionality Control of Domestic Law

Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

Indem es Lehren aus der Doktrin der Verfassungsmäßigkeitskontrolle zieht, befasst sich das Buch hauptsächlich mit der Konventionalitätskontrolle durch gerichtliche Adjudikatoren. Diese Monographie schließt die Lücke im vergleichenden internationalen Menschenrechtsrecht, indem sie die Praxis der Konventionalitätskontrolle in Europa und Lateinamerika analysiert. Basierend auf den empirischen Daten stellt sich der Autor normativ ein „Trapez“-Modell der Konventionalitätskontrolle mit den Merkmalen Offenheit, Substantivismus und Humanzentrierung vor, das die Grenzen des geschlossenen, formalistischen und staatszentrierten „Pyramiden“-Modells überwindet. Der Autor Yota Negishi ist außerordentlicher Professor für Völkerrecht, Seinan-Gakuin-Universität, Fukuoka, Japan.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8562-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2983-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
Band
312
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
252
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 16 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. Systemic Human Rights Violations Caused by Unconventionality of Domestic Law
      2. B. Conventionality Control of Domestic Law
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. International and Constitutional Adjudications in Europe and Latin America
      2. B. Conventionality Control Parameters and Powers
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
          1. (i) Evolutionary Interpretation of Living Instruments
          2. (ii) Regional Consensus
          1. (i) Evolutionary Interpretation through Universal Standards
          2. (ii) Universal Consensus
          1. (i) Unification through Interpretative Rules
          2. (ii) Unification by Prioritising Most Favourable Standards
          1. (i) Diversification through Interpretative Rules
          2. (ii) Diversification by Prioritising Most Favourble Standards
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
          1. (i) Negative Subsidiarity for Allocating Powers to Domestic Courts
          2. (ii) Granting Margin of Appreciation to Domestic Courts
          1. (i) Positive Subsidiarity for Allocating Powers to Regional Courts
          2. (ii) Restricting Margin of Appreciation by Regional Courts
          1. (i) Prescribing Remedies for Systemic Violations
          2. (ii) Identifying Organs Responsible for Systemic Violations
          1. (i) Margin of Appreciation in Conventionality Control
          2. (ii) Deference to Domestic Margin of Appreciation
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
          1. (i) Incorporating Regional Conventions through National Constitutions
          2. (ii) Regional Courts Decisions in National Constitutions
          1. (i) Consubstantial Constitutional Contestations against Regional Conventions
          2. (ii) Sovereigntist Constitutional Contestations against Regional Conventions
          1. (i) Sword Function for Regional Conventions against National Constitutions
          2. (ii) Relativising Absolute Protections of Constitutional Rights by Regional Conventions
          1. (i) Shield Function for National Constitutions against Regional Conventions
          2. (ii) Relativising Absolute Protections of Conventional Rights by National Constitutions
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
          1. (i) Consistent Interpretation of Legislation with National Constitutions
          2. (ii) Disapplication of Legislation Inconsistent with Community Law
          1. (i) Individual Complaint Procedures
          2. (ii) Rules Prioritising Constitutional Procedures over Community Law Procedures
          1. (i) Disapplying Legislation Incompatible with Regional Conventions
          2. (ii) Interpreting Legislation in Consistency with Regional Conventions
          1. (i) Democracy: Balancing Individual Autonomy and Public Autonomy
          2. (ii) Legal Certainty: Balancing Predictability and Acceptability
    3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
        1. A. Pyramid Model: Closedness, Formalism and State-Centrism
        2. B. Reconciling Constitutionalism and Legal Pluralism Beyond the State
        1. A. Trapezium Model: Openness, Substantivism and Human-centrism
        2. B. Uni/Diversified Parameters and De/Centralised Powers of Conventionality Control
    1. Permanent Court of International Justice / International Court of Justice 209 - 209 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    2. Human Rights Committee 209 - 209 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. [Judgments, Decisions and Opinions of the European Court of Human Rights]
      2. [Others]
    4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. [Advisory Opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Series A)]
      2. [Judgements of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Series C)]
      3. [Others]
    5. Court of Justice of the European Union 219 - 219 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    6. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. [Argentine]
      2. [Austria]
      3. [Belgium]
      4. [Bolivia]
      5. [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
      6. [Brasil]
      7. [Chile]
      8. [Colombia]
      9. [Costa Rica]
      10. [Dominican Republic]
      11. [Ecudador]
      12. [El Salvador]
      13. [Germany]
      14. [France]
      15. [Honduras]
      16. [Hungary]
      17. [Italy]
      18. [Malawi]
      19. [Mexico]
      20. [Peru]
      21. [Poland]
      22. [Russia]
      23. [South Africa]
      24. [Spain]
      25. [The Netherlands]
      26. [The United Kingdom]
      27. [Uruguay]
      28. [Venezuela]
    7. Miscellaneous 224 - 224 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    8. Literature 225 - 252 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (390)

  1. Acosta-López, Juana I, ‘The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Colombian Peace: Redefining the Fight Against Impunity’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 178–182 Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Aguilar Cavallo, Gonzalo, ‘El control de convencionalidad; análisis en derecho comparado’ (2013) 9 Revista Direito GV 721–754 Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Akinkugbe, Olabisi, ‘Towards an Analysis of the Mega-Political Jurisprudence of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice’ in James Thuo Gathii (eds), The Performance of Africa's International Courts: Using Litigation for Political, Legal, and Social Change (Oxford University Press 2020) 149–177 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Alter, Karen J and Helfer, Laurence R, Transplanting International Courts: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (Oxford University Press 2017), 187; Salvatore Caserta, International Courts in Latin America and the Caribbean: Foundations and Authority (Oxford University Press 2020) 230–235 Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Alter, Karen J and Helfer, Laurence R (eds), Transplanting International Courts: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Alter, Karen J, Gathii, James T and Helfer, Laurence R, ‘Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa: Causes and Consequences’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 293–328 Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Alter, Karen J, Laurence R Helfer and Osvaldo Saldías, ‘Transplanting the European Court of Justice: The Experience of the Andean Tribunal of Justice’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 629–664 Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Alter, Karen, ‘The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Resolution, Constitutional and Administrative Review’ in Jeffrey L Dunoff and Mark A Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2012) 345–370 Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Amaya Villarreal, Álvaro Franciscco, ‘El principio pro homine: Interpretación extensiva vs. el consentimiento del Estado’ (2005) Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 337–380 Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Amos, Merris, ‘The Dialogue between United Kingdom Courts and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 61 Int’l & Comp. LQ 557. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik, ‘“Preventive Detention.” No. 2 BvR 2365/09’ (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law (2011) 768–774 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik, ‘National Implementation of ECHR Rights’, in Andreas Føllesdal, Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein (eds), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press 2013) 181–262 Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Antkowiak, Thomas M, ‘An Emerging Mandate for International Courts: Victim Centered Remedies and Restorative Justice’ (2011) 47 Stanford Journal of Internationall Law 270–332 Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Anzilotti, Dionisio, ‘La responsabilité internationale des États à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’ (1906) 13 Revue générale de droit international public 5–29 and 284–309 Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Anzilotti, Dionisio, Cours de droit international, Premier Volume: Introduction : Théorie génerales, traduit par Gilbert Gidel) (Sirey 1929) Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, ‘Disharmony in the Process of Harmonisation? – The Analytical Account of the Strasbourg Court’s Variable Geometry of Decision-Making Policy Based on the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’ in Mads Andenas and Camilla Baasch Andersen (eds), Theory and Practice of Harmonization (Edward Elgar 2011) 95–114 Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Arias López, Boris Wilson, ‘Entre la Constitución y los tratados de derechos humanos’ (2014) 38 Derecho y Cambio Social 1–13 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 819–843 Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan, ‘Introduction’ in Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek (eds), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Hart 2012) 1–15 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Ayala Corao, Carlos, Del diálogo jurisprudencial al Control de Convencionalidad (Editorial Jurídica Venezolana 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Baillet, C. M, ‘Measuring Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The Ongoing Challenge of Judicial Independence in Latin America’ (2013) 31 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31 (2013) 477–495, 478–480 Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Baillet, Cecilia M, ‘Measuring Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The Ongoing Challenge of Judicial Independence in Latin America’ (2013) 31 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 477–495 Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Barraud, Boris, Repensar la pyramide des normes à l’ère des réseaux : Pour une conception pragmatique du droit (L’Harmattan 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Barsotti, Vittoria, Paolo G Carozza, Marta Cartabia and Andrea Simoncini, Italian Constitutional Justice in Global Context (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Basch, Fernando, Filippini, Leonardo, Laya, Ana, Nino, Mariano, Rossi, Felicitas and Schreiber, Bárbara, ‘The Effectiveness of the Inter-American System of Human Rights Protection: A Quantitative Approach to Its Functioning and Compliance with Its Judgments’ (2010) 7 International Journal of Human Rights 9–35 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Bazán, Víctor, ‘La interacción del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos y el derech interno en Argentina’ (2007) 5 Estudios Constitucionales 137–183 Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’ (1999) 31 New York Journal of International Law and Policy 834–854 Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘Just Satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Maurizio Ragazzi (ed), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2005) 243–252 Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Besselink, Leonard F M, ‘The Proliferation of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Adjudication or How American Judicial Review Came to Europe After All’ (2013) 9 Utrecht Law Review 19–35 Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Besson, Samantha, ‘The Erga Omnes Effect of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: What’s in a Name?’ in Samantha Besson (ed), La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme après le Protocole 14: Premier bilan et perspectives (Schulthess 2011) 125–175 Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Besson, Samantha, ‘The Reception in Ireland and the United Kingdom’ in Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 31–106 Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Bessson, Samantha, ‘State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-making: Dissolving the Paradox’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 289–316 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bessson, Samantha, ‘The Authority of International Law: Lifting the State Veil’ (2009) 31 Sydney Law Review 343–380 Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Beyani, Chaloka, ‘Reconstituting the Universal: Human Rights as a Regional Idea’ in Conor Gearty and Costas Douzinas (eds), The Cambrdige Companion to Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2012) 173–190 Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Biaggini, Giovanni, ‘Switzerland’ in Dawn Oliver and Carlo Fusaro (eds), How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study (2011) 303–328 Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bianco, Giuseppe and Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘Dialogue or Disobedience? On the Domestic Effects of the ECHR in Light of the Kamberaj Decision’ (2014) 20 European Public Law 435–450 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Bickel, Alexander M, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, 2nd ed (Yale University Press 1986) Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Biondi dal Monte, Francesca and Fontanelli, Filippo, ‘The Decisions No. 348 and 349/2007 of the Italian Constitutional Court: The Efficacy of the European Convention in the Italian Legal System’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 889–932 Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Bjorge, Eirik, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford University Press 2014); Katharina Böth, Evolutive Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge: Eine Untersuchung zu Voraussetzungen und Grenzen in Anbetracht der Praxis internationaler Streitbeilegungsinstitutionen (Duncker & Humbolt 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Bodnar, Adam, ‘Res Interpretata: Legal Effect of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments for other States Than Those Which Were Party to the Proceedings’ in Yves Haeck and Eva Brems (eds), Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century (Springer 2014) 223–262 Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Bonelli, Matteo, ‘The Taricco Saga and the Consolidation of Judicial Dialogue in the European Union CJEU’ (2018) 25 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 357–373, 364–365. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bossuyt, Marc and Verrijdt, Willem, ‘The Full Effect of EU Law and of Constitutional Review in Belgium and France after the Melki Judgment’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 355–391, 366–375. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Boudouhi, El, ‘The National Judge as an Ordinary Judge of International Law? Invocability of Treaty Law in National Courts’ (2015) 28 Leiden Journal of International Law 283–301 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Brems, Eva, ‘Positive Subsidiarity and Its Implications for the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’ (2019) 37 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 210–227 Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Breuer, Marten, ‘Principled Resistance’ to ECtHR Judgments: An Appraisal’ in Marten Breuer (ed), Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments: A New Paradigm? (Springer 2019) 323–350 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Brewer-Carías, Allan R, Constitutional Protection of Human Rights in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Amparo Proceedings (Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Bricker, Kristin, ‘Military Justice and Impunity in Mexico's Drug War’ (2011) 3 CIGI Security Sector Reform Issue Paper 2–13 Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Broude, Tomer, ‘The Constitutional Function of Contemporary International Tribunals, or Kelsen’s Visions Vindicated’ (2012) 4 Göttingen Journal of International Law 519–549 Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, ‘Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies’ in Laurence Burgorgue-Larsen and Amaya Úbeda de Torres (eds), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011) 129–145 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, ‘Interpreting the European Convention: What Can the African Human Rights System Learn from the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Interpretation of the European Convention?’ (2012) 5 Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal 90–123 Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, ‘La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos como tribunal constitucional’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Héctor Fix-Flerro and Mariela Morales Antoniazzi (eds), Ius Constitutionale Commune en América Latina: Rasgos, Potencialidades y Desafios (Universidd Nacional Autótonoma de México 2014) 421–457 Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, ‘Nothing is Perfect : Libres propos sur la méthodologie interpretative de la Cour européenne’ in L’homme et le droit : En hommage au Professeur Jean-François Flauss (Pedone 2014) 129–143 Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Burke-White, William W, ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53–108 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Caballero Ochoa, José Luis, ‘La cláusula de interpretación conforme y el principio pro persona (artículo 1º., segundo párrafo, de la Constitucion)’ in Miguel Carbonell and Pedro Salazar (eds), La reforma constitucional de derechos humanos: un nuevo paradigma (Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2012) 103–133 Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Cabranes, José A, ‘Human Rights and Non-Intervention in the Inter-American System’ (1967) 65 Michigan Law Review 1147–1182 Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Caflisch, Lucius and Cançado Trindade, Antonio Augusto, ‘Les conventions américaine et européenne des Droits de l’Homme et le droit international général’ (2004) 108 Revue générale de droit international public 5–62 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Çalı, Başak, ‘From Flexible to Variable Standards of Judicial Review: The Responsible Domestic Courts Doctrine at the European Court of Human Rights’, in Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir and Antoine Buyse (eds), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU, and National Legal Orders (Routledge 2016) 144–161. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Çalı, Başak, The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Cançado Trindade, Antonio Augusto, International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (Brill 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Cançado Trindade, Antonio Augusto, Reflexiones sobre el Futuro del Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos, in Juan E Méndez and Francisco Cox (eds), El futuro del sistema interamericano de protección a los derechos humanos (IIDH 1998) 573–603 Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Candela Soriano, Mercedes, ‘The Reception Process in Spain and Italy’ in Keller and Stone Sweet Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 393–450 Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Cannizzaro, Enzom ‘Proportionality and Margin of Appreciation in the Whaling Case: Reconciling Antithetical Doctrines?’ (2017) 27 European Journal of International Law 1061–1069 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Cappelletti, Mauro, ‘Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective’ (1970) 58 California Law Review 1017–1053 Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Carcano, Andrea, ‘Uses and Possible Misuses of a Comparative International Law Approach’ (2018) 54 Questions of International Law 21–38 Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Carozza, Paolo G, ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’ (2003) American Journal of International Law 38–79 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Carozza, Paolo G, ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 38–79 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Casanovas y La Rosa, Oriol, Unity and Pluralism in Public International Law (Martinus Nijhoff The Hague 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Caserta, Salvatore, International Courts in Latin America and the Caribbean: Foundations and Authority (Oxford University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Cassel, Douglas, ‘The Expanding Scope and Impact of Reparations Awarded by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ in Koen De Feyter, Stephan Parmentier, Marc Bossuyt and Paul Lemmens (eds), Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations (Intersentia 2005) 191–223 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Cassese, Antonio, ‘Towards a Moderate Monism: Could International Eventually Acquire the Force to Invalidate Inconsistent National Law?’ in in Antonio Cassese (ed), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 187–199 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Castañeda, Mireya, El principio pro persona: experiencias y expectativas (Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos 2014)110–129 Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Cavallaro, James L and Brewer, Stephanie Erin, ‘Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 768–827 Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Cede, Philip, ‘Report on Austria and Germany’ in Giuseppe Martinico and Oreste Pollicino (eds), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective (Europa Law Publishing 2010) 55–80 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Cerna, Christina M, ‘The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights’ (2004) 16 Florida Journal of International Law 195–212, 201–203. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Chang, Wen-Chen and Yeh, Jiunn-Rong, ‘Internationalization of Constitutional Law’ in Michel Rosenfeld and A András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 1165–84 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Chowdhury, Nupur, European Regulation of Medical Device and Pharmaceutical: Regulatee Expectations of Legal Certainty (Springer 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Christiano, Thomas, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions’ in Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law 119–138 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Christoffersen, Jonas, ‘Individual and Constitutional Justice: Can the Power Balance of Adjudication be Reversed?’ in Jonas Christoffersen and Mikael Rask Madsen (eds), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press 2011) 181–203 Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Claes, Monica, The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution (Hart 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Claes, Monica, The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Clayton, Richard, ‘Should the English Courts under the HRA Mirror the Strasbourg Case Law?’, in Katja S Ziegler, Elizabeth Wicks and Loveday Hodson (eds), The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart 2015) 95–114, 105 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Cohen, Jean L, Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Colandrea, Valerio, ‘On the Power of the European Court of Human Rights to Order Specific Non-Monetary Measures: Some Remarks in Light of the Assanidze, Broniowski and Sejdovic Cases’ (2007) 7 Human Rights Law Review 396–411 Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Collings, Justin, ‘Introduction’ in Matthias Jestaedt, Oliver Lepsius, Christoph Schönberger, Christoph Möllers (eds), The German Federal Constitutional Court: The Court Without Limits (Oxford University Press 2020) xv–xvi Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Contesse, Jorge, ‘Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Inter-American Human Rights Law’ (2019) 44 North Carolina Journal of International Law 353–385. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Contreras, Pablo, ‘National Discretion and International Deference in the Restriction of Human Rights: A Comparison between the Jurisprudence of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 11 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 28–82 Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Corten, Olivier, ‘Les techniques reproduites aux aritlces 31 à 33 des conventions de Vienne : approche objectivistte ou approche volontariste de l’interprétation?’ (2011) 115 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 351–366 Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Cot, Jean-Pierre, ‘Margin of Appreciation’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press) updated in 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Cowell, Frederick, ‘The Death of the Southern African Development Community Tribunals Human Rights Jurisdiction’ (2013) 13 Human Rights Law Review 153–165 Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Crema, Luigi, ‘Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 681–700 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Cuenca Gómez, Patricia, ‘La incidncia del derecho interncional de los derechos humanos en el derecho interno: la interpretación del Artículo 10.2 de la Constitución española’ (2012) 12 Revista de Estudios Jurídicos 1–24 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Cuenca Gómez, Patricia, ‘La incidncia del derecho interncional de los derechos humanos en el derecho interno: la interpretación del Artículo 10.2 de la Constitución española’ (2012) 12 Revista de Estudios Jurídicos 1–24 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. D’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Comparativism and Colonizing Thinking in International Law’ (2019) 57 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 89–112 Google Scholar öffnen
  99. D’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  100. De Búrca, Gráinne, ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?’ (2013) 13 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 168–184 Google Scholar öffnen
  101. de Londras, Fiona and Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, Great Debates on the European Convention on Human Rights (Macmillan International Higher Education, 2018) 61–62. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. De S-O-l’E Lasser, Mitchel, Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  103. De Visser, Maartje, Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Hart 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  104. De Wet, Erika, ‘The Reception Process in the Netherlands and Belgium’ in Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 229–310 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. De Wet, Erika, ‘The Reception Process in the Netherlands and Belgium’ in Keller and Stone Sweet Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 229–310 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Del Mar, Maksymilian, ‘Legal Reasoning in Pluralist Jurisprudence: The Practice of The Relational Imagination’ in Nicole Roughan and Andrew Halpin (eds), In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017) 40–63 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Del Toro Huerta, Mauricio Iván, ‘La aperture constitucional al derecho internacional de los derechos humanos en la era de la Mundialización y sus consecuencias en la práctica judicial’ (2005)112 Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado 325–363 Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Le pluralisme ordnné : Les forces imaginantes du droit (tome 2) (Le Seuil 2006) 28 (Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (Hart 2009)) Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Dhommeaux, Jean, ‘Hiérarchie et conflits en droit international des droits de l’homme’ (2009) 4 Annuaire international des droits de l’homme 55–62 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Dickson, Brice, Human Rights and the United Kingdom Supreme Court (Oxford University Press 2013) 43 Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Dominigo, Rafael, The New Global Law (Cambridge University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Dougan, Michael, ‘The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remedies and Procedures for Enforcing Union Law before the National Courts’ in Paul Craig and Gráinne de Búrca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press 2015) 407–438 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Drzemczewski, Andrew, ‘The Parliamentary Assembly’s Involvement in the Supervision of the Judgments of the Strasbourg Court’ (2010) 28 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 164-178 Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Dulitzky, Ariel, ‘An Inter-American Constitutional Court? The Invention of the Conventionality Control by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2015) 50 Texas International Law Journal 45–93 Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Dionisio Anzilotti and the Law of International Law’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 139–148 Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’ in Enzo Cannnizzaro (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) 123–137 Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Enabulele, Amos O, ‘Incompatibility of National Law with the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Does the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights Have the Final Say’ (2016) 16 African Human Rights Law Journal 1–28 Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Endo, Ken, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity: From Johannes Althusius to Jacques Delors’ (1994) 46 Hokudai Hogaku Ronsyu 2064–1965 Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Fabbrini, Federico, Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Farahat, Anuscheh, ‘The German Federal Constitutional Court’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions (Oxford University Press 2020) 320–324. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Faúndez Ledesma, Héctor, The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights: Institutional and Protection Aspects, 1st ed in English, trans of 3rd ed in Spanish (Inter-American Institute of Human Rights 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Feichtner, Isabel, ‘Subsidiarity’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press), updated in 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Ferdinandusse, Ward, ‘Out of the Black-Box? The International Obligation of State Organs’ (2003) 29 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 45–127 Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo and Sánchez Gil, Rubén, ‘Mexico: Struggling for an Open View in Constittuional Adjudcation’ in Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau (eds), The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constituional Judges (Hart Publishing 2013) 301–320 Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo, ‘Interpretación conforme y control difuso de convencionalidad: El nuevo paradigma para el juez mexicano’ (2011) 9 Estudioos Constitucionales 531–622, 620. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Ferreres Comella, Víctor, ‘The Rise of Specialized Constitutional Courts’ in Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law: Research Handbooks in Comparative Law (Edward Edgar 2011) 265–277 Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Ferreres Comella, Víctorm Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values: A European Perspective (Yale University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  129. FikFak, Veronika, ‘Non-pecuniary Damages before the European Court of Human Rights: Forget the Victim: It’s All about the State’ (2020) 33 Leiden Journal of International Law 335–369 Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Fitzmaurice, Gerald, ‘The General Principles of international Law: Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957-II) 92 Recueil des cours 1–228 Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties’ in Dinah Shelton (ed), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press 2013) 739–771 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Flauss, Jean-François and Cohen-Jonathan, Gérard, ‘Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et droit international général’ (2008) 54 Annuaire français de droit international 529–546 Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Føllesdal, Andreas, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law’ (2013) 2 Global Constitutionalism 37–62 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Fouarge, Didier, Poverty and Subsidiarity in Europe: Minimum Protection from an Economic Perspective (Edward Elgar 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Frankenberg, Günter, ‘Democracy’ in Michel Rosenfeld and A András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 250–258 Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Friedmann, Wolfgang, The Changing Structure of International Law (Columbia University Press 1964) Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Furuya, Syuichi, ‘The Image of International Legal Order in International Criminal Adjudicative System: The Exteriorisation of “International Law as Intervention” [Kokusai Keiji Sisutem no Kokusaiho Chitsujozo: “Kainyu no Kokusaiho” no Kenzaika]’ (2013) 11 Horitsu Jiho 32–36 (in Japanese). Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Fyrnys, Markus, ‘Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1231–1259 Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Garay Boza, Norberto E, ‘Gobernar desde abajo: Del control de convencionalidad a la instrumentalización de la inversión estructural de la pirámide kelseniana’ (2012) 5 Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal 124–147 Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Garlicki, Lech, ‘Broniowski and After: On the Dual Nature of ‘Pilot Judgments’ in Lucius Caflisch, Johan Callewaert, Roderick Liddell, Paul Mahoney and Mark Villiger (eds), Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber: Human Rights: Strasbourg Views (N P Engel 2007) 177–192 Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Garlicki, Lech, ‘Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 44–68 Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Garlicki, Lech, ‘Contrôle de constitutionnalité et contrôle de conventionnalité : sur le dialogue des juges’ in La conscience des droits : Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Dalloz 2011) 271–280 Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Garlicki, Lech, ‘Cooperation of Courts: The Role of Supranational Jurisdictions in Europe’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 509–530 Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph, ‘The Netherlands’ in Janneke Gerards and Joseph Fleuren (eds), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law: A Comparative Analysis (Intersentia 2014) 217–260 Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Gerards, Janneke, ‘Advisory Opinion: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)’ in Hélène Ruiz Fabri (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Gerards, Janneke, ‘Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’ (2011) 17 European Law Journal 80–120 Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Ghandhi, Sandy, ‘Human Rights and the International Court of Justice: The Ahmadou Sadio Diallo Case’ (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review 527–555 Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Giannopoulos, Christos, ‘The Reception by Domestic Courts of the Res Interpretata Effect of Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2019) Human Rights Law Review 537–559 Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Ginsburg, Tom, ‘The Global Spread of Constitutional Review’, in Gregory A Keleman, R Daniel Kelemen and Keith E Whittington (eds), Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (Oxford University Press 2008) 81–98 Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Gisbert, Bustos, ‘Elementos constitucionales en la red global’ (2012) 60 Estudios de Deusto 21–43 Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Glas, Lize R, ‘The European Court of Human Rights supervising the execution of its judgments’ (2019) 37 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 228–244 Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Gonenc, Levent and Esen, Selin ‘The Problem of the Application of Less Protective International Agreements in Domestic Legal Systems: Article 90 of the Turkish Constitution’ (2007) 8 European Journal of Law Reform 485–500 Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Góngora Mera, Manuel Eduardo, ‘La diffusion del bloque de constitucionalidad en la jurisprudencia latinoamericana y su potencial en la construcción del ius constitutionale commune latinoamericano’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Héctor Fix-Fierro and Mariela Morales Antoniazzi (eds), Ius constitututionale commune en América Latina: Rasgos, potencialidades y desafíos (UNAM ─IIJ/Institut Max Planck de Derecho Público comparado y Derecho Internacional 2014) 301–324 Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Góngora Mera, Manuel Eduardo, Inter-American Judicial Constitutionalism: On the Constitutional Rank of Human Rights Treaties in Latin America through National and Inter-American Adjudication (Inter-American Institute of Human Rights 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  155. González Pascal, María Isabel, ‘El CEDH como parte del Derecho Constitucional Europeo’ in Queralt Jiménez (ed), El Tribunal de Estrasburgo en el Espacio Judicial Europeo (2013) 109–130 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. González-Domínguez, Pablo, The Doctrine of Conventionality Control: Between Uniformity and Legal Pluralism in the Inter-American Human Rights System (Intersentia 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Graf-Brugère, Anne-Laurence, ‘A lex favorabilis? Resolving Norm Conflicts between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law’ in Robert Kolb and Gloria Gaggioli (eds), Research Handbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar 2013) 251–270 Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Gragl, Paul, Legal Monism: Law, Philosophy, and Politics (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Groppi, Tania, ‘Constitutional Reasoning in the Italian Constitutional Court’ (2014) Rivista dell’Associazione Italiana dei Costituzionalisti 1–45 Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Gros Espiell, Héctor, ‘L’appplication du droit international dans le droit interne en amérique latine’ in Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, Vol I (Editoriale Scientifica 2004) 529–549 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Werner, Wouter (eds), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Guggenheim, Paul, Traité de droit international public, 2e éd., (Tome I, Librairie de l'Université, Georg & Cie S. A. 1967) Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton University Press 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Häberle, Peter, Der kooperative Verfassungsstaat aus Kultur und als Kultur: Vorstudien zu einer universalen Verfassungslehre (Duncker & Humblot GmbH 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ (2001) 29 Political Theory 766–781 Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Habermas, Jürgen, Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (Suhrkamp 1992) Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Halberstam, Daniel, ‘It’s the Autonomy, Stupid!’ A Modest Defense of Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR and a Way Forward’ (2015) Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (University of Michigan), 19 <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2567591> accessed 30 March 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Haljan, David, Separating Powers: International Law before National Courts (Springer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Halmai, Gábor, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23–42 Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Hawkins, Darren and Jacoby, Wade, ‘Partial Compliance: A Comparison of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights’ (2010) 6 Journal of International Law & International Relations 35–85 Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Heinrich, Andrew, ‘Sub-Regional Courts as Transitional Justice Mechanisms: The Case of the East African Court of Justice in Burundi’ in James Thuo Gathii (eds), The Performance of Africa's International Courts: Using Litigation for Political, Legal, and Social Change (Oxford University Press 2020) 88–105 Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Helen Keller, ‘Reception of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) in Poland and Switzerland’ (2005) 65 Zeitschrift für ausläandisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 283–349 Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Helfer, Laurence R, ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 125–159 Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Henderson, Humberto, ‘Los tratados internacionales de derechos humanos en el orden interno: la importancia del principio pro homine’ (2004) 39 Revista IIDH 71–99 Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Hennebel, Ludovic, ‘The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The Ambassador of Universalism’ (2011) Quebec Journal of International l Law (Special Edition) 57–97 Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Hentrei, Simon,‘Generalising the Principle of Complementarity: Framing International Judicial Authority’ (2013) 4 Transnational Legal Theory 419–435 Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Hernández Castaño, Diana P, Legitimidad democrática de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el control de convencionalidad (Universidad Externado de Colombia 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Hernández, Gleider, ‘E Pluribus Unum? A Divisible College?: Reflections on the International Legal Profession’ (2018) 29 European Journal of International Law 1003–1022 Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Concept of ‘The State’: Variable Geometry and Dualist Perceptions’ in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Vera Gowlland-Debbas (eds), The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality (Martinus Nijhoff 2001) 547–561 Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Hillebrecht, Courtney, Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (Cambridge University Press 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Huneeus, Alexandra, ‘Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights’ (2011) 44 Cornell International Law Journal 493–533 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Isiksel, Turkuler ‘Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm’ (2013) 2 Global Constitutionalism 160–195 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Iwasawa, Yuji, ‘Domestic Application of International Law’ (2016) 378 Recueil des Cours 9–261 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Jowell, Jeffery, The Changing Constitution (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Kahn, Jeffrey, ‘The Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: Conflicting Conceptions of Sovereignty in Strasbourg and St Petersburg’ (2019) 30 European Journal of International Law 933–959 Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Kattan, Victor, ‘Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)’ (2020) 114 American Journal of International Law 281–287 Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Kavanagh, Aileen, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Kavanagh, Aileen, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Kelemen, R Daniel and Pech, Laurent, ‘The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 59–74 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, ‘Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems’ in Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 677–710 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law, 2nd ed. (Revised and Edited by Robert W Tucker) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1967) Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd ed (Deuticke 1960) Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘International Law as Inter-Public Law’, in Henry S Richardson and Melissa Williams (eds), Nomos XLIX: Moral Universalism and Pluralism (New York University Press 2009) 167–204 Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Klabbers, Jan, ‘Constitutionalism Lite’ (2004) 1 International Organizations Law Review 31–58 Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Klabbers, Jan, ‘International Legal Positivism and Constitutionalism’, in Jean d’Aspremont and Jörg Kammerhofer (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press 2014) 264–290 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘Alfred Verdross as a Founding Father of International Constitutionalism?’ (2012) 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 385–416 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Koller, David, ‘... and New York and The Hague and Tokyo and Geneva and Nuremberg and...: The Geographies of International Law’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 97–119 Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Komárek, Jan, ‘National Constitutional Courts in the European Constitutional Democracy’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 525–544, 528 (emphasis added). Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Korhonen, Outi, ‘New International Law: Silence, Defence or Deliverance?’ (1996) 7 European Journal of International Law 1–28 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Koskenniemi, Martti, The Case for Comparative International Law’ (2009) 20 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 1–8 Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Krisch, Nico, ‘Global Administrative Law and the Constitutional Ambition’ in Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin (eds), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Oxford University Press 2010) 245–266 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Chap 4. It is suggestive that Greer and Wildhaber, who had advocated the ECtHR’s constitutional justice, altered their position incorporating these pluralists’ perspectives. Steven Greer and Luzius Wildhaber, ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 12 Human Rights Law Rreview 655–687 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Kühn, Zdeněk, ‘Wachauf and ERT: On the Road from the Centralized to the Decentralized System of Judicial Review’ in Miguel Poiares Maduro and Loïc Azoulai (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law. The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010) 151–162 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Kumm, Matthias, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 907–931 Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Kunz, Raffaela, Richter über internationale Gerichte? Die Rolle innerstaatlicher Gerichte bei der Umsetzung der Entscheidungen von EGMR und IAGMR (Springer 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Lageot, Céline, ‘France’ in Janneke Gerards and Joseph Fleuren (eds), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law: A Comparative Analysis (Intersentia 2014) 145–184 Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Lalisan, Samantha, ‘Classifying Systems of Constitutional Review: A Context-Specific Analysis’ (2020) 5 Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design 1–24 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Lamarque, Elisabetta, ‘Interpreting Statutes in Conformity with the Constitution: The Role of the Italian Constitutional Court and Ordinary Judges’ (2010) 1 Italian Journal of Public Law 87–120 Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Langer, Magnus Jesko and Hansbury, Elise, ‘Monitoring Compliance with the Decisions of Human Rights Courts: The Inter-American Particularism’ in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Marcelo G Kohen and Jorge E Viñuales (eds), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Martinus Nijhoff 2013) 213–245 Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Langer, Magnus Jesko and Hansbury, Elise, ‘Monitoring Compliance with the Decisions of Human Rights Courts: The Inter-American Particularism’ in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Marcelo Gustavo Kohen, Jorge E Viñuales (eds), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Martinus Nijhoff 2013) 213–245, 230–236 Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Lawson, Rick, ‘Beyond the Call of Duty? Domestic Courts and the Standards of the European Court of Human Rights’, in Henk Snijders and Stefan Vogenauer (eds), Content and Meaning of National Law in the Context of Transnational Law (Sellier European Law Publishers 2010) 21–38 Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Lazzerini, Nicole, ‘Dual Preliminarity Within the Scope of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Light of Order 182/2020 of the Italian Constitutional Court’, European Papers 25 November 2020, 1–14. See also the list of decisions coherent with and diverging from the Italian Constitutional Court Judgment No 269/2017, available at https://www.cir.santannapisa.it/observatory-practices-inter-legality-italian-high-courts. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Leach, Philip, ‘No Longer Offering Fine Mantras to a Parched Child? The European Court’s Developing Approach to Remedies’ in in Andreas Føllesdal, Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein (eds), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press 2013) 142–180 Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Legg, Andrew, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Leiter, Andrea, ‘Review Essay: Is International Law International? by Anthea Roberts’ (2018) 19 Melbourne Journal of International Law 413–422 Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Letsas, George, ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’ in Andreas Føllesdal, Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein (eds), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press 2013) 106–141 Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Letsas, Goerge, ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’ (2006) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705–732 Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Lixinski, Lucas, ‘The Consensus Method of Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 3 Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law 65–95 Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Lixinski, Lucas, ‘Treaty Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Expansionism at the Service of the Unity of International Law’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 585–604 Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Lopes Saldanha, Jânia M and Pacheco Vieira, Lucas, ‘Controle jurisdictional de convencionalidade e reenvio prejudicial interamericano: Um diálogo de ferramentas processuais em favor da efetivação do direito internacional dos direitos humanos’ (2013) 19 Anuario de derecho constitucional latinoamericano 435–466 Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Lopes Saldanha, Jânia Maria and Pacheco Vieira, Lucas, ‘Controle jurisdictional de convencionalidade e reenvio prejudicial interamericano: Um diálogo de ferramentas processuais em favor da efetivação do direito internacional dos direitos humanos’ (2013) 19 Anuario de derecho constitucional latinoamericano 435–460 Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Lovat, Henry, ‘International Criminal Tribunal Backlash’ in Kevin Heller, Frédéric Mégret, Sarah Nouwen, Jens Ohlin, and Darryl Robinson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2020) 601-625 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Mac Amhlaigh, Cormac, ‘Back to a Sovereign Future?: Constitutional Pluralism after Brexit’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 41–58 Google Scholar öffnen
  224. MacCormick, Niel, ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’ (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 1–18 Google Scholar öffnen
  225. MacCormick, Niel, Questioning Sovereignty (Oxford University Press 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Malarino, Ezequiel, ‘Judicial Activism, Punitivism and Supranationalisation: Illiberal and Antidemocratic Tendencies of the Inter- American Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 12 International Criminal Law Review 665–695 Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Malinverni, Giorgio, ‘La compétence de la Cour pour surveiller l’exécution de ses propres arrêts’ in Dean Spielmann, Marialena Tsirti, Panayotis Voyatzis (eds), La Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, un instrument vivant : Mélanges en l’honneur de Chirstos L. Rozakis (Bruylant 2011) 361–375 Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Mälksoo, Lauri, ‘International Legal Theory in Russia: A Civilizational Perspective, or: Can Individuals Be Subjects of International Law?’ in Florian Hoffmann and Anne Orford (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press 2016) 257–275 Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Mälksoo, Lauri, ‘Russia’s Constitutional Court Defies the European Court of Human Rights: Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Judgment of 14 July 2015, No 21-П/2015’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 377–395 Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Maringele, Sarah, European Human Rights Law: The Work of the European Court of Human Rights Illustrated by an Assortment of Selected Cases (Anchor Academic Publishing 2014)McKenna, Miriam Bak, ‘Decentering the Universal: Comparative International Law and Decolonizing Critique’ (2018) 12 ESIL Conference Paper Series 1–25 Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Martineau, Anne-Charlotte, ‘The Rhetoric of Fragmentation: Fear and Faith in International Law’ (2009) 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 1–28 Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Martínez Estay, José Ignacio, ‘The Impact of the Jurisprudence Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Chilean Constitutional System’ in Rainer Arnold (ed), The Universalism of Human Rights (Springer 2013) 63–79 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Martinico, Giuseppe and Repetto, Giorgio, ‘Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Duels in Europe: An Italian Perspective on Case 269/2017 of the Italian Constitutional Court and Its Aftermath’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 731–751 Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘Constitutionalism, Resistance and Openness: Comparative Law Reflections on Constitutionalism in Global Governance’ (2016) 35 Yearbook of European Law 318–340 Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘Corti constituzionali (o supreme) e “disobbedienza funzionale”: Critica, dialogo e conflitti nel rapporto fra diritto interno e diritto delle Convenzioni (CEDU e Convenzione americana sui diritti umani)’ Diritto Penale Contemporaneo, 28 Aprile 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘Is the European Convention Going to Be “Supreme”? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 401–424 Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘Is the European Convention Going to Be “Supreme”? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 401–424 Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Matringe, Jean, ‘L’exécution par le juge étatique des décisions judiciares internationales’ (2013) 117 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 555–578 Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Matsuda, Hiromichi, ‘International Law in Japanese Courts’ in Curtis Bradley (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law (Oxford University Press 2019) 537–548 Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Maus, Didier, ‘Nouveux regards sur le contrôle de constitutionnalité par voie d’exception’ in Dnys de Béchillon, Pierre Brunet, Véronique Champeil-Desplats and Éric Millard (eds), L’architecture du droit : Mélanges en l’honneur de Michel Troper (Economica 2006) 665–678 Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Maxeiner, James R, ‘Legal Certainty: A European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?’ (2006–2007) 15 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 541–607 Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Mazzuoli, Valerio De Oliveira and Ribeiro, Dilton, ‘The Pro Homine Principle as an Enshrined Feature of International Human Rights Law’ (2016) 3 Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 77–99 Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Medellín Urquiaga, Ximena, Principio pro persona (Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Distrito Federal, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación y Oficina en México del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos 2013) 16–17 Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Miara, Lucja and Prais, Victoria, ‘The Role of Civil Society in the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 5 European Human Rights Law Review 528–537 Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Michaels, Ralf, ‘Law and Recognition: Towards a Relational Concept of Law’ in Nicole Roughan and Andrew Halpin (eds), In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017) 90–115 Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Michelman, Frank I, ‘The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction’ in Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law: Research Handbooks in Comparative Law (Edward Edgar 2011) 278–297 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Milanovic, Marko, ‘Sejdić &Finci v Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2010) 104 American Journal of International Law 636–641 Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Morales Antoniazzi, Mariela,‘El nuevo paradigma de la apertura de los órdenes constitucionales: una perspectiva sudamericana’, in Armin von Bogdandy and José María Serna de la Garza (eds), Soberanía y Estado abierto en América Latina y Europa (Biblioteca Jurídica Virtual 2014) 233–282. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Moreira Maués, Antonio, ‘Supra-Legality of International Human Rights Treaties and Constitutional Interpretation’ (2013) 18 SUR – International Journal on Human Rights 205–223 Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Mowbray, Alastair, ‘An Examination of the European Court of Human Rights’ Indication of Remedial Measures’ (2017) 17 Human Rights Law Review 451–478 Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Negishi, Yota, ‘Relative Authorities: Constitutional Reasonable Resistances against Inter-American Court’s Doctrines’ (2018) 21 Iuris Dictio 49–61 Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Negishi, Yota, ‘The Pro Homine Principle’s Role in Regulating the Relationship between Conventionality Control and Constitutionality Control’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 457–481 Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Negishi, Yota, ‘Conventionality Control of Domestic ‘Abuse of Power’ Influencing Human Rights and Democracy’ (2016) 26 Italian Yearbook of International Law 243–264 Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Negishi, Yota, ‘The Subsidiarity Principle’s Role in Allocating Competences Between Human Rights Courts and States Parties: The Hybrid Model of Centralized and Diffused Conventionality Control of Domestic Law’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Flávia Piovesan e Mariela Morales Antoniazzi (eds), Ius Constitutionale Commune na América Latina, Volume III, Diálogos Jurisdicionais e Controle de Convencionalidade: Coleção Direitos Humanos e Constitucionalismo Regional Transformador (Juruá Editora 2016) 125–160 Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Negishi, Yota, ‘Distribution of Powers for the Conventionality Control of Domestic Law between Constitutional and Ordinary Courts: Decentralisation and Recentralisation’ (2016) 1 Turkish Journal of Legal Studies 77–101 Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Neuman, Gerald L, ‘Import, Export and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 101–123 Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Neuman, Gerald L, ‘Subsidiarity’ in Dinah Shelton (ed), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press 2013) 360–378 Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Nickel, Rainer, ‘Private and Public Autonomy: Jürgen Habermas’ Concept of Co-Originality in Times of Globalisation and the Militant Security State’ in Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press 2007) 147–167 Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Nijman, Janne E and Nollkaemper, André, ‘Beyond the Divide’, in Janne E Nijman and André Nollkaemper (eds), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (2007) 341–360 Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto, ‘Diálogo interjurisdiccional, control de convencionalidad y jurispurdencia del Tribunal Constitucional en período 2006–2011’ (2012) 10 Estudios Constitucionales 57–140 Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto, ‘El control de convencionalidad y el diálogo interjurisdiccional entre tribunales nacionales y Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos’ (2013) 19 Revista de Derecho Constitucional Europeo 221–270 Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Nollkaemper, André, ‘Conversations among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators’ in Cesare P R Romano, Karen Alter and Yuval Shany (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2014) 523–549 Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Nollkaemper, André, ‘The Duality of Direct Effect of International Law’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 105–125 Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Nollkaemper, André, ‘Rethinking the Supremacy of International Law’ (2010) 65 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 65–85 Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Nollkaemper, André, ‘The Power of Secondary Rules to Connect the International and National Legal Order’ in Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany (eds), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Hart 2011) 45–67 Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Nollkaemper, André, National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Nolte, Georg, Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  269. O’Donoghue, Aoife, Constitutionalism in Global Constitutionalisation (Cambridge University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Kaoru Obata, ‘The Emerging Principle of Functional Complementarity for Coordination Among National and International Jurisdictions: Intellectual Hegemony And Heterogeneous World’ in Takao Suami, Anne Peters, Mattias Kumm and Dimitri Vanoverbeke (eds.), Global Constitutionalism from European and East Asian Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2018) 451–469 Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Okafor, Obiora C and Effoduh, Okechukwu J, ‘The ECOWAS Court as a (Promising) Resource for Pro-Poor Activist Forces: Sovereign Hurdles, Brainy Relays, and “Flipped Strategic Social Constructivism”’ in James Thuo Gathii (eds), The Performance of Africa's International Courts: Using Litigation for Political, Legal, and Social Change (Oxford University Press 2020) 106–148 Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Oklopčić, Zoran, Beyond the People: Social Imaginary and Constituent Imagination (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Omerdić, Dženeta and Halilović, Harun, ‘The Case of Baralija v Bosnia and Herzegovina: A new Challenge for the State Authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina?’ (2020) 4 Društvene i humanističke studije 217–238 Google Scholar öffnen
  274. ONUMA Yasuaki, International Law in a Transcivilizational World (Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Oscar Schachter, ‘The Invisible College of International Lawyers’ (1977–78) 72 Northwestern University Law Review 217–226 Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Ost, François and van de Kerchove, Michel, De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit (Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Palombino, Fulvio M, ‘Compliance with International Judgments: Between Supremacy of International Law and National Fundamental Principles’ (2015) 75 Heidelberg Journal of International Law (2015) 503–529 Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Panoussis, Ioannis, ‘L’obligation générale de protection des droits de l'homme dans la jurisprudence des organes internationaux’ (2007) 70 Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 427–461 Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Paris, Davide, ‘Constitutional Courts as Guardians of EU Fundamental Rights? Centralized judicial Review of Legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU: European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber), Judgment of 11 September 2014, Case C-112/13, A v B and Others’ (2015) 11 European Constitutional Law Review 389–407 Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Pascual Vives, Francisco, ‘Consenso e interpretación evolutiva de lots tratados regionales de derechos humanos’ (2014) 66 Revista Española de Derecho Internacional 113–153 Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Pasqualucci, Jo M, The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2nd ed, Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Paulus, Andreas L, ‘Subsidiarity, Fragmentation and Democracy: Towards the Demise of General International Law?’ in Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany (eds), The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity: Essays in Honour of Professor Ruth Lapidoth (Hart 2008) 193–213 Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Paunio, Elina, ‘Beyond Predictability: Reflections on Legal Certainty and the Discourse Theory of Law in the EU Legal Order’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1469–1493 Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Pavoni, Riccardo, ‘Simoncioni v. Germany’ (2015) 109 American Journal of International Law 400–406 Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Peat, Daniel and Windsor, Matthew, ‘Playing the Game of Interpretation: On Meaning and Metaphor in International Law’ in Andrea Bianchi, Daniel Peat, and Matthew Windsor (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 3–33 Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Pernice, Ingolf, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel Constitutionalism in Action’ (2009) 15 Columbia Journal of European Law 349–407 (emphasis added). See also, Ingolf Pernice, ‘Theorie und Praxis des Europäischen Verfassungsverbundes’ in Calliess (ed), Verfassungswandel im europäischen Staaten- und Verfassungsverbund (Mohr Siebeck 2007) 61–92 Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Peters, Anne, ‘Fragmentation and Constitutionalization’ in Anne Orford and Florian Hoffmann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press 2016) 1011–1032 Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Peters, Anne, ‘Realizing Utopia as a Scholarly Endeavour’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 533–552 Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Peters, Anne, ‘Supremacy Lost: International Law Meets Domestic Constitutional Law’ (2009) 3 Vienna Online Journal of International Constitutional Law 170–198 Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Petzold, Herbert, ‘The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity’ in Ronald St J MacDonald, Franz Matscher and Herbert Petzold (eds), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff 1993) 41–62 Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Philipp Aust, Helmut, Rodiles, Alejandro and Staubach, Peter, ‘Unity or Uniformity? Domestic Courts and Treaty Interpretation’, 27 Leiden Journal of International Law (2014) 75–112 Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Pinto, Mónica, ‘El principio pro homine: criterios de la hermenéutica y pautas para la regulación de los derechos humano’, in Martín Abregú and Christian Courtis (eds), La aplicación de los tratados sobre derechos humanos por los tribunales locales (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales 1997) 163–171 Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Piovesan, Flávia, ‘Direitos humanos e diálogo entre juridições’ (2012) 19 Revista Brasileira de Direito Constitucional 67–93 Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Pisillo-Mazzeschi, Riccardo, ‘Responsabilité de l’État pour violation des obligations positives relatives aux droits de l’homme’ (2009) Recoueil des cours 177–506 Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Pizzolo, Calogero, ‘Los mechanismos de protección en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos y el derecho interno de los países miembros: El caso argentino’, in R. Méndez Silva (ed.), Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Memoria del VII Congreso Iberoamericano de Derecho Constitucional (2002) 505–519 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Pollicino, Oreste, ‘The Italian Constitutional Court at the Crossroads between Constitutional Parochialism and Co-operative Constitutionalism. Judgments Nos. 348 and 349 of 22 and 24 October 2007’ (2008) 4 European Constitutional Law Review 363–382 Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Popelier, Patricia and Patiño Álvarez, Aída Araceli, ‘Deliberative Practices of Constitutional Courts in Consolidated and Non-consolidated Democracies’ in Patricia Popelier, Armen Mazmayan and Werner Vandenbruwaene (eds), The Role of Constitutional Courts in Multilevel Governance (Intersentia 2013) 199–231 Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Porto, Sierra, ‘La Corte Constitucional colombiana frente al control de convencionalidad’ in Edgar Corzo Sosa, Jorge Ulises Carmona Tinoco and Pablo Saavedra Alessandri (eds), Impacto de las sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Tirant lo Blanch México 2013) 427–447, 440–446. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Prost, Mario, The Concept of Unity in International Law (Hart 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Quesada, Jimena, Jurisdicción nacional y control de convencionalidad: A propósito del diálogo judicial global y de la tutela multinivel de derechos (Aranzadi 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Rachovitsa, Adamantia, ‘Fragmentation of International Law Revisited: Insights, Good Practices and Lessons to be Learned from the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2015) 28 Leiden Journal of International Law 863–885 Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Roberts, Anthea, Is International Law International? (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘The Law and Politics of the Pro Persona Principle in Latin America’ in Helmut Philipp Aust and Georg Nolte (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Unity, Diversity, Convergence (Oxford University Press 2015) 153–174 Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Rodley, Nigel, ‘The International Court of Justice and Human Rights Treaty Bodies’ in James A Green and Christopher PM Waters (eds), Adjudicating International Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Sandy Ghandhi (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2014) 12–33 Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Roughan, Nicole, Authorities: Conflict, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Rousseau, Charles, ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1958-I) 93 Recueil des cours 369–550 Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Rt Hon Lady Justice Arden DBE, ‘Peaceful or Problematic? The Relationship between National Supreme Courts and Supranational Courts in Europe’ (2010) 29 Yearbook of European Law 3–20, 14. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Ruiz González, Ana María, ‘Supreme Court of Justice of Costa Rica (Corte Suprema de Justicia de Costa Rica) Costa Rica [cr]’ in Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann, Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2019), updated in 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo, ‘The Conventionality Control: Examples of (Un)Successful Experiences in Latin America’ (2010) 3 Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal 200–219 Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Saavedra Alessandri, Pablo, ‘The Role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Monitoring Compliance with Judgments’ (2020) 12 Journal of Human Rights Practice 178–184 Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Sadat-Akhavi, Methods of Resolving Conflicts between Treaties (Brill 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Sadurski, Wojciech, Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Sagüés, Néstor Pedro, ‘El “control de convencionalidad” en el sistema interamericano, y sus anticipos en el ámbito de los derechos económico-sociales: concordancias y diferencias con el sistema europeo’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Héctor Fix-Fierro, Mariela Morales Antoniazzi and Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor (eds), Construcción y papel de los derechos sociales fundamentales: Hacia un ius constitucionale commune en América Latina (Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas 2011) 993–1030 Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Sauer, Heiko, ‘Principled Resistance to and Principled Compliance with ECtHR Judgments’ in Marten Breuer (ed), Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments: A New Paradigm? (Springer 2019) 55–88 Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Schönsteiner, Judith, ‘Dissuasive Measures and the ‘Society as a Whole’: A Working Theory of Reparations in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2007) 23 American University International Lwe Review 127–164 Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Schroth, Peter W, ‘Marbury and Simmenthal: Reflections on the Adoption of Decentralized Judicial Review by the Court of Justice of the European Community’ (1979) 12 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 869–902 Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Judicial Engagement in International Human Rights Comparativism’ in August Reinisch, Mary E Footer and Christina Binder (eds), International Law and...: Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Vol 5, (Hart 2014) 7–24 Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Seminara, Letizia, Les effets des arrêts de la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme (Bruylant/Nemesis 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Shai Dothan, International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? (Cambridge University Press 2020) 41–60 Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Shany, Yuval, ‘Dédoublement fonctionnel and the Mixed Loyalties of National and International Judges’ in Filippo Fontanelli, Giuseppe Martinico and Paolo Carrozza (eds), Shaping Rule of Law Through Dialogue (Europa Law Publishing 2010) 27–44 Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Shany, Yuval, ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 907–940 Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Shelton, Dinah and Huneeus, Alexandra, ‘In re Direct Action of Unconstitutionality Initiated Against the Declaration of Acceptance of the Jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 109 American Journal of International Law 866–872 Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Shelton, Dinah, ‘Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts’ Chin. J. Int’l L. 9 (2009), 537–571 Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Shelton, Dinah, ‘Subsidiarity and Human Rights Law’ (2006) 27 Human Rights Law Journal 4–11 Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Sijniensky, Romina I, ‘From the Non-Discrimination Clause to the Concept of Vulnerability in International Human Rights Law: Advancing on the Need for Special Protection of Certain Groups and Individuals’ in Yves Haeck, Brianne MacGonigle Leyh, Clara Burbano-Herrera and Diana Contreras-Garduño (eds), The Realization of Human Rights: When Theory Meets Practice: Studies in Honour of Leo Zwaak (Intersentia 2013) 259–272 Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Singh, Sahib, ‘The Potential of International Law: Fragmentation and Ethics’ (2011) 24 Leiden Journal of International Law 23–43 Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Soley, Ximena and Steininger, Silvia, ‘Parting Ways or Lashing Back? Withdrawals, Backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2018) 14 International Journal of Law in Context 237–257; Jorge Contesse, ‘Resisting the Inter-American Human Rights System’ (2018) 44 Yale Journal of International Law 179–237 Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Spano, Robert, ‘Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity’ (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 487–502 Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Steiner, Henry J, Philip Alston and Ryan Goodman, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals : Text and Materials, 3rd ed (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Stone Sweet, Alec, ‘A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe’ (2011) 1 Global Constitutionalism 53–90 Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Stone Sweet, Alec, ‘Sur la constitutionalisation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : cinquante ans aprês son installation, la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme conçue comme une cour constitutionnelle’ (2009) 77 Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 923–944 Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Storme, Matthias E, ‘The Struggle Concerning Interpretative Authority in the Context of Human Rights: The Belgian Experience’ in Rainer Arnold (ed), The Universalism of Human Rights (Springer 2013) 223–235 Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Storme, Matthias E, ‘The Struggle Concerning Interpretative Authority in the Context of Human Rights: The Belgian Experience’ in Rainer Arnold (ed), The Universalism of Human Rights (Springer 2013) 223–236 Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Sudre, Frédéric, ‘L’interpretation constructive de la liberté syndicale, au sens de l’article 11 de la Convention EDH’ (2009) 5 JCP/La semaine juridique, édition générale 30–33 Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Sudre, Frédéric, ‘Question préjudicielle de constitutionnalité et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme’ (2009) 3 Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et a l’etranger 671–684 Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Susi, Mart, ‘The Definition of a “Structural Problem” in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights Since 2010’ (2012) 55 German Yearbook of International Law 1–51 Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Szymezak, David, ‘Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : L’européanisation « heurtée » du Conseil constitutionnel français’ (2012) 7 Jus Politicum 1–23 Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Szymezak, David, ‘Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : L’européanisation « heurtée » du Conseil constitutionnel français’ (2012) 7 Jus Politicum 1–23 Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Teagu, Elizabeth, ‘Russia’s Constitutional Reforms of 2020’ (2020) 5 Russian Politics 301–328 Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Teraya, Koji, ‘Shijinkan Koryoku to “Kokusaiho” no Siko Yoshiki: Kenpogaku to Kokusaihogaku no Dosyoimu [Horizontal Application Theories and “International Law” Thinking: Strange Bedfellows in the Disciplines of Constitutional Law and International Law]’ (2012) 23 Kokusai Jinken [Human Rights International] 9–15 (in Japanese) Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Teubner, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Thirlway, Hugh, The Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Thürer, Daniel, ‘Kosmopolitische Verfassungsentwicklungen’ in Daniel Thürer (ed), Kosmopolitisches Staatsrecht, Vol 1 (Schulthess Zurich 2005) 3–39 Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Thürer, Daniel, ‘Verfassungsrecht und Völkerrecht’ in Daniel Thürer, Jean-François Aubert, Jörg Paul Müller (eds), Verfassungsrecht der Schweiz (Schulthess 2001) 179–206 Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Thurnherr, Daniela, ‘The Reception Process in Austria and Switzerland’ in Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 311–391 Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Tigroudja, Hélène, ‘La satisfaction et les garanties de non-répétition de l’illicite dans le contentieux interaméricain des droit de l’homme’ in Elisabeth Lambert Abdelgawad and Kathia Martin-Chenut (eds), Réparer les violations graves et massives des droits de l'homme: la Cour interaméricaine, pionnière et modèle? (Société de Législation Comparée 2010) 69–89 Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Tigroudja, Hélène, ‘The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law’ in Robert Kolb and Gloria Gaggioli (eds), Research Handbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar 2013) 466–479 Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Tojo, Liliana y Elizalde, Pilar, ‘Artículos 44–47: Competencia de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos’ in Christian Steiner and Patricia Uribe (eds), Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos: Comentarios (Konrad Adenauer Stiftung 2014) 765–784 Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Torres Pérez, Aida, ‘Melloni in Three Acts: from Dialogue to Monologue’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review (2014) 308–331 Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Torres Zúñiga, Natalia, El control de convencionalidad: Deber complementario del juez constitucional peruano y el juez interamericano (similitudes, deferencias y convergencias) (Editorial Académica Española 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  351. Torres Zúñiga, Natalia, El control de convencionalidad: Deber complementario del juez constitucional peruano y el juez interamericano (similitudes, deferencias y convergencias) (Editorial Académica Española 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  352. Triepel, Heinrich ‘Les rapports entre le droit interne et le droit international’ (1923) 1 Recueil des cours 73–122, 82–87 Google Scholar öffnen
  353. Trispiotis, Ilias, ‘Two Interpretations of “Living Together” in European Human Rights Law’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 580–607 Google Scholar öffnen
  354. Tzanakapoulos, Antonios, ‘Domestic Courts in International Law: The International Judicial Function of National Courts’ (2011) 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 133–168 Google Scholar öffnen
  355. Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘Domestic Courts in International Law: The International Judicial Function of National Courts’ (2011) 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 133–168 Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Ulfstein, Geir, ‘The International Judiciary’ in Jan Klabbers, Anne Peters and Geir Ulfstein, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press 2009) 126–152 Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Uprimny Yepes, Rodrigo y Saffon, María Paula, ‘Reparaciones transformadoras, justicia distributiva y profundización democrática’ in Catalina Díaz Gómez, Nelson Camilo Sánchez, Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes (eds), Reparar en Colombia: los dilemas en contextos de conflicto, pobreza y exclusión (Centro Internacional para la Justicia Transicional y Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad 2009) 31–70 Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Valticos, Nicolas and Potobsky, Gerald W von, International Labour Law, 2nd ed (Kluwer 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Van Aaken, Anne, ‘Defragmentation of Public International Law through Interpretation: A Methodological　Proposal’ (2009) 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 483–512 Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Van Bockel, Bas and Wattel, Peter, ‘New Wine into Old Wineskins: The Scope of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU after Åkerberg Fransson’ (2013) 38 European Law Review 866–883 Google Scholar öffnen
  361. Van de Heyning, Catherine, ‘Constitutional Courts as Guarantees of Fundamental Rights: The Constitutionalisation of the Convention through Domestic Constitutional Adjudication’ in Patricia Popelier, Armen Mazmayan and Werner Vandenbruwaene (eds), The Role of Constitutional Courts in Multilevel Governance (Intersentia 2013) 21–48 Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Van de Heyning, Catherine, ‘No Place like Home: Discretionary Space for the Domestic Protection of Human Rights’ in Patricia Popelier, Catherine Van de Heyning and Piet Van Nuffel (eds), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and National Courts (Intersentia 2011) 65–96 Google Scholar öffnen
  363. Van de Heyning, Catherine, ‘The Natural “Home” of Fundamental Rights Adjudication: Constitutional Challenges to the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 31 Yearbook of European Law 128–161 Google Scholar öffnen
  364. Van den Eynde, Laura ‘The Consensus Argument in NGOs’ Amicus Curiae Briefs Defending Minorities Through A Creatively Used Majoritarian Argument’ in Panos Kapotas and Vassilis P Tzevelekos (eds), Building Consensus on European Consensus: Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Europe and Beyond (Cambridge University Press 2019) 96–119 Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Van der Schyff, Gerhard, ‘Constitutional Review by the Judiciary in the Netherlands’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal 275–290 Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Van Hoecke, Mark, ‘Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy’ Patricia Popelier, Armen Mazmayan and Werner Vandenbruwaene (eds), The Role of Constitutional Courts in Multilevel Governance (Intersentia 2013) 183–198 Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Vereshchetin, Vladen S, ‘On the Expanding Reach of the Rulings of the International Court of Justice’ in Pierre-Marie Dupuy, Bardo Fassbender, Malcolm N Shaw and Karl-Peter Sommermann (eds), Völkerrecht als Wertordnung: für Christian Tomuschat (N P Engel 2006) 621–633 Google Scholar öffnen
  368. Villagrán Sandoval, Carlos Arturo and Carvalho Veçoso, Fabia Fernandes, ‘A Human Rights’ Tale of Competing Narratives’ (2016) 8 Revista Direito e Práxis 1603–1651. Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Villiger, Mark E, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity in the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Marcelo G Kohen (ed), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch (Martinus Nijhoff 2007) 623–637 Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Vítolo, Alfredo M, ‘Una novedosa categoría jurídica: el «querer ser». Acerca del pretendido carácter normativo erga omnes de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Las dos caras del «control de convencionalidad»’ (2013) 18 Pensamiento Constitucional 357–380 Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Voeten, Erik, ‘Populism and Backlashes against International Courts’ (2020) 18 Perspectives on Politics 407–422 Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Vogel, Klaus, Die Verfassungsentscheidung des Grundgesetzes für die internationale Zusammenarbeit (Mohr Siebeck 1964) Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo, ‘On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority’ (2013) Leiden Journal of International Law 49–72 Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Founding Principles’ in Armin von Bogdandy and Jürgen Bast (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2010) 93–111 Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 397–413 Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Von Staden, Andreas, ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constittuional Law 1023–1049 Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Wachsmann, Patrick, ‘Réflexions sur l’interprétation ‘globalisante’ de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme’ in La conscience des droits : Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Dalloz 2011) 667–676 Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Wagnerova, Eliska, ‘The Direct Applicability of Human Rights Treaties’ in Council of Europe (ed), The Status of International Treaties on Human Rights (2006) 111–128 Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Wählisch, Martin, Peacemaking, Power-sharing and International Law: Imperfect Peace (Bloomsbury 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  380. Wendel, Mattias, ‘Lisbon Before the Courts: Comparative Perspectives’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 96–137 Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Wendel, Mattias, Permeabilität im europäischen Verfassungsrecht: Verfassungsrechtliche Integrationsnormen auf Staats- und Unionsebene im Vergleich (Mohr Siebeck 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Wheatley, Steven, The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law (Bloomsbury Publishing 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Wiener, Antje and Oeter, Stefan, ‘Introduction: Who recognizes the emperor’s clothes anymore?’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 608–621 Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Wiklund, Ola, ‘The Reception Process in Sweden and Norway’ in Keller and Stone Sweet Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 165–228 Google Scholar öffnen
  385. Yamamoto, Hajime and Negishi, Yota, ‘Japan’ in Fulvio M Palombino (ed), Duelling for Supremacy: International vs. National Fundamental Principles (Cambridge University Press 2019) 210–233 Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Yourow, Howard Charles, ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (1987) 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 111–159 Google Scholar öffnen
  387. Yourow, Howard Charles, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (Brill 1996) 193. Google Scholar öffnen
  388. Zglinski, Jan, Europe's Passive Virtues: Deference to National Authorities in EU Free Movement Law (Oxford University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Ziemele, Ineta, ‘European Consensus and International Law’ in Anne van Aaken and Iulia Motoc (eds), The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law (Oxford University Press 2018) 23–39 Google Scholar öffnen
  390. Zurn, Christopher F, Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Staatsrecht & Verfassungsrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover des Buchs: Ansehen und Absetzen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jonathan Schramm
Ansehen und Absetzen
Cover des Buchs: Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Augusto Wiegand Cruz
Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex