Cover des Buchs: Blockchain Governance
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Blockchain Governance

Challenges and New Paths for Modern Statehood in the Digital Sphere
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

León Vollerigh analysiert verschiedene Aspekte von Blockchain Governance im Hinblick auf zentrale Prinzipien des modernen Rechtsstaats und seine Durchsetzungsfähigkeit in digitalen und dezentralen Kontexten. Dabei werden zunächst relevante Prinzipien und Veränderungen moderner Staatlichkeit herausgestellt sowie die Funktion und Entwicklung von Blockchain und Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) betrachtet. Diese Grundlagen münden in die Analyse der „On-Chain Governance“ im Hinblick auf Modi der Konsensfindung. Inwieweit moderne Staatlichkeit in einer durch Internationalisierung und Privatisierung geprägten Welt durch autonome und digitale Formen von Governance herausgefordert wird und wie Governance der digitalen und dezentralisierten Welt aussehen kann, wird schließlich untersucht.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4772-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7878-5
Verlag
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Wissenschaftl.Beitr.a.d.Tectum Verlag: Politikwissenschaft
Band
98
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
206
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff I - X
  2. A. Introduction Kein Zugriff 1 - 6
  3. B. Theoretical Reflections Kein Zugriff 7 - 10
  4. C. Hypotheses Kein Zugriff 11 - 12
  5. D. Methodology Kein Zugriff 13 - 14
  6. E. The Evolution of Statehood Kein Zugriff 15 - 18
      1. F.1.1. Modern Statehood Kein Zugriff
      2. F.1.2. The Monopoly on Force Kein Zugriff
      3. F.1.3. Legitimation of Authority Kein Zugriff
      4. F.1.4. Statehood in Transformation Kein Zugriff
      5. F.1.5. Statehood in the Digital Sphere Kein Zugriff
      1. F.2.1. Historical Roots of the Technology Kein Zugriff
      2. F.2.2. The Bitcoin Blockchain Kein Zugriff
      3. F.2.3. Central Characteristics of the Technology Kein Zugriff
        1. F.2.4.1. Blockchains Kein Zugriff
        2. F.2.4.2. Distributed Ledger Technologies Kein Zugriff
        3. F.2.4.3. Initial Coin Offerings (ICOS) and Tokenization Kein Zugriff
        1. F.2.5.1. Actors Kein Zugriff
        2. F.2.5.2. Processes Kein Zugriff
        3. F.2.5.3. Structures Kein Zugriff
      6. F.2.6. Limitations, Problems, and New Solutions Kein Zugriff
      1. F.3.1. Is the State Still Necessary? Kein Zugriff
        1. F.3.2.1. Business and Finance Kein Zugriff
        2. F.3.2.2. State Functions and Spheres of Public Interest Kein Zugriff
        3. F.3.2.3. The Status Quo Kein Zugriff
        4. F.3.2.4. New Technological Forces Kein Zugriff
      3. F.3.3. Autonomous Governance Systems and Organizations Kein Zugriff
      4. F.3.4. New Forms of Cooperation Kein Zugriff
      5. F.3.5. Intensification of Decentralization Processes Kein Zugriff
      1. F.4.1. Code vs. Law Kein Zugriff
      2. F.4.2. Forms of Regulation Kein Zugriff
      1. F.5.1. Scenario Kein Zugriff
      2. F.5.2. Theses Kein Zugriff
      3. F.5.3. Solution Kein Zugriff
  8. G. Conclusion Kein Zugriff 183 - 188
  9. H. Sources Kein Zugriff 189 - 206

Literaturverzeichnis (241)

  1. Abraham et al (2018): Solida, A Blockchain Protocol Based on Reconfigurable Byzantine Consensus, VMWare Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  2. AktG, Deutsches Aktiengesetz, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/aktg/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  3. Anand, Shefali (2018): A Pioneer in Real Estate Blockchain Emerges in Europe, Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-pioneer-in-real-estate-blockchain-emerges-in-europe-1520337601?mod=rss_Technology&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=7382fb054a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-7382fb054a-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  4. Andrew, Edward (2011): Jean Bodin on Sovereignty, in: Republics of Letters, University of Toronto Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  5. Anther, Andreas (2016): Max Weber und die Staatsrechtslehre, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  6. Ardic, Oya Pinar / Heimann, Maximilien / Mylenko, Nataliya (2011): Access to Financial Services and the Financial Inclusion Agenda around the World, A Cross-Country Analysis with a New Data Set, Policy Research Working Paper 5537, The World Bank Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  7. Asolo (2018): What is the Tangle (IOTA)?, mycryptopedia.com, https://www.mycryptopedia.com/what-is-the-tangle-iota/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  8. Atzori, Marcella (2015): Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance, Is the State Still Necessary?, Center for Blockchain Technologies, University College of London Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  9. Axtmann, Roland (2004): The State of the State, The Model of the Modern State and its Contemporary Transformation, in: International Political Science Review (2004), Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 259–279 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  10. Azhar, Azeem (2017): 18 Exponential Changes We Can Expect in the Year Ahead, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609868/18-exponential-changes-we-can-expect-in-the-year-ahead/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  11. Bair, Sheila (2018): Former FDIC chair, The Fed needs to get serious about its own digital currency, finance.yahoo.com, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/former-fdic-chair-fed-needs-get-serious-digital-currency-131756819.html?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=592869193b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-592869193b-156341069&guccounter=1 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  12. Baird, Leemon (2016): The Swirlds Hashgraph Consensus Algorithm, Fair, Fast, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Swirlds Tech Report SWIRLDS-TR-2016–01 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  13. Baker, Paddy (2018): Quantum Resistant Blockchains, Your Wallet’s Kevlar Vest, cryptobriefing.com, https://cryptobriefing.com/quantum-resistant-blockchains-kevlar/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  14. Barabas, Chelsea / Narula, Neha / Zuckerman Ethan (2017): Defending Internet Freedom through Decentralization, Back to the Future?, The Center for Civic Media & The Digital Currency Initiative, MIT Media Lab Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  15. Barber, Gregory (2018): Coinbase Doubles Down on the Future of Digital Identity, wired.com, https://www.wired.com/story/coinbase-distributed-systems-acquisition/?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=4b93c28a36-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-4b93c28a36-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  16. Basseyantai (2018): Is ACHAIN now better than Neo Eth, ?, steemit.com, https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@basseyantai/is-achain-now-better-than-neo-eth (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  17. Basu, Saswata (2018): Why dApps don’t need to build blockchains, medium.com, https://medium.com/0chain/why-dapps-dont-need-to-build-blockchains-d668aea3c9dd (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  18. Basu, Saswata / Austin, Tom (2017): A Self-Forking, Zero-Cost, Sub-Second Blockchain Protocol, 0chain Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  19. BBC (2018): Cambridge Analytica files spell out election tactics, bbc.com, http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43581892 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  20. Belchior, Rafael (2021): The State of Blockchain Interoperability in 2021, hackernoon.com, https://hackernoon.com/the-state-of-blockchain-interoperability-in-2021-bb1s33of (retrieved: 10.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  21. Benz, Arthur (2008): Der moderne Staat – Grundlagen der politologischen Analyse, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  22. Bhai, Ferdous (2018): “Anything not enforceable won’t be enforced,”, twitter.com, https://twitter.com/ferdousbhai (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  23. Bitcoin.it (2018a): Bitcoin Improvement Proposals, bitcoin.it, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  24. Bitcoin.it (2018b): Hardware wallet, bitcoin.it, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hardware_wallet (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  25. Bitcoincore (2018): About, bitcoincore.org, https://bitcoincore.org/en/about/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  26. Blockchainhub (2018): Blockchain & Distributed Ledger Technologies, blockchainhub.net, https://blockchainhub.net/blockchains-and-distributed-ledger-technologies-in-general/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  27. Blockchair (2022): Bitcoin Hashrate distribution, https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/charts/hashrate-distribution (retrieved: 12.02.2022) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  28. Bodin, Jean (1576): Six Books of the Commonwealth, Basil Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  29. Bogdandy, Armin / Venzke, Ingo (2012): Beyond Dispute, International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers, in: International Judicial Lawmaking (2012): On Public Authority and Democratic Legitimation in Global Governance, Springer, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  30. Bollier, David (2015): The Blockchain, A Promising New Infrastructure for Online Commons, bollier.org, http://www.bollier.org/blog/blockchain-promising-new-infrastructure-online-commons (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  31. Bonneau, Joseph et al (2015): SoK, Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies, Princeton University Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  32. Bordo, Michael (2017): 5 questions about central banks and digital currency, World Economic Forum, weforum.org, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/09/5-questions-about-central-banks-and-digital-currency/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  33. Boucher, Philip (2017a): How blockchain technology could change our lives, European Parliamentary Research Service Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  34. Boucher, Philip (2017b): Are Blockchain Applications Guided by Adequate Social Values?, euroscientist.com, https://www.euroscientist.com/blockchain-applications-guided-adequate-social-values/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  35. Brito, Jerry / Castillo, Andrea (2013): Bitcoin, A Primer for Policymakers, Mercatus Center Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  36. Brown, Marisa (2021): 5 challenges with blockchain adoption and how to avoid them, https://searchcio.techtarget.com/tip/5-challenges-with-blockchain-adoption-and-how-to-avoid-them (retrieved: 10.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  37. Business Dictionary (2018a): probabilistic, businessdictionary.com, http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/probabilistic.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  38. Business Dictionary (2018b): deterministic, businessdictionary.com, http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/deterministic.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  39. Buterin, Vitalik (2014): DAOs, DACs, Das and More, An Incomplete Technology Guide, ethereum.org, https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/05/06/daos-dacs-das-and-more-an-incomplete-terminology-guide/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  40. Carneiro, Robert L. (1970): A Theory of the Origin of the State, in: Science (1970), Vol. 169, pp. 733–738 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  41. Casey, Michael J. (2018a): Blockchains Alone Won’t Fix the Facebook Problem, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/blockchains-alone-wont-fix-facebook-problem/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  42. Casey, Michael J. (2018b): It’s Too Soon for On-Chain Governance, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/soon-chain-governance/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  43. Casey, Michael J. / Vigna, Paul (2018a): In blockchain we trust, in: MIT Technology Review (2018), Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 10–16 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  44. Casey, Michael J. / Vigna, Paul (2018b): The Truth Machine, The Blockchain and the Future of Everything, Harper Collins Publishers, London Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  45. Chavez-Dreyfuss, Gertrude (2018): IBM joins group building a blockchain-based global identity network, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ibm-blockchain/ibm-joins-group-building-a-blockchain-based-global-identity-network-idUSKCN1HC2LM?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtechnologyNews+%28Reuters+Technology+News%29&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=de0a4656fe-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-de0a4656fe-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  46. Cheng, Steve et al (2017): Using blockchain to improve data management in the public sector, McKinsey Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  47. Chepurnoy, Alexander / Larangeira, Mario / Ojiganov, Alexander (2016): Rollerchain, a Blockchain With Safely Pruneable Full Blocks, IOHK Research Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  48. Chiocchetti, Paolo (2017): Democratic legitimacy, RESuME, https://resume.uni.lu/story/democratic-legitimacy (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  49. Clark, Mitchell (2021): What we know about China’s cryptocurrency crackdown, theverge.com, https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/23/22544367/china-crypto-crackdown-bitcoin-mining-sichuan-ban-hydro-cryptocurrency-trading (retrieved: 10.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  50. Coinmarketcap.com (2021a): Bitcoin, coinmarketcap.com, https://coinmarketcap.com/de/currencies/bitcoin/ (retrieved: 05.01.2022) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  51. Coinmarketcap.com (2021b): Global Charts, Total Market Capitalization, coinmarketcap.com, https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/ (retrieved: 07.01.2022) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  52. Craig, Jeffrey (2021): What is Transactions Per Second (TPS): A Comparative Look at Networks, phemex, https://phemex.com/blogs/what-is-transactions-per-second-tps (retrieved: 02.11.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  53. Cui, Tony et al (2015): Achain Whitepaper, Achain Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  54. Davidson, Sinclair / De Filippi, Primavera / Potts, Jason (2017): Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism, in: Journal of Institutional Economics Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  55. De Filippi, Primavera (2015a): From Competition to Cooperation, TEDx, youtube.com, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYOPcHRO3tc (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  56. De Filippi, Primavera (2015b): Translating Commons-Based Peer Production Values into Metrics, Towards Commons-Based Cryptocurrencies, in: Kuo Chuen, David Lee (2015): Handbook of Digital Currency, Academic Press, pp. 463–483 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  57. De Filippi, Primavera (2018): Code Is Law, But It’s Not the Only Law for Blockchains, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/code-law-not-law-blockchains/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  58. De Filippi, Primavera / Hassan, Samer (2016): Blockchain Technology as a Regulatory Technology, From Code is Law to Law is Code Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  59. De Filippi, Primavera / Troxler, Peter (2015): From material scarcity to artificial abundance – The case of FabLabs and 3D printing technologies, in: Van den Berg, Bibi / van der Hof, Simone / Kosta, Eleni (2015): 3D Printing, Springer, Wiesbaden Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  60. De Filippi, Primavera / Wright, Aaron (2018): Blockchain and the Law, The Rule of Code, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  61. Del Castillo, Michael (2018): First Results of Sierra Leone’s Blockchain Vote Are In, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/early-returns-sierra-leones-first-blockchain-vote/?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=963c3a95f5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-963c3a95f5-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  62. Demaj, Labinot (2018): Smart Government, Die Verwaltung und den Staat der Zukunft denken, in: Informatik Spektrum (2018), Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 123–137 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  63. Easton, David (1965): A Systems Analysis of Political Life, John Wiley, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  64. Eaves, David (2018): They’ll Just Make It Illegal, eaves.ca, https://eaves.ca/2018/06/22/theyll-just-make-it-illegal/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  65. Eaves, David / McGuire, Ben (2018): The Fast-Follower Strategy for Technology in Government, governing.com, http://www.governing.com/blogs/bfc/col-fast-follower-strategy-technology-government.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  66. Ekblaw, Ariel et al (2016): A Case Study for Blockchain in Healthcare, “MedRec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data, White Paper, IEEE Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  67. Eppler, Erhard (2009): Auslaufmodell Staat, Politik im Schraubstock der Globalisierung Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  68. Erdmann, Gero (2003): Apokalyptische Trias, Staatsversagen, Staatsverfall und Staatszerfall, strukturelle Probleme der Demokratie in Afrika, in: Bendel, Petra et al (2003): Demokratie und Staatlichkeit, Systemwechsel zwischen Staatlichkeit und Staatskollaps, Leske Budrich, Opladen, pp. 267–294 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  69. Etherchain (2018): EIP 999, etherchain.com, https://www.etherchain.org/coinvote/poll/35 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  70. Ethereum.org (2018): About the Ethereum Foundation, Ethereum.org, https://www.ethereum.org/foundation (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  71. Euler, Thomas (2018): The Token Classification Framework, A multi-dimensional tool for understanding and classifying crypto tokens, untitled-inc.com, http://www.untitled-inc.com/the-token-classification-framework-a-multi-dimensional-tool-for-understanding-and-classifying-crypto-tokens/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  72. Fatás, Antonio / Weder di Mauro, Beatrice (2018): As Cryptocurrencies Rise, Who Needs Banks?, Harvard Business Review, hbr.org, https://hbr.org/2018/05/as-cryptocurrencies-rise-who-needs-banks (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  73. Fisahn, Andreas (2011): Legitimation des Gewaltmonopols, in: Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung (2011), Jg. 94, Heft 1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  74. Floyd, David (2018a): Block.one Wants to Rewrite the Entire EOS Constitution, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/block-one-wants-rewrite-entire-eos-constitution/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  75. Floyd, David (2018b): Chile Is Using Ethereum’s Blockchain to Track Energy Data, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/chile-to-use-ethereums-blockchain-to-track-energy-data/?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=de0a4656fe-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-de0a4656fe-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  76. Fortune (2017): Big Business Giants From Microsoft to J.P. Morgan Are Getting Behind Ethereum, fortune.com, http://fortune.com/2017/02/28/ethereum-jpmorgan-microsoft-alliance/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  77. Foxx, Chris (2018): YouTube stars’ fury over algorithm test, bbc.com, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-44279189 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  78. Fung, Archon (2003): Survey Article, Recipes for Public Spheres, Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences, in: The Jornal of Political Philosophy (2003), Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 338–367 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  79. Galen, Doug et al (2018): Blockchain for Social Impact, Moving Beyond the Hype, Stanford GBS Center for Social Innovation Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  80. Genschel, Philipp / Zangl, Bernhard (2007): Die Zerfaserung von Staatlichkeit und die Zentralität des Staates, TranState working papers, No. 62 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  81. Gershenfield, Alan / Cutcher-Gershenfield, Joel (2018): Reactive Versus Proactive Social Science, in: Gershenfield, Neil / Gershenfield, Alan / Cutcher-Gershenfield, Joel (2018): Designing Reality, Basic Books, New York, pp. 120–130 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  82. Gershenfield, Neil (2018): From Moore’s Law to Lass’ Law, in: Gershenfield, Neil / Gershenfield, Alan / Cutcher-Gershenfield, Joel (2018): Designing Reality, Basic Books, New York, pp. 95–102 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  83. Gershenfield, Neil / Gershenfield, Alan / Cutcher-Gershenfield, Joel (2018): Designing Reality, Basic Books, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  84. Giesel, Katharina D. (2007): Leitbilder in den Sozialwissenschaften, Begriffe, Theorien und Forschungskonzepte, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  85. GitHub (2018a): Proof of Stake FAQs, github.com, https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Proof-of-Stake-FAQs (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  86. GitHub (2018b): BIP 0002, github.com, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#BIP_Editor_Responsibilities__Workflow (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  87. Global Times (2021a): China to shut down over 90% of its Bitcoin mining capacity after local bans, globaltimes.cn, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1226598.shtml (retrieved: 10.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  88. Global Times (2021b): China’s Bitmain suspends crypto mining machine sales, after 90% capacity shut down in the country, globaltimes.cn, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1227098.shtml (retrieved: 10.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  89. Gorbunov, Sergey / Micali, Silvio (2018): Towards a Unified Metric for Performance Evaluation of Proof-of-Stake Blockchains, medium.com, https://medium.com/algorand/towards-a-unified-metric-for-performance-evaluation-of-proof-of-stake-blockchains-e29a405d73ba (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  90. Graham, Nathan (2018): Norway’s Central Bank Considering Adopting CBDC As A Supplement To Cash, ethnews.com, https://www.ethnews.com/norway-central-bank-considering-adopting-cbdc-as-a-supplement-to-cash?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=e2ca208fe6-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-e2ca208fe6-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  91. Gray, Alex (2017): A question of confidence, the countries with the most trusted governments, weforum.org, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/the-countries-with-the-most-and-least-trusted-governments/?utm_content=buffer65371&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  92. Grechening, Kristoffel / Kolmar, Martin (2011): The State’s Enforcement Monopoly and the Private Protection of Property, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  93. Gronholt-Pedersen, Jacob (2018): Maersk, IBM say 94 organizations have joined blockchain trade platform, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-shipping-blockchain-maersk-ibm/maersk-ibm-say-94-organizations-have-joined-blockchain-trade-platform-idUSKBN1KU1LM?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtechnologyNews+%28Reuters+Technology+News%29&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=a31135f2b9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_08_09_05_12&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-a31135f2b9-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  94. Hackernoon (2017): ICOs & Token Types for Dummies, hackernoon.com, https://hackernoon.com/icos-token-types-for-dummies-an-buyers-guide-to-crypto-tokens-b6edea16776e (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  95. Hardjono, Thomas / Lipton, Alexander / Pentland, Alex (2018): Towards a Design Philosophy for Interoperable Blockchain Systems, MIT Connection Science, MIT, Cambridge Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  96. Hargrave, John / Shadev, Navroop / Feldmeier, Olga (2018): How Value is Created in Tokenized Assets, SSRN Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  97. Hartwig, Matthias (2010): ICANN – Governance by Technical Necessity, in: Bogdandy, Armin et al (2010): The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Advancing International Institutional Law, Springer, New York, pp. 575–605 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  98. Heavens, Andrew (2021): China vows to crack down on bitcoin mining, trading activities, reuters.com, https://www.reuters.com/technology/china-says-it-will-crack-down-bitcoin-mining-trading-activities-2021-05-21/ (retrieved: 10.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  99. Hedera Hashgraph (2018): FAQ, hederahashgraph.com, https://www.hederahashgraph.com/faq (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  100. Hobbes, Thomas (1651): Leviathan, London Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  101. Hoffmann, Hermann / Maurer, Andreas (2010): Bedeutungsverlust staatlicher Zivilgerichte, einem empirischen Nachweis auf der Spur, TranState Working Papers No. 133, Universität Bremen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  102. Holst, Arne (2021): Number of IoT connected devices worldwide 2019–2030, Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1183457/iot-connected-devices-worldwide/ (retrieved: 20.10.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  103. Iansiti, Marco / Lakhani, Karim R. (2017): The Truth About Blockchain, in: Harvard Business Review 2017, JAN-FEB issue, hbr.org, https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  104. IBM.com (2018): Maersk and IBM Introduce TradeLens Blockchain Shipping Solution, ibm.com, http://newsroom.ibm.com/2018-08-09-Maersk-and-IBM-Introduce-TradeLens-Blockchain-Shipping-Solution (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  105. International Risk Governance Center (2017): Governing Risks and Benefits of Distributed Ledger Technologies, IRGC Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  106. Investopedia (2018a): Dotcom Bubble, investopedia.com, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dotcom-bubble.asp (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  107. Investopedia (2018b): Proof of Capacity (Cryptocurrency), investopedia.com, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/proof-capacity-cryptocurrency.asp (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  108. Isensee, Josef (2004): Staat und Verfassung, in: Isensee, Josef / Kirchhof, Paul (2004): Handbuch des Staatsrechts, Bd. II Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  109. Ito, Joichi / Narula, Neha / Ali, Robleh (2017): The Blockchain Will Do to the Financial System What the Internet Did to Media, Harvard Business Review, hbr.org, https://hbr.org/2017/03/the-blockchain-will-do-to-banks-and-law-firms-what-the-internet-did-to-media (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  110. Jellinek, Georg (1900): Allgemeine Staatslehre, Berlin Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  111. Jenks, Tyler (2018): Pros and Cons of Different Blockchain Consensus Protocols, verypossible.com, https://www.verypossible.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-different-blockchain-consensus-protocols (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  112. Jessop, Bob (2002): The Future of the Capitalist State, Polity Press, Cambridge Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  113. Johnson, Simon (2018): ICOs Are Setting Capital Free. That’s Revolutionary, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/initial-coin-offerings-setting-capital-free-thats-huge/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  114. Juskalian, Russ (2018): The place where life hangs by a chain, in: MIT Technology Review (2018), Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 42–51 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  115. Kadelbach, Stefan / Günther, Klaus (2011): Recht ohne Staat, Zur Normativität nichtstaatlicher Rechtsetzung, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  116. Kähler, Lorenz (2002): Abschied vom rechtsphilosophischen Etatismus, in: Calliess, Gralf-Peter / Mahlmann, Matthias (2002): Der Staat der Zukunft, Vorträge der 9. Tagung des Jungen Forum Rechtsphilosophie in der IVR, 27.-29. April 2001 an der Freien Universität Berlin, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 68–83 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  117. Kaiser, Karen (2010): WIPO’s International Registration of Trademarks, An International Administrative Act Subject to Examination by the Designated Contracting Parties, in: Bogdandy, Armin et al (2010): The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Advancing International Institutional Law, Springer, New York, pp. 133–163 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  118. Karacaoglu, Yusuf (2021): Blockchain Interoperability, Information Technology Solutions Technology and Innovation Lab, World Bank Group Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  119. Katz, Lily / Bain, Benjamin (2018): Winklevoss Twins Have a Plan to Police Cryptocurrency Trading, Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-13/winklevoss-twins-have-a-plan-to-police-cryptocurrency-trading?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=d9ed13edd0-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-d9ed13edd0-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  120. Kim, Amy Davine / Boring, Perianne (2018): State-by-State Smart Contract Laws? If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/state-state-smart-contract-laws-aint-broke-dont-fix/?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=6150c00384-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-6150c00384-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  121. Kooiman, Jan (2002): Governance, A Social-Political Perspective, in: Grote, Jürgen R. / Gbikpi, Bernard (ed.) (2002): Participatory Governance, Political and Societal Implications, Opladen, pp. 71–96 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  122. Kostakis, Vasilis / Roos, Andreas (2018): New Technologies Won’t Reduce Scarcity but Here’s Something That Might, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/06/new-technologies-wont-reduce-scarcity-but-heres-something-that-might?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=hbr (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  123. Kramer, Nicole (2018): Blockchain, Personal Data and the GDPR Right to be Forgotten, blockchainandthelaw.com, https://www.blockchainandthelaw.com/2018/04/blockchain-personal-data-and-the-gdpr-right-to-be-forgotten/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  124. Kravchenko, Pavel (2016): Ok, I need a blockchain, but which one, medium.com, https://medium.com/@pavelkravchenko/ok-i-need-a-blockchain-but-which-one-ca75c1e2100 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  125. Kunze, Federico (2017): A First Introduction to Blockchain, Blockchain at Berkeley, medium.com, https://medium.com/@fekunze/a-first-introduction-to-blockchain-db68454b4ae (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  126. Lannquist, Ashley (2018): Blockchain in Enterprise, How Companies are Using Blockchain Today, Blockchain at Berkeley, https://blockchainatberkeley.blog/a-snapshot-of-blockchain-in-enterprise-d140a511e5fd (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  127. Larimer, Daniel (2014): The Coming Digital Anarchy, telegraph.co.uk, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10881213/The-coming-digital-anarchy.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  128. Larimer, Daniel (2016): DPOS BFT – Pipelined Byzantine Fault Tolerance, medium.com, https://medium.com/eosio/dpos-bft-pipelined-byzantine-fault-tolerance-8a0634a270ba (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  129. Larimer, Daniel (2018): DPOS BFT Pipelined Byzantine Fault Tolerance, medium.com, https://medium.com/eosio/dpos-bft-pipelined-byzantine-fault-tolerance-8a0634a270ba (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  130. Lau, Yvonne (2021): Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin says long-awaited shift to ‘proof-of-stake’ could solve environmental woes, fortune.com, https://fortune.com/2021/05/27/ethereum-founder-vitalik-buterin-proof-of-stake-environment-carbon/ (retrieved: 05.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  131. Lessig, Lawrence (1999): Code, Basic Books, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  132. Lessig, Lawrence (2006): Code, Version 2.0, Basic Books, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  133. Levy, Karen E. C. (2017): Book-Smart, Not Street-Smart, Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts and the Social Workings of Law, in: Engaging Science, Technology, and Society (2017), No. 3, pp. 1–15 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  134. Lightning.network (2018): How it Works, lightning.network, https://lightning.network/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  135. Lipset, Seymour (1959): Some Social Requisites of Democracy – Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, in: The American Political Science Review (1959), Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 69–105 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  136. Lomas, Natasha (2018): Not just another decentralized web whitepaper, techcrunch.com, https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/02/not-just-another-decentralized-web-whitepaper/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  137. LongHash (2018): Thought Bitcoin Had a Whale Problem? Ethereum Is Much Worse, longhash.com, https://www.longhash.com/news/thought-bitcoin-had-a-whale-problem-ethereum-is-much-worse?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=71d253d5c0-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_08_28_04_04&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-71d253d5c0-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  138. Marr, Bernard (2021): The Important Links Between NFTs, Blockchain, And The Metaverse, https://bernardmarr.com/the-important-links-between-nfts-blockchain-and-the-metaverse/ (retrieved 01.12.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  139. Mathias, Pete (2017): Blockchain, Top 10 Areas Ripe for Government Innovation, innovations.harvard.edu, https://www.innovations.harvard.edu/blog/blockchain-top-10-areas-ripe-government-innovation (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  140. Maxmen, Amy (2018): AI researchers embrace Bitcoin technology to share medical data, Nature, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02641-7?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=963c3a95f5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-963c3a95f5-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  141. Merkel, Wolfgang (2010): Systemtransformation, Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung, Springer VS, Wiesbaden Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  142. Miles, Kathryn (2018): The little coin that ate Quebec, in: MIT Technology Review (2018), Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 35–39 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  143. Miller, Ben (2018): West Virginia Becomes First State to Test Mobile Voting by Blockchain in a Federal Election, govtech.com, www.govtech.com/biz/West-Virginia-Becomes-First-State-to-Test-Mobile-Voting-by-Blockchain-in-a-Federal-Election.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  144. MINDSMITH (2021): 74% of Central banks are Interested in Blockchain, MINDSMITH, https://mindsmith.io/en-blockchain-central-banks/ (retrieved: 04.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  145. MinerGate (2018): Why Proof-of-capacity could be the future of cryptocurrency, minergate.com, https://minergate.com/blog/why-proof-of-capacity-could-be-the-future-of-cryptocurrency/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  146. Ming, Cheang (2018): The World Bank is preparing for the world’s first blockchain bond, cnbc.com, https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/10/world-bank-picks-commonwealth-bank-for-worlds-first-blockchain-bond.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  147. Monegro, Joel (2014): The Blockchain Application Stack, coindesk.com, https://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-application-stack/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  148. Nakamoto, Satoshi (2008): Bitcoin, A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, bitcoin.org Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  149. Narayanan, Arvind (2013): What Happened to the Crypto Dream, Part 1, in: IEEE Security & Privacy (2013), March/April, pp. 75–76 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  150. Narayanan, Arvind (2015): The Future of Bitcoin?, youtube.com, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG7l0XPtzD4&feature=youtu.be (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  151. Newman, Peter (2020): THE INTERNET OF THINGS 2020: Here’s what over 400 IoT decision-makers say about the future of enterprise connectivity and how IoT companies can use it to grow revenue, businessinsider.com, https://www.businessinsider.com/internet-of-things-report?IR=T (retrieved: 04.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  152. Nguyen, Winnie (2018): Hedera Hashgraph Review – The Blockchain Killer?, bitcoinforbeginners.io, https://www.bitcoinforbeginners.io/cryptocurrency-reviews/hedera-hashgraph-review/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  153. Niesen, Peter (1999): Die politische Theorie des politischen Liberalismus – John Rawls, in: Brodocz, André / Schaal, Gary S. (1999): Politische Theorien der Gegenwart, Springer, Wiesbaden Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  154. OECD (2017): Government at a Glance, 2017, OECD Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  155. Orcutt, Mike (2017a): Why People Get Religious about Bitcoin, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609313/why-people-get-religious-about-bitcoin/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2018_04_10&utm_campaign=chain_letter&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=de0a4656fe-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-de0a4656fe-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  156. Orcutt, Mike (2017b): A Mind-Bending Cryptographic Trick Promises to Take Blockchains Mainstream, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609448/a-mind-bending-cryptographic-trick-promises-to-take-blockchains-mainstream/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  157. Orcutt, Mike (2017c): Cryptocurrency Exchanges Can Be Pretty Sketchy Places. The Solution? A Blockchain, of Course, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609621/cryptocurrency-exchanges-can-be-pretty-sketchy-places-the-solution-a-blockchain-of-course/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2018_05_01&utm_campaign=chain_letter&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=fe86c0f0e1-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-fe86c0f0e1-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  158. Orcutt, Mike (2017d): Blockchains Are Poised to End the Password Era, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609583/why-blockchains-are-poised-to-end-the-password-era/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2018_04_10&utm_campaign=chain_letter&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=de0a4656fe-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-de0a4656fe-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  159. Orcutt, Mike (2018a): Ethereum’s smart contracts are full of holes, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610392/ethereums-smart-contracts-are-full-of-holes/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2018_03_08&utm_campaign=chain_letter&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=7382fb054a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-7382fb054a-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  160. Orcutt, Mike (2018b): How to fix one of Bitcoin’s biggest problems, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610950/how-to-fix-one-of-bitcoins-biggest-problems/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  161. Orcutt, Mike (2018c): EOS Governance, Chain Letter, No. 65, MIT Technology Review, https://mailchi.mp/technologyreview/chain-letter-763625?e=7fb353573a (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  162. Orcutt, Mike (2018d): Fork this, What an unprecedented court battle says about the future of cryptocurrency, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610928/fork-this-what-an-unprecedented-court-battle-says-about-the-future-of-cryptocurrency/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  163. Orcutt, Mike (2018e): Building Bridges, Chain Letter, No. 57, technologyreview.com, https://mailchi.mp/technologyreview/chain-letter-57?e=7fb353573a (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  164. Orcutt, Mike (2018f): Berkeley, California, is considering an ICO unlike any other, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610442/berkeley-ca-is-considering-an-ico-unlike-any-other/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  165. Orcutt, Mike (2018g): IBM thinks blockchains can help reduce carbon emissions, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611670/blockchain-explainer-tokenizing-carbon-credits/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2018_07_20&utm_campaign=the_download (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  166. Orcutt, Mike (2018h): Why security experts hate that ‘blockchain voting’ will be used in the midterm elections, technologyreview.com, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611850/why-security-experts-hate-that-blockchain-voting-will-be-used-in-the-midterm-elections/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2018_08_10&utm_campaign=the_download (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  167. Orcutt, Mike (2018i): SRO’s, Chain Letter No. 80, MIT Technology Review, https://mailchi.mp/technologyreview/chain-letter-765121?e=7fb353573a (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  168. Orcutt, Mike (2018j): Weirdly, pro-crypto laws could be bad for innovation, Chain Letter No. 42, MIT Technology Review, https://mailchi.mp/technologyreview/chain-letter-42?e=7fb353573a (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  169. Orcutt, Mike (2018k): Blockchain, in: MIT Technology Review, Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 18–23 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  170. Pawczuk, Linda (2020): Global perspectives on blockchain adoption by industry: The future is now, Deloitte, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/consulting/articles/blockchain-adoption-by-industry.html (retrieved: 04.08.2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  171. Pazzanese, Christina (2018): On the web, privacy in peril, The Harvard Gazette, https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2018/03/facebooks-privacy-problem-may-erode-web-trust-harvard-analyst-says/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  172. Pearcy, Aimee (2018): Blockchain Scaling Solutions Explained, medium.com, https://blog.icoalert.com/blockchain-scaling-solutions-explained-the-lightning-network-raiden-network-and-plasma-74b3f06e587a (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  173. Penke, Michel (2018): Parity-Millionen in Kryptowährung wohl für immer verloren, gruenderszene.de, https://www.gruenderszene.de/fintech/parity-millionen-wallet-protokoll-999 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  174. Percy, Sally (2018): How blockchain will revolutionize finance and auditing, ey.com, https://betterworkingworld.ey.com/digital/blockchain-why-finance-and-auditing-will-never-be-the-same (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  175. Peter, Fabienne (2017): Political Legitimacy, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  176. Petev, Valentin (2011): Ein globales Recht im 21. Jahrhundert?, in: Gutmann, Thomas / Pieroth, Bodo (2011): Die Zukunft des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols, Nomos, pp. 77–82 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  177. Pieroth, Bodo (2011): Das staatliche Gewaltmonopol – ein Verfassungsrechtssatz?, in: Gutmann, Thomas / Pieroth, Bodo (2011): Die Zukunft des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols, Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 53–62 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  178. Pierre, Jon (2000): Debating Governance, Authority, Steering, and Democracy, Oxford Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  179. Pierre, Jon / Peters, B. Guy (2000): Governance, Politics and the State, London Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  180. Popov, Serguei (2017): The Tangle, IOTA Whitepaper Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  181. Popper, Nathaniel (2018): Blockchain Will Be Theirs, Russian Spy Boasted at Conference, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/29/technology/blockchain-iso-russian-spies.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=fe86c0f0e1-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-fe86c0f0e1-156341069 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  182. Price, Calvin (2018): On Blockchain and the Internet of Things, Blockchain at Berkeley, https://blockchainatberkeley.blog/on-blockchain-and-the-internet-of-things-f6b0b2deb528 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  183. Prpic, John (2017): Unpacking Blockchains, Collective Intelligence 2017, NYU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  184. Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  185. Rawls, John (2001): Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  186. Ray, Shaan (2017): Blockchain Interoperability, medium.org, https://towardsdatascience.com/blockchain-interoperability-33a1a55fe718 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  187. Reddit (2018): PARSEC, A Paradigm Shift for Asynchronous and Permissionless Consensus, reddit.com, https://www.reddit.com/r/safenetwork/comments/8lueuf/parsec_a_paradigm_shift_for_asynchronous_and/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  188. Reijers, Wessel / O’Brolcháin, Fiachra / Haynes, Paul (2016): Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories, Ledger Journal Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  189. Researchgate.net (2018): Basic diagram of the Pathetic Dot, researchgate.net, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Basic-diagram-of-the-Pathetic-Dot_fig13_264918873 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  190. Reutzel, Bailey (2016): The DAO Shows Blockchain Can’t Code Away Social Problems, coindesk, https://www.coindesk.com/system-problems-social-issues-daos-structure/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  191. Röben, Volker (2010): The Enforcement Authority of International Institutions, in: Bogdandy, Armin et al (2010): The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Advancing International Institutional Law, Springer, New York, pp. 819–842 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  192. Salzman, Avi (2018): Blockchain starts to show real promise amid the hype, Financial News, https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/blockchain-starts-to-show-real-promise-amid-the-hype-20180821 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  193. Schaal, Gary S. / Heidenreich, Felix (2016): Einführung in die politischen Theorien der Moderne, Barbara Budrich, Opladen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  194. Schmidt, Tobias (2017): Münster, Blockchain, Chancen, Recht und Regulierung, BTC-Echo, https://www.btc-echo.de/muenster-blockchain-chancen-recht-und-regulierung/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  195. Schwab, Klaus (2016): The Fourth Industrial Revolution, what it means, how to respond, weforum.org, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  196. Scott, Brett (2014): Visions of a Techno-Leviathan, The Politics of the Bitcoin Blockchain, e-ir.info, https://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/01/visions-of-a-techno-leviathan-the-politics-of-the-bitcoin-blockchain/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  197. Service, Elman (1975): Origins of the State and Civilization, Norton, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  198. Shueh, Jason (2018): Vermont city pilots blockchain for real estate, statescoop.com, https://statescoop.com/vermont-city-pilots-blockchain-for-real-estate (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  199. Singh, Divya (2018): Types of Consensus Algorithms, blockchainsemantics.com, https://www.blockchainsemantics.com/blog/types-consensus-algorithm/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  200. Smrkolj, Maja (2010): International Institutions and Individualized Decision-Making, An Example of UNHCR’s Refugee Status Determination, in: Bogdandy, Armin et al (2010): The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Advancing International Institutional Law, Springer, New York, pp. 165–193 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  201. Spielman, Avi (2016): Blockchain Digitally Rebuilding the Real Estate Industry, MIT Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  202. Spruyt, Hendrik (2002): The Origins, Development, and Possible Decline of the Modern State, in: Annual Review of Political Science (2002), No. 5, pp. 127–149 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  203. Stalder, Felix (2016): Kultur der Digitalität, Suhrkamp, Berlin Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  204. Statista (2022): Number of Blockchain wallet users worldwide from November 2011 to November 22, 2021, statista.com, https://www.statista.com/statistics/647374/worldwide-blockchain-wallet-users/ (retrieved: 07.01.2022) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  205. Surowiecki, James (2018): Bitcoin would be a calamity, not an economy, in: MIT Technology Review (2018), Vol. 121, No. 3 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  206. Swan, Melanie (2015): Blockchain, Blueprint for a New Economy, O’Reilly, Sebastopol Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  207. Szabo, Nick (1997): Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks, in: Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet (1997), Vol. 2, No. 9, http://ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/548/469?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&utm_campaign=b8a076088c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_03_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_997ed6f472-b8a076088c-156341069#1 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  208. Tam, KC (2018): Blockchain and the Challengers, medium.com, https://medium.com/@kctheservant/blockchain-and-the-challengers-74e22cf0cf4e (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  209. Tangleblog (2018): IOTA-Roundup, tangleblog.com, http://www.tangleblog.com/what-is-iota-what-is-the-tangle/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  210. Tapscott, Don / Tapscott, Alex (2016): Blockchain Revolution, How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World, Penguin Random House, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  211. Targett, Ed (2018): The Top 10 New Blockchain Technologies, CBR, https://www.cbronline.com/in-depth/top-10-new-blockchain-technologies (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  212. Teubner, Gunther (2003): Globale Zivilverfassungen, Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (2003), 63 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  213. Thake, Max (2018): What’s so special about Distributed Ledger Technology, medium.com, https://medium.com/nakamo-to/whats-so-special-about-distributed-ledger-technology-e08d5fc8c074 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  214. The Economist (2015): The great chain of being sure about things, economist.com, https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21677228-technology-behind-bitcoin-lets-people-who-do-not-know-or-trust-each-other-build-dependable (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  215. The Guardian (2018): Kodak leads surge of companies exploiting bitcoin buzz, theguardian.com, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/11/kodak-companies-bitcoin-buzz-cryptocurrencies-share-price (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  216. Tindell, Ken (2013): Geeks Love the Bitcoin Phenomenon Like They Loved the Internet in 1995, Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/how-bitcoins-are-mined-and-used-2013-4?IR=T (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  217. Tokenring.com (2018): Token, https://tokenring.com/?utm_source=tokenize/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  218. Torres, Nancy (2018): Three Emerging Technologies To Improve Emergency Management, Data-Smart City Solutions, https://datasmart.ash.harvard.edu/news/article/three-emerging-technologies-improve-emergency-management (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  219. Tucker, Catherine / Catalini, Christian (2018): What Blockchain Can’t Do, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/06/what-blockchain-cant-do (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  220. Tuwiner, Jordan (2017): Ethereum Mining Pools, buybitcoinworldwide.com, https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/ethereum/mining-pools/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  221. UK Government Office for Science (2016): Distributed Ledger Technology, beyond block chain, UK Government Ofice for Science Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  222. Understandingpaxos (2018): Understanding Paxos, understandingpaxos.com, https://understandingpaxos.wordpress.com/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  223. Van der Lijn, Jair (2016): The Future Monopoly on the Legitimate Use of Force, Think Piece 20, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  224. Van Wirdum, Aaron (2016): A Primer on Bitcoin Governance, or Why Developers Aren’t in Charge of the Protocol, bitcoinmagazine.com, https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/a-primer-on-bitcoin-governance-or-why-developers-aren-t-in-charge-of-the-protocol-1473270427/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  225. Vermeulen, Jan (2017): Bitcoin and Ethereum vs Visa and PayPal Transactions per second, mybroadband.com, https://mybroadband.co.za/news/banking/206742-bitcoin-and-ethereum-vs-visa-and-paypal-transactions-per-second.html (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  226. Von Humboldt, Wilhelm (1792): Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen, http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/buch/ideen-zu-einem-versuch-die-grenzen-der-wirksamkeit-des-staats-zu-bestimmen-2640/8 (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  227. Vorick, David (2018): The State of Cryptocurrency Mining, medium.com, https://blog.sia.tech/the-state-of-cryptocurrency-mining-538004a37f9b (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  228. Weber, Max (1919): Politics as a Vocation, Essays in Sociology, Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  229. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (2008): Private Law, edition 2, The Gale Group, https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/private+law (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  230. Wikipedia (2018a): Diffie-Hellman key exchange, wikipdeia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman_key_exchange (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  231. Wikipedia (2018b): Data Encryption Standard, Wikipedia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Encryption_Standard (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  232. Wikipedia (2018c): DAX, wikipedia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAX (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  233. Wikipedia (2018d): Byzantine fault tolerance, wikipedia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_fault_tolerance (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  234. Wikipedia (2018e): Markov chain Monte Carlo, wikipedia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain_Monte_Carlo (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  235. Wikipedia (2018f): Directed acyclic graph, wikipedia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_acyclic_graph (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  236. Wong, Joon Ian (2016): Even the US military is looking at blockchain technology – to secure nuclear weapons, Quartz, https://qz.com/801640/darpa-blockchain-a-blockchain-from-guardtime-is-being-verified-by-galois-under-a-government-contract/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  237. Wright, Aaron / De Filippi, Primavera (2015): Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographica Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  238. Wright, Henry T. (1977): Recent Research on the Origin of the State, in: Annual Review of Anthropology (1977), No. 6, pp. 379–397 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  239. Yarvin, C. (2016): The DAO as a lesson in decentralized governance, urbit.org, https://urbit.org/blog/dao/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  240. Zahawi, Hamada (2018): Can Blockchain Revolutionize Civic Engagement?, Kennedy School Review, http://ksr.hkspublications.org/2018/03/13/can-blockchain-revolutionize-civic-engagement/ (retrieved: 30.08.2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785
  241. Zheng, Zibin et al (2017): An Overview of Blockchain Technology, Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends, in: IEEE 6th International Congress on Big Data (2017), pp. 557–564 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828878785

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Politische Theorie", "Politik allgemein"
Cover des Buchs: The Function of Political Authority
Monographie Vollzugriff
Carola Hesch
The Function of Political Authority
Cover des Buchs: (Neu-)Ordnung
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Uwe Wagschal, Marius Fröhle
(Neu-)Ordnung
Cover des Buchs: Arenen des Diskurses
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Thomas Schölderle, Laura Martena
Arenen des Diskurses
Cover des Buchs: Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Sara Arezes
Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda
Cover des Buchs: Türkiye und Österreich im 21. Jahrhundert
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Mehmet Soytürk
Türkiye und Österreich im 21. Jahrhundert

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex