, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Families
- Autor:innen:
- Verlag:
- 2014
Schlagworte
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Auflage
- 1/2014
- Copyrightjahr
- 2014
- ISBN-Print
- 978-0-7618-6424-0
- ISBN-Online
- 978-0-7618-6425-7
- Verlag
- Hamilton Books, Lanham
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Seiten
- 426
- Produkttyp
- Monographie
Inhaltsverzeichnis
KapitelSeiten
- Contents Kein Zugriff
- Figures Kein Zugriff
- Tables Kein Zugriff
- References within the Essays Kein Zugriff
- Preface Kein Zugriff
- 1.1. One fragment of a history: Father Kolvenbach speaks at Santa Clara University Kein Zugriff
- 1.2. I gather some flowers from Father Kolvenbach’s Santa Clara speech Kein Zugriff
- 1.3. But in the first place Father Kolvenbach’s conclusion was a non sequitur Kein Zugriff
- 1.4. In the second place Father Kolvenbach’s teachings contravened the Gospel Kein Zugriff
- 1.5. In the third place Father Kolvenbach’s teachings contravened charity and justice Kein Zugriff
- 1.6. So Father Kolvenbach’s Santa Clara speech failed in at least three ways Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- 2.1. Familial preference conflicts with deontologism and utilitarianism Kein Zugriff
- 2.2. The principle of familial preference descends from charity to mercy Kein Zugriff
- 2.3. Works of mercy constitute a naturally familial practice Kein Zugriff
- 2.4. Works of mercy toward strangers are constrained by familial preference Kein Zugriff
- 2.5. Familial preference is compatible with the Parable of the Merciful Samaritan Kein Zugriff
- 2.6. “Catholic” social thought provides an attenuated principle of familial preference Kein Zugriff
- 2.7. Duties of familial preference give rise to rights of familial preference Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- 3.1. The Roman definition of justice suffers two defects; I’ll take up the second Kein Zugriff
- 3.2. Acts of justice aim at the right by adaptations to another according to equality Kein Zugriff
- 3.3. One object of acts of justice will be “the parental just” Kein Zugriff
- 3.4 Another object of acts of justice will be “the domestic just” Kein Zugriff
- 3.5. “The domestic just” is an object of acts of justice for heterosexual pairs Kein Zugriff
- 3.6. The acts of the kinds of justice conform to the principle of familial preference Kein Zugriff
- 3.7. “The parental just” and “the domestic just” give rise to natural rights Kein Zugriff
- 3.8. These analyses mitigate issues in modern understandings of “(what is) his right” Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- 4.1. Political life in city-states is not directly an object of natural human inclination Kein Zugriff
- 4.2. A political city-state is one of the civil societies produced by human art Kein Zugriff
- 4.3. The political city-state is not by nature superordinate to the familial household Kein Zugriff
- 4.4. Political life in city-states is not natural as familial life in households is Kein Zugriff
- 4.5. The political city-state is not necessarily or by nature prior to the household Kein Zugriff
- 4.6. I summarize and then suggest definitions of “family” and “human family” Kein Zugriff
- 4.7. I suggest a natural law version of the principle of familial preference Kein Zugriff
- 4.8. I suggest metaphysical priorities regarding familial life and political life Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- 5.1. In traditional moral philosophy prudence presents a distinctive set of features Kein Zugriff
- 5.2. In traditional moral philosophy prudence is of three distinct species Kein Zugriff
- 5.3. Diversity of sciences suggests diversity of prudences Kein Zugriff
- 5.4. Diversity of basic goods-as-ends determines diversity of prudences Kein Zugriff
- 5.5. Domestic prudence appears in familial flight, concealment, and migration Kein Zugriff
- 5.6. I describe three paradigm cases of domestic prudence Kein Zugriff
- 5.7. The aim of domestic prudence is “to live completely well” by domestic association Kein Zugriff
- 5.8. The orders within the moral virtues support a principle of familial preference Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- 6.1. Conditions for validity of contract and validity of oath seem to be the same Kein Zugriff
- 6.2. But contract and oath (or vow) are not the same Kein Zugriff
- 6.3. The marriage ceremony exhibits validity-features not of contract but of oath Kein Zugriff
- 6.4. There’s nothing contractual or comprehensible in an “exchange of promises” Kein Zugriff
- 6.5. Practices of contract performance differ from practices of oath performance Kein Zugriff
- 6.6. Marriage, although certainly not a contract, is certainly a social status Kein Zugriff
- 6.7. I offer brief tentative descriptions of some outward relations of marriage Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- Bibliography Kein Zugriff Seiten 373 - 390
- Index Kein Zugriff Seiten 391 - 424
- About the Author Kein Zugriff Seiten 425 - 426
