Cover of book: Edmund Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Edited Book No access

Edmund Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations

Commentary, Interpretations, Discussions
Editors:
Series:
Phänomenologie, Volume 34
Publisher:
 2023

Summary

The volume offers the first systematic discussion of Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations. Beginning with a commentary on the text of the five Meditations, the essays published here examine and clarify some of the most important concepts of Husserl’s philosophy: intentionality, synthesis, evidence, inter-subjectivity. In addition, the volume provides the first discussion of Husserl’s late version of transcendental philosophy and its relevance for contemporary debates in both continental and analytic philosophy. With contributions byAndreea Smaranda Aldea | Lilian Alweiss | Stefano Bancalari | Jakub Čapek | Emanuela Carta | Daniele De Santis | Aurélien Djian | Saulius Geniusas | Sara Heinämaa | Leonard Ip | Hynek Janoušek | Federico Lijoi | Claudio Majolino | Danilo Manca | Sergio Pérez-Gatica | Witold Plotka | Alice Pugliese | Ignacio Quepons | Rosemary Rizo-Patrón de Lerner | Agustín Serrano de Haro | Wojciech Starzyński

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-495-99554-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-495-99555-6
Publisher
Karl Alber, Baden-Baden
Series
Phänomenologie
Volume
34
Language
English
Pages
0
Product type
Edited Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 8
  2. Introduction No access 9 - 20
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
      1. 2.1. The »motif« and the »content« No access
      2. 2.2. The repetition and variation of the »motif« No access
      3. 2.3. The critique of the »doctrinal content«. No access
      4. 2.4. Insightfulness and tradition No access
      5. 2.5. The »motif« and the »motive« No access
      6. 2.6. The »idea« of science and the »factual« sciences No access
      1. 3.1. On the manifold beginnings of philosophy No access
      2. 3.2. The »first beginning«: the Pre-Socratics No access
      3. 3.3. Towards the »second beginning«: the Sophists No access
      4. 3.4. The »second beginning«: Socrates and Plato No access
      5. 3.5. The »third beginning«: Descartes No access
      6. 3.6. Descartes and the Sophist No access
      1. 4.1. Splinters No access
      2. 4.2. Unity and pseudo-unity No access
      3. 4.3. The Sophist within No access
      4. 4.4. The scientist without No access
      1. 5.1. Biographical and structural dependency No access
      2. 5.2. The variation of the first layer: from »private« to »personal ego« No access
      3. 5.3. The variation of the first layer and its way to the »deeper« layer No access
      4. 5.4. The variation of the deeper layer: from »doubt« to »bracketing« No access
      5. 5.5. The variation of the deeper layer: from »pure« to »transcendental« ego No access
      6. 5.6. The variation of the deeper layer: from »sheer« to »inadequate« apodicticity No access
      7. 5.6. The variation of the second layer and its way to the doctrinal critique No access
      8. 5.7. The critique of the doctrine: »substances« and »axioms« No access
      9. 5.8. The critique of the doctrine: »solipsism« No access
    6. 6. Concluding remark. Columbus above the Tartarus—an analogy No access
  4. Authors:
    1. Introduction No access
    2. 1. A broadening of, and deviation from, the Cartesian doctrinal content: The theoretical background of the conceptual network of the horizon No access
      1. a. Intentionality and reflection No access
      2. b. Synthesis. No access
      3. c. Horizon No access
    4. 3. Intentional analysis No access
    5. Conclusion No access
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. The Bracketing of the Natural Attitude No access
    3. 3. An Inquiry into Existence and Non-Existence No access
    4. 4. Kant’s response to Hume’s circle No access
    5. 5. Husserl’s response to Hume’s circle No access
    6. 6. The limit of ontology No access
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. Preliminary remarks on transcendental idealism No access
    3. 3. The essence of the monad No access
    4. Intermezzo on Ideas I No access
    5. 4. The structure of the monad No access
    6. 5. Systematic remarks on transcendental idealism No access
  7. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. The Problem No access
    3. 3. The Sphere of Ownness No access
    4. 4. Living Bodiliness (Leiblichkeit) No access
    5. 5. Transfer of Sense No access
  8. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. Unity as a nucleus of presentation (§ 55) No access
    3. 4. The unity of the monad No access
    4. 5. Conclusions: Phenomenology and metaphysics No access
  9. Authors:
    1. 1. The sublation of the natural attitude No access
    2. 2. The sublation of the disinterested onlooker No access
    3. 3. Unconscious life and the method of phenomenology No access
  10. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. On the historical context of Ingarden’s reading of CM No access
    3. 3. Ingarden on CM and the realism-idealism controversy No access
    4. 4. The problem of the beginning No access
    5. 5. Developments of Ingarden’s reading of CM No access
    6. 6. Conclusion No access
  11. Authors:
    1. 1. Landgrebe and the reception of Husserl’s Cartesianism after World War II No access
    2. 2. Landgrebe’s argument in Husserl’s departure from Cartesianism No access
    3. 3. Behind Husserl’s back: Contexts and motivations of Landgrebe’s position No access
    4. 4. Critical assessment of Landgrebe’s interpretation of the role of horizons in his critique of Husserl’s Cartesianism No access
  12. Authors:
    1. 1. Between objectivity and intersubjectivity: Levinas on the place of the Meditations in Husserl’s work No access
    2. 2. Deduction and dissimulation: The interpretation of the Fifth Meditation No access
    3. 3. Apodicticity and intersubjective reduction: Extending the Cartesian Meditations beyond Husserl’s phenomenology No access
  13. Authors:
    1. 1. Criticism: Husserl made the problem of the other unsolvable No access
    2. 2. Encountering others: Sharing of the same corporeity and culture No access
    3. 3. Undifferentiated generality vs. appresentation No access
    4. 4. »We must return to the cogito« No access
    5. Conclusion: Sharing and exposure No access
  14. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. How Cartesian are the Cartesian Meditations? No access
    3. 3. How descriptive is Husserl’s descriptive phenomenology? No access
    4. 4. How egological is Husserl’s egology? No access
    5. 5. Conclusion: Ricoeur and the Husserlian Heresies No access
  15. Authors:
      1. 1.1. Patočka’s stay in Paris and his first encounter with Husserl No access
      2. 1.2. Deepening the Cartesian theme No access
      1. 2.1. Descartes as the thinker of the total system of the scientific revolution No access
      2. 2.2. Descartes as a cunning destroyer of ancient metaphysics No access
      3. 2.3. Descartes as the founder of psychologized subjectivity No access
      4. 2.4. Descartes and the end of metaphysics through its instrumentalization No access
      1. 3.1. The Brentanian roots of Husserl’s Cartesianism No access
      2. 3.2 Epochē and reduction No access
      3. 3.3. Aspects of Husserl’s Cartesianism No access
    4. 4. Conclusion No access
  16. Authors:
    1. 1. Where and when No access
    2. 2. »Kantian« meditations: A dispute about science No access
    3. 3. »Cartesian« (and »neo-Kantian«) meditations: Grundnorm and intersubjectivity No access
    4. 4. Kelsen versus Husserl? No access
  17. Authors:
    1. 0. Introduction No access
      1. 1.1 The core thesis No access
      2. 1.2 The corollary thesis No access
      1. 2.1 Evidence and the truth-connection No access
      2. 2.2 The incompatibility of metaphysical realism and the phenomenological perspective No access
      3. 2.3 An alternative to The Standard View No access
    4. 3. Why evidence justifies belief No access
    5. 4. Conclusion No access
  18. Authors:
    1. 1. An »ancient staging of an ancient theater« No access
    2. 2. Two directions: Begründung and Fundierung No access
    3. 3. Husserl’s two antithetical rational demands No access
    4. 4. The Cartesian Meditations and the so-called »Cartesian way« No access
    5. 5. Geltungsfundierung and Genesisfundierung in the Cartesian Meditations No access
    6. 5. Concluding remarks No access
  19. Authors:
    1. 1. Husserl on self-variation and eidetic variation No access
    2. 2. Reflexion, Ichspaltung, Wiedererfahrung—self-imagining reconsidered No access
    3. 3. Self-variation anew … Radikale Selbstbesinnung revisited No access
  20. Authors:
    1. 1. The powerful work of Jean-François Lavigne No access
    2. 2. The so-called »ontological psychologism« of the Logical Investigations No access
    3. 3. The metaphysical postulates of transcendental phenomenology No access
    4. 4. Absolute affection and transcendence No access
  21. Authors:
    1. 1. The Cartesian path No access
    2. 2. The basic distinction No access
    3. 3. First philosophy as such No access
    4. 4. Closing remarks: first philosophy and phenomenology No access
  22. Authors:
    1. 1. From »First Philosophy« to »Second Philosophy« No access
    2. 2. From »Second Philosophy« to »Last Philosophy« No access
    3. 3. »Last Philosophy« in the Cartesian Meditations No access

Bibliography (821)

  1. Heck, Philipp (1914a): Begriffsbildung und Interessenjurisprudenz. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  2. Heck, Philipp (1914b): Gesetzauslegung und Interessenjurisprudenz. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  3. Hold-Ferneck, Alexander (1926): Der Staat als Übermensch. Zugleich eine Auseinandersetzung mit der Rechtslehre Kelsens. Jena: Gustav Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  4. Husserl, Edmund (1908): »Zur Auseinandersetzung meiner transzendentalen Phänomenologie mit Kants Transzendentalphilosophie.« In: Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. Hua VII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff (1956), pp. 381–395. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  5. Husserl, Edmund (1924): Kant und die Idee der transzendentalphilosophie. In: Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. Hua VII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff (1956), pp. 230–287. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  6. Husserl, Edmund (1939): Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik, Ludwig Landgrebe (Ed.). Prag: Academia Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  7. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Hua II. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff (The Idea of Phenomenology. Lee Hardy [Trans.]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  8. Husserl, Edmund (1968): Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag (Logical Investigations, vol. 1. J.N. Findlay [Trans.], Dermot Moran [Ed.]. London: Routledge, 2001). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  9. Husserl, Edmund (1973a): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Hua I. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  10. Husserl, Edmund (1973b): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. Hua XV. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  11. Husserl, Edmund (1988): Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre 1908–1914. Hua XXVIII. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  12. Husserl, Gerhart (1925): Rechtskraft und Rechtsgeltung. Eine rechtsdogmatische Untersuchung. Berlin: Julius Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  13. Husserl, Gerhart (1929): Recht und Welt. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  14. Kantorowicz, Hermann (1906): Der Kampf um die Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg: C. Winter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  15. Kaufmann, Felix (1922): Logik und Rechtswissenschaft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  16. Kaufmann, Felix (1924): Die Kriterien des Rechts. Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der juristischen Methodenlehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  17. Kelsen, Hans (1911): Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  18. Kelsen, Hans (1914): »Reichsgesetz und Landesgesetz nach der österreichischen Verfassung.« In: Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 32, pp. 202–245, 390–438. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  19. Kelsen, Hans (1916): »Die Rechtswissenschaft als Norm- oder als Kulturwissenschaft.« In: Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche 40, pp. 1181–1239. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  20. Kelsen, Hans (1922): »Rechtswissenschaft und Recht.« In: F. Sander and H. Kelsen, Die Rolle des Neukantianismus in der Reinen Rechtslehre. Eine Debatte zwischen Sander und Kelsen. Aalen: Scientia Verlag (1988), pp. 279–411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  21. Kelsen, Hans (1923): Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre entwickelt aus der Lehre vom Rechtssatze (1911). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  22. Kelsen, Hans (1926a): Der Staat als Übermensch. Eine Erwiderung. Wien: Julius Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  23. Kelsen, Hans (1926b): Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie des Staates. Wien: R.M. Rohner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  24. Kelsen, Hans (1928): Der soziologische und der juristische Staatsbegriff. Kritische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses von Staat und Recht (1922). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  25. Kelsen, Hans (1953): »Reine Rechtslehre und egologische Theorie.« In: Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 5, pp. 449–482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  26. Kelsen, Hans (1962): »Derogation.« In: R.A. Newman (Ed.), Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound. Indianapolis: The Bobb-Merrill Company, pp. 339–355. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  27. Kelsen, Hans (1965a): »Eine phänomenologische Rechtstheorie.« In: Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 15, pp. 353–409. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  28. Kelsen, Hans (1965b): »Law and Logic.« In: W. F. de Gaay Fortman et al. (Ed.): Philosophy and Christianity: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Herman Dooyeweerd. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, pp. 231–236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  29. Kelsen, Hans (1965c): »Recht und Logik.« In: Forum 12, pp. 421–425, 495–500, 579. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  30. Kelsen, Hans (1966): »Recht, Rechtswissenschaft und Logik.« In: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 52, pp. 545–552. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  31. Kelsen, Hans (1967): »Nochmals: Recht und Logik. Zur Frage der Anwendbarkeit logischer Prinzipien auf Rechtsnormen.« In: Forum 14, pp. 39–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  32. Kelsen, Hans (1968): »Zur Frage des praktischen Syllogismus.« In: Neues Forum 15, pp. 333–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  33. Kelsen, Hans (1979): Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Wien: Manz Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  34. Kelsen, Hans (1994): Reine Rechtslehre. Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik (1934). Aalen: Scientia Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  35. Kelsen, Hans (2006): Im Selbstzeugnis. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  36. Kelsen, Hans (2010): »Justiz und Verwaltung« (1929). In: H.R. Klecatsky, R. Marcic, and H. Schambeck (Eds.), Die Wiener Rechtstheoretische Schule, vol. 2. Wien: Verlag Österreich, pp. 1459–1484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  37. Kelsen, Hans, and Klug, Ulrich (1981): Rechtsnormen und logische Analyse. Ein Briefwechsel 1959 bis 1965. Wien: Deuticke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  38. Kelsen, Hans, and Treves, Renato (1992): Formalismo giuridico e realtà sociale. Napoli: ESI. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  39. Kern, Iso (1964): Husserl und Kant. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  40. Klug, Ulrich (1951): Juristische Logik. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  41. Krawietz, Werner (1974): »Grundnorm.« In: J. Ritter (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 3. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchhandlung, pp. 918–922. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  42. Larenz, Karl (1975): Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft (1960). Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  43. Lijoi, Federico (2016): »Ethics and Law in Paul Natorp.« In: E. Pattaro and C. Roversi (Eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, vol. 12, I. Wien: Springer, pp. 29–31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  44. Lijoi, Federico (2020): »The Democratic Value of Law: Hans Kelsen on the Theory and Praxis of Relativism.« In: M. Jestaedt, R. Poscher, and J. Kammerhofer (Eds.), Die Reine Rechtslehre auf dem Prüfstand. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 393–411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  45. Merkl, Adolf (1918): »Das doppelte Rechtsanlitz. Eine Betrachtung aus der Erkenntnistheorie des Rechts.« In: Juristische Blätter 47, pp. 425–427, 444–447, 463–465. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  46. Métall, Rudolf Aladar (1969): Hans Kelsen. Leben und Werk. Wien: Deuticke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  47. Natorp, Paul (1887): »Über objektive und subjektive Begründung der Erkenntnis.« In: Philosophische Monatschrifte 23, pp. 256–283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  48. Natorp, Paul (1901): »Zur Frage nach der logischen Methode. Mit Beziehung auf Edmund Husserls ›Prolegomena zur reinen Logik.‹« In: Kant-Studien 6, pp. 270–283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  49. Olechowski, Thomas (2020): Hans Kelsen. Biographie eines Rechtswissenschaftlers. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  50. Opalek, Kazimierz (1980): Überlegungen zu Hans Kelsens »Allgemeine Theorie der Normen.« Wien: Manz Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  51. Paulson, Stanley L. (1993): »Die unterschiedlichen Formulierungen der ›Grundnorm.‹« In: A. Aarnio, S.L. Paulson, and O. Weinberger (Eds.), Rechtsnorm und Rechtswirklichkeit. Festschrift für Werner Krawietz zum 60. Geburtstag. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 53–74. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  52. Rickert, Heinrich (1913): Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung (1896–1902). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  53. Rickert, Heinrich (1915): Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft (1898). Tübingen J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  54. Rothacker, Erich (1930): Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  55. Sander, Fritz (1922): Staat und Recht. Prolegomena zu einer Theorie der Rechtserfahrung. Wien: Deuticke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  56. Sander, Fritz (1923): Kelsens Rechtslehre. Kampfschrift wider die normative Jurisprudenz. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  57. Schreier, Fritz (1924): Grundbegriffe und Grundformen des Rechts (Wiener staatswissenschaftliche Studien, Neue Folge, Bd. 4). Wien: Deuticke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  58. Stella, Giuliana (1990): I giuristi di Husserl. Milano: Giuffrè. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  59. Stella, Giuliana (1997): Stato e scienza. I fondamenti epistemologici della dottrina pura del diritto. Napoli: ESI. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  60. Stella, Giuliana (2016): »From Criticism to the Phenomenology of Law.« In: E. Pattaro and C. Roversi (Eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, vol. 12, I. Wien: Springer, pp. 157–188. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  61. Treves, Renato (1993): Il diritto come relazione. Saggi di filosofia della cultura. Napoli: ESI. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  62. Vida, Silvia (2007): Sinn e Bedeutung della norma nell’ultimo Kelsen. Bologna: Gedit. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  63. Walter, Robert (1992): »Entstehung und Entwicklung des Gedankens der Grundnorm«. In: Robert Walter (Ed.), Schwerpunkte der Reinen Rechtslehre. Wien: Manz Verlag, pp. 47–59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  64. Windelband, Wilhelm (1882): »Normen und Naturgesetze.« In: Wilhelm Windelband, Präludien, vol. 2. Tübingen J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1911, pp. 59–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  65. Windelband, Wilhelm (1912): »Prinzipien der Logik.« In: A. Ruge (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften, vol. 1. Tübingen J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 1–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  66. Winternitz, Emanuel (1922–1923): »Zum Gegenstandsproblem der Rechtstheorie. Kritische Bemerkungen zu Fritz Sanders ›Kampfschrift wider die normative Jurisprudenz: Kelsens Rechtslehre.‹« In: Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 3, pp. 684–698. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  67. Berghofer, Philipp (2018): »Husserl's Conception of Experiential Justification: What It is and Why It Matters.« In: Husserl Studies 34 (2), pp. 145–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  68. Berghofer, Philipp (2019): »On the Nature and Systematic Role of Evidence: Husserl as a Proponent of Mentalist Evidentialism?« In: European Journal of Philosophy 27 (1), pp. 98–117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  69. Bernet, Rudolf (2004): »Husserl’s Transcendental Realism Revisited.« In: The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 4, pp. 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  70. Breyer, Thiemo (2010): »Bewährung.« In: Husserl-Lexikon. Hans-Helmuth Gander (Ed.). Darmstadt: WBG, pp. 44–45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  71. Carta, Emanuela (2022): »On the Distinction between Husserl’s Notions of Essence and of Idea in the Kantian Sense.« In: The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 19, pp. 177–194. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  72. Doyon, Maxime (2021). »The Normative Turn of Perceptual Intentionality and its Metaphysical Consequences (or why Husserl was neither a disjunctivist nor a conjunctivist).« In: The Husserlian Mind. Hanne Jacobs (Ed.). London and New York: Routledge, pp. 172–183. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  73. Dutant, Julien (2015): »The Legend of the Justified True Belief Analysis.« In: Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1), pp. 95–145. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  74. Dupre, Luis (1964): »The Concept of Truth in Husserl’s.« In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3), pp. 345–354. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  75. Hardy, Lee (2013): Nature’s Suit: Husserl's Phenomenological Philosophy of the Physical Sciences. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  76. Heffernan, George (1998): »Miscellaneous Lucubrations on Husserl’s Answer to the Question ›was die Evidenz sei‹: A Contribution to the Phenomenology of Evidence on the Occasion of the Publication of Husserliana Volume XXX.« In: Husserl Studies 15, pp. 1–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  77. Heffernan, George (2020): »Truth and Evidence.« In: The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. Daniele De Santis, Burt C. Hopkins, Claudio Majolino (Eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 412–424. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  78. Hopp, Walter (2011): Perception and Knowledge: A Phenomenological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  79. Hopp, Walter (2016): »Phenomenal Conservatism and the Principle of all Principles.« In: Philosophy of Mind and Phenomenology. Daniel Dahlstrom, Andrea Elpidorou and Walter Hopp (Eds.). New York: Routledge, pp. 180–202. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  80. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  81. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften, Hua V. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  82. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations. Trans. by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  83. Husserl, Edmund (1966): Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926, Hua XI. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  84. Husserl, Edmund (1969): Formal and Transcendental Logic. Trans. by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  85. Husserl, Edmund (1973): Experience and Judgment Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Trans. by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  86. Husserl, Edmund (1996): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil, Hua VIII. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  87. Husserl, Edmund (1997): Thing and Space. Lectures of 1907. Trans. by Richard Rojcewicz. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  88. Husserl, Edmund (2001a): Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Lectures on Transcendental Logic. Trans. by Anthony J. Steinbock. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  89. Husserl, Edmund (2001b): Logical Investigation. Volume I. Trans. by. John N. Findlay. London and New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  90. Husserl, Edmund (2001c): Logical Investigation. Volume II. Trans. by. John N. Findlay. London and New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  91. Husserl, Edmund (2001d): Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1927, Hua XXXII. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  92. Husserl, Edmund (2002): Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913), Hua XX/1. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  93. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge. Lectures 1906/07. Trans. by Claire Ortiz Hill. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  94. Husserl, Edmund (2014): Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Trans. by Daniel Dahlstrom. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  95. Husserl, Edmund (2019): First Philosophy. Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Trans. by Sebastian Luft and Thane M. Naberhaus. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  96. Kidd, Chad (2014): »Husserl’s Phenomenological Theory of Intuition.« In: Rational Intuition. Linda Osbeck and Barbara Held (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  97. Patzig, Günther. (1977): »Husserl on Truth and Evidence.« In: Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Jitendra N. Mohanty (Eds.). The Hague: M. Nijhoff, pp. 179–196. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  98. Piazza, Tommaso (2013): »The Evidence of the Senses is no Evidence from the Senses. Husserl’s Sixth Logical Investigation on the Justification of Perceptual Beliefs.« In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 16 (1), pp. 174–191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  99. Pietersma, Henry (1977): »Husserl’s Views on the Evident and the True.« In: Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Frederick A. Elliston and Peter McCormick (Eds.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 38–53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  100. Silva, Paul and Oliveira, Luis (forthcoming): »Propositional Justification and Doxastic Justification«. In: The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evidence. Maria Lasonen-Aarnio and Clayton Littlejohn (Eds.). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  101. Ströker, Elisabeth (1997): The Husserlian Foundations of Science. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  102. Tugendhat, Ernst (1967): Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  103. Zahavi, Dan (2010): »Husserl and the ›Absolute.‹ In Philosophy, phenomenology, science. Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl. Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jacobs and Filip Mettens (Eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 71–92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  104. Zahavi, Dan (2017): Husserl’s Legacy. Phenomenology, Metaphysics, and Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  105. Zuidervaart, Lambert (2016): »Synthetic Evidence and Objective Identity: The Contemporary Significance of Early Husserl’s Conception of Truth.« In: European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1), pp. 122–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  106. Wiltsche, Harald A. (2015): »Intuitions, Seemings, and Phenomenology.« In: Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 34 (3), pp. 57–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  107. Wiltsche, Harald A. (2021): »Husserl on Rationality.« In: European Journal of Philosophy, pp. 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-375
  108. Angern, Emil (1986): »Krise der Vernunft? Neuere Beiträge zur Diagnose und Kritik der Moderne.« Philosophische Rundschau, vol. 33, 3/4, pp. 169–179. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  109. Aristotle (1937): Parts of Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library). DOI: 10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-parts_animals, visited on 15 December 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  110. Aristotle (1960): Posterior Analytics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library). DOI: 10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-posterior_analytics, visited on 15 December 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  111. Aristotle (1975): The Metaphysics Books I–IX. Cambridge, MA., London: Harvard University Press, William Heinemann Ltd. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  112. Berghofer, Philipp (2017): »Why Husserl is a Moderate Foundationalist.« Husserl Studies, vol. 34, pp. 1–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  113. Boehm, Rudolf (1982): »A Tale of Estrangement: Husserl and Contemporary Philosophy.« Research in Phenomenology, vol. 12, pp. 13–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  114. Cavallaro, Marco (2013): »Der Beitrag der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls zur Debatte über die Fundierung des Gesteswissenschaften.« Phänomenologische Forschungen, pp. 77–93, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24360746. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  115. Correia, Febrice (2004): »Husserl on Foundation.« Dialectica, vol. 58, 3, pp. 349–367. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  116. Crowell, Steven G. (2001): Husserl, Heidegger and the Space of Meaning: Paths toward Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  117. Descartes, René (1956): Discourse on Method. L.J. LaFleur (Trans.). Indianapolis, New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., subsidiary of Howard W. Sams & Co., Inc., Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  118. Descartes, René (1960): Meditations on First Philosophy. L.J. LaFleur (Trans.). Indianapolis, New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., subsidiary of Howard W. Sams & Co., Inc., Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  119. Descartes, René (1966): Règles pour la direction de l'esprit. Trans. J. Sirven. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  120. Drummond, John J. (1990): Husserlian Intentionality and Non-foundational Realism: Noema and Object. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  121. Fink, Eugen (1966): »Was will die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls? (Die phänomenologische Grundlegungsidee).« In: Studien zur Phänomenologie 1930–1939. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 157–178 = (1972): »What Does the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl Want to Accomplish? (The Phenomenological Idea of Laying-a-Ground).« Arthur Grugan (Trans.). Research in Phenomenology vol. 2, pp. 5–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  122. Granel, Gérard (1976): Préface du Traducteur.« In: La crise des sciences européennes et la phénoménologie transcendantale d’E. Husserl. Paris: Gallimard, pp. v–vii. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  123. Guéroult, Martial (1953): Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons. Paris: Aubier-Éditions Montaigne. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  124. Hopp, Walter (2008): »Husserl, Phenomenology, and Foundationalism.« Inquiry, vol. 51, 2, pp. 194–216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  125. Husserl, Edmund (1939): Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Ludwig Landgrebe (Ed.). Prague: Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung = (1973): Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Ludwig Landgrebe (Ed.), James Churchill and Karl Ameriks (Trans.), Lothar Eley (Afterword). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  126. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Hua I. Ed. Stephan Strasser. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  127. Husserl, Edmund (1952a): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Hua IV. Marly Biemel (Ed.) Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (1989): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  128. Husserl, Edmund (1952b): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften. Hua V. Marly Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, »Nachwort« [pp. 138–162] = (1989): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, »Epilogue,« pp. 405–430. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  129. Husserl, Edmund. (1954): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Hua VI. Walter Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. David Carr (Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  130. Husserl, Edmund. (1956): Erste Philosophie (1923–1924). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. Hua VII. Rudolf Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (2019): First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Sebastian Luft and Thane Naberhaus (Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  131. Husserl, Edmund (1959): Erste Philosophie (1923–1924). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. Hua VIII. Rudolf Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (2019): First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Sebastian Luft and Thane Naberhaus (Trans.) Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 207–390. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  132. Husserl, Edmund (1968): Phänomenologische Psychologie, Vorlesungen Sommer Semester 1925. Hua IX. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. [pp. 1–234] = (1977): Phenomenological Psychology, Lectures, Summer Semester 1925. Trans. John Scanlon. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. [pp. 237–301] = (1997): Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931). Thomas Sheehan and Richard E. Palmer (Ed. & Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 83–179. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  133. Husserl, Edmund (1970): Philosophie der Arithmetik. Mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901). Hua XII. Lothar Eley (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff = (2003): Philosophy of Arithmetic: Psychological and Logical Investigations. Dallas Willard (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  134. Husserl, Edmund (1973a): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil: 1905–1920. Hua XIII. Iso Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. [pp. 112–234, 90–98, 8–9] = (2006): The Basic Problems of Phenomenology: From the Lectures, Winter Semester, 1910–1911. Ingo Farin and James G. Hart (Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  135. Husserl, Edmund (1973b): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928. Hua XIV. Iso Kern (Ed.) Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  136. Husserl, Edmund (1973c): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. Hua XV. Iso Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  137. Husserl, Edmund (1973d): Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Hua II. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (1964): The Idea of Phenomenology. William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  138. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Hua XVII. Paul Janssen (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (1969): Formal and Transcendental Logic. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  139. Husserl, Edmund (1975): Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Text der 1. und der 2. Auflage. Hua XVIII. Elmar Holenstein (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (2001): Logical Investigations. J.N. Findlay (Trans.), Dermot Moran (Ed.), vol. 1. London: Routledge, pp. 1–161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  140. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Hua III/1. Karl Schuhmann (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff = (1982): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Frederik Kersten (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  141. Husserl, Edmund (1979): Aufsätze und Rezensionen (1890–1910), mit ergänzenden Texten. Hua XXII. Bernhard Rang (Ed). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff [pp. 92–123, 132–135] = (1994): Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Dallas Willard (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 139–170, 178–182. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  142. Husserl, Edmund (1984a): Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band, Erster und zweiter Teile Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Hua XIX/1–2. Ursula Panzer (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff [pp. 5–226; 227–778] = (2001): Logical Investigations. J.N. Findlay (Trans.), Dermot Moran (Ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 163–331 (vol. I), pp. 1–358 (vol. II). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  143. Husserl, Edmund (1984b): Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/07. Hua XXIV. Ullrich Melle (Ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff [pp. 442–447] = (1994): Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Dallas Willard (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 490–497. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  144. Husserl, Edmund (1987): »Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft.« In Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921). Mit ergänzenden Texten. Hua XXV. Thomas Nenon and Hans-Rainer Sepp (Eds.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff [pp. 8–41] = (1965): »Philosophy as Rigorous Science.« Quentin Lauer (Trans.). In: Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 79–122. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  145. Husserl, Edmund (1988): VI. Cartesianische Meditation. Teil 1. Die Idee einer transzendentalen Methodenlehre. Texte aus dem Nachlass Eugen Finks (1932) mit Anmerkungen und Beilagen aus dem Nachlass Edmund Husserls (1933/34). Hua-Dok II/1. Hans Ebeling, Jann Holl, and Guy van Kerckhoven (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers = (1995): Eugen Fink. Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method. With Textual Notations by Edmund Husserl. Ronald Bruzina (Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  146. Husserl, Edmund (1994): Briefwechsel. Philosophenbriefe, Hua-Dok III/6. Ed. Karl Schuhmann with Elisabeth Schuhmann. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  147. Husserl, Edmund (1995): Logik und allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Vorlesungen 1917/1918. Mit ergänzenden Texten aus den ersten Fassung 1910/11. Hua XXX. Ursula Panzer (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers = (2019): Logic and General Theory of Science. Lectures 1917/18 with Supplementary Texts from the First Version of 1910/11. Claire Ortiz Hill (Trans.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  148. Husserl, Edmund (2002a): Logische Untersuchungen Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logische Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913). Hua XX/1. Ullrich Melle (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers [pp. 272–329] = (1975): Introduction to the Logical Investigation. J. Bossert and C.H. Peters (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  149. Husserl, Edmund (2002b): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1922/23. Hua XXXV. Berndt Goosens (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  150. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Hua XXXIX. Rochus Sowa (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  151. Kant, Immanuel (1974): Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1–2. Werkausgabe, vol. 3. W. Weischedel (Ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp = (1999): Critique of Pure Reason. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  152. Kern, Iso (1964): Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  153. Kern, Iso (1977): »The Three Ways to the Transcendental Phenomenological Reduction in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl.« In: Frederick Elliston and Peter McCormick (Eds.). Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 126–149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  154. Landgrebe, Ludwig (1963): »Husserls Abschied vom Cartesianismus [1962].« In his: Der Weg der Phänomenologie. Das Problem einer ursprünglichen Erfahrung. Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, pp. 163–206 = (1970): »Husserl’s Departure from Cartesianism.« In: R.O. Elveton (Ed.). The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, pp. 259–306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  155. Ladrière, Jean (1976): »L’Abîme.« In: Savoir, faire, espérer. Les limites de la raison. Bruxelles: Facultés Universitaires de Saint Louis, pp. 171–191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  156. Lerner, Rosemary R.P. (1992): »Analyse intentionnelle et crise des fondements dans les recherches phénoménologiques d’Edmond Husserl.« In: Gérard Granel and Élisabeth Rigal (Eds.). La notion d’analyse. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, pp. 193–216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  157. Lerner, Rosemary R.P. (2004): »Husserl versus Neo-Kantianism Revisited: On Skepticism, Foundationalism, and Intuition.« The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, vol. 4, pp. 173–208. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  158. Lerner, Rosemary R.P. (2010): »The Cartesian Meditations’ Foundational Discourse: An Obsolete Project?« The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, vol. 10, pp. 145–165. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  159. Lyotard, Jean-François (1989): »Argumentation et présentation: la crise des fondements.« In: André Jacob (Ed.). Encyclopédie philosophique universelle I: L’Univers Philosophique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 738–750. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  160. Kranz, Walther, and Hermann Diels (Eds.). (1966): Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Dublin, Zurich: Weidman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  161. Mertens, Karl (1996): Zwischen Letztbegründung und Skepsis. Kritische Untersuchungen zum Selbstverständnis der transzendentalen Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls. Freiburg, Munich: Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  162. Nenon, Thomas (2008): »Deux modèles de fondation dans les Recherches logiques.« Methodos: Savoir et Textes [Online], vol. 9, 20, http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/2186. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  163. Posada Varela, Pablo (2014): »Phénomènes et concrétudes. De la réduction phénoménologique comme réduction méréologique.« Eikasia, nº 55, pp. 187–202. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  164. Pryor, Jim (2005): »There is Immediate Justification.« In: Matthias Steup and Ernst Sosa (Eds.). Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 181–202 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  165. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja (2013): »Husserls Fundierungsmodell als Grundlage einer intentionalen Wertungsanalyse.« Metodo: International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, vol. 1, 2, pp. 59–82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  166. Schlick, Moritz (1969): »Gibt es ein materiales Apriori?« In: Friedrich Waismann (Ed.). Gesammelte Aufsätze 1926–1936. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. 20–30 = (1949): »Is there a Factual Apriori?« In: Herbert Feigl, and Wilfrid Sellars (Eds.). Readings in Philosophical Analysis. W. Sellars (Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 277–285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  167. Waldenfels, Bernhard (1982): »The Despised Doxa: Husserl and the Continuing Crisis of Western Reason.« Research in Phenomenology, vol. 12, pp. 21–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-401
  168. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda (2016): »Phenomenology as Critique: Teleological-Historical Reflection and Husserl’s Transcendental Eidetics.« In: Husserl Studies 31(1), pp. 21–46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  169. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda (2017): »Making Sense of Husserl’s Notion of Teleology—Normativity, Reason, Progress and Phenomenology as ›Critique from Within.‹« In: Hegel Bulletin 38(1), pp. 104–128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  170. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda (2019): »Critical imagination and lived possibilities—An Other Kind of Otherwise.« In: New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: Imagination in Kant and Husserl, XVII, pp. 204–224. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  171. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda (2020): »Modality Matters: Imagination as Consciousness of Possibilities and Husserl’s Transcendental Eidetics.« Special Issue: Imagination in Phenomenology: Variations and Modalities, Husserl Studies 36(3), pp. 303–318. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  172. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda (2022): »Husserlian Phenomenology as Radical Immanent Critique— Or How Phenomenology ImaginesIitself.« In Aldea, A.S., Carr, D. & Heinämaa, S. (Eds.): Why Method Matters: Phenomenology as Critique. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  173. Aldea, Andreea Smaranda & Jansen, Julia (2020): »We Have only just Begun: On the Reach of the Imagination and the Depths of Conscious Life.« In: Husserl Studies, 36(3), pp. 205–211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  174. Altobrando, Andrea et al. (Eds.) (2018): Realizations of the Self. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  175. Bernet, Rudolf (2002): »Unconscious consciousness in Husserl and Freud.« In: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, pp. 327–351. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  176. Carr, David (1986): Time, Narrative, History. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  177. Cavallaro, Marco (2017): »The Phenomenon of Ego-Splitting in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Pure Phantasy.« In: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 48(2), pp. 162–177. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  178. Davis, Duane (2020). »The Phenomenological Method.« In: Wiess, G. Murphy, A., Salamon, G. (Eds.): 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 3–9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  179. De Santis, Daniele (2020): »›Self-Variation‹: A Problem of Method in Husserl’s Phenomenology.« In: Husserl Studies, 36, pp. 255–269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  180. Geniusas, Saulius (2020): »Towards a Phenomenology of the Unconscious: Husserl and Fink on Versunkenheit.« Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, online first October 15, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1834334 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  181. Guenther, Lisa (2020). »Critical Phenomenology.« In: Wiess, G. Murphy, A., Salamon, G. (Eds.): 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 11–16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  182. Hartimo, Mirja (2022): »Radical Besinnung as a Method for Phenomenological Critique.« In: Aldea, A.S., Carr, D. & Heinämaa, S. (Eds.): Why Method Matters: Phenomenology as Critique, Londong, New York, Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  183. Heinämaa, Sara, Carr, David, Aldea, Andreea Smaranda (2022): »Matters of Method: Suspension, Imagination, and Critique.« In: Aldea, A.S., Carr, D. & Heinämaa, S. (Eds.): Why Method Matters: Phenomenology as Critique. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  184. Husserl, Edmund (1948): Erfahrung und Urteil, Landgrebe, L. (Ed.). Hamburg: Claassen & Goverts. In English: Experience and judgment, Churchill, J. and Ameriks, K. (Trans). Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  185. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Stephan Strasser (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  186. Husserl, Edmund (1954): Die Krisis de Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie. Walter Biemel (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. David Carr (Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  187. Husserl, Edmund (1959): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. Rudolf Boehm (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. First Philosophy Lectures 1923/24. Sebastian Luft & Thane Naberhaus (Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer, 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  188. Husserl, Edmund (1962): Phänomenologische Psychologie. Walter Biemel (ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  189. Husserl, Edmund (1966): Analysen zur Passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926. Margot Fleischer (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  190. Husserl, Edmund (1973a): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil: 1905–1920. Iso Kern (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  191. Husserl, Edmund (1973b): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. Iso Kern (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  192. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und Transzendentale Logik. Paul Janssen (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Formal and Transcendental Logic. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  193. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu Einer Reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch. Karl Schuhmann (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  194. Husserl, Edmund (1980): Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung 1898–1925. Eduard Marbach (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  195. Husserl, Edmund (1993): Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1934–1937). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  196. Husserl, Edmund (2002): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1922/23. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  197. Husserl, Edmund (2012): Zur Lehre vom Wesen und zur Methode der eidetischen Variation. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1891–1935). Dirk Fonfara (ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  198. Husserl, Edmund (2014): Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937). Rochus Sowa and Thomas Vongehr (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  199. Lobo, Carlos (2013). »Self-Variation and Self-Modification or the Different Ways of Being Other.« In: R.T. Jensen and D. Moran (Eds.): The Phenomenology of Embodied Subjectivity, Contributions to Phenomenology 71. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 263–283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  200. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2012): Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, D. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  201. Mohanty, Jitendra Nath (1999): Logic, Truth and the Modalities: From a Phenomenological Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  202. Ricoeur, Paul (1990): Oneself As Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  203. Summa, Michela (2022): »On the Functions of Examples in Critical Philosophy.« In Aldea, A.S., Carr, D. & Heinämaa, S. (Eds.): Why Method Matters: Phenomenology as Critique. London, New York, Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-429
  204. Drummond, John J. (2003): »Husserl’s Third Logical Investigation: Parts and Wholes, Founding Connections, and the Synthetic A Priori.« In: Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Ed.): Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 57–68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  205. García-Baró, Miguel (1993): La verdad y el tiempo. Salamanca: Sígueme. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  206. García-Baró, Miguel (2008): Teoría fenomenológica de la verdad. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  207. Heidegger, Martin (1963): »Mein Weg in die Phänomenologie.« In: Zur Sache des Denkens (1962–1964), GA 14. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, pp. 91–104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  208. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  209. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  210. Husserl, Edmund (1966): Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917), Hua X. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  211. Husserl, Edmund (1969): Formal and Transcendental Logic. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  212. Husserl, Edmund (1970): Logical Investigations. Trans. J. N. Findlay. 2 vols. [continuous pagination]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  213. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft, Hua XVII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  214. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch, Hua III/1. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  215. Husserl, Edmund (1982): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. Fred Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  216. Husserl, Edmund (1984): Logische Unterschungen. Zweiter Teil, Hua XIX/1–2. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  217. Husserl, Edmund (1991): On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Trans. John Barnett Brough. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  218. Husserl, Edmund (2001): Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie (1902–1903), Hua Mat I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  219. Jacobs, Hanne (2007): »Lavigne, Jean-François, Husserl et la naissance de la phénoménologie (1900–1913).« In: Husserl Studies 23, pp. 71–82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  220. Lavigne, Jean-François (2005): Husserl et la naissance de la phénoménologie (1900–1913). Des Recherches logiques aux Ideen: La genèse de l’idéalisme transcendantal phénoménologique. Paris: PUF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  221. Lavigne, Jean-François (2009): Accéder au transcendantal? Réduction et idéalisme transcendantal dans les Idées I de Husserl. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  222. Serrano de Haro, Agustín (2010): »Husserl’s Mereological Argument for Intentional Constitution.« In: Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jacobs, Filip Mattens (Eds.): Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences: Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 543–559. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  223. Serrano de Haro, Agustín (2021): »The Development of Husserl`s Analysis of Physical Pain.« In: Phenomenology in the Hispanic World, Antonio Zirión Q., Jethro Bravo, Noé Expósito, and Jonathan Guereca (Eds.): The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 19, pp. forthcoming. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  224. Zahavi, Dan (2017): Husserl’s Legacy: Phenomenology, Metaphysics, Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-459
  225. Aristotle (1922): Lehre vom Beweis oder Zweite Analytik (Organon IV). Trans. Eugen Rolfes. Hamburg: Meiner (reprint 1975). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  226. Aristotle (1966): Über die Seele. Trans. Willy Theiler. Berlin: Akademie / Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  227. Aristotle (1990): Metaphysik. Trans. Friedrich Bassenge. Berlin: Akademie. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  228. Berghofer, Philipp (2020): »Husserl’s Project of Ultimate Elucidation and the Principle of all Principles«. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3), pp. 285–296. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  229. Biemel, Walter (1954): »Einleitung des Herausgebers«. In: Husserl 1954, pp. xiii-xxii. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  230. Bußmann, Hadumod (Ed.) (2008): Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kröner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  231. Fabbianelli, Faustino (2017): »Phänomenologie als Erste Philosophie«. In: Luft, Sebastian/Wehrle, Maren (Eds.): Husserl Handbuch. Leben—Werk—Wirkung. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, pp. 135–142. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  232. Folger-Fonfara, Sabine (2008): Das »Super«-Transzendentale und die Spaltung der Metaphysik. Der Entwurf des Franziskus von Marchia. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  233. Fonfara, Dirk (2016): »Zur Auseinandersetzung Edmund Husserls mit Platon und Aristoteles. Metaphysik, Ontologie und Theologie in Husserls eidetischer Phänomenologie als Erster Philosophie«. In: Murat, Ates; Bruns, Oliver; Han, Choong-Su; Sören Schulz, Ole (eds.). Überwundene Metaphysik? Beiträge zur Konstellation von Phänomenologie und Metaphysik-kritik, Freiburg / München: Karl Alber, pp. 29–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  234. Geniusas, Saulius (2012): The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  235. Husserl, Edmund (1950a): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Hua I. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  236. Husserl, Edmund (1950b): Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Hua II. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  237. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften. Hua V. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  238. Husserl, Edmund (1954): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Hua VI. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  239. Husserl, Edmund (1956a): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. Hua VII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  240. Husserl, Edmund (1956b): Philosophy as Strict Science. Trans. Quentin Lauer. In: Cross Currents, 6(4), pp. 325–344. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  241. Husserl, Edmund (1959): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. Hua VIII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  242. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  243. Husserl, Edmund (1969): Formal and Transcendental Logic. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  244. Husserl, Edmund (1970): The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  245. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Mit ergänzenden Texten. Hua XVII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  246. Husserl, Edmund (1975): Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Hua XVIII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  247. Husserl, Edmund (1980): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Third Book: Phenomenology and the Foundations of the Sciences. Trans. Ted E. Klein and William E. Pohl. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  248. Husserl, Edmund (1984a): Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/07. Hua XXIV. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  249. Husserl, Edmund (1984b): Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Hua XIX/1–2. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  250. Husserl, Edmund (1987): Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921). Mit ergänzenden Texten. Hua XXV. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  251. Husserl, Edmund (1989a): Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922–1937). Mit ergänzenden Texten. Hua XXVII. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  252. Husserl, Edmund (1989b): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  253. Husserl, Edmund (1994): Briefwechsel. Teil 3: Die Göttinger Schule. Hua-Dok III/3. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  254. Husserl, Edmund (1999): The Idea of Phenomenology. Trans. Lee Hardy. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  255. Husserl, Edmund (2001): Logical Investigations. Vol. 1. Trans. John Niemeyer Findlay. Ed. Dermot Moran. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  256. Husserl, Edmund (2002a): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1922/23. Hua XXXV. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  257. Husserl, Edmund (2002b): Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil: Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913). Hua XX/1. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  258. Husserl, Edmund (2002c): Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935). Hua XXXIV. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  259. Husserl, Edmund (2005): Einführung in die Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis. Vorlesung 1909. Hua Mat VII. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  260. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Hua XXXIX. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  261. Husserl, Edmund (2012): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1916–1920. Hua Mat IX. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  262. Husserl, Edmund (2019): First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Trans. Sebastian Luft and Thane M. Naberhaus. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  263. Kern, Iso (1962): »Die drei Wege zur transzendental-phänomenologischen Reduktion in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls«. In: Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 24, pp. 303–349. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  264. Lohmar, Dieter (2000): Edmund Husserls »Formale und transzendentale Logik«. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  265. Lohmar, Dieter (2016): Denken ohne Sprache. Phänomenologie des nicht-sprachlichen Denkens bei Mensch und Tier im Licht der Evolutionsforschung, Primatologie und Neurologie. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  266. Mertens, Karl (1996): Zwischen Letztbegründung und Skepsis. Kritische Untersuchungen zum Selbstverständnis der transzendentalen Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls. Freiburg / München: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  267. Pérez-Gatica, Sergio (2020): Anfang und Methode. Zur Verwandlung der Ersten Philosophie in eine Grundlagenwissenschaft bei Husserl. KUPS: Universität zu Köln <https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/62926/>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  268. Pérez-Gatica, Sergio (2021): »Die Diskussion zwischen José Gaos und Luis Villoro über den Begriff der Lebenswelt—Kritische Auswertung einer entscheidenden Episode der Rezeptionsgeschichte von Husserls Phänomenologie in Spanien und Mexiko«. In: Husserl Studies, 37(3), pp. 271–286 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-021-09293-y>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  269. Perkins, Patricio (2017): »A critical taxonomy of the theories about the paths into the reduction«. In: Husserl Studies, 33(2), pp. 127–148 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-016-9206-8>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  270. Vollrath, Ernst (1962): »Die Gliederung der Metaphysik in eine metaphysica generalis und eine metaphysica specialis«. In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 16, pp. 258–284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-481
  271. Arnold, Thomas (2017): Phänomenologie als Platonismus. Zu den Platonischen Wesensmomenten der Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  272. Arnold, Thomas/D’Angelo, Diego (2020): »Edmund Husserl – Ein Weg in die Metaphysik?«. In: Tobias Keiling (Ed.): Phänomenologische Metaphysik. Konturen eines Problems seit Husserl. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  273. Bernet, Rudolf/Kern, Iso/Marbach, Eduard (1993): An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  274. Boehm, Rudolf (1956): »Einleitung des Herausgebers«. In: Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil, Hua VII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  275. Breuer, Irene (2020): »Towards a Phenomenological Metaphysics: The Contingent Core of the ego and of all Eidetic Forms«. In: Iulian Apostolescu/Claudia Serban (Eds.): Husserl, Kant and Transcendental Phenomenology. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 213–233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  276. Boehm, Rudolf (1968): Vom Gesichtspunkt der Phänomenologie. Husserl-Studien. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  277. Chernavin, Georgy (2012): Transzendentale Archäologie – Ontologie – Metaphysik. Methodologische Alternativen in der phänomenologischen Philosophie Husserls. Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  278. De Santis, Daniele (2018). »›Metaphysische Ergebnisse‹: Phenomenology and Metaphysics in Edmund Husserl’s Cartesianische Meditationen (§60). Attempt at Commentary.« In: Husserl Studies 34, pp. 63–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  279. De Santis, Daniele (2021). »Husserl’s Concept of Metaphysics in its Historical Context«. In: Hanne Jacobs (Ed.): The Husserlian Mind. New York, London: Routledge, 2021, pp. 481–493. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  280. Fink, Eugen (1988): VI. Cartesianische Meditation. Teil 1. Die Idee einer transzendentalen Methodenlehre. Texte aus dem Nachlass Eugen Finks (1932) mit Anmerkungen und Beilagen aus dem Nachlass Edmund Husserls (1933/34), Hua-Dok II/1. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  281. Held, Klaus (1966): Lebendige Gegenwart. Die Frage nach der Seinsweise des transzendentalen Ich bei Edmund Husserl, entwickelt am Leitfaden der Zeitproblematik. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  282. Held, Klaus (2010): »Gott in Edmund Husserls Phänomenologie«. In: Carlo Ierne/Hanne Jacobs/Filip Mattens (Eds.): Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences: Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 723–738. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  283. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  284. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  285. Husserl, Edmund (1956a): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil, Hua VII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  286. Husserl, Edmund (1956b): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil, Hua VII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  287. Husserl, Edmund (1966): Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlseungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926, Hua XI. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  288. Husserl, Edmund (1968): Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925, Hua IX. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  289. Husserl, Edmund (1973a): Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen, Hua II. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  290. Husserl, Edmund (1973b): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935, Hua XV. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  291. Husserl, Edmund (1976a): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, Hua III/1. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  292. Husserl, Edmund (1976b): Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ein Einleitung in die Phänomenologische Philosophie, Hua VI. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  293. Husserl, Edmund (1988): Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre 1908–1914, Hua XXVIII. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  294. Husserl, Edmund (1994): Briefwechsel. Philosophenbriefe, Hua-Dok III/6. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  295. Husserl, Edmund (1999): The Idea of Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  296. Husserl, Edmund (2001): Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesung 1902/03, Hua-Mat III. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  297. Husserl, Edmund (2002a): Zur Phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935), Hua XXXIV. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  298. Husserl, Edmund (2002b): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1922/23, Hua XXXV. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  299. Husserl, Edmund (2006): Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte, Hua-Mat VIII. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  300. Husserl, Edmund (2013): Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937), Hua XLII. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  301. Husserl, Edmund (2019): First Philosophy Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  302. Kern, Iso (1962): Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserl Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  303. Kern, Iso (1975): Idee und Methode der Philosophie. Leitgedanken für eine Theorie der Vernunft. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  304. Landgrebe, Ludwig (1976): »Die Phänomenologie als transzendentale Theorie der Geschichte«. In: Phänomenologische Forschungen 3, pp. 17–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  305. Landgrebe, Ludwig (1982): Faktizität und Individuation. Studien zu den Grundfragen der Phänomenologie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  306. Lee, Nam-In (1993): Edmund Husserls Phänomenologie der Instinkte. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  307. Lee, Nam-In (2007): »Husserl’s View of Metaphysics: The Role of Genuine Metaphysics in Phenomenological Philosophy«. In: Cheung Chan-Fai/Yu Chung-Chi (Eds.): Phenomenology 2005, Vol. I, Selected Essays from Asia. Bucharest: Zeta Books, pp. 441–462. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  308. Lembeck, Karl-Heinz (1987): »›Faktum Geschichte‹ und die Grenzen phänomenologischer Geschichtsphilosophie«. In: Husserl Studies 4, pp. 209–224. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  309. Lo, Lee-Chun (2008): Die Gottesauffassung in Husserls Phänomenologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  310. Luft, Sebastian (2015): »Phänomenologische Lebensweltwissenschaft und empirische Wissenschaften vom Leben -Bruch oder Kontinuität?«. In: Phänomenologische Forschungen, pp. 47–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  311. Majolino, Claudio (2015): »Individuum and region of being: On the unifying principle of Husserl’s »headless« ontology«. In: Andrea Staiti (Ed.): Commentary on Husserl's »Ideas I«. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 33–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  312. Majolino, Claudio (2020): »Husserl and the Reach of Attitudes«. In: Phänomenologische Forschungen, pp. 85–108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  313. Marosan, Bence Peter (2016): »Husserls Gedanke einer phänomenologisch neubegründeten Metaphysik am Leitfaden der Idee der indirekten Apodiktizität«. In: Murat Ates/Oliver Bruns/Choong-Su Han/Ole Sören Schulz (Eds.): Überwundene Metaphysik? Beiträge zur Konstellation von Phänomenologie und Metaphysikkritik. Freiburg, Munich: Karl Alber, pp. 59–70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  314. Micali, Stefano (2008): Überschüsse der Erfahrung. Grenzdimensionen des Ichs nach Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  315. Richir, Marc (1992): Méditations phénoménologiques. Phénoménologie et phénoménologie du langage. Grenoble: Jérôme Million. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  316. Richir, Marc (2004): Phantasia, imagination, affectivité. Grenoble: Jérôme Million. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  317. Römer, Inga (2017a): »Ontologie und Metaphysik«. In: Sebastian Luft/Maren Wehrle (Eds.): Husserl-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, pp. 327–331. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  318. Römer, Inga (2017b): »Was ist phänomenologische Metaphysik?«. In: Markus Gabriel/Csaba Olay/Sebastian Ostritsch (Eds.): Welt und Unendlichkeit – ein deutsch-ungarischer Dialog in memoriam László Tengelyi. Freiburg, Munich: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  319. Schuhmann, Karl (1977): Husserl-Chronik. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  320. Schuhmann, Karl (1988): »Husserls Idee der Philosophie«. In: Husserl Studies 5, pp. 235–256. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  321. Sowa, Rochus/Vongehr, Thomas (2013): »Einleitung«. In: Sowa, Rochus/Vongehr, Thomas (Eds.): Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937), Hua XLII. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. XIX-CXV. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  322. Tengelyi, László (2014): Welt und Unendlichkeit. Zum Problem phänomenologischer Metaphysik. Freiburg, Munich: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  323. Trizio, Emiliano (2017): »Husserl’s Early Concept of Metaphysics As the Ultimate Science of Reality«. In: Phainomenon 26, pp. 37–68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  324. Zahavi, Dan (2003). »Phenomenology and metaphysics«. In: S. Heinamaa/Hans Ruin/D. Zahavi (Eds.): Metaphysics, facticity, interpretation. Phenomenology in the Nordic countries. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  325. Zahavi, Dan (2017): Husserl’s Legacy: Phenomenology, Metaphysics, and Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-497
  326. Altobrando, Andrea (2017): »Prefazione.« In: Edmund Husserl, Meditazioni cartesiane. Traduzione italiana di A. Altobrando. Napoli-Salerno: Orthotes, pp. 7–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  327. Becker, Oskar (1930): »Die Philosophie Edmund Husserls.« In: Kant Studien 35, pp. 119–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  328. Bruzina, Ronald (2004): Edmund Husserl & Eugen Fink: Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology, 1928–1938. New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  329. Cairns, Dorion (1976): Conversations with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  330. De Santis, Daniele (2018): »›Metaphysische Ergebnisse‹: Phenomenology and Metaphysics in Edmund Husserl’s Cartesianische Meditationen (§60). Attempt at Commentary.« In: Husserl Studies 34, pp. 63–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  331. De Santis, Daniele (2020): »›Self-Variation‹: A Problem of Method in Husserl’s Phenomenology.« In: Husserl Studies 36, pp. 255–269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  332. De Santis, Daniele (2021): »Problemas limite de la fenomenología trascendental. Teleología, generatividad, absoluto.« In: Agustín Serrano de Haro (Ed.), Guía Comares de Husserl. Granada: Comares Editorial, pp. 237–255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  333. Farber, Marvin (1935): »Husserl’s Méditations Cartésiennes.« In: The Philosophical Review 44, pp. 380–387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  334. Franck, Didier (1981): Chair et corps. Sur la phénoménologie de Husserl. Paris: Minuit. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  335. Gaiser, Konrad (1960): »Hans Kuhn, Sokrates. Versuch über den Ursprung der Metaphysik.« In: Philosophische Rundschau 8, pp. 160–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  336. Gaos, José (1996): »Historia y significado.« In: Edmund Husserl, Meditaciones cartesianas. Mexico D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 11–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  337. Heidegger, Martin (1986): Seminare, GA 15. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  338. Heidegger, Martin (2003): Four Seminars. Translated by Andrew Mitchell and Francois Raffoul. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  339. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  340. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Band: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften, Hua V. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  341. Husserl, Edmund (1956): Erste Philosophie (1923/1924). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte, Hua VII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  342. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  343. Husserl, Edmund (1968): Briefe an Roman Ingarden. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  344. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Band: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, Hua III/1. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  345. Husserl, Edmund (1994a): Briefwechsel. Philosophenbriefe, Hua-Dok III/6. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  346. Husserl, Edmund (1994b): Briefwechsel. Familienbriefe, Hua-Dok III/9. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  347. Husserl, Edmund (2014): Ideas I. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  348. Husserl, Edmund (2019): First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Sebastian Luft and Thane M. Naberhaus (Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  349. Lavigne, Jean-François (Ed.) (2016): Les Méditations Cartésiennes de Husserl. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  350. Kuhn, Helmut (1933): »Edmund Husserl, Méditations Cartésiennes.« In: Kant Studien 38, pp. 209–216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  351. Kuhn, Helmut (1959): Sokrates. Versuch über den Ursprung der Metaphysik. München: Kösel Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  352. Maritain, Jacques (1932): »Notes sur la connaissance.« In: Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 24, pp. 13–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  353. Sartre, Jean-Paul (2003): La transcendance de l’ego et autres textes phénoménologiques. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  354. Smith, Arthur David (2003): Guidebook to Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  355. Stout, Alan Ker (1932): »Edmund Husserl, Méditations Cartésiennes.« In: Mind 41, pp. 513–516. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-9
  356. Becker, Oskar (1936–37): »Husserl und Descartes, im Anschluß an Husserls ›Meditations cartesiennes‹«. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 30, pp. 616–621. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  357. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana IV; Engl. tr. Husserl collected works III. Dordrecht: Springer, 1989). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  358. Husserl, Edmund (1956): Erste Philosophie. Erste Teil. Kritische Ideengeschichte. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana VII; Engl. tr. Husserl collected works XIV, 3–206. Dordrecht: Springer 2019). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  359. Husserl, Edmund (1973a): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1973 (Husserliana I; Engl. tr. Cartesian Meditations. The Hague: Nijhoff 1960). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  360. Husserl, Edmund (1973b): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Erster Teil. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana XIII). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  361. Husserl, Edmund (1973c): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Dritter Teil. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, (Husserliana XV). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  362. Husserl, Edmund (1973d): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Zweiter Teil. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana XIV). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  363. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana VI; Engl tr. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern, 1989). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  364. Husserl, Edmund (1977): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana III/1; Engl. tr. Husserl collected works II. Dordrecht: Springer, 1980). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  365. Husserl, Edmund (1986): Aufsätze und Vorträge. 1911–1921. The Hague: M. Nijhoff (Husserliana XXV). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  366. Husserl, Edmund (2002): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1922/23. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Husserliana XXXV). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  367. Husserl, Edmund (2012): Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1916–1919. Dordrecht: Springer, (Husserliana Materialien IX). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  368. Kittstein, Lothar (1995): »Die res cogitans bei Descartes und das transzendentale Bewußtsein bei Husserl. Ein Vergleich mit Blick auf die Entwicklung von Husserls Spätphilosophie«. Prima philosophia, 8, pp. 35–67. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  369. Lavigne, Jean-François (2008): Les Méditations cartésiennes de Husserl (ed.). Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  370. Von Hermann, Friedrich-Wilhelm: Husserl und die Meditationen des Descartes. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  371. Wüstenberg, Klaus (1985): Kritische Analyse zu den Grundproblemen der transzendentalen Phänomenologie Husserls unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Philosophie Descartes’. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-21
  372. Blumenberg, Hans (2010): Theorie der Lebenswelt. Ed. Manfred Sommer. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  373. Derrida, Jacques, and Marion, Jean-Luc (1999): »On the Gift: A Discussion between Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Marion.« In: John D. Caputo and Michael Scanlon (Eds.), God, Gift, and Post-Modernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 54–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  374. De Santis, Daniele (2021): Husserl and the A Priori. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  375. Djian, Aurélien (2018): »L’horizon et le destin de la phénoménologie.« In: Philosophiques 45, pp. 343–364. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  376. Djian, Aurélien (2021): Husserl et l’horizon comme problème. Une contribution à l’histoire de la phénoménologie. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  377. Geniusas, Saulius (2012): The Origin of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  378. Heidegger, Martin (1959): Gelassenheit. Pfullingen: Günther Neske Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  379. Henry, Michel (2011): L’essence de la manifestation. Paris: PUF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  380. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  381. Husserl, Edmund (1973): Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Ludwig Landgrebe (Ed.), James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks (Trans.). Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  382. Husserl, Edmund (1983): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Fred Kersten (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  383. Husserl, Edmund (1989): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  384. Husserl, Edmund (1997): Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907. Richard Rojcewicz (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  385. Husserl, Edmund (1999): The Idea of Phenomenology. Lee Hardy (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  386. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge: Lectures 1906/07. Claire Ortiz Hill (Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  387. Levinas, Emmanuel (1990): Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’extériorité. Paris: Le Livre de Poche. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  388. Majolino, Claudio (2020): »Husserl and the Reach of Attitude.« In: Phänomenologische Forschungen 1, pp. 85–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  389. Marion, Jean-Luc (2013): Étant donné. Essai d’une phénoménologie de la donation. Paris: PUF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  390. Romano, Claude (2010): Au cœur de la raison, la phénoménologie. Paris: Gallimard. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-63
  391. Alweiss, Lilian (1999a): »The Presence of Husserl.« In: The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 30, pp. 59–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  392. Alweiss, Lilian (1999b): »The Enigma of Time.« In; Phänomenologische Forschungen, 4 (3), pp. 150–203. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  393. Alweiss, Lilian (2002): »Heidegger and the Concept of Time.« In: History of the Human Sciences, 15 (3), pp. 117–132. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  394. Alweiss, Lilian (2005): »Is there an ›End‹ to Philosophical Scepticism.« In: Philosophy, 80 (313), pp. 395–411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  395. Alweiss, Lilian (2007): »Leaving Metaphysics to Itself.« In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15 (3), pp. 349–365. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  396. Alweiss, Lilian (2010): »Thinking about Non-Existence.« In: Carlo Ierna/Hanne Jacobs/Filip Mattens (Eds.): Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences. Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 695–721. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  397. Alweiss, Lilian (2013): »Beyond Existence and Non-Existence.« In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies. Special Issue: Intentionality, 21 (3), pp 448–469. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  398. Bernet, Rudolf (2004): »Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism.« In: New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 4, pp. 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  399. Fulda, Hans Friedrich (1988): »Ontologie nach Kant und Hegel.« In: Henrich, Dieter/Rolf-Peter Horstmann (Eds.): Metaphysik nach Kant?, Stuttgart: Klett-Gotta, pp. 44–82 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  400. Heidegger, Martin (1962): Being and Time. Translation by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  401. Heidegger, Marting (1971): »Building Dwelling Thinking.« In: Poetry Language Truth. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 145–61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  402. Held, Klaus (2000): »The Controversy Concerning Truth: Towards a Prehistory of Phenomenology.« In: Husserl Studies, 17 (1), pp. 35–48. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  403. Hume, David (1975): Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd and revised ed. by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  404. Hume, David (1978): A Treatise of Human Nature edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge and revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  405. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  406. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  407. Husserl, Edmund (1964): The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  408. Husserl, Edmund (1982): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Translated by F. Kersten. The Hague: M. Nijhoff Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  409. Kant, Immanuel (1933): Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  410. Kant, Immanuel (1997): Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Edited by G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  411. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1989): »On Truth and Lying in an Extra-Moral Sense.« In: Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. ed. and trans. by Gilman, Blair and Parent, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  412. Strawson, Peter Frederick (1959): Individuals. London: Methuen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  413. Strawson, Peter Frederick (1966): The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  414. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1981): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translation by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  415. Wittgenstein, L. (1975) On Certainty, Über Gewissheit, bilingual ed., eds. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, trans. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-91
  416. De Santis, Daniele (2017): »Husserl on Leib and Transcendental Idealism. Sketching a Counter-Approach Based on Husserliana XXXVI.« In: Interpretationes, pp. 34–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  417. De Santis, Daniele (2021): »Variation.« In: Daniele De Santis/Burt Hopkins/Claudio Majolino (Eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 425–434 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  418. Heidegger, Martin (1967): Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  419. Heidegger, Martin (1991): Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt a. M.: V. Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  420. Hering, Jean (1921): »Bemerkungen über das Wesen, die Wesenheit und die Idee.« In: Jahrbuch für Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie, 4, pp. 495–543. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  421. Hering, Jean (1926): Phénoménologie et philosophie religieuse. Paris: Alcan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  422. Housset, Emmanuel (2016): »Quatrième méditation (§ 30–41).« In: Jean-François Lavigne (Ed.): Les Méditations Cartésiennes de Husserl. Paris: Vrin, pp. 101–134. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  423. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  424. Husserl, Edmund (1953): Méditations Cartésiennes. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  425. Husserl, Edmund (1956): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil, Hua VIII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  426. Husserl, Edmund (1968a): Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925, Hua IX. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  427. Husserl, Edmund (1968b): Karteziánské meditace. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  428. Husserl, Edmund (1971): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Buch, Hua V. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  429. Husserl, Edmund (1973): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935, Hua XV. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  430. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft, Hua XVII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  431. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch, Hua III/1. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  432. Husserl, Edmund (1984): Logische Unterschungen. Zweiter Teil, Hua XIX/1. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  433. Husserl, Edmund (1986): Meditaciones Cartesianas. México: Fondo de cultura económica. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  434. Husserl, Edmund (1989): Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922–1937), Hua XXVII. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  435. Husserl, Edmund (1994a): Briefwechsel. Wissenschaftlerkorrespondenz, Hua-Dok III/7. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  436. Husserl, Edmund (1994b): Briefwechsel. Die Göttinger Schule, Hua-Dok III/3. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  437. Husserl, Edmund (1997): Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  438. Husserl, Edmund (2002a): Zur Phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935), Hua XXXIV. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  439. Husserl, Edmund (2002b): Einleitung in die Philosophie 1922/23, Hua XXXV. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  440. Husserl, Edmund (2002c): Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1919, Hua-Mat IV. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  441. Husserl, Edmund (2003): Transzendentaler Idealismus. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1921), Hua XXXVI. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  442. Husserl, Edmund (2005): Einführung in die Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis. Vorlesung 1909, Hua-Mat VII. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  443. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937), Hua XXXIX. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  444. Ingarden, Roman (1964): Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt I. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  445. Lavigne, Jean-François (2005): Husserl et la naissance de la phénoménologie. Paris: PUF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  446. Loidolt, Sophie (2015): »Transzendentalphilosophie und Idealismus in der Phänomenologie«. In: Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 1, pp. 103–135. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  447. Meixner, Uwe (2010): »Husserls transzendentaler Idealismus als Supervenienzthese. Ein interner Realismus.« In: Manfred Frank/Niels Weidtmann (Eds.): Husserl und die Philosophie des Geistes. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  448. Millán-Puelles, Antonio (1990): Teoría del objecto puro. Madrin: Ediciones Rialp, S. A. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  449. Philipse, Herman (1995): »Transcendental Idealism.« In: Barry Smith/David Woodruf Smith (Eds.): Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–322- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  450. Ricoeur, Paul (1954): »Étude sur les ›Méditations Cartésiennes‹ de Husserl.« In: Revue philosophique de Louvain, pp. 75–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  451. Scheler, Max (1927): »Idealismus-Realismus.« Philosophicher Anzeiger, pp. 255–324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  452. Severino, Emanuele (1994): Heidegger e la metafisica. Milano: Adelphi. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  453. Smith, Arthur David (2003): Guidebook to Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations. London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  454. Spiegelberg, Herbert (1982): »Epoché und Reduktion bei Pfänder und Husserl.« In: Herbert Spiegelberg/Eberhard Avè-Lallement (Eds.): Pfänder-Studien. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, pp. 3–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  455. Stein, Edith (2010): Aus dem Leben einer jüdischen Familie. Freiburg: Herder. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  456. Stein, Edith (2014): »Freiheit und Gnade« und weitere Beiträge zur Phänomenologie und Ontologie. Freiburg: Herder Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  457. Zahavi, Dan (2017): Husserl’s Legacy. Phenomenology, Metaphysics and Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-113
  458. Benkhe, Elisabeth (2011): »Edmund Husserl: Phenomenology of embodiment.« In: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/husspemb/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  459. Birnbaum, Daniel (1998): The Hospitality of Presence: Problems of Otherness in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell International. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  460. Carman, Taylor (2008): Merleau-Ponty. London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  461. Carr, David (1973): »The ›fifth Meditation‹ and Husserl’s Cartesianism.« In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34. No. 1, pp. 14–35. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  462. Crowell, Steven (2012): »Transcendental phenomenology and the seductions of naturalism: Subjectivity, consciousness, and meaning.« In Dan Zahavi (Ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  463. Crowell, Steven (2013): Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  464. Depraz, Natalie (1995): Transcendance et incarnation: la statut de l’intersubjectivité comme altérité à soi chez Husserl. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  465. De Preester, Helena (2008): »From ego to alter ego: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty and a layered approach to intersubjectivity.« In: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7. No. 1, pp. 133–142. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  466. Derrida, Jacques ([1962] 1974): »Introduction.« In Edmund Husserl: L’origine de la géométrie, trans. Jacques Derrida. Paris: PUF. In English Edmund Husserl’s »Origin of Geometry«: An Introduction, trans. John P. Leavey. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  467. Derrida, Jacques ([1990] 2003): The Problem of Genesis in Husserl’s Philosophy, trans. Marian Hobson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  468. Friedman, Randy (2014): »Alterity and asymmetry in Levinas’s ethical phenomenology.« In: The Journal of Scriptural Reasoning 13. No. 1, pp. 1–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  469. Guenther, Lisa (2011): »Subjects without a world? A Husserlian analysis of solitary confinement.« In: Human Studies 34. No. 3, pp. 257–276. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  470. Hart, James (1992): The Person and the Common Life: Studies in a Husserlian Social Ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  471. Heidegger, Martin ([1927] 1993): Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. In English: Being and Time, trans. Macquerrie and Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  472. Heidegger, Martin (1979): Gesamtausgabe, II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1923–1944, Band 20: Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, eds. Petra Jaeger. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann. In English: History of the Concept of Time, Prolegomena, trans. Theodore Kisiel. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1985. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  473. Heinämaa, Sara (1918): »Embodiment and bodily becoming.« In Dan Zahavi (Ed.): The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 533–557. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  474. Heinämaa, Sara (1919): »Two ways of understanding persons: A Husserlian distinction.« In: Phenomenology and Mind. No. 15, eds. Roberta De Monticelli and Francesca De Vecchi. Firenze University Press, pp. 92–103. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  475. Heinämaa, Sara (2020): »Values of love: Two forms of infinity characteristic of human persons.« In: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 19. No. 3, pp. 431–450. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  476. Heinämaa, Sara (2021): »On the transcendental undercurrents of phenomenology: The case of the living body.« In: Continental Philosophy Review 54. No. 2, pp. 237 – 257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  477. Heinämaa, Sara, David Carr and Andreea Smaranda Aldea (2022): »Introduction: Critique – matter of methods.« In: Andreea Smaranda Aldea, Davic Carr and Sara Heinämaa (Eds.): Phenomenology as Critique: Why Method Matters. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  478. Held, Klaus (1972): »Das Problem der Intersubjektivität und die Idee einer phänomenologischen Transzendentalphilosophie.« In Klaus Held and Ulrich Claesges (Eds.): Perspektiven transzendentalphänomenologischer Forschung: Für Ludwig Langdgrebe zum 70. Geburstag von seinem Kölner Schülern. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 3–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  479. Husserl, Edmund ([1901] 1984a): Logische Untersuchungen, Zweiter Band, Erster Teil, Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Husserliana XIX/1, ed. Ursula Panzer. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Logical Investigations, Volume II, ed. D. Moran, trans. J.N. Findley. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  480. Husserl, Edmund ([1901] 1984b): Logische Untersuchungen, Zweiter Band, Zweiter Teil, Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Husserliana XIX/2, ed. Ursula Panzer. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Logical Investigations, Volume II, ed. D. Moran, trans. J.N. Findley. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  481. Husserl, Edmund ([1939] 1985): Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik, revised and ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Hamburg: Felix Mayer Verlag. In English: Experience and Judgement: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, trans. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  482. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Husserliana I, ed. Stephan Strasser. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Cartesian Meditations, trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  483. Husserl, Edmund (1952a): Ideen zu einer einen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften, Husserliana V, ed. Marly Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenological Constitution, Collected Works II, trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  484. Husserl, Edmund (1952b): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaft, Husserliana V, ed. Marly Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Third Book: Phenomenology and the Foundations of the Sciences, Collected Works I, trans. Ted E. Klein and William E. Pohl. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971; and for pages 138–162: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenological Constitution, Collected Works II, trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  485. Husserl, Edmund (1954): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, Husserliana VI, ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1988. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  486. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations, trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  487. Husserl, Edmund (1966): Analysen zur passiven Synthesis, Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten, 1918–1926, Husserliana XI, ed. Margot Fleischer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, trans. Anthony J. Steinbock. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  488. Husserl, Edmund (1968): Phänomenologische Psychologie, Vorlesung Sommersemester 1925, Husserliana IX, ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  489. Husserl, Edmund (1973a): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlass, Erster Teil: 1905–1920, Husserliana XIII, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  490. Husserl, Edmund (1973b): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlass, Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928, Husserliana XIV, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  491. Husserl, Edmund (1973c): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlass, Dritter Teil: 1929–1935, Husserliana XV, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  492. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft, Husserliana XVII, ed. Paul Janssen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. In English: Formal and Transcendental Logic, trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  493. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Husserliana III/1, ed. Karl Schumann. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  494. Husserl, Edmund (1993): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, Ergänzungsband: Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934–1937, Husserliana XXIX, ed. Reinhold N. Smid. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  495. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der Vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Constitution, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937), Husserliana XXXIX, ed. Rochus Sowa. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  496. Husserl, Edmund (2012): Einleitung in die Philosophie, Vorlesungen 1916–1919, Husserliana Materien IX, ed. Hanne Jacobs. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  497. Husserl, Edmund (2013): Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie: Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte, Metaphysik, Späte Ethik, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937), Husserliana XLII, eds. Rochus Sowa and Thomas Vongehr. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  498. Husserl, Edmund (2020): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution und Wissenschaftstheorie, Husserliana IV/V, ed. Dirk Fonfara. The Hague: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  499. Jardine, James (2014): »Husserl and Stein on the phenomenology of empathy: Perception and explication,« In: Synthesis Philosophica 29. No. 2, pp. 273–288. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  500. Jardine, James (2021): Empathy, Embodiment and the Person: Husserlian Investigations of Social Experience and the Self. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  501. Kern, Iso (2019): »Husserl’s phenomenology of intersubjectivity.« In Frode Kjosavik, Christian Beyer and Christel Fricke (Eds.): Husserl’s Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: Historical Interpretations and Contemporary Applications. New York: Routledge, pp. 11–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  502. Kern, Iso (2021): Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität und metaphysische Monadologie: Zu einer Synthese von Husserl und Leibniz. Basel, Berlin: Schwabe Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  503. Levinas, Emmanuel ([1947] 1994): Le temps et l'autre. Paris: Quadrige/PUF. In English: Time and Other, trans. R.A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1987. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  504. Levinas, Emmanuel ([1961] 1988): Totalité et infini: essai sur l’extériorité. Paris: Kluwer. In English: Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1969. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  505. Levinas, Emmanuel ([1974] 1988): »From consciousness to wakefulness,« trans. Richard A. Cohen and Michal B. Smith. In: Discovering Existence with Husserl. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1988, pp. 307–317. Original »De la conscience a la veille: A partir de Husserl.« In: Bijdragen 35. No. 3–4, pp. 235–249. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  506. Lohmar, Dieter (2017): »Eine genetische Analyse des Zugangs zum Anderen.« In: Gestalt Theory 39. No. 2/3, pp. 129–154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  507. Luo, Zhida (2017): »Motivating empathy: The problem of bodily similarity in Husserl’s theory of empathy.« In: Husserl Studies 33. No. 1, pp. 45–61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  508. Luo, Zhida (2018): »› Seeing-in‹ and twofold empathetic intentionality: A Husserlian account.« In: Continental Philosophy Review 51. No. 3, pp. 301–321. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  509. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice ([1945] 1993): Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris: Gallimard. In English: Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. London: Routledge, 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  510. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964b): Le visible et l’invisible, ed. Claude Lefort. Paris: Gallimard. In English: The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1975. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  511. Merten Karl (2012): »The subject and the self.« In Sebastian Luft and Søren Overgaard (Eds.): The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. London: Routledge, pp. 168–179. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  512. Moran, Dermot (2011): Edmund Husserl: The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  513. Overgaard, Søren (2003): »On Levinas’ critique of Husserl.« In Dan Zahavi, Sara Heinämaa and Hans Ruin (Eds.): Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 115–138. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  514. Reynaert, Peter (2001): »Intersubjectivity and naturalism – Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation revisited.« In: Husserl Studies 17. No. 3, pp. 207–216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  515. Ricœur, Paul (1967): »Husserl’s fifth Cartesian meditation.« In Husserl: An Analysis of his Phenomenology. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, pp. 82–114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  516. Sakakibara, Tetsuya (1997): »Das problem des Ich und der Ursprung der genetischen Phänomenologie.« In: Husserl Studies 14. No. 1, pp. 21–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  517. de Santis, Daniele (2017): »Edmund Husserl on Leib and transcendental idealism: A Counter-approach based in Husserliana 36.« In: Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Interpretationes, Studia Philosophica Europeanea 2, pp. 34–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  518. Scheler, Max (1913–1916): Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Halle, Verlag von Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  519. Schmiedgen, Peter (2000): »Levinas and the infinite: Between Husserlian phenomenology and Cartesian infinity.« In: Synthesis Philosophica 15. No. 1–2, pp. 145–161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  520. Schnell, Alexander (2010): »Intersubjectivity in Husserl’s works.« In: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy II. No. 1, pp. 9–32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  521. Schütz, Alfred (1962): Collected Papers, Volume I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  522. Schütz, Alfred (1966): Collected Papers, Volume III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  523. Smith, A. David (2003): Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations. London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  524. Stawarska, Beata (2009). Between You and I: Dialogical Phenomenology. Athens: Ohio State University. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  525. Stein, Edith (1917): Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Dio., Halle. In English: On the Problem of Empathy, trans. Walter Stein. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  526. Steinbock, Anthony (1995): Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  527. Szanto, Thomas and Dermot Moran (2020): »Edith Stein.« In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/stein/>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  528. Taipale, Joona (2009): Incarnate Subjectivity: The Constitutive Significance of Embodiment in Husserlian Phenomenology. PhD Dissertation, University of Helsinki. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  529. Taipale, Joona (2014): Phenomenology and Embodiment: Husserl and the Constitution of Subjectivity. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  530. Taipale, Joona (2015): »Beyond Cartesianism: Body-perception and the immediacy of empathy.« In: Continental Philosophy Review 48. No. 2, pp. 161–178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  531. Tengelyi, László [1998] 2004: The Wild Region of Life-History, trans. Géza Kállay. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  532. Waldenfels, Bernhard (1990): »Experience of the alien in Husserl’s phenomenology,« trans. Anthony J. Steinbock. In: Research in Phenomenology 20, pp. 19–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  533. Williams, Bernard [1986] 2006: »Hylomorphism.« In: The Sense of the Past: Essays in the History of Philosophy, ed. Myles Burnyeat. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 218–227. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  534. Zahavi, Dan (1996): Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivität: Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik. Dordrecht: Kluwer. In English: Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique, trans. Elisabeth A. Behnke. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  535. Zahavi, Dan. (2003). Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  536. Zahavi, Dan (2008): »Simulation, projection and empathy.« In: Consciousness and Cognition 17. No. 2, pp. 514–522. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  537. Zahavi, Dan (2010): »Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: From Lipps to Schutz.« In: Inquiry 53. No. 3, pp. 285–306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  538. Zahavi, Dan (2014): Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  539. Zahavi, Dan (2015): »You, me, and we: The sharing of emotional experiences.« In: Consciousness Studies 22. No. 1–2, pp. 84–101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-141
  540. Aldea, Andrea (2016): »Phenomenology as Critique: Teleological–Historical Reflection and Husserl’s Transcendental Eidetics.« In: Husserl Studies 32, pp. 21–46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  541. Altobrando, Andrea (2010): Husserl e il problema della monade. Torino: Trauben. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  542. Altobrando, Andrea (2017): »Prefazione.« In: Edmund Husserl, Meditazioni cartesiane. Napoli-Salerno: Orthotes, pp. 7–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  543. Bachelard, Suzanne (1968): A Study of Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  544. Beierwaltes, Werner (1972): Platonismus und Idealismus. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  545. Benoist, Jocelyn (1997): Phénoménologie, sémantique, ontologie. Paris: PUF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  546. Bernet, Rudolf (1997): »Husserls Begriff des Phantasiebewusstseins als Fundierung von Freuds Begriff des Unbewußten.« In: Christoph Jamme (Ed.), Grundlinien der Vernunftkritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 277–306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  547. Bernet, Rudolf (2013): Force–pulsion–désir. Une autre philosophie de la psychanalyse. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  548. Brudzinska, Jagna (2018): »Husserls Psychologie in neuem Licht.« In: G. Benetka and H. Werbik (Eds.), Die philosophischen und kulturellen Wurzeln der Psychologie. Traditionen in Europa, Indien und China. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, pp. 225–245. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  549. Brudzinska, Jagna (2020a): Bi-Valenz der Erfahrung. Assoziation, Imaginäres und Trieb in der Genesis der Subjektivität bei Husserl und Freud. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  550. Brudzinska, Jagna (2020b): »Beyond You and Me: Unconscious Dynamics of Individuation.« In: T. Fuchs and S. Kristiansen (Eds.), Modes of Unconscious: The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. London: Routledge, forthcoming. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  551. Canguilhem, Georges (1991): The Normal and the Pathological. C. R. Fawcett in collaboration with R. S. Cohen (Trans.). New York: Zone Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  552. Ciocan, Cristian (2017): »Husserl’s Phenomenology of Animality and the Paradoxes of Normality.« In: Human Studies 40, pp. 175–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  553. Cristin, Renato (1990): »Phänomenologie und Monadologie. Husserl und Leibniz.« In: Studia Leibnitiana 22, pp. 163–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  554. D’Angelo, Diego (2019): Zeichenhorizonte. Semiotische Strukturen in Husserls Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  555. De Palma, Vittorio (2012): »Die Phänomenologie als radikaler Empirismus.« In: Studia Phaenomenologica 12, pp. 331–357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  556. De Santis, Daniele (2018): »›Metaphysische Ergebnisse‹: Phenomenology and Metaphysics in Edmund Husserl’s Cartesianische Meditationen (§60). Attempt at Commentary.« In: Husserl Studies 34, pp. 63–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  557. de Warren, Nicolas (2015): »Husserl’s Cartesianism, anew.« In: Emanuele Mariani (Ed.), A partire da Husserl. Figure, funzioni, e critica della soggettività. In: Discipline Filosofiche 25, pp. 231–248. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  558. Descartes, René (1641): Meditations on First Philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  559. Descartes, René (1649): The Passions of the Soul. In: J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch (Eds.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  560. Fink, Eugen (1988): VI. Cartesianische Meditation. Teil I: Die Idee einer transzendentalen Methodenlehre. Texte aus dem Nachlass Eugen Finks (1932) mit Anmerkungen und Beilagen aus dem Nachlass Edmund Husserls (1933/34), Hua-Dok II/1. Ed. H. Ebeling, J. Holl, and G. van Kerckhoven. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  561. Hartimo, Mirja (2018): »Radical Besinnung in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929).« In: Husserl Studies 34, pp. 247–266. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  562. Heffernan, George (1997): »An Essay in Epistemic Kuklophobia: Husserl’s Critique of Descartes’ Conception of Evidence.« In: Husserl Studies 13, pp. 89–140. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  563. Heinämaa, Sara, and Taipale, Joona (2018): »Normality.« In: G. Stanghellini, A. Raballo, M. Broome, A. V. Fernandez, P. Fusar-Poli, and R. Rosfort (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 284–296. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  564. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Ed. Stephan Strasser. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  565. Husserl, Edmund (1956): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion, Hua VIII. Ed. Rudolf Boehm. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  566. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  567. Husserl, Edmund (1966): Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926, Hua XI. Ed. Margot Fleischer. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  568. Husserl, Edmund (1973): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  569. Erster Teil: 1905–1920, Hua XIII. Ed. Iso Kern. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  570. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, Hua III/1. Ed. Karl Schuhmann. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  571. Husserl, Edmund (1984): Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Erster Teil, Hua XIX/1. Ed. Ursula Panzer. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  572. Husserl, Edmund (2006): Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte, Hua Mat VIII. Ed. Dieter Lohmar. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  573. Husserl, Edmund (2014): Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik, Hua XLII. Ed. Rochus Sowa and Thomas Vongehr. Dordrecht: Springer Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  574. Jansen, Julia (2016): »Kant’s and Husserl’s Agentive and Proprietary Accounts of Cognitive Phenomenology.« In: Philosophical Explorations 19, pp. 161–172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  575. Kaehler, Klaus E. (1995): »Die Monade in Husserls Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität.« In: Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 57, pp. 672–709. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  576. Kern, Iso (1964): Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  577. Leibniz, G. Wilhelm (1989): First Truths. In: L. E. Loemker (Ed.), Philosophical Papers and Letters: The New Synthese Historical Library (Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy), vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  578. Lohmar, Dieter (1998): Erfahrung und kategoriales Denken. Hume, Kant und Husserl über vorprädikative Erfahrung und prädikative Erkenntnis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  579. Lohmar, Dieter (2000): Edmund Husserls »Formale und transzendentale Logik.« Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  580. Luft, Sebastian (2002): Phänomenologie der Phänomenologie. Systematik und Methodologie der Phänomenologie in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Husserl und Fink. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  581. Majolino, Claudio (2012): »Molteplicità e costituzione. Un manifesto per la fenomenologia.« In: Carmine Di Martino (Ed.), Attualità della fenomenologia. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, pp. 95–133. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  582. Majolino, Claudio (2017): »The Infinite Academy: Husserl on how to be a Platonist with some (Aristotelian?) help.« In: The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 15, pp. 164–221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  583. Mertens, Karl (2000): »Husserls Phänomenologie der Monade. Bemerkungen zu Husserls Auseinandersetzung mit Leibniz.« In: Husserl Studies 17, pp.1 – 20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  584. Paci, Enzo (1961): Tempo e verità nella fenomenologia di Husserl. Bari: Laterza. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  585. Paci, Enzo (1978): Il problema della monadologia da Leibniz a Husserl. Per una concezione scientifica e umana della società. Milano: Unicopli. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  586. Peucker, Henning (2002): Von der Psychologie zur Phänomenologie. Husserls Weg in die Phänomenologie der »Logischen Untersuchungen.« Hamburg: Meiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  587. Pugliese, Alice (2018): »Motivational Analysis in Husserl’s Genetic Phenomenology.« In: Studia Phaenomenologica 18, pp. 91–108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  588. Rinofner, Sonja (2010): »Husserls phänomenologische Theorie der Motivation.« In: Petr Urban (Ed.), Geburt der Phänomenologie. Edmund Husserl zu Ehren. Prag: Filosofický Casopis, pp. 9–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  589. Sakai, Kiyoshi (2002): »Die Fensterlosigkeit der Monade. Ein Aspekt der Frage nach dem Anderen.« In: H. Hüni and P. Trawny (Eds.), Die erscheinende Welt. Festschrift für Klaus Held. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 751–771. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  590. Shim, K. Michael (2013): »Monad and Consciousness in Husserl: A Quasi-representationalist Interpretation.« In: Discipline Filosofiche 23, pp. 175–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  591. Simons, Peter (1982): »Three essays in formal ontology.« In: B. Smith (Ed.), Parts and moments: Studies in logic and formal ontology, Analytica series, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, pp.111 – 260. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  592. Smith, Barry, and Mulligan, Kevin (1982): »Pieces of a theory.« In: B. Smith (Ed.), Parts and moments: Studies in logic and formal ontology, Analytica series, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, pp. 15–110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  593. Sokolowski, Robert (1977): »The Logic of Parts and Wholes in Husserl’s Investigations.« In: J. N. Mohanty (Ed.), Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 94–111. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  594. Strasser, Stephan (1989): »Monadologie und Teleologie in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls.« In: Phänomenologische Forschungen 22, pp. 217–235. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  595. Taipale, Joona (2012): »Twofold Normality: Husserl and the Normative Relevance of Primordial Constitution.« In: Husserl Studies 28, pp. 49–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  596. Tieszen, Richard (2012): »Monads and Mathematics: Gödel and Husserl.« In: Axiomathes 22, pp. 31–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  597. Walsh, Philip J. (2013): »Husserl’s Concept of Motivation: The Logical Investigations and Beyond.« In: Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 16, pp. 70–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  598. Wehrle, Maren (2018): »›There is a Crack in Everything.‹ Fragile Normality: Husserl’s Account of Normality Re-visited.« In: Phainomenon 28, pp. 49–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  599. Zahavi, Dan (2003): »Phenomenology and metaphysics.« In: Dan Zahavi, Sara Heinämaa, and Hans Ruin (Eds.), Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  600. Zahavi, Dan (2017): Husserl’s Legacy: Phenomenology, Metaphysics, and Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-169
  601. Bernet, Rudolf (1996): »The Unconscious between Representation and Desire: Freud, Husserl, and Schopenhauer.« Trans. Michael Brockman. In: The Truthful and the Good: Essays in Honor of Robert Sokolowski. Ed. John J. Drummond and James G. Hart. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 81–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  602. Bernet, Rudolf (2003): »Unconscious Consciousness in Husserl and Freud.« In: The New Husserl: A Critical Reader. Ed. Donn Welton. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 199–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  603. Bodei, Remo (2014): La civetta e la talpa: Sistema ed epoca in Hegel. Bologna: Il Mulino. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  604. Bruzina, Ronald (2002): »Eugen Fink and Maurice Merleau-Ponty: The Philosophical Lineage in Phenomenology.« In: Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Ed. Ted Toadvine and Lester Embree. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 173–200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  605. Bruzina, Ronald (2009): Edmund Husserl and Eugen Fink: Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology 1928–1938. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  606. Cairns, Dorion (1976): Conversations with Husserl and Fink. Ed. Husserl-Archives. Den Haag: Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  607. Derrida, Jacques (1972): »La différance.« In: Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, pp. 1–29; (1982): »Différance.« Trans. Alan Bass. In: Margins of Philosophy. Brighton: The Harvester Press, pp. 1–28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  608. Ferrarin, Alfredo (2017): »Hegel and Husserl on the Emergence of the I out of Subjectivity.« In: Hegel Bulletin 38, pp. 7–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  609. Ferrarin, Alfredo (2019a): Thinking and the I: Hegel and the Critique of Kant. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  610. Ferrarin, Alfredo (2019b): »Hegel, Husserl and Imagination.« In: Hegel and Phenomenology. Ed. Alfredo Ferrarin, Dermot Moran, Elisa Magrì, and Danilo Manca. Cham: Springer, pp. 115–130. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  611. Finetti, Stéphane (2013): La phénoménologie de la phénoménologie de E. Fink et son problème directeur. Grenoble: Millon. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  612. Finetti, Stéphane (2015): »L’idea di una dialettica fenomenologica: Per un confronto tra Fink e Hegel.« In: Hegel e la fenomenologia trascendentale. Ed. Danilo Manca, Elisa Magrì, and Alfredo Ferrarin. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, pp. 218–235. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  613. Fink, Eugen (1966): Studien zur Phänomenologie 1930–1939. Den Haag: Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  614. Fink, Eugen (1988a): VI. Cartesianische Meditation. Teil 1: Die Idee einer transzendentalen Methodenlehre. Texte aus dem Nachlass Eugen Finks (1932) mit Anmerkungen und Beilagen aus dem Nachlass Edmund Husserls (1933/34). Husserliana Dokumente. Vol. II/1. Ed. Hans Ebeling, Jann Holl, and Guy van Kerckhoven. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer; (1994): Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method. Trans. Ronald Bruzina. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  615. Fink, Eugen (1988b): VI. Cartesianische Meditation. Teil 2: Ergänzungsband. Husserliana Dokumente. Vol. II/2. Ed. Guy van Kerckhoven. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  616. Fink, Eugen (2006): Phänomenologische Werkstatt. Teilband 1: Die Doktorarbeit und erste Assistenzjahre bei Husserl. Ed. Ronald Bruzina. Freiburg, München: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  617. Fink, Eugen (2008): Phänomenologische Werkstatt. Teilband 2: Die Bernauer Zeitmanuskripte, Cartesianische Meditationen und System der phänomenologischen Philosophie. Ed. Ronald Bruzina. Freiburg, München: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  618. Guzzoni, Ute (1982): Werden zu sich. Eine Untersuchung zu Hegel’s »Wissenschaft der Logik.« 3rd Ed. Freiburg, München: Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  619. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1968): »Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie in Beziehung auf Reinhold’s Beyträge zur leichtern Übersicht des Zustands der Philosophie zu Anfang des neunzchnten Jahrhunderts.« In: Jenaer Kritische Schriften. Ed. Hartmut Buchner und Otto Pöggeler. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 1–92; (1977): Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy in connection with the first fascicle of Reinhold’s Contributions to a more convenient survey of the state of philosophy at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Trans. H. S. Harris and Walter Cerf. Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  620. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1970): Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse 1830. Erster Teil: Die Wissenschaft der Logik, mit mündlichen Zusätzen. Ed. Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michel. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Vol. 8. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp; (2010): Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: The Science of Logic. Trans. Klaus Brinkmann and Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  621. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1971): Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie III. Ed. Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michel. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Vol. 10. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp; (1995): Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Vol. 3. Trans. Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane and Francis H. Simson on the basis of Michelet’s 1940 edition (London: Kegan Paul, originally published in 1892 by Trübner). Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  622. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1978): Wissenschaft der Logik. Zweites Buch: Die Lehre vom Wesen. In: Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die objective Logik (1812/1813). Ed. Friedrich Hogemann and Walter Jaeschke. Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 11. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 233–412; (2010): The Science of Logic. Trans. and ed. George Di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337–506. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  623. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1980): Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ed. Wolfgang Bonsiepen and Reinhard Heede. Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 9. Hamburg: Meiner; (2018): The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. and ed. Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  624. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1985): Wissenschaft der Logik. Teil I: Die objektive Logik. Band I: Die Lehre vom Sein (1832). Ed. Friedrich Hogemann and Walter Jaeschke. Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 21. Hamburg: Meiner; (2010): The Science of Logic. Trans. and ed. George Di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  625. Houlgate, Stephen (2006): The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  626. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Husserliana I. Ed. Stephan Strasser. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff; (19827): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. Den Haag: Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  627. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV. Ed. Marly Biemel. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff; (1989): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  628. Husserl, Edmund (1974): Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Husserliana XVII. Ed. Paul Janssen. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff; (1969): Formal and Transcendental Logic. Trans. from the original ed. by Dorion Cairns. Den Haag: Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  629. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Husserliana VI. Ed. Walter Biemel. 2nd ed. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff; (1970): The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  630. Husserl, Edmund (1994): Briefwechsel. Husserliana Dokumente. Ed. Karl Schuhmann and Elisabeth Schuhmann. Hua-Dok III/5: Die Neukantianer; III/7: Wissenschaftlerkorrespondenz. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  631. Husserl, Edmund (2002): Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935). Husserliana XXXIV. Ed. Sebastian Luft. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  632. Luft, Sebastian (2002): »Phänomenologie der Phänomenologie.« Systematik und Methodologie der Phänomenologie in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Husserl und Fink. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  633. Manca, Danilo (2016): Esperienza della ragione: Hegel e Husserl in dialogo. Pisa: Edizioni ETS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  634. Manca, Danilo (2017): »The phenomenologizing subject as an active power: An Aristotelian model for Husserl’s theory of subjectivity.« In: The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 15, pp. 247–268 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  635. Manca, Danilo (2018): »Husserl e l’inconscio fenomenologico.« In: Paradigmi 3, pp. 595–606. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  636. Manca, Danilo (2019): »Hegel and Husserl on the History of Reason.« In: Hegel and Phenomenology. Ed. Alfredo Ferrarin, Dermot Moran, Elisa Magrì, and Danilo Manca. Cham: Springer, pp. 45–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  637. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1960): »Le philosophe et son ombre.« In: Signes. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 201–228; (1964): »The Philosopher and his Shadow.« In: Signs. Trans. Richard C. McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press 1964, pp. 159–181. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  638. Nuzzo, Angelica (2003): »The Truth of ›absolutes Wissen‹ in Hegel’s Phenomenology.« In: Hegel’s »Phenomenology of Spirit.« Ed. A. Denker. Amherst, NY: Humanities Press, pp. 265–294. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  639. Ricœur, Paul (1965): De l’interprétation: Essai sur Freud. Paris: Seuil; (1970): Freud and Philosophy: Essays on Interpretation. Trans. Denis Savage. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  640. Van Kerckhoven, Guy (2003): Mundanisierung und Individuation bei Edmund Husserl und Eugen Fink. Die sechste Cartesianische Meditation und ihr »Einsatz.« Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-193
  641. Bostar, Leo (1994): »Reading Ingarden Read Husserl: Metaphysics, Ontology, and Phenomenological Method.« In: Husserl Studies 10 (3), pp. 211–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  642. Byrne, Thomas (2020): »Ingarden’s Husserl: A Critical Assessment of the 1915 Review of the Logical Investigations«. In: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (2), pp. 513–31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  643. Chrudzimski, Arkadiusz (1999): Die Erkenntnistheorie von Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  644. De Santis, Daniele (2020): »›Self-variation:‹ A Problem of Method in Husserl’s Phenomenology.« In: Husserl Studies 36 (3), pp. 255–69. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  645. Gierulanka, Danuta (1989): »Ingarden’s Philosophical Work. A Systematic Outline.« In: Bohdan Dziemidok, Peter McCornick (Eds.): On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  646. Głombik, Czesław (2011): Husserl und die Polen. Frühgeschichte einer Rezeption. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  647. Gniazdowski, Andrzej (2010): »Roman Ingarden (1893–1970).« In: Hans R. Sepp, Lester Embree (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 167–70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  648. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Hua I. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  649. Husserl, Edmund (1959): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil. Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion, Hua VIII. Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  650. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague, Boston, London: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  651. Husserl, Edmund (1994a): Briefwechsel. Die Brentanoschule, Hua-Dok III/1. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  652. Husserl, Edmund (1994b): Briefwechsel. Die Göttinger Schule, Hua-Dok III/3. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  653. Husserl, Edmund (1994c): Briefwechsel. Die Freiburger Schüler, Hua-Dok III/4. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  654. Husserl, Edmund (2019): First Philosophy. Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925), CW XIV. Trans. Sebastian Luft & Thane M. Naberhaus. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  655. Ingarden, Roman (1921): »Über die Gefahr einer Petitio Principii in der Erkenntnistheorie.« In: Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 4, pp. 545–68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  656. Ingarden, Roman (1925): »Essentiale Fragen. Ein Beitrag zu dem Wesensproblem«. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 7, pp. 125–304. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  657. Ingarden, Roman (1926): Über die Stellung der Erkenntnistheorie im System der Philosophie. Habilitationsvortrag. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  658. Ingarden, Roman (1929). »Bemerkungen zum Problem ›Idealismus-Realismus.‹« In: Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 10, pp. 159–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  659. Ingarden, Roman (1931): Das literarische Kunstwerk. Eine Untersuchung aus dem Grenzgebiet der Ontologie, Logik und Literaturwissenschaft. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  660. Ingarden, Roman (1939): »Lecture of Roman Ingarden on the Meeting of Lviv Scientific Society 15.06.1939.« In: The Roman Ingarden Digital Archive, signature K_III-26_84. http://ingarden.archive.uj.edu.pl/en/archiwum/lecture-of-roman-ingarden-on-the-meeting-of-lwow-scientific-society-15-06-1939/, visited on 2 February 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  661. Ingarden, Roman (1968): »Erläuterungen zu den Briefen Husserls.« In: Edmund Husserl, Briefe an Roman Ingarden mir Erläuterungen un Erinnerungen an Husserl, Phaenomenologica, vol. 25. Roman Ingarden (Ed.), pp. 136–84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  662. Ingarden, Roman (1971): »Stanowisko teorii poznania w systemie nauk filozoficznych.« In: Roman Ingarden, U podstaw teorii poznania. Część pierwsza. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. 381–406. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  663. Ingarden, Roman (1973): The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. Trans. George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  664. Ingarden, Roman (1976): »Probleme der Husserlschen Reduktion. Vorlesung gehalten an der Universitat Oslo, Oktober/November 1967.« In: Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (Ed.), Ingardeniana, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 4. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 1–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  665. Ingarden, Roman (1983): »Man and Time.« In: Roman Ingarden, Man and Value. Trans. Arthur Szylewicz. München, Wien: Philosophia Verlag, pp. 33–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  666. Ingarden, Roman (1994): Frühe Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie, Roman Ingarden: Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 6. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  667. Ingarden, Roman (1998): Schriften zur Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls, Roman Ingarden: Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 5. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  668. Ingarden, Roman (1999): »Dzieje mojej ›kariery uniwersyteckiej.‹« Ryszard Jadczak (Ed.). In: Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 27 (2), pp. 183–201. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  669. Ingarden, Roman / Twardowski, Kazimierz (2016): Korespondencja Romana Witolda Ingardena z Kazimierzem Twardowskim. Radosław Kuliniak, Dorota Leszczyna, Mariusz Pandura (Eds.). Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  670. Kockelmans, Joseph J. (1987): »Husserl’s Original View on Phenomenological Psychology.« In: Joseph J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenological Psychology. The Dutch School, Phaenomenological, vol. 103. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: M. Nijhoff, pp. 3–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  671. Kuliniak, Radosław / Pandura, Mariusz (2019): »Jestem filozofem świata« (Κόσμου φιλόσοφός εἰμι). Roman Witold Ingarden (1893–1970). Część pierwsza: lata 1893–1938. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  672. Laskey, Dallas (1972): »Ingarden’s Criticism of Husserl.« In: Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (Ed.), The Later Husserl and the Idea of Phenomenology, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 2. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 48–54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  673. Luft, Sebastian (2004): »Husserl’s Theory of the Phenomenological Reduction: Between Life-world and Cartesianism.« In: Research in Phenomenology 34, pp. 198–234. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  674. Mitscherling, Jeff (1997): Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  675. Mohanty, J.N. (1997): Between Essentialism and Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  676. Piwowarczyk, Marek (2020): »The Ingardenian Distinction Between Inseparability and Dependence: Historical and Systematic Considerations.« In: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (2), pp. 532–51. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  677. Płotka, Witold (2017a): »Early Phenomenology in Poland (1895–1945): Origins, Development, and Breakdown.« In: Studies in East European Thought 69 (1), pp. 79–91. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  678. Płotka, Witold (2017b): »Le motif cartésien dans la phénoménologie polonaise (1895–2015): Transformations, polémiques, perspectives.« In: Les Études philosophiques (2), pp. 167–96. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  679. Płotka, Witold (2020): »A Controversy over the Existence of Fictional Objects: Husserl and Ingarden on Imagination and Fiction.« In: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 51 (1), pp. 33–54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  680. Półtawski, Andrzej (1982): »Słowo wstępne.« In: Edmund Husserl, Medytacje kartezjańskie z dodaniem uwag krytycznych Romana Ingardena. Trans. Andrzej Wajs. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. xi-xxvii. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  681. Scheler, Max (1927): »Idealismus-Realismus.« In: Philosophicher Anzeiger 2, pp. 255–324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  682. Spiegelberg, Herbert (1994): The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, third revisited and enlarged edition. With the collaboration of Karl Schuhmann. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  683. Starzyński, Wojciech (2022): »Roman Ingarden’s Egology and Cartesianism.« In: Studia UBB. Philosophia 66 (1), pp. 189–211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  684. Wajs, Andrzej (1982): »Od wydawcy«. In: Edmund Husserl, Medytacje kartezjańskie z dodaniem uwag krytycznych Romana Ingardena. Trans. Andrzej Wajs. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. xviii-xxx. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  685. Wallner, Ingrid M. (1987): »In Defense of Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism: Roman Ingarden’s Critique Re-examined.« In: Husserl Studies 4 (1), pp. 3–43. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  686. Welton, Donn (2000): The Other Husserl. The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  687. Zahavi, Dan (2017): Husserl’s Legacy. Phenomenology, Metaphysics and Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-215
  688. Gaos, José (1986): »Historia y significado.« In: Edmund Husserl, Meditaciones Cartesianas. Trans. José Gaos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 11–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  689. Geniusas, Saulius (2012): The Origin of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  690. Held, Klaus (1996): »Abschied vom Cartesianismus. Die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls.« Neue Zuercher Zeitung (30.03.1996), p. 67. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  691. Hopkins, Burt C. (1993): Intentionality in Husserl and Heidegger. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  692. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Hua I. Stephan Strasser (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff; (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  693. Husserl, Edmund (1952): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Hua IV. Marly Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  694. Husserl, Edmund (1954): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Hua VI. Walter Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  695. Husserl, Edmund (1959): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. Hua VIII. Rudolf Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  696. Husserl, Edmund (1962): Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925. Hua IX. Walter Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  697. Husserl, Edmund (1973): Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil: 1905–1920. Hua XIII. Iso Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  698. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Hua III/1. Karl Schuhmann (Ed.). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  699. Husserl, Edmund (1994a): Briefwechsel: Die Göttinger Schule. Hua-Dok III/3. Karl Schuhmann with Elisabeth Schuhmann (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  700. Husserl, Edmund (1994b): Briefwechsel: Die Freiburger Schüler. Hua-Dok III/4. Karl Schuhmann with Elisabeth Schuhmann (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  701. Husserl, Edmund (2008): Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihre Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Hua XXXIX.. Rochus Sowa (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  702. Husserl, Edmund (2020): Studien zur Struktur des Bewusstseins. Teilbände I-IV. Ullrich Melle/Thomas Vongehr (Eds.). Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  703. Landgrebe, Ludwig (1928): »W. Diltheys Theorie der Geisteswissenschaften. Analyse ihre Grundbegriffe.« In: Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 9, pp. 237–366. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  704. Landgrebe, Ludwig (1981): »Husserl’s Departure from Cartesianism.« Trans. R. O. Elveton. In: D. Welton (Ed.): Ludwig Landgrebe, The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl: Six Essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 66–121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  705. Landgrebe, Ludwig (1982): Faktizität und Individuation. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  706. Landgrebe, Ludwig (2010): Der Begriff des Erlebens. Ein Beitrag zur Kritik unseres Selbstverständnisses und zum Problem der seelischen Ganzheit. Karel Novotný (Ed.). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  707. Lohmar, Dieter (1996): »Zu der Entstehung und den Ausgangsmaterialien von Edmund Husserls Werk Erfahrung und Urteil.« In: Husserl Studies 13, pp. 31–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  708. Luft, Sebastian (2019): »Introduction to the Translation.« In: Edmund Husserl, First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/1924 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Trans. Sebastian Luft/Thane M. Naberhaus. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. xiii-lxxv. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  709. Misch, Georg (1930): Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie. Eine Auseinandersetzung der Diltheyan Richtung mit Husserl und Heidegger. Bonn: F. Cohen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  710. Perkins, Patricio A. (2014): »Acerca de la interpretación de Landgrebe sobre el cartesianismo de Husserl.« In: Investigaciones Fenomenológicas 11, pp. 203–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  711. San Martín, Javier (1997): »La despedida de Husserl del cartesianismo según Landgrebe.« In: Agora: Papeles de Filosofía 16, pp. 101–121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  712. San Martín, Javier (2015): El nuevo Husserl: Lecciones de Guanajuato. Madrid: Trotta. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  713. Schuhmann, Karl (1977): Husserl-Chronik. Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. Hua-Dok I. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  714. Spiegelberg, Herbert (1982): The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  715. Villoro, Luis (1960): »Edmund Husserl, Erste Philosophie (1923–1924). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der Phänomenologischen Reduktion.« In: Diánoia: Revista de Filosofía (Ciudad de México) 6, pp. 231–235. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  716. Walton, Roberto (2015): Intencionalidad y horizonticidad. Cali: Aula Editorial, Universidad San Buenaventura. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  717. Welton, Donn (2000): The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  718. Xolocotzi, Angel (2011): Una crónica de Ser y Tiempo de Martin Heidegger. México: Ítaca, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-237
  719. Bancalari, Stefano (2015): Logica dell’epochè. Per un’introduzione alla fenomenologia della religione. Pisa: ETS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  720. Hering, Jean (1932): »Recension de E. Levinas: La théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl.« In: Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 113, pp. 474–481. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  721. Husserl, Edmund (1953): Méditations Cartésiennes. Introduction à la phénoménologie. Gabrielle Peiffer and Emmanuel Levinas (Trans.). Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  722. Husserl, Edmund (1982): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  723. Husserl, Edmund (1994): »Brief an Roman Ingarden vom 31.VIII.1931.« In Briefwechsel. Hua Dok III/3. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 278. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  724. Kobayashi, Reiko (2002): »Totalité et infini et la cinquième Méditation cartésienne.« In: Revue philosophique de Louvain 100, pp. 149–185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  725. Lavigne, Jean-François (2000): »Lévinas avant Lévinas. L’introducteur et le traducteur de Husserl.« In: Jean-Luc Marion (Ed.), Lévinas et la phénoménologie. Paris: PUF, pp. 49–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  726. Lescourret, Marie-Anne (1994): Emmanuel Lévinas. Paris: Flammarion. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  727. Levinas, Emmanuel (1979): Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Alphonso Lingis (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff (French edition: Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’extériorité [1961]. Paris: Librairie Générale Française, 2000). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  728. Levinas, Emmanuel (1995): The Theory of Intuition in Husserl’s Phenomenology. André Orianne (Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press (French edition: La théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl [1930]. Paris: Vrin, 1994). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  729. Levinas, Emmanuel (1998): Discovering Existence with Husserl. Richard A. Cohen and Michael B. Smith (Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press: Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  730. a: »On Ideas,« pp. 3–31 (»Sur les ›Ideen‹ de M. E. Husserl« [1929]. In: Les imprévus de l’histoire. Paris: Librairie Générale Française, 1994, pp. 37–80). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  731. b: »The Work of Edmund Husserl,« pp. 47–87 (»L’oeuvre d’Edmond Husserl« [1940]. In: En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin, 1994, pp. 7–52). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  732. c: »The Ruin of Representation,« pp. 111–121 (»La ruine de la representation« [1959]. In: En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin, 1994, pp. 125–135). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  733. d: »Intentionality and Metaphysics,« pp. 122–129 (»Intentionalité et métaphysique« [1959]. In: En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin, 1994, pp. 137–144). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  734. e: »From Consciousness to Wakefulness,« pp. 153–168 (»De la conscience à la veille« [1974]. In: De Dieu qui vient à l’idée. Paris: Vrin, 1992, pp. 34–61). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  735. f: »Philosophy and Awakening,« pp. 169–179 (»La philosophie et l’éveil« [1977]. In: Entre nous. Essais sur le penser-à-l’autre. Paris: Librairie Générale Française, 1991, pp. 86–99). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  736. Schütz, Alfred (1957): »Das Problem der transzendentale Intersubjektivität bei Husserl.« In: Philosophische Rundschau 5, pp. 81–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  737. Vergani, Mario (2011): Levinas fenomenologo. Umano senza condizioni. Brescia: Morcelliana. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-259
  738. Barbaras, Renaud (1998): Le tournant de l’expérience. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  739. Barbaras, Renaud (2001): De l’être du phénomène. Sur l’ontologie de Merleau-Ponty. Grenoble: Millon. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  740. Butler, Judith (2005): Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  741. Carman, Taylor (2008). Merleau-Ponty. New York – London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  742. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. D. Cairns. The Hague/Boston/London: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  743. Husserl, Edmund (1963): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  744. Husserl, Edmund (1931): Méditations cartésiennes. Trans. E. Levinas. Paris: Armand Colin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  745. Kearney, Richard (2021): Touch. Recovering our Most Vital Sense. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  746. Krueger, Joel (2013): »Merleau-Ponty on shared emotions and the joint ownership thesis.« In: Continental Philosophy Review, 46, pp. 509–531. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  747. Lefort, Claude (1992): »Flesh and Otherness.« In: Johnson, G. A.; Smith, M. B. (eds.), Ontology and Alterity in Merleau-Ponty. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 3–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  748. Levinas, Emmanuel (1987) : »De l’intersubjectivité. Notes sur Merleau-Ponty.« In: Hors sujet, Paris: Fata Morgana, pp. 143–153. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  749. McWeeny, Jennifer (2019) : »The Panpsychism Question in Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology.« In: Alloa, Emmanuel; Chouraqui, Frank; Kaushik, Rajiv (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and Contemporary Philosophy, Albany, SUNY Press, pp. 121–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  750. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964a): »On the Phenomenology of Language.« In: Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 84–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  751. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964b): »The Philosopher and His Shadow.« In: Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 159–181. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  752. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964c): »Phenomenology and the Sciences of Man.« In: The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 43–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  753. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964d): »The Child’s Relations with Others.« In: The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, transl. by James M. Edie. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 96–155. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  754. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964e): »Primacy of Perception.« In: The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, transl. by James M. Edie. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 12–42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  755. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1968): The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  756. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1973): The Prose of the World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  757. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2002): Parcours deux. 1951–1961. Lagrasse: Verdier. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  758. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2001). Psychologie et pédagogie de l’enfant. Cours de Sorbonne 1949–1952. Lagrasse: Verdier. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  759. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2010) : Child Psychology and Pedagogy. The Sorbonne Lectures 1949–1952. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  760. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2014): Phenomenology of Perception. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  761. Moran, Dermot (2010): »Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on Embodied Experience.« In: Nenon, Thomas; Blosser, Philip (eds.), Advancing Phenomenology. Essays in Honor of Lester Embree. Springer, pp. 179–195. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  762. Scheler, Max (1973): Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern: Francke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  763. Scheler, Max (2017): The Nature of Sympathy. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  764. Smith, Arthur David (2007): »The Flesh of Perception. Merleau-Ponty and Husserl.« In: Baldwin, Thomas (ed.), Reading Merleau-Ponty. On Phenomenology of Perception. London – New York: Routledge, pp. 1–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  765. Taipale, Joona (2007): »Perceiving the Other: Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on the Genesis of Intersubjectivity.« In: Sepp, Hans Reiner; Copoeru, Ion (eds.), Phenomenology 2005. Volume IV: Selected Essays from Northern Europe. Bucharest: Zeta Books, pp. 735–763. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  766. Tengelyi, László (2004): The Wild Region in Life-History. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  767. Toadvine, Ted; Embree, Lester (2002): Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  768. Zahavi, Dan (2001): Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity. Athens: Ohio University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  769. Zahavi, Dan (2002): »Merleau-Ponty on Husserl. A Reappraisal.« In: Toadvine, Ted; Embree, Lester (eds.): Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Springer, pp. 3–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-281
  770. Bello, Angela Ales (1991): »Phenomenology as Archeology vs. Contemporary Hermeneutics.« In: Tymnieniecka, Anna-Teresa (Ed.), The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, Vol. XXXVI: Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  771. Čapek, Jakub (2017): »Oneself Through Another: Ricoeur and Patočka on Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy XI/2, pp. 387–415. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  772. Davidson, Scott (2013): »The Husserl Heretics: Levinas, Ricoeur, and the French Reception of Husserlian Phenomenology.« Studia Phaenomenologica XIII, pp. 209–230. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  773. Husserl, Edmund (1950): Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Hua I. Ed. by Stephan Strasser. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  774. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations. Trans. by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  775. Husserl, Edmund (1970): The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. D. Carr (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  776. Husserl, Edmund (1976): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Hua VI. Ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  777. Jervolino, Domenico (1991): »Ricoeur and Husserl: Towards a Hermeneutic Phenomenology.« In: Tymnieniecka, Anna-Teresa (Ed.), The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, Vol. XXXVI: Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 23–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  778. Moran, Dermot (2017): »Husserl and Ricoeur: The Influence of Phenomenology on the Formation of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of the ›Capable Human.‹« Journal of the French and Francophone Philosophy XXV/1, pp. 182–199. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  779. Million, Pierre (1991): »Can Hermeneutics Respond to the Predicament of Reason? From Husserl to Ricoeur.« In: Tymnieniecka, Anna-Teresa (Ed.), The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, Vol. XXXVI: Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 53–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  780. Ricoeur, Paul (1966): Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary. Trans. by Erazim V. Kohak. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  781. Ricoeur, Paul (1967): Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Trans. by Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  782. Ricoeur, Paul (1974): »Phenomenology.« Trans. by Daniel J. Herman and Donald V. Morano. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 5/3, pp. 149–168. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  783. Ricoeur, Paul (1975): »Phenomenology and Hermeneutics.« Nous 9/1, pp. 85–102. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  784. Ricoeur, Paul (1991): From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II. Trans. by Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  785. Ricoeur, Paul (1992): Oneself as Another. Trans. by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  786. Ricoeur, Paul (2005): The Course of Recognition. Trans. by David Pellauer. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  787. Sokolowski, Robert (1970): The Formation of Husserl’s Concept of Constitution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  788. Spiegelberg, Herbert (1971): The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Vol. 2. Second Edition. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-303
  789. Brentano, Franz (1981): The Theory of Categories. R. Chisholm and N. Guterman (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  790. Descartes, René (1996): Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery (Eds.), new ed. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  791. Husserl, Edmund (1956): Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. Hua VII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  792. Husserl, Edmund (1960): Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  793. Husserl, Edmund (1964): The Paris Lectures. Peter Koestenbaum (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  794. Husserl, Edmund (1983): Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Fred Kersten (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  795. Marion, Jean-Luc (2018): »En quel sens la phénoménologie peut-elle ou non se réclamer de Descartes?« In: D. Pradelle and C. Riquier (Eds.), Descartes et la phénoménologie. Paris: Hermann, pp. 339–361. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  796. Mezei, Balazs M. (1994): »Brentano, Cartesianism and Jan Patočka.« In: Brentano Studien 5, pp. 69–87. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  797. Parker, Rodney (2018): »The History Between Koyré and Husserl.« In: R. Pisano et al. (Eds.), Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 243–275. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  798. Patočka, Jan (2008 [1931]): Pojem evidence a jeho význam pro noetiku. In: Jan Patočka (2008), pp. 13–125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  799. Patočka, Jan (1992 [1933]): »Doslov.« In: R. Descartes, Rozprava o metodě, jak správně vésti svůj rozum a hledati pravdu ve vědách. Praha: Svoboda: pp. 65–68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  800. Patočka, Jan (2008 [1936]): Přirozený svět jako filosofický problém. In: Jan Patočka (2008), pp. 127–262. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  801. Patočka, Jan (1937): »Descartes a metafysika.« In: Česká mysl 33, pp. 143–156. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  802. Patočka, Jan, and Zumr, Josef (1967): »K filosofovým šedesátinám. S Janem Patočkou o filosofii a filosofech.« In: Filosofický časopis 15, pp. 585–598. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  803. Patočka, Jan (1965): »Nepublikovaný původní závěr VI. Kapitoly z autorského strojopisu.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 106–113. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  804. Patočka, Jan (1968): »Husserlův pojem názoru a prafenomén jazyka.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 542–549. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  805. Patočka, Jan (1970a): »›Přirozený svět‹ v meditaci svého autora po třiatřiceti letech.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 265–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  806. Patočka, Jan (1970b): »Subjektivismus Husserlovy fenomenologie a možnost ›asubjektivní‹ fenomenologie.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 379–396. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  807. Patočka, Jan (1971): »Subjektivismus Husserlovy fenomenologie a požadavek fenomenologie asubjektivní.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 397–418. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  808. Patočka, Jan (1975): »Epoché a redukce. Několik poznámek.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 442–452. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  809. Patočka, Jan (1976a): »Karteziánství a fenomenologie.« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 453–496. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  810. Patočka, Jan (1976b): »Autorův doslov k francouzskému vydání díla ›Přirozený svět jako filosofický problém.‹« In: Jan Patočka (2009), pp. 367–378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  811. Patočka, Jan (1996 [1965]): Introduction to Husserl’s Phenomenology. Erazim Kohák (Trans.), James Dodd (Ed.). Chicago: Open Court. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  812. Patočka, Jan (2008): Fenomenologické spisy I. Texty z let 1931–1949. Přirozený svět. Praha: Oikoymenh. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  813. Patočka, Jan (2009): Fenomenologické spisy II. Co je existence. Publikované texty z let 1967–1977. Praha: Oikoymenh. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  814. Pradelle, Dominique, and Riquier, Camille (Eds.) (2018): Descartes et la phénoménologie. Paris: Hermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-329
  815. Amselek, Paul (1964): Méthode phénoménologique et theorie du droit. Paris: R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  816. Bernet, Rudolf, Kern, Iso, and Marbach, Eduard (1993): An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  817. Bindreiter, Uta (2002): Why Grundnorm? A Treatise on the Implications of Kelsen’s Doctrine. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  818. Cohen, Hermann (1987): Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. In: Hermann Cohen, Werke, Hermann Cohen–Archiv Zürich (Ed.), vol. 6. Hildesheim: Olms. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  819. Ehrlich, Eugen (1913): Grundlegung der Sozio­logie des Rechts. München: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  820. Fassò, Guido (2003): Storia della filosofia del diritto, III. Ottocento e Novecento. Roma: Laterza. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353
  821. Heck, Philipp (1912): Das Problem der Rechtsgewinnung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783495995556-353

Similar publications

from the series "Phänomenologie"
Cover of book: Phenomenology, Metaphysics, Ontology
Edited Book No access
Iulian Apostolescu
Phenomenology, Metaphysics, Ontology
Cover of book: Die temporale Ontologie des Rechts
Book Titles No access
Oleksiy Stovba
Die temporale Ontologie des Rechts
Cover of book: Crisis and Lifeworld
Edited Book No access
Hernán Gabriel Inverso, Alexander Schnell
Crisis and Lifeworld
Cover of book: Vernunft und Philosophiegeschichte
Book Titles No access
Kurt Rainer Meist
Vernunft und Philosophiegeschichte
Cover of book: Phänomenologie in Spanien und Hispanoamerika
Edited Book No access
Guillermo Ferrer, Niklas Schmich, Sergio Pérez Gatica
Phänomenologie in Spanien und Hispanoamerika

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex