, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Dramas of Reconciliation

A performance approach to the analysis of political apologies in international relations
Authors:
Publisher:
 2019

Summary

Political apologies have been described as modern political rites. However, the scholarship has failed so far to take the ritualistic elements in apologies seriously. This book addresses this lacuna. Contrary to linguistic approaches that locate the transformative power of apologies in correct wording, this book grounds the force of apologies in ritual performances. Drawing on ritual theory the book reveals how apology performances bear characteristics of rites of transitions. This book lays down the ritual features that enwrap apologies, demonstrates how apologizing agents activate sacred symbols in apology ceremonies, and how rites as a distinct mode of social communication may create extra-ordinary moments of transition. Based on a discourse analytical methodology, the study analyses several apology performances for historic crimes and discloses the potentials and the limits of rituals of apologies.

Keywords



Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2019
Copyright Year
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2098-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6161-4
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
English
Pages
262
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 20
    1. 1. From apologies to apology gestures No access
    2. 2. Individual apologies No access
    3. 3. Collective apologies No access
      1. 4.1. Content No access
      2. 4.2. Actors No access
      3. 4.3. Context No access
    4. 2. Lacunae in apology research No access
    5. 3. Taking rituals seriously No access
    6. 4. Rituals of apologies as liminal events No access
    7. 5. “Successful” apology performances No access
    8. 6. What renders apology performances successful? No access
      1. 7.1. Case selection No access
      2. 7.2. Phenomenological Methodology No access
    9. 8. The chapters No access
    1. 1. Introduction No access
      1. 2.1. Human rights No access
      2. 2.2. Globalized Holocaust memory No access
      3. 2.3. Rituals of transition in transitology No access
      4. 2.4. Apologies as historically incorporated practices No access
      1. 3.1. Ritual as the creation of apartness No access
      2. 3.2. Rituals as a communicative system No access
      3. 3.3. Rituals as performative action No access
      1. 4.1. Rituals of purification No access
      2. 4.2. Apologies as settlement rites No access
      3. 4.3. Apologies as liminal performances No access
    2. 5. What is “success” in ritualized apologies? No access
    3. 6. Elements of apology performances No access
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. The forefront No access
    3. 3. The performance No access
      1. 4.1. Suspended time – sacred time No access
      2. 4.2. Status reversal No access
      3. 4.3. Spontaneity and Virtuosity No access
      1. 5.1. The emotional impact No access
      2. 5.2. The status transformation of the collectivity No access
      3. 5.3. The biography of the protagonist No access
    4. 6. Brandt’s Kniefall: the creation of a global icon No access
    5. 7. Conclusion No access
      1. 1.1. Forefront No access
        1. 1.2.1 The creation of an apology event No access
        2. 1.2.2 The apology declaration No access
      2. 1.3. The closing No access
      1. 2.1. The historic wrong No access
      2. 2.2. The apology crisis No access
      3. 2.3. The forefront No access
      4. 2.4. The procession No access
      5. 2.5. The Closing No access
    1. 3. Conclusion No access
    1. 1. The historical wrong No access
    2. 2. Forefront No access
    3. 3. The Procession No access
    4. 4. The Closing No access
    5. 5. Katyn No 2 No access
    6. 6. Conclusion No access
    1. 1. Introduction No access
      1. 2.1. Vukovar No access
      2. 2.2. Srebrenica No access
      3. 2.3. Ahmiči No access
        1. 3.1.1 The forefront No access
        2. 3.1.2 The Procession No access
        3. 3.1.3 The Closing No access
        1. 3.2.1 The forefront No access
        2. 3.2.2 The Procession No access
        3. 3.2.3 Closing No access
        1. 3.3.1 Forefront No access
        2. 3.3.2 Procession No access
        3. 3.3.3 Closing No access
        1. 3.4.1 Forefront No access
        2. 3.4.2 Procession No access
        3. 3.4.3 Closing No access
      1. 4. Conclusion No access
    1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. Politicized atonement in the early 1990s No access
      1. 3.1 The forefront phase No access
      2. 3.2 The procession No access
      3. 3.3 The closing No access
    3. 4. Conclusion No access
      1. 1.1 Forefront No access
      2. 1.2 Procession No access
      3. 1.3 Marking New Beginnings – Inaugurations No access
      4. 1.4 The Actors: No access
      5. 1.5 Closing No access
      1. 2.1 Space matters No access
      2. 2.2 Time matters No access
      3. 2.3 Mise-en-scène matters No access
      4. 2.4 Performance matters No access
      5. 2.5 Actors matter No access
    1. 3. The force and limits of apologies as dramas of reconciliation No access
    2. 4. Ritual apologies as global rituals No access
    3. 5. The Limits of ceremonialism No access
    4. 6. Implications for further research No access
  2. IX. Literature No access Pages 253 - 262

Bibliography (188 entries)

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey C. (2004): On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The “Holocaust” from War Crime to Trauma Drama, in: Alexander, Jeffrey C. (Ed.): Cultural trauma and collective identity, Berkeley, 196–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  2. Alexander, Jeffrey C. (2006): Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy, in: Alexander, Jeffrey C./Alexander-Giesen-Mast (Eds.): Social performance. Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual, Cambridge, 29–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  3. Andrieu, Kora (2009): ‘Sorry for the Genocide’: How Public Apologies Can Help Promote National Reconciliation, Millennium – Journal of International Studies 38: 1, 3–23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  4. Assmann, Aleida (2006): Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit. Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik, Bonn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  5. Augoustinos, Martha/Lecouteur, Amanda/Soyland, John (2002): Self-sufficient Arguments in Political Rhetoric: Constructing Reconciliation and Apologizing to the Stolen Generations, Discourse & Society 13: 1, 105–142. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  6. Austin, John L. (1962): How to do things with words, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  7. Austin, John L. (1975): Wort und Bedeutung. philosophische Aufsätze, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  8. Barkan, Elazar (2000): The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  9. Balzacq, Thierry (2005): The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, European Journal of International Relations 11: 2, 171–201. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  10. Barkan Elazar/Karn, Alexander (2006): Group Apology as an Ethical Imperative, in: Barkan, Elazar/Karn, Alexander (eds.): Taking wrongs seriously. Apologies and reconciliation, Stanford, 3–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  11. Bell, Catherine (1997): Ritual. Perspectives and Dimensions, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  12. Bell, Catherine (2010): Ritual theory, ritual practice, Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  13. Benoit, William L (1995): Accounts, excuses, and apologies. A theory of image restoration strategies, Albany. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  14. Bleiker, Roland/Hutchison, Emma (2008): Fear no more: emotions and world politics, Review of International Studies 34, 115–135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  15. Bloch, Maurice (1997): Symbols, song, dance and features of articulation, in: Bloch, Maurice (eds.): Ritual, history and power. Selected papers in anthropology, London, 19–45. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  16. Bourdieu, Pierre (1980): Le sens pratique, Paris. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  17. Bourdieu, Pierre (1989): La noblesse d’Etat. Grandes ecoles et esprit de corps, Paris. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  18. Bourdieu, Pierre (1995): Language and symbolic power, Cambridge Mass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  19. Brandt, Willy (1976): Begegnungen und Einsichten. D. Jahre 1960-1975, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  20. Brandt, Willy (1989): Erinnerungen, Zürich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  21. Bromberger, Christian (2003): Fussball als Weltsicht und als Ritual, in: Belliger, Andréa/Krieger, David J. (eds.): Ritualtheorien. Ein einführendes Handbuch, Wiesbaden, 281–298. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  22. Burg, Steven L./Shoup, Paul S. (2000): The war in Bosnia-Herzegovina ethnic conflict and international intervention, Armonk, NY. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  23. Burke, Kenneth/Gusfield, Joseph R. (1989): On symbols and society, Chicago. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  24. Campbell, David (2010): Poststructuralism, in: Dunne, Timothy/Kurki, Milja/Smith, Steve (eds.): International relations theories. Discipline and diversity, Oxford, New York, 213–237. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  25. Carlson, Marvin A. (1999): Performance. A critical introduction, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  26. Celermajer, Danielle (2009): The sins of the nation and the ritual of apologies, Cambridge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  27. Celermajer, Danielle (2006): From the Levinasian apology to the political apology; reflections on ethical politics, in: http://wwwcms.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Schools/ Economics%20Politics%20and%20Tourism/APSA%202006/POLSOCTHEORY/Celermajer,%20Danielle.pdf; accessed: 27 October 2011. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  28. Coicaud, Marc/Jönsson, Jibecke (2008): Elements for Road Map for a Politics of Apology, in: Gibney, Mark/Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E./Coicaud, Jean-Marc/Steiner, Niklaus (eds.): The age of apology. Facing up to the past, Philadelphia, 77–91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  29. Connerton, Paul (2004): How societies remember, Cambridge, UK, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  30. Connolly, William E. (1993): The terms of political discourse, Princeton N.J. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  31. Cordell, Karl/Wolff, Stefan (2007): A Foreign Policy Analysis of the “German Question”: Ostpolitik Revisited, Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 3, 255–271. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  32. Crawford, Neta C. (2000): The Passion of World Politics. Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships, International Security 24: 4, 116–156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  33. Daase, Christopher (2010): Addressing Painful Memories: Apologies as a new Practice in International Relations, in: Assmann, Aleida/Conrad, Sebastian (eds.): Memory in a Global Age: Discourses, Practices and Trajectories, New York, 19–31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  34. Dayan, Daniel/Katz,Elihu (1988): Articulating consensus: the ritual and rhetoric of media events, in: Alexander, Jeffrey C. (eds.): Durkheimian sociology. Cultural studies, Cambridge [England] New York, 161–186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  35. Dayan, Daniel/Katz,Elihu (1992): Media events. The live broadcasting of history, Cambridge, Mass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  36. Dayan, Daniel/Katz,Elihu (1995): Télévision d’intervention et spectacle politique. Agir par le rituel, Hermès: 17-18, 163–186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  37. Derrida, Jacques (1999): Le siècle et le pardon, in: http://hydra.humanities.uci.edu/Derrida/siecle.html; accessed: 05. December 2009. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  38. Derrida, Jacques (2001): On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness, London Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  39. Dundes Renteln, Alison (2008): Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Analysis, in: Gibney, Mark (Ed): The age of apology. Facing up to the past, Philadelphia, 61–77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  40. Dupriez, Bernard Marie/Halsall, Albert W. (1991): A dictionary of literary devices. Gradus, A – Z, Toronto. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  41. Durkheim, Emile (1981): Die elementaren Formen des religiösen Lebens, Frankfurt am Main. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  42. Edelman, Murray J. (2005): Politik als Ritual. Die symbolische Funktion staatlicher Institutionen und politischen Handelns, Frankfurt/Main; New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  43. Edkins, Jenny (2003): Trauma and the memory of politics, Cambridge, UK, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  44. Emmison, Michael/Smith, Philip (2007): Researching the visual. Images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  45. Fairclough, Norman (2010): Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language, Harlow. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  46. Field, Norma (1997): War and Apology: Japan, Asia, the Fiftieth, and After, positions 5: 1, 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  47. Fischer-Lichter, Erika (1998): Inszenierung und Theatralität, in: Willems, H./Jurga, M. (eds.): Inszenierungsgesellschaft.: Ein einführendes Handbuch, 81–92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  48. François, Etienne (2004): Meistererzählungen und Dammbrüche. Die Erinnerung an den Zweiten Weltkrieg zwischen Nationalisierung und Universalisierung, in: Flacke, Monika (eds): Mythen der Nationen. Arena der Erinnerungen. Katalog zur Ausstellung im Deutschen Historischen Museum Berlin, Mainz, 13–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  49. François, Etienne /Schulze, Hagen (2005): Deutsche Erinnerungsorte. Eine Auswahl, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  50. Garfinkel, Harold (1956): Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies, American Journal of Sociology 61: 5, 420–424. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  51. Gibbs, Graham (2008): Analysing qualitative data, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  52. Gibney, Mark/Roxstrom, Erik (2001): The Status of State Apologies, Human Rights Quarterly 23: 4, 911–941. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  53. Giesen, Bernhard (2004): Das Tätertrauma der Deutschen. Eine Einleitung, in: Giesen, Bernhard (Ed): Tätertrauma. Nationale Erinnerungen im öffentlichen Diskurs, Konstanz, 11–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  54. Gilbert; Martha (2001): Collective Remorse, in: Jokic, Aleksandar (Ed): War crimes and collective wrongdoing. A Reader, Malden, Mass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  55. Gilbert, Martha (2006): Who's to Blame? Collective Moral Responsibility and Its Implications for Group Members, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: 1, 94–114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  56. Glavašević, Siniša (1994): Geschichten aus Vukovar, Trier. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  57. Gluckman, Max (1963): Order and Rebellion in Tribal Africa. Collected Essays, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  58. Goffman, Erving (1971): Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  59. Goodman, Tanya (2006): Performing a new nation: the role of the TRC in South Africa, in: Alexander, Jeffrey C./Alexander-Giesen-Mast (eds.): Social performance. Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual, Cambridge, 169–192. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  60. Goody, Jack (1977): Against “Ritual”. Loosely Structure Thoughts on a Loosely Defined Topic, in: Moore, Sally F./Myerhoff, Barbara G. (eds.): Secular ritual, Assen, 25–35. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  61. Govier, Trudy/Verwoerd,Wilhelm (2002): The Promise and Pitfalls of Apology, Journal of Social Philosophy 33: 1, 67–82. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  62. Grainger Karen/Harris, Sandra (2007): Special Issue: Apologies: Introduction, Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 3: 1, 1–9. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  63. Grimes, Ronald L. (1990): Ritual criticism. Case studies in its practice, essays on its theory, Columbia, S.C. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  64. Guzzini, Stefano (2011): Securitization as a causal mechanism, Security Dialogue 42: 4-5, 329–341. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  65. Hall, Kira (1999): Performativity, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9: 1-2, 184–187. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  66. Handelman, Don (1998): Models and mirrors. Towards an anthropology of public events, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  67. Hansen, Lene (2007): Security as practice. Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  68. Harris, Sandra/Crainger, Karen/Mullany, Louise (2006): The pragmatics of political apologies, Discourse & Society 17: 6, 715–737. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  69. Hazan, Pierre (2006): Measuring the impact of punishment and forgiveness: a framework for evaluating transitional justice, International Review of the Red Cross 88: 861, 19–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  70. Hobsbawm, Eric (1992): Introduction. Inventing Traditions, in: Hobsbawm, Eric/Ranger, Terrence (eds): The Invention of Tradition. Introduction, 1–14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  71. Hockerts, Hans Günter (2003): Wiedergutmachung. Ein umstrittener Begriff und ein weites Feld, in: Hockerts, Hans G./Kuller, Christiane (eds): Nach der Verfolgung. Wiedergutmachung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts in Deutschland?, Göttingen, 7–33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  72. Hollis, Martin/Smith, Steve (2004): Explaining and understanding international relations, Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  73. Horelt; Michel-André /Renner, Judith (2008): Denting a Heroic Picture. A Narrative Analysis of Collective Memory in Post-War Croatia, Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs 16: 2, 5–27. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  74. Horelt, Michel-André (18 April 2010): Reconciliation in Eastern Bosnia, Srebrenica, Interview with Čamil Duraković. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  75. Horelt, Michel-André (2011): 'Durch Recht oder Symbolik zur Versöhung?' Ein Vergleich der Versöhnungswirkung des Internationalen Strafgerichtshof für das ehemalige Jugoslawien (ICTY) und politischer Entschuldigungen im ehemaligen Jugoslawien, in: Friedens-Warte, Journal of International Peace and Organization, 86:1-2, 73-96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  76. Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E./Gibney, Mark (2008): Introduction: Apologies and the West, in: Gibney, Mark/Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E./Coicaud, Jean-Marc/Steiner, Niklaus (eds): The age of apology. Facing up to the past, Philadelphia, 1–12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  77. Howe, Leo (2000): Risk, Ritual and Performance, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 1, 63–79. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  78. ICTY (03 March 2000): The Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic. Judgement. IT-95-14-T, in: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/tjug/en/bla-tj000303e.pdf; accessed: 9 July 2011. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  79. ICTY (02 August 2001): Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic. Judgement. IT-98-33-T, in: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/tjug/en/krs-tj010802e.pdf; accessed: 10 February 2011. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  80. ICTY (22 November 2002): The Prosecuter v. Slobodan Milosevic. Amended Indictment. IT-02-54-T, in: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  81. slobodan_milosevic/ind/en/mil-ai040421-e.htm; accessed: 9 October 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  82. ICTY, (19 April 2004): Prosecutor v. Radislav Kristic. Appeal Judgement. IT-98-33-A, in: http://www.un.org/icty/krstic/Appeal/judgement Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  83. /index.htm; accessed: 25 May 2009. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  84. ICTY (19 September 2012): Prosecutor v. Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez. Open session. IT-95-14/2-T, in: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  85. kordic_cerkez/trans/en/000131ed.htm; accessed: 22. October 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  86. ICTY (8 December 2010): Prosecutor v. Veselin Sljivacanin, in: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/mrksic/acjug/en/101208_review_judgement.pdf., accessed: 9 October 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  87. ICTY (15 April 2011): Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina Ivan Cermak Mladen Markac, in: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/gotovina/tjug/en/110415 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  88. _judgement_vol1.pdf.; accessed: 9 October 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  89. Jaspers, Karl [1946] (1960): Die Schuldfrage. Von der politischen Haftung Deutschlands, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  90. Josipović, Ivo (2010): Address by President Josipović at the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, published on 14 April 2010 in: http://www.predsjednik.hr/14042010-Sarajevo02; accessed: 10 September 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  91. Kalyvas, Stahtis/Sambanis, Nicholas (2005): Bosnia's Civil War: Origins and Violence Dynamics, in: Collier, Paul/Sambanis, Nicholas (eds): Europe, Central Asia, and other regions, Washington, DC, 191–230. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  92. Kampf, Zohar (2008): The pragmatics of forgiveness: judgments of apologies in the Israeli political arena, Discourse Society 19: 5, 577–598. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  93. Kampf, Zohar (2009): Public (non-) apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Lexical Contrast in Discourse, Journal of Pragmatics 41: 11, 2257–2270. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  94. Kampf Zohar/Löwenheim, Nava (2012): Rituals of apology in the global arena, Security Dialogue 43: 1, 43–60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  95. Kelsall, Tim (2005): Truth, Lies, Ritual: Preliminary Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone, Human Rights Quarterly 27: 2, 361–391. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  96. Kertzer, David (1988): Ritual, politics, and power, New Haven. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  97. Kolesch; Doris (2004): Rollen, Rituale und Inszenierungen, in: Jaeger, Friedrich/Straub, Jürgen (eds.): Handbuch der Kulturwissenschaften. Paradigmen und Disziplinen, Stuttgart, 277–292. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  98. Kopelew, Lew (4 February 1977): Bekenntnisse eines Sowjetbürgers, in: Die Zeit, 46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  99. Kriesberg; Louis (2001): Changing Forms of Coexistence, in: Abu-Nimer, Mohammed (Ed): Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, Lanham, Md., 47–64. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  100. Kristof, Nicholas D. (1998): The Problem of Memory, Foreign Affairs 77: 6, 37–49. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  101. La Caze, Marguerite (2000): The Asymmetry between Apology and Forgiveness, Contemporary Political Theory 5: 4, 447–468. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  102. LaCapra, Dominick (2001): Writing history, writing trauma, Baltimore. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  103. Langer, Susanne K. (1963): Philosophy in a new key, Cambridge, Mass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  104. Langer, Susanne K (2008): The Logic of Signs and Symbols, in: Lambek, Michael (Ed): A reader in the anthropology of religion, Malden, MA, 136–144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  105. Lazare, Aaron (2004): On apology, Oxford, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  106. Leach, Edmund R. (1976): Culture and communication, Cambridge, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  107. Lederach, John P. (1997): Building peace. Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies, Washington D.C. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  108. Levy, Jack/Sznaider,Natan (2006): The Holocaust and memory in the global age, Philadelphia. Lind, Jennifer M. (2008): Sorry states. Apologies in international politics, Ithaca. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  109. Long, William J/Brecke, Peter (2003): War and reconciliation. Reason and emotion in conflict resolution, Cambridge, Mass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  110. Löwenheim, Nava (2009): A haunted past: requesting forgiveness for wrongdoing in International Relations, Review of International Studies 35: 03, 531–555. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  111. Lübbe,Hermann (2001): Ich entschuldige mich. Das neue politische Bußritual, Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  112. Mac Ginty, Roger (2008): Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace, Cooperation and Conflict 43: 2, 139–163. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  113. Mani, Rama (2002): Beyond retribution. Seeking justice in the shadows of war, Cambridge, UK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  114. Marrus, Michael R. (2007): Official Apologies and the Quest for Historical Justice, Journal of Human Rights 6: 1, 75–105. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  115. Mauss, Marcel (2007): Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques, Paris. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  116. Meier, Ardith J. (1998): Apologies: what do we know?, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8: 2, 215–231. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  117. Meyer, Thomas/Ontrup, Rüdiger/Schicha, Christian/Brosda, Carsten (2000): Die Inszenierung des Politischen. Zur Theatralität von Mediendiskursen, Opladen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  118. Milliken, Jennifer (1999): The Study of Discourse in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations 5: 2, 225–254, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  119. Minow, Martha (2003): Between vengeance and forgiveness. Facing history after genocide and mass violence, Boston. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  120. Mok, Jeffrey/Tokunaga, Mitsuhiro (2009): A cross cultural apology episode of a diplomatic repair: A study into Japan’s former Prime Minister Koizumi’s official apology in April 2005, Journal of Language and Politics 8: 1, 72–96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  121. Moore, Sally F./Myerhoff, Barbara (1977): Introduction. Secular Rituals: Forms and Meanings, in: Moore, Sally F./Myerhoff, Barbara G. (eds): Secular ritual, Assen, 3–24. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  122. Müller, Martin (2010): Doing discourse analysis in Critical Geopolitics, in: http://espacepolitique.revues.org/index1743.html; accessed: 25 October 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  123. Nelson, Brandon (13 February 2008), Apology to Australia’s Indigenous peoples, in: http://www.aph.gov.au/house/Nelson_speech.pdf; accessed: 28 June 2010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  124. Neumann, Iver B (2008): The Body of the Diplomat, European Journal of International Relations 14: 4, 671–695. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  125. Nobles, Melissa (2008): The politics of official apologies, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  126. Obradovic-Wochnik, Jelena (2009): Knowledge, Acknowledgement and Denial in Serbia’s Responses to the Srebrenica Massacre, Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17: 1, 61–74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  127. Obradovic-Wochnik, Jelena (2010): Serbia's Srebrenica Declaration. A small step, but in the right direction, in: http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Serbias_Srebrenica_ Declaration.pdf; accessed: 09. October 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  128. O’Halloran, Kay L. (2004): Introduction, in: O’Halloran, Kay L. (Ed): Multimodal discourse analysis. Systemic-functional perspectives, London, New York, 1–10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  129. Olick, Jeffrey (2007a): Collective Memory. The Two Cultures, in: Olick, Jeffrey K. (Ed): The politics of regret. On collective memory and historical responsibility, New York, 17–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  130. Olick, Jeffrey (2007b): Figurations of Memory: A Process-Relational Methodology, Illustrated on the German Case, in: Olick, Jeffrey K. (Ed): The politics of regret. On collective memory and historical responsibility, New York, 85–120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  131. Olick, Jeffrey (2007c): The Politics of Regret. Analytical Frames, in: Olick, Jeffrey K. (Ed): The politics of regret. On collective memory and historical responsibility, New York, 121–138. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  132. O’Neill, Barry (1999): Honor, symbols, and war, Ann Arbor. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  133. Ottmann, Henning (2001): Die Griechen. Teilband 2. Von Platon bis zum Hellenismus, Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  134. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel (1972): The concept of representation, Berkeley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  135. Platvoet, Jan (1995): Ritual in plural and pluralist societies: instrument of analysis, in: Platvoet, Jan (Ed): Pluralism and identity. Studies in ritual behaviour, Leiden, 25–52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  136. Ramet, Sabrina (2006): The three Yugoslavias. State-building and legitimation, 1918 – 2005, Bloomington. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  137. Rappaport, Roy (2002): Enactments of Meaning, in: Lambek, Michael (Ed): A reader in the anthropology of religion, Malden, Mass, 446–467. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  138. Rauer, Valentin (2006): Symbols in action: Willy Brandt’s kneefall at the Warsaw Memorial, in: Alexander, Jeffrey C./Alexander-Giesen-Mast (Ed): Social performance. Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual, Cambridge, 257–282. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  139. Reckwitz, Andreas (2002): The status of the “material” in theories of culture: From “social structure” to “artefacts”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 2, 195–217. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  140. Reconciliation Australia (2010): The Apology, DVD, [in possession of the Author]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  141. Rose, Gillian (2006): Visual methodologies. An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  142. Ross, Marc H. (2004): Ritual and the Politics of Reconciliation, in: Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (Ed): From conflict resolution to reconciliation, Oxford, 197–223. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  143. Ross, Carroll (2008): The Politics of Culpability. Apology and Forgiveness in International Society. Conference Paper presented at the World International Studies Committee, 23- 26 July 2008, Ljubljana. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  144. Rudd, Kevin (2008): Apology to Australia's Indigenous Peoples, in: http://pmrudd.archive.dpmc.gov.au/node/5952; accessed: 20 June 2010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  145. Saaler, Sven (2005): Politics, memory and public opinion. The history textbook controversy and Japanese society, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  146. Sanford, George (2005): Katyn and the Soviet Massacre of 1940: Truth, Justice and Memory, New York Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  147. Schieffelin, Edward L (1998): Problematizing Performance, in: Hughes-Freeland, Felicia (Ed): Ritual, performance, media, London, 194–207. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  148. Schneider, Carl (2000): What it means to be sorry. The Power of Apology in Mediation, Mediation Quarterly 17: 3, 265–280. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  149. Schneider, Christoph (2006): Der Warschauer Kniefall. Ritual, Ereignis und Erzählung, Konstanz. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  150. Schreiber, Hermann (1970): Ein Stück Heimkehr, Der Spiegel: 51, 29–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  151. Schwartz, Barry (1996): Memory as a Cultural System: Abraham Lincoln in World War II, American Sociological Review 61: 5, 908–927. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  152. Searle, John (1971): The philosophy of language, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  153. Seaton, Philip A. (2007): Japan's contested war memories. The "memory rifts" in historical consciousness of World War II, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  154. Sewell, William H. (2005): Logics of history. Social theory and social transformation, Chicago. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  155. Smith, Philip (1991): Codes and conflict. Toward a theory of war as ritual, Theory and Society 20, 103–138; 03.4.2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  156. Smith,Nick (2005): The Categorical Apology, Journal of Social Philosophy 36: 4, 473–496. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  157. Smith,Nick (2008): The categorical apology, Cambridge, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  158. Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2004): Knien vor Gott – Knien vor dem Kaiser. Zum Ritualwandel im Konfessionskonflikt, in: Althoff, Gerd (Ed): Zeichen, Rituale, Werte. Internationales Kolloquium des Sonderforschungsbereichs 496 an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, 501–533. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  159. Sundhausen, Holm (2008): Der Zerfall Jugoslawiens und dessen Folgen, in: http://webarchiv.bundestag.de/archive/2010/0824/dasparlam Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  160. ent/2008/32/Beilage/002.html#; accessed: 1 December 2011. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  161. Taft, Lee (2000): Apology Subverted: The Commodification of Apology, Yale Law Journal 109: 5, 1135–1160. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  162. Tambiah, Stanley J. (1968): The Magical Power of Words, Man 3: 2, 175–208, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  163. Tambiah, Stanley J. (1985): A performative Approach to Ritual, in: Tambiah, Stanley J. (Ed): Culture, thought, and social action. An anthropological perspective, Cambridge, Mass, 123–166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  164. Tambiah, Stanley J (2003): Eine performative Theorie des Rituals, in: Belliger, Andréa/Krieger, David J. (Ed): Ritualtheorien. Ein einführendes Handbuch, Wiesbaden, 223–246. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  165. Tavuchis; Nicholas (1991): Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation, Stanford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  166. Teitel, Ruti (2002): Transitional justice, Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  167. Thompson, Jana (2002): Taking responsibility for the past. Reparation and historical injustice, Cambridge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  168. Thompson, Jana (2006): Collective Responsibility for Historic Injustices, Midwest Studies In Philosophy 30: 1, 154–167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  169. Torpey, John (2003): Introduction, in: Torpey, John C. (Ed): Politics and the past. On repairing historical injustices, Lanham, Md., 1–34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  170. Torpey, John (2006): Making whole what has been smashed. On reparations politics, Cambridge, Mass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  171. Trouillot, Michel R. (2000): Abortive Rituals: Historical Apologies in the Global Era, Interventions: The International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 2: 2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  172. Turner, Victor (1977): Variations on the Theme of Liminality, in: Moore, Sally F./Myerhoff, Barbara G. (eds): Secular ritual, Assen, 36–57. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  173. Turner, Victor (1995a): Images and Reflection. Carnival, Film, and Spectacle in Cultural Performance, in: Turner, Victor/Schechner, Richard (Eds.): The anthropology of performance, New York, 21–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  174. Turner, Victor (1995b): The ritual process. Structure and anti-structure, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  175. Turner, Victor (2009a): Das Liminale und das Liminoide in Spiel,“Fluß und Ritual”. Ein Essay zur vergleichenden Symbologie, in: Turner, Victor W. (Ed): Vom Ritual zum Theater. Der Ernst des menschlichen Spiels, Frankfurt, M., New York, NY, 28–94. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  176. Turner, Victor (2009b): Soziale Dramen und Geschichten über sie, in: Turner, Victor W. (Ed): Vom Ritual zum Theater. Der Ernst des menschlichen Spiels, Frankfurt a. M., 95–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  177. Turner, Victor (2009c): Vom Ritual zum Theater. Der Ernst des menschlichen Spiels, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  178. Turner, Victor/Schechner, Richard (1995): The anthropology of performance, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  179. UFA Wochenschau (1970): Warschau: Willy Brandt zur deutsch-polnischen Vertragsunterzeichnung, DSP 196 (25 December 1970), Deutsche Wochenschau Filmarchiv. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  180. Watzlawick, Paul /Bavelas, Janet Beavin/Jackson, Don (1967): Pragmatics of human communication;. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  181. Williams, Micheal C. (2003): Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics, International Studies Quarterly 47: 4, 511–531. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  182. Wirth, Uwe (2007): Der Perfromanzbegriff im Spannungsfeld von Illokution, Iteration und indexikalität, in: Wirth, Uwe (Ed): Performanz. Zwischen Sprachphilosophie und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main, 9–60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  183. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2003): Philosophische Untersuchungen, Frankfurt am Main. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  184. Wohl, Michael J./Hornsey, Matthew J./Philpot, Catherine R.(2011): A Critical Review of Official Public Apologies: Aims, Pitfalls, and a Staircase Model of Effectiveness, Social Issues and Policy Review 5: 1, 70–100. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  185. Wolffsohn, Michael/Brechenmacher, Thomas (2005): Denkmalsturz? Brandts Kniefall, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  186. Wulf, Christoph/Zirfas, Jörg (2003): Anthropologie und Ritual. Eine Einleitung, Paragrana 12: 1 and 2, 11–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  187. Young, James (1993): The texture of memory. Holocaust memorials and meanings, New Haven. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614
  188. Zveržhanovski, Ivan (2007): Watching War Crimes: The Srebrenica Video and the Serbian Attitudes to the 1995 Srebrenica Massacre. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 7: 3, 417–430. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845261614

Similar publications

from the topics "Politische Kommunikation", "Medienwissenschaft, Kommunikationsforschung"
Cover of book: Extremismusforschung
Edited Book No access
Eckhard Jesse, Tom Mannewitz
Extremismusforschung
Cover of book: Künstliche Intimität
Edited Book Full access
Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Lena Becker
Künstliche Intimität
Cover of book: Fraktales Erzählen
Monograph No access
Anna Zimmermann
Fraktales Erzählen