Integration und Desintegration in Europa | Integration and Desintegration in Europe | Intégration et Désintégration en Europe

Prof. Dr. Jörn Axel Kämmerer; Prof. Dr. Markus Kotzur LL.M. (Duke Univ.); Prof. Dr. Jacques Ziller

doi:10.5771/9783748902225

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2019
Copyright Year: 2019
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-6131-9
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-0222-5
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Societas Iuris Publici Europaei (SIPE)
Volume: 13
Language: German
Pages: 386
Product Type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 20
Dinner Speech beim Abendempfang von SIPE am 20. Juli 2018 in Hamburg No access Pages 21 - 26
Authors:
1. Die integrative Kraft des Rechts in Europa No access Pages 27 - 34
  Authors:
2. Welcome Address Integration and Disintegration in Europe – A View from Inside and Outside No access Pages 35 - 38
  Authors:
3. Grußwort: Wissenschaft hat eine Bringschuld No access Pages 39 - 40
  Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Einleitung No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Begriffsbestimmung No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Funktionen von Soft Law und sein integratives Potential No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Rechtsstaatliche Herausforderungen No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Bewertung No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Prolog No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Der Vorstoß der EU-Kommission im März 2017: „Koalitionen der Willigen“ als eine denkbare Zukunftsperspektive? No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. EU-Finanztransaktionssteuer No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Internationales Privatrecht: Eheliches und Güterrecht eingetragener Partnerschaften No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. „Europäische Staatsanwaltschaft‘ No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Exkurs: „Ständige Strukturierte Zusammenarbeit“ (insbes. Art. 42 Abs. 6 und Art 46 EUV) No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Eigene Vorschläge effizienter Umsetzung des Ansatzes der EU-Kommission zu „Koalitionen der Willigen“ No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The rise and fall of the EU territoriality No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The nexus between Schengen and Dublin and their controversial coexistence since the 2015 crisis No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Three ways ahead: Dublin criteria, free movement for beneficiaries of international protection and legal pathways to reach the EU No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Final remarks No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. Abstract No access
    Authors:
  2. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. The Concept of Human Rights No access
      Authors:
    2. Theoretical Underpinnings of Human Rights Protections as a Motor of European Integration No access
      Authors:
  4. III. The Historical Experience of Central and Eastern European Countries No access
    Authors:
  5. IV. The European Court of Human Rights as a Motor of European Integration between Western and Eastern Europe No access
    Authors:
  6. V. How to Proceed with the Reform? No access
    Authors:
  7. VI. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Vorbemerkung: Das italienische Verfassungsgericht und die beiden europäischen Gerichte EuGH und EGMR No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Überschneidung zwischen die Zuständigkeit des EuGH und der Corte costituzionale No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Die sogenannte „doppelte Vorfrage" und ihre jüngsten Entwicklungen. No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Die Lehre der controlimiti (Gegengrenzen) No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Die Positionen der Corte costituzionale und des BVerfG im Vergleich No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Ein gelungenes Beispiel für einen Dialog: die „Taricco Sage" No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction: Subsidiarity as a principle and as a procedure on articulation of powers, a problematic relationship. No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Subsidiarity as a competence articulation procedure No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Subsidiarity as a structural principle of the European Union No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. The evolution of the principle of subsidiarity after Lisbon: the "anti-subsidiarity" No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Conclusions. A productive dialectic between subsidiarity as a principle and as a procedure No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. A. Dimension structurelle No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Dimension axiologique No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. A. Etablissement des voies de droit No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Renvoi préjudiciel No access
      Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. La portée et les limites de la notion « d’intégration » dans les relations Suisse /UE No access
      Authors:
    2. Ce mélange entre proximité et distance contiendrait-il un élément d’« intégration »? No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) La substance juridique des accords No access
        Authors:
      2. b) La connexité des accords No access
        Authors:
    2. 2. L’adaptation unilatérale du droit suisse No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. L’adaptation No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. L’interprétation homogène No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Le règlement des différends No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. La surveillance d’application No access
      Authors:
  5. IV. Vers l’application à la Suisse d’un modèle généralisé « d’association privilégiée » à l’Union No access
    Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. L’abandon de l’illusion des relations « équilibrées » en faveur d’une l’adhésion No access
      Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. A. The Union's Social Crisis No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. I. Poland No access
      Authors:
    2. II. Hungary No access
      Authors:
    3. III. ‘Shock Therapy on Steroids’ and Emerging Populism in (East) Germany No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. I. A banking crisis turned into a fiscal crisis No access
      Authors:
    2. II. Cost competitiveness vs. technological competitiveness No access
      Authors:
    3. III. Imposition of structural changes for the benefit of multinationals No access
      Authors:
  4. D. Austerity, Populism and the Brexit vote No access
    Authors:
  5. E. Possible ways forward No access
    Authors:
  6. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. Rendering EU Law into UK Law No access
      Authors:
    2. Foreseeable Controversies No access
      Authors:
    3. The Judicial Function No access
      Authors:
    4. Judicial Review in the UK after a Brexit No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Crime, Policing, and Security No access
      Authors:
    2. Air Transport No access
      Authors:
    3. Trade and Customs No access
      Authors:
    4. Persons: Mutual recognition of qualifications; and families No access
      Authors:
    5. Devolved Administrations No access
      Authors:
  3. III. The need for moderation No access
    Authors:
4. Die Türkei und Europa: Zwischen Integration und Desintegration No access Pages 243 - 252
  Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. I. The rupture with the constitutional legal order and the illegal referendum No access
    Authors:
  3. II. The open nature of the Spanish territorial organization system No access
    Authors:
  4. III. The decision by the Spanish Constitutional Court in 2010 on the Catalan Statute of Autonomy No access
    Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. IV.1. On the Catalan side… No access
      Authors:
    2. IV.2. On the Spanish side… No access
      Authors:
    3. IV.3. The current situation No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. V.1. A “populist drift” No access
      Authors:
    2. V.2. Spain: an imperfect democracy, as all of them are No access
      Authors:
    3. V.3. There are no political prisoners, but politicians on remand. No access
      Authors:
    4. V.4. The myth of a “single Catalan people” No access
      Authors:
    5. V.5. The right to vote, the right to decide and the right of self-determination No access
      Authors:
  7. VI. A necessary constitutional reform No access
    Authors:
  8. VII. Final remarks No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. Die Ursachen der Krise No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Das Anpassungsmodell No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Sind die Programme gescheitert? Eine kurze Bilanz. No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Kurzer Ausblick (nach 2018) No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Risiken No access
      Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introductory remarks No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Outline No access
    Authors:
  3. III. European common values, principles and objectives No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. IV.1. General remarks on the Portuguese austerity measures No access
      Authors:
    2. IV.2. Main lines of the Portuguese Constitutional Court’s “case law of the crisis” No access
      Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. IV.3.1. Challenging austerity measures enshrined in State Budgets Laws No access
        Authors:
      2. IV.3.2. Reviewing substantial budgetary measures No access
        Authors:
      3. IV.3.3. Reviewing other measures No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. IV.4.1. Criticism No access
        Authors:
      2. IV.4.2. Reply to the criticism as regards the parameters used by the Portuguese Constitutional Court No access
        Authors:
      3. IV.4.2. Reply to criticism related to the lack of judicial dialogue No access
        Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. V.1. Rejecting the preliminary rulings requested by Portuguese courts during the crisis No access
      Authors:
    2. V.2. Times have changed… No access
      Authors:
    3. V.3. Interim conclusion No access
      Authors:
  6. VI. Case law of the ECTHR concerning the Portuguese austerity measures No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Concluding remarks No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. I.1. The main causes of legal divergence in the EU No access
      Authors:
    2. I.2. Current legal challenges at EU level No access
      Authors:
    3. I.3. Future legal challenges No access
      Authors:
    4. I.4. The magnitude of the crisis and of the questions raised by it – some statistics No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. II.1. The main EU law sources of legal divergences No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        A. With regard to the powers of the European Council No access
        Authors:
        B. The first ever interpretation of Article 80 TFEU on solidarity No access
        Authors:
        C. The possible use of any form of the differentiated integration No access
        Authors:
        D. As regards the right to asylum as fundamental right No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        II.2.2.1. The Hungarian Constitutional Court's most recent judicial practice No access
        Authors:
        II.2.2.2. The so-called VIIth Amendment to the Hungarian Fundamental Law No access
        Authors:
      3. II.2.3. Competence-competence debate and the protection of national security No access
        Authors:
      4. II.2.4. The right to asylum as a fundamental right No access
        Authors:
  3. III. Current legal challenges and those lying ahead No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Concluding remarks No access
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. Defizite der Aufsichtsstrukturen in der Vorkrisenzeit No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Intensivierung der Koordination: Die Einführung des Europäischen Systems der Finanzaufsicht (European System of Financial Supervision, ESFS) No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Differenzierte Integration: Die Einführung des Einheitlichen Aufsichts- und des Einheitlichen Abwicklungsmechanismus No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Ziele der Bankenunion No access
      Authors:
    5. Authors:
      1. a. Politische Vorbehalte No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Sachzwänge No access
        Authors:
      3. c. Primärrechtliche Zweifel No access
        Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Beitritt No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a. Widerspruchsrecht No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Finanzierung des Abwicklungsfonds No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. a. Koordination von EZB und SRB mit den nationalen Behörden nicht-teilnehmender Staaten No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Koordination zwischen EZB und EBA No access
        Authors:
  3. III. Ausblick: Förderung der Finanzstabilität durch differenzierte Integration No access
    Authors:
6. Schlussbemerkungen No access Pages 375 - 380
  Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. No access
    Authors:
  2. II. No access
    Authors: